Abstract
N6‐Methyladenosine (m6A) is considered the most common and endogenous modification of eukaryotic RNAs. Highly conserved in many species, m6A regulates RNA metabolism, cell differentiation, cell circadian rhythm, and cell cycle; it also responds to endogenous and exogenous stimuli and is associated with the development of tumors. The m6A methyltransferase complex (MTC) regulates the m6A modification of transcripts and involves two components, methyltransferase‐like enzyme 3 (METTL3) and methyltransferase‐like enzyme 14 (METTL14), and other auxiliary regulatory distinct components. Though with no catalytic effect, METTL14 serves as an RNA‐binding scaffold in MTC, promotes RNA substrate recognition, activates, and escalates the catalytic capability of METTL3, thus accounting for a pivotal member of the complex. It was reported that METTL14 regulates tumor proliferation, metastasis, and self‐renewal, and plays a part in tumorigenesis, tumor progression, and other processes. The present work is a review of the role of METTL14 both as a tumor suppressor and a tumor promoter in the oncogenesis and progression of various tumors, as well as the potential molecular mechanisms.
Keywords: cancer, m6A, METTL14, non‐coding RNA, RNA modification
Roles of METTL14 in oncogenesis and development. The abnormal expression of METTL14, an m6A modification editor, affects tumor cell proliferation, metastasis, tumor stem cell self‐renewal, and chemotherapy resistance.
1. INTRODUCTION
Epigenesis refers to the heritable variation of gene functions under the condition that the DNA sequence does not change, which ultimately leads to the change in phenotype. 1 , 2 Epigenetics participates in and regulates multiple levels of information flow from DNA to RNA to protein. 3 , 4 Recent investigations have found that the epigenetic modification of RNA plays vital roles in biological processes. 5 N6‐methyladenosine (m6A), as one of more than 170 RNA modifications observed so far in coding and non‐coding of RNAs, is the most common internal modification in mRNA, 6 , 7 and is almost universally presented in poly (A)+ RNA of all advanced eukaryotes. 8 , 9 In human cells, there are 2000 m6A peaks in beyond 7000 mRNA and 300 non‐coding RNA transcripts. 10 It was found that m6A is not randomly distributed on mRNA, but mainly clustered in long introns and stop codons near the 3′UTR region. 11 Under similar physiological conditions, highly conserved m6A peaks have been observed in mouse and human transcriptomes, revealing significant correlation between m6A abundance and functions of specific genes. 10 In mutation analysis, RRm6ACH has been defined as a consensus m6A sequence, where R = G/A (G > A) and H = U/A/C (U > A > C). 12 In the early 1970s, m6A modification was first detected in mammalian cells, but due to the constraints of the research conditions and technology at that time, the functional significance of this modification was not clarified. The true biological significance of m6A was not disclosed until 2011 when it was discovered that fat mass and obesity‐associated (FTO) protein reversibly inhibited the m6A level. 13 Meanwhile, advancements in sequencing technology and quantitative mass spectrometry technology 10 , 11 , 14 encouraged researchers to probe further into m6A modification. It was reported that m6A can regulate cell differentiation, 15 , 16 cell circadian rhythm, 17 cell cycle, 18 , 19 and cell stress response 20 , 21 by participating in various aspects of RNA physiological processes, such as mRNA maturation, 22 , 23 , 24 transport from nucleus to cytoplasm, 25 , 26 translation efficiency 21 , 27 , 28 and stability 29 , 30 (Figure 1).
RNA m6A modification is co‐mediated by the modification machineries EEE (Editor, Eraser, and Effector). 31 The modification Editor—multicomponent methyltransferase complex (MTC), positioned in the nuclear spot area, catalyzes the dislocation of methyl group to the certain adenine of the target RNA from S‐adenosylmethionine (SAM) and methylates the hydrogen atom on the adenine atom N6, 32 , 33 by recruiting two predominant units, that is, methyltransferase‐like enzyme 3 (METTL3) and methyltransferase‐like enzyme 14 (METTL14), and with other auxiliary managing distinct units, such as Wilm's tumor‐1‐associated protein (WTAP), vir‐like m6A methyltransferase‐associated (VIRMA), KIAA1429, Hakai, RNA‐binding motif protein 15 (RBM15), and methyltransferase‐like enzyme 16 (METTL16). The modification Erasers—FTO and alkB homolog 5 (ALKBH5), are both Fe (II)/α‐ketoglutarate‐dependent alkB dioxygenase family members, which perform as m6A erasers and catalyze the reversible oxidative demethylation of the m6A methyl group. 34 , 35 The messages embedded in the methyl group are decoded by a certain type of protein component called m6A Effectors, including YTH domain family proteins (YTHDC1/2 and YTHDF1/2/3), insulin‐like growth factor 2 mRNA‐binding protein (IGF2BP1/2/3), and heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein (hnRNPC and hnRNPG), which bind m6A to modulate the nuclear transportation, degradation, and steadiness of mRNAs, thereby determining the fate of the modified target RNA. 21 , 36 , 37
Methyltransferase and its components can regulate cell cycle, cell growth, cell differentiation, cell apoptosis, and other cellular biological processes. The correlation between methyltransferase and tumors has become a new research focus. It has been found that m6A modification and methyltransferase are related to tumor augmentation, differentiation, tumor formation, infiltration, and metastasis. Recently, increasing proof has attested to the involvement of METTL14, an indispensable constituent of MTC, in cancer. Here, we review the role methyltransferase METTL14 in tumor occurrence and expansion.
2. STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS OF METTL14 IN MTC
In the last decade of the 20th century, Tuck 38 isolated two methylase constituents of 200 kDa (MT‐A) and 800 kDa (MT‐B), from the nuclear extract of Hela cells, and identified one key methylase subunit 70 kDa, named METTL3 or MT‐A70, from MT‐A. This investigation marks a considerable breakthrough in the research of m6A methyltransferase. The METTL3 protein, which has 580 amino acids, is comprised of a zinc finger domain (ZFD) and a methyltransferase domain (MTD). The ZFD contains two tandem CCCH‐type zinc fingers (ZnF1 and ZnF2) connected by an anti‐parallel β‐sheet (Figure 2A,B), which is responsible for target recognition, specifically for binding to single‐stranded RNAs containing 5′‐GGACU‐3′ consensus sequence. 39 Phylogenetic analysis revealed that METTL14, a homologue of METTL3 in the human genome, shares 43% homologous sequence with METTL3. 40 The METTL14 gene is 30.06 kb in size, contains 11 exons, and is positioned on chromosome 4q26. This gene is expressed in many tissues at different developmental stages. As relevant research deepens, more knowledge about the METTL14 gene, including its expression products, structure, and functions, is revealed. The METTL14 protein has 456 amino acids and is predominantly composed of a MTD, while without a ZFD as the METTL3 protein does (Figure 2C,D). METTL14 and METTL3 form a compact and stable asymmetric heterodimer with a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio, and there are extensive hydrogen bond interactions between the two. 41 X‐ray crystallography was adopted to inspect the structure of the MTD of the METTL3‐14 heterodimer. The MTD of METTL14 encompasses residues 110–404, while that of METTL13 consists of residues 358–580. The crystal structure of the heterodimer revealed dense presence of SAM in the catalytic cavity of METTL3; the MTD of METTL14, though similar to that of METTL3, has a closed catalytic cavity with no SAM binding sites, which indicates that METTL3 is the only catalytic subunit in the MTC, and METTL14 in the complex does not serve a role to catalyze methyl group transfer. 40 The overall structure of MTD3 resembles that of Class I DNA N6‐adenine MTD. Nevertheless, neither MTD3 nor MTD14 possesses a target recognition domain (TRD) similar to DNA m6A, which appears as a substrate‐binding platform. Analysis of the surface electrostatic potential of the METTL3/METTL14 complex demonstrated that there is a groove with positive charges between METTL3 and METTL14. Ten positively charged residues, including R245, R249, R254, R255, K297, and R298 from METTL14, and R465, R471, H474, and H478 from METTL3, together shapes this groove (Figure 2E). In the case that the above residues from METTL14 in the groove are mutated, the activity of groove‐bound RNA decreases and the activity of methyltransferase drops, 42 indicating that the groove formed by the positively charged residues of METTL3 and METTL14 may affect the binding of the complex to the RNA substrate. A recent study revealed that the C‐terminus of METTL14 was induced arginine methylation by binding to protein arginine methyltransferase 1 (PRMT1), which promotes the interaction of RNA substrates to METTL14, and enhances the RNA methylation catalytic capacity of the MTC and interaction with RNA polymerase II (RNAPII). 43 Importantly, the level of m6A modification is dependent on arginine methylation of METTL14. Analysis of transcriptome m6A modification levels revealed that nearly 2000 m6A sites, which depend on arginine methylation of METTL14, distribute over 1000 genes involved in cellular physiological processes including DNA repair. Specifically, the m6A modification of DNA double‐stranded cross‐linking repair‐related genes relies on arginine methylation of METTL14, which improves the translation efficiency of these genes. In addition, the N‐terminus of METTL14 can discern and directly interact with histone 3 trimethylated at Lys 36 (H3K36me3). The combination promotes recruitment of the MTC to RNAP II nearby, revealing that the MTC exerts cotranscriptional selective deposition by moving to the site of immature RNA. 44 Liu et al. 41 reported that the catalytic activity of the METTL3‐METTL14 complex has considerably stronger catalytic activity than the METTL3 protein isolated in vitro. The above results indicate that though METTL3 plays a catalytic role in the MTC, its catalytic capability relies on METTL14. Though METTL14 itself has no catalytic effect, it acts as a premier RNA‐binding platform, which promotes the recognition to RNA substrates, activates, and escalates the methyltransferase activity of METTL3, and significantly improves the methylation efficiency of the MTC. The role of METTL14 in the METTL3‐METTL14 MTC is much like that of Dnmt3L in the DNA methyltransferase complex Dnmt3a‐Dnmt3L: Dnmt3L activates and enhances the methylation activity of the DNA methyltransferase complex by binding to Dnmt3a, but Dnmt3L itself has no methylation activity. 45 Therefore, in general, METTL14 is similar to Dnmt3L in that they both contain MTD without catalytic activity, but activate and strengthen the methylation of the chaperone.
3. MODULATION OF METTL14 EXPRESSION
The abnormal expression of METTL14 in cancers and other diseases is triggered by multiple mechanisms. It was reported that METTL14 overexpression in acute myeloid leukemia is negatively regulated by SPI1 and mediates downstream targets, MYB and MYC, to accelerate acute myeloid leukemia (AML) oncogenesis. 46 In breast cancer, aurora kinase A (AURKA) positively regulates METTL14 protein expression by inhibiting its ubiquitylation‐mediated degradation to elevate DROSHA m6A content to improve DROSHA mRNA stability in breast cancer stem‐like cells. 47 METTL14 expression is also regulated by transcription factors. In pancreatic cancer, transcription factor P65 positively regulates METTL14 expression by interconnecting with the promoter region of METTL14. Upregulated METTL14 hampers the attenuation of cytidine deaminase (CDA) transcript, enhances its stability, and induces chemotherapy resistance of pancreatic cancer cells. 48 Non‐coding RNAs (ncRNAs) also play a role in regulation of METTL14 expression. In breast cancer, the stability and expression of METTL14 are positively regulated by LNC942, which elevates the m6A content in downstream targets CXCR4 and CYP1B1, stabilizes protein expression and translation, and further promotes tumorigenesis. 49 The expression of METTL14 is regulated by miR‐103‐3p to inhibit osteogenesis, and m6A modification executed by METTL14 in turn promotes osteogenesis by inhibiting the treatment of miR‐103‐3p by DiGeorge critical region 8 (DGCR8), which reveals the key role of miR‐103‐3p ‐ METTL14 ‐ m6A modification axis in osteoblast activity. 50 In vascular endothelial cells, the expression level of METTL14, modulated by miR‐4729, is reduced, resulting in declination in m6A modification level of TIE1 mRNA 3′UTR specific site, TIE1 mRNA stability reduction, and angiogenesis inhibition. 51 In renal cell carcinoma, METTL14 is regulated by the competitive binding effect of circRNAs and miRNAs, and affects the expression of downstream molecule PTEN and changes in related AKT/PKB signals. 52 In skin tumors, METTL14 acts as the target of NBR1‐dependent selective autophagy, and its expression level is down‐regulated. METTL14 depletion reduces the translation efficiency of damaged DNA binding protein 2 (DDB2), causes global genome repair (GGR) repair defect, and provokes UVB‐induced skin tumorigenesis. 53 In Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV)‐related cancers, METTL14 expression and stability is upregulated by Epstein‐Barr nuclear antigen 3C (EBNA3C) through interaction at the specific amino domain of EBNA3C. 54
4. METTL14 AND CANCER
In recent decades, increasing investigations have shown that METTL14, as an m6A methyltransferase, is involved in tumorigenesis and development, whether as an oncogene or an anti‐oncogene, as shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Role | Cancer type | Regulator | Targets | Molecular mechanism | Signaling pathway/Axis | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anti‐oncogene | Bladder cancer | Notch1 | mRNA stabilization | METTL14 ‐ m6A modification ‐ Notch1 axis | 55 | |
Colorectal cancer | SOX4 | mRNA degradation | METTL14 ‐ YTHDF2 ‐ SOX4 axis; SOX4‐mediated EMT process and PI3K/AKT signaling pathway partly | 56 | ||
DGCR8 | miR‐375 | Modulate pri‐miR‐375 process in an m6A‐dependent manner | METTL14 ‐ miR‐375 ‐ YAP1 axis and METTL14 ‐ miR‐375 ‐ SP1 axis | 57 | ||
lncRNA XIST | LncRNA degradation | METTL14 ‐ YTHDF2 ‐ lncRNA XIST axis | 58 | |||
MeCP2 | KLF4 | mRNA stabilization | MeCP2 ‐ METTL14 ‐ KLF4 axis | 75 | ||
Endometrial cancer | PHLPP2; mTORC2 | Promote translation by YTHDF1; mRNA degradation by YTHDF2 | METTL14‐ PHLPP2/mTORC2‐AKT pathway | 60 | ||
Gastric cancer | Wnt and PI3K signals | Regulate Wnt and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway | Wnt and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways | 61, 79 | ||
LINC01320 | LncRNA stabilization | METTL14 ‐ LINC01320 ‐ miR‐495‐5p ‐ RAB19 axis | 62 | |||
PTEN | mRNA stabilization | METTL14 ‐ m6A modification ‐ PTEN axis | 80 | |||
Glioblastoma | ADAM19 | mRNA m6A modification | METTL14 ‐ m6A modification ‐ ADAM19 axis | 63 | ||
Hepatocellular carcinoma | DGCR8 | miR‐126 | Modulate pri‐miR‐126 process in an m6A‐dependent manner | DGCR8 ‐ METTL14 – miR‐126 axis | 64 | |
USP48 | mRNA stabilization | METTL14 ‐ USP48 ‐ SIRT6 axis | 65 | |||
EGFR | Stimulate PI3K/AKT signals | EGFR/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway | 66 | |||
Renal cell carcinoma | P2RX6 | pre‐mRNA splicing | ATP‐P2RX6‐Ca2+‐p‐ERK1/2 ‐MMP9 signals | 68 | ||
circRNAs | PTEN | mRNA stabilization | circRNAs ‐ miRNAs ‐ METTL14 ‐ PTEN axis | 52 | ||
Papillary thyroid carcinoma | OIP5‐AS1 | Regulate expression | EGFR, MEK/ERK signaling pathway | 86 | ||
Osteosarcoma | Caspase‐3 | Activate caspase‐3 | Apoptosis | 87 | ||
Skin tumor | NBR1‐dependent autophagy | DDB2 | Translation efficiency | NBR1‐dependent autophagy ‐ METTL14 – DDB2 axis | 53 | |
Oncogene | Acute myeloid leukemia | SPI1 | MYB; MYC | Accelerate hematopoietic stem cells proliferation and reduce monocyte differentiation | SPI1 ‐ METTL14 ‐ MYB/MYC axis | 46 |
MALAT1 | PML‐PARα | mRNA exportation | lncRNA ‐ fusion gene ‐ METTL14 loop | 92 | ||
Breast cancer | LNC942 | CXCR4; CYP1B1 | mRNA stabilization and translation | LNC942 ‐ METTL14 ‐ CXCR4/CYP1B1 axis | 49 | |
AURKA | DROSHA | mRNA stabilization | AURKA ‐ METTL14 ‐ DROSHA axis | 47 | ||
Pancreatic cancer | PERP | mRNA turnover | METTL14 ‐ m6A modification ‐ PERP axis | 95 | ||
P65 | CDA | mRNA stabilization | P65 ‐ METTL14 ‐ CDA axis | 48 | ||
Prostate cancer | CLK1‐SRSF5 axis | Alternative splicing | CLK1 ‐ SRSF5 ‐ METTL14exon10 skipping axis | 97 | ||
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma | LNCAROD | LncRNA stabilization | METTL14 – LNCAROD ‐YBX1/HSPA1A axis | 99 | ||
EBV‐related tumors | EBNA3C | Maintain METTL14 protein stability | 54 |
5. METTL14 AS AN ANTI‐ONCOGENE
In most cases, METTL14 is identified as a tumor suppressor gene, which inhibits oncogenesis and progression of various cancers, such as bladder cancer, 55 colorectal cancer, 56 , 57 , 58 endometrial cancer, 59 , 60 gastric cancer, 61 , 62 glioblastoma, 63 hepatocellular carcinoma, 64 , 65 , 66 and renal cell carcinoma, 52 , 67 , 68 by reducing m6A modification on key transcripts.
5.1. Bladder cancer
Bladder cancer is a widespread malignant cancer worldwide. 69 Bladder cancer stem cells (CSCs), a subgroup of bladder cancer cells also known as tumor‐initiating cells (TICs), can self‐renew and differentiate into large cell populations, and are rich in tumorigenic properties. 70 Gu et al. 55 found that METTL14 expression is reduced in bladder cancer and bladder TICs, and it is the main regulator for the decline of m6A content in bladder cancer and bladder TICs. METTL14 reduction promotes cell propagation, aggression, and self‐renewal of bladder TICs. Studies have shown that neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 1 (Notch1) plays a part in accelerating bladder cancer and bladder TICs. The m6A modification of Notch1 is reduced after overexpression of METTL14, which in turn depresses the stability of Notch1 mRNA and inhibits protein expression. The above results indicate that METTL14 may target Notch1 to inhibit progression of bladder cancer and spread of bladder TICs, which reveals that the METTL14‐m6A‐Notch1 axis has the potential to serve as an underlying target for the treatment of bladder cancer.
5.2. Colorectal cancer
Colorectal cancer (CRC), the third most prevalent digestive tract malignancy worldwide, has seen an increasing incidence rate of CRC in the younger population. 71 , 72 The expression of METTL14 is remarkably depressed in CRC, and a reduction in METTL14 is associated with poor overall survival (OS). Cox regression analysis has revealed that METTL14 is an independent prognostic molecule for CRC, and it is positively associated with the level of immune infiltration. 73 It was proved that METTL14 impedes the metastasis of CRC cells and exerts a tumor suppressor effect. Studies have found that SRY‐related high‐mobility‐group box 4 (SOX4) is controlled by m6A modification mediated by METTL14, and METTL14 represses the progression of CRC via the SOX4‐mediated EMT process and PI3K/AKT signals. 56 It was found in another study that METTL14, as the upstream target of miR‐375, suppresses CRC cells propagation via the miR‐375—Yes‐associated protein 1 (YAP1) axis, and depresses migration and aggression of CRC cells via the miR‐375 ‐ SP1 axis. 57 Yang et al., 58 using RNA sequencing (RNA‐seq) and methylated RNA immunoprecipitation (Me‐RIP), found that the oncogene lncRNA XIST is the downstream molecule of METTL14, which down‐regulates lncRNA XIST in an m6A‐dependent process and inhibits tumor‐driving effects such as the growth and metastasis of CRC. In CRC that is resistant to immunotherapy, mismatched repair proficiency or low microsatellite instability (pMMR‐MSI‐L) tumors account for about 85% of all patients. Studies have proved that reducing m6A modification by knocking down METTL14 escalates the response of pMMR‐MSI‐L CRC to anti‐PD‐1 treatment. 74 METTL14 and methyl CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2) jointly regulate the m6A modification of the specific site of the tumor suppressor Kruppel‐like factor 4 (KLF4) mRNA through the protein interaction between the two proteins. The M6A reader IGF2BP2 regulates the stability of KLF4 mRNA and the expression of KLF4 protein by reading unique methylation modification information, and ultimately affects the progression and metastasis of CRC. 75
5.3. Endometrial cancer
Endometrial cancer (EC) is a common gynecologic malignancy, originating from endometrium that grows out of control. 76 , 77 Ma et al. 59 described METTL14 as a probable indicator for the diagnosis and prognosis of EC. Liu et al. 60 sequenced clinical specimens of EC and found that METTL14 has a hot spot R298P mutation, which induces about 70% of EC to reduce m6A methylation compared with matched normal endometrium, contributing to the proliferation of EC cells and tumorigenicity. Analysis of m6A‐seq characteristics of EC samples from patients and cell lines shows that the decline in m6A mRNA methylation motivated by the METTL14 mutation may cause a decreased level of the negative effector PHLPP2 of the AKT signals and an increase in the level of the positive effector mTORC2, resulting in increased AKT activity and enhanced cell proliferation. METTL14 was found to be an important governor of the AKT signals and cell propagation in EC.
5.4. Gastric cancer
Gastric cancer (GC), also known as stomach cancer, is a leading digestive system cancer worldwide and still contributes to human death in less developed countries. 78 METTL14 is lowly expressed in GC and is a key regulatory factor that decreases m6A levels in GC. 61 METTL14 overexpression curbs the propagation of GC cells by inhibiting Wnt and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signals, and suppresses aggression of gastric cancer cells by obstructing the EMT process, while an increase in m6A caused by FTO knockdown reverses the above changes. 61 , 79 Hu et al. 62 demonstrated that METTL14 methylates LINC01320 to upregulate LINC01320 expression, accelerating aggression of GC cells through the miR‐495‐5p‐RAB19 axis. Yao et al. 80 verified that METTL14 enhances phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) m6A modification by interconnecting the m6A characteristic sequence GGACT with PTEN mRNA, improving RNA stability of PTEN and playing a role in cancer inhibition in stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD).
5.5. Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma (GBM), occurring predominantly among adults, is the most common and aggressive type of glioma. 81 METTL14 deficiency considerably accelerates the propagation, self‐renewal, and oncogenesis of glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs). After METTL14 knockdown GSCs transplanted into immunodeficiency non‐obese diabetes/severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD/SCID) mice, it was found that METTL14 depletion results in significant tumor progression initiated by GSCs in the cerebra of the mice. The results of m6A sequencing showed that METTL14 knockdown leads to overexpression of the oncogene ADAM19 mRNA in GSCs. 63 It implies that METTL14 and m6A modification may have the potential to be a brand‐new molecular target for GBM treatment.
5.6. Hepatocellular carcinoma
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), accounting for more than 80% of primary liver carcinoma, is the most common malignant carcinoma of liver cells and is an urgent health threat worldwide. 82 , 83 In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), particularly in metastatic HCC, m6A modification is reduced, METTL14 is identified as the core molecule regulating abnormal m6A modification of HCC. In addition, down‐regulation of METTL14 is a detrimental prognostic factor for recurrence‐free survival of HCC and is appreciably related to tumor aggression. Furthermore, miR‐126, as an anti‐oncogene, is the target of METTL14 in the process of HCC metastasis. METTL14 interacts with DGCR8 and regulates the pri‐miR‐126 process to reduce miR‐126 expression, thereby promoting HCC metastasis, which accounts for an important function of METTL14 and m6A in HCC metastasis. 64 Du et al. 65 found that ubiquitin‐specific peptidase 48 (USP48) bound SIRT6 through deubiquitination at specific sites of SIRT6 and stabilized SIRT6 mRNA, thereby hindering metabolic reprogramming to inhibit HCC oncogenesis. Importantly, METTL14 stabilizes USP48 mRNA by provoking m6A modification. The METTL14‐USP48‐SIRT6 axis is involved in glycolysis regulation to suppress HCC, and hence is considered a promising target for future therapeutic research. Shi et al. 66 found by overlapping RNA‐seq and m6A‐seq that EGFR is the downstream target of METTL14 in HCC. EGFR is an important oncogene that is present in most solid cancers and is significantly pertinent to the stimulation of the PI3K/AKT signals in HCC. Under‐expressed METTL14 upregulates EGFR expression in an m6A‐dependent manner, contributing in activating the PI3K/AKT signals and enhancing the propagation of HCC cells. It has been proved that METTL14 hampers oncogenesis and metastasis of HCC cells by regulating the EGFR/PI3K/AKT signals.
5.7. Renal cancer
METTL14 is predominantly positioned in the nucleus of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cells. Compared with normal renal tissues, the ccRCC tissues have a significantly lower level of METTL14 mRNA. The expression level of METTL14 is positively correlated with OS, and is also related to the clinicopathological factors of RCC (sex, T stage, M stage, and pathological stage). 84 , 85 Studies have found that the VHL‐HIF‐ZNF217‐METTL14‐mediated hypoxia pathway affects generation and sustentation of the RCC cancer stem cells by regulating m6A levels, and mediates oncogenesis and development of ccRCC via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and p53 signaling pathways that are the downstream targets of m6A. 67 In normal renal tissues, METTL14 elevates the pre‐mRNA splicing of P2RX6 by upregulating the m6A content of P2RX6 mRNA, leading to a P2RX6 reduction. In RCC cells, however, METTL14 depletion results in the high expression of P2RX6 via the ATP‐P2RX6‐Ca2+‐p‐ERK1/2‐MMP9 signaling pathway and finally accelerates the aggressiveness of RCC cells. 68 In addition, METTL14 mediates stability of PTEN mRNA that negatively regulates the AKT/PKB signaling pathway and exerts a tumor suppressor effect. METTL14 also interacts with EIF3A to generate a collaborative effect and modulate the tumorigenesis of RCC. 52 Using bioinformatics analysis, Wang et al. 52 found that the level of METTL14 in RCC presents significantly negative correlation to the expression of four miRNAs, miR‐130a‐3p, miR‐106b‐5p, miR‐130b‐3p, and miR‐301a‐3p, which regulate the METTL14 expression by interacting with a series of 24 circRNAs, such as circ‐0023414 and circ‐0031772.
5.8. Other cancer
In papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), OIP5‐AS1 is a downstream target of METTL14. METTL14 upregulation hinders the expression of OIP5‐AS1, regulates EGFR, MEK/ERK signals, and depresses PTC cell proliferation and aggression. 86 METTL14 exerts a tumor suppressor effect by activating caspase‐3 to constrain the propagation, migration, and aggression of osteosarcoma cells, and is considered a potential target for osteosarcoma treatment. 87
6. METTL14 AS AN ONCOGENE
Although METTL14 has a tumor suppressor effect in most cancer types, it has also been found to act as a contributing factor to tumorigenesis and development.
6.1. Acute myeloid leukemia
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML), characterized by aberrant clonal expansion and impaired differentiation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), is the most common form of acute leukemia among adults. 88 , 89 Weng et al. 46 identified the position of METTL14 in tumorigenesis and progression of AML. Analysis of TCGA data showed that METTL14 is highly expressed in bone marrow mononuclear cells (MNCs) of AML patients and of primary AML patients with common chromosomal translocation such as AML1‐ETO (t8; t21), PML‐RARα (t15; t17), and MLL fusions (t11). However, METTL14 is down‐regulated in directed or differentiated myeloid cells during myeloid differentiation. In experiments, METTL14 fl/fl ‐CREERT conditional knockout mice (METTL14 flox (METTL14 fl/+ ) generated by CRISPR/Cas9 technique were crossbred to produce homozygous METTL14 knockout mice (METTL14 fl/fl ). The genetic switch is the CREERT system consisting of three key components—CRE recombinase, ER (estrogen receptor), and T (Tamoxifen). Briefly, the CREERT system can be induced to turn on by the drug tamoxifen. To eliminate the effect of endogenous estrogen, the estrogen receptor of the mouse was mutated. The mutated estrogen receptor no longer binds to estrogen and has an affinity only for foreign drugs like tamoxifen. In other words, only when tamoxifen appears can the CRE enzyme enter the nucleus to regulate gene expression. 90 , 91 The experiments on the mice show that METTL14 depletion inhibits the proliferation and self‐renewal activity of HSCs in vivo. The above results indicate that METTL14 promotes leukemia progression by accelerating HSC proliferation and renewal, and by reducing monocyte differentiation. Importantly, METTL14 is adversely modulated by SPI1 and positively mediates the expression of MYB and MYC via m6A‐dependent post‐transcriptional modulation. The above results reveal that the SPI1‐METTL14‐MYB/MYC axis plays a key role in the formation of malignant myelopoiesis and the pathogenesis of AML. In addition, METTL14 can be directly combined with MALAT1. Importantly, the interaction between METTL14 and fusion‐gene PML‐RARα is regulated by MALAT1, a functional loading bridge, which further elevates PML‐RARα mRNA METTL14‐dependent m6A modification and accelerates the fusion‐gene exporting. The lncRNA‐fusion‐gene‐m6A loop regulates the differentiation of myeloid cells by controlling the export of the fusion gene and affects the malignant hematopoietic process. 92
6.2. Breast cancer
Breast cancer (BC), the most frequent female malignant neoplasia worldwide, is in want of better prognosis solutions. 78 , 93 Yi et al. 94 observed upregulation of METTL14 in breast cancer tissues and its correlation to the TNM stage of patients. Specifically, high expression of METTL14 changes the miRNA expression profile and increases the expression of hsa‐miR‐146a‐5p, thereby promoting migration and aggression of BC cells. Additionally, in BC cells and tissues, METTL14 mRNA stability and protein expression are positively modulated by LNC942. LNC942 and METTL14 protein specifically bind through specific motif/GCAGGG (+176 – +265) to elevate the m6A content of downstream target molecules such as CXCR4 and CYP1B1, thus stabilizing the expression and translation of CXCR4 and CYP1B1, and ultimately promoting BC cell propagation in vivo and in vitro. 49 In breast cancer stem‐like cells, METTL14 mRNA stability and protein expression are upregulated by overexpression of the upstream molecule AURKA, which stabilizes METTL14 protein by inhibiting ubiquitylation‐dependent degradation of METTL14, resulting in enhanced DROSHA mRNA stability through METTL14‐dependent m6A modification. More importantly, binding of AURKA to DROSHA transcript further strengthens the binding of IGF2BP2 to the m6A modified transcript, hence increasing DROSHA mRNA stability and ultimately enhancing BCSC phenotype. 47
6.3. PANCREATIC CANCER
Wang et al. 95 found increased m6A modification in more than half of pancreatic cancer tissues, and identified METTL14 as the major molecule that regulates m6A methylation in pancreatic cancer. Specifically, overexpressed METTL14 directly targets the downstream PERP mRNA to enhance propagation and migration of pancreatic cancer cells in an m6A‐dependent way. Kong et al. 96 validated that down‐regulation of METTL14 makes pancreatic cancer cells sensitive to cisplatin by accelerating apoptosis, and improves autophagy induced by cisplatin through the mTOR signaling‐dependent pathway. Another study elucidated the mechanism of METTL14 in drug resistance in pancreatic cancer. In gemcitabine‐resistant pancreatic cancer cells, METTL14 is regulated by P65, a transcriptional factor binding to METTL14 promoter region, and elevates the transcript stability of CDA, which causes gemcitabine inactivation, and ultimately developments gemcitabine resistance of pancreatic cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. 48 These results suggest that METTL14 may possess feasibility in treating chemotherapy‐resistant pancreatic cancer.
6.4. Prostate cancer
By transcriptome sequencing, Chen et al. 97 identified METTL14exon10 and Cyclin L2exon6.3 skipping as vital alternative splicing events managed by the CLK1‐SRSF5 axis. The phosphorylation of SRSF5250‐Ser, reinforced by CLK1, promotes the skipping of Cyclin L2exon6.3 while hampering inhibits the skipping of METTL14exon10, which enhances m6A modification and increases the migration capacity of prostate cancer cells. METTL14 upregulation was found to be closely correlated with the recurrence‐free survival of prostate cancer. Specifically, METTL14 overexpression elevates the m6A modification level of mRNA and enhances the advancement of prostate cancer by managing the localization of subcellular proteins. 98
6.5. Other cancer
METTL14‐mediated m6A improves the stabilization of LNCAROD, an oncogenic lncRNA in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cells, and acts as a scaffold in the protein interaction between YBX1 and HSPA1A to maintain the stability of YBX1 protein, and contributes to HNSCC cell propagation, migration, and oncogenesis. 99 EBV, one of the most prevalent oncogenic viruses, causes a variety of tumors. Lang et al. 54 found that EBV drives the proliferation of EBV‐transformed cells and related oncogenesis by EBNA3C that upregulates protein levels and stability of METTL14 which interacts with specific amino domains of EBNA3C. METTL14 is considered to be an innovative molecular target for treatment of EBV‐related tumors.
7. CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES
In conclusion, m6A affects various aspects of RNA physiological processes, such as mRNA processing, translation efficiency, and transcription stability, and contributes to developmental regulation, cell cycle, and other cellular physiological processes of tumors and other diseases. METTL14, as an m6A methyltransferase, regulates m6A contents. Existing works have confirmed that METTL14 plays a pivotal role in many aspects of tumor progression, including cell accumulation, aggression, apoptosis, and self‐renewal, as either an oncogenic and anti‐oncogenic factor. However, the role of METTL14 in tumors and its potential molecular mechanism is far from being fully clarified. It should be noted that, however, the role of METTL3, another important component of MTC, should be considered in investigations on the role of METTL14 in tumors. Theoretically speaking, METTL14 and METTL3, both as components of MTC, play similar roles in the same tumor. This holds true for some cases. For instance, METTL3 was found to act as a tumor suppressor alike METTL14 in tumors such as renal cancer and endometrial cancer, and plays a tumor‐promoting role alike METTL14 in tumors such as AML, breast cancer, and pancreatic cancer. In tumors such as HCC and gastric cancer, however, these two proteins work in opposite ways. The causes for the opposing roles of these two constituents of MTC in the same tumor may be tumor heterogeneity, their different protein structures, and, in some cases, different study models. The discrepancy remains to be investigated further.
Since METTL14 has extensive impacts on tumor progression and plays different roles in various tumors, it is expected to become a novel molecule for tumor diagnosis and treatment, but specific METTL14‐targeted therapy strategies are yet to be explored.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
XL conducted research and drafted the manuscript. YPD, ZHH, HLQ, and JWC provided assistance in the process of revised drafting manuscript and figure and tables construction. YZ contributed to conceptual framework, supervised the study, and revised the manuscript. All authors read the final manuscript and approved.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by the Project for Key Medicine Discipline Construction of Guangzhou Municipality (No. 2021‐2023‐17); The Young Science‐technology Talents Support Project of Guangzhou, China (No. X20200301068).
Liu X, Du Y, Huang Z, Qin H, Chen J, Zhao Y. Insights into roles of METTL14 in tumors. Cell Prolif.2022;55:e13168. doi: 10.1111/cpr.13168
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- 1. Vercelli D. Genetics, epigenetics, and the environment: switching, buffering, releasing. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113(3):381‐386; quiz 387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bird A. Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature. 2007;447(7143):396‐398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Egger G, Liang G, Aparicio A, Jones PA. Epigenetics in human disease and prospects for epigenetic therapy. Nature. 2004;429(6990):457‐463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bird A. Molecular biology. Methylation talk between histones and DNA. Science. 2001;294(5549):2113‐2115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Zhao BS, Roundtree IA, He C. Post‐transcriptional gene regulation by mRNA modifications. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18(1):31‐42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Wang X, Lu Z, Gomez A, et al. N6‐methyladenosine‐dependent regulation of messenger RNA stability. Nature. 2014;505(7481):117‐120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Deng X, Chen K, Luo GZ, et al. Widespread occurrence of N6‐methyladenosine in bacterial mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(13):6557‐6567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Maity A, Das B. N6‐methyladenosine modification in mRNA: machinery, function and implications for health and diseases. FEBS J. 2016;283(9):1607‐1630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Arguello AE, Srikumar T, Kleiner RE. A photocrosslinking‐based RNA chemical proteomics approach to profile m(6) A‐regulated protein‐RNA interactions. Curr Protoc Nucleic Acid Chem. 2018;75(1):e69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Dominissini D, Moshitch‐Moshkovitz S, Schwartz S, et al. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A‐seq. Nature. 2012;485(7397):201‐206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Meyer KD, Saletore Y, Zumbo P, Elemento O, Mason CE, Jaffrey SR. Comprehensive analysis of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 3′ UTRs and near stop codons. Cell. 2012;149(7):1635‐1646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Csepany T, Lin A, Baldick CJ Jr, Beemon K. Sequence specificity of mRNA N6‐adenosine methyltransferase. J Biol Chem. 1990;265(33):20117‐20122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Jia G, Fu Y, Zhao X, et al. N6‐methyladenosine in nuclear RNA is a major substrate of the obesity‐associated FTO. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7(12):885‐887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Lin Z, Tong MH. m(6)A mRNA modification regulates mammalian spermatogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech. 2019;1862(3):403‐411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Geula S, Moshitch‐Moshkovitz S, Dominissini D, et al. Stem cells. m6A mRNA methylation facilitates resolution of naive pluripotency toward differentiation. Science. 2015;347(6225):1002‐1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Wang Y, Li Y, Toth JI, Petroski MD, Zhang Z, Zhao JC. N6‐methyladenosine modification destabilizes developmental regulators in embryonic stem cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16(2):191‐198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Fustin JM, Doi M, Yamaguchi Y, et al. RNA‐methylation‐dependent RNA processing controls the speed of the circadian clock. Cell. 2013;155(4):793‐806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Feillet C, van der Horst GT, Levi F, Rand DA, Delaunay F. Coupling between the circadian clock and cell cycle oscillators: implication for healthy cells and malignant growth. Front Neurol. 2015;6:96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Aguilo F, Zhang F, Sancho A, et al. Coordination of m(6)A mRNA methylation and gene transcription by ZFP217 regulates pluripotency and reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;17(6):689‐704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Schwartz S, Agarwala SD, Mumbach MR, et al. High‐resolution mapping reveals a conserved, widespread, dynamic mRNA methylation program in yeast meiosis. Cell. 2013;155(6):1409‐1421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Wang X, Zhao BS, Roundtree IA, et al. N(6)‐methyladenosine modulates messenger RNA translation efficiency. Cell. 2015;161(6):1388‐1399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Tong J, Flavell RA, Li HB. RNA m(6)A modification and its function in diseases. Front Med. 2018;12(4):481‐489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Roignant JY, Soller M. m(6)A in mRNA: an ancient mechanism for fine‐tuning gene expression. Trends Genet. 2017;33(6):380‐390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Xiao W, Adhikari S, Dahal U, et al. Nuclear m(6)A reader YTHDC1 regulates mRNA splicing. Mol Cell. 2016;61(4):507‐519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Kennedy EM, Bogerd HP, Kornepati AVR, et al. Posttranscriptional m(6)A editing of HIV‐1 mRNAs enhances viral gene expression. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;22(6):830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Zheng G, Dahl JA, Niu Y, et al. ALKBH5 is a mammalian RNA demethylase that impacts RNA metabolism and mouse fertility. Mol Cell. 2013;49(1):18‐29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Lin S, Choe J, Du P, Triboulet R, Gregory RI. The m(6)A methyltransferase METTL3 promotes translation in human cancer cells. Mol Cell. 2016;62(3):335‐345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Qi ST, Ma JY, Wang ZB, Guo L, Hou Y, Sun QY. N6‐methyladenosine sequencing highlights the involvement of mRNA methylation in oocyte meiotic maturation and embryo development by regulating translation in Xenopus laevis . J Biol Chem. 2016;291(44):23020‐23026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Zhao BS, Wang X, Beadell AV, et al. m(6)A‐dependent maternal mRNA clearance facilitates zebrafish maternal‐to‐zygotic transition. Nature. 2017;542(7642):475‐478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Shi H, Wang X, Lu Z, et al. YTHDF3 facilitates translation and decay of N(6)‐methyladenosine‐modified RNA. Cell Res. 2017;27(3):315‐328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Fu Y, Dominissini D, Rechavi G, He C. Gene expression regulation mediated through reversible m(6)A RNA methylation. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15(5):293‐306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Lee M, Kim B, Kim VN. Emerging roles of RNA modification: m(6)A and U‐tail. Cell. 2014;158(5):980‐987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Hartstock K, Rentmeister A. Mapping N(6)‐methyladenosine (m(6) A) in RNA: established methods, remaining challenges, and emerging approaches. Chemistry. 2019;25(14):3455‐3464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Du K, Zhang L, Lee T, Sun T. m(6)A RNA methylation controls neural development and is involved in human diseases. Mol Neurobiol. 2019;56(3):1596‐1606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Rowles J, Wong M, Powers R, Olsen MFTO. RNA epigenetics and epilepsy. Epigenetics. 2012;7(10):1094‐1097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Li Z, Qian P, Shao W, et al. Suppression of m(6)A reader Ythdf2 promotes hematopoietic stem cell expansion. Cell Res. 2018;28(9):904‐917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Liu N, Zhou KI, Parisien M, Dai Q, Diatchenko L, Pan T. N6‐methyladenosine alters RNA structure to regulate binding of a low‐complexity protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(10):6051‐6063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Tuck MT. Partial purification of a 6‐methyladenine mRNA methyltransferase which modifies internal adenine residues. Biochem J. 1992;288(Pt 1):233‐240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Huang J, Dong X, Gong Z, et al. Solution structure of the RNA recognition domain of METTL3‐METTL14 N(6)‐methyladenosine methyltransferase. Protein Cell. 2019;10(4):272‐284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Wang P, Doxtader KA, Nam Y. Structural basis for cooperative function of Mettl3 and Mettl14 methyltransferases. Mol Cell. 2016;63(2):306‐317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Liu J, Yue Y, Han D, et al. A METTL3‐METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N6‐adenosine methylation. Nat Chem Biol. 2014;10(2):93‐95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Wang X, Feng J, Xue Y, et al. Structural basis of N(6)‐adenosine methylation by the METTL3‐METTL14 complex. Nature. 2016;534(7608):575‐578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Wang Z, Pan Z, Adhikari S, et al. m(6) A deposition is regulated by PRMT1‐mediated arginine methylation of METTL14 in its disordered C‐terminal region. EMBO J. 2021;40(5):e106309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Li Y, Xia L, Tan K, et al. N(6)‐Methyladenosine co‐transcriptionally directs the demethylation of histone H3K9me2. Nat Genet. 2020;52(9):870‐877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Jia D, Jurkowska RZ, Zhang X, Jeltsch A, Cheng X. Structure of Dnmt3a bound to Dnmt3L suggests a model for de novo DNA methylation. Nature. 2007;449(7159):248‐251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Weng H, Huang H, Wu H, et al. METTL14 inhibits hematopoietic stem/progenitor differentiation and promotes leukemogenesis via mRNA m(6)A modification. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;22(2):191‐205.e199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Peng F, Xu J, Cui B, et al. Oncogenic AURKA‐enhanced N(6)‐methyladenosine modification increases DROSHA mRNA stability to transactivate STC1 in breast cancer stem‐like cells. Cell Res. 2021;31(3):345‐361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Zhang C, Ou S, Zhou Y, et al. m(6)A methyltransferase METTL14‐mediated upregulation of cytidine deaminase promoting gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;11:696371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Sun T, Wu Z, Wang X, et al. LNC942 promoting METTL14‐mediated m(6)A methylation in breast cancer cell proliferation and progression. Oncogene. 2020;39(31):5358‐5372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Sun Z, Wang H, Wang Y, et al. MiR‐103‐3p targets the m(6) A methyltransferase METTL14 to inhibit osteoblastic bone formation. Aging Cell. 2021;20(2):e13298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Liu T, Zhou H, Lu H, et al. MiR‐4729 regulates TIE1 mRNA m6A modification and angiogenesis in hemorrhoids by targeting METTL14. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(3):232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Wang Q, Zhang H, Chen Q, Wan Z, Gao X, Qian W. Identification of METTL14 in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma using bioinformatics analysis. Dis Markers. 2019;2019:5648783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Yang Z, Yang S, Cui YH, et al. METTL14 facilitates global genome repair and suppresses skin tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118(35):e2025948118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Lang F, Singh RK, Pei Y, Zhang S, Sun K, Robertson ES. EBV epitranscriptome reprogramming by METTL14 is critical for viral‐associated tumorigenesis. PLoS Pathog. 2019;15(6):e1007796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Gu C, Wang Z, Zhou N, et al. Mettl14 inhibits bladder TIC self‐renewal and bladder tumorigenesis through N(6)‐methyladenosine of Notch1. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Chen X, Xu M, Xu X, et al. METTL14‐mediated N6‐methyladenosine modification of SOX4 mRNA inhibits tumor metastasis in colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer. 2020;19(1):106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Chen X, Xu M, Xu X, et al. METTL14 suppresses CRC progression via regulating N6‐methyladenosine‐dependent primary miR‐375 processing. Mol Ther. 2020;28(2):599‐612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 58. Yang X, Zhang S, He C, et al. METTL14 suppresses proliferation and metastasis of colorectal cancer by down‐regulating oncogenic long non‐coding RNA XIST. Mol Cancer. 2020;19(1):46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Ma J, Yang D, Ma XX. Immune infiltration‐related N6‐methyladenosine RNA methylation regulators influence the malignancy and prognosis of endometrial cancer. Aging. 2021;13(12):16287‐16315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Liu J, Eckert MA, Harada BT, et al. m(6)A mRNA methylation regulates AKT activity to promote the proliferation and tumorigenicity of endometrial cancer. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20(9):1074‐1083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Liu X, Xiao M, Zhang L, et al. The m6A methyltransferase METTL14 inhibits the proliferation, migration, and invasion of gastric cancer by regulating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. J Clin Lab Anal. 2021;35(3):e23655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Hu N, Ji H. N6‐methyladenosine (m6A)‐mediated up‐regulation of long noncoding RNA LINC01320 promotes the proliferation, migration, and invasion of gastric cancer via miR495‐5p/RAB19 axis. Bioengineered. 2021;12(1):4081‐4091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Cui Q, Shi H, Ye P, et al. m(6)A RNA methylation regulates the self‐renewal and tumorigenesis of glioblastoma stem cells. Cell Rep. 2017;18(11):2622‐2634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Ma JZ, Yang F, Zhou CC, et al. METTL14 suppresses the metastatic potential of hepatocellular carcinoma by modulating N(6) ‐methyladenosine‐dependent primary MicroRNA processing. Hepatology. 2017;65(2):529‐543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Du L, Li Y, Kang M, et al. USP48 is upregulated by Mettl14 to attenuate hepatocellular carcinoma via regulating SIRT6 stabilization. Cancer Res. 2021;81(14):3822‐3834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Shi Y, Zhuang Y, Zhang J, Chen M, Wu S. METTL14 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis through regulating EGFR/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in an m6A‐dependent manner. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:13173‐13184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Zhou J, Wang J, Hong B, et al. Gene signatures and prognostic values of m6A regulators in clear cell renal cell carcinoma ‐ a retrospective study using TCGA database. Aging. 2019;11(6):1633‐1647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Gong D, Zhang J, Chen Y, et al. The m(6)A‐suppressed P2RX6 activation promotes renal cancer cells migration and invasion through ATP‐induced Ca(2+) influx modulating ERK1/2 phosphorylation and MMP9 signaling pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394‐424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Chen M, Nie ZY, Wen XH, Gao YH, Cao H, Zhang SF. m6A RNA methylation regulators can contribute to malignant progression and impact the prognosis of bladder cancer. Biosci Rep. 2019;39(12):BSR20192892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Weinberg BA, Marshall JL, Salem ME. The growing challenge of young adults with colorectal cancer. Oncology. 2017;31(5):381‐389. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7‐30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Cai C, Long J, Huang Q, et al. M6A “Writer” gene METTL14: a favorable prognostic biomarker and correlated with immune infiltrates in rectal cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;11:615296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Wang L, Hui H, Agrawal K, et al. m(6) A RNA methyltransferases METTL3/14 regulate immune responses to anti‐PD‐1 therapy. EMBO J. 2020;39(20):e104514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Wang S, Gan M, Chen C, et al. Methyl CpG binding protein 2 promotes colorectal cancer metastasis by regulating N(6) ‐methyladenosine methylation through methyltransferase‐like 14. Cancer Sci. 2021;112(8):3243‐3254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69‐90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Morice P, Leary A, Creutzberg C, Abu‐Rustum N, Darai E. Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2016;387(10023):1094‐1108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7‐30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Zhang C, Zhang M, Ge S, et al. Reduced m6A modification predicts malignant phenotypes and augmented Wnt/PI3K‐Akt signaling in gastric cancer. Cancer Med. 2019;8(10):4766‐4781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Yao Q, He L, Gao X, et al. The m6A methyltransferase METTL14‐mediated N6‐methyladenosine modification of PTEN mRNA inhibits tumor growth and metastasis in stomach adenocarcinoma. Front Oncol. 2021;11:699749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Jaoude DA, Moore JA, Moore MB, Twumasi‐Ankrah P, Ablah E, Moore DF Jr. Glioblastoma and increased survival with longer chemotherapy duration. Kans J Med. 2019;12(3):65‐69. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. European Association for the Study of the Liver . EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;69(1):182‐236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2012;379(9822):1245‐1255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Wei J, Qian Y, Tang Y, et al. Establishment of a risk signature based on m6A RNA methylation regulators that predicts poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther. 2021;14:413‐426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Zhang Y, Yao Y, Qi X, et al. Identification of a new prognostic risk signature of clear cell renal cell carcinoma based on N(6)‐methyladenosine RNA methylation regulators. J Immunol Res. 2021;2021:6617841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Zhang X, Li D, Jia C, Cai H, Lv Z, Wu B. METTL14 promotes tumorigenesis by regulating lncRNA OIP5‐AS1/miR‐98/ADAMTS8 signaling in papillary thyroid cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(6):617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Liu Z, Liu N, Huang Z, Wang W. METTL14 overexpression promotes osteosarcoma cell apoptosis and slows tumor progression via caspase 3 activation. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:12759‐12767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Ferrara F, Schiffer CA. Acute myeloid leukaemia in adults. Lancet. 2013;381(9865):484‐495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Medyouf H. The microenvironment in human myeloid malignancies: emerging concepts and therapeutic implications. Blood. 2017;129(12):1617‐1626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Brash JT, Bolton RL, Rashbrook VS, Denti L, Kubota Y, Ruhrberg C. Tamoxifen‐activated CreERT impairs retinal angiogenesis independently of gene deletion. Circ Res. 2020;127(6):849‐850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Pitulescu ME, Schmidt I, Benedito R, Adams RH. Inducible gene targeting in the neonatal vasculature and analysis of retinal angiogenesis in mice. Nat Protoc. 2010;5(9):1518‐1534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Chen ZH, Chen TQ, Zeng ZC, et al. Nuclear export of chimeric mRNAs depends on an lncRNA‐triggered autoregulatory loop in blood malignancies. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(7):566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Fan L, Strasser‐Weippl K, Li JJ, et al. Breast cancer in China. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(7):e279‐e289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Yi D, Wang R, Shi X, Xu L, Yilihamu Y, Sang J. METTL14 promotes the migration and invasion of breast cancer cells by modulating N6methyladenosine and hsamiR146a5p expression. Oncol Rep. 2020;43(5):1375‐1386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Wang M, Liu J, Zhao Y, et al. Upregulation of METTL14 mediates the elevation of PERP mRNA N(6) adenosine methylation promoting the growth and metastasis of pancreatic cancer. Mol Cancer. 2020;19(1):130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Kong F, Liu X, Zhou Y, et al. Downregulation of METTL14 increases apoptosis and autophagy induced by cisplatin in pancreatic cancer cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2020;122:105731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Chen S, Yang C, Wang ZW, et al. CLK1/SRSF5 pathway induces aberrant exon skipping of METTL14 and Cyclin L2 and promotes growth and metastasis of pancreatic cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14(1):60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Ji G, Huang C, He S, et al. Comprehensive analysis of m6A regulators prognostic value in prostate cancer. Aging. 2020;12(14):14863‐14884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Ban Y, Tan P, Cai J, et al. LNCAROD is stabilized by m6A methylation and promotes cancer progression via forming a ternary complex with HSPA1A and YBX1 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Oncol. 2020;14(6):1282‐1296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.