Skip to main content
Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry logoLink to Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry
. 2021 Dec 5;70(2):151–168. doi: 10.1369/00221554211061359

Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas

Carine Renner 1,2, Clarissa Gomez 1,2, Mike R Visetsouk 1,2, Isra Taha 1,2, Aisha Khan 1,2, Stephanie M McGregor 1,2, Paul Weisman 1,2, Alexandra Naba 1,2,, Kristyn S Masters 1,2, Pamela K Kreeger 1,2
PMCID: PMC8777377  PMID: 34866441

Abstract

Recent evidence supports the fimbriae of the fallopian tube as one origin site for high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). The progression of many solid tumors is accompanied by changes in the microenvironment, including alterations of the extracellular matrix (ECM). Therefore, we sought to determine the ECM composition of the benign fallopian tube and changes associated with serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas (STICs), precursors of HGSOC. The ECM composition of benign human fallopian tube was first defined from a meta-analysis of published proteomic datasets that identified 190 ECM proteins. We then conducted de novo proteomics using ECM enrichment and identified 88 proteins, 7 of which were not identified in prior studies (COL2A1, COL4A5, COL16A1, elastin, LAMA5, annexin A2, and PAI1). To enable future in vitro studies, we investigated the levels and localization of ECM components included in tissue-engineered models (type I, III, and IV collagens, fibronectin, laminin, versican, perlecan, and hyaluronic acid) using multispectral immunohistochemical staining of fimbriae from patients with benign conditions or STICs. Quantification revealed an increase in stromal fibronectin and a decrease in epithelial versican in STICs. Our results provide an in-depth picture of the ECM in the benign fallopian tube and identified ECM changes that accompany STIC formation. (J Histochem Cytochem XX: XXX–XXX, XXXX)

Keywords: mass spectrometry, matrisome, multispectral immunohistochemistry, ovarian cancer, tumor microenvironment, tumor stroma

Introduction

The most lethal and common of the epithelial ovarian cancers is high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), which is diagnosed in approximately 15,000 women annually in the United States. A majority of these patients will experience at least one recurrence following frontline treatment, resulting in a 5-year survival rate of only 48%. 1 A contributing factor to the high lethality of this cancer is its late-stage diagnosis when surgical debulking and chemotherapy, the primary means of treatment, may not be sufficient. 2 Diagnosis at late stages also obscured the cell of origin for the disease for decades; current literature now supports the “tubal hypothesis,” where the fallopian tube epithelium (rather than the ovarian surface epithelium) is the likely origin for many cases of HGSOC.35 Support for the tubal hypothesis includes genomic analyses linking TP53 mutations in HGSOC samples to those found within the fallopian tube epithelium at sites known as serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas (STICs).6,7 Additional support for the tubal origin includes the stronger correlation of HGSOC tumors to the benign fallopian tube when comparing the expression of the top 50 differentially expressed genes between potential origin sites of metastatic HGSOC (fallopian tube, ovary, and peritoneum). 5

Although driver mutations of TP53 play an essential role in HGSOC, recent evidence also points to a role for the microenvironment, and more specifically of the extracellular matrix (ECM), in the progression of HGSOC. The ECM is a complex and dynamic meshwork of proteins that regulate cell and organ physiology and plays key roles in cancer initiation, progression, and dissemination,8,9 including HGSOC. 10 For example, elevated levels of laminin-γ2, type I and type III collagens, fibronectin, versican (VCAN), and hyaluronan (HA) have all been associated with a poorer prognosis of ovarian cancers. 11 Decreased type I collagen or increased type III collagen concentrations led to increased invasion of fallopian tube epithelial cells in models of ovarian cortical inclusion cysts, which are hypothesized to be the first metastatic site of HGSOC. 12 Evidence for ECM changes in STICs has been reported recently, including differences in collagen fiber morphology 13 and increased levels of highly sulfated chondroitin sulfate, 14 an ECM component commonly associated with cancer. 15

Although there is growing evidence to suggest that ECM changes contribute to the early progression of HGSOC, we still do not have a complete picture of the extent of ECM changes occurring as STICs arise in the fallopian tube. First, the ECM composition, or “matrisome,” of the benign fallopian tube has not been defined. A recent study characterized the changes in type I and III collagens and four proteoglycans in the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle 16 ; however, this report focused on the ampullar region of the fallopian tube, where relatively few STICs have been observed. 17 Global proteomics of the human fallopian tube have been reported,1821 but these methods are not able to differentiate intracellular vs extracellular components or characterize the insoluble matrisome in depth. An additional obstacle to analyzing ECM alterations in STICs is the limited availability of STIC samples from pre- or early-stage HGSOC. STICs are primarily identified when patients undergo surgery for suspected ovarian cancer; at this point, the tumor has frequently advanced to stage III with peritoneal metastases, and STICs may be altered by the systemic changes associated with increased tumor burden. Alternatively, STICs in pre- or early-stage HGSOC can be identified during risk-reduction salpingectomy, followed by sectioning and extensively examining the fimbria (SEE-FIM). 3 Moreover, when STICs are identified at these early stages, they are restricted regions of tens to hundreds of cells, which limits the type and number of analyses that can be performed. Recent work employed a combination of laser capture microdissection and ultra-high-sensitivity mass spectrometry (MS) to perform proteomic profiling of STICs from patients with metastatic disease. 18 Although the generated STIC proteomic signature contained many ECM proteins, the method employed was not ideal for capturing the insoluble ECM, suggesting that it did not completely define the tissue matrisome.

Here, we employed a set of complementary approaches to characterize the ECM of human fallopian tubes and examine how this ECM changes when STIC lesions develop. We first conducted a meta-analysis of existing global proteomic profiles of benign human fallopian tube studies to identify the ECM and ECM-associated proteins found in these tissues. We next used an ECM enrichment approach to characterize the insoluble ECM components composing the human fallopian tube matrisome by MS. Based on the result of our experimental ECM data and meta-analysis, we then utilized multispectral immunofluorescence to characterize the differences in a selected set of core matrisome components including type I, III, and IV collagens, the proteoglycans perlecan (HSPG2) and VCAN, the glycoproteins fibronectin and laminins, and the glycosaminoglycan HA, in STICs compared with non-STIC regions of patients with STICs or with patients with benign fallopian tubes. Elucidating the changes in the ECM during STIC development could provide critical insights into the pathogenic progression of HGSOC and potentially illuminate diagnostic markers and preventive therapeutic strategies.

Materials and Methods

Unless specified otherwise, all reagents were from ThermoFisher Scientific (Waltham, MA).

Meta-analysis of Existing Proteomic Studies of Human Fallopian Tubes

Global proteomic abundance data were collected from the supplemental tables of four studies: Wang et al., 19 Supplemental Table S1; Eckert et al., 18 Supplemental Table S2; Hu et al., 20 Supplemental Table S2; and McDermott et al., 21 Supplemental Table S1. Data for benign 19 or histologically normal18,20,21 human fallopian tube (hFT) samples were extracted from each study, representing data from more than 100 unique patient samples, and data for STIC stromal and STIC epithelial samples were extracted from the study by Eckert et al. Proteins detected with non-zero abundance in any single sample within a given study were added to that study’s hFT protein list. Each list was then annotated to identify matrisome proteins, and matrisome proteins were further classified into different matrisome divisions and categories we previously defined22,23 (see Supplemental Table 1).

Proteomic Analysis of Human Fallopian Tube

Tissue Decellularization

Four flash-frozen benign human fallopian tube samples from four Caucasian females (aged 40–52 years) were procured from the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center Translational Science Biocore BioBank, which collects biospecimens through an institutional review board (IRB)-approved protocol at UW-Madison and then acts as an honest broker to provide deidentified tissue to investigators. As we obtained a large sample (700 mg) from one of the individuals, we further divided this sample into three 150 mg samples, allowing us to assess tissue heterogeneity.

In all, 100–150 mg of tissue was homogenized for 2 min at a power setting of 12 using a Bullet Blender and stainless steel beads of various diameters (Navy Bead Lysis Kit; Next Advance, Averill Park, NY) following the manufacturer’s instructions. ECM enrichment was achieved through the sequential extraction of intracellular proteins in order of decreasing protein solubility, using a subcellular protein fractionation kit for tissues following the manufacturer’s instructions. The efficiency of the sequential extraction of intracellular components and concomitant ECM protein enrichment was monitored by Western blot analysis, probing for collagen I (#AB765P, 1 µg/ml; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), histone H4 (#05-858, 1 µg/ml; Sigma), and actin using a serum containing anti-actin antibodies (1/5000) kindly gifted by the Hynes Lab at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Cambridge, MA).

Protein Sample Preparation for Mass Spectrometry

The ECM-enriched protein sample was subsequently solubilized and digested into peptides following an established protocol.22,24 Briefly, proteins were solubilized in an 8 M urea solution prepared in 100 mM NH4HCO3, and protein disulfide bonds were reduced using 10 mM dithiothreitol. Reduced disulfide bonds were then alkylated with 25 mM iodoacetamide (30-min incubation, in the dark, at room temperature). The urea concentration was brought to 2 M, and proteins were then deglycosylated with PNGaseF (New England Biolabs; Ipswich, MA) for 2 hr at 37C, in Celsius units, and digested sequentially, first with Lys-C for 2 h at 37C, in Celsius units, and then with trypsin, overnight at 37C, in Celsius units. A fresh aliquot of trypsin was added on the following day and samples were incubated for an additional 2 hr at 37C, in Celsius units. All incubations were performed under agitation as previously described. The sample was acidified with 50% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and desalted using Pierce Peptide Desalting Spin Columns. Peptides were reconstituted in 95% HPLC grade water, 5% acetonitrile (ACN), and 0.1% formic acid (FA), and the concentration of the peptide solution was measured using the Pierce Quantitative Colorimetric Peptide Assay kit.

Peptide Analysis by LC-MS/MS

Approximately 600 ng of desalted peptides was analyzed at the University of Illinois Mass Spectrometry core facility on a Q Exactive HF quadrupole Orbitrap mass spectrometer coupled with an UltiMate 3000 RSLC nano system with a Nanospray Frex Ion Source (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Three technical replicates (hFT1-1, hFT1-2, hFT1-3) were acquired for one patient sample and one technical replicate for each of the other three patient samples. Samples were loaded into a PepMap C18 cartridge (0.3 × 5 mm, 5 μm particle) trap column and then a 75 μm × 150 mm PepMap C18 analytical column (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and separated at a flow rate of 300 nl/min. Solvent A was 0.1% FA in water and solvent B was 0.1% FA, 80% ACN in water. The solvent gradient of liquid chromatography (LC) was 5–8% B at 5 min, 8–10% B at 7 min, 10–30% B at 65 min, 30–40% B at 80 min, 40–95% B at 90 min, and wash in 95% B at 95 min, followed by 5% B equilibration until 105 min. Full MS scans were acquired in the Q-Exactive mass spectrometer over 350–1400 m/z range with resolution of 60,000 (at 400 m/z) from 5 to 97 min. The Automatic Gain Control (AGC) target value was 1.00E + 06 for full scan. The 15 most intense peaks with charge states 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 were fragmented in the Higher-energy C-trap dissociation (HCD) collision cell with normalized collision energy of 30%; these peaks were then excluded for 12 sec within a mass window of 1.2 m/z. Tandem mass spectrum was acquired in the mass analyzer with a resolution of 15,000. The AGC target value was 5.00E + 04. The ion selection threshold was 1.00E + 04 counts, and the maximum allowed ion injection time was 30 msec for full scans and 50 msec for fragment ion scans.

Database Searching

All MS/MS samples were analyzed using Mascot (version 2.6.2; Matrix Science, London, UK). Mascot was set up to search the Uniprot-human_20200811 database (unknown version, 20375 entries) assuming the digestion enzyme stricttrypsin. Mascot was searched with a fragment ion mass tolerance of 0.20 Da and a parent ion tolerance of 10.0 PPM. O-110 of pyrrolysine, u+49 of selenocysteine, and carbamidomethyl of cysteine were specified in Mascot as fixed modifications. Gln → pyro-Glu of the n-terminus, deamidation of asparagine and glutamine, and oxidation of methionine, lysine, and proline were specified in Mascot as variable modifications, the latter two being characteristic of posttranslational modifications of ECM proteins, in particular collagens and collagen-domain-containing proteins, as we previously reported. 25 Of the six samples processed, only the three that came from the same individual, a 43-year-old Caucasian female diagnosed with a benign pelvic mass, had a quality sufficient for subsequent analysis.

Criteria for Protein Identification

Scaffold (version Scaffold_4.11.1; Proteome Software Inc., Portland, OR) was used to validate MS/MS-based peptide and protein identifications. Peptide identifications were accepted if they could be established at greater than 91.0% probability to achieve a false discovery rate (FDR) less than 1.0% by the Scaffold Local FDR algorithm. Protein identifications were accepted if they could be established at greater than 8.0% probability to achieve an FDR less than 1.0% and contained at least two identified peptides. Protein probabilities were assigned by the Protein Prophet algorithm. 26 Proteins that contained similar peptides and could not be differentiated based on MS/MS analysis alone were grouped to satisfy the principles of parsimony. Proteins sharing significant peptide evidence were grouped into clusters. MS output was further annotated to identify ECM and non-ECM components.22,25 Specifically, matrisome components are classified as core matrisome or matrisome-associated components, and further categorized into groups based on structural or functional features: ECM glycoproteins, collagens, or proteoglycans for core matrisome components; and ECM-affiliated proteins, ECM regulators, or secreted factors for matrisome-associated components (Supplemental Table 2).22,23

Raw MS data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium 27 via the PRIDE partner repository 28 with the dataset identifier PXD023707.

Multispectral Analysis of Human Fallopian Tubes and STICs

Tissue Procurement

Archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded fallopian tube/fimbriae (10 benign, 12 with STICs) were acquired from archived pathology samples through an IRB-approved protocol at UW-Madison. Samples were retrieved from cases of benign or STIC patients who had undergone surgical debulking. Clinical information can be found in Supplemental Table 3. As we limited our search to patients who did not have metastatic HGSOC, both the number of patients and the amount of material available from each pathology block were small (n=10 patients with STIC; not all sections have STIC region present).

Multispectral Immunohistochemistry

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded fallopian tube/fimbriae were cut and processed into 5 µm sections as previously described. 29 Multispectral immunohistochemistry was performed using the Opal 7-Color Manual IHC Kit (NEL811001KT; Akoya Biosciences/PerkinElmer, Marlborough, MA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The maximum number of fluorescent signals that could be spectrally unmixed was limited to five channels; therefore, we separated our analyses of ECM components, along with nuclei and P53 for tissue context and STIC identification, into two staining sets (Supplemental Table 4). Briefly, slides were deparaffinized using SafeClear II xylene substitute, followed by rehydration in a series of ethanol dilutions (100% twice, 90%, 70%, 50%), ending with a rinse in deionized water. Slides were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 20 min, rinsed in deionized water, and then placed in PerkinElmer AR6 buffer. For antigen retrieval, slides were microwaved at 100% in AR6 buffer until the buffer boiled and then microwaved at 20% power for 15 min, cooled to room temperature, and rinsed in deionized water and tris-buffered saline with 0.1% tween-20 (TBST). PerkinElmer blocking solution was used overnight at 4C, in Celsius units, followed by biotin blocking with avidin (SP-2001; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 15 min, TBST wash, and then biotin incubation for 15 min. Optimized antibody information is in Supplemental Table 4. Briefly, set 1 consisted of type IV collagen, pan-laminin, type I collagen, type III collagen, and P53, stained in that order. Set 2 consisted of HA, HSPG2, fibronectin, VCAN, and P53, stained in that order. Slides were incubated in primary antibody solutions for 2 hr at room temperature, washed in TBST, and then incubated in PerkinElmer Polymer HRP Ms+Rb for 10 min at room temperature. Slides were washed in TBST and incubated in Opal Fluorophore diluent as described in Supplemental Table 4 for 10 min. Antibody stripping was performed in AR6 buffer in between each component using the microwave technique described for antigen retrieval. Slides were blocked for 30 min at room temperature or overnight at 4C, in Celsius units, followed by avidin and biotin blocking, and the staining process was repeated. After all ECM components and P53 had been stained, slides were counterstained with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) and sealed using ProLong Diamond Antifade Mountant.

Imaging and Analysis

Imaging of fimbriae was performed on a Nuance Multispectral imaging system with an Olympus UPlanFL N 20× objective, NA 0.5, using the Nuance Software version 3.0.2 (PerkinElmer). Spectral unmixing of the Opal fluorophores and autofluorescence was performed after imaging using manufacturer-provided instructions, and images were exported as 16-bit TIFF. Images were categorized as either benign or STIC, based on patient source. All non-STIC patients had single-cell layered epithelia with only occasional P53-positive cells. Within STIC patients, we observed both STIC regions (three or more layers of P53-positive cells) and non-STIC regions (single-cell layered epithelia, P53-negative) (Supplemental Fig. 1). As samples were from pathology archives, it is possible that the entire STIC was sectioned during clinical analysis. Indeed, not all sections from STIC patients had STIC regions, but were included in non-STIC region analyses based on the associated pathological report. Regions of interest (ROIs) were created for epithelia or stroma using the DAPI image, free-hand selection tool, and ROI manager in FIJI ImageJ Software version 2.0.0 (Supplemental Fig. 2). Images were analyzed for mean fluorescent signal intensity (MFI) in epithelial and stromal ROIs, and their relative levels were calculated as an epithelial to stromal ratio (E:S ratio).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical calculations were carried out as indicated in the figure legends (GraphPad Prism version 8.4.1) with p<0.05 set as a threshold for significance.

Results

Meta-analysis of the Proteomes of Benign Human Fallopian Tube and STICs

Although the ECM of the fallopian tube has not yet been fully characterized, the global proteome of the benign and HGSOC fallopian tubes has been profiled in several recent studies.1821 We thus sought to conduct a meta-analysis of these studies with the goal of defining the human fallopian tube matrisome. To do so, we retrieved the list of proteins identified in human fallopian tubes or STIC samples profiled in the four studies representing data from more than 100 unique patient samples1821 (Supplemental Table 1A) and annotated them to determine which proteins belong to the human matrisome that we previously defined. 22 This led to the identification of 295 ECM proteins in the Wang dataset, 238 in the Eckert dataset, 397 in the Hu dataset, and 524 in the McDermott dataset (Fig. 1A; Supplemental Table 1B). These vastly different numbers can be explained by multiple factors, including the depth (i.e., were the peptides fractionated or not) and modality of the MS analyses, and the number of samples included in each study (Supplemental Table 1A). We next broke down the proteins into different matrisome categories. First, there are the structural ECM components that constitute the “core matrisome”: collagens, proteoglycans, and ECM glycoproteins. In addition, we identified “matrisome-associated” proteins, including ECM-associated proteins, ECM regulators, and secreted factors. In all four studies, the majority of matrisome proteins detected belonged to the matrisome-associated class, including ECM regulators that are enzymes known to impact ECM proteins, such as proteases (Fig. 1A; Supplemental Table 1B). The comparison of the data from these four studies led to the identification of a set of 190 matrisome proteins present in all four human fallopian tube proteome datasets out of initial 430 distinct matrisome proteins identified across the individual studies (Fig. 1B; Supplemental Table 1B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Proteomic analysis of the human fallopian tube matrisome. (A) Distribution of ECM and ECM-associated proteins detected in benign human fallopian tube samples in four global proteomic studies (see Supplemental Table 1B). (B) Venn diagram of matrisome proteins detected in four global proteomic studies (see Supplemental Table 1B). (C) Western blot analysis of different protein fractions obtained during sample decellularization process revealed successful solubilization and extraction of intracellular proteins (actin, histones), while the diagnostic ECM protein, type I collagen, was retained in the remaining insoluble fraction. The ECM-enriched protein fraction was further analyzed by mass spectrometry. (D) The three technical replicates (hFT1-1, hFT1-2, hFT1-3) resulted in a similar number of matrisome proteins (left panel), with a strong degree of overlap in identity (right panel, see Supplemental Table 2B and C). (E) Distribution of ECM and ECM-associated proteins detected among matrisome categories (see Supplemental Table 2C). (F) Heatmap representing normalized numbers of unique peptides and total spectra detected for each matrisome protein in all three replicates. (G) Venn diagram of the experimental matrisomic data obtained in comparison with the meta-analysis of global proteomic studies of human fallopian tubes. Unique proteins are listed; font color indicates matrisome category. Abbreviation: ECM, extracellular matrix; MW, molecular weight.

One of the problems inherent in the proteomic analysis of STIC tissues is the very small sample size. To overcome this, Eckert and collaborators 18 developed a novel method that combined laser capture microdissection and label-free MS to identify proteins present in samples composed of as few as 5000 cells. This method also allowed the tumor compartment to be separated from the stromal compartment, with the latter presumably enriched for ECM proteins. However, the tissue used for this proteomic analysis was collected from patients who had already progressed to metastatic HGSOC; in contrast, we seek to characterize the earliest stages using benign fallopian tubes and STIC lesions in the absence of metastatic tumors.

Proteomic Analysis of Benign Human Fallopian Tube/Fimbriae

Global proteomics permits the identification of a significant number of ECM and ECM-associated proteins, but whether these proteins are, in fact, part of the assembled ECM meshwork remains to be determined. Indeed, although all ECM and ECM-associated proteins are produced intracellularly, they exert their functions when they are incorporated in the insoluble ECM scaffold. The incorporation of the proteins in the ECM scaffold requires posttranslational modifications, including glycosylation and cross-linking, and protein–protein interactions. These factors render ECM and ECM-associated proteins largely insoluble, and so the pool of assembled ECM proteins is notoriously difficult to capture from precleared tissue lysates,25,30 which were utilized in the studies included in our meta-analysis.

We previously developed a MS pipeline tailored to study insoluble ECM proteins.22,24 In brief, this pipeline consists of (1) enrichment of ECM proteins from tissue and concomitant depletion of soluble intracellular components, (2) digestion of ECM-enriched protein samples into peptides after deglycosylation to maximize trypsin accessibility and proteolytic cleavage, (3) acquisition of MS data, and (4) analysis of MS data, with the inclusion of parameters to maximize ECM protein identification, such as allowing for ECM-specific posttranslational modifications such as hydroxylysines and hydroxyprolines.25,30 Here, to experimentally characterize the protein composition of the insoluble ECM fraction of fallopian tube/fimbriae, we obtained samples from patients without a history of ovarian cancer and enriched the ECM as previously described. 24 This enrichment was monitored by conducting Western blots on all protein fractions generated during decellularization and probing for collagen I, cellular actin, and nuclear histone H4 (Fig. 1C). To determine technical variability in the list of proteins identified, three technical replicates (hFT1-1, hFT1-2, hFT1-3) were performed and revealed a high level of reproducibility (Fig. 1D; Supplemental Fig. 3 and Supplemental Table 2B). Overall, we consistently identified 88 matrisome proteins in the ECM of the human fallopian tube sample, including 35 glycoproteins, 17 collagens, and 9 proteoglycans in the category of core matrisome components; and 9 ECM-affiliated proteins, 18 ECM regulators, and 1 secreted factor in the category of matrisome-associated proteins (Fig. 1E; Supplemental Table 2C). Using normalized spectral counts to estimate relative protein abundance, we found that the most abundant proteins were core matrisome proteins (Fig. 1F; Supplemental Table 2C).

Last, we sought to compare our findings with that of the meta-analysis we conducted on global proteomic datasets. Although the scale and depth of our study are very small in comparison with those of the previously published studies, we were able to detect seven proteins that were not detected by global proteomics. These include three collagens: fibrillar type II collagen (COL2A1), basement membrane collagen COL4A5, and type XVI collagen (COL16A1) of the fibril-associated collagens with interrupted triple helices (FACIT) collagen family (Fig. 1G; Supplemental Tables 1B and 2C). Two other core ECM glycoproteins were detected: elastin and the α chain of laminin 5, as well as annexin A2 and the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI1 or SERPINE1). In addition to many other proteins, we detected subunits of type I collagen, type III collagen, type IV collagen, and laminins, as well as fibronectin (FN1), VCAN, and HSPG2 through both our findings and the previous meta-analysis (Supplemental Tables 1B and 2C). Of these, collagen I, collagen III, fibronectin, VCAN, and laminin have previously been associated with poorer prognosis in ovarian cancer. 11 Each of these proteins was identified in at least one of the other fallopian tube samples that was only able to be preliminarily analyzed. Altogether, our pilot analysis demonstrated the feasibility of applying ECM-focused proteomics to gain insight into the composition of the ECM scaffold of human fallopian tube.

Characterization of the ECM of STICs Using Multispectral Immunofluorescence

As noted above, early-stage STIC samples are rare due to the high frequency of late-stage diagnosis of HGSOC. Moreover, common ECM analysis techniques, such as the MS pipeline described above or even immunohistochemical staining of numerous tissue slices, require more material than is typically present in an early STIC. Thus, ECM changes that occur during STIC development remain largely unexplored. Building upon the human fallopian tube matrisome identified in Fig. 1, we aimed to investigate differences in the ECM of STICs vs benign fallopian tube tissue using multispectral immunofluorescence, which enables multiplexed visualization of ECM components (Fig. 2; Supplemental Fig. 4) and is thus advantageous for scarce samples. We elected to examine ECM components that are commonly used for in vitro models of disease 31 to provide a foundation for future studies that mimic the earliest stages of HGSOC. This included fibrillar type I collagen, basement membrane type IV collagen, pan-laminin, and the glycosaminoglycan HA. We also examined proteins that are closely associated with these components in the native ECM: fibrillar type III collagen, the basement membrane proteoglycan HSPG2, the proteoglycan VCAN, and fibronectin. The seven matrisome proteins were detected with high confidence in our proteomic analysis of the ECM of benign fallopian tube as well as in the global proteomic studies of human fallopian tubes (see above); although HA cannot be detected by proteomics, it has been shown to be upregulated in the cancer microenvironment.32,33 In addition to analyzing differences in the ECM composition between benign and STIC patients, we examined differences in ECM levels in STIC regions vs non-STIC regions within the same patient (Supplemental Fig. 1). Despite the relative rarity of early STIC samples, we were able to profile each target in a minimum of seven unique patients for each category (benign, non-STIC, and STIC regions).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Differential levels of ECM in fimbriae of benign vs STIC patients. (A) Representative multispectral staining for DNA (DAPI), P53, and ECM components: type I collagen (Coll I, red), type III collagen (Coll III, green), type IV collagen (Coll IV, blue), and pan-laminin (Lam, magenta) from a benign sample and non-STIC and STIC region from an STIC patient. (B) Representative multispectral staining for DNA (DAPI), P53, and ECM components: FN (red), HA (green), HSPG2 (blue), and VCAN (magenta) from a benign sample and non-STIC and STIC region from an STIC patient. Scale bar = 100 µm. Abbreviations: ECM, extracellular matrix; STIC, serous intraepithelial carcinoma; FN, fibronectin; HA, hyaluronan; HSPG2, perlecan; VCAN, versican; DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.

Distribution of Collagens in STIC ECM

Examination of staining for type I, type III, and type IV collagens indicated that these proteins were present in both the epithelial and stromal regions of benign fallopian tube/fimbriae, non-STIC regions, and STICs (Figs. 2A and 3A). To define the ECM changes occurring in the epithelium and in the stroma immediately adjacent to the epithelium, we quantified the MFI of the multispectral ECM staining in selected regions of interest (Supplemental Fig. 2). Comparisons were made between benign and non-STIC tissue, between benign and STIC tissue (Fig. 3B), and between patient-matched non-STIC and STIC regions (Fig. 3C). In both the epithelial and stromal regions, the intensity of each ECM protein was similar for all comparisons. We noted that there was substantial variability in the levels of type IV collagen in STIC patients. Comparison of non-STIC with STIC regions within the same patient showed a non-significant trend of decreased type IV collagen in STICs (Fig. 3C). We next examined the potential for changes in ECM localization by calculating the ratio of the epithelial to stromal signal for each protein. Consistent with other tissues,3436 the E:S ratio of benign tissue indicated that type I collagen was more abundant in the stroma (E:S less than 1.0), whereas type III and type IV collagens were distributed nearly evenly between the epithelia and stromal regions (E:S approximately 1.0). Interestingly, the E:S ratios of type III and type IV collagens were significantly decreased in STICs relative to benign tissue (Fig. 3B) and showed a similar, but not significant, trend of decreasing between patient-matched STIC and non-STIC regions (Fig. 3C). Given the limited number of matched samples, it is difficult to be certain whether the change in E:S resulted from loss of epithelial type III and type IV collagens or an increase in stromal type III and type IV collagens; regardless, these results suggest a relative enrichment in stromal collagens compared with benign or non-STIC regions.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Differential levels of collagens in STICs. (A) Representative multispectral staining of fimbriae for type I, type III, and type IV collagens in benign (B), non-STIC (NS), or STIC (S) regions. Scale bar = 200 µm. (B) Quantification of epithelial MFI, stromal MFI, and epithelial:stromal ratio (E:S ratio) of collagen I, collagen III, or collagen IV in benign (B), non-STIC (NS), or STIC (S) regions. Data are presented as a box plot indicating median and range; dashed line demonstrates E:S = 1. *p< 0.05 for S compared with B by Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s multiple comparison posttest. n=10 (B), 8 (NS), and 7 (S). (C) Epithelial MFI, stromal MFI, and E:S ratio of patient-matched NS and S regions (indicated by connecting lines). Dashed line demonstrates E:S = 1. *p<0.05 by Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test. n=4 patients. Abbreviations: STIC, serous intraepithelial carcinoma; MFI, mean fluorescent signal intensity.

Distribution of Proteoglycans and Glycosaminoglycans in the STIC ECM

Multispectral staining indicated the presence of HA, HSPG2, and VCAN in epithelial and stromal regions of benign fallopian tube/fimbriae, non-STIC regions, and STICs (Figs. 2B and 4A). The levels of HA and HSPG2 were not significantly different for any direct comparisons of epithelial and stromal regions (Fig. 4B and C). Although VCAN did not show a difference in either epithelial or stromal regions when comparing across all patients, there was a significant decrease in epithelial VCAN between patient-matched STIC regions relative to non-STIC regions (Fig. 4C). In benign tissue, analysis of the E:S ratio showed that HA and HSPG2 levels were both similar across the epithelia and stroma, whereas VCAN was more abundant in the epithelia compared with the stroma (Fig. 4B). Although the E:S ratio for HA was consistent across the three tissue types, HSPG2 and VCAN exhibited lower E:S ratios in STICs compared with benign tissue (Fig. 4B) and in STICs compared with non-STIC regions of patient-matched tissues (Fig. 4C). For HSPG2, examination of the individual samples suggests this is due to loss of epithelial production, as all but one patient had a decrease in epithelial HSPG2 (Fig. 4C; note that the outlier had increases in both epithelial and stromal HSPG2 but an overall drop in the E:S ratio). As noted above, the decrease in epithelial VCAN was statistically significant between matched samples, confirming that the decreased E:S ratio resulted from relative depletion of VCAN in the epithelial layer.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Differential levels of proteoglycans and GAGs in STICs. (A) Representative multispectral staining of hyaluronan, perlecan, or versican in benign (B), non-STIC (NS), and STIC (S) regions. Scale bar = 200 µm. (B) Quantification of epithelial MFI, stromal MFI, and epithelial:stromal ratio (E:S ratio) of hyaluronan, perlecan, or versican in B, NS, or S regions. Data are presented as box plots indicating median and range; dashed line demonstrates E:S = 1. *p<0.05 for S compared with B by Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s multiple comparison posttest. n=10 (B), 11 (NS), and 8 (S). (C) Epithelial MFI, stromal MFI, and E:S ratio of patient-matched NS and S regions (indicated by connecting lines). Dashed line demonstrates E:S = 1. *p<0.05 by Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test. n=8 patients. Abbreviations: GAG, glycosaminoglycans; STIC, serous intraepithelial carcinoma; MFI, mean fluorescent signal intensity.

Distribution of Glycoproteins in STIC ECM

Laminin was observed in multispectral staining of epithelial and stromal regions of benign fallopian tube/fimbriae, non-STIC regions, and STICs (Figs. 2A and 5A). Laminin in epithelial and stromal regions was not different between all comparisons (Fig. 5B and C). The E:S ratio showed that laminin was evenly distributed in the epithelia relative to the stroma of benign tissue (Fig. 5B). Interestingly, laminin had a higher E S ratio in non-STIC tissue vs benign tissue, but no difference was observed in STIC tissue compared with benign (Fig. 5B) or between matched non-STIC and STIC regions (Fig. 5C).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Differential levels of glycoproteins in STICs. (A) Representative multispectral staining of laminins and fibronectin in benign (B), non-STIC (NS), and STIC (S) regions. Scale bar = 200 µm. (B) Quantification of epithelial MFI, stromal MFI, and epithelial:stromal ratio (E:S ratio) of laminins and fibronectin in B, NS, or S regions. Data are presented as box plots indicating median and range; dashed line demonstrates E:S = 1. * p<0.05 for S compared with B by Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s multiple comparison posttest. For laminins, n=10 (B), 8 (NS), and 7 (S); for fibronectin, n=10 (B), 11 (NS), and 8 (S). (C) Epithelial MFI, stromal MFI, and E:S ratio of patient-matched NS and S regions (indicated by connecting lines). Dashed line demonstrates E:S = 1, *p<0.05 by Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test. n=4 patients for laminin, n=8 patients. Abbreviations: STIC, serous intraepithelial carcinoma; MFI, mean fluorescent signal intensity.

The presence of fibronectin was observed in multispectral staining of epithelial and stromal regions of benign fallopian tube/fimbriae, non-STIC regions, and STICs (Figs. 2B and 5A). Analysis of epithelial regions showed that levels of fibronectin were unchanged in all comparisons (Fig. 5B and C). In the stroma, the levels of fibronectin did not significantly differ when comparing benign tissue with either non-STIC tissue or STIC tissue (Fig. 5B). However, stromal levels of fibronectin were significantly higher in STIC regions compared with non-STIC regions of patient-matched samples (Fig. 5C). Calculation of the E:S ratio demonstrated wide variation in fibronectin distribution across samples, but fibronectin was generally higher in the stroma (median E:S ratio ~0.6; Fig. 5B). The E:S ratio was significantly lower in STIC tissue compared with benign (Fig. 5B) or compared with non-STIC regions of patient-matched tissue (Fig. 5C). Given the increased levels of stromal fibronectin that were observed in patient-matched samples, it is likely that the relative enrichment of fibronectin in the stromal region during early disease is due to increased stromal fibronectin rather than loss of epithelial fibronectin.

Discussion

The ECM has been shown to be altered in early tumors, leading to effects on cellular behavior that support cancer progression.31,37 Therefore, we sought to characterize the ECM microenvironment of the human fallopian tube and examine how the ECM is altered in early STICs. We first conducted a meta-analysis of several global proteomic datasets that included benign fallopian tubes 19 or the histologically normal fallopian tube tissue from patients with metastatic HGSOC.18,20,21 We then characterized the matrisome of a benign human fallopian tube using the MS pipeline we previously developed. 22 A comparison of the overlap between these datasets demonstrated a large overlap for core matrisome proteins. This finding suggests that matrisome annotation of global proteomic datasets such as data generated by the National Cancer Institute Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC, https://proteomics.cancer.gov/programs/cptac) could be useful to identify changes in the matrisome during tumor progression. In addition to the HGSOC tumors analyzed here, CPTAC has characterized the proteomes of over 3000 samples from 12 tumor types using a standardized method.

Importantly, the meta-analysis revealed a large number of matrisome-associated proteins that were not identified in our insoluble matrix-enriched sample. This finding is perhaps not surprising as some of these proteins may be at much higher abundance intracellularly than in the matrix. It will be interesting to further fractionate peptide samples, for example, using basic reversed-phase LC,22,25 to identify proteins present in lower abundance in the insoluble ECM scaffold, such as growth factors or cytokines, to determine which of these factors could regulate the microenvironment. Although a recent study of the ampullar region of the fallopian tube demonstrated minimal changes between the luteal and follicular phase for six ECM analytes, 16 there remains the potential for patient-to-patient variability with respect to age and hormonal status (i.e., pre- vs postmenopausal, hormonal interventions, and menstrual cycle stage). To clarify the impact of these variables on the matrisome, a larger bank of benign fallopian tube samples could be collected and analyzed.

Comparison of the matrisome from the insoluble matrix-enriched sample to the global proteomic data identified seven additional proteins: collagens (COL2A1, COL4A5, COL16A1), glycoproteins (elastin, α chain of laminin 5), annexin A2, and PAI1. mRNA expression of all but COL2A1 has been reported in benign human fallopian tubes (www.proteinatlas.org). 38 Interestingly, several of these proteins have been linked to later stage events in HGSOC metastasis. Annexin A2 is found both intracellularly and in the stroma of metastatic HGSOC at higher levels than normal ovarian tissue, with potential roles in metastatic adhesion and invasion into the peritoneum. 39 Annexin A2 has also been shown recently to have potential as a biomarker for ovarian cancer, as levels in the blood were elevated in patients with stage I or II disease relative to healthy controls and benign tumors. 40 PAI-1 levels have been shown to correlate with peritoneal metastasis and a worse prognosis in HGSOC. 41 LAMA5 has been shown to be expressed in endometrioid ovarian cancer 42 and ovarian clear cell carcinoma, 43 but to our knowledge has not been described in HGSOC. Decreased COL2A1 expression 44 and elevated COL16A1 expression45,46 have been correlated to poor prognosis in HGSOC. Finally, one study demonstrated a decrease in tropoelastin expression in ovarian tumors relative to normal ovarian tissue. 47 We would emphasize that many of these studies utilized ovarian tissue as a comparison; therefore, much remains to be learned about the role of these proteins in the normal fallopian tube and in the early development of HGSOC tumors of tubal origin.

We utilized the overlap between global proteomics and our matrisome-specific analysis to identify targets to characterize by multispectral imaging in benign tissue and STICs. Our results demonstrated that there were no significant differences in epithelial or stromal ECM levels between benign tissue and non-STIC regions from patients with STICs. However, it is unclear whether this conclusion would hold as the number and size of STICs increased, or after the onset of metastasis and the accumulation of ascites. Indeed, prior work from our lab has demonstrated that soluble factors in the ascites are capable of increasing ECM deposition in tissue that is distal from the tumor mass. 48 Therefore, further characterization of the STIC matrisome should rely on tissues acquired in the absence of tumors. Our results also demonstrated substantial variation in the levels of several ECM components, particularly in STICs. We therefore relied on the ability to use patient-matched STIC and non-STIC regions to control for variables such as age and hormonal status. These comparisons identified three variations: decreased VCAN in the STIC epithelium, increased fibronectin in the STIC stroma, and a trend toward increased ECM in the stroma relative to the epithelium in STICs for type III collagen, type IV collagen, HSPG2, VCAN, and fibronectin.

Increased stromal matrix is a common feature of many tumors 37 and is commonly associated with the production of increased matrix by cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). 49 To our knowledge, the CAF phenotype has not been observed in early STICs; in addition, the stroma that was characterized in our studies was immediately proximal to the epithelial layer and may result from changes in ECM expression and remodeling within the fallopian tube epithelium. The observation of increased fibronectin in the stroma of these precursor lesions is consistent with findings from matrisome characterization of metastatic HGSOC, where fibronectin showed the greatest fold change when comparing omental tumors and omentum from stage I/II disease that has not spread throughout the peritoneum. 50 A potential role for fibronectin has been reported in the transition from STIC to ovarian tumor, 51 and mouse oviductal epithelial cells have been shown to adhere to fibronectin. 52

Intriguingly, our results demonstrated a decrease in VCAN in the fimbriae epithelium while there were minimal changes in stromal levels. In contrast, prior work has demonstrated an increase in VCAN in many tumor types (including HGSOC), 53 with elevated levels a prognostic indicator in some solid tumors. 54 In general, reduction in VCAN has been shown to decrease cell proliferation and increase apoptosis,55,56 as well as increase inflammation, 57 responses that would be associated with a protumorigenic role for VCAN. However, the effects of VCAN have also been observed to be antitumorigenic, which may result from expression of different isoforms. For example, the V3 isoform has been shown to hinder proliferation and metastasis in melanoma.58,59 Prior examination of VCAN in ovarian cancer has focused on the advanced stages of disease. In this setting, VCAN expression has been shown to be important for the adhesion and disaggregation of ovarian cancer spheroids at metastatic sites. 60 Although further work will be needed to elucidate the potential effects of decreased VCAN on STIC formation, the literature does suggest two possibilities. First, VCAN has been described as “anti-adhesive” in that it can interfere with binding to fibronectin6163 and retention of HA. 64 Therefore, the combination of increased stromal fibronectin with decreased epithelial VCAN may alter cellular organization and set the stage for epithelial cells to develop the multilayered structure characteristic of an STIC. Second, VCAN can impact expression of both E-cadherin and N-cadherin65,66 which could impact cellular organization of the STIC.

In conclusion, out study resulted in the first matrisome-specific characterization of the human fallopian tube. Using this information and an imaging analysis method appropriate for small, clinical samples, we identified changes in the epithelial:stromal abundance of several ECM proteins, increased stromal fibronectin, and decreased epithelial VCAN in STICs. These results suggest that similar approaches will be useful to identify changes in the ECM of other early tumors that have limited sample material.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-6-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 – Supplemental material for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas

Supplemental material, sj-docx-6-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas by Carine Renner, Clarissa Gomez, Mike R. Visetsouk, Isra Taha, Aisha Khan, Stephanie M. McGregor, Paul Weisman, Alexandra Naba, Kristyn S. Masters and Pamela K. Kreeger in Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry

sj-pdf-1-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 – Supplemental material for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas by Carine Renner, Clarissa Gomez, Mike R. Visetsouk, Isra Taha, Aisha Khan, Stephanie M. McGregor, Paul Weisman, Alexandra Naba, Kristyn S. Masters and Pamela K. Kreeger in Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry

sj-xlsx-2-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 – Supplemental material for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas

Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-2-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas by Carine Renner, Clarissa Gomez, Mike R. Visetsouk, Isra Taha, Aisha Khan, Stephanie M. McGregor, Paul Weisman, Alexandra Naba, Kristyn S. Masters and Pamela K. Kreeger in Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry

sj-xlsx-3-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 – Supplemental material for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas

Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-3-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas by Carine Renner, Clarissa Gomez, Mike R. Visetsouk, Isra Taha, Aisha Khan, Stephanie M. McGregor, Paul Weisman, Alexandra Naba, Kristyn S. Masters and Pamela K. Kreeger in Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry

sj-xlsx-4-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 – Supplemental material for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas

Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-4-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas by Carine Renner, Clarissa Gomez, Mike R. Visetsouk, Isra Taha, Aisha Khan, Stephanie M. McGregor, Paul Weisman, Alexandra Naba, Kristyn S. Masters and Pamela K. Kreeger in Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry

sj-xlsx-5-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 – Supplemental material for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas

Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-5-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas by Carine Renner, Clarissa Gomez, Mike R. Visetsouk, Isra Taha, Aisha Khan, Stephanie M. McGregor, Paul Weisman, Alexandra Naba, Kristyn S. Masters and Pamela K. Kreeger in Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry

Acknowledgments

We thank the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center Experimental Pathology Laboratory and the University of Wisconsin Optical Imaging Core supported by NIH5P30CA014520. We also would like to thank Dr. Hui Chen and Dr. Sunil Hwang from the Mass Spectrometry Core facility at the University of Illinois at Chicago for their technical assistance. We thank the members of the Kreeger, Masters, and Naba laboratories for helpful discussions with this manuscript.

Footnotes

Competing Interest: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: P.K.K. has a sponsored research agreement with Novartis International AG related to research that is not included in this study. A.N. has a sponsored research agreement with Boehringer-Ingelheim related to research that is not included in this study. C.R., C.G., M.R.V., I.T., A.K., S.M.M., P.W., and K.S.M. declare no competing interests.

Author Contributions: CR, AN, KSM, and PKK designed the study; PW and SMM identified clinically appropriate samples and helped with data interpretation; CG, IT, and AN conducted the analysis and experiments for Fig. 1 and prepared Fig. 1 and associated supplementals; CR conducted the experiments for Figs. 2–5 and associated supplemental materials; MRV and AK did the quantification in Figs. 3–5 and associated supplementals; MRV and PKK prepared Figs. 2–5 and associated supplementals; and CR, CG, MRV, AN, KSM, and PKK wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Funding for this project was provided by a pilot award from NIH P30CA014520-46 (K.S.M.) and NIH R01CA232517 (P.K.K., K.S.M., A.N.). Proteomics services were provided by the UIC Research Resources Center Mass spectrometry Core which was established in part by a grant from The Searle Funds at the Chicago Community Trust to the Chicago Biomedical Consortium. I.N.T. is the recipient of a UIC Honors College Research Grant. I.N.T. and C.G. are recipients of awards from the LAS Undergraduate Research Initiative (LASURI) at UIC. The funders had no role in study design, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate: This study was reviewed by the University of Wisconsin IRB and declared to be not human subjects research as all materials were deidentified.

Availability of Data and Materials: The mass spectrometry dataset generated during this study has been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/archive/projects/PXD023707) via the ProteomeXchange repository with the identifier PXD023707 and the Project DOI: 10.6019/PXD023707. Materials generated during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Literature Cited

  • 1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2021. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bowtell DD, Bohm S, Ahmed AA, Aspuria PJ, Bast RC, Jr, Beral V, Berek JS, Birrer MJ, Blagden S, Bookman MA, Brenton JD, Chiappinelli KB, Martins FC, Coukos G, Drapkin R, Edmondson R, Fotopoulou C, Gabra H, Galon J, Gourley C, Heong V, Huntsman DG, Iwanicki M, Karlan BY, Kaye A, Lengyel E, Levine DA, Lu KH, McNeish IA, Menon U, Narod SA, Nelson BH, Nephew KP, Pharoah P, Powell DJ, Jr, Ramos P, Romero IL, Scott CL, Sood AK, Stronach EA, Balkwill FR. Rethinking ovarian cancer II: reducing mortality from high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15(11):668–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Lee Y, Miron A, Drapkin R, Nucci MR, Medeiros F, Saleemuddin A, Garber J, Birch C, Mou H, Gordon RW, Cramer DW, McKeon FD, Crum CP. A candidate precursor to serous carcinoma that originates in the distal fallopian tube. J Pathol. 2007;211(1):26–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Perets R, Wyant GA, Muto KW, Bijron JG, Poole BB, Chin KT, Chen JY, Ohman AW, Stepule CD, Kwak S, Karst AM, Hirsch MS, Setlur SR, Crum CP, Dinulescu DM, Drapkin R. Transformation of the fallopian tube secretory epithelium leads to high-grade serous ovarian cancer in brca;Tp53; Pten models. Cancer Cell. 2013;24(6):751–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Ducie J, Dao F, Considine M, Olvera N, Shaw PA, Kurman RJ, Shih IM, Soslow RA, Cope L, Levine DA. Molecular analysis of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma with and without associated serous tubal intra-epithelial carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kuhn E, Kurman RJ, Vang R, Sehdev AS, Han G, Soslow R, Wang TL, Shih Ie M. TP53 mutations in serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma and concurrent pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma–evidence supporting the clonal relationship of the two lesions. J Pathol. 2012;226(3):421–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Labidi-Galy SI, Papp E, Hallberg D, Niknafs N, Adleff V, Noe M, Bhattacharya R, Novak M, Jones S, Phallen J, Hruban CA, Hirsch MS, Lin DI, Schwartz L, Maire CL, Tille JC, Bowden M, Ayhan A, Wood LD, Scharpf RB, Kurman R, Wang TL, Shih IM, Karchin R, Drapkin R, Velculescu VE. High grade serous ovarian carcinomas originate in the fallopian tube. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Bonnans C, Chou J, Werb Z. Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15(12):786–801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Kai F, Drain AP, Weaver VM. The extracellular matrix modulates the metastatic journey. Dev Cell. 2019;49(3):332–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Cho A, Howell VM, Colvin EK. The extracellular matrix in epithelial ovarian cancer—a piece of a puzzle. Front Oncol. 2015;5:245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ricciardelli C, Rodgers RJ. Extracellular matrix of ovarian tumors. Semin Reprod Med. 2006;24(4):270–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Fleszar AJ, Walker A, Porubsky VL, Flanigan W, James D, Campagnola PJ, Weisman PS, Kreeger PK. The extracellular matrix of ovarian cortical inclusion cysts modulates invasion of fallopian tube epithelial cells. APL Bioeng. 2018;2:031902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Rentchler EC, Gant KL, Drapkin R, Patankar M, Campagnola PJ. Imaging collagen alterations in STICs and high grade ovarian cancers in the fallopian tubes by second harmonic generation microscopy. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(11):1805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. van der Steen S, Bulten J, Van de Vijver KK, van Kuppevelt TH, Massuger L. Changes in the extracellular matrix are associated with the development of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma into high-grade serous carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017;27(6):1072–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Pudelko A, Wisowski G, Olczyk K, Kozma EM. The dual role of the glycosaminoglycan chondroitin-6-sulfate in the development, progression and metastasis of cancer. FEBS J. 2019;286(10):1815–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Godoy-Guzman C, Nunez C, Orihuela P, Campos A, Carriel V. Distribution of extracellular matrix molecules in human uterine tubes during the menstrual cycle: a histological and immunohistochemical analysis. J Anat. 2018;233(1):73–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Przybycin CG, Kurman RJ, Ronnett BM, Shih Ie M, Vang R. Are all pelvic (nonuterine) serous carcinomas of tubal origin? Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34(10):1407–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Eckert MA, Coscia F, Chryplewicz A, Chang JW, Hernandez KM, Pan S, Tienda SM, Nahotko DA, Li G, Blazenovic I, Lastra RR, Curtis M, Yamada SD, Perets R, McGregor SM, Andrade J, Fiehn O, Moellering RE, Mann M, Lengyel E. Proteomics reveals NNMT as a master metabolic regulator of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Nature. 2019;569(7758):723–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Wang C, Liu Y, Chang C, Wu S, Gao J, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Zhong F, Deng G. Human fallopian tube proteome shows high coverage of mesenchymal stem cells associated proteins. Biosci Rep. 2016;36(1):e00297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Hu Y, Pan J, Shah P, Ao M, Thomas SN, Liu Y, Chen L, Schnaubelt M, Clark DJ, Rodriguez H, Boja ES, Hiltke T, Kinsinger CR, Rodland KD, Li QK, Qian J, Zhang Z, Chan DW, Zhang H. Integrated proteomic and glycoproteomic characterization of human high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Cell Rep. 2020;33(3):108276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. McDermott JE, Arshad OA, Petyuk VA, Fu Y, Gritsenko MA, Clauss TR, Moore RJ, Schepmoes AA, Zhao R, Monroe ME, Schnaubelt M, Tsai CF, Payne SH, Huang C, Wang LB, Foltz S, Wyczalkowski M, Wu Y, Song E, Brewer MA, Thiagarajan M, Kinsinger CR, Robles AI, Boja ES, Rodriguez H, Chan DW, Zhang B, Zhang Z, Ding L, Smith RD, Liu T, Rodland KD. Proteogenomic characterization of ovarian HGSC implicates mitotic kinases, replication stress in observed chromosomal instability. Cell Rep Med. 2020;1(1):100004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Naba A, Clauser KR, Hoersch S, Liu H, Carr SA, Hynes RO. The matrisome: in silico definition and in vivo characterization by proteomics of normal and tumor extracellular matrices. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11(4):M111.014647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Naba A, Clauser KR, Ding H, Whittaker CA, Carr SA, Hynes RO. The extracellular matrix: tools and insights for the “omics” era. Matrix Biol. 2016;49:10–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Naba A, Clauser KR, Hynes RO. Enrichment of extracellular matrix proteins from tissues and digestion into peptides for mass spectrometry analysis. J Vis Exp. 2015;101:e53057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Naba A, Pearce OMT, Del Rosario A, Ma D, Ding H, Rajeeve V, Cutillas PR, Balkwill FR, Hynes RO. Characterization of the extracellular matrix of normal and diseased tissues using proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2017;16(8):3083–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Nesvizhskii AI, Keller A, Kolker E, Aebersold R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2003;75(17):4646–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Deutsch EW, Bandeira N, Sharma V, Perez-Riverol Y, Carver JJ, Kundu DJ, Garcia-Seisdedos D, Jarnuczak AF, Hewapathirana S, Pullman BS, Wertz J, Sun Z, Kawano S, Okuda S, Watanabe Y, Hermjakob H, MacLean B, MacCoss MJ, Zhu Y, Ishihama Y, Vizcaíno JA. The ProteomeXchange consortium in 2020: enabling “big data” approaches in proteomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(D1):D1145–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Perez-Riverol Y, Csordas A, Bai J, Bernal-Llinares M, Hewapathirana S, Kundu DJ, Inuganti A, Griss J, Mayer G, Eisenacher M, Pérez E, Uszkoreit J, Pfeuffer J, Sachsenberg T, Yılmaz Ş, Tiwary S, Cox J, Audain E, Walzer M, Jarnuczak AF, Ternent T, Brazma A, Vizcaíno JA. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D442–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Carroll MJ, Fogg KC, Patel HA, Krause HB, Mancha AS, Patankar MS, Weisman PS, Barroilhet L, Kreeger PK. Alternatively activated macrophages upregulate mesothelial expression of P-selectin to enhance adhesion of ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2018;78:3560–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Taha IN, Naba A. Exploring the extracellular matrix in health and disease using proteomics. Essays Biochem. 2019;63(3):417–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Micek HM, Visetsouk MR, Masters KS, Kreeger PK. Engineering the extracellular matrix to model the evolving tumor microenvironment. iScience. 2020;23(11):101742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Laurich C, Wheeler MA, Iida J, Neudauer CL, McCarthy JB, Bullard KM. Hyaluronan mediates adhesion of metastatic colon carcinoma cells. J Surg Res. 2004;122(1):70–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Kosaki R, Watanabe K, Yamaguchi Y. Overproduction of hyaluronan by expression of the hyaluronan synthase Has2 enhances anchorage-independent growth and tumorigenicity. Cancer Res. 1999;59(5):1141–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Vellinga TT, den Uil S, Rinkes IH, Marvin D, Ponsioen B, Alvarez-Varela A, Fatrai S, Scheele C, Zwijnenburg DA, Snippert H, Vermeulen L, Medema JP, Stockmann HB, Koster J, Fijneman RJ, de Rooij J, Kranenburg O. Collagen-rich stroma in aggressive colon tumors induces mesenchymal gene expression and tumor cell invasion. Oncogene. 2016;35(40):5263–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Varghese SS, Sarojini SB, George GB, Vinod S, Mathew P, Babu A, Sebastian J. Evaluation and comparison of the biopathology of collagen and inflammation in the extracellular matrix of oral epithelial dysplasias and inflammatory fibrous hyperplasia using picrosirius red stain and polarising microscopy: a preliminary study. J Cancer Prev. 2015;20(4):275–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Nissen NI, Karsdal M, Willumsen N. Collagens and cancer associated fibroblasts in the reactive stroma and its relation to cancer biology. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Uhlen M, Fagerberg L, Hallstrom BM, Lindskog C, Oksvold P, Mardinoglu A, Sivertsson A, Kampf C, Sjostedt E, Asplund A, Olsson I, Edlund K, Lundberg E, Navani S, Szigyarto CA, Odeberg J, Djureinovic D, Takanen JO, Hober S, Alm T, Edqvist PH, Berling H, Tegel H, Mulder J, Rockberg J, Nilsson P, Schwenk JM, Hamsten M, von Feilitzen K, Forsberg M, Persson L, Johansson F, Zwahlen M, von Heijne G, Nielsen J, Pontén F. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science. 2015;347(6220):1260419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Lokman NA, Elder AS, Ween MP, Pyragius CE, Hoffmann P, Oehler MK, Ricciardelli C. Annexin A2 is regulated by ovarian cancer-peritoneal cell interactions and promotes metastasis. Oncotarget. 2013;4(8):1199–211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Lokman NA, Ricciardelli C, Stephens AN, Jobling TW, Hoffmann P, Oehler MK. Diagnostic value of plasma annexin A2 in early-stage high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(1):69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Peng Y, Kajiyama H, Yuan H, Nakamura K, Yoshihara M, Yokoi A, Fujikake K, Yasui H, Yoshikawa N, Suzuki S, Senga T, Shibata K, Kikkawa F. PAI-1 secreted from metastatic ovarian cancer cells triggers the tumor-promoting role of the mesothelium in a feedback loop to accelerate peritoneal dissemination. Cancer Lett. 2019;442:181–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Bekos C, Muqaku B, Dekan S, Horvat R, Polterauer S, Gerner C, Aust S, Pils D. NECTIN4 (PVRL4) as putative therapeutic target for a specific subtype of high grade serous ovarian cancer-an integrative multi-omics approach. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(5):698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Kobayashi H, Sugimoto H, Onishi S, Nakano K. Novel biomarker candidates for the diagnosis of ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Oncol Lett. 2015;10(2):612–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Ganapathi MK, Jones WD, Sehouli J, Michener CM, Braicu IE, Norris EJ, Biscotti CV, Vaziri SA, Ganapathi RN. Expression profile of COL2A1 and the pseudogene SLC6A10P predicts tumor recurrence in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer. 2016;138(3):679–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Pan X, Ma X. A novel six-gene signature for prognosis prediction in ovarian cancer. Front Genet. 2020;11:1006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Li M, Cheng X, Rong R, Gao Y, Tang X, Chen Y. High expression of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) predicts poor outcome in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):1032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Manders DB, Kishore HA, Gazdar AF, Keller PW, Tsunezumi J, Yanagisawa H, Lea J, Word RA. Dysregulation of fibulin-5 and matrix metalloproteases in epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncotarget. 2018;9(18):14251–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Fogg KC, Renner CM, Christian H, Walker A, Marty-Santos L, Khan A, Olson WR, Parent C, O’Shea A, Wellik DM, Weisman PS, Kreeger PK. Ovarian cells have increased proliferation in response to heparin-binding epidermal growth factor as collagen density increases. Tissue Eng Part A. 2020;26(13–4):747–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Sahai E, Astsaturov I, Cukierman E, DeNardo DG, Egeblad M, Evans RM, Fearon D, Greten FR, Hingorani SR, Hunter T, Hynes RO, Jain RK, Janowitz T, Jorgensen C, Kimmelman AC, Kolonin MG, Maki RG, Powers RS, Puré E, Ramirez DC, Scherz-Shouval R, Sherman MH, Stewart S, Tlsty TD, Tuveson DA, Watt FM, Weaver V, Weeraratna AT, Werb Z. A framework for advancing our understanding of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020;20(3):174–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Pearce OMT, Delaine-Smith RM, Maniati E, Nichols S, Wang J, Bohm S, Rajeeve V, Ullah D, Chakravarty P, Jones RR, Montfort A, Dowe T, Gribben J, Jones JL, Kocher HM, Serody JS, Vincent BG, Connelly J, Brenton JD, Chelala C, Cutillas PR, Lockley M, Bessant C, Knight MM, Balkwill FR. Deconstruction of a metastatic tumor microenvironment reveals a common matrix response in human cancers. Cancer Discov. 2018;8(3):304–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Doberstein K, Spivak R, Feng Y, Stuckelberger S, Mills GB, Devins KM, Schwartz LE, Iwanicki MP, Fogel M, Altevogt P, Drapkin R. Fallopian tube precursor lesions of serous ovarian carcinoma require L1CAM for dissemination and metastasis. bioRxiv. 2018. doi: 10.1101/270785. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Dean M, Jin V, Russo A, Lantvit DD, Burdette JE. Exposure of the extracellular matrix and colonization of the ovary in metastasis of fallopian-tube-derived cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2019;40(1):41–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Ghosh S, Albitar L, LeBaron R, Welch WR, Samimi G, Birrer MJ, Berkowitz RS, Mok SC. Up-regulation of stromal versican expression in advanced stage serous ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;119(1):114–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Shen XH, Lin WR, Xu MD, Qi P, Dong L, Zhang QY, Ni SJ, Weng WW, Tan C, Huang D, Ma YQ, Zhang W, Sheng WQ, Wang YQ, Du X. Prognostic significance of versican expression in gastric adenocarcinoma. Oncogenesis. 2015;4:e178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Papadas A, Asimakopoulos F. Versican in the tumor microenvironment. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1272:55–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Papadas A, Arauz G, Cicala A, Wiesner J, Asimakopoulos F. Versican and versican-matrikines in cancer progression, inflammation, and immunity. J Histochem Cytochem. 2020;68(12):871–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Kim S, Takahashi H, Lin WW, Descargues P, Grivennikov S, Kim Y, Luo JL, Karin M. Carcinoma-produced factors activate myeloid cells through TLR2 to stimulate metastasis. Nature. 2009;457(7225):102–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Serra M, Miquel L, Domenzain C, Docampo MJ, Fabra A, Wight TN, Bassols A. V3 versican isoform expression alters the phenotype of melanoma cells and their tumorigenic potential. Int J Cancer. 2005;114(6):879–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Miquel-Serra L, Serra M, Hernandez D, Domenzain C, Docampo MJ, Rabanal RM, de Torres I, Wight TN, Fabra A, Bassols A. V3 versican isoform expression has a dual role in human melanoma tumor growth and metastasis. Lab Invest. 2006;86(9):889–901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Desjardins M, Xie J, Gurler H, Muralidhar GG, Sacks JD, Burdette JE, Barbolina MV. Versican regulates metastasis of epithelial ovarian carcinoma cells and spheroids. J Ovarian Res. 2014;7:70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Sakko AJ, Ricciardelli C, Mayne K, Suwiwat S, LeBaron RG, Marshall VR, Tilley WD, Horsfall DJ. Modulation of prostate cancer cell attachment to matrix by versican. Cancer Res. 2003;63(16):4786–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Touab M, Villena J, Barranco C, Arumi-Uria M, Bassols A. Versican is differentially expressed in human melanoma and may play a role in tumor development. Am J Pathol. 2002;160(2):549–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Braunewell KH, Pesheva P, McCarthy JB, Furcht LT, Schmitz B, Schachner M. Functional involvement of sciatic nerve-derived versican- and decorin-like molecules and other chondroitin sulphate proteoglycans in ECM-mediated cell adhesion and neurite outgrowth. Eur J Neurosci. 1995;7(4):805–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Keire PA, Bressler SL, Lemire JM, Edris B, Rubin BP, Rahmani M, McManus BM, van de Rijn M, Wight TN. A role for versican in the development of leiomyosarcoma. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(49):34089–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Sheng W, Wang G, La Pierre DP, Wen J, Deng Z, Wong CK, Lee DY, Yang BB. Versican mediates mesenchymal-epithelial transition. Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17(4):2009–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Carthy JM, Meredith AJ, Boroomand S, Abraham T, Luo Z, Knight D, McManus BM. Versican V1 overexpression induces a myofibroblast-like phenotype in cultured fibroblasts. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):e0133056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

sj-docx-6-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 – Supplemental material for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas

Supplemental material, sj-docx-6-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas by Carine Renner, Clarissa Gomez, Mike R. Visetsouk, Isra Taha, Aisha Khan, Stephanie M. McGregor, Paul Weisman, Alexandra Naba, Kristyn S. Masters and Pamela K. Kreeger in Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry

sj-pdf-1-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 – Supplemental material for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas by Carine Renner, Clarissa Gomez, Mike R. Visetsouk, Isra Taha, Aisha Khan, Stephanie M. McGregor, Paul Weisman, Alexandra Naba, Kristyn S. Masters and Pamela K. Kreeger in Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry

sj-xlsx-2-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 – Supplemental material for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas

Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-2-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas by Carine Renner, Clarissa Gomez, Mike R. Visetsouk, Isra Taha, Aisha Khan, Stephanie M. McGregor, Paul Weisman, Alexandra Naba, Kristyn S. Masters and Pamela K. Kreeger in Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry

sj-xlsx-3-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 – Supplemental material for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas

Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-3-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas by Carine Renner, Clarissa Gomez, Mike R. Visetsouk, Isra Taha, Aisha Khan, Stephanie M. McGregor, Paul Weisman, Alexandra Naba, Kristyn S. Masters and Pamela K. Kreeger in Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry

sj-xlsx-4-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 – Supplemental material for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas

Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-4-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas by Carine Renner, Clarissa Gomez, Mike R. Visetsouk, Isra Taha, Aisha Khan, Stephanie M. McGregor, Paul Weisman, Alexandra Naba, Kristyn S. Masters and Pamela K. Kreeger in Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry

sj-xlsx-5-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 – Supplemental material for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas

Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-5-jhc-10.1369_00221554211061359 for Multi-modal Profiling of the Extracellular Matrix of Human Fallopian Tubes and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinomas by Carine Renner, Clarissa Gomez, Mike R. Visetsouk, Isra Taha, Aisha Khan, Stephanie M. McGregor, Paul Weisman, Alexandra Naba, Kristyn S. Masters and Pamela K. Kreeger in Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry


Articles from Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry are provided here courtesy of The Histochemical Society

RESOURCES