The authors regret that some of the graphs in Figs. 4 and 5 were wrongly indicating the treatment of one of the groups. This mistake does not affect the text, which describes the results accurately. The conclusion of the findings in the paper remains also unaltered. Below are the old and new images with the change highlighted in red.
The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Footnotes
DOI of original article: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.07.002.