Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2022 Jan 20;11(1):e00868-21. doi: 10.1128/mra.00868-21

Genome Assembly of the Ty1-Less Saccharomyces paradoxus Strain DG1768

Jingxuan Chen a,, Holly McQueary b,*, David W Hall b,§, Peter Philippsen c, David J Garfinkel b,d, Casey M Bergman a,b,
Editor: Vincent Brunoe
PMCID: PMC8772602  PMID: 35049349

ABSTRACT

Here, we report an essentially complete genome assembly for the Ty1-less Saccharomyces paradoxus strain DG1768 (derivative of strain 337) based on PacBio and Illumina shotgun sequence data. We also document the genetic alterations that make this yeast strain a key resource for Ty1 mobility studies.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Saccharomyces yeasts have played essential roles in elucidating the biology of eukaryotic retrotransposons (14). Here, we report a genome assembly for Saccharomyces paradoxus strain DG1768, a representative of a “Ty1-less” lineage frequently used to study Ty1 retrotransposition (511). DG1768 [MATα ura3-100 Ty1-155-Δura3(Scer)-101 his3-Δ200hisG] is derived from a wild Saccharomyces strain collected in California (UCDFST 51-186) that was obtained from the Ron Davis laboratory (renamed 155). Michael Ciriacy mated strain 155 with Saccharomyces cerevisiae GRF18 and then repeatedly backcrossed to strain 155 to create a nearly isogenic strain (called 276) carrying ho(Scer), one full-length Ty1 element (called Ty1-155), and a ura3 mutation at the endogenous URA3 locus. Homologous recombination was used to replace Ty1-155 in strain 276 with S. cerevisiae URA3 plus ∼600 bp of vector sequence, followed by selection of a ura3 mutation in the new heterologous URA3 locus to create the ρ− strain 337. Finally, HIS3 was deleted (replaced with Salmonella HisG), and functional S. cerevisiae mitochondria were introduced via cytoduction to create strain DG1768 (6). Subsequently, DG1768 was shown to be S. paradoxus (8).

To prepare DNA for sequencing, single colonies of strain DG1768 were inoculated in 7 mL of yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) liquid broth and cultured for ∼24 h at 30°C. Table 1 provides details on how PacBio and Illumina data sets were generated. For assembly, unfiltered PacBio reads were input to HGAP 4 (smrtlink-release_5.1.0.26412) (12), which performed read quality control, error correction, and adapter trimming. The PacBio-only assembly was polished five times with Pilon (v1.24) (13) using unfiltered paired-end 150-bp Illumina reads as input. Polished contigs were scaffolded with RagTag (v2.0.1) (14) using S. paradoxus YPS138 as the reference (15). Assembly statistics were calculated using QUAST (v5.0.2) (16) and BUSCO (v5.0.0, saccharomycetes_odb10 database) (17). Ty elements were annotated using a RepeatMasker-based pipeline (11). Telomere-associated sequences were annotated with LRSDAY (18). Default software parameters were used except where otherwise noted.

TABLE 1.

Methods for and properties of the PacBio and Illumina whole-genome sequencing data sets used to assemble and polish the DG1768 genome

Parameter PacBio reads Illumina reads
DNA isolation method Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega) YeaStar genomic DNA kit (Zymo Research)
Library prepn method SMRTbell Express template preparation kit >15-kb size-selection protocol with Covaris g-TUBE shearing Method of Urich et al. (19) with no bisulfite conversion
Sequencing chemistry Sequel sequencing kit v2.1 S4 reagent kit (300 cycles)
Sequencing instrument PacBio Sequel II NovaSeq 6000
Avg read length (bp) 5,912 150
N50 (bp) 10,652 150
No. of reads 615,827 2,357,654

Our DG1768 assembly is 11,932,051 bp in length (scaffold N50 value of 917,222 bp), with an overall GC content of 38.43%. The assembly has 18 contigs in 17 scaffolds; 15 chromosomes and the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) are completely assembled in 1 contig each, and chromosome XII is assembled in 1 scaffold with 2 contigs, with a gap at the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) locus. A total of 97.5% of Saccharomycetes benchmarking universal single-copy orthologs (BUSCOs) are present and single copy. Core X elements or Y′ elements were annotated in 29 of 32 scaffold ends, indicating the near completeness of all chromosomes. We confirmed that no full-length copies of Ty1 are present in the DG1768 genome. The scar of the Ty1-155 knockout was localized to chromosome VI from nucleotide position 292,634 to 294,347. The scar of the HIS3 knockout was localized to chromosome XV from nucleotide position 686961 to 688113. We also identified a segment of S. cerevisiae DNA, spanning chromosome IV from nucleotide position 1 to 135828, caused by introduction of the ho allele, and we confirmed that DG1768 mtDNA is from S. cerevisiae. The provenance and essentially complete genome assembly for DG1768 presented here should provide a useful resource for studies on Ty1 retrotransposon biology.

Data availability.

PacBio data used to generate the assembly and Illumina data used to polish the assembly are available under BioProject accession number PRJNA748953. The assembly was deposited at NCBI under GenBank accession numbers CP081969 to CP081986.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We dedicate this article to Michael Ciriacy, who performed all genetic steps essential for the Ty1-155 knockout experiment at the University of Düsseldorf and tragically died before seeing the fruition of his work. We thank Kyria Boundy-Mills (University of California, Davis) and Jasper Rine (University of California, Berkeley) for assistance determining the provenance of strain 155. We thank Marissa Howard, Noah Workman, and Magdy Alabady at the University of Georgia Genomics and Bioinformatics Core for assistance with PacBio library preparation and sequencing, Tyler Earp for assistance with Illumina library preparation, GeneWiz for Illumina sequencing, the Georgia Advanced Computing Resource Center for computational resources, and two members of the Microbiology Resource Announcements editorial board for comments on the manuscript.

This work was funded by the University of Georgia Research Foundation (C.M.B.) and NIH grant R01GM124216 (D.J.G. and C.M.B.).

Contributor Information

Jingxuan Chen, Email: jingxuanchen@uga.edu.

Casey M. Bergman, Email: cbergman@uga.edu.

Vincent Bruno, University of Maryland School of Medicine.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Cameron JR, Loh EY, Davis RW. 1979. Evidence for transposition of dispersed repetitive DNA families in yeast. Cell 16:739–751. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90090-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Boeke JD. 1999. Retrotransposons of fungi, p 1503–1507. In Granoff A, Webster RG (ed), Encyclopedia of virology, 2nd ed. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA. doi: 10.1006/rwvi.1999.0249. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Curcio MJ, Lutz S, Lesage P. 2015. The Ty1 LTR-retrotransposon of budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Spectr 3:MDNA3-0053-2014. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0053-2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sandmeyer S, Patterson K, Bilanchone V. 2015. Ty3, a position-specific retrotransposon in budding yeast. Microbiol Spectr 3:MDNA3-0057-2014. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0057-2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wilke CM, Adams J. 1992. Fitness effects of Ty transposition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 131:31–42. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.1.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Garfinkel DJ, Nyswaner K, Wang J, Cho JY. 2003. Post-transcriptional cosuppression of Ty1 retrotransposition. Genetics 165:83–99. doi: 10.1093/genetics/165.1.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Blanc VM, Adams J. 2004. Ty1 insertions in intergenic regions of the genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcribed by RNA polymerase III have no detectable selective effect. FEMS Yeast Res 4:487–491. doi: 10.1016/S1567-1356(03)00199-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Moore SP, Liti G, Stefanisko KM, Nyswaner KM, Chang C, Louis EJ, Garfinkel DJ. 2004. Analysis of a Ty1-less variant of Saccharomyces paradoxus: the gain and loss of Ty1 elements. Yeast 21:649–660. doi: 10.1002/yea.1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Garfinkel DJ, Nyswaner KM, Stefanisko KM, Chang C, Moore SP. 2005. Ty1 copy number dynamics in Saccharomyces. Genetics 169:1845–1857. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.037317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Saha A, Mitchell JA, Nishida Y, Hildreth JE, Ariberre JA, Gilbert WV, Garfinkel DJ. 2015. A trans-dominant form of Gag restricts Ty1 retrotransposition and mediates copy number control. J Virol 89:3922–3938. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03060-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Czaja W, Bensasson D, Ahn HW, Garfinkel DJ, Bergman CM. 2020. Evolution of Ty1 copy number control in yeast by horizontal transfer and recombination. PLoS Genet 16:e1008632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chin CS, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, Clum A, Copeland A, Huddleston J, Eichler EE, Turner SW, Korlach J. 2013. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 10:563–569. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, Cuomo CA, Zeng Q, Wortman J, Young SK, Earl AM. 2014. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Alonge M, Soyk S, Ramakrishnan S, Wang X, Goodwin S, Sedlazeck FJ, Lippman ZB, Schatz MC. 2019. RaGOO: fast and accurate reference-guided scaffolding of draft genomes. Genome Biol 20:224. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1829-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yue JX, Li J, Aigrain L, Hallin J, Persson K, Oliver K, Bergstrom A, Coupland P, Warringer J, Lagomarsino MC, Fischer G, Durbin R, Liti G. 2017. Contrasting evolutionary genome dynamics between domesticated and wild yeasts. Nat Genet 49:913–924. doi: 10.1038/ng.3847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Simao FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. 2015. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31:3210–3212. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yue JX, Liti G. 2018. Long-read sequencing data analysis for yeasts. Nat Protoc 13:1213–1231. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2018.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Urich MA, Nery JR, Lister R, Schmitz RJ, Ecker JR. 2015. MethylC-seq library preparation for base-resolution whole-genome bisulfite sequencing. Nat Protoc 10:475–483. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

PacBio data used to generate the assembly and Illumina data used to polish the assembly are available under BioProject accession number PRJNA748953. The assembly was deposited at NCBI under GenBank accession numbers CP081969 to CP081986.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES