Abstract
Context
Menopause before age 45 is a risk factor for fractures, but menopause occurs at age ≥45 in ~90% of women.
Objective
To determine, in women with menopause at age ≥45, whether (1) years since the final menstrual period (FMP) is more strongly associated with postmenopausal bone mineral density (BMD) than chronological age and (2) lower age at FMP is related to more fractures.
Design and Setting
The Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation, a longitudinal cohort study of the menopause transition (MT).
Participants
A diverse cohort of ambulatory women (pre- or early perimenopausal at baseline, with 15 near-annual follow-up assessments).
Main Outcome Measures
Postmenopausal lumbar spine (LS) or femoral neck (FN) BMD (n = 1038) and time to fracture (n = 1554).
Results
Adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), cigarette use, alcohol intake, baseline LS or FN BMD, baseline MT stage, and study site using multivariable linear regression, each additional year after the FMP was associated with 0.006 g/cm2 (P < 0.0001) and 0.004 g/cm2 (P < 0.0001) lower postmenopausal LS and FN BMD, respectively. Age was not related to FN BMD independent of years since FMP. In Cox proportional hazards regression, accounting for race/ethnicity, BMI, cigarette use, alcohol intake, prior fracture, diabetes status, exposure to bone-modifying medications/supplements, and study site, the hazard for incident fracture was 5% greater for each 1-year decrement in age at FMP (P = 0.02).
Conclusions
Years since the FMP is more strongly associated with postmenopausal BMD than chronological age, and earlier menopause is associated with more fractures.
Keywords: menopause, bone mineral density, fracture, general population studies
The number of years elapsed since the final menstrual period (FMP) has been proposed as a metric for biological aging in women, because the menopause transition (MT) is accompanied by physiologic changes that are strongly linked to adverse health outcomes in later life (1,2). A corollary of this hypothesis is that earlier menopause is associated with worse health in older ages. Bone is an ideal system for testing this hypothesis and its corollary, because bone loss in women is intimately tied to reduced ovarian function (3-14). Bone mineral density (BMD) decline in women accelerates 1 year before the FMP, continues at a rapid pace for 3 years, and persists in postmenopause more slowly. Over the 5 years bracketing the FMP, total bone loss can exceed 10% (14) and is accompanied by alterations in bone quality that diminish fracture resistance (15-17). Indeed, the incidence of distal appendicular fractures increases during the first postmenopausal decade (18), foreshadowing future vertebral and hip fractures (19). Menopause is, accordingly, cited as a reason that women have greater prevalence of osteoporosis and more fractures than men (20).
Because BMD decline accelerates earlier in women whose FMP occurs earlier, many investigators have hypothesized that lower age at FMP leads to lower postmenopausal BMD at a given chronological age and greater fracture risk (21-38). In support of this thesis, various studies have demonstrated that primary ovarian insufficiency [menopause before age 40 (21,22)] and menopause before age 45 (23-28) are related to lower BMD and/or more fractures. Indeed, in clinical practice, menopause before age 45 is commonly recognized as a risk factor for fracture (39). However, approximately 90% of women have their FMP at or after age 45 years (40), and the association of age at FMP with subsequent BMD and fracture risk in this large majority of women is less certain (22,29). Such an association, if it exists, could be used to improve the prediction of BMD and fracture in all postmenopausal women.
The objective of this study was, therefore, to fill this knowledge gap and address the following 2 research questions in women with FMPs at age ≥45, First, in postmenopausal women, does the number of years elapsed since the FMP predict lower BMD, independent of chronological age? If it does, then in women of the same chronological age, those with lower age at FMP will have lower BMD. Second, is a lower age at FMP associated with greater rates of fracture? We used previously collected reproductive, BMD, and fracture data from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN), a longitudinal study of the MT in a diverse cohort of ambulatory women.
Methods
SWAN is a multicenter, longitudinal study of the MT in a diverse cohort of community-dwelling women (41). At study inception (1996), participants were between 42 and 52 years of age, were in premenopause (regular menstrual bleeding in the past year) or early perimenopause (less predictable menstrual bleeding at least once every 3 months), had an intact uterus with >1 ovary, and were not taking sex steroid hormones. The SWAN cohort included 3302 participants recruited from 7 US sites (Boston, MA; Chicago, IL; Detroit, MI; Pittsburgh, PA; Los Angeles, CA; Newark, NJ; Oakland CA). The SWAN Bone Cohort was a subset of 2407 participants from 5 sites (excluding Chicago and Newark, where bone assessments were not performed). To date, a total of 16 visits (1 baseline and 15 follow-up) spanning 2 decades have been conducted. Each SWAN clinical site obtained Institutional Review Board approval, and all participants provided written informed consent.
Study Sample Derivation
This study consisted of 2 analytic samples. We used a fracture analysis sample to test whether earlier age at FMP (age ≥45) is related to greater incidence of subsequent fracture. This sample was derived from the full SWAN cohort, of whom 1595 underwent a natural (nonsurgical) menopause at age ≥45 and had a known FMP date. From these women, we then excluded those who started a bone-beneficial or bone-detrimental medication prior to SWAN baseline (n = 41). Accordingly, the fracture analysis sample included 1554 women. Bone-beneficial medications included hormone therapy, calcitonin, calcitriol, bisphosphonates, denosumab, and parathyroid hormone. Bone-detrimental medications were oral or injectable glucocorticoids, aromatase inhibitors, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, or antiepileptic medications.
To examine whether the number of years elapsed since the FMP (age ≥45) is associated with lower postmenopausal BMD, independent of chronological age, we used a BMD analysis sample. This sample was derived from the subset of SWAN participants who were in the Bone Cohort. Again, starting with the 1595 participants who had a known FMP date at age ≥45 years, we excluded those who were not from a SWAN Bone site (n = 404), did not have a BMD measurement at least 3 years after their FMP (n = 121), or started a bone-beneficial or bone-detrimental medication before the SWAN baseline visit (n = 32). This left us with a BMD analysis sample of 1038 women.
Outcomes
Bone mineral density
For our first analysis, the outcome was BMD at the last SWAN visit (up to follow-up visit 15). BMD at the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) BMD (g/cm2) were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at each study visit. An anthropomorphic spine phantom was circulated for cross-site calibration. The Boston, Detroit, and Los Angeles sites began SWAN with Hologic 4500A models and then upgraded to Hologic Discover A hardware. Davis and Pittsburgh started SWAN with Hologic 2000 models and later upgraded to Hologic 4500A machines. When a site upgraded hardware, it scanned 40 women on the old and new machines to develop cross-calibration regression equations. A standard quality control program included daily phantom measurements, local site review of all scans, central review of scans that met problem-flagging criteria, and central review of a 5% random sample of scans. Short-term in vivo measurement variability was 0.014 g/cm2 (1.4%) at the LS and 0.016 g/cm2 (2.2%) at the FN.
Fracture
Incident fracture was the outcome in our second analysis. Fractures were self-reported by all SWAN participants (even if not in the SWAN Bone Cohort) using standardized questionnaires. Questionnaires were administered at the SWAN baseline visit (to ascertain fractures prior to SWAN inception) and at each follow-up visit (to ascertain fractures that occurred since the previous visit after the start of SWAN). The site of all fractures was recorded. For fractures before SWAN baseline, age at the time of the fracture was elicited. For fractures during study follow-up, SWAN did not collect event dates during the first 6 follow-up visits; dates were thus imputed as the midpoint between the participants’ previous and index visits. SWAN began collecting the date of fracture at visit 7. Also starting at visit 7, medical records were obtained to adjudicate fractures; since inauguration of adjudication, 95% of self-reports were confirmed. For fractures that occurred during SWAN, mechanism of injury was assessed. Fractures were considered minimum trauma if they did not occur after a fall from a height of ≥6 inches, a motor vehicle accident, moving fast (eg, skating), playing sports, or from impact with heavy or fast-moving projectiles. Our analyses did not include craniofacial and digital fractures. However, we included minimum- and nonminimum-trauma fractures as both fracture types are associated with low BMD (42) and mechanism of injury was not recorded for fractures that occurred prior to SWAN baseline.
Primary Exposure: Age at the Final Menstrual Period
Participants were classified as postmenopausal after >1 year of amenorrhea. In women who underwent natural menopause, FMP date was defined as the first date of the last menstrual bleeding cycle before 12 months of amenorrhea.
Covariates
Risk factors for low BMD and fracture were included as covariates in analyses, as appropriate. These included age (years), race/ethnicity, body mass index [BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms/(height in meters)2], cigarette use (current/past/never), alcohol intake (<7 drinks per week, >7 and <14 drinks per week, and >14 drinks per week), prior fracture (yes/no), diabetes status (yes/no), and use of bone-beneficial or bone-detrimental medications and/or vitamin D or calcium supplementation. Each of these variables was collected at every SWAN visit using standardized self-report or interview forms. Anthropometrics were ascertained using standardized and quality-controlled protocols (41).
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics for all variables were generated and distributions of continuous variables were assessed for normality.
Our first analysis tested whether time elapsed since the FMP is associated with lower postmenopausal BMD, independent of chronological age. At any given chronological age in postmenopause, women who had earlier FMPs have had more years elapsed since the FMP; thus, this analysis also tests the hypothesis that at a given chronological age, earlier FMP is associated with lower BMD. We used multivariable linear regression to model BMD at the last SWAN visit as a function of years elapsed since the FMP and adjusted for chronological age (at the time of the outcome BMD assessment). Additional nontime-varying covariates included race/ethnicity, SWAN study site, and exposure to bone-beneficial or bone-detrimental medications and/or vitamin D or calcium supplementation. Time-varying covariates assessed at SWAN baseline were BMI (kg/cm2), cigarette use (current/past/never), alcohol intake (<7 drinks per week, >7 and <14 drinks per week, and >14 drinks per week), LS or FN BMD, and MT stage (pre- or early perimenopause). Exposure to bone-beneficial or bone-detrimental medications and/or vitamin D or calcium supplementation was operationalized as the percentage of visits from SWAN study baseline to the last SWAN visit that the participant reported taking the medication or supplement in question. Separate models were run for the LS and FN.
Our second analysis examined whether lower age at FMP is associated with greater fracture hazard. We used Cox proportional hazards regression with time to first fracture as the outcome and age at FMP as the continuous primary predictor. We started the observation period clock for fracture at age 40 to address potential confounding by chronological age and because MT-related BMD loss begins prior to the FMP (14), and we did not want to miss fractures that may have occurred before the FMP. Covariates included race/ethnicity, SWAN study site, BMI (kg/cm2), history of fracture before age 40 (yes/no), cigarette use (current/past/never), alcohol intake (<7 drinks per week, >7 and <14 drinks per week, and >14 drinks per week), diabetes status (yes/no), exposure to bone-beneficial or bone-detrimental medications and/or vitamin D or calcium supplementation. Values for BMI, cigarette use, alcohol intake, and diabetes status were obtained at study baseline. Exposure to bone-beneficial or bone-detrimental medications and/or vitamin D or calcium supplementation was modeled as the percentage of visits from age 40 to the time of censoring or fracture that the participant reported taking the drug in question. To examine whether age at FMP is related to incident fracture independent of BMD in pre- and early perimenopause, we used participants in the fracture analysis sample who were recruited from Bone Cohort sites and ran the same Cox proportional hazards regression model as previously described but additionally adjusted for LS or FN BMD plus MT stage (pre- or early perimenopause) at the SWAN baseline visit.
Results
Participant Characteristics
Analytic sample characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The BMD analysis sample consisted of 1038 participants who had a known FMP date at age ≥45 and a BMD assessment at least 3 years after the FMP. Twenty-seven percent of participants were black, 13% Chinese, 15% Japanese, and 45% white. Mean age at FMP was 52 years. At the time of the last BMD measurement, participants were, on average, 61.9 years of age, and had undergone 13 BMD assessments.
Table 1.
BMD samplea (n = 1038) | Fracture analysis sampleb (n = 1554) | |
---|---|---|
Age at final menstrual period, years | 52.1 (2.7) | 52.1 (2.8) |
Race/ethnicity: | ||
Black | 278 (27) | 443 (29) |
Chinese | 136 (13) | 147 (9) |
Hispanic | - | 105 (7) |
Japanese | 159 (15) | 178 (11) |
White | 465 (45) | 681 (44) |
At SWAN baseline | ||
Chronological age, years | 46.5 (2.7) | 46.5 (2.7) |
Body mass index, kg/m2 | 27.2 (6.8) | 28.1 (7.3) |
Lumbar spine BMD, g/cm2 | 1.07 (0.14) | - |
Femoral neck BMD, g/cm2 | 0.84 (0.13) | - |
Cigarette use | ||
Never | 629 (61) | 907 (58) |
Past | 255 (25) | 386 (25) |
Current | 154 (14) | 261 (17) |
Alcohol intake: | ||
0 per week | 560 (54) | 807 (52) |
<7 per week | 402 (439) | 634 (41) |
>7 to 14 per week | 51 (5) | 78 (5) |
>14 per week | 25 (2) | 35 (2) |
Diabetes, yes | 39 (4) | 76 (5) |
At last SWAN visit | ||
Chronological age, years | 61.9 (4.2) | - |
Time from final menstrual period, years | 9.1 (4.0) | - |
Lumbar spine BMD, g/cm2 | 0.957 (0.170) | - |
Femoral Neck BMD, g/cm2 | 0.739 (0.131) | - |
Data are given as n (%) for categorical variables and mean (SD) for continuous variables.
Abbreviations: BMD, bone mineral density; SWAN, Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation.
aBMD analysis sample is used to examine the association of age at final menstrual period (FMP) with future BMD. Sample includes women who had a natural menopause and known FMP date at age 45 and later, did not start a bone-beneficial or bone-detrimental medication before the SWAN baseline visit, and had a BMD measurement at least 3 years after the FMP. Bone-beneficial medications included hormone therapy, calcitonin, calcitriol, bisphosphonates, denosumab, and parathyroid hormone. Bone-detrimental medications included oral or injectable glucocorticoids, aromatase inhibitors, gonadotropin releasing-hormone agonists, or antiepileptic medications.
bFracture analysis sample is used to examine the relation of age at final menstrual period (FMP) with subsequent fracture. Sample includes women who had a natural menopause and known FMP date at age 45 and later and did not start a bone-beneficial or bone-detrimental medication before the SWAN baseline visit. Bone-beneficial medications included hormone therapy, calcitonin, calcitriol, bisphosphonates, denosumab, and parathyroid hormone. Bone-detrimental medications included oral or injectable glucocorticoids, aromatase inhibitors, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, or antiepileptic medications.
The fracture analysis sample included 1554 women who had a known FMP date at age ≥45 and did not use a bone-beneficial or bone-detrimental medication before the SWAN baseline visit. The racial/ethnic composition in this sample was 29% black, 9% Chinese, 7% Hispanic, 11% Japanese, and 44% white. On average, the FMP occurred at age 52 years in this sample.
Age at FMP and Bone Mineral Density
In the BMD analysis sample, mean (SD) LS and FN BMD at the last SWAN follow-up visit was 0.957 (0.170) and 0.739 (0.131) g/cm2, respectively. In postmenopausal women who underwent menopause at age ≥45, greater time elapsed since the FMP (ie, lower age at the FMP) was associated with lower BMD, independent of chronological age. In multivariable linear regression, adjusted for chronological age, BMI, cigarette use, alcohol intake, exposure to bone-beneficial or bone-detrimental medications and/or vitamin D or calcium supplementation, baseline BMD, baseline MT stage, and study site, each additional year after the FMP was associated with 0.006 (P < 0.0001) and 0.004 (P = 0.0001) g/cm2 lower LS and FN BMD, respectively, at the last SWAN visit. Thus, compared to women with menopause at age 55, women with menopause at age 47 had 0.048 and 0.032 g/cm2 lower BMD at the LS and FN, respectively. Along these lines, LS and FN BMD were 0.030 and 0.020 g/cm2 lower, respectively, in those with FMP at age 47 vs FMP at 52 years. Adjusted for time from FMP, chronological age was not associated with BMD at the FN, but greater chronological age was related to greater BMD at the LS. Years elapsed since the FMP and baseline LS or FN BMD were independently associated with postmenopausal BMD. Controlling for baseline BMD, race/ethnicity was not associated with LS or FN BMD at the last SWAN visit (Table 2).
Table 2.
BMD (g/cm2) at the last study visit | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Lumbar spine | P-value | Femoral neck | P-value | |
Time from FMP, years | −0.006 (−0.08, −0.004) | <0.0001 | −0.004 (−0.006, −0.002) | <0.0001 |
Chronological age, years | 0.006 (0.003, 0.09) | <0.0001 | −0.000 (−0.002, 0.002) | 0.7 |
BMI, kg/m2 | 0.004 (0.009, 0.012) | <0.0001 | 0.000 (−0.001, 0.001) | 0.5 |
Race/ethnicity | ||||
Black | −0.005 (−0.020, 0.011) | 0.5 | −0.004 (−0.019, 0.011) | 0.4 |
Chinese | 0.001 (−0.026, 0.027) | 0.9 | −0.003 (−0.023, 0.018) | 0.7 |
Japanese | 0.002 (−0.024, 0.027) | 0.9 | −0.012 (−0.031, 0.008) | 0.2 |
White | Reference | Reference | ||
Starting BMD | ||||
Lumbar spine, SD | 0.166 (0.159, 0.174) | <0.0001 | — | — |
Femoral neck, SD | — | — | 0.129 (0.122, 0.136) | <0.0001 |
Associations are presented as point estimate (95% CI) and are results of multivariable linear regression with the last postmenopausal lumbar spine or femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) measurement in each participant as outcome and the number of years from the final menstrual period at the time of the BMD measurement as primary predictor. Models were adjusted for chronological age at the time of the BMD assessment, race/ethnicity, Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN) study site, exposure to bone-beneficial or bone-detrimental medications and/or vitamin D or calcium supplementation, and the following covariates assessed at SWAN baseline: body mass index (kg/cm2), cigarette use (current/past/never), and alcohol intake (<7 drinks per week, >7 and <14 drinks per week, and >14 drinks per week), lumbar spine or femoral neck BMD, and menopause transition stage (pre- or early perimenopause). Bone-beneficial medications included hormone therapy, calcitonin, calcitriol, bisphosphonates, denosumab, and parathyroid hormone. Bone-detrimental medications included oral or injectable glucocorticoids, aromatase inhibitors, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, or antiepileptic medications.
Abbreviations: BMD, bone mineral density; BMI, body mass index; FMP, final menstrual period.
Age at FMP and Incident Fracture
In the fracture analysis sample, a total of 317 women sustained an incident fracture. Fractures occurred most frequently at distal appendicular sites, with ankle, wrist, and foot being the most common. Mean duration of the observation period was 22 years, meaning that, on average, the analysis followed women into their 60s.
In women with natural menopause at age ≥45, menopause at a lower age was associated with more future fractures. Using Cox proportional hazards regression and accounting for race/ethnicity, BMI, cigarette use, alcohol intake, prior fracture, diabetes status, exposure to bone-beneficial or bone-detrimental medications and/or vitamin D or calcium, and study site, the hazard for incident fracture was 5% greater for each 1-year decrement in age at FMP (P = 0.02) (Table 3). Thus, the hazard for fracture was 23% and 34% greater in women with menopause at age 47 vs menopause at ages 52 and 55, respectively. In terms of fracture risk, the estimated 20-year cumulative fracture probability in women with FMP at age 47 was 4.1% greater than in women with FMP at age 52 (20.2% vs16.1%) and 6.3% greater than in women with FMP at age 55 (20.2% vs 13.9%). A diagnosis of diabetes and prior fracture were related to more future fractures. Compared to white women, black and Japanese women had lower rates of fractures.
Table 3.
Hazard ratio for incident fracture (95% CI) | P-value | |
---|---|---|
Age at FMP, years | 0.95 (0.91, 0.99) | 0.02 |
Race/ethnicity | ||
Black | 0.55 (0.46, 0.75) | 0.0002 |
Chinese | 0.73 (0.41, 1.31) | 0.2 |
Hispanic | 0.50 (0.22, 1.14) | 0.1 |
Japanese | 0.47 (0.27, 0.84) | 0.01 |
White | Reference | |
Fracture before age 40, yes/no | 1.62 (1.17, 2.23) | 0.003 |
Diabetes status, yes/no | 1.81 (1.14, 2.89) | 0.01 |
Associations were determined by Cox proportional hazards regression with time to first fracture as the outcome and age at FMP as primary predictor. The model was adjusted for race/ethnicity, BMI, history of fracture before age 40, cigarette use, alcohol intake, diabetes status, exposure to bone-beneficial or bone-detrimental medications and/or vitamin D or calcium supplementation, and study site. Bone-beneficial medications included hormone therapy, calcitonin, calcitriol, bisphosphonates, denosumab, and parathyroid hormone. Bone-detrimental medications included oral or injectable glucocorticoids, aromatase inhibitors, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, or anti-epileptic medications.
Abbreviation: FMP, final menstrual period.
Lastly, we examined whether FMP at a lower age was associated with subsequent fracture, independent of baseline BMD using a subset of 1146 women from the fracture analysis sample recruited from Bone Cohort sites. Of these volunteers, 224 sustained an incident fracture. In Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for the same covariates as previously listed, plus baseline LS or FN BMD and baseline MT stage, each 1-year decrement in age at FMP was associated with a 5% greater hazard for incident fracture hazard (hazard ratio = 0.95, P = 0.04). Higher starting LS and FN BMD were associated with lower rates of subsequent fracture, independent of age at FMP. Each SD greater BMD at the LS and FN was associated with 33% and 31% lower fracture hazard (P < 0.0001), respectively.
Discussion
The objectives of this study were to examine whether the number of years since the FMP (in women whose FMP occurs at age ≥45) is more strongly associated with postmenopausal BMD than chronological age and whether earlier menopause is related to more fractures. Our analyses demonstrate that among postmenopausal women, the number of years elapsed since the FMP is more strongly associated with LS and FN BMD than chronological age. In fact, chronological age did not predict BMD at the FN after accounting for years since the FMP and was associated with greater BMD at the LS. The unexpected positive association between chronological age and LS BMD (for a given number of years since the FMP) is likely a reflection of age-associated degenerative changes causing false elevations in BMD measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (43). Our analysis also demonstrated that lower age at FMP is associated with greater incidence of fractures.
Menopause before age 45 is commonly considered a risk factor for lower BMD and fractures (21-28), but the relation between age at FMP with subsequent BMD and fractures in women who have their FMP at age ≥45 is less certain (29). For example, the Women’s Health Initiative published that women with primary ovarian insufficiency (FMP before age 40) had lower BMD and a 21% greater fracture hazard compared to women whose FMP occurred after age 50 (21). More recently, a meta-analysis of over 460 000 women reported that menopause before age 45 was associated with a 36% greater odds of fracture (28).
Our study contributes to the current body of literature by specifically examining the relation between age at FMP with subsequent BMD and fracture in women whose FMPs occurred at age ≥45. This population is important to study because ~90% of women transition to postmenopause after age 45 (40). Indeed, in this group of women, the gradient of risk between age at FMP with fracture was substantial: the absolute difference in 20-year cumulative fracture probability was 6.3% greater for women with menopause at age 47 vs 55 years. Our results are consistent with findings from the Malmo Perimenopausal Study, which revealed that menopause before age 47 was associated with an 83% and 59% greater risk of densitometric osteoporosis and fracture, respectively, by age 77 (29). In contrast to the Malmo study, we only included women with an age at FMP of ≥45 so that women with menopause before age 45 would not drive our results.
Physiologically, earlier FMP means earlier MT-related acceleration in BMD loss and worse bone outcomes in later life. BMD decline accelerates approximately 1 year before the FMP, decreases at its greatest rate during the MT (1 year before to 2 years after the FMP), and persists at a lower rate in postmenopause (14). In turn, rapid MT-related and postmenopausal bone loss is accompanied by declines in bone quality and strength (15-17). It is, therefore, not surprising that earlier menopause means lower BMD at a given chronological age and more fractures. These results add to a growing body of literature suggesting that the endocrine changes that occur during the MT trigger a pathophysiologic cascade that leads to organ dysfunction (44). Within this construct, earlier menopause has been proposed as a marker for more advanced biological age (2). To date, adverse cardiovascular events and outcomes, frailty, and even shorter life expectancy have all been linked to lower age at FMP (1-13).
Clinically, knowing that time since the FMP is more strongly related to postmenopausal BMD than chronological age and that earlier menopause is a risk factor for fractures may ultimately aid prediction of these outcomes. Future studies should examine whether years since the FMP predicts major osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures, specifically and, if so, whether replacing chronological age with years since the FMP improves the performance of clinical prediction tools, such as FRAX (39).
A methodologic strength of this study is that, in SWAN, age at FMP was collected during real-time, observational follow-up. This may be one reason that we were able to discern relations of age at FMP with BMD and fracture risk, whereas other studies that ascertained age at FMP by recall (often decades after participants transitioned to postmenopause) (34-38) could not. Our study has several limitations that warrant mention. First, while fractures of the spine and hip are associated with the greatest morbidity and mortality (45,46), the majority of fractures sustained in our younger study cohort occurred at distal appendicular sites. In addition, we did not have a sufficient number of fractures at each anatomic site to examine the association of age at FMP with fracture type. Despite these limitations, identifying risk factors for distal appendicular fractures is clinically important, as distal appendicular fractures are harbingers of future spine and hip fractures (47-52). Lastly, because the number of fracture events in nonwhite women was relatively small, we did not have sufficient power to formally test whether the associations of age at FMP with postmenopausal BMD and incident fracture were modified by race/ethnicity.
Conclusion
To summarize, this study demonstrates that in women who become postmenopausal at age ≥45, lower age at FMP is associated with lower postmenopausal BMD and more future fractures. Future studies will examine whether combining age at FMP with other clinical and biochemical factors can improve risk stratification for future fractures.
Acknowledgments
We thank the study staff at each site and all the women who participated in SWAN.
Author Contributions: Study design: A.S., G.A.G., and A.S.K. Data acquisition: G.A.G., J.A..C, S.B., C.K., and A.S.K. Data analysis: K.M.R. and Y.L. Data interpretation: A.S., G.A.G., J.A.C., C.K., J.C.L., and A.S.K. Drafting manuscript: A.S., G.A.G., and A.S.K. Revising manuscript content: A.S., K.M.R., G.A.G., Y.L., J.A.C., S.B., C.K., and A.S.K. Approving final version of manuscript: A.S., K.M.R., G.A.G., Y.L., J.A.C., S.B., C.K., and A.S.K. A.S. and Y.L. had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Supporting Grants/Fellowships: The Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN) has grant support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services, through the National Institute on Aging (NIA), the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) and the NIH Office of Research on Women’s Health (ORWH) (Grants NR004061; AG012505, AG012535, AG012531, AG012539, AG012546, AG012553, AG012554, AG012495). The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIA, NINR, ORWH, or the NIH.
Clinical Centers: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor—Siobán Harlow, PI 2011-present, MaryFran Sowers, PI 1994-2011; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA—Joel Finkelstein, PI 1999-present; Robert Neer, PI 1994-1999; Rush University, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL—Howard Kravitz, PI 2009-present, Lynda Powell, PI 1994-2009; University of California, Davis/Kaiser—Ellen Gold, PI; University of California, Los Angeles—Gail Greendale, PI; Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY—Carol Derby, PI 2011-present, Rachel Wildman, PI 2010-2011; Nanette Santoro, PI 2004-2010; University of Medicine and Dentistry—New Jersey Medical School, Newark—Gerson Weiss, PI 1994-2004; and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA—Karen Matthews, PI.
NIH Program Office: National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, MD—Chhanda Dutta 2016-present; Winifred Rossi 2012-2016; Sherry Sherman 1994-2012; Marcia Ory 1994-2001; National Institute of Nursing Research, Bethesda, MD—Program Officers.
Central Laboratory: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor—Daniel McConnell (Central Ligand Assay Satellite Services).
Coordinating Center: University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA—Maria Mori Brooks, PI 2012-present; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell, PI 2001-2012; New England Research Institutes, Watertown, MA—Sonja McKinlay, PI 1995-2001.
Steering Committee: Susan Johnson, Current Chair, and Chris Gallagher, Former Chair.
Additional Information
Disclosure Statement: The authors have nothing to disclose.
Data Availability: Some or all data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
- 1. Gold EB. The timing of the age at which natural menopause occurs. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2011;38(3):425-440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Levine ME, Lu AT, Chen BH, et al. Menopause accelerates biological aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(33):9327-9332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Muka T, Oliver-Williams C, Kunutsor S, et al. Association of age at onset of menopause and time since onset of menopause with cardiovascular outcomes, intermediate vascular traits, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(7):767-776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Appiah D, Schreiner PJ, Demerath EW, Loehr LR, Chang PP, Folsom AR. Association of age at menopause with incident heart failure: a prospective cohort study and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(8):e003769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Cooper GS, Sandler DP. Age at natural menopause and mortality. Ann Epidemiol. 1998;8(4):229-235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. van der Schouw YT, van der Graaf Y, Steyerberg EW, Eijkemans JC, Banga JD. Age at menopause as a risk factor for cardiovascular mortality. Lancet. 1996;347(9003):714-718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Verschoor CP, Tamim H. Frailty is inversely related to age at menopause and elevated in women who have had a hysterectomy: an analysis of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019;74(5):749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Velez MP, Alvarado BE, Rosendaal N, et al. Age at natural menopause and physical functioning in postmenopausal women: the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Menopause. 2019;26(9):958-965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Jacobsen BK, Heuch I, Kvåle G. Age at natural menopause and all-cause mortality: a 37-year follow-up of 19 731 Norwegian women. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(10):923-929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Ossewaarde ME, Bots ML, Verbeek AL, et al. Age at menopause, cause-specific mortality and total life expectancy. Epidemiology. 2005;16(4):556-562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Kritz-Silverstein D, Barrett-Connor E. Early menopause, number of reproductive years, and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Am J Public Health. 1993;83(7):983-988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Cui R, Iso H, Toyoshima H, et al. ; JACC Study Group . Relationships of age at menarche and menopause, and reproductive year with mortality from cardiovascular disease in Japanese postmenopausal women: the JACC study. J Epidemiol. 2006;16(5):177-184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Hu FB, Grodstein F, Hennekens CH, et al. Age at natural menopause and risk of cardiovascular disease. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(10):1061-1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Greendale GA, Sowers M, Han W, et al. Bone mineral density loss in relation to the final menstrual period in a multiethnic cohort: results from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(1):111-118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Greendale GA, Huang M, Cauley JA, et al. Trabecular bone score declines during the menopause transition: the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(4):e1872-e1882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Akhter MP, Lappe JM, Davies KM, Recker RR. Transmenopausal changes in the trabecular bone structure. Bone. 2007;41(1):111-116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ishii S, Cauley JA, Greendale GA, et al. Trajectories of femoral neck strength in relation to the final menstrual period in a multi-ethnic cohort. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(9):2471-2481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. van Staa TP, Dennison EM, Leufkens HG, Cooper C. Epidemiology of fractures in England and Wales. Bone. 2001;29(6):517-522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, Abbott TA 3rd, Berger M. Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15(4):721-739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Hansen MA, Overgaard K, Riis BJ, Christiansen C. Role of peak bone mass and bone loss in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 12 year study. BMJ. 1991;303(6808):961-964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Sullivan SD, Lehman A, Thomas F, et al. Effects of self-reported age at nonsurgical menopause on time to first fracture and bone mineral density in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. Menopause. 2015;22(10):1035-1044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Johansson C, Mellström D. An earlier fracture as a risk factor for new fracture and its association with smoking and menopausal age in women. Maturitas. 1996;24(1–2):97-106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Gärdsell P, Johnell O, Nilsson BE. The impact of menopausal age on future fragility fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res. 1991;6(5):429-433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Hadjidakis DJ, Kokkinakis EP, Sfakianakis ME, Raptis SA. Bone density patterns after normal and premature menopause. Maturitas. 2003;44(4):279-286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. van der Klift M, de Laet CE, McCloskey EV, et al. Risk factors for incident vertebral fractures in men and women: the Rotterdam Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2004;19(7):1172-1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Paganini-Hill A, Atchison KA, Gornbein JA, Nattiv A, Service SK, White SC. Menstrual and reproductive factors and fracture risk: the Leisure World Cohort Study. J Women’s Health 2005;14(9):808-819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Francucci CM, Romagni P, Camilletti A, et al. Effect of natural early menopause on bone mineral density. Maturitas. 2008;59(4):323-328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Anagnostis P, Siolos P, Gkekas NK, et al. Association between age at menopause and fracture risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine. 2019;63(2):213-224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Svejme O, Ahlborg HG, Nilsson JÅ, Karlsson MK. Early menopause and risk of osteoporosis, fracture and mortality: a 34-year prospective observational study in 390 women. BJOG. 2012;119(7):810-816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Kelsey JL, Browner WS, Seeley DG, Nevitt MC, Cummings SR. Risk factors for fractures of the distal forearm and proximal humerus. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;135(5):477-489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Pouillès JM, Trémollières F, Bonneu M, Ribot C. Influence of early age at menopause on vertebral bone mass. J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9(3):311-315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Kuh D, Muthuri S, Cooper R, et al. Menopause, reproductive life, hormone replacement therapy, and bone phenotype at age 60-64 years: a British Birth Cohort. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(10):3827-3837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Cumming RG, Klineberg RJ. Breastfeeding and other reproductive factors and the risk of hip fractures in elderly women. Int J Epidemiol. 1993;22(4):684-691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Cummings SR, Nevitt MC, Browner WS, et al. Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(12):767-773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Papaioannou A, Joseph L, Ioannidis G, et al. Risk factors associated with incident clinical vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal women: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(5):568-578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Banks E, Reeves GK, Beral V, Balkwill A, Liu B, Roddam A; Million Women Study Collaborators . Hip fracture incidence in relation to age, menopausal status, and age at menopause: prospective analysis. PLoS Med. 2009;6(11):e1000181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Gerdhem P, Obrant KJ. Bone mineral density in old age: the influence of age at menarche and menopause. J Bone Miner Metab. 2004;22(4):372-375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Johansson C, Mellström D, Milsom I. Reproductive factors as predictors of bone density and fractures in women at the age of 70. Maturitas. 1993;17(1):39-50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E. FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19(4):385-397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Appiah D, Nwabuo CC, Ebong IA, Wellons MF, Winters SJ. Trends in age at natural menopause and reproductive life span among US women, 1959-2018. JAMA. 2021;325(13):1328-1330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Sowers M, Crawford S, Sternfeld B, et al. SWAN: a multi-center, multi-ethnic, community-based cohort study of women and the menopausal transition. In: Lobo R, Kelsey J, Marcus R, eds. Menopause: Biology and Pathobiology. Academic Press; 2000:175-188. [Google Scholar]
- 42. Mackey DC, Lui LY, Cawthon PM, et al. ; Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) and Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS) Research Groups . High-trauma fractures and low bone mineral density in older women and men. JAMA. 2007;298(20):2381-2388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Tenne M, McGuigan F, Besjakov J, Gerdhem P, Åkesson K. Degenerative changes at the lumbar spine–implications for bone mineral density measurement in elderly women. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(4):1419-1428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Rocca WA, Shuster LT, Grossardt BR, et al. Long-term effects of bilateral oophorectomy on brain aging: unanswered questions from the Mayo Clinic Cohort Study of Oophorectomy and Aging. Womens Health (Lond). 2009;5(1):39-48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Forsén L, Sogaard AJ, Meyer HE, Edna T, Kopjar B. Survival after hip fracture: short- and long-term excess mortality according to age and gender. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10(1):73-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Gehlbach SH, Burge RT, Puleo E, Klar J. Hospital care of osteoporosis-related vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14(1):53-60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. van Staa TP, Leufkens HG, Cooper C. Does a fracture at one site predict later fractures at other sites? A British cohort study. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13(8):624-629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Cuddihy MT, Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ 3rd. Forearm fractures as predictors of subsequent osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 1999;9(6):469-475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Gehlbach S, Saag KG, Adachi JD, et al. Previous fractures at multiple sites increase the risk for subsequent fractures: the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(3):645-653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Warriner AH, Patkar NM, Curtis JR, et al. Which fractures are most attributable to osteoporosis? J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(1):46-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Barrett-Connor E, Sajjan SG, Siris ES, Miller PD, Chen YT, Markson LE. Wrist fracture as a predictor of future fractures in younger versus older postmenopausal women: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA). Osteoporos Int. 2008;19(5):607-613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Crandall CJ, Hovey KM, Cauley JA, et al. Wrist fracture and risk of subsequent fracture: findings from the Women’s Health Initiative Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2015;30(11):2086-2095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]