Abstract
Objective: Surgical approach to low-grade glioma (LGG) involving the posterior insula is challenging, especially in the left hemisphere, with a high risk of sensorimotor, language, or visual deterioration. In this study, a case series of 5 right-handed patients harboring a left posterior insular LGG is reported, by detailing a transcorticosubcortical approach.
Method: The five surgeries were achieved in awake patients using cortical and axonal electrostimulation mapping. The glioma was removed through the left rolandic and/or parietal opercula, with preservation of the subcortical connectivity.
Results: The cortical mapping was positive in the five patients, enabling the selection of an optimal transcortical approach, via the anterolateral supramarginal gyrus in four patients and/or via the lateral retrocentral gyrus in three cases (plus through the left superior temporal gyrus in one case). Moreover, the white matter tracts were identified in all cases, i.e., the lateral part of the superior longitudinal fasciculus (five cases), the arcuate fasciculus (four cases), the thalamocortical somatosensory pathways (four cases), the motor pathway (one case), the semantic pathway (three cases), and the optic tract (one case). Complete resection of the LGG was achieved in two patients and near-total resection in three patients. There were no postoperative permanent sensorimotor, language, or visual deficits.
Conclusion: A transcortical approach through the parietorolandic operculum in awake patients represents safe and effective access to the left posterior insular LGG. Detection and preservation of the functional connectivity using direct electrostimulation of the white matter bundles are needed in this cross-road brain region to prevent otherwise predictable postsurgical impairments.
Keywords: intraoperative mapping, left insula, low-grade glioma, transcortical approach, awake surgery
Introduction
Although surgery of insular gliomas was reputed for a long time to be very challenging, there is currently a growing number of series demonstrating a significant improvement of functional and oncological outcomes—see recent reviews on this topic (1–3). Such better results have in particular been correlated to the use of awake surgery with intraoperative electrical mapping [for a meta-analysis, see (4)] and to transopercular approach, which allows a wider surgical exposure of the insula and a decrease of vascular injuries at the level of the Sylvian arteries (5–7). However, surgical access remains complex for gliomas within the left posterior insula (8), explaining why a greater amount of postoperative residue was observed in this location, especially when the tumor involves zone II according to the Berger-Sanai classification system (9). Furthermore, identification of the eloquent subcortical pathways is critical in this cross-road brain region to avoid postoperative severe permanent deteriorations (10).
Here, this case series details a transcortical approach to reach the left posterior insular low-grade glioma (LGG) through the parietorolandic operculum in five patients operated on with awake mapping. Beyond the access to the insula selected according to the results of the individual cortical mapping, the purpose is to emphasize the need to preserve the neural connectivity, thanks to the detection of the white matter tracts by means of subcortical electrostimulation, these pathways serve as deep functional boundaries of the resection.
Method
Patients
This is a consecutive case series of patients with an LGG involving the left posterior insula and who underwent awake surgery between October 2015 and March 2021.
Written signed consent was obtained from all patients before surgery. Ethics Committee approval was not required because of the descriptive nature of the study.
Pre- and post-operative functional outcome was assessed systematically via neurological examination. All patients underwent preoperative MRI, then postoperative MRI within 24 h postsurgery, at 3-month and 6-month intervals thereafter.
Surgical Procedure
All the patients underwent awake resection with cortical and subcortical direct electrical stimulation (DES) as extensively described elsewhere (10, 11). Briefly, patients underwent anesthesia induction and placement of a laryngeal mask airway. A local anesthetic was applied, and a left craniotomy was performed. Patients were then woken up and the airway was removed to enable full participation in functional mapping. After durotomy, tumor, sulcal, and gyral boundaries were delineated with intrasurgical ultrasonography to confirm localization. No other technical adjunct was used in the operative theater (no neuronavigation, no functional MRI, no tractography, and no intraoperative MRI).
Direct electrical stimulation (DES) was achieved by means of a bipolar stimulator with tips spaced 5-mm apart. A biphasic current with pulse frequency 60 Hz, single pulse phase duration 1 ms, amplitude 2–3 mA, and stimulation duration of 4 s was applied. In all cases, initial sensorimotor and speech mapping (counting) was achieved to identify negative motor and primary sensorimotor sites, and speech regions (ventral premotor cortex). Then, patients have been asked to complete a dual naming task (eventually with the presentation of two objects situated diagonally on the computer screen to preserve the visual field) combined with a contralateral upper limb movement (12). Cortical areas inducing sensorimotor responses, language disturbances (speech arrest, phonological or semantic paraphasia, and anomia), and/or visual troubles during DES were marked by sterile tags.
Glioma removal then proceeded by first achieving a safe corticectomy through the lateral part of the retrocentral gyrus (lRCG) and/or through the anterolateral part of the anterior supramarginal gyrus (alSMG) according to the results of the cortical mapping. The lateral part of the superior longitudinal fasciculus (lSLF), critical for articulatory processes (13), was then identified and served as the upper limit of the opercular resection. The surface of the insula was subsequently exposed in the depth using a subpial dissection technique. The next step consisted of lifting the circular sulcus of the insula, allowing to provide access to the tumor involving the posterior part of the insular lobe, and removing it by preserving the Sylvian branches (since protected by the pia-matter) (10). Finally, in the white matter underneath the insula, tumor removal and axonal DES mapping were alternated to detect the eloquent pathways which represented the deep functional boundaries of the resection while the patient continued to perform multitasking (movement, language, and/or visual tasks). The goal was to identify and preserve the arcuate fasciculus (AF) (which generates phonological disorders during DES), the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF) (which induces semantics disturbances during DES), the somatosensory thalamocortical pathway (TCP) (which elicits dysesthesia or pain during DES), the pyramidal pathway (PT) (which evokes involuntary movement during DES), and/or the optic radiation (OR) (which causes visual disorders during DES). Resections were thus pursued until critical neural networks were encountered around the whole surgical cavity, with no margin around eloquent structures, to optimize the extent of resection (EOR) (14).
Photographs of cortical and subcortical responses (indicated by sterile tags) were taken before and after resection. Each DES site was manually plotted on the three-month postoperative MRI. Replacement of stimulation point was done by using intrasurgical photos (enabling to accurately identify the location of functional areas marked with sterile numbered tags), written surgical reports, cortical (e.g., gyri, sulci, and vessels) and subcortical (e.g., edges of the resection cavity) landmarks identifiable on both the postsurgical MRI and the intraoperative photographs. This method has been successfully used and validated in the previous series (15–17).
Results
Five patients were included in this study. Specific case details, with clinical, radiological, surgical, and pathological characteristics are shown in Table 1 and Figures 1–3. The mean age of operated patients was 39 years (23–59), with three males and two females. The five patients were right-handed. The tumor was diagnosed because of seizures in all cases but one (incidental discovery). There was no preoperative neurological deficit.
Table 1.
Age/Sex | Clinical presentation | Intraoperative mapping | Surgical Approach | Pathology | EOR | Post-op Assessment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient 1 | 35/M | Seizures | • Cortical mapping: speech arrest (vPMC), M1 (face), dysesthesia (face) (S1) • Subcortical mapping: Anarthria (lSLF), phonological paraphasia (AF) | Through alSMG | WHO Grade II Oligodendroglioma | NTR | • No epilepsy • No neurological deficit (transitory phonological disorders) • KPS 90 |
Patient 2 | 59/M | Seizures | • Cortical mapping: speech arrest (vPMC), M1 (face), dysesthesia (face) (S1) • Subcortical mapping: Anarthria (lSLF), phonological paraphasia (AF), semantics (IFOF), dysesthesia (TCP) | Through lRCG | WHO Grade II Astrocytoma | GTR | • No epilepsy • No neurological deficit • IK 100 |
Patient 3 | 42/F | Incidental discovery (tinnitus) | • Cortical mapping: speech arrest (vPMC), M1 (face), dysesthesia (face and upper limb) (S1), anomia (STG) • Subcortical mapping: Anarthria (lSLF), phonological paraphasia (AF), semantics (IFOF), dysesthesia/pain (TCP), involuntary movement (PT), visual disorders (OR) | Through alSMG + lRCG | WHO Grade II Astrocytoma | NTR | • Transient seizures then epilepsy control • No neurological deficit • KPS 100 |
Patient 4 | 23/F | Seizures | • Cortical mapping: speech arrest (vPMC), arrest of movement, M1 (face), dysesthesia (face) (S1), anomia (STG) • Subcortical mapping: Anarthria (lSLF), semantics (IFOF), dysesthesia (TCP), involuntary movement (PT) | Through alSMG + lRCG | WHO Grade II Astrocytoma | GTR | • No epilepsy • No neurological deficit (transitory right dysesthesia) • KPS 90 |
Patient 5 | 36/F | Seizures | • Cortical mapping: speech arrest (vPMC), dysesthesia (face) (S1) • Subcortical mapping: Anarthria (lSLF), phonological paraphasia (AF), dysesthesia/pain (TCP) | Through alSMG + STG | WHO Grade II Astrocytoma | NTR | • No epilepsy • No neurological deficit (transitory right dysesthesia) • KPS 90 |
F, female; M, male; vPMC, ventral premotor cortex; S1, primary sensory cortex; M1, primary motor cortex; STG, superior temporal gyrus; alSMG, antero-lateral supramarginal gyrus; lRCG, lateral retrocentral gyrus; WHO, World Health Organization; NTR, near-total resection; GTR, Gross-total resection; KPS, Karnovsky Performance Status; lSLF, lateral superior longitudinal fasciculus; AF, arcuate fasciculus; IFOF, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus; TCP, thalamo-cortical pathway; PT, pyramidal tract; OR, optic radiations.
The cortical mapping was positive in the five patients, with articulatory/language and/or sensorimotor disturbances transitorily induced by DES. This enabled the selection of an optimal transcortical approach, via the alSMG (i.e., the anterior parietal operculum) in four patients and/or via the lRCG (i.e., the posterior rolandic operculum) in three cases. In one case, a combined approach was performed through the posterior part of the superior temporal gyrus in addition to the SMG. Moreover, the white matter tracts were identified by means of axonal DES in all cases, i.e., the lSLF before reaching the insula in the five cases, then the AF (four cases), the somatosensory TCP (four cases), the IFOF (three cases), the PT (two cases), and the OR in one case. Surgical resection was stopped into the contact of these functional pathways in the five patients.
Two patients had a gross total resection and three patients had a near-total resection on the postoperative FLAIR-weighted MRI. No permanent sensorimotor, language, or visual symptoms were experienced by any patient in this series. Histopathology results revealed the WHO grade II glioma (LGG) in all the cases (three astrocytomas and two oligodendrogliomas). No adjuvant medical treatment has been administrated in the postoperative period.
Discussion
Despite the recent improvement of postoperative results following resection of insular gliomas (18), the rate of permanent deterioration remains high in series which still advocates the use of a trans-Sylvian approach, i.e., between 6 and 17% (19–22). In addition, among all the types of insular tumors, those involving the posterior part of the insula in the left hemisphere are more difficult to deal with (8), particularly when involving the zone II in the Berger-Sanai classification—thus resulting in a lower EOR (9, 22, 23). Indeed, its surgical approach is complex, because this area is deeper than the anterior insula. Moreover, since the bifurcation of the superficial Sylvian vein is frequently localized directly above the posterior insula, splitting the posterior part of the Sylvian fissure is more challenging. Finally, in the trans-Sylvian approach, the risk of spasm after skeletonizing the Sylvian artery is higher, which could have major consequences given the fact that the long perforating arteries, critical for the corona radiata, may arise from these posterior branches that overly the posterior insula (24).
To overcome these issues, the present case series detailed a transcortical approach to reach the left posterior LGG, thanks to optimized access through the lRCG and/or alSMG in awake patients. Indeed, this approach via the rolandic and/or parietal opercula offers a safe and effective corridor to the posterior insula, deeply located, by decreasing brain retraction by means of a large and straightforward working corridor, and by minimizing the vascular risks related to the opening of the Sylvian fissure. Here, no severe long-lasting worsening has been generated, in agreement with a low rate of morbidity (<6%) reported in previous surgical experiences which used a transcortical approach (5–7)—nonetheless by emphasizing in the present series the reproducibility of these results by using a transparietocentral opercular access regarding specifically LGG centered on the left posterior insula.
Furthermore, the favorable functional outcomes reported here may be attributed to the use of awake mapping, in line with recent series which evidenced a lower rate of persistent deficits in insular resection following awake procedure with DES compared with asleep craniotomy (4). Such a functional mapping is very important in this left posterior insular localization both for surgical access and concerning the limit of resection into the contact of the deep white matter tracts. In fact, conversely to the classical transcortical approach often reported through the frontal operculum in the literature, a more posterior approach via the left lRCG/alSMG implies not only to take account of the critical cortical sites mapped by DES but also to preserve the lSLF which is essential for articulatory processing (25). This corticocortical tract connects the junction between the posterior SMG and the posterior superior temporal gyrus with the ventral premotor cortex, and it runs more superficially than the insula (26). Because this auditory-motor pathway cannot be functionally compensated, since leading otherwise to permanent dysarthria when damaged (13), it should be imperatively identified by means of axonal DES as the upper functional limit of the transopercular approach to the left posterior insula. Of note, in the present series, the lSLF has been detected in all patients before reaching the insula.
A step forward, after removing the insular tumor, the eloquent fasciculi have also to be preserved within the deep white matter connectivity. Indeed, the region underneath the insula is a major cross-road, which includes several neural networks, that is, the AF, the somatosensory TCP, the PT, the OR, and the IFOF. The axonal fiber tract serving as the deep posterosuperior boundary is represented by the left AF, which arches around the posterior insula, situated more deeply than the lSLF, and which generates phonological paraphasia during DES (dorsal route) (11, 27). Moreover, the profound part of the posterior insula is very close to the posterior limb of the internal capsule. Therefore, the TCP which elicits dysesthesia or pain when stimulated and the PT which evokes movement disturbances during DES (25) should be identified and preserved in the depth of the surgical cavity. The OR may also be detected, causing visual disorders during DES and serving as the deep posterior limit of the resection (28). Finally, the left IFOF, which runs in the external capsule, can be identified by inducing semantic paraphasia during DES, thus serving as the lower and anterior boundary of the glioma removal (ventral route) (10, 11, 27). In the present series, one or several of these critical pathways have been mapped in all patients (Figures 1–3), avoiding to damage axonal fibers and generating long-lasting functional deterioration related to subcortical structural disconnections. Indeed, despite mechanisms of neural reconfiguration which may be elicited by slow-growing LGG (29), such a potential of neuroplasticity is very limited at the level of the white matter connectivity, thus with a high risk of permanent deficit in the event of tracts injury (16, 30, 31).
To sum up, a comprehensive investigation of the cortical and axonal functional anatomy by means of intraoperative DES should be considered for each patient with a left posterior insular glioma, both for selecting the best transopercular corridor and for optimizing the EOR while preserving the deep neural circuits.
Conclusion
Although this is a small series, the present results support that a transcortical approach through the parietal and/or rolandic opercula (i.e., anterolateral part of the SMG and/or lateral part of the RCG) in awake patients represents safe and effective access to the left posterior insular LGG. In addition, detection and preservation of the functional connectivity using axonal stimulation mapping of the white matter bundles are needed in this major cross-road brain region to circumvent predictable long-lasting postoperative worsening.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Ethics Statement
Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author Contributions
The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- 1.Lu VM, Goyal A, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Chaichana KL. Updated incidence of neurological deficits following insular glioma resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. (2019) 177:20–6. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.12.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hervey-Jumper SL, Berger MS. Insular glioma surgery: an evolution of thought and practice. J Neurosurg. (2019) 130:9–16. 10.3171/2018.10.JNS181519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Przybylowski CJ, Hervey-Jumper SL, Sanai N. Surgical strategy for insular glioma. J Neurooncol. (2021) 151:491–7. 10.1007/s11060-020-03499-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Di Carlo DT, Cagnazzo F, Anania Y, Duffau H, Benedetto N, Morganti R, et al. Post-operative morbidity ensuing surgery for insular gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev. (2020) 43:987–97. 10.1007/s10143-019-01113-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hameed NUF, Qiu T, Zhuang D, Lu J, Yu Z, Wu S, et al. Transcortical insular glioma resection: clinical outcome and predictors. J Neurosurg. (2018) 131:706–16. 10.3171/2018.4.JNS18424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Li Z, Li G, Liu Z, Pan Y, Hou Z, Wu L, et al. Transcortical approach for insular gliomas: a series of 253 patients. J Neurooncol. (2020) 147:59–66. 10.1007/s11060-020-03390-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mandonnet E. Transopercular resection of IDH-mutated insular glioma: a critical appraisal of an initial experience. World Neurosurg. (2019) 132:e563–76. 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Duffau H. A personal consecutive series of surgically treated 51 cases of insular WHO Grade II glioma: advances and limitations. J Neurosurg. (2009) 110:696–708. 10.3171/2008.8.JNS08741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sanai N, Polley MH, Berger MS. Insular glioma resection: assessment of patient morbidity, survival, and tumor progression. J Neurosurg. (2010) 112:1–9. 10.3171/2009.6.JNS0952 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Michaud K, Duffau H. Surgery of insular and paralimbic diffuse low-grade gliomas: technical considerations. J Neurooncol. (2016) 130:289–98. 10.1007/s11060-016-2120-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Duffau H. Stimulation mapping of white matter tracts to study brain functional connectivity. Nat Rev Neurol. (2015) 11:255–65. 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Duffau H. New philosophy, clinical pearls and methods for intraoperative cognition mapping and monitoring “à la carte” in brain tumor patients. Neurosurgery. (2021) 88:919–30. 10.1093/neuros/nyaa363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.van Geemen K, Herbet G, Moritz-Gasser S, Duffau H. Limited plastic potential of the left ventral premotor cortex in speech articulation: evidence from intraoperative awake mapping in glioma patients. Hum Brain Mapp. (2014) 35:1587–96. 10.1002/hbm.22275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Duffau H. Brain connectomics applied to oncological neuroscience: from a traditional surgical strategy focusing on glioma topography to a meta-network approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien). (2021) 163:905–17. 10.1007/s00701-021-04752-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Herbet G, Moritz-Gasser S, Lemaitre AL, Almairac F, Duffau H. Functional compensation of the left inferior longitudinal fasciculus for picture naming. Cogn Neuropsychol. (2019) 36:140–57. 10.1080/02643294.2018.1477749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sarubbo S, Tate M, De Benedictis A, Merler S, Moritz-Gasser S, Herbet G, et al. Mapping critical cortical hubs and white matter pathways by direct electrical stimulation: an original functional atlas of the human brain. Neuroimage. (2020) 205:116237. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Roux A, Lemaitre AL, Deverdun J, Ng S, Duffau H, Herbet G. Combining Electrostimulation with fiber tracking to stratify the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus. Front Neurosci. (2021) 15:683348. 10.3389/fnins.2021.683348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Duffau H. Surgery of insular gliomas. Prog Neurol Surg. (2018) 30:173–85. 10.1159/000464393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sughrue M, Bonney PA, Burks JD, Othman J, Baker C, Glenn CA, et al. Multilobar insular-involving gliomas: results with hyperaggressive resection. Cureus. (2017) 9:e1623. 10.7759/cureus.1623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Przybylowski CJ, Baranoski JF, So VM, Wilson J, Sanai N. Surgical morbidity of transsylvian versus transcortical approaches to insular gliomas. J Neurosurg. (2019) 132:1731–8. 10.3171/2018.12.JNS183075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pitskhelauri D, Bykanov A, Konovalov A, Danilov G, Buklina S, Sanikidze A, et al. Transsylvian insular glioma surgery: new classification system, clinical outcome in a consecutive series of 79 cases. Oper Neurosurg. (2021) 20:541–8. 10.1016/j.bas.2021.100470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lang FF, Olansen NE, DeMonte F, Gokaslan ZL, Holland EC, Kalhorn C, et al. Surgical resection of intrinsic insular tumors: complication avoidance. J Neurosurg. (2001) 95:638–50. 10.3171/jns.2001.95.4.0638 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zentner J, Meyer B, Stangl A, Schramm J. Intrinsic tumors of the insula: a prospective surgical study of 30 patients. J Neurosurg. (1996) 85:263–71. 10.3171/jns.1996.85.2.0263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Türe U, Yasargil MG, Al-Mefty O, Yasargil DC. Arteries of the insula. J Neurosurg. (2000) 92:676–87. 10.3171/jns.2000.92.4.0676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Maldonado IL, Moritz-Gasser S, Menjot de. Champfleur N, Bertram L, Moulinié G, Duffau H. Surgery for gliomas involving the left inferior parietal lobule: new insights into the functional anatomy provided by stimulation mapping in awake patients. J Neurosurg. (2011) 115:770–9. 10.3171/2011.5.JNS112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Martino J, De Witt Hamer PC, Berger MS, Lawton MT, Arnold CM, de Lucas EM, et al. Analysis of the subcomponents and cortical terminations of the perisylvian superior longitudinal fasciculus: a fiber dissection and DTI tractography study. Brain Struct Funct. (2013) 218:105–21. 10.1007/s00429-012-0386-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Duffau H, Moritz-Gasser S, Mandonnet E. A re-examination of neural basis of language processing: proposal of a dynamic hodotopical model from data provided by brain stimulation mapping during picture naming. Brain Lang. (2014) 131:1–10. 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.05.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chan-Seng E, Moritz-Gasser S, Duffau H. Awake mapping for low-grade gliomas involving the left sagittal stratum: anatomofunctional and surgical considerations. J Neurosurg. (2014) 120:1069–77. 10.3171/2014.1.JNS132015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Duffau H. Functional mapping before and after low-grade glioma surgery: a new way to decipher various spatiotemporal patterns of individual neuroplastic potential in brain tumor patients. Cancers (Basel). (2020) 12:2611. 10.3390/cancers12092611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Herbet G, Maheu M, Costi E, Lafargue G, Duffau H. Mapping neuroplastic potential in brain-damaged patients. Brain. (2016) 139:829–44. 10.1093/brain/awv394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Herbet G, Duffau H. Revisiting the functional anatomy of the human brain: toward a meta-networking theory of cerebral functions. Physiol Rev. (2020) 100:1181–228. 10.1152/physrev.00033.2019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.