Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ZooKeys logoLink to ZooKeys
. 2022 Jan 13;1081:111–125. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1081.77043

Complete mitochondrial genome of Rhodeuscyanorostris (Teleostei, Cyprinidae): characterization and phylogenetic analysis

Wenjing Li 1,✉, Ning Qiu 2, Hejun Du 3
PMCID: PMC8776718  PMID: 35087298

Abstract

Rhodeuscyanorostris Li, Liao & Arai, 2020 is a freshwater fish that is endemic to China and restricted to Chengdu City in Sichuan Province. This study is the first to sequence and characterize the complete mitochondrial genome of R.cyanorostris. The mitogenome of R.cyanorostris is 16580 bp in length, including 13 protein-coding genes, two rRNA genes, 22 tRNA genes, and a control region (D-loop). The base composition of the sequence is 28.5% A, 27.6% C, 26.4% T, and 17.5% G, with a bias toward A+T. The genome structure, nucleotide composition, and codon usage of the mitogenome of R.cyanorostris are consistent with those of other species of Rhodeus. To verify the molecular phylogeny of the genus Rhodeus, we provide new insights to better understand the taxonomic status of R.cyanorostris. The phylogenetic trees present four major clades based on 19 mitogenomic sequences from 16 Rhodeus species. Rhodeuscyanorostris exhibits the closest phylogenetic relationship with R.pseudosericeus, R.amarus, and R.sericeus. This study discloses the complete mitochondrial genome sequence of R.cyanorostris for the first time and provides the most comprehensive phylogenetic reconstruction of the genus Rhodeus based on whole mitochondrial genome sequences. The information obtained in this study will provide new insights for conservation, phylogenetic analysis, and evolutionary biology research.

Keywords: Acheilognathinae, freshwater fish, genome structure, phylogenetic relationships

Introduction

The cyprinid subfamily Acheilognathinae are small freshwater fish commonly known as bitterlings. These fish are characterized by their compressed body and their unique spawning strategy of depositing their eggs through extended spawning tubes into the gill cavity of live freshwater mussels and clams, where they hatch and develop until the juvenile fish are able to swim freely (Smith et al. 2004; Nelson et al. 2016; Li et al. 2017, 2020a). The subfamily Acheilognathinae includes 75 species and six valid genera, including Acheilognathus, Paratanakia, Pseudorhodeus, Rhodeus, Sinorhodeus, and Tanakia (Arai and Akai 1988; Chang et al. 2014; Li et al. 2017, 2020a). Most of the bitterlings inhabit still-water areas such as rivers, lakes, ponds, and reservoirs, and a few species live in streams. Bitterlings are omnivorous, mainly feeding on algae, plankton, and debris. All species are distributed in East and Southeast Asian countries (China, Korea, Japan, Vietnam, and Myanmar), except the three Rhodeus species in Europe and adjacent West Asia (Arai et al. 2001; Bogutskaya and Komlev 2001; Bohlen et al. 2006; Li et al. 2017; Bartáková et al. 2019).

Although the classification of the subfamily Acheilognathinae has been controversial for many years, the genus Rhodeus is distinguished from other genera by characteristics such as an incomplete lateral line, no barbels, two rows of light spots on the dorsal fin, a pharyngeal teeth formula of 0,0,5–5,0,0, a black spot on the anterior part of the dorsal fin in juveniles (absent in R.amarus, R.meridionalis, and R.sericeus), and wing-like yolk sac projections in the larvae (Arai and Akai 1988; Li et al. 2017; Li et al. 2020a; Li et al. 2020b). The genus Rhodeus is distributed in two disjunct regions of Eurasia and contains approximately 22 species/subspecies, with 19 in East Asia and three in Europe and West Asia (Arai et al. 2001; Bogutskaya and Komlev 2001; Bohlen et al. 2006; Li and Arai 2014; Bartáková et al. 2019; Li et al. 2020a). Among the 19 Rhodeus species/subspecies in East Asia, eight (R.albomarginatus, R.cyanorostris, R.fangi, R.nigrodorsalis, R.ocellatus, R.sinensis, R.shitaiensis, and R.flaviventris) have been reported in the Yangtze river basin of China (Li et al. 2020a, b).

Rhodeuscyanorostris Li, Liao & Arai, 2020 is endemic to China and is restricted to Chengdu City, Sichuan Province. It can be easily distinguished from other congeners (except for R.nigrodorsalis) by its blue snout, less branched dorsal- and anal-fin rays (both no more than eight of each), and lack of pored scales (Li et al. 2020a). Moreover, according to the personal observations of the first author, R.cyanorostris and R.nigrodorsalis are the only two bitterling species known to spawn mainly in winter, from January to March (Li et al. 2020a).

The mitochondrial genome has been widely used in molecular evolution, phylogeny, and population genetics because of its maternal inheritance, stable genetic composition, fast evolutionary rate, low recombination frequency, and highly conserved gene content (Ballard and Whitlock 2004; Oliveria et al. 2008; Galtier et al. 2009; Simon and Hadrys 2013; Hao et al. 2021; Zhao et al. 2021). Complete mitochondrial genomes can provide much more reliable phylogenetic information than smaller parts of the mitochondrial DNA (Huang et al. 2017; Hou et al. 2020) and have been considered reliable markers for constructing fish phylogenies in recent studies of the taxonomy and phylogeny of cyprinids (Wang et al. 2008; Tang et al. 2010; Muniyangdi et al. 2015; Huang et al. 2017; Chung et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2021).

The main purpose of the current study is to disclose the complete mitochondrial genome sequence of R.cyanorostris for the first time and to construct a phylogenetic tree based on complete mitogenome sequences to elucidate the molecular phylogenetic relationship between R.cyanorostris and other species of Rhodeus. Therefore, this study provides essential scientific data and contributes to studies of the population genetics, adaptation, and phylogeny of R.cyanorostris.

Materials and methods

Sampling, sequencing, and assembly

Samples of Rhodeuscyanorostris were collected from the Pidu District of Chengdu City in the Sichuan Province of China (30°55'12"N, 103°50'51"E). The fish were caught with seines, anesthetized with MS-222 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), fixed and stored in 95% ethanol. Species-level morphological identification was carried out according to the description of Fan Li (2020a). Total genomic DNA was extracted using a TIANamp Micro DNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, DNA was stored at –20 °C for subsequent use.

The primers were designed based on the known mitochondrial genomes of R.sinensis by NCBI primer-BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/). PCR was performed by using an Eppendorf Thermal Cycler (5331AH760577, Eppendorf, Germany) with a 30 µL reaction mixture containing 15 µL of 2×Power Taq PCR MasterMix (Tianyi Huiyuan, China), 1 µL of DNA template, 1 µL of each primer (10 mM of each), and 12 µL of ultrapure water. The cycling procedures were as follows: denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 sec, annealing at 60 °C for 30 sec, extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. Agarose gel electrophoresis was used to detect each PCR product to verify the amplification efficiency. PCR products were purified and sequenced by primer walking from both directions.

Sequences were assembled using the DNASTAR package (Burland 2000). Overlapping fragments obtained by sequencing were edited using BIOEDIT v. 7.0.9.0 (Hall 1999) and aligned using MEGA v. 7.0 (Kumar et al. 2016).

Mitogenome annotation and analyses

The mitogenome annotation, tRNA gene localization, and their secondary structure prediction of R.cyanorostris were all completed by the MITOS web server (http://mitos2.bioinf.uni-leipzig.de/index.py) (Bernt et al. 2013). The online MitoFish tool (http://mitofish.aori.u-tokyo.ac.jp/) was used to map the mitochondrial genome structure. The base structure, nucleotide composition, and relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) were calculated using MEGA v. 7.0 (Kumar et al. 2016). The skewing of the nucleotide composition was calculated with the formulas: AT skew = (A – T) / (A + T) and GC skew = (G – C) / (G + C) (Perna and Kocher 1995). The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of R.cyanorostris has been submitted to NCBI (GenBank no. OL856007).

Phylogenetic analyses

Twenty-one mitogenomic sequences downloaded from GenBank (Table 1) were aligned using MEGA v. 7.0 (alignment with CLUSTALW) with default settings (Kumar et al. 2016). The best model GTR +G + I was chosen based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC) using JMODELTEST v. 2 (Darriba et al. 2012), and the ML (maximum likelihood method) tree was constructed using PHYML v. 3.0 (Guindon et al. 2010). The confidence intervals were assessed through the bootstrap test inferred from 1000 replicates. An NJ (neighbor-joining method) tree was constructed based on the Kimura 2-parameter model with 1000 bootstrap replicates using MEGA v. 7.0 (Kumar et al. 2016).

Table 1.

List of the species used to construct the phylogenetic tree.

Classific-ation Subfamily Genus Species Accession number Gene length
Outgroup Culterinae Hemiculter Hemiculterleucisculus KF956522.1 16622 bp
Outgroup Barbinae Onychostoma Onychostomalepturum MT258556.1 16598 bp
Ingroup Acheilognathinae Rhodeus Rhodeusalbomarginatus MW896838.1 16764 bp
Ingroup Acheilognathinae Rhodeus Rhodeusamarus AP011209.1 16607 bp
Ingroup Acheilognathinae Rhodeus Rhodeusatremius AP010778.1 17282 bp
Ingroup Acheilognathinae Rhodeus Rhodeusatremiusatremius AP011255.1 16734 bp
Ingroup Acheilognathinae Rhodeus Rhodeusfangi KF980890.1 16733 bp
Ingroup Acheilognathinae Rhodeus Rhodeuslighti KM232987.1 16677 bp
Ingroup Acheilognathinae Rhodeus Rhodeusnotatus KU291171.1 16735 bp
Ingroup Acheilognathinae Rhodeus Rhodeusocellatuskurumeus AB070205.1 16674 bp
Ingroup Acheilognathinae Rhodeus Rhodeusocellatus 1 DQ026430.1 16680 bp
Ingroup Acheilognathinae Rhodeus Rhodeusocellatus (Kner) 2 KT004415.1 16761 bp
Ingroup Acheilognathinae Rhodeus Rhodeusocellatus 3 MW007386.1 16675 bp
Ingroup Acheilognathinae Rhodeus Rhodeuspseudosericeus KF425517.1 16574 bp
Ingroup Acheilognathinae Rhodeus Rhodeussericeus KM052222.1 16581 bp
Ingroup Acheilognathinae Rhodeus Rhodeusshitaiensis KF176560.1 16774 bp
Ingroup Acheilognathinae Rhodeus Rhodeussinensis KF533721.1 16677 bp
Ingroup Acheilognathinae Rhodeus Rhodeussuigensis EF483934.1 16733 bp
Ingroup Acheilognathinae Rhodeus Rhodeusuyekii 1 DQ155662.1 16817 bp
Ingroup Acheilognathinae Rhodeus Rhodeusuyekii 2 EF483937.1 16827 bp
Open in a new tab

Results

Mitochondrial genomic structure and composition

The complete mitochondrial genome of Rhodeuscyanorostris had a total length of 16580 bp (Fig. 1). The complete R.cyanorostris genome had a typical circular molecular structure and contained 37 genes, including 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), two ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, 22 tRNA genes, and a noncoding control region (D-loop) (Table 2). Among these genes, NADH dehydrogenase 6 (ND6) and 8 tRNA genes (tRNAGln, tRNAAla, tRNAAsn, tRNACys, tRNATyr, tRNASer, tRNAGlu, tRNAPr°) were encoded by L-strand, and the rest were encoded by H-strand. The mitogenome was compact, with eight gene overlaps, ranging in length from 1 to 7 bp. In addition, there were fourteen 1–30 bp coding gene spacer regions, with a total length of 63 bp; the longest spacer region fell between tRNAVal and 16S rRNA genes.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Gene map of the mitochondrial genome of Rhodeuscyanorostris. The genome contained two rRNA genes (in yellow), 13 coding genes (in black), 22 tRNA genes (in red), and a control region (D-loop) (in brown).

Table 2.

Organization of the mitochondrial genome of Rhodeuscyanorostris.

Locus position Size (bp) Intergenic nucleotides Codon Anti-codon Strand
start stop start stop
tRNAPhe 1 69 69 0 – – GAA H
12s rRNA 70 1026 957 1 – – – H
tRNAVal 1028 1099 72 30 – – TAC H
16s rRNA 1130 2786 1657 0 – – – H
tRNALeu 2787 2862 76 0 – – TAA H
ND1 2863 3837 975 4 GTG TAA – H
tRNAlle 3842 3913 72 –2 – – GAT H
tRNAGln 3912 3982 71 1 – – TTG L
tRNAMet 3984 4052 69 0 – – CAT H
ND2 4053 5099 1047 –2 ATG TAG – H
tRNATrp 5098 5168 71 1 – – TCA H
tRNAAla 5170 5238 69 1 – – TGC L
tRNAAsn 5240 5312 73 2 – – GTT L
tRNACys 5345 5413 69 0 – – GCA L
tRNATyr 5414 5483 70 1 – – GTA L
COI 5485 7035 1551 0 GTG TAA – H
tRNASer 7036 7106 71 2 – – TGA L
tRNAAsp 7109 7178 70 9 – – GTC H
COII 7188 7878 691 0 ATG T(AA) – H
tRNALys 7879 7953 75 1 – – TTT H
ATP8 7955 8119 165 –7 ATG TAG – H
ATP6 8113 8796 684 –1 ATG TAA – H
COIII 8796 9580 785 –1 ATG TA(A) – H
tRNAGly 9580 9650 71 0 – – TCC H
ND3 9651 9999 349 0 ATG T(AA) – H
tRNAArg 10000 10069 70 0 – – TCG H
ND4L 10070 10366 297 –7 ATG TAA – H
ND4 10360 11738 1379 3 ATG TA(A) – H
tRNAHis 11742 11810 69 0 – – GTG H
tRNASer 11811 11879 69 1 – – GCT H
tRNALeu 11881 11953 73 0 – – TAG H
ND5 11954 13789 1836 –4 ATG TAG – H
ND6 13786 14307 522 0 ATG TAA – L
tRNAGlu 14308 14376 69 6 – – TTC L
Cyt b 14383 15523 1141 0 ATG T(AA) – H
tRNAThr 15524 15597 74 –1 – – TGT H
tRNAPr° 15597 15666 70 54 – – TGG L
D-loop 15721 16438 718 142 – – – H
Open in a new tab

The base composition of the entire sequence was in the order of A (28.5) > C (27.6) > T (26.4) > G (17.5), with a bias toward A+T. This bias was observed in all genetic elements except for ND3 (Table 3). The complete genome also showed a clear AC bias (AT skew = 0.04, GC skew = –0.22), indicating a greater abundance of A than T and C than G (Table 3).

Table 3.

Nucleotide contents of genes and the mitochondrial genome skew of Rhodeuscyanorostris.

Regions Size (bp) T C A G A+T (%) G+C (%) AT skew GC skew
rRNAs 2645 20.0 25.1 33.4 21.5 53.4 46.6 0.25 –0.08
ND1 975 27.3 29.7 26.2 16.8 53.5 46.5 –0.02 –0.28
tRNAs 1562 26.6 22.0 28.6 22.9 55.2 44.9 0.04 0.02
ND2 1045 26.6 31.8 26.9 14.7 53.5 46.5 0.01 –0.37
COI 1551 29.3 27.3 24.3 19.0 53.6 46.3 –0.09 –0.18
COII 691 26.9 27.5 27.9 17.7 54.8 45.2 0.02 –0.22
ATP8 165 27.3 26.7 33.3 12.7 60.6 39.4 0.10 –0.36
ATP6 683 29.6 30.5 25.6 14.3 55.2 44.8 –0.07 –0.36
COIII 784 29.7 27.0 24.1 19.1 53.8 46.1 –0.10 –0.17
ND3 349 28.1 31.2 20.6 20.1 48.7 51.3 –0.15 –0.22
ND4L 297 28.6 30.0 24.6 16.8 53.2 46.8 –0.08 –0.28
ND4 1382 27.6 28.8 27.3 16.3 54.9 45.1 –0.01 –0.28
ND5 1836 27.9 28.2 29.6 14.2 57.5 42.4 0.03 –0.33
ND6 522 37.7 12.6 14.9 34.7 52.6 47.3 –0.43 0.47
Cyt b 1141 29.4 29.3 25.1 16.3 54.5 45.6 –0.08 –0.29
D-loop 860 31.6 21.9 30.9 15.6 62.5 37.5 –0.01 –0.17
PCGs 11421 28.7 28.1 25.9 17.3 54.6 45.4 –0.05 –0.24
Genome 16580 26.4 27.6 28.5 17.5 54.9 45.1 0.04 –0.22
Open in a new tab

Among the 13 protein-coding genes, the ND1 and COI genes started with GTG, while all other PCGs contained the usual ATG start codon. Eight of the 13 PCGs were terminated with the conventional stop codons (TAA or TAG), while the other five (ND4, COIII, COII, ND3, and Cyt b) were terminated with incomplete stop codons (TA or T). Moreover, the AT skew and GC skew values of the PCGs were –0.05 and –0.24, respectively, indicating that the nucleotides T and C had a greater abundance than their respective counterparts (Table 3).

Statistics on the relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) of R.cyanorostris showed that the most abundant codons were CCC (Pro), UUU (Phe), AAA (Lys), and AUU (Ile) (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Codon distribution a and relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) b in the mitogenome of Rhodeuscyanorostris.

Transfer and ribosomal RNA genes

The two ribosomal RNAs (12S and 16S ribosomal RNA) were positioned between tRNAphe and tRNAleu and separated by tRNAval in the mitogenome of R.cyanorostris. The 12S ribosomal RNA was composed of 957 bp, and the 16S ribosomal RNA was 1657 bp long. Both rRNA genes were encoded on the H-strand and displayed a positive AT skew and a negative GC skew (AT skew = 0.25, GC skew = –0.08).

The mitogenome of R.cyanorostris included 22 transfer RNA genes as in most vertebrates. These transfer RNA genes ranged from 69 to 76 bp. The total concatenated length of tRNA genes was 1562 bp, the AT skew of 22 tRNAs was 0.04, and the GC skew was 0.02, showing slightly higher A and G (Table 3). The secondary structures of all tRNA genes were traditional cloverleaf structures (Fig. 3). In addition to the typical base pairs (G-C and A-U), there were also some wobble G-U pairs in these secondary structures, which could form stable chemical bonds between U and G.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Putative secondary structures of the 22 tRNAs of Rhodeuscyanorostris.

Phylogenetic analysis

To elucidate the phylogenetic relationship in the genus Rhodeus, 21 whole mitochondrial genome sequences of 18 species were used in this study. As a result, ML and NJ analyses generated the same topological structure with well-supported values, and both presented four major sister clades (Fig. 4). Within Clade 1, the branch including three species (R.notatus, R.suigensis, and R.fangi) first formed a sister cluster with high bootstrap values with the branch containing R.atremius and R.atremiusstremius. Then, they clustered with the branch including R.shitaiensis and R.uyekii. In Clade 2, R.cyanorostris clustered together with R.pseudosericeus, R.amarus, and R.sericeus. In Clade 3, the branch including two species (R.ocellatus and R.sinensis) first formed a sister cluster with the branch containing R.lighti, R.ocellatuskurumeus, and R.ocellatus 3. Clade 4 included R.albomarginatus and R.ocellatus 2. R.cyanorostris exhibited the closest phylogenetic relationship with R.pseudosericeus, R.amuarus, and R.sericeus.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Phylogenetic trees derived from the maximum-likelihood (ML) and neighbor joining (NJ) approaches based on whole mitochondrial genomes. The numbers on the nodes are the bootstrap values of ML and NJ. The number after the species name is the GenBank accession number.

Discussion

We successfully sequenced and assembled for the first time the mitogenome of Rhodeuscyanorostris, an endemic fish species in China. The mitogenome was 16580 bp in length, which was similar to the genome size of the known acheilognathine mitogenomes, for example, 16677 bp in R.sinensis, 16677 bp in R.lighti, and 16581 bp in R.sericeus (Wang et al. 2014; Xu et al. 2015; Yang et al. 2015). Differences in mitochondrial genome length in related species may be caused by changes in tandem repeats in the control region (Wang et al. 2020). Consistent with the genome structure of other teleost fish, the mitogenome of R.cyanorostris included 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 2 rRNA genes, 22 tRNA genes, and a non-coding control region (D-loop). The gene distribution was mainly presented on the H-strand, and only the ND6 gene and eight rRNA genes were located on the L-strand. This distribution is consistent with that of other species of Acheilognathinae (Wang et al. 2014; Xu et al. 2015; Yang et al. 2015). In comparison, the 13 PCGs in the mitogenome revealed a relatively low GC content, which was common in the Rhodeus mitogenome (Xu et al. 2015; Yang et al. 2015).

The whole mitochondrial genome of the genus Rhodeus is extremely similar in its nucleotide composition and codon usage, but there were also subtle differences. For example, among the 13 protein-coding genes of R.cyanorostris, two genes (ND1 and COI) start with GTG, and the other 11 start with ATG. In R.shitaiensis, only COI and ND5 start with GTG (Li et al. 2013). Rhodeuslighti, R.sericeus, R.sinensis, R.suigensis, and R.uyekii all start with ATG except for COI, which starts with GTG (Kim et al. 2006; Hwang et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2014; Xu et al. 2015; Yang et al. 2015). The termination codons of R.lighti, R.sericeus, R.sinensis, R.suigensis, and R.uyekii include conventional codons (TAA and TAG) and incomplete codons (T- and TA-).

The secondary structures of tRNA for R.cyanorostris are conserved, and these features meet the characteristics of vertebrate mitochondrial genomes (Zhao et al. 2021). In addition to the typical Watson-Crick pairing (A-U and G-C), there are also some typical pairings such as U-G. Some scholars have proposed that the non-Watson-Crick matched tRNAs can be transformed into fully functional proteins through a post-transcriptional mechanism (Pons et al. 2014; Zhao et al. 2021).

Mitochondrial genome sequences are widely used to study phylogenetic relationships because they offer small, stable changes over a long period for any given taxon. In this regard, whole mitochondrial genes can better transmit phylogenetic information than single genes (mitochondrial/nuclear) can (Huang et al. 2017; Hou et al. 2020). Previous studies have revealed different phylogenetic relationships of different bitterlings by using different molecular datasets. For the first time, we used whole mitochondrial genome sequences to construct the most comprehensive phylogenetic reconstruction of the genus Rhodeus thus far. The phylogenetic results indicated that there were some slightly different topologies compared to other studies due to different outgroups, contrast species, and molecular markers (Okazaki et al. 2001; Chang et al. 2014; Cheng et al. 2014; Kawamura et al. 2014). For example, Okazaki et al. (2001) reported the phylogenetic relationships of 27 species or subspecies of Acheilognathinae based on the 12S rRNA gene. Chang et al. (2014) used six nuclear gene loci (RAG1, RH, IRBP2, EGR1, EGR2B, and EGR3) and one mitochondrial gene (cyt b) to study the phylogenetic relationship of the subfamily Acheilognathinae, including Rhodeus. Cheng et al. (2014) reconstructed a species-level phylogenetic tree of Acheilognathinae based on the mtDNA cyt b and 12S rRNA gene sequences. Kawamura et al. (2014) elucidated the phylogeny of 49 species or subspecies in three genera (Tanakia, Rhodeus, and Acheilognathus) with cyt b. In this study, the phylogenetic tree showed that the genus Rhodeus is divided into four clades. Rhodeuscyanorostris is most closely related to R.pseudosericeus, R.amarus, and R.sericeus. They occupy Clade Ⅱ, and the closer phylogenetic relationship between the latter three was consistent with the study of Kawamura et al. (2014). The mitogenome sequences of R.shitaiensis, R.uyekii, and four members of the R.smithii complex (R.fangi, R.notatus, R.atremius, R.suigensis) (Kimura and Nagata 1992; Arai et al. 2001; Okazaki et al. 2010; Yu et al. 2016) constituted Clade Ⅰ of the phylogenetic tree. Furthermore, the phylogenetic relationship among species was also closely related to their morphological similarity. For example, R.albomarginatus is the most morphologically similar to R.ocellatus and R.sinensis (Chang et al. 2014), which are the most widely distributed Rhodeus species in China. They occupied the Clades Ⅲ and Ⅳ. According to Li et al. (2010), R.shitaiensis closely resembled the R.sericeus complex (R.sericeus, R.colchicus, R.meridionalis, and R.amarus).

Conclusions

In summary, we successfully sequence and characterize the complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Rhodeuscyanorostris for the first time and furtherly elucidate the relationship between R.cyanorostris and other species in the genus Rhodeus. The information obtained from this study will be valuable in further studies on the conservation, molecular identification, and evolutionary biology of the diverse Rhodeus species.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Three Gorges Environment Protection Fund, Chinese Three Gorges Corporation (WWKY-2021–0035). The authors declare that no conflicts of interest exist.

Citation

Li W, Qiu N, Du H (2022) Complete mitochondrial genome of Rhodeus cyanorostris (Teleostei, Cyprinidae): characterization and phylogenetic analysis. ZooKeys 1081: 111–125. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1081.77043

References

  1. Arai R, Akai Y. (1988) Acheilognathusmelanogaster, a senior synonym of A.moriokae, with a revision of the genera of the subfamily Acheilognathinae (Cypriniformes, Cyprinidae). Bulletin of the National Science Museum, Tokyo, Series A 14: 199–213. [Google Scholar]
  2. Arai R, Jeon SR, Ueda T. (2001) Rhodeuspseudosericeus sp. nov., a new bitterling from South Korea (Cyprinidae, Acheilognathinae). Ichthyological Research 48: 275–282. 10.1007/s10228-001-8146-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ballard JWO, Whitlock MC. (2004) The incomplete natural history of mitochondria. Molecular Ecology 13: 729–744. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.02063.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bartáková V, Bryja J, Šanda R, Bektas Y, Stefanov T, Choleva L, Smith C, Reichard M. (2019) High cryptic diversity of bitterling fish in the southern West Palearctic. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 133: 1–11. 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.12.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bernt M, Donath A, Jühling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Fritzsch G, Pütz J, Middendorf M, Stadler PF. (2013) MITOS: improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 69: 313–319. 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bogutskaya NG, Komlev AM. (2001) Some new data to morphology of Rhodeussericeus (Cyprinidae: Acheilognathinae) and a description of a new species, Rhodeuscolchicus, from West Transcaucasia. Proceedings of the Zoological Institute, St. Petersburg 287: 81–97. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bohlen J, Šlechtová V, Bogutskaya N, Freyhof J. (2006) Across Siberia and over Europe: phylogenetic relationships of the freshwater fish genus Rhodeus in Europe and the phylogenetic position of R.sericeus from the River Amur. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40: 856–865. 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.04.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burland TG. (2000) DNASTAR’s Lasergene sequence analysis software. Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols 132: 71–91. 10.1385/1-59259-192-2:71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang CH, Li F, Shao KT, Lin YS, Morosawa T, Kim S, Koo H, Kim W, Lee JS, He S, Smith C, Reichard M, Miya M, Sado T, Uehara K, Lavoué S, Chen WJ, Mayden RL. (2014) Phylogenetic relationships of Acheilognathidae (Cypriniformes: Cyprinoidea) as revealed from evidence of both nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequence variation: evidence for necessary taxonomic revision in the family and the identification of cryptic species. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 81: 182–194. 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.08.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cheng PL, Yu D, Liu SQ, Tang QY, Liu HZ. (2014) Molecular phylogeny and conservation priorities of the subfamily Acheilognathinae (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Zoological Science 31: 300–308. 10.2108/zs130069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chung HH, Kamar CKA, Lim LWK, Liao Y, Lam TT, Chong YL. (2020) Sequencing and characterisation of complete mitogenome DNA for Rasborahobelmani (Cyprinidae) with phylogenetic consideration. Journal of Ichthyology 60: 90–98. 10.1134/S0032945220010014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. (2012) jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics, and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9: 772–772. 10.1038/nmeth.2109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Galtier N, Nabholz B, Glémin S, Hurst G. (2009) Mitochondrial DNA as a marker of molecular diversity: a reappraisal. Molecular Ecology 18: 4541–4550. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04380.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59: 307–321. 10.1093/sysbio/syq010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hall TA. (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hao XY, Liu JQ, Chiba H, Xiao JT, Yuan XQ. (2021) Complete mitochondrial genomes of three skippers in the tribe Aeromachini (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Hesperiinae) and their phylogenetic implications. Ecology and Evolution 11: 8381–8393. 10.1002/ece3.7666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hou XJ, Lin HD, Tang WQ, Liu D, Han CC, Yang JQ. (2020) Complete mitochondrial genome of the freshwater fish Acrossocheiluslongipinnis (Teleostei: Cyprinidae): genome characterization and phylogenetic analysis. Biologia 75: 1871–1880. 10.2478/s11756-020-00440-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Huang SP, Wang FY, Wang TY. (2017) Molecular phylogeny of the Opsariichthys group (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) based on complete mitochondrial genomes. Zoological studies 56: e40. 10.6620/ZS.2017.56-40 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  19. Hwang DS, Lee WO, Lee JS. (2014) Complete mitochondrial genome of the freshwater fish, Rhodeussuigensis (Cypriniformes, Cyprinidae). Mitochondrial DNA 25: 1–2. 10.3109/19401736.2013.775275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kawamura K, Ueda T, Arai R, Smith C. (2014) Phylogenetic relationships of bitterling fishes (Teleostei: Cypriniformes: Acheilognathinae), inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences. Zoological Science 31: 321–329. 10.2108/zs130233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim BC, Kang TW, Kim MS, Kim CB. (2006) The complete mitogenome of Rhodeusuyekii (Cypriniformes, Cyprinidae). DNA Sequence 17: 181–186. 10.1080/10425170600806928 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kimura S, Nagata Y. (1992) Scientific name of Nippon-baratanago, a Japanese bitterling of the genus Rhodeus. Ichthyological Research 38: 425–429. 10.1007/BF02905605 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33: 1870–1874. 10.1093/molbev/msw054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li F, Arai R. (2014) Rhodeusalbomarginatus, a new bitterling (Teleostei: Cyprinidae: Acheilognathinae) from China. Zootaxa 3790: 165–176. 10.11646/zootaxa.3790.1.7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Li F, Arai R. (2010) Rhodeusshitaiensis, a new bitterling from China (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 21: 303–312. 10.1016/S0304-3835(03)00416-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Li F, Arai R, Liao TY. (2020b) Rhodeusflaviventris, a new bitterling (Teleostei: Cyprinidae: Acheilognathinae) from China. Zootaxa 4790: 329–340. 10.11646/zootaxa.4790.2.8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Li F, Liao TY, Arai R, Zhao LJ. (2017) Sinorhodeusmicrolepis, a new genus and species of bitterling from China (Teleostei: Cyprinidae: Acheilognathinae). Zootaxa 4353: 69–88. 10.11646/zootaxa.4353.1.4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Li F, Liao TY, Arai R. (2020a) Two new species of Rhodeus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae: Acheilognathinae) from the River Yangtze, China. Journal of Vertebrate Biology 69: e19055. 10.25225/jvb.19055 [DOI]
  29. Li F, Shao KT, Lin YS, Chang CH. (2013) The complete mitochondrial genome of the Rhodeusshitaiensis (Teleostei, Cypriniformes, Acheilognathidae). Mitochondrial DNA 26: 301–302. 10.3109/19401736.2013.825785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Muniyandi N, Raja M, Vikram P. (2015) Genetic characterization of Bagarius species using cytochrome c oxidase I and cytochrome b genes. Mitochondrial DNA Part A 27: 3781–3783. 10.3109/19401736.2015.1079902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Nelson JS, Grande TC, Wilson MVH. (2016) Fishes of the World (5th Edn.). John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 707 pp. 10.1002/9781119174844 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Okazaki M, Naruse K, Shima A, Arai R. (2010) Phylogenetic relationships of bitterlings based on mitochondrial 12s ribosomal DNA sequences. Journal of Fish Biology 58: 89–106. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2001.tb00501.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Oliveira DCSG, Rhitoban R, Lavrov DV, Werren JH. (2008) Rapidly evolving mitochondrial genome and directional selection in mitochondrial genes in the parasitic wasp Nasonia (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 2167–2180. 10.1093/molbev/msn159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Perna NT, Kocher TD. (1995) Patterns of nucleotide composition at fourfold degenerate sites of animal mitochondrial genomes. Journal of Molecular Evolution 41: 353–358. 10.1007/BF00186547 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pons J, Bauzà-Ribot MM, Jaume D, Juan C. (2014) Next-generation sequencing, phylogenetic signal and comparative mitogenomic analyses in Metacrangonyctidae (Amphipoda: Crustacea). BioMed Central 15: e566. 10.1186/1471-2164-15-566 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  36. Simon S, Hadrys HA. (2013) A comparative analysis of complete mitochondrial genomes among Hexapoda. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 69: 393–403. 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.03.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Smith C, Reichard M, Jurajda P, Przybylski M. (2004) The reproductive ecology of the European bitterling (Rhodeussericeus). Journal of Zoology 262: 107–124. 10.1017/s0952836903004497 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tang KL, Agnew MK, Hirt MV, Sado T, Schneider LM, Freyhof JR, Sulaiman Z, Swartz E, Vidthayanon C, Miya M. (2010) Systematics of the subfamily Danioninae (Teleostei: Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 57: 189–214. 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.05.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang C, Chen Q, Lu G, Xu J, Yang Q, Li S. (2008) Complete mitochondrial genome of the grass carp (Ctenopharyngodonidella, Teleostei): insight into its phylogenic position within Cyprinidae. Gene 424: 96–101. 10.1016/j.gene.2008.07.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang BH, Wang SH, Hu ML, Wang F. (2014) Complete mitochondrial genome of Rhodeuslighti (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). Mitochondrial DNA 27: 1497–1498. 10.3109/19401736.2014.953109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang IC, Lin HD, Liang CM, Huang CC, Wang RD, Yang JQ, Wang WK. (2020) Complete mitochondrial genome of the freshwater fish Onychostomalepturum (Teleostei, Cyprinidae): genome characterization and phylogenetic analysis. ZooKeys 1005: 57–72. 10.3897/zookeys.1005.57592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Xu CZ, Xie F, Zhang X, Zhao S. (2015) The complete mitochondrial genome of Amur bitterling (Rhodeussericeus) from China. Mitochondrial DNA 27: 2377–2378. 10.3109/19401736.2015.1028038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Yang XF, Ma ZH, Xie LP, Yang RB, Shen JZ. (2015) Complete mitochondrial genome of the Chinese bitterling Rhodeussinensis (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). Mitochondrial DNA 26: 1–2. 10.3109/19401736.2013.836517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yu Y, Yi WJ, Ma ZH, Yang RB, Shen JZ. (2016) The complete mitochondrial genome of Rhodeusfangi (Cypriniformes, Cyprinidae, Acheilognathinae), Mitochondrial DNA Part A 27: 284–285. 10.3109/19401736.2014.892079 [DOI] [PubMed]
  45. Zhang K, Liu YF, Chen J, Zhang H, Gong L, Jiang LH, Liu LQ, Lü ZM, Liu BJ. (2021) Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Macrotocinclusaffinis (Siluriformes; Loricariidae) and phylogenetic studies of Siluriformes. Molecular Biology Reports 48: 677–689. 10.1007/s11033-020-06120-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhao L, Wei JF, Zhao WQ, Chen C, Gao ZY, Zhao Q. (2021) The complete mitochondrial genome of Pentatomarufipes (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae) and its phylogenetic implications. ZooKeys 1042: 51–72. 10.3897/zookeys.1042.62302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ZooKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES