National guidelines on the management of venous thromboembolism: Joint guideline of the Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, and Phlebology Society

Abstract

These evidence-based guidelines from the Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, and Phlebology Society intend to support clinicians in best decisions regarding the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The Editor was selected by the three national societies and was tasked with the recruitment of the recognized panel. All financial support was solely derived from the sponsoring societies without the direct involvement of industry or other external stakeholders. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians in terms of VTE. The panel agreed on 42 recommendations under 15 headings for the diagnosis, initial management, secondary prevention of VTE, and treatment of recurrent VTE events. Important recommendations included the use of ultrasonography, preference for home treatment over hospital treatment for uncomplicated VTE, preference for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over vitamin K antagonists for primary treatment of cancer and non-cancer-related VTE, extended or indefinite anticoagulation with DOACs in selected high-risk patients. Early catheter-directed thrombectomy was recommended in only young symptomatic patients with a diagnosis of fresh iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a clinical picture that includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). The average annual incidence of VTE is around 104 to 183 per 100,000 individuals.[1,2] Its incidence is up to 68/1,000 in high-risk cases.[3] The frequency of venous ulcers, which is the most important complication of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS), is 300 per 100,000 and 25% is caused by DVT. Although VTE recurrence rate varies depending on risk factors, it recurs at a rate of 20% in five years. Another possible complication in insufficiently treated VTE cases is chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).[2] The main goal of the VTE treatment is to prevent PE, CTEPH, VTE recurrence, and PTS. This evidence-based guideline from the Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, and Phlebology Society aims to support clinicians in best decisions regarding the treatment of VTE.

Diagnosis

In the presence of pain, swelling, edema and risk factors in the leg or upper extremity, VTE should be suspected and clinical evaluation should be made. Currently, color Doppler ultrasonography (USG) is the most effective method for the diagnosis of DVT.[4] D-dimer also contributes to diagnosis and continuation of treatment in selected patients.[5]

Treatment

It is safe and cost-effective to treat DVT and possibly PE at home with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in well-selected patients. If there is no problem in reaching the hospital or if the necessary support units are available at the patient's location, outpatient treatment should be considered as the initial approach.[8-10]

The following patients should be treated in the hospital:

• Phlegmasia cerulea dolens, phlegmasia alba dolens, symptomatic PE

• Patients at high risk of bleeding

• Active bleeding

• New surgery

• Active peptic ulcer

• Advanced hepatic disease (international normalized ratio [INR] >1.3)

• Thrombocytopenia (<100,000/µL) or familial bleeding disease

• Body weight less than 45 kg or more than 100 kg

• Children

• Complicated pregnant women

• Associated medical problems (e.g., dialysis)

Recom-. G-1.

Recommendation	Grade	Level of evidence	Key references
In all patients with clinical suspicion, color Doppler USG is recommended as the first line option in the diagnosis of DVT.	Very strong recommendation (I)	A	Wittens et al.[4] Kakkos et al.[2]
Hereditary thrombophilia tests should only be considered for unprovoked thrombus + VTE history in the first-degree relatives.	Strong recommendation (IIa)	C	Moll[6]
USG or D-dimer may be considered to detect residual occlusion if extended therapy is planned.	Weak recommendation (IIb)	B	Prandoni et al.[7]
USG: Ultrasonography; DVT: Deep vein thrombosis; VTE: Venous thromboembolism.

Recom-. G-2.

Recommendation	Grade	Level of evidence	Key references
When the conditions are suitable, ambulatory care is recommended for patients with acute DVT	Very strong recommendation (I)	A	Kearon et al.[8] Ortel et al.[9] Othieno et al.[10]
DVT: Deep vein thrombosis.

Anticoagulation is the mainstay of DVT treatment. The aim is to prevent the progression of thrombosis, new thrombosis, and PE. Classical treatment is to continue with vitamin K antagonist (VKA), when the target INR level is achieved for >24 h after treatment with LMWH.[8,9] The target INR level should be 2 to 3. Warfarin, originally developed as a poison, is an extremely effective and inexpensive drug. However, the treatment range is narrow, and drug-food interaction is common. Frequent INR examinations pose a serious problem for the healthcare system. The necessity of administering LMWHs by subcutaneous injection and drug-food interactions of oral VKAs have led to the standard treatment being far from ideal and more effective drugs to be developed. Among these, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban are the drugs licensed in Turkey for the treatment of VTE as of February 2021.

Main advantages of DOACs are as follows:[9,11]

• Rapid onset of action due to short half-life, and rapid elimination after drug withdrawal

• Less drug-food interactions

• Not requiring laboratory examination for dose adjustment

• A single drug treatment is possible with rivaroxaban and apixaban (no need for early treatment with LMWH)

In the 2020 American Society of Hematology (ASH) guideline, the data of 28,876 patients diagnosed with VTE in 24 reviews and 12 randomized studies conducted with DOACs were evaluated.[9] All studies compared a DOAC with standard therapy (LMWH followed by VKA). Mortality and VTE risk did not change with the use of DOACs. However, there was a decline in the frequency of major bleeding. The economic aspect was evaluated in 14 studies and DOAC treatment was found to be more cost-effective. Therefore, the 2020 ASH and the European Society of Vascular Surgery (ESVS) guidelines recommend that DOAC treatment should be preferred to standard treatment. However, standard therapy is recommended for patients using cytochrome P450 enzyme inhibitors. Dose adjustments should be considered according to the DOAC to be used in renal and hepatic insufficiency. Patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, impaired absorption such as following bariatric surgery, a body weight of >120 kg, or extremely thin patients are not optimal DOAC candidates.[2,9,11]

The most common anticoagulation protocol in our country is to start with LMWH and continue with VKA. However, in a study conducted in cardiology clinics by Ertaş et al.,[12] the time in therapeutic range (TTR) rate was found to be only 41.3%, and this rate should be over 60% according to the world standards. Similarly, in a study conducted by Sargin et al.,[13] TTR was evaluated in 1,912 patients who were followed for more than three months. Only 34.3% of the patients had an INR value between 2 to 3 during follow-up and the average INR value was below 2 in 52.03% of the patients. The aforementioned authors also reported that the total hospital cost was $2,785 for patients whose INR values could be kept at the desired level and $3,192 for those who could not.[14] It is obvious that keeping INR within the desired limits is not satisfactory in our country and poses a serious economic burden on the healthcare system.[12-14]

Recom-. G-3.

Recommendation	Grade	Level of evidence	Key references
It is recommended to treat DVT with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban or edoxaban for 3 to 6 months.	Very strong recommendation (I)	A	Kakkos et al.[16] Ortel et al.[9] Kakkos et al.[2]
Direct oral anticoagulant therapy is preferred to VKAs.	Very strong recommendation (I)	A	Kakkos et al.[16] Ortel et al.[9] Kakkos et al.[2]
When treatment is to be performed with VKA; LMWH + VKA are started together, when the INR value is >2 and if this value is maintained for 24 hours, treatment with VKA alone should be continued.	Very strong recommendation (I)	A	Heit et al.[1]
DVT: Deep vein thrombosis; VKA: Vitamin K antagonist; LMWH: Low molecular weight heparin; INR: International normalized ratio.

In a study, the most common causes of drug-related hospitalization in patients over 65 years of age were warfarin (33.3%), insulin (13.9%), and antiaggregant drugs (13.3%).[15] Considering the current guidelines and the circumstances specific to our country, the following recommendations are presented in terms of the treatment of proximal acute DVT.

There are no randomized comparative studies of the four DOACs in use, and no preference is made in the guidelines. Dabigatran (80%), apixaban (27%), rivaroxaban (35%) are excreted by renal clearance, and studies on apixaban and rivaroxaban in end-stage renal failure patients are still ongoing. In general, DOACs are not used in cases with severe hepatic failure; however, dabigatran is the least eliminated agent from the liver. In addition, the reasons for preference of the patient should be considered (i.e., necessity to be taken with food, single dose-double dose, or bleeding risk). It should be kept in mind that amiodarone, fluconazole, rifampin, and phenytoin interact with DOACs and alter the plasma levels.

Cancer and Venous thromboembolism

Malignancy is an important risk factor for VTE (3 to 7-fold increase in risk), and its incidence may reach 10 to 20% in these patients.[17,18] Cancer can be diagnosed in 4 to 12% of DVTs of uncertain cause within the following months.[18] A detailed examination and screening for occult cancer are not recommended for all patients.[2,18,19] Cancer-related risk factors are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Risk factors for cancer-related VTE.

Group	Risk factor	Increased risk
Tumor-related	Region	Brain, pancreas, stomach, ovary, lung, myeloma, lymphoma, kidney
	Cancer duration Stage	<3 months from diagnosis High
	Phase	Advanced
Patient-related	Non-cancer-related	>40 years of age, female sex, concomitant diseases, infection, obesity, anemia, dehydration, personal or family history of VTE, hereditary or acquired thrombophilia, concurrent acute illness, lung disease, kidney disease, long-term immobility, smoking
	Cancer-related	Thrombocytosis, leukocytosis, anemia, hospitalization, acquired, protein C resistance
Treatm ent-related	Surgical	>30 min laparotomy or laparoscopy; major abdominal or pelvic surgery
	Pharm acological	Aggressive chemotherapy, antiangiogenic drugs, growth factors, blood products
	Venous catheter associated	Central venous catheter, femoral venous catheter, peripheral intravenous catheter
VTE: Venous thromboembolism.

It has been well documented that VKAs are not ideal in VTE patients with cancer, since they have a 3.2-fold higher VTE risk and 2.3-fold higher bleeding risk, compared to patients without cancer. Therefore, LMWH was considered the gold standard until DOAC studies were completed. However, all LMWHs can be applied by injection only, and the rate of patients completing this recommended treatment for six months was reported as only 61% with oral anticoagulants and 37% with LMWH. Patients usually refrain from injection.[20-22]

Recom-. G-4.

Recommendation	Grade	Level of evidence	Key references
Clinical examination and sex-specific cancer screening are recommended in unprovoked VTE cases (e.g, PSA).	Very strong recommendation (I)	A	Klein et al.[19] Kakkos et al.[2]
VTE: Venous thromboembolism; PSA: Prostate specific antigen.

There is a significant number of cancer patients in the first Phase 3 registry studies of DOACs that is the scope of a meta-analysis. Interestingly, a 35% reduction in VTE risk was found with the use of DOACs without any significant change in the mortality rates.[23] In addition, a 36% reduction in VTE risk and a 55% reduction in bleeding risk were reported with DOACs, which are factor Xa inhibitors. After these promising data, cancer-specific DOAC studies started to be published.[24-27] All of these studies were designed as open-label for ethical reasons, and the comparator was dalteparin. In all studies, DOACs were used at standard doses, and dalteparin was used at the standard dose for one month, but then continued with a 25% lower dose. While the rate of major bleeding was not significantly different with rivaroxaban, the rate of clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding was high. Edoxaban showed the same effect as dalteparin, except for an increasing trend in major bleeding. Apixaban was equally found to be effective and did not affect major and CRNM bleeding rates. The increase in bleeding rates observed in the first two DOAC studies is most likely related to the reduction of the dalteparin dose after one month, despite standard DOAC dosage. Previous studies have specifically reported an increase in bleeding with DOACs in gastrointestinal tumors, while a recent apixaban study does not support this finding.[28]

The recommendations in the current ESVS (January 2021)[2] and ASH (March 2021) guidelines[19] are not compatible. The ESVS guidelines prioritize a more traditional approach and recommend LMWH treatment as a priority in cancer patients. However, the ASH guidelines recommend DOAC as the firstline treatment. In all of them, it is recommended to use DOACs carefully in gastrointestinal system tumors. These data are depicted in Table 2.

Table 2. ESVS and ASH recommendations in the treatment of cancer-related VTE.

European Society of Vascular Surgery[2]	American Society of Hematology[19]
LMWH is recommended in cases of cancer associated VTE (IA recommendation) After three months of LMWH, switch to oral anticoagulant for extended therapy (I C recommendation) In selected patients, an approved DOAC can be used at all stages if the tumor is not in the gastrointestinal or genitourinary system (IIa A recommendation)	In the initial treatment (first 7 days) DOAC (apixaban or rivaroxaban) or LMWH can be used In the short-term VTE treatment (3-6 months), DOAC (apixaban, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban) is preferred to LMWH and VKA. Preferred to LMWH and VKA. In the presence of active cancer and VTE, treatment with DOAC or LMWH is recommended after 6 months.
ESVS: European Society of Vascular Surgery; ASH: American Society of Hematology; VTE: Venous thromboembolism; LMWH: Low molecular weight heparin; DOAC: Direct oral anticoagulant; VKA: Vitamin K antagonist.

In addition to all these information and guidelines, recommendations in the treatment of cancer-related VTE are summarized under G-5 in this guideline, taking into account the recent study reported by Ageno et al.[28]

Recom-. G-5.

National guideline recommendations for the treatment of cancer-related VTE
Recommendation	Grade	Level of evidence	Key references
LMWH is recommended in cases of VTE due to cancer.	Very strong recommendation (I)	A	Kakkos et al.[2] Ortel et al.[9] Kirkilesis et al.[23]
Use of DOAC (apixaban*, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) is recommended for the treatment of cancer-related VTE.	Very strong recommendation (I)	A	Kakkos et al.[2] Ortel et al.[9] Kirkilesis et al.[23] Agnelli et al.[27]Ageno et al.[28]
VTE: Venous thromboembolism; LMWH: Low molecular weight heparin; DOAC: Direct oral anticoagulant; * Apixaban may be preferred primarily in carefully selected patients with gastrointestinal system tumors.

What is the most appropriate treatment for venous thromboembolism in pregnancy?

There is insufficient evidence to make recommendations for the treatment of VTE in pregnant women. Pregnant women are five times more likely to have VTE than non-pregnant women. The VKAs cross the placenta in pregnant women and may cause embryopathy between the 6^th and 12^th week and bleeding at birth. However, standard heparin and LMWH do not cross the placenta. In general, DOACs are not recommended during pregnancy.[11] Table 3 summarizes the anticoagulant option in different patient groups.

Table 3. Factors that may affect the choice of anticoagulant drugs.

Factor	Drug of choice
Cancer Single dose request Reluctance to parenteral therapy Liver disease and coagulopathy Renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance rate <30 mL/min) Coronary artery disease Pregnancy Neutralization possibility Dyspepsia and risk of GIS bleeding	LMWH and DOAC Rivaroxaban, edoxaban, VKA Rivaroxaban, apixaban LMWH VKA VKA, rivaroxaban, apixaban LMWH Standard heparin Apixaban
LMWH: Low molecular weight heparin; DOAC: Direct oral anticoagulant; VKA: Vitamin K antagonist; GIS: Gastrointestinal system.

Duration of anticoagulant therapy

In the standard approach, treatment of VTE is discontinued after three to six months, if the patient does not have any risk factors such as thrombophilia. However, in such cases, the risk of rethrombosis is not low and the risk of PTS increases significantly after rethrombosis. The possibility of recurrence in different risk groups is shown in Table 4.[5,8]

Table 4. Possibility of recurrence in risk groups.

Risk factor	Risk of recurrence
Temporary risk factor Non-surgical temporary risk factor Idiopathic or demonstrated thrombophilia Cancer	3-5% a year 15%-5 years 30%-5 years 15% for each year	Surgery, major internal disease Long travel, estrogen therapy, pregnancy, leg trauma + AT, PC, PS deficiency, homozygous
Isolated distal DVT	1/2 reduction in all ratios above
Idiopathic DVT	1/2 increase in all the above rates
AT: Atherothrombin; PC: Protein C; PS: Protein S; DVT: Deep vein thrombosis.

After three to six months of DVT treatment, the decision to continue anticoagulation should be made with the likelihood of recurrence in the risk groups above. Two other important factors to be considered clinically are the patient's sex and D-dimer values.

Recom-. G-6.

Recommendation	Grade	Level of evidence	Key references
In DVT cases occurring during pregnancy, LMWH is recommended in three months therapeutic dose. It is recommended to continue for at least six weeks after birth.	Very strong recommendation (I)	B	Greer and Nelson-Piercy[29] Kakkos et al.[2]
DVT: Deep vein thrombosis; LMWH: Low molecular weight heparin.

The recurrence risk in male patients is 75% higher than women.[30] I f D -dimer measurement one month after the cessation of treatment is still high, the possibility of recurrence is twice as high.[31] The risk multiplies in men and patients with high D-dimer values. Clinicians usually avoid prolonged treatment due to the risk of excessive bleeding associated with the use of VKAs. However, researches are ongoing due to the high risk of rethrombosis.[32-37] In comparative studies with DOACs, 2.5 mg of apixaban, 10 or 20 mg of rivaroxaban, and 60 mg of edoxaban appear to be superior for the benefit-risk relationship. The acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) was compared with placebo in the WARFASA, ASPIRE, and INSPIRE studies. Mainly, with a minimal increase in bleeding risk, an 1/3 increase of effect was achieved.[38-40]

The Turkish National guideline was published in 2016[41] and, in light of the information in the 2020 ASH and 2021 ESVS guidelines, the recommendations were updated as follows:[2,9]

Venous thromboembolism in children

In children, the 2018 ASH guidelines recommend LMWH or VKA in symptomatic cases of DVT and PE, despite the scarcity of data.[45] In the dabigatran DIVERSITY study published in December 2020, 328 children (<18 years of age) were either treated with standard therapy (LMWH, VKA or fondaparinux)

Recom-. G-7.

Recommendation	Grade	Level of evidence	Key references
In selected cases of provoked proximal DVT, if there is a persistent risk factor other than cancer, extended therapy should be considered (after assessing the risk of thrombosis and bleeding).	Strong recommendation (IIa)	C	Kakkos et al.[2]
In selected cases of provoked proximal DVT, if there is a minor transient risk factor, extended therapy may be considered (after assessing the risk of thrombosis and bleeding).	Weak recommendation (IIb)	C	Prins et al.[42]
In the presence of unprovoked DVT, if the bleeding risk is low or moderate, extended anticoagulation is recommended by periodically evaluating the bleeding risk.	Very strong recommendation (I)	A	Kakkos et al.[2]
DOAC should be preferred to VKA for extended anticoagulation.	Strong recommendation (IIa)	B	Ortel et al.[9] Kakkos et al.[2]
Apixaban, rivaroxaban or edoxaban should be considered if extended treatment is considered after six months in a patient with provoked DVT.	Strong recommendation (IIa)	B	Agnelli et al.[43] Weitz et al.[35]
ASA may be considered in patients not using oral anticoagulants.	Weak recommendation (IIb)	C	Becattini et al.[38] Brighton et al.[39]Simes et al.[40]
In the presence of a second or subsequent unprovoked DVT, extended therapy is recommended.	Very strong recommendation (I)	B	Kakkos et al.[2]
If DVT develops during treatment in the patient whose medication is certain, anticoagulant regimen may be changed, LMWH dose may be increased, DOAC treatment dose may be increased, and a higher INR may be targeted for the VKA dose.	Weak recommendation (IIb)	C	Schulman et al.[44]
DVT: Deep vein thrombosis; DOAC: Direct oral anticoagulant; VKA: Vitamin K antagonist; ASA: Acetylsalicylic acid; LMWH: Low molecular weight heparin; INR: International normalized ratio.

or with dabigatran adjusted for age and weight.[46] Bleeding was reported as 24% with standard therapy and as 22% with dabigatran, and major bleeding rates were not significantly different. Dabigatran was found to have a comparable efficacy with standard therapy. Similar efficacy was reported with rivaroxaban in pediatric patients, and it was approved for use in the United Kingdom healthcare system in February 2021.[47]

Direct oral anticoagulants and neutralization

The DOAC neutralization may be required for emergency intervention in some patients. Options are summarized below.[48,49]

The antidote strategy recommended by the American College of Cardiology (ACC) in bleeding due to various anticoagulants is summarized below (Table 5).[50]

Table 5. Oral anticoagulant neutralization recommendations.

Oral anticoagulant	Neutralization recommendations
Vitamin K antagonist	Give 4F-PCC (4 factor prothrombin complex concentrate), otherwise give fresh frozen plasma
Factor IIa inhibitor (dabigatran)	Apply idarucizumab If it is not available, issue PCC or aPCC (activated PCC) If medication is taken within 2-4 hours, consider activated charcoal.
FXa inhibitors (apixaban, betrixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban)	Give Andexanet alpha If it is not available, PCC or aPCC If medication is taken within 2-4 hours, consider activated charcoal.
PCC: Prothrombin complex concentrate; If PCC is used for vitamin K antagonist neutralization, vitamin K must be added.

Acute isolated distal DVT

Proximal progression and PE are seen in 15% of cases with distal isolated DVT. The following factors increase the risk of proximal progression and PE:[5] positive D-dimer, thrombus longer than 5 cm along the vein, thrombus diameter greater than 7 cm, thrombus close to the proximal veins, active cancer, and a previous history of VTE. In a Cochrane analysis reported by Kirkilesis et al.,[51] VKA reduced the risk of recurrent VTE, although its effect on PE was not demonstrated. While the risk did not increase in major bleeding, a minimal increase was found in CRNM bleeding. With six-week and three-month anticoagulation, recurrent DVT was found to be 5.8% and 13.9%, respectively and there was no significant increase in bleeding. In the light of these data, the national guideline recommendations are as follows:

Superficial vein thrombosis (SVT)

In the POST study, deep vein progression or PE was detected in 25% of patients with SVT.[53] In other studies, the possibility of thromboembolism was reported to be between 6.2 and 22.6%.[2] These data indicate that SVT is not innocent. Cancer, thrombus close to the saphenofemoral (SFJ) or saphenopopliteal junction (SPJ), varicose veins, and thrombosis are the risk factors.[54]

In a meta-analysis conducted in 2019, Duffett et al.[55] reviewed data from 6,862 patients receiving SVT treatment. During follow-up, the VTE rate (per 100 patient years) was reported as 12.1 with LMWH, 1.4 with fondaparinux, and 9.6 with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). While fondaparinux was evaluated in a very well standardized study, there are substantial differences in duration and dose in LMWH and NSAID patients. Fondaparinux treatment is relatively expensive and requires subcutaneous injection. Rivaroxaban can be used, as it is more cost-effective and has been shown to be at least as effective as fondaparinux.[56]

Recom-. G-8.

Recommendation	Grade	Level of evidence	Key references
In the presence of distal DVT, three months treatment is preferred to a shorter treatment.	Very strong recommendation (I)	A	Kirkilesis et al.[51]
DOACs are preferred to LMWH. The other option is VKA.	Very strong recommendation (I)	C	Kakkos et al.[16]
In the presence of symptomatic calf DVT plus cancer, treatment for more than three months is recommended.	Very strong recommendation (I)	C	Galanaud et al.[52]
DVT: Deep vein thrombosis; DOAC: Direct oral anticoagulant; LMWH: Low molecular weight heparin; VKA: Vitamin K antagonist.

Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis

In DOAC Phase 3 studies, upper extremity DVT cases were not included, and there are no specific data available on this subject. In a prospective review of 210 patients treated in the Mayo Clinic between 2013 and 2019, 63 patients were treated with apixaban, 39 patients with rivaroxaban, and 108 patients with LMWH and/or warfarin.[59] The series included 51% catheter-related DVT, 60% cancer, and 14% PE and no significant difference was found in the treatment efficacy. Three major bleeding was detected in the LMWH and/or warfarin group, but not in the DOAC group. In a rivaroxaban study, 30 patients were followed for six months and recurrent thrombosis was observed.[60] While two CRNMs and two minor hemorrhages were reported, complete recanalization was found in the affected vein in all patients. Thrombolytic therapy can be considered in well-selected patients.[61]

Recom-. G-9.

Recommendation	Grade	Level of evidence	Key references
Anticoagulation is not recommended in isolated superficial vein thrombosis of <5 cm in lower extremity if there is no risk such as malignancy, thrombophilia, or proximity to the deep venous system.	Not recommended (III)	C	Kakkos et al.[32]
In the lower extremity superficial vein thrombosis case, when acute inflammation and prothrombotic process improve, endovenous ablation procedures should be considered (>3 months).	Strong recommendation (IIa)	C	Kakkos et al.[32]
Fondaparinux 2.5 mg or rivaroxaban 10 mg recommended if superficial vein thrombosis of the lower extremity is >3 cm from the deep vein and is >5 cm long	Very strong recommendation (I)	B	Decousus et al.[57 Beyer-Westendorf et al.[56]
If the lower extremity superficial vein thrombosis is >3 cm from the deep vein and >5 cm in length, LMWH should be considered as an alternative.	Strong recommendation (IIa)	B	Duffett et al.[55] Nikolakopoulos et al.[58]
If the lower extremity superficial vein thrombosis is >3 cm from the deep vein and >5 cm in length, anticoagulation for 45 days is recommended.	Very strong recommendation (I)	B	Decousus et al.[57]Beyer-Westendorf et al.[56] Duffett et al.[55]
Therapeutic anticoagulation is recommended if the lower extremity superficial vein thrombosis is <3 cm from the deep vein.	Very strong recommendation (I)	C	Kakkos et al.[32]
Three months of treatment may be considered in clinically or anatomically risky patients.	Weak recommendation (IIb)	C	Nikolakopoulos et al.[58]
LMWH: Low molecular weight heparin.

Recom-. G-10.

Recommendation	Grade	Level of evidence	Key references
Anticoagulation with DOAC for three months is recommended in the presence of primary upper extremity DVT.	Very strong recommendation (I)	B	Houghton et al.[59 Schastlivtsev et al.[60]
Thrombolysis can be considered in the first two weeks in a young and active patient with serious complaints.	Weak recommendation (IIb)	C	Illig and Doyle[61]
DOAC: Direct oral anticoagulant; DVT: Deep vein thrombosis.

Catheter-directed thrombolysis

There are 11 reviews and 19 randomized studies related to the treatment of acute proximal DVT with thrombolytic therapy + anticoagulant or anticoagulant alone.[9] Thrombolytic therapy has no significant effect on the mortality rate in DVT patients, but may reduce the risk of PTS, despite high major and intracranial bleeding rates. Although the increase in major bleeding is seen in systemic and catheterdirected thrombolysis, it does not reach statistical significance.

Currently, catheter-directed pharmacomechanical thrombolysis is a great debate in the treatment of VTE. The CAVENT study yielded positive results, but the ATTRACT and CAVA studies demonstrated no benefit.[62-64] To date, a decrease in PTS was reported in seven series; however, no significant difference was found in one study (ATTRACT study). On the other hand, there is widespread controversy regarding the ATTRACT methodology. In the 2020 ASH guideline, thrombolytic therapy is recommended in a young patient with a low risk of bleeding, with extremity threat (phlegmasia cerulea dolens), and symptomatic DVT in the iliac and common femoral vein, despite a low level of evidence.[9] When the results of 427 patients in three reviews and five controlled studies were examined, bleeding was found to be lower with catheter-directed thrombolysis and might be preferred to systemic thrombolysis. During the two-year follow-up of the ATTRACT study, a significant improvement was found in the quality of life scores in patients who underwent pharmacomechanical thrombolysis.[65] However, this effect could not be demonstrated in the femoropopliteal region.[66]

Recom-. G-11.

Recommendation	Grade	Level of evidence	Key references
Early thrombectomy should be considered in selected symptomatic patients with a diagnosis of iliofemoral DVT.	Strong recommendation (IIa)	A	Enden et al.[62] Vedantham et al.[63] Notten et al.[64] Kahn et al.[65]
Early thrombus removal is not recommended in cases limited to femoral, popliteal and calf veins.	Not recommended (III)	B	Kearon et al.[66]
Standard anticoagulant therapy is recommended for these patients.	Very strong recommendation (I)	C	Kearon et al.[66]
Catheter-directed thrombolysis should be preferred to systemic thrombolysis.	Strong recommendation (IIa)	B	ASH 2020[9]
DVT: Deep vein thrombosis.

Recom-. G-12.

Recommendation	Grade	Level of evidence	Key references
Temporary IVC filter is recommended in patients for whom anticoagulation is contraindicated and in patients who have recurrent venous thromboembolism despite adequate anticoagulation.	Very strong recommendation (I)	B	Kaufman et al.[69]
IVC: Inferior vena cava.

Approximately half of the patients undergoing pharmacomechanical thrombolysis require an additional intervention.[67] Venous balloon dilatation and stenting may be required, particularly for proximal occlusive lesions. Therefore, a close follow-up is recommended in the early period after treatment, specifically in the first few weeks. The absolute and relative contraindications of thrombolytic therapy are summarized in Table 6.

Table 6. Absolute and relative contraindications of thrombolytic therapy.

Absolute contraindications
Previous hemorrhagic stroke Active non-menstrual bleeding Tendency to bleed	Intracranial disease Ischemic stroke within three months Cerebral tumor
Relative contraindications
Recent noncranial bleeding Active peptic ulcer Uncompressible vascular bleeding New trauma from 2-4 weeks ago	Blood pressure >180/110 mmHg Recent surgery Pregnancy

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter

The routine use of IVC filters in addition to anticoagulant therapy is not recommended in patients with DVT. In the PREPIC 2 study, there was no decrease in recurrent PE rates after three months with an IVC filter.[68] On t he other hand, a numerical increase in the mortality and DVT rates was found in cases in whom the filter was used. Recommendations are summarized below in the light of the 2020 Society of Interventional Radiology guideline and the experience of our country.[69]

Do early mobilization and compression stockings reduce the incidence of postthrombotic syndrome?

No reduction in PTS was observed with the use of compression stockings in a large-scale study reported by Kahn et al.[70] Therefore, t he 2016 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines does not recommend the use of compression stockings to decrease the possibility of PTS. However, in the 2021 ESVS guideline, multiple bandages or compression stockings (30 to 40 mmHg) are recommended within the first 24 h to reduce pain, edema, and residual obstruction in proximal DVT cases. In addition, if symptoms and signs are limited in proximal DVT cases, knee-length compression stockings are recommended for 6 to 12 months.[71]

Venous thromboembolism in the presence of thrombophilia

Congenital and acquired hematological pathologies as VTE risk factors are summarized in Table 7. Recommendations on this issue are summarized in the G-14 title.

Table 7. Frequency of VTE in common hematological disorders.

	Frequency in the population (%)	Frequency of VTE cases (%)	Relative risk increase
Heterozygous AT	0.02	1	10-30
Heterozygous PC	0.2-0.5	1-3	10
Homozygous PC			Very high-risk increase
Heterozygous PS	0.1-0.7	1-2	8
Homozygous PS			Very high-risk increase
Heterozygous Factor V Leiden	2-15	20-20	3-7
Homozygous Factor V Leiden	0.06-0.25		80
Heterozygous Factor II G202110A	1-2	3-5	3-7
Homozygous Factor II G202110A	Rare	Rare	10-20
Factor VIII >150%	11	25	2
MTHFR polymorphism (homocysteine↑)	5	10	1.5
Antiphospholipid syndrome	2	4-15	7-10
Dysfibrinogenemia	Rare	Rare	5-7
Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria	1-9/100000	Rare	3-5
VTE: Venous thromboembolism; AT: Antithrombin; PC: Protein C; PS: Protein S; MTHFR: Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase.

Recom-. G-13.

Recommendation	Grade	Level of evidence	Key references
Multiple bandages or compression stockings (30-40 mmHg) may be considered within the first 24 hours to reduce pain, edema and residual obstruction in proximal DVT cases.	Weak recommendation (IIb)	B	Amin et al.[72]
If symptoms and signs are limited in proximal DVT cases, knee-length compression stocking may be considered for 6-12 months.	Weak recommendation (IIb)	B	Ten Cate-Hoeke et al.[71]
DVT: Deep vein thrombosis.

Recom-. G-14.

Recommendation	Grade	Level of evidence	Key references
In the presence of DVT + thrombophilia (antiphospholipid syndrome, homozygous factor V Leiden mutation, protein C, S and antithrombin deficiency), periodic evaluation and full dose extended anticoagulation is recommended.	Very strong recommendation (I)	C	Malec et al.[73] Stevens et al.[74]
DOAC should not be used in the presence of DVT and antiphospholipid syndrome.	Not recommended (III)	C	Malec et al.[73]
DVT: Deep vein thrombosis; DOAC: Direct oral anticoagulant.