Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2001 Feb;39(2):779–781. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.2.779-781.2001

Nosocomial Spread of an Unusual Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Clone That Is Sensitive to All Non-β-Lactam Antibiotics, Including Tobramycin

Spyros Pournaras 1,2, Aris Slavakis 1, Aleka Polyzou 1, Danai Sofianou 1, Antonios N Maniatis 2, Athanassios Tsakris 3,*
PMCID: PMC87820  PMID: 11158151

Abstract

Between January and December 1999, in Hippokration General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece, a large proportion of the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates (34.4%) exhibited susceptibility to virtually all alternative non-β-lactam antibiotics, including tobramycin. Twenty-five of them were selected randomly for further testing; all belonged to a unique genotype and were characterized as heterogeneously resistant to oxacillin. The aadD gene, encoding tobramycin resistance, failed to be amplified in all cases, indicating absence of the gene or the entire plasmid pUB110 from the mec DNA.


The increased incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in many countries during the last decades has been accompanied by the appearance of multidrug-resistant clones, replacing other MRSA lineages (1). Tobramycin in particular is unlikely to be effective against MRSA because the gene (aadD) encoding tobramycin and kanamycin resistance is present within plasmid pUB110, which is considered a stable part of the mec DNA (3, 6). Recently, MRSA strains sensitive to gentamicin but resistant to tobramycin have emerged in French hospitals (5, 7, 8), while several MRSA strains sensitive to kanamycin have been occasionally isolated in the United Kingdom; they generally retained resistance to several alternative antibiotics (16). We report a hospital outbreak of clinical infections due to MRSA that exhibits susceptibility to virtually all alternative non-β-lactam antibiotics, including tobramycin.

Between January and December 1999, 247 S. aureus isolates were recovered from clinical infection of separate patients in Hippokration General Hospital, Thessaloniki, northern Greece. Identification to species level was performed by using the Vitek automated system (bioMerieux, Hazelwood, Mo.). MICs of oxacillin and tobramycin were tested using an agar dilution method (10). As many as 128 isolates (51.8%) were characterized as MRSA, and a large proportion of them (44 isolates, 34.4%) were sensitive to tobramycin (MICs ranged from 0.5 to 1 μg/ml). Twenty-five of the tobramycin-sensitive isolates were selected randomly for further testing. These isolates were recovered from clinical samples from patients hospitalized in nine different departments, including special intensive-care units (ICUs), and medical, pediatric, and surgery units (Table 1). Four other tobramycin-sensitive MRSA isolates, recovered previously in two general hospitals of Thessaloniki (AHEPA and Agios Dimitrios; Table 1) were also included in the study.

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of the 29 multidrug-susceptible Greek MRSA isolatesc

Isolate no. Ward or hospitala Date of isolation (mo/day/yr or yr) Site of isolation Drugs to which isolate was resistantb MIC of oxacillin PFGE type
57 Medicine 1 04/14/99 Pus Pn, Amc, Ox  16 I
78 Neonatal ICU 2 06/22/99 Pus Pn, Amc, Ox  32 I
82 Pediatric Surgery 06/15/99 Pus Pn, Amc, Ox  16 I
88 AHEPA Hospital (Plastic Surgery) 1996 Unknown Pn, Amc, Ox  32 I
89 AHEPA Hospital (Surgery 1) 1996 Unknown Pn, Amc, Ox  64 I
90 Agios Dimitrios Hospital 1996 Unknown Pn, Amc, Ox, Cp, Te 256 II
91 AHEPA Hospital (ICU) 1996 Unknown Pn, Amc, Ox, Cp, Te 128 III
93 Dialysis 06/18/99 Blood Pn, Amc, Ox  32 I
102 Neonatal ICU 2 06/27/99 Bronchial tube Pn, Amc, Ox  16 I
103 Neonatal ICU 2 07/02/99 Umbilical cord Pn, Amc, Ox  16 I
113 Neonatal ICU 2 07/12/99 Blood Pn, Amc, Ox  32 I
122 Medicine 1 07/21/99 Conjunctiva Pn, Amc, Ox  16 I
130 Dialysis 08/26/99 Peritoneal catheter Pn, Amc, Ox  32 I
141 Medicine 2 09/21/99 Blood Pn, Amc, Ox  32 I
157 Pediatrics 1 09/29/99 Urine Pn, Amc, Ox  16 I
158 Surgery 5 09/30/99 Trauma Pn, Amc, Ox  32 I
186 Pediatrics 1 10/17/99 Pus Pn, Amc, Ox  16 I
190 Pediatrics 1 10/19/99 Blood Pn, Amc, Ox  32 I
192 Medicine 2 10/21/00 Urine Pn, Amc, Ox  16 I
196 Dialysis 10/27/99 Blood Pn, Amc, Ox  16 I
197 Neonatal ICU 1 10/28/99 Umbilical cord Pn, Amc, Ox  16 I
198 Pediatrics 1 10/31/99 Blood Pn, Amc, Ox  16 I
204 Medicine 1 11/04/99 Intravascular catheter Pn, Amc, Ox  32 I
205 Surgery 3 11/12/99 Pus Pn, Amc, Ox  16 I
209 Pediatrics 1 11/16/99 Blood Pn, Amc, Ox  32 I
217 Medicine 2 12/01/99 Blood Pn, Amc, Ox  32 I
221 Neonatal ICU 2 12/07/99 Bronchial tube Pn, Amc, Ox  16 I
223 Medicine 2 12/09/99 Intravascular catheter Pn, Amc, Ox  32 I
232 Neonatal ICU 1 12/17/99 Bronchial tube Pn, Amc, Ox  32 I
a

All isolates except 88, 89, 90, and 91 were recovered from various wards of Hippokration Hospital. 

b

Pn, penicillin; Amc, amoxycillin-clavulanate; Ox, oxacillin; Cp, ciprofloxacin; Te, tetracycline. 

c

All isolates were negative for Tn554 and ermA

The 29 tobramycin-sensitive MRSA isolates were tested by an agar dilution method (10) for susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, erythromycin, fusidic acid, gentamicin, kanamycin, nitrofurantoin, rifampin, tetracycline, trimethoprim, and vancomycin. The isolates were also tested for high-level resistance to spectinomycin (500 μg/ml), which has been associated with carriage of transposon Tn554 (12). The methicillin resistance phenotype was further evaluated by the 1-μg oxacillin disk diffusion method using plates containing Mueller-Hinton agar (Difco, Detroit, Mich.) supplemented with 4% NaCl, which were incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The initial classification of the isolates as heterogeneously or homogeneously resistant was confirmed by population analysis profiles using four dilutions of the bacterial cultures (4, 12). The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of the antibiotic that inhibited 99.9% of the bacterial cells.

PCR was performed for the tobramycin-sensitive MRSA isolates to amplify a 449-bp product within the mecA gene (2). The method was also used for the detection of genes ermA (139-bp product), which is part of transposon Tn554, and aadD (165-bp product), which is part of plasmid pUB110, using published primers (9, 14).

The protocol used for the determination of SmaI macrorestriction patterns was described previously (15). The digested chromosomal DNAs were separated with a contour-clamped homogeneous electric field DRIII apparatus (Bio-Rad, Birmingham, United Kingdom). Concatameric bacteriophage lambda DNA molecules (48.5 kb; Bio-Rad) were used as size standards. Banding patterns of the strains were compared visually according to the criteria proposed by Tenover et al. (13).

The 25 isolates that were recovered from Hippokration Hospital remained susceptible to ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, erythromycin, fusidic acid, gentamicin, kanamycin, nitrofurantoin, rifampin, tetracycline, trimethoprim, and vancomycin. Among the four isolates that were recovered from two different hospitals in Thessaloniki (Table 1), two were also susceptible to all non-β-lactam antibiotics; the remaining two exhibited additional resistance to ciprofloxacin and tetracycline. The PCR test for the mecA gene was positive in the 29 isolates, while aadD and ermA genes failed to be amplified in all cases. The isolates were susceptible to spectinomycin at 500 μg/ml, required a MIC of oxacillin equal to or higher than 16 mg/liter, and were characterized by disk diffusion and population analysis as heterogeneously resistant, belonging to class II or II/III (12).

SmaI macrorestriction showed that the 25 isolates from Hippokration Hospital and 2 from AHEPA hospital (Table 1) belonged to a unique genotype (pattern I; Table 1). The remaining two isolates, which were recovered from different hospitals (Agios Dimitrios and AHEPA), exhibited distinct pulsotypes (patterns II and III, respectively; Fig. 1; Table 1). Patterns II and III differed from each other by only five bands. The isolation of tobramycin-sensitive MRSA in two other tertiary hospitals in our region, two isolates from which exhibited a clonal identity with those recovered in our hospital, may indicate the geographical spread of this clone. The common pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern of the Greek isolates seems to differ substantially from those of other multidrug-susceptible MRSA clones that have been described previously (5, 7, 8, 12, 16), although these strains were not run under the same conditions. However, most of the latter MRSA strains exhibited resistance to some non-β-lactam antibiotics, such as ciprofloxacin and tobramycin.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

PFGE patterns of SmaI-restricted genomic DNA of representative MRSA strains tested in this study. The origins of the strains are shown in Table 1. Lanes M, molecular mass markers.

Tobramycin seldom retains activity against MRSA because the gene conferring resistance (aadD) is present within plasmid pUB110, which is usually part of the mec DNA (3), although recently mec elements lacking this plasmid have been described (11). pUB110 was integrated during the period when mec DNA was being formed and prior to the emergence of the first outbreaks of MRSA infections in European hospitals in the early 1960s (3). This was the era of pre-MRSA, in which transcription of the mecA gene was strongly repressed by the mecI gene encoding a repressor function. A mutation in the rep gene of pUB110 possibly served for the stabilization of the plasmid after its integration into the chromosome of S. aureus (6). The appearance of MRSA was followed by various patterns of resistance to antibiotics, but tobramycin resistance was consistently recorded (1, 5, 6). In our isolates, aadD failed to be amplified, indicating the absence of the gene or the entire plasmid from the mec DNA. Also, the susceptibility of the isolates to spectinomycin at 500 μg/ml suggested the absence of transposon Tn554, which has been related to resistance to several alternative antibiotics (3).

The MRSA strain of this report has spread into different departments of a general hospital where antibiotic usage is heavy. This observation might indicate the virulence of this strain, which survived and became widespread in the hospital despite its susceptibility to a wide range of antimicrobials. It should be noted that the antibiotics mainly in use in this as well as other Greek hospitals are β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, monobactams, carbapenems, and glycopeptides. The overuse of most of these drugs might have facilitated the spread of this MRSA strain.

Multidrug-resistant MRSA has become a major nosocomial pathogen, and vancomycin is at present the antibiotic of choice for systemic infection. However, it is believed that the widespread use of vancomycin in regions with high proportions of MRSA will hasten the emergence of resistance in staphylococci and may also select for vancomycin-resistant enterococci. In view of the intrahospital spread of “new” multidrug-susceptible MRSA clones, we feel that additional therapeutic options are presented and vancomycin usage could be considerably reduced. Also, several of the antibiotics used on less of an intrahospital basis, such as macrolides, tetracyclines, lincosamides, and cotrimoxazole, could be used more extensively. This is of more value for regions such as Greece where the prevalence of MRSA is one of the highest in Europe. Nevertheless, vancomycin might still be the most appropriate agent for life-threatening infections. It has yet to be determined whether dissemination of this particular clone resulted from strains with enhanced virulence or genetic adaptability or from selection caused by changing consumption of antibiotics.

Acknowledgments

We thank A. P. Johnson and D. Morrison for helpful discussion.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ayliiffe G A J. The progressive intercontinental spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24(Suppl. 1):S74–S79. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.supplement_1.s74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bignardi G E, Woodford N, Chapman A, Johnson A P, Speller D C E. Detection of the mec-A gene and phenotypic detection of resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates with borderline or low-level methicillin resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996;37:53–63. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.1.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chambers H F. Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:781–791. doi: 10.1128/cmr.10.4.781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.de Lencastre H, Figueiredo A M S, Urban C, Rahal J, Tomasz A. Multiple mechanisms of methicillin resistance and improved methods for detection in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35:632–639. doi: 10.1128/aac.35.4.632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Galdbart J O, Morvan A, El Solh N. Phenotypic and molecular typing of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains susceptible to gentamicin isolated in France from 1995 to 1997. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:185–190. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.1.185-190.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ito T, Katayama Y, Hiramatsu K. Cloning and nucleotide sequence determination of the entire mec DNA of pre-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus N315. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:1449–1458. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.6.1449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lelievre H, Lina G, Jones M E, Olive C, Forey F, Roussel-Delvallez M, Nicolas-Chanoine M-H, Bebear C M, Jarlier V, Andremont A, Vandenesch F, Etienne J. Emergence and spread in French hospitals of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with increasing susceptibility to gentamicin and other antibiotics. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:3452–3457. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.11.3452-3457.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lemaitre N, Sougakoff W, Masmoudi A, Fievet M-H, Bismuth R, Jarlier V. Characterization of gentamicin-susceptible strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus involved in nosocomial spread. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:81–85. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.1.81-85.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Martineau F, Picard F J, Lansac N, Menard C, Roy P H, Ouellette M, Bergeron M G. Correlation between the resistance genotype determined by multiplex PCR assays and the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:231–238. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.2.231-238.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 4th ed. Approved standard M7-A4. Wayne, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Oliveira D C, Wu S W, de Lencastre H. Genetic organization of the downstream region of the mecA element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates carrying different polymorphisms of this region. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:1906–1910. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.7.1906-1910.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sa-Leao R, Santos Sanches I, Dias D, Peres I, Barros R M, de Lencastre H. Detection of an archaic clone of Staphylococcus aureus with low-level resistance to methicillin in a pediatric hospital in Portugal and in international samples: relics of a formerly widely disseminated strain? J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:1913–1920. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.6.1913-1920.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tenover F C, Arbeit R D, Goering R V, Mickelsen P A, Murray B E, Persing D H, Swaminathan B. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:2233–2239. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.9.2233-2239.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.van Asselt G J, Vliegenthart J S, Petit P L, van de Klundert J A, Mouton R P. High-level aminoglycoside resistance among enterococci and group A streptococci. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1992;30:651–659. doi: 10.1093/jac/30.5.651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.van Belkum A, van Leeuwen W, Kaufmann M E, Cookson B, Forey F, Etienne J, Goering R, Tenover F, Steward C, O'Brien F, Grubb W, Tassios P, Legakis N, Morvan A, El Solh N, de Ryck R, Struelens M, Salmenlinna S, Vuopio-Varkila J, Kooistra M, Talens W, Witte W, Verbrugh H. Assessment of resolution and intercenter reproducibility of results of genotyping Staphylococcus aureus by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of SmaI macrorestriction fragments: a multicenter study. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:1653–1659. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.6.1653-1659.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Working Party Group. Revised guidelines for the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in hospitals. J Hosp Infect. 1998;39:253–290. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(98)90293-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES