Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2022 Jan 18;66(1):e01400-21. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01400-21

Cyclohexyl-griselimycin Is Active against Mycobacterium abscessus in Mice

Wassihun Wedajo Aragaw a, Christine Roubert b, Evelyne Fontaine b, Sophie Lagrange b, Matthew D Zimmerman a, Véronique Dartois a,c, Martin Gengenbacher a,c, Thomas Dick a,c,d,
PMCID: PMC8765428  PMID: 34723632

ABSTRACT

Cyclohexyl-griselimycin is a preclinical candidate for use against tuberculosis (TB). Here, we show that this oral cyclodepsipeptide is also active against the intrinsically drug-resistant nontuberculous mycobacterium Mycobacterium abscessus in vitro and in a mouse model of infection. This adds a novel advanced lead compound to the M. abscessus drug pipeline and supports a strategy of screening chemical matter generated in TB drug discovery efforts to fast-track the discovery of novel antibiotics against M. abscessus.

KEYWORDS: Mycobacterium abscessus, nontuberculous mycobacteria, NTM, griselimycin, DnaN

INTRODUCTION

Mycobacterium abscessus causes difficult-to-cure lung disease. Multidrug regimens are administered for months to years and typically contain an oral macrolide (azithromycin or clarithromycin) and intravenously administered amikacin, imipenem/cefoxitin, or tigecycline. However, cure rates are low (<50%), and patients often undergo surgical lung resection, if feasible (13). Given the poor performance of the current regimens, more efficacious drugs are needed. Not surprisingly, the M. abscessus drug pipeline is thinly populated and largely focused on repurposing and reformulation of approved antibiotics. De novo drug discovery efforts (new chemotypes and/or new targets) are hindered by extremely low hit rates in screens attempting to identify chemical starting points (4, 5).

M. abscessus is intrinsically resistant to many antituberculosis (anti-TB) antibiotics, including all first-line drugs (6). Despite M. abscessus resistance to most approved antituberculars, we found that compound collections of TB actives provide a rich source for the identification of hits against M. abscessus (7). In contrast to the limited efforts in M. abscessus drug discovery, anti-TB drug discovery experienced a renaissance over the past 2 decades, resulting in a number of advanced lead series (Stop TB Working Group on New TB Drugs [https://www.newtbdrugs.org/pipeline/discovery]). The mechanism of action of many anti-TB leads has been elucidated, and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties have been optimized to enable proof-of-concept studies in animal models. Prioritization of advanced TB leads avoids the high attrition encountered in early lead optimization due to failure to introduce favorable PK properties and thus should accelerate the drug discovery process for M. abscessus. To leverage these advances, we screened TB leads against M. abscessus and identified several novel anti-M. abscessus compounds with demonstrated in vivo activity, including inhibitors of ATP synthase (8), leucyl tRNA synthetase (9, 10), and DNA gyrase (11). Expanding on this strategy, we asked whether the recently identified preclinical anti-TB candidate cyclohexyl-griselimycin (CGM) (12) is active against M. abscessus.

Griselimycins are cyclic depsipeptides that were originally isolated from Streptomyces species (13). Evidence for the anti-TB activity of these natural products goes back to their discovery in the 1960s. However, the first human studies were halted due to poor oral bioavailability (12, 14, 15). These forgotten natural products were recently revisited by investigators from Sanofi in association with TB Alliance to identify analogs with improved PK properties. The cyclohexyl analog CGM (Fig. 1) showed excellent in vitro potency and attractive oral bioavailability and efficacy in TB mouse models (12). Interestingly, resistance against this new drug candidate emerged at extremely low frequency and was associated with strong fitness costs (12). Genome analyses revealed that resistance was associated with amplification of large chromosomal segments, all containing the dnaN gene, suggesting dnaN overexpression as a mechanism of resistance (12). Indeed, binding studies and costructural analyses showed that griselimycins target mycobacterial DnaN (12).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Structure of cyclohexyl-griselimycin, CGM (12).

DnaN encodes the DNA sliding clamp, also referred to as DNA polymerase III β subunit. This DNA sliding clamp is crucial for bacterial DNA replication and repair, acting as a protein-protein interaction (PPI) hub. The protein surrounds double-stranded DNA and functions to recruit a diverse range of accessory proteins involved in DNA metabolism (1618). DnaN protein partners interact with a specific hydrophobic cleft on the DnaN clamp. Griselimycins bind to the same cleft, disrupting DnaN PPIs, as shown by elegant biochemical analyses (12). On-target activity was recently confirmed by de Wet and colleagues in intact mycobacteria (19). By combining inducible CRISPR interference and image-based analyses of morphological features in mycobacteria, the authors demonstrated that griselimycin copied the phenotype of a dnaN knockdown (19). Fluorescence microscopy analyses further demonstrated that griselimycins cause replisome instability and affect the structure of the nucleoid in vivo (20). Thus, the peptide antibiotic griselimycin corrupts DnaN-dependent machines involved in genome copying and maintenance by acting as a PPI inhibitor.

Interestingly, CGM not only was potent in vitro against Mycobacterium tuberculosis but also was active against the nonpathogenic mycobacterial model organism Mycobacterium smegmatis (12). To determine whether CGM retained activity against the opportunistic pathogen M. abscessus, we measured its MIC against reference strains and clinical isolates of the three M. abscessus complex subspecies, using CGM from Evotec’s compound archive (12). Dose-response curves were established using the broth dilution method in Middlebrook 7H9 medium (BD Difco) and optical density at 600 nm (OD600) as the readout for growth (21). CGM exhibited uniform submicromolar growth-inhibitory activity against all M. abscessus strains tested (Table 1), suggesting that CGM is broadly active against the M. abscessus complex.

TABLE 1.

In vitro activity of cyclohexyl-griselimycin (CGM) against M. abscessus

Strainsb erm(41) sequevarc CLR sensitivityc MIC (μM)a
CGM CLR
Culture collection reference strains
 M. abscessus subsp. abscessus ATCC 19977 T28 Resistant 0.5 3
 M. abscessus subsp. massiliense CCUG 48898T Deletion Sensitive 0.8 0.8
 M. abscessus subsp. bolletii CCUG 50184T T28 Resistant 0.8 6
Clinical isolatesb
 M. abscessus subsp. abscessus bamboo C28 Sensitive 0.8 0.8
 M. abscessus subsp. abscessus M9 T28 Resistant 0.8 6
 M. abscessus subsp. abscessus M199 T28 Resistant 0.8 6
 M. abscessus subsp. abscessus M337 T28 Resistant 0.8 6
 M. abscessus subsp. abscessus M404 C28 Sensitive 0.2 0.6
 M. abscessus subsp. abscessus M422 T28 Resistant 0.4 2
 M. abscessus subsp. bolletii M232 T28 Resistant 0.4 3
 M. abscessus subsp. bolletii M506 C28 Sensitive 0.1 0.6
 M. abscessus subsp. massiliense M111 Deletion Sensitive 0.4 0.4
 M. abscessus subsp. abscessus K21 C28 Sensitive 0.4 0.4
a

MICs are defined as drug concentrations causing 90% growth inhibition compared to untreated control and are means from two independent experiments.

b

Described in references 21, 23, and 24.

c

erm(41), ribosome methylase. T28 sequevars confer inducible clarithromycin (CLR) resistance. C28 and “deletion” sequevars are CLR sensitive (25). CLR was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and included as a positive control.

To determine whether CGM retained bactericidal activity as observed against M. tuberculosis (12), dose-response time-kill experiments were carried out with the type strain M. abscessus ATCC 19977 (21). Treatment with CGM at the MIC (0.5 μM) resulted in 10-fold and >1,000-fold reductions in CFU after 1 and 3 days, respectively, indicating pronounced time-dependent bactericidal activity (Fig. 2A). Time kill experiments were also carried out for M. abscessus K21, the strain we employ in our mouse infection studies (see below). Interestingly, the bactericidal activity of CGM against M. abscessus K21 was lower than that against M. abscessus ATCC 19977. Despite showing similar MICs against both strains (∼0.5 μM) (Table 1), higher concentrations of CGM were required to achieve comparable reduction of CFU in M. abscessus K21 cultures (Fig. 2B). The reason for the apparent strain-dependent bactericidal activity of CGM remains to be determined. Figure 2C and D show the results of the time-kill experiments for the mostly bacteriostatic clarithromycin as control. Consistent with previous results (22), treatment with the macrolide did not result in significant reduction of CFU.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Bactericidal activity of cyclohexyl-griselimycin (CGM) against M. abscessus. (A and B) Exponential-phase cultures of M. abscessus ATCC 19977 (A) and M. abscessus K21 (B) were treated with CGM at the indicated increasing concentrations, and CFU were enumerated at time zero and after 1 and 3 days by plating appropriate sample dilutions on Middlebrook 7H10 agar (BD Difco) (21). CGM MIC against M. abscessus ATCC 19977, 0.5 μM; CGM MIC against M. abscessus K21, 0.4 μM (Table 1). Note the higher CGM concentrations required to reduce the CFU of M. abscessus K21 cultures compared to M. abscessus ATCC 19977. (C and D) Results of the same experiment carried out with the mainly bacteriostatic clarithromycin (CLR) as a control. Note that M. abscessus ATCC 19977 harbors a functional erm(41) conferring inducible macrolide resistance (reflected by a higher MIC of 3 μM) (Table 1), whereas M. abscessus K21 harbors a noninducible sequevar of erm(41) (reflected by a lower MIC of 0.4 μM) (Table 1). The results were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) multicomparison (****, P < 0.0001; ns, nonsignificant [P > 0.05]). Experiments were carried out three times independently. Mean values and standard deviations are shown. LoD, limit of detection.

To assess the in vivo efficacy of CGM, we infected 8-week-old female NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid/NCrCrl (NOD SCID) mice (Charles River Laboratories) by intranasal delivery of 106 CFU M. abscessus K21 as described previously (23). In this immunodeficient mouse model, the K21 strain produces a sustained infection resulting in a largely constant bacterial lung burden over time, thus allowing the effects of drugs to be evaluated (23). Drugs or the vehicle control was administered once daily for 10 consecutive days by oral gavage, starting 1 day postinfection. CGM was formulated in Cremophor RH 40–Capryol 90–Miglyol 812 N (10/20/70 [wt/wt/wt]) and administered at 250 mg/kg of body weight. Clarithromycin, formulated in 0.4% methylcellulose–sterile water, was used as a positive control at the human-equivalent dose of 250 mg/kg. All mice were euthanized 24 h after the last dose, and bacterial load in the lungs and spleen was determined by plating serial dilutions of the organ homogenates onto Middlebrook agar. All experiments involving live animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Center for Discovery and Innovation, Hackensack Meridian Health. As expected, treatment with the vehicle did not affect the bacterial lung burden (Fig. 3A). Compared to the vehicle control, treatment with 250 mg/kg CGM reduced lung CFU 10-fold and thus more than the positive-control clarithromycin at 250 mg/kg (Fig. 3A). CFU reduction in the spleen followed a similar pattern (Fig. 3B). Thus, CGM is efficacious in a mouse model of M. abscessus infection.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

In vivo activity of cyclohexyl-griselimycin (CGM) against M. abscessus. NOD SCID mice were infected intranasally with 106 CFU of M. abscessus K21. At 1 day postinfection, 6 mice were euthanized to determine the bacterial load of organs prior to starting chemotherapy. Groups of 6 mice were treated by daily oral gavage for 10 consecutive days with CGM, the control drug clarithromycin (CLR), or vehicle only and were euthanized 24 h after the last dose. The bacterial burden in lungs (A) and spleen (B) was determined by plating organ homogenates on agar. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) multicomparison and Tukey’s posttest (**, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001). One representative data set of two independent experiments is shown. LoD, limit of detection. The LoD for the results depicted in panel A was 10 CFU.

In conclusion, we show that the cyclohexyl analog of griselimycin, CGM, is broadly active against the M. abscessus complex in vitro. The advanced anti-TB lead compound displayed bactericidal activity in vitro and reduced the bacterial lung burden in a mouse model of M. abscessus infection. This work adds a new advanced lead compound to the preclinical M. abscessus drug discovery pipeline and suggests that the new anti-TB drug candidate could be explored for the treatment of M. abscessus lung disease. The demonstration that yet another TB active displays anti-M. abscessus activity supports the paradigm of exploiting chemical matter generated for TB drug discovery to accelerate de novo drug discovery for M. abscessus.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Wei Chang Huang (Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan) for providing M. abscessus Bamboo, to Jeanette W. P. Teo (Department of Laboratory Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore) for providing the collection of M. abscessus clinical M isolates, and to Sung Jae Shin (Department of Microbiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea) and Won-Jung Koh (Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea) for providing M. abscessus K21. We are grateful to Sanofi for providing the cyclohexyl-griselimycin compound.

Research reported in this work was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under award R01AI132374.

W.W.A.: Investigation, writing original draft. C.R.: Materials. E.F.: Materials. S.L.: Materials. M.D.Z.: Investigation. V.D.: Supervision. M.G.: Investigation, supervision. T.D.: Supervision, funding acquisition. All authors contributed to writing the final version of the manuscript.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Daley CL, Iaccarino JM, Lange C, Cambau E, Wallace RJ, Andrejak C, Bottger EC, Brozek J, Griffith DE, Guglielmetti L, Huitt GA, Knight SL, Leitman P, Marras TK, Olivier KN, Santin M, Stout JE, Tortoli E, van Ingen J, Wagner D, Winthrop KL. 2020. Treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: an official ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA clinical practice guideline: executive summary. Clin Infect Dis 71:e1–e36. 10.1093/cid/ciaa241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Johansen MD, Herrmann JL, Kremer L. 2020. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria and the rise of Mycobacterium abscessus. Nat Rev Microbiol 18:392–407. 10.1038/s41579-020-0331-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Daniel-Wayman S, Abate G, Barber DL, Bermudez LE, Coler RN, Cynamon MH, Daley CL, Davidson RM, Dick T, Floto RA, Henkle E, Holland SM, Jackson M, Lee RE, Nuermberger EL, Olivier KN, Ordway DJ, Prevots DR, Sacchettini JC, Salfinger M, Sassetti CM, Sizemore CF, Winthrop KL, Zelazny AM. 2019. Advancing translational science for pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial infections. A road map for research. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 199:947–951. 10.1164/rccm.201807-1273PP. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wu ML, Aziz DB, Dartois V, Dick T. 2018. NTM drug discovery: status, gaps and the way forward. Drug Discov Today 23:1502–1519. 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Egorova A, Jackson M, Gavrilyuk V, Makarov V. 2021. Pipeline of anti‐Mycobacterium abscessus small molecules: repurposable drugs and promising novel chemical entities. Med Res Rev 41:2350–2387. 10.1002/med.21798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Luthra S, Rominski A, Sander P. 2018. The role of antibiotic-target-modifying and antibiotic-modifying enzymes in Mycobacterium abscessus drug resistance. Front Microbiol 9:2179. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Low JL, Wu M-L, Aziz DB, Laleu B, Dick T. 2017. Screening of TB actives for activity against nontuberculous mycobacteria delivers high hit rates. Front Microbiol 8:1539. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sarathy JP, Ganapathy US, Zimmerman MD, Dartois V, Gengenbacher M, Dick T. 2020. TBAJ-876, a 3, 5-dialkoxypyridine analogue of bedaquiline, is active against Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e02404-19. 10.1128/AAC.02404-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ganapathy US, Del Rio RG, Cacho-Izquierdo M, Ortega F, Lelièvre J, Barros-Aguirre D, Lindman M, Dartois V, Gengenbacher M, Dick T. 2021. A leucyl-tRNA synthetase inhibitor with broad-spectrum anti-mycobacterial activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 65:e02420-20. 10.1128/AAC.02420-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ganapathy US, Gengenbacher M, Dick T. 2021. Epetraborole is active against Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 65:e01156-21. 10.1128/AAC.01156-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ganapathy US, Del Río RG, Cacho-Izquierdo M, Ortega F, Lelièvre J, Barros-Aguirre D, Aragaw WW, Zimmerman MD, Lindman M, Dartois V, Gengenbacher M, Dick T. 2021. A Mycobacterium tuberculosis NBTI DNA gyrase inhibitor is active against Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 65:e01514-21. 10.1128/AAC.01514-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kling A, Lukat P, Almeida DV, Bauer A, Fontaine E, Sordello S, Zaburannyi N, Herrmann J, Wenzel SC, König C, Ammerman NC, Barrio MB, Borchers K, Bordon-Pallier F, Brönstrup M, Courtemanche G, Gerlitz M, Geslin M, Hammann P, Heinz DW, Hoffmann H, Klieber S, Kohlmann M, Kurz M, Lair C, Matter H, Nuermberger E, Tyagi S, Fraisse L, Grosset JH, Lagrange S, Müller R. 2015. Targeting DnaN for tuberculosis therapy using novel griselimycins. Science 348:1106–1112. 10.1126/science.aaa4690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Terlain B, Thomas J. 1971. Structure of griselimycin, polypeptide antibiotic extracted from streptomyces cultures. II. Structure of griselimycin. Bull Soc Chim Fr 6:2357–2362. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Herold M, Gabriel Z. 1966. Antibiotics: advances in research, production and clinical use: proceedings of the Congress on Antibiotics held in Prague, 15–19 June, 1964. Butterworths, London, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Noufflard-Guy-Loe H, Berteaux S. 1965. Experimental antituberculous action of a new antibiotic: RP 11,072. Rev Tuberc Pneumol (Paris) 29:301–326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ditse Z, Lamers MH, Warner DF. 2017. DNA Replication in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbiol Spectr 5:TBTB2-0027-2016. 10.1128/microbiolspec.TBTB2-0027-2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cossar PJ, Lewis PJ, McCluskey A. 2020. Protein‐protein interactions as antibiotic targets: a medicinal chemistry perspective. Med Res Rev 40:469–494. 10.1002/med.21519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Warner DF, Ndwandwe DE, Abrahams GL, Kana BD, Machowski EE, Venclovas Č, Mizrahi V. 2010. Essential roles for imuA′-and imuB-encoded accessory factors in DnaE2-dependent mutagenesis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:13093–13098. 10.1073/pnas.1002614107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.de Wet TJ, Winkler KR, Mhlanga M, Mizrahi V, Warner DF. 2020. Arrayed CRISPRi and quantitative imaging describe the morphotypic landscape of essential mycobacterial genes. Elife 9:e60083. 10.7554/eLife.60083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Trojanowski D, Kołodziej M, Hołówka J, Müller R, Zakrzewska-Czerwińska J. 2019. Watching DNA replication inhibitors in action: exploiting time-lapse microfluidic microscopy as a tool for target-drug interaction studies in Mycobacterium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e00739-19. 10.1128/AAC.00739-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Aziz DB, Low JL, Wu M-L, Gengenbacher M, Teo JW, Dartois V, Dick T. 2017. Rifabutin is active against Mycobacterium abscessus complex. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00155-17. 10.1128/AAC.00155-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Negatu DA, Beuchel A, Madani A, Alvarez N, Chen C, Aragaw WW, Zimmerman MD, Laleu B, Gengenbacher M, Dartois V, Imming P, Dick T. 2021. Piperidine-4-carboxamides target DNA gyrase in Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 65:e00676-21. 10.1128/AAC.00676-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dick T, Shin SJ, Koh W-J, Dartois V, Gengenbacher M. 2020. Rifabutin is active against Mycobacterium abscessus in mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e01943-19. 10.1128/AAC.01943-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yee M, Klinzing D, Wei J-R, Gengenbacher M, Rubin EJ, Dick T. 2017. Draft genome sequence of Mycobacterium abscessus Bamboo. Genome Announc 5:e00388-17. 10.1128/genomeA.00388-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nash KA, Brown-Elliott BA, Wallace RJ. 2009. A novel gene, erm(41), confers inducible macrolide resistance to clinical isolates of Mycobacterium abscessus but is absent from Mycobacterium chelonae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:1367–1376. 10.1128/AAC.01275-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES