Skip to main content
BMJ Open Access logoLink to BMJ Open Access
. 2021 Sep 28;93(2):169–179. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-326630

Longitudinal thalamic white and grey matter changes associated with visual hallucinations in Parkinson’s disease

Angeliki Zarkali 1,, Peter McColgan 2, Louise Ann Leyland 1, Andrew John Lees 3, Rimona Sharon Weil 1,4,5
PMCID: PMC8785065  PMID: 34583941

Abstract

Objective

Visual hallucinations are common in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and associated with worse outcomes. Large-scale network imbalance is seen in PD-associated hallucinations, but mechanisms remain unclear. As the thalamus is critical in controlling cortical networks, structural thalamic changes could underlie network dysfunction in PD hallucinations.

Methods

We used whole-brain fixel-based analysis and cortical thickness measures to examine longitudinal white and grey matter changes in 76 patients with PD (15 hallucinators, 61 non-hallucinators) and 26 controls at baseline, and after 18 months. We compared white matter and cortical thickness, adjusting for age, gender, time-between-scans and intracranial volume. To assess thalamic changes, we extracted volumes for 50 thalamic subnuclei (25 each hemisphere) and mean fibre cross-section (FC) for white matter tracts originating in each subnucleus and examined longitudinal change in PD-hallucinators versus non-hallucinators.

Results

PD hallucinators showed white matter changes within the corpus callosum at baseline and extensive posterior tract involvement over time. Less extensive cortical thickness changes were only seen after follow-up. White matter connections from the right medial mediodorsal magnocellular thalamic nucleus showed reduced FC in PD hallucinators at baseline followed by volume reductions longitudinally. After follow-up, almost all thalamic subnuclei showed tract losses in PD hallucinators compared with non-hallucinators.

Interpretation

PD hallucinators show white matter loss particularly in posterior connections and in thalamic nuclei, over time with relatively preserved cortical thickness. The right medial mediodorsal thalamic nucleus shows both connectivity and volume loss in PD hallucinations. Our findings provide mechanistic insights into the drivers of network imbalance in PD hallucinations and potential therapeutic targets.

Keywords: Parkinson's disease, hallucinations

Introduction

Visual hallucinations (VH) are common in Parkinson’s disease (PD), can cause significant distress to affected individuals and their families and are associated with worse outcomes:1 patients with PD and VH have worse quality of life,2 increased mortality,3 higher rates of subsequent dementia4 and are more likely to require nursing home care.5

PD-associated hallucinations are accompanied by macroscale brain network imbalance with aberrant activation of the default mode network and reduced activity of other networks such as the dorsal attentional network.6 Network changes are thought to underlie the impaired accumulation of sensory evidence7 and the overweighting of previously held beliefs (at the expense of sensory information)8 seen in PD hallucinators. Widespread changes in brain structure are seen in PD hallucinations with loss of grey matter volume across regions including the precuneus, cingulate and superior and inferior frontal gyri9 and white matter structure within posterior tracts and at whole-network level.10 11 However, our understanding of the drivers of these large-scale network changes remains unclear.

We recently showed that structural connectivity loss may preferentially affect areas that normally exert high levels of influence over the whole-brain network and are particularly important for switching the brain between states.12 The thalamus, a connection-rich diencephalic hub critical for cortical sensory filtering,13 14 has been recently proposed as a potential key driver for unbalanced network activation.15 16 Thalamic hypometabolism and atrophy are seen in patients with PD and hallucinations17 and is also present in frontotemporal dementia associated with C9orf72 mutations where hallucinations are reported.18 Reduced thalamic connectivity with the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is also seen in relation to hallucinations in psychosis.19 However, the thalamus is a heterogeneous structure comprised of distinct nuclei with different cortical projections and functions.13 Specific thalamic subnuclei may be implicated in Parkinson’s hallucinations and can now be robustly segmented using a recently described probabilistic atlas.20

White matter changes, detected using diffusion-weighted MRI, may be more sensitive to early degenerative processes in PD than grey matter loss, as they reflect changes in axons rather than neuronal loss.21 White matter changes may occur at an earlier stage in PD:22 in whole-brain studies of PD and cognition, white matter loss is seen before significant grey matter atrophy.23 24

Here, we attempt to clarify the longitudinal grey and white matter changes underlying VH in PD and assess the relative involvement of different thalamic nuclei. We examined whole-brain cortical thickness and white matter integrity using fixel-based analysis, a sensitive and fibre-specific framework,25 at baseline and after 18 months in patients with PD with (PD-VH) and without hallucinations (PD non-VH). Additionally, we assessed changes in grey matter volume of 50 thalamic subnuclei and macrostructural white matter integrity of their respective corticothalamic projections at baseline and longitudinally. We hypothesised that corticothalamic connection loss would precede volume loss in PD-VH and that subregions of the thalamus would show differential vulnerability to degeneration.

Methods

Participants

Participants were recruited to the National Hospital, Queen Square and underwent clinical assessments and brain imaging at baseline and after 18 months (visit 2). Only participants who had structural and diffusion-weighted imaging satisfying predetermined quality control criteria at both visits were included (see online supplemental methods for details on excluded participants). 101 participants were included: 76 patients with PD and 26 age-matched controls (from spouses and volunteer databases). All patients with PD satisfied the Queen Square Brain Bank criteria.26 The study was approved by the Queen Square ethics committee (15/LO/00476) and all participants provided written informed consent prior to taking part.

Supplementary data

jnnp-2021-326630supp001.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

Participants with PD were classified as PD with VH (PD-VH, n=15) if they scored more than 1 for question 2 of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS): ‘Over the past week have you seen, heard, smelled or felt things that were not really there?’ in either study visit; all participants reported hallucinations in the visual domain. All other participants were classified as PD non-VH (n=61). Further details on the frequency and severity of VH were collected for all participants using the University of Miami Parkinson’s Disease Hallucinations Questionnaire (UM-PDHQ).27

All participants underwent assessments of general cognition using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Comprehensive domain-specific cognitive assessments were also performed using two tests per cognitive domain (see online supplemental methods for details). Levodopa dose equivalence scores were calculated for PD participants.28

MRI data acquisition

All MRI data were acquired on the same 3T Siemens Magnetom Prisma scanner (Siemens) with a 64-channel head coil. Magnetisation prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo was acquired using the following parameters: 1×1×1 mm voxel, TE=3.34 ms, TR=2530 ms, flip angle=7°. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was acquired using these parameters: b=50 s/mm2/17 directions, b=300 s/mm2/8 directions, b=1000 s/mm2/64 directions, b=2000 s/mm2/64 directions, 2×2×2 mm isotropic voxels, Echo time (TE)=3260 ms, Repetition time (TR)=58 ms, 72 slices, 2 mm thickness, acceleration factor=2.

Grey matter imaging processing

FreeSurfer V.6.0 was used with default parameters for cross-sectional processing, then images were automatically processed with the longitudinal stream.29 Specifically, an unbiased within-subject template space and image were created using inverse consistent registration. Subsequent processing steps were initialised with common information from the within-subject template, increasing accuracy and statistical power.29 After longitudinal processing, surface reconstructions of the template and of images at T1 and T2 were inspected, corrected and reprocessed where necessary.

In addition, thalamic subnuclei volumes were derived from each longitudinally processed Freesurfer reconstruction using a recently described Bayesian segmentation method based on a probabilistic histology-derived atlas.20 Volumes were derived for 25 subnuclei for each thalamus: anteroventral, laterodorsal, lateral posterior, ventral anterior, ventral anterior magnocellular, ventral lateral anterior, ventral lateral posterior, ventral posterolateral, ventromedial (VM), central medial (CeM), central lateral, paracentral (Pc), Centromedian, parafascicular, paratenial, Reuniens medial ventral, mediodorsal medial magnocellular (MDm), mediodorsal medial parvocellular, lateral geniculate (LGN), medial geniculate, limitans, pulvinar anterior, pulvinar medial, pulvinar lateral and pulvinar inferior.

DWI processing

DWI images passing quality control underwent denoising,30 removal of ringing artefacts,31 eddy-current and motion correction32 and bias-field correction.33 Spatial resolution was then up sampled to 1.3 mm3 voxel size as recommended for fixel-based analysis and intensity normalisation performed across subjects. For each participant, fibre-orientation distributions (FODs) were then computed using multishell three-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution with the group-average response function for each tissue type (grey matter, white matter, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)).34

To allow longitudinal comparison, we created a group-averaged FOD template at baseline from 30 randomly selected subjects (20 PD, 10 controls). Each participant’s FOD was registered to the template35 and fixel-based metrics derived: (a) Fibre density (FD): a metric of microstructural changes within tracts, (b) Fibre cross-section (FC): a relative measure of macrostructural changes and (c) Combined measure of fibre density and cross-section (FDC): a combined metric calculated as FD multiplied by FC for each fixel and representing overall white matter integrity.21 All preprocessing and analyses of DWI data were performed in MRtrix V.3.0.

To specifically assess the integrity of thalamic connections, we also generated specific tracts per hemisphere from each of the 50 thalamic subnuclei. Each subnucleus was registered to the population template using linear registration with NiftyReg.36 Subsequently, a tractogram for each thalamic subnucleus was generated using probabilistic tractography on the population template.37 Streamlines were initiated in each thalamic subnucleus to the ipsilateral hemisphere, with the rest of the thalamus excluded to minimise overlap between tracts. This resulted in a single tract-of-interest from each thalamic subnucleus to the cortex. Mean FC was then calculated across each tract-of-interest per participant; FC was chosen as prior works showed it is the most sensitive fibre-specific metric in PD.10 38

Statistical analysis

Demographics

Group differences in demographics and clinical characteristics were assessed using independent t-samples and analysis of variance (ANOVA)s for normally distributed continuous (post-hoc Tukey), Mann-Whitney and Kruskall-Wallis for non-normally distributed (post-hoc Dunn) and χ2 for categorical variables; statistical significance p<0.05. Shapiro-Wilk was used to assess normality.

Whole-brain fixel-based analysis

Non-parametric permutation testing and connectivity-based fixel enhancement (CFE)25 was used to identify significant differences in fixel-based metrics. We generated a tractogram with 20 million streamlines using whole-brain probabilistic tractography on the population FOD template; this was filtered to 2 million streamlines using SIFT (spherical deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms).39 CFE was performed on the resulting streamlines using the default smoothing parameters (C=0.5, E=2, H=3), with 5000 permutations and family-wise error correction (FWE) for multiple comparisons. FWE-corrected p<0.05 with cluster-extent-based threshold of 10 voxels was considered statistically significant. We used the John Hopkins University atlas to identify white matter fixels across the whole brain for subsequent statistical comparisons, in keeping with previous studies.10 38 40 Whole white-matter comparisons were performed at baseline between PD-VH and PD non-VH, using age, gender and intracranial volume as covariates. To implement a longitudinal design matrix, we subtracted each baseline image from the visit 2 image. Whole white-matter statistical analyses were then performed on these difference images with baseline age, gender, intracranial volume and time between scans as covariates.

Whole-brain cortical thickness analysis

To determine differences in cortical thickness trajectories over time between PD-VH and PD non-VH, we used Linear Mixed Effect models in MATLAB (The MathWorks) designed for longitudinal FreeSurfer data.41 A spatiotemporal novel mass-univariate analysis was performed with cortical thickness as the dependent variable and a random intercept defining subject as a random factor. Additional regressors included the time-between-scans in years (baseline imaging marked as 0), age at baseline, gender, group (PD-VH vs PD non-VH), and group-by-time interaction (variable of interest). Significance maps for group-by-time interactions were corrected for multiple comparisons using a false discovery rate (FDR) correction combined over the left and right hemispheres and saved for later visualisation in freeview.

Thalamic subnucleus and tract-of-interest analysis

Thalamic volumes and mean tract FC at baseline were compared between PD-VH and PD non-VH using a linear mixed model with age, gender and intracranial volumes as covariates. To assess differences in longitudinal rate of change for each thalamic subnucleus and each tract-of-interest, respectively, we used a linear mixed model with group-by-time interaction as the variable of interest and group (PD-VH vs PD non-VH), age, gender, and time-between-scans as regressors and a random intercept. Correction for multiple comparisons was performed using FDR correction across 50 subnuclei/tracts. Correlational analyses of subnucleus volumes or mean tract FC with UM-PDHQ scores (indicating hallucination severity) was performed using Spearman correlation coefficient.

To ensure that anxiety and depression did not drive the effect seen in PD-VH, we also performed correlation analyses (Spearman correlation coefficient) of subnucleus volumes and tract FC with Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores. Statistical analyses were performed in Python V.3 using Jupyter Lab V.1.2.6.

Results

A total of 101 participants were included; 76 patients with PD, of whom 15 PD-VH and 61 PD non-VH, and 26 controls. Demographics and results of clinical assessments at baseline are shown in table 1. The groups were well matched in age, gender, years in education. PD-VH and PD non-VH did not differ in terms of baseline cognitive performance, except lower scores in Stroop (both colour and interference) in PD-VH. PD-VH had higher prevalence of other non-motor symptoms with higher anxiety and depression scores and higher total UPDRS scores (U=289, p=0.014) but did not differ in motor severity, disease duration or levodopa-equivalent daily dose (table 1). Time interval between the two scans (baseline and visit 2) was 1.17 to 1.67 years (mean 1.28, SD 0.08) with no significant between-group differences.

Table 1.

Demographics and results of clinical assessments at baseline

Characteristic Controls n=26 PD non-VH n=61 PD-VH n=15 P value
Age (years) 67.4 (8.2) 64.6 (8.1) 64.5 (8.0) 0.308
Male (%) 12 (46.2) 36 (59.0) 6 (40%) 0.302
Years of education 17.9 (2.2) 17.3 (2.6) 16.9 (3.8) 0.686
Vision
 Contrast sensitivity (Pelli Robson)§ 1.8 (0.2) 1.8 (0.2) 1.7 (0.2) 0.136
 Acuity (LogMar)§ −0.08 (0.2) −0.07 (0.2) −0.08 (0.1) 0.136
 Colour vision (D15)§ 1.2 (1.0) 1.2 (1.0) 1.6 (1.8) 0.927
General cognition
 MOCA 29 (1.2) 28.0 (2.3) 27.6 (1.8) 0.050‡
 MMSE 29.2 (0.9) 29.0 (1.2) 28.9 (1.3) 0.847
Mood
 HADS anxiety 3.5 (3.5) 5.1 (3.5) 8.0 (4.2) 0.002*†
 HADS depression 1.2 (1.5) 3.7 (3.1) 4.8 (3.3) <0.001†‡
Detailed neuropsychology
 Attention
Digit span forwards 9.3 (2.1) 9.1 (2.0) 10 (2.0) 0.412
Digit span backwards 6.9 (2.4) 7.3 (2.2) 7.6 (2.4) 0.748
Stroop: colour (sec) 31.9 (7.6) 32.6 (6.4) 38.3 (8.5) 0.012*‡
Executive function
Stroop: interference (sec) 56.2 (14.3) 40.3 (20.1) 72.9 (26.6) 0.029*‡
Category fluency 21.9 (4.8) 22.1 (6.0) 20.1 (4.0) 0.502
 Memory
Word recognition task 24.5 (1.0) 24.3 (2.3) 23.8 (1.2) 0.077
Logical memory (delayed) 12.8 (3.5) 13.3 (4.6) 13.5 (4.5) 0.928
 Language
Graded naming task 23.6 (1.0) 24.3 (2.5) 23.5 (3.1) 0.638
Letter fluency 17.8 (5.1) 17.3 (5.3) 16.1 (4.9) 0.711
 Visuospatial
Benton’s judgement of line orientation 26 (3.4) 25.3 (3.7) 23.1 (4.8) 0.134
Hooper 25.9 (2.1) 25.0 (2.9) 23.9 (3.1) 0.082
Disease-specific measures
 Years from diagnosis 4.0 (2.5) 4.5 (2.7) 0.238
 UPDRS total score 42.9 (19.4) 57.8 (24.3) 0.014
 UPDRS motor score 22.7 (11.7) 26.2 (15.2) 0.052
 Right side affected at onset 28 (45.9) 4 (26.7) 0.187
 RBDSQ 3.8 (2.1) 5.7 (2.4) 0.003
 Sniffin sticks 7.6 (2.9) 6.9 (3.4) 0.003
 LEDD 427.1 (220.1) 431.0 (233.1) 0.951

All data shown are mean (SD) except gender and affected size.

In bold characteristics that significantly differed between groups.

For all neuropsychology measures, higher scores indicate better performance, except Stroop Colour and Interference where lower scores imply better performance.

*Statistically significant difference between PD-VH and PD non-VH.

†Statistically significant difference between PD non-VH and controls.

‡Statistically significant difference between PD-VH and controls.

§Best binocular score used; LogMAR and D15: lower score implies better performance, Pelli-Robson: higher score implies better performance.

HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (higher scores indicate increased anxiety and depression) LEDD, levodopa equivalent dose; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; MOCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; PD, Parkinson’s disease; RBDSQ, REM sleep behaviour disorder scale; UPDRS, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; VH, visual hallucination.

During follow-up, PD-VH showed greater worsening performance than PD non-VH in measures of general cognition (MOCA t=2.930, p=0.005; MMSE Mann-Whitney U=317.5, p=0.030). Table 2 shows the longitudinal changes in general cognition and motor symptoms in PD participants (for details on longitudinal cognitive performance, see online supplemental table 1).

Table 2.

Longitudinal changes in patients with Parkinson’s disease without hallucinations (PD non-VH) and patients with hallucinations (PD-VH)

Cognitive test PD non-VH n=61 PD-VH n=15 PD non-VH n=61 PD-VH n=15 Statistic
General cognition Baseline visit Follow-up visit (18 months) P value*
MOCA 28.0 (2.3) 27.6 (1.8) 28.1 (2.1) 25.5 (5.2) t=2.93
p=0.005
MMSE 29.0 (1.2) 28.9 (1.3) 29.1 (1.0) 27.7 (3.2) U=317.5
p=0.030
Motor symptoms
 UPDRS total score 42.9 (19.4) 57.8 (24.3) 41.8 (6.3) 58.4 (17.2) t=0.345
p=0.731
 UPDRS motor score 22.7 (11.7) 26.2 (15.2) 21.7 (10.2) 26.1 (10.2) t=0.244
p=0.808
 LEDD 427.1 (220.1) 431.0 (233.1) 427.1 (220.1) 431.0 (233.1)
Hallucinations
 Weekly visual hallucinations 14 (93.3) 12 (80.0) x2=0.001
p=0.985
 UM-PDHQ 3.5 (2.9) 3.7 (3.2) t=0.179
p=0.859

All data shown are mean (SD) except the presence of weekly visual hallucinations which is presented as n (%).

No difference was seen in any individual cognitive tests longitudinally between PD-VH and PD non-VH; results of individual cognitive tests per domain are presented in online supplemental table 2).

UM-PDHQ: University of Miami Parkinson’s disease Hallucinations Questionnaire: higher scores indicate more severe hallucinations.

*Statistical comparison of individual performance change (performance in follow-up visit – performance in baseline visit) for each metric; using t-test for normally distributed variables and Mann-Whitney for non-normally distributed variables. In bold characteristics that significantly differed in terms of change between visit 2 and baseline between groups.

LEDD, levodopa dose equivalence score; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; MOCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; PD, Parkinson’s disease; UPDRS, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; VH, visual hallucination.

Cortical grey matter is relatively preserved in PD with VH despite widespread white matter macrostructural changes

At baseline, no statistically significant differences in cortical thickness were seen between PD with and without hallucinations. Cortical thickness for both PD-VH and PD non-VH decreased over 18 months follow-up, with significantly higher reductions longitudinally in PD-VH compared with PD non-VH with clusters including the left precuneus, bilateral anterior cingulate, bilateral precentral and postcentral gyrus, bilateral superior frontal and anterior cingulate gyrus, bilateral insula, right supramarginal gyrus, right superior temporal gyrus and right lateral occipital gyrus (figure 1A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Whole brain, grey matter and white matter changes in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and visual hallucinations (VH) at 18 months follow-up. (A) Changes in cortical thickness seen in patients with compared with those without hallucinations (PD non-VH) at 18 months follow-up, on a surface rendered right hemisphere (left: lateral view top panel, medial view bottom panel) and left hemisphere. No statistically significant changes were seen in cortical thickness at baseline imaging. Colour coding indicates cluster significance for group-by-time interactions. Significance levels are on a logarithmic scale of p values (−log10). Positive values indicate PD-VH cortical thickness <PD non-VH; negative values indicate PD-VH >PD non VH. Results are corrected for false discovery rate across both hemispheres. (B) Changes in white matter macrostructure (fibre cross-section, FC) seen in PD-VH compared with PD non-VH at longitudinal follow-up. Baseline changes are presented in online supplemental figure 1. Results are displayed as streamlines; these correspond to fixels that significantly differed between PD low and high visual performers (family-wise error correction (FWE)-corrected p<0.05). Streamlines are coloured by percentage reduction (colourbars) in PD-VH compared with PD non-VH.

For white macro- and micro-structure, PD-VH also showed significant changes compared with PD without hallucinations, longitudinally (figure 1B), and some changes were already present at baseline, as we have previously shown.10 Specifically, at baseline, PD-VH showed macrostructural changes (FC reductions) and microstructural changes (FD reductions) within the splenium of the corpus callosum and the left posterior thalamic radiation. Reductions were also seen in the combined FDC metric across the same regions, particularly within the splenium which showed over 30% FDC reduction in PD-VH compared with PD non-VH (online supplemental figure 1).

Longitudinally, there were additional extensive macrostructural changes (FC reductions) in PD-VH compared with PD non-VH within the splenium, bilateral posterior thalamic radiations, bilateral posterior internal capsules, bilateral tapetum, left inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, and left superior longitudinal fasciculus (figure 1B). No differences in the longitudinal reduction of FD or FDC were seen between groups.

Specific volume loss of the right mediodorsal medial thalamic nucleus is seen in PD-VH longitudinally and is preceded by respective white matter connection loss

Thalamic volumes (either whole thalamic or subnucleus volume) at baseline showed no significant difference between PD-VH and PD non-VH, correcting for age, gender and total intracranial volume, after correction for multiple comparisons. However, when assessing differences in longitudinal thalamic subnuclei volumes, PD-VH showed significantly higher reductions in volume of the right medial mediodorsal magnocellular nucleus (MDm: t=−3.018, FDR-corrected p value, q<0.001) and the left Pc nucleus (Pc: t=−3.490, q<0.001) compared with PD non-VH (figure 2, table 3). Thalamic subnucleus volume loss was significantly correlated with hallucination severity (mean UM-PDHQ score across both visits) for both the right MDm (Ρ=−0.362, p=0.001) and the left Pc nucleus (Ρ=−0.339, p=0.003).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Thalamic subnucleus specific changes in PD with visual hallucinations compared with PD without hallucinations at 18 months follow-up. (A) Diagrammatic representation of the human thalamic subnuclei. Highlighted in pink are the nuclei showing significant longitudinal changes in volume in PD with visual hallucinations (PD-VH) compared with PD without hallucinations (PD non-VH). The medial mediodorsal nucleus is further subdivided into mediodorsal medial parvocellular and mediodorsal medial magnocellular nuclei. Intralaminar nuclei include the Pc, Pf, CeM, CL and CM. (B) Longitudinal change in thalamic nuclei volumes for the right MDm and the left Pc in PD-VH, PD nonVH in mm3. Corrected for age, gender, total intracranial volume and time between scan. Family wise error (FDR) corrected p-value presented for the group-by-time interaction comparison between PD-VH and PD non-VH participants. Error bars represent SD. (C) Change in thalamic nuclei volumes for the right MDm and the left Pc in PD participants was correlated with severity of visual hallucinations, assessed using the University of Miami Parkinson’s disease Hallucinations Questionnaire. Higher scores indicating more severe hallucinations. AV, anteroventral; CeM, central medial; Cl, central lateral; CM, centromedian; L_Sg, limitans; LD, laterodorsal; LGN, lateral geniculate; LP, lateral posterior; MDl, mediodorsal medial parvocellular; MDm, mediodorsal medial magnocellular; MGN, medial geniculate; MVRe, reuniens medial ventral; PD, Parkinson’s disease; Pf, parafascicular; PuA, pulvinar anterior; PuI, pulvinar inferior; PuL, pulvinar lateral; PuM, pulvinar medial; VA, ventral anterior; VAmc, ventral anterior magnocellular; VLa, ventral lateral anterior; VLp, ventral lateral posterior; VPL, ventral posterolateral; VM, ventromedial; ρ, Spearman correlation coefficient.

Table 3.

Grey matter areas showing significant longitudinal differences in cortical thickness or thalamic nucleus volumes between PD patients with visual hallucinations (PD-VH) and those without hallucinations (PD non-VH)

Changes in cortical thickness
Tailarach coordinates Hemisphere Anatomical location Number of vertices Size (mm2) Zmax
x y z
28.1 −20.8 37.8 L Precuneus 368 140.54 7.5
−32.7 55.4 14.2 R Caudal anterior cingulate 136 56.87 7.4
29 13.8 27.1 R Precentral 143 39.47 7.4
3.5 92.5 −31 R Rostral middle frontal 115 57.25 7.3
27.7 −66.5 28.8 L Superior frontal 134 55.16 7.2
−16 29.5 −12.3 L Insula 184 45.62 7.1
−20.4 −11 42.5 L Postcentral 113 29.17 7.1
−15.8 28.4 −31.5 L Insula 343 136.58 7
5.7 67.6 30.9 L Superior frontal 196 98.74 6.9
22.8 12.3 −5.5 R Postcentral 126 31.91 6.7
−30.2 42.5 41.1 R Superior frontal 53 27.29 6.7
38.1 48.9 −28.4 L Rostral anterior cingulate 50 29.98 6.6
16.7 25.3 −27.5 R Insula 152 57.93 6.6
28.3 −29.1 31.3 R Supramarginal 91 24.73 6.6
35.8 0.5 25.4 R Postcentral 84 22.18 6.4
3.5 −86.9 −28.8 R Lateral occipital 19 9.09 6.3
30.2 24.7 38.3 L Superior frontal 50 15.03 6.1
−33.5 62.6 4.4 R Caudal anterior cingulate 50 29.73 6.1
39.4 −7 −29.4 R Superior temporal 29 9.06 6.1
−4 93.4 −27.3 L Rostral middle frontal 41 21.08 6
−27.7 36.1 11.5 L Precentral 25 9.54 5.9
Changes in thalamic subnucleus volume
Thalamic subnucleus Hemisphere Beta P value Q value
Mediodorsal medial magnocellular R −0.037 0.002 0.05
Paracentral L −0.016 9.85E-06 <0.001

Anatomical locations extracted from aparc freesurfer annotation.

Zmax indicates the −log10 (p value) for the cluster, a threshold of 5.613 was calculated to represent false discover rate (FDR) corrected values p<0.05 for both hemispheres.

No statistically changes were seen at baseline imaging between PD-VH and PD non-VH participants.

L, left; PD, Parkinson’s disease; R, right.VH, visual hallucination;

White matter tracts-of-interest from thalamic subnuclei to the ipsilateral cortex showed significant reductions in mean FC in PD-VH compared with PD non-VH already at baseline; specifically in the right mediodorsal medial magnocellular nucleus (MDm: t=−0.037, FDR-corrected q=0.05) and the right centromedial nucleus (CeM: t=−0.0157, q<0.001) (figure 3A). Longitudinally, tracts-of-interest from 44 out of 50 thalamic subnuclei showed significant reductions in mean FC in PD-VH compared with PD non-VH, adjusting for age, gender, total intracranial volume and time between scans and FDR corrected across 50 tracts (figure 3B). The Pc and paratenial nuclei bilaterally did not show significant differences in PD-VH longitudinally (FDR-corrected q>0.05) and bilaterally the ventromedial nuclei showed significantly less volume loss in PD-VH (right VM: t=2.964, q=0.006, left VM: t=2.952, q=0.006). All other thalamic tracts-of-interest (88%) showed greater volume loss in PD-VH compared with PD non-VH; longitudinal reduction in mean FC was significantly correlated with hallucination severity (Ρ=−0.212, q<0.001). Details on the longitudinal changes in thalamic tract mean FC are seen in online supplemental table 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Thalamic tract-of-interest changes in FC in PD-VH compared with those without hallucinations at baseline and during longitudinal follow-up. (A) Baseline visit. Reduction (mean, 95% CI) in FC visualised for patients with PD-VH compared with patients with PD without hallucinations (PD non-VH). Tracts with significantly reduced FC (FDR-corrected p value<0.05) are shown in dark red (right MDm and right CeM), while tracts where there are no significant changes in FDC are plotted in grey. (B) Visit 2 (18 months follow-up). Reduction (mean, 95% CI) in FC visualised for PD-VH compared with PD non-VH. Tracts with significantly reduced FC (FDR-corrected p value<0.05) are shown in colour, while tracts with no significant changes in FDC are plotted in grey. White matter tracts from all but three thalamic subnuclei (Pc, Pt and VM bilaterally) showed more severe volume loss in PD-VH compared with PD non-VH at longitudinal follow-up. Bilaterally tracts originating in the VM nuclei showed significantly less volume loss in PD-VH compared with PD non-VH. AV, anteroventral; CeM, central medial; CL, central lateral; CM, centromedian; L_Sg, limitans; LD, laterodorsal; LGN, lateral geniculate; LP, lateral posterior; MDl, mediodorsal medial parvocellular, MDm, mediodorsal medial magnocellular; MGN, medial geniculate; MVRe, reuniens medial ventral; Pc, paracentral; PD, Parkinson’s disease; Pf, parafascicular; PuA, pulvinar anterior; PuI, pulvinar inferior; PuL, pulvinar lateral; PuM, pulvinar medial; VA, ventral anterior; VAmc, ventral anterior Pt, paratenial; magnocellular; VH, visual hallucination; VLa, ventral lateral anterior; VLp, ventral lateral posterior; VPL, ventral posterolateral; VM, ventromedial.

Anxiety and depression scores (using the HADS) were not correlated with MDm subnucleus volume or mean tract FC at baseline or longitudinally (see online supplemental table 3 and online supplemental figures 2 and 3).

Discussion

This study sheds light on the timeline and spatial profile of structural thalamic involvement in patients with PD and VH. We have shown that: (a) the right mediodorsal medial thalamus is affected in PD with hallucinations, with white matter tracts connected to the right mediodorsal thalamus showing macrostructural changes (reduced FC) at baseline and volume loss within the nucleus after 18 months, (b) widespread white matter macrostructural changes develop over time involving the majority of thalamocortical white matter tracts and (c) white matter changes associated with PD-hallucinations precede loss of cortical thickness, with whole-brain white matter changes already seen at baseline but differences in cortical thickness only evolving after follow-up.

By using a recently described probabilistic atlas derived from ex vivo imaging and histology,20 we were able to detect differences in volumes within the right mediodorsal medial thalamic subnucleus in PD with hallucinations. The mediodorsal medial nucleus is a higher order, associative thalamic nucleus with multiple reciprocal connections with the prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex.42 Its role in cognition is now well established, particularly in sustaining PFC activity during working and spatial memory43 and monitoring and updating mental representations.13 It has also been implicated in psychiatric disease; patients with schizophrenia show reduced functional activation and associated reduced functional connectivity to the PFC during executive tasks;44 they also show grey matter atrophy in the mediodorsal thalamus.45 46 Reduced functional connectivity of the mediodorsal thalamus with the paracingulate and posterior cingulate has also been described in patients with Parkinson’s and cognitive impairment.47 The complex way that the mediodorsal medial nucleus interacts with the PFC is not fully understood, however, there is evidence to suggest that it may act as a regulator of PFC function:48 reduced input from the mediodorsal medial nucleus, due to white matter degeneration and neuronal loss within the nucleus could result in subsequent unregulated PFC activity.

In whole-brain fixel-based analysis, we saw a significant posterior predominance of white matter changes in PD-VH: changes in the splenium of the corpus callosum and posterior thalamic radiations seen at baseline progressed during follow-up to involve multiple tracts such as the tapetum and posterior internal capsules but frontal connections remained relatively preserved. Reduced connectivity between subcortical regions and visuospatial regions when combined with unregulated PFC activity (due to reduced control from the mediodorsal medial thalamic nucleus), which retains its other cortical white matter projections, may partly explain the overweighting of prior knowledge seen in PD-hallucinators.8

In addition, significant longitudinal changes were seen in infratentorial regions, particularly in bilateral middle cerebellar peduncles. Increasing evidence has demonstrated a potential crucial role for the cerebellum in the development of hallucinations: atrophy of the cerebellum has been described in patients with PD and VH,49–51 reduced metabolism of the vermis has been shown in patients with hallucinations secondary to Lewy body disorders,52 and a recent study of lesional hallucinations using network lesion mapping revealed a common network associated with hallucinations, with connectivity to the cerebellar vermis and inferior cerebellum.53 The cerebellum plays an important role in cognition, crucially by updating predictive models of behaviours through error learning54 with sensitivity to errors associated with the activity of the cerebellar vermis.55 Loss of grey and white matter within the cerebellum may lead to a reduced sensitivity to prediction errors and may contribute to the relative overweighting of prior knowledge seen during visual perception in PD hallucinators.8

Interestingly, both in whole-brain and thalamic analyses, we saw white matter macrostructural changes in PD-VH before any changes in cortical thickness or thalamic volume loss were evident: patients with PD-VH showed significant macrostructural (reduced FC) and microstructural changes (reduced FD) within posterior white matter tracts already at baseline, in the absence of any cortical thickness changes. In addition, the right mediodorsal medial thalamus, which showed reduced volume in PD-VH at follow-up, showed macrostructural changes in its connections with the cortex at baseline.

Although, this result could be due to different sensitivities of the imaging modalities used to assess grey and white matter, it provides further support for the important role white matter degeneration plays in PD. Axonal pathology has been demonstrated prior to dopaminergic neuronal loss in animal22 56 and cell models.57 Alpha-synuclein plays a role in axonal growth with higher density, thinner axons seen in the brain of patients with early PD.58 Imaging biomarkers that assess white matter integrity such as fixel-based analysis might be more sensitive at picking up anatomical abnormalities at the earliest stages of PD; our findings support this.

Our finding of changes in thalamic grey and white matter in PD with hallucinations could underlie the more widespread network differences found in PD hallucinators.6 11 12 The medial mediodorsal nucleus, which showed volume reduction in PD hallucinators, is a feasible target for deep brain stimulation, which has been performed in small numbers of patients with severe obsessive compulsive disorder.59 Given the changes in white matter connectivity from the medial mediodorsal nucleus to the cortex seen in PD hallucinators, further work in the connectivity between this subnucleus and PFC, in particular, could yield possible connectomic targets for deep brain stimulation60 to treat hallucinations in PD.

Although the LGN has previously been functionally implicated in PD hallucinations,53 61 we did not find specific volume or tract reductions for the LGN at baseline, although reductions in tracts connected to the LGN were seen longitudinally. It is possible that changes in functional connections with the LGN do not affect structural integrity until later stages.

Several methodological considerations need to be considered when interpreting our findings. Our participants underwent imaging acquisition while continuing their usual dopaminergic medications. Given we are assessing structural metrics, it is unlikely that these will be affected by medication and levodopa equivalent doses did not differ between PD-VH and PD non-VH. The number of hallucinators in our cohort is consistent with reports from other groups showing that minor hallucinations can be seen even in patients recently diagnosed with PD.62 Due to the imaging acquisition protocols in our study, we could not formally quantify the presence of white matter hyperintensities. Although no studies using fixel-based analysis have specifically controlled for white matter hyperintensities,10 38 40 if present, these are likely to decrease FD.63 It is not clear if white matter hyperintensities could have an effect on FC, which was our primary metric to assess white matter longitudinally; this could be clarified in future studies. Hallucinations in PD are associated with other non-motor symptoms and worsening cognition;1 2 5 similarly, in our cohort, PD-VH had higher rates of anxiety and depression. Although HADS scores were not correlated with MDm volume or tract FC at baseline or longitudinally, the structural changes identified in our study could be influenced by non-motor symptoms other than hallucinations.

Patients with PD and VH show both white matter and grey matter degeneration longitudinally with changes in metrics of white matter macrostructure such as fibre cross-section occurring before loss of cortical thickness. In addition, we show that thalamic cortical connectivity is affected in Parkinson’s-associated hallucinations, particularly within the mediodorsal nucleus. Our findings provide mechanistic support for the role of the thalamus as a driver of network imbalance in Parkinson’s hallucinations and support the use of imaging techniques aimed at white rather than grey matter in assessing early stages of PD.

Acknowledgments

We thank all our participants for their time. We gratefully acknowledge the support of NVIDIA Corporation with the donation of the Quadro P6000 GPU used for this research. The authors acknowledge the use of the UCL Myriad High Performance Computing Facility (Myriad@UCL), and associated support services, in the completion of this work. This research was also supported by the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre.

Footnotes

Twitter: @ajlees, @rimonaweil

Contributors: Study design and concept: AZ, RSW, data collection: AZ, LAL, RSW, imaging and statistical analysis: AZ, drafting and revision of the manuscript: AZ, PMC, LAL, AJL, RSW.

Funding: AZ is supported by an Alzheimer’s Research UK Clinical Research Fellowship (2018B-001). PMC is supported by the National Institute for Health Research. RSW is supported by a Wellcome Clinical Research Career Development Fellowship (205167/Z/16/Z)

Competing interests: None declared.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Supplemental material: This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

Data availability statement

Data are available in a public, open access repository. Data are available upon reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. All code used to perform the analyses presented in this study is shared freely as a github repository: https://github.com/AngelikaZa/ThalamicSubnuclei. Anonymized data will be shared on request, for purposes of replicating procedures and results.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Not required.

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the Queen Square Ethics Committee, Reference: 15/LO/00476.

References

  • 1. Fénelon G, Mahieux F, Huon R, et al. Hallucinations in parkinson's disease: prevalence, phenomenology and risk factors. Brain 2000;123 (Pt 4):733–45. 10.1093/brain/123.4.733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. McKinlay A, Grace RC, Dalrymple-Alford JC, et al. A profile of neuropsychiatric problems and their relationship to quality of life for parkinson's disease patients without dementia. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2008;14:37–42. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2007.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Goetz CG, Stebbins GT. Risk factors for nursing home placement in advanced parkinson's disease. Neurology 1993;43:2227–9. 10.1212/WNL.43.11.2227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Galvin JE, Pollack J, Morris JC. Clinical phenotype of parkinson disease dementia. Neurology 2006;67:1605–11. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000242630.52203.8f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Aarsland D, Larsen JP, Tandberg E, et al. Predictors of nursing home placement in parkinson's disease: a population-based, prospective study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000;48:938–42. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb06891.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Shine JM, O'Callaghan C, Halliday GM, et al. Tricks of the mind: visual hallucinations as disorders of attention. Prog Neurobiol 2014;116:58–65. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. O'Callaghan C, Kveraga K, Shine JM, et al. Predictions penetrate perception: converging insights from brain, behaviour and disorder. Conscious Cogn 2017;47:63–74. 10.1016/j.concog.2016.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Zarkali A, Adams RA, Psarras S, et al. Increased weighting on prior knowledge in lewy body-associated visual hallucinations. Brain Commun 2019;1:fcz007. 10.1093/braincomms/fcz007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Lenka A, Jhunjhunwala KR, Saini J, et al. Structural and functional neuroimaging in patients with parkinson's disease and visual hallucinations: a critical review. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2015;21:683–91. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Zarkali A, McColgan P, Leyland L-A, et al. Fiber-specific white matter reductions in parkinson hallucinations and visual dysfunction. Neurology 2020;94:e1525–38. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hall JM, O'Callaghan C, Muller AJ, et al. Changes in structural network topology correlate with severity of hallucinatory behavior in parkinson's disease. Netw Neurosci 2019;3:521–38. 10.1162/netn_a_00078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Zarkali A, McColgan P, Ryten M, et al. Differences in network controllability and regional gene expression underlie hallucinations in parkinson's disease. Brain 2020;143:3435–48. 10.1093/brain/awaa270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Wolff M, Vann SD. The cognitive thalamus as a gateway to mental representations. J Neurosci 2019;39:3–14. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0479-18.2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Cunningham SI, Tomasi D, Volkow ND. Structural and functional connectivity of the precuneus and thalamus to the default mode network. Hum Brain Mapp 2017;38:938–56. 10.1002/hbm.23429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Russo M, Carrarini C, Dono F, et al. The pharmacology of visual hallucinations in synucleinopathies. Front Pharmacol 2019;10:1379. 10.3389/fphar.2019.01379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Onofrj M, Espay AJ, Bonanni L, et al. Hallucinations, somatic-functional disorders of PD-DLB as expressions of thalamic dysfunction. Mov Disord 2019;34:1100–11. 10.1002/mds.27781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Nishio Y, Yokoi K, Uchiyama M, et al. Deconstructing psychosis and misperception symptoms in parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2017;88:722–9. 10.1136/jnnp-2017-315741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Bocchetta M, Iglesias JE, Neason M, et al. Thalamic nuclei in frontotemporal dementia: mediodorsal nucleus involvement is universal but pulvinar atrophy is unique to C9orf72. Hum Brain Mapp 2020;41:1006–16. 10.1002/hbm.24856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Anticevic A, Cole MW, Repovs G, et al. Characterizing thalamo-cortical disturbances in schizophrenia and bipolar illness. Cereb Cortex 2014;24:3116–30. 10.1093/cercor/bht165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Iglesias JE, Insausti R, Lerma-Usabiaga G, et al. A probabilistic atlas of the human thalamic nuclei combining ex vivo MRI and histology. Neuroimage 2018;183:314–26. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Raffelt DA, Tournier J-D, Smith RE, et al. Investigating white matter fibre density and morphology using fixel-based analysis. Neuroimage 2017;144:58–73. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Chung CY, Koprich JB, Siddiqi H, et al. Dynamic changes in presynaptic and axonal transport proteins combined with striatal neuroinflammation precede dopaminergic neuronal loss in a rat model of AAV alpha-synucleinopathy. J Neurosci 2009;29:3365–73. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5427-08.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Hattori N, Yabe I, Hirata K, et al. Brain regions associated with cognitive impairment in patients with parkinson disease: quantitative analysis of cerebral blood flow using 123I iodoamphetamine SPECT. Clin Nucl Med 2013;38:315–20. 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182873511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Duncan GW, Firbank MJ, Yarnall AJ, et al. Gray and white matter imaging: a biomarker for cognitive impairment in early parkinson's disease? Mov Disord 2016;31:103–10. 10.1002/mds.26312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Raffelt DA, Smith RE, Ridgway GR, et al. Connectivity-based fixel enhancement: whole-brain statistical analysis of diffusion MRI measures in the presence of crossing fibres. Neuroimage 2015;117:40–55. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Daniel SE, Lees AJ. Parkinson's disease society brain bank, London: overview and research. J Neural Transm Suppl 1993;39:165–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Papapetropoulos S, Katzen H, Schrag A, et al. A questionnaire-based (UM-PDHQ) study of hallucinations in parkinson's disease. BMC Neurol 2008;8:21. 10.1186/1471-2377-8-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Tomlinson CL, Stowe R, Patel S, et al. Systematic review of levodopa dose equivalency reporting in parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2010;25:2649–53. 10.1002/mds.23429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Reuter M, Schmansky NJ, Rosas HD, et al. Within-subject template estimation for unbiased longitudinal image analysis. Neuroimage 2012;61:1402–18. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Veraart J, Fieremans E, Novikov DS. Diffusion MRI noise mapping using random matrix theory. Magn Reson Med 2016;76:1582–93. 10.1002/mrm.26059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kellner E, Dhital B, Kiselev VG, et al. Gibbs-ringing artifact removal based on local subvoxel-shifts. Magn Reson Med 2016;76:1574–81. 10.1002/mrm.26054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Anderson G. Assuring quality/resisting quality assurance: academics’ responses to ‘quality’ in some australian universities. Qual High Educ 2006;12:161–73. 10.1080/13538320600916767 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Tustison NJ, Avants BB, Cook PA, et al. N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010;29:1310–20. 10.1109/TMI.2010.2046908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Dhollander T, Raffelt D, Connelly A. Unsupervised 3-tissue response function estimation from single-shell or multi-shell diffusion MR data without a co-registered T1 image. ISMRM Workshop Break Barriers Diffus MRI, Lisbon, Portugal, 2016:5. [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Raffelt D, Tournier J-D, Fripp J, et al. Symmetric diffeomorphic registration of fibre orientation distributions. Neuroimage 2011;56:1171–80. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Modat M, Ridgway GR, Taylor ZA, et al. Fast free-form deformation using graphics processing units. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2010;98:278–84. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2009.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Tournier J-D, Smith R, Raffelt D, et al. MRtrix3: a fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisation. Neuroimage 2019;202:116137. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Rau Y-A, Wang S-M, Tournier J-D, et al. A longitudinal fixel-based analysis of white matter alterations in patients with parkinson's disease. Neuroimage Clin 2019;24:102098. 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Smith RE, Tournier J-D, Calamante F, et al. SIFT: spherical-deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms. Neuroimage 2013;67:298–312. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Mito R, Raffelt D, Dhollander T, et al. Fibre-specific white matter reductions in alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Brain 2018;141:888–902. 10.1093/brain/awx355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Bernal-Rusiel JL, Reuter M, Greve DN, et al. Spatiotemporal linear mixed effects modeling for the mass-univariate analysis of longitudinal neuroimage data. Neuroimage 2013;81:358–70. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Mitchell AS, Chakraborty S. What does the mediodorsal thalamus do? Front Syst Neurosci 2013;7:37. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Parnaudeau S, Bolkan SS, Kellendonk C. The mediodorsal thalamus: an essential partner of the prefrontal cortex for cognition. Biol Psychiatry 2018;83:648–56. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.11.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Minzenberg MJ, Laird AR, Thelen S, et al. Meta-analysis of 41 functional neuroimaging studies of executive function in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2009;66:811–22. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.91 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Cobia DJ, Smith MJ, Salinas I, et al. Progressive deterioration of thalamic nuclei relates to cortical network decline in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2017;180:21–7. 10.1016/j.schres.2016.08.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Pergola G, Trizio S, Di Carlo P, et al. Grey matter volume patterns in thalamic nuclei are associated with familial risk for schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2017;180:13–20. 10.1016/j.schres.2016.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Owens-Walton C, Jakabek D, Power BD. Structural and functional MRI changes associated with cognitive impairment and dementia in parkinson disease. medRxiv 2019;19002147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Pergola G, Danet L, Pitel A-L, et al. The regulatory role of the human mediodorsal thalamus. Trends Cogn Sci 2018;22:1011–25. 10.1016/j.tics.2018.08.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Maiti B, Koller JM, Snyder AZ, et al. Cognitive correlates of cerebellar resting-state functional connectivity in parkinson disease. Neurology 2020;94:e384–96. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Rollins CPE, Garrison JR, Simons JS, et al. Meta-analytic evidence for the plurality of mechanisms in transdiagnostic structural MRI studies of hallucination status. EClinicalMedicine 2019;8:57–71. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.01.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Pagonabarraga J, Soriano-Mas C, Llebaria G, et al. Neural correlates of minor hallucinations in non-demented patients with parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2014;20:290–6. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.11.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Park HS, KIm BS, Kim YK. Different cerebral metabolic features in dementia with lewy bodies with/without visual hallucination. J Nucl Med 2008;49:36P. [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Kim NY, Hsu J, Talmasov D, et al. Lesions causing hallucinations localize to one common brain network. Mol Psychiatry 2021;26:1299–309. 10.1038/s41380-019-0565-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Ramnani N. The primate cortico-cerebellar system: anatomy and function. Nat Rev Neurosci 2006;7:511–22. 10.1038/nrn1953 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Powers AR, Mathys C, Corlett PR. Pavlovian conditioning-induced hallucinations result from overweighting of perceptual priors. Science 2017;357:596–600. 10.1126/science.aan3458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Tofaris GK, Garcia Reitböck P, Humby T, et al. Pathological changes in dopaminergic nerve cells of the substantia nigra and olfactory bulb in mice transgenic for truncated human alpha-synuclein(1-120): implications for Lewy body disorders. J Neurosci 2006;26:3942–50. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4965-05.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Volpicelli-Daley LA, Luk KC, Patel TP, et al. Exogenous α-synuclein fibrils induce lewy body pathology leading to synaptic dysfunction and neuron death. Neuron 2011;72:57–71. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Schechter M, Grigoletto J, Abd-Elhadi S, et al. A role for α-synuclein in axon growth and its implications in corticostriatal glutamatergic plasticity in parkinson’s disease. Mol Neurodegener 2020;15:24. 10.1186/s13024-020-00370-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Maarouf M, Neudorfer C, El Majdoub F, et al. Deep brain stimulation of medial dorsal and ventral anterior nucleus of the thalamus in OCD: a retrospective case series. PLoS One 2016;11:e0160750. 10.1371/journal.pone.0160750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Li N, Baldermann JC, Kibleur A, et al. A unified connectomic target for deep brain stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Nat Commun 2020;11. 10.1038/s41467-020-16734-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Weil RS, Hsu JK, Darby RR, et al. Neuroimaging in parkinson’s disease dementia: connecting the dots. Brain Commun 2019;1. 10.1093/braincomms/fcz006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Pagonabarraga J, Martinez-Horta S, Fernández de Bobadilla R, et al. Minor hallucinations occur in drug-naive Parkinson's disease patients, even from the premotor phase. Mov Disord 2016;31:45–52. 10.1002/mds.26432 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Dhollander T, Raffelt D, Connelly A. Towards interpretation of 3- tissue constrained spherical deconvolution results in pathology. Honolulu, Hawai, 2017: 1815. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307863133_Unsupervised_3-tissue_response_function_estimation_from_single-shell_or_multi-shell_diffusion_MR_data_without_a_co-registered_T1_image [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data

jnnp-2021-326630supp001.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

Data are available in a public, open access repository. Data are available upon reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. All code used to perform the analyses presented in this study is shared freely as a github repository: https://github.com/AngelikaZa/ThalamicSubnuclei. Anonymized data will be shared on request, for purposes of replicating procedures and results.


Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES