Skip to main content
Wolters Kluwer - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wolters Kluwer - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 Dec 27;149(2):373–374. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008749

Plastic Surgery Innovation through War, Disaster, and Pandemic

Kayla L Clodfelter 1, Brian Mailey 2, Aladdin H Hassanein 3,
PMCID: PMC8779604  NIHMSID: NIHMS1742313  PMID: 34958650

The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted the practice of medicine. Historically, the field of plastic surgery has been influenced by catastrophic events. Modern warfare in World War I resulted in mass casualties and survivors with deformities. Plastic surgery arose as a distinct specialty to restore form and function in these wounded soldiers.1 Subsequent crises have provided challenges to drive development of new plastic surgical solutions. The purpose of this study was to (1) assess innovations in plastic surgery that emerged from disasters and (2) identify possible ideas that may arise from the COVID-19 situation.

PubMed and Ovid databases were searched for articles documenting origination of plastic surgery ideas during a disaster using search terms “disaster,” “war,” “plastic,” “burn,” “terror,” and/or “novel.” Types of “disasters” were categorized as war, terrorism, accident, and natural disaster. Articles were included if they discussed novel therapies that emerged in association with the disaster.

Eighteen articles met inclusion criteria (Table 1). Eleven papers described innovations during war, including percutaneous fixation of hand fractures with use of Kirschner wires, delayed wound closure, cleft lip repair, vascular repair of traumatic injuries, mafenide acetate wound dressings, and portable negative-pressure wound therapy. Two publications described surgical staff collaboration modeling and recruitment from terrorist attacks. Our results show war was a significant contributor during the first half of the twentieth century; however, the last few decades show a shift toward other disaster types.

Table 1.

Articles Documenting Origination of Plastic Surgery Ideas during a Disaster

Innovation Disaster Date of Disaster
Tubed pedicle skin flap graft (Gillies, 1932; PMID: 20777210) WWI 1914–1918
Techniques for gender affirmation surgery (Gillies H, Millard DR. The Principles and Art of Plastic Surgery, Volume 2. Boston: Little, Brown; 1957) WWII 1939–1945
Delayed wound closure in compound hand fractures (Cleveland and Grove, 1945; ISSN: 0375-9229) WWII 1939–1945
Internal fixation of metacarpals with k-wire (Berkman and Miles, 1943; ISSN: 0375-9229) WWII 1939–1945
Hand surgery becomes distinct specialty (Carter, 2003; PMID: 12671847) WWII 1939–1945
Millard cleft lip repair (Baker, 2012; PMID: 22594134) Korean War 1950–1953
Vascular Repair of Acute Trauma in Upper Extremities (Jahnke and Seeley, 1953; PMID: 13066006) Korean War 1950–1953
K-wire bayonets (Brown, 1995; PMID: 7642952) Vietnam War 1955–1975
Sulfamylon (mafenide acetate) antibiotics for burns (Lindberg et al., 1965; PMID: 5318146) Vietnam War 1955–1975
Artery anastomosis débridement to grossly normal tissue (Whelan, 1975; PMID: 1101399) Vietnam War 1955–1975
Portable negative-pressure therapy (Couch and Stojadinovic, 2011; PMID: 21200282) War in Afghanistan 2001–Present
Collaboration model of surgical staff for mass casualties (Caterson et al., 2013; PMID: 23851738) Boston Marathon bombing 2013
Social networking for rapid recruitment of surgical staff (Gregory et al., 2016; PMID: 27578051) Paris, France, terrorist attack 2015
Leap motor control improves hand function in burn victims (Wu et al., 2019; PMID: 30322737) Fun Coast dust explosion 2015
Cultured epithelial autograft in mass disaster (Matsumura et al., 2016; PMID: 26818956) Fun Coast dust explosion 2015
Cultured epithelial autograft device for resource-poor areas (Serena et al., 2015; PMID: 25658643) Haiti earthquake 2010
Telemedicine as novel plastic surgery tool (Giunta et al., 2020; PMID: 32392587) (Shokri and Lighthall, 2020; PMID: 32302225) COVID-19 2019–Present

Sir Harold Gillies became a dedicated reconstructive surgeon to restore deformed soldiers in World War I. In 1917, he developed his tubed pedicle flap, which provided the ability to close difficult wounds with poor local options.2 Berkman inserted wires laterally through metacarpals, allowing patients to have enough extension and flexion to carry out minor duties the next day.3 Ralph Millard, whose cleft repair is still widely performed, was also shaped by his experiences in the Korean conflict. War is not the only disaster to influence changes in our practice. More recently, terrorist attacks have led to new ways of organizing surgical staff during mass casualties.4

The modern field of plastic surgery originated from the global catastrophic events of World War I and continues to progress from innovations devised during disasters. Our study has highlighted advancements that have arisen from tragedy. We found war has been the greatest motivator of ingenuity. Terrorism and natural disasters have emerged as events leading to innovation during the last few decades. The current COVID-19 pandemic may alter practice as well. An electroceutical fabric dressing designed for chronic wounds was adapted as a face mask effective at eliminating COVID-19.5 The widespread use of telemedicine from COVID-19 will expand the reach of plastic surgical evaluation to smaller communities. Plastic surgery procedures that may have resulted in a short admission may become outpatient on a more universal level as a result of attempts to limit hospitalizations during COVID-19. Our field must do what it has always done: use a major crisis to spark innovation to improve the care of patients.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This project was funded in part with support from the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute and in part by the National Institutes of Health (grant UL1TR002529). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

DISCLOSURE

None of the authors has a financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Kayla L. Clodfelter, B.S.
Division of Plastic Surgery
Indiana University School of Medicine
Indianapolis, Ind.

Brian Mailey, M.D.
Insitute of Plastic Surgery
Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
Springfield, Ill.

Aladdin H. Hassanein, M.D., M.M.Sc.
Division of Plastic Surgery
Indiana University School of Medicine
Indianapolis, Ind.

GUIDELINES

Viewpoints, pertaining to issues of general interest, are welcome, even if they are not related to items previously published. Viewpoints may present unique techniques, brief technology updates, technical notes, and so on. Viewpoints will be published on a space-available basis because they are typically less timesensitive than Letters and other types of articles. Please note the following criteria:

  • Text—maximum of 500 words (not including references)

  • References—maximum of five

  • Figures/Tables—no more than two figures and/or one table

Authors will be listed in the order in which they appear in the submission. Viewpoints should be submitted electronically via PRS’ enkwell, at www.editorialmanager.com/prs/. We strongly encourage authors to submit figures in color.

We reserve the right to edit Viewpoints to meet requirements of space and format. Any financial interests relevant to the content must be disclosed. Submission of a Viewpoint constitutes permission for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its licensees and assignees to publish it in the Journal and in any other form or medium.

The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in the Viewpoints represent the personal opinions of the individual writers and not those of the publisher, the Editorial Board, or the sponsors of the Journal. Any stated views, opinions, and conclusions do not reflect the policy of any of the sponsoring organizations or of the institutions with which the writer is affiliated, and the publisher, the Editorial Board, and the sponsoring organizations assume no responsibility for the content of such correspondence.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Battle R. Plastic surgery in the two world wars and in the years between. J R Soc Med. 1978;71:844–848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gillies HD. Plastic Surgery of the Face. London: The Joint Committee of Henry Frowde, Hodder and Stoughton; 1920. Available at: https://www.archive.org/details/plasticsurgeryof00gilluoft/mode/2up. Accessed July 3, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Berkman EF, Miles GH. Internal fixation of metacarpal fractures exclusive of the thumb. J Bone Joint Surg. 1943;24:816–821. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Caterson EJ, Carty MJ, Weaver MJ, Holt EF. Boston bombings: A surgical view of lessons learned from combat casualty care and the applicability to Boston’s terrorist attack. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24:1061–1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sen A, Khona D, Ghatak S, et al. Electroceutical fabric lowers zeta potential and eradicates coronavirus infectivity upon contact. ChemRxiv. Preprint posted online May 15, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES