Abstract
The fermentation production of platform chemicals in biorefineries is a sustainable alternative to the current petroleum refining process. The natural advantages of Corynebacterium glutamicum in carbon metabolism have led to C. glutamicum being used as a microbial cell factory that can use various biomass to produce value-added platform chemicals and polymers. In this review, we discussed the use of C. glutamicum surface display engineering bacteria in the three generations of biorefinery resources, and analyzed the C. glutamicum engineering display system in degradation, transport, and metabolic network reconstruction models. These engineering modifications show that the C. glutamicum engineering display system has great potential to become a cell refining factory based on sustainable biomass, and further optimizes the inherent properties of C. glutamicum as a whole-cell biocatalyst. This review will also provide a reference for the direction of future engineering transformation.
Keywords: Corynebacterium glutamicum, Surface display system, Biorefinery, Transport, Metabolic network reconstruction
Introduction
Current industrial chemical products mainly use fossil energy including petroleum, coal, and natural gas as raw materials, and account for about 85% of energy use [1, 2]. Fossil resources are not sustainable, and their combustion by-product, carbon dioxide, is the main cause of global warming, accounting for approximately 52% of global warming factors [3]. The conversion to alternative energy sources from the extraction of fossil fuels leads to a more sustainable economy with renewable resources and has attracted worldwide attention. The utilization of biomass resources provides possibilities for the integrated production of chemistry, materials, energy, and food [4]. The concept of bio-refining emerged and gradually evolved. The biorefining concept is similar to that of traditional petroleum refining and uses biomass as a raw material to obtain a series of products, including commodities, and fine and specialty chemicals [5]. The International Energy Agency (IEA) defines bio-refining as "'the sustainable processing of biomass into a spectrum of marketable products and energy" [6]. Biorefineries have different definitions and classifications according to different conditions, platform technologies, final products, raw materials, and conversion processes. The biorefineries introduced in this review are classified according to the source of the raw materials. Three different types of bio-refineries can be used, depending on whether the raw materials used as raw materials come from starch and other grains (first-generation biorefinery), agricultural waste (second-generation biorefinery), or CO2 or toxic environmental pollution (third-generation biorefinery) [5, 7–10].In addition, industrial biorefineries have been identified as the most promising route to the creation of a new domestic bio-based industry [11].
At present, a variety of compounds and commodities are produced through biorefinery. Industrial microorganisms such as Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Corynebacterium glutamicum are designed as microbial cell factories that can use biomass to produce value-added platform chemicals and polymers. Compared with E. coli and S. cerevisiae [12], C. glutamicum has shown great potential to surpass other industrial microorganisms and has many advantages. First, C. glutamicum has low extracellular protease activity and can secrete properly folded functional precursor proteins [13]. Second, C. glutamicum has a weak carbon catabolite inhibitory effect and can use mixed sugars as a carbon source without significant growth retardation [14, 15]. Third, C. glutamicum is robust and exhibits tolerance to organic acids, furfural, and toxic aromatic compounds. Moreover, C. glutamicum cells maintain a strong catalytic function under growth-inhibiting conditions and maintain high cell growth with high-density fermentation [16–18]. These features are of great significance to the toxic substances produced during lignocellulose treatment and environmental pollutant degradation. Fourth, C. glutamicum has a wide spectrum of natural carbon source substrates. It has a natural metabolic network for five-carbon sugars (D-xylose and L-arabinose), six-carbon sugars (glucose, and mannose), monosaccharides (maltose), and toxic aromatic compounds [19, 20]. The spectrum of C. glutamicum substrates involves three generations of bio-refining raw materials. Additionally, C. glutamicum is safe, has a clear genetic manipulation background, can be used to produce a variety of compounds, and can convert cheap biomass into high-value products.
The direct application of C. glutamicum in biorefineries is limited because it cannot secrete effective hydrolytic enzymes to utilize the biorefinery raw materials. To address this limitation, C. glutamicum has been engineered to optimize and construct the degradation module (consisting of the anchor protein and display enzyme), the transport module (pentose, hexose, and other transporters), and utilization module (natural metabolic network and artificial metabolic network) to perform biological treatment of biomass raw materials and compound production by expressing and displaying various functional genes (Fig. 1). These engineering technologies have expanded the C. glutamicum substrate spectrum, enhanced its utilization of renewable biomass resources, and have provided important incremental improvements to the economics of industrial-scale manufacturing (Fig. 1). C. glutamicum will use renewable resources to produce natural or non-natural products, making it a biorefinery cell factory with economic benefits and prospects.
Fig. 1.
Engineering transformation of the C. glutamicum system for the display and degradation, transport, and metabolic network reconstruction models. Display and degradation modules include anchored protein and polymer lyase; the transport module includes ATP-dependent, ion channels, PTS, secondary transporters and artificial transporters; the utilization module (metabolic network reconstruction models) include central metabolic pathways, natural metabolic pathways, and artificial metabolic pathways
C. glutamicum and its engineering display system
C. glutamicum is a fast-growing, aerobic, and non-pathogenic Gram-positive soil bacterium that is a generally considered safe (GRAS) industrial microorganism. C. glutamicum has been studied for over 50 years [21]. In the food and feed industries, C. glutamicum is the main production strain of amino acids such as glutamic acid and lysine [22, 23], and it has been engineered to produce industrial and commercial chemicals. For example, biofuels (such as ethanol, isobutanol, and higher alcohols), organic acids (such as lactic acid, pyruvic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, γ-aminobutyric acid, methyl salicylic acid, and 5-aminovaleric acid [24–26]), and monomers or precursors for biopolymers (including lactate, succinate, putrescine (1,4-Diaminobutane), cadaverine (1,5-diaminopentane), adipic acid, terephthalic acid, 1,2-propanediol, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (4-HBA), and 1-(2, 4,6-trihydroxyphenyl)butane-1,3-dione (TPBD) [27–31]) and other high value-added compounds such as resveratrol [16, 32–34]. Additionally, the lack of endotoxin and low extracellular protease content, make C. glutamicum a potential host for the production of recombinant proteins, including pharmaceutical proteins (single-chain Fv [35, 36] and Fab fragment [37]) and industrial enzymes (amylase [38–42], glycosidase [43, 44], etc.). Metabolic engineers have been exploring alternative renewable carbon sources that have competitive value in the food and feed industries for the production of commercial chemicals of C. glutamicum (Table 1).
However, surface display technology gives C. glutamicum the ability to utilize renewable carbon sources because the display of functional proteins on the cell surface gives host cells new functions to produce chemicals from cheap biomass [45]. Compared with secreted enzymes, the displayed enzymes have many advantages, including improved stability of enzyme activity [46, 47] and enzyme thermal stability [48], convenient recovery [49] and wide application value (whole cell catalysis, combinatorial library screening, protein engineering, bioremediation, biosensor, biofuels production, etc.) [50–53]. To display proteins on the surface of C. glutamicum, several anchoring motifs have been used. At present, the display system of C. glutamicum only uses three types of anchoring proteins: foreign proteins PgsA, mycoloylated proteins, and membrane proteins. PgsA is a transmembrane protein derived from Bacillus subtilis and is part of the poly-γ-glutamate synthase complex [42]. Mycoloylated proteins are special proteins that exist on the mycolic acid layer of the C. glutamicum outer membrane and are fixed on mycolic acids through O-acylation covalent modification, which occurs on serine residues [54]. The currently known mycoloylated proteins that can be used as anchor motifs are NCgl1337, ion-selective channel protein NCgl0933 (porin B, PorB), NCgl0932 (porin C, PorC), and PorH(NCgl number of PorH have not been assigned [55]) [39, 40]. PorH combines with PorA to form a cation-selective channel called the PorHA channel. In the absence of PorHA channels, a functional anion-selective channel, PorB, is necessary for optimal growth [56]. Among the C. glutamicum membrane proteins, only NCgl1221 (mechanosensitive channel, MscCG) has been developed as an anchor protein[41]. NCgl1221 is also the main glutamate efflux system of C. glutamicum [57]. Recombinant C. glutamicum, with these anchored proteins, has been modified to display carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZy) to expand the carbon sources available during fermentation and to enable C. glutamicum to ferment cheap raw materials into valuable biological products. These CAZy include amylase [38–42], glucanase [58], glycosidase [43, 44], and cellulase complex [59].
C. glutamicum uptake of some of the display system degradation products requires the transport system. The transmembrane transport system in C. glutamicum includes ATP-dependent ion channels, the phosphotransferase system (PTS), and secondary transporters [29, 60, 61]. The transport of many hexoses is involved in the phosphorylation cycle of the PTS system [62]. Pts are composed of two common energy-coupling cytoplasmic proteins, enzyme I (EI) and histidine-containing phosphor carrier protein (HPr), which are encoded by ptsI (NCgl1858) and ptsH (NCgl1862), respectively, and a series of sugar-specific enzyme II complexes (EII) [63–65]. Currently, four sets of PTSs have been identified in C. glutamicum, each of these PTSs is specific for a different substrate and those identified are specific for glucose, fructose, sucrose, and an unknown substrate [66]. In addition, C. glutamicum can also transport glucose through inositol transporters coded by iolT1 and iolT2 [67]. For aromatic compound transport, most of the functionally identified aromatic compound transport systems belong to either the aromatic acid/H + symporter (AAHS) family of transporters within the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) or the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily [68]. In C. glutamicum, two benzoate transporters are encoded by NCgl2325 and NCgl2326. Additionally, a gene encoding a putative phenylacetate transporter (CgR_0643, NCgl numbers have not been assigned) was observed in the putative paa cluster of C. glutamicum strain R [69]. With the expansion of the substrates of C. glutamicum, artificial transport systems for various substrates have been developed through gene editing (Fig. 2), and a series of methods have been developed for C. glutamicum through reconstruction and optimization of metabolic pathways. In addition, through restructuring and optimizing metabolic pathways, a series of methods have been developed for the uptake, transport, metabolism, and production of the biomass carbon source in C. glutamicum. In the next section, this review will introduce the use of engineering C. glutamicum based on the surface display system in the three generations biorefining raw materials and the engineering transformation in this process (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Utilization of three generations of biorefinery materials based on the surface display system of C. glutamicum, including surface display, transporters, and metabolic reactions. Overview of the surface display, transporters, and metabolic reactions in C. glutamicum for uptake and conversion of three generations of biorefinery materials. Black represents the endogenous reaction of C. glutamicum, and * represents foreign proteins expressed by heterologous genes. Purple indicates the utilization path of the first-generation of biorefinery, blue indicates the utilization path of the second-generation of biorefinery, and orange indicates the possible utilization path of the third-generation of biorefinery. The solid line represents direct reactions, and the dashed line represents indirect reactions. Enzymes of the Cre pathway: CreHI, CreJEF, CreG, CreC, and CreD; enzymes of the Paa pathway: PaaK, PaaABCDE, PaaG, PaaZ, PaaG/J, PaaF, PaaH, and PaaJ; amino acid transporter: LyaE for L-lysine, L-arginine, L-citrulline; CgmA for L-arginine; YggB: L-glutamate; ThrE for L-threonine, L-serine; BrnEF: L-valine, L-leucine, L-isoleucine, L-methionine. Glc glucose, Glc6P glucose-6-phosphate, Fru6P frucose-6-phosphate, Xyl xylose, Ara, arabinose, CelE endoglucanase E, BglA β-glucosidase A, Msc mechanosensitive channel, Glc1P, glucose-1-phosphate, F6P fructose-6-phosphate, PYR pyruvate, Gluc6P,gluconate-6-phosphate, Glc6P gluconate-1-phosphate, Man, mannose, Man6P mannose-6-phosphate, Ara arabinose, AraA arabinose isomerase, AraB ribulokinase, AraD ribulose 5-phosphate 4-epimerase, Ru ribulose, L-Ru5P L-ribulose-5-phosphate, D-Ru5P D-ribulose-5-phosphate, PEP phosphoenolpyruvate, DHAP 1,3-dihydroxyacetone phosphate, and PCA protocatechuate. PTS phosphoenolpyruvate phosphotransferase, Xylu5P xylulose-5-phosphate, D-Ribo5P ribose-5-phosphate, Xyl xylose, XylA xylose isomerase, XylB xylulokinase, Xu xylulose, PP pathway, pentose phosphate pathway, TCA tricarboxylic acid cycle, Vdh putative vanillin dehydrogenase gene, vanAB genes encoding subunits A and B of vanillate demethylase, PAA phenylacetic acid, Fcs feruloyl-CoA synthetase, Ech enoyl-CoA hydratase/aldolase, PobA 4-hydroxybenzoate 3-hydroxylase (NCgl1032), CatA catechol 1,2-dioxygenase (NCgl2319), BenABC benzoate dioxygenase complex, encoded putatively by NCgl2320, NCgl2321, and NCgl2322, benD 2-hydro-1,2dihydroxybenzoate dehydrogenase (putatively encoded by NCgl2323), MucK a native MFS transporter known to import muconate in ADP1 (from Acinetobacter baylyi), DCD 1,2-dihydroxy-3,5-cyclo-hexadiene-1,4-dicarboxylate
Application of C. glutamicum and its surface display system in the first-generations of biological refining
The first generation of biorefinery uses starch and other grains as raw materials to produce biofuels and chemicals. Starch is used as the main carbon source for the industrial production of amino acids, but C. glutamicum cannot directly utilize starch [70]. In the past ten years, researchers have realized the direct utilization of starch and product production by C. glutamicum by displaying amylase on the surface. Tateno et al. showed that α-amylase (from Streptococcus bovis) surface displayed by pgsA produced 6.04 g/L lysine [42], 15.5 ± 1.3 g/L glutamic acid [41], poly-β-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) [71], cadaverine [72], 88.9 g/L lactic acid, and 14.0 g/L succinic acid [73] (Fig. 2). In addition, mycolic acid layer proteins PorC, NCgl1337, and membrane protein Msc were used as anchoring motifs to display α-amylase, and these recombinant strains produced glutamic acid or L-lysine from starch successfully [39, 41, 44] (Table 1).
Table 1.
Utilization of three generations of biorefinery raw materials based on the surface display system of C. glutamicum
| Substrate | Anchorprotein | Passengerprotein | Resource of passenger protein | Producer | Product | Titer(g/Lmedium) | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First generation of biorefinery | Starch | PgsA | α-amylase(AmyA) | Streptococcusbovis148 | ATCC13032 | L-Lysine | 6.04 | Tateno et al. [42] | 
| PgsA | α-amylase(AmyA) | Streptococcusbovis148 | ATCC13032 | Polyhydroxybutyrate(PHB) | 6.4wt% | Song et al. [47] | ||
| PgsA | α-amylase(AmyA) | Streptococcusbovis148 | ATCC13032 | Organic Acids | 107.8 | Tsuge et al. [73] | ||
| NCgl1221 | α-amylase(AmyA) | Streptococcusbovis148 | ATCC13869 | L-glutamate | 19.3 | Yao et al. [41] | ||
| NCgl1337S | α-amylase(AmyA) | Streptococcusbovis148 | ATCC13032 | L-Lysine | 4.39 | Choi et al. [39] | ||
| NCgl1337 | α-amylase(AmyA) | Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) | ATCC13032 | L-Lysine | 1.75 | Choi et al. [39] | ||
| Second generation of biorefinery | Xylooligosaccharides | PorH | β-xylosidase(Xyl) | Bacillussubtilis | PIS8 | 1,5-Diaminopentane(cadaverine) | 1.28 | Imao et al. [127] | 
| Hemicellulose | NCgl1337/ NCgl1337S | Endoxylanase(XlnA) | Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) | ATCC13032 | Xylooligomers | - | Choi et al. [39] | |
| Cellobiose | Porin(porC) | β-glucosidase(Sde1394) | Saccharophagusdegradans | ATCC13032 | L-Lysine | 1.08 | Adachi et al. [44] | |
| Porin(porC) | β-glucosidase(Sde1394) | Saccharophagusdegradans | DM1729 | L-Lysine | 0.73 | Anusree et al. [58] | ||
| Third generation of biorefinery | CO2 | Porin(porB) | carbonic anhydrase (CA) | Neisseria gonorrhoeae | C. glutamicum | Bicarbonates | - | Koo et al. [111] | 
Application of C. glutamicum and its surface display system in the second-generation of biorefinery
The first-generation raw material has adverse effects on food prices and the environment [74, 75]. However, lignocellulose, the main raw material of the second-generation biorefinery, is a complex heteropolymer composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin that is formed through hydrogen and covalent bonds. It is a complex heteropolymer that can be used to produce biofuels and abundant renewable raw materials for commercial chemicals [76]. Lignocellulose is composed of 40–50% cellulose, 25–35% hemicellulose, and 10–20% lignin [77]. Cellulose is composed of cellobiose, which is a homopolymer of glucose. Hemicellulose is composed of various hexoses (D-glucose, D-mannose, and D-galactose) and pentoses (D-xylose Xyl and L-Arabinose Ara). The total content of pentose sugars in lignocellulose hydrolysates reaches 5–20% xylose, 1–5% arabinose, and 10%–20% mannose [78, 79]. Currently, these monomers are utilized in C. glutamicum through natural or engineered metabolic networks. Utilizing the natural ability of C. glutamicum to degrade and utilize different sugars, establish effective sugar degradation and transport pathways. This further improves the conversion efficiency of renewable resources and avoids competition between biorefineries and food or feed supplies.
Cellulose
Cellobiose is a disaccharide composed of two glucose monomers connected with β-1-4-glycosidic bonds. The degradation of cellulose is generally carried out by a combination of a variety of cellulase enzymes, such as endoβ-1,4-glucanase (EC 3.2.1.4), exo-β-1,4-glucanase, cellobiohydrolase (EC 3.2.1.91), or β-glucosidase (BGL) (EC 3.2.1.21). Kim used Msc to display the cellulase complex endoglucanase E (CelE) and β-glucosidase A (BglA) enzymes on the C. glutamicum cell surface to completely degrade cellulose into glucose. The synergistic effect of these two cellulases significantly improved the saccharification efficiency and thermal stability. The activity of the displayed cellulase complex was higher than that of the secreted cellulase complex [59]. Adachi used porins to display Sde1394 (a BGL from Saccharophagus degradans) on the surface of C. glutamicum cells and to directly assimilate cellobiose as a carbon source. The recombinant strain produced 1.08 g/L of L-lysine from 20 g/L of cellobiose, which was approximately three times higher than the L-lysine produced by secreted BGL in C. glutamicum [44]. In addition, by co-expressing these CAZy in C. glutamicum, glucose, xylose, and arabinose produced by lignocellulose can be used together, and the products produced do not inhibit enzyme activity. The combined utilization of these polysaccharides is of great significance for the practical industrial application of lignocellulose [58, 80, 81]. Shortly, this surface display of multiple enzymes on a single cell will greatly promote whole-cell catalysis [49]. The combined utilization of these polysaccharides is of great significance for the practical industrial application of lignocellulose [58, 81].
Hemicellulose
The utilization of hemicellulose by C. glutamicum mainly focuses on the transport of hemicellulose hydrolysates, and there are few studies on display involved. Hydrolyzed hemicellulose produces hexoses (D-glucose, D-mannose, and D-galactose) which are transported into the cell through the PTS transport system [29] or the ABC carrier [82] (Fig. 2). Glucose is transported by PTS and produces Glc6P or is transported by lolT1/lolT2 and then converted to Glc6P by hexokinase before entering the glycolytic pathway. The mannose 6-phosphate produced by PTS transport of mannose is reversibly converted to fructose 6-phosphate by the phosphate isomerase(Pmi) before entering glycolysis. As for galactose, wild-type C. glutamicum lacks the galactose metabolism network. The engineered C. glutamicum containing L. lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363 galactose operon, including aldose-1-epimerase (galM), galactokinase (galK), udp-glucose-1-p-Glutamate strains with uridyltransferase (galT), and UDP-galactose-4-epimerase (galE) genes, can grow and produce lysine with galactose as the sole carbon source [83].
At present, the research on the utilization of the hemicellulose products of C. glutamicum is mainly xylose and arabinose. Most wild-type C. glutamicum lack effective xylose and arabinose transport or metabolic pathways. Currently, three transmembrane proteins that transport xylose have been used in C. glutamicum: lolT1 [84], XylE [85], and AraE [86]. Most studies on C. glutamicum Xylose metabolism have focused on the xylose isomerase (XI) pathway and the Weimberg (WMB) pathway. Researchers have expressed that xylA (xylose isomerase) and xylB (xylose kinase) (from E. coli and Xanthomonas campestris) can utilize D-xylose and produce L-ornithine, lactic acid, and succinic acid in C. glutamicum [87, 88]. Imao et al. used PorH ankyrin to display β-xylosidase (from B. subtilis) on the cell surface of C. glutamicum, and expressed xylAB (from E. coli). The engineered strain could produce 12.4 mM lysine and 11.6 mM 1,5-diaminopentane from 11.9 g/L xylo-oligosaccharides. Jin et al. used engineered C. glutamicum GJ04 to produce 61.7 g/L glutamic acid from xylose and glucose derived from lignocellulose. Additionally, most wild-type C. glutamicum lack the arabinose transport pathway as well, and a few species of C. glutamicum, such as C. glutamicum ATCC 31831, have the endogenous AraE arabinose transporter [19]. AraE is a membrane channel protein with xylose transport function, which can simultaneously transport L-arabinose. Arabinose is converted into D-xylose-5-phosphate by the action of arabinose isomerase (araA), ribonucleic acid kinase (araB), and ribulose-5-phosphate 4-epimerase (araD) to enter the PP pathway. However, because hydrolyzed cellulose is composed of glucose, xylose, arabinose, and other sugars, it can be considered that the fermentation of mixed sugars is the main bottleneck for its utilization [89].
Lignin
Lignin is composed of coniferyl alcohol, sinapyl alcohol, and p-coumarol benzyl alcohol units, and can be used for the production of aromatic-derived fuels and chemicals [90]. Unfortunately, the complex chemical structure of lignin is a raw material that is difficult to depolymerize and degrade. Lignin decomposition products are mainly aromatic compounds, which are usually toxic to microorganisms commonly used in biological production. C. glutamicum can not only tolerate and degrade aromatic hydrocarbons, but can also use many aromatic compounds derived from lignin (including ferulic acid, vanillin, phenol, benzoic acid, phenylacetic acid, and 4-cresol) as the only carbon source for growth and energy [91]. C. glutamicum has a remarkable ability to utilize aromatic compounds, which makes it unique advantages in the use of lignocellulose hydrolysates in industrial fermentation. Becker et al. engineered C. glutamicum to produce Cis, cis-muconic acid (MA) from glucose, catechol, phenol, and benzoic acid. After hydrothermal depolymerization of softwood lignin into small aromatic hydrocarbons, the strain accumulated 1.8 g/L MA from the hydrolysate [92]. Kallscheuer et al. studied the degradation pathway of ferulic acid in C. glutamicum and expressed genes encoding chalcone synthase (CHS) and chalcone isomerase (CHI), and produced naringenin and mustard caffeic acid from phenylalanine p-coumaric acid and phenylalanine. In addition, the research team knocked out 27 genes of C. glutamicum, eliminating most of the catabolism pathways of known aromatic compounds. The resulting strain produces 2-hydroxybenzoate, 3-hydroxybenzoate, protocatechuate, and 4-hydroxybenzoate from intermediates of aromatic amino acids in the shikimate pathway [33, 93, 94].
The high tolerance of C. glutamicum to aromatic compounds may be due to its typical outer membrane-like structure (mycomembrane), which is mainly composed of fungal acids and can act as a permeation barrier to toxic aromatic compounds [95]. However, the high resistance to aromatic compounds and complex catabolic network also prevents the metabolism and production of C. glutamicum during the production of aromatic compounds (except aromatic amino acids). This prevents C. glutamicum from being used as a medicine or being used as a production host of aromatic compounds involved in biotechnology [69, 93]. At present, researchers have realized the utilization of lignin hydrolysate and product production through engineering transformation of C. glutamicum, but few display technologies of C. glutamicum used in the degradation of lignin polymers. This may be due to the limitation caused by the low expression of the foreign protein of C. glutamicum. In this review, we described the metabolism and regulation of C. glutamicum genes involved in the metabolism of lignin-derived aromatic compounds. It is expected that the display technology of C. glutamicum is a feasible direction for lignin degradation and utilization (Fig. 2) [18, 96–101]
Application of C. glutamicum and its surface display system in the third-generation of biorefinery
The third-generation biorefinery relies on the use of toxic waste, syngas, microalgae, or bacteria that use sunlight for production. The second-and third-generation bio-refineries will reduce the cost of raw material processing, reduce the demand for resources such as food and water, further promote sustainable clean and green biological manufacturing [5, 7]. Corynebacteria are soil and saprophytic microorganisms with cold-tolerant cell walls and have been used in various bioremediation fields. The C. glutamicum has a high tolerance to the polymer units of petroleum pollutants, plastics, and pesticides and possesses a natural metabolic network. There are also potential high-yielding strains of these units. Current research mostly focuses on the utilization of C. glutamicum in the decomposition unit of these pollutants, and there is little research about the surface display system. However, the decomposition of polymer pollutants is generally based on chemical decomposition, and it is expected that degradation through demonstration technology is a feasible future direction. Therefore, we mainly discuss progress in the utilization of C. glutamicum for environmental pollutants such as petroleum pollutants, plastics, pesticides, and their derivatives, as well as possible surface display solutions. It is expected that C. glutamicum is a potential bacterial substrate for use in future bioremediation.
The main components of most petroleum pollutants, plastics, and pesticides are aromatic compounds. C. glutamicum can degrade a variety of aromatic monomers. C. glutamicum has a metabolic network involving the following aromatic compounds: benzoic acid, phenol, 3-hydroxybenzoic acid, gentisic acid, protocatechuic acid, vanillic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, 4-cresol, resorcinol, benzyl alcohol, 2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid, 3,5-dihydroxytoluic acid, naphthalene, vanillin, ferulic acid, cinnamic acid, caffeic acid, and coumaric acid [69] (Fig. 2). C. glutamicum is highly resistant to various toxic aromatic compounds such as phenol, protocatechuic acid, 4-HBA, and 4-ABA, and this feature of C. glutamicum is not observed in other industrial microorganisms including E. coli and B. subtilis. The high tolerance of C. glutamicum to toxic aromatic compounds is a key factor in the production of high-valence aromatic compounds. However, most industrially important aromatic compounds are produced through the chemical conversion of petroleum-based raw materials, such as benzene, toluene, and xylene. Therefore, C. glutamicum can connect the degradation of environmental pollutants with the production of commercial plastics, ensuring sustainable green development and avoiding the fossil route [102].
In terms of display technology, researchers have achieved the degradation of aromatic polymers by displaying functional enzymes on the surface of yeast. Chen et al. used GPI-modified cell wall proteins to display PETase(polyethylene terephthalate-degrading enzyme) on the surface of Pichia pastoris cells to achieve high-efficiency biodegradation of PET(polyethylene terephthalate) and improve the pH and thermal stability [102]. Ding et al. displayed the carboxylesterase CarEW (from Bacillus sp. K91) and GFP on the surface of E. coli through ice nucleation protein. They found that 1.5 mg/ml of DiBP (diisobutyl phthalate, one of the main PAE(phthalic acid esters) plasticizers) was degraded by 10 U of surface-displayed CarEW cells in 120 min [103]. In addition, PET and PAE degradation systems, and their monomeric terephthalic acid and phthalic acid transport systems [104–108], and metabolic networks [100, 109] are gradually improving, making it feasible for the application of C. glutamicum display system in these polymers. Therefore, this review envisages the possible PET and PAE degradation pathways in the C. glutamicum display system (Fig. 2).
Researchers recently proposed the concept of CO2 substrate-based third-generation biorefinery for green biomanufacturing [5, 7–10, 110]. C. glutamicum is used in a large number of industrial applications due to its large-scale production process and transgenic stability, and it is a feasible research direction in the capture and application of CO2. Koo et al. used porB to display carbonic anhydrase (CA) on the surface of C. glutamicum to achieve effective CO2 capture and CO2 hydrate [111]. In addition, Researchers have used combined biological treatment to utilize CO2-fixed biomass in engineered C. glutamicum. Lee et al. used engineered C. glutamicum bacteria and microalgae to jointly process succinic acid production. The engineered strain that secretes amylase can produce succinic acid (0.28 g succinic acid/g total sugars including starch) from the pretreated Chlamydomonas reinhardtii microalgae biomass, which is a mixture of starch and glucose accumulated by microalgae grown with CO2 [112]. At present, the Calvin-Benson cycle has been reconstructed in E. coli [113] and Pichia pastoris [114, 115] to use CO2 as the only carbon source. Based on the carbon metabolism network and carbon loss advantages of C. glutamicum, it is expected that the use of CO2 for biological manufacturing by C. glutamicum will be a feasible research direction soon.
Challenges and prospects
C. glutamicum provides a flexible protein production technology platform with a relatively complete display, transport, metabolism, and secretion systems. In addition, many techniques for producing chemicals using sustainable biomass raw materials have been reported through the surface display system of C. glutamicum. This shows that the development of the display system will expand the potential applications of surface engineering microorganisms to industrial applications. Using biotechnology, exhibiting and using extracellular enzymes to engineer C. glutamicum as a cell refinery in the future is ideal, but challenging. To realize the potential of C. glutamicum in cell refineries in the future, it is necessary to further optimize the display system of C. glutamicum, including the following aspects: (1)The display system of Corynebacterium requires optimization to improve the efficiency. Bacterial protein displays have not been widely used in industrial environments, partly because it limits the number and stability of display proteins [116]. (2) Improve the expression level of foreign proteins, optimize the transportation and coordination of carbon metabolism and nitrogen metabolism network. The low production efficiency of the recombinant protein of C. glutamicum is an urgent problem to be solved in the biorefinery of C. glutamicum. The metabolic burden is a phenomenon known in heterologous expression systems. It is due to the overexpression of foreign proteins occupying a large part of the intracellular nutrient flux, which affects the balance of cell metabolism [49]. (3) Improve the study of metabolic regulation mechanisms. C. glutamicum still lacks an in-depth understanding of the basic regulatory principles for the synthesis of central metabolic enzymes under different environmental conditions and their effects on cell growth [117]. In recent years, research on the catalysis and regulation mechanism [118–121] and resistance of aromatic compounds [122], genome simplification, optimization of gene editing tools [123, 124], and research on ribosomal switches [125] and biosensors [126] have gradually increased. With the developments in metabolic engineering, systems biology, and synthetic biology, C. glutamicum will hopefully become a promising and advantageous biorefinery factory.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Authors' contributions
SZ and KL conceived and designed the manuscript. KL wrote the manuscript. SH revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Funding
This study was funded by Tianjin Synthetic Biotechnology Innovation Capacity Improvement Project (TSBICIP-KJGG-005) and the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFA0901700).
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Goldemberg J. Ethanol for a sustainable energy future. Science. 2007;315:808–810. doi: 10.1126/science.1137013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hoffert MI, Caldeira K, Benford G, Criswell DR, Green C, Herzog H, et al. Advanced technology paths to global climate stability: energy for a greenhouse planet. Science. 2002;298:981–987. doi: 10.1126/science.1072357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wilbanks TJ, Fernandez SJ. Climate change and infrastructure, urban systems, and vulnerabilities: Technical Report for the U.S. Department of Energy in Support of the National Climate Assessment. Washington: Island Press; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Torres Manno MA, Pizarro MD, Prunello M, Magni C, Daurelio LD, Espariz M. GeM-Pro: a tool for genome functional mining and microbial profiling. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019 doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-09648-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Castilla-Archilla J, O’Flaherty V, Lens PNL. Biorefineries: Industrial Innovation and Tendencies. In: Bastidas-Oyanedel J-R, Schmidt JE, editors. Biorefinery: Integrated sustainable processes for biomass conversion to biomaterials, biofuels, and fertilizers /Juan-Rodrigo Bastidas-Oyanedel, Jens Ejbye Schmidt, editors. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2019. p. 3–35. 10.1007/978-3-030-10961-5_1.
- 6.de Jong E, Higson A, Walsh P, Wellisch M. Task 42 Biobased Chemicals - Value Added Products from Biorefineries. Available from: http://www.qibebt.ac.cn/xwzx/kydt/201202/P020120223409482956847.pdf\nhttp://www.ieabioenergy.com/publications/bio-based-chemicals-value-added-products-from-biorefineries/
- 7.Liu Z, Wang K, Chen Y, Tan T, Nielsen J. Third-generation biorefineries as the means to produce fuels and chemicals from CO 2. Nat Catal. 2020;3:274–288. doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0421-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hossain GS, Liu L, Du GC. Industrial Bioprocesses and the Biorefinery Concept. In: Larroche C, Sanroman MA, Du G, Pandey A, editors. Current developments in biotechnology and bioengineering: Bioprocesses, bioreactors and controls / edited by Christian Larroche, M. Angeles Sanroman, Guocheng Du, Ashok Pandey. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2016. p. 3–27. 10.1016/B978-0-444-63663-8.00001-X.
- 9.Liu Z, Wang K, Chen Y, Tan T, Nielsen J. Third-generation biorefineries as the means to produce fuels and chemicals from CO2. Nat Catal. 2020;3:274–288. doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0421-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Moncada J, Cardona CA, Rincón LE. Design and analysis of a second and third generation biorefinery: the case of castorbean and microalgae. Bioresour Technol. 2015;198:836–843. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.09.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kamm B, Gruber PR, Kamm M. Biorefineries-industrial processes and products. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Arnone JT. Genomic considerations for the modification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for biofuel and metabolite biosynthesis. Microorganisms. 2020 doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8030321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Liu X, Yang Y, Zhang W, Sun Y, Peng F, Jeffrey L, et al. Expression of recombinant protein using Corynebacterium glutamicum: progress, challenges and applications. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016;36:652–664. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2015.1004519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Burkovski A. Corynebacteria: Genomics and molecular biology. Wymondham: Caister Academic; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Baritugo KAG, Kim HT, David YC, Choi JH, Choi J, Kim TW, et al. Recent advances in metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum as a potential platform microorganism for biorefinery. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref. 2018;12:899–925. doi: 10.1002/bbb.1895. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kogure T, Inui M. Recent advances in metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for bioproduction of value-added aromatic chemicals and natural products. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:8685–8705. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9289-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Conrady M, Lemoine A, Limberg MH, Oldiges M, Neubauer P, Junne S. Carboxylic acid consumption and production by Corynebacterium glutamicum. Biotechnol Prog. 2019;35:e2804. doi: 10.1002/btpr.2804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chen C, Pan J, Yang X, Xiao H, Zhang Y, Si M, et al. Global transcriptomic analysis of the response of Corynebacterium glutamicum to ferulic acid. Arch Microbiol. 2017;199:325–334. doi: 10.1007/s00203-016-1306-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Choi JW, Jeon EJ, Jeong KJ. Recent advances in engineering Corynebacterium glutamicum for utilization of hemicellulosic biomass. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2019;57:17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2018.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kitade Y, Hiraga K, Inui M. Aromatic compound catabolism in Corynebacterium glutamicum. In: Corynebacterium glutamicum: Springer. 10.1007/978-3-030-39267-3_11.
- 21.Vertès AA, Inui M, Yukawa H. Postgenomic approaches to using corynebacteria as biocatalysts. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2012;66:521–550. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-010312-105506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yang J, Yang S. Comparative analysis of Corynebacterium glutamicum genomes: a new perspective for the industrial production of amino acids. BMC Genomics. 2017;18:940. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-3255-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Andriiash GS, Sekan OS, Tigunova OO, Blume YB, Shulga SM. Metabolic engineering of lysine producing Corynebacterium glutamicum strains. Cytol Genet. 2020;54:137–146. doi: 10.3103/S0095452720020024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kobayashi S, Kawaguchi H, Shirai T, Ninomiya K, Takahashi K, Kondo A, Tsuge Y. Automatic redirection of carbon flux between glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathway using an oxygen-responsive metabolic switch in Corynebacterium glutamicum. ACS Synth Biol. 2020;9:814–826. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.9b00493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kallscheuer N, Kage H, Milke L, Nett M, Marienhagen J. Microbial synthesis of the type I polyketide 6-methylsalicylate with Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103:9619–9631. doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-10121-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wieschalka S, Blombach B, Eikmanns BJ. Engineering Corynebacterium glutamicum for the production of pyruvate. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;94:449–459. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3843-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Milke L, Kallscheuer N, Kappelmann J, Marienhagen J. Tailoring Corynebacterium glutamicum towards increased malonyl-CoA availability for efficient synthesis of the plant pentaketide noreugenin. Microb Cell Fact. 2019;18:71. doi: 10.1186/s12934-019-1117-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lee SY, Kim HU, Chae TU, Cho JS, Kim JW, Shin JH, et al. A comprehensive metabolic map for production of bio-based chemicals. Nat Catal. 2019;2:18–33. doi: 10.1038/s41929-018-0212-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pérez-García F, Wendisch VF. Transport and metabolic engineering of the cell factory Corynebacterium glutamicum. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2018 doi: 10.1093/femsle/fny166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lee J-Y, Na Y-A, Kim E, Lee H-S, Kim P. The actinobacterium Corynebacterium glutamicum, an industrial workhorse. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;26:807–822. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1601.01053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kitade Y, Hashimoto R, Suda M, Hiraga K, Inui M. Production of 4-hydroxybenzoic acid by an aerobic growth-arrested bioprocess using metabolically engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 doi: 10.1128/AEM.02587-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Milke L, Ferreira P, Kallscheuer N, Braga A, Vogt M, Kappelmann J, et al. Modulation of the central carbon metabolism of Corynebacterium glutamicum improves malonyl-CoA availability and increases plant polyphenol synthesis. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2019;116:1380–1391. doi: 10.1002/bit.26939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kallscheuer N, Marienhagen J. Produktion pflanzlicher Polyphenole mit Corynebacterium glutamicum. BIOspektrum. 2017;23:344–346. doi: 10.1007/s12268-017-0804-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kallscheuer N, Vogt M, Bott M, Marienhagen J. Functional expression of plant-derived O-methyltransferase, flavanone 3-hydroxylase, and flavonol synthase in Corynebacterium glutamicum for production of pterostilbene, kaempferol, and quercetin. J Biotechnol. 2017;258:190–196. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.An SJ, Yim SS, Jeong KJ. Development of a secretion system for the production of heterologous proteins in Corynebacterium glutamicum using the Porin B signal peptide. Protein Expr Purif. 2013;89:251–257. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2013.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yim SS, An SJ, Choi JW, Ryu AJ, Jeong KJ. High-level secretory production of recombinant single-chain variable fragment (scFv) in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;98:273–284. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5315-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Matsuda Y, Itaya H, Kitahara Y, Theresia NM, Kutukova EA, Yomantas YAV, et al. Double mutation of cell wall proteins CspB and PBP1a increases secretion of the antibody Fab fragment from Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb Cell Fact. 2014;13:56. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-13-56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tateno T, Fukuda H, Kondo A. Direct production of L-lysine from raw corn starch by Corynebacterium glutamicum secreting Streptococcus bovis alpha-amylase using cspB promoter and signal sequence. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;77:533–541. doi: 10.1007/s00253-007-1191-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Choi JW, Yim SS, Jeong KJ. Development of a potential protein display platform in Corynebacterium glutamicum using mycolic acid layer protein, NCgl1337, as an anchoring motif. Biotechnol J. 2018 doi: 10.1002/biot.201700509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tateno T, Hatada K, Tanaka T, Fukuda H, Kondo A. Development of novel cell surface display in Corynebacterium glutamicum using porin. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;84:733–739. doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-2021-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yao W, Chu C, Deng X, Zhang Y, Liu M, Zheng P, Sun Z. Display of alpha-amylase on the surface of Corynebacterium glutamicum cells by using NCgl1221 as the anchoring protein, and production of glutamate from starch. Arch Microbiol. 2009;191:751–759. doi: 10.1007/s00203-009-0506-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tateno T, Fukuda H, Kondo A. Production of L-Lysine from starch by Corynebacterium glutamicum displaying alpha-amylase on its cell surface. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;74:1213–1220. doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0766-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Muñoz-Gutiérrez I, Oropeza R, Gosset G, Martinez A. Cell surface display of a β-glucosidase employing the type V secretion system on ethanologenic Escherichia coli for the fermentation of cellobiose to ethanol. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;39:1141–1152. doi: 10.1007/s10295-012-1122-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Adachi N, Takahashi C, Ono-Murota N, Yamaguchi R, Tanaka T, Kondo A. Direct L-lysine production from cellobiose by Corynebacterium glutamicum displaying beta-glucosidase on its cell surface. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:7165–7172. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5009-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Tanaka T, Kondo A. Cell surface engineering of industrial microorganisms for biorefining applications. Biotechnol Adv. 2015;33:1403–1411. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yamakawa S, Yamada R, Tanaka T, Ogino C, Kondo A. Repeated fermentation from raw starch using Saccharomyces cerevisiae displaying both glucoamylase and α-amylase. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2012;50:343–347. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2012.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Song Y, Matsumoto K, Tanaka T, Kondo A, Taguchi S. Single-step production of polyhydroxybutyrate from starch by using α-amylase cell-surface displaying system of Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Biosci Bioeng. 2013;115:12–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2012.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Liu W, Zhao H, Jia B, Xu L, Yan Y. Surface display of active lipase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using Cwp2 as an anchor protein. Biotech Lett. 2010;32:255–260. doi: 10.1007/s10529-009-0138-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Schüürmann J, Quehl P, Festel G, Jose J. Bacterial whole-cell biocatalysts by surface display of enzymes: toward industrial application. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98:8031–8046. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-5897-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wu CH, Mulchandani A, Chen W. Versatile microbial surface-display for environmental remediation and biofuels production. Trends Microbiol. 2008;16:181–188. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2008.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kondo A, Ueda M. Yeast cell-surface display—applications of molecular display. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;64:28–40. doi: 10.1007/s00253-003-1492-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Han L, Zhao Y, Cui S, Liang B. Redesigning of microbial cell surface and its application to whole-cell biocatalysis and biosensors. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2018;185:396–418. doi: 10.1007/s12010-017-2662-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Cherf GM, Cochran JR. Applications of yeast surface display for protein engineering. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1319:155–175. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2748-7_8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Huc E, Meniche X, Benz R, Bayan N, Ghazi A, Tropis M, Daffé M. O-mycoloylated proteins from Corynebacterium: an unprecedented post-translational modification in bacteria. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:21908–21912. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C110.133033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Inui M, Toyoda K. Corynebacterium glutamicum: Biology and Biotechnology/edited by Masayuki Inui, Koichi Toyoda. 2. Cham: Springer; 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Issa H, Huc-Claustre E, Reddad T, Bonadé Bottino N, Tropis M, Houssin C, et al. Click-chemistry approach to study mycoloylated proteins: Evidence for PorB and PorC porins mycoloylation in Corynebacterium glutamicum. PLoS ONE. 2017 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Nakayama Y, Hashimoto K-I, Kawasaki H, Martinac B. “Force-From-Lipids” mechanosensation in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Biophys Rev. 2019;11:327–333. doi: 10.1007/s12551-019-00524-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Anusree M, Wendisch VF, Nampoothiri KM. Co-expression of endoglucanase and β-glucosidase in Corynebacterium glutamicum DM1729 towards direct lysine fermentation from cellulose. Bioresour Technol. 2016;213:239–244. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kim SJ, Hyeon JE, Jeon SD, Choi G, Han SO. Bi-functional cellulases complexes displayed on the cell surface of Corynebacterium glutamicum increase hydrolysis of lignocelluloses at elevated temperature. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2014;66:67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2014.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Elbourne LDH, Tetu SG, Hassan KA, Paulsen IT. TransportDB 2.0: a database for exploring membrane transporters in sequenced genomes from all domains of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Eggeling L, Bott M, editors. Handbook of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Mori M, Shiio I. Pyruvate formation and sugar metabolism in an amino acid-producing bacterium Brevibacterium flavum. Agric Biol Chem. 1987;51:129–138. doi: 10.1080/00021369.1987.10868003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kuhlmann N, Petrov DP, Henrich AW, Lindner SN, Wendisch VF, Seibold GM. Transcription of malP is subject to phosphotransferase system-dependent regulation in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microbiology. 2015;161:1830–1843. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Martins GB, Giacomelli G, Goldbeck O, Seibold GM, Bramkamp M. Substrate-dependent cluster density dynamics of Corynebacterium glutamicum phosphotransferase system permeases. Mol Microbiol. 2019;111:1335–1354. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ikeda M. Sugar transport systems in Corynebacterium glutamicum: features and applications to strain development. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;96:1191–1200. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4488-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Parche S, Burkovski A, Sprenger GA, Weil B, Krämer R, Titgemeyer F. Corynebacterium glutamicum: a dissection of the PTS. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;3:423–428. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ikeda M, Mizuno Y, Awane S, Hayashi M, Mitsuhashi S, Takeno S. Identification and application of a different glucose uptake system that functions as an alternative to the phosphotransferase system in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;90:1443–1451. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3210-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Phale PS, Malhotra H, Shah BA. Degradation strategies and associated regulatory mechanisms/features for aromatic compound metabolism in bacteria. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2020;112:1–65. doi: 10.1016/bs.aambs.2020.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Shen X-H, Zhou N-Y, Liu S-J. Degradation and assimilation of aromatic compounds by Corynebacterium glutamicum: Another potential for applications for this bacterium? Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;95:77–89. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4139-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Seibold G, Auchter M, Berens S, Kalinowski J, Eikmanns BJ. Utilization of soluble starch by a recombinant Corynebacterium glutamicum strain: growth and lysine production. J Biotechnol. 2006;124:381–391. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Liu Q, Ouyang S-P, Kim J, Chen G-Q. The impact of PHB accumulation on L-glutamate production by recombinant Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Biotechnol. 2007;132:273–279. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Tateno T, Okada Y, Tsuchidate T, Tanaka T, Fukuda H, Kondo A. Direct production of cadaverine from soluble starch using Corynebacterium glutamicum coexpressing alpha-amylase and lysine decarboxylase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;82:115–121. doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1751-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Tsuge Y, Tateno T, Sasaki K, Hasunuma T, Tanaka T, Kondo A. Direct production of organic acids from starch by cell surface-engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum in anaerobic conditions. AMB Express. 2013;3:72. doi: 10.1186/2191-0855-3-72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Nguyen Q, Bowyer J, Howe J, Bratkovich S, Groot H, Pepke E, Fernholz K (2017) Global production of second generation biofuels: Trends and influences. Dovetail Partners Inc.
- 75.Naik SN, Goud VV, Rout PK, Dalai AK. Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2010;14:578–597. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Isikgor FH, Becer CR. Lignocellulosic biomass: a sustainable platform for the production of bio-based chemicals and polymers. Polym Chem. 2015;6:4497–4559. doi: 10.1039/C5PY00263J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Kaloudas D, Pavlova N, Penchovsky R. Lignocellulose, algal biomass, biofuels and biohydrogen: a review. Environ Chem Lett. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s10311-021-01213-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Aristidou A, Pentilla M. Metabolic engineering applications to renewable resource utilization. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2000;11:187–198. doi: 10.1016/S0958-1669(00)00085-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Peters D. Carbohydrates for fermentation. Biotechnol J. 2006;1:806–814. doi: 10.1002/biot.200600041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Sasaki M, Jojima T, Inui M, Yukawa H. Simultaneous utilization of D-cellobiose, D-glucose, and D-xylose by recombinant Corynebacterium glutamicum under oxygen-deprived conditions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;81:691–699. doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1703-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Matsuura R, Kishida M, Konishi R, Hirata Y, Adachi N, Segawa S, et al. Metabolic engineering to improve 1,5-diaminopentane production from cellobiose using β-glucosidase-secreting Corynebacterium glutamicum. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2019;116:2640–2651. doi: 10.1002/bit.27082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Santos AS, Ramos RT, Silva A, Hirata R, Mattos-Guaraldi AL, Meyer R, et al. Searching whole genome sequences for biochemical identification features of emerging and reemerging pathogenic Corynebacterium species. Funct Integr Genomics. 2018;18:593–610. doi: 10.1007/s10142-018-0610-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Barrett E, Stanton C, Zelder O, Fitzgerald G, Ross RP. Heterologous expression of lactose- and galactose-utilizing pathways from lactic acid bacteria in Corynebacterium glutamicum for production of lysine in whey. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:2861–2866. doi: 10.1128/aem.70.5.2861-2866.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Brüsseler C, Radek A, Tenhaef N, Krumbach K, Noack S, Marienhagen J. The myo-inositol/proton symporter IolT1 contributes to d-xylose uptake in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Bioresour Technol. 2018;249:953–961. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Yim SS, Choi JW, Lee SH, Jeong KJ. Modular optimization of a hemicellulose-utilizing pathway in Corynebacterium glutamicum for consolidated bioprocessing of hemicellulosic biomass. ACS Synth Biol. 2016;5:334–343. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.5b00228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Chen Z, Huang J, Wu Y, Wu W, Zhang Y, Liu D. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for the production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid from glucose and xylose. Metab Eng. 2017;39:151–158. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2016.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Kawaguchi H, Vertès AA, Okino S, Inui M, Yukawa H. Engineering of a xylose metabolic pathway in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:3418–3428. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.5.3418-3428.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Zhang B, Jiang Y, Li Z, Wang F, Wu X-Y. Recent progress on chemical production from non-food renewable feedstocks using Corynebacterium glutamicum. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:606047. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.606047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Mindt M, Heuser M, Wendisch VF. Xylose as preferred substrate for sarcosine production by recombinant Corynebacterium glutamicum. Bioresour Technol. 2019;281:135–142. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Becker J, Wittmann C. A field of dreams: Lignin valorization into chemicals, materials, fuels, and health-care products. Biotechnol Adv. 2019;37:107360. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Wendisch VF, Jorge JMP, Pérez-García F, Sgobba E. Updates on industrial production of amino acids using Corynebacterium glutamicum. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;32:105. doi: 10.1007/s11274-016-2060-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Becker J, Kuhl M, Kohlstedt M, Starck S, Wittmann C. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for the production of cis, cis-muconic acid from lignin. Microb Cell Fact. 2018;17:115. doi: 10.1186/s12934-018-0963-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Kallscheuer N, Marienhagen J. Corynebacterium glutamicum as platform for the production of hydroxybenzoic acids. Microb Cell Fact. 2018;17:1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12934-018-0923-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Kallscheuer N, Vogt M, Stenzel A, Gätgens J, Bott M, Marienhagen J. Construction of a Corynebacterium glutamicum platform strain for the production of stilbenes and (2S)-flavanones. Metab Eng. 2016;38:47–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2016.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Lanéelle M-A, Tropis M, Daffé M. Current knowledge on mycolic acids in Corynebacterium glutamicum and their relevance for biotechnological processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:9923–9930. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5265-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Kallscheuer N, Vogt M, Kappelmann J, Krumbach K, Noack S, Bott M, Marienhagen J. Identification of the phd gene cluster responsible for phenylpropanoid utilization in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100:1871–1881. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-7165-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Merkens H, Beckers G, Wirtz A, Burkovski A. Vanillate Metabolism in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Curr Microbiol. 2005;51:59–65. doi: 10.1007/s00284-005-4531-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Huang Y, Zhao K, Shen X-H, Jiang C-Y, Liu S-J. Genetic and biochemical characterization of a 4-hydroxybenzoate hydroxylase from Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;78:75–83. doi: 10.1007/s00253-007-1286-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Ding W, Si M, Zhang W, Zhang Y, Chen C, Zhang L, et al. Functional characterization of a vanillin dehydrogenase in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8044. doi: 10.1038/srep08044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Du L, Ma L, Qi F, Zheng X, Jiang C, Li A, et al. Characterization of a unique pathway for 4-cresol catabolism initiated by phosphorylation in Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:6583–6594. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.695320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Shen X, Liu S. Key enzymes of the protocatechuate branch of the β-ketoadipate pathway for aromatic degradation inCorynebacterium glutamicum. Sci China, Ser C Life Sci. 2005;48:241–249. doi: 10.1007/BF03183617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Chen Z, Wang Y, Cheng Y, Wang X, Tong S, Yang H, Wang Z. Efficient biodegradation of highly crystallized polyethylene terephthalate through cell surface display of bacterial PETase. Sci Total Environ. 2020;709:136138. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Ding J, Zhou Y, Wang C, Peng Z, Mu Y, Tang X, Huang Z. Development of a whole-cell biocatalyst for diisobutyl phthalate degradation by functional display of a carboxylesterase on the surface of Escherichia coli. Microb Cell Fact. 2020 doi: 10.1186/s12934-020-01373-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Carniel A, Valoni É, Nicomedes J, Gomes ADC, Castro AMD. Lipase from Candida antarctica (CALB) and cutinase from Humicola insolens act synergistically for PET hydrolysis to terephthalic acid. Process Biochem. 2017;59:84–90. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2016.07.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Lykidis A, Chen C-L, Tringe SG, McHardy AC, Copeland A, Kyrpides NC, et al. Multiple syntrophic interactions in a terephthalate-degrading methanogenic consortium. ISME J. 2011;5:122–130. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Wu J-H, Wu F-Y, Chuang H-P, Chen W-Y, Huang H-J, Chen S-H, Liu W-T. Community and proteomic analysis of methanogenic consortia degrading terephthalate. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:105–112. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02327-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Nybo SE, Khan NE, Woolston BM, Curtis WR. Metabolic engineering in chemolithoautotrophic hosts for the production of fuels and chemicals. Metab Eng. 2015;30:105–120. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Pardo I, Jha RK, Bermel RE, Bratti F, Gaddis M, McIntyre E, et al. Gene amplification, laboratory evolution, and biosensor screening reveal MucK as a terephthalic acid transporter in Acinetobacter baylyi ADP1. Metab Eng. 2020;62:260–274. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2020.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Kim HT, Kim JK, Cha HG, Kang MJ, Lee HS, Khang TU, et al. Biological valorization of poly(ethylene terephthalate) monomers for upcycling waste PET. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2019;7:19396–19406. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b03908. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Peralta-Yahya PP, Zhang F, del Cardayre SB, Keasling JD. Microbial engineering for the production of advanced biofuels. Nature. 2012;488:320–328. doi: 10.1038/nature11478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Koo BI, Choi JW, Song SY, Choi YH, Lee TY, Kim S-H, et al. Robust biocatalysts displayed on crystalline protein-layered cells for efficient and sustainable hydration of carbon dioxide. Adv Funct Mater. 2021 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202102497. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Lee J, Sim SJ, Bott M, Um Y, Oh M-K, Woo HM. Succinate production from CO2-grown microalgal biomass as carbon source using engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum through consolidated bioprocessing. Sci Rep. 2014;4:5819. doi: 10.1038/srep05819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Antonovsky N, Gleizer S, Noor E, Zohar Y, Herz E, Barenholz U, et al. Sugar synthesis from CO2 in Escherichia coli. Cell. 2016;166:115–125. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Gassler T, Sauer M, Gasser B, Egermeier M, Troyer C, Causon T, et al. The industrial yeast Pichia pastoris is converted from a heterotroph into an autotroph capable of growth on CO2. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:210–216. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0363-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Gassler T, Sauer M, Gasser B, et al (2019) A synthetic Calvin cycle enables autotrophic growth in yeast. bioRxiv, 2019: 862599. 10.1101/862599
- 116.Grace LH. Bacillus subtilis as a candidate for consolidated bioprocessing: microbial cell wall engineering for the display of heterologous proteins. Los Angeles: University of California; 2017. p. 240. [Google Scholar]
- 117.Noack S, Voges R, Gätgens J, Wiechert W. The linkage between nutrient supply, intracellular enzyme abundances and bacterial growth: New evidences from the central carbon metabolism of Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Biotechnol. 2017;258:13–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.06.407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Aleshintsev A, Eppinger E, Gröning JAD, Stolz A, Gupta R. Substrate promiscuity and active site differences in gentisate 1,2-dioxygenases: electron paramagnetic resonance study. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2019;24:287–296. doi: 10.1007/s00775-019-01646-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Cai C, Nie Y, Gong Y, Li S, Ramelot TA, Kennedy MA, et al. Solution NMR structure of CGL2373, a polyketide cyclase-like protein from Corynebacterium glutamicum. Proteins. 2020;88:237–241. doi: 10.1002/prot.25771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Milke L, Mutz M, Marienhagen J. Synthesis of the character impact compound raspberry ketone and additional flavoring phenylbutanoids of biotechnological interest with Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb Cell Fact. 2020;19:92. doi: 10.1186/s12934-020-01351-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Burschowsky D, Thorbjørnsrud HV, Heim JB, Fahrig-Kamarauskaitė JR, Würth-Roderer K, Kast P, Krengel U. Inter-Enzyme allosteric regulation of chorismate mutase in Corynebacterium glutamicum: structural basis of feedback activation by Trp. Biochemistry. 2018;57:557–573. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b01018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Si M, Chen C, Wei Z, Gong Z, Li G, Yao S. CarR, a MarR-family regulator from Corynebacterium glutamicum, modulated antibiotic and aromatic compound resistance. Biochem J. 2019;476:3141–3159. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20190320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Wang Yu, Cheng H, Liu Y, Liu Ye, Wen X, Zhang K, et al. In-situ generation of large numbers of genetic combinations for metabolic reprogramming via CRISPR-guided base editing. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21003-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Yang Y, Liu G, Chen X, Liu M, Zhan C, Liu X, Bai Z. High efficiency CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system with an eliminable episomal sgRNA plasmid in Pichia pastoris. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2020.109556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Kent R, Dixon N. Systematic evaluation of genetic and environmental factors affecting performance of translational riboswitches. ACS Synth Biol. 2019;8:884–901. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.9b00017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Jurischka S, Bida A, Dohmen-Olma D, Kleine B, Potzkei J, Binder S, et al. A secretion biosensor for monitoring Sec-dependent protein export in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb Cell Fact. 2020;19:11. doi: 10.1186/s12934-019-1273-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Imao K, Konishi R, Kishida M, Hirata Y, Segawa S, Adachi N, et al (2017) 1,5-Diaminopentane production from xylooligosaccharides using metabolically engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum displaying beta-xylosidase on the cell surface. Bioresour Technol 245 1684 1691 [DOI] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.


