Skip to main content
Sage Choice logoLink to Sage Choice
letter
. 2022 Jan 13;43(1):146–147. doi: 10.1177/10711007211058693

Letter Regarding: Long-term Outcomes of Microfracture for Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

Carlijn S ter Laak Bolk, Jari Dahmen, Gino MMJ Kerkhoffs
PMCID: PMC8772008  PMID: 35023393

Dear Editor,

We thank the team of Dr Corr 1 for performing an interesting study titled “Long-term Outcomes of Microfracture for Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus.” Although we read the work with pleasure, some thought-provoking points were raised which we wish to respectfully discuss.

Firstly, 55% of the patients were available for follow-up. Obviously, this introduces risk of bias affecting outcomes and conclusions based on the performed analyses. Despite comparing the included cohort to the lost-to-follow-up cohort, important demographic, prognostic, and outcome factors are lacking in this analysis (eg, lesion size and morphology). Excluding patients with larger lesion sizes or prognostically inferior lesion morphologies can skew the results favorably.

Furthermore, the study’s purpose was to determine whether orthobiologic treatment is a necessary addition to BMS for long-term clinical outcomes. It was not mentioned whether orthobiologics contributed to improving long-term outcomes, thereby not completing the study’s purpose. We wonder whether orthobiologics were used in the current population and whether a subanalysis could have been performed. Moreover, the study did not refer to relevant publications researching long-term clinical outcomes after BMS. Discussing European publications would have contributed to the quality of the discussion as recent publications assessed that the long-term outcomes are less favorable than the authors presented.2,4,5 Comparing the results in a more comprehensive manner can yield insights why such promising results were found in a treatment that we think may not do that well at the long term.

Finally, the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were used. The validity and reliability of the FAAM can be questioned as this score has not (yet) been specifically validated to assess outcomes of OLT treatment. Besides, it is unclear in which setting (rest, standing, during activities) the patients’ pain was assessed, making the interpretation of the VAS scores impossible. This distinction is vital for OLT patients as they will have higher pain scores during weightbearing. Moreover, higher pain scores during weightbearing can imply cartilage or subchondral bone degeneration following microfracture, negatively affecting outcomes in the long term. 3

Concluding from the above, we can state that the study’s results should be received and interpreted with a number of reservations as the results appear more promising compared to the current literature on the long-term efficacy of BMS. Subsequently, it is yet to be determined whether orthobiologics have a role in improving long-term outcomes.

Supplemental Material

sj-pdf-1-fai-10.1177_10711007211058693 – Supplemental material for Letter Regarding: Long-term Outcomes of Microfracture for Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-fai-10.1177_10711007211058693 for Letter Regarding: Long-term Outcomes of Microfracture for Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus by Carlijn S. ter Laak Bolk, Jari Dahmen and Gino M.M.J. Kerkhoffs in Foot & Ankle International

Carlijn S. ter Laak Bolk, BSc
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amsterdam Movement
Sciences, Amsterdam UMC,
Location AMC, University of Amsterdam,
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Academic Center for Evidence based Sports medicine (ACES),
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS),
International Olympic Committee (IOC) Research Center, Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Jari Dahmen, MD
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC,
Location AMC, University of Amsterdam,
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Academic Center for Evidence based Sports medicine (ACES),
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS),
International Olympic Committee (IOC) Research Center,
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Gino M.M.J. Kerkhoffs, MD, PhD
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC,
Location AMC, University of Amsterdam,
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Academic Center for Evidence based Sports medicine (ACES),
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS),
International Olympic Committee (IOC) Research Center, Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Email: g.m.kerkhoffs@amsterdamumc.nl

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. ICMJE forms for all authors are available online.

Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD: Jari Dahmen, MD, Inline graphic https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2227-3195

References

  • 1. Corr D, Raikin J, O’Neil J, Raikin S. Long-term outcomes of microfracture for treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Foot Ankle Int. 2021;42(7):833-840. doi: 10.1177/1071100721995427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Lambers KTA, Dahmen J, Altink JN, Reilingh ML, van Bergen CJA, Kerkhoffs G. Bone marrow stimulation for talar osteochondral lesions at long-term follow-up shows a high sports participation though a decrease in clinical outcomes over time. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021;29(5):1562-1569. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06250-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Murawski CD, Foo LF, Kennedy JG. A Review of arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation techniques of the talus: the good, the bad, and the causes for concern. Cartilage. 2010;1(2):137-144. doi: 10.1177/1947603510364403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Rikken QGH, Dahmen J, Stufkens SAS, Kerkhoffs GMMJ. Satisfactory long-term clinical outcomes after bone marrow stimulation of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(11):3525-3533. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06630-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. van Bergen CJ, Kox LS, Maas M, Sierevelt IN, Kerkhoffs GM, van Dijk CN. Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral defects of the talus: outcomes at eight to twenty years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95(6):519-525. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.L.00675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

sj-pdf-1-fai-10.1177_10711007211058693 – Supplemental material for Letter Regarding: Long-term Outcomes of Microfracture for Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-fai-10.1177_10711007211058693 for Letter Regarding: Long-term Outcomes of Microfracture for Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus by Carlijn S. ter Laak Bolk, Jari Dahmen and Gino M.M.J. Kerkhoffs in Foot & Ankle International


Articles from Foot & Ankle International are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES