Abstract
Post-stroke vascular remodeling, including angiogenesis, facilitates functional recovery. Proper vascular repair is important for efficient post-stroke recovery; however, the underlying mechanisms coordinating the diverse signaling pathways involved in vascular remodeling remain largely unknown. Recently, axon guidance molecules were revealed as key players in injured vessel remodeling. One such molecule, Semaphorin 3E (Sema3E), and its receptor, Plexin-D1, control vascular development by regulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling. In this study, using a mouse model of transient brain infarction, we aimed to investigate whether Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling was involved in cerebrovascular remodeling after ischemic injury. We found that ischemic damage rapidly induced Sema3e expression in the neurons of peri-infarct regions, followed by Plexin-D1 upregulation in remodeling vessels. Interestingly, Plexin-D1 reemergence was concurrent with brain vessels entering an active angiogenic process. In line with this, Plxnd1 ablation worsened neurological deficits, infarct volume, neuronal survival rate, and blood flow recovery. Furthermore, reduced and abnormal vascular morphogenesis was caused by aberrantly increased VEGF signaling. In Plxnd1 knockout mice, we observed significant extravasation of intravenously administered tracers in the brain parenchyma, junctional protein downregulation, and mislocalization in regenerating vessels. This suggested that the absence of Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling is associated with blood–brain barrier (BBB) impairment. Finally, the abnormal behavioral performance, aberrant vascular phenotype, and BBB breakdown defects in Plxnd1 knockout mice were restored following the inhibition of VEGF signaling during vascular remodeling. These findings demonstrate that Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling can promote functional recovery by downregulating VEGF signaling in the injured adult brain.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12975-021-00914-4.
Keywords: Plexin-D1, Axon guidance, Stroke, Vascular recovery, Blood–brain barrier
Introduction
Stroke is the most common cause of death and a leading cause of disability worldwide [1, 2]. It is accompanied by structural and functional vascular injuries and remodeling [3]; therefore, enhancing angiogenesis in the damaged tissue to promote recovery of nearby brain cells has been proposed as a therapeutic option [3, 4]. However, despite tremendous efforts to develop pharmacological therapies promoting cerebrovascular repair, there are no definitive remedies. This is mainly due to the varying degrees of severity from early-onset to late chronic pathology and the multifaceted cellular and molecular events that occur during repair [5–7]. For example, treatment with tissue plasminogen activator is considered the gold standard for ischemic stroke; however, one of its side effects is an enhanced inflammatory response in brain capillaries and neuronal cell damage [8, 9]. The brain vasculature has a unique structure that is composed of endothelial cells, neurons, astrocytes, and pericytes. This is known as the neurovascular unit (NVU), where vessels tightly regulate the passage of substances between the bloodstream and brain parenchyma via the blood–brain barrier (BBB) [10, 11]. Neural activity and vascular dynamics are tightly coupled in the NVU; the connection and bidirectional communication between the two systems is crucial for proper brain function [12, 13]. Because of the importance of such integrative interaction, neovascularization and vascular repair in the brain after injury require stepwise processes and regulatory mechanisms to reconstruct a functional NVU [14–16].
Previous studies have shown that angiogenesis rapidly occurs post-ischemia in the brain. This contributes to functional recovery and prolonged survival in human patients and experimental rodent models [3, 16, 17]. Indeed, endothelial cell proliferation occurs at 12–24 h following a stroke, and active angiogenesis in the peri-infarcted region is observed 3–4 days after an ischemic insult in humans [15]. However, little is known about the molecular mechanism orchestrating vascular remodeling during repair processes in the post-ischemic brain. To coordinate a highly branched and hierarchically organized vascular network, endothelial cells grow and connect according to the multiple steps during angiogenesis [18]. VEGF and its receptor, VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2), are expressed by endothelial cells; they are master mediators of vascular network establishment during both developmental and pathological angiogenesis [19, 20]. After cerebral ischemia, both VEGF and VEGFR2 are mainly expressed in the ischemic border, known as the peri-infarct region, where the vessels remain salvageable. Therefore, this is considered a treatable target [21–23]. Interestingly, VEGF signaling is associated with neuroprotection and neurogenesis in ischemic stroke models [24–28]. However, it produces harmful effects, such as BBB breakdown, that are dependent on administration timing and dosage after stroke induction [29, 30]. Therefore, elucidating the balanced mechanism and precise activation dynamics of VEGF signaling is of high importance [31].
During the angiogenic process, endothelial tip cells use the same guidance molecules as neuronal growth cones to regulate proper vascular network formation [10, 12]. These cues also play a crucial role during vascular remodeling induced by ischemic damage [32]. One such guidance cue is Semaphorin 3E (Sema3E) and its receptor, Plexin-D1. Sema3E is one of seven class-3 secreted semaphorins. It transduces its signal via direct binding to the Plexin-D1 receptor independently of neuropilins, the primary binding receptor of other class-3 semaphorins [13, 33]. In the nervous system, the Sema3E-Plexin-D1 axis provides a repulsive signal by inhibiting axonal growth or restricting synapse formation [34, 35]. However, its mode of action on vascular topology varies depending on the temporal and spatial expression patterns of Sema3E and Plexin-D1 [33]. For example, the absence of Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling leads to excessive vessel outgrowth in the developing somite or decreased vessel sprouting in the retina [13, 36]. Moreover, Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling is associated with ischemia-induced angiogenesis in the periphery tissue and retina [13, 37], but its activity in the central nervous system has not been elucidated. A few studies have revealed that Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling is interwoven with VEGF signaling under normal or pathological conditions [36–38]. In the developing and pathological retinal vasculature, Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling modulates the angiogenic process at sprouting ends through a VEGF-induced negative feedback mechanism [36, 37]. Because Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling is actively involved in many angiogenic conditions, we speculated that this signaling contributes to vascular remodeling after brain damage, such as in ischemic stroke. In this study, we investigated whether Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling was necessary for the development of functional brain vasculature during vascular remodeling after an ischemic insult.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Plxnd1flox/flox [36] and Mfsd2a-CreERT2 mice [39] were maintained on a C57Bl/6 J (#000664, Jax) background. Rosa26-RFP mice (( Ai9; #007909, Jax)) were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory and maintained on a C57Bl/6 J background. To generate the endothelial cell-specific inducible Plxnd1 knockout mice, tamoxifen (T5648, Sigma) was dissolved in corn oil and administered to male mice 14 days before surgery. Male mice received 0.1–0.2 mg tamoxifen per gram of body weight by oral gavage. All protocols for animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Korea Brain Research Institute (IACUC-18–00008). All experiments were performed according to the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and ARRIVE guidelines.
Ischemic Brain Mouse Model
The transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) mouse model, whereby a temporary reduction of blood flow followed by reperfusion generates cerebral ischemic injury in the cortex and striatum, was performed as described previously [40]. Briefly, anesthesia was induced with 5% isoflurane in an anesthetic chamber and maintained with 1.5% isoflurane via a nose cone. Rectal temperature was maintained at 37.0 ± 0.5 °C during surgery and the recovery period using a 37 °C heating pad. A 1-cm-long midline skin incision was performed in the neck area. The right common carotid artery (CCA) was carefully dissected free from the surrounding nerves and tied off using a 7–0 silk suture. The right external carotid artery was isolated and cauterized 2–3 mm distal to the bifurcation, and a vessel clip was placed just before the CCA bifurcation to avoid retrograde flow at the time of arteriotomy. An arteriotomy was performed between the proximal ligated suture and vessel clip on the CCA with micro-scissors. Next, a silicone-rubber-coated 6–0 nylon filament (602145PK10, Doccol) was inserted into the CCA and advanced for 9 mm to the carotid bifurcation along the internal carotid artery (ICA) and origin of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). Next, the neck incision was sutured and the mouse was placed in a 37 °C nursing box to recover from anesthesia. After 30 min of occlusion, the filament was removed to restore the blood flow to the MCA. In sham-operated mice, the ICA was surgically prepared for filament insertion, but it was not inserted.
In Situ Hybridization
In situ hybridization (ISH) was performed under RNase-free conditions by standard procedures [36]. After fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 20 min, 14-μm-thick cryosections sections were preincubated in hybridization buffer (5 × Denhardt’s solution, 5 × saline sodium citrate (SSC), 50% formamide, 0.25 mg/ml Baker yeast tRNA, and 0.2 mg/ml salmon sperm DNA) for at least 1 h at room temperature. Next, sections were hybridized in the same buffer containing the indicated digoxigenin-conjugated riboprobe at 60 °C overnight. After hybridization, sections were washed in serial SSC buffer, formamide solution, and preincubated in buffer 1 (100 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl) plus 1% blocking reagent (Roche) for 1 h at room temperature. Next, sections were incubated with sheep anti-digoxigenin-alkaline phosphatase (AP) antibody (1:3000, Roche) for 90 min at room temperature, washed in the buffer 1, and incubated in AP buffer (100 mM Tris–HCl, pH 9.5, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2) containing 4-nitro blue tetrazolium chloride (NBT, Roche), 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate (BCIP, Roche), and levamisole (1359302, Sigma). Purple precipitates were visualized. After mounting with coverslips, the samples were analyzed via confocal laser-scanning microscopy with a Nikon Eclipse Ti-U microscope or Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope.
For subsequent immunostaining with anti-ColIV (1:500, ab6586, Abcam) after ISH, sections were washed in 1 × phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) several times and post-fixed in 4% PFA for 5 min. After fixation, all procedures were performed as described in the immunohistochemistry section. For the double fluorescence ISH, the tyramide signal amplification method with minor modification was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions (NEL753001KT, PerkinElmer) [34]. The following anti-sense riboprobes were used: Plxnd1[36], Sema3e[13], and Snap25 riboprobes were designed based on the ISH database provided by the Allen Institute for Brain Science.
AP-Ligand Preparation and Binding Analysis
AP-conjugated Sema3E ligands were generated in HEK293T cells, and ligand binding experiments were performed as described previously [36]. Briefly, the AP-Sema3E expression construct was transfected into cells by LipofectAMINE 2000 (11668019, Invitrogen) and cultured overnight in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, 11995–065, Gibco) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Next, the medium was replaced with OPTI-MEM (31985–070, Gibco) and harvested at 5 days post-transfection. The collected conditioned medium was filtered to increase ligand concentration.
For AP-Sema3E binding analysis, 20-μm-thick cryosections were fixed in cold methanol for 8 min and preincubated in 1 × PBS containing 4 mM MgCl2 and 10% FBS for 1 h. Next, a binding solution (1 × PBS-MgCl2 plus 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.0) containing 2 nM AP-Sema3E was applied, and sections were incubated for 2 h at room temperature. After five washes in 1 × PBS-MgCl2, sections were briefly soaked in acetone-formaldehyde fixative (60% acetone, 1.1% formaldehyde, and 20 mM HEPES pH 7.0) and heat-inactivated in 1 × PBS at 65 °C for 2 h. Next, sections were incubated in AP buffer with NBT and BCIP overnight at room temperature. The subsequent immunostaining procedure was performed as described in the immunohistochemistry section. For quantification, three brain sections per animal were analyzed and averaged the mean signal intensity per image.
Neurological Scoring
A neurological deficit grading system [41] was used to evaluate mice at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days after tMCAO. The scores were as follows: 0, no neurological deficit; 1, forelimb flexion when suspended by the tail, or failure to fully extend forepaw; 2, shoulder adduction when suspended by the tail; 3, reduced resistance to lateral push; 4, spontaneous movement in all directions with unilateral circling only if pulled by the tail; 5, spontaneous unilateral circling; 6, walk only when stimulated; 7, no response to stimulation; and 8, stroke-related death.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) experiments were performed using a Bruker 9.4 preclinical MRI (BioSpec 94/20 USR; Laboratory Animal Center of Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation, Korea). Briefly, mice were anesthetized with a continuous supply of 1.5% isoflurane. Respiratory rates were monitored continuously. A fast spin-echo sequence (4000/12.5 ms of repetition time/echo time) was employed for T2-weighted imaging and a spin-echo sequence (700/7 ms of repetition time/echo time) for T1-weighted imaging. For all scans, the field of view was 20 × 20 mm2, slice thickness 3.0 mm, number of slices 18, and matrix size 256 × 256, except for the diffusion sequence where the matrix size was 128 × 128. Pre-contrast T1-weighted images were acquired before gadoterate meglumine (Gd-DOTA) injection. Post-contrast T1-weighted images were acquired 30 min after intravenous injection of Gd-DOTA (0.2 ml/kg body weight) with normal saline. A region of interest (ROI) was drawn in the peri-infarct and extravasation areas on images using the ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).
Immunohistochemistry
For immunostaining with floating samples, brains were fixed in 4% PFA overnight and equilibrated with 30% sucrose in 1 × PBS. Mouse brain sections were cut into 30-μm slices on a cryostat (Leica Microsystems Inc., Buffalo Grove, IL, USA). Next, they were permeabilized in PBST (PBS containing 0.3% Triton X-100) for 10 min, blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBST for 60 min at room temperature, and incubated in primary antibody diluted in blocking solution overnight at 4 °C. The following primary antibodies were used: anti-CD31 (1:500, 553370, BD Bioscience), anti-Collagen IV (1:500, ab6586, Abcam), anti-NeuN (1:1000, MAB377, Merck), anti-Ter-119 (1:100, MAB1125, R&D System), and anti-MAP-2 (1:500, ab32454, Abcam). After washing with PBST three times, sections were incubated for 1 h with Alexa Fluor 488-, 594-, or 647-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:1000, Invitrogen). For negative controls, brain sections were stained with secondary antibodies alone.
For BBB junctional protein immunostaining, brains were isolated, immediately snap-frozen with liquid nitrogen, and cut (14-μm-thick sections) on a cryostat. Sections were fixed in cold 100% acetone for 15 min followed by cold 100% methanol for 20 min. Permeabilization, blocking, and antibody incubation were performed as described above. The following primary antibodies were used: anti-ZO-1 (1:500, 61–7300, ThermoFisher), anti-claudin5 (1:200, 35–2500, Invitrogen), anti-claudin5-488 ( 1:500, 352588, Invitrogen), and anti-Occludin (1:200, 33–1500, Invitrogen). Images were collected under a Nikon Eclipse Ti-U microscope (Nikon, Japan) or Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope (Leica, Germany). Image processing was performed using the ImageJ, Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Photoshop CC2019), and Angio Tool (National Cancer Institute, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) software.
Measurements of Infarct Volume
Infarct area was measured by cresyl violet and microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2) staining. Mouse brain sections were cut into 30-μm slices on a cryostat (Leica Microsystems Inc., Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) from five levels (bregma −1.6 mm, −0.8 mm, 0 mm, 0.8 mm, and 1.6 mm) and stained with 1% cresyl violet solution. In addition, the neuron-specific marker, MAP2, was visualized with anti-MAP2 (1:500, ab32454, Abcam) immunofluorescence staining. Sections were digitized and the border between infarct and non-infarct tissue outlined using ImageJ. The infarct volume was calculated by subtracting the volume of the non-lesioned area in the ipsilateral hemisphere from the volume of the whole area in the contralateral hemisphere.
Vascular Labeling and Analysis of Vascular Density
Animals were intravenously perfused 5 min before euthanasia with Dylight 594-conjugated Lycopersicon esculentum (Tomato) lectin (DL-1177, Vector Laboratories) at a dose of 1 mg/kg body weight. After perfusion, the brains were dissected, fixed, and then cut into 100-μm-thick free-floating sections using a vibratome. Vascular area (%), vessel length (μm/μm2), and branch point number were calculated using Angio Tool.
For microaneurysm-like capillary vessel analysis, images immunostained with anti-Col IV and anti-Ter-119 antibodies without PBS perfusion procedure were analyzed using ImageJ. The capillaries holding the single lining of red blood cells were defined as a normal capillary. The mean diameter of the capillaries was calculated to determine the cutoff value. Vessels thicker than the cutoff size were considered abnormal. The number and coverage of abnormal vs normal vessels were analyzed per image.
Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase–Mediated dUTP Nick End-Labeling Staining
Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay was employed to observe the apoptotic cells. Using the In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, TMR red (12156792910, Roche), the brain sections were treated according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Immunoblotting
Brain tissue was collected in a RIPA buffer with a protease inhibitor cocktail (11697498001, Roche) and protein amounts were quantified by a BCA protein assay kit (23227, Thermo Fisher Scientific). A total of 40 g of protein was loaded per well and separated on a sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) polyacrylamide gel and transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (IPVH00010, Merck) at 100 V for 90 min. All membranes were blocked with Everyblot blocking buffer (12010020, Bio-rad) for 1 h and probed overnight with the indicated primary antibodies in blocking buffer at 4 °C. The primary antibodies were rabbit monoclonal anti-Phospho-VEGF Receptor2 (Tyr951) (15D2) antibody (1:1000, 4991, Cell Signaling), rabbit monoclonal anti-Phospho-VEGF Receptor 2 (Tyr1175) (D5B11) antibody (1:1000, 3770, Cell Signaling), rabbit monoclonal anti-VEGF Receptor 2 (55B11) antibody (1:1000, 2479, Cell Signaling), goat polyclonal anti-Dll4 antibody (1:1000, AF1389, R&D systems), rabbit monoclonal anti-b-actin antibody (1:5000, 5125, Cell Signaling), rabbit polyclonal anti-ZO-1 antibody (1:1000, 61–7900, Invitrogen), rabbit polyclonal anti-Claudin-5 antibody (1:1000, 34–1600, Invitrogen), and rabbit polyclonal anti-Occludin antibody (1:1000, 71–1500, Invitrogen). The membranes were incubated in PBST and appropriate horseradish peroxidase (HRP)–conjugated secondary antibodies. Bands were developed with enhanced chemiluminescence using the Fusion FX7 (Vilber, Germany) and analyzed using Image J.
Whole-Brain Immunostaining and Clearing
For adult mouse brain clearing, the CUBIC method was used [42] according to the manufacturer’s instructions (T3740 and T3741, Tokyo Chemical Industry). After fixation in cold 4% PFA in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), the areas of interest in the brain were sectioned in a parallel direction (3 mm) and washed with 1 × PBS three times for at least 2 h each time with shaking at room temperature (RT). The samples were then cleared with 1/2-CUBIC-L under shaking at 60 rpm and 37 °C for 5 h. CUBIC-L was applied for clearing under the same conditions for 48 h. The samples were washed with 1 × PBS containing 0.3% Triton X-100 (0.3% PBST) with soft shaking at RT three times for at least 2 h each time, once overnight and again for 2 h. Next, samples were blocked with 5% BSA with shaking at 60 rpm at 37 °C for 3 h, followed by incubation with CD31 antibodies (diluted in 5% BSA) with shaking at 60 rpm at 37 °C for 24 h, and washing three times with PBST and shaking at RT for at least 1 h each time. Corresponding secondary antibodies (diluted in 5% BSA) were applied to the sample under the same conditions as primary antibody incubations. Next, the samples were rewashed with PBST three times for at least 1 h. Finally, 1/2-CUBIC-R was applied to clear samples with shaking at 60 rpm at 37 °C for 24 h. CUBIC-R was used for further clearing; it was replaced every 2 days until satisfactory optical transparency was achieved. Cleared samples were stored in CUBIC-R at 4 °C until imaging. Light-sheet microscopy images were acquired with the LightsheetZ.1 and 5 × EC plan objective lens (Carl Zeiss, Germany).
Cortical Cerebral Blood Flow Measurement
Real-time two-dimensional cerebral blood flow (CBF) was monitored using a laser speckle contrast imager (PeriCam PSI HR System, Perimed, Sweden). After anesthesia induction, mice were placed in the prone position and the skull was exposed through a cut in the skin at the parietal midline. A camera was placed above the head at a working distance of 10 cm from the skull surface. This was illuminated with a laser diode (785 nm) to allow laser penetration through the brain. CBF was recorded before the induction of cerebral ischemia, during cerebral ischemia, and for the first 10 min of reperfusion. To evaluate CBF changes, the ROI included the cortical area supplied by the MCA.
BBB Permeability
To assess BBB permeability, Texas red dextran (MW = 10 kDa, Invitrogen; 0.1 ml of 10 mg/ml) was injected retro-orbitally on 1, 3, and 7 days post-tMCAO. After a 2-h circulation period, mice were perfused transcardially with PBS, followed by ice-cold 4% PFA in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, and brains were dissected. Brain samples were post-fixed in 4% PFA for 16–18 h and equilibrated with 30% sucrose in 1 × PBS. Mouse brain sections that encompassed the MCA region were cut into 30-μm slices. Immunofluorescence was performed with antibodies for anti-CD31 (1:500, 553370, BD Bioscience). Alexa594-conjugated mouse IgG (1:500) was used to visualize IgG leakage in the brain. Sections were imaged with a Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope (Leica, Germany). IgG leakage was quantified with the Fiji software. Brain slices were uniformly thresholded to quantify the total IgG area. Areas that exceeded threshold levels were defined as leakage areas. The histological procedure was performed as described in the immunohistochemistry section above.
VEGF-R2 Inhibition
According to the manufacturer’s recommendations, mice received daily intraperitoneal injections (50 mg/kg) of VEGF-R2 inhibitor SU5416 (S8442, Sigma) dissolved in dimethylformamide (DMF). Control animals received intraperitoneal injections of DMF alone.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 8 (GraphPad Software). All results are presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). At least three mice pairs per experiment were used for all histological analyses. For image data quantification, at least three brain sections per mouse were collected and analyzed. All data analyses were performed by a blinded investigator. Statistical significance was determined using two-tailed Mann–Whitney U tests between two groups and one- or two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test for three or more groups. For ANOVA analysis, the normal distribution of data was using the Shapiro–Wilk normality and Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests. Differences were considered as statistically significant when p < 0.05.
Results
Sema3E Is Rapidly Expressed in Peri-infarct Neurons, whereas Plexin-D1 Expression Slowly Increases in Blood Vessels
We investigated whether Sema3E and Plexin-D1 expression are induced in ischemic tissue after tMCAo. We found a significant and rapid elevation of Sema3e mRNA in the peri-infarct region as early as 6 h post-tMCAo. In contrast, Plxnd1 mRNA expression remained relatively unchanged until 24 h after ischemic injury (Fig. 1a, b). In addition, increased colocalization of Sema3e and the neuronal marker, snap25, indicated that Sema3e expression in peri-infarct neurons is highly responsive to ischemic injury (Fig. 1c).
High Plexin- D1 expression is found in the brain vasculature during development [43]; however, changes in its expression throughout life are not known. To examine Plexin-D1 expression in the brain vasculature, we performed an AP-Sema3E binding assay, which detects Plexin-D1 localization through specific ligand-receptor binding capacity [13, 44]. Consistent with the previous observations, Plexin-D1 was highly expressed throughout the brain vasculature. Interestingly, its expression was dramatically downregulated after birth and barely detectable in adult brain vessels, with the exception of trace amounts in a few larger vessels (Supplemental Fig. 1). Despite no change in Plxnd1 mRNA expression during the initial phase after ischemic insult, we wondered whether Plexin-D1 could reappear in newly sprouting vessels under ischemic conditions. Since hypoxia induces VEGF and subsequent signaling via VEGFR2 upregulates Plxnd1 expression in capillary vessels [37], we surmised that the activation of Plxnd1 expression in remodeling vessels might take time to develop. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the temporal features of Plexin-D1 expression after tMCAo (Fig. 1d, e). Three days after tMCAo, Plexin-D1 protein was expressed in blood vessels near the infarct core (Fig. 1d, area 2), which reached peri-infarct vessels by day 7 (Fig. 1d, area 3, and Supplemental Fig. 2). Seven days post-ischemia, most ipsilateral vessels strongly and broadly expressed Plexin-D1 (Fig. 1d, areas 3 and 4) at levels similar to those found in the early developing vasculature (Supplemental Fig. 1). This indicated that vessels were actively being reconstructed. In the contralateral (intact) hemisphere, Plexin-D1 was detected in axonal tracts (Fig. 1d, area 1) and not blood vessels.
Plxnd1 Conditional Ablation in Brain Endothelial Cells Interfered with Recovery after Ischemic Stroke
Next, to address whether Plexin-D1 was critical for vascular remodeling, we generated an endothelial brain cell–specific Plxnd1 knockout mouse model (Plxnd1iECKO). Endothelial cell–specific Plexin-D1 deletion leads to significant perinatal lethality [45]; therefore, it was necessary to ablate Plxnd1 in a temporally controlled manner. To generate this time-specific Plxnd1 KO mouse, we crossed Plxnd1flox/flox mice with Mfsd2a-CreERT mice, which express the tamoxifen-inducible Cre predominantly in brain endothelial cells and not peripheral vessels [39]. We observed that a single tamoxifen injection into the Mfsd2a-CreERT;ROSA26-RFP mouse sufficiently induced reporter gene expression in most adult brain endothelial cells (Supplemental Fig. 3a). Additionally, we confirmed the elimination of Plexin-D1 expression following tamoxifen injection in brain endothelial cells under hypoxic conditions using AP-Sema3E binding analysis (Supplemental Fig. 3b).
We examined the extent of brain damage and vascular alterations after tMCAo in Plxnd1iECKO mice following the experimental scheme outlined in Fig. 2a. Heterozygous Mfsd2a-CreERT;Plxnd1flox/+ littermates were used as controls for all experiments because no difference was found in blood flow, vascular structure, survival rate, or infarction size after tMCAo, just as in Plxnd1flox/flox mice (Supplemental Fig. 4). In addition, we decided to perform all analyses within 7 days after stroke due to ethical considerations. First, Plxnd1iECKO mice showed a significant decrease in survival rate and body weight in contrast to control littermates (Fig. 2b, c). To examine behavioral performance, we used an 8-scale neurological deficit grading system [41] and found that Plxnd1iECKO mice consistently displayed a higher score than the control group for a week (Fig. 2d). On the first day post-stroke, the mean score for control mice was 4, which improved to 1–3 by post-stroke day 7. However, the mean score for Plxnd1iECKO mice was 6 on day 1 after tMCAo. A relatively high neuronal deficit phenotype, i.e., spontaneous unilateral circling (scores of 4–5), was maintained a week after tMCAo.
To analyze the histological effects of tMCAo, we measured ischemia-induced lesion volume by T2-weighted MRI. We observed significantly increased high-intensity regions representing lesions in Plxnd1iECKO mice on day 7 after tMCAo (Fig. 2e). In addition, the Plxnd1iECKO mice showed broader infarction areas from the cortex to the striatum (Fig. 2f, g). Next, to assess the number of neurons damaged by the ischemic insult, we performed NeuN and TUNEL co-staining and found increased neuronal death in the ipsilateral, damaged hemisphere of Plxnd1iECKO mice when compared with control (heterozygous Mfsd2a-CreERT;Plxnd1flox/+) mice. Damaged neurons were barely detectable in the contralateral side of both the control and Plxnd1 knockout mice (Fig. 2h, i). At post-tMCAo day 7, the Plxnd1iECKO mice generally showed significantly decreased neuron numbers (Fig. 2i).
Altered Structural and Functional Cerebrovascular Remodeling in Plxnd1 iECKOMice after Stroke
To investigate whether reactivation of Sema3E/Plexin-D1 signaling following stroke leads to vascular alterations, we first monitored CBF in the ischemic region using laser Doppler imaging (Fig. 3a). No significant difference was observed in CBF between control and Plxnd1iECKO groups before (baseline) or after occlusion (tMCAo) onset. In contrast, at 7 days after reperfusion, CBF recovery was delayed by ~ 20% in Plxnd1iECKO mice when compared with control littermates (Fig. 3b).
In a rodent stroke model, active vessel sprouting begins 3 days after ischemic stroke, and noticeable angiogenesis is observed 1 week later [14, 46]. Therefore, we analyzed structural changes in the peri-infarct vasculature up to 7 days post-tMCAo. Ischemia significantly decreased the vessel number by day 3 in both heterozygous control and Plxnd1iECKO mice; however, vessel number recovery was only measured in the control mice at post-tMCAo day 7 (Fig. 3c, d). Plxnd1iECKO mice showed a significant decrease in vessel density at day 7 compared with control mice. Interestingly, we observed that Plxnd1iECKO mice had increased overall vessel diameter and a few aberrantly thick vessels despite reduced vascular formation (Fig. 3c, d). These results suggested that Plexin-D1 expression in damaged vessels 3 days after tMCAo (Fig. 1d) is crucial for angiogenic sprouting and subsequent vascular network repair. For further in-depth analysis of the vasculature defect, we performed three-dimensional (3D) image analysis using the CUBIC method, a recently developed tissue-clearing technique [42] that allows visualization of the entire vascular network surrounding the infarct core (Fig. 3e). Overall, 3D vascular patterning was much less elaborate in the Plxnd1iECKO mice; all parameters were significantly lower than those of the control mice (Fig. 3f). This emphasized that brain endothelial Plexin-D1 promotes vascular network formation following ischemic stroke.
Aberrant VEGF Signaling Impairs Vascular Remodeling in Plxnd1 iECKO Mice after Stroke
Plxnd1iECKO mice displayed malformed blood vessels with microaneurysm-like abnormal structures (Fig. 4a, b), suggesting a misregulation of endothelial cell proliferation and/or migration during vascular remodeling. VEGF/VEGFR2 signaling is a master regulatory pathway for vascular development and function in health and disease [47]; therefore, we assumed that Sema3E-Plexin-D1 controlled VEGF signaling after stroke. First, we examined VEGF signaling activity by measuring phosphorylated VEGFR2 expression 4 days post-tMCAo, when angiogenic remodeling actively progresses. We focused on two major tyrosine phosphorylation sites, Y949 and Y1173, that are associated with endothelial cell proliferation and migration [48]. Surprisingly, no change in the expression of phosphos-Y949 was found in the Plxnd1iECKO mouse brain. In contrast, phosphorylation at Y1173 was significantly increased when compared with the control mice (Fig. 4c, d). To further assess the increased VEGF signaling, we examined Dll4 expression, a well-characterized VEGF downstream target in endothelial cells [49]. Dll4 expression was upregulated in Plxnd1iECKO mice (Fig. 4e, f), which demonstrated that the absence of Plexin-D1 causes aberrant activation of VEGF signaling in vessel remodeling post-ischemia.
Endothelial-Specific Plxnd1 Deletion Leads to BBB Breakdown
We examined whether the abnormal vessel formation observed in Plxnd1iECKO mice during ischemic remodeling was accompanied by other functional impairments, such as BBB breakdown. To assess the integrity of growing vessels during remodeling, we assessed BBB breakdown via T1-Gd MRI in live animals. Signal intensities increased in Plxnd1iECKO mice when compared with control littermates (Fig. 5a, b), indicating incomplete BBB recovery in the absence of Plexin-D1. Next, we intravenously administered a low molecular weight 10-kDa fluorescent dextran tracer and monitored its distribution within the injured cortex until post-tMCAo day 7. Tracer extravasation was observed on day 3, which continuously increased until day 7 in Plxnd1iECKO mice. In control mice, 10-kDa dye leakage was barely detectable even 7 days post-tMCAo (Fig. 5c, d). In addition, we evaluated whether the impaired vessels in Plxnd1 knockout mice were permeable to high molecular weight proteins, such as immunoglobulin G, and found a significant accumulation in the brain parenchyma (Fig. 5e, f).
To further investigate whether BBB disruption was caused by a structural change of the NVU, the expression of three major BBB junctional proteins was analyzed in the peri-infarct region. The expression of junctional proteins, ZO-1, Claudin5, and Occludin, was downregulated in Plxnd1iECKO mice when compared with sham or control mice (Fig. 6a, b). Despite their overall downregulation in knockout mice, ZO-1 and Claudin5 were detected on remodeling vessels albeit with an altered distribution (Fig. 6c, arrowheads). The coverage ratio of Occludin on vessels lacking Plexin-D1 was extremely low (Fig. 6c arrows, d). These results demonstrated that Plexin-D1 signaling is critical to establish proper brain vascular structures because it controls the expression and distribution of BBB constituents in growing vessels.
Inhibition of VEGF Signaling during Vascular Remodeling Facilitates Functional Recovery in Plxnd1 iECKO Mice
Based on the above results, we speculated that reactivation of Plexin-D1 may control VEGF signaling in remodeling vessels, thereby preventing the detrimental effects of overactivated VEGF. To test this, we administered SU5416, a VEGFR2 inhibitor, during the vascular remodeling period after stroke (Fig. 7a) and analyzed VEGFR2 activation and its downstream target Dll4 expression. SU5416 injection dramatically reduced phosphor-Y1173 and Dll4 expression in Plxnd1iECKO mice (Fig. 7b, c). These results provided additional evidence that signaling through VEGF2 activation in the remodeling vessel is closely modulated by the Plexin-D1 signaling pathway at the molecular level. Next, we monitored body weight and neurological score. As shown in Fig. 7d, the VEGFR2 inhibitor treatment prevented body weight loss and improved behavioral performance in Plxnd1iECKO mice when compared with vehicle-treated Plxnd1iECKO mice. This indicated that the functional recovery of Plxnd1iECKO mice was inhibited by overactive VEGFR2 signaling. In Plxnd1iECKO mice, VEGFR2 inhibition reduced infarction area (Fig. 7e, f) and BBB permeability (Fig. 7g, h). Moreover, SU5416 treatment reverted the abnormal vascular morphology in Plxnd1iECKO mice (larger diameter and reduced vascular density) (Fig. 7g, i).
Finally, we tested whether the inactivation of VEGFR2 signaling within a specific time window was critical to stroke recovery. We administered SU5416 to wild-type mice before or after vascular remodeling began and analyzed the brain damage. The early inactivation of VEGF signaling caused severe brain damage, including increased edema and infarction area (~ 30%) even at day 4 post-tMCAO (Supplemental Fig. 5a–e). Moreover, late VEGF signaling inactivation during vascular recovery also caused brain damage; however, its severity was less mild (~ 15% infarction area, Supplemental Fig. 5f–j) than the early inactivation. These results indicated that VEGF signaling activation after ischemia is necessary for proper vascular remodeling, but its activation degree is differently regulated.
Discussion
This study demonstrated that the reactivation of Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling following ischemic stroke is essential for reconstructing a healthy vasculature via the regulation of VEGF signaling during vascular remodeling. Therefore, enhancing Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling in angiogenic vessels during the critical period of vascular repair could become a new target for stroke treatment.
The expression of Sema3E and Plexin-D1 in the nervous and vascular systems changes dramatically after birth (Supplemental Fig. 1) [34]. In the developing brain, Plexin-D1 was broadly detected across capillary endothelial cells. At birth, however, its expression in vessels was sharply downregulated, and it was barely evident in adult brain vasculature (Fig. 1 and Supplemental Fig. 1). Our previous findings have demonstrated that unlike in the developing brain or peripheral vasculature, in the developing mouse retina, Plxnd1 mRNA is expressed only in endothelial cells at the front of actively sprouting blood vessels from P3 to P5 and reappears in new sprouts to form deeper vascular layers at P6 [36, 37]. Those results, together with the results of the present study, strongly suggest that Plexin-D1 expression is practically absent in mature blood vessels.
Interestingly, Plexin-D1 expression is regulated by VEGF signaling, a major hypoxia-inducible pathway, during retinal vascularization [36]. Furthermore, it is highly upregulated in the endothelial cells of extraretinal vessels in the ischemic retina [37]. Therefore, we speculated that Plexin-D1 expression is essential in critical situations, such as vascular remodeling induced by ischemia, where newly sprouting vessels require vascular guidance in response to VEGF signaling [50]. Previous reports that have used the same ischemic stroke model found that VEGF expression was remarkably elevated in the cortex within 3 h post-ischemia. In contrast, VEGFR2 expression was high on day 1 and remained high until post-ischemia day 21 [14]. Consistent with this, vascular Plexin-D1 was observed in our study at post-ischemic insult day 3 and reached most of the damaged area in similar ischemic conditions in this study (Fig. 1d, e). This supports our assumption that Plexin-D1 expression is under VEGF signaling control, even in the brain vasculature.
Sema3E expression is confined to specific neuronal cells in the brain from development to adulthood [34, 51]. Previous studies have documented differential Sema3E expression and function under various ischemic conditions. For example, Sema3E and Plexin-D1 are upregulated in ischemic mouse limbs via p53. Inhibition of Sema3E function leads to a significant increase in blood flow recovery [52], indicating that Sema3E/Plexin-D1 signaling activation adversely affects neovascularization. In a murine ischemic retinopathy model, Sema3E expression in ganglionic cells is relatively constant. In contrast, reduced expression of aqueous Sema3E is observed in patients with diabetic retinopathy when compared with nondiabetic controls [37, 53, 54]. This suggests that the regulatory activity of Sema3E varies by pathological condition and species. In the present study, Sema3E expression was rapidly and precisely induced in peri-infarct area neurons during the early phase after stroke (Fig. 1a–c). Therefore, further study should examine how Sema3E expression is elevated in such a short period in the hypoxic brain.
Multiple studies have demonstrated that axon guidance molecules are associated with modulating vascular patterning under disease conditions and during development via similar signaling pathways [12, 55]. These guidance cues may be beneficial or detrimental during remodeling in the ischemic brain [56–60]. Sema3A has been studied during vascular recovery following ischemic damage. Stroke induction increases Sema3A in the cortex for up to 2 weeks and is detrimental to the damaged brain [61]. Additionally, Sema3A injection into the cerebral cortex increases vascular permeability, and the ablation of Sema3A expression reduces cerebrovascular permeability and brain damage in the tMCAO model [62]. Similarly, Sema3E may function as a remodeling modulator. In an oxygen-induced retinopathy model, enhanced Plexin-D1 or intravitreal Sema3E injection prevents abnormal vessel projections and leads to normal vascular remodeling [37]. This suggests a beneficial mechanism of Sema3E-Plexin-D1. In an ischemia-induced aged rat brain model, Zhou et al. have reported that the inhibition of Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling via a lentiviral shRNA knockdown system recovers the vascular network and improves physiological functions, such as cerebral perfusion and BBB integrity, thereby reducing brain damage [63]. However, the results from our current study, using genetically modified mouse models, demonstrated that a lack of Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signals in the ischemic brain leads to significant tissue damage and delayed recovery (Fig. 2). This strongly suggests a beneficial role for Sema3E-Plexin-D1 during stroke-induced functional recovery.
The underlying mechanism of Sema3E/Plexin-D1 signaling involvement in functional brain recovery after ischemic stroke is unclear. Our 3D-vascular network analysis and blood flow recovery experiment indicated that the greatest damage in the brains of Plxnd1 knockout mice was due to aberrant and decreased vasculature (Fig. 3, 4). Previously, the absence of this signaling pathway was thought to unlock the normal limits on vessel growth, thereby increasing the size and branching of vascular networks. This has been observed in mouse peripheral and avian periocular vasculature; vessels devoid of Sema3E or Plexin-D1 grow densely across their boundaries [13, 64]. However, this mechanism is not observed in the retinal vasculature, where Sema3e or Plxnd1 knockout results in sparse and underdeveloped network formation. This indicates that the diverse regulatory behaviors of Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling are dependent upon location and tissue. In our study, Plxnd1 knockout mice had reduced vasculature during remodeling as opposed to the overgrowth observed in developing vasculature. Therefore, they recapitulated the retinal vasculature devoid of Sema3e or Plxnd1 knockouts [36, 37].
In addition, Plxnd1 knockout mice showed aberrantly thick remodeling vessels, which may have been caused by abnormal endothelial cell proliferation and migration (Fig. 4a, b). We analyzed phospho-VEGFR2 expression at Y1173, which is the site responsible for regulating endothelial cell proliferation and migration [48]. We found increased phosphorylation in the Plxnd1 knockout mice (Fig. 4c, d). In addition, we examined Dll4 expression, which is associated with normal sprouting and branching as an intercellular VEGF signaling mediator [36]. Its expression was significantly increased in the Plxnd1 knockout mice (Fig. 4e, f). These results are consistent with the previous finding that Sema3E-Plexin-D1 negatively controls VEGF signaling in the retina vasculature [36]. Considering the numerous phosphorylation sites on VEGFR2, it will be interesting to explore how the Y1173 site is under the control of Plexin-D1 signaling. Recently, Fukushima et al. [38]. have reported that Sema3E treatment results in VEGFR2 phosphorylation at Y1214, but not Y1175 (comparable to mouse Y1173), which induces reverse migration in cultured human endothelial cells. Moreover, this event occurs via RhoJ-mediated Plexin-D1 and VEGFR2 association. Therefore, it will be interesting to study whether this mechanism is recapitulated during cerebrovascular remodeling in our ischemic model.
During stroke, the VEGF signaling pathway shows both positive and negative effects in the ischemic brain according to their activation timing and dose across the initial-to-late chronic conditions [29]. Given the rapid VEGF and VEGFR2 expression after ischemic induction [14], VEGF signaling is necessary in the acute phase after stroke onset, probably acting for neuroprotection and angiogenic potentiation despite the high risk of a leaky BBB. Later, the newly sprouting vessels need to optimize the overactivated VEGF signaling to maintain proper angiogenic strength and neuroprotective roles via Sema3E-Plexin-D1. Supporting this assumption, we showed that VEGF signaling inhibition during the vascular remodeling phase promoted functional recovery accompanied by relatively normal vasculature in the Plxnd1 knockout mice (Fig. 7). By contrast, VEGF signaling inhibition in the wild-type mice after stroke aggravated brain damage with a slight difference according to the inactivation time (Supplemental Fig. 5). In conclusion, VEGF signaling is immediately activated and prepares angiogenic sprouting during the early stages after ischemic damage, but its continuous overactivation during the recovery stage can lead to vascular injuries. To prevent the harmful effects of VEGF signaling, the reactivation of Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling is necessary as the damaged vasculature enters the remodeling stage (Fig. 7j). Plexin-D1 deficiency may cause excessively active VEGF signaling and induce functional and structural vascular malformations.
In this study, the disruption of Sema3E/Plexin-D1 signaling caused severe BBB breakdown. This was signified by increased tracer permeability and fewer junctional proteins (Figs. 5 and 6). BBB breakdown in response to ischemia occurs in two sequential steps: upregulation of transcytosis within hours, followed by paracellular pathway defects through the remodeling of tight junction proteins in the next 2–3 days [65]. Considering the timing of Plexin-D1 reemergence, we speculate that Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling is more relevant to BBB permeability through the paracellular pathway. Another mode of BBB disruption comes from the interaction impairment between endothelial cells and pericytes in the brain. During development, both cells have a reciprocal interaction through a specific signaling pathway. Endothelial cells secrete PDGF-BB to recruit pericytes expressing PDGFR-β. Conversely, pericytes secrete angiopoietin 1 (Ang1) to activate endothelial cells via Tie2 receptors [66]. Furthermore, pericytes cover most brain capillaries and continue producing matrix proteins in the basement membrane alongside endothelial cells. This promotes a stable BBB structure and impermeability [67]. Intriguingly, pericyte-derived Ang1 induces Occludin expression in brain capillary endothelial cells [66]. In this study, we found that Occludin distribution was exclusively reduced in the absence of Sema3E/Plexin-D1 signaling (Fig. 6c), which suggested a potential relationship between BBB disruption and abnormal pericytes in the Plxnd1 knockout mice. Collectively, future studies should explore the involvement of Sema3E/Plexin-D1 signaling in the pericyte coverage process during vascular remodeling after stroke.
Here, we showed the antagonistic mechanisms of Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling as a beneficial mediator on VEGF-induced angiogenic sprouting. Further attention should focus on how these signaling pathways are precisely interconnected during vascular remodeling after stroke. Finally, further examination of the specific downstream targets of Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling in brain endothelial cells should be conducted to decipher the molecular mechanisms of intercellular communication. This may uncover novel therapeutic strategies for ameliorating the unfavorable outcomes in brain vascular diseases, such as stroke.
Conclusion
In summary, we show that Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling is necessary for the development of functional brain vasculature during vascular remodeling after an ischemic insult. We found that after ischemia, neurons in the peri-infarct region upregulate Sema3E, and vessels close to the damaged region subsequently express Plexin-D1. Furthermore, loss of Plexin-D1 function exacerbated brain damage and abnormal behavioral performance, accompanied by lower vessel density in the peri-infarct region, similar to previous observations in a retinopathy model [37]. Newly generated vessels lacking Plexin-D1 also yielded abnormal BBB function and structure. Suppression of overactive VEGF signaling in the Plxnd1 knockout during vascular remodeling periods rescued vascular defects. These data support a beneficial role of Sema3E-Plexin-D1 signaling in vascular repair regulation following ischemic stroke.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs. Ayal Ben-Zvi, Masha Gelfand, and Baptiste Lacoste for reading the manuscript and providing critical feedback; Dr. Chenghua Gu for providing Plxnd1-flox mice; the Advanced Neural Imaging Center in KBRI for light sheet and confocal microscopy image analysis; and Dr. Hoe-Su Jung of the Laboratory Animal Center at Daegu-Gyeongbuk Medical Innovation Foundation for MRI analysis.
Abbreviations
- AP
Alkaline phosphatase
- BBB
Blood-brain barrier
- CBF
Cerebral blood flow
- CCA
Common carotid artery
- ICA
Internal carotid artery
- ISH
In situ hybridization
- MCAo
Middle cerebral artery occlusion
- MRI
Magnetic resonance imaging
- NVU
Neurovascular unit
- PFA
Paraformaldehyde
- SEM
Standard error of the mean
- VEGF
Vascular endothelial growth factor
Author Contribution
WO conceived and designed the project. WO and RY conducted experiments and acquired data. RY, JJ, YL, and NK analyzed imaging data and quantification. BZ provided the mfsd2a-CreERT2 mouse model. SP performed data interpretation. WO and RY wrote the manuscript with significant input from SP.
Funding
This research was supported by the KBRI basic research program of the Korea Brain Research Institute funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (KBRI 20-BR-01–06) and the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) & funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (NRF-2020M3E5D9079766).
Data availability
All data generated and analyzed for this study are included in this published article and its supplementary additional files.
Declarations
Ethics approval
All protocols for animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Korea Brain Research Institute (IACUC-18–00008). All experiments were performed according to the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and ARRIVE guidelines.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137(12):e67. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hu X, De Silva TM, Chen J, Faraci FM. Cerebral vascular disease and neurovascular injury in ischemic stroke. Circ Res. 2017;120(3):449–471. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Freitas-Andrade M, Raman-Nair J, Lacoste B. Structural and functional remodeling of the brain vasculature following stroke. Front Physiol. 2020;11:948. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hatakeyama M, Ninomiya I, Kanazawa M. Angiogenesis and neuronal remodeling after ischemic stroke. Neural Regen Res. 2020;15(1):16. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.264442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Arai K, Jin G, Navaratna D, Lo EH. Brain angiogenesis in developmental and pathological processes: neurovascular injury and angiogenic recovery after stroke. FEBS. 2009;276(17):4644–4652. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07176.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Del Zoppo G. The neurovascular unit in the setting of stroke. J Intern Med. 2010;267(2):156–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2009.02199.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Murphy TH, Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(12):861–872. doi: 10.1038/nrn2735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gravanis I, Tsirka SE. Tissue-type plasminogen activator as a therapeutic target in stroke. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2008;12(2):159–170. doi: 10.1517/14728222.12.2.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Amani H, Habibey R, Shokri F, Hajmiresmail SJ, Akhavan O, Mashaghi A, et al. Selenium nanoparticles for targeted stroke therapy through modulation of inflammatory and metabolic signaling. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42633-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Carmeliet P, Tessier-Lavigne M. Common mechanisms of nerve and blood vessel wiring. Nature. 2005;436(7048):193. doi: 10.1038/nature03875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hawkins BT, Davis TP. The blood-brain barrier/neurovascular unit in health and disease. Pharmacol Rev. 2005;57(2):173–185. doi: 10.1124/pr.57.2.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Adams RH, Eichmann A. Axon guidance molecules in vascular patterning. Cold Spring Harbor perspect Biol. 2010;2(5):a001875. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gu C, Yoshida Y, Livet J, Reimert DV, Mann F, Merte J, et al. Semaphorin 3E and plexin-D1 control vascular pattern independently of neuropilins. Science. 2005;307(5707):265–268. doi: 10.1126/science.1105416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hayashi T, Saito A, Okuno S, Ferrand-Drake M, Dodd RL, Chan PH. Damage to the endoplasmic reticulum and activation of apoptotic machinery by oxidative stress in ischemic neurons. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2005;25(1):41–53. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Beck H, Plate KH. Angiogenesis after cerebral ischemia. Acta neuropathol. 2009;117(5):481–496. doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0483-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Liu J, Wang Y, Akamatsu Y, Lee CC, Stetler RA, Lawton MT, et al. Vascular remodeling after ischemic stroke: mechanisms and therapeutic potentials. Prog Neurobiol. 2014;115:138–156. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kanazawa M, Takahashi T, Ishikawa M, Onodera O, Shimohata T, del Zoppo GJ. Angiogenesis in the ischemic core: A potential treatment target? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019;39:753–769. doi: 10.1177/0271678X19834158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Phng L-K, Gerhardt H. Angiogenesis: a team effort coordinated by notch. Dev Cell. 2009;16(2):196–208. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Eichmann A, Simons M. VEGF signaling inside vascular endothelial cells and beyond. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2012;24(2):188–193. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2012.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Karaman S, Leppänen V-M, Alitalo K. Vascular endothelial growth factor signaling in development and disease. Development. 2018;145. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 21.Hayashi T, Abe K, Suzuki H, Itoyama Y. Rapid induction of vascular endothelial growth factor gene expression after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats. Stroke. 1997;28(10):2039–2044. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.10.2039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lennmyr F, Ata KA, Funa K, Olsson Y, Terént A. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors (Flt-1 and Flk-1) following permanent and transient occlusion of the middle cerebral artery in the rat. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1998;57(9):874–882. doi: 10.1097/00005072-199809000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Plate KH, Beck H, Danner S, Allegrini PR, Wiessner C. Cell type specific upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor in an MCA-occlusion model of cerebral infarct. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1999;58(6):654–666. doi: 10.1097/00005072-199906000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sun Y, Jin K, Xie L, Childs J, Mao XO, Logvinova A, et al. VEGF-induced neuroprotection, neurogenesis, and angiogenesis after focal cerebral ischemia. J Clin Investig. 2003;111(12):1843–1851. doi: 10.1172/JCI17977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hayashi T, Abe K, Itoyama Y. Reduction of ischemic damage by application of vascular endothelial growth factor in rat brain after transient ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1998;18(8):887–895. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199808000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kirby ED, Kuwahara AA, Messer RL, Wyss-Coray T. Adult hippocampal neural stem and progenitor cells regulate the neurogenic niche by secreting VEGF. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112(13):4128–4133. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1422448112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Li W-L, Fraser JL, Shan PY, Zhu J, Jiang Y-J, Wei L. The role of VEGF/VEGFR2 signaling in peripheral stimulation-induced cerebral neurovascular regeneration after ischemic stroke in mice. Exp Brain Res. 2011;214(4):503. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2849-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang Y, Kilic E, Kilic Ü, Weber B, Bassetti CL, Marti HH, et al. VEGF overexpression induces post-ischaemic neuroprotection, but facilitates haemodynamic steal phenomena. Brain. 2005;128(1):52–63. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Geiseler SJ, Morland C. The Janus face of VEGF in stroke. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(5):1362. doi: 10.3390/ijms19051362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Reeson P, Tennant KA, Gerrow K, Wang J, Novak SW, Thompson K, et al. Delayed inhibition of VEGF signaling after stroke attenuates blood–brain barrier breakdown and improves functional recovery in a comorbidity-dependent manner. J Neurosci. 2015;35(13):5128–5143. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2810-14.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lange C, Storkebaum E, De Almodóvar CR, Dewerchin M, Carmeliet P. Vascular endothelial growth factor: a neurovascular target in neurological diseases. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(8):439. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ding Q, Liao SJ, Yu J. Axon guidance factor netrin-1 and its receptors regulate angiogenesis after cerebral ischemia. Neurosci Bull. 2014;30(4):683–691. doi: 10.1007/s12264-013-1441-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Oh WJ, Gu C. The role and mechanism-of-action of Sema3E and Plexin-D1 in vascular and neural development. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2013;24(3):156–162. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ding JB, Oh W-J, Sabatini BL, Gu C. Semaphorin 3E–Plexin-D1 signaling controls pathway-specific synapse formation in the striatum. Nat Neurosci. 2012;15(2):215. doi: 10.1038/nn.3003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chauvet S, Cohen S, Yoshida Y, Fekrane L, Livet J, Gayet O, et al. Gating of Sema3E/PlexinD1 signaling by neuropilin-1 switches axonal repulsion to attraction during brain development. Neuron. 2007;56(5):807–822. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kim J, Oh WJ, Gaiano N, Yoshida Y, Gu C. Semaphorin 3E-Plexin-D1 signaling regulates VEGF function in developmental angiogenesis via a feedback mechanism. Genes Dev. 2011;25(13):1399–1411. doi: 10.1101/gad.2042011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fukushima Y, Okada M, Kataoka H, Hirashima M, Yoshida Y, Mann F, et al. Sema3E-PlexinD1 signaling selectively suppresses disoriented angiogenesis in ischemic retinopathy in mice. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(5):1974–1985. doi: 10.1172/JCI44900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fukushima Y, Nishiyama K, Kataoka H, Fruttiger M, Fukuhara S, Nishida K, et al. RhoJ integrates attractive and repulsive cues in directional migration of endothelial cells. The EMBO J. 2020;39(12):e102930. doi: 10.15252/embj.2019102930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pu W, Zhang H, Huang X, Tian X, He L, Wang Y, et al. Mfsd2a+ hepatocytes repopulate the liver during injury and regeneration. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13369. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Koizumi J. Experimental studies of ischemic brain edema. 1. A new experimental model of cerebral embolism in rats in which recirculation can be introduced in the ischemic area. Jpn J stroke. 1986;8(1):8. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Xia C-F, Smith RS, Jr, Shen B, Yang Z-R, Borlongan CV, Chao L, et al. Postischemic brain injury is exacerbated in mice lacking the kinin B2 receptor. Hypertension. 2006;47(4):752–761. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000214867.35632.0e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Susaki EA, Tainaka K, Perrin D, Yukinaga H, Kuno A, Ueda HR. Advanced CUBIC protocols for whole-brain and whole-body clearing and imaging. Nat Protoc. 2015;10(11):1709. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Van Der Zwaag B, Hellemons AJ, Leenders WP, Burbach JPH, Brunner HG, Padberg GW, et al. PLEXIN-D1, a novel plexin family member, is expressed in vascular endothelium and the central nervous system during mouse embryogenesis. Dev Dyn. 2002;225(3):336–343. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.10159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Oh W-J, Gu C. Establishment of neurovascular congruency in the mouse whisker system by an independent patterning mechanism. Neuron. 2013;80(2):458–469. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gitler AD, Lu MM, Epstein JA. PlexinD1 and semaphorin signaling are required in endothelial cells for cardiovascular development. Dev Cell. 2004;7(1):107–116. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Krupinski J, Stroemer P, Slevin M, Marti E, Kumar P, Rubio F. Three-dimensional structure and survival of newly formed blood vessels after focal cerebral ischemia. NeuroReport. 2003;14(8):1171–1176. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000075304.76650.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Simons M, Gordon E, Claesson-Welsh L. Mechanisms and regulation of endothelial VEGF receptor signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17(10):611. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Koch S, Claesson-Welsh L. Signal transduction by vascular endothelial growth factor receptors. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2(7):a006502. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a006502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hellström M, Phng L-K, Hofmann JJ, Wallgard E, Coultas L, Lindblom P, et al. Dll4 signalling through Notch1 regulates formation of tip cells during angiogenesis. Nature. 2007;445(7129):776–780. doi: 10.1038/nature05571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Marti HJ, Bernaudin M, Bellail A, Schoch H, Euler M, Petit E, et al. Hypoxia-induced vascular endothelial growth factor expression precedes neovascularization after cerebral ischemia. Am J Pathol. 2000;156(3):965–976. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64964-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chauvet S, Mann F. The declaration of independence of the neurovascular intimacy. Neuron. 2013;80(2):262–265. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Moriya J, Minamino T, Tateno K, Okada S, Uemura A, Shimizu I, et al. Inhibition of semaphorin as a novel strategy for therapeutic angiogenesis. Circ Res. 2010;106(2):391–398. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.210815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sun Y, Liu C-H, Wang Z, Meng SS, Burnim SB, SanGiovanni JP, et al. RORα modulates semaphorin 3E transcription and neurovascular interaction in pathological retinal angiogenesis. FASEB J. 2017;31(10):4492–4502. doi: 10.1096/fj.201700172R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kwon SH, Shin JP, Kim IT, Park DH. Aqueous levels of angiopoietin-like 4 and semaphorin 3E correlate with nonperfusion area and macular volume in diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(5):968–975. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Gelfand MV, Hong S, Gu C. Guidance from above: common cues direct distinct signaling outcomes in vascular and neural patterning. Trends Cell Biol. 2009;19(3):99–110. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2009.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ghori A, Freimann FB, Nieminen-Kelhä M, Kremenetskaia I, Gertz K, Endres M, et al. EphrinB2 activation enhances vascular repair mechanisms and reduces brain swelling after mild cerebral ischemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017;37(5):867–878. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.308620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Thundyil J, Manzanero S, Pavlovski D, Cully TR, Lok K-Z, Widiapradja A, et al. Evidence that the EphA2 receptor exacerbates ischemic brain injury. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1):e53528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zhou Y-F, Li Y-N, Jin H-J, Wu J-H, He Q-W, Wang X-X, et al. Sema4D/PlexinB1 inhibition ameliorates blood–brain barrier damage and improves outcome after stroke in rats. FASEB J. 2018;32(4):2181–2196. doi: 10.1096/fj.201700786RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zheng M, Chen R, Chen H, Zhang Y, Chen J, Lin P, et al. Netrin-1 promotes synaptic formation and axonal regeneration via JNK1/c-Jun pathway after the middle cerebral artery occlusion. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:13. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rust R, Grönnert L, Weber RZ, Mulders G, Schwab ME. Refueling the ischemic CNS: guidance molecules for vascular repair. Trends in neurosciences. 2019. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 61.Pekcec A, Yigitkanli K, Jung JE, Pallast S, Xing C, Antipenko A, et al. Following experimental stroke, the recovering brain is vulnerable to lipoxygenase-dependent semaphorin signaling. FASEB J. 2013;27(2):437–445. doi: 10.1096/fj.12-206896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hou ST, Nilchi L, Li X, Gangaraju S, Jiang SX, Aylsworth A, et al. Semaphorin3A elevates vascular permeability and contributes to cerebral ischemia-induced brain damage. Sci Rep. 2015;5:7890. doi: 10.1038/srep07890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zhou Y-F, Li P-C, Wu J-H, Haslam JA, Mao L, Xia Y-P, et al. Sema3E/PlexinD1 inhibition is a therapeutic strategy for improving cerebral perfusion and restoring functional loss after stroke in aged rats. Neurobiol Aging. 2018;70:102–116. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kwiatkowski SC, Ojeda AF, Lwigale PY. PlexinD1 is required for proper patterning of the periocular vascular network and for the establishment of corneal avascularity during avian ocular development. Dev Biol. 2016;411(1):128–139. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Knowland D, Arac A, Sekiguchi KJ, Hsu M, Lutz SE, Perrino J, et al. Stepwise recruitment of transcellular and paracellular pathways underlies blood-brain barrier breakdown in stroke. Neuron. 2014;82(3):603–617. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hori S, Ohtsuki S, Hosoya Ki, Nakashima E, Terasaki T. A pericyte‐derived angiopoietin‐1 multimeric complex induces occludin gene expression in brain capillary endothelial cells through Tie‐2 activation in vitro. J Neurochem. 2004;89(2):503–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02343.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Zhao Z, Nelson AR, Betsholtz C, Zlokovic BV. Establishment and dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier. Cell. 2015;163(5):1064–1078. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated and analyzed for this study are included in this published article and its supplementary additional files.