Skip to main content
National Science Review logoLink to National Science Review
. 2021 May 18;9(1):nwab088. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwab088

Cretaceous basin evolution in northeast Asia: tectonic responses to the paleo-Pacific plate subduction

Qing-Ren Meng 1,2,3,, Zhong-He Zhou 4,5, Ri-Xiang Zhu 6,7,8, Yi-Gang Xu 9,10,11, Zheng-Tang Guo 12,13,14
PMCID: PMC8776546  PMID: 35070326

ABSTRACT

Cretaceous rift basin evolution was an important part of the tectonic history of northeast Asia in the late Mesozoic. Three types of rift basins are identified—active, passive and wide rift basins—and they developed in different regions. Passive rift basins in the eastern North China craton are thought to be the consequence of crustal stretching and passive asthenospheric upwelling. Wide rift basins in the eastern Central Asian orogen are assumed to originate from gravitational collapse of the thickened and heated orogenic crust. Active rift basins in the northern North China craton are attributed to uprising of asthenospheric materials along a lithospheric-scale tear fault. Slab tearing of the subducting paleo-Pacific plate is postulated and well explains the spatial distribution of different types of rift basins and the eastward shifting of magmatism in the northern North China craton. The Late Cretaceous witnessed a period of mild deformation and weak magmatism, which was possibly due to kinematic variation of the paleo-Pacific plate.

Keywords: NE Asia, Cretaceous, rift basin, volcanism, paleo-Pacific plate


Cretaceous basins in NE Asia originated from three types of continental rifting in disparate regions and evolved in response to differential subduction and slab tearing of the western paleo-Pacific plate.

INTRODUCTION

The northeastern Asian continent experienced alternating crustal contraction and extension as well as sporadic magmatism in the Mesozoic [1–4]. The multiple tectono-magmatic processes are ascribed to the near-field and far-field effects of the changes in subduction angles of the paleo-Pacific plate [5,6], continent–continent collisions and the resulting escape tectonics [7–9], subcontinental thermo-tectonic processes [10–12], and a combination of diverse tectonic drivers [13]. Two phases of strong crustal shortening, which took place in the late Middle Jurassic and at the end of the Late Jurassic [2,14,15], have been identified and extensively studied. The end-Jurassic contraction was intense and extensive, as indicated by widespread folding and thrusting as well as a regional angular unconformity beneath Lower Cretaceous strata [2,16]. This phase of shortening, termed Phase B of the Yanshanian orogeny in the literature [17], resulted in two main consequences: crustal thickening of the eastern Central Asian orogen (ECAO) and the onset of destabilization of the North China craton (NCC). Extensive rifting occurred in the aftermath of this contractional event [18,19]. Early Cretaceous rift basins developed throughout the northeastern Asian continent and expressed themselves in general as disparate small- and mediate-scale basins (Fig. 1). Vigorous volcanism accompanied the rifting [3,12,20], with volcanic/volcaniclastic rocks making up significant parts of most basin successions. Previous studies focused mainly on individual rift basins in different regions, such as the Erlian, Hailar and Songliao basins in the ECAO [21–23], the Luanping basin in the northern NCC [24] and the Hefei and Jiaolai basins in the eastern NCC [25].

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Tectonic map showing distribution of Cretaceous basins in NE Asia. The NE Asian continent is divided into two main domains, the North China craton (NCC) and eastern Central Asian orogen (ECAO). The NCC can be further divided into three parts, the western, eastern and northern NCC, based on their distinct tectonic evolution in late Mesozoic. Note that passive, active and wide rift basins are distributed in different regions, with metamorphic core complexes being closely associated with active rift basins.

Distinct rift basins are distributed in different regions, as hinted by diverse Lower Cretaceous volcano-sedimentary sequences. The basins in the eastern NCC started with clastic sedimentation, which was followed by volcanic eruption [25,26]. By contrast, volcanism marked the initiation of the rift basins in the northern NCC, and clastic deposition then succeeded [24]. Volcaniclastic and volcanic rocks are present throughout basin sequences in the ECAO [21,23]. The existing tectonic models, however, seldom explicate how the diverse rift basins are generated simultaneously and why they are distributed in different areas. Early Cretaceous rifting in NE Asia is commonly attributed to backarc extension induced by the westward subduction of the paleo-Pacific plate [1,25]. Unfortunately, it remains poorly known why extension basically came to an end during the Late Cretaceous and what caused differential basin subsidence in space. This study takes a holistic treatment of tectonic evolution of Cretaceous rift basins in NE Asia and attempts to explore the dynamic controls of time-space variations of the rift basins.

TECTONIC SETTING

The northeast Asian continent is made up of two tectonic domains, the NCC in the south and the ECAO in the north (Fig. 1). The NCC developed as a single stable tectonic domain from the Mesoproterozoic to Paleozoic, and underwent little crustal deformation and magmatism for over 1.20 Ga [1,3]. The NCC kept its stability as a whole in the early Mesozoic albeit its peripheral regions were affected by terrane accretion as a result of the closure of the paleo-Asian and paleo-Tethyan oceans [27]. The late Mesozoic was a period when the different portions of the NCC began experiencing diverse thermo-tectonic evolution. The western NCC still behaved as a stable element with few tectonic activities. In contrast, the eastern NCC was characterized by lithospheric thinning and extensive magmatism, and completely lost its stability by the Early Cretaceous [1,3,11]. The northern NCC manifests itself as a unique zone by virtue of strong extension and magmatic outpouring, which were interrupted by short-term crustal/lithospheric shortening [1,2]. Compared with the NCC, the ECAO was built up with a number of terranes that had been amalgamated by the end of the Paleozoic [28]. The ECAO is therefore a wide orogenic domain with complex crustal compositions and fabrics.

Cretaceous extensional tectonics in NE Asia are evidenced by rift basins, metamorphic core complexes and vigorous magmatism [2,24,29–33]. In addition, the NCC lithosphere was significantly attenuated and experienced a radical change from continental to oceanic lithospheric mantle [34,35]. These tectonic processes happened mainly in the Early Cretaceous and led to total destabilization of the eastern NCC [36]. Early Cretaceous extension and magmatism in the eastern NCC were in essence the surface expressions of deep thermo-mechanic processes, which were possibly associated with a big mantle wedge system resulting from rollback and retreat of the subducting paleo-Pacific plate [1,10]. Coeval extension in the ECAO is thought to be the consequence of gravitational collapse of the thickened orogenic crust [29,37]. Crustal thickening might have resulted partly from the collision of the ECAO and Siberian craton along the Mongo-Okhotsk suture [38] and partly from the tectonic push due to flat subduction of the paleo-Pacific plate at the Jurassic to Cretaceous transition [1,39]. This shortening event is registered by a regional unconformity beneath the Lower Cretaceous in the ECAO [9] (Fig. 2). Late Cretaceous tectonics of NE Asia was characterized by vertical crustal motion, with Early Cretaceous rift basins either undergoing uplift/erosion or subsidence. The small-scale basins in both the ECAO and the northern NCC were uplifted or inversed at the end of Early Cretaceous, with a few Upper Cretaceous strata left (Fig. 2). The Songliao basin, situated in the east of the ECAO, is an exception in that it experienced pronounced sagging during the Late Cretaceous [21]. The Jiaolai basins in the eastern NCC also underwent striking subsidence in the Late Cretaceous, which is assumed to have had a bearing on the strike-slip motion of the Tanlu fault [26]. Large-scale sinistral transpression happened ∼100 Ma along the eastern margin of the NE Asian continent, as manifested by the occurrence/reactivation of left-slip faulting, such as the Tanlu fault [5], Dunhua-Mishan fault [40] and the Central Sikhote-Alin fault [41].

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Stratigraphic correlation of Cretaceous sequences in NE Asia. Lower Cretaceous strata in the eastern NCC start with clastic rocks, which are followed by volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks. In contrast, Lower Cretaceous sequences in the northern NCC are marked by volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks in the lower part and clastics in the upper. In the ECAO, clastic rocks dominate Lower Cretaceous successions in the western portion, whereas volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks are prevalent in the eastern portion. The Songliao basin possesses thick Upper Cretaceous strata in contrast with other basins. The number in square brackets refers to numbering of the reference list.

BASIN SEQUENCES

Cretaceous strata are well preserved in NE Asia, and both lithostratigraphic and biostratigraphic sequences have been intensively investigated. Basins in different regions display distinct volcano-sedimentary sequences (Fig. 2). The ages of lithostratigraphic units are tightly constrained by precise U-Pb zircon and Ar-Ar dating of volcanic and volcaniclastic beds in conjunction with fossil assemblages. Cretaceous successions are separated from the underlying units by a regional angular unconformity, which registers a strong shortening event just prior to the Early Cretaceous rifting. Another unconformity occurs between the Lower and Upper Cretaceous, and manifests itself as either a parallel or low-angle discordant surface (Fig. 2). Cretaceous strata are unconformably covered by or pass upward conformably to Tertiary sediments [25,42].

Complete Cretaceous successions in the eastern NCC are best preserved in the Jiaolai and Hefei basins (Fig. 2). Lower Cretaceous succession displays two distinct parts, with the lower dominated by clastic rocks and the upper by volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks. The clastic parts are represented by the Laiyang Group in the Jiaolai basin and by the Zhuxiang Formation in the Hefei basin. Fluvial conglomerate and sandstone facies associations make up the lower part of the Laiyang Group, whereas the upper part consists primarily of meandering fluvial and lacustrine facies [43]. The Shuinan Formation, a unit in the middle Laiyang Group, contains a basalt layer that yields an 40Ar/39Ar plateau age of 129.7 ± 1.7 Ma [26]. The Zhuxiang/Fenghuangtai Formation in the Hefei basin shares similar facies to the lower Laiyang Group, and has an accumulative thickness up to 2500 m [44,45]. Clastic sedimentation was suppressed by vigorous volcanism, as indicated by a rapid change from siliciclastic to volcaniclastic and/or volcanic rocks that dominate the upper parts of the Lower Cretaceous successions of both the Hefei and Jiaolai basins (Fig. 2). The Maotanchang volcanics, up to 1000 m thick, represent late volcanism in the Hefei basin, and range in age from 130 to 120 Ma [45]. The Maotanchang volcanics pass upward into the Heishidu Formation, which is dominated by lacustrine fine-grained facies and contains abundant pyroclastic rocks [44]. The Qingshan Group, up to 1500 m thick, comprises basic and felsic volcanic rocks that yield 40Ar/39Ar plateau ages from 122 to 105 Ma [26,46,47]. Lower Cretaceous sequences are overlain unconformably by Upper Cretaceous strata, such as the Wangshi Group in the Jiaolai basin and the Zhangqiao Formation in the Hefei basin (Fig. 2). The Wangshi Group consists mostly of alluvial–fluvial coarse-grained facies, with depositional ages ranging from 107 to 73.5 Ma based on radiometric ages of volcanic beds and detrital zircons [48,49]. An angular unconformity separates the Lower from Upper Cretaceous units in the eastern NCC [26]. The discordant contacts are both observed at outcrops and identified on seismic profiles that are near or within the Tanlu fault zone [26,50].

Cretaceous sequences commence with volcanics in the northern NCC, as recorded by the Donglingtai Formation in the western segment, the Zhangjiakou Formation in the middle segment and the Yixian Formation in the eastern segment (Fig. 2). The Zhangjiakou and Donglingtai volcanics in the western Yanshan belt are dated at 143 ± 0.67 Ma, 143.4 ± 0.65 Ma and 140.7 ± 0.64 Ma [54,76,77], whereas the Zhangjiakou rhyolite and ignimbrite in the eastern Yanshan belt yield U-Pb zircon ages ranging from 136 to 131 Ma [24,56,60]. The Yixian volcanics have both 40Ar/39Ar plateau ages and U-Pb zircon ages ranging from 126 to 124 Ma [61,78]. Accordingly, Early Cretaceous volcanism became younger eastward in the northern NCC [10,11]. Clastic sedimentation then took the place of volcanism with time, and prevailed in the late stage, as recorded by the Xiguayuan and Jiufotang Formations in different basins (Fig. 2). The clastic units are collectively assigned to the Hauterivian to Aptian ages based on radiometric ages and fossil assemblages [64], and are characterized by fluvial-lacustrine facies associations [24,79]. The Qingshila, Shahai and Fuxin Formations represent the uppermost portions of Lower Cretaceous successions, and are made up mostly of fluvial facies associations. The Upper Cretaceous, if present, is separated from older units by either disconformities or low-angle unconformities (Fig. 2).

Lower Cretaceous strata are extensively preserved in the ECAO, and composed primarily of clastic facies [29,37,80]. Volcanics, usually present as interlayers, also occur in Lower Cretaceous successions of the East Gobi, Erlian and Hailar basins, and are largely basalt and basaltic andesite, yielding 40Ar/39Ar ages from 142 to 113 Ma [22,29,65,66,80–82]. Early Cretaceous volcanics and volcaniclastic rocks are widespread in the Great Xing’an Range, and dated at 135–115 Ma [20,68,69,81]. The Lower Cretaceous succession of the Songliao basin contains thick volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks, such as the Huoshiling and Yingcheng Formations, albeit clastic facies are also commonplace (Fig. 2). The Huoshiling volcanics are recently dated at 133–129 Ma [71,72], much younger than the previous age assignment of ∼150 Ma [21]. The Yingcheng volcanics are constrained at 120–105 Ma [21], indicating the persistence of volcanism to the end of the Early Cretaceous. The Upper Cretaceous is well developed in the Songliao basin, up to 3 km thick [83]. In contrast, the rift basins in the western portion of the ECAO possess meager Upper Cretaceous strata, which are usually less than 500 m thick [29]. A regional unconformity separates the Lower from Upper Cretaceous [21,29].

MAGMATISM

Vigorous volcanism and plutonism characterized the NE Asian continent during the Early Cretaceous [3,20,32]. Volcanic rocks are widely distributed in the northern NCC, as represented by the Donglingtai andesite in the West Hill, Zhangjiakou rhyolite in northern Hebei and Yixian basalts in western Liaoning. Volcanism in the eastern NCC took place in the late stage of rift basin development, as recorded by the Qingshan rhyolite and basalt in the Jiaolai basin, the Maotanchang andesite in the Hefei basin, the Laohutai basalts in the Fushun basin [84] and Xiaoling Formation in eastern Liaoning [85]. Early Cretaceous volcanism was vigorous in the Great Xing’an Range and the Songliao basin [20,21,70,81], but declined significantly westward. Volcanic and/or volcaniclastic rocks are only present as interlayers in the lower successions of the East Gobi [80] and Erlian basins [66].

Early Cretaceous intrusions are also extensive in NE Asia [3,32]. Mafic intrusives occur in the eastern NCC, such as gabbro-pyroxenite complexes in the Taihang Shan belt and diorite/gabbro bodies in western Shandong [86,87]. Granitoids are distributed in the periphery of the eastern NCC [3,32], such as the Fangshan granite in the western Yanshan belt [88], the Sanguliu granite in the eastern Liaoning belt [11] in the northern NCC, the Guojialing granite in the Jiaodong Peninsula in the NCC eastern margin [89] and the Huashan and Heyu granites at the southern edge of the NCC [90]. Early Cretaceous granitoids are also widely documented in the ECAO, particularly in NE China [32,91].

Growing geochronologic data show that Early Cretaceous magmatism took place during a wide range of time although it mainly happened from 130 to 120 Ma [32]. An east-younging trend in magmatic activity has been recognized [10,11], and is best demonstrated by eastward progression of Early Cretaceous volcanism in the northern NCC (Fig. 3). Volcanism started at 143–140 Ma in the Yinshan and western Yanshan belts [3,54,77], ∼136 Ma in the eastern Yanshan belt [56], ∼126 Ma in the Liaoxi region and ∼120–110 Ma in the Liaodong region [32,85]. Early Cretaceous magmatism in the eastern NCC commenced around 138 Ma in the Taihangshan belt [92], and appeared to have not started until ∼130 Ma in the easternmost NCC [87]. No matter when it began, Early Cretaceous magmatism lasted until ∼110 Ma within and around the eastern NCC [11,32]. Early Cretaceous magmatism in the ECAO occurred from ∼130 to 110 Ma, and was vigorous in the east [70,81].

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Distribution of Early Cretaceous igneous rocks in the NCC. Note that igneous rocks are particularly abundant in the northern NCC and both intrusive and extrusive rocks display a marked east-younging trend.

Also noticeable is the time-space variation of magma types in the eastern NCC. Felsic and intermediate magmatism was prevailing in the west from 143 to 136 Ma, whereas mafic magmatism took place largely in the east from 130 to 110 Ma [87]. The eastward migration of magmatism was also associated with an increase in alkaline and mafic rocks like syenite and gabbro [93]. This situation is well exemplified by ∼143 Ma rhyolites and granitoids in the western Yanshan and Taihangshan belts [3,54] and ∼130–110 Ma mafic rocks in the easternmost NCC [87]. Magmatism persisted in the western portion of the eastern NCC when migrating eastwards [11]. Felsic volcano-plutonic associations are also common in the easternmost NCC, coeval with mafic and alkaline magmatism [32,87].

Early Cretaceous granite in the northern NCC is shown to have formed at high temperature ranging from 640 to 1100oC with a peak at ∼770oC [11]. This deduction is supported by the co-occurrence of mafic rocks that originate from high-temperature melts [87]. Coexistence of felsic and mafic magmas in the northern NCC indicate intense crust–mantle interaction [94], thereby hinting at the uprising of hot asthenospheric materials.

Magmatism declined significantly throughout the NCC and ECAO in the Late Cretaceous [3,4], and occurred largely along the eastern edge of the NE Asian continent, such as the Sikhote Alin belt [95], Korea [96] and southwestern Japan [91]. Late Cretaceous igneous rocks are mostly granitoid, andesite and pyroclastic rocks, representing island-arc magmatic activities triggered by the paleo-Pacific plate subduction [69,97].

BASIN EVOLUTION

Rift basins are usually classified on the basis of dynamic, geometric and kinematic aspects, such as active and passive rifts [98] and wide and narrow rifts [99,100]. Active rifting is attributed to active uprising of mantle plumes, which first leads to doming and then induces supracrustal stretching [101]. Passive rifting is ascribed to lithosphere extension as a result of horizontal in-plane far-field forces, with the asthenospheric materials rising passively due to lithosphere thinning [101]. Wide rift systems develop owing to gravitational collapse of the orogenically thickened crust. Tensile deviatoric stress fields in the thickened crust are produced by lateral variation in gravitational potential energy [102]. By contrast, narrow rifts result from necking of the lithosphere with normal geotherm and crust thickness [100], and therefore fit the passive rifting mode. Merle (2010) proposes a rift classification in the context of tectonic settings, such as subduction-, mantle-, transform- and mountain-related rifts [103]. However, it is a purely interpretive classification and cannot help explore the real mechanism of continental rifting. Moreover, wide rifts are neither taken into account in Merle's classification nor readily fall into the category of Sengör and Burke's (1978) classification [98]. Active and passive rifting modes do have drawbacks and cannot successfully explain the whole evolution of continental rifts [103,104]. However, this simple classification proves quite useful for the first-order assessment of continental rifting [105]. Obviously, no existing rift classifications can encompass all types of continental rifts and no single driving force can account for all aspects of rift basins. We thus take a pragmatic approach to dealing with Cretaceous rift basins in NE Asia by adopting the categorization of active, passive and wide rifting. Our rationale is that the investigated basin successions appear to be compatible with the distinct rifting modes. The three types of rifting are thus considered to originate from three driving forces: (i) far-field forces originating at plate boundaries; (ii) forces acting on the base of the lithosphere due to the asthenospheric uprising, and (iii) buoyancy forces arising within the thickened orogenic crust. Different drivers may work together to control the development of some rift basins.

The relative timing of extension and volcanism is pivotal in discriminating different types of rift basins, which can be readily recognized by their distinct stratigraphic sequences (Fig. 4). Passive rift basins develop when the lithosphere is stretched and thinned, with the asthenosphere rising passively (Fig. 4A-a). Magma is then generated either by melting of the crust and lithospheric mantle due to asthenospheric heating or by decompressional melting of the asthenosphere. As a result, volcanic eruptions take place in the late stage of rifting when the lithosphere is considerably attenuated (Fig. 4A-b). Passive rift basin development is thus recorded by basin sequences typified by the lower clastic rocks and the upper volcanic/volcaniclastic rocks (Fig. 4A-c). By contrast, extensive volcanism usually precedes subsidence of active rift basins as a consequence of the active asthenospheric upwelling and crustal doming (Fig. 4B-a). The domed upper crust then experiences horizontal stretching owing to gravitational instability and collapse, thereby forming active rift basins in the extended areas. Clastic sedimentation is therefore characteristic of the late stage of active rift basins (Fig. 4B-b). Typical volcano-sedimentary sequences of active rift basins are accordingly marked by a lower volcanic part and an upper clastic part (Fig. 4B-c). As regards wide rift basins, they initiate and develop owing to gravitational collapse of the thickened orogenic crust, as manifested by broad occurrence of small-scale disparate rift basins in the upper crust (Fig. 4C-a). The isolated basins expand through lateral linkage of adjacent basins, and thus often express themselves as elongated or narrow basins in map view (Fig. 5). Continued gravitational spreading can result in stress localization and may eventually give rise to metamorphic core complexes (MCCs) [99]. The close association of MCCs with wide rifting can be exemplified by the presence of a number of Early Cretaceous MCCs, like the Yagan MCC [29,106], Ereendavaa MCC [107] and Ulan-Ude MCC [33] in the ECAO. Magmatism also occurs simultaneously with wide rifting (Fig. 4C-b) and is well documented [108110]. Potential heat sources for partial melting of thickened crust might be internal heat production by radioactive decay [111] and/or heat flux related to the asthenospheric upwelling triggered possibly by plate subduction [112]. Widespread volcanism in the ECAO is commonly attributed to subduction-induced delamination [69]. Wide rifts are marked by basin sequences dominated by clastic facies, with volcanic interlayers being present at different stratigraphic levels (Fig. 4C-c).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Models for tectonic subsidence of different types of rift basins and resultant volcano-sedimentary sequences. (A) Passive rift basin. (B) Active rift basin. (C) Wide rift basin. Refer to text for detailed explanation. eNCC = eastern NCC; nNCC = northern NCC.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Diagrams showing structures of rift basins in the ECAO. (A) Map view of the Yingen basin, which is made up of many individual sub-basins and associated with metamorphic core complexes. (B) Map view of Early Cretaceous Songliao basin. Note the individualities of sub-basins. (C) A geologic section across the Yingen basin (a-a’ profile in A), showing marked synrift subsidence and minor postrift subsidence. (D) A geologic section across the southern Songliao basin (b-b’ profile in B) that is typified by pronounced postrift subsidence. Abbreviations: K1 = Lower Cretaceous, K1y = Yixian Formation, K1j = Jiufotang Formation, K1s = Shahai Formation, K1f = Fuxin Formation.

Early Cretaceous rift basins in NE Asia are categorized into three types in this study: passive, active and wide rift basins. Rift basins in the eastern NCC display similar synrift stratigraphic successions that begin with clastic units characterized by alluvia/fluvial and lacustrine facies associations. The clastic units are overlain by upper units dominated by volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks. These typical synrift sequences are well manifested in the Jiaolai and Hefei basins (Fig. 2). The Laiyang Group and Zhuxiang Formation represent the lower clastic units, while the Qingshan Group and Maotanchang Formation exemplify the upper volcanic units (Figs 2 and 4A-d). Rift basins in the eastern NCC thus fall into passive rift basins. Rift basins in the northern NCC show synrift sequences typified by a lower volcanic unit and an upper clastic unit, contrasting strikingly with rift basin sequences in the eastern NCC. The lower unit is represented by the Donglingtai, Zhangjiakou and Yixian volcanics, while the Dabeigou, Xiguayuan and Jiufotang

Formations make up the upper clastic units in the Luanping and Beipiao basins, respectively (Figs 2 and 4B-d). The rift basins in the northern NCC are therefore considered as active rift basins. Early Cretaceous basins in the ECAO have been well investigated and classified as wide rift basins [29,37,80]. The extensive distribution of small-scale basins, as manifested by Early Cretaceous basin families in the Yingen and Songliao basins (Fig. 5), typifies the wide rift basins. Volcanic layers of various thicknesses occur at different levels of successions of the wide rift basins (Figs 2 and 4C-d), as displayed by Lower Cretaceous sequences in the Songliao basin [21,71,72], the Great Xing’an Range [68], the Hailar basin [66,67] and the Erlian basin [66].

It is noteworthy that the distinct types of rift basins occurred in different regions in NE Asia during the Early Cretaceous: wide rift basins developed in the ECAO, active rift basins in the northern NCC and passive rift basins in the eastern NCC (Fig. 1). The wide rift basins are reminiscent of the Tertiary Basin and Range Province of the United States [113,114], and were attributed to gravitationally driven collapse of thickened and heated orogenic crust [29,37,115,116]. Other drivers are also proposed for the Early Cretaceous extension, such as backarc crustal extension [21,117] or transtension in association with escape tectonics [9,118]. However, these mechanisms can hardly explain the extensive distribution of these supracrustal basin families. Passive rift basins in the eastern NCC resulted from backarc extension triggered by high-angle subduction of the paleo-Pacific plate [18,119], with regional tensional stress oriented NW to SE [120,121]. The Tanlu fault behaved as a major normal fault in the Early Cretaceous, playing a major role in subsidence of the Hefei, Jiaolai and other adjacent basins [25]. It has been bewildering how an active rift basin was induced in the northern NCC.

The Late Cretaceous saw a period when most rift basins experienced vertical motion in NE Asia [21,29]. Basin subsidence and sedimentation in eastern NCC were partly associated with normal faulting [25,26]. Magmatism became quiet, and was only active at the eastern edge of the NE Asian continent, such as the Sikhote Alin belt, southeast Korea and southwest Japan [3,4,91]. The passive rift basins in the eastern NCC subsided as a result of N–S extension, as exemplified by the Jiaolai basin where the Upper Cretaceous Wangshi Group was deposited under the control of E–W-striking normal faults like the Baichihe and Pingdu faults [26]. The N–S extension was postulated to have resulted from transcurrent tectonics [5]. E–W-trending normal faulting also took place in the Hefei basins, and controlled sedimentation of the Zhangqiao Formation [25]. Contraction happened in the easternmost NE Asian continent at the end of the Early Cretaceous, as registered by a regional unconformity beneath Upper Cretaceous strata in a number of basins, such as the Hefei, Jiaolai, Songliao and Sanjiang basins [21,26,122]. Strong transpression occurred along strike-slip fault zones, leading to folding and uplifting of Lower Cretaceous successions of the basins near or within the fault zones, as indicated by intense deformation of Lower Cretaceous strata in the Sanjiang basin [122] and the Yisu basin [26]. The basins far away from the strike-slip faults only experienced a short-lived vertical uplift, with no obvious break in the Lower–Upper Cretaceous successions. For instance, Lower and Upper Cretaceous strata are conformable in the Gyeongsang basin in SE Korea [52], and the Cretaceous synrift and postrift sequence is only separated by a short-termed disconformity in the Songliao basin [21].

Most rift basins in the ECAO underwent minor subsidence in the postrift stage, with postrift successions usually <800 m thick [29]. The insignificant postrift subsidence resulted possibly from lower-crustal flows from the less stretched areas to the strongly attenuated regions [29]. The lower-crustal flows prevented the crust of the rift basins from further thinning, thereby reducing postrift tectonic subsidence. The Songliao basin is an exception in that it underwent striking postrift subsidence with sedimentary successions up to 5000 m thick [21]. Opinions diverge on the origins of large-magnitude postrift subsidence of the Songliao basin. It is assumed that the lithosphere of the Songliao basin was significantly thinned due to backarc extension, and subsequent thermal contraction of the asthenosphere was thus responsible for the pronounced postrift subsidence [21]. Li and Liu attributed the marked postrift subsidence to the superposition of dynamic subsidence induced by downward dragging of the subducting paleo-Pacific plate [123]. It is also argued that west-verging thrusting on the eastern margin of the Songliao basin might have contributed partially to the postrift subsidence, albeit thermal subsidence was dominant in the early stage [122]. Transpressional deformation was localized along the strike-slip fault zones in the easternmost margin of NE China at the Early to Late Cretaceous boundary, like the Yilan–Yitong and Dunhua–Mishan faults [5,40], and led to inversion of the Sanjiang basins in between [122]. The Songliao basin did not undergo shortening until ∼80 Ma when all the basin's fills were folded to various degrees and partially uplifted under roughly west–east compression [21].

Upper Cretaceous strata are considerably thin and only occur in a few rift basins in the northern NCC (Fig. 2). It is unclear why the active rift basins largely came to an end in the Late Cretaceous. Most Early Cretaceous successions remain fairly flat, indicating weak deformation. It is plausible that the active rift basins terminated as a result of vertical crustal motion rather than horizontal shortening. The northern NCC in practice experienced polyphase rapid uplifting in the Cretaceous, starting ∼120 Ma based on low-temperature thermochronologic data [124]. The episodic vertical motion might be responsible for the lack of Upper Cretaceous strata. More work is obviously needed to explore the driver of the polyphase uplift/denudation of the northern NCC. The end-Early Cretaceous thrusting was rarely recorded in the northern NCC except in a few localities where sinistral transpressive faults, such as the Nantianmen and Yaowangmiao faults in western Liaoning, displace the Mesoproterozoic dolostones over Lower Cretaceous strata [125].

DYNAMICS OF CRETACEOUS BASINS

Distinct types of rift basins developed in different regions in NE Asia during the Early Cretaceous, and there should be a coherent mechanism that governed spatial distribution of the diverse rift basins. We here advance a tectonic model that seems to better explain why different rifting took place in different regions in the Early Cretaceous (Fig. 6). The NE Asian continent was bounded on the east by a subduction zone, which presumably initiated in the Early Jurassic, as implied by the presence of Early Jurassic accretionary complexes and arc/backarc igneous associations at the eastern margin of the ECAO [4,14,126]. Early Cretaceous arc volcanic rocks are rarely documented in the eastern edge of the NCC, but mafic and felsic intrusives in the eastern NCC implicate active subduction of the paleo-Pacific plate [87]. One possibility is that the subduction zone was far away from the present-day eastern edge of the NCC continent, and the Early Cretaceous island-arc belt might have been destroyed by later subduction and/or transform processes due to reorganization of the western Pacific plate [127,128]. This situation hints at a change in the paleo-Pacific plate subduction process along the subduction zone (Fig. 6A). The whole subduction zone could be divided into the northern and southern segments (Fig. 6). The northern subduction zone east of the ECAO was relatively fixed, as evidenced by complete preservation of Jurassic–Early Cretaceous accretionary complexes in the Nadanhada and Sikhote Alin belts [41,126]. In contrast, a lack of geologic records of Jurassic–Early Cretaceous arc systems suggests that the subduction zone east of the NCC might have been located far away from the continental margin. It is thus plausible that a transfer zone developed to accommodate the different subduction processes at the northern and southern subduction zones. The transfer zone just occurred beneath the northern NCC (Fig. 6A).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Diagram showing a possible linkage between Early Cretaceous basins and the paleo-Pacific plate subduction. (A) Passive rift basins occur in the NCC, bounded on the east by the southern subduction zone. Wide rift basins develop in the ECAO, bounded by the northern subduction zone. Active rift basins happen in the northern NCC. (B) A sketch showing that wide rift basins result from supracrustal stretching due to gravitational collapse of the thickened ECAO crust. The Songliao basin crust is significantly thinned owing to the superposition of backarc extension induced by paleo-Pacific plate subduction. Note that the northern subduction zone was relatively fixed in Jurassic to Early Cretaceous times. (C) A sketch showing that passive rift basins originate from backarc extension triggered by a combination of rollback and retreat of the subducting paleo-Pacific plate. A big mantle wedge might have begun developing beneath the NCC since the Early Cretaceous.

An internal connection might exist between the paleo-Pacific plate subduction and extensional tectonics in the ECAO during the Early Cretaceous (Fig. 6B). The paleo-Pacific plate subduction not only produced an accretionary prism, as evidenced by the Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous Nadanhada and Sikhote-Alin complexes [41,126], but also induced backarc extension, as implicated by Early Cretaceous bimodal volcanism and A-type rhyolite [4,20]. The free eastern boundary could have facilitated extensional collapse of the thickened ECAO crust, leading to the formation of wide rift basins. The superposition of backarc extension and gravitational collapse brought about significant thinning of the whole lithosphere in the eastern ECAO (Fig. 6B), thereby resulting in uprising of the asthenosphere and voluminous volcanic eruption in both the Songliao basin and Great Xing’an Range [20,69,81]. This mechanism offers a satisfactory explanation for intense volcanism in the Great Xing’an Range in the Early Cretaceous and the pronounced thermal subsidence of the Songliao basin in the Late Cretaceous.

It was argued that Early Cretaceous magmatism was younging to the east in the ECAO [69]. Close scrutiny of available geochronologic data, however, shows that magmatism occurred throughout the ECAO mainly in the timespan from 135 to 110 Ma [32,69,81,97,110] and did not display the marked eastward progression. Extensive volcanism across the ECAO is attributed either to the break-off of the subducting plate [20] or delamination of subcontinental lithosphere [23]. Although the two tectonic models could explain extensive magmatic outpouring and uplifting of wide rift systems in the late Early Cretaceous, they can hardly account for why significant thermal subsidence only happened in the Songliao basin. We tentatively ascribe Early Cretaceous magmatism in the ECAO interior to the combination of internal heating due to radioactive decay in the thickened crust and heat flux of the asthenospheric upwelling triggered by plate subduction.

Passive rifting in the eastern NCC resulted from horizontal lithospheric extension, which was presumably induced by rollback and retreat of the subducting paleo-Pacific plate [10,25]. The westward decrease in the intensity of crustal stretching implies that horizontal tensile force must have been applied from the east. Given that there are no records of Early Cretaceous arc magmatism in the present-day eastern edge of the NCC, the subduction zone must have been located far to the east during the Early Cretaceous. It is conjectured that the southern subduction zone had continued migrating eastward with time owing to persistent rollback and/or retreat of the subducting paleo-Pacific plate (Fig. 6C). Continued rollback and/or retreat of paleo-Pacific plate subduction might also have led to the formation of a big mantle wedge beneath the NCC in the Early Cretaceous, which in turn promoted lithospheric thinning of the eastern NCC by means of water-assisted thermal erosion [10].

Two-dimensional thermal mechanical modeling was recently performed to investigate behaviors of the overriding continent with differing thermal states in the process of oceanic plate subduction [129]. It is shown that: (i) trenchward thrusting of overthickened and hot (>17.5°C km−1) crust will slow down the trench retreat; and (ii) decoupling could occur between the overriding continents and subducting oceanic plates if continents possess low thermal gradients (∼10–15°C km−1) and normal crustal thickness. The modeling results carry important implications for subduction processes of the western paleo-Pacific plate. As discussed earlier, complete Jurassic–Cretaceous accretionary complexes are well preserved at the eastern margin of the ECAO. This fact implicates that the northern subduction zone must have been

relatively fixed or experienced little eastward retreat during the late Mesozoic, compatible with the prediction of the modeling [129]. In contrast, the NCC was a domain with relatively normal geotherm and crustal thickness as a whole. Given that few geologic records of arc systems have been identified along the eastern margin of the NCC, the southern subduction zone is thus inferred to have undergone eastward migration as a result of continuous trench retreat and subduction rollback of the paleo-Pacific plate. Both geologic observations and interpretations seem consistent with the numerical modeling [129].

Tearing of the subducting lithospheric slab has been widely documented by geophysical observations in many subduction zones around the world [130,131], and is attributed to the variation in rates of subduction rollback and trench retreat along the length of subduction zones [132]. We conjecture that the subducting paleo-Pacific plate experienced vertical slab tearing beneath the northern NCC as a result of different rollback and/or retreat velocities of the northern and southern subduction zones (Fig. 7). The northern subduction zone was relatively fixed between the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous, whereas the southern subduction zone continued migrating to the east, with only the backarc system left in the eastern NCC (Fig. 6A). Persistent eastward retreat of the southern subduction zone eventually led to segmentation of the subduction zone and the formation of a lithospheric-scale tear fault that split the subducting paleo-Pacific plate beneath the NE Asian continent (Fig. 7). One of the direct consequences is the ascent of the hot asthenospheric materials along the tear fault, which heated the overlying lithosphere and triggered vigorous magmatism in the northern NCC (Fig. 6). The plausibility of tearing of the subducting paleo-Pacific plate is sustained by several geologic facts. First, Early Cretaceous volcanism and plutonism occurred mostly in the northern NCC, as indicated by linear distribution of igneous rocks (Fig. 3). Second, Early Cretaceous volcanism showed an eastward younging polarity, taking place first in the west and shifting to the east [10,11] (Fig. 3). Third, Early Cretaceous igneous rocks in the northern NCC were formed at high temperatures and sourced partially from depleted mantle materials [11]. All the geologic records are compatible with the proposed slab tearing process. Tearing of the subducted

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

A tectonic model showing that slab tearing played an important role in controlling active rift basin evolution and high-flux magmatism in the northern NCC in the Early Cretaceous. Slab tearing possibly resulted from a higher rate of rollback and retreat of the subducting paleo-Pacific plate at the southern subduction zone. Hot mantle materials ascended through the tear fault and impinged on the overlying lithosphere, thus triggering magmatism and eastward-younging polarity as slab tearing progressed from west to east. Passive rift basins in the eastern NCC were generated by horizontal extension induced by rapid trench retreat in conjunction with subduction rollback. Wide rift basins developed due to gravitational collapse of the thickened crust of the ECAO and the northern subduction zone underwent not very much eastward migration.

paleo-Pacific plate happened first in the west, thus permitting asthenospheric materials to penetrate through the slab gap produced by lithospheric-scale tearing (Fig. 7). Consequently, vigorous magmatism occurred first in the western segment of the northern NCC as a result of heating of the asthenospheric uprising, giving rise to the voluminous Donglingtai and Zhangjiakou volcanics. Tearing then propagated eastward and upward over time, and brought about eastward migration of magmatic activities (Fig. 7). Slab tearing thus offers a good explanation for the generation of voluminous volcanism and active rift basins in the northern NCC (Fig. 7).

Also noticeable is the occurrence of a number of Early Cretaceous MCCs in the northern NCC (Fig. 1), such as the Hohhot [133], Yunmengshan [134,135], Yiwulushan [136] and Liaonan MCCs [137], indicating that the northern NCC was a highly extended corridor. The MCCs possess two important aspects: (i) footwalls or the lower plates usually contain Early Cretaceous plutons; and (ii) detachments experience high temperature (up to 600°C) ductile shearing [109]. The facts imply that magmatism must have played an important role in the MCCs’ formation by thermally weakening the lithosphere/crust. MCCs preferentially form in the hot and thickened crust, as revealed by both natural examples and numerical modeling [99,100,138]. The northern NCC had experienced two strong shortening events prior to the Early Cretaceous [2,15,16], and had already evolved into an intraplate orogen with the considerably thickened crust. Subsequent voluminous magmatic activity must have further weakened the northern NCC [109]. Therefore, the northern NCC behaved as a unique extensional corridor affected by both magmatic uprising and gravitational collapsing in the Early Cretaceous, and was thus prone to active rifting and MCC formation.

A global plate reorganization event happened at ∼105–90 Ma, and the paleo-Pacific plate began moving to the north or north-northwest [127]. The N- or NNW-directed movement of the paleo-Pacific plate strongly sheared the eastern margin of the NE Asian continent from the beginning of the Late Cretaceous [41,127,139], contrasting with the dominant NW-directed subduction in the Early Cretaceous [25]. The kinematic change in direction, rate and subduction angle of the paleo-Pacific plate led to two prominent consequences in the eastern margin of NE Asia in the Late Cretaceous time: (i) reactivation and/or initiation of a number of large-scale left-slip faults, such as the Tanlu fault [5], Dunhua-Mishan fault [40], Median tectonic lines [140], South Korea tectonic line [141] and Central Sikhote Alin fault [41]; (ii) transpressional deformation in the period from 97 to 80 Ma, which presumably resulted from an abrupt increase in subduction rate of the paleo-Pacific plate [139]. The transgression resulted in inversion of Early Cretaceous rift basins in the eastern margin of the NE Asian continent, such as the Hefei, Jiaolai, Yisu, Sanjiang and Songliao basins [21,26,122]. Following the shortening event, rifting resumed as a consequence of N-S extension in some localities, and possibly bore upon persistent large-scale left-slip faulting [26,120,141]. Late Cretaceous magmatism was thus concentrated along the easternmost margin of the NE Asian continent [41,96], and became significantly weak toward the interior due to localization of transcurrent deformation [3,5]. The Songliao basin underwent marked postrift subsidence in the Late Cretaceous tectonic quiescence [21]. Most of the NE Asia continent experienced vertical uplift or minor subsidence in the Late Cretaceous on account of the scarcity of Upper Cretaceous strata [122].

Admittedly, uncertainties and disagreements remain regarding the subduction history of the western paleo-Pacific plate in the late Mesozoic. The existing reconstructions of paleo-Pacific plate subduction need to be refined when new data are available. A more feasible mechanism for tectonic development of Cretaceous basins in NE Asia awaits a better understanding of subduction processes and the kinematic history of the paleo-Pacific plate in the late Mesozoic.

CONCLUSION

Cretaceous rift basins characterize the NE Asian continent. Three types of rift basin are identified according to their distinct volcano-sedimentary sequences and subsidence history, and termed as passive, active and wide rift basins. Passive rift basins in the eastern NCC commenced with clastic deposition, which was followed by volcanic eruption. Active rift basins were formed in the northern NCC and marked by vigorous volcanism at the beginning of basin history. Clastic sedimentation then took place and became more prevalent with time. Wide rift basins occurred in the ECAO and were mostly filled with clastics. Volcanic and volcaniclastic layers were present throughout basin successions, and abundant in the eastern ECAO. The passive rift basins are attributed to horizontal lithospheric stretching induced by rollback and retreat of the subducting paleo-Pacific plate. The wide rift basins originate from gravitational collapse of the hot and thickened crust. Development of active rift basins is presumably related to asthenospheric uprising through a lithospheric-scale tear fault. The Late Cretaceous was a period of tectonic quiescence, and most of the Early Cretaceous rift basins experienced either sagging or uplift. Late Cretaceous crustal deformation was localized along the eastern margin of the NE Asian continent in response to kinematic change of the paleo-Pacific plate that began moving to the north or north-northwest. Basins near or within major strike-slip faults in the eastern margin were either inversed or developed into strike-slip basins.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We wish to thank Guo-Li Wu, Long-Gang Fan and Hong-Hong Wei for fieldwork assistance and helpful discussion. Three reviewers are acknowledged for their constructive comments and helpful suggestions that led to the improvement of this paper.

Contributor Information

Qing-Ren Meng, State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China; Innovation Academy for Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China; College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

Zhong-He Zhou, College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China.

Ri-Xiang Zhu, State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China; Innovation Academy for Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China; College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

Yi-Gang Xu, Innovation Academy for Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China; College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; State Key Laboratory of Isotope Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.

Zheng-Tang Guo, Innovation Academy for Earth Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China; College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Key Laboratory of Cenozoic Geology and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0600406) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41688103, 41702237 and 91114204).

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

The ideas and concepts of this study stem from long-term collaboration between all the authors. Qing-Ren Meng drafted the manuscript and designed the illustrations based on repeated discussions among the authors. All the authors contributed to the completion of the final version of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Zhu RX, Zhu G, Li JWet al. Destruction of the North China Craton. Beijing: Science China Press, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Davis GA, Yadong Z, Cong Wet al. Mesozoic tectonic evolution of the Yanshan fold and thrust belt, with emphasis on Hebei and Liaoning provinces, northern China. Mem-Geol Soc Am 2001: 171–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Zhang SH, Zhao Y, Davis GAet al. Temporal and spatial variations of Mesozoic magmatism and deformation in the North China Craton: implications for lithospheric thinning and decratonization. Earth-Sci Rev 2014; 131: 49–87. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.12.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Tang J, Xu WL, Wang Fet al. Subduction history of the Paleo-Pacific slab beneath Eurasian continent: Mesozoic-Paleogene magmatic records in Northeast Asia. Sci China Earth Sci 2018; 61: 527–59. 10.1007/s11430-017-9174-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Zhu G, Liu C, Gu CCet al. Oceanic plate subduction history in the western Pacific Ocean: constraint from late Mesozoic evolution of the Tan-Lu Fault Zone. Sci China Earth Sci 2018; 61: 386–405. 10.1007/s11430-017-9136-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zhu R, Zhou Z, Meng Q.. Destruction of the North China Craton and its influence on surface geology and terrestrial biotas. Chin Sci Bull 2020; 65: 2954–65. 10.1007/s11430-012-4516-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Kimura G, Takahashi M, Kono M. Mesozoic collision—extrusion tectonics in eastern Asia. Tectonophysics 1990; 181: 15–23. 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90005-S [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Li S, Zhao G, Dai Let al. Mesozoic basins in eastern China and their bearing on the deconstruction of the North China Craton. J Asian Earth Sci 2012; 47: 64–79. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2011.06.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Yang Y, Guo Z, Song Cet al. A short-lived but significant Mongol–Okhotsk collisional orogeny in latest Jurassic–earliest Cretaceous. Gondwana Res 2015; 28: 1096–116. 10.1016/j.gr.2014.09.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Zhu RX, Xu YG.. The subduction of the west Pacific plate and the destruction of the North China Craton. Sci China Earth Sci 2019; 62: 1340–50. 10.1007/s11430-018-9356-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Wu FY, Yang JH, Xu YGet al. Destruction of the North China Craton in the Mesozoic. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 2019; 47: 173–95. 10.1146/annurev-earth-053018-060342 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ma Q, Xu Y. Magmatic perspective on subduction of Paleo-Pacific plate and initiation of big mantle wedge in East Asia. Earth-Sci Rev 2021; 213: 103473. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103473 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Dong S, Zhang Y, Zhang Fet al. Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous continental convergence and intracontinental orogenesis in East Asia: a synthesis of the Yanshan Revolution. J Asian Earth Sci 2015; 114: 750–70. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.08.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Hao W, Zhu R, Zhu G.. Jurassic tectonics of the eastern North China Craton: response to initial subduction of the Paleo-Pacific Plate. Geol Soc Am Bull 2021; 133: 19–36. 10.1130/B35585.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Wu G, Meng Q, Zhu Ret al. Middle Jurassic orogeny in the northern North China block. Tectonophysics 2021; 801: 228713. 10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228713 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Li CM, Zhang CH, Cope TDet al. Out-of-sequence thrusting in polycyclic thrust belts: an example from the Mesozoic Yanshan belt, North China Craton. Tectonics 2016; 35: 2082–116. 10.1002/2016TC004187 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Dong S, Zhang Y, Li Het al. Out-of-sequence thrusting in polycyclic thrust belts: an example from the Mesozoic Yanshan belt, North China Craton. Sci China Earth Sci 2018; 61: 1888–909. 10.1007/s11430-017-9297-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ren J, Tamaki K, Li Set al. Late Mesozoic and Cenozoic rifting and its dynamic setting in Eastern China and adjacent areas. Tectonophysics 2002; 344: 175–205. 10.1016/S0040-1951(01)00271-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Lin W, Wei W. Late Mesozoic extensional tectonics in the North China Craton and its adjacent regions: a review and synthesis. Int Geol Rev 2020; 62: 811–39. 10.1080/00206814.2018.1477073 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Xu WL, Pei FP, Wang Fet al. Spatial-temporal relationships of Mesozoic volcanic rocks in NE China: constraints on tectonic overprinting and transformations between multiple tectonic regimes. J Asian Earth Sci 2013; 74: 167–93. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.04.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Wang P, Mattern F, Didenko NAet al. Tectonics and cycle system of the Cretaceous Songliao basin: an inverted active continental margin basin. Earth-Sci Rev 2016; 159: 82–102. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.05.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Guo ZX, Yang YT, Zhao XZet al. Early Cretaceous tectonostratigraphic evolution of the Erlian Basin, NE China: a record of Late Mesozoic intraplate deformation in East Asia. Mar Pet Geol 2019; 110: 539–64. 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.07.043 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Ji Z, Meng QA, Wan CBet al. Generation of late Mesozoic felsic volcanic rocks in the Hailar Basin, northeastern China in response to overprinting of multiple tectonic regimes. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 15854. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Wei H, Meng Q, Wu Get al. Multiple controls on rift basin sedimentation in volcanic settings: insights from the anatomy of a small Early Cretaceous basin in the Yanshan belt, northern North China. Geol Soc Am Bull 2012; 124: 380–99. 10.1130/B30495.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Zhu G, Jiang DZ, Zhang BLet al. Destruction of the eastern North China Craton in a backarc setting: evidence from crustal deformation kinematics. Gondwana Res 2012; 22: 86–103. 10.1016/j.gr.2011.08.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Zhang YQ, Li JL, Zhang Tet al. Cretaceous to Paleocene tectono-sedimentary evolution of the Jiaolai Basin and the contiguous areas of the Shandong Peninsula (North China) and its geodynamic implications. Acta Geol Sin 2008; 82: 1229–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Meng QR, Wu GL, Fan LGet al. Tectonic evolution of early Mesozoic sedimentary basins in the North China block. Earth-Sci Rev 2019; 190: 416–38. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.12.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Zhou J, Wilde SA, Zhao Get al. Nature and assembly of microcontinental blocks within the Paleo-Asian Ocean. Earth-Sci Rev 2018; 186: 76–93. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.01.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Meng QR. What drove late Mesozoic extension of the northern China-Mongolia tract? Tectonophysics 2003; 369: 155–74. 10.1016/S0040-1951(03)00195-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Davis GA, Cong W, Zheng YDet al. The enigmatic Yinshan fold-and-thrust belt of northern China: new views on its intraplate contractional styles. Geology 1998; 26: 43–6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Cope TD, Shultz MR, Graham SA. Detrital record of Mesozoic shortening in the Yanshan belt, NE China: testing structural interpretations with basin analysis. Basin Res 2007; 19: 253–72. 10.1111/j.1365-2117.2007.00321.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Wu FY, Lin JQ, Wilde SAet al. Nature and significance of the Early Cretaceous giant igneous event in eastern China. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2005; 233: 103–19. 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.02.019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wang T, Zheng YD, Zhang JJet al. Pattern and kinematic polarity of late Mesozoic extension in continental NE Asia: perspectives from metamorphic core complexes. Tectonics 2011; 30: TC6007. 10.1029/2011TC002896 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Griffin WL, Andi Z, O’Reilly SYet al. Phanerozoic evolution of the lithosphere beneath the Sino-Korean craton. In: Flower M, Chung S and Lo C et al. (eds.). Mantle Dynamics and Plate Interactions in East. Washington DC: AGU. 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Zhang HF. Transformation of lithospheric mantle through peridotite-melt reaction: a case of Sino-Korean craton. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2005; 237: 768–80. 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.041 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Zhu R, Xu Y, Zhu Get al. Destruction of the North China Craton. Sci China Earth Sci 2012; 55: 1565–87. 10.1007/s11430-012-4516-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Graham SA, Hendrix MS, Johnson CLet al. Sedimentary record and tectonic implications of Mesozoic rifting in southeast Mongolia. Geol Soc Am Bull 2001; 113: 1560–79. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Van der Voo R, van Hinsbergen DJ, Domeier Met al. Latest Jurassic–earliest Cretaceous closure of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean: a paleomagnetic and seismological-tomographic analysis. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 2015; 513: 589–606. 10.1130/2015.2513(19) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Kusky TM, Windley BF, Wang Let al. Flat slab subduction, trench suction, and craton destruction: comparison of the North China, Wyoming, and Brazilian cratons. Tectonophysics 2014; 630: 208–21. 10.1016/j.tecto.2014.05.028 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Liu C, Zhu G, Zhang Set al. Mesozoic strike-slip movement of the Dunhua-Mishan Fault Zone in NE China: a response to oceanic plate subduction. Tectonophysics 2018; 723: 201–22. 10.1016/j.tecto.2017.12.024 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Khanchuk AI, Kemkin IV, Kruk NN. The Sikhote-Alin orogenic belt, Russian South East: terranes and the formation of continental lithosphere based on geological and isotopic data. J Asian Earth Sci 2016; 120: 117–38. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.10.023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Heumann MJ, Johnson CL, Webb LE.. Plate interior polyphase fault systems and sedimentary basin evolution: a case study of the East Gobi Basin and East Gobi Fault Zone, southeastern Mongolia. J Asian Earth Sci 2018; 151: 343–58. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.05.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Ren F, Liu Z, Qiu Let al. The prototype character of Jiaolai Basin in Cretaceous Laiyang period (in Chinese). Acta Sedimentol Sin 2008; 26: 221–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Meng Q, Li S, Li R. Mesozoic evolution of the Hefei basin in eastern China: sedimentary response to deformations in the adjacent Dabieshan and along the Tanlu fault. Geol Soc Am Bull 2007; 119: 897–916. 10.1130/B25931.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Wang W, Zhu G, Zhang Set al. Detrital zircon evidence for depositional time and provenance of Mesozoic sediments in the Hefei Basin (in Chinese). Geol Rev 2017; 63: 955–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Ling W, Xie X, Liu Xet al. Zircon U-Pb dating on the Mesozoic volcanic suite from the Qingshan Group stratotype section in eastern Shandong Province and its tectonic significance. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci 2007; 50: 813–24. 10.1007/s11430-007-2065-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Kuang YS, Pang CJ, Luo ZYet al. 40Ar-39Ar geochronology and geochemistry of mafic rocks from Qingshan Group, Jiaodong area: implications for the destruction of the North China Craton. Acta Petrol Sin 2012; 28: 1073–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 48. An W, Kuang HW, Liu YQet al. Detrital zircon dating and tracing the provenance of dinosaur bone beds from the Late Cretaceous Wangshi Group in Zhucheng, Shandong, East China. J Palaeogeog 2016; 5: 72–99. 10.1016/j.jop.2015.11.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Wang J, Chang SC, Lu HBet al. Detrital zircon provenance of the Wangshi and Laiyang groups of the Jiaolai basin: evidence for Early Cretaceous uplift of the Sulu orogen, Eastern China. Int Geol Rev 2016; 58: 719–36. 10.1080/00206814.2015.1105728 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Zhang JD, Hao TY, Fan DHet al. Identification of geological time of Mesozoic strata in Hefei Basin and its significance (in Chinese). Acta Geol Sin 2009; 83: 599–608. [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Li YJ, He HY, Deng CLet al. 40Ar/39Ar dating results from the Shijiatun Formation, Jiaolai Basin: new age constraints on the Cretaceous terrestrial volcanic-sedimentary sequence of China. Cretaceous Res 2018; 86: 251–60. 10.1016/j.cretres.2018.03.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Lee TH, Park KH, Yi K. Nature and evolution of the Cretaceous basins in the eastern margin of Eurasia: a case study of the Gyeongsang Basin, SE Korea. J Asian Earth Sci 2018; 166: 19–31. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2018.07.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Zhang Y, Zhai M, Hou Qet al. Late Cretaceous volcanic rocks and associated granites in Gyeongsang Basin, SE Korea: their chronological ages and tectonic implications for cratonic destruction of the North China Craton. J Asian Earth Sci 2012; 47: 252–64. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2011.12.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Qu H, Wang E, Zhang Let al. Zircon geochronology and its structural implications of Late Mesozoic andesite from the Beijing plain (in Chinese with English abstract). Acta Petrol Sin 2016; 32: 3547–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Yuan H, Liu X, Liu Yet al. Geochemistry and U-Pb zircon geochronology of Late-Mesozoic lavas from Xishan, Beijing. Sci China Ser D-Earth Sci 2006; 49: 50–67. 10.1007/s11430-004-0009-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Niu B, He Z, Song Bet al. SHRIMP dating of the Zhangjiakou formation volcanic rocks and implications (in Chinese). Geol Bull China 2003; 22: 140–1. [Google Scholar]
  • 57. He HY, Wang XL, Zhou ZHet al. 40Ar/39Ar dating of Lujiatun bed (Jehol group) in Liaoning, northeastern China. Geophys Res Lett 2006; 33: L04303. 10.1029/2005GL025274 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Yang SH, He HY, Jin Fet al. The appearance and duration of the Jehol Biota: constraint from SIMS U-Pb zircon dating for the Huajiying formation in northern China. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2020; 117: 14299–305. 10.1073/pnas.1918272117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Liu YQ, Li PX, Tian SG.. SHRIMP U-Pb zircon age of Late Mesozoic tuff (lava) in Luanping basin, northern Hebei, and its implications (in Chinese). Acta Petrol Mineral 2003; 22: 237–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Zhang H, Yuan HL, Hu ZCet al. U-Pb zircon dating of the Mesozoic volcanic strata in Luanping of North Hebei and its significance (in Chinese). Earth Sci-J China Univ Geosci 2005; 30: 707–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Swisher CC, Wang YQ, Wang XLet al. Cretaceous age for the feathered dinosaurs of Liaoning, China. Nature 1999; 400: 58–61. 10.1038/21872 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Chang SC, Zhang HC, Renne PRet al. High-precision 40Ar/39Ar age for the Jehol Biota. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 2009; 280: 94–104. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2009.06.021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Eberth DA, Russell DA, Braman DRet al. The age of the dinosaur-bearing sediments at Tebch, Inner Mongolia, People's Republic of China. Can J Earth Sci 1993; 30: 2101–6. 10.1139/e93-182 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. He HY, Wang XL, Zhou ZHet al. Timing of the Jiufotang formation (Jehol Group) in Liaoning, northeastern China, and its implications. Geophys Res Lett 2004; 31: L12605. [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Chen ZG, Zhang LC, Wu HYet al. Ar-Ar age, geochemistry and petrogenesis of Late Mesozoic volcanic rocks in the northern marginal region of Erlian basin, Inner-Mongolia (in Chinese). Acta Petrol Sin 2009; 25: 297–310. [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Guo ZX, Zhao XZ, Yang YTet al. Jurassic–earliest Cretaceous tectonostratigraphic evolution of the Erlian Basin, Northeast China: records of polyphase intracontinental deformation in Northeast Asia. Mar Pet Geol 2018; 96: 405–28. 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.06.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Zhu JC, Meng QR, Feng YLet al. Decoding stratigraphic evolution of the Hailar Basin: implications for the late Mesozoic tectonics of NE China. Geol J 2020; 55: 1750–62. 10.1002/gj.3563 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Ying JF, Zhou XH, Zhang LCet al. Geochronological framework of Mesozoic volcanic rocks in the Great Xing’an Range, NE China, and their geodynamic implications. J Asian Earth Sci 2010; 39: 786–93. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.04.035 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Zhang JH, Gao S, Ge WCet al. Geochronology of the mesozoic volcanic rocks in the great xing’an range, northeastern China: implications for subduction-induced delamination. Chem Geol 2010; 276: 144–65. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.05.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Yang XP, Jiang B, Yang YJ.. Spatial-temporal distribution characteristics of early Cretaceous volcanic rocks in Great Xing’an range area (in Chinese). Earth Sci 2019; 44: 3237–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Pei FP, Xu WL, Yang DBet al. Mesozoic volcanic rocks in the southern Songliao Basin: zircon U-Pb ages and their constraints on the nature of basin basement (in Chinese). Earth Sci-J China Univ Geosci 2008; 5: 603–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Wang C, Zhang M, Sun Ket al. Latest zircon U-Pb geochronology of the huoshiling formation volcanic rocks in the southeastern margin of the Songliao Basin. Acta Geol Sin 2017; 91: 1924–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Yu ZQ, He HY, Deng CLet al. New SIMS U-Pb geochronology for the shahezi formation from CCSD-SK-IIe borehole in the Songliao Basin, NE China. Sci Bull 2020; 65: 1049–51. 10.1016/j.scib.2020.03.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. He HY, Deng CL, Wang PJet al. Toward age determination of the termination of the cretaceous normal superchron. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 2012; 13: Q02002. 10.1029/2011GC003901 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Yu ZQ, He HY, Deng CLet al. New geochronological constraints for the upper cretaceous nenjiang formation in the Songliao Basin, NE China. Cretaceous Res 2019; 102: 160–9. 10.1016/j.cretres.2019.05.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Qi GW, Zhang JJ, Wang M.. Mesozoic tectonic setting of rift basins in eastern North China and implications for destruction of the North China Craton. J Asian Earth Sci 2015; 111: 414–27. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.06.022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Lin Y, Zhang CH, Li CMet al. From dextral contraction to sinistral extension of intracontinental transform structures in the Yanshan and northern Taihang Mountain belts during Early Cretaceous: implications to the destruction of the North China Craton. J Asian Earth Sci 2020; 189: 104139. [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Renne PR, Mundil R, Balco Get al. Joint determination of 40K decay constants and 40Ar/40K for the Fish Canyon sanidine standard, and improved accuracy for 40Ar/39Ar geochronology. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 2010; 74: 5349–67. 10.1016/j.gca.2010.06.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Cope TD, Graham SA. Upper crustal response to Mesozoic tectonism in western Liaoning, North China, and implications for lithospheric delamination. Geol Soc London Spec Publ 2007; 280: 201–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Johnson CL. Polyphase evolution of the East Gobi basin: sedimentary and structural records of Mesozoic-Cenozoic intraplate deformation in Mongolia. Basin Res 2004; 16: 79–99. 10.1111/j.1365-2117.2004.00221.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Wang F, Zhou XH, Zhang LCet al. Late Mesozoic volcanism in the Great Xing’an range (NE China): timing and implications for the dynamic setting of NE Asia. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2006; 251: 179–98. 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.09.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Johnson CL, Webb LE, Graham SAet al. Sedimentary and structural records of late Mesozoic high-strain extension and strain partitioning, East Gobi basin, southern Mongolia. Geol Soc Am Mem 2001; 194: 413–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Song Y, Ren J, Liu Ket al. Post-rift anomalous thermal flux in the Songliao Basin, NE China, as revealed from fission track thermochronology and tectonic analysis. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 2018; 508: 148–65. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.07.030 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Kuang YS, Wei X, Hong LBet al. Petrogenetic evaluation of the Laohutai basalts from North China Craton: melting of a two-component source during lithospheric thinning in the late Cretaceous-early Cenozoic. Lithos 2012; 154: 68–82. 10.1016/j.lithos.2012.06.027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Pang CJ, Wang XC, Xu YGet al. Pyroxenite-derived Early Cretaceous lavas in the Liaodong Peninsula: implication for metasomatism and thinning of the lithospheric mantle beneath North China Craton. Lithos 2015; 227: 77–93. 10.1016/j.lithos.2015.03.022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Xu YG, Huang X, Ma Jet al. Crust-mantle interaction during the tectono-thermal reactivation of the North China Craton: constraints from SHRIMP zircon U–Pb chronology and geochemistry of Mesozoic plutons from western Shandong. Contrib Mineral Petrol 2004; 147: 750–67. 10.1007/s00410-004-0594-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Zheng YF, Xu Z, Zhao ZFet al. Mesozoic mafic magmatism in North China: implications for thinning and destruction of cratonic lithosphere. Sci China Earth Sci 2018; 61: 353–85. 10.1007/s11430-017-9160-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Sun JF, Yang JH, Wu FYet al. Magma mixing controlling the origin of the Early Cretaceous Fangshan granitic pluton, North China Craton: in situ U-Pb age and Sr-, Nd-, Hf- and O-isotope evidence. Lithos 2010; 120: 421–38. 10.1016/j.lithos.2010.09.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Li H, Li D, Geng Ket al. The mesozoic magmatic activities framework in Jiaodong area: SHRIMP chronology recording of single particle zircon (in Chinese with English abstract). Acta Geol Sin 2017; 91: 163–79. 10.1111/1755-6724.13237 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Gao XY, Zhao TP. Late Mesozoic magmatism and tectonic evolution in the Southern margin of the North China Craton. Sci China Earth Sci 2017; 60: 1959–75. 10.1007/s11430-016-9069-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Jahn BM, Valui G, Kruk Net al. Emplacement ages, geochemical and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic characterization of Mesozoic to early Cenozoic granitoids of the Sikhote-Alin Orogenic Belt, Russian Far East: crustal growth and regional tectonic evolution. J Asian Earth Sci 2015; 111: 872–918. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.08.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Shen ZC, Hou ZQ, Yu Fet al. SHRIMP zircon U-Pb ages and Hf isotopes of the intermediate-acidic rocks of Wanganzhen complex in northern part of Taihang Mountains and their geological implications (in Chinese). Acta Petrol Sin 2015; 31: 1409–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Chen B, Tian W, Jahn BMet al. Zircon SHRIMP U-Pb ages and in-situ Hf isotopic analysis for the Mesozoic intrusions in South Taihang, North China craton: evidence for hybridization between mantle-derived magmas and crustal components. Lithos 2008; 102: 118–37. 10.1016/j.lithos.2007.06.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Yang JH, Wu FY, Chung SLet al. Multiple sources for the origin of granites: geochemical and Nd/Sr isotopic evidence from the Gudaoling granite and its mafic enclaves, northeast China. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 2004; 68: 4469–83. 10.1016/j.gca.2004.04.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Khanchuk AI, Grebennikov AV, Ivanov VV. Albian-Cenomanian orogenic belt and igneous province of pacific asia. Russ J Pac Geol 2019; 13: 187–219. 10.1134/S1819714019030035 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Sagong H, Kwon ST, Ree JH.. Mesozoic episodic magmatism in South Korea and its tectonic implication. Tectonics 2005; 24: TC5002. [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Wu FY, Sun DY, Ge WCet al. Geochronology of the Phanerozoic granitoids in northeastern China. J Asian Earth Sci 2011; 41: 1–30. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.11.014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Sengör AMC, Burke K.. Relative timing of rifting and volcanism on earth and its tectonic implications. Geophys Res Lett 1978; 5: 419–21. 10.1029/GL005i006p00419 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Buck WR. Modes of continental lithospheric extension. J Geophys Res 1991; 96: 20161–78. 10.1029/91JB01485 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Brun JP. Narrow rifts versus wide rifts: inferences for the mechanics of rifting from laboratory experiments. Philos T R Soc A 1999; 357: 695–710. 10.1098/rsta.1999.0349 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Ruppel C. Extensional processes in continental lithosphere. J Geophys Res 1995; 100: 24187–215. 10.1029/95JB02955 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Rey P, Vanderhaeghe O, Teyssier C.. Gravitational collapse of the continental crust: definition, regimes and modes. Tectonophysics 2001; 342: 435–49. 10.1016/S0040-1951(01)00174-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Merle O. A simple continental rift classification. Tectonophysics 2011; 513: 88–95. 10.1016/j.tecto.2011.10.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Ziegler PA, Cloetingh S.. Dynamic processes controlling evolution of rifted basins. Earth-Sci Rev 2004; 64: 1–50. 10.1016/S0012-8252(03)00041-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Frizon De Lamotte D, Fourdan B, Leleu Set al. Style of rifting and the stages of Pangea breakup. Tectonics 2015; 34: 1009–29. 10.1002/2014TC003760 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Webb LE, Graham SA, Johnson CLet al. Occurrence, age, and implications of the Yagan–Onch Hayrhan metamorphic core complex, southern Mongolia. Geology 1999; 27: 143–6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Daoudene Y. La tectonique extensive en Mongolie orientale au Mésozoïque supérieur-modalités et implications géodynamiques. Ph.D. Thesis. Université Rennes 1, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Daoudene Y, Gapais D, Ruffet Get al. Syn-thinning pluton emplacement during Mesozoic extension in eastern Mongolia. Tectonics 2012; 31: TC3001. [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Wang T, Guo L, Zheng Yet al. Timing and processes of late Mesozoic mid-lower-crustal extension in continental NE Asia and implications for the tectonic setting of the destruction of the North China Craton: mainly constrained by zircon U–Pb ages from metamorphic core complexes. Lithos 2012; 154: 315–45. 10.1016/j.lithos.2012.07.020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Yang X, Jiang B, Yang Y.. Spatial-temporal distribution characteristics of early Cretaceous volcanic rocks in great Xing’an range area (in Chinese with English abstract). Earth Sci 2019; 44: 3237–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Jamieson RA, Beaumont C, Fullsack Pet al. Barrovian regional metamorphism: where's the heat? Geol Soc London Spec Pub 1998; 138: 23–51. 10.1144/GSL.SP.1996.138.01.03 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Vanderhaeghe O, Teyssier C.. Partial melting and flow of orogens. Tectonophysics 2001; 342: 451–72. 10.1016/S0040-1951(01)00175-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Sonder LJ, Jones CH.. Western United States extension: how the west was widened. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 1999; 27: 417–62. 10.1146/annurev.earth.27.1.417 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Liu M. Cenozoic extension and magmatism in the North American Cordillera: the role of gravitational collapse. Tectonophysics 2001; 342: 407–33. 10.1016/S0040-1951(01)00173-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Traynor JJ, Sladen C. Tectonic and stratigraphic evolution of the Mongolian People's Republic and its influence on hydrocarbon geology and potential. Mar Pet Geol 1995; 12: 35–52. 10.1016/0264-8172(95)90386-X [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Zorin YA. Geodynamics of the western part of the Mongolia–Okhotsk collisional belt, Trans-Baikal region (Russia) and Mongolia. Tectonophysics 1999; 306: 33–56. 10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00042-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Ma L, Yang J, Ding Z. Songliao Basin—an intracontinental sedimentary basin of combination type. In: Zhu X (ed.). Chinese Sedimentary Basins. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc., 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Lamb MA, Hanson AD, Graham SAet al. Left-lateral sense offset of upper Proterozoic to Paleozoic features across the Gobi Onon, Tost, and Zuunbayan faults in southern Mongolia and implications for other Central Asian faults. Earth Planet Sci Lett 1999; 173: 183–94. 10.1016/S0012-821X(99)00227-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Watson MP, Hayward AB, Parkinson DNet al. Plate tectonic history, basin development and petroleum source rock deposition onshore China. Mar Pet Geol 1987; 4: 205–25. 10.1016/0264-8172(87)90045-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Zhang YQ, Dong SW, Shi W.. Cretaceous deformation history of the middle Tan-Lu fault zone in Shandong Province, eastern China. Tectonophysics 2003; 363: 243–58. 10.1016/S0040-1951(03)00039-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Zhu G, Niu M, Xie Cet al. Sinistral to normal faulting along the Tan-Lu fault zone: evidence for geodynamic switching of the East China continental margin. J Geol 2010; 118: 277–93. 10.1086/651540 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Zhang FQ, Dilek Y, Chen HLet al. Structural architecture and stratigraphic record of late Mesozoic sedimentary basins in NE China: tectonic archives of the Late Cretaceous continental margin evolution in East Asia. Earth-Sci Rev 2017; 171: 598–620. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.05.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Li C, Liu SF.. Cretaceous anomalous subsidence and its response to dynamic topography in the Songliao Basin, Northeast China. J Asian Earth Sci 2015; 109: 86–99. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.04.045 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Wu L, Wang F, Lin Wet al. Rapid cooling of the Yanshan Belt, northern China: constraints from 40Ar/39Ar thermochronology and implications for cratonic lithospheric thinning. J Asian Earth Sci 2014; 90: 107–26. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.04.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Su N, Zhu G, Liu Cet al. Alternation of back-arc extension and compression in an overriding plate: evidence from Cretaceous structures in the western Liaoning region, eastern China. Int J Earth Sci 2020; 109: 707–27. 10.1007/s00531-020-01827-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Zhou JB, Cao JL, Wilde SAet al. Paleo-Pacific subduction-accretion: evidence from geochemical and U-Pb zircon dating of the Nadanhada accretionary complex, NE China. Tectonics 2014; 33: 2444–66. 10.1002/2014TC003637 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Engebretson DC, Cox A, Gordon R. Relative Motions Between Oceanic and Continental Plates in the Pacific Basin. Boulder: Geological Society of America, 1985; 206: 1–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Matthews KJ, Seton M, Muller RD. A global-scale plate reorganization event at 105-100 Ma. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2012; 355: 283–98. 10.1016/j.epsl.2012.08.023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Tang JX, Chen L, Meng QRet al. The effects of the thermal state of overriding continental plate on subduction dynamics: two-dimensional thermal-mechanical modeling. Sci China Earth Sci 2020; 63: 1519–39. 10.1007/s11430-019-9624-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Rosenbaum G, Gasparon M, Lucente FPet al. Kinematics of slab tear faults during subduction segmentation and implications for Italian magmatism. Tectonics 2008; 27: TC2008. 10.1029/2007TC002143 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Jolivet L, Faccenna C, Huet Bet al. Aegean tectonics: strain localisation, slab tearing and trench retreat. Tectonophysics 2013; 597: 1–33. 10.1016/j.tecto.2012.06.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Govers R, Wortel MJR.. Lithosphere tearing at STEP faults: response to edges of subduction zones. Earth Planet Sci Lett 2005; 236: 505–23. 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.03.022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Davis GA, Darby BJ, Yadong Zet al. Geometric and temporal evolution of an extensional detachment fault, Hohhot metamorphic core complex, Inner Mongolia, China. Geology 2002; 30: 1003–6.10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<1003:GATEOA>2.0.CO;2 [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Davis GA, Qian XL, Zheng YDet al. Mesozoic deformation and plutonism in the Yunmeng Shan: a metamorphic core complex north of Beijing, China. In: Yin A and Harrison TM (eds.). Tectonic Evolution of Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996; 253–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Zhu G, Chen Y, Jiang Det al. Rapid change from compression to extension in the North China Craton during the Early Cretaceous: evidence from the Yunmengshan metamorphic core complex. Tectonophysics 2015; 656: 91–110. 10.1016/j.tecto.2015.06.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Darby B, Davis G, Zhang Xet al. The newly discovered Waziyu metamorphic core complex, Yiwulu Shan, western Liaoning province, North China. Earth Sci Front 2004; 11: 145–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Liu JL, Davis GA, Lin ZYet al. The Liaonan metamorphic core complex, Southeastern Liaoning Province, North China: a likely contributor to Cretaceous rotation of Eastern Liaoning, Korea and contiguous areas. Tectonophysics 2005; 407: 65–80. 10.1016/j.tecto.2005.07.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Gans PB, Mahood GA, Schermer E. Synextensional Magmatism in the Basin and Range Province: a Case Study from the Eastern Great Basin. Boulder: Geological Society of America, 1989, 1–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Yin H, Zhu G, Wu Xet al. Continental response to mid-Cretaceous global plate reorganization: evidence from the Tan–Lu Fault Zone, eastern China. Gondwana Res 2020; 86: 23–45. 10.1016/j.gr.2020.05.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Kubota Y, Takeshita T, Yagi Ket al. Kinematic analyses and radiometric dating of the large-scale paleogene two-phase faulting along the median tectonic line, Southwest Japan. Tectonics 2020; 39: e2018TC005372. 10.1029/2018TC005372 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Lee DW. Strike-slip fault tectonics and basin formation during the Cretaceous in the Korean Peninsula. Island Arc 1999; 8: 218–31. 10.1046/j.1440-1738.1999.00233.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from National Science Review are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES