Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 27;14(1):45. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14010045

Table 3.

Effect of MET and SM therapy on hepatic inflammation and oxidative stress parameters in HHTg rats.

HHTg/C HHTg/MET HHTg/MET+SM PMET PMET+SM
GSH/GSSG 27.06 ± 2.41 39.44 ± 2.38 44.09 ± 2.64 ** 0.01 n.s.
SOD (U/mg protein) 0.127 ± 0.01 0.152 ± 0.01 0.183 ± 0.01 0.05 0.01
CAT (µM H2O2 min/mg protein) 1437 ± 80 1311 ± 88 1662 ± 130 n.s. 0.05
GPx (µM NADPH/min/mg protein) 249 ± 14 272 ± 12 349 ± 15 n.s. 0.001
4-HNE (ng/mg protein) 69.1 ± 4.4 47.7 ± 1.6 *** 46.6 ± 1.4 0.001 0.05
MDA (nM/mg protein) 3.43 ± 0.37 2.10 ± 0.29 2.28 ± 0.14 *** 0.01 ns
MCP-1 (pg/mg protein) 27.132 ± 1.494 27.187 ± 2.579 ** 13.366 ± 1.074 ** ns 0.001
TNFα (pg/mg protein) 68.615 ± 5.493 54.114 ± 0.994 *** 45.274 ± 0.984 0.01 0.05
hsCRP (ng/mg protein) 93.618 ± 7.824 68.836 ± 2.616 *** 50.240 ± 2.423 * 0.001 0.01
Resistin (pg/mg protein) 4.672 ± 0.315 3.715 ± 0.178 *** 3.767 ± 0.161 0.01 ns

Values are expressed as means ± SEM; n = 6 for HHTg/C, n = 7 for HHTg/MET, n = 8 for HHTg/MET+SM; PMET—probability reflecting the effect of metformin monotherapy vs. the control group without any treatment, PMET+SM—probability reflecting the effect of metformin therapy vs. metformin + silymarin combination therapy; data analysed by two-way-ANOVA; Fisher’s post-hoc LSD test applied for multiple comparisons between groups; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, n.s.—the difference is not significant.