Abstract
The ability of the ID 32E system to identify and discriminate 74 Escherichia coli O157 isolates among 106 E. coli non-O157 isolates was evaluated. The results showed atypical biochemical reactions but accurate identification at the species level and no unique biochemical profile numbers for E. coli O157, although these numbers were distinct from those of other serotypes.
Verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli (VTEC), a new public health problem worldwide, is represented by more than 100 serotypes that produce verocytotoxins, with two main serotypes, O157:H7 and O157:H(−). These last two serotypes, classified as enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), are implicated in hemorrhagic colitis, hemolytic-uremic syndrome, and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. EHEC strains have been described as important and emergent food-borne pathogens (4, 18, 31). Other non-O157 VTEC serotypes, not deprived of pathogenicity, have been increasingly implicated in sporadic enteric diseases and outbreaks (18, 31).
Detection of E. coli O157:H7 is based on its recovery from samples and the presence of its virulence-associated factors (verocytotoxins) or the detection of its O157 antigens (3, 30, 31). Selective media for isolating O157:H7 strains rely on the fact that most of these strains display characteristic biochemical reactions (31): no β-glucuronidase activity and no d-sorbitol fermentation within 24 h at 37°C, except for some German or U.S. strains (10, 12). However, these last two biochemical features are not commonly used in routine clinical and food laboratories because of the simplicity of well-established commercial identification systems. The use of these systems on presumptive E. coli strains offers not only the advantage of confirming strains at the genus and/or species level but also the possibility to detect the presence of O157 EHEC by identifying profiles that are unique to these strains. For the Microscan dried conventional gram-negative identification panel (Dade-MicroScan International, West Sacramento, Calif.), 90% of the tested E. coli O157:H7 strains shared two common biochemical profiles (1), whereas in the case of the API 20E (bioMérieux Vitek, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.), 92% of the tested strains displayed the same profile (8).
A new well-based identification system, ID 32E, was recently developed by bioMérieux Vitek for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae and other nonfastidious gram-negative bacteria, after an incubation period of 22 ± 2 h at 37 ± 1°C (17, 23). This system is an upgrading of the API 20E gallery and consists of 32 individual conic test wells (13 enzymatic, 3 biochemical, and 16 sugar utilization tests) in polystyrene trays (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
E. coli biochemical activity profile
| Biochemical characteristic | % Activity for E. coli as reported by:
|
% Activity as determined by ID 32E in:
|
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Krieg and Holt (15) (n = ND)a | Farmer et al. (7) (n = ND)b | Ewing (5) (n = 1,231)c | Manufacturer's notice (n ≅ 150)d | E. coli non-O157 (n = 106)e | E. coli O157:H7 (n = 55)e | E. coli O157:H(−) (n = 19)e | |
| Ornithine decarboxylase | 26–75 | 65 | 64.2 | 69 | 67 | 98.2 | 89.5 |
| Arginine dihydrolase | 11–25 | 17 | 17.6 | 3 | 3.8 | 0 | 0 |
| Lysine decarboxylase | 76–89 | 90 | 88.7 | 81 | 91.5 | 90.9 | 100 |
| Urease | 0–10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.9 | 18.2 | 5.3 |
| l-Arabitol | 0–10 | 5 | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Galacturonate | ND | ND | ND | 99 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 5-Ketogluconate | 0–10 | ND | ND | 44 | 2.8 | 0 | 0 |
| Lipase | 0–10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Phenol red | 90–100 | 99 | 99.9 | 99 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| β-Glucosidase | ND | ND | ND | 5 | 17.9 | 0 | 0 |
| Mannitol | 90–100 | 98 | 96.8 | 98 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Maltose | 90–100 | 95 | 89.9 | 98 | 86.8 | 100 | 100 |
| Adonitol | 0–10 | 5 | 5.6 | 6 | 2.8 | 0 | 0 |
| Palatinose | ND | ND | ND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| β-Glucuronidase | 90–100 | ND | ND | 92 | 96.2 | 0 | 5.3 |
| Malonate | 0–10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Indole | 90–100 | 98 | 98.6 | 84 | 99.1 | 100 | 100 |
| N-Acetyl-β-glucosaminidase | ND | ND | ND | 0 | 0.9 | 0 | 0 |
| β-Galactosidase | 90–100 | 95 | ND | 91 | 94.3 | 100 | 100 |
| Glucose | 90–100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Saccharose | 26–75 | 50 | 48.9 | 31 | 24.5 | 45.5 | 47.4 |
| l-Arabinose | 90–100 | 99 | 99.4 | 99 | 98.1 | 100 | 100 |
| d-Arabitol | 0–10 | 5 | ND | 5 | 18.9 | 1.8 | 0 |
| α-Glucosidase | 0–10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1.8 | 5.3 |
| α-Galactosidase | ND | 99 | ND | 99 | 98.1 | 100 | 100 |
| Trehalose | 90–100 | 98 | 98.8 | 99 | 91.5 | 58.2 | 52.6 |
| Rhamnose | 76–89 | 80 | 82.3 | 95 | 80.2 | 63.6 | 42.1 |
| Inositol | 0–10 | 1 | 1.1 | 2 | 6.6 | 1.8 | 0 |
| Cellobiose | 0–10 | 2 | 2.4 | 0 | 0.9 | 0 | 0 |
| Sorbitol | 90–100 | 94 | 93.4 | 38 | 31.1 | 0 | 5.3 |
| α-Maltosidase | ND | ND | ND | 1 | 5.7 | 1.8 | 0 |
| l-Aspartic acid arylamidase | ND | ND | ND | 1 | 1.9 | 0 | 0 |
n, number of strains; ND, not determined.
Percentage of strains displaying a positive reaction after 48 h at 36°C. Positive reaction after 48 h are not considered. n, number of strains; ND, not determined.
Percentage of strains displaying a positive reaction after 24 h at 36 ± 1°C. n, number of strains; ND, not determined.
Percentage of strains displaying a positive reaction after 24 h at 36 ± 1°C. n, number of strains.
Percentage of strains displaying a positive reaction after 22 ± 2 h at 37 ± 1°C. n, number of strains.
A total of 180 serotyped E. coli strains were tested with the ID 32E system. These included 55 O157:H7 strains, 19 O157:H(−) strains confirmed by PCR on the rfbO157 locus (3), and 106 reference strains and laboratory isolates of non-O157:H7 or O157H(−) E. coli harboring (76 strains) or not harboring (30 strains) verocytotoxin genes, originating from patients, animals, and food samples. The strains were isolated on casein soymeal peptone agar (Caso medium; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Conventional identification of strains was done using the Kligler-Hajna, indole, Voges-Proskauer, Simmon's citrate, β-galactosidase, urease, glutamate decarboxylase, sorbitol fermentation, and β-glucuronidase tests (2, 7, 15, 35). A suspension of each strain, adjusted to a 0.5 McFarland standard (theoretical optical density at 550 nm of 0.125) with a spectrophotometer (Beckman Instruments, Inc., Fullerton, Calif.), was prepared, and the ID 32E strip was inoculated by pipetting 55 μl of this suspension into each well. After an incubation of 22 ± 2 h at 37 ± 1°C, James reagent was added to the indole well, and the variation of color of each well was visually read according to the manufacturer's instructions. The reactions were tabulated into an 11-digit numerical profile and entered into the upgrading APILAB Plus computerized software version 3.3 (bioMérieux Vitek) containing 103 reference bacterial taxa. In the computer report, identifications are classified according to the percentage of identification accuracy (%ID), an estimate of how closely the profile corresponds to the taxon relative to all other taxa in the database, and the T index (T), an estimate of how closely the profile corresponds to the most typical set of reactions for the stated taxon, as follows: excellent (%ID ≥ 99.9, T ≥ 0.75), very good (%ID ≥ 99.0, T ≥ 0.5), good (%ID ≥ 90.0, T ≥ 0.25), and acceptable (%ID ≥ 80.0, T ≥ 0). Atypical tests, named “supplemental tests,” are listed at the end of the computer report in order to confirm identification by the new classical tests.
E. coli O157:H7 showed significant divergent biochemical activities from classical E. coli for ornithine decarboxylase, arginine dihydrolase, urease, 5-ketogluconate, β-glucuronidase, and sorbitol and, to a lesser extent for rhamnose (1), adonitol, d-arabitol, trehalose, and inositol (Table 1). Ten Belgian human and French animal isolates displayed urease-positive reactions. Identification as E. coli was excellent or very good. Although no single biochemical profile number could account for all E. coli O157:H7 (Table 2) isolates, two-thirds of these isolates were distributed into only five profiles, with one (i.e., 54465743000) representing 25% of the tested strains.
TABLE 2.
Frequency of biochemical profile numbers of E. coli O157:H7 or O157:H(−)
| Profile no.a | Profile frequencies (%)b
|
|
|---|---|---|
| E. coli O157:H7 | E. coli O157:H(−) | |
| 54465743000 | 25 | 32 |
| 54465543000 | 11 | 5 |
| 54465542000 | 11 | 5 |
| 54465540000 | 11 | 0 |
| 54465541000 | 9 | 0 |
| 54465741000 | 0 | 21 |
| 54465742000 | 6 | 0 |
| 55465743000 | 5 | 17 |
| 55465540000 | 4 | 0 |
| 54465763000 | 0 | 5 |
| 54465740000 | 4 | 5 |
| 54465554000 | 4 | 0 |
| 44465740000 | 2 | 0 |
| 44465543420 | 0 | 5 |
| 44465542000 | 0 | 5 |
| 15465543000 | 2 | 0 |
| 15465543040 | 2 | 0 |
| 15465541000 | 2 | 0 |
| 15465742000 | 2 | 0 |
These numbers represent a tabulation of positive biochemical results of strains based on ID 32E analysis.
Each number corresponds to the percentage of strains displaying this profile number. The total numbers of tested strains were 55 and 19 for O157:H7 and O157:H(−) isolates, respectively. Note that none of these profiles were observed among the non-O157 isolates.
On average, the biochemical activity profiles of O157:H(−) strains were more similar to those of the O157:H7 strain than to those of the non-O157 strain (Table 1). Slight differences between both O157:H serotypes were noted for rhamnose and ornithine decarboxylase activities. One strain, isolated from a Belgian human, was positive for the urease test. The quality of identification as E. coli varied from good to very good. Five O157:H(−) biochemical profiles numbers were also shared by O157:H7 strains (Table 2). Interestingly, O157 E. coli profile numbers were not encountered with other non-O157 E. coli strains, regardless of their verocytotoxin production (data not show).
Non-O157 E. coli isolates displayed significant distinct results compared to the previously reported manufacturer or published data (Table 1), especially for 5-ketogluconate, β-glucosidase, and d-arabitol. The two main biochemical characteristics of E. coli O157:H7, i.e., β-glucuronidase and sorbitol, were fairly frequent (17.9 and 31.1%, respectively) among non-O157 serotypes. No strikingly different biochemical activity profiles were found between verocytotoxygenic and non verocytotoxygenic non-O157 E. coli strains (data not shown). As for O157, the quality of identification of the non-O157 as E. coli was mostly excellent, especially with the strains not producing verocytotoxins that displayed less atypical biochemical characters. Sixty-one profiles for VTEC non-O157 strains (main profile number 54465543400) were observed.
The reproducibility of the ID 32E system was determined by performing repeat analyses, at different days and with different batches for 10 O157 and 10 non-O157 strains. The exact same biotype number was generated for each replicate (100% reproducibility).
In the present study, the biochemical characteristics of O157 E. coli did not influence accuracy of identification and were responsible for the various biochemical profile numbers shown in Table 2. Although phenotypic variants (5, 6, 15, 20, 21, 23) can cause identification problems for some E. coli strains, numerous commercial systems or previous study on ID 32E systems (17, 23) have been shown to identify E. coli with a fairly high degree of accuracy (11, 13, 14, 16, 19–22, 25–29, 32, 33, 36, 37).
One strain serotyped as O74:H52 was found to be indole negative without affecting its identification as E. coli. These atypical characteristics have been previously described in the literature (29) and especially for the pathogenic class of E. coli (10). The O157 E. coli characterized in this work seemed to be more often urease positive than the other E. coli isolates (15 versus 0.9%, respectively). However, no plasmid detection was investigated (24, 34), and it remains to be seen whether this phenotype offers any ecological advantage to these isolates.
Whereas β-glucuronidase appears to be a confirmed character to differentiate between E. coli O157 and non-O157 strains, the sorbitol fermentation is more questionable due to the low number of positive E. coli non-O157 strains studied thus far. Interestingly, this observation could explained, at least partially, by the discrepancy between the classical selective media for O157:H7 E. coli, mainly based on sorbitol fermentation, and chromogenic agar, based on β-glucuronidase and β-galactosidase.
Contrary to the data reported for the Microscan (1) or API 20E (8) tests, the results of this study using ID 32E suggested that E. coli O157:H7 or O157:H(−) strains do not display a unique profile but instead several particular biochemical profiles. Nevertheless, a single profile (i.e., 54465743000) accounted for 25 and 32% of all O157:H7 and O157:H(−) isolates, respectively. Moreover, eight profiles (i.e., 54465743000, 54465543000, 54465542000, 54465540000, 54465541000, 54465741000, 54465742000, and 55465743000) represented ∼ 80% of all O157:H7 and O157:H(−) strains, and these profiles were not found among the non-O157 E. coli strains.
Finally, it is important to note that the current ID 32E database of reference biochemical profiles has been mostly made with classical E. coli and does not take into account specific biochemical characteristics of the O157 serotype. Incorporation of these particular biochemical profiles or numbers into the ID 32E database could inform customers of presumptive identification of the E. coli serotype O157 and should suggest additional confirmation tests which must be performed.
REFERENCES
- 1.Abbott S L, Hanson D F, Felland T D, Connell S, Shum A H, Janda J M. Escherichia coli O157:H7 generates a unique biochemical profile on MicroScan conventional gram-negative identification panels. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:823–824. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.3.823-824.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Balows A, Hausler W J, Herrman K L, Isenberg H G, Shadomy H J. Manual of clinical microbiology. 5th ed. Washington, D.C.: American Society of Microbiology; 1991. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Desmarchelier P M, Bilge S S, Fegan N, Mills L, Vary J C, Tarr P I. A PCR specific for Escherichia coli O157 based on the rfb locus encoding O157 lipopolysaccharide. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:1801–1804. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.6.1801-1804.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Doyle M P, Schoeni J L. Isolation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from retail fresh meats and poultry. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987;53:2394–2396. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.10.2394-2396.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ewing W H. Edwards and Ewing's identification of Enterobacteriaceae. 4th ed. New York, N.Y: Elsevier Publishing Co., Inc.; 1986. The genus Escherichia; pp. 67–107. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Farmer J J, III, Brenner D J. Concept of a bacterial species. In: Hoadley A W, Dutka B J, editors. Bacterial indicators/health hazards associated with water. Philadelphia, Pa: American Society for Testing and Materials; 1977. pp. 37–47. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Farmer J J, III, Davis B R, Hickman-Brenner F W, McWhorteh A, Huntley-Carter G P, Asbury M A, Riddle C, Wathen-Grady H G, Elias C, Fanning G R, Steigerwalt A G, O'Hara C M, Morris G K, Smith P B, Brenner D J. Biochemical identification of new species and biogroups of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1985;21:46–76. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.1.46-76.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Haldane D J M, Damm M A S, Anderson J D. Improved biochemical screening procedure for small clinical laboratories for Vero (Shiga-like)-toxin producing strains of Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;24:652–653. doi: 10.1128/jcm.24.4.652-653.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hartman P A, Petzel J P, Kaspar C W. New methods for indicator organisms. In: Pierson M D, Stern N J, editors. Foodborne microorganisms and their toxins: developing methodology. New York, N.Y: Marcel Dekker, Inc; 1986. pp. 175–203. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hayes P S, Blom K, Feng P, Lewis J, Strockbine N A, Swaminathan B. Isolation and characterization of a β-d-glucuronidase-producing strain of Escherichia coli serotype O157:H7 in the United States. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:3347–3348. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.12.3347-3348.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Holmes B, Costas M, Thaker T, Stevens M. Evaluation of two BBL Crystal systems for identification of some clinically important gram-negative bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:2221–2224. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.9.2221-2224.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Karch H, Böhm H, Schmidt H, Gunzer F, Aleksic S, Heesemann J. Clonal structure and pathogenicity of Shiga-like toxin-producing, sorbitol-fermenting Escherichia coli O157:H−. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:1200–1205. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.5.1200-1205.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kelly M T, Leicester C. Evaluation of the Autoscan Walkaway system for rapid identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:1568–1571. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.6.1568-1571.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kitch T T, Jacobs M R, Appelbaum P C. Evaluation of RapID onE for identification of 379 strains in the family Enterobacteriaceae and oxidase-negative, gram-negative non-fermenters. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:931–934. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.4.931-934.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Krieg N R, Holt J G. Escherichia. In: Krieg N R, Holt J G, editors. Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology. Vol. 1. Baltimore, Md: The Williams & Wilkins Co.; 1984. pp. 420–423. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Miller J M, Rhoden D L. Preliminary evaluation of Biolog, a carbon source utilization method for bacterial identification. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:1143–1147. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.6.1143-1147.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Monnet D, Lafay D, Desmonceaux M, Boeufgras J M, Allard F, Freney J. Evaluation of semi-automated 24-hour commercial system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae and other gram-negative bacteria. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994;13:424–430. doi: 10.1007/BF01972003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nataro J P, Kaper J B. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11:142–201. doi: 10.1128/cmr.11.1.142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Odumeru J A, Steele M, Fruhner L, Larkin C, Jiang J, Mann E, McNab W B. Evaluation of accuracy and repeatability of food-borne pathogens by automated bacterial identification systems. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:944–949. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.4.944-949.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.O'Hara C M, Rhoden D L, Miller J M. Reevaluation of the API20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:123–125. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.1.123-125.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.O'Hara C M, Miller J M. Evaluation of the autoSCAN-W/A system for rapid (2 hour) identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:1541–1543. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.6.1541-1543.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.O'Hara C M, Tenover F C, Miller J M. Parallel comparison of accuracy of API 20E, Vitek GNI, MicroScan Walk/Away Rapid ID, and Becton Dickinson Cobas Micro ID-E/NF for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and common gram-negative, non-glucose-fermenting bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:3165–3169. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.12.3165-3169.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.O'Hara C M, Miller J M. Evaluation of the ID 32E for the identification of gram-negative glucose-fermenting and glucose-non-fermenting bacilli. Clin Microbiol Infect. 1999;5:277–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.1999.tb00141.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Orskov I, Orskov F, Sojka W J, Leach J M. Simultaneous occurrence of E. coli B and L antigens in strains from diseased swine. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1961;53:404–422. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pfaller M A, Sahm D, O'Hara C, Ciaglia C, Yu M, Yamane N, Scharnweber G, Rhoden G. Comparison of the AutoScan-W/A Rapid Bacterial Identification system and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:1422–1428. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.7.1422-1428.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rhoads S, Marinelli L, Imperatrice C A, Nachamkin I. Comparison of MicroScan WalkAway system and Vitek system for identification of gram-negative bacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:3044–3046. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.11.3044-3046.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Robinson A, McCarter Y S, Tetreault J. Comparison of Crystal Enteric/Nonfermenter system, API 20E system, and the Vitek Automicrobic system for identification of gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:364–370. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.2.364-370.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Scheftel J M, Barth J G, Vincent M. Evaluation d'une nouvelle méthode semi-automatique d'identification des entérobactéries MIS-Enterobacteriaceae. Ann Biol Clin. 1989;47:207–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Scheftel J M. Identification des entérobactéries en fonction de l'évolution taxonomique et des systèmes. Bull Soc Fr Microbiol. 1996;11:204–208. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Smith H R, Scotland S M. Isolation and identification methods for Escherichia coli O157 and other verocytotoxin-producing strains. J Clin Pathol. 1993;46:10–17. doi: 10.1136/jcp.46.1.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Vernozy-Rozand C. Verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in medicine and food industry. Ann Biol Clin. 1999;57:507–515. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Visser M R, Bogaards L, Rozenberg-Arska M, Verhoef J. Comparison of the AutoScan-W/A and Vitek Automicrobic system for identification and susceptibility testing of bacteria. J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992;11:979–984. doi: 10.1007/BF01967786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vuye A. Evaluation of spectrum-10 system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:2366–2368. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.10.2366-2368.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wachsmuth I K, Davis B R, Allen S D. Urealytic Escherichia coli of human origin: serologic, epidemiologic, and genetic analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 1979;10:897–902. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.6.897-902.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wauters G, Cornelis G. Méthode simple pour la recherche de la décarboxylation de l'acide glutamique chez les bactéries à Gram négatif. Ann Microbiol Inst Pasteur. 1974;125A:183–192. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wauters G, Boels A, Voorn G P, Verhaegen J, Meunier F, Janssens M, Verbist L. Evaluation of a new identification system, Crystal Enteric/Non-Fermenter, for gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:845–849. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.4.845-849.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.York M K, Brooks G F, Fiss E H. Evaluation of the autoSCAN-W/A rapid systems for identification and susceptibility testing of gram-negative fermentative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:2903–2910. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.11.2903-2910.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
