Abstract
Aims
Hippo signalling is an evolutionarily conserved pathway that controls organ size by regulating apoptosis, cell proliferation, and stem cell self‐renewal. Recently, the pathway has been shown to exert powerful growth regulatory activity in cardiomyocytes. However, the functional role of this stress‐related and cell death‐related pathway in the human heart and cardiomyocytes is not known. In this study, we investigated the role of the transcriptional co‐activators of Hippo signalling, YAP and TAZ, in human‐induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC‐CMs) in response to cardiotoxic agents and investigated the effects of modulating the pathway on cardiomyocyte function and survival.
Methods and results
RNA‐sequencing analysis of human heart samples with doxorubicin‐induced end‐stage heart failure and healthy controls showed that YAP and ERBB2 (HER2) as upstream regulators of differentially expressed genes correlated with doxorubicin treatment. Thus, we tested the effects of doxorubicin on hiPSC‐CMs in vitro. Using an automated high‐content screen of 96 clinically relevant antineoplastic and cardiotherapeutic drugs, we showed that doxorubicin induced the highest activation of YAP/TAZ nuclear translocation in both hiPSC‐CMs and control MCF7 breast cancer cells. The overexpression of YAP rescued doxorubicin‐induced cell loss in hiPSC‐CMs by inhibiting apoptosis and inducing proliferation. In contrast, silencing of YAP and TAZ by siRNAs resulted in elevated mitochondrial membrane potential loss in response to doxorubicin. hiPSC‐CM calcium transients did not change in response to YAP/TAZ silencing.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that Hippo signalling is involved in clinical anthracycline‐induced cardiomyopathy. Modelling with hiPSC‐CMs in vitro showed similar responses to doxorubicin as adult cardiomyocytes and revealed a potential cardioprotective effect of YAP in doxorubicin‐induced cardiotoxicity.
Keywords: Hippo signalling, YAP/TAZ, Human pluripotent stem cell‐derived cardiomyocytes, Doxorubicin‐induced cardiotoxicity
Introduction
Traditional chemotherapeutic drug families, like anthracyclines, are highly effective drugs, particularly against breast cancer and haematological malignancies. 1 , 2 However, these drugs are the leading cause of cardiac dysfunction in cancer survivors. 3 Doxorubicin has a multimodal mechanism of inducing cardiotoxicity, including impairment of mitochondrial metabolism, reactive oxygen species production, disruption of Ca2+ modulation, and direct DNA damage. 4 Because the regenerative potential of cardiac cells is known to be low, 5 controlling cell survival is more important than in other cell types with greater regenerative capacity.
Hippo signalling is an evolutionarily conserved pathway that controls organ size by regulating cell proliferation, apoptosis, and stem cell self‐renewal. 6 , 7 The key effectors of the Hippo pathway are the yes‐associated protein (YAP) and transcriptional co‐activator with PDZ‐binding motif (TAZ). These effectors are regulated through phosphorylation, leading to inhibition of nuclear translocation and proteasomal degradation. Dysregulation of the Hippo pathway, via activation of YAP and TAZ, results in uncontrolled proliferation and suppression of apoptosis in adult organs. It is implicated in tumorigenesis of breast, colon, lung, and liver cancers. 8 , 9 , 10 Small‐molecule YAP inhibitors are a potential new therapeutic strategy for various cancers. 8 , 9 The Hippo pathway has also been shown to play a crucial role in regulation of cardiomyocytes. 11 YAP target genes are preferentially expressed in the foetal heart, 12 and the deletion of YAP in embryonic cardiomyocytes leads to heart hypoplasia. 13 In adult hearts, YAP silencing led to dilated cardiomyopathy and overexpression of YAP increased cardiomyocyte number and thus heart size in mouse models. 14 Moreover, when YAP is overexpressed in the adult mouse heart, enhanced preservation of heart function and reduced scar size was observed after myocardial infarction. 13 Consistent with the in vivo observation of doxorubicin‐induced reduction of heart size in mice, 15 doxorubicin treatment decreased the expression of YAP and caused cell death of neonatal and H9c2 rat cardiomyocytes in vitro. 16 , 17 In contrast, overexpression of YAP inhibited doxorubicin‐induced cardiomyocyte in vitro. 17 These findings suggest that YAP/TAZ activation is modified in response to doxorubicin treatment and is a promising potential target for regenerative or protective therapy of the heart. 18 Assessment of YAP/TAZ‐targeted pathway can be used to develop strategies to counter the toxicity of chemotherapies in the human myocardium. However, it is unknown whether chronic manipulation of YAP/TAZ signalling has any potentially deleterious effects on cardiovascular function and homeostasis.
The Hippo pathway and YAP/TAZ transcriptional co‐activators in cardiotoxicity have previously been characterized in H9c2 rat cardiac cells and animal models. 15 , 18 , 19 However, there has been no human‐based study investigating YAP/TAZ transcriptional co‐activators in doxorubicin‐induced cardiotoxicity. In this study, we analysed ex vivo human heart samples to evaluate key signalling pathways in doxorubicin‐induced cardiac cell death. RNA‐sequencing analysis revealed that YAP is an upstream regulator of differentially expressed genes between samples from patients with doxorubicin‐induced heart failure and healthy controls. Human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC)‐derived cardiomyocytes are suitable for characterization of molecular mechanisms of cardiotoxicity. 4 , 20 We generated a human in vitro model for doxorubicin‐induced cardiotoxicity and investigated the role of YAP/TAZ in doxorubicin‐induced cell death. A combination of our ex vivo and in vitro results suggest that Hippo–YAP/TAZ signalling is involved in anthracycline‐induced cardiomyopathy.
Methods
Patient samples
Anonymized human left ventricular myocardial samples were obtained from five patients with doxorubicin‐induced heart failure, undergoing heart transplantation. Healthy left ventricular tissue samples were procured from five non‐failing hearts with no history of cardiac abnormalities, intended for transplantation, but not used by the surgical transplant team of the St Vincent's Hospital Heart and Lung Clinic, Australia. Failing hearts were processed within minutes of the cross‐clamp of the coronary arteries. Non‐failing (donor) hearts were perfused with cardioplegic solution and quickly transported to the Sydney Heart Bank for processing. Approximately 1‐g‐sized pieces of tissue were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in nitrogen vapour. Work with human samples protocol was approved by the Sydney Heart Bank Executive and the Human Research Ethics Committee, University of Sydney (HREC Approval 2016/923), and consent was obtained in accordance with these approvals. All work conforms to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Subject characteristics are summarized in Table 1 .
Table 1.
Donor | Patient no. | Sample | Sex | Age | LVEF (%) | Cause of death |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.014 | C1 | Non‐failing | M | 30 | >50% | Subarachnoid haemorrhage |
3.135 | C2 | Non‐failing | M | 26 | >50% | Head injury |
6.038 | C3 | Non‐failing | M | 25 | >50% | Fractured vertebrae, drowning |
6.072 | C4 | Non‐failing | M | 16 | >50% | Suicide by hanging |
7.054 | C5 | Non‐failing | M | 33 | >50% | Chest injury |
Donor | Patient no. | Sample | Sex | Age | LVEF (%) | Cause of heart failure |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.064 | D1 | Doxorubicin | M | 13 | 26 | ALL |
3.015 | D2 | Doxorubicin | M | 16 | N/A | ALL |
3.093 | D3 | Doxorubicin | M | 34 | 17 | CLL |
4.133 | D4 | Doxorubicin | M | 32 | 15 | Bowel cancer |
DOX D | D6 | Doxorubicin | M | 53 | 10 | N/A |
ALL, acute lymphocytic leukaemia; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.
Immunohistochemistry
Cryosections of human heart tissues were transferred to glass slides and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Slices were permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X‐100 and blocked with 1% normal donkey serum and 2% bovine serum albumin. YAP/TAZ (1:100) (rabbit, Cell Signaling Technology), caspase‐3 (1:300) (rabbit, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and troponin I (1:300) (WH0007137M4, Sigma‐Aldrich) primary antibodies were applied in 2% bovine serum albumin overnight. Sections were washed and incubated with secondary antibodies, donkey anti‐rabbit Alexa488 (Jackson IR) and donkey anti‐mouse CF568 (Biotium), each diluted in 1:500 in TBS. Samples were mounted in Fluoromount‐G with DAPI (Invitrogen).
Haematoxylin and eosin staining
Cryosections of human heart tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. After dehydration, the slices were incubated in Mayer's haematoxylin solution (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 15 min. Slices were rinsed in running tap water and placed in distilled water. Samples were incubated in aqueous eosin Y solution (Sigma) for 3 min. After dehydration and clearing, slides were mounted.
Image analysis
Immunofluorescence was analysed using the Nikon A1R laser confocal system; image stacks were obtained with NIS‐Elements AR software. The signal intensity was analysed with ImageJ software. The applied ImageJ macro measured the nuclear signal (colocalization with DAPI) and the cytoplasmic signal around the nuclei in a 5‐px‐wide radius. The difference between these two signals was used as a measure of YAP/TAZ activation. Sarcomere structure and disorganization has been quantitated with the use of the SampEn2D PlugIn in ImageJ software. 21
mRNA quantification by reverse transcription–real‐time PCR
Human‐induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC‐CMs) were lysed in TriReagent, and total RNA was purified using RNeasy columns (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For controls, total RNA extracted from human foetal and adult hearts was purchased from Takara Bio (Cat Nos. 636583 and 636532).
A total of 500 ng of RNA was subsequently converted into cDNA using High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Real‐time quantitative PCR (RT‐qPCR) analyses were performed with TaqMan Gene Expression Assays for YAP (Hs00902712_g1) and TAZ (Hs00794094_m1) (Thermo Fisher Scientific), using GAPDH as the endogenous control. TaqMan Gene Expression Master Mix and a Mastercycler Realplex System (Eppendorf) were used for all RT‐qPCR measurements. mRNA levels were quantified and presented using the 2−ΔCt method. Cell death profiling of hiPSC‐CMs was performed by 96‐well SYBR green‐based quantitative real‐time RT2 PCR array with 84 genes (Human Cell Death PathwayFinder, 330231 PAHS‐212ZA, Qiagen).
RNA sequencing
Sequencing library for RNA sequencing was prepared with TruSeq RNA Library Prep Kit v2 (Illumina), according to the manufacturer's protocols. RNA sequencing was performed using the Illumina HiSeq2500 sequencer with 100 bp paired‐end reads. The quality of the reads was assessed using FastQC Version 0.10.1. The reads were then mapped on the reference human genome, version hg19, obtained from the University of California Santa Cruz (https://genome.ucsc.edu/) using TopHat. For gene‐level analysis, raw counts were produced using HTSeq Version 0.6.1 with human RefSeq annotation and used for differential expression analysis with DESeq2 from Bioconductor (https://www.bioconductor.org/). An outlier identified by principal component analysis was excluded from downstream analysis. Differentially expressed genes between samples from heart failure patients and healthy donors were identified using DESeq2, with age included as a covariant in the model to account for age‐dependent effects. RNA‐sequencing data showed that age had an effect on gene expression profiles in preliminary analysis. Therefore, age was included in the model as a covariate when calculating differential expression with DESeq2 to account for any age‐dependent expression differences. Pathway analyses were performed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA, Qiagen, http://www.ingenuity.com/products/ipa). Differential expression values (log2FC) were uploaded for the core IPA analyses; activation (positive z‐score) or inhibition (negative z‐score) of the significantly enriched pathways is shown. For IPA comparison analysis, genes that were up‐regulated and down‐regulated (z‐score >1.5 and z‐score <−1.5) were analysed. Functional and gene ontology enrichment analysis was performed by interrogating the STRING (https://string‐db.org) and Gene Ontology (GO) databases.
Preparation of pluripotent stem cell‐derived cardiomyocytes
Human‐induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived cardiomyocytes (iCell Cardiomyocytes, Cat. No. 11713, FujiFilm Cellular Dynamics, Inc.) were thawed and cultured according to the manufacturer's instructions for up to 1 month at 37°C in 5% CO2. For optical assays, cells were seeded at 1.8 × 104 viable cells per 0.35 cm2 in 0.1% gelatin‐coated glass‐bottom dishes (MatTek, Ashland, MA) to form a synchronous syncytium. For studying the effect of cell density on YAP/TAZ, hiPSC‐CMs were plated on 96‐well plates in densities of 7 × 103 and 2 × 104 cells per well (‘sparse’ and ‘dense’, respectively). YAP and TAZ mRNA levels and YAP/TAZ nuclear translocation were measured after 1 week of culture post‐plating. Replicates were performed with at least three independent cell batches.
High‐content imaging
ArrayScan High Content Platform (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to quantify cell death and YAP/TAZ nuclear translocation. Live cells were stained with TO‐PRO‐3, tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester (TMRM), and caspase 3/7‐FAM as markers of necrosis, mitochondrial membrane potential, and apoptosis, respectively. For cell counting, 2.5 × 104 cells/cm2 were seeded in 96‐well plate format. Images were acquired with ×10 objective. Cells were identified with Hoechst fluorescence that defined the nuclear area. Cell loss was calculated from the difference in cell number between control and treated conditions. Data are shown as (% of positive cells − % positive cells in control)∕(100% − % positive cells in control). For nuclear translocation assessment by immunocytochemistry, cells were fixed and stained with YAP/TAZ rabbit mAb (D24E4, Cell Signaling Technology) as the primary antibody and Alexa Fluor 546 anti‐rabbit Ab (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as the secondary antibody, and nuclei were labelled with Hoechst. Nuclear translocation of YAP/TAZ was defined as the differences between their nuclear and cytoplasmic intensities. Experiments were performed on at least three independent cell batches.
Calcium transients
For functional assessment of the cardiomyocytes, hiPSC‐CMs were cultured as a confluent monolayer (1.8 × 104 cells per well) in 96‐well glass‐bottomed plates (MatTek) coated with fibronectin (Sigma) in a humidified incubator at 37°C. Cells were loaded for 30 min with 4 μM Fura‐4F in serum‐free media (SFM) [phenol‐free DMEM (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK), supplemented with 10 mM galactose, 10 mM sodium pyruvate, and 2 mM l‐glutamine]. Cells were washed with SFM and further incubated for 30 min in SFM prior to experimentation. Calcium transients were recorded using the CellOPTIQ® platform (Clyde Biosciences Ltd, Glasgow, UK). 22 The Fura‐4F signal was recorded from a 0.2 × 0.2 mm area using a ×40 (NA 0.6) objective lens. Ratiometric imaging was performed using fast switching between light‐emitting diode excitation wavelengths of 355 ± 10 and 380 ± 10 nm. Emitted light was collected by a photomultiplier at 510–560 nm. The two fluorescence signals were digitized at 1 kHz, and the ratio of fluorescence (long wavelength/short wavelength) was used to assess calcium transient properties and beating rates. Specific parameters measured were calcium transient amplitude, time to transient peak (T peak), time to 50% decay (T 50), 75% decay (T 75), and 90% decay (T 90). Experiments were performed on at least three independent cell batches.
Toxicity assay screen on 384‐well plates
Cell death and YAP/TAZ nuclear translocation in hiPSC‐CMs in response to 96 antineoplastic and cardiotherapeutic drugs from Prestwick library (www.prestwickchemical.com, 10 μM all) were assessed by high‐content imaging. Experiments were performed on at least three independent cell batches.
Modification of YAP/TAZ signalling
For overexpression of YAP, the plasmid peGFP‐C3‐hYAP (Addgene plasmid #17843) with TransIT‐LT1 Transfection Reagent (Mirus Bio) was used, according to manufacturer's protocol. Lonza pmaxGFP green fluorescent protein plasmid was used as a GFP control for fluorescence‐based imaging. Successful transfection and overexpression were confirmed using Zeiss LSM‐780 confocal microscopy, Arrayscan high‐content platform, and RT‐qPCR after incubation for 48 h. Gene silencing was achieved with siRNAs for YAP and TAZ (25 nM, SMARTpool: ON‐TARGETplus YAP siRNA L‐012200‐00‐0005; SMARTpool: ON‐TARGETplus WWTR1 siRNA L‐016083‐00‐0005; Dharmacon, Inc.) diluted with 1× buffer; cells were transfected with DharmaFECT™ 1 Transfection Reagent (Dharmacon, Inc.), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Non‐targeting scrambled siRNA control (25 nM; Dharmacon, Inc.) was used as a control. The extent of gene knockdown was quantified after 48 h by RT‐qPCR.
Statistical methods
Data were plotted in GraphPad Prism Version 8.0 and expressed as mean ± SEM. Unpaired t‐tests were used to compare control and doxorubicin‐treated groups of human tissue samples. Paired t‐test was used to assess differences between pairs of data of three independent in vitro experiments. Comparisons between multiple conditions in three independent in vitro experiments were analysed using one‐way ANOVA. Differences at the level of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, and the following labelling key was used: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001.
Results
YAP and ERBB2 are upstream regulators of doxorubicin‐induced differentially expressed genes in human ventricular myocardium samples
Screening of biopsies has shown that high nuclear translocation and expression of YAP/TAZ is associated with a poor prognosis and reduced survival rate in various cancers. 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 Following a similar strategy, we performed RNA sequencing on explanted heart samples from patients with doxorubicin‐induced heart failure and control samples from healthy donors (Table 1 ). Differential expression analysis was performed accounting for age‐related effects. More than 140 significantly differentially expressed genes were identified (Figure 1 A ). Principal component analysis demonstrated a clear separation of control and doxorubicin‐treated samples (Figure 1 B ). IPA identified YAP and ERBB2 as upstream regulators, indicating their putative role in doxorubicin‐induced cardiotoxicity (Figure 1 C ). Interactions, network associations, and gene ontology analysis were analysed by STRING‐DB and IPA and identified active pathways of cell adhesion, remodelling, and extracellular matrix development (Figure 1 D and 1 E ). Functional association network also identified differentially expressed YAP downstream targets in doxorubicin‐induced failing hearts, including mitochondrial membrane elements involved in apoptotic signalling, cell cycle transition (regulation of G0 to G1 phases), and intrinsic apoptotic pathways (Figure 1 F ).
Doxorubicin‐induced heart failure is associated with the disorganized sarcomere structure and apoptosis
To investigate the role of YAP/TAZ transcriptional co‐activators in doxorubicin‐induced heart failure, we compared control and doxorubicin‐treated human heart tissues. Haematoxylin and eosin and troponin I staining revealed disorganization of sarcomere structure in doxorubicin‐treated samples compared with control (Figure 2 A and 2 B ). Furthermore, immunostaining showed significantly higher expression of apoptotic marker caspase 3 in doxorubicin‐treated samples compared with control tissue (Figure 2 C ). In addition, we found increased nuclear translocation of activated YAP/TAZ transcriptional factors in doxorubicin‐treated hearts (Figure 2 D ). The presence of YAP/TAZ in cell nuclei is indicative of activation of the transcriptional factors (Figure 2 E ). The linear regression confirmed significant correlation between caspase‐3 expression and YAP/TAZ activation (Figure 2 F ). Collectively, these data indicate the presence of heart failure in the doxorubicin patient hearts and indicate a potential link YAP/TAZ activation and doxorubicin‐induced heart failure.
Doxorubicin induces YAP/TAZ nuclear translocation and cell death
Human‐induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived cardiomyocytes (iCell) and an oestrogen and progesterone receptor‐positive human breast cancer cell MCF7 were used for investigating changes in cell death profiles in response to chemotherapeutic drugs. By using the FDA/EMA‐approved Prestwick drug library, we screened 96 antineoplastic and cardiotherapeutic drugs (Figure 3 A ). High‐content/medium‐throughput screening showed that anthracycline agents, such as doxorubicin and daunorubicin, decreased cell viability (as shown by decreased mitochondrial membrane potential) and induced greater nuclear translocation of YAP/TAZ than other classes of drugs in both cell types. A high percentage of cells positive for necrosis marker TO‐PRO‐3 was observed in response to doxorubicin in breast cancer cells but not in hiPSC‐CMs (Figure 3 A ).
Cell death of hiPSC‐CMs in response to doxorubicin treatment was further explored (Figure 3 B ). We found that hallmarks of apoptosis, such as activation of caspase 3/7, mitochondrial depolarization, and nuclear fragmentation, 27 , 28 were increased in response to doxorubicin exposure in a concentration‐dependent manner. However, necrosis was only induced in up to 7% of hiPSC‐CMs in response to 3 μM doxorubicin (Figure 3 B ).
Modulating YAP/TAZ expression and activation in human‐induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived cardiomyocytes
YAP and TAZ were expressed in hiPSC‐CMs as well as in human foetal heart tissue and adult ventricular cardiomyocytes; however, mRNA levels of YAP and TAZ were lower in in vitro differentiated hiPSC‐CMs than those in human ex vivo samples (Figure 4 A ). It is known that YAP and TAZ are mechanotransducers, responding to signals such as cell–extracellular matrix contacts and changes in cell–cell contacts. 7 , 29 Increases in cell density have been shown to decrease YAP and TAZ activity in other cell populations. 30 , 31 To validate our cell culture model, we questioned whether cell density of hiPSC‐CMs can affect YAP/TAZ expression and nuclear translocation. To this end, cells were plated ‘sparse’ and ‘dense’; we found that the levels of YAP and TAZ mRNA were decreased in densely plated cell populations in comparison with sparsely plated populations (Figure 4 B ). Nuclear translocation of YAP/TAZ quantified by automated fluorescent microscopy was also decreased in dense cultures (Figure 4 B and 4 C ). These findings corresponded with the known effects of mechanical cues on YAP and TAZ regulated by cell–cell connections. 32
Our next step was to investigate the effect of transient silencing of YAP and TAZ expression levels on cardiomyocyte function and doxorubicin‐induced cell death. Our results showed that silencing of both YAP and TAZ by siRNA resulted in a decrease in respective mRNA levels (siYAP: 19.6%; siTAZ: 18.6%; and siYAP/siTAZ: 29.3/19.9%) (Figure 4 D ). Next, we transiently overexpressed YAP (by pEGFP‐C3‐hYAP1 plasmid) in hiPSC‐CMs (Figure 4 E and 4 F ), which resulted in an over 8000‐fold increase in mRNA levels compared with cells transfected with GFP+ plasmid. We first investigated whether YAP/TAZ gene silencing leads to modification of cardiac function by examining calcium transients as a hallmark of cardiomyocyte function. Gene silencing did not significantly affect calcium transient amplitude, time to transient peak, or transient decay (Figure 4 G ). Yet altered sarcomere alignment of hiPSC‐CMs does not exclude altered excitation–contraction coupling and thereby effect on contractile properties in YAP/TAZ siRNA group.
To assess whether the knockdown of YAP and/or TAZ or overexpression of YAP can influence cell survival, total cell count, necrosis marker TO‐PRO‐3, and mitochondrial membrane potential marker TMRM intensity were assessed. High concentration of doxorubicin (15 μM) led to a significant decrease in cell number in hiPSC‐CMs and silencing YAP or TAZ, or YAP/TAZ together did not appear to influence this cellular phenotype (Figure 4 H ). In contrast, YAP overexpression increased the cell count of untreated hiPSC‐CMs and decreased the level of cell loss in response to doxorubicin resulting in comparable total cell count to untreated control cells (Figure 4 H ). When measuring necrosis marker TO‐PRO‐3, we found no significant difference between doxorubicin‐treated and vehicle‐treated cells (Figure 4 I ). On the other hand, decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential was more prominent in response to YAP or YAP/TAZ siRNA compared with TAZ siRNA (Figure 4 J ). These results show that silencing YAP may further induce mitochondrial membrane potential loss after doxorubicin treatment. To confirm this, we used real‐time PCR array to profile the expression of 84 key underlying genes of cellular death: apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis. We found that YAP siRNA inhibited a set of doxorubicin‐induced cell death genes, including anti‐apoptotic XIAP, Bcl‐2, and eIF5B (Figure 4 K ), which form a network of apoptosis‐related genes (Figure 4 L ). Doxorubicin‐induced mitochondrial membrane potential loss remained non‐significant in YAP overexpressing hiPSC‐CMs (Figure 4 M ).
Discussion
Traditional chemotherapeutic drug families, like anthracyclines, are highly effective drugs in several cancer types. 1 , 2 Improvement in cancer survival rates has increased the recognition of chemotherapy‐induced cardiotoxicity. 3 These drugs cause cardiac dysfunction leading to a high risk of developing heart failure in cancer survivors. 33 Yet our current knowledge of the underlying mechanisms and targets involved in drug‐induced cardiotoxicity is limited. The Hippo signalling pathway has been identified in various types of cancer as a growth controlling and tumour suppressor pathway. 34 , 35 Based on RNA‐sequencing analysis of left ventricular samples from cancer patients with doxorubicin‐induced heart failure and healthy controls, we found that YAP is one of the top upstream regulators of differentially expressed genes, such as those involved in extracellular matrix rearrangement, oxidative stress, or contractility. As assessed by high‐resolution histology of explants, YAP/TAZ activation in cardiomyocytes was more pronounced in failing than in healthy hearts. This activation was observed parallel with elevated caspase‐3 levels as a marker of apoptosis in cardiomyocytes as well as a loss and remodelling of the whole myocardium. This implicates that YAP may have a role in doxorubicin‐induced cardiotoxicity.
To confirm this, we generated in vitro models with hiPSC‐CMs and breast cancer cells and investigated doxorubicin‐induced cell death. Testing a library of 96 antineoplastic and cardiotherapeutic drugs routinely used in clinics, we found that doxorubicin was the strongest inducer of YAP/TAZ nuclear translocation in both breast cancer cells and hiPSC‐CMs. However, cancer cells and hiPSC‐CMs presented with different cell death profiles in response to doxorubicin. Whilst doxorubicin primarily induced necrosis in breast cancer cells, hiPSC‐CMs showed induction of apoptosis but not necrosis. Comparable with the ex vivo data, we found that doxorubicin led to elevated levels of caspase 3/7, nuclear fragmentation, and a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential in a concentration‐dependent manner in hiPSC‐CMs; this indicates that doxorubicin‐induced toxicity occurs primarily through apoptosis.
Similar to in ex vivo hearts, doxorubicin induced YAP/TAZ activation in hiPSC‐CMs. YAP/TAZ nuclear translocation (and mRNA levels) was also increased, most likely due to doxorubicin‐induced cell loss and subsequent lower cell density, corresponding with the mechanotransducer role of YAP/TAZ activated by altered extracellular and cell–cell connections. 15 , 19 We showed that overexpression of YAP improved doxorubicin‐induced cell death markers such as cell loss and reduction in mitochondrial membrane potential; moreover, YAP overexpression increased cell proliferation, suggesting that increasing YAP expression may be a beneficial strategy against doxorubicin‐induced cardiotoxicity. Given that increased YAP might lead to drug resistance in cancer cells, 36 , 37 it is important to consider cardio‐selective overexpression when developing new cardioprotective strategies. 35 , 38 Cardiac‐specific YAP activation would selectively protect cardiac cells and allow doxorubicin to simultaneously exert its effect on cancer cells. 39 In turn, small‐molecule inhibitors of YAP/TAZ are considered potential therapies for various cancers, like mesothelioma and basal cell carcinoma. 8 , 9 , 10 In late preclinical and early phase clinical trials, the targets of these molecules include the MST/LATS of the Hippo core complex direct YAP1 and upstream regulators of the pathway such as Rho GTPases and YES1. 40 For the cardiovascular system, the Hippo pathway has been identified as a target of pro‐regenerative miRNAs like mir302 41 ; thus, a gene therapy approach with AAV vectors using these miRNAs may be a future option in heart failure.
Transient silencing of YAP and TAZ co‐activators resulted in a modest mitochondrial membrane potential loss and a related inhibition of mitochondrial anti‐apoptotic pathways (XIAP, EIF5B, and BCL2). However, as these were not accompanied with significant cell death, the direct role of these inhibitors and thus other Hippo‐dependent elements on cardiomyocyte viability warrants further investigation.
In summary, our results show that doxorubicin‐induced cardiac death is mediated primarily by apoptosis and not necrosis. YAP/TAZ is activated in response to doxorubicin treatment, suggesting that the Hippo pathway plays a role in doxorubicin‐induced cardiotoxicity. Overexpression of YAP rescued doxorubicin‐induced cell loss, by inhibiting apoptosis and through induction of proliferation. Our data add important novel insights into the mechanisms mediating doxorubicin‐induced cell loss and suggest a potential cardioprotective effect of YAP in doxorubicin‐induced cardiotoxicity. Moreover, it further strengthens that hiPSC‐CMs can be used to evaluate patient‐specific drug safety and efficacy, and the underlying molecular mechanisms. 4 , 20
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing financial or non‐financial interests.
Funding
This study was supported by the Medical Research Council (MR/R025002/1 and MC_U12266B), the British Heart Foundation (BHF) Centre of Regenerative Medicine, and the Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Fund (NVKP_16‐1‐2016‐0017, NKFI‐6 K128444, and OTKA K 128369).
Acknowledgements
We thank Professor David Kaye, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, for providing us with two explanted heart samples and Professor Peter S. Macdonald, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, for his data analytic support.
Berecz, T. , Yiu, A. , Vittay, O. , Orsolits, B. , Mioulane, M. , dos Remedios, C. G. , Ketteler, R. , Merkely, B. , Apáti, Á. , Harding, S. E. , Hellen, N. , and Foldes, G. (2022) Transcriptional co‐activators YAP1–TAZ of Hippo signalling in doxorubicin‐induced cardiomyopathy. ESC Heart Failure, 9: 224–235. 10.1002/ehf2.13756.
References
- 1. Shah AN, Gradishar WJ. Adjuvant anthracyclines in breast cancer: what is their role? Oncologist 2018; 23: 1153–1161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ghigo A, Li M, Hirsch E. New signal transduction paradigms in anthracycline‐induced cardiotoxicity. Biochim Biophys Acta 2016; 1863: 1916–1925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. McGowan JV, Chung R, Maulik A, Piotrowska I, Walker JM, Yellon DM. Anthracycline chemotherapy and cardiotoxicity. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2017; 31: 63–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Burridge PW, Li YF, Matsa E, Wu H, Ong SG, Sharma A, Holmstrom A, Chang AC, Coronado MJ, Ebert AD, Knowles JW, Telli ML, Witteles RM, Blau HM, Bernstein D, Altman RB, Wu JC. Human induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived cardiomyocytes recapitulate the predilection of breast cancer patients to doxorubicin‐induced cardiotoxicity. Nat Med 2016; 22: 547–556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kikuchi K, Poss KD. Cardiac regenerative capacity and mechanisms. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2012; 28: 719–741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Piccolo S, Dupont S, Cordenonsi M. The biology of YAP/TAZ: hippo signaling and beyond. Physiol Rev 2014; 94: 1287–1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Low BC, Pan CQ, Shivashankar GV, Bershadsky A, Sudol M, Sheetz M. YAP/TAZ as mechanosensors and mechanotransducers in regulating organ size and tumor growth. FEBS Lett 2014; 588: 2663–2670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Cordenonsi M, Zanconato F, Azzolin L, Forcato M, Rosato A, Frasson C, Inui M, Montagner M, Parenti AR, Poletti A, Daidone MG, Dupont S, Basso G, Bicciato S, Piccolo S. The Hippo transducer TAZ confers cancer stem cell‐related traits on breast cancer cells. Cell 2011; 147: 759–772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Stanger BZ. Quit your YAPing: a new target for cancer therapy. Genes Dev 2012; 26: 1263–1267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Xu MZ, Yao TJ, Lee NP, Ng IO, Chan YT, Zender L, Lowe SW, Poon RT, Luk JM. Yes‐associated protein is an independent prognostic marker in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 2009; 115: 4576–4585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Zhou Q, Li L, Zhao B, Guan KL. The hippo pathway in heart development, regeneration, and diseases. Circ Res 2015; 116: 1431–1447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Morikawa Y, Zhang M, Heallen T, Leach J, Tao G, Xiao Y, Bai Y, Li W, Willerson JT, Martin JF. Actin cytoskeletal remodeling with protrusion formation is essential for heart regeneration in Hippo‐deficient mice. Sci Signal 2015; 8: ra41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Mia MM, Singh MK. The Hippo signaling pathway in cardiac development and diseases. Front Cell Dev Biol 2019; 7: 211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Windmueller R, Morrisey EE. Hippo and cardiac hypertrophy: a complex interaction. Circ Res 2015; 117: 832–834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Takaguri A, Akihiro O, Sasano J, Satoh K. Involvement of Yes‐associated protein 1 (YAP1) in doxorubicin‐induced cytotoxicity in H9c2 cardiac cells. Cell Biol Int 2020; 44: 873–881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Li HR, Wang C, Sun P, Liu DD, Du GQ, Tian JW. Melatonin attenuates doxorubicin‐induced cardiotoxicity through preservation of YAP expression. J Cell Mol Med 2020; 24: 3634–3646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Wang P, Wang M, Hu Y, Chen J, Cao Y, Liu C, Wu Z, Shen J, Lu J, Liu P. Isorhapontigenin protects against doxorubicin‐induced cardiotoxicity via increasing YAP1 expression. Acta Pharma Sinica B 2021; 11: 680–693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Chen X, Li Y, Luo J, Hou N. Molecular mechanism of hippo–YAP1/TAZ pathway in heart development, disease, and regeneration. Front Physiol 2020; 11: 389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Xiao D, Chang W, Ding W, Wang Y, Fa H, Wang J. Enhanced mitophagy mediated by the YAP/Parkin pathway protects against DOX‐induced cardiotoxicity. Toxicol Lett 2020; 330: 96–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Matsa E, Burridge PW, Yu KH, Ahrens JH, Termglinchan V, Wu H, Liu C, Shukla P, Sayed N, Churko JM, Shao N, Woo NA, Chao AS, Gold JD, Karakikes I, Snyder MP, Wu JC. Transcriptome profiling of patient‐specific human iPSC‐cardiomyocytes predicts individual drug safety and efficacy responses in vitro. Cell Stem Cell 2016; 19: 311–325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Silva LEV, Senra ACS, Fazan VPS, Felipe JC, Murta LO. Two‐dimensional sample entropy: assessing image texture through irregularity. Biomed Phys Eng Expr 2016; 2: 045002. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Blinova K, Stohlman J, Vicente J, Chan D, Johannesen L, Hortigon‐Vinagre MP, Zamora V, Smith G, Crumb WJ, Pang L, Lyn‐Cook B, Ross J, Brock M, Chvatal S, Millard D, Galeotti L, Stockbridge N, Strauss DG. Comprehensive translational assessment of human‐induced pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes for evaluating drug‐induced arrhythmias. Toxicologic Sci 2017; 155: 234–247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Cottini F, Hideshima T, Xu C, Sattler M, Dori M, Agnelli L, ten Hacken E, Bertilaccio MT, Antonini E, Neri A, Ponzoni M, Marcatti M, Richardson PG, Carrasco R, Kimmelman AC, Wong KK, Caligaris‐Cappio F, Blandino G, Kuehl WM, Anderson KC, Tonon G. Rescue of Hippo coactivator YAP1 triggers DNA damage‐induced apoptosis in hematological cancers. Nat Med 2014; 20: 599–606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Zanconato F, Cordenonsi M, Piccolo S. YAP/TAZ at the roots of cancer. Cancer Cell 2016; 29: 783–803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Moroishi T, Hansen CG, Guan KL. The emerging roles of YAP and TAZ in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2015; 15: 73–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Panciera T, Azzolin L, Cordenonsi M, Piccolo S. Mechanobiology of YAP and TAZ in physiology and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2017; 18: 758–770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Lugli E, Troiano L, Ferraresi R, Roat E, Prada N, Nasi M, Pinti M, Cooper EL, Cossarizza A. Characterization of cells with different mitochondrial membrane potential during apoptosis. Cytometry Part A J Int Soc Anal Cytol 2005; 68: 28–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Saraste A, Pulkki K. Morphologic and biochemical hallmarks of apoptosis. Cardiovasc Res 2000; 45: 528–537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Rausch V, Hansen CG. The Hippo pathway, YAP/TAZ, and the plasma membrane. Trends Cell Biol 2020; 30: 32–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Aragona M, Panciera T, Manfrin A, Giulitti S, Michielin F, Elvassore N, Dupont S, Piccolo S. A mechanical checkpoint controls multicellular growth through YAP/TAZ regulation by actin‐processing factors. Cell 2013; 154: 1047–1059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Pavel M, Renna M, Park SJ, Menzies FM, Ricketts T, Fullgrabe J, Ashkenazi A, Frake RA, Lombarte AC, Bento CF, Franze K, Rubinsztein DC. Contact inhibition controls cell survival and proliferation via YAP/TAZ‐autophagy axis. Nat Commun 2018; 9: 2961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Karaman R, Halder G. Cell junctions in Hippo signaling. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2018; 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Geiger S, Lange V, Suhl P, Heinemann V, Stemmler HJ. Anticancer therapy induced cardiotoxicity: review of the literature. Anticancer Drugs 2010; 21: 578–590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Han Y. Analysis of the role of the hippo pathway in cancer. J Transl Med 2019; 17: 116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Johnson R, Halder G. The two faces of Hippo: targeting the Hippo pathway for regenerative medicine and cancer treatment. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2014; 13: 63–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Zhang H, Yu QL, Meng L, Huang H, Liu H, Zhang N, Liu N, Yang J, Zhang YZ, Huang Q. TAZ‐regulated expression of IL‐8 is involved in chemoresistance of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Arch Biochem Biophys 2020; 693: 108571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Huo X, Zhang Q, Liu AM, Tang C, Gong Y, Bian J, Luk JM, Xu Z, Chen J. Overexpression of Yes‐associated protein confers doxorubicin resistance in hepatocellullar carcinoma. Oncol Rep 2013; 29: 840–846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Golforoush PA, Narasimhan P, Chaves‐Guerrero PP, Lawrence E, Newton G, Yan R, Harding SE, Perrior T, Chapman KL, Schneider MD. Selective protection of human cardiomyocytes from anthracycline cardiotoxicity by small molecule inhibitors of MAP4K4. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 12060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Lin Z, von Gise A, Zhou P, Gu F, Ma Q, Jiang J, Yau AL, Buck JN, Gouin KA, van Gorp PR, Zhou B, Chen J, Seidman JG, Wang DZ, Pu WT. Cardiac‐specific YAP activation improves cardiac function and survival in an experimental murine MI model. Circ Res 2014; 115: 354–363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Sebio A, Lenz HJ. Molecular pathways: hippo signaling, a critical tumor suppressor. Clin Cancer Res 2015; 21: 5002–5007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Tian Y, Liu Y, Wang T, Zhou N, Kong J, Chen L, Snitow M, Morley M, Li D, Petrenko N, Zhou S, Lu M, Gao E, Koch WJ, Stewart KM, Morrisey EE. A microRNA‐Hippo pathway that promotes cardiomyocyte proliferation and cardiac regeneration in mice. Sci Transl Med 2015; 7: 279ra38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]