Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2022 Jan 17;15(1):e247237. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-247237

Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)-induced aortitis in a patient undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

Rehan Asif 1,, Gwenllian Edwards 2, Annabel Borley 2, Sharon Jones 1
PMCID: PMC8768863  PMID: 35039373

Abstract

Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is used to prevent febrile neutropenia post chemotherapy. Usually well tolerated with minimal side effects but aortitis is an extremely rare side effect previously reported. A 64-year-old woman treated with adjuvant chemotherapy including G-CSF for left breast cancer was admitted with fevers, neutropenia and markedly raised inflammatory markers after 7 days of her first cycle. Initially diagnosed with neutropenic sepsis, she did not respond to broad spectrum antibiotics with subsequent CT imaging revealing marked periaortic inflammatory changes consistent with aortitis and periaortitis. Extensive investigations for other causes of large vessel vasculitis were negative and G-CSF was the only causative factor. She rapidly responded to steroids with almost complete resolution of inflammatory changes on repeat imaging within 4 weeks and no recurrence on tapering of steroids. This diagnosis must be considered in patients presenting with fever and raised inflammatory markers post G-CSF treatment.

Keywords: malignant disease and immunosuppression, breast cancer, unwanted effects / adverse reactions, vasculitis

Background

Febrile neutropenia is a well-recognised and serious complication of chemotherapeutic agents, a major cause of infection related mortality in cancer patients and also a dose limiting toxicity resulting in frequent dose reductions and delays in treatment. Recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is frequently prescribed not only to reduce the incidence of severe chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia but also to maintain the intended dose intensity and schedule of treatment particularly in patients treated with a radical or curative intent.

G-CSF is considered a safe and well-tolerated agent with its most common side effects often being quite mild.1 2 However, aortitis and large vessel vasculitis have been reported as a rare complication with G-CSF therapy.3 A recent systematic review by Muzanna et al analysed 57 patients with G-CSF-associated aortitis.4 It is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication with the risk of aneurysmal dilatation and aortic dissection. Aortitis can present with non-specific symptoms and can closely mimic neutropenic infections which make the diagnosis challenging.

Case presentation

A 64-year-old woman presented to the medical admissions unit 7 days after her first cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide with pegylated G-CSF support. She had 4-day history of malaise, left flank pain and developed a fever of 38°C on the day of admission. Her medical history included a previous right breast cancer in 2002 treated with mastectomy and axillary node clearance (ANC) followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and endocrine therapy. In October 2020, she was diagnosed with a T3N2M0 oestrogen receptor positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) left-sided breast cancer for which she underwent a mastectomy and ANC. Beyond her breast malignancies, she had no other significant comorbidities.

On examination, her temperature was 38°C, BP 107/70 mm Hg and HR 78 /min. Clinical assessment did not identify a source of infection. Investigations revealed a raised CRP of 196 mg/L, neutrophils of 0.2×109 /L and normal renal and liver function tests. Chest X-ray was normal and urine dipstick was clear. Crucially, as her admission occurred during UK lockdown conditions due to the global pandemic, her COVID-19 PCR was negative. Serum procalcitonin was not elevated, measuring only 0.05 ug/L. Of note, the patient had a tunnelled central venous catheter (CVC), which on inspection was flushing well and revealed no signs of local superficial infection.

Initial diagnosis and management

Neutropenic sepsis was suspected prompting prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics with piperacillin-tazobactam and amikacin.

Case progression and outcome

During admission, the patient continued to be febrile and had a continued, gradual rise of CRP. On day 9 her CRP was 546 mg/L prompting a change of antibiotic therapy to meropenem. Five sets of blood cultures taken during admission both peripherally and from the CVC showed no growth. Further infection screen including a throat swab, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), Cytomegalovirus (CMV), hepatitis B, C and HIV were also negative.

A CT abdomen, pelvis requested to investigate her flank pain did not demonstrate any infective foci, however, did comment on inflammatory changes around the descending aorta extending up to the abdominal aorta, which were suggestive of aortitis. These changes were not present at staging CT scan done at the time of her cancer diagnosis. Subsequent CT angiogram confirmed extensive periaortic inflammatory changes consistent with initial findings (figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Axial CT slices demonstrating marked periaortic inflammatory changes of the lower thoracic aorta and aortic arch.

Rheumatology team requested further tests to investigate the possibility of a primary vasculitis. Rheumatoid factor, ANA, ANCA, ENA antibodies, IgG subclass 4 and syphilis screen were all negative. At this point, a diagnosis of G-CSF-induced aortitis was suspected, therefore the patient was initiated on prednisolone 20 mg daily and antibiotic therapy was stopped. Her symptoms began to improve within 48 hours with resolution of fever. She was therefore discharged with close follow-up.

Outcome and follow-up

Two weeks following discharge her symptoms had completely resolved with a decline in CRP to 11 mg/L. Subsequent CT angiogram 3 weeks after discharge showed almost complete resolution of the inflammatory changes (figure 2). Prednisolone dose was slowly tapered down to 10 mg over a period of 2 months and then to 0 mg over next 6 months. She had no symptoms or signs of disease relapse on tapering steroids.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Complete resolution of periaortic inflammatory changes of the lower thoracic aorta and aortic arch post-treatment.

Discussion

Primary vasculitis syndromes causing aortitis include Takayasu, giant cell arteritis and IgG4 disease, whereas tuberculosis, salmonella and syphilis are some of the rare infectious causes. Infectious and primary inflammatory aetiologies must also be excluded before a diagnosis of G-CSF-associated aortitis is considered. Primary inflammatory vasculitis syndromes typically have an indolent and chronic course contrary to acute presentation seen in G-CSF-associated aortitis as was the case in our patient.

Apart from the infectious and inflammatory causes, some of the other chemotherapeutic agents and targeted therapies have also been implicated in drug-induced aortitis and vasculitis. These include platinum based anti-cancer drugs, gemcitabine and bevacizumab. Patients receiving these therapies must also be monitored for this rare complication. Our patient did not receive any of these chemotherapeutic agents.

G-CSF has been reported as a rare cause of drug-induced aortitis.5 6 Data from a Japanese database reported the incidence of G-CSF-induced aortitis as 0.47%, while another study of patients with breast cancer, reported the incidence of pegylated G-CSF-induced aortitis as 0.3%.

The underlying pathophysiology remains unclear but is thought to be mediated by pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-6.2 6 7 G-CSF stimulates neutrophil precursors and promotes neutrophil-mediated inflammatory response eliciting vessel wall damage seen in aortitis.

Establishing the diagnosis can be challenging as patients often manifest with non-specific symptoms including fever, back pain and raised inflammatory markers, which can overlap with common presenting symptoms of chemotherapeutic side effects or indeed neutropenic fever.

A review of 10 published case reports identified from PubMed are summarised in table 1.7–16 The existing case reports describe similar presenting features with patients developing an acute onset of symptoms mimicking an infective picture and most cases describing a rapid resolution of symptoms.7 8 11 12 14–16 Six of 10 cases received some form of steroid therapy as did our patient. The rest resolved spontaneously with no intervention.

Table 1.

Summary of 10 previously published case reports of G-CSF associated aortitis

Miller, Grosu, Landau7 Hoshina, Takei 2019 8 Mukai, Kubo et al 20209 Shirai, Komatsu et al 202010 Nakamura, Nishi et al11 Darie, Boutalba et al 200412 Kamentai, Otani et al13 Kinjo, Kurita et al14 Corral de la fuente et al15 Harada, Motoki et al16
52 72 66 65 66 55 56 77 59 52
Male Female Female Female Female Female Male Female Female Female
Healthy bone marrow donor Breast cancer Breast cancer Pancreatic cancer Breast cancer Breast cancer Chondrosarcoma Ovarian cancer Breast cancer Ovarian cancer
Pegfilgrastim Pegfilgrastim Pegfilgrastim Pegfilgrastim Pegfilgrastim Pegfilgrastim Pegfilgrastim Not stated Pegfilgrastim Unknown
Infrarenal aorta Descending aorta Aortic arch & abdominal aorta Aortic arch Not stated Unknown aorta Bilateral common carotid and left subclavian Myocarditis and carotidynia Aortic arch /abdominal aorta
Nil Docetaxel, trastuzumab, pertuzumab Docetaxel and cyclophosphamide Folfirinox Doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide Unknown Adriamycib, ifosfamide Paclitaxel, carboplatin Unknown Paclitaxel, carboplatin
1 year 5 days 10 days 12 days 11 days Unknown 4 days 2 days 11 days 14 days
CT PET/CT CT CT CT Unknown CT CT Unknown CT and PET
Rapid improvement Spontaneous after 19 days Rapid Spontaneous, rapid within 10 days Spontaneous 3 weeks 6 months Rapid resolution Rapid spontaneous Initially rapid Rapid on commencement of steroids
Prednisolone Nil Methylprednisolone Nil Nil Yes Prednisolone 1 mg/kg nil Prednisolone Prednisolone

It is imperative to reduce the risk of hospitalisation from neutropenic sepsis particularly in this period of a global pandemic. The patient discussed here went on to receive further adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel, which confers a much lower risk of neutropenic complications and therefore does not necessitate the supportive coadministration of G-CSF. Naranjo algorithm, which is a questionnaire designed to determine the likelihood of adverse drug reaction (ADR) was also applied in our case and the score was 7 (probable ADR). A score of 9 (definite ADR) requires re-challenging with the particular drug which was not done in our case because of high risk of relapse of aortitis. In two of the identified case reports, patients were re-challenged with G-CSF and subsequently developed further episodes of large vessel vasculitis.

There are no clear predictors or risk factors of G-CSF-associated aortitis. We recommend a high index of suspicion of this rare complication from G-CSF treatment. Early imaging is essential in identifying this complication, planning treatment and prevent any further complications.

Learning points.

  • Aortitis is an extremely rare but important complication of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy

  • This diagnosis must be considered in patients presenting with fever and unclear source of raised inflammatory markers post chemotherapy including G-CSF

  • Early imaging can help in prompt diagnosis and discontinuation of G-CSF, preventing subsequent aortitis-related complications.

Footnotes

Contributors: RA was responsible in writing the initial draft of the case report. GE did literature review of the existing evidence and case reports on this subject and also contributed to discussion section of the article. AB and SJ were involved in the final review of the article.

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.

Competing interests: None declared.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Consent obtained directly from patient(s).

References

  • 1.Lardieri A, McCulley L, Christopher Jones S, et al. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors and aortitis: a rare adverse event. Am J Hematol 2018;93:E333–6. 10.1002/ajh.25220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Taimen K, Heino S, Kohonen I, et al. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor- and chemotherapy-induced large-vessel vasculitis: six patient cases and a systematic literature review. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2020;4:rkaa004. 10.1093/rap/rkaa004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Muzzana M, Pedrazzoli P, Lasagna A. G-Csf and G-CSF-related vasculitis: a systematic review of the literature and intriguing future research perspectives. Future Oncol 2021;17:4619–34. 10.2217/fon-2021-0701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sato Y, Kaji S, Ueda H, et al. Thoracic aortitis and aortic dissection following pegfilgrastim administration. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017;52:993–4. 10.1093/ejcts/ezx165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Oshima Y, Takahashi S, Tani K, et al. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-associated aortitis in the Japanese adverse drug event report database. Cytokine 2019;119:47–51. 10.1016/j.cyto.2019.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lee SY, Kim EK, Kim J-Y, et al. The incidence and clinical features of PEGylated filgrastim-induced acute aortitis in patients with breast cancer. Sci Rep 2020;10:18647. 10.1038/s41598-020-75620-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Miller EB, Grosu R, Landau Z. Isolated abdominal aortitis following administration of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). Clin Rheumatol 2016;35:1655–7. 10.1007/s10067-016-3253-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hoshina H, Takei H. Granulocyte-Colony stimulating factor-associated aortitis in a woman with advanced breast cancer: a case report and review of the literature. BMC Cancer 2019;19:1217. 10.1186/s12885-019-6403-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mukai T, Kubo S, Morita Y, et al. Aortitis which developed after the administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. Mod Rheumatol Case Rep 2020;4:74–8. 10.1080/24725625.2019.1629570 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shirai T, Komatsu H, Sato H, et al. Migratory aortitis associated with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor. Intern Med 2020;59:1559–63. 10.2169/internalmedicine.4331-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nakamura J, Nishi TM, Yamashita S, et al. Pegfilgrastim-associated large-vessel vasculitis developed during adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a case report and review of the literature. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2020;26:1785–90. 10.1177/1078155220910800 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Darie C, Boutalba S, Fichter P, et al. [Aortitis after G-CSF injections]. Rev Med Interne 2004;25:225–9. 10.1016/j.revmed.2003.10.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kametani T, Otani Y, Ohigashi T, et al. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-induced aortitis with lung injury, splenomegaly, and a rash during treatment for recurrent extraosseous mucinous chondrosarcoma. Intern Med 2021;60:1311–5. 10.2169/internalmedicine.5913-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kinjo Y, Kurita T, Ueda T, et al. Acute arteritis after G-CSF administration. Int Cancer Conf J 2019;8:77–80. 10.1007/s13691-018-00357-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Corral de la Fuente E, Barquín Garcia A, Saavedra Serrano C, et al. Myocarditis and carotidynia caused by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor administration. Mod Rheumatol Case Rep 2020;4:318–23. 10.1080/24725625.2020.1754552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Harada M, Motoki H, Sakai T, et al. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor-associated aortitis evaluated via multiple imaging modalities including vascular echography: a case report. Eur Heart J Case Rep 2021;5:ytaa503. 10.1093/ehjcr/ytaa503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES