Skip to main content
Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene logoLink to Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
. 2021 Jun 16;116(1):80–84. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trab089

Congenital Chagas disease in Santa Cruz Department, Bolivia, is dominated by Trypanosoma cruzi lineage V

Leny Sanchez 1, Louisa A Messenger 2,, Tapan Bhattacharyya 3, Robert H Gilman 4,5, Holger Mayta 6, Rony Colanzi 7, Ricardo Bozo 8, Manuela Verástegui 9, Michael A Miles 10, Caryn Bern 11
PMCID: PMC8776560  PMID: 34134129

Abstract

Background

This study identified Trypanosoma cruzi discrete typing units (DTUs) in maternal and infant specimens collected from two hospitals in Bolivia, using conventional genotyping and DTU-specific serotyping.

Methods

Specimens from 142 mothers were used, including 24 seronegative and 118 seropositive individuals; 29 women transmitted T. cruzi to their infants. Maternal and infant parasite loads were determined by quantitative real-time PCR. Maternal sera were tested with an in-house parasite lysate ELISA and serotyped by a lineage-specific peptide ELISA, targeting the trypomastigote small surface antigen (TSSA). Trypanosoma cruzi genotypes in infected infants were determined by a triple PCR-RFLP assay.

Results

All infant specimens were genotyped as TcV. Maternal parasite loads and absorbance values by the lysate ELISA were significantly higher for transmitters compared with non-transmitters. Among seropositive mothers, 65.3% had positive results by the TSSA II/V/VI peptide ELISA. No significant difference in reactivity to TSSA II/V/VI was observed for transmitters compared with non-transmitters (79.3% vs 60.7%, respectively).

Conclusions

Our findings reinforce the difficulty in obtaining sufficient sample numbers and parasite DNA to investigate the interaction between parasite genetics and the risk of congenital transmission and argue for the inclusion of DTU-specific serotyping in prospective studies.

Keywords: Bolivia, Chagas disease, congenital transmission, DTUs, Trypanosoma cruzi, TSSA

Introduction

Trypanosoma cruzi, the parasite that causes Chagas disease, is transmitted when the feces of an infected triatomine vector enters through broken skin or intact mucosa.1 Alternate routes, via blood components, organ transplantation and congenital transmission, have taken on more prominence as effective vector control programs have been established in most affected regions of Latin America. Of new T. cruzi infections, an estimated 22% is now attributed to mother-to-child transmission.2 Control requires pre- or perinatal identification of infected women, followed by evaluation of their infants on multiple occasions over the first year of life.3 Diagnostic testing for infection in early infancy is best performed by molecular techniques, but these are rarely available in the most highly endemic areas. Direct microscopy, even with concentration, has low sensitivity.3

Bolivia has the highest prevalence of T. cruzi infection in the world. In Santa Cruz Department, infection prevalence among women of reproductive age can be as high as 15–20% in the capital city and 45–50% in the towns and villages of the hyperendemic Chaco region.4 Barriers to effective screening programs range from biological features of the disease to logistical challenges within health systems.3

Recent reviews have identified maternal parasite load as the primary determinant of vertical T. cruzi transmission.5,6 Although T. cruzi genetic lineages (or discrete typing units [DTUs]) have been hypothesized to alter congenital transmission risk, direct data are sparse. Familial clustering has been reported, with mothers of one congenitally infected child being significantly more likely to transmit to that child's siblings than mothers without previous transmission.7 Selection for parasite strains more apt to cross the placenta was hypothesized to underlie this observation. However, maternal factors such as age, parity or immune response could alter parasite load, independent of lineage.

Obtaining population-level genotypic information is limited by sample sizes and collection of sufficient biological material, including paired mother-infant specimens, as well as by suboptimal sensitivity and cross-reactivity of current genotyping techniques.8 To date, most congenital genotyping studies have been performed in Argentina, Bolivia and Chile, and reflect the predominance of TcII/V/VI lineages observed among chronic adult infections.8 However, congenital transmission occurs across the endemic range of all major T. cruzi lineages, including TcI,9 and the latter DTU circulates sympatrically in the Southern Cone, albeit less frequently than TcII/V/VI. As an evaluation nested within a cohort study of congenital Chagas disease in Santa Cruz Department, Bolivia, the objective was to identify T. cruzi DTUs present during congenital transmission by characterizing specimens from infants born to transmitters and non-transmitter mothers, using both genotyping (PCR-RFLP) and serotyping techniques (in-house ELISAs to detect T. cruzi infection and DTU-specific peptide ELISAs).

Methods

Maternal and infant specimens were collected during a 4-y cohort study of congenital Chagas disease in Hospital Japones in Santa Cruz de la Sierra and the Municipal Hospital of Camiri in Camiri, described in detail elsewhere.4,10 In the initial screen, maternal T. cruzi infection was confirmed using two rapid tests, Trypanosoma Detect or Chagas Detect Plus (InBios, Seattle, WA, USA) and PolyChaco indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA; Lemos Laboratories, Santiago del Estero, Argentina) at a single dilution of 1:16. Sera with positive screening results were further tested by IHA with multiple dilutions, plus either Chagatest lysate ELISA or Recombinante 3.0 ELISA (both from Wiener Laboratories, Rosario, Argentina). Confirmed infection required positive results by two or more tests.1 During the original data generation, DNA was extracted from maternal blood and neonatal umbilical cord blood and tissue. Parasite load was determined by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), as previously described.4,11

A total of 1851 women were screened during the parent study; of these, 476 had confirmed T. cruzi infection. The original cohort thus included 476 seropositive women and their 487 infants.10 The 118 seropositive mother-infant pairs in the current analysis comprised a subset of the full cohort, based on the availability of specimens at the time of the laboratory analysis reported here. Specimens from 24 seronegative women were included as a negative control group. qPCR data were available for 10 of the transmitting and 55 of the non-transmitting seropositive mothers included in the current analysis.

Maternal sera were tested by an in-house ELISA to confirm T. cruzi infection, using lysate produced by liquid nitrogen lysis of strain Chaco 23 col4 (TcII) epimastigotes.12 Maternal serotyping, to detect major T. cruzi DTUs, was undertaken using five synthesized peptides targeting the trypomastigote small surface antigen (TSSA) (TSSApep-I, TSSApep-II/V/VI, TSSApep-III, TSSApep-IV and TSSApep-V/VI) in an ELISA, according to Bhattacharyya et al.12 Briefly, Nunc MaxiSorp 96-well microplates (United Kingdom) were incubated overnight at 4°C with: (i) avidin, diluted in carbonate-bicarbonate buffer pH 9.6 (Sigma-Aldrich, United Kingdom) (for binding to biotin bound to synthesized peptides; TSSApep-I, TSSApep-II/V/VI, TSSApep-III, TSSApep-IV and TSSApep-V/VI), at a concentration of 1 µg/100 µl/per well; or (ii) T. cruzi lysate (Chaco 23 col4) at a concentration of 0.2 µg/100 µl/per well, as a positive control (run in parallel as standard for all assays). The next day, avidin and lysate that did not bind to the plate were removed by washing with 1X PBS/0.05% Tween20 three times. Plate wells were blocked by the addition of 200 µl of 2% skimmed milk and incubated for 2 h (1 h at 37°C and 1 h at room temperature, under constant agitation). At the end of the incubation, plates were washed three times, and peptides were added at 1 µg/100 µl/per well, diluted in 1X PBS/Tween20 plus 2% skimmed milk and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. At the end of the incubation, 100 µl/well of 1:200 serum samples, diluted in blocking buffer, were added and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. At the end of the incubation, plates were washed six times and a secondary antihuman IgG antibody labeled with horseradish peroxidase was added at a dilution of 1/15 000 and incubated at 37ºC for 1 h. At the end of the incubation, plates were washed six times and 100 µl of substrate/chromogen (TMB) was added and plates were incubated in a dark room for 5 min. Finally, 50 µl of 2 M H2SO4 was added and plates were read at 450 nm in a VERSA max microplate reader (Molecular Devices, USA).

Genotypes in infected infants were determined by a triple PCR-RFLP assay, targeting COXII + AluI, 24Sα rRNA and the SL-IR, according to Zingales et al.13

Categorical variables were compared using Mantel–Haenszel χ2 or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Distributions of continuous variables were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. The relationship between lysate optical density (OD) values and maternal parasite load was tested in a linear regression model. All analyses were conducted in SAS 9.4.

Results

Specimens from 24 seronegative and 118 seropositive women were included in the current analysis; 29 women transmitted T. cruzi to their infants. Results by the in-house lysate ELISA showed 100% concordance with the serological results generated at the time of the original data collection. Among infected women, both OD values by the lysate ELISA (median 2.64 vs 2.23, respectively; p<0.0001) (Figure 1) and parasite loads by qPCR were significantly higher among transmitters compared with non-transmitters (median 115.24 vs 27.043 par-eq/ml, respectively; p=0.0057), as reported in our previous publications.4,10 The relationship between lysate OD values and parasite load did not reach statistical significance (p=0.128 by linear regression).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Recognition of maternal seropositive sera to T. cruzi in-house lysate (A) or TSSA II/V/VI lineage-specific peptide (B) between congenitally transmitting and non-transmitting mothers. Each datapoint represents the A450 of the mean reaction of duplicates of each serum sample per assay. Medians for each group are represented by solid lines. M+ B-, mother seropositive, baby uninfected; M+ B+, mother seropositive, baby infected.

Among seropositive mothers, 65.3% (77/118) had positive results by TSSA II/V/VI peptide ELISA. For transmitters compared with non-transmitters, 79.3% (23/29) vs 60.7% (54/89) reacted to the TSSA II/V/VI peptide (p=0.12), and OD distribution did not differ significantly for transmitters compared with non-transmitters (median 0.5401 vs 0.5086, respectively; p=0.1925).

Among 25 infected newborns with available specimens, 17 umbilical cord tissue and 13 cord blood specimens had parasitic loads greater than 104 par-eq/ml, the limit of detection for DNA-based genotyping in our laboratory. All infant specimens were genotyped as TcV (Figure 2) based on bands visualized at 81 and 294 bp for COII + AluI, 150 bp for the SL-IR and 110 bp for 24α rRNA.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Amplification of PCR-RFLP assays with T. cruzi reference strains (A-D): Chaco 23 col4; TcII, JR c14; TcI, A18; TcIII, ERA; TcIV, Bug2148; TcV, CL Brener; TcVI; CN: negative control and congenital specimens (E-H), alongside a 100 bp molecular ladder (M). (A) COXII reference DTUs; all bands are 375 bp. (B) COXII + AluI reference DTUs; TcII: 81 bp + 212 bp; TcI: 30 bp + 81 bp + 264 bp; TcIII: 81 bp + 294 bp; TcIV: 81 bp + 294 bp; TcV: 81 bp + 294 bp; and TcVI: 81 bp + 294 bp. (C) 24Sα rRNA reference DTUs; TcI: 110 bp; TcII: 125 bp; TcIII: 110 bp; TcIV: 120 bp; TcV: 110 bp or 110 bp + 125 bp; TcVI: 125 bp. (D) SL-IR reference DTUs; TcI: 150 bp; TcII: 150 bp; TcIII: 200 bp; TcIV: 200 bp; TcV: 150 bp; TcVI: 150 bp. (E) COXII congenital specimens #1-9 + negative control (#10). (F) COXII + AluI congenital specimens #1-9 + negative control (#10). (G) 24Sα rRNA congenital specimens #1-8 + negative control (#9). (H) SL-IR congenital specimens #1-8 + negative control (#9).

Discussion

TcV was the only DTU detected in infected infants, consistent with previous reports from Bolivia.8,14 Further work is needed to characterize intra-DTU diversity associated with congenital transmission. The majority of seropositive mothers reacted to TSSA II/V/VI, confirming the predominance of these lineages in Bolivia8,15; however, as we lack a TSSA V-specific peptide, due to shared motifs among TcII/V/VI from common ancestry, we are unable to unequivocally confirm that these mothers are only infected with this particular DTU. Given the challenges of obtaining specimens adequate for conventional genotyping, serotyping represents a promising technique with which to screen exposed populations on a larger scale,16,17 especially when used as a low-cost rapid test18 and combined with a recently improved epitope specific to TcI.19 Screening with the latter assay could help resolve the role of TcI in congenital infection but was unfortunately unavailable at the time of our study. The relative likelihood of congenital transmission in areas with TcI predominance compared with those with TcII/V/VI predominance remains a matter of debate.9

As previously, we observed higher parasite load associated with congenital transmission,4,5,20 and for the first time, significantly higher levels of anti-T. cruzi antibodies in women who transmitted compared with those who did not. Anti-T. cruzi antibodies mediate extracellular parasite elimination by complement-dependent and independent lysis and phagocytosis of opsonized parasites.21 Higher levels in transmitters may reflect an enhanced serological response to higher circulating parasitemia.5,22 With congenital transmission affecting a variable, but small, proportion of infected mothers (1–10%) among endemic regions,23 PCR assays must be conducted on specimens from a large number of women to have sufficient statistical power to investigate the interaction between parasite genetics and congenital transmission risk. DTU-specific serotyping, which requires fewer costs and specialized infrastructure and is less constrained by low maternal parasitemia, may represent a more feasible method of T. cruzi lineage detection among prospective maternal cohorts as well as in other population-based surveys.

Acknowledgements

Members of the Working Group on Chagas disease in Bolivia and Peru include Lisbeth Ferrufino, Sara Quispe, Edith Hinojosa, Margot Ramirez, Eliana Saenza, Jorge Luis Flores-Franco, Janet Acosta, Maribel Suxo, Hilsen Roncales, Fernando Ramirez, Nazaret Bozo Escalera, Celia Espinoza and Janet Vizcarra. We are grateful to the nurses and physicians of the obstetrical services of Hospital Japones and Hospital Municipal Camiri for their collaboration and dedication to the welfare of the women and infants of Santa Cruz Department.

Contributor Information

Leny Sanchez, Laboratorio de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas, Departamento de Ciencias Celulares y Moleculares, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima Av. Honorio Delgado 430, San Martín de Porres 15102, Perú.

Louisa A Messenger, Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, UK.

Tapan Bhattacharyya, Department of Infection Biology, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, UK.

Robert H Gilman, Laboratorio de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas, Departamento de Ciencias Celulares y Moleculares, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima Av. Honorio Delgado 430, San Martín de Porres 15102, Perú; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.

Holger Mayta, Laboratorio de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas, Departamento de Ciencias Celulares y Moleculares, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima Av. Honorio Delgado 430, San Martín de Porres 15102, Perú.

Rony Colanzi, Hospital Japonés de Tercer Nivel, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Plurinational State of Bolivia.

Ricardo Bozo, Hospital Municipal Camiri, Camiri, Plurinational State of Bolivia.

Manuela Verástegui, Laboratorio de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas, Departamento de Ciencias Celulares y Moleculares, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima Av. Honorio Delgado 430, San Martín de Porres 15102, Perú.

Michael A Miles, Department of Infection Biology, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, UK.

Caryn Bern, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, 550 16th St, San Francisco, California 94158, USA.

Author contributions

LS, LAM, TB, RHG, MAM and CB designed the study. LS, HM and MV performed the experiments, with materials supplied by LAM, TB, RHG, RC, RB, MAM and CB. LS, LAM, TB, RHG, HM, MV, MAM and CB were responsible for data analysis and interpretation. LAM and CB drafted the manuscript, which was revised by all co-authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01-AI087776] and NIH Global research training grant [D43 TW006581]. LS was supported by a scholarship from el Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnológico (FONDECYT) [#119-2015-FONDECYT]. LAM was supported by a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council doctoral training grant, the Dr Gordon Smith Travelling Fellowship and a grant from the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

The institutional review boards of Hospital Universitario Japones; Universidad Catolica Boliviana; Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia; Asociación Benéfica Proyectos en Informática, Salud, Medicina y Agricultura; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health approved the protocol. Approval to perform secondary data analyses was granted by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. All women in the study provided written informed consent for their own and their infants’ participation. The consent form included explicit agreement to the storage and future use of specimens for evaluation of novel diagnostic techniques.

Data availability

Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Bern  C. Chagas’ disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(5):456–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. WHO . Chagas disease in Latin America: an epidemiological update based on 2010 estimates. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2015;90:33–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Messenger  LA, Bern  C.  Congenital Chagas disease: current diagnostics, limitations and future perspectives. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2018;31(5):415–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kaplinski  M, Jois  M, Galdos-Cardenas  G  et al.  Sustained domestic vector exposure is associated with increased Chagas cardiomyopathy risk but decreased parasitemia and congenital transmission risk among young women in Bolivia. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(6):918–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bustos  PL, Milduberger  N, Volta  BJ  et al.  Trypanosoma cruzi infection at the maternal-fetal interface: implications of parasite load in the congenital transmission and challenges in the diagnosis of infected newborns. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Klein  MD, Proaño  A, Noazin  S  et al.  Risk factors for vertical transmission of Chagas disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;105:357–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Sánchez Negrette  O, Mora  MC, Basombrio  MA.  High prevalence of congenital Trypanosoma cruzi infection and family clustering in Salta, Argentina. Pediatrics. 2005;115(6):e668–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Messenger  LA, Miles  MA, Bern  C.  Between a bug and a hard place: Trypanosoma cruzi genetic diversity and the clinical outcomes of Chagas disease. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2015;13(8):995–1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Buekens  P, Cafferata  ML, Alger  J  et al.  Congenital transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi in Argentina, Honduras, and Mexico: an observational prospective study. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;98(2):478–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Messenger  LA, Gilman  RH, Verastegui  M  et al.  Towards improving early diagnosis of congenital Chagas disease in an endemic setting. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(2):268–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Piron  M, Fisa  R, Casamitjana  N  et al.  Development of a real-time PCR assay for Trypanosoma cruzi detection in blood samples. Acta Trop. 2007;103(3):195–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Bhattacharyya  T, Falconar  AK, Luquetti  AO  et al.  Development of peptide-based lineage-specific serology for chronic Chagas disease: geographical and clinical distribution of epitope recognition. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(5):e2892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Zingales  B, Miles  MA, Campbell  DA  et al.  The revised Trypanosoma cruzi subspecific nomenclature: rationale, epidemiological relevance and research applications. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12(2):240–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Virreira  M, Alonso-Vega  C, Solano  M  et al.  Congenital Chagas disease in Bolivia is not associated with DNA polymorphism of Trypanosoma cruzi. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75(5):871–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Del Puerto  R, Nishizawa  JE, Kikuchi  M  et al.  Lineage analysis of circulating Trypanosoma cruzi parasites and their association with clinical forms of Chagas disease in Bolivia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4(5):e687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Bhattacharyya  T, Murphy  N, Miles  MA.  Trypanosoma cruzi lineage-specific serology: new rapid tests for resolving clinical and ecological associations. Future Sci OA. 2019;5(10):FSO422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Murphy  N, Macchiaverna  NP, Cardinal  MV  et al.  Lineage-specific rapid diagnostic tests can resolve Trypanosoma cruzi TcII/V/VI ecological and epidemiological associations in the Argentine Chaco. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Bhattacharyya  T, Messenger  LA, Bern  C  et al.  Severity of chagasic cardiomyopathy is associated with response to a novel rapid diagnostic test for Trypanosoma cruzi TcII/V/VI. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67(4):519–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Murphy  N, Rooney  B, Bhattacharyya  T  et al.  Glycosylation of Trypanosoma cruzi TcI antigen reveals recognition by chagasic sera. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):16395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Carlier  Y, Truyens  C.  Congenital Chagas disease as an ecological model of interactions between Trypanosoma cruzi parasites, pregnant women, placenta and fetuses. Acta Trop. 2015;151:103–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Kemmerling  U, Osuna  A, Schijman  AG  et al.  Congenital transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi: a review about the interavtions between the parasite, the placenta, the maternal and the fetal/neonatal immune response. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Buss  LF, de Oliveira-da Silva  LC, Moreira  CHV  et al.  Declining antibody levels to Trypanosoma cruzi correlate with polymerase chain reaction positivity and electrocardiographic changes in a retrospective cohort of untreated Brazilian blood donors. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14(10):e0008787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Howard  EJ, Xiong  X, Carlier  Y  et al.  Frequency of congenital transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2014;121(1):22–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES