Skip to main content
In Vivo logoLink to In Vivo
. 2022 Jan 3;36(1):221–226. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12694

Beneficiary Effect of Fibrin Glue on Healing of Ileoileal Anastomoses in Rats

IOANNIS GEROGIANNIS 1, APOSTOLOS PAPALOIS 2, DIMITRA PSALLA 3, APOSTOLOS KAMBAROUDIS 4
PMCID: PMC8765189  PMID: 34972718

Abstract

Background/Aim: Intestinal anastomosis’ integrity is crucial in surgery. This study aimed to investigate whether fibrin glue (FG) (a fibrin sealant containing human factor XII and fibrinogen) has a positive effect on the healing and the integrity of the ileoileal anastomosis in rats. Materials and Methods: Twenty Wistar rats underwent enterotomy, ileoileal anastomosis and divided into four groups (A: complete anastomosis-no FG, B: complete anastomosis-FG, C: incomplete anastomosis-no FG, D: incomplete anastomosis-FG). Data included leak, adhesions, bursting pressure of the anastomosis, neo­angiogenesis, and hydroxyproline levels. Results: Angiogenesis was significantly higher in group B compared to group A (p=0.019). There were no significant differences between groups A and B regarding adhesions, hydroxyproline, and bursting pressure (p=0.500, p=0.158 and p=0.829, respectively). Hydroxyproline levels were higher in group D compared to C, but did not reach significance (p=0.098). Conclusion: Fibrin glue has a positive effect on ileoileal anastomoses. It is not entirely clear whether this effect is due to mechanical support or to the facilitation of the healing process or both. Further research is needed before FG can be applied to humans.

Keywords: Glue, bowel, ileoileal, anastomosis, hydroxyproline, healing


Small bowel anastomoses, and especially ileoileal ones, are ubiquitously present in every general surgeon’s practice. A safe healing of the anastomosis is crucial for the outcome of the operation and the recovery of the patient after a simple or a complex abdominal procedure. Ileoileal anastomoses are performed in case of small bowel obstruction and strangulated hernias, trauma, Crohn’s disease or reversal of ileostomy. Although anastomosis can be safe when performed on a patient with no comorbidities, the procedure is clean and the surgeon is experienced, some anastomoses continue to leak. Published studies report that the overall morbidity is 22.8% and mortality 2.5% (1).

Hence there is an ongoing need to discover innovative solutions to improve the strength of the anastomosis, and reduce the possibility of a leak, other post-operative complications and finally mortality. To achieve this goal, various techniques or materials have been applied. However, only few studies are using fibrin glue (FG) for small bowel anastomoses and the results are inconclusive.

FG is a fibrin sealant containing human factor XII with human fibrinogen. It is used for haemostasis during surgical procedures, when control of bleeding by conventional surgical techniques is ineffective or impractical (as a sealant) and as an adjunct for closure of colostomies and for mesh fixation in repair of abdominal hernias. Mimicking the coagulation process, FG forms an insoluble fibrin clot which appears as a white, elastic mass which firmly adheres to tissue and which can be used to achieve haemostasis or seal tissue sealing (2,3).

In this study, we performed an ileoileal anastomosis on rats using a specific surgical technique and applying FG on the suture line. Our aim was to investigate whether FG can have a positive effect on the healing and the integrity of the anastomosis.

Materials and Methods

Twenty female Wistar rats with mean body weight of 244 g were used for our study. The experiments were performed at the animal laboratory of ELPEN’s Experimental – Research Center, Athens, Greece. The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Veterinary Government Department of Attika with Protocol number 20-19.01/2012 and 357-05/02/2013. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

The ELPEN Experimental – Research Center provided specialised personnel to facilitate the progress of the experiments and a specialised veterinary surgeon who supervised the experimental process.

The animals were housed to a standard animal facility with a temperature range between 20-26˚C, 50-60% humidity and adequate ventilation with 12/12-hour daylight/darkness. They had free access to pellet type food (Ratti-Topi, Company Vergerio Mangimi s.r.l., Padova, Italy) and water throughout the whole process.

Experimental design.

Groups. According to the type of the anastomosis and the use of FG the animals were divided into 4 groups. All animals underwent a laparotomy, enterotomy of their ileum and end-to-end handsewn ileoileal anastomosis. Five animals had a complete end to end ileoileal anastomosis with no FG (group A). Five animals had an incomplete end to end ileoileal anastomosis with no FG (group C). Five animals had a complete end to end ileoileal anastomosis and FG was used on the suture line to study its effect on the healing and integrity of the anastomosis, (group B). Five animals had an incomplete end to end ileoileal anastomosis and FG was used on the suture line (group D).

Anaesthesia. Animals were anaesthetised by intramuscular injection of a Ketamine 100 mg/kg and Xylazine 10 mg/kg solution. After the induction of anaesthesia and prior to the laparotomy, animals were left for 15 minutes in a quiet and dark environment. An extra anaesthetic dose, equal to the 1/3 of the initial one, administered in case there was a need for more anaesthetic.

Operative procedure. Laparotomy was performed after shaving the abdominal wall and applying antiseptic solution (povidone iodine 10%). A midline incision was used to enter in the peritoneal cavity. The caecum was identified and then a part of the small bowel was carefully pulled out of the abdomen in order to preserve its vascularity and not traumatise its mesentery. Furthermore, a protective gauze was placed around it to prevent spillage of contents during the enterotomy, which was performed approximately 15 cm from the ileocaecal junction. Post-enterotomy, the contents from the efferent and the afferent lumen were washed out and an end-to-end handsewn anastomosis was performed with Polypropylene suture 6-0 in an interrupted full thickness manner.

To avoid a tight anastomosis, a small 8 Fr plastic tube was inserted in both lumens and removed before inserting the last two sutures (Figure 1). The number of the interrupted sutures were between 6 and 8, depending on the diameter of the ileum of each animal. A wash out of the abdominal cavity was performed with normal saline and the anterior abdominal wall was closed in one layer with a continuous Silk 3-0 suture. Povidone Iodine Solution 10% was applied on the wound.

Figure 1. End to end handsewn ileoileal anastomosis with use of plastic catheter 8 Fr.

Figure 1

In the case of incomplete anastomosis, the same procedure was applied except no further sutures were applied after the removal of the plastic tube. In the treatment groups, FG was applied on the suture line in order to fully cover it irrespective of the type of anastomosis (complete or incomplete). We used FG meticulously to prevent spillage of the FG to surrounding tissues and intrabdominal organs (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Application of the fibrin glue on the anastomosis.

Figure 2

Post-operative care. At the end of the experiment, the animals were placed in cages with infrared beam and observed for an hour until they recovered completely and had adequate mobilisation. Post operatively animals received clear fluids for the first 12 hours and free diet after that. The animals received analgesia and antibiotics for 2 days post-operatively (Carprofen 5 mg/kg/24 h subcutaneously and Enrofloxacin 10 mg/kg/24 h, respectively).

Sacrifice. Animals were sacrificed on the 7th post-operative day after intramuscular administration of ketamine 100 mg/kg and xylazine 10 mg/kg followed by a high dose of intravenous pentobarbital.

A laparotomy was performed after application of povidone iodine solution 10% on the previous midline incision and removal of the silk sutures. After entering the peritoneal cavity, an assessment was performed and the findings were recorded (presence of peritonitis, free fluid, pus, reactive fluid or enteral contents, collections or adhesions).

Study outcomes. The evaluation of the adhesions was made according to the Van de Ham’s scoring system (0: no adhesions; 1: adhesions towards the anastomosis line from the omentum; 2: adhesions of bowel and omentum towards the anastomosis line; 3: extensive adhesions towards the anastomosis line and contemporary presence of abscess) (4).

After isolating a part of the ileum measuring 10 cm including the anastomosis, we performed small bowel resection. A washout of any intraluminal contents was performed in order to clean the bowel. To measure the bursting pressure of the anastomosis, two catheters 14G were placed and fixed with 3-0 silk on both ends of the bowel segment (Figure 3). On one end a pump containing normal saline was used with a rate of 0.5 ml/min and the other end was connected with an electronic sensor for continuous monitoring of the intraluminal pressure (mmHg). After the measurements, the anastomotic site was removed and specimens were collected and sent for histopathologic and biochemical analysis (Figure 4). For histology, the specimens were preserved in formalin 10% and for biochemical analysis the specimens were placed at –70˚C. The resulting paraffin-embedded sections of 3-5 μm underwent haematoxylin- eosin (H&E) staining and were scored according to the scale used by Erlich and Hunt modified by Phillips (5).

Figure 3. Measurement of bursting pressure of the anastomosis.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Small bowel specimen with the anastomotic suture line.

Figure 4

Neoangiogenesis was scored using a 5-point scale (0: No angiogenesis present, 1: minimal, 2: few, 3: many, 4: maximum).

Statistical analysis. Data collection and analysis of the results was performed with adherence to data protection principles. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software (SPSS 20, Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics are expressed as frequencies and percentages for categorical and as medians with range for continuous variables. To compare study outcomes between groups we used chi-square test, Fisher exact and the Mann-Whitney U-test (for analysing the relationship between categorical and continuous variables respectively). Statistical significance was set at p-value <0.05.

Results

A total of 20 animals were used. Table I presents the comparison between the control group and the FG group irrespectively of the type of anastomosis. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in regard to the number of adhesions, presence of peritonitis and the bursting pressure (p=0.175, p=0.500, and p=0.429 respectively).

Table I. Comparison of study outcomes between animals grouped according to the use of fibrin glue (irrespectively of the type of anastomosis performed).

graphic file with name in_vivo-36-224-i0001.jpg

p<0.05 was considered significant.

The levels of hydroxyproline approached, but did not reach, significance between the 2 groups (p=0.064) with the FG group having a higher level than the control group (1,307 vs. 746 respectively).

The level of angiogenesis between the 2 groups was statistically significantly different; 90% of animals in the FG group showed angiogenesis levels of 3 and 4 compared to 50% of animals in the control group (p=0.011).

Table II presents the study outcomes only for the animals that had a complete anastomosis (n=10). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in regard to the number of adhesions, hydroxyproline levels and bursting pressure (p=0.500, p=0.158, and p=0.829 respectively). There were no animals with leaks or peritonitis in both groups.

Table II. Comparison of study outcomes between animals grouped according to the use of fibrin glue (only for animals with a complete anastomosis).

graphic file with name in_vivo-36-224-i0002.jpg

p<0.05 was considered significant.

The level of angiogenesis between the two groups was statistically significantly different; 80% of animals in the FG group showed angiogenesis levels 3 and 4, compared to 20% of animals in the control group (p=0.019).

Table III presents the study outcomes only for the animals that had incomplete anastomosis (n=10). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in regard to the number of adhesions, presence of peritonitis, hydroxyproline levels, bursting pressure and neoangiogenesis (p=0.222, p=0.500, p=0.098, p=0.261 and p=0.368 respectively). There were no animals with leaks in both groups.

Table III. Comparison outcomes between animals grouped according to the use of fibrin glue (only for animals with an incomplete anastomosis).

graphic file with name in_vivo-36-225-i0001.jpg

p<0.05 was considered significant.

Discussion

Adhesions are formed during healing; hence they appear more or less after most intrabdominal procedures. Adhesions usually have a positive effect on the anastomotic healing process, because they appear to cover small defects of the suture line and offer more vascularity in hypoperfused areas of the anastomosis (6,7).

We showed that FG promotes the formation of adhesions around the anastomosis on the 7th post-operative day irrespectively of the type of anastomosis, but the results did not reach statistical significance. Ozel et al. reported a higher rate of adhesions in the group of rats that received a fibrin sealant compared to the control group (8).

Anastomotic leak is one of the most important indicators of the healing of the anastomosis. Early leak is a sign of intraoperative technical failure and it usually happens between the 7th to 8th post-operative day (9-12). In our study there was no difference in the leak rates between the diagnostic groups.

Bursting pressure is a reliable index for identifying the grade of strength and integrity of the anastomosis. We used the Laplace equation to measure the resistance of the bowel wall as the intraluminal pressure gradually increases (13,14). Van der Vijver et al. also studied small bowel anastomosis and found that the bursting pressure was lower in the group that used a type of FG (3). However, in our study, bursting pressure was higher, but not statistically significantly different, in all FG groups compared to the control group. Furthermore, it seems that even if there is an anastomotic defect (translated as an intraoperative technical error), the use of FG can strengthen the anastomosis.

Neoangiogenesis can be an important parameter of anastomotic healing as it increases vascularity and promotes new tissue formation (15-18). In our study, the FG groups showed significant neoangiogenesis compared to control groups. That could potentially mean that during the first seven post-operative days, FG plays an important role in neoangiogenesis and therefore in anastomotic healing.

The value of our study lies in investigating the usefulness of FG in small bowel anastomosis. Future studies could use a higher number of animals to further consolidate our results and determine the time course of the histopathologic changes postoperatively.

Conclusion

In conclusion, FG seems to have a positive effect on ileoileal anastomoses. However, it is not entirely clear if this effect is due to mechanical support or to facilitation of the healing process. The above results are in agreement with a recent review by Nordentoft et al. who reported that FG does not have a consistent positive influence on the healing of gastrointestinal anastomoses (19). Further research is needed to determine the exact effect of FG on small bowel anastomosis with an aim to use it as an intraoperative adjunct during bowel resections in humans.

Conflicts of Interest

The Authors have no conflicts of interest in relation to this study.

Authors’ Contributions

Ioannis Gerogiannis designed the study, performed the laboratory experiments and wrote the manuscript, Apostolos Papalois provided the scholarship via ELPEN Center and supervised the laboratory experiments, Dimitra Psalla supervised the statistical analysis and the interpretation of the results, and Apostolos Kambaroudis was the supervisor.

Acknowledgements

The Authors thank ELPEN Experimental – Research Center for the scholarship that they offered in order for this experimental study to be completed. Ioannis Gerogiannis was the recipient of the scholarship.

References

  • 1.Saha AK, Tapping CR, Foley GT, Baker RP, Sagar PM, Burke DA, Sue-Ling HM, Finan PJ. Morbidity and mortality after closure of loop ileostomy. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11(8):866–871. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01708.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nordentoft T. Sealing of gastrointestinal anastomoses with fibrin glue coated collagen patch. Dan Med J. 2015;62(5):B5081. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.van der Vijver RJ, van Laarhoven CJ, de Man BM, Lomme RM, Hendriks T. The effect of fibrin glue on the early healing phase of intestinal anastomoses in the rat. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27(8):1101–1107. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1435-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.van der Ham AC, Kort WJ, Weijma IM, van den Ingh HF, Jeekel H. Healing of ischemic colonic anastomosis: fibrin sealant does not improve wound healing. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35(9):884–891. doi: 10.1007/BF02047878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ehrlich HP, Tarver H, Hunt TK. Effects of vitamin A and glucocorticoids upon inflammation and collagen synthesis. Ann Surg. 1973;177(2):222–227. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197302000-00017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kanellos I, Odisseos C, Zaraboukas T, Kavouni A, Galovatsea K, Dadoukis I. Colonic healing after early intraperitoneal administration of 5-fluorouracil and interferon in rats. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1997;12(1):45–48. doi: 10.1007/s003840050078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kanellos I, Kavouni A, Zaraboukas T, Odisseos C, Galovatsea K, Dadoukis I. Influence of intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid on the healing of colonic anastomoses in rats. Eur Surg Res. 1996;28(5):374–379. doi: 10.1159/000129479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ozel SK, Kazez A, Akpolat N. Does a fibrin-collagen patch support early anastomotic healing in the colon? An experimental study. Tech Coloproctol. 2006;10(3):233–236. doi: 10.1007/s10151-006-0285-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zacharakis E, Demetriades H, Kanellos D, Sapidis N, Zacharakis E, Mantzoros I, Kanellos I, Koliakos G, Zaraboukas T, Topouridou K, Betsis D. Contribution of insulin-like growth factor I to the healing of colonic anastomoses in rats. J Invest Surg. 2007;20(1):9–14. doi: 10.1080/08941930601126074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kanellos I, Vasiliadis K, Angelopoulos S, Tsachalis T, Pramateftakis MG, Mantzoros I, Betsis D. Anastomotic leakage following anterior resection for rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2004;8 Suppl 1:s79–s81. doi: 10.1007/s10151-004-0119-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Villar JM, Martinez AP, Villegas MT, Muffak K, Mansilla A, Garrote D, Ferron JA. Surgical options for malignant left-sided colonic obstruction. Surg Today. 2005;35(4):275–281. doi: 10.1007/s00595-004-2931-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.El-Malt M, Ceelen W, Boterberg T, Claeys G, de Hemptinne B, de Neve W, Pattyn P. Does the addition of glutamine to total parenteral nutrition have beneficial effect on the healing of colon anastomosis and bacterial translocation after preoperative radiotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol. 2003;26(3):e54–e59. doi: 10.1097/01.COC.0000072505.67810.B1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kanellos I, Mantzoros I, Demetriades H, Kalfadis S, Kelpis T, Sakkas L, Betsis D. Healing of colon anastomoses covered with fibrin glue after immediate postoperative intraperitoneal administration of 5-fluorouracil. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(4):510–515. doi: 10.1007/s10350-003-0085-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cihan A, Armutcu F, Uçan BH, Acun Z, Numanoglu VK, Gürel A, Ulukent SC. Comparison of the measurement methods of bursting pressure of intestinal anastomoses. Hepatogastroenterology. 2003;50(Suppl 2):ccxxxii–ccxxxiv. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Distler JH, Hirth A, Kurowska-Stolarska M, Gay RE, Gay S, Distler O. Angiogenic and angiostatic factors in the molecular control of angiogenesis. Q J Nucl Med. 2003;47(3):149–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McNamara DA, Harmey JH, Walsh TN, Redmond HP, Bouchier-Hayes DJ. Significance of angiogenesis in cancer therapy. Br J Surg. 1998;85(8):1044–1055. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00816.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Risau W. Mechanisms of angiogenesis. Nature. 1997;386(6626):671–674. doi: 10.1038/386671a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.van der Bilt JD, Borel Rinkes IH. Surgery and angiogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1654(1):95–104. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2004.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nordentoft T, Pommergaard HC, Rosenberg J, Achiam MP. Fibrin glue does not improve healing of gastrointestinal anastomoses: a systematic review. Eur Surg Res. 2015;54(1-2):1–13. doi: 10.1159/000366418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from In Vivo are provided here courtesy of International Institute of Anticancer Research

RESOURCES