Abstract
In early embryogenesis of fast cleaving embryos, DNA synthesis is short and surveillance mechanisms preserving genome integrity are inefficient, implying the possible generation of mutations. We have analyzed mutagenesis in Xenopus laevis and Drosophila melanogaster early embryos. We report the occurrence of a high mutation rate in Xenopus and show that it is dependent upon the translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) master regulator Rad18. Unexpectedly, we observed a homology-directed repair contribution of Rad18 in reducing the mutation load. Genetic invalidation of TLS in the pre-blastoderm Drosophila embryo resulted in reduction of both the hatching rate and single-nucleotide variations on pericentromeric heterochromatin in adult flies. Altogether, these findings indicate that during very early Xenopus and Drosophila embryos TLS strongly contributes to the high mutation rate. This may constitute a previously unforeseen source of genetic diversity contributing to the polymorphisms of each individual with implications for genome evolution and species adaptation.
Graphical Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Very early embryogenesis of fast cleaving embryos is characterized by unusually contracted cell cycles, made of a periodic and synchronous succession of DNA synthesis (S-phase) and mitosis with virtually absent gap phases. S-phase length is dramatically short (15 min in Xenopus and only 4 min in Drosophila) and feedback mechanisms controlling genome integrity (checkpoints) are largely repressed, as there is no time to slow down the cell cycle [see (1) for review, and references therein]. These include the ATR-dependent checkpoint that monitors replication fork progression [see (2) for review]. This checkpoint is activated close to the midblastula transition (MBT) in concomitance with activation of zygotic transcription (3–5). Experiments in Xenopus have shown that checkpoint activation is sensitive to the DNA-to-cytoplasmic (N/C) ratio, since it can be triggered by artificially increasing the amount of DNA in the embryo over a threshold level, a situation that mimics the increase in DNA content reached close to the MBT (6). Previous observations in Caenorhabditis elegans (7–9) and more recently in Xenopus laevis (10) have implicated the translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) branch of DNA damage tolerance in silencing the DNA damage checkpoint. In Xenopus cleavage-stage embryos, constitutive recruitment of at least one Y-family TLS polymerase (Polη) onto replication forks, driven by the TLS master regulator Rad18 (E3) ubiquitin ligase, minimizes replication fork stalling in front of UV lesions, thereby limiting single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) production that is essential for replication checkpoint activation (10–13). This configuration is lost prior to MBT following a developmentally regulated decline of Rad18 abundance (10).
TLS Pols have the unique capacity to replicate damaged DNA, thanks to a catalytic site more open than that of replicative polymerases that can accommodate damaged bases. Because TLS Pols cannot discriminate the insertion of the correct nucleotide and lack proofreading activity, they can be highly mutagenic especially on undamaged templates [see (14) for review]. Recruitment of Y-family TLS Pols (ι, η, κ and Rev1) requires monoubiquitination of the replication fork-associated protein PCNA (PCNAmUb) by Rad18 (E3) and Rad6 (E2) ubiquitin ligase complex (15,16). Aside from its TLS function, Rad18 is also implicated in error-free homology-directed DNA repair (HDR) in response to both double-strand breaks and interstrand cross-links (17–21). These functions are separable and lie in distinct domains of the Rad18 protein. The Rad18 TLS activity is confined to its ring finger domain (22), while the HDR activity mainly depends upon its zinc finger and ubiquitin binding domain (17,18). We have previously shown that in early Xenopus embryos PCNA is constitutively monoubiquitinated, irrespective of the presence of DNA damage (10). Whether TLS is active during the early embryonic cleavage stages is currently unclear. Previous work in C. elegans has shown that mutations in some TLS Pols do not influence global mutagenesis although a polη and polκ double mutant accumulates DNA deletions (9). In this work, we provide evidence for TLS-dependent mutagenesis in early Xenopus and Drosophila embryos and show that in Xenopus both Rad18 HDR activity and the mismatch repair (MMR) system alleviate mutagenesis, thus reducing the mutation load.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Experiments with Xenopus were performed in accordance with current institutional and national regulations approved by the Ministery of Research under supervision of the Departmental Direction of Population Protection. Xenopus embryos were prepared by in vitro fertilization as previously described (10). Two-cell-stage embryos were microinjected in the animal pole using a Nanoject auto oocyte injector under a stereomicroscope (two injections of 9 nl in one blastomer). Each embryo was injected with 12 ng (pre-MBT) or 72 ng (post-MBT) of supercoiled plasmid, undamaged or irradiated with 200 J m−2 of UV-C with a UV-Stratalinker, and/or 5 ng of either RAD18 or MLH1 mRNAs. Embryos were collected at 16- or 32-cell stage, according to Nieuwkoop and Faber normal tables, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C.
Drosophila melanogaster stocks were maintained and experiments were performed following standard procedures on standard cornmeal–yeast medium, inside a thermostatic room at 25°C with alternating light and dark for an equal amount of hours per day. The following stocks were from Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center: dPolηExc2.15 (#57341) and OreRmE (#25211). The latter was homogenized through serial individual backcrosses for nine generations. dPolη12 was a kind gift of Benjamin Loppin (23). Balancer stocks were from our laboratory. Quantifications of hatching rates (eggs to larvae) were determined as previously described (24). Hatch rate is the ratio of hatched eggs to total eggs laid expressed as a percentage. Two hundred or more embryos were scored twice per genotype. In addition, hatching of adult flies was estimated by calculating the percentage of larvae (counted 2–2.5 days after fertilization) developed to mature flies (counted 10 days after fertilization).
Plasmid DNAs
lacZ-containing plasmid (pEL1) was obtained by subcloning the lac operon from pBluescript into the SpeI–KpnI restriction sites of pRU1103 vector, which contains full-length lacZ. pEL1 was transformed and amplified in Escherichia coli and purified using a standard protocol (QIAGEN) at a temperature lower than or equal to 12°C to obtain a near 100% supercoiled DNA, as previously described (25). This procedure greatly minimizes DNA damage and background mutations. pCS2-MLH1 plasmid was obtained by subcloning human MLH1 cDNA from pCEP9MLH1 (26), into the BamHI–XhoI restriction sites of pCS2 vector. Rad18 wild-type, C28F and C207F mutant plasmids were previously described (10). The Rad18C28FC207 double mutant was generated by standard site-directed mutagenesis from the Rad18C28F mutant plasmid.
In vitro transcription
mRNA synthesis was performed with mMESSAGE mMACHINE kit SP6® (AM1340, Thermo fisher). mRNAs were recovered by phenol–chloroform extraction and isopropanol precipitation. Following centrifugation and ethanol wash, mRNAs were dissolved in 20 μl of RNase-free water. mRNA quality was checked by formaldehyde gel electrophoresis.
Xenopus embryos and egg protein extracts
An average of 20 embryos were lysed in Xb buffer (5 μl of buffer per embryo; 100 mM KCl, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 50 mM sucrose, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.7) supplemented with cytochalasin (10 μg ml–1), phosphatases (PhosSTOP 1×, Roche) and protease inhibitors (5 μg ml–1 leupeptin, pepstatin A and aprotinin). After 10-min centrifugation at maximum speed in a benchtop centrifuge at 4°C, cytoplasmic fraction was recovered, neutralized in an equal volume of Laemmli buffer 2× and boiled at 95°C for 5 min. Embryo lysates were loaded on precast gradient gels (4–12%, NuPAGE, Invitrogen). Gels were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane for western blotting and incubated with the indicated antibodies. Interphasic Xenopus egg extracts were prepared and used as previously described (10).
Ribonucleotide incorporation assay
Upon thawing, Xenopus egg extracts were supplemented with cycloheximide (250 μg ml–1) and an energy regeneration system (1 mM ATP, 2 mM MgCl2, 10 mM creatine kinase, 10 mM creatine phosphate). M13mp18 ssDNA was added as a template for DNA replication at the indicated concentrations in the presence of α-32PdCTP (3000Ci mmol, Perkin Elmer). At the indicated time points, half of the samples were neutralized in STOP MIX (10 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS) with 200 μg ml–1 Proteinase K, and incubated at 52°C for 1 h. Samples were treated with 0.3 M NaOH at 55°C for 2 h to digest incorporated ribonucleotides in the plasmid and loaded on 5 M urea–8% acrylamide gel–TBE 0.5× after formamide denaturation at 55°C for 3 min. After migration, the gel was exposed to autoradiography.
Plasmid DNA isolation from embryos
Frozen embryos were crushed in STOP MIX supplemented with fresh Proteinase K (600 μg μl–1). Embryos were homogenized with a tip in this solution while thawing. Immediately after protein digestion at 37°C for 1 h, total DNA was extracted as described earlier by phenol–chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. Recovered DNA was digested with DpnI to destroy unreplicated plasmids and subsequently purified with the QIAGEN gel extraction kit.
Somatic A6 cell culture
A6 epithelial cells were grown in modified Leibowitz L-15 medium containing 20% sterile distilled water, 10% fetal bovine serum and 100 U ml−1 penicillin/streptomycin at 25°C. A subcultivation ratio of 1:3 was employed. Cells were detached after a single wash with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) by incubation with 0.25% trypsin–0.03% EDTA for 4 min at 37°C. The day prior to transfection, 3 × 10–6 cells were seeded in 10-cm2 dishes. One day later, cells were transfected with 60 μl Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 24 μg of plasmid DNA following the manufacturer’s recommendations.
Plasmid recovery from A6 cells
Cells were harvested by trypsinization and centrifugation 48 h post-transfection. After washing cell pellets with PBS, cells were crushed in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 8.0; 100 mM NaCl; 10 mM EDTA, pH 8.0; 0.5% SDS) supplemented with fresh Proteinase K (600 μg μl–1) by means of a tip (500 μl per sample). Immediately after protein digestion at 37°C, SDS was precipitated by adding half volume of saturated (6 M) NaCl to each tube and centrifugation at 4°C for 10 min at 5000 rpm after 10-min incubation on ice. Total DNA was extracted from the supernatant as described earlier by phenol–chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. Recovered DNA was digested with DpnI restriction enzyme (NEB) to destroy unreplicated plasmids and subsequently purified with the QIAGEN gel extraction kit.
White/blue colony selection and mutation frequency
DNA extracted from embryos was transformed in electrocompetent indicator bacteria (MBM7070 strain bearing an amber mutation in the lacZ gene) for white/blue screening and plated on selective Petri dishes (40 μg ml–1 X-gal, 200 μM IPTG). Over 1000 colonies were scored at least for each condition in each replicate. Plasmid DNA was isolated from mutant clones using a standard protocol (QIAGEN). After paired-end Sanger sequencing, polymorphisms were filtered for sequencing quality >30 and analyzed on both strands using Geneious or Snapgene software. Mutation rates were estimated from the proportion of blue colonies observed (P0). Before calculating the proportion of blue colonies observed (P0), the basal percentage of white colonies prior to microinjection was subtracted from the percentage of white colonies in each experimental condition. The observed P0 was substituted for P0 to obtain the mutation rate (μ) using the following formula: μ = −ln(P0) and normalized to the number of cell cycles before embryo collection.
Antibodies
The following antibodies were used: Gapdh (ab9484, Abcam); PCNAmUb Lys 164 (13439, Cell Signaling Technology); PCNA (PC10, Sigma); XlRad18 (10); SMAUG (27); Tubulin (DM1A, T9026 for Drosopohila, Sigma); and Mlh1 (ab14206 Abcam). The PC10 antibody cross-reacts with D. melanogaster PCNA (28).
DAPI staining of Drosophila embryos
Embryo collection (0–2 h, unless otherwise indicated) was carried out using standard techniques (29). Embryos were dechorionated in 50% bleach and fixed by shaking in a mixture of paraformaldehyde 4% in PBS and heptane (1:1) for 30 min and the aqueous layer containing formaldehyde was removed. Embryos were devitellinized upon washing in methanol–heptane mixture (1:1) and conserved in methanol at −20°C overnight and for up to a week. Embryos were rehydrated by sequential incubations of 10 min in ethanol/PBS-T 7:3 (1× PBS + 0.1% Triton X-100), ethanol/PBS-T 3:7 and PBS-T. Embryos were stained with an anti-tubulin antibody as described (24) and then incubated for 30 min at room temperature in DAPI–PBS-T (1 μg ml–1) in the dark and rinsed three times in PBS-T. The third wash was performed overnight with mild shaking on a wheel in the dark at 4°C. Samples were mounted in coverslips using Vectashield. Images were acquired with a Zeiss Axiovert Apotome microscope at 5× using a Coolsnap HQ CDD camera (Photometrics) and processed using Omero 5.2.0 software. P-values were obtained using a two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t-test.
Drosophila embryo protein lysate preparation
Sixty females and 10 males were incubated together inside embryo collectors with embryo dishes for a certain number of hours according to the desired stage of embryos to be harvested. Collected embryos were gently rinsed off the medium with embryo collection buffer (Triton X-100 0.03%; NaCl 68 mM). Embryos were removed from the medium using a brush and poured into a sieve (Falcon Cell Strainer 40 μM Nylon, 352340). Harvested embryos were washed again and collected in a fresh tube (up to 50 μl of embryos corresponding to 100 embryos). Laemmli 2× was added in ratio 1:1 in comparison to harvested volume and embryos were lysed by means of a pestle. After boiling embryo’s mush at 95°C for 5 min, chorion residues were removed by centrifugation with a benchtop centrifuge (maximum speed) at room temperature. Protein concentration was estimated by Amido Black staining using bovine serum albumin of known concentration as a reference.
Genomic DNA extraction from single flies for Illumina next-generation sequencing
Each fly was crushed with a pestle in a 1.5-ml tube containing 170 μl of extraction buffer (Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 50 mM; EDTA 50 mM; SDS 1%). Proteinase K (555 μg μl–1) was added once the tissues had been completely grinded. After incubating for 15 min at room temperature, cellular debris was removed twice by potassium acetate addition (0.83 M) and centrifugation with a benchtop centrifuge (maximum speed) at 4°C for 10 min. DNA was isolated by double phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) extraction and ethanol precipitation overnight at −20°C with glycogen (20 μg) followed by centrifugation at 4°C. Precipitated DNA was washed with cold ethanol 70%, dried at room temperature for 30 min and dissolved in water. The quality of extracted DNA (∼150 ng) was verified by agarose gel electrophoresis.
Illumina next-generation sequencing
Two genomic DNA samples per condition (extracted from single heterozygous dpolηEXC215/+ males either dPolη maternally depleted or maternally provided; see the text) were sequenced by Illumina next-generation sequencing (Illumina HiSeq2000 machine). Library preparation was performed using the NEBNext Ultra DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina subjected to 10 PCR cycles. After library construction and shotgun, whole Drosophila genomes were 100 bp paired-end sequenced and assembled as previously described (30). Data were filtered for genotype quality >35 and depth >10 before sequence alignment against the Drosophila reference genome (FlyBase release 6). Between 95 million and 127 million read pairs were generated and passed quality control for each of the four samples sequenced. Variant calling was done using FreeBayes software version 0.9.20. Genotype ratio was not changed from recommended settings. Alignment was performed with BWA version 0.7.12-r1039. Variant calling was then annotated with Ensembl VEP version 82. Single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) and insertions and deletions (indels) were then separated for downstream analyses. The threshold generally is above 33% to call an allele variant from the reference. Gene Ontology term analysis was performed using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery v6.8 (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/home.jsp) (31).
Mutational signature analysis
The analysis was performed using a modified version of SigProfilerMatrixGenerator (32) to accept the Drosophila genome reference dm6, which is available at https://github.com/CloXD/SigProfilerMatrixGenerator. The comparison with COSMIC (Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer) cancer mutational signatures (33) was performed using the cosine similarity from the MutationalPatterns R package (34) as a measure of closeness.
Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed using the Prism software (version 8). Means were compared using analysis of one-way ANOVA. Post-hoc tests were performed with a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test unless otherwise specified. Asterisks indicate significant differences: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 and ‘ns’ denotes nonsignificant statistical test.
RESULTS
High mutagenesis rate in the pre-MBT Xenopus embryo
We employed a classical lacZ-based reporter assay to measure mutagenesis in pre-MBT X. laevis embryos. In this experimental procedure, a plasmid containing the whole 3-kb lacZ gene is microinjected in in vitro fertilized Xenopus embryos at the 2-cell stage (Figure 1A) and development is allowed to continue until before MBT (16-cell stage). Upon injection, plasmid DNAs form minichromosomes and replicate as episomes once per cell cycle with no sequence specificity (35,36). Total DNA is then extracted, purified and plasmid DNA is recovered in E. coli by transformation, since only plasmid DNA can transform bacteria (see the ‘Materials and Methods’ section). Bacteria are plated on a chromogenic substrate (X-gal) to screen colonies for white or blue color. Wild-type lacZ produces active β-galactosidase that stains colonies in blue in the presence of X-gal and IPTG, while mutations generated in the lacZ gene that affect β-galactosidase activity will leave colonies colorless (white) or pale blue. A pre-MBT dose of supercoiled plasmid DNA (12 ng per embryo, Supplementary Figure S1A) was used in most of the experiments as previously described (6).
Recovery of the lacZ-containing plasmid DNA isolated from pre-MBT embryos into E. coli generated white colonies with a frequency of 0.5%, compared to the non-injected plasmid (pre-injection, Figure 1B) or the same plasmid transfected into Xenopus somatic cells (Supplementary Figure S1E). Accordingly, mutation rate was calculated by normalization to the number of cell cycles (see the ‘Materials and Methods’ section) and estimated to be on the order of 10–3 (Figure 1C, lacZ). Importantly, the mutation rate dropped to a background level when embryos were injected with a post-MBT amount of plasmid DNA, a situation that increases the N/C ratio and induces a cell cycle delay (6). Analysis of mutations by DNA sequencing revealed the presence of both SNVs and unexpectedly large deletions ranging from 100 bp to 1.5 kb (Figure 1D and Supplementary Figure S1B). Mutation inspection on the lacZ gene showed that they are generally widespread over the entire sequence with no hotspots (Supplementary Figure S1B). Analysis of the mutation spectrum shows that most SNVs detected were C > A and C > T changes (Figure 1D). Another frequent signature was G > A transitions and T > A transversions, as well as nucleotide indels. This mutation spectrum is close to that reported for TLS Pols on undamaged templates (14), in particular Polη and Polκ (37,38), although C > T transitions are also thought to be due to spontaneous deamination of 5-methylcytosine to thymine. We further analyzed the context-dependent mutation frequencies that consider two nucleotides in the flanking 5′ and 3′ positions of SNVs. As shown in Supplementary Figure S2, the most abundant SNV (G > A) showed the preference for a purine nucleotide at position −1 irrespective of UV irradiation, while upon UV irradiation a pyrimidine was preferred to a purine at position +1. The second most abundant SNV (C > A) showed the consensus GCG > GAG in the absence of UV irradiation, while upon UV irradiation the consensus shifted to (C)(A)C(G)(A), showing a preference for a purine at position +1. As for the indels, the A deletion showed a preference for a purine at position −1, and either a purine or a pyrimidine at position +1.
The high frequency of base substitution and deletion prompted us to test the contribution of the MMR system in the mutagenesis rate. For this, we overexpressed either a wild-type or catalytically inactive mutant (N38H) of Mlh1, a critical MMR component (26). We co-injected the lacZ-containing plasmid together with in vitro transcribed MLH1 mRNAs to act as dominant negative by antagonizing the function of the endogenous protein (Figure 1E). While expression of Mlh1WT only slightly increased the mutation rate, the latter was increased 2-fold upon expression of the Mlh1N38H catalytically inactive mutant (Figure 1E–G) suggesting that the MMR is functional and contributes to restrain mutagenesis. The slightly increased mutagenesis observed by overexpression of Mlh1WT was previously reported in yeast and it has been attributed to partial inactivation of MMR activity due to imbalance of MMR complexes (39). Altogether, these results show that the mutation spectrum observed in pre-MBT Xenopus embryos is similar to that expected for TLS Pols and that mutagenesis is restrained by the MMR system, suggesting that TLS Pols may actively contribute to mutagenesis in very early embryogenesis.
Rad18-dependent mutagenesis in the early Xenopus embryos
We have previously shown that in the pre-MBT Xenopus embryos TLS may be constitutively primed at replication forks in the absence of external DNA damage (10). To determine the possible contribution of TLS to the mutagenesis in Xenopus embryos, we made use of a Rad18 TLS-deficient mutant in a dominant negative assay as done for Mlh1 (Figure 2A and Supplementary Figure S3E). Mutagenesis was analyzed as described in the previous paragraph. Expression of the TLS-deficient Rad18C28F mutant strongly reduced both the frequency of white colonies and the mutagenesis rate of ∼100-fold compared to injection of either Rad18WT or lacZ alone (Figure 2B and C). In contrast, Rad18WT overexpression did not alter the mutagenesis rate compared to embryos injected with lacZ plasmid only, although it generated a different mutational spectrum, consisting of T > A transversions, C and G insertions, and remarkably no large deletions (Figure 2E and Supplementary Figure S3A). T > A transversions were reported to be significantly decreased in mice bearing the pcnaK164R mutation that cannot support PCNAmUb (40), suggesting that this signature is Rad18 TLS activity dependent. Compared to Rad18WT, the residual mutagenesis observed in embryos injected with the Rad18C28F mutant showed a drastically reduced frequency of T > A transversion as well as C and T insertions, a TLS Polη and Polκ signature, suggesting that these mutations are PCNAmUb dependent, while the frequency of T > C transitions increased. These latter mutations are consistent with a Rev1 signature, a TLS Pol that can also be recruited independently of PCNAmUb (41,42).
We also tested the effect of expressing the HDR-deficient, TLS-proficient, Rad18C207F mutant, which is predicted to behave as Rad18WT (Figure 2A). Unexpectedly, however, expression of this mutant increased the number of white colonies 2-fold compared to Rad18WT or lacZ alone, and the mutagenesis rate increased accordingly (Figure 2B and C) notwithstanding a similar expression level (Figure 2D). Compared to Rad18WT, expression of the Rad18C207F mutant produced a reduction in T > A transversions (Figure 2E) and generated large deletions (Supplementary Figure S3C and see below). The significant increase in single-nucleotide substitutions generated by this mutant is consistent with the occurrence of unproofed mutations generated by its TLS activity. As expected, expression of the Rad18C28FC207F double mutant produced a mutation burden similar to that of the TLS-deficient Rad18C28F mutant, strongly suggesting that the mutagenesis restricted by the Rad18 HDR activity is TLS dependent. Expression of this mutant increased G > A transitions and also produced large deletions (Figure 2E and Supplementary Figure S3D). In parallel, we analyzed mutagenesis when TLS is normally activated by UV irradiation and observed a very modest increase. The mutation spectrum was similar to that of the −UV condition and showed an increase in T insertions, as expected, which corresponds to TLS Polη and Polκ mutational signature (37) (Figure 2E and Supplementary Figure S1C and D), as well as disappearance of C > G transversions and reduction of C > T transitions. The modest increase in UV-induced mutagenesis is expected if TLS is constitutively activated, and is consistent with an error-free bypass of UV lesions by TLS Polη. Interestingly, no large deletions were detected (Supplementary Figure S1C and see discussion). Analysis of the dinucleotide context-dependent mutation frequencies showed that in embryos expressing either Rad18WT or Rad18C207F, the C > A SNV contains a purine at position +1, as found in nonirradiated embryos injected with lacZ only (Supplementary Figure S2), while at position −1 either a purine or a pyrimidine was preferred (Supplementary Figure S4). For the G > A SNV, a purine was always preferred at position −1, for both the Rad18C207F and the Rad18C28FC207F double mutant, as for UV-irradiated embryos injected with lacZ only. At position +1, a purine was preferred for the Rad18C207F, while in the Rad18C28FC207F double mutant either a purine or a pyrimidine could be found. This latter result suggests that RAD18-dependent TLS activity is responsible for insertion of a pyrimidine at position +1. We could not perform this analysis for the Rad18C28F mutant due to a very low recovery of mutants.
Collectively, these results show that mutagenesis in the pre-MBT Xenopus embryo is Rad18 dependent and that, unexpectedly, the extent of TLS-dependent mutagenesis is alleviated by the error-free Rad18-dependent HDR activity.
Reduced hatching rate in dpolη maternally deprived flies
In the aim to assess whether TLS-dependent mutagenesis is a general feature of fast cleaving embryos, and to obtain genetic evidence for this process, we turned to D. melanogaster, a more genetically amenable system compared to allotetraploid Xenopus. First, we wished to establish whether developmental regulation of PCNAmUb also occurs during Drosophila embryogenesis. Similar to Xenopus, Drosophila early development occurs through a rapid and synchronous series of embryonic cleavages before activation of zygotic transcription (MBT, Figure 3A) (43). Total protein extracts were prepared from Drosophila embryos before and after MBT and both total PCNA and PCNAmUb levels were analyzed by western blot with specific antibodies (see the ‘Materials and Methods’ section and Supplementary Figure S3A). Figure 3B and C shows that similar to that previously observed in Xenopus (10), PCNAmUb is detectable in pre-MBT Drosophila embryos (0–2 h) and declines at later stages (3–5 h, post-MBT). The developmental stage where a decline in PCNAmUb is observed coincided with that of Smaug, an mRNA polyadenylation factor destabilized just after MBT (44). We could not probe Rad18 expression since a Drosophila ortholog could not be found, neither by sequence homology nor by structure-specific alignments (Busseau, Lo Furno, Bourbon and Maiorano, unpublished).
Altogether, these observations suggest that in pre-MBT Drosophila embryos TLS may be constitutively primed. In line with this conclusion, previous observations have shown that Drosophila Polη (dPolη) is highly expressed in pre-MBT embryos and localizes into interphase nuclei, similar to that previously observed in Xenopus (10), while dpolη mutant embryos are sensitive to UV irradiation (45).
In Drosophila, the presence of only three Y-family TLS Pols has been reported, since a Polκ ortholog could not be identified (46). In order to gain insight into whether TLS is also active in pre-MBT Drosophila embryos, in the absence of external damage, and assess the consequences of this activity during development from larvae to adult stage, we employed a previously generated dpolηExc2.15 null mutant to obtain dPolη maternally depleted progeny (45). Eggs laid by females flies homozygous for the dpolηExc2.15 mutation are maternally deprived of dPolη because in the pre-MBT embryos transcription is naturally shut off and is only re-established after MBT by transcription of the paternal gene provided by the sperm of wild-type flies (Figure 3A). As a consequence, phenotypes observed in this experimental setting can be attributed to dPolη absence during the pre-blastoderm cleavage stages. dPolη maternally depleted flies were obtained by crossing either dpolηExc2.15/dpolηExc2.15 (homozygous –/–) or dpolηExc2.15/+ (heterozygous +/–, as a control) females with wild-type male flies (Figure 4A). Development was monitored from early embryos to adult stage and compared to that of both wild-type and maternally provided flies (obtained by crossing wild-type males with dpolηExc2.15/+ flies as explained earlier). Pre-blastoderm dpolη maternally depleted embryos showed altered chromatin features, suggesting defects in chromosome segregation (Figure 4B). Consistent with these observations, and in contrast with previously published data (45), dpolη maternally deprived embryos exhibited higher mortality and reduced hatching rate compared to maternally provided fly embryos whose hatching rate was similar to that of the wild type (Figure 4C). We observed a very similar phenotype in compound mutant flies, bearing two different dpolη alleles (dpolηExc2.15 and dpolη12), confirming that the observed reduced hatching rate is specifically due to dPolη absence. Altogether, these results suggest that there is no dPolη dosage effect. These phenotypes are entirely consistent with a similar phenotype very recently reported in TLS-deficient C. elegans pcnaK164R mutant embryos (47). No significant difference in the survival rate was detected from larvae to adult stage in dpolηEXC215 crosses (Figure 4D). In conclusion, these results indicate that dPolη absence before MBT affects embryo’s survival from embryo to larva stage.
Genome-wide analysis of dpolη maternally depleted flies
To determine dPolη contribution to mutagenesis during the Drosophila cleavage stages, we analyzed SNVs and short indels by whole genome sequencing (WGS) in the genome of single flies obtained by crossing females either dpolηExc2.15/dpolηExc2.15 (homozygous –/–) or dpolηExc2.15/+ (heterozygous +/–) with the same wild-type Oregon-R male fly homogenized through serial individual backcrosses for nine generations, so as to obtain genotypically identical progeny (Supplementary Figure S5B). Due to the error-prone nature of TLS Polη, especially on undamaged templates, it is expected that flies obtained from maternally depleted dpolη embryos must display less mutations than either flies that contain maternally deposited dPolη or wild-type flies. However, following alignment against the reference genome (dm6) and general genome analysis, we observed that the global number of SNVs and indels was not significantly reduced (Figure 5A and B), consistent with previous observations in C. elegans (48). This result can be interpreted as functional redundancy among Y-family TLS pols (9,49). Notwithstanding, analysis of SNV distribution on specific chromosomes revealed a significant SNV depletion on chromosome 3 of maternally depleted flies compared to maternally provided flies (Supplementary Figure S5A and B, and Figure 5C), in particular within a cluster of Responder satellite DNA repeat within the pericentromeric heterochromatin of chromosome 3L (Figure 5D). The SNV difference in this region accounts for 100-fold decrease in the mutagenesis rate in the maternally depleted flies compared to the maternally provided flies, consistent with an error-prone activity of dPolη. A difference was also observed in the pericentromeric region of the right part of the same chromosome (3R) including a shift far from the centromere in the maternally depleted flies (Figure 5D), while no gross variations were observed on other chromosomes, except some significant variations on chromosomes 4, X and Y (Supplementary Figure S6D–F). Analysis of the mutation spectrum on chromosomes 3R and 3L (Figure 5C) revealed a predominant reduction of C > T and T > C transitions and T > A transversions. This is in line with the observation that unlike yeast and humans, dPolη misincorporates G opposite T template leading to T > C transitions (50). Analysis of indel length shows a prevalence of 1-bp deletion/insertion and blocks substitutions in maternally provided dpolη flies compared to maternally depleted flies (Supplementary Figure S7A). Analysis of the dinucleotide context-dependent mutation frequencies (Supplementary Figure S7B) showed that the C > T change occurred more frequently within the (A/G/)T(A/T) context, the T > A mutation type within the trinucleotide setting (A/T)T(A/T) and the T > C mutation within the trinucleotide setting (A/G/T)T(A/T). This signature was similar in dpolη maternally depleted flies, although occurred at a lower frequency. Comparison of this signature to the COSMIC signature of mutations found in cancers highlights a similarity with three different cancer signatures (SSB3, SSB5 and SSB40, Supplementary Figure S7C). The most similar signature (SSB5) corresponds to mutational burden increased in bladder cancer samples and in many cancer types due to tobacco smoking, in line with the implication of TLS pols in tolerating DNA damage generated by DNA adducts due to tobacco smoking. The next most similar signature (SSB3) corresponds to mutations associated with HDR-defective cancers (see the ‘Discussion’ section).
Because approximately two-thirds of the genes located on 3L pericentromeric heterochromatin are required for developmental viability and/or adult fertility (51), we evaluated the predicted effects of mutations in either maternally depleted or maternally provided adults by attributing variant effect predictor (VEP) score to each variation. VEP score determines the effect of variants (SNVs, insertions, deletions, copy number variations or structural variants) on genes, transcripts and protein sequence, as well as regulatory regions. In both dpolη maternally depleted and maternally provided fly genomes, the majority of variants present a modifier score more enriched in the maternally depleted mutant on the pericentromeric region of chromosomes 3L and 3R (Supplementary Figure S6A). Most variants in this category affect intron splicing or noncoding regions (intergenic variants, Supplementary Figure S6A and B). However, once the VEP score modifier is removed, the most recurrent SNVs presented a moderate score or a low score (Figure 5C and D). Scoring the consequences of these variants shows that they lead to missense mutations in coding genes in the maternally deprived mutant. This category of variants changes the genetic code, which may potentially alter the function of a protein. Gene Ontology term analysis identifies five clusters, of which the most enriched includes homeobox genes, strongly implicated in development (Supplementary Figure S8E). Other clusters include metabolic genes and genes involved in cuticle development.
Taken altogether, these data show that dpolη maternally depleted adults are characterized by decreased mutations on specific chromosome regions that may depend upon dPolη for efficient replication during the very fast cleavage stages and containing genes important from embryo viability (51).
DISCUSSION
High mutagenesis in the very early Xenopus embryo
In this work, we have provided evidence for the occurrence of a surprisingly high mutation rate in the very early, pre-MBT Xenopus embryo. Mutation rate was estimated to be in the range of 10–3 and corresponds to 0.8 mutations per cell cycle, a value very close to that observed in the human germline (0.4–1.2) (52) but slightly lower than that estimated for pre-implantation human embryos (2.8) (53). This mutation rate, which is within the range observed for Y-family TLS Pols, was greatly reduced upon expression of either the TLS-deficient Rad18C28F or the Rad18C28FC207F mutant. The corresponding mutation spectrum is also consistent with the mutagenesis spectrum of TLS Pols on undamaged DNA templates. Collectively, these findings indicate that in pre-MBT Xenopus embryos TLS strongly contributes to the observed mutagenesis.
The residual mutations observed in the Rad18C28F mutant include C > T transitions and C > A transversions. These mutations, which were recently reported to be also predominant in early human embryos (53), can be a consequence of either ribonucleotide incorporation or generation as a result of cytosine deamination into uracil, which is then turned into a thymine upon replication. The concentration of ribonucleotides exceeds ∼1000-fold that of deoxyribonucleotides, and we have observed a high level of ribonucleotide incorporation during DNA synthesis in Xenopus egg extracts that depends upon the DNA-to-cytoplasmic ratio (Supplementary Figure S3F). This may depend upon TLS activity, in line with evidence demonstrating ribonucleotide incorporation in vitro by human Polη (54,55). Because ribonucleotides slow down DNA replication, constitutive TLS activation facilitates their bypass, a strategy that the Xenopus embryos may have evolved to cope with a highly contracted cell cycle. Notwithstanding, it cannot be excluded that these mutations might also be a consequence of unproofed errors of replicative DNA Pols.
Unexpectedly, we have also observed large deletions in the lacZ gene recovered from pre-MBT embryos. These rearrangements are unlikely to be an artifact of the plasmid assay, since they were detected neither in plasmids isolated from embryos co-injected with Rad18WT, nor from UV-irradiated embryos. In this respect, genomic deletions have been observed in the S subgenome of adult X. laevis (56) as well as in D. melanogaster (57), suggesting that such genomic rearrangements might be generated naturally during evolution in these organisms. Although Y-family TLS Pols can generate deletions, their extent is rather small (1–3 bp), implying other mechanisms such as replication fork instability, which is a common feature of DNA damage checkpoint inefficiency (5,58,59). Replication fork collapse can also happen when repriming and template switching are inefficient; however, we have found no evidence for repriming or template switching in the context of Xenopus early embryogenesis (10) (and our unpublished observations). Replication fork collapse can be a consequence of suboptimal TLS activity due to limiting Rad18 levels (10). Consistent with this interpretation, C. elegans strains with reduced TLS function accumulate spontaneous genomic deletions as a result of double-strand breaks at forks arrested by endogenous DNA lesions (48). Notwithstanding, it cannot be excluded that these rearrangements are the result of rare intermediates, Polη-dependent, that turned into deletion upon transformation into E. coli. Rad18WT overexpression would reduce fork stalling by boosting both TLS and HDR, suppress NHEJ toxic effect at collapsed replication forks and therefore reduce deletions. This scenario is in line with evidence showing that Rad18 has a negative effect on NHEJ (60) and that NHEJ is predominant over HDR in the early Xenopus embryo (61). Due to low HDR activity, it is unlikely that TLS and HDR are in competition, but rather they may work synergistically. Externally applied DNA damage may stimulate repriming and/or template switching by so far unclear mechanisms, thus facilitating replication fork restart and suppressing replication fork collapse.
Functional conservation of constitutive TLS in the early embryogenesis of fast cleaving embryos
Similar to that observed in Xenopus (10), we have provided evidence for both developmental regulation of PCNAmUb in Drosophila early embryogenesis and TLS activity, suggesting that this process is also conserved in invertebrates. Because a Drosophila Rad18 ortholog in Drosophila could not be identified, it has not been possible to analyze mutagenesis in a complete Y-family TLS-free context.
Detailed genome-wide analysis of SNVs in maternally depleted dpolη adults revealed a strong SNV reduction in the pericentromeric region of chromosome 3, as well as SNV depletion on the Y chromosome and the pericentromeric region of chromosome X. It is currently unclear why dPolη maternal depletion mainly affects SNV abundance on chromosome 3. This is the largest Drosophila chromosome that includes the largest cluster of 120-bp Responder DNA repeats of α-satellite DNA within the pericentromeric heterochromatin (62). Such DNA sequences form secondary structures that constitute a challenge for a canonical replication fork, and Polη, and not Polι, has been previously shown to be important to replicate unusual DNA sequences in somatic cells (63,64). Because Drosophila lacks Polκ, Polη may be essential to assist the replisome in the replication of heterochromatin, in particular on chromosome 3 that contains the largest block of Responder DNA repeats. This interpretation is consistent with SNV depletion observed on chromosome Y that is highly heterochromatic and with the mutation spectrum that corresponds to the reported incorporation errors of Polη on undamaged templates (37,40,50). Either replicative polymerases or dRev1 may compensate for dPolη absence, although less efficiently. Due to inefficiency of the replication checkpoint in the Drosophila pre-blastoderm syncytium, embryos may accumulate chromosome abnormalities and undergo apoptosis at MBT (5), thus explaining the reduced hatching rate and chromosome abnormalities observed in maternally depleted dpolη embryos. A caveat of this interpretation is that mapping to highly repetitive genomic regions is not very accurate. However, we do not have any indication that this contributed to the difference in SNVs identified on 3L and 3R chromosome arms between the maternally depleted and maternally provided dPolη flies. Altogether, these observations suggest that in Drosophila Polη may be important to facilitate DNA replication through heterochromatin in the early embryo.
Comparison of the SNV signature generated by dPolη on the pericentromeric region of chromosome 3 with that of cancer in the COSMIC database revealed similarity to a signature related to TLS Pol function in tolerating DNA damage generated by tobacco smoking. The second highest similarity is with a signature found in HDR-defective cancers. This latter observation is consistent with the notion that HDR is largely suppressed in heterochromatin (65) and that Polη facilitates replication fork restart at difficult to replicate DNA regions, such as those found in highly repetitive DNA regions, at the expense of increased mutation load.
The 3L chromosome region also contains a set of genes involved in development and viability. A great majority of SNVs in this region are predicted to generate mutations with low or moderate impact on gene functions. Hence, it cannot be excluded that the phenotype observed in the dpolη homozygous flies may also be a consequence of mutations in essential genes.
Consequences of a high mutagenic rate in early embryogenesis: good or bad?
The occurrence of a high mutation rate in early developing embryos of fast cleaving organisms is rather surprising but somehow not completely unexpected since these embryos are characterized by a highly contracted cell cycle that does not leave enough time to allow quality control (1). In this situation, the toll to pay is an increased risk of mutagenesis and genomic instability, as we have reported in this work. Several reports have highlighted the occurrence of genomic instability and mutations in early embryos [see (1) for review], which is apparently compatible with normal development (67). These observations suggest that active protection mechanisms must be operating to reduce the mutation load. Consistent with this possibility, mutagenesis dropped to background levels when Xenopus embryos were injected with a high dose of DNA, which mimics a pre-MBT stage (6). At MBT, cell cycle extension, activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and apoptosis would ensure repair of errors introduced during the cleavage stages, thereby limiting the propagation of cells having gross chromosomal alterations, and explaining both the low level of developmental defects and embryonic mortality (5,66–68). In this work, we have unveiled that in Xenopus Rad18 has a protective function through an error-free HDR activity that reduces its TLS mutagenic activity. In addition, we have shown that the MMR pathway also contributes to reduce mutagenesis in the pre-MBT embryo. However, we have shown that in Drosophila mutations generated in the pre-blastoderm embryo are inherited in the adult, suggesting that protection mechanisms against genomic instability are not very stringent.
Introduction of random mutations, generated by so far unclear mechanisms, has been also recently observed in human embryos (53). In addition, pre-implantation human embryos display genomic instability characterized by gross chromosomal rearrangements that can lead to cleavage arrest at the two- to four-cell stage (69). Introduction of random mutations may constitute an unexpected and novel source of genetic variation contributing to genome evolution that may be advantageous for the adaptation of the species, but at the same time might be dangerous for life. For example, an overall high mutation rate may be important for pseudogenization, a process that silences the expression of pseudogenes (70), and may also be important to adaptation to a new environment. A recent study identified several genes located on the Drosophila 3L chromosome involved in adaptation (71). We have observed that Polη mutagenic activity may be important to maintain the stability of centromeric DNA sequences in the Drosophila pre-blastoderm embryo, thus being good for life. Genome-wide association studies have implicated hundreds of thousands of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in human diseases and traits (72). In the future, it will be important to explore what is the level of DNA damage inherited in the post-MBT embryo, and its contribution to the polymorphisms that characterize each individual.
DATA AVAILABILITY
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or Supplementary Data. WGS data have been submitted to Gene Expression Omnibus (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/; ID GSE161335).
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish to thank Marcel Méchali for technical advice, J.-S. Hoffmann and S.E. Kearsey for critical reading of the manuscript, B. Rondinelli, J. Sale, A.-M. Martinez and A. Goriely for useful discussions, S. Sharif for technical assistance and H.-M. Bourbon for help with sequence alignments.
Author contributions: Conceptualization, D.M. and E.L.F.; methodology, D.M., E.L.F. and I.B.; investigation, E.L.F., I.B. and A.A.; formal analysis, C.S., S.Z., M.C.D. and C.L.; writing, E.L.F. and D.M.; funding acquisition, D.M.; supervision, D.M. and I.B.; visualization, D.M. and E.L.F.; resources, D.M. and I.B.
Notes
Present address: Elena Lo Furno, San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy (SR-TIGET), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Contributor Information
Elena Lo Furno, Genome Surveillance and Stability Laboratory, Institut de Génétique Humaine, Université de Montpellier, CNRS-UMR9002, 34000 Montpellier, France.
Isabelle Busseau, Systemic Impact of Small Regulatory RNAs Laboratory, Institut de Génétique Humaine, Université de Montpellier, CNRS-UMR9002, 34000 Montpellier, France.
Antoine Aze, Genome Surveillance and Stability Laboratory, Institut de Génétique Humaine, Université de Montpellier, CNRS-UMR9002, 34000 Montpellier, France.
Claudio Lorenzi, Machine Learning and Gene Regulation Laboratory, Institut de Génétique Humaine, Université de Montpellier, CNRS-UMR9002, 34000 Montpellier, France.
Cima Saghira, Department of Human Genetics, Hussman Institute for Human Genomics, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Matt C Danzi, Department of Human Genetics, Hussman Institute for Human Genomics, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Stephan Zuchner, Department of Human Genetics, Hussman Institute for Human Genomics, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Domenico Maiorano, Genome Surveillance and Stability Laboratory, Institut de Génétique Humaine, Université de Montpellier, CNRS-UMR9002, 34000 Montpellier, France.
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online.
FUNDING
Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-12-BSV2-0022 to D.M.]; MSD Avenir [to D.M.]; Ligue contre le Cancer [to E.L.F.]; Fondation ARC contre le cancer [to E.L.F.]. Funding for open access charge: MSD Avenir.
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
REFERENCES
- 1. Kermi C., Aze A., Maiorano D.. Preserving genome integrity during the early embryonic DNA replication cycles. Genes. 2019; 10:398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Saldivar J.C., Cortez D., Cimprich K.A.. The essential kinase ATR: ensuring faithful duplication of a challenging genome. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017; 18:622–636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Blythe S.A., Wieschaus E.F.. Zygotic genome activation triggers the DNA replication checkpoint at the midblastula transition. Cell. 2015; 160:1169–1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Newport J., Dasso M.. On the coupling between DNA replication and mitosis. J. Cell Sci. Suppl. 1989; 12:149–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Sibon O.C., Stevenson V.A., Theurkauf W.E.. DNA-replication checkpoint control at the Drosophila midblastula transition. Nature. 1997; 388:93–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Conn C.W., Lewellyn A.L., Maller J.L.. The DNA damage checkpoint in embryonic cell cycles is dependent on the DNA-to-cytoplasmic ratio. Dev. Cell. 2004; 7:275–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Holway A.H., Kim S.H., La Volpe A., Michael W.M.. Checkpoint silencing during the DNA damage response in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. J. Cell Biol. 2006; 172:999–1008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Ohkumo T., Masutani C., Eki T., Hanaoka F.. Deficiency of the Caenorhabditis elegans DNA polymerase eta homologue increases sensitivity to UV radiation during germ-line development. Cell Struct. Funct. 2006; 31:29–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Roerink S.F., Koole W., Stapel L.C., Romeijn R.J., Tijsterman M.. A broad requirement for TLS polymerases eta and kappa, and interacting sumoylation and nuclear pore proteins, in lesion bypass during C. elegans embryogenesis. PLoS Genet. 2012; 8:e1002800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kermi C., Prieto S., van der Laan S., Tsanov N., Recolin B., Uro-Coste E., Delisle M.B., Maiorano D.. RAD18 is a maternal limiting factor silencing the UV-dependent DNA damage checkpoint in Xenopus embryos. Dev. Cell. 2015; 34:364–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Shechter D., Costanzo V., Gautier J.. ATR and ATM regulate the timing of DNA replication origin firing. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004; 6:648–655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Recolin B., Van der Laan S., Maiorano D.. Role of replication protein A as sensor in activation of the S-phase checkpoint in Xenopus egg extracts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40:3431–3442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Van C., Yan S., Michael W.M., Waga S., Cimprich K.A.. Continued primer synthesis at stalled replication forks contributes to checkpoint activation. J. Cell Biol. 2010; 189:233–246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Vaisman A., Woodgate R.. Translesion DNA polymerases in eukaryotes: what makes them tick?. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017; 52:274–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kannouche P.L., Wing J., Lehmann A.R.. Interaction of human DNA polymerase eta with monoubiquitinated PCNA: a possible mechanism for the polymerase switch in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell. 2004; 14:491–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Watanabe K., Tateishi S., Kawasuji M., Tsurimoto T., Inoue H., Yamaizumi M.. Rad18 guides poleta to replication stalling sites through physical interaction and PCNA monoubiquitination. EMBO J. 2004; 23:3886–3896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Huang J., Huen M.S., Kim H., Leung C.C., Glover J.N., Yu X., Chen J.. RAD18 transmits DNA damage signalling to elicit homologous recombination repair. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009; 11:592–603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Watanabe K., Iwabuchi K., Sun J., Tsuji Y., Tani T., Tokunaga K., Date T., Hashimoto M., Yamaizumi M., Tateishi S.. RAD18 promotes DNA double-strand break repair during G1 phase through chromatin retention of 53BP1. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37:2176–2193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Helchowski C.M., Skow L.F., Roberts K.H., Chute C.L., Canman C.E.. A small ubiquitin binding domain inhibits ubiquitin-dependent protein recruitment to DNA repair foci. Cell Cycle. 2013; 12:3749–3758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Moquin D.M., Genois M.-M., Zhang J.-M., Ouyang J., Yadav T., Buisson R., Yazinski S.A., Tan J., Boukhali M., Gagné J.-P.. Localized protein biotinylation at DNA damage sites identifies ZPET, a repressor of homologous recombination. Genes Dev. 2019; 33:75–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Raschle M., Smeenk G., Hansen R.K., Temu T., Oka Y., Hein M.Y., Nagaraj N., Long D.T., Walter J.C., Hofmann K.et al.. Proteomics reveals dynamic assembly of repair complexes during bypass of DNA cross-links. Science. 2015; 348:1253671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Tateishi S., Sakuraba Y., Masuyama S., Inoue H., Yamaizumi M.. Dysfunction of human Rad18 results in defective postreplication repair and hypersensitivity to multiple mutagens. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000; 97:7927–7932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Delabaere L., Orsi G.A., Sapey-Triomphe L., Horard B., Couble P., Loppin B.. The spartan ortholog maternal haploid is required for paternal chromosome integrity in the Drosophila zygote. Curr. Biol. 2014; 24:2281–2287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Merkle J.A., Rickmyre J.L., Garg A., Loggins E.B., Jodoin J.N., Lee E., Wu L.P., Lee L.A.. no poles encodes a predicted E3 ubiquitin ligase required for early embryonic development of Drosophila. Development. 2009; 136:449–459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Carbone A., Fioretti F.M., Fucci L., Ausió J., Piscopo M.. High efficiency method to obtain supercoiled DNA with a commercial plasmid purification kit. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2012; 59:275–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Papadopoulos N., Nicolaides N., Wei Y., Ruben S., Carter K., Rosen C., Haseltine W., Fleischmann R., Fraser C., Adams M.et al.. Mutation of a mutL homolog in hereditary colon cancer. Science. 1994; 263:1625–1629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Chartier A., Klein P., Pierson S., Barbezier N., Gidaro T., Casas F., Carberry S., Dowling P., Maynadier L., Bellec M.et al.. Mitochondrial dysfunction reveals the role of mRNA poly(A) tail regulation in oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy pathogenesis. PLoS Genet. 2015; 11:e1005092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kolesnikova T.D., Posukh O.V., Andreyeva E.N., Bebyakina D.S., Ivankin A.V., Zhimulev I.F.. Drosophila SUUR protein associates with PCNA and binds chromatin in a cell cycle-dependent manner. Chromosoma. 2013; 122:55–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Rothwell W.F., Sullivan W.. Sullivan W., Ashburner M., Hawley R.S.. Fluorescent analysis of Drosophila embryos. Drosophila Protocols. 2000; NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 141–157. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Gonzalez M.A., Van Booven D., Hulme W., Ulloa R.H., Lebrigio R.F.A., Osterloh J., Logan M., Freeman M., Zuchner S.. Whole genome sequencing and a new bioinformatics platform allow for rapid gene identification in D. melanogaster EMS screens. Biology. 2012; 1:766–777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Huang D.W., Sherman B.T., Lempicki R.A.. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37:1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Bergstrom E.N., Huang M.N., Mahto U., Barnes M., Stratton M.R., Rozen S.G., Alexandrov L.B.. SigProfilerMatrixGenerator: a tool for visualizing and exploring patterns of small mutational events. BMC Genomics. 2019; 20:685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Tate J.G., Bamford S., Jubb H.C., Sondka Z., Beare D.M., Bindal N., Boutselakis H., Cole C.G., Creatore C., Dawson E.et al.. COSMIC: the catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47:D941–D947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Blokzijl F., Janssen R., van Boxtel R., Cuppen E.. MutationalPatterns: comprehensive genome-wide analysis of mutational processes. Genome Med. 2018; 10:33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Harland R.M., Laskey R.A.. Regulated replication of DNA microinjected into eggs of Xenopus laevis. Cell. 1980; 21:761–771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Mechali M., Kearsey S.. Lack of specific sequence requirement for DNA replication in Xenopus eggs compared with high sequence specificity in yeast. Cell. 1984; 38:55–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Matsuda T., Bebenek K., Masutani C., Hanaoka F., Kunkel T.A.. Low fidelity DNA synthesis by human DNA polymerase-eta. Nature. 2000; 404:1011–1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Ogi T., Kato T., Kato T., Ohmori H.. Mutation enhancement by DINB1, a mammalian homologue of the Escherichia coli mutagenesis protein dinB. Genes Cells. 1999; 4:607–618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Shcherbakova P.V., Hall M.C., Lewis M.S., Bennett S.E., Martin K.J., Bushel P.R., Afshari C.A., Kunkel T.A.. Inactivation of DNA mismatch repair by increased expression of yeast MLH1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001; 21:940–951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Langerak P., Nygren A.O.H., Krijger P.H.L., van den Berk P.C.M., Jacobs H.. A/T mutagenesis in hypermutated immunoglobulin genes strongly depends on PCNAK164 modification. J. Exp. Med. 2007; 204:1989–1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Edmunds C.E., Simpson L.J., Sale J.E.. PCNA ubiquitination and REV1 define temporally distinct mechanisms for controlling translesion synthesis in the avian cell line DT40. Mol. Cell. 2008; 30:519–529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Guo C., Fischhaber P.L., Luk-Paszyc M.J., Masuda Y., Zhou J., Kamiya K., Kisker C., Friedberg E.C.. Mouse Rev1 protein interacts with multiple DNA polymerases involved in translesion DNA synthesis. EMBO J. 2003; 22:6621–6630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Farrell J.A., O’Farrell P.H.. From egg to gastrula: how the cell cycle is remodeled during the Drosophila mid-blastula transition. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2014; 48:269–294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Benoit B., He C.H., Zhang F., Votruba S.M., Tadros W., Westwood J.T., Smibert C.A., Lipshitz H.D., Theurkauf W.E.. An essential role for the RNA-binding protein Smaug during the Drosophila maternal-to-zygotic transition. Development. 2009; 136:923–932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Wallace H.A., Merkle J.A., Yu M.C., Berg T.G., Lee E., Bosco G., Lee L.A.. TRIP/NOPO E3 ubiquitin ligase promotes ubiquitylation of DNA polymerase eta. Development. 2014; 141:1332–1341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Marygold S.J., Attrill H., Speretta E., Warner K., Magrane M., Berloco M., Cotterill S., McVey M., Rong Y., Yamaguchi M.. The DNA polymerases of Drosophila melanogaster. Fly. 2020; 14:49–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Shao Z., Niwa S., Higashitani A., Daigaku Y.. Vital roles of PCNA K165 modification during C. elegans gametogenesis and embryogenesis. DNA Repair. 2019; 82:102688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Roerink S.F., van Schendel R., Tijsterman M.. Polymerase theta-mediated end joining of replication-associated DNA breaks in C. elegans. Genome Res. 2014; 24:954–962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Jansen J.G., Temviriyanukul P., Wit N., Delbos F., Reynaud C.-A., Jacobs H., de Wind N.. Redundancy of mammalian Y family DNA polymerases in cellular responses to genomic DNA lesions induced by ultraviolet light. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42:11071–11082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Ishikawa T., Uematsu N., Mizukoshi T., Iwai S., Iwasaki H., Masutani C., Hanaoka F., Ueda R., Ohmori H., Todo T.. Mutagenic and nonmutagenic bypass of DNA lesions by Drosophila DNA polymerases dpoleta and dpoliota. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276:15155–15163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Syrzycka M., Hallson G., Fitzpatrick K.A., Kim I., Cotsworth S., Hollebakken R.E., Simonetto K., Yang L., Luongo S., Beja K.. Genetic and molecular analysis of essential genes in centromeric heterochromatin of the left arm of chromosome 3 in Drosophila melanogaster. G3. 2019; 9:1581–1595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Rahbari R., Wuster A., Lindsay S.J., Hardwick R.J., Alexandrov L.B., Turki S.A., Dominiczak A., Morris A., Porteous D., Smith B.et al.. Timing, rates and spectra of human germline mutation. Nat. Genet. 2016; 48:126–133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Ju Y.S., Martincorena I., Gerstung M., Petljak M., Alexandrov L.B., Rahbari R., Wedge D.C., Davies H.R., Ramakrishna M., Fullam A.. Somatic mutations reveal asymmetric cellular dynamics in the early human embryo. Nature. 2017; 543:714–718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Mentegari E., Crespan E., Bavagnoli L., Kissova M., Bertoletti F., Sabbioneda S., Imhof R., Sturla S.J., Nilforoushan A., Hübscher U.et al.. Ribonucleotide incorporation by human DNA polymerase η impacts translesion synthesis and RNase H2 activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45:2600–2614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Su Y., Egli M., Guengerich F.P.. Mechanism of ribonucleotide incorporation by human DNA polymerase η. J. Biol. Chem. 2016; 291:3747–3756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Session A.M., Uno Y., Kwon T., Chapman J.A., Toyoda A., Takahashi S., Fukui A., Hikosaka A., Suzuki A., Kondo M.. Genome evolution in the allotetraploid frog Xenopus laevis. Nature. 2016; 538:336–343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Petrov D.A., Hartl D.L.. High rate of DNA loss in the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis species groups. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1998; 15:293–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Sibon O.C., Laurençon A., Hawley R., Theurkauf W.E.. The Drosophila ATM homologue Mei-41 has an essential checkpoint function at the midblastula transition. Curr. Biol. 1999; 9:302–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Dungrawala H., Rose K.L., Bhat K.P., Mohni K.N., Glick G.G., Couch F.B., Cortez D.. The replication checkpoint prevents two types of fork collapse without regulating replisome stability. Mol. Cell. 2015; 59:998–1010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Kobayashi S., Kasaishi Y., Nakada S., Takagi T., Era S., Motegi A., Chiu R.K., Takeda S., Hirota K.. Rad18 and Rnf8 facilitate homologous recombination by two distinct mechanisms, promoting Rad51 focus formation and suppressing the toxic effect of nonhomologous end joining. Oncogene. 2015; 34:4403–4411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Lehman C.W., Clemens M., Worthylake D.K., Trautman J.K., Carroll D.. Homologous and illegitimate recombination in developing Xenopus oocytes and eggs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1993; 13:6897–6906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Larracuente A.M. The organization and evolution of the Responder satellite in species of the Drosophila melanogaster group: dynamic evolution of a target of meiotic drive. BMC Evol. Biol. 2014; 14:233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Betous R., Rey L., Wang G., Pillaire M.J., Puget N., Selves J., Biard D.S., Shin-ya K., Vasquez K.M., Cazaux C.. Role of TLS DNA polymerases eta and kappa in processing naturally occurring structured DNA in human cells. Mol. Carcinog. 2009; 48:369–378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Bergoglio V., Boyer A.S., Walsh E., Naim V., Legube G., Lee M.Y., Rey L., Rosselli F., Cazaux C., Eckert K.A.. DNA synthesis by Pol eta promotes fragile site stability by preventing under-replicated DNA in mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 2013; 201:395–408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Amaral N., Ryu T., Li X., Chiolo I.. Nuclear dynamics of heterochromatin repair. Trends Genet. 2017; 33:86–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Anderson J.A., Lewellyn A.L., Maller J.L.. Ionizing radiation induces apoptosis and elevates cyclin A1–Cdk2 activity before but not after the midblastula transition in Xenopus. Mol. Biol. Cell. 1997; 8:1195–1206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Bolton H., Graham S.J.L., Van der Aa N., Kumar P., Theunis K., Gallardo E.F, Voet T., Zernicka-Goetz M.. Mouse model of chromosome mosaicism reveals lineage-specific depletion of aneuploid cells and normal developmental potential. Nat. Commun. 2016; 7:11165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Hensey C., Gautier J.. A developmental timer that regulates apoptosis at the onset of gastrulation. Mech. Dev. 1997; 69:183–195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Shukla V., Høffding M.K., Hoffmann E.R.. Genome diversity and instability in human germ cells and preimplantation embryos. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021; 113:132–147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Force A., Lynch M., Pickett F.B., Amores A., Yan Y.L., Postlethwait J.. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics. 1999; 151:1531–1545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Mateo L., Rech G.E., González J.. Genome-wide patterns of local adaptation in Western European Drosophila melanogaster natural populations. Sci. Rep. 2018; 8:16143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Buniello A., MacArthur J.A.L., Cerezo M., Harris L.W., Hayhurst J., Malangone C., McMahon A., Morales J., Mountjoy E., Sollis E.. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog of published genome-wide association studies, targeted arrays and summary statistics 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47:D1005–D1012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or Supplementary Data. WGS data have been submitted to Gene Expression Omnibus (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/; ID GSE161335).