Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2021 Dec 25;13(12):e20679. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20679

Brucella Peritonitis in a Patient on Peritoneal Dialysis: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Saeed M Al Zabali 1,, Aljawharah K Rubaihan 2, Madawi F Alnetaifat 3, Salem Alshahrani 4, Moza Alhammadi 5,6
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC8786575  PMID: 35106220

Abstract

Peritoneal dialysis (PD)-associated peritonitis is the most common cause of morbidity, mortality, and treatment failure in patients on PD. Brucellosis is a worldwide zoonotic infectious disease caused by gram-negative bacteria of the genus Brucella. It is a major public issue in some regions. According to the World Health Organization report in 2011, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is considered endemic for brucellosis. Brucella peritonitis is one of the rarest presentations of Brucella. We report a case of a 14-year-old girl known to have end-stage renal disease, secondary to the autosomal recessive polycystic kidney. She had congenital hepatic fibrosis and pancytopenia. She had been undergoing automated PD for the past seven years and presented with abdominal pain, seizure, and poor feeding. There was no history of ingestion of unpasteurized milk or contact with raw infected animal products. The color of PD fluid was turbid with leukocytosis, predominantly neutrophils. The peritoneal fluid culture was positive for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The patient was started on intraperitoneal vancomycin, which showed slow improvement. The second culture of the peritoneal fluid showed Brucella species after a few days. Blood culture and serum serology titer for Brucella showed negative results. An anti-Brucella regimen, including rifampin and doxycycline, was initiated. She was treated with this regimen for six weeks. After the initiation of the anti-Brucella regimen, she showed marked improvement. To the best of our knowledge, only a small number of cases of Brucella peritonitis in PD patients have been reported. Despite the rarity of Brucella as a peritonitis-causing organism, it should be considered as a relevant pathogen in peritonitis cases, especially in endemic regions. PD-associated Brucella peritonitis is rare, and PD catheter saving may be considered if there is a response to anti-Brucella treatment.

Keywords: end-stage renal disease, catheter removal, peritoneal dialysis, peritonitis, brucella

Introduction

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is the primary modality of renal replacement therapy in children [1]. The number of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving PD therapy has been increasing because of the improvement in PD techniques and patient survival [2]. PD-associated peritonitis is a major cause of hospitalization in pediatric patients [3]. Peritonitis is the most common complication of PD; it is generally caused by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and Staphylococcus aureus [4]. Brucellosis, also known as “undulant fever” or “Mediterranean fever,” is a zoonotic infectious disease transmitted primarily by direct or indirect contact with infected animals or their products. Infection generally occurs in endemic areas [5]. Brucellosis is endemic in Saudi Arabia, with an incidence of 12.44 cases per 100,000 population as reported in 2019 [4]. The bacterium Brucella first infects animals and is then transmitted to humans through contact with an infected animal [6]. Brucellosis generally presents as an acute or subacute infection. Hepatosplenomegaly, fever, and peripheral arthritis are the most frequent clinical findings [5]. Peritonitis caused by brucellosis is considered to be rare. Most reported cases were in Saudi Arabia and Turkey, with only one case reported in China. Herein, we present a case of Brucella-related PD in a patient who was treated with doxycycline and rifampin for six weeks without the removal of the PD catheter.

Case presentation

The patient is a 14-year-old Saudi girl with congenital hepatic fibrosis with pancytopenia and ESRD, secondary to autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease, on automated PD for seven years. She had a medical history of seizure disorders and developmental delay and was on antiepileptic drugs. She was presented to the emergency department with complaints of abdominal pain for one day and a change in the peritoneal dialysate color, associated with abnormal movements described as generalized tonic-clonic convulsions. She had no fever or vomiting, but there was a history of acquiring bacterial peritonitis infections several times. She received a blood transfusion a few months before the presentation and was not known to have any allergies. Her vital signs at admission were as follows: temperature: 37.2°C, heart rate: 106/min, respiratory rate: 24/min, and blood pressure: 97/32 mmHg. On examination, she was conscious and alert but irritable and appeared pale. Her abdomen was distended with tenderness throughout. Other systemic examinations were unremarkable. Upon presentation, the patient’s white blood cell (WBC) count was low at 3.09 10e9/L, along with a high neutrophil proportion of 79.6%, low lymphocyte proportion of 11.0%, a low hemoglobin level of 8.7 g/dl, low platelet count of 61.0 10e9/L (it is the baseline for this case), markedly elevated plasma creatinine level of 675 mmol/L, high urea level of 21 mmol/L, bicarbonate (CO2) level of 18 mmol/L, elevated C-reactive protein level of 157 ml/L, high alkaline phosphatase level of 909 U/I, high alanine aminotransferase level of 98 U/I, and a high bilirubin level of 16.4 umol/L.

A sample of peritoneal fluid was collected for analysis, which exhibited a turbid yellowish appearance, a WBC count of 59,658/mm3, and a high neutrophil proportion of 94%. The peritoneal fluid culture was positive for methicillin-resistant S. aureus. The patient was started on intraperitoneal vancomycin and ceftazidime, but the abdominal pain did not decrease with the treatment, and she had one spike of fever of 38.1°C. Fungal culture was negative and the second culture of peritoneal fluid revealed Brucella species after four days of growth (Table 1).

Table 1. Results of peritoneal fluid culture.

Culture Organism
Brucella spp.
Antibiotic sensitivity Interpretation result
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole Sensitive
Gentamicin Sensitive
Streptomycin Sensitive
Tetracycline Sensitive
Doxycycline Sensitive

Blood culture and serum serology (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] assay test) for Brucella showed negative results. When we further examined the patient’s history, the mother denied any history of ingestion of unpasteurized milk or contact with raw infected animal products. The infectious diseases team was consulted and they started a treatment regimen for brucellosis with oral rifampicin 10 mg/kg once daily and doxycycline 2 mg/kg/dose every 12 hours for six weeks. Blood culture showed negative results for Brucella, and a repeat peritoneal culture showed negative findings on the fourth day after treatment initiation. Peritoneal fluid analysis showed a decreased WBC count of 40,000/mm3 and clear peritoneal fluid. Although removal of the PD catheter was indicated, the patient’s mother refused as the patient showed clinical improvement. She was discharged in a good condition without the removal of the PD catheter, and PD was resumed as usual without stopping it.

Discussion

Brucella species are gram-negative unencapsulated, nonmotile, nonspore-forming, facultative intracellular bacilli [7]. They are transmitted to humans from infected animals through ingestion, inhalation, conjunctiva, or skin abrasions. This bacterium affects multiple organs in the body through hematogenous spread [8]. The accurate diagnosis of brucellosis is difficult because of nonspecific clinical characteristics, slow growth in cultures, and the complexity of serological diagnosis [9]. Bone and joint involvement is the most frequent complication of brucellosis. According to the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis, peritonitis must always be diagnosed when at least two of the following findings are present: (a) clinical features consistent with peritonitis, (b) dialysis effluent WBC count of >100/μL or >0.1 × 109/L with >50% polymorphonuclear cells, and (c) positive dialysis fluid culture [10].

Patients who are on PD are at a higher risk of developing peritonitis than the general population because of the impaired peritoneal defenses in patients on PD [11]. Brucella shunt infection complicated by peritonitis has been reported [12]. PD-associated Brucella peritonitis is extremely rare [8]. To our knowledge, only nine cases have been reported in the literature to date. The majority of the reported cases were in Turkey and Saudi Arabia, with one case reported in China. Table 2 summarizes the general characteristics and clinical findings of the reported cases of Brucella PD-related peritonitis. Almost all the reported cases were adult patients (Table 2). Our patient is the only pediatric case.

Table 2. Reported cases of Brucella PD-related peritonitis.

PD: peritoneal dialysis; p.o.: per oral; IP: intraperitoneal.

Study Taskapan et al. (2002) [7] Ozisik et al. (2006) [11] Alothman et al. (2008) [13] Unal et al. (2009) case 1 [8] Unal et al. (2009) case 2 [8] Solak et al. (2012) [14] Koz et al. (2014) [15] Niu et al. (2018) [16] Bukhari et al. (2018) [17] Present report
Age, gender 47-year-old male 39-year-old woman 67-year-old male 38-year-old male 52-year-old male 48-year-old man 49-year-old man 54-year-old woman 45-year-old man 14-year-old woman
Country Turkey Turkey Saudi Arabia Turkey Turkey Turkey Turkey China Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia
History 15-day history of fatigue, fever, sweating, back pain, and two-day history of cloudy dialysate Nausea and severe abdominal pain. History of four peritonitis episodes Change of peritoneal fluid color, associated with abdominal pain and increased lower limb edema of one week Two-day history of nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and cloudy dialysate History of nausea, vomiting, fever, joint pain, severe abdominal pain, and cloudy dialysate Abdominal bloating and constipation of two weeks, no fever or hypotension, mild abdominal tenderness Abdominal pain and cloudy dialysate effluent. He had myalgia and malaise for 10 days Abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue, anorexia, bilateral knee pain, cloudy PD effluent, and ultrafiltration decrease, only one previous peritonitis episode Two to three days history of fever, on-off vague generalized dull abdominal pain, vomiting, and diarrhea Abdominal pain for one day and history of change peritoneal dialysate color, no history of fever
Examination Temperature of 38.2°C, heart rate of 106 beats/min, and blood pressure of 150/100 mmHg, with prominent abdominal tenderness Temperature of 37.3°C, blood pressure of 160/90 mmHg, and pulse rate of 105 beats/min. The patient had abdominal pain during palpation, and the peritoneal catheter was normal Abdominal examination revealed diffuse mild tenderness with clean CAPD catheter exit-site. There was bilateral lower limb edema Temperature of 37.3°C, heart rate of 88 beats/min, blood pressure of 135/85 mmHg, and diffuse abdominal mild tenderness Temperature of 37.2°C, heart rate of 94 beats/min, blood pressure of 150/100 mmHg. The patient was pale with diffuse abdominal mild tenderness without rebound tenderness or guarding. He also had bilateral orbital edema No fever or hypotension, mild abdominal tenderness. Other aspects of the physical examination were unremarkable. Peritoneal effluent was not cloudy No fever. Physical examination revealed abdominal tenderness, negative rebound tenderness Temperature of 36.2°C, blood pressure of 150/80 mmHg. The patient had umbilical tenderness during palpation and slight bilateral lower limb edema Temperature was 38°C, blood pressure was 120/60 mmHg, and tender abdomen with turbid PD fluid Vitally she was hypotensive afebrile. On examination she was irritable, the abdomen was distended with tenderness all over, other systemic examinations were unremarkable
Risk factors History of unpasteurized, unsalted cheese ingestion Direct contact with animal History of raw milk ingestion History of unpasteurized cheese ingestion History of unpasteurized milk and cheese ingestion Contact with sheep and cattle Not reported Possible ingestion of undercooked beef, single PD exchange while in restaurant History of unpasteurized cheese ingestion No history of direct contact with animal or raw milk ingestion
Time to peritonitis 12 months 5 years 4 months 2 months 6 months 3 years Not reported 11 years 3 years 7 years
Blood test Culture Brucella melitensis on the sixth day No growth No growth Brucella melitensis on the fifth day Brucella organism on the sixth day No growth Not reported No growth Isolated heavy growth of Brucella melitensis on the fourth day No growth
WBC 6200/ mm3 14.5 8.1 × 109 cells/L 4080/mm3 8100/mm3 7.16 × 109 cells/L 7100/ mm3 17.16 × 109 cells/L 15.9 × 109 cells/L 3.09 10e9/L
PD fluid analysis Culture Brucella melitensis on the sixth day Brucella melitensis Grew Brucella spp. on day six Brucella melitensis on the fifth day Brucella organism on the sixth day Brucella spp. Brucella spp. Brucella spp. Isolated heavy growth of Brucella melitensis on the fourth day Brucella spp.
WBC differential NA Neutrophils predominance 8% lymphocytes and 85% neutrophils Neutrophil predominance Neutrophil predominance Lymphocytes 28.9% neutrophils and 70.4% lymphocytes. Neutrophils 87% Neutrophils 86% Neutrophils 94%
WBC count 300/mm3 3140 3356 1600/mm3 5100/mm3 820 1300/mm3 1950/μL 2280 × 109 cells/L, 59658/cumm
Brucella agglutination test 1/2560 Serum 1/160, dialysate 1/60 Serum 1/2560, dialysate unknown Serum 1/640, dialysate negative 1/640 1/5120 1/1280 Not reported Unknown Negative
Treatment Doxycycline p.o. and rifampicin p.o. for six weeks Rifampin p.o. and doxycycline p.o. for six weeks Doxycycline p.o. and rifampicin p.o. for 12 weeks Doxycycline p.o. and rifampicin p.o. for six weeks Doxycycline p.o. and rifampicin p.o. for six weeks Rifampicin p.o. ceftriaxone for 45 days, doxycycline was not tolerated Amikacin intraperitoneal (IP), doxycycline p.o., and rifampicin p.o. for 42 days Levofloxacin IP and amikacin IP for three weeks then minocycline p.o., rifampicin p.o., and levofloxacin p.o. for a total treatment duration of 18 weeks Rifampicin p.o., doxycycline p.o., ciprofloxacin p.o. Rifampicin was discontinued and doxycycline was replaced by minocycline for 12 weeks Oral rifampicin and oral doxycycline
Outcome PD catheter removed. The patient was switched to hemodialysis PD catheter removed. The patient was switched to hemodialysis PD catheter removed. The patient was switched to hemodialysis PD was resumed as usual PD was resumed as usual PD was resumed as usual PD was resumed as usual PD was resumed as usual PD catheter removed. The patient was switched to hemodialysis PD was resumed as usual

Regarding clinical presentations, the most common presenting symptom was abdominal pain. Fever was present in four cases. Our patient presented both fever and abdominal pain. Most cases reported that there was a source for infection with Brucella, whereas in our case, the source of infection was not clear, with no obvious environmental risk factors. Her mother denied any history of ingestion of unpasteurized milk or contact with raw infected animal products, but she had received a blood transfusion a few months before presentation. The risk of transfusion-transmitted brucellosis has been reported [18]. Serology is the preferred method for diagnosing brucellosis when bacterial isolation is not possible, and serological testing is widely used in the diagnosis of brucellosis [19]. Turan Buzgan et al. reported that 1.1% of the patients remained seronegative [19]. As the peritoneal fluid showed a positive result for Brucella species after four days of growth, and the serum serology titer for Brucella revealed negative findings, we diagnosed the patient with seronegative Brucella peritonitis.

The PD catheter was removed in four patients with Brucella peritonitis [6,11,17]. However, our patient was successfully treated with antibiotics without the removal of the PD catheter. Niu et al. suggested that catheter removal should be considered for those patients with severe manifestations, who are unresponsive despite optimal treatment with intraperitoneal antibiotics and appropriate oral antibiotics [16]. Several studies have shown that it is necessary to use antibiotics for at least six weeks or more to avoid relapse or develop resistance [6]. The best results are observed when antimicrobial treatment is administered early in combination therapy with adequate dosing [16]. The treatment commonly used for children is age-specific. If the patient is aged greater than eight years, the treatment is complex, consisting of oral doxycycline and rifampicin. Children aged less than eight years are routinely treated with trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole, and rifampicin [6,20]. In most of the reported cases, doxycycline and rifampicin were administered. Levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin was added in some cases [16,17]. Ceftriaxone was administered to one patient, who could not tolerate doxycycline [14]. In our patient, oral rifampicin and doxycycline were highly effective.

Conclusions

In conclusion, Brucella peritonitis in a PD patient is rare but associated with excellent outcomes if treated appropriately. In PD-related peritonitis that does not respond to standard antibiotic treatment, Brucella peritonitis should be considered, particularly in endemic countries. The use of oral antibiotics is a good option for treatment unless the patient cannot tolerate it.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the pediatric nephrology team and pediatric infectious diseases team, as well as the research center at King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, for their continuous support.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study

References


Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES