Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 24;327(6):546–558. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0028

Table 4. Primary and Secondary Outcomes in the High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Group vs the Conventional Oxygen Therapy Group.

High-flow nasal oxygen Conventional oxygen therapy Difference (95% CI)a Unadjusted Adjusted
Effect estimate (95% CI) P valueb Effect estimate (95% CI)c P valueb
Primary composite outcome
Tracheal intubation or mortality within 30 d, No./total (%) 184/415 (44.3) 166/368 (45.1) AD, −1 (−8 to 6) OR, 0.97 (0.73 to 1.29) .83 OR, 0.94 (0.68 to 1.29) .69
Secondary outcomes
Individual components of the primary composite outcome, No./total (%)
Tracheal intubation within 30 d 170/415 (41.0) 153/368 (41.6) AD, −1 (−8 to 6) OR, 0.98 (0.73 to 1.30) .86 OR, 0.94 (0.69 to 1.30) .72
Mortality within 30 d 78/416 (18.8) 74/370 (20.0) AD, −1 (−7 to 4) OR, 0.92 (0.65 to 1.32) .66 OR, 0.97 (0.65 to 1.46) .90
Tracheal intubation rate, No./total (%)d 169/415 (40.7) 154/368 (41.8) AD, −1 (−8 to 6) OR, 0.95 (0.72 to 1.27) .75 OR, 0.92 (0.67 to 1.27) .62
Admission to intensive care unit, No./total (%) 252/408 (61.8) 214/361 (59.3) AD, 2 (−4 to 9) OR, 1.11 (0.83 to 1.48) .48 OR, 1.04 (0.75 to 1.45) .81
Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation after tracheal intubation, median (IQR), de (n = 169)
15.0 (8.0 to 26.0)
(n = 154)
12.0 (6.0 to 23.0)
MDND, 3.0 (−1.0 to 7.0) HR, 0.92 (0.71 to 1.20) .56 HR, 1.01 (0.76 to 1.34) .96
Time to event, median (IQR), d
Tracheal intubationf (n = 169)
1.0 (0 to 3.0)
(n = 154)
1.0 (0 to 3.0)
MDND, 0 (−0.4 to 0.4) HR, 0.98 (0.78 to 1.21) .82 HR, 0.92 (0.74 to 1.16) .49
Deathg (n = 88)
16.5 (9.0 to 22.5)
(n = 85)
17.0 (11.0 to 24.0)
MDND, 0 (−3.4 to 3.4) HR, 0.94 (0.68 to 1.29) .69 HR, 0.94 (0.67 to 1.32) .74
Mortality, No./total (%)
During intensive care unit stay 72/251 (28.7) 65/214 (30.4) AD, −2 (−10 to 7) OR, 0.92 (0.62 to 1.38) .69 OR, 0.98 (0.63 to 1.54) .94
During hospital stay 86/405 (21.2) 80/359 (22.3) AD, −1 (−7 to 5) OR, 0.94 (0.67 to 1.33) .73 OR, 0.99 (0.67 to 1.47) .97
Length of stay, mean (SD), d
Intensive care unith (n = 407)
10.5 (15.6)
(n = 361)
9.6 (14.1)
MD, 0.95 (−1.16 to 3.07) .38 MD, 0.47 (−1.57 to 2.50) .65
Hospitali (n = 405)
18.3 (20.0)
(n = 359)
17.1 (18.0)
MD, 1.21 (−1.50 to 3.93) .38 MD, 0.33 (−2.28 to 2.94) .80

Abbreviations: AD, absolute difference; HR, hazard ratio; MD, mean difference; MDND, median difference; OR, odds ratio.

a

Expressed as a percentage unless otherwise indicated.

b

The cutoff values for the P values to define statistical significance for the primary comparison of high-flow nasal oxygen vs conventional oxygen therapy corrected for the interim analyses were equivalent to .044 for 2-sided P values (calculated using the method described by Jennison and Turnbull22). For the secondary outcomes (not corrected for the interim analyses), the significance threshold of .05 was used.

c

Adjusted for age, sex, morbid obesity (defined as a body mass index >35), ethnicity, Fio2, respiratory rate, and treatment phases. Hospital site was included as a random effect.

d

Outcome included tracheal intubation during the index hospital admission.

e

The proportional hazards assumption was tested in the unadjusted model; the P value was .32.

f

The proportional hazards assumption was tested in the unadjusted model; the P value was .81.

g

The proportional hazards assumption was tested in the unadjusted model; the P value was .64.

h

Patients who were not admitted to intensive care unit were allocated a stay of 0 days.

i

Included time from emergency department arrival to hospital discharge.