Skip to main content
Wellcome Open Research logoLink to Wellcome Open Research
. 2020 Dec 23;5:292. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16474.1

Host Directed Therapies for Tuberculous Meningitis

Angharad G Davis 1,2,3,a, Joseph Donovan 4,5, Marise Bremer 3, Ronald Van Toorn 6, Johan Schoeman 6, Ariba Dadabhoy 7, Rachel PJ Lai 2,8, Fiona V Cresswell 9,10, David R Boulware 11, Robert J Wilkinson 1,2,3,8, Nguyen Thuy Thuong Thuong 4,5, Guy E Thwaites 4,5, Nathan C Bahr 7; Tuberculous Meningitis International Research Consortium
PMCID: PMC8792876  PMID: 35118196

Abstract

A dysregulated host immune response significantly contributes to morbidity and mortality in tuberculous meningitis (TBM). Effective host directed therapies (HDTs) are critical to improve survival and clinical outcomes. Currently only one HDT, dexamethasone, is proven to improve mortality. However, there is no evidence dexamethasone reduces morbidity, how it reduces mortality is uncertain, and it has no proven benefit in HIV co-infected individuals. Further research on these aspects of its use, as well as alternative HDTs such as aspirin, thalidomide and other immunomodulatory drugs is needed. Based on new knowledge from pathogenesis studies, repurposed therapeutics which act upon small molecule drug targets may also have a role in TBM. Here we review existing literature investigating HDTs in TBM, and propose new rationale for the use of novel and repurposed drugs. We also discuss host variable responses and evidence to support a personalised approach to HDTs in TBM.

Keywords: Tuberculous Meningitis, Host Directed Therapies, Dexamethasone

Introduction

Clinical outcomes in tuberculous meningitis (TBM) depend upon both killing Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) and managing host inflammatory response. Antimicrobial drug therapy for TBM has been adapted from that used for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB); four drugs are given initially, with subsequent tapering to two or three drugs (in drug-susceptible TBM, dependent on local guidelines) for continuation of therapy up to one year. Yet the host immune response may be dysregulated, and contributes to the poor outcomes associated with TBM. Host directed therapies (HDTs) seek to control this host response and reduce death and neurological injury.

The discovery and assessment of new therapeutics in TBM has been a neglected area; this includes the development of bespoke antitubercular drug regimens that account for differing ability of drugs to penetrate the central nervous system (CNS), and the design of HDTs that counter dysregulated immune responses to M.tb within the CNS. In fact, corticosteroids are the only widely used host directed therapy in TBM with any proven benefit in both adults 1 and children 2 . In adults, in particular, questions around their clinical use remain, including whether they have a role in improving outcomes in HIV-associated TBM and the mechanisms by which they improve survival. Clinical trials to assess the efficacy of other HDTs including aspirin and thalidomide have been conducted; however, there is not yet conclusive evidence to suggest when, with whom and at what dose they may be effective. New knowledge from studies uncovering mechanisms of inflammation and brain injury may also allow for a directed approach to modulating the host response. Similarly, studies aiming to contribute knowledge of factors at play that influence variability in the host may lead us away from a ‘one size fits all’ therapeutic approach.

We review the evidence on currently used HDTs in TBM and suggest potential therapeutics based on pathogenesis studies and drawing from knowledge and experience in other forms of tuberculosis and neuroinflammatory conditions. We will review work that has contributed to our understanding of variation in host response and discuss how this knowledge might be harnessed to design a personalised approach to the use of HDT in TBM.

Existing host directed therapies for tuberculous meningitis

Dexamethasone

Adjunctive corticosteroids reduce mortality from TBM, at least in the short term 1, 3, 4 . The mechanism through which corticosteroids confer clinical benefit is unclear, although reduction in intracerebral inflammation seems most likely. Glucocorticoids bind to and activate the glucocorticoid receptor of macrophages and other cells, interfering with inflammatory mediator transcription and expression 5 . Additional indirect genomic effects of inhibition of pro-inflammatory transcription factors such as activator protein-1, and non-genomic mechanisms further mediate glucocorticoid anti-inflammatory effects 69 .

Murine studies suggest M.tb induces activation of the microglial NLRP3 inflammasome, a multimolecular immune complex of receptors and sensors that mediates innate immune responses and induces inflammation via pro-inflammatory caspases and cytokines; a process inhibited by dexamethasone 10, 11 . In TBM, pro-inflammatory cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytokine concentrations are acutely elevated, although therapeutically reducing these concentrations may not be clinically beneficial. In a study of 16 individuals with TBM in India, concentrations of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 were elevated in TBM vs. controls, and declined during TB treatment, yet cytokine concentrations were not related to disease severity, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities or clinical outcome 12 . In a paediatric study (n=30), CSF TNF-α, IL-1β, and interferon (IFN)-gamma concentrations were elevated in acute TBM, but again did not correlate with disease severity, nor were they influenced by corticosteroid administration 13 . However, in a large study of clinical and intracerebral inflammatory phenotype and nine-month survival in adults with TBM from Vietnam, multiple pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory CSF cytokines were significantly reduced in HIV uninfected individuals who died vs. in HIV uninfected who survived 14 . This effect (lower pro-inflammatory cytokines in individuals who died) was not seen in HIV co-infection.

In 545 Vietnamese individuals >14 years recruited to a randomized placebo-controlled trial of dexamethasone for TBM, dexamethasone was associated with a reduced risk of death (relative risk 0.69, p=0.01) 1 . In a representative subset of this study, dexamethasone did not significantly alter tested CSF cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12) over time vs. placebo 15 . CSF concentrations of IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 fell slowly after commencement of anti-TB chemotherapy, and TNF-α fell rapidly, all irrespective of dexamethasone treatment. In a subgroup of HIV uninfected adults (n=37), dexamethasone significantly reduced CSF matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in follow up samples taken after a median five days of treatment 16 . Further work is required to determine whether the protective effect of dexamethasone with a measurable reduction in intracerebral inflammation.

International guidelines recommend adjunctive corticosteroids for TBM management 17 . Corticosteroid use in TBM is commonplace, dexamethasone is commonly used as it is affordable and widely available although the optimal corticosteroid preparation, dose, and route of administration are unknown 18 . Whether beneficial therapeutic effects extend to HIV co-infected individuals is uncertain. In a HIV-positive subgroup (n=98) from a randomized trial of adjunctive corticosteroids for TBM in Vietnamese adults, dexamethasone was associated with a non-significant trend towards improved survival 1 . Subsequently, a study of adults with HIV-associated TBM showed global increase in pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations, running counter to theory that immunosuppressed HIV co-infected individuals have lower intracerebral inflammation 14 . A multicentre randomized controlled trial of adjunctive corticosteroids for HIV co-infected adults with TBM is currently underway in Vietnam and Indonesia ( NCT03092817) 19 .

Corticosteroids are frequently used to treat common neuro-complications of TBM; paradoxical reactions, and the immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). Paradoxical neuro-inflammatory reactions, which occur despite appropriate anti-TB chemotherapy, may reflect host response to dead and dying bacteria 20 . TBM-IRIS is a common and often severe complication of starting antiretroviral therapy (ART) in TBM, and is associated with high CSF neutrophil counts and a positive M.tb culture at presentation 21 . Interestingly, a CSF inflammatory process, specifically high neutrophils and high TNF-α in combination with low IFN-gamma, predicted later TBM-IRIS in a study of 34 individual with TBM in South Africa 21 . Inflammasome activation appears to be involved in the development of TBM-IRIS, with MMP-9 a possible mediator of brain tissue damage 11 . Whilst corticosteroids during the first four weeks after initiation of ART reduced TB-associated IRIS in HIV co-infected individuals in a trial in South Africa, individuals with TBM were excluded 22 . There are no randomized trials of corticosteroid therapy for TBM-IRIS, nor for paradoxical neurological reactions in HIV uninfected individuals. Table 1 summarises the current evidence for dexamethasone use in TBM, as well as for other host-directed therapies.

Table 1. Summary of clinical studies investigating the efficacy of dexamethasone, aspirin and thalidomide in TBM.

Reference Intervention (drug,
dose, duration)
Study design Population Primary
outcome
Key findings
Mai 27 Aspirin 81 mg vs.
1000 mg vs. placebo
for 60 days
RCT: double-blind,
placebo
controlled
Adults,
non-HIV,
Vietnam
n = 120
Mortality or
stroke
No difference in two-month mortality.
Subgroup analysis showed reduction in
infarcts and death with aspirin 81 mg (15%)
and 1000 mg (11%) compared to placebo
(34%); p = 0.06
Misra 28 Aspirin 150mg vs.
placebo
RCT: placebo
controlled
Adults
n=118
Mortality or
stroke
Decreased three-month mortality (21.7%)
vs placebo (43.4%); odds ratio = 3.17, 95%CI
1.21 - 8.31. Aspirin resulted in absolute risk
reduction of stroke in 19.1% and significant
reduction in mortality compared to placebo
(21.7% vs 43.4%, p=0.02).
Misra 29 Aspirin 150mg Retrospective
cohort
n=135 Mortality Non-statistical reduction in deaths (25%)
at three months compared to standard TB
treatment (17%).
Schoeman 30 Aspirin 75mg or
100mg/kg
RCT Children
n=146
No improved neurological or cognitive
outcomes or survival with aspirin.
Schoeman 31 Thalidomide 6mg/kg,
12mg/kg, or 24mg/kg
Dose escalating
pilot study
Children
n=15
Safety and
tolerability
Reduced CSF TNF-α in children with stage 2
TBM.
Schoeman 32 Thalidomide 24mg/kg
for one month
RCT: double-blind Children
n=47
Discontinued prematurely due to side effects
and deaths in thalidomide arm.
Thwaites 1 Dexamethasone RCT: double-
blind, placebo
controlled
Adults,
HIV and
non-HIV
n=545
Mortality Reduced risk of death through nine
months (relative risk 0.69, p=0.01) with
dexamethasone.
Simmons 15 Dexamethasone RCT: double-
blind, placebo
controlled
Adults
n=87
Dexamethasone did not significantly alter
tested CSF cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8,
IL-10, IL-12) over time vs. placebo.

RCT, randomised clinical trial; IL, interleukin; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; TBM, tuberculous meningitis; TB, tuberculosis; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid.

In childhood TBM, benefit from corticosteroids has been demonstrated in a number of studies 2, 2325 . Unlike in adults, improvement in disability, albeit moderate, is described 3 . Dosage and duration, however, is debated and in randomized trials dosage has varied between 1mg/kg and 4mg/kg daily, for 3–4 weeks. One trial compared three dosage regimens; 2 mg/kg/day over four weeks vs 4 mg/k/day over one week and 2 mg/k/day for the next three weeks vs 4 mg/kg/day over four weeks 26 . In each group the initial four weeks was followed by four weeks of tapering. There was no difference in mortality between groups; however, prolonged periods of higher dose prednisolone were associated with new onset optic neuropathy and hydrocephalus 26 . These findings highlight the delicate balance between moderating host immunity and avoiding the occurrence of adverse events. Further studies are needed to identify ideal dosage regimen, as well as explore host variability in response to corticosteroids in childhood TBM.

Aspirin

Cerebral infarction occurs in 25–71% of TBM cases 27, 33 , and stroke was associated with a two-fold increase in mortality in a recent meta-analysis 34 . The inflammatory state occurring in TBM contributes to the pathogenesis of stroke. A prospective study of 146 TBM patients demonstrated an acute phase inflammatory response with significantly elevated cytokines (e.g. IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-1β, IFN-γ, TNF- α) in blood and CSF 35 . A hypercoagulable state was reflected by elevated protein C, factor VII, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and anticardiolipin antibodies, as well as decreased protein S in a case series of 16 children. Bleeding times were also markedly shorter and platelet counts remained markedly raised in this subgroup 36 . Hypercoagulability has been shown to occur in adults with pulmonary tuberculosis, and may also contribute to pathogenesis of stroke in TBM. Local intra- and extra-vascular factors contributes to TBM pathogenesis, most significantly in the form of cerebral vasculitis secondary to inflammatory infiltrates; initially believed to be directly due to tubercle bacilli implantation, now known to correlate with the inflammatory exudate in the basal cisterns and subarachnoid space 37, 38 . The significance of intravascular thrombosis is still unclear. While thrombosis might be common in the context of vasculitis, autopsies on TBM patients failed to demonstrate frequent arterial thrombosis 37 . Significant platelet dysfunction has also been demonstrated in TBM, manifesting as increased mean platelet volumes, platelet distribution width and platelet-large cell ratio 39 . These parameters are significantly associated with infarcts and suggests the use of antiplatelet agents in TBM 39 . Local intra- and extra-vascular factors contribute to TBM pathogenesis in the form of vasculitis due to bacilli infiltration. In an effort to reduce mortality and long-term neurological disability in TBM, aspirin is increasingly being studied due to its anti-inflammatory and inhibitory effects on platelet and thrombus production. In murine models, low dose aspirin (3 mg/kg) showed a systemic decrease in serum cytokines (e.g. TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β) and late stage T cell responses in M.tb infection. Aspirin also enhances T helper cell 1 responses for eliminating bacilli from lungs 40 .

To date, three randomized controlled trials have investigated the role of aspirin in adult and paediatric TBM. In 118 adult TBM patients in India, aspirin resulted in absolute risk reduction of stroke in 19.1% and significant reduction in mortality compared to placebo (10 of 118 (21.7%) versus 23 of 118 (43.4%), p=0.02) 28 . A randomised controlled trial of TBM involving children in South Africa (n=146) could not establish improved neurological/cognitive outcomes or survival with aspirin at doses of 75 mg (low dose) or 100 mg/kg/day (high dose) 30 . However, the developmental outcome of children on high dose aspirin was similar to the placebo and low dose aspirin groups, despite being younger of age and having higher baseline severity. This finding warrants further investigation of high-dose aspirin in childhood TBM. A study of 120 Vietnamese adults with TBM demonstrated a reduction in death and new infarcts with the addition of 81 mg/day aspirin (8 of 36 or 22.2%) and 1000 mg/day aspirin (6 of 38 or 15.8%), versus placebo (11 of 38 or 28.9%) 27 . Aspirin was associated with dose-dependent inhibition of thromboxane A2 and upregulation of pro-resolving protectins in the CSF. Another retrospective study by Misra et al. in India failed to validate clinical benefit, showing an insignificant reduction in deaths with the addition of 150 mg aspirin as compared to standard anti-TB therapy 29 . However, 25% (11 of 135) of patients randomized to the aspirin arm had a complete recovery at three months versus 17.1% (7 of 135) in the standard treatment arm. In the three adult trials, corticosteroids were administered alone or in conjunction with aspirin with no adverse event signal found. None of these trials observed an increase in adverse events, but safety concerns with increasing doses of aspirin persist. Whilst these studies of adjunctive aspirin described varying results regarding morbidity and mortality, they paved the way for further large randomised controlled trials. Phase 2 ( NCT03927313) and 3 ( NCT04145258) trials are currently underway to validate aspirin as a host-directed therapy. Given the insufficient evidence base, aspirin is not routinely used in most individuals with TBM.

Thalidomide

Thalidomide has a wide range of biological effects, due to its ability to interfere with the immune system, and depending on the cell type or pathway of activation. The inhibition of TNF-α, which is produced primarily by macrophages and monocytes, accounts for most of the immunological effects of the drug. TNF-α performs a delicate balancing act during host response to M.tb infection, whereby on the one hand it is mandatory for keeping infection under control, but on the other hand, if produced at too high levels it induces a hyperinflammatory state resulting in severe tissue damage. The potential of thalidomide to activate T-cells, resulting in elevated production of IL2, IFN and TNF-α, may potentially interfere with its anti-inflammatory properties 41 . In addition, thalidomide does not inhibit TNF-α produced by stimulated T-cells. The therapeutic effect of thalidomide therefore appears to be dose dependant since differing TNF-α concentrations will result in opposing physiological consequences.

Thalidomide has been shown to reduce CSF TNF-α experimentally in rabbits 42 as well as in children with UK Medical Research Council (MRC) grade 2 TBM in a dose-escalating pilot study 31 . However, a double-blind, randomized trial of high dose thalidomide treatment (24mg/kg/day for one month) in children with grade 2 and 3 TBM was discontinued due to side effects (skin rash, hepatitis, neutropenia or thrombocytopenia) and deaths in the thalidomide arm 32 .

The anti-inflammatory benefits of thalidomide (e.g. improved resolution of basal enhancement and tuberculomas) noted in both the pilot and randomized trials have led to more targeted studies, albeit at a much reduced dosage (≤5 mg/kg/day). Additionally, adjunctive thalidomide has been shown to be particularly effective in observational studies involving tuberculous brain abscesses 43, 44 and blindness-related to optochiasmatic arachnoiditis 45, 46 . Adverse drug effects have been less of an issue in these situations. The life-threatening nature of these TBM sequelae as well as the anatomical location of the lesions, which precluded surgery, disqualified them from being included in trials. Nonetheless, the clinical improvements noted have been substantial ( Figure 1).

Figure 1. CT axial, MRI T2 axial, CT sagittal and MRI T1 post-gadolinium sagittal images at 3–4 month intervals of a 16-month-old HIV-infected female with stage III tuberculous meningitis.

Figure 1.

The initial computed tomography (CT) axial and sagittal scans ( A, F) showed a large right sided middle cerebral artery infarction, hydrocephalus as well as multiple small rim-enhancing foci in the prepontine cisterns. After three months of anti-TB and two months of anti-retroviral therapy, they presented with a depressed level of consciousness. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2 axial ( B) and MRI T1 post-gadolinium sagittal ( G) demonstrated multiple TB abscesses in the interpeduncular, prepontine and chiasmic cisterns (paradoxical HIV related TB IRIS) as well as right cerebral hemisphere spongiotic changes (old infarction). Thalidomide was initiated following a poor response to one week of high dose corticosteroids. This resulted in rapid improvement in the level of consciousness, gradual decrease in the size of the TB abscesses and loss of T2 signal (i.e. inflammation), which is a marker of cure as it represents gradual calcification ( CE & HJ). We confirm that we have obtained consent to use images from the parent/guardian of the patient included in this presentation. Permission was obtained in the form of informed written consent.

When used, the duration of adjunctive thalidomide therapy should be guided by subsequent clinical and radiological responses. In TB, clinical improvement of mass lesions generally precedes radiological improvement due to a reduction in peri-lesional inflammation. Serial MRI T2-weighted studies have shown that evolution of the lesions from early stage “T2 bright” abscesses with oedema to “T2 black” represents a marker of cure 44 . Regression is associated with fibrosis, mineralization (calcification) and eventually disappearance, usually with no residual structural abnormalities. T2-black granulomas may, however, persist for years in asymptomatic children. In most cases, cure is achieved after less than three months of adjunctive thalidomide therapy.

It is the authors experience that adjunctive thalidomide warrants consideration in the following TBM-related conditions: corticosteroid-unresponsive optochiasmatic arachnoiditis resulting in visual impairment and/or optic disc pallor; enlarging TB abscess despite corticosteroid therapy (TB-IRIS); large TB abscess/tuberculomas in critical brain regions (i.e. brainstem) that is not amenable to surgical drainage and not responding to corticosteroids; large dural-based TB abscess resulting in epilepsia partialis.

TNF-α has been shown to exert deleterious effects on capillaries already sensitized by exposure to mycobacterial products. The endarteritis, coupled with raised intracranial pressure because of edema and obstructive hydrocephalus, often leads to cerebral ischaemia/infarction. The value of low-dose adjunctive thalidomide in modifying the progressive endarteritis is yet to be explored.

Immunomodulatory therapies

Modulation of cytokines known to contribute to pathology is a potential strategy to support host defenses or control deleterious inflammation in TBM. In TBM, a number of pro-inflammatory cytokines are thought to play a role in pathogenesis, including IL-2, IL-6, IL-1β, IFN-γ and TNF-α 38 . However, like in other neuroinflammatory conditions where cytokines such as IFN-γ have opposing roles 47 , inhibition of these cytokines may not necessarily lead to improved outcomes and therefore caution must be exercised in exploring the potential drugs that inhibit these pro-inflammatory cytokines as candidate HDTs.

There are accumulating data on the role of the anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibodies infliximab and adalimumab and the soluble TNF-α receptor etanercept in TBM treatment. Although these agents are described as options for treating refractory paradoxical reactions involving the CNS 4851 , they may also be responsible for latent TB reactivation and dissemination to the CNS in those where the drug is used to treat autoimmune conditions 52 . Anakinra is a human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist that blocks the biological activity of natural IL-1 and may also have a role in TBM. Anakinra demonstrated efficacy in one case of life-threatening protracted paradoxical inflammation in CNS TB where high dose corticosteroids failed 53 . Other immunomodulatory agents of interest include canakinumab and tocilizumab, human monoclonal antibodies inhibiting IL-1 and IL-6, respectively. In TBM, vasculitis occurs due to the proximity of the progressive exudative meningitis to the basal subarachnoid cistern and the circle of Willis. Cyclophosphamide, an alkylating cytotoxic drug is an effective drug in the treatment of primary cerebral vasculitis. Two case reports have described clinical improvement with the use of cyclophosphamide in TBM associated cerebral vasculitis 54, 55 ; however, its role as an effective treatment in this context needs further investigation, particularly due to concerns over its potential adverse activity as a potent immunosuppressive drug. Table 2 summarises cases within the published literature where these agents have been used in the context of TBM; however, pre-clinical and clinical studies to systematically investigate the therapeutic effectiveness are required before they can be used more widely as adjunctive therapies in TBM.

Table 2. Biologics and other immunomodulatory therapies in TBM; summary of published case reports.

Reference Drug Dose Mechanism Clinical outcome
Blackmore 48 Infliximab 10mg/kg, three
doses at monthly
intervals
Anti-TNF Given after four months due to ongoing clinical
deterioration, despite treatment with dexamethasone
and cyclophosphamide; resulted in clinical
improvement.
Jorge 49 Infliximab 10mg/kg, three
doses at monthly
intervals
Anti-TNF Young adult with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, treated
with infliximab developed disseminated TB. With
stopping of infliximab, neurological deterioration
occurred with isolation of M.tb in CSF, with no
improvement with corticosteroids. Infliximab re-
initiation led to neurological improvement.
Molten 50 Infliximab Case 1: 10mg/kg,
three doses at
monthly intervals
Case 2: 5mg/kg,
three doses at six-
week intervals
Anti-TNF Two cases describing paradoxical worsening
after initiation of TBM treatment, unresponsive to
dexamethasone. In both cases, clinical improvement
occurred following administration of infliximab.
Abo 51 Infliximab 5mg/kg, three doses
at weeks 1, 3 and 7
Anti-TNF Paradoxical worsening (optochiasmatic arachnoiditis,
leading to loss of vision) on starting TB treatment in
a seven-year-old with TBM, despite dexamethasone.
Clinical improvement occurred following infliximab
administration.
Keeley 53 Anakinra 100 mg
subcutaneously daily
Interleukin-1
receptor
antagonist
Two cases of steroid dependant neurotuberculosis
(paradoxical worsening when steroids stopped). In both
cases, patients responded to anakinra therapy.
A. Gonzalez-
Duarte 55
Cyclophosphamide 750mg/m 3 every
three weeks
Alkylating agent
of nitrogen
mustard type.2
Clinical improvement
Celloti 54 Cyclophosphamide 750mg/m 3 every
three weeks
Alkylating agent
of nitrogen
mustard type.2
Clinical improvement

TNF, tumor necrosis factor; TB, tuberculosis; M.tb, Mycobacterium tuberculosis; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; TBM, tuberculous meningitis.

Antiretroviral therapy

The decision as to when antiretroviral therapy is started must consider the potential immunopathogenic complications as well as the benefit in preventing further opportunistic infection. Guidelines vary slightly regarding the timing of initiation of ART relative to initiation of anti-TB chemotherapy in those co-infected with TB and HIV. The 2010 World Health Organisation (WHO) ART guidelines recommend initiating ART within eight weeks of anti-TB chemotherapy in all HIV-TB co-infected patients regardless of CD4 count 56 . The U.S. National Institutes of Health HIV guidelines recommend starting ART within two weeks of anti-TB chemotherapy for HIV-TB co-infected patients with CD4 cell counts <50 cells/ µL and within eight weeks for CD4 counts >50 cells/µL 57 . In TBM there are unique considerations given the infection surrounds crucial structures (the brain and spinal cord) with a very limited ability to expand within the skull and spinal canal should excess inflammation occur. Inflammation occurring following the initiation of HIV therapy is known as immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), which in the context of TBM is associated is frequent (up to 40%) and associated with high mortality (30%) 58, 59 .

In a randomised trial of testing immediate HIV therapy initiation (at time of initiating TB treatment) vs delayed (after two months) in TBM, immediate therapy was associated with significantly more grade 4 adverse events (n=102) than delayed HIV therapy (n=87; p=.04). This trial informed current consensus that ART initiation should be delayed by between 4-8 weeks after starting TBM therapy 60 . This approach hopes to strike a balance between the beneficial effects of ART (immune reconstitution, control of HIV, prevention of other opportunistic infections) and the potential harms of TB-IRIS.

Potential future host directed therapies for tuberculous meningitis

Although host directed therapies are in use, they are limited in either efficacy or availability. Therefore, the quest for more effective therapeutics remains ongoing. Here we discuss potential therapies that target pathways highlighted in recent pathogenesis studies, or draw on insights from other forms of TB or inflammatory conditions with shared mechanisms of pathogenesis ( Figure 2).

Figure 2. Schematic of relevant biochemical pathways implicated in development of emerging host directed therapies.

Figure 2.

A: Drugs that reduce glutamate ‘glutamate grabbers’ by increasing breakdown of glutamate (either recombinant glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT1), or others that mimic its action) may decrease neuro-excitotoxicity associated with brain injury in TBM. B: Phosphodiesterase inhibitors reduce breakdown of cAMP to 5’AMP, leading to increased neuronal survival, immune modulation, and increase in axon plasticity and myelination. C: Interruption of the tryptophan pathway via modulation of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) activity may have neuroprotective effect, although more data to understand the role of downstream metabolites, particularly the contribution of kyruneic acid in antagonism of glutamate receptors, is needed.

Statin therapy

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (‘statins’) are ubiquitously used in prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease, but are also known to have immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative properties. Several in vitro studies have demonstrated that statins enhance anti-inflammatory and inhibit pro-inflammatory functions in microglial cells and inhibit mechanisms involved in neurodegeneration 6164 . Anti-inflammatory properties may be due to modulation of isoprenylation 65 with downstream effects on inhibitory and stimulatory transcription pathways, or via allosteric inhibition of leucocyte function antigen (LFA)-1 integrin 66 , which is involved in the transmigration of activated T cells through the blood brain barrier. Neuroprotective effects may be due to modulation of excitotoxicity, vascular function, angiogenesis, and/or reduced oxidative damage through nitric oxide stimulas 67, 68 . Importantly, some studies have shown increased neuronal death with higher concentrations of statins 6971 .

The potential of statins to effect CNS inflammation and neurodegeneration in other conditions are of interest given the shared mechanistic pathways in TBM. For example, animal models of multiple sclerosis (MS) show that statins skew immune responses towards an anti-inflammatory T-helper cell 2 response, inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-2, IL-12 and IFN-γ 72 . Patients with secondary progressive MS benefited from statin therapy 73 and a phase 3 trial is currently underway to examine this further ( NCT03387670). In a mouse model of traumatic brain injury, atorvastatin led to profound attenuation of T cell, neutrophil and natural killer cell invasion into the CNS, and reduction in production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IFN-y and IL-6) and chemokines (CCL5 and CXCL10) 74 . In a retrospective observational study, pre-injury statin therapy was associated with improved neurological outcomes in mild traumatic brain injury 75 ; however, in moderate to severe injury no benefit was noted 76 . In a double-blind randomised trial involving 36 patients with traumatic brain injury, rosuvastatin given for 10 days in the acute phase of injury significantly reduced TNF-α, which correlated with a reduction in disability scores 77 . Other conditions where the role of statins has been explored include Alzheimer’s disease 78 , and Parkinson’s disease 79 . Further, statins may be associated with reduced risk of tuberculosis 80 . In a TB murine model, adjunctive simvastatin shortened time to culture clearance by 1 month, enhanced bacterial killing, and decreased culture-positive relapse and enhance bacterial killing 8183 . Clinical trials ( NCT03456102, NCT04147286) will investigate the efficacy of statins in pulmonary tuberculosis. Given their potential use as an adjunctive TB therapy, their lipophilic properties allowing good penetration to the CNS, as well as their potential as an anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective agent, statins may have a role as a HDT in TBM; trials to explore this hypothesis are needed.

Glutamate ‘grabbing’ drugs

Excessive glutamate and neuro-excitotoxicity are thought to contribute to brain injury and cell death in TBM. In one study, RNA sequencing of whole blood and CSF from children with TBM demonstrated significant enrichment of transcripts associated with neural excitotoxicity predominantly driven by glutamate release, NMDA receptor binding and uptake 84 . This mechanism is thought to contribute to brain injury and cell death in other neurological conditions such as stroke, epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s disease 85, 86 . Therapeutics that aim to reduce glutamate excitotoxicity either by i) modulating the downstream effects of glutamate via NMDA receptor binding or ii) reducing extracellular glutamate (e.g. glutamate ‘grabbing’) may have a role in the treatment of TBM. In acute stroke, a similar approach was taken; however, although animal studies were promising, randomised trials in humans assessing efficacy of NMDA antagonists largely failed 8789 . Therapeutics have been designed to reduce glutamate induced excitotoxicity by lowering blood glutamate concentration, thus leading to a larger natural glutamate gradient between the brain and blood, thereby facilitating the efflux of extracellular brain glutamate into the blood 90 . In an animal study, riboflavin (vitamin B 2), selected for its ability to interact with glutamate-oxaloacetate transaminase (GOT), significantly reduced blood glutamate levels compared to placebo ( Figure 2A) 91 . In a randomised trial, riboflavin was correlated with improvement of disability when given intravenously in adults with acute stroke 91 . A number of studies have explored the neuroprotective properties of riboflavin including in conditions such as migraine and Parkinson’s disease 92 . It is unclear whether drugs such as riboflavin, or others that reduce glutamate neuro-excitotoxicity, have a role as an adjunctive therapy to promote neuroprotection in TBM; however, given the emerging body of evidence that suggests involvement of the glutamate-glutamine pathway, this is a potential area of interest for future studies.

Tryptophan pathway drug targets

Tryptophan is an essential amino acid that can either be converted to serotonin or oxidized kynurenines via indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO1) ( Figure 2C). Further oxidization occurs to convert kynurenine to kynurenic acid, which has neuroprotective properties. Prior studies have shown that M.tb induces marked upregulation of IDO-1 expression in both human and murine macrophages in vitro 93 , and that blockade of IDO activity reduces both clinical manifestations of TB as well as microbial and pathological correlates of the human TB syndrome in macaques 94 . In an observational cohort study of TBM, low CSF tryptophan levels were found in those who survived, compared to non-survivors or controls 95 . It is therefore unclear in TBM whether drugs that block IDO-1 such as indoximod, an immunometabolic adjuvant that is current under investigation in cancer therapy 96 , would cause benefit or harm. It is plausible that improved survival seen in those with low CSF tryptophan is due to increased availability of kynurenic acid, which has neuroprotective action via glutamate receptors and reactive oxygen species. Further investigation into the influence of tryptophan and its downstream metabolites on pathogenesis in TBM is required in order to establish suitable targets along this pathway for HDTs.

Eicosanoid modulating drugs

Eicosanoids are arachidonic acid derived lipid mediators that trigger pro-and anti-inflammatory responses and include prostaglandins, resolvins, lipoxins, and leukotrienes, which serve as signalling molecules, modulating inflammation and cell death in TB 97 . A delicate balance in eicosanoid levels is crucial for M.tb control and regulating the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines 98 .

Non-steroidal inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which exert their effects by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX) activity may lead to reduction of excessive inflammation in TBM. As discussed, aspirin, a non-selective COX inhibitor, has been investigated in three trials in TBM with variable outcomes 27, 28, 30 . New generation NSAIDs with more selective inhibition of COX2 may have more favourable safety profiles. Phase 1 trials to assess the safety and bactericidal activity of celecoxib and etoricoxib in healthy volunteers with a view to developing these agents as HDTs for drug sensitive TB are currently underway ( NCT02602509, NCT02503839). Although trials to further investigate the role of aspirin in TBM are underway, future research should consider the potential contribution of newer more selective COX2 inhibitors in TBM.

Phosphodiesterase inhibitors

Phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDE-i) are small-molecule inhibitors that reduce inflammation by increasing intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate and cyclic guanine monophosphate 99 ( Figure 2B). Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE-4) inhibitors such as roflumilast have shown to be effective in the treatment of numerous inflammatory conditions including chronic obstructive inflammatory disease 100 . PDE-4 is expressed within the cortex and hippocampus and animal models suggest that inhibition of PDE-4 may have a beneficial role in CNS conditions where inflammation plays a role in pathogenesis 101105 . In animal models of pulmonary TB, inhibition of PDE-3 (cilostazol), PDE-4 (roflumilast) and PDE-5 (sildenafil) have all increased bacterial clearance and reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines, which contributed to a reduction in neutrophil infiltration and lung pathology 106109 . The role of phosphodiesterase inhibitors has not been studied in TBM but the properties above make them intriguing candidates for adjunctive therapy in TBM.

Variable host responses and a personalized approach

Host immune response to M.tb in TBM is vital, although excessive inflammation leads to neurological damage. Polymorphisms in genes involved in immune response or signalling pathways can influence host inflammatory response, or susceptibility to TBM 110 .

Previous study in the zebrafish model showed that the leukotriene A4 hydrolase ( LTA4H) gene influenced the balance of pro and anti-inflammatory eicosanoids in response to M.tb infection 111 . LTA4H catalyses the final step in pro-inflammatory leukotriene B4 (LTB4) synthesis 111 , with LTB4 effects usually balanced by anti-inflammatory lipoxin A4 (LXA4), the two together ensuring an appropriate response to M.tb without excessive tissue damage 112 . A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (rs17525495) in the promoter region of the LAT4H gene alters gene expression, and LTB4 LXA4 balance; low (CC) and high (TT) inflammatory states result from LTA4H allele homozygosity whereas an intermediate (CT) inflammatory state results from allele heterozygosity 111 . Both TT and CC inflammatory states were associated with increased death in a retrospective study of adults with TBM 113 . In this retrospective study adjunctive dexamethasone was associated with improved survival in the high inflammatory TT group, with the effect of dexamethasone unclear in the CC and CT groups 113 . In a subsequent study of 764 Vietnamese adults, 10 CSF cytokines were measured of: TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, IL4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13 14 . In HIV-uninfected adults with TBM, pro-inflammatory IL-1β, IL-2, and IL-6 (but not TNF-α) were significantly associated with LTA4H genotype; low concentrations in CC genotype, intermediate concentrations in CT genotype, and high concentrations in TT genotype 14 . In HIV co-infected individuals with TBM, LTA4H genotype did not appear to influence survival, response to dexamethasone, or CSF cytokine profile 14 . Additionally, LTA4H genotype did not influence survival in a study of HIV-uninfected Indonesian adults with TBM, all of whom received corticosteroids 114 . A LTA4H genotype stratified approach to adjunctive corticosteroid therapy in TBM is now being assessed in an ongoing randomized placebo-controlled LTA4H genotype stratified non-inferiority trial of HIV uninfected adults with TBM in Vietnam ( NCT03100786) 115 . If benefit of adjunctive corticosteroids as a host directed therapy are shown to be limited to one or more LTA4H genotypes, this paves the way for personalized corticosteroid therapy in TBM.

Where variable host responses to M.tb increase intracerebral inflammation, or genetic polymorphisms lead to overexpression of a specific molecule or target, targeted personalized therapies may be beneficial. In a study of tryptophan genome wide SNP data we identified 11 quantitative trait loci associated with CSF tryptophan concentrations, and found that these quantitative trait loci were predictive of patient survival 19 . A SNP (rs17842268) in CD43, a surface glycoprotein, has been associated with more severe presentation, and decreased survival, in TBM 116 . Why SNPs in CD43 affect M.tb susceptibility is uncertain, but CD43 has a role in regulating proinflammatory cytokines 116 , and theoretically anti-inflammatory therapies may be beneficial in such patients. Evidence that patients with a dysregulated host immune response benefit from more, or different, host directed therapies is lacking.

Conclusions and key areas for future research

Host directed therapies are an evolving area of TBM research. We know that the inflammatory response in TBM contributes to poor outcomes. Further, we know that dexamethasone reduces death from TBM. What is unknown is how the drug works, who might benefit most from dexamethasone or whether other therapies should be given in addition to dexamethasone or in place of it in some scenarios. There may also be scenarios where dexamethasone is harmful. Important questions regarding the exact role of thalidomide and aspirin also remain. While in the case of the former, a narrow context in which the drug might be useful is becoming clearer, in the latter, the optimal and safe dose of aspirin, considering its antiplatelet and anti-inflammatory properties, is uncertain. Although the use of immunomodulatory therapies has been reported sporadically, often where corticosteroid treatments have failed, no clinical trials have been conducted to systematically assess their safety profile and efficacy.

Drug discovery depends on accurately identifying molecular targets that play crucial roles in disease biology, and which are amenable to modulation via biologics or small molecule drug therapeutics. In diseases with high global incidences such diabetes or hypertension, large scale data repositories are beginning to provide genetic insights to inform drug discovery and therefore change the direction of and speed at which novel and repurposed therapeutics become available 117 . In TBM we must work towards establishing similar repositories through international collaboration. However, the relatively low global incidence of the disease, and the challenging environments in which TBM most commonly occurs will make this a lengthy endeavour.

In the near future, we can focus on better understanding of key pathogenic processes underpinning inflammation and brain injury. For example, further understanding of the role and interaction of glutamate and tryptophan in brain injury may uncover targets for which existing drugs can be repurposed and novel therapeutics developed. The rational design of animal models to help inform which of these might deserve clinical trials in TBM is also key; although the rabbit model of TBM has been in use since the early 1900s 118 , further research is required to establish whether a more refined or alternative model could better recapitulate human disease. Genomic research to identify variation in host response will allow further refinement of therapeutic approaches based on factors at the individual patient and population level. While studies of LTA4H genotype have led the way in this area of TBM research, focus must now widen to include other pathways that are likely to vary between hosts. As we move forward with host-directed therapies for TBM, we must remain cognisant of the characteristics of the hosts whose responses we are attempting to change. Whether these changes are obvious (e.g. HIV infection) or more opaque (e.g. unknown genetic polymorphisms), they must be considered with trial design so that we can understand as fully as possible, the role of these therapies in improving outcomes in TBM.

Data availability

No data are associated with this article.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust through a UCL Wellcome Trust PhD Programme for Clinicians Fellowship to AGD [175479]; support for GT and JD [110179]; a Wellcome International Intermediate Fellowship to NTTT [206724]; a Wellcome Clinical PhD Fellowship to FVC [210772]; support for RJW [104803; 203135] and funding for the Francis Crick Institute [FC0010218]. RL is supported by a MRC CDA Fellowship [MRC/R008922/1]. DRB is supported by the National Institutes of Neurological Diseases and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health [R01NS086312]. RJW receives support from Francis Crick Institute, which is funded by UKRI [FC0010218]; Wellcome [FC0010218] and CRUK [FC0010218]. He also receives support from Meningitis Now and NIH [R01AI45436]. NCB is supported by the National Institutes of Neurological Diseases and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health [K23NS110470].

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

References

  • 1. Thwaites GE, Nguyen DB, Nguyen HD, et al. : Dexamethasone for the treatment of tuberculous meningitis in adolescents and adults. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(17):1741–1751. 10.1056/NEJMoa040573 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Schoeman JF, Van Zyl LE, Laubscher JA, et al. : Effect of corticosteroids on intracranial pressure, computed tomographic findings, and clinical outcome in young children with tuberculous meningitis. Pediatrics. 1997;99(2):226–231. 10.1542/peds.99.2.226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Prasad K, Singh MB, Ryan H: Corticosteroids for managing tuberculous meningitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4(4):CD002244. 10.1002/14651858.CD002244.pub4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Torok ME, Nguyen DB, Tran TH, et al. : Dexamethasone and long-term outcome of tuberculous meningitis in Vietnamese adults and adolescents. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e27821. 10.1371/journal.pone.0027821 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Abraham SM, Lawrence T, Kleiman A, et al. : Antiinflammatory effects of dexamethasone are partly dependent on induction of dual specificity phosphatase 1. J Exp Med. 2006;203(8):1883–1889. 10.1084/jem.20060336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Meintjes G, Scriven J, Marais S: Management of the immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2012;9(3):238–250. 10.1007/s11904-012-0129-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Newton R: Molecular mechanisms of glucocorticoid action: what is important? Thorax. 2000;55(7):603–613. 10.1136/thorax.55.7.603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Rhen T, Cidlowski JA: Antiinflammatory action of glucocorticoids--new mechanisms for old drugs. N Eng J Med. 2005;353(16):1711–1723. 10.1056/NEJMra050541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Adcock IM: Glucocorticoid-regulated transcription factors. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2001;14(3):211–219. 10.1006/pupt.2001.0283 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lee HM, Kang J, Lee SJ, et al. : Microglial activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome by the priming signals derived from macrophages infected with mycobacteria. Glia. 2013;61(3):441–452. 10.1002/glia.22448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Marais S, Lai RPJ, Wilkinson KA, et al. : Inflammasome Activation Underlying Central Nervous System Deterioration in HIV-Associated Tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 2017;215(5):677–686. 10.1093/infdis/jiw561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Misra UK, Kalita J, Srivastava R, et al. : A study of cytokines in tuberculous meningitis: clinical and MRI correlation. Neurosci Lett. 2010;483(1):6–10. 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.07.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Donald PR, Van Toorn R: Use of corticosteroids in tuberculous meningitis. Lancet. 2016;387(10038):2585–2587. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30770-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Thuong NTT, Heemskerk D, Tram TTB, et al. : Leukotriene A4 Hydrolase Genotype and HIV Infection Influence Intracerebral Inflammation and Survival From Tuberculous Meningitis. J Infect Dis. 2017;215(7):1020–1028. 10.1093/infdis/jix050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Simmons CP, Thwaites GE, Quyen NT, et al. : The clinical benefit of adjunctive dexamethasone in tuberculous meningitis is not associated with measurable attenuation of peripheral or local immune responses. J Immunol. 2005;175(1):579–590. 10.4049/jimmunol.175.1.579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Green JA, Tran CT, Farrar JJ, et al. : Dexamethasone, cerebrospinal fluid matrix metalloproteinase concentrations and clinical outcomes in tuberculous meningitis. PLoS One. 2009;4(9):e7277. 10.1371/journal.pone.0007277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Thwaites G, Fisher M, Hemingway C, et al. : British Infection Society guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis of the central nervous system in adults and children. J Infect. 2009;59(3):167–187. 10.1016/j.jinf.2009.06.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Donovan J, Figaji A, Imran D, et al. : The neurocritical care of tuberculous meningitis. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(8):771–783. 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30154-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Donovan J, Phu NH, Mai NTH, et al. : Adjunctive dexamethasone for the treatment of HIV-infected adults with tuberculous meningitis (ACT HIV): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. Wellcome Open Res. 2018;3:31. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14006.2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Thuong NTT, Thwaites GE: Treatment-Associated Inflammatory Deterioration in Tuberculous Meningitis: Unpicking the Paradox. J Infect Dis. 2017;215(5):665–667. 10.1093/infdis/jiw565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Marais S, Meintjes G, Pepper DJ, et al. : Frequency, severity, and prediction of tuberculous meningitis immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56(3):450–460. 10.1093/cid/cis899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Meintjes G, Stek C, Blumenthal L, et al. : Prednisone for the Prevention of Paradoxical Tuberculosis-Associated IRIS. N Eng J Med. 2018;379(20):1915–1925. 10.1056/NEJMoa1800762 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Girgis NI, Farid Z, Kilpatrick ME, et al. : Dexamethasone adjunctive treatment for tuberculous meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991;10(3):179–183. 10.1097/00006454-199103000-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. O'Toole RD, Thornton GF, Mukherjee MK, et al. : Dexamethasone in tuberculous meningitis. Relationship of cerebrospinal fluid effects to therapeutic efficacy. Ann Intern Med. 1969;70(1):39–48. 10.7326/0003-4819-70-1-39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Kumarvelu S, Prasad K, Khosla A, et al. : Randomized controlled trial of dexamethasone in tuberculous meningitis. Tuber Lung Dis. 1994;75(3):203–207. 10.1016/0962-8479(94)90009-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Shah I, Meshram L: High dose versus low dose steroids in children with tuberculous meningitis. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21(5):761–764. 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.07.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Mai NT, Dobbs N, Phu NH, et al. : A randomised double blind placebo controlled phase 2 trial of adjunctive aspirin for tuberculous meningitis in HIV-uninfected adults. eLife. 2018;7:e33478. 10.7554/eLife.33478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Misra UK, Kalita J, Nair PP: Role of aspirin in tuberculous meningitis: a randomized open label placebo controlled trial. J Neurol Sci. 2010;293(1–2):12–17. 10.1016/j.jns.2010.03.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Misra UK, Kalita J, Sagar B, et al. : Does adjunctive corticosteroid and aspirin therapy improve the outcome of tuberculous meningitis? Neurol India. 2018;66(6):1672–1677. 10.4103/0028-3886.246278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Schoeman JF, Janse van Rensburg A, Laubscher JA, et al. : The role of aspirin in childhood tuberculous meningitis. J Child Neurol. 2011;26(8):956–962. 10.1177/0883073811398132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Schoeman JF, Springer P, Ravenscroft A, et al. : Adjunctive thalidomide therapy of childhood tuberculous meningitis: possible anti-inflammatory role. J Child Neurol. 2000;15(8):497–503. 10.1177/088307380001500801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Schoeman JF, Springer P, van Rensburg AJ, et al. : Adjunctive thalidomide therapy for childhood tuberculous meningitis: results of a randomized study. J Child Neurol. 2004;19(4):250–257. 10.1177/088307380401900402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wasay M, Khan M, Farooq S, et al. : Frequency and Impact of Cerebral Infarctions in Patients With Tuberculous Meningitis. Stroke. 2018;49(10):2288–2293. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Wen L, Li M, Xu T, et al. : Clinical features, outcomes and prognostic factors of tuberculous meningitis in adults worldwide: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol. 2019;266(12):3009–3021. 10.1007/s00415-019-09523-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Sharma S, Goyal MK, Sharma K, et al. : Cytokines do play a role in pathogenesis of tuberculous meningitis: A prospective study from a tertiary care center in India. J Neurol Sci. 2017;379:131–136. 10.1016/j.jns.2017.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Schoeman J, Mansvelt E, Springer P, et al. : Coagulant and fibrinolytic status in tuberculous meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007;26(5):428–431. 10.1097/01.inf.0000261126.60283.cf [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Lammie GA, Hewlett RH, Schoeman JF, et al. : Tuberculous cerebrovascular disease: a review. J Infect. 2009;59(3):156–166. 10.1016/j.jinf.2009.07.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Davis AG, Rohlwink UK, Proust A, et al. : The pathogenesis of tuberculous meningitis. J Leukoc Biol. 2019;105(2):267–280. 10.1002/JLB.MR0318-102R [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Verma R, Mahapatro S, Kumar A, et al. : Platelet dysfunction and coagulation assessment in patients of tuberculous meningitis. Neurol Sci. 2020;41(8):2103–2110. 10.1007/s10072-020-04299-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Kroesen VM, Rodriguez-Martinez P, Garcia E, et al. : A Beneficial Effect of Low-Dose Aspirin in a Murine Model of Active Tuberculosis. Front Immunol. 2018;9:798. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Haslett PA, Corral LG, Albert M, et al. : Thalidomide costimulates primary human T lymphocytes, preferentially inducing proliferation, cytokine production, and cytotoxic responses in the CD8+ subset. J Exp Med. 1998;187(11):1885–92. 10.1084/jem.187.11.1885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Tsenova L, Sokol K, Freedman VH, et al. : A combination of thalidomide plus antibiotics protects rabbits from mycobacterial meningitis-associated death. J Infect Dis. 1998;177(6):1563–1572. 10.1086/515327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Schoeman JF, Fieggen G, Seller N, et al. : Intractable intracranial tuberculous infection responsive to thalidomide: report of four cases. J Child Neurol. 2006;21(4):301–308. 10.1177/08830738060210040801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. van Toorn R, du Plessis AM, Schaaf HS, et al. : Clinicoradiologic response of neurologic tuberculous mass lesions in children treated with thalidomide. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015;34(2):214–218. 10.1097/INF.0000000000000539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Roberts MT, Mendelson M, Meyer P, et al. : The use of thalidomide in the treatment of intracranial tuberculomas in adults: two case reports. J Infect. 2003;47(3):251–255. 10.1016/s0163-4453(03)00077-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Schoeman JF, Andronikou S, Stefan DC, et al. : Tuberculous meningitis-related optic neuritis: recovery of vision with thalidomide in 4 consecutive cases. J Child Neurol. 2010;25(7):822–828. 10.1177/0883073809350507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Ottum PA, Arellano G, Reyes LI, et al. : Opposing Roles of Interferon-Gamma on Cells of the Central Nervous System in Autoimmune Neuroinflammation. Front Immunol. 2015;6:539. 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Blackmore TK, Manning L, Taylor WJ, et al. : Therapeutic use of infliximab in tuberculosis to control severe paradoxical reaction of the brain and lymph nodes. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(10):e83–85. 10.1086/592695 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Jorge JH, Graciela C, Pablo AP, et al. : A life-threatening central nervous system-tuberculosis inflammatory reaction nonresponsive to corticosteroids and successfully controlled by infliximab in a young patient with a variant of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Clin Rheumatol. 2012;18(4):189–191. 10.1097/RHU.0b013e318258b725 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Molton JS, Huggan PJ, Archuleta S: Infliximab therapy in two cases of severe neurotuberculosis paradoxical reaction. Med J Aust. 2015;202(3):156–157. 10.5694/mja14.00716 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Abo YN, Curtis N, Butters C, et al. : Successful Treatment of a Severe Vision-Threatening Paradoxical Tuberculous Reaction with Infliximab: First Pediatric Use. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020;39(4):e42–e45. 10.1097/INF.0000000000002578 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Harris J, Keane J: How tumour necrosis factor blockers interfere with tuberculosis immunity. Clin Exp Immunol. 2010;161(1):1–9. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04146.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Keeley AJ, Parkash V, Tunbridge A, et al. : Anakinra in the treatment of protracted paradoxical inflammatory reactions in HIV-associated tuberculosis in the United Kingdom: a report of two cases. Int J STD AIDS. 2020;31(8):808–812. 10.1177/0956462420915394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Celotti A, Vianello F, Sattin A, et al. : Cyclophosphamide immunomodulation of TB-associated cerebral vasculitis. Infect Dis (Lond). 2018;50(10):779–782. 10.1080/23744235.2018.1467038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Gonzalez-Duarte A, Higuera-Calleja J, Flores F, et al. : Cyclophosphamide treatment for unrelenting CNS vasculitis secondary to tuberculous meningitis. Neurology. 2012;78(16):1277–1278. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318250d84a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. World Health Organisation: Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in adults and adolescents. Recommendations for a public health approach: 2010 revision. Reference Source [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Department of Health and Human Services: Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents with HIV. 2019 revision. [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Marais S, Pepper DJ, Schutz C, et al. : Presentation and outcome of tuberculous meningitis in a high HIV prevalence setting. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20077. 10.1371/journal.pone.0020077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Pepper DJ, Marais S, Maartens G, et al. : Neurologic manifestations of paradoxical tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome: a case series. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(11):e96–107. 10.1086/598988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. South African Department of Health: ART Clinical Guidelines for the Management of HIV in Adults, Pregnancy, Adolescents, Children, Infants and Neonates. Updated.2019. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Kata D, Foldesi I, Feher LZ, et al. : Rosuvastatin enhances anti-inflammatory and inhibits pro-inflammatory functions in cultured microglial cells. Neuroscience. 2016;314:47–63. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.11.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Churchward MA, Todd KG: Statin treatment affects cytokine release and phagocytic activity in primary cultured microglia through two separable mechanisms. Mol Brain. 2014;7:85. 10.1186/s13041-014-0085-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Cordle A, Landreth G: 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors attenuate beta-amyloid-induced microglial inflammatory responses. J Neurosci. 2005;25(2):299–307. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2544-04.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. McFarland AJ, Davey AK, McDermott CM, et al. : Differences in statin associated neuroprotection corresponds with either decreased production of IL-1beta or TNF-alpha in an in vitro model of neuroinflammation-induced neurodegeneration. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2018;344:56–73. 10.1016/j.taap.2018.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Waiczies S, Bendix I, Zipp F: Geranylgeranylation but not GTP-loading of Rho GTPases determines T cell function. Sci Signal. 2008;1(12):pt3. 10.1126/stke.112pt3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Weitz-Schmidt G, Welzenbach K, Brinkmann V, et al. : Statins selectively inhibit leukocyte function antigen-1 by binding to a novel regulatory integrin site. Nat Med. 2001;7(6):687–692. 10.1038/89058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Bosel J, Gandor F, Harms C, et al. : Neuroprotective effects of atorvastatin against glutamate-induced excitotoxicity in primary cortical neurones. J Neurochem. 2005;92(6):1386–1398. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02980.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Ponce J, de la Ossa NP, Hurtado O, et al. : Simvastatin reduces the association of NMDA receptors to lipid rafts: a cholesterol-mediated effect in neuroprotection. Stroke. 2008;39(4):1269–1275. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.498923 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Michikawa M, Yanagisawa K: Inhibition of cholesterol production but not of nonsterol isoprenoid products induces neuronal cell death. J Neurochem. 1999;72(6):2278–2285. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0722278.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Tanaka T, Tatsuno I, Uchida D, et al. : Geranylgeranyl-pyrophosphate, an isoprenoid of mevalonate cascade, is a critical compound for rat primary cultured cortical neurons to protect the cell death induced by 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibition. J Neurosci. 2000;20(8):2852–2859. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-08-02852.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Schulz JG, Bosel J, Stoeckel M, et al. : HMG-CoA reductase inhibition causes neurite loss by interfering with geranylgeranylpyrophosphate synthesis. J Neurochem. 2004;89(1):24–32. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.02305.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Youssef S, Stuve O, Patarroyo JC, et al. : The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin, promotes a Th2 bias and reverses paralysis in central nervous system autoimmune disease. Nature. 2002;420(6911):78–84. 10.1038/nature01158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Chataway J, Schuerer N, Alsanousi A, et al. : Effect of high-dose simvastatin on brain atrophy and disability in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS-STAT): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2014;383(9936):2213–2221. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62242-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Xu X, Gao W, Cheng S, et al. : Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory mechanisms of atorvastatin in a murine model of traumatic brain injury. J Neuroinflammation. 2017;14(1):167. 10.1186/s12974-017-0934-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Lokhandwala A, Hanna K, Gries L, et al. : Preinjury Statins Are Associated With Improved Survival in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury. J Surg Res. 2020;245:367–372. 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Whyte J, Ketchum JM, Bogner J, et al. : Effects of Statin Treatment on Outcomes after Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2018. 10.1089/neu.2017.5545 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Sanchez-Aguilar M, Tapia-Perez JH, Sanchez-Rodriguez JJ, et al. : Effect of rosuvastatin on cytokines after traumatic head injury. J Neurosurg. 2013;118(3):669–675. 10.3171/2012.12.JNS121084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Jick H, Zornberg GL, Jick SS, et al. : Statins and the risk of dementia. Lancet. 2000;356(9242):1627–1631. 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03155-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Yan J, Qiao L, Tian J, et al. : Effect of statins on Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(12):e14852. 10.1097/MD.0000000000014852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Lai CC, Lee MTG, Lee SH, et al. : Statin treatment is associated with a decreased risk of active tuberculosis: an analysis of a nationally representative cohort. Thorax. 2016;71(7):646–651. 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Dutta NK, Bruiners N, Pinn ML, et al. : Statin adjunctive therapy shortens the duration of TB treatment in mice. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(6):1570–1577. 10.1093/jac/dkw014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Skerry C, Pinn ML, Bruiners N, et al. : Simvastatin increases the in vivo activity of the first-line tuberculosis regimen. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69(9):2453–2457. 10.1093/jac/dku166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Parihar SP, Guler R, Khutlang R, et al. : Statin therapy reduces the mycobacterium tuberculosis burden in human macrophages and in mice by enhancing autophagy and phagosome maturation. J Infect Dis. 2014;209(5):754–763. 10.1093/infdis/jit550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Rohlwink UK, Figaji A, Wilkinson KA, et al. : Tuberculous meningitis in children is characterized by compartmentalized immune responses and neural excitotoxicity. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3767. 10.1038/s41467-019-11783-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Meldrum BS: Glutamate as a neurotransmitter in the brain: review of physiology and pathology. J Nutr. 2000;130(4S Suppl):1007S–1015S. 10.1093/jn/130.4.1007S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Wang R, Reddy PH: Role of Glutamate and NMDA Receptors in Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;57(4):1041–1048. 10.3233/JAD-160763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Jia M, Njapo SAN, Rastogi V, et al. : Taming glutamate excitotoxicity: strategic pathway modulation for neuroprotection. CNS Drugs. 2015;29(2):153–162. 10.1007/s40263-015-0225-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Kalia LV, Kalia SK, Salter MW: NMDA receptors in clinical neurology: excitatory times ahead. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(8):742–755. 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70165-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Grupke S, Hall J, Dobbs M, et al. : Understanding history, and not repeating it. Neuroprotection for acute ischemic stroke: from review to preview. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;129:1–9. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.11.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Castillo J, Loza MI, Mirelman D, et al. : A novel mechanism of neuroprotection: Blood glutamate grabber. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2016;36(2):292–301. 10.1177/0271678X15606721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. da Silva-Candal A, Perez-Diaz A, Santamaria M, et al. : Clinical validation of blood/brain glutamate grabbing in acute ischemic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2018;84(2):260–273. 10.1002/ana.25286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Marashly ET, Bohlega SA: Riboflavin Has Neuroprotective Potential: Focus on Parkinson's Disease and Migraine. Front Neurol. 2017;8:333. 10.3389/fneur.2017.00333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Blumenthal A, Nagalingam G, Huch JH, et al. : M. tuberculosis induces potent activation of IDO-1, but this is not essential for the immunological control of infection. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37314. 10.1371/journal.pone.0037314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Gautam US, Foreman TW, Bucsan AN, et al. : In vivo inhibition of tryptophan catabolism reorganizes the tuberculoma and augments immune-mediated control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(1):E62–E71. 10.1073/pnas.1711373114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. van Laarhoven A, Dian S, Aguirre-Gamboa R, et al. : Cerebral tryptophan metabolism and outcome of tuberculous meningitis: an observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(5):526–535. 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30053-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Fox E, Oliver T, Rowe M, et al. : Indoximod: An Immunometabolic Adjuvant That Empowers T Cell Activity in Cancer. Front Oncol. 2018;8:370. 10.3389/fonc.2018.00370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Ricciotti E, FitzGerald GA: Prostaglandins and inflammation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31(5):986–1000. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.207449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Young C, Walzl G, Du Plessis N: Therapeutic host-directed strategies to improve outcome in tuberculosis. Mucosal Immunol. 2020;13(2):190–204. 10.1038/s41385-019-0226-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Page CP, Spina D: Phosphodiesterase inhibitors in the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2011; (204):391–414. 10.1007/978-3-642-17969-3_17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Calverley PM, Rabe KF, Goehring UM, et al. : Roflumilast in symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: two randomised clinical trials. Lancet. 2009;374(9691):685–694. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61255-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Schaal SM, Garg MS, Ghosh M, et al. : The therapeutic profile of rolipram, PDE target and mechanism of action as a neuroprotectant following spinal cord injury. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e43634. 10.1371/journal.pone.0043634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Atkins CM, Oliva AA, Jr, Alonso OF, et al. : Modulation of the cAMP signaling pathway after traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol. 2007;208(1):145–158. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.08.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Gong B, Vitolo OV, Trinchese F, et al. : Persistent improvement in synaptic and cognitive functions in an Alzheimer mouse model after rolipram treatment. J Clin Invest. 2004;114(11):1624–1634. 10.1172/JCI22831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Gonzalez-Garcia C, Bravo B, Ballester A, et al. : Comparative assessment of PDE 4 and 7 inhibitors as therapeutic agents in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Br J Pharmacol. 2013;170(3):602–613. 10.1111/bph.12308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Wu Q, Qi L, Li H, et al. : Roflumilast Reduces Cerebral Inflammation in a Rat Model of Experimental Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Inflammation. 2017;40(4):1245–1253. 10.1007/s10753-017-0567-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Subbian S, Tsenova L, O'Brien P, et al. : Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibition combined with isoniazid treatment of rabbits with pulmonary tuberculosis reduces macrophage activation and lung pathology. Am J Pathol. 2011;179(1):289–301. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.03.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Maiga MC, Ahidjo BA, Maiga M, et al. : Roflumilast, a Type 4 Phosphodiesterase Inhibitor, Shows Promising Adjunctive, Host-Directed Therapeutic Activity in a Mouse Model of Tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(12):7888–7890. 10.1128/AAC.02145-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Maiga M, Agarwal N, Ammerman NC, et al. : Successful shortening of tuberculosis treatment using adjuvant host-directed therapy with FDA-approved phosphodiesterase inhibitors in the mouse model. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30749. 10.1371/journal.pone.0030749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Konrad FM, Bury A, Schick MA, et al. : The unrecognized effects of phosphodiesterase 4 on epithelial cells in pulmonary inflammation. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0121725. 10.1371/journal.pone.0121725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Wilkinson RJ, Rohlwink U, Misra UK, et al. : Tuberculous meningitis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13(10):581–598. 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Tobin DM, Vary JC, Jr, Ray JP, et al. : The lta4h locus modulates susceptibility to mycobacterial infection in zebrafish and humans. Cell. 2010;140(5):717–730. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Hawn TR, Shah JA, Kalman D: New tricks for old dogs: countering antibiotic resistance in tuberculosis with host-directed therapeutics. Immunol Rev. 2015;264(1):344–362. 10.1111/imr.12255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Tobin DM, Roca FJ, Oh SF, et al. : Host genotype-specific therapies can optimize the inflammatory response to mycobacterial infections. Cell. 2012;148(3):434–446. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. van Laarhoven A, Dian S, Ruesen C, et al. : Clinical Parameters, Routine Inflammatory Markers, and LTA4H Genotype as Predictors of Mortality Among 608 Patients With Tuberculous Meningitis in Indonesia. J Infect Dis. 2017;215(7):1029–1039. 10.1093/infdis/jix051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Donovan J, Phu NH, Thao LTP, et al. : Adjunctive dexamethasone for the treatment of HIV-uninfected adults with tuberculous meningitis stratified by Leukotriene A4 hydrolase genotype (LAST ACT): Study protocol for a randomised double blind placebo controlled non-inferiority trial [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. Wellcome Open Res. 2018;3:32. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14007.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Campo M, Randhawa AK, Dunstan S, et al. : Common polymorphisms in the CD43 gene region are associated with tuberculosis disease and mortality. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2015;52(3):342–348. 10.1165/rcmb.2014-0114OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Hingorani AD, Kuan V, Finan C, et al. : Improving the odds of drug development success through human genomics: modelling study. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):18911. 10.1038/s41598-019-54849-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Kasahara M: The Production of tuberculous meningitis in the rabbit and the changes in its cerebrospinal fluid. Am J Dis Child. 1924;27:428–432. 10.1001/archpedi.1924.01920110009002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Apr 12. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.18139.r42998

Reviewer response for version 1

Vishwanath Venketaraman 1

This review is well-written with complete focus on the potential host directed therapies for TB meningitis. The manuscript contains a detailed literature review (both preclinical and clinical trial studies) on the use of corticosteroids, aspirin, thalidomide, statins, and other molecules, against TB meningitis. 

Recommendations: Introducing a paragraph about tuberculosis incidence and epidemiology at the beginning of the manuscript, followed by sections on the prevalence of TB meningitis, and then pathogenesis of TB meningitis, will further enhance the strength of the manuscript.

The reviewer has provided specific comments within the text of the manuscript.

Is the review written in accessible language?

Yes

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn appropriate in the context of the current research literature?

Yes

Is the topic of the review discussed comprehensively in the context of the current literature?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Tuberculosis, HIV and Diabetes

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Wellcome Open Res. 2021 May 19.
Angharad Davis 1

Dear Reviewer 2, 

Many thanks for your thorough review of the manuscript and your suggestion to add a section on TBM epidemiology and pathogenesis.

We agree that these are important areas, however since this manuscript forms a collection of published papers in a TBM supplement, many of which covered TBM epidemiology and pathogenesis in detail, the authors felt that this manuscript should maintain a narrow focus on the subject area, and therefore felt chapters on TBM epidemiology/pathogenesis was beyond the scope of the article.

Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Feb 5. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.18139.r41926

Reviewer response for version 1

Fabrice Bonnet 1

General comments:

This review regarding the host directed therapy (HDT) for TBM is globally well written and includes adequate references on this topic to date. It could be better balanced.

In the introduction, the authors could include a short chapter about TBM epidemiology.

Systematic review:

Title

I do not agree to consider aspirin, thalidomide and immunomodulatory therapies (anti-TNF and anti-Il1 antibodies) as “existing “ HDT in TBM. To date, only one HDT has been proven to reduce mortality, namely dexamethasone and the other one are promising approaches but have not been assessed in clinical trials yet. So I would consider as Existing HDT the only dexamethasone and “Promising” HDT the other ones.

The title “potential future HDT…” should be replaced by Potential “pathways” for HDT since some of the activators/inhibitors cited in this chapter are new components never evaluated in RCTs.

Chapter Dexamethasone:

The authors should describe what kind of controls were evaluated in a study of 16 individuals in India.

The authors write about cerebral inflammation but it is a proxy to consider CSF cytokines as a maker of cerebral inflammation. The authors should comment on this point.

The issue of dexamethasone dosage (and of rifampicin induction) and of the use of other corticosteroids should be detailed in this chapter described since dexa is the only HDT validated in the guidelines.

Chapter Aspirin:

The chapter is well written.

In addition to the comprehensive antiagregant effect of aspirin, can the author explain how they expect an additional antiinflammatory effect to high dose dexamethasone?  The duration of the treatment should be discussed.

Chapter Thalidomide:

Data on thalidomide are very few and mainly observed in children.

The authors should be cautious regarding their experience with adjunctive thalidomide in TBM regarding the lack of date. Thalidomide is an old anti-inflammatory drug used in inflammatory diseases and progressively removed from guidelines because of its toxicity. Again, it seems difficult to consider thalidomide as a “promising” drug for TBM since new biological agents are far more efficient on proinflammatory cytokines.

The authors should not suggest using thalidomide at a large scale in TBM/TB brain abscess.

Chapter Immunomodulatory HDT:

This chapter is quite short regarding the perspective given by anti-TNF in a severe form of TBM/CNS TB. The choice of the type of anti-TNF, as well as the duration of treatment and the risk associated to this medication, could be discussed. To my mind, anti-TNF therapies may represent one of the best approaches to reduce mortality and morbidity of TBM/TB Abssess in HIV and non HIV people and in children. The main issues are the toxicity of these drugs in the environment where TBM occurs and the availability of these drugs in poor income countries. These points have to be discussed in this review.

In table 2, the authors should add the following references about adalimumab:

Adalimumab treatment may replace or enhance the activity of steroids in steroid-refractory tuberculous meningitis.  Lee HS, Lee Y, Lee SO, Choi SH, Kim YS, Woo JH, Kim SH. J Infect Chemother. 2012 Aug;18(4):555-7

Adalimumab for Corticosteroid and Infliximab-Resistant Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome in the Setting of TB/HIV Coinfection.  Lwin N, Boyle M, Davis JS. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 30;5(2):ofy027

ART:

It is not really fair to consider ART as HDT… even if it is obvious that ART has a significant impact on immunological status. HIV coinfection raises other issues in the management of TBM and I would consider separating this chapter from HDT.

Chapter Future pathways…:

Chapter Statin therapy

It is not well balanced to have a chapter statin with no data on TBM longer than the chapter on biological agents, even if the background is interesting.

I would summarize the impact of statin on multiple sclerosis,  brain injury, etc since it is quite far from TBM to focus on the potential interest of statins on TB and immune response.

FIGURE 2: Not really helpful in the present form.

I would perform a central plot with increased neuronal survival, immune modulation, axon plasticity myelination that are the goal of treatment; and to describe around the central plot the different pathways to reach this target.  

Chapter Host response:

The discussion regarding the LTA4H gene and the response to dexamethasone is an important point of pharmacogenetic. The authors should discuss if this strategy is affordable in every setting.

Is the review written in accessible language?

Yes

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn appropriate in the context of the current research literature?

Yes

Is the topic of the review discussed comprehensively in the context of the current literature?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

HIV Infection ; TBM

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Wellcome Open Res. 2021 May 19.
Angharad Davis 1

Dear reviewer 1,

Many thanks for your thorough review of the manuscript and your suggestions. We have addressed each in turn in the responses below.

General comments:

This review regarding the host directed therapy (HDT) for TBM is globally well written and includes adequate references on this topic to date. It could be better balanced.

In the introduction, the authors could include a short chapter about TBM epidemiology.

We agree that this is an important area, however since this manuscript forms a collection of published papers in a TBM supplement, many of which covered TBM epidemiology in detail, the authors felt that this manuscript should maintain a narrow focus on the subject area, and therefore felt a chapter on TBM epidemiology was beyond the scope of the article.

Paragraph sub-headings:

I do not agree to consider aspirin, thalidomide and immunomodulatory therapies (anti-TNF and anti-Il1 antibodies) as “existing “ HDT in TBM. To date, only one HDT has been proven to reduce mortality, namely dexamethasone and the other one are promising approaches but have not been assessed in clinical trials yet. So I would consider as Existing HDT the only dexamethasone and “Promising” HDT the other ones.

The title “potential future HDT…” should be replaced by Potential “pathways” for HDT since some of the activators/inhibitors cited in this chapter are new components never evaluated in RCTs.

We have changed the sub-headings as suggested.

Chapter Dexamethasone:

The authors should describe what kind of controls were evaluated in a study of 16 individuals in India.

This has been added to this section.

The authors write about cerebral inflammation but it is a proxy to consider CSF cytokines as a maker of cerebral inflammation. The authors should comment on this point.

A comment has been added to this section as per suggestion .

The issue of dexamethasone dosage (and of rifampicin induction) and of the use of other corticosteroids should be detailed in this chapter described since dexa is the only HDT validated in the guidelines.

We agree this issue is important and have commented on this in the text pointing out to readers that although “Corticosteroid use in TBM is commonplace, dexamethasone is commonly used as it is affordable and widely available although the optimal corticosteroid preparation, dose, and route of administration are unknown.” We have added text to further clarify this point in a sentence following this.

Chapter Aspirin:

The chapter is well written. In addition to the comprehensive antiagregant effect of aspirin, can the author explain how they expect an additional anti-inflammatory effect to high dose dexamethasone?  The duration of the treatment should be discussed.

Many thanks. These suggestions have been added to this section.

Chapter Thalidomide:

Data on thalidomide are very few and mainly observed in children.

The authors should be cautious regarding their experience with adjunctive thalidomide in TBM regarding the lack of date. Thalidomide is an old anti-inflammatory drug used in inflammatory diseases and progressively removed from guidelines because of its toxicity. Again, it seems difficult to consider thalidomide as a “promising” drug for TBM since new biological agents are far more efficient on proinflammatory cytokines.

The authors should not suggest using thalidomide at a large scale in TBM/TB brain abscess.

Many thanks for your comments on this. We feel differently that the use of thalidomide is supported by now numerous published studies, the most recent being the largest cohort of adult or pediatric patients treated with adjunctive thalidomide for CNS TB–related complications. In this study (reference below), published this year in Clinical Infectious Diseases, thalidomide appeared to be safe, well tolerated and clinically efficacious. Although we appreciate that further RCT generated evidence is required to warrant its use widescale, it is the opinion of the authors on the manuscript that this is indeed a ‘promising’ HDT that warrants discussion and further explanation.

Ronald van Toorn, Regan S Solomons, James A Seddon, Johan F Schoeman. Thalidomide Use for Complicated Central Nervous System Tuberculosis in Children: Insights From an Observational Cohort. Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 72, Issue 5, 1 March 2021, Pages e136–e145

Chapter Immunomodulatory HDT:

This chapter is quite short regarding the perspective given by anti-TNF in a severe form of TBM/CNS TB. The choice of the type of anti-TNF, as well as the duration of treatment and the risk associated to this medication, could be discussed. To my mind, anti-TNF therapies may represent one of the best approaches to reduce mortality and morbidity of TBM/TB Abssess in HIV and non HIV people and in children. The main issues are the toxicity of these drugs in the environment where TBM occurs and the availability of these drugs in poor income countries. These points have to be discussed in this review.

In table 2, the authors should add the following references about adalimumab:

Adalimumab treatment may replace or enhance the activity of steroids in steroid-refractory tuberculous meningitis.  Lee HS, Lee Y, Lee SO, Choi SH, Kim YS, Woo JH, Kim SH. J Infect Chemother. 2012 Aug;18(4):555-7

Adalimumab for Corticosteroid and Infliximab-Resistant Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome in the Setting of TB/HIV Coinfection.  Lwin N, Boyle M, Davis JS. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 30;5(2):ofy027

Many thanks for these comments. These references have been added as suggested.

ART:

It is not really fair to consider ART as HDT… even if it is obvious that ART has a significant impact on immunological status. HIV coinfection raises other issues in the management of TBM and I would consider separating this chapter from HDT.

Many thanks for these comments. As per your suggestion we have separated this section as a distinct sub-chapter within the manuscript.

Chapter Future Pathways:

Chapter Statin therapy - It is not well balanced to have a chapter statin with no data on TBM longer than the chapter on biological agents, even if the background is interesting. I would summarize the impact of statin on multiple sclerosis,  brain injury, etc since it is quite far from TBM to focus on the potential interest of statins on TB and immune response.

Thank you for these comments, we have shortened this paragraph as suggested.

FIGURE 2: Not really helpful in the present form.

I would perform a central plot with increased neuronal survival, immune modulation, axon plasticity myelination that are the goal of treatment; and to describe around the central plot the different pathways to reach this target. 

Many thanks for your thoughts on this. We agreed with these and attempted to modify the figure as you suggested. However, on review, given that the effect of manipulation of these pathways has not yet been explored in this context we did not want to develop a figure which may be misleading given the early stages of research in this area. We have rather simplified the diagram as a reference figure for readers as they read this section, allowing them to visualise the pathways being discussed.  

Chapter Host response:

The discussion regarding the LTA4H gene and the response to dexamethasone is an important point of pharmacogenetic. The authors should discuss if this strategy is affordable in every setting.

Many thanks, we agree this is an important issue; we have added a comment on this to the section.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    No data are associated with this article.


    Articles from Wellcome Open Research are provided here courtesy of The Wellcome Trust

    RESOURCES