Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2000 Dec;38(12):4640–4642. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.12.4640-4642.2000

Apparent Culture-Negative Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis Caused by Peptostreptococcus magnus

Eric R van der Vorm 1,*, Arjen M Dondorp 2, Ruud J van Ketel 1, Jacob Dankert 1
PMCID: PMC87652  PMID: 11101611

Abstract

In two patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis due to Peptostreptococcus magnus, blood cultures in the BacT/Alert and BACTEC 9240 systems were signal negative. The capability of the BacT/Alert system to detect various Peptostreptococcus species was assessed. P. magnus and P. anaerobius could not be detected, and subcultures remained negative. The growth in conventional media of these two species and other Peptostreptococcus species was similar.


Gram-positive anaerobic cocci (GPAC) are commonly present in clinical specimens and are often mixed with other anaerobic or aerobic bacteria. GPAC can be involved in chronic infections of the upper respiratory tract, ears, mastoid, sinuses and teeth, intra-abdominal and female pelvic regions, subcutaneous and soft tissue abscesses, and diabetic foot ulcers, as well as in osteomyelitis and arthritis (2, 3, 7). Peptostreptococcus magnus, one of the GPAC species, is part of the normal flora of the human mucocutaneous surfaces. Although P. magnus is the most frequently isolated GPAC from clinical specimens, as well as in pure culture and from normally sterile sites, it has been scarcely reported as a cause of septicemia or native- or prosthetic-valve endocarditis (7, 8). Automated blood culture systems are developed in order to culture a broad variety of microorganisms. The anticipated pitfall of these systems is the inability to recover fastidious microorganisms with low CO2 production, such as Brucella species (12). Recently, however, false-negative cultures in an automated blood system were also reported for Pseudomonas aeruginosa as well (5). We report here two cases of prosthetic-valve endocarditis due to P. magnus which was recovered after culturing the surgically removed infected valve, whereas BacT/Alert blood cultures, incubated for 14 days, remained negative. Therefore, we assessed the capability of the BacT/Alert system to detect GPAC bacteremia.

Case 1.

The first case was a 65-year-old man who suffered from a mitral valve incompetence due to degenerative changes. The patient was scheduled for mitral valvuloplasty and a venous single graft coronary bypass on the posterior descending branch. Routine preoperative screening for infectious dental foci was negative. During the operation, valvuloplasty appeared to give insufficient results, so the mitral valve was excised and replaced with a prosthetic heart valve (Medtronic Hall number 29). The patient received cefamandole as routine surgical prophylaxis for 2 days. The postoperative course was unremarkable, and the patient was discharged 19 days after surgery. On day 23 the patient was admitted to local hospital A because of a high-grade fever (39.2°C) with cold chills. On physical examination he was hemodynamically stable and clear clicks of the prosthetic valve were present without any murmurs. The wound of the venectomy on the left leg was slightly inflamed. C-reactive-protein (CRP) levels were increased up to 157 U/liter, there was a mild normocytic anemia of 5.6 mmol/liter, and there was an increased leukocyte count of 34.2 × 109/liter, with band forms. In total, 14 blood culture sets were taken and incubated in the BACTEC 9240 system. All cultures remained negative after incubation for 2 weeks. A culture taken from the venectomy wound revealed Staphylococcus aureus, and flucloxacillin was started (6,000 mg/24 h). Despite treatment, the patient remained febrile. On day 33 after surgery, the patient developed a sudden, rapidly progressive pulmonary congestion and was referred to our hospital. On transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), a severe paravalvular leakage of the prosthetic mitral valve was demonstrated due to an almost complete dehiscence. On this valve, vegetations were observed. Two blood culture sets were taken and incubated in the BacT/Alert system, used in our laboratory. At reoperation the infected prosthetic valve was removed, the infected area was surgically cleaned, and a new Medtronic Hall prosthetic mitral valve was implanted. The removed valve was immediately transported to our laboratory in a sterile container. Several impression smears were made. Gram staining showed some destructed cells and no bacteria. Histopathologic preparations showed only degenerative changes and no bacteria. Valve parts were ground and cultured on Columbia blood agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, England), on chocolate agar (GC Agar Base; Oxoid), and in BBL Thioglycollate Medium (Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md.). Incubation was done at 5% CO2 and anaerobically at 37°C for up to 7 days. The patient was treated with vancomycin (2,000 mg/24 h), gentamicin (240 mg/24 h), and rifampin (1,200 mg/24 h). Despite maximal support, the patient died 2 days later because of untreatable cardiogenic shock. On autopsy, a dilated hypertrophic left and right ventricle was found with signs of an old infarction in the posterior wall with recent extension to the lateral side of the septum. The grafts on the posterior descending branch and the descending anterior branch were patent. There was no dehiscence of the reimplanted prosthetic heart valve. In the BacT/Alert system no growth was detected after incubation for 14 days. Subcultures of the four BacT/Alert bottles on Columbia blood agar and chocolate agar were also negative. Anaerobic culture of the removed infected heart valve yielded a few colonies of large gram-positive cocci after 48 h of incubation on blood agar. Also, the Thioglycollate Medium showed growth after 48 h. The cocci were biochemically inert, sensitive for kanamycin, and resistant for sodium polyanethol sulfonate (SPS) and were identified as P. magnus. The identification was confirmed by 16S rRNA sequencing (National Institute of Public Health, Bilthoven, The Netherlands).

Case 2.

The second case was a 39-year-old male who underwent an aortic valve replacement because of severe aortic regurgitation. Routine preoperative screening for infectious dental foci was negative. Two months after the operation dehiscence of the prosthetic valve was seen on TEE with paravalvular leakage. A few months later there were progression of the dehiscence and valvular vegetations, and aortic root abscesses could be detected by TEE. Blood cultures collected at local hospital B and incubated in the BACTEC 9240 remained negative, and no antibiotic therapy was started. The patient was referred to our hospital for a second aortic valve (Sorin 29) replacement. On admission, the CRP level was elevated (104 U/liter), and blood cultures were obtained. The removed valve was handled according to standard operating procedures as described above (case 1). The Gram staining of impression smears showed some leukocytes and sporadic gram-positive cocci. Empirical treatment was started with vancomycin (2,000 mg/24 h) and gentamicin (240 mg/24 h). Seven blood culture sets incubated for 14 days in the BacT/Alert system remained negative. P. magnus grew after 96 h of culture of the valve vegetations on blood agar and in Thioglycollate Medium. The patient was started on penicillin G (12,000,000 U/24 h) and metronidazole (1,500 mg/24 h). A few days later a third operation was necessary because of the presence of abscesses detected by TEE. A bioprosthesis (Freestyle) was inserted. The postoperative period was without complications, and the patient recovered completely. After 6 weeks of treatment, the CRP level was normal (<3 U/liter), and the antibiotics were discontinued.

The findings of these two cases prompted us to the question whether P. magnus could be detected in the BACTEC and BacT/Alert automated blood culture systems. Since we use the BacT/Alert system, assessment was done in this system. We compared the growth of P. magnus and other GPAC, including a more fastidious species (P. anaerobius) in blood culture media. The isolates from the patients (G9g1, G11a2), other isolates from our own collection, and strains from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) were used (Table 1). After 48 h of anaerobic growth a colony of GPAC was taken from a subculture, diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (Merck), and then further diluted in horse blood. Aerobic (FA) and anaerobic (FN) BacT/Alert FAN bottles were seeded with 5 ml of horse blood containing 103 to 104 GPAC CFU per ml and incubated as recommended by the manufacturer (Organon Teknika, Durham, N.C.). Simultaneously (for quantity control), 10 μl of the blood sample was plated on blood agar, and colonies were counted after 48 h of anaerobic growth. Bacterial growth in these bottles was compared with that in Thioglycollate Medium and Columbia Broth (Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md.), daily spotted by eye. Subcultures from culture-negative bottles were made on days 3, 7, and 14 on blood agar and incubated anaerobically for up to 96 h.

TABLE 1.

Growth of peptostreptococci in BacT/Alert FAN anaerobic and aerobic blood culture media, Thioglycollate Medium, and Columbia Broth supplemented with 5 ml of horse blood

Microorganism Isolate BacT/Alert FAN anaerobic (FN)
BacT/Alert FAN aerobic (FA)
TM/CBc growth (day)
Signala (day) Cultureb (day) Signala (day) Cultureb (day)
P. anaerobius AMC B10g8 No Neg No Neg 3
P. anaerobius AMC D24d8 No Neg No Neg 3
P. anaerobius ATCC 27337 No Neg No Neg 5
P. magnus AMC G9g1 No Neg No Neg 3
P. magnus AMC G11a2 No Neg No Neg 3
P. magnus ATCC 29328 No Neg No Neg 3
P. asaccharolyticus AMC B10h3 1 1 No Neg 3
P. asaccharolyticus AMC B10h4 1 1 7 7 3
P. asaccharolyticus ATCC 29743 1 1 No Neg 3
P. micros AMC A3e4 6 6 No Neg 3
P. micros AMC B10h2 2 2 6 6 3
P. micros ATCC 33270 2 2 No 14 3
P. productus ATCC 27340 1 1 No Neg 5
a

Automated detection by the BacT/Alert system for 14 days. microorganisms were reconfirmed after subculture. No, no signal. 

b

Subcultured after signaling and routinely after 3, 7, or 14 days. Neg, negative. 

c

TM/CB, Thioglycollate Medium and Columbia Broth, daily spotted by eye for bacterial growth. 

P. micros, P. asaccharolyticus, and P. productus (recently renamed as Ruminococcus productus) grew readily in the anaerobic BacT/Alert FAN bottles and were routinely detected via CO2 production. Some P. micros and P. asaccharolyticus isolates also grew in the vented aerobic BacT/Alert FAN bottle (two of six isolates automatically detected and one of six isolates after subculture; Table 1). P. magnus and P. anaerobius were not detected by the BacT/Alert FAN system, and subcultures remained negative (Table 1). P. magnus grew readily in Thioglycollate Medium and Columbia Broth. Repeated seeding experiments in BacT/Alert FAN bottles (FN) with inocula of P. magnus isolates ranging from 103 to 105 CFU/ml remained signal negative. Subcultures only revealed growth for the G9g1 isolate at an inoculum of 105 CFU/ml. There was no increase in CFU after incubation for 3 days, and subcultures after days 7 and 14 were negative. Thus, survival in the BacT/Alert system seems possible at high inocula for a limited time. The lack of growth of P. magnus in the BacT/Alert system has not been described previously to our knowledge. SPS cannot account for this finding, because the P. magnus isolates were tested for susceptibility to SPS and proved to be resistant. The reason for the inability to grow in the BacT/Alert system for P. magnus, remains unclear. Strains of P. anaerobius are known to be sensitive for SPS. Their inability to grow in the BacT/Alert system is probably due to SPS. However, some P. anaerobius strains have been detected in the routine use of the BacT/Alert system (11).

At local hospital A, where patient 1 was originally treated, 28 blood culture bottles had been taken. No growth was detected in the routine setting by their BACTEC system. When the cultures of the valve became positive, 16 bottles were still available for prolonged incubation (up to 28 days) and subculture. In only two bottles was P. magnus detected after subculture. Thus, in the BACTEC system P. magnus also does not grow readily and at least cannot be automatically detected, probably due to insufficient CO2 production.

Endocarditis caused by GPAC remains a rare event. P. micros, P. magnus, and P. anaerobius are the species that have been described in case reports so far (6, 7, 8, 10). Anaerobic bacteria are recovered from 3 to 8% of the positive blood cultures in comparative studies of various automated blood culture systems (1, 4, 9, 11, 13). Clostridium and Bacteroides species are the predominant clinical relevant anaerobic species isolated. P. micros is the most common GPAC isolate cultured from automated blood systems, probably because of its ability to produce CO2. The frequency of P. magnus in such systems may be underestimated, based on our findings. Since we were able to culture the organism from the excised valve in a case of apparent culture-negative endocarditis, P. magnus may be the etiological agent in other cases of culture-negative endocarditis and has to be taken into account when selecting empirical treatment. Remarkably, in an earlier report of prosthetic valve endocarditis, P. magnus also was only detected after culture of the infected valve (8).

In cases of bacteremia and native- or prosthetic-valve endocarditis, automated blood culture sets may be not sensitive enough to detect microorganisms such as P. magnus. Therefore, we recommend the use of additional media, such as conventional Thioglycollate Medium, for blood cultures from patients suspected for such infections.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bannister E R, Woods G L. Evaluation of routine anaerobic blood cultures in the BacT/Alert blood culture system. Am J Clin Pathol. 1995;104:279–282. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/104.3.279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bourgault A M, Rosenblatt J E, Fitzgerald R H. Peptococcus magnus: a significant human pathogen. Ann Intern Med. 1980;93:244–248. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-93-2-244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brook I. Recovery of anaerobic bacteria from clinical specimens in 12 years at two military hospitals. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26:1181–1188. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.6.1181-1188.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Doern G V, Barton A, Rao S. Controlled comparative evaluation of BacT/Alert FAN and ESP 80A aerobic media as means for detecting bacteremia and fungemia. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:2686–2689. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.9.2686-2689.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Klaerner H-G, Escchenbach U, Kamereck K, Lehn N, Wagner H, Miethke T. Failure of an automated blood culture system to detect nonfermentative gram-negative bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:1036–1041. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.3.1036-1041.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Montejo M, Ruiz-Irastorza G, Aguirrebengoa K, Amutio E, Hernandez J L, Aguirre C. Prosthetic-valve endocarditis caused by Peptostreptococcus anaerobius. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;20:1431. doi: 10.1093/clinids/20.5.1431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Murdoch D A. Gram-positive anaerobic cocci. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11:81–120. doi: 10.1128/cmr.11.1.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pouedras P, Donnio P Y, Sire J M, Avril J L. Prosthetic valve endocarditis and paravalvular abscess caused by Peptostreptococcus magnus. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;15:185. doi: 10.1093/clinids/15.1.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rohner P, Pepey B, Auckenthaler R. Comparison of BacT/Alert with Signal blood culture system. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:313–317. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.2.313-317.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wenisch C, Wiesinger E, Werkgartner T, Makristathis A, Graninger W. Treatment of Peptostreptococcus micros endocarditis with teicoplanin. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;21:446–447. doi: 10.1093/clinids/21.2.446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wilson M L, Weinstein M P, Mirrett S, Reimer L G, Feldman R J, Chuard C R, Reller L B. Controlled evaluation of BacT/Alert standard anaerobic and FAN anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:2265–2270. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2265-2270.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yagupsky P. Detection of brucellae in blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:3437–3442. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.11.3437-3442.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ziegler R, Johnscher I, Martus P, Lenhardt D, Just H M. Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of two supplemented aerobic and anaerobic media used in automated blood culture systems to detect bloodstream infections. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:657–661. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.3.657-661.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES