Skip to main content
PMC home page
Portland Press Open Access logoLink to Portland Press Open Access
. 2021 Dec 16;49(6):2787–2795. doi: 10.1042/BST20210753

VDAC2 and the BCL-2 family of proteins

Zheng Yuan 1,2, Grant Dewson 1,2, Peter E Czabotar 1,2, Richard W Birkinshaw 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC8786305  PMID: 34913469

Abstract

The BCL-2 protein family govern whether a cell dies or survives by controlling mitochondrial apoptosis. As dysregulation of mitochondrial apoptosis is a common feature of cancer cells, targeting protein–protein interactions within the BCL-2 protein family is a key strategy to seize control of apoptosis and provide favourable outcomes for cancer patients. Non-BCL-2 family proteins are emerging as novel regulators of apoptosis and are potential drug targets. Voltage dependent anion channel 2 (VDAC2) can regulate apoptosis. However, it is unclear how this occurs at the molecular level, with conflicting evidence in the literature for its role in regulating the BCL-2 effector proteins, BAK and BAX. Notably, VDAC2 is required for efficient BAX-mediated apoptosis, but conversely inhibits BAK-mediated apoptosis. This review focuses on the role of VDAC2 in apoptosis, discussing the current knowledge of the interaction between VDAC2 and BCL-2 family proteins and the recent development of an apoptosis inhibitor that targets the VDAC2–BAK interaction.

Keywords: apoptosis, BAK, BAX, BCL-2 family proteins, VDAC2, voltage-gated channels

Introduction

Apoptosis is a major form of programmed cell death that clears potentially dangerous cells or cells that are no longer needed. Hence, apoptosis is important to maintain our health, as many cells in our body must die for embryonic development, maintenance of normal tissue homeostasis and a regulated immune response to infection. Insufficient apoptosis has been implicated in cancer [1,2] and autoimmunity [3], while excessive apoptosis is often associated with neurodegenerative disease [4,5]. The BCL-2 protein family tightly regulates mitochondrial apoptosis. The family is sub-divided by apoptotic phenotype into pro-survival (e.g. BCL-XL, BCL-2 and MCL-1) and pro-apoptotic proteins (e.g. BIM, BAK and BAX) [6]. The subtle balance between the two groups determines the cell life/death decision.

The pro-apoptotic effector proteins BAK and BAX are executioners of the apoptotic pathway; their conformational changes and oligomerisation in response to apoptotic stressors cause mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilisation (MOMP) [6]. This pivotal step releases cytochrome c and other apoptogenic factors from mitochondria to trigger the activation of cellular proteases and caspases to fully commit the cell to apoptosis [7]. The BCL-2 protein family share sequence homology in up to four conserved motifs called the BCL-2 homology (BH) domains, of which BAK and BAX contain all four. Structurally, BAK and BAX consist of nine α-helices (α1–9), including a transmembrane (TM) domain (α9), and exhibit a typical BCL-2 fold: seven α-helices folding around the central hydrophobic α5-helix [8,9]. A key feature of this fold is a hydrophobic surface groove formed by α-helices 2 to 5. This surface groove is key for their interactions with the BH3 domains of the pro-apoptotic proteins (e.g. BIM or another BAK/BAX protein) [10–12]. In addition, there are reports of a second rear pocket between α-helices 1 and 6 where BH3 peptides can also interact [13–16]. Binding of a BH3 domain to either site triggers activation and unfolding of the BAK and BAX BCL-2 fold. This unfolding event transitions BAK and BAX from their inert monomers into activated homo-dimers that then oligomerise and cause MOMP [10,11,17].

BAK and BAX have been suggested to function redundantly [18,19], despite potential differences in the levels of tissue expression and subcellular localisation (Figure 1) [20]. BAX is in a dynamic equilibrium between the cytosol and mitochondria, [21] and is predominantly found in the cytosol in its inactive state, as its α9-helix transmembrane (TM) domain is sequestered in its hydrophobic groove (Figure 1) [8]. In contrast, BAK is constitutively localised to mitochondria via its TM domain [22] and where it forms complexes with VDAC2 (Figure 1) [23]. In this review, we summarise the roles of VDAC2 in apoptosis and specifically discuss its interactions with BAK and BAX and the consequences for apoptotic progression.

Figure 1. VDAC2 is important for BAK and BAX targeting mitochondria.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

The pro-apoptotic effectors BAK and BAX interact with VDAC2 on the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM) to enable membrane recruitment [24]. Induction of apoptosis by up-regulation of BH3-only proteins activates BAK and BAX regardless of their starting subcellular localisation, and they dissociate from VDAC2 to cause MOM permeabilisation (MOMP) and cytochrome c release from the inter membrane space (IMS) [24,25]. (a) BAK can still migrate to the mitochondria in a VDAC2-deficient (VDAC2−/−) setting [23–26]. (b) However, in the absence of VDAC2, BAX becomes dependent on BAK for its mitochondrial targeting [24,25]. Arrows indicate movement between BAK and BAX localisation and conformation, with arrow length indicating the preference for localisation (smaller is less prominent).

VDAC2 in apoptosis

Voltage Dependent Anion Channels (VDACs), also known as mitochondrial porins, are a family of β-barrel membrane proteins that are the most abundant proteins in the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM) [27]. VDACs allow passage of both negatively and positively charged ions [28–30], NADH [31], ATP/ADP [32] and other metabolites [33] across the MOM. Three VDAC isoforms (1, 2 and 3) are found in mammals, which show high sequence similarity and overlapping tissue expression [30,34]. They share responsibility in metabolite flux function and have been implicated in many pathways including glycolysis [35] and release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [36,37]. Among the 3 VDAC isoforms, VDAC2 has drawn considerable interest as VDAC1 or VDAC3 knockout mice displayed no overt to mild phenotypes [38–40], while VDAC2-deficient embryos died during development [23,25]. This embryonic lethality was proposed to arise from its role in regulating apoptosis [41].

VDAC2 was originally thought to form part of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (PTP) complex which allowed the release of cytochrome c during apoptosis [42]. This hypothesis was based on VDAC2's channel function, its abundance in the MOM and its interactions with pro-survival proteins BCL-2 [43,44] and BCL-XL [45,46]. Several models have been proposed [45,47] and well-reviewed [48]. While evidence for a role of VDAC in MOMP accumulated, genetic studies from Baines and colleagues [49] refuted this hypothesis. In cells lacking all three isoforms of VDAC mitochondrial permeability transition and also apoptosis were unaffected [49]. This indicated that VDAC proteins are dispensable for apoptosis and that cytochrome c was released by another mechanism, notably via activation and oligomerisation of BAX and BAK [6].

As VDAC2 was not required for apoptosis, the field shifted direction focusing on its interactions with the pro-apoptotic proteins BAK and BAX. This began with Cheng and colleagues investigating potential binding partners of BAK on the MOM [23]. Using chemical crosslinking methods, they found that mitochondrial BAK could cross-link with VDAC2, but not VDAC1 or 3. This VDAC2–BAK complex was disrupted when apoptosis was initiated, and they found that overexpression of VDAC2 inhibited BAK-mediated apoptosis. Furthermore, mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) lacking VDAC2 were more sensitive to apoptosis induced by the BH3-only protein BID. This suggests that VDAC2 inhibits BAK-mediated apoptosis by sequestering BAK in its inactive form. BAK was subsequently reported to dissociate from the MOM in VDAC2-deficient cells and that tBID was required to recruit BAK to the MOM [24]. Hence, in VDAC2-deficient cells the mitochondria-associated pool of BAK does not promote constitutive apoptosis, but requires additional stimuli to recruit BAK to mitochondria for effective cytochrome c release [24]. Therefore, VDAC2 plays a role both in recruiting BAK to the MOM and in inhibiting its activation (Figure 1).

While BAK-mediated apoptosis can still occur in the absence of VDAC2, contrastingly BAX requires VDAC2 to mediate apoptosis [24,25]. This is due to a requirement of BAX for VDAC2 (or BAK) at mitochondria for efficient mitochondrial localisation (Figure 1). Furthermore, in cells where apoptosis is solely mediated by BAX, deletion of VDAC2 could provide long-term protection against induction of apoptosis by small molecule ‘BH3-mimetics’ apoptotic agents [25]. Hence, VDAC2 has contrasting roles in regulating BAX and BAK-mediated apoptosis.

The localisation of BAK and BAX to the MOM is counterbalanced by retrotranslocation of both BAK and BAX to the cyotosol, potentially coordinated by the pro-survival protein BCL-XL [50,51], although a mechanism independent of BCL-2 proteins has also been proposed [21]. Retrotranslocation is more prominent for BAX, helping to maintain its residence in the cytosol in the absence of apoptotic stimuli. For BAK the retrotranslocation rate is low, which is consistent with BAKs predominant localisation at the MOM [51]. The interaction between VDAC2 and BAK is proposed to prevent BAK retrotranslocation by BCL-XL [52]. This is consistent with the observations that BAK redistributes to the cytosol in VDAC2 deficient cells [24].

Beyond protein–protein interactions, another consideration is the effect of lipid on BAK, BAX and VDAC and their oligomerisation. All three proteins perform their critical function in a lipid membrane. Lipids can regulate VDAC1 oligomerisation, with cardiolipin disrupting and phosphatidylglycerol promoting VDAC1 oligomers [53]. Interestingly, cardiolipin is also required for efficient tBid recruitment to the MOM to promote BAX homo-oligomerisation during apoptosis [54–56]. In addition, lipids have been shown to regulate BAK/BAX activation and stabilise BAK oligomers [57–59]. However, roles for cardiolipin and other lipids in regulating VDAC2 interactions with BAK and BAX are not currently established.

Unmasking the VDAC2–BAK binding interface

BAK integrates into the VDAC2–BAK complex in its inactive form [23]. The C-terminal TM domain (α9-helix) and preceding hydrophilic segment (mBAK 186–209, referred to as ‘BAK C-terminus’ hereafter) play an essential role in both targeting BAK to mitochondria and its interaction with VDAC2. This was demonstrated by replacing the BAK C-terminus with that of Fis1 (BAK-Fis1TM), a protein that like BAK, can anchor to the MOM with its C-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence [26]. This chimeric BAK-Fis1TM protein maintained mitochondrial localisation, but failed to assemble into the VDAC2 complex. Conversely, when GFP is fused with the BAK C-terminus, this GFP-BAKTM molecule targets mitochondria, but is again unable to recognise VDAC2 [60]. These data show that the BAK C-terminus is critical for VDAC2 interactions, but also indicate that additional regions in the BAK α1–8 core domain are required to stabilise the VDAC2–BAK interaction.

Chemical cross-linking studies in MEFs show that BAK can cross-link with VDAC2 using the primary amine cross-linker disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS) [23]. Mouse BAK contains only four primary amine groups (-NH2) that are available for this reaction located at the N-terminus, in the N-terminal flexible region (K11), or in the α4-helix (K111 and K118), which indicates the potential interfaces of BAK that are in proximity to VDAC2 (Figure 2). Mutagenesis studies suggest the VDAC2–BAK interaction is lost with the BAK BH3 domain mutant L76E and reduced with BAK BH1 domain triple mutant W123A/G124E/R125A (Figure 2) [23]. This implies that BAK interacts with VDAC2 through its BH1 and BH3 domains, which are both part of the BAK hydrophobic BH3 binding groove (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Potential interface on BAK and VDAC2 involved in VDAC2–BAK interaction.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

(a) Diagram of pro-apoptotic effector proteins BAX and BAK with proposed VDAC2 interacting residues on mouse BAK (mBAK). (b) The crystal structure of mBAK (PDB: 6MCY) [61] is shown in cartoon representation with α-helices 2 to 5 forming the hydrophobic surface groove shown in yellow; residues implicated in the VDAC2–BAK interaction are shown as sticks. The proposed interacting residues on BAK can be classified into three hot spots: (1) the BAK canonical hydrophobic binding grove formed by α-helices 2–5; (2) a small region behind the canonical binding groove centred around L40 in mBAK (green) which is equivalent to R42 in human BAK (hBAK, cyan, PDB: 2IMT) [9]; (3) the BAK TM domain (not resolved in this structure) and the C-terminus of α8. (c) AlphaFold2 predicted model of mVDAC2 (UniProt: Q60930) is shown in yellow cartoon with β7–10 highlighted in orange [62,63]. The region on VDAC2 involved in VDAC2–BAK interaction has been mapped to its β7–10 region, where T168 and D170 are considered crucial while S123 and G124 are also relevant. They all locate to the cytosol-orientated region of VDAC2, facing towards the inside of the pore.

VDAC2 is an integral β-barrel membrane protein consisting of 19 β-strands with an N-terminal α-helix that resides within the pore (Figure 2) [64]. There is currently no experimentally determined structure available for mammalian VDAC2; however, structures exist for human/mouse VDAC1 chimeras [65–67] and zebrafish VDAC2 [64], which are normally used as models for the mammalian orthologues. There are now high confidence molecular models publicly available thanks to a collaboration between the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) and DeepMind's AlphaFold2 structure prediction pipeline (Figure 2) [62,63]. Despite 75% sequence identity between VDAC1 and VDAC2, their ability to bind BAK has diverged, providing an opportunity to unmask the BAK binding interface on VDAC2. Gain-of-function studies with VDAC1/2 chimeras show that β-strands 7–11 are required for BAK to bind VDAC2 [30]. Several residues in this region including T168 and D170 have been identified critical for BAK binding, while S123 and G124 are also involved (Figure 2) [30].

These studies have narrowed down the regions on BAK and VDAC2 that interact; however, they do not explain exactly how VDAC2 and BAK interface. This detail is required to understand how other proteins, or potentially small molecules, could disrupt or stabilise the complex to alter apoptosis.

The nature of the VDAC2–BAK complex

While evidence of the VDAC2–BAK interaction accumulates, the role of this protein–protein interaction has gradually become unmasked.

As discussed above, VDAC2 is suggested to play an important role in targeting BAK to mitochondria [26], though not essential, as BAK can still reach the mitochondria in VDAC2-deficient cells despite being primarily localised to the cytosol [25,26]. This was further demonstrated by an in vitro protein import assay into mitochondria. The level of in vitro-imported BAK was compromised by the knockdown of VDAC2 but not VDAC1 [60]. Conversely, overexpression of VDAC2, but not VDAC1, increased mitochondrial accumulation of BAK.

The VDAC2–BAK complex can be isolated from non-apoptotic mitochondria by digitonin extraction, with an apparent and approximate mass of 400 kDa according to Blue Native gel electrophoresis [24,26]. Quantitative mass spectrometry data confirmed the presence of VDAC2 and BAK in this complex, as well as VDAC1 and VDAC3 [25]. Although deletion of VDAC1 or VDAC3 disrupted this 400 kDa mitochondrial VDAC2–BAK complex, VDAC1 and VDAC3 are not thought to interact with BAK directly and only VDAC2 is required for efficient BAK localisation to mitochondria [60]. When apoptosis is initiated, the larger VDAC2–BAK complex is disrupted and BAK homo-oligomers are formed, suggesting that BAK dissociates from VDAC2 upon apoptosis [24]. Furthermore, cytochrome c release in mitochondria lacking VDAC2 is indeed faster than in mitochondria from wild-type MEFs, suggesting a potential restraining role for VDAC2 in regulating BAK apoptotic function [26].

Targeting the VDAC2–BAK interaction

The importance of the VDAC2–BAK interaction is highlighted by a small molecule developed by van Delft and colleagues [61]. This molecule, WEHI-9625, is a selective mouse BAK inhibitor that blocks apoptosis before MOMP and affords cells long-term protection in response to apoptotic stress in clonogenic assays [61]. While activating apoptosis with BH3 mimetic small molecules is clinically validated for cancer treatment [68], the development of WEHI-9625 paves the way towards small molecules that block unwanted apoptosis. WEHI-9625 acts to prevent BAK function by stabilising the VDAC2–BAK interaction, hence it prevents disassociation of the VDAC2–BAK complex in cells under apoptotic stress. This highlights the key role VDAC2 plays in regulating apoptosis and reveals the physiological consequence of stabilising VDAC2–BAK interaction.

The defined binding interface of WEHI-9625 remains unknown, however, it is appreciated that VDAC2 is required for WEHI-9625 to function. This was demonstrated by a pull-down assay using a chemical probe analogue of WEHI-9625 with UV photocross-linking in MEFs [61]. While both VDAC1 and 2 were significantly enriched, only VDAC2 was found to be essential for WEHI-9625 function in cells. In addition, gain-of-function studies using VDAC1/2 chimeras suggests that some residues in the cytosol facing segment of VDAC2 β7–10 are important for WEHI-9625 function [61]. This data aligns with previous studies indicating the essential role of VDAC2 β7–11 in targeting BAK to mitochondria and assembly of the VDAC2–BAK complex [30].

Curiously, WEHI-9625 only inhibits mouse BAK-mediated apoptosis and is completely inactive against human BAK. Given the marked divergence of WEHI-9625's ability to block mBAK and hBAK function, a series of m/hBAK chimeras were generated for activity studies. This narrowed down the region of BAK involved in the interface to two regions. The first involved several residues at the C-terminus of α8 (F181, R182, R183, D184 and T188 based on mBAK) that are in proximity to the transmembrane domain. Part of this region is poorly defined in BAK experimental structures [61] and likely flexible, making it difficult to understand how this region contributes to compound binding. The second region locates to the middle of α1 (L40), which is involved in a defined pocket behind the canonical hydrophobic groove. In the case of hBAK, this L40 is replaced by R42 which points into, and changes the nature of, the groove in this region [12]. Neither of these regions have been implicated in VDAC2–BAK interaction previously. Combined with the aforementioned crosslinking data [23], the regions of BAK that are implicated in the VDAC2–BAK interaction are revealed as, (1) a small region behind the canonical binding groove centred around L40; (2) the BH1 and BH3 domains within the canonical hydrophobic binding groove; and (3) the C-terminal segment which is either in proximity to, or embedded in, the membrane.

Conclusions

VDAC2 has emerged as a non-BCL-2 family protein that regulates apoptosis. Although the exact molecular mechanism behind this is not yet completely understood, it is now appreciated that VDAC2 differentially controls BAK and BAX apoptotic activity. VDAC2 is important for both BAX and BAK targeting to mitochondria where they execute apoptosis. BAK forms a distinct complex with VDAC2 on the MOM, which it dissociates from, in response to apoptotic signals [24,25]. The interaction between BAK and VDAC2 is a potential drug target, now highlighted by the development of WEHI-9625, a selective mBAK inhibitor. However, there are currently no experimental structures available for mammalian VDAC2 or full-length BAK with its TM domain. Instead, the VDAC2–BAK interface has been mapped by chemical cross-linking and mutagenesis approaches. Unfortunately, these studies lack the information required to understand the mechanism by which WEHI-9625 prevents dissociation of BAK from VDAC2. The VDAC2–BAK interface can be narrowed down to the single β7–10 region on VDAC2 [30], but the proposed interaction sites on BAK are separated, where its C-terminal segment, TM domain [26,60] and residues in proximity to the hydrophobic groove [23,61] are implicated. Mapping the VDAC2–BAK interaction at the molecular level will be pivotal for understanding the mechanism of WEHI-9625. Understanding this mechanism is key for developing similar inhibitors for human cells and assessing their potential to treat human disease.

Perspectives

  • The last twenty years has shown VDAC2 plays a role in apoptosis which is dependent on BAK and BAX.

  • VDAC2 facilitates the import of both BAK and BAX into the mitochondrial outer membrane, where it restrains BAK activation.

  • A small molecule (WEHI-9625) protects against apoptosis and is dependent on both VDAC2 and mouse BAK but does not affect the human BAK orthologue. Understanding this selectivity will inform if apoptosis can be inhibited by a similar mechanism in human cells and can guide new avenues for therapy.

Abbreviations

BH

BCL-2 homology

DSS

disuccinimidyl suberate

EBI

European Bioinformatics Institute

IMS

inter membrane space

MEF

mouse embryonic fibroblast

MOM

mitochondrial outer membrane

MOMP

mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilisation

PTP

permeability transition pore

ROS

reactive oxygen species

TM

transmembrane

VDAC

Voltage dependent anion channel 2

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.

Funding

G.D., P.E.C. and R.W.B. are supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia (Project Grant 1158137 and Ideas Grant 2001406). G.D. is supported by a Fellowship from the Bodhi Education Fund.

Open Access Statement

Open access for this article was enabled by the participation of The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, in an all-inclusive Read & Publish pilot with Portland Press and the Biochemical Society under a transformative agreement with CAUL.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation — Z.Y., G.D., P.E.C. and R.W.B. Writing — Original draft, Z.Y. — Review and editing G.D., P.E.C. and R.W.B.

References

  • 1.Wong, R.S. (2011) Apoptosis in cancer: from pathogenesis to treatment. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 30, 87 10.1186/1756-9966-30-87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Carneiro, B.A. and El-Deiry, W.S. (2020) Targeting apoptosis in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 17, 395–417 10.1038/s41571-020-0341-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mountz, J.D., Wu, J., Cheng, J. and Zhou, T. (1994) Autoimmune disease. A problem of defective apoptosis. Arthritis Rheum. 37, 1415–1420 10.1002/art.1780371002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Su, J.H., Deng, G. and Cotman, C.W. (1997) Bax protein expression is increased in Alzheimer's brain: correlations with DNA damage, Bcl-2 expression, and brain pathology. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 56, 86–93 10.1097/00005072-199701000-00009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lu, T., Aron, L., Zullo, J., Pan, Y., Kim, H., Chen, Y. et al. (2014) REST and stress resistance in ageing and Alzheimer's disease. Nature 507, 448–454 10.1038/nature13163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Czabotar, P.E., Lessene, G., Strasser, A. and Adams, J.M. (2014) Control of apoptosis by the BCL-2 protein family: implications for physiology and therapy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 49–63 10.1038/nrm3722 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kluck, R.M., Bossy-Wetzel, E., Green, D.R. and Newmeyer, D.D. (1997) The release of cytochrome c from mitochondria: a primary site for Bcl-2 regulation of apoptosis. Science 275, 1132–1136 10.1126/science.275.5303.1132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Suzuki, M., Youle, R.J. and Tjandra, N. (2000) Structure of Bax: coregulation of dimer formation and intracellular localization. Cell 103, 645–654 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00167-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Moldoveanu, T., Liu, Q., Tocilj, A., Watson, M., Shore, G. and Gehring, K. (2006) The X-ray structure of a BAK homodimer reveals an inhibitory zinc binding site. Mol. Cell 24, 677–688 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.10.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Czabotar, P. E., Westphal, D., Dewson, G., Ma, S., Hockings, C., Fairlie, W. D. et al. (2013) Bax crystal structures reveal how BH3 domains activate Bax and nucleate its oligomerization to induce apoptosis. Cell 152, 519–531 10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brouwer, J.M., Westphal, D., Dewson, G., Robin, A.Y., Uren, R.T., Bartolo, R. et al. (2014) Bak core and latch domains separate during activation, and freed core domains form symmetric homodimers. Mol. Cell 55, 938–946 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.07.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Brouwer, J.M., Lan, P., Cowan, A.D., Bernardini, J.P., Birkinshaw, R.W., van Delft, M.F. et al. (2017) Conversion of Bim-BH3 from activator to inhibitor of Bak through structure-based design. Mol. Cell 68, 659–672 e9 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gavathiotis, E., Suzuki, M., Davis, M.L., Pitter, K., Bird, G.H., Katz, S.G. et al. (2008) BAX activation is initiated at a novel interaction site. Nature 455, 1076–1081 10.1038/nature07396 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gavathiotis, E., Reyna, D.E., Davis, M.L., Bird, G.H. and Walensky, L.D. (2010) BH3-triggered structural reorganization drives the activation of proapoptotic BAX. Mol. Cell 40, 481–492 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.10.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Leshchiner, E.S., Braun, C.R., Bird, G.H. and Walensky, L.D. (2013) Direct activation of full-length proapoptotic BAK. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, E986–E995 10.1073/pnas.1214313110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li, M.X., Tan, I.K.L., Ma, S.B., Hockings, C., Kratina, T., Dengler, M.A. et al. (2017) BAK alpha6 permits activation by BH3-only proteins and homooligomerization via the canonical hydrophobic groove. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 7629–7634 10.1073/pnas.1702453114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Birkinshaw, R.W., Iyer, S., Lio, D., Luo, C.S., Brouwer, J.M., Miller, M.S. et al. (2021) Structure of detergent-activated BAK dimers derived from the inert monomer. Mol. Cell 81, 2123–2134 e5 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.03.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Knudson, C.M., Tung, K.S., Tourtellotte, W.G., Brown, G.A. and Korsmeyer, S.J. (1995) Bax-deficient mice with lymphoid hyperplasia and male germ cell death. Science 270, 96–99 10.1126/science.270.5233.96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lindsten, T., Ross, A.J., King, A., Zong, W.X., Rathmell, J.C., Shiels, H.A.et al. (2000) The combined functions of proapoptotic Bcl-2 family members bak and bax are essential for normal development of multiple tissues. Mol. Cell 6, 1389–1399 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00136-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Evans, J.D., Cornford, P.A., Dodson, A., Greenhalf, W., Foster, C.S. and Neoptolemos, J.P. (2001) Detailed tissue expression of bcl-2, bax, bak and bcl-x in the normal human pancreas and in chronic pancreatitis, ampullary and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Pancreatology 1, 254–262 10.1159/000055820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schellenberg, B., Wang, P., Keeble, J.A., Rodriguez-Enriquez, R., Walker, S., Owens, T.W.et al. (2013) Bax exists in a dynamic equilibrium between the cytosol and mitochondria to control apoptotic priming. Mol. Cell 49, 959–971 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.12.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Griffiths, G.J., Dubrez, L., Morgan, C.P., Jones, N.A., Whitehouse, J., Corfe, B.M.et al. (1999) Cell damage-induced conformational changes of the pro-apoptotic protein Bak in vivo precede the onset of apoptosis. J. Cell Biol. 144, 903–914 10.1083/jcb.144.5.903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cheng, E.H., Sheiko, T.V., Fisher, J.K., Craigen, W.J. and Korsmeyer, S.J. (2003) VDAC2 inhibits BAK activation and mitochondrial apoptosis. Science 301, 513–517 10.1126/science.1083995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ma, S.B., Nguyen, T.N., Tan, I., Ninnis, R., Iyer, S., Stroud, D.A.et al. (2014) Bax targets mitochondria by distinct mechanisms before or during apoptotic cell death: a requirement for VDAC2 or Bak for efficient Bax apoptotic function. Cell Death Differ. 21, 1925–1935 10.1038/cdd.2014.119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chin, H.S., Li, M.X., Tan, I.K.L., Ninnis, R.L., Reljic, B., Scicluna, K.et al. (2018) VDAC2 enables BAX to mediate apoptosis and limit tumor development. Nat. Commun. 9, 4976 10.1038/s41467-018-07309-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lazarou, M., Stojanovski, D., Frazier, A.E., Kotevski, A., Dewson, G., Craigen, W.J.et al. (2010) Inhibition of Bak activation by VDAC2 is dependent on the Bak transmembrane anchor. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 36876–36883 10.1074/jbc.M110.159301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yamamoto, T., Yamada, A., Watanabe, M., Yoshimura, Y., Yamazaki, N., Yoshimura, Y.et al. (2006) VDAC1, having a shorter N-terminus than VDAC2 but showing the same migration in an SDS-polyacrylamide gel, is the predominant form expressed in mitochondria of various tissues. J. Proteome Res. 5, 3336–3344 10.1021/pr060291w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Colombini, M. (1989) Voltage gating in the mitochondrial channel, VDAC. J. Membr. Biol. 111, 103–111 10.1007/BF01871775 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gincel, D., Silberberg, S.D. and Shoshan-Barmatz, V. (2000) Modulation of the voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) by glutamate. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 32, 571–583 10.1023/A:1005670527340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Naghdi, S. and Hajnoczky, G. (2016) VDAC2-specific cellular functions and the underlying structure. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1863, 2503–2514 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.04.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zizi, M., Forte, M., Blachly-Dyson, E. and Colombini, M. (1994) NADH regulates the gating of VDAC, the mitochondrial outer membrane channel. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 1614–1616 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)42070-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Benz, R. (1994) Permeation of hydrophilic solutes through mitochondrial outer membranes: review on mitochondrial porins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1197, 167–196 10.1016/0304-4157(94)90004-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tornroth-Horsefield, S. and Neutze, R. (2008) Opening and closing the metabolite gate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 19565–6 10.1073/pnas.0810654106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zinghirino, F., Pappalardo, X.G., Messina, A., Guarino, F. and De Pinto, V. (2020) Is the secret of VDAC isoforms in their gene regulation? characterization of human VDAC genes expression profile, promoter activity, and transcriptional regulators. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 7388 10.3390/ijms21197388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pastorino, J.G. and Hoek, J.B. (2008) Regulation of hexokinase binding to VDAC. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 40, 171–182 10.1007/s10863-008-9148-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Han, D., Antunes, F., Canali, R., Rettori, D. and Cadenas, E. (2003) Voltage-dependent anion channels control the release of the superoxide anion from mitochondria to cytosol. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 5557–5563 10.1074/jbc.M210269200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Abu-Hamad, S., Zaid, H., Israelson, A., Nahon, E. and Shoshan-Barmatz, V. (2008) Hexokinase-I protection against apoptotic cell death is mediated via interaction with the voltage-dependent anion channel-1: mapping the site of binding. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 13482–13490 10.1074/jbc.M708216200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Anflous, K., Armstrong, D.D. and Craigen, W.J. (2001) Altered mitochondrial sensitivity for ADP and maintenance of creatine-stimulated respiration in oxidative striated muscles from VDAC1-deficient mice. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 1954–1960 10.1074/jbc.M006587200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sampson, M.J., et al. (2001) Immotile sperm and infertility in mice lacking mitochondrial voltage-dependent anion channel type 3. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 39206–39212 10.1074/jbc.M104724200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Weeber, E.J., Levy, M., Sampson, M.J., Anflous, K., Armstrong, D.L., Brown, S.E., et al. (2002) The role of mitochondrial porins and the permeability transition pore in learning and synaptic plasticity. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 18891–7 10.1074/jbc.M201649200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ren, D., Kim, H., Tu, H.C., Westergard, T.D., Fisher, J.K., Rubens, J.A.et al. (2009) The VDAC2-BAK rheostat controls thymocyte survival. Sci. Signal. 2, ra48 10.1126/scisignal.2000274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shimizu, S., Narita, M. and Tsujimoto, Y. (1999) Bcl-2 family proteins regulate the release of apoptogenic cytochrome c by the mitochondrial channel VDAC. Nature 399, 483–487 10.1038/20959 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tsujimoto, Y. and Shimizu, S. (2000) VDAC regulation by the Bcl-2 family of proteins. Cell Death Differ. 7, 1174–1181 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Arbel, N. and Shoshan-Barmatz, V. (2010) Voltage-dependent anion channel 1-based peptides interact with Bcl-2 to prevent antiapoptotic activity. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 6053–6062 10.1074/jbc.M109.082990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Shimizu, S., Shinohara, Y. and Tsujimoto, Y. (2000) Bax and Bcl-xL independently regulate apoptotic changes of yeast mitochondria that require VDAC but not adenine nucleotide translocator. Oncogene 19, 4309–4318 10.1038/sj.onc.1203788 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zheng, Y., Shi, Y., Tian, C., Jiang, C., Jin, H., Chen, J.et al. (2004) Essential role of the voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) in mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening and cytochrome c release induced by arsenic trioxide. Oncogene 23, 1239–1247 10.1038/sj.onc.1207205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Shimizu, S., Matsuoka, Y., Shinohara, Y., Yoneda, Y. and Tsujimoto, Y. (2001) Essential role of voltage-dependent anion channel in various forms of apoptosis in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 152, 237–250 10.1083/jcb.152.2.237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.McCommis, K.S. and Baines, C.P. (2012) The role of VDAC in cell death: friend or foe? Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1818, 1444–1450 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.10.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Baines, C.P., Kaiser, R.A., Sheiko, T., Craigen, W.J. and Molkentin, J.D. (2007) Voltage-dependent anion channels are dispensable for mitochondrial-dependent cell death. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 550–555 10.1038/ncb1575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Edlich, F., Banerjee, S., Suzuki, M., Cleland, M. M., Arnoult, D., Wang, C.et al. (2011) Bcl-x(L) retrotranslocates Bax from the mitochondria into the cytosol. Cell 145, 104–116 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Todt, F., Cakir, Z., Reichenbach, F., Emschermann, F., Lauterwasser, J., Kaiser, A.et al. (2015) Differential retrotranslocation of mitochondrial Bax and Bak. EMBO J. 34, 67–80 10.15252/embj.201488806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Dudko, H.V., Urban, V.A., Davidovskii, A.I. and Veresov, V.G. (2020) Structure-based modeling of turnover of Bcl-2 family proteins bound to voltage-dependent anion channel 2 (VDAC2): implications for the mechanisms of proapoptotic activation of Bak and Bax in vivo. Comput. Biol. Chem. 85, 107203 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2020.107203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Betaneli, V., Petrov, E.P. and Schwille, P. (2012) The role of lipids in VDAC oligomerization. Biophys. J. 102, 523–531 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.12.049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lutter, M., Perkins, G.A. and Wang, X. (2001) The pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family member tBid localizes to mitochondrial contact sites. BMC Cell Biol. 2, 22 10.1186/1471-2121-2-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lovell, J.F., et al. (2008) Membrane binding by tBid initiates an ordered series of events culminating in membrane permeabilization by Bax. Cell 135, 1074–1084 10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lucken-Ardjomande, S., Montessuit, S. and Martinou, J.C. (2008) Contributions to Bax insertion and oligomerization of lipids of the mitochondrial outer membrane. Cell Death Differ. 15, 929–937 10.1038/cdd.2008.9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chipuk, J.E., McStay, G.P., Bharti, A., Kuwana, T., Clarke, C.J., Siskind, L.J.et al. (2012) Sphingolipid metabolism cooperates with BAK and BAX to promote the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis. Cell 148, 988–1000 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kumar, A., Byun, H.S., Bittman, R. and Saba, J.D. (2011) The sphingolipid degradation product trans-2-hexadecenal induces cytoskeletal reorganization and apoptosis in a JNK-dependent manner. Cell Signal. 23, 1144–1152 10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.02.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cowan, A.D., et al. (2020) BAK core dimers bind lipids and can be bridged by them. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 1024–1031 10.1038/s41594-020-0494-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Setoguchi, K., Otera, H. and Mihara, K. (2006) Cytosolic factor- and TOM-independent import of C-tail-anchored mitochondrial outer membrane proteins. EMBO J. 25, 5635–5647 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.van Delft, M.F., Chappaz, S., Khakham, Y., Bui, C.T., Debrincat, M.A., Lowes, K.N.et al. (2019) A small molecule interacts with VDAC2 to block mouse BAK-driven apoptosis. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 1057–1066 10.1038/s41589-019-0365-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Senior, A.W., Evans, R., Jumper, J., Kirkpatrick, J., Sifre, L., Green, T.et al. (2020) Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning. Nature 577, 706–710 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O.et al. (2021) Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Schredelseker, J., Paz, A., Lopez, C.J., Altenbach, C., Leung, C.S., Drexler, M.K.et al. (2014) High resolution structure and double electron-electron resonance of the zebrafish voltage-dependent anion channel 2 reveal an oligomeric population. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 12566–12577 10.1074/jbc.M113.497438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bayrhuber, M., Meins, T., Habeck, M., Becker, S., Giller, K., Villinger, S.et al. (2008) Structure of the human voltage-dependent anion channel. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 15370–5 10.1073/pnas.0808115105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hiller, S., Garces, R.G., Malia, T. J., Orekhov, V.Y., Colombini, M. and Wagner, G.et al. (2008) Solution structure of the integral human membrane protein VDAC-1 in detergent micelles. Science 321, 1206–1210 10.1126/science.1161302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ujwal, R., Cascio, D., Colletier, J.P., Faham, S., Zhang, J., Toro, L.et al. (2008) The crystal structure of mouse VDAC1 at 2.3 A resolution reveals mechanistic insights into metabolite gating. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. US.A. 105, 17742–7 10.1073/pnas.0809634105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Roberts, A.W., Davids, M.S., Pagel, J.M., Kahl, B.S., Puvvada, S.D., Gerecitano, J.F. et al. (2016) Targeting BCL2 with venetoclax in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 374, 311–322 10.1056/NEJMoa1513257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Society Transactions are provided here courtesy of Portland Press Ltd

RESOURCES