Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Jan 20;17(1):e0261668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261668

Enhanced β-adrenergic response in mice with dominant-negative expression of the PKD2L1 channel

Manabu Murakami 1,*, Agnieszka M Murakami 2, Takayuki Nemoto 1, Takayoshi Ohba 3, Manabu Yonekura 4, Yuichi Toyama 4, Hirofumi Tomita 4, Yasushi Matsuzaki 5, Daisuke Sawamura 5, Kazuyoshi Hirota 6, Shirou Itagaki 7, Yujiro Asada 8, Ichiro Miyoshi 9
Editor: Alexander G Obukhov10
PMCID: PMC8775249  PMID: 35051185

Abstract

Polycystic kidney disease (PKD) is the most common genetic cause of kidney failure in humans. Among the various PKD-related molecules, PKD2L1 forms cation channels, but its physiological importance is obscure. In the present study, we established a transgenic mouse line by overexpressing the dominant-negative form of the mouse PKD2L1 gene (i.e., lacking the pore-forming domain). The resulting PKD2L1del-Tg mice exhibited supraventricular premature contraction, as well as enhanced sensitivity to β-adrenergic stimulation and unstable R-R intervals in electrocardiography. During spontaneous atrial contraction, PKD2L1del-Tg atria showed enhanced sensitivity to isoproterenol, norepinephrine, and epinephrine. Action potential recording revealed a shortened action potential duration in PKD2L1del-Tg atria in response to isoproterenol. These findings indicated increased adrenergic sensitivity in PKD2L1del-Tg mice, suggesting that PKD2L1 is involved in sympathetic regulation.

Introduction

Polycystic kidney disease (PKD) is a common autosomal dominant Mendelian disorder affecting 0.1% of the population, and it is the most common genetic cause of kidney failure in humans [1]. PKD is a monogenic hereditary disease characterized by multiple, progressive bilateral cystic dilatations of renal tubules, which result in renal failure. Positional cloning analysis has revealed two loci of etiological importance: polycystin-1 (PKD1), mapped to chromosome 16p13.3, and polycystin-2 (PKD2), mapped to chromosome 4q21–23) [25]. Ninety-five percent of patients with autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) exhibit mutations in PKD1 (about 85%) and PKD2 (about 15%). Notably, cardiovascular complications are the major causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with PKD. Cardiac-related death is estimated to be 1.6- to 3.2-fold more frequent in these patients than in the general population [6].

PKD1 and PKD2 participate in the transient receptor potential polycystic (TRPP) channel subfamily. There are two types of PKD-related TRPP genes: PKD1-like (PKD1, also known as TRPP1) and PKD2-like (TRPP2, TRPP3, and TRPP5). As an important PKD2-like gene, PKD2 (TRPP2) forms a calcium-permeable nonselective cation channel [79]. Four other forms of PKD-related genes have been identified by means of computer-based homology screening [10]. Among them, polycystin-2L1 (PKD2L1, also known as TRPP3 or PKDL) has high homology to PKD2. Mice lacking PKD2L1 and Pax2 genes develop lethal PKD [11], while other homologous-recombinant gene-targeting approaches revealed an epileptic phenotype in PKD2L1-null mice [12]. In previous studies, our group demonstrated that PKD2L1 forms cation channels [13]. PKD2L1 is also involved in high-salt-induced cardiac hypertrophy [14]. PKD2L1, is a non-selective cation channel that is permeable to Ca2+, K+, and Na+ [12, 15]. This channel is expressed in the kidney, brain, heart, and other tissues [13, 1519]. PKD2L1 forms cation channels with PKD1L3 interacting with its C-terminal domain or its transmembrane domain [20, 21].

In a previous study, Yao et al. demonstrated an epileptic phenotype in PKD2L1-deficient mice, along with interaction and co-localization of PKD2L1 with β2-adrenergic receptors (β2ARs) in the brain [12]. PKD2L1 deficiency led to the loss of β2AR on neuronal cilia, which was accompanied by a 27% reduction in cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels in the central nervous system. Thus far, multiple aspects of PKD2L1 remain unclear, such as the physiological importance of PKD2L1 in channel formation in cardiac tissue and the importance of PKD2L1 in PKD. Here, to further characterize the roles of PKD2L1, we constructed a dominant-negative form of the PKD2L1 gene and overexpressed it in transgenic (Tg) mice.

Methods

Ethics statement

This study was performed with the approval of the Institutional Review Board of Miyazaki University. All experiments were conducted in accordance with the Guidelines for the Use of Laboratory Animals at Miyazaki University. The animals were housed throughout the study under a constant 12-h light/dark cycle with free access to food and water. Mice aged 12–20 weeks were used in all experiments. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia as described below, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering. To isolate the heart, the mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of a mixture of medetomidine hydrochloride (0.315 mg/kg), midazolam (2.0 mg/kg), and butorphanol tartrate (2.5 mg/kg). To prevent any pain associated with the injections, the mice were first anesthetized by inhaling 80% carbon dioxide and 20% oxygen before the intraperitoneal injection.

Generation of dominant-negative PKD2L1 Tg mice

Mouse PKD2L1 cDNA was used as reported previously [13]. Two PCR fragments were amplified using specific primers, and three restriction sites (BglII, XbaI, and NotI) were introduced to construct the DNA. The primers BglII-PKD2L1For (5’-AAAAGATCTATGAATAGTATGGAAAGCCCC-3’) and mPKD2L1AXbaIRev (5’-AAATCTAGAGGTGGAGGAGAGCTGTGTCATGG-3’) were used to amplify the PKD2L1 sequence from the start codon to the fourth transmembrane domain. mPKD2L1BXbaIFor (5’-AAATCTAGAAACGACACATACTCCGAGGTCAAG-3’) and NotI-PKD2L1Rev (5’-AAGCGGCCGCACAACTCCTTCCAGAACACA-3’) were used to amplify the 3’ terminal sequences of the construct. Two fragments were ligated at the XbaI sites and inserted into multiple cloning sites (BamHI and NotI) of the pQBI expression plasmid (Wako Chemicals, Osaka, Japan), which contained the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter, enhanced green fluorescent protein, and bovine growth hormone poly(A) sequences. This cDNA (PKD2L1del) contained the first four transmembrane domains of the PKD2L1 gene and no pore-forming fifth and sixth transmembrane domains, which are essential for cation channel formation. To evaluate the functions of the pore-forming domains, other sequences were maintained as in the original mouse PKD2L1 cDNA. PKD2L1del-Tg mice were generated as described previously [22].

RNA isolation and reverse-transcription (RT)-PCR analysis

Total RNA was isolated from the hearts and kidneys of C57/BL6 and PKD2L1del-Tg mice using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA). The reverse-transcription reaction was performed using a first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in a volume of 25 μL at 42°C for 45 min.

PKD2L1-specific sequences were amplified for 39 cycles using specific primers (PKD2L1-5Terminal, S1 Table in S1 File). Comparative RT-PCRs were performed under the same conditions for 34 PCR cycles. Control RT-PCRs were performed for 28 cycles using β-actin-specific primers. Subsequently, specific sequences of β1-adrenergic receptors, β2ARs, and muscarinic 2 receptors were amplified by PCR (37 cycles). β-actin sequences were amplified by PCR as an internal control (35 cycles). The primers used for the RT-PCR analysis are shown in S1 Table in S1 File.

Western blot analysis

Protein samples from the heart were homogenized and lysed in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 140 mM NaCl, and 5 mM EDTA with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Complete Mini; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Aliquots (100 μg) of the homogenate from each mouse were resolved on 7.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and subjected to western blotting. Commercially available polyclonal antibodies specific for PKD2L1 (Novus Biologicals, Centennial, CO, USA). An anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) antibody was used as a control.

General anesthesia

Mice (12–16 weeks of age) were anesthetized in an induction chamber (25 × 25 × 14 cm) containing 4% isoflurane (Forane; Abbott Japan Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and room air. Anesthesia was maintained for 45 min (anesthetic maintenance state) using 2% isoflurane inhaled anesthesia at an airflow rate of 0.5 L/min. Ten minutes after inducing anesthesia, baseline electrocardiogram and echocardiography recordings were performed for 5 min, followed by pharmacological tests. All experiments were conducted between 10:00 and 16:00 [23].

Electrocardiography

Electrocardiography (ECG) was performed as described previously [23]. Analog ECG signals were transferred to a receiver, digitized using the Power Lab system, and analyzed using LabChart 8 software (AD Instruments, Dunedin, New Zealand). The heart rate and other ECG parameters were evaluated using commercial software (ML846 Power Lab system; AD Instruments). Heart rate variability (HRV) was determined according to the normal-to-normal R-R interval (SDNN), which is presumed to reflect the integrity of cardiac vagal control. The HRV analysis featured a time domain analysis (based on calculating the standard deviation of the SDNN) and an analysis of the HRV power spectrum. The SDNN represents total variability. The HRV power spectrum has three components: very low frequency, low frequency (LF), and high frequency (HF). The LF component reflects sympathetic/parasympathetic tone, while the HF component reflects parasympathetic tone. We defined the ranges of the spectral components as < 0.15, very low frequency; > 0.15 and < 1.5, LF; and > 1.5 and < 5, HF, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The mice were administered atropine (1.0 mg/kg) to induce parasympathetic blockade or propranolol (1.0 mg/kg) to induce sympathetic blockade for the pharmacological analysis.

Inotropic atrial contraction

Left atria were dissected free of ventricular tissue and placed in an oxygenated 37°C tissue bath containing Tyrode’s solution (123.8 mM NaCl, 5.0 mM KCl, 2.0 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM MgCl2, 25.0 mM NaHCO3, and 11.2 mM glucose).

Isolated left atria were stimulated at 2 Hz and a voltage immediately above the threshold for 30 min of basal contraction (1-ms duration) to stabilize basal contraction. The isometric contractile force was measured using a force transducer (CD200; Nihon Koden, Tokyo, Japan) [24].

Action potentials

Isolated right atria were mounted in an organ bath (10 mL) continuously perfused with oxygenated Tyrode’s solution containing the following (in mM): NaCl 126.7, KCl 5.4, CaCl2 1.8, MgCl2 1.05, NaHCO3 22, NaHPO4 0.42, and glucose 5.6. After equilibration with room air, the pH of the solution was 7.4 (25°C). Action potentials were recorded from the external epicardial surface using conventional glass pipettes filled with a 3.0 M KCl solution (tip resistance, 20–30 MΩ). Action potentials were recorded using an amplifier (MEZ-8301; Nihon Koden) and stored on a personal computer for subsequent off-line analyses of the following parameters: resting membrane potential, action potential amplitude, maximum up-stroke velocity (dV/dtmax), and action potential durations at 40% and 90% repolarization. All data were acquired and analyses were performed using LabChart software (AD Instruments). A Ca2+ antagonist (verapamil) was added to Tyrode’s solution from concentrated stock solutions to yield the final concentration (10 μM) for the pharmacological evaluation of verapamil.

Statistical analysis

Results are expressed as the mean ± standard error. Means were compared using the Newman–Keuls post-hoc multiple-range test. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to detect differences followed by Dunnett’s t-test. The isoproterenol pharmacological analysis (ECG, contraction, and action potential duration) was evaluated with two-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni comparison, and p-values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Establishment of dominant-negative PKD2L1-overexpressing mice

The overexpression construct was generated by ligating two PCR-amplified fragments of the PKD2L1 coding sequence into the pQBI plasmid (Wako Chemicals), controlled by the CMV promoter; enhanced green fluorescent protein sequence was followed by the PKD2L1 sequence and a rabbit globin poly(A) signal (Fig 1A). This “PKD2L1del” cDNA lacks the fifth and sixth pore-forming transmembrane domains, which are presumed to be essential for cation channel formation (Fig 1A inset). All other sequences were maintained as in the wild-type (WT) mouse PKD2L1 cDNA. The plasmid insert (from the promoter to the poly(A) sequence) was prepared and injected into the pronucleus [22].

Fig 1.

Fig 1

A) Molecular characterization of PKD2L1del overexpressed in Tg mice. Schematic of the CMV promoter/PKD2L1del construct used for the generation of PKD2L1del-Tg mice. The deletion site is also shown. The primer sets for each PCR amplification (DNA typing and RT-PCR) are indicated with arrows. The inset shows predicted schematic transmembrane constructs of full-length PKD2L1 (upper panel) and PKD2L1del. Scale bar = 1 kb. B) DNA typing of Tg mice. Tg-A mice contained a single copy of the external gene, whereas mice in Tg-B contained two copies. RT-PCR analysis of cardiac tissue from Tg mice. Tg-B mice showed enhanced PKD2L1 expression in the heart. NC, negative control without cDNA. The names of the Tg lines (A and B) are indicated. C) Western blot analysis of the hearts from the WT and Tg mice. Representative immunoblots of membranes from WT and Tg mice analyzed for the expression of PKD2L1 (left panel) and GAPDH (right panel).

Tg offspring were genotyped by quantitative PCR analysis, confirming the generation of two transgenic lines (Tg-A and Tg-B) with germ-line transmission (Fig 1B, DNA typing, lanes A and B: Tg-A and Tg-B, respectively). The Tg-B line was estimated to carry two copies of the transgene, compared with the Tg-A line, which had a single copy of the transgene (Fig 1B, RT-PCR, S3 Fig in S1 File).

The RT-PCR analysis revealed expression of the Tg-A and Tg-B transgenes in the heart (Fig 1B, RT-PCR, lanes A and B: Tg-A and Tg-B, respectively). Because no significant phenotype was observed and expression of the transgenes was high, the Tg-B mouse line was used for further analysis.

To further investigate the expression of the transgene at the protein level, we analyzed the protein expression of PKD2L1 in the heart of WT and Tg-B mice by immunoblotting (Fig 1C). The endogenous PKD2L1 formed a single 85-kDa band in the WT control mice (Fig 1C). The Tg mice showed an additional 95-kDa band, indicating overexpression of the dominant-negative form of the PKD2L1 transgene with the CMV promoter (Tg). Anti-GAPDH antibody binding (Fig 1C, GAPDH) confirmed comparable loading of proteins on the gel. The histological examination revealed no obvious changes in the heart or kidneys.

Expression profile using RT-PCR

To investigate the influence of overexpression of dominant-negative PKD2L1, we analyzed the expression of PKD-related genes in the kidneys and hearts of Tg and WT control mice by RT-PCR (Fig 2A). Using the CMV promoter combined with endogenous expression, PKD2L1 was significantly overexpressed both in kidney and heart (S3 Fig in S1 File). The mRNA expression levels of the PKD1, PKD2, and PKD2L2 genes did not significantly differ between Tg and WT mice. Conversely, the expression levels of β1-adrenergic receptors and β2ARs were elevated (Fig 2, S3 Fig in S1 File), while CREB1 and muscarinic M2 receptor expression levels were not affected in the heart.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

A) Typical RT-PCR data from kidney and heart tissues collected from WT and Tg mice. Amplified sequences are shown. Increased expression levels of PKD2L1 were confirmed in kidney and heart tissues from Tg mice. The expression levels of PKD1, PKD2, and PKD2L2 were assessed. Expression of β-actin was evaluated as a control. The primer sets used for PCR amplification are shown. B) Representative ECG tracings of WT and Tg mice under basal conditions (i). Statistical analysis of the heart rates of WT and Tg mice (ii). There were no significant differences in heart rate between WT (n = 10) and Tg (n = 6) mice under basal conditions. Isoproterenol administration resulted in increased heart rate changes in Tg mice (iii). *P < 0.05, between WT (n = 10) and Tg (n = 6) mice. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean.

We also examined the expression levels of other genes involved in cardiac hypertrophy, but found no significant changes (S1 Fig in S1 File). Additionally, we analyzed RT-PCR with a primer set, which distinguished the endogenous PKD2L1 gene (507 bp) and the transgene (235 bp). The WT heart showed a single band, while Tg mice showed an additional 235-bp band, indicating expression of the transgene (S1 Fig in S1 File). Taken together, the results showed that overexpression of dominant-negative PKD2L1 resulted in enhanced expression of β-adrenergic receptors.

Modified pacemaking in the heart

Previously, Yao et al. reported that PKD2L1 interacts and co-localizes with β2AR, a G-protein-coupled receptor active in cAMP production, on the primary cilia of neuronal cells in the brain. Therefore, we speculated that PKD2L1 might participate in a protein kinase A (PKA)-dependent pathway by interacting with β-adrenergic receptors in the heart. To evaluate this possibility, we performed ECG. Fig 2B shows representative ECG traces from WT control (upper panel) and PKD2L1del-Tg (lower panel) mice. Although most ECG results showed regular waves and rhythms, PKD2L1del-Tg mice demonstrated some supraventricular premature contraction (arrow). Because the PKA-dependent pathway is often associated with cAMP-related arrhythmia, our present data suggest the involvement of PKD2L1 in a PKA-dependent pathway. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in basal heart rate. However, enhanced responsiveness to isoproterenol (4 μg/kg), a β-adrenergic agonist, was observed in PKD2L1del-Tg mice (Fig 2B).

Modified HRV

Because PKD2L1del-Tg mice showed enhanced responsiveness to isoproterenol, we performed ECG analysis to explore heart rate regulation in these mice using Power Lab HRV software. Fig 3A shows representative Poincaré plots for WT (left panel) and PKD2L1del-Tg mice (right panel). WT mice exhibited stable changes in R-R intervals, whereas PKD2L1del-Tg mice exhibited unstable R-R intervals (shown as dots in Fig 3A). These data suggested unstable pacemaking in the Tg mice, which coincided with supraventricular premature contraction on basal ECG (Fig 2B, arrow). Power spectral analysis (Fig 3B) showed no significant differences between the groups, whereas the standard deviation of SDNN was significantly greater in PKD2L1del-Tg mice (Fig 3C). This indicated unstable R-R intervals, suggestive of modified sympathetic nerve regulation in the Tg mice.

Fig 3. HRV analysis.

Fig 3

A) Representative ECG Poincaré plots of WT (left panel) and Tg mice (right panel). Poincaré plots (RRn vs. RRn+1) in which consecutive pairs of R-R intervals during the control period were plotted with the nth+1 R-R interval against the nth R-R period. Note the marked scattering in Tg mice. B) Representative power spectral analysis of WT (left panel) and Tg mice (right panel). C) Statistical analysis of the power spectra (i–iii). LF (i) and HF (ii) components, LF/HF (iii), and SDNN of WT (open circles) and Tg mice (filled circles) are shown. *P < 0.05 vs. WT. Each group consisted of at least six samples. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean.

Enhanced atrial contraction

Because of increased β-adrenergic receptors and enhanced responsiveness to isoproterenol in ECG, atrial contraction was analyzed. Sympathetic responsiveness was evaluated by measuring inotropic responses to isoproterenol in isolated spontaneously beating right atria. Fig 4A shows force changes in response to isoproterenol (100 nM) in the atria from WT and PKD2L1del-Tg mice. Isoproterenol caused dose-dependent changes in force within atria from WT and PKD2L1del-Tg mice; the responsiveness at high doses was enhanced in PKD2L1del-Tg compared with WT atria (Fig 4B). Norepinephrine and epinephrine (other catecholamines) elicited similar results, indicating that PKD2L1del-Tg mice possess enhanced responsiveness to β-adrenergic stimulation (S2 Fig in S1 File).

Fig 4. Increased contractility in PKD2L1del-Tg atria in response to isoproterenol.

Fig 4

A) Typical traces of atrial contraction in WT (upper panels) and PKD2L1del-Tg (lower panels) mice. Isoproterenol (100 nM) increased atrial contractility in WT mice. Tg mice showed enhanced atrial contractility to isoproterenol. B) Dose-dependent changes in atrial contractility in response to isoproterenol (10–100 nM) in WT and Tg mice. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. *P < 0.05, between atria from WT and Tg mice.

Action potential changes

Because of the enhanced responsiveness to β-adrenergic stimulation in Tg atrial contraction, we examined atrial cardiac action potentials. Fig 5A shows representative traces of basal cardiac action potentials in the atria from a WT mouse (Fig 5A left upper panel) and a PKD2L1del-Tg mouse (right upper panel). The rapid upstroke of the cardiac action potential was followed by a plateau phase and subsequent rapid terminal repolarization. Isoproterenol (100 nM) shortened the action potential duration in both mice (lower panels). Statistical analysis revealed no significant effects on resting membrane potential or action potential amplitude, whereas the 90% action potential duration was significantly shortened in the atria of PKD2L1del-Tg mice (Fig 5A red arrow and 5B).

Fig 5. Action potential in atria.

Fig 5

A) Representative action potentials of atrial sinus nodes in WT and PKD2L1del-Tg mice. Basal action potential changes in WT and Tg mice are shown (upper panels). Action potential changes are shown in response to isoproterenol (100 nM, lower panels). B) Statistical analysis of the atrial action potential duration at 90% repolarization in WT and Tg mice. Atria from Tg mice showed a shortened action potential duration (red arrow). n = 8–12. P < 0.05.

Discussion

In this study, we established a mouse line overexpressing the dominant-negative form of PKD2L1, which cannot form a cation channel. The Tg mice showed enhanced expression of PKD2L1, but no significant changes in other PKD-related genes. Comparative RT-PCR analysis revealed elevated expression levels of the β1- and β2-adrenergic receptors in the hearts of PKD2L1del-Tg mice. The PKD2L1del-Tg mice sometimes showed supraventricular premature contraction. Furthermore, the PKD2L1del-Tg mice showed enhanced sensitivity to β-adrenergic stimulation on ECG. HRV analysis showed an unstable R-R interval and increased SDNN in PKD2L1del-Tg mice. Examination of spontaneous atrial contraction showed enhanced sensitivity to isoproterenol. Action potential recordings revealed a shortened action potential duration in response to isoproterenol in the atria of PKD2L1del-Tg-mice. Taken together, PKD2L1del-Tg mice showed enhanced adrenergic sensitivity, suggesting involvement of PKD2L1 in sympathetic regulation.

In a previous study, Yao et al. reported reduced cAMP and β-adrenergic responses in the brains of PKDL-deficient mice [12]. Consistent with their findings, our dominant-negative PKD2L1-overexpressing mice showed enhanced β-adrenergic responsiveness. Choi et al. reported the involvement of PKD2 in A-kinase anchoring protein complexes in kidney epithelial cells [25]. Considering the high similarity between PKD2 and PKD2L1 [10], the dominant-negative form of PKD2L1 might enhance the PKA cascade, although future studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. Nevertheless, the findings in our study suggest a close relationship between PKD-forming channels and the cAMP cascade.

Lu et al. reported that high-salt-induced cardiac hypertrophy occurs in PKD2L1-deficient mice [14]. Similar to PKD2L1, transient receptor potential channels participate in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease [26]. PKDD channels, including PKD2, PKD2L1, and PKD2L2, are nonselective ion channel proteins associated with ADPKD [27]. Cardiac hypertrophy is an important clinical complication in patients with ADPKD [28].

Yao et al. reported interactions between PKD2L1 and β2AR, both in vitro and in vivo [12]. PKD2L1 deficiency did not affect the protein level of β2AR in the brain but caused loss of ciliary β2AR in neurons, suggesting that PKD2L1 is required for β2AR ciliary localization. In the study by Yao et al., PKD2L1-null mice showed reduced cAMP levels in the brain. Furthermore, the PKD2 channel, which demonstrates a high degree of homology with PKD2L1, participates in cAMP homeostasis in a primary cilium-dependent manner [25]. Additional analyses are needed to elucidate the precise mechanism of β2AR trafficking and the roles of PKD channels in controlling the cAMP signaling cascade. In the present study, overexpression of the dominant-negative form of PKD2L1 resulted in enhanced expression of β1-adrenergic receptors and β2ARs in the heart (S3 Fig in S1 File). In addition, PKD2L1del-Tg mice showed increased responsiveness to isoproterenol. Thus, we speculate that overexpression of PKD2L1 induces transcription of β1- and β2-adrenergic receptors. Additionally, overexpressed PKD2L1 might interact with β1- or β2-adrenergic receptors, resulting in enhanced sensitivity to isoproterenol.

To determine the mechanisms underlying enhanced sympathetic responses in PKD2L1del-Tg mice, the interaction between PKD2L1 and β-adrenergic receptors should be evaluated in future studies. In addition, the levels of cAMP and PKA-dependent phosphorylation of target molecules, such as CREB, should be analyzed. The PKD2L1 ionic currents in cardiac myocytes from wild-type and PKD2L1del-transgenic mouse should also be evaluated.

In conclusion, we established a Tg mouse line overexpressing a dominant-negative form of PKD2L1. The novel Tg mice showed enhanced sensitivity to β-adrenergic stimulation in the ECG analysis. Examination of HRV showed an unstable R-R interval and increased SDNN in PKD2L1del-Tg mice, suggesting modified sympathetic nerve regulation. Spontaneous atrial contraction and action potential recordings demonstrated enhanced sensitivity to isoproterenol in the atria of PKD2L1del-Tg mice. Taken together, our findings strongly suggest that PKD2L1 is involved in sympathetic regulation.

Supporting information

S1 File

(DOCX)

S1 Raw images

(TIFF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Maximilian Murakami for his technical assistance.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This research was sponsored, in part, by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from JSPS, KAKENHI (17K08527, 17H04319, 16K09489, and 20K07255). No additional external funding was received for this study.

References

  • 1.Gabow P. A. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 329, 332–342 (1993). doi: 10.1056/NEJM199307293290508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Reeders S. T. et al. A highly polymorphic DNA marker linked to adult polycystic kidney disease on chromosome 16. Nature. 317, 542–544 (1985). doi: 10.1038/317542a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kimberling W. J. et al. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: localization of the second gene to chromosome 4q13-q23. Genomics. 3, 467–472 (1993). doi: 10.1016/s0888-7543(11)80001-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Peters D. J. et al. Chromosome 4 localization of a second gene for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Nat. Genet. 4, 359–362 (1993). doi: 10.1038/ng1293-359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mochizuki T. et al. PKD2, a gene for polycystic kidney disease that encodes an integral membrane protein. Science. 272, 1339–1342 (1996). doi: 10.1126/science.272.5266.1339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Elder T. Cardiovascular complications in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Curr. Hypertens. Rev. 1, 2–11 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hanaoka K. et al. Co-assembly of polycystin-1 and -2 produces unique cation-permeable currents. Nature. 408, 990–994 (2000). doi: 10.1038/35050128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gonzalez-Perrett S. et al. Polycystin-2, the protein mutated in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), is a Ca2+-permeable nonselective cation channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 1183–1187 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Koulen P. et al. Polycystin-2 is an intracellular calcium release channel. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 191–197 (2002). doi: 10.1038/ncb754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nomura H. et al. Identification of PKDL, a novel polycystic kidney disease 2-like gene whose murine homologue is deleted in mice with kidney and retinal defects. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 25967–25973 (1998). doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.40.25967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Keller S. A. et al. Kidney and retinal defects (Krd), a transgene-induced mutation with a deletion of mouse chromosome 19 that includes the Pax2 locus. Genomics. 23, 309–320 (1994). doi: 10.1006/geno.1994.1506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yao G. et al. Disruption of polycystin-L causes hippocampal and thalamocortical hyperexcitability. Hum. Mol. Genet. 25, 448–458 (2016). doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Murakami M. et al. Genomic organization and functional analysis of murine PKD2L1. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 5626–5635 (2005). doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411496200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lu Z. et al. Deficiency of PKD2L1 (TRPP3) exacerbates pathological cardiac hypertrophy by augmenting NCX1-mediated mitochondrial calcium overload. Cell Rep. 24, 1639–1652 (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.07.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen X. Z. et al. Polycystin-L is a calcium-regulated cation channel permeable to calcium ions. Nature. 401, 383–386 (1999). doi: 10.1038/43907 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Guo L., Chen M., Basora N. & Zhou J. The human polycystic kidney disease 2-like (PKDL) gene: exon/intron structure and evidence for a novel splicing mechanism. Mamm. Genome. 11, 46–50 (2000). doi: 10.1007/s003350010009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wu G. et al. Identification of PKD2L, a human PKD2-related gene: tissue-specific expression and mapping to chromosome 10q25. Genomics. 54, 564–568 (1998). doi: 10.1006/geno.1998.5618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Basora N. et al. Tissue and cellular localization of a novel polycystic kidney disease-like gene product, polycystin-L. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 13, 293–301 (2002). doi: 10.1681/ASN.V132293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li Q. et al. Direct binding of alpha-actinin enhances TRPP3 channel activity. J. Neurochem. 103, 2391–2400 (2007). doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04940.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ishimaru Y., Katano Y., Yamamoto K., Akiba M., Misaka T., Roberts R. W., et al. Interaction between PKD1L3 and PKD2L1 through their transmembrane domains is required for localization of PKD2L1 at taste pores in taste cells of circumvallate and foliate papillae. FASEB J. 24(10), 4058–4067 (2010). doi: 10.1096/fj.10-162925 Epub 2010. Jun 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hussein S., Zheng W., Dyte C., Wang Q., Yang J., Zhang F., et al. Acid-induced off-response of PKD2L1 channel in Xenopus oocytes and its regulation by Ca2+. Sci. Rep. 5, 15752 (2015). doi: 10.1038/srep15752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Murakami M. et al. Modified sympathetic nerve system activity with overexpression of the voltage-dependent calcium channel β3 subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 24554–24560 (2008). doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802319200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shintaku T. et al. Effects of propofol on electrocardiogram measures in mice. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 126, 351–358 (2014). doi: 10.1254/jphs.14181FP [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ino M. et al. Functional disorders of the sympathetic nervous system in mice lacking the alpha 1B subunit (Cav 2.2) of N-type calcium channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 5323–5328 (2001). doi: 10.1073/pnas.081089398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Choi Y. H. et al. Polycystin-2 and phosphodiesterase 4C are components of a ciliary A-kinase anchoring protein complex that is disrupted in cystic kidney diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 10679–10684 (2011). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016214108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Watanabe H., Murakami M., Ohba T., Takahashi Y. & Ito H. TRP channel and cardiovascular disease. Pharmacol. Ther. 118, 337–351 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2008.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Moran M. M., Xu H. & Clapham D. E. TRP ion channels in the nervous system. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14, 362–369 (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2004.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chapman A. B. et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 8, 1292–1297 (1997). doi: 10.1681/ASN.V881292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Alexander G Obukhov

29 Jun 2021

PONE-D-21-08901

Enhanced β-adrenergic response in mice with dominant-negative expression of the PKD2L1 channel

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Murakami,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. While addressing the reviewer's concerns, please better uncropped images of Western blots. Also, better PCR images are needed. All bar graphs should be converted to dot plots with indicated mean and error bars.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 07 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Alexander G Obukhov, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1.Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. To comply with PLOS ONE submissions requirements, please provide methods of sacrifice in the Methods section of your manuscript. 

3. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

This research was sponsored in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from JSPS, KAKENHI (17K08527, 17H04319, 16K09489, and 20K07255).

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

This research was sponsored in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from JSPS, KAKENHI (17K08527, 17H04319, 16K09489, and 20K07255).

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

6. Please upload a copy of Supporting Information Figures S1, S2, S3 and S4 which you refer to in your text on page 24 and 25.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Polycystic kidney disease 2-like 1 protein also known as transient receptor potential polycystic 2 (TRPP2) is a protein that in humans is encoded by the PKD2L1 gene. This study reports the development and characterisation of a transgenic mouse line overexpressing a dominant negative form of PKD2L1. The phenotype showed an augmented sensitivity to B-adrenergic stimulation, an unstable R-R interval and elevated paramertes of sympathetic regulation. The paper is generally well written and presented, and the data will be of interest to better understand the pathogenesis of ADPKD.

Comments

1. The Introduction seems dis-jointed. For example, the rationale and link with ADPKD is not clear and could be better explained

2. As this is the first description of this mouse line, it would be important to report whether there any other phenotype, such as the histological presence of kidney cysts and/or vascular abnormalities

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Jan 20;17(1):e0261668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261668.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


15 Jul 2021

My coauthors and I wish to submit our manuscript, entitled “Enhanced β-adrenergic response in mice with dominant-negative expression of the PKD2L1 channel,” for consideration for publication as an Article in PLoS ONE.

We thank the editor and reviewer for reviewing our manuscript and for the suggested revisions. We have addressed all of the reviewers’ queries.

The authors have ensured that the revised manuscript conforms to the style requirements of PLOS ONE. The authors have converted the bar graphs into bar graphs (means ± standard errors) with dots.

The authors have provided the original uncropped and unadjusted images of DNA typing and reverse-transcription PCR in Supporting Information (SI) Fig. 4A. The original whole western blot images in Fig. 1C are provided in SI Fig. 4B.

The authors have corrected the funding information in accordance with the suggestion.

The authors have provided a minimal data set in the SI according to the suggestion.

The Poincaré and power spectral density plots in Fig. 2A and B were calculated from one mouse electrocardiogram recording. A statistical analysis of the electrocardiogram recordings was performed for the heart rate variability analysis using the power spectrum low frequency (LF) and high frequency (HF), LF/HF, and normal-to-normal R-R intervals, which were calculated from the electrocardiogram recordings (Fig. 3C).

Our point-by-point responses to each of the comments are presented in the response letter.

Sincerely,

Manabu Murakami

Department of Pharmacology,

Hirosaki University, Graduate School of Medicine

E-mail: mmura0123@hotmail.co.jp

Attachment

Submitted filename: response letter Tg.docx

Decision Letter 1

Alexander G Obukhov

20 Oct 2021

PONE-D-21-08901R1Enhanced β-adrenergic response in mice with dominant-negative expression of the PKD2L1 channelPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Murakami,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but requires some minor revisions before it can be accepted for publication in PLOS ONE. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised by the reviewer.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 04 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the reviewer. You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Alexander G Obukhov, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: Murakami et al. created PKD2L1del-Tg mice to investigate physiological role of PKD2L1channel, particularly for β-adrenergic stimulation. Using this new model, the authors measured EKG, inotropic atrial contractions, and action potentials. Their measurements show that PKD2L1del-Tg mice have increased adrenergic sensitivity indicating PKD2L1 involvement to sympathetic regulation. The study is important and well-done. I only have a question about statistics and an optional suggestion to improve the paper Discussion.

Please clarify statistics:

Figures 4 and 5: What is “n” in the figure legends: n =6~7 and n = 8-12. Is it number of animals, number of cells, or number of measurements?

Discussion:

PKD2L1 is a cation channel. However according to the literature and results of the present study, its involvement to sympathetic regulation may not be necessarily linked to its activity as a channel, but to its role in regulation of β2AR trafficking or some other activity. The paper discussion is rather short, and I would encourage the authors to write more about possible mechanisms of PKD2L1 involvement in sympathetic regulation. Based on the new results of the present study and literature data, please make a schematic figure to illustrate possible interactions and possible mechanisms of how PKD2L1 regulate β-adrenergic stimulation.

Line :370: “Additional analyses are needed to elucidate the precise mechanism of β2AR trafficking and the roles of PKD channels in controlling the cAMP signaling cascade.”

Please specify what specific analyses and/or experiments are needed to clarify the mechanisms.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Jan 20;17(1):e0261668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261668.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


29 Nov 2021

We thank the editor and reviewers for reviewing our manuscript and suggesting revisions. We have addressed all of the reviewers’ queries.

Our point-by-point responses to each of the comments are presented in the rebuttal letter (Our responses are in red).

Sincerely yours,

Manabu Murakami

Attachment

Submitted filename: RebuttalLetter2411.docx

Decision Letter 2

Alexander G Obukhov

9 Dec 2021

Enhanced β-adrenergic response in mice with dominant-negative expression of the PKD2L1 channel

PONE-D-21-08901R2

Dear Dr. Murakami,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Alexander G Obukhov, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: The authors have satisfactorily addressed my comments. The paper has been improved. I have no further comments.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Alexander G Obukhov

7 Jan 2022

PONE-D-21-08901R2

Enhanced β-adrenergic response in mice with dominant-negative expression of the PKD2L1 channel

Dear Dr. Murakami:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Alexander G Obukhov

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File

    (DOCX)

    S1 Raw images

    (TIFF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: response letter Tg.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: RebuttalLetter2411.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES