Abstract
Pigments of fungi are a fertile ground of inspiration: they spread across various chemical backbones, absorption ranges, and bioactivities. However, basidiomycetes with strikingly colored fruiting bodies have never been explored as agents for photodynamic therapy (PDT), even though known photoactive compound classes (e.g., anthraquinones or alkaloids) are used as chemotaxonomic markers. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that the dyes of skin-heads (dermocyboid Cortinarii) can produce singlet oxygen under irradiation and thus are natural photosensitizers. Three photosensitizers based on anthraquinone structures were isolated and photopharmaceutical tests were conducted. For one of the three, i.e., (–)-7,7′-biphyscion (1), a promising photoyield and photocytotoxicity of EC50 = 0.064 µM against cancer cells (A549) was found under blue light irradiation (λexc = 468 nm, 9.3 J/cm2). The results of molecular biological methods, e.g., a viability assay and a cell cycle analysis, demonstrated the harmlessness of 1 in the dark and highlighted the apoptosis-inducing PDT potential under blue light irradiation. These results demonstrate for the first time that pigments of dermocyboid Cortinarii possess a so far undescribed activity, i.e., photoactivity, with significant potential for the field of PDT. The dimeric anthraquinone (–)-7,7′-biphyscion (1) was identified as a promising natural photosensitizer.
Subject terms: Biophysical chemistry, Natural products, Small molecules, Single-molecule biophysics, Drug discovery, Drug discovery and development, Fungi, Drug discovery and development, Photobiology
Introduction
Mushrooms, the versatile fruiting bodies of fungi, trigger very different feelings in the western world: they scare the inexperienced mushroom hunter but delight the skilled pickers' tongue. While in Europe mushrooms tend to be reduced to their nutritional value, the Asian culture values fungi also as medicinal remedies. For example, Ganoderma lucidum is recognized for its anticancer action1 and Hericium erinaceus for its anti-inflammatory effects2. The phytochemical principles behind these bioactivities are triterpenes and sterols, respectively. Another compound class of fungi with pharmaceutical effect is the class of anthraquinones (AQs), responsible for the laxative effect of certain colorful mushrooms3, i.e., species belonging to the subgenus dermocyboid Cortinarii.
Looking with a photochemist's eye at the structure of these fungal AQs4, however, an additional potential pharmacological application can be suggested: Photodynamic therapy (PDT)5. PDT as a treatment strategy utilizes the synergistic effect of the light and the drug, the so-called photosensitizer (PS). In detail, the PS transforms the absorbed light into toxic reactive oxygen species (ROS), inducing cell death at the irradiation site. PDT is a promising alternative to classic chemotherapy to combat resistant cancer types and nonsurgical tumors6–9, which is—due to the needed spatial light activation—expected to reduce the painful side-effects of chemotherapeutics. Nevertheless, the treatment-specific adverse reactions of the most commonly used porphyrin-like photosensitizers (i.e., general photosensitivity of the skin) force the search for new scaffolds10.
One alternative PS is hypericin, the active ingredient of Hypericum perforatum. Intriguingly, the quinoid PS was not only discovered in several plant species of the genus Hypericaceae but also in colorful mushrooms (i.e., dermocyboid Cortinarii)11. Though this is known for more than 30 years, further investigations illuminating the potential of dermocyboid Cortinarii in PDT are limited to a pilot study12, in which a Cortinarius croceus extract was identified to possess a promising and selective photocytotoxicity. Inspired by this, the present study was designed to isolate PDT-active PSs from colorful dermocyboid Cortinarii. Dermocyboid Cortinarii were initially considered a genus of agaricoid Basidiomycota (i.e., Dermocybe)13 and were classified into four sections based on pigment occurrence (refer Table 1)14. For each section, unique AQ patterns were utilized as chemotaxonomic markers15. Some of these AQs equal photosensitizers which are proposed as PDT agents, as e.g., emodin, physcion, or hypericin. Thus, we hypothesize that the subgenus contains several unknown and known photoactive constituents, which may act as PDT-like compounds.
Table 1.
Species | Pigmentation-type | Section |
---|---|---|
C. olivaceofuscus | Cinnamomea | Holoxanthae |
C. cinnamomeoluteus | Dermocybe | |
C. uliginosus | ||
C. malicorius | Malicoria | Malicoriae |
C. phoeniceus | Sanguinea | Sanguineae |
C. semisanguineus | ||
C. cinnabarinus | Cinnabarina |
To test this hypothesis, seven species being representatives of the four pigmentation types were selected (Table 1) and submitted to a photo-activity workflow12 consisting of an (i) HPLC-DAD-MS fingerprint analysis, (ii) a singlet-oxygen detection assay (i.e., DMA-assay), and (iii) a (photo)cytotoxicity screening. Subsequently, the most active extract was subjected to in-depth mycochemical analysis, including the photoactivity-guided isolation of secondary metabolites.
This study reports the extracts' photo- and bioactivities, the activity-guided isolation, and the photopharmacological evaluation of the most active fungal PSs. All technical results of this multidisciplinary research study are reported and discussed in detail in the electronic supplementary information (ESI). In contrast, the key results are presented in the main manuscript to achieve concise communication.
Material and methods
Detailed information on analytical instruments, reagents, and general materials used in this study are provided in the electronic supplementary information (refer ESI, Chapters 1.1 and 1.2).
Fungal biomaterial
Fruiting bodies of the investigated Cortinarius species were collected in different European countries in the late twentieth century. C. malicorius was collected in 2018 in Italy. Sampling permissions were obtained for all voucher materials collected in Italy. All study/experimental protocols involving fungal materials were conducted in accordance with institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation. The Conventions on Biological Diversity were followed and, where applicable, The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity. All exact collection sites and names of the respective collectors are listed in Table 2. Voucher specimens of all species are deposited in the mycological collection of the Tiroler Landesmuseen (IBF, Naturwissenschaftliche Sammlungen|Tiroler Landesmuseen 2021 (tiroler-landesmuseen.at).
Table 2.
Voucher | leg. et det. | Origin | Year of collection | |
---|---|---|---|---|
C. uliginosus Berk. | IBF19951120 | Pilzverein Jenbach/M. Moser | Austria, Tyrol | 1995 |
C. phoeniceus (Bull.) R. Maire (C. purpureus (Bull. ex Pers.) Bidaud, Moënne-Locc. & Reumaux) | IBF19750022 | M. Moser | Germany, Baden-Württemberg | 1975 |
C. semisanguineus (Fr.) Gillet | IBF19740665 | M. Moser | Sweden, Småland, Femsjö | 1974 |
C. cinnabarinus Fr. | IBF19801005 | R. Pöder | Sweden, Småland, Femsjö | 1980 |
C. olivaceofuscus Kühner (D. carpineti nom. inval.) | IBF19750023 | M. Moser | Swiss, Basel | 1975 |
C. cinnamomeoluteus P.D. Orton | IBF19710420 | M. Moser | Swiss, Luzern | 1971 |
C. malicorius Fr. | IBF2018009 | D. Borghi | Italy, South Tyrol | 2018 |
Preparation of extracts
After the collection, the fresh fungal material was air dried and stored in paper bags. The dried fruiting bodies of the seven dermocyboid Cortinarius species were ground to a fine powder using a laboratory mill (mesh size = 0.5 mm) and then subjected to Soxhlet extraction. Approximately two grams of each species were weighed into extraction thimbles and defatted using petroleum ether (V = 500 mL, t = 8 h 20 min, Twater bath = 76 °C). After the first extraction step, the biomaterials were allowed to dry overnight at room temperature. Then, exhaustive extraction with methanol was conducted (V = 500 mL, t = 7 h 15 min, Twater bath = 90 °C). The extracts were evaporated to dryness at T = 40 °C under reduced pressure and stored in a desiccator. All steps were done under the exclusion of light. The yields and the color of the extracts, as well as the starting materials, are given in the supplementary information (refer ESI, Chapter 1.4, Table S1).
For the in-depth study of C. uliginosus, the extraction was carried out on a larger scale. Ground fruiting bodies (m = 78.84 g) were weighed into a large extraction thimble and subjected to Soxhlet extraction under reduced pressure. First, the powder was defatted with petroleum ether (V = 2500 mL, t = 17 h 35 min, p = 350 mbar, Twater bath = 30 °C) and then dried overnight at room temperature. The petroleum ether was removed after decantation using vacuum rotary evaporation at T = 40 °C to yield m = 1.31 g (η = 1.7% d.w.). Subsequently, the same biomaterial was extracted with methanol (V = 1900 mL, t = 19 h 22 min, p = 275–310 mbar, Twater bath = 40 °C). The solution was evaporated to dryness at T = 40 °C under reduced pressure to yield m = 18.47 g (η = 23.4% d.w.) of methanol extract.
All extraction procedures were conducted under the exclusion of direct sunlight using aluminum foil. The extracts were stored in a desiccator at room temperature prior to further analysis.
Liquid–liquid fractionation
An aliquot of the C. uliginosus methanolic extract (m = 18.4 g) was dissolved in water (V = 500 mL) and transferred into a separating funnel. The solution was partitioned with diethyl ether (V = 350 mL, n = 4), ethyl acetate (V = 300 mL, n = 4), and water-saturated n-butanol (V = 220 mL, n = 3). The individual fractions were dried using vacuum rotary evaporation at T = 40 °C and stored in a desiccator. The supplementary information (refer ESI, Chapter 1.8, Table S3, Fig. S3) provides the yields of the fractions, their colors, and their HPLC profiles.
Photoactivity-guided isolation of secondary metabolites
The isolation of compounds 1–3 from C. uliginosus is reported in detail in the supplementary information (refer ESI, Chapters 1.9–1.11). Briefly, after liquid–liquid fractionation of the methanolic extract, fractions were further separated and analyzed using standard phytochemical methods (e.g., column chromatography and HPLC). All generated fractions were evaluated on their ability to generate singlet oxygen with the DMA assay12. Compound 1 (η = 8.3 mg, 0.04% w/wMeOH) was isolated from the diethyl ether fraction employing dry column vacuum chromatography. Compounds 2 (η = 1.8 mg, 0.01% w/wMeOH) and 3 (η = 4.5 mg, 0.02% w/wMeOH) were obtained from the ethyl acetate fraction using flash chromatography, dry column vacuum chromatography, and preparative HPLC. The spectral and physicochemical data of 1–3 are provided in the supplementary information (refer ESI, Chapter 1.12).
Analytical profiling
The 14 fungal extracts (i.e., seven MeOH and seven PE extracts) were dissolved in DMSO (c = 1 mg/mL) and analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using an Agilent Technologies 1200 Series system equipped with a Synergi MAX-RP 80 Å column (150 × 4.60 mm, 4 micron) from Phenomenex (Aschaffenburg, Germany) as stationary phase. The mobile phase (A) was water, (B) consisted of acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid. Elution was performed in gradient mode starting with 10% B to 50% from 0 to 30 min, 50% B to 90% B from 30–34 min, 90% B to 90% B from 34–50 min, 90% B to 10% B from 50–55 min, followed by t = 10 min of re-equilibration with 90% A. The DAD was set to 210, 254, 330, and 468 nm, and flow rate, sample volume and column temperature were adjusted to 0.5 mL/min, V = 5 μL, and T = 35 °C, respectively. The chromatograms observed at λ = 468 nm are depicted in Fig. S1. For HPLC–MS analyses, an Agilent Technologies 1260 Infinity II HPLC system was coupled to an amaZon iontrap mass spectrometer (Bruker, Bremen, Germany) utilizing the same stationary phase and mobile phase as mentioned above. MS spectra were recorded in negative ESI mode, with a drying gas temperature of T = 320 °C, the nebulizer gas (nitrogen) set to 25 psi, and a nebulizer flow (nitrogen) of 12 l/min. The scanned mass range was between m/z 70–1500, at a capillary voltage of 4.5 kV.
Photochemical and photophysical investigation
The fungal extracts were dissolved in DMSO, mixed with an ethanolic 9,10-dimethylanthracene (DMA)-solution, and irradiated with blue light (λ = 468 nm)12. The generated singlet oxygen was then indirectly quantified via the quenching of absorbance at λ = 377 nm. Berberine was used as a reference compound. An accurate protocol for conducting the DMA-assay is provided in the supplementary (ESI chapter 1.6). The photophysical investigation of the isolated compounds 1–3, i.e., the calculation of the singlet oxygen quantum yields, the recording of luminescence spectra, and the determination of photostability, was carried out as described in the supplementary (refer ESI, Chapter 3).
Molecular networking
The methanolic extract of C. phoeniceus as well as the methanolic extract of C. uliginosus, including its four fractions resulting from the liquid–liquid extraction (i.e., diethyl ether, ethyl acetate, n-butanol, and water), were subjected to a feature-based molecular networking analysis. Briefly, the extracts and fractions were analyzed by UHPLC-DAD-MS/MS. Acquired MS data were first converted from .RAW standard format to .mzXML format and then treated using the MZmine software suite v. 2.3816. After mass detection, chromatogram building, deconvolution, adduct search, dereplication using an in-house database of fungal pigments, alignment, and gap-filling, a feature-based molecular network was created with the online workflow on the GNPS website. The visualization of the network was done with the software Cytoscape17. Metabolite annotation was performed combining in-house library dereplication, in-silico annotation with Sirius18, and a script for taxonomically informed metabolite annotation. The detailed workflow of the molecular networking analysis is given in the supplementary material (refer ESI, Chapter 2).
Stability testing of isolated secondary metabolites
A stability evaluation of the isolated compounds 1–3 was conducted to investigate the influence of different temperature and light conditions. Briefly, 1 was dissolved in dimethylformamide (DMF) and aliquots were pipetted into white-glass HPLC-vials. The vials were stored under five different light/temperature conditions, and the residual concentration of 1 (relative to the original concentration) was determined after a whole week (refer ESI, Chapter 4). In addition, the stability of 1–3 under cell culture conditions was investigated. The DMSO stock solutions of 1–3 were stored in brown-glass HPLC-vials at room temperature and under the exclusion of light. Over a period of 33 h and 19 min, the solutions were repeatedly measured by HPLC, and the remaining concentrations of 1–3 were calculated relative to their original concentration (ESI chapter 4.2). Serial dilutions of the DMSO stocks of 1–3 in Opti-MEM® were also subjected to stability testing. The dilutions were analyzed by HPLC before and after a period of 24 h at 37 °C (refer ESI, Chapter 4.2). The influence of blue light on the stability of 1 was assessed as well. Dilutions of a DMSO stock of 1 in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), DMEM, and Opti-MEM® were analyzed by HPLC before and after blue light (λ = 468 nm) irradiation (refer ESI, Chapter 4.3).
(Photo)cytotoxicity assay and cell culture maintenance
Cells of the non-small cell lung cancer cell line A549 (ATCC, Sigma-Aldrich), the cervical cancer cell line HeLa (kindly donated by A. Trockenbacher (Management Center Innsbruck, Austria)), the stomach cancer cell line AGS (CLS, Eppelheim), and the human urinary bladder carcinoma cell line (CLS, Eppelheim) were maintained in T-flasks (25 cm2) and MEM-medium containing FCS (10%) and penicillin/streptomycin (1%). Cells were trypsinized every other day and used for approximately 4 weeks. Cell freezing and de-freezing was done according to standard procedures. The (photo)cytotoxicity assay was done as previously published19. Briefly, cells (AGS: 2500 cells/well, T24 & A549 & HeLa: 2000 cells/well) were seeded in Opti-MEM® (2.5% FCS, P/S) and after 24 h treated with each extract (50, 25, and 5 µg/mL, stock solution 10 mg/mL in DMSO, max DMSO 0.65%). After additional 24 h, the medium was aspirated and replaced by fresh Opti-MEM®. Thereafter, the plate was irradiated for the indicated amount of time (i.e. 0, 2.5, 5, or 7.5 min; 0, 3.1, 6.2, or 9.3 J/cm2 respectively). The cells were fixed with chilled trichloroacetic acid (100 µL) after 72 h in total. After washing (4 times 200 µL, water) the wells were stained with sulforhodamine B (SRB, 0.4% in acetic acid (1%)) for 30 min. Then, the plates were rewashed (4 times 200 µL, acetic acid 1%) and dried under air. The dried dye was dissolved with a TRIS solution (10 mM in water, 100 µL) and the absorbance measured at 540 nm with a plate reader (Tecan, Spark, M10). The EC50 of berberine and the pure compounds 1–3 was calculated with Prism 5.0 employing the relative Hill-Slope equation and is given with its confidence interval (95%). For the extracts, no cytotoxicity was defined if more than 50% of the cell population was existent at 50 µg/mL. Moderate activity was assigned for an extract resulting at 50% cell population in a range of 25–50 µg/mL, high activity between 5 and 25 µg/mL, and exorbitant under 5 µg/mL, respectively. The selectivity indices (S.I.) express the ratio of cells killed in the dark and cells killed under irradiation. It is calculated from the EC50 values as the quotient of EC50|Dark and EC50|Irradiated.
Anthraquinone uptake studies
The cellular uptake of the isolated anthraquinones 1–3 was investigated via combining in vitro cell culture experiments and liquid-chromatographic analyses (i.e., HPLC–DAD). The exact protocols are given in the supplementary material (refer ESI, Chapter 5.4).
Metabolic activity assay, cell cycle analysis, and cell viability assay
The metabolic activity of A549 cancer cells treated with 1 was investigated using the resazurin assay (refer ESI, Chapter 5.5). A cell cycle analysis was performed with A549 cancer cells treated with 1 employing flow cytometric analysis (refer ESI, Chapter 5.6). The viability of A549 cancer cells treated with 1 was tested utilizing Annexin V and DRAQ7 (refer ESI, Chapter 5.7).
Photocytotoxicity inhibition studies
Various antioxidants were assessed for their ability to chemically quench singlet oxygen (DMA studies/refer ESI, Chapter 5.8.1) and to inhibit photodamage induced by 1 on A549 and T24 cancer cells (refer ESI, Chapter 5.8.2).
Results and discussion
Photobiological screening and photoactivity guided isolation
The HPLC–DAD-MS analysis of the fungal extracts revealed that the apolar fractions were characterized at most with two major pigments (mono- and/or bis-anthraquinones). In comparison, the polar extracts consisted of up to seven pigments (refer ESI, Fig. S1). These results corresponded with the previous work utilizing complete extracts and thin-layer chromatographic methods15. An UV–Vis analysis disclosed that most pigments were characterized by an absorbance maximum between 450 and 500 nm (refer ESI, Table S2). As a consequence, the DMA-assay was done employing blue light (λirr = 468 nm, H = 24.3 J/cm2) and the natural photosensitizer berberine (λmax, EtOH = 429 nm, ϕΔ,EtOH = 0.0520). Additionally, a methanolic extract of the roots of Berberis ilicifolia was used to rank the fungal extract's potential compared to an herbal extract. As shown in Fig. 1, all extracts were more active than the B. ilicifolia extract, and most extracts were more active than the standard berberine (Fig. 1). Thus,—for the first time—a general photoactivity of fruiting bodies was revealed in European species of dermocyboid Cortinarii.
The activity profile of the mushrooms could be ranked according to their pigment profile (Table 1). In detail, mushrooms belonging to the sanguinea pigment type were less active than those belonging to the malicoria and cinnamomea pigment type. Fruiting bodies of the cinnabarina pigmentation type were the most active and thus was C. cinnabarinus (403%). The cinnabarina pigmentation type is atypical for European species and more common for species of the Southern Hemisphere15,21.
The results of the photo-cytotoxicity assay (refer ESI, Table S10) showed, however, that a high singlet-oxygen production rate alone is a poor indicator for a selective photo-cytotoxic activity. The PE extract of C. cinnabarinus, for example, was an efficient producer of 1O2 (403%), but its dark cytotoxicity was too pronounced (EC50 = 28 µg/mL, A549 cells) and consequently the by light induced selectivity factor of three not prominent enough (Table S10, EC50, BL, A549 = 9 µg/mL vs EC50, Dark, A549 = 28 µg/mL). Moreover, the MeOH extract of C. cinnabarinus (1O2 = 275%) lacked activity under irradiation, indicating cellular uptake deficits. In analogy, the other extracts of the fruiting bodies belonging to Moser's section sanguinea (i.e., C. phoeniceus and C. semisanguineus) lacked either photo-activity in vitro (MeOH extracts) or held insignificant selectivity indices (PE extracts, SIDarK/BL = max. 4). The PE extracts of the three investigated species of the cinnamomea pigmentation type (i.e., C. olivaceofuscus, C. cinnamomeoluteus, and C. uliginosus) showed a similar pattern. The results of the respective methanolic fractions, however, were of utmost interest: All extracts of the cinnamomea pigmentation type were highly active (EC50 = 2–7 µg/mL) under irradiation (468 nm, 9.3 J/cm2) while being inactive in the dark (EC50 > 50 µg/mL). For the isolation, the most promising dermocyboid Cortinarius, i.e., C. uliginosus, was chosen.
Starting with dried and ground fruiting bodies (m = 80.0 g), a sequential Soxhlet-extraction with PE and MeOH yielded a red (1.7 wt %, 1.3 g) and an orange (23.5 wt %, 18.5 g) viscose fluid. The MeOH fraction was separated further into four fractions via liquid–liquid extraction. The highest photoactivities were found in the diethyl ether (316%) and ethyl acetate (251%) fractions (Fig. S3). While the diethyl ether fraction consisted of only one prominent peak (tr = 44.2 min) absorbing at 468 nm (Fig. S1), the ethyl acetate fraction showed (Fig. 2) two additional significant (tr = 23.7 and 25.7 min) and three minor pigments (tr = 21.6, 28.6, and 31.8 min).
Feature-based molecular networking (FBMN)22 analysis was conducted to support the annotation of C. uliginosus' secondary metabolites. FBMN, a state-of-the-art metabolomics tool, is used to visualize complex data obtained through untargeted LC–MS/MS metabolite profiling analyses. Furthermore, it is employed to identify extract constituents based on structural similarity. Hence, the two methanolic extracts (i.e., C. uliginosus and C. phoeniceus) and four fractions (i.e., diethyl ether, ethyl acetate, n-butanol, and water) were subjected to UHPLC-HRMS/MS analysis. The acquired data were pretreated and a molecular network was generated using the GNPS platform22. The principles of bioactive natural product prioritization23 were used to organize and explore the network to spot unknown metabolites of interest. Evidently (refer ESI, Chapter 2 for the detailed results of the FBMN study), the bioactivity can be attributed to AQs in the apolar fractions. Based on all gathered insights, the compound appearing at 44.2 min was annotated as 7,7′-biphyscion (1) and isolated via dry column vacuum chromatography (refer ESI, Chapters 1.7–1.10 for the detailed discussion of the isolation process) as an orange powder (8.32 mg, 0.04% d.w.). The annotation as 7,7′-biphyscion (1) was confirmed via standard techniques (NMR, IR, UV–Vis, HRMS, m.p., refer ESI Chapter 1.12.1 for the complete structure discussion). The specific rotation of 1 was determined to be levorotary ([α]D, T = 25 °C = − 178 (c = 0.1 mg/mL)).
Via photoactivity-guided fractionation of the ethyl acetate fraction and semi-preparative HPLC, the peaks at tr = 23.6 min and tr = 25.7 min were additionally isolated (for details refer ESI, Chapter 1.11). These metabolites could be identified as the known fungal AQs24 dermolutein (2) and dermorubin (3), respectively (refer ESI, Chapters 1.12.2 and 1.12.3 for the complete structural assignment). The minor peaks were putatively annotated as physcion-8-O-glycoside (tr = 21.6 min), 5-chloro-dermorubin (tr = 28.6 min), and endocrocin-6,8-dimethylether (tr = 31.8 min) based on a comparison of the literature data15 with the detected MS signals (refer ESI, Chapter 2).
Photochemical and photobiological evaluation of the isolated pigments
The three isolated pigments 1–3 were submitted to photochemical and -physical studies (refer ESI Chapter 3). As shown in Table 3, all isolated fungal metabolites produced singlet oxygen under irradiation (ACN, 450 nm, 50 mW, d4-MeOH). With a quantum yield of 20%, 1 is the most efficient PS of the isolated metabolites of C. uliginosus. The monomeric AQs 2 and 3 held a singlet oxygen quantum yield (ϕΔ) of 3% and 8%, respectively. Thus, compared to the other known natural PSs based on a dimeric AQ structure, i.e., 5,5′-bisoranjidiol ϕΔ = 18%25, 1 showed similar photophysical properties. The photophysical activity of the monomeric AQs 2 and 3 blended into the wide range of quantum yields described for AQs26. Furthermore, luminescence spectra (refer ESI Fig. S30) were recorded, lifetime measurements were done, and emission quantum yields were determined (Table 3, refer ESI Fig. S29). In terms of luminescence, the monomeric AQs were more efficient than the bisanthraquinone 1, with 3 being the most efficient. The obtained lifetimes in the nanosecond scale indicated the fluorescent nature of the luminescence, which is in line with reports on AQs27. Additionally, we were interested in the photostability of the isolated metabolites. A decomposition was observed for the monomeric AQs in methanol under blue light irradiation (450 nm LED, refer ESI Chapter 3.4). The evolution of several new species was detected for 1. These transformations appeared with a quantum yield of 0.78% in the first 75 min. Thus, only a marginal part of the natural PS 1 decomposes under the given light conditions, and a photo-activated biological effect is highly likely.
Table 3.
1 | 2 | 3 | MeOH extract | |
---|---|---|---|---|
λabs[a] [nm] (log ε) | 440 (3.48) | 427 (3.89) | 490 (3.92) | 420 |
440 (3.85) | 530 (3.58) | |||
λems[b] [nm] | 607 | 625 | 593 | 593 |
ϕF[b,c] | 0.016 ± 0.005 | 0.048 ± 0.005 | 0.087 ± 0.002 | 0.04 ± 0.01 |
τ[d] [ns] | 0.8 | 1.6 | 4.3 | 1.1/4.7 |
ϕΔ[b,c] | 20 ± 2% | 3 ± 0.3% | 8 ± 2% | 10 ± 1% |
ϕdecom | 0.78% | 1.6% | 0.18% | – |
[a] In MeOH [b] In air-saturated D4MeOH [c] Relative measurement using [Ru(bpy)3]Cl2 as standard with ΦP = 0.015. Laser settings: 450 nm, 15 mW [d] With a resolution of 0.3 ns.
The photo-activated effect of 1–3 was tested via a (photo)cytotoxicity assay employing cells of three malignant cell lines (A549/human lung carcinoma, AGS/human gastric adenocarcinoma, T24/human bladder carcinoma). Figure 3 summarizes the results. A conducted stability assay (ESI Chapter 4) in the medium (refer ESI, Tables S8, S9, Fig. S31) confirmed the stability of the isolated metabolites 1–3 beforehand.
The monomeric AQs 2 and 3, as displayed in Figs. S46–48, were neither in the dark nor under irradiation toxic (EC50 > 12.5 µM). A missing cellular uptake might explain the lack of photoactivity. Indeed, a HPLC–DAD-based uptake study showed that 2 and 3 are not intracellularly present (refer ESI, Chapter 5.4 and Fig. S33A). The bisanthraquinone 1, however, was taken up by the cells (refer ESI, Figs. S33A and S34) and exhibited a significant cytotoxic effect in a nanomolar range (Fig. 3) after being irradiated with blue light (468 nm, 9.3 J/cm2) while 1 lacked activity in the dark (EC50 > 2.5 µM). The natural PS 1 was also phototoxic for cells of the non-malignant cell line NIH3T3 (Fig. 3). Such lack of selectivity is a severe problem for classic chemotherapeutics. For PSs, however, it is less problematic as the spatial irradiation of the tumorous tissues induces the toxic effect selectively. Under dark conditions, 1 was non-toxic for the fibroblasts.
To verify the harmlessness of 1 in the dark, we conducted (i) a metabolic activity assay, which results proved that 1—without irradiation—does not interfere with the metabolic activity of A549 cells (refer to ESI, Fig. S36). Furthermore, we conducted (ii) a cell cycle analysis. The results (refer to ESI, Fig. S37) showed no differences between control and treatment, portraying 1 as innocuous in the dark. And finally, (iii) a viability assay (annexin V/DRAQ7) also confirmed the harmlessness of 1 in the dark (Figs. 4 and S38–S41).
Under irradiation, a different pattern was observed for cells being treated with 1: 24 h after the external trigger, 45% percent of all cells were apoptotic (22% early apoptotic and 23% secondary apoptotic) (Fig. 4). At higher concentrations of 1 (i.e., c = 1 µM), more apoptotic cells were observed (i.e., 79% refer ESI, Figs. S40 and S41). These results are in line with the noticed morphological changes. Cells treated with 1 and blue light were shrunken, membranes blebbed, and nuclei condensed (Figs. S47–S49). In contrast, cells treated under dark conditions did not show any morphological changes compared to the non-irradiated control.
To understand the effect of light irradiation on the bioactivity of 1 in more detail, we performed several analyses: (i) Irradiating 1 in OMEM medium (w/ FCS) showed that 6.1% of 1 were degraded after 7.5 min (9.3 J/cm2, 468 nm) (Fig. S32). In contrast, in solutions without FCS, significantly more degradation was observed (Fig. S31, up to 65% were degraded after irradiation). As a consequence, an involvement of ROS in the degradation mechanism is implied since FCS is a known ROS scavenger28. However, a single photochemical degradation product of 1 was not detected in any of the HPLC–DAD analyses (Fig. S35). To (ii) test whether a solution of 1 could be used in several irradiation cycles, cells were treated with pre-irradiated solutions of 1 and (mock)-irradiated after 24 h of incubation again. After this subsequent irradiation, a similar EC50 value (51 ± 14 nM) was calculated compared to the standard protocol. This result proved the opportunity of a pulsed irradiation cycle. Also, under dark conditions, the pre-irradiation of 1 did not change the activity profile (i.e., pre-irradiated 1 is non-toxic too (EC50, Dark > 2.5 µM)), which proved the harmlessness of the produced degradation products.
Photocytotoxicity inhibition studies were conducted with different antioxidants (refer ESI, Chapter 5.4) to understand the induced ROS better. Under cell-free conditions, 75% of the ROS production was quenched by sodium azide (Table S11). This reduction proved singlet oxygen as major ROS, as sodium azide is a physical quencher of singlet oxygen29. Sodium azide is, however, not recommended for in vitro assays due to its dual function as singlet oxygen quencher29 and potent inhibitor of the cytochrome oxidase of the electron transport system30. Thus, a ROS-dependent mode-of-action was demonstrated by a co-treatment with N-acetyl-l-cysteine and β-carotene. In cells of the A549 and T24 cell lines, the in vitro photodamage was reduced by up to 52% (refer ESI chapter 5.4.2).
With these results, 1 is one of the most potent AQ-based PS so far known: With its average EC50, BL of approx. 0.05 µM 1 exceeds the photocytotoxicity of the reported monomeric AQs rubiadin (EC50, MCF7 = 74 µM) and soranjidiol (EC50, MCF7 = 37 µM)31 by more than 1300 fold. Thus, 1 represents a natural compound with a true potential as PDT hit structure. Furthermore, 1 demonstrated in vitro activities not inferior to those of transition metal complexes already used in clinical trials (i.e., Ru(II) polypyridiyl complex TLD1433 with an EC50 of 51 nM against cells of the U87 human glioblastoma cell line, activated by green light (530 nm, 45 J/cm2))32,33. Finally, the apoptosis-inducing character of 1 under irradiation rendered this new natural photosensitizer highly promising.
Conclusion
In this study, the first PSs (1–3) were isolated from fungal fruiting bodies in a targeted manner. Their structures belong to the photoactive class of anthraquinones26. In the plant kingdom (Plantae), photoactive AQs are part of the plant defense mechanisms34–37. This fact hints towards a potentially undiscovered ecological function of the fungal AQs.
The ability of 7,7′-biphyscion (1) to produce (i) singlet oxygen (ϕΔ = 20%), (ii) its stability, and (iii) its photopharmacological potential with a selectivity index of over 39, (iv) an EC50 in the lower nanomolar range (i.e., 64 nM, A549), and (v) its ability to induce apoptosis turn this first fungal PS of basidiomycetes into a promising new candidate for PDT. The fact that 1 was also discovered in endophytic fungi38 bears the potential of biotechnical production.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
The Austrian Science Fund (FWF PP 31915 , BS) and the University of Innsbruck are thanked for their support. B. Matuszczak for measuring the IR spectra, S. Bonnet for the access to the laser table, and H. Stuppner for his support and input. Dr. H. Schöbel and Prof. L. Huber are kindly acknowledged for the NiH3T3 cells. Dr. C. Schinagl’s and Dr. B. Waltenberger’s proofreading is highly appreciated. We thank Autonome Provinz Bozen Abteilung Forstwirtschaft for the granting of the collection permit.
Abbreviations
- ACN
Acetonitrile
- AQ
Anthraquinone
- BL
Blue light
- DAD
Diode array detector
- DMA
9,10-Dimethylanthracene
- DRAQ
Dark red anthraquinone 7
- EC50
Half maximal effective concentration
- ESI
Electronic supplementary information
- FBMN
Feature-based molecular network
- FCS
Fetal calve serum
- HPLC
High performance liquid chromatography
- HRMS/MS
High-resolution tandem mass spectrometry
- IR
Infrared
- LED
Light emitting diode
- m.p.
Melting point
- MeOH
Methanol
- MS
Mass spectrometry
- NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
- 1O2
Singlet oxygen
- OMEM
Opti-MEM
- PDT
Photodynamic therapy
- PE
Petrol ether
- PS
Photosensitizer
- ROS
Reactive oxygen species
- TLC
Thin-layer-chromatography
- SI
Selectivity indices
- UHLPC
Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography
- UV–Vis
Ultraviolet–visible
Author contributions
F.H. isolated and characterized the photosensitizers, performed the DMA assay, the photocytotoxicity assays of the isolated PSs, and wrote large parts of the SI. I.B. performed the phototoxicity assays of the extracts. A.P. performed and analyzed the photophysical experiments. A.M. performed the FACS analysis and the metabolic activity assay under the supervision of R.G. A.M. and B.S. analyzed the data. AR performed the MN measurement under the supervision of J.L.W.. B.S., and A.R. analyzed the MN under the supervision of J.L.W.. U.P. curated the fungal material. B.S. conceived the study, wrote the first draft of the paper, and supervised the experiments. All authors contributed to the final manuscript and approved it. All data were generated in-house, and no paper mill was used. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of work, ensuring integrity and accuracy.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-04975-9.
References
- 1.Ahmad MF. Ganoderma lucidum: A rational pharmacological approach to surmount cancer. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020;260:113047. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2020.113047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Friedman M. Chemistry, nutrition, and health-promoting properties of Hericium erinaceus (Lion’s Mane) mushroom fruiting bodies and mycelia and their bioactive compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015;63:7108–7123. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b02914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mueller SO, et al. Occurrence of emodin, chrysophanol and physcion in vegetables, herbs and liquors. Genotoxicity and anti-genotoxicity of the anthraquinones and of the whole plants. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1999;37:481–491. doi: 10.1016/S0278-6915(99)00027-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Siewert B. Does the chemistry of fungal pigments demand the existence of photoactivated defense strategies in basidiomycetes? Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s43630-021-00034-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dolmans DEJGJ, Fukumura D, Jain RK. Photodynamic therapy for cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2003;3:380–387. doi: 10.1038/nrc1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Protti S, Albini A, Viswanathan R, Greer A. Targeting photochemical scalpels or lancets in the photodynamic therapy field—the photochemist's role. Photochem. Photobiol. 2017;93:1139–1153. doi: 10.1111/php.12766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.van Straten D, Mashayekhi V, de Bruijn HS, Oliveira S, Robinson DJ. Oncologic photodynamic therapy: Basic principles, current clinical status and future directions. Cancers. 2017;9:19. doi: 10.3390/cancers9020019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shafirstein G, et al. Interstitial photodynamic therapy—A focused review. Cancers. 2017;9:12. doi: 10.3390/cancers9020012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bacellar IO, Tsubone TM, Pavani C, Baptista MS. Photodynamic efficiency: From molecular photochemistry to cell death. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015;16:20523–20559. doi: 10.3390/ijms160920523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hamblin MR. Photodynamic therapy for cancer: What's past is prologue. Photochem. Photobiol. 2020;96:506–516. doi: 10.1111/php.13190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gill M, Steglich W. Pigments of fungi (Macromycetes) Fortschr. Chem. Org. Naturst. 1987;51:1–317. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6971-1_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Siewert B, Vrabl P, Hammerle F, Bingger I, Stuppner H. A convenient workflow to spot photosensitizers revealed photo-activity in basidiomycetes. RSC Adv. 2019;9:4545–4552. doi: 10.1039/C8RA10181G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fries EM. Hymenomycetes europaei: sive, Epicriseos systematis mycologici. E. Berling; 1874. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Moser M. Die Gattung Dermocybe (Fr.) Wünsche (Die Hautköpfe) Schw. Zeitschrift für Pilzkunde. 1972;83(11):153–167. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Keller G. Pigmentationsuntersuchungen bei europäischen Arten aus der Gattung Dermocybe (FR.) WÜNSCHE. Sydowia. 1982;35:110–126. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pluskal T, Castillo S, Villar-Briones A, Orešič M. MZmine 2: Modular framework for processing, visualizing, and analyzing mass spectrometry-based molecular profile data. BMC Bioinform. 2010;11:395. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shannon P, et al. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13:2498–2504. doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dührkop K, et al. SIRIUS 4: A rapid tool for turning tandem mass spectra into metabolite structure information. Nat. Methods. 2019;16:299–302. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0344-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hopkins SL, et al. An in vitro cell irradiation protocol for testing photopharmaceuticals and the effect of blue, green, and red light on human cancer cell lines. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2016;15:644–653. doi: 10.1039/C5PP00424A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Görner H, Miskolczy Z, Megyesi M, Biczók L. Photoreduction and ketone-sensitized reduction of alkaloids. Photochem. Photobiol. 2011;87:284–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2010.00880.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Keller G, Moser M, Horak E, Steglich W. Chemotaxonomic investigations of species of Dermocybe (FR.) WÜNSCHE (Agaricales) from New Zealand, Papua New Guinea and Argentina. Sydowia. 1988;40:168–187. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nothias L-F, et al. Feature-based molecular networking in the GNPS analysis environment. Nat. Methods. 2020;17:905–908. doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-0933-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Olivon F, et al. Bioactive natural products prioritization using massive multi-informational molecular networks. ACS Chem. Biol. 2017;12:2644–2651. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.7b00413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Steglich W, Arnold R, Loesel W, Reininger W. Biosynthesis of anthraquinone pigments in Dermocybe. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1972 doi: 10.1039/C39720000102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Comini LR, Núñez Montoya SC, Sarmiento M, Cabrera JL, Argüello GA. Characterizing some photophysical, photochemical and photobiological properties of photosensitizing anthraquinones. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2007;188:185–191. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2006.12.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Siewert B, Stuppner H. The photoactivity of natural products—An overlooked potential of phytomedicines? Phytomedicine. 2019;60:152985. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2019.152985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gollnick K, Held S, Martire DO, Braslavsky SE. Hydroxyanthraquinones as sensitizers of singlet oxygen reactions—quantum yields of triplet formation and singlet oxygen generation in acetonitrile. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A. 1992;69:155–165. doi: 10.1016/1010-6030(92)85273-W. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mun S-E, et al. Dual effect of fetal bovine serum on early development depends on stage-specific reactive oxygen species demands in pigs. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0175427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Li MY, et al. Quenching of singlet molecular oxygen (1O2) by azide anion in solvent mixtures. Photochem. Photobiol. 2001;74:760–764. doi: 10.1562/0031-8655(2001)0740760QOSMOO2.0.CO2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dawson TL, Gores GJ, Nieminen AL, Herman B, Lemasters JJ. Mitochondria as a source of reactive oxygen species during reductive stress in rat hepatocytes. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 1993;264:C961–C967. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1993.264.4.C961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Comini LR, et al. Photodynamic activity of anthraquinones isolated from Heterophyllaea pustulata Hook f. (Rubiaceae) on MCF-7c3 breast cancer cells. Phytomedicine. 2011;18:1093–1095. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2011.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Monro S, et al. Transition metal complexes and photodynamic therapy from a tumor-centered approach: Challenges, opportunities, and highlights from the development of TLD1433. Chem. Rev. 2019;119:797–828. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fong J, et al. A novel class of ruthenium-based photosensitizers effectively kills in vitro cancer cells and in vivo tumors. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2015;14:2014–2023. doi: 10.1039/C4PP00438H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Downum KR. Light-activated plant defence. New Phytol. 1992;122:401–420. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb00068.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Berenbaum M. Phototoxicity of plant secondary metabolites: Insect and mammalian perspectives. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 1995;29:119–134. doi: 10.1002/arch.940290204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ben Amor T, Jori G. Sunlight-activated insecticides: Historical background and mechanisms of phototoxic activity. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2000;30:915–925. doi: 10.1016/S0965-1748(00)00072-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Roberts MR, Paul ND. Seduced by the dark side: Integrating molecular and ecological perspectives on the influence of light on plant defence against pests and pathogens. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2006;170:677–699. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01707.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.da Silva Brandão M, Silva Abreu L, Geris R. Phialomyces macrosporus: Chemical constituents, antimicrobial activity and complete NMR assignments for the 7,7′-biphyscion. Chem. Biodivers. 2019;16:e1900353. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201900353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.