Abstract
In women with very active multiple sclerosis (MS), natalizumab can be continued during pregnancy to prevent rebound disease activity. Our aim was to evaluate changes in serum natalizumab trough concentrations during pregnancy. Blood samples of 3 patients were collected before, during, and after pregnancy. Natalizumab trough concentrations gradually decreased during pregnancy. The patient with the lowest trough concentrations during the third trimester was treated with extended interval dosing (EID). After delivery, natalizumab concentrations increased to similar levels as before pregnancy. All patients remained clinically and radiologically stable. MS neurologists should be aware of decreasing natalizumab concentrations during pregnancy, especially in patients with low initial trough concentrations and patients with EID.
Keywords: Multiple sclerosis, natalizumab, personalized dosing, extended interval dosing, pregnancy, concentrations
Introduction
Natalizumab, a monoclonal antibody against α4 integrin, is an effective therapy for patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). 1 Natalizumab is approved for intravenous administration every 4 weeks. However, previous research suggested that extended interval dosing (EID) of natalizumab could be equally effective to 4-week standard interval dosing (SID). 2 EID of natalizumab could be established by therapeutic drug monitoring, in which infusion intervals are based on serum natalizumab trough concentrations. 2 Although inter-individual serum natalizumab trough concentrations can vary widely (range: 0.1–112 µg/mL), intra-individual trough concentrations are usually stable within a regular dosing interval.2,3
Young women with highly active MS are often treated with natalizumab, including those with a desire for a future pregnancy. Current guidelines recommend continuation of natalizumab during pregnancy in patients with very active MS to prevent rebound disease activity after withdrawal of the drug.4,5 Serum concentrations of monoclonal antibodies may however fluctuate during pregnancy, as was demonstrated by Flanagan et al. 6 Concentrations of vedolizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the α4β7-integrin, decreased during pregnancy (−0.18 µg/L/week, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.33 to −0.02, p = 0.03). 6 This decrease was small, and dose adjustments or therapeutic drug monitoring was not considered necessary. In previous studies on natalizumab, higher body weight was associated with lower natalizumab concentrations.2,3 When natalizumab concentrations are below 1–2 µg/mL, α4β1-integrin receptor desaturation can occur causing a decrease of natalizumab efficacy.3,7 This is especially relevant for patients with EID, who usually have lower trough concentrations of natalizumab compared with patients with SID (mean concentration: 10 vs 30 µg/mL).2,3 EID of natalizumab during pregnancy could, on the contrary, be beneficial by minimizing fetal exposure to natalizumab, as mild to moderate hematologic abnormalities such as anemia and thrombocytopenia were observed in infants born after continuation of natalizumab during the third trimester. 8
Our aim was to evaluate changes in natalizumab trough concentrations during pregnancy in patients with relapsing remitting MS to assess the possible influence of pregnancy on natalizumab pharmacokinetics.
Methods
In an ongoing pharmacovigilance cohort of patients with MS treated with natalizumab in the MS Center Amsterdam (Amsterdam UMC, location VUMC), blood samples are collected every 3 months and stored in the MS biobank. Of this cohort, patients were selected when natalizumab was continued during the entire pregnancy. Stored blood samples were obtained and serum natalizumab trough concentrations were analyzed at Sanquin Laboratory Amsterdam using a cross-linking assay. 9 Patient characteristics and information regarding MS were collected. Approval of the institutional ethics committee was obtained (VUMC Ethics committee numbers: 2020.269 and 2016.554). Patients provided written informed consent for the use of data and blood samples from the MS biobank of the MS center Amsterdam.
Results
Three cases were included. Natalizumab was continued during pregnancy in these patients due to a history of very active MS. Two patients had SID of natalizumab (4-week interval). One of the patients had EID of natalizumab (6-week interval) before and during her pregnancy as part of a current trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04225312). Additional measurements of natalizumab trough concentrations were performed in this patient during pregnancy.
In all patients, natalizumab trough concentrations gradually declined during pregnancy (Figure 1). Natalizumab trough concentrations in these 3 patients ranged from 17–34 µg/mL before pregnancy, 13–31 µg/mL during the first trimester, 3–26 µg/mL during the second trimester, and 2.6–13 µg/mL (n = 2) during the third trimester. The patient with EID of natalizumab had the lowest trough concentration of 2.6 µg/mL during the third trimester. After delivery, natalizumab trough concentrations increased to similar concentrations as before pregnancy (range: 19–38 µg/mL). All patients remained clinically stable (no new neurological symptoms evaluated by a neurologist, lasting more than 24 hours and caused by MS) and radiologically stable (no new or enlarged T2 lesions on yearly brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans) during pregnancy and up to 1 year after delivery.
Discussion
These cases illustrate decreasing serum natalizumab trough concentrations during pregnancy. In the patient with EID, trough concentrations during the third trimester were roughly 85% lower compared with trough concentrations before and after pregnancy. The lowest concentration of 2.6 µg/mL was close to the assumed therapeutic cut-off of 1–2 µg/mL. 7 In both patients with SID, initial trough concentrations before pregnancy were higher and natalizumab concentrations remained adequate during pregnancy.
During pregnancy, volume of distribution increases due to increased total body water and increased body fat. 10 Since monoclonal antibodies have a relatively limited volume of distribution within plasma and extracellular fluid, major changes in concentrations are not expected. 6 However, in a study investigating the pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies during pregnancy, vedolizumab concentrations were lower during pregnancy, similar to our observations, possibly by pregnancy-related alterations in drug clearance. 6 In a case series of patients using natalizumab during the third trimester, natalizumab concentrations of 5 mother–infant pairs after delivery were higher in mothers and infants with more frequent and more recent exposure to natalizumab. 8 In one mother, natalizumab concentrations were low (1.6 µg/mL) without the presence of natalizumab antibodies. Although previous natalizumab concentrations were not reported, the low natalizumab concentration in this patient could be due to inter-individual differences in natalizumab concentrations and possibly lower natalizumab concentrations during her pregnancy.
Pregnancies can effectuate a protective function on MS disease activity. Nonetheless, the risk of relapses even during pregnancy can be higher in patients discontinuing natalizumab due to rebound disease activity. 4 This can be a challenging decision because data on infant outcomes born after natalizumab exposure are limited.5,8 Reducing natalizumab exposure with EID of natalizumab in women who continue natalizumab during pregnancy could possibly reduce harmful effects on the fetus. Therapeutic drug monitoring of natalizumab trough concentrations is currently not being used for patients on SID. However, since patients on EID of natalizumab usually have lower trough concentrations compared with patients on SID, therapeutic drug monitoring could be relevant for this patient group.
In conclusion, natalizumab concentrations can decrease during pregnancy. MS neurologists should be aware of decreasing natalizumab concentrations during pregnancy, especially in patients with low initial trough concentrations and patients with EID.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interest: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: A.A.T., E.M.M.S., B.W.v.O., B.A.d.J., and Z.L.E.v.K. reported no disclosures relevant to the manuscript; T.R. received funding for research from Genmab; B.M.J.U. reported personal fees from Genzyme, Biogen Idec, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Merck Serono, and Roche; and J.K. has accepted speaker fees from Merck Serono, Biogen, Roche, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Genzyme, and Novartis.
Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
ORCID iDs: Alyssa A Toorop https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7196-9826
Theo Rispens https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9600-1312
Contributor Information
Alyssa A Toorop, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Theo Rispens, Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Biologics Laboratory, Sanquin Diagnostic Services, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eva MM Strijbis, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bob W van Oosten, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Brigit A de Jong, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bernard MJ Uitdehaag, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joep Killestein, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Zoé LE van Kempen, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
References
- 1. Polman CH, O’Connor PW, Havrdova E, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 899–910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. van Kempen ZLE, Hoogervorst ELJ, Wattjes MP, et al. Personalized extended interval dosing of natalizumab in MS: A prospective multicenter trial. Neurology 2020; 95: e745–e754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Zhovtis Ryerson L, Li X, Goldberg JD, et al. Pharmacodynamics of natalizumab extended interval dosing in MS. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2020; 7(2): e672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Portaccio E, Moiola L, Martinelli V, et al. Pregnancy decision-making in women with multiple sclerosis treated with natalizumab: II: Maternal risks. Neurology 2018; 90: e832–e839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Demortiere S, Rico A, Maarouf A, et al. Maintenance of natalizumab during the first trimester of pregnancy in active multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2021; 27: 712–718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Flanagan E, Gibson PR, Wright EK, et al. Infliximab, adalimumab and vedolizumab concentrations across pregnancy and vedolizumab concentrations in infants following intrauterine exposure. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020; 52(10): 1551–1562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Khatri BO, Man S, Giovannoni G, et al. Effect of plasma exchange in accelerating natalizumab clearance and restoring leukocyte function. Neurology 2009; 72: 402–409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Haghikia A, Langer-Gould A, Rellensmann G, et al. Natalizumab use during the third trimester of pregnancy. JAMA Neurol 2014; 71: 891–895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Rispens T, Leeuwen A, Vennegoor A, et al. Measurement of serum levels of natalizumab, an immunoglobulin G4 therapeutic monoclonal antibody. Anal Biochem 2011; 411: 271–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Feghali M, Venkataramanan R, Caritis S. Pharmacokinetics of drugs in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol 2015; 39: 512–519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]