Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2022 Jan 28;11:e68000. doi: 10.7554/eLife.68000

Characterization of the neurogenic niche in the aging dentate gyrus using iterative immunofluorescence imaging

John Darby Cole 1, Jacobo Sarabia del Castillo 2, Gabriele Gut 2, Daniel Gonzalez-Bohorquez 1, Lucas Pelkmans 2, Sebastian Jessberger 1,
Editors: D Nora Abrous3, Marianne E Bronner4
PMCID: PMC8798039  PMID: 35089129

Abstract

Advancing age causes reduced hippocampal neurogenesis, associated with age-related cognitive decline. The spatial relationship of age-induced alterations in neural stem cells (NSCs) and surrounding cells within the hippocampal niche remains poorly understood due to limitations of antibody-based cellular phenotyping. We established iterative indirect immunofluorescence imaging (4i) in tissue sections, allowing for simultaneous detection of 18 proteins to characterize NSCs and surrounding cells in 2-, 6-, and 12-month-old mice. We show that reorganization of the dentate gyrus (DG) niche already occurs in middle-aged mice, paralleling the decline in neurogenesis. 4i-based tissue analysis of the DG identifies changes in cell-type contributions to the blood-brain barrier and microenvironments surrounding NSCs to play a pivotal role to preserve neurogenic permissiveness. The data provided represent a resource to characterize the principles causing alterations of stem cell-associated plasticity within the aging DG and provide a blueprint to analyze somatic stem cell niches across lifespan in complex tissues.

Research organism: Human, Mouse

Introduction

Somatic stem cells divide throughout life to generate progeny that is required for tissue homeostasis and repair (Fuchs and Segre, 2000). With advancing age, there is a decline in stem cell numbers, output, and function, which has been associated to altered organ integrity and reduced tissue repair in aging mammals (Ermolaeva et al., 2018). In addition to age-dependent, cell-intrinsic alterations causing reduced functionality of somatic stem cells, there is ample evidence that changes in the surrounding stem cell niche contribute to age-related stem cell phenotypes (Morrison and Spradling, 2008; Dulken et al., 2019; Navarro Negredo et al., 2020). However, the exact spatial relationships between altered niche cells and somatic stem cells remain incompletely understood, likely because conventional immunohistochemical approaches only allow for the simultaneous detection of few proteins. Further, conventional RNA sequencing approaches or proteome analyses do not allow for the recovery of spatial information within complex tissues. Thus, recent work aimed to overcome these limitations, for example by the development of spatial transcriptomics, multiplexed protein detection, and mass-spectrometry based approaches allowing for the detection of dozens of proteins with cellular resolution (Giesen et al., 2014; Ståhl et al., 2016; Schapiro et al., 2017; Lin et al., 2018; Schulz et al., 2018; Burgess, 2019; Moncada et al., 2020). Based on these technological innovations major advances have been achieved characterizing the cellular organization and complexity of mouse and human tissues in health and disease (Decalf et al., 2019; Wagner et al., 2019). However, these approaches largely miss three-dimensional (3D) information in tissues and require highly specialized equipment and/or customized or conjugated antibodies, reducing their availability. We recently developed the 4i (iterative indirect immunofluorescence imaging) technology, which allows for the detection of >40 individual proteins or protein states using conventional primary and secondary antibodies and mild conditions of antibody elution by preventing photo-induced crosslinking during imaging, thereby preserving sample integrity and achieving high reproducibility at very high spatial resolution across many cycles (Gut et al., 2018). Since 4i was originally established for monolayers of cultured cells, we here developed a robust protocol to apply 4i to histological tissue sections to characterize the aging dentate gyrus (DG) niche of the mouse hippocampus, one of the brain areas where neural stem cells (NSCs) generate new neurons throughout life (Gage, 2019). Advancing age has been associated with strongly reduced NSC activity and diminished neuronal output, which is due to cell-intrinsic, niche-dependent, and humoral mechanisms (Villeda et al., 2011; Moore et al., 2015; Boldrini et al., 2018; Kalamakis et al., 2019; Moreno-Jiménez et al., 2019; Tobin et al., 2019; Denoth-Lippuner and Jessberger, 2021). Using 4i, we show that the cellular reorganization of the DG niche occurs relatively early in life and identify substantial alterations in contact sites between NSCs and the vasculature, and niche-associated changes that are paralleled with a decline in neurogenesis. The data presented here characterize age-related changes in the DG niche and provide a blueprint for the analyses of a substantial number of proteins in single cells and their surrounding niche within complex tissues.

Results

Iterative 4i immunostaining in complex mouse and human tissues

To achieve multiple rounds of 4i on tissue, sections needed to be adequately mounted to minimize loss of samples through detachment without affecting antigenicity. Coating the glass-bottomed well-plates with poly-d-lysine (PDL) was effective to preserve tissue adhesion across multiple cycles of 4i in sections of 3-month-old adult mouse brain (Figure 1A), human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-derived regionalized forebrain organoids (Figure 1B), and embryonic day 14.5 (E14.5) mouse brain (Figure 1C). Thus, using this approach, sequential rounds of conventional antibody stainings in mouse and human tissues becomes achievable (Figure 1A–C, for details of used antibodies refer to the legend of Figure 1). Notably, 4i in tissue sections allows for 3D reconstruction of tissue volumes, facilitating detailed spatial analyses throughout tissue sections (Figure 1D), showcased using antibodies against IBA1-labeled microglia, Nestin- and GFAP-labeled NSC processes, DCX-expressing immature neurons, LaminB1-expressing cells, and CollagenIV-labeled vasculature (Figure 1D). To assess potential effects of cyclic staining and repeated elutions on sample antigenicity, adult brain sections were stained with the 18 antibodies used in the present study, imaged, and subsequently subjected to six rounds of elution prior to restaining. Measured fluorescence intensities between the stainings before and after rounds of elution were strongly correlated (Figure 1E and Figure 1—figure supplement 1), indicating that antigenicity is preserved across repeated cycles of iterative immunostainings for most of the antibodies that we used in tissue sections, similar to the high reproducibility that 4i achieves in cultured cells (Gut et al., 2018). Significant correlation was not achieved for the stem cell marker ID4 and MT3+ cells were poorly correlated between rounds. While staining was impaired for ID4, the quality was improved for MT3, suggesting the elution step may have some efficacy for antigen retrieval.

Figure 1. Iterative immunostaining in mouse and human tissue sections.

(A) Shown is an adult mouse dorsal hippocampal section labeled with 11 antibodies, as indicated in the individual panels, acquired over five rounds of 4i. SOX2/ID4/HOPX astrocytes/NSCs; KI67, proliferation; NeuroD1/DCX, immature neurons; Parvalbumin, interneurons; S100β, astrocytes; NG2, oligodendroglia; IBA1, microglia; and CD13, pericytes. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (B) An hESC-derived, forebrain organoid section fixed at day 40 in vitro and labeled with eight antibodies, as indicated in the individual panels, over four rounds of 4i. SOX2/Nestin, apical progenitors; KI67, proliferation; TBR2, basal progenitors; DCX, immature neurons; cCaspase3, apoptotic cells; and TBR1/TUJ1, neurons. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (C) Shown is a cortical section from an E14.5 mouse embryo labeled with eight antibodies, as indicated in the individual panels, over four rounds of 4i. Phopho-Vimentin, intermediate filaments; IBA1, microglia; SOX2/Nestin, astrocytes/NSCs; TBR2, basal progenitors; CTIP2, neurons; and DCX/TUJ1, immature neurons. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (D) 3D reconstruction of a region in the dorsal DG analyzed with antibodies as indicated, with an arrow highlighting a Nestin+/GFAP+ R cell radial process indicating the spatial fidelity of 4i across cycles. (E) Examples of HOPX, IBA1, and SOX2 labeling in adult mouse brain sections, with proof of elution efficacy and restaining quality. The normalized fluorescent intensities for each stain were correlated between rounds. For details of statistics please refer to Supplementary file 1. Scale bars represent 200 µm (A), 100 µm (B, C), 25 µm (D), and 50 μm (E). 4i, immunofluorescence imaging; DG, dentate gyrus; hESC, human embryonic stem cell.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Examples of used antibody labeling in adult mouse brain sections, with proof of elution efficacy and restaining quality.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

The normalized fluorescent intensities for each stain were correlated between rounds. For details of statistics please refer to Supplementary file 1. Scale bars represent 50 μm.

Cellular alterations in the DG niche with advancing age

After establishing a robust protocol for iterative immunostainings in complex tissues, we used 4i to analyze age-associated cellular and molecular alterations in the DG of the hippocampal formation. NSCs generate new neurons throughout life in the DG. However, hippocampal neurogenesis is significantly decreasing during adulthood (Ben Abdallah et al., 2010; Denoth-Lippuner and Jessberger, 2021). To test for 4i’s ability to identify age-related changes within the DG, a panel of commonly used antibodies was applied iteratively on the exact same sections to visualize a number of diverse cell types in 2-, 6-, and 12-month-old brain sections: ‘Stem cells’ were visualized using HOPX, Nestin, GFAP, SOX2, ID4, MT3, and LaminB1; ‘Proliferation’ was assessed using pH3 and KI67, ‘Neurons’ were labeled with DCX, PV, ARC (i.e., expressed after plasticity-inducing activity), and LaminB1, ‘Glial cells’ were stained for NG2, OLIG2, IBA1, S100β, and GFAP, ‘Vasculature’ was analyzed with CD13 and Collagen IV (Figure 2A–D and Figure 2—figure supplements 14; Ben Abdallah et al., 2010; Denoth-Lippuner and Jessberger, 2021). Radial glia-like stem cells (R, also referred to as type 1 cells) were phenotyped based on the combinatorial expression of HOPX, SOX2, and the extension of a glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) positive radial process (Denoth-Lippuner and Jessberger, 2021). As HOPX, SOX2, and GFAP are also expressed in astrocytes, only cells that were negative for the astrocytic calcium-binding protein S100β, a marker for mature astrocytes, were considered to be R cells. Proliferating non-radial (NR) cells were identified in the subgranular zone (SGZ) by the expression of KI67 and absence of a GFAP-labeled radial process. Immature neurons were classified based on doublecortin (DCX) expression. Antibodies were used in the same order for all age groups analyzed (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B).

Figure 2. Expression of 18 proteins in the DG of mice with different ages.

(A) Images of 18 proteins labeled in the same area of the DG from a 2-month-old mouse. HOPX/Nestin/GFAP/SOX2/ID4/MT3 astrocytes/NSCs; KI67/phospho-Histone 3, proliferation; DCX, immature neurons; ARC, mature neurons; Parvalbumin, interneurons; CD13, pericytes; CollagenIV, vasculature; S100β, astrocytes; IBA1, microglia; OLIG2/NG2, oligodendroglia; and LaminB1, nuclear lamina. (B) shows merged channels for stem cells, proliferation, neurons, vasculature, and glial cells. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (C) Images of 18 proteins labeled in the same area of the DG from a 12-month-old mouse. (D) shows composites grouping markers based on cell type. Note that the same sections were used for Figure 4, highlighting the power of iterative immunostaining using 4i. Scale bars represent 25 μm. DG, dentate gyrus; NSC, neural stem cell.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Expression of 18 proteins in the DG of 6-month-old mice.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

(A) Close-up images of the 18 proteins labeled in the same area of the DG from a 6-month-old mouse with composites grouping markers based on cell type. (B) Combinations used for iterative immunostaining. Scale bar represents 25 μm. DG, dentate gyrus.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2. Overview expression of 18 proteins in the DG of 2-month-old mice.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2.

Overview images of the 18 proteins labeled in the same area of the DG from a 2-month-old mouse with composites grouping markers based on cell type. Scale bar represents 100 µm. DG, dentate gyrus.
Figure 2—figure supplement 3. Overview expression of 18 proteins in the DG of 6-month-old mice.

Figure 2—figure supplement 3.

Overview images of the 18 proteins labeled in the same area of the DG from a 6-month-old mouse with composites grouping markers based on cell type. Scale bar represents 100 µm. DG, dentate gyrus.
Figure 2—figure supplement 4. Overview expression of 18 proteins in the DG of 12-month-old mice.

Figure 2—figure supplement 4.

Overview images of the 18 proteins labeled in the same area of the DG from a 12-month-old mouse with composites grouping markers based on cell type. Scale bar represents 100 µm. DG, dentate gyrus.

Using the whole panel of antibodies, distinct cell types were quantified in the SGZ and normalized to the volume of the DG granule cell layer (GCL) (Figure 3A–C). As expected, the density of R cells was significantly reduced in animals with advancing age (Figure 3A–B; Denoth-Lippuner and Jessberger, 2021). While the total density of proliferating KI67+ cells decreased with advancing age, KI67+ R cells did not change. Additionally, the density of immature neurons, positive for DCX was strongly reduced at 12 months of age (Figure 3A–B).

Figure 3. Age-related dynamics of cell populations in the mouse DG.

(A) Example overviews of the same DGs from 2- and 12-month-old mice showing the neurogenic and glial markers used to phenotype cells in population density measures. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (B) Density analyses of neurogenic cells in the SGZ, defined as the number of R cells. For details of statistics please refer to Supplementary file 1. (C) Density analyses of microglia, OPCs, and astrocytes in the total sampled area of the DG, in the granule cell layer, the molecular layer, and hilus. For details of statistics please refer to Supplementary file 1. Scale bar represents 100 μm. *p<0.05, **p<0.01. DG, dentate gyrus; OPC, oligodendrocyte precursor cell; SGZ, subgranular zone.

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Expression of stem cell and glial cell markers in the DG.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

(A) High-power views of markers for R cells (upper panels, arrowheads) and classical astrocytes (lower panels, arrowhedas). Right lower panel shows merged images with the markers indicated. (B) High-power views of markers for microglial (left panel arrowheads), astroglial (middle panel arrowheads), and oligodendroglial cells (right panel arrowheads). Scale bar represents 25 μm.

In the neurogenic niche, R cells interact with and are regulated by several different cell types that are present within their DG niche (Song et al., 2016; Mosher and Schaffer, 2018). To assess potential changes in the cytoarchitecture of the neurogenic niche, microglia, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes were counted and normalized to the total tissue volume as well as the sub-regions of the DG, the molecular layer (ML), GCL, and hilus. There were no significant differences in IBA1-labeled microglia, or oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs, expressing OLIG2 and NG2) in the DG or within the analyzed DG sub-regions (Figures 2A–B ,3C). However, in animals of advanced age, the numbers of astrocytes, expressing S100β, in the whole DG were reduced (Figure 3A and C).

We next used 4i to analyze the expression levels of selected proteins in the same R cells identified in the quantification of cell density. We focused on HOPX and MT3, which have been identified to be present in R cells and may be related to R cell quiescence (Shin et al., 2015; Berg et al., 2019; Bottes et al., 2021). Supporting previous data suggesting that advancing age is associated with increased R cell quiescence (Kalamakis et al., 2019; Harris et al., 2021), we identified in 12-month-old animals increased fluorescent intensities of HOPX and MT3 (Figure 4A and B). Notably, altered expression of HOPX and MT3 was not observed in classical astrocytes classified via expression of S100β (Figure 4C).

Figure 4. Age-dependent changes of protein expression in the DG.

Figure 4.

(A) Representative images of 2- and 12-month-old DG sections labeled with quiescent markers HOPX and MT3. Arrowheads indicate the same cell across stains. (B) Quantification of the fluorescent intensities of HOPX and MT3 in R cells normalized to background. (C) Quantification of the fluorescent intensities of HOPX and MT3 in astrocytes normalized to background. For details of statistics please refer to Supplementary file 1. (D) Images showing LaminB1 in DGs from 2- and 112-month-old mice with different cell types indicated by arrows. (E) Quantification of the fluorescent intensities normalized to background. For details of statistics please refer to Supplementary file 1. Scale bars represent 25 μm. ****p<0.0001. DG, dentate gyrus.

To further validate the 4i approach on tissue sections, we analyzed age-related expression of LaminB1 (LB1), one of the four intermediate filaments that make up the nuclear lamina, and where reductions with aging and the premature aging phenotype of progeria have been previously described (Burke and Stewart, 2013). Confirming previous reports, we found reduced levels of LB1 between 2- and 12-month-old animals in R cells and DCX-labeled immature neurons (Bedrosian et al., 2021; Bin Imtiaz et al., 2021). As 4i allows for analyzing expression levels in other cell types within exactly the same sections, we found that microglia, astrocytes, and Parvalbumin (PV)-labeled interneurons in the niche showed no significant changes with age in their LB1 expression levels (Figure 4D and E).

Decline of vascular network and alterations of BBB composition with age

In the DG, both R and NR cells have close relationships with surrounding blood vessels that are the source of regulatory trophic factors, originating from vascular endothelial cells, and connect the neurogenic niche to the circulating blood system. Across species, the hippocampus shows a strong age-related decline in vascularization (Katsimpardi et al., 2014; Boldrini et al., 2018). 4i-based analysis confirmed that vascular density decreases with age, with reductions already visible by 6 months of age (Figure 5A–B). In addition to declining vascular networks, age has been associated with an increase in leakiness of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), potentially permitting molecules into the brain leading to increased inflammation and neurotoxicity (Bell et al., 2010). BBB integrity was estimated by measuring the percent of vasculature covered by other cell types based on signal colocalization. While there was no significant change in the total percentage of vasculature coverage, differences were observed in the contributions of different cell types (Figure 5C–D). Pericytes, expressing CD13 and representing one of the primary cell-types that make up the BBB (Bell et al., 2010), were significantly reduced at 6 months with area covered remaining stable at 12 months. Interestingly, there appeared to be a compensatory increase in coverage by astrocytes labeled by GFAP (Figure 5C–D). GFAP-expressing cells may also include Nestin+ R cells; however, their contribution to increased GFAP vasculature coverage with advancing age appears unlikely given the substantially reduced coverage of Nestin-expressing cells (Figure 5D). Additionally, there was a strong trend for an increase in microglia-blood vessel contact at 6 months that reached significance in 12-month-old mice compared to young adult mice (Figure 5C–D). The contribution of R cells (expressing Nestin) to vasculature coverage significantly decreased with age, likely due to the decrease in population, while OPC (labeled with NG2) contact sites with the vasculature remained consistent at each age point (Figure 5C–D).

Figure 5. Changes of DG vasculature with advancing age.

Figure 5.

(A) Images of CollagenIV+ blood vessels in the DGs at 2, 6, and 12 months. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. (B) Quantification of vascular density in the DGs of 2-, 6-, and 12-month-old mice. For details of statistics please refer to Supplementary file 1. (C) Representative images showing the interactions of pericytes, glia, and R cells with the vasculature in the DG. (D) Quantification of colocalization of pericytes, astrocytes, R cells, microglia, and OPCs with CollagenIV+ represented a percentage of total vascular volume. For details of statistics please refer to Supplementary file 1. Scale bars represent 100 µm (A), 25 µm (C). **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001. DG, dentate gyrus; OPC, oligodendrocyte precursor cell.

Microniche-based analysis identifies novel age-related characteristics of the DG

We speculated that within the aging DG neurogenic niche, microenvironments may exist possessing distinct capacities for preservation of neurogenic processes. Spots were randomly distributed across the GCL spaced 50 µm apart. Utilizing the multidimensionality of the data set acquired with 4i, volumes of 11 cell markers were measured within a 50 µm radius of each spot to achieve contiguous sampling of ‘microniches’ in the GCL and bordering areas of the hilus and ML (Figure 6A). The aim of such microniche-based analyses was to identify age-related changes within the immediate proximity of neurogenic cells. Post hoc analysis showed significant differences (in terms of percent of marker expression per randomized microniche volume) in a variety of measured cell types within microniches (Figure 6B). For example, vascular and pericyte densities were similarly decreased at 6 and 12 months compared to 2-month-old mice. While the stem cell marker Nestin was significantly reduced by 6 months, GFAP, which is also present in classical astrocytes, remained stable between each age time point, indicating that classical astrocytes contribute substantially to GFAP-expression volumes in analyzed microniches (Figure 6B). Additionally, SOX2 was reduced at 6 months, and decreased further in 12-month-old animals. For glial cells, IBA1-expressing microglia sequentially increased with age while OPCs showed a temporary increase at 6 months with a trending decrease at 12 months (Figure 6B). Thus, 4i applied to tissue sections allows for the identification of cell-type specific alterations with advancing age.

Figure 6. Microniche analysis reveals features of the neurogenic niche with advancing age.

(A) A representative overview of the arrangement of randomized sampling spots, with close-up examples of the cellular contents within a single sampled spot for each age group. (B) Quantification of volumes of cell types within the random sampled spots normalized to the sampled area. For details of statistics please refer to Supplementary file 1. (C) Principle component analysis for dimensional reduction and clustering of the random sampled spots from 2-, 6-, and 12-month groups based on cellular content. (D) Percentage of spots identified as either ‘young’ or ‘old’ separated through k-means analysis. (E) Comparison of cell volumes in spots identified as young and old in the 2-month-old group. (F) Comparison of cell volumes in spots identified as high and low R cell populated as neurogenic classified of age in the 2- (upper graph), 6- (middle graph), and 12-month group (lower graph). Scale bars represent 25 µm (A, lower panels) and 100 µm (upper panel). *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

Figure 6.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1. Quantification of proliferating and non-proliferating cellular microenvironments in the DG.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1.

(A) The volume of Nestin-labeled radial processes within the random sampled spots. Spots in red were classified as high Nestin populated while blue represents low Nestin spots. (B–D) Comparison of cell volumes in spots containing and lacking Ki67+ cells in the 2 month (B). For details of statistics please refer to Supplementary file 1. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

For dimensional reduction, principal component analysis was used to cluster the sample regions based on their cellular contents. The majority of regions from 2-month-old animals formed a cluster that was distinct from 6- and 12-month-old animals, which primarily clustered together (Figure 6C). As the spots were largely segregated into two groups, k-means clustering was performed expecting two populations; one ‘young-like’ and one ‘old-like’ identified based on neurogenic cell content. In the 2-month-old animals, 64.5% of spots were grouped as young while 35.5% were labeled as old (Figure 6D). Comparing the contents of the two classes of spots, ‘young’ spots showed higher volumes of Nestin, SOX2, KI67, DCX, CollagenIV, PV, IBA1, and NG2 (Figure 6E). As such, the development of an ‘aged’ phenotype occurred for select niches already at 2 months of age and became already very pronounced in 6-month-old mice. To explore the potential of microenvironments that may support the persistence of R cells within the DG, spots were split by Nestin radial process content. Spots containing a population of Nestin-labeled R cells were classified as high Nestin-containing areas when they were falling within the top three quartiles of spots identified in young mice (0.4% volumetric coverage) (Figure 6—figure supplement 1a). At 2 months, there were no differences in the volumes of CollagenIV vasculature or IBA1-expressing microglia between high and low Nestin populated spots (Figure 6F). However, in both the 6- and 12-month-old groups, both CollagenIV and IBA1 were robustly elevated in the ‘high’ Nestin spots (Figure 6F). In contrast, spots containing Ki67+ proliferating cells, CollagenIV and IBA1 volumes were comparable to Ki67 spots from middle-aged and aged animals (Figure 6B–D). Thus, 4i identified preferential occupancy of blood vessels and IBA1-labeled cells in Nestin-containing microniches, indicating a potential role for the vasculature and microglial cells in the maintenance of quiescent stem cells.

Age-dependent dynamics of potential stem cell contact sites in the DG niche

Taking advantage of the ability to analyze 3D cellular interactions using 4i on complex tissues, we next characterized potential contact sites (as judged by proximity) of radial processes extending from R cells (Seri et al., 2001; Kronenberg et al., 2003). While little is still known about the function of the radial processes, they are believed to have a role in receiving regulatory signals from the surrounding niche (Moss et al., 2016). To analyze possible interactions between R cells and other cell types in the niche, areas of niche cell marker colocalization with Nestin+ RGL processes were measured and normalized to the area of RGL processes. While the optical resolution was not sufficient to definitively identify contact points, signal colocalization indicates a proximity of cells within ~1 µm. In general, a greater percentage of radial processes in 12-month-old animals were in close proximity with niche cell markers for vasculature, pericytes, and microglia, than in younger mice (Figure 7A–B). R cell processes were preferentially close to the vasculature in areas with low pericyte coverage (areas that are negative for CD13) (Licht et al., 2020), but colocalization of radial processes with CD13-labeled pericytes was increased at 12 months compared to at 2 months (Figure 7A–B). Further, the number of close proximity potential contact sites with IBA1-labeled microglia increased with age, while proximity between R cells and OPCs remained unchanged (Figure 7A–B).

Figure 7. Age-dependent dynamics of the niche surrounding adult stem cells.

Figure 7.

(A) Representative images showing the interactions of R cells with vascular and glial cells in the surrounding niche in the DG in 2-, 6-, and 12-month-old mice. (B) Quantification of colocalization of blood vessels, pericytes, microglia, and OPCs with CollagenIV+ represented a percentage of total vascular volume. For details of statistics please refer to Supplementary file 1. (C) Representative images of areas measured for volumes of vasculature and microglia at radiating distances around Nestin+ R cells and Ki67+ proliferating cells. (D) Quantification of volumes of vasculature and microglia at radiating distances from R cells and Ki67+ proliferating cells. For details of statistics please refer to Supplementary file 1. Scale bars represent 25 μm. Scale bar represents 100 µm. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001. DG, dentate gyrus; OPC, oligodendrocyte precursor cell.

To further confirm the findings of the randomized microniche analyses, we took a more targeted approach, measuring the volumetric distribution of niche cells radiating out from Nestin-labeled radial processes and KI67-labeled proliferating cells (Figure 7C). Consistent with R cell contact analyses, we found reduced volumes of blood vessels in the immediate vicinity (<15 µm distance) of radial processes with densities being unchanged at further distances in 6-month-old animals. Vascular densities were comparable between 2- and 12-month-old animals across all distances from R cells (Figure 7D). In contrast, the relative volume of microglia around R cell processes was increased across all radii in 6- and 12-month-old mice (Figure 7C). For the environment of proliferating cells, we found that vascular density was markedly reduced in aged animals, while microglia were unchanged across all distances (Figure 7C), suggesting that IBA1-expressing microglia is important to maintain the niche but does not directly affect cell proliferation of neurogenic cells within the DG.

Discussion

We here used 4i on tissue sections with the aim to characterize age-related changes in the number and distribution of a variety of cell types within individual tissue sections of the DG. We show that alterations within the neurogenic niche of the DG occur relatively early in life and identify changes in niche cell composition of the BBB and microenvironments surrounding adult NSCs as putative regulators of neurogenic permissiveness throughout life.

Reduced levels of neurogenesis in the mammalian DG have been associated with age-related cognitive decline and neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease (Kuhn et al., 1996; Drapeau et al., 2003; Ben Abdallah et al., 2010; Knoth et al., 2010; Boldrini et al., 2018; Moreno-Jiménez et al., 2019; Tobin et al., 2019; Denoth-Lippuner and Jessberger, 2021). Thus, previous work aimed to identify age-dependent changes within neurogenic NSCs and their surrounding niches. A number of cell-intrinsic and extrinsic factors have been identified that appear to mediate the age-related decline in NSC activity (Verbitsky et al., 2004; Hafezi-Moghadam et al., 2007; Leeman et al., 2018; Dulken et al., 2019; Martín-Suárez et al., 2019; Morrow et al., 2020; Vonk et al., 2020; Bedrosian et al., 2021). Further, structural but also functional benefits have been associated with experimentally enhanced neurogenesis in mice of advanced age (Villeda et al., 2011; Katsimpardi et al., 2014; McAvoy et al., 2016; Fan et al., 2017; Ozek et al., 2018; Berdugo-Vega et al., 2020; Horowitz et al., 2020). A critical role for vasculature within the dense vessel network of the DG has been described (Palmer et al., 2000; van Praag et al., 2005; Shen et al., 2019). However, it remained difficult to obtain a comprehensive view of age-related changes within the DG niche due to the difficulty to combine decisive cellular phenotyping of neurogenic cells with a number of different cell type markers within the same tissue section, a requirement to obtain a more complete picture of what changes indeed occur within or in the direct vicinity of NSCs in the mammalian DG. Using 4i, we here show that prominent changes in vascular microarchitecture and contact sites occur early on in life. Interestingly, we found that stem cells showed enhanced proximity with pericytes with advancing age. Further, our data indicate that both vascular density but also relative distribution of IBA1-labeled microglia and NG2-labeled oligodendroglia are associated with stem cell maintenance in the aged DG. If those cellular alterations are truly responsible for age-related changes of neurogenesis remain to be tested. Furthermore, additional alterations of niche cells may have been missed as the set of markers used to identify non-neurogenic cells in the DG do not indicate cell states or subtypes. Future experiments will aim to selectively manipulate newly identified aspects of niche interactions and composition that were identified here, probing for their functional significance. Together with other omics-based approaches that aim to identify age-dependent changes in the aging brain and within NSCs and their progeny (Shavlakadze et al., 2019; Ximerakis et al., 2019; Ibrayeva et al., 2020), the 4i-based data set we provide here will contribute to future work with the aim to enhance neurogenesis in aged brains. 4i-based data will contribute to such efforts by not only allowing for high spatial resolution of obtained expression data within complex tissues but also allowing for the characterization of interactions in the 3D space.

We here used 18 different antibodies to label identical tissue sections. However, that number may be easily scaled up when required. We show that 4i is applicable to a variety of mouse and human tissues, indicating its potential use in basically all tissues and organs. Thus, 4i will be useful to analyze a plethora of tissues and may turn out to be especially useful when only limited tissues/cells are available. For instance, it is a current fundamental limitation in clonal lineage tracing experiments that daughter cells cannot be definitely phenotyped. Rather, current limitations only allow for exclusion-based phenotyping, at least when starter/mother cells can generate a diverse set of daughter cell fates (e.g., a cell expresses protein X and Y but not Z; because only X and Y can be combined for analysis within a single stain, the negativity of Z cannot be shown and phenotypic classification needs to rely on exclusion or non-standardized morphological criteria). Thus, to date, all clonal lineages that generate >2 cell types can only be partially phenotyped and diverse cell types cannot be conclusively classified within the exact same clone (Bonaguidi et al., 2011; Pilz et al., 2018). 4i on tissue sections will overcome these technical limitations in an easy and readily applicable way, allowing for the use of extensively characterized and validated sets of antibodies with indirect immunofluorescence.

We here demonstrate the applicability of iterative immunostaining in tissue sections using 4i, provide a comprehensive data set of the aging DG with a large set of combined markers, and identify vasculature- and glia-associated changes within the neurogenic niche that may be responsible to mediate the age-related decline of neurogenesis in the mammalian hippocampus.

Materials and methods

Key resources table.

Reagent type (species) or resource Designation Source or reference Identifiers Additional information
Biological
samples
(Mus musculus)
C57BL/6JRj Janvier Labs https://www.janvier-labs.com/en/fiche_produit/c57bl-6jrj_mouse/
Antibody ARC (Guinea
pig Polyclonal)
Synaptic Systems RRID:AB_2619853 Dilution: (1:500)
Antibody BLBP
(Rabbit Polyclonal)
Abcam RRID:AB_880078 Dilution: (1:200)
Antibody CD13
(Goat Polyclonal)
Novus RRID:AB_2227288 Dilution: (1:500)
Antibody Cleaved
Caspase
3 (Rabbit Polyclonal)
Cell
Signaling
Technology
RRID:AB_2341188 Dilution: (1:150)
Antibody CollagenIV (Rabbit Polyclonal) Bio-Rad RRID:AB_2082660 Dilution: (1:750)
Antibody CTIP2
(Rat Monoclonal)
Abcam RRID:AB_2064130 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody Doublecortin (Goat
Polyclonal)
Santa Cruz RRID:AB_2088491 Dilution: (1:300)
Antibody GFAP
(Chicken Polyclonal)
Novus RRID:AB_1556315 Dilution: (1:750)
Antibody Histone H3 Phospho
S10 (Mouse Monoclonal)
Abcam RRID:AB_443110 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody HOPX
(Mouse Monoclonal)
Santa Cruz RRID:AB_2687966 Dilution: (1:500)
Antibody IBA1
(Rabbit Polyclonal)
WAKO RRID:AB_839504 Dilution: (1:500)
Antibody ID4
(Rabbit Monoclonal)
Biocheck RRID:AB_2814978 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody KI67
(Rat Monoclonal)
Bioscience RRID:AB_10854564 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody LaminB1
(Rabbit Polyclonal)
Abcam RRID:AB_10107828 Dilution: (1:500)
Antibody MT3
(Rabbit Monoclonal)
Abcam RRID:AB_2297959 Dilution: (1:300)
Antibody Nestin
(Mouse Monoclonal)
BD RRID:AB_396354 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody NeuroD1
(Goat
Polyclonal)
Santa Cruz RRID:AB_630922 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody NG2
(Rabbit
Polyclonal)
Millipore RRID:AB_11213678 Dilution: (1:500)
Antibody OLIG2
(Rabbit
Polyclonal)
Millipore RRID:AB_570666 Dilution: (1:500)
Antibody Parvalbumin (Mouse
Monoclonal)
Sigma-Aldrich RRID:AB_477329 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody S100β
(Rabbit Monoclonal)
Abcam RRID:AB_882426 Dilution: (1:500)
Antibody SOX2
(Rat Monoclonal)
Invitrogen RRID:AB_11219471 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody Anti-Chicken
IgY (IgG)
488
(Donkey Polyclonal)
Jackson Laboratory RRID:AB_2340375 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody Anti-Chicken
IgY (IgG) 647
(Donkey Polyclonal)
Jackson Laboratory RRID:AB_2340379 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody Anti-Goat
IgG 488
(Donkey Polyclonal)
Jackson Laboratory RRID:AB_2336933 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody Anti-Goat
IgG 647
(Donkey Polyclonal)
Jackson Laboratory RRID:AB_2340437 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody Anti-Goat
IgG Cy3
(Donkey Polyclonal)
Jackson Laboratory RRID:AB_2307351 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody Anti-Guinea
pig IgG488
(Donkey Polyclonal)
Jackson Laboratory RRID:AB_2340472 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody Anti-Guinea
pig IgG647
(Donkey Polyclonal)
Jackson Laboratory RRID:AB_2340476 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody Anti-Mouse
IgG 488
(Donkey Polyclonal)
Jackson Laboratory RRID:AB_2341099 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody Anti-Mouse
IgG 647
(Donkey Polyclonal)
Jackson Laboratory RRID:AB_2340863 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody Anti-Mouse
IgG Cy3
(Donkey Polyclonal)
Jackson Laboratory RRID:AB_2315777 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody Anti-Rabbit
IgG 488
(Donkey Polyclonal)
Jackson Laboratory RRID:AB_2313584 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody Anti-Rabbit
IgG 647
(Donkey Polyclonal)
Jackson Laboratory RRID:AB_2492288 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody Anti-Rabbit
IgG Cy3
(Donkey Polyclonal)
Jackson Laboratory RRID:AB_2307443 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody Anti-Rat IgG
488 (Donkey
Polyclonal)
Jackson Laboratory RRID:AB_2340684 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody Anti-Rat IgG
647 (Donkey
Polyclonal)
Jackson Laboratory RRID:AB_2340694 Dilution: (1:250)
Antibody Anti-Rat IgG
Cy3 (Donkey
Polyclonal)
Jackson Laboratory RRID:AB_2340667 Dilution: (1:250)
Chemical
compound,
drug
Donkey
serum
Millipore Cat#: 530-100 ML
Chemical
compound,
drug
Ethylene
glycol
Sigma-Adrich Cat#: 324558
Chemical
compound,
drug
Glycerol Sigma-Aldrich Cat#: G5516
Chemical
compound,
drug
Glycine Biosolve Cat#: 071323
Chemical
compound,
drug
Guanidinium chloride Sigma-Aldrich Cat#: G4505
Chemical
compound,
drug
Hydrochloric acid
standard 33% solution
Sigma-Aldrich Cat#: 71826
Chemical
compound,
drug
N-Acetyl-
Cysteine
Sigma-Aldrich Cat#: A9165
Chemical
compound,
drug
NaCl Sigma-Aldrich Cat#: S9625
Chemical
compound,
drug
O.C.T
compound TissueTek
Sakura Cat#: 4583 OCT 25608-930
Chemical
compound,
drug
Para
formaldehyde
Sigma-Aldrich Cat#: 441244
Chemical
compound,
drug
Poly-D-Lysine Sigma-Aldrich Cat#: P6407
Chemical
compound,
drug
Potassium chloride Sigma-Aldrich Cat#: P9333
Chemical
compound,
drug
Potassium
phosphate
monobasic
Sigma-Aldrich Cat#: P8709
Chemical
compound,
drug
Sodium hydroxide Sigma-Aldrich Cat#: S5881
Chemical
compound,
drug
Sodium phosphate
dibasic
dehydrate
Sigma-Aldrich Cat#: 30435
Chemical
compound,
drug
Sodium phosphate
monobasic
monohydrate
Sigma-Aldrich Cat#: S9638
Chemical
compound,
drug
Sucrose Sigma-Aldrich Cat#: 84100
Chemical
compound,
drug
TCEP-HCl Sigma-Aldrich Cat#: C4706
Chemical
compound,
drug
Triton X-100 Sigma-Aldrich Cat#: 93443
Chemical
compound,
drug
Urea Sigma-Aldrich Cat#: U1250
Software,
algorithm
GraphPad
Prism
GraphPad RRID:SCR_002798 http://www.graphpad.com/
Software,
algorithm
Fiji/ImageJ Fiji RRID:SCR_002285 http://fiji.sc
Software,
algorithm
ZEN Blue Carl Zeiss AG RRID:SCR_013672 http://www.zeiss.com/microscopy/en_us/products/microscope-Software,
Algorithm/zen.
html#introduction
Software,
algorithm
Past4.03 Oyvind Hammer RRID:SCR_019129 http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past/
Other DAPI Sigma-
Aldrich
Cat#: D9542 Dilution: (1:1000)

Mice

Animal experiments were approved by the Cantonal Commission for Animal Experimentation of the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland in accordance with national and cantonal regulations (license ZH037/2017; ZH126/2020). In developing the 4i protocol for tissue sections, brain tissue was collected from male and female C57Bl/6 mice ranging between 2 and 4 months of age. To attain embryonic day (E) 14.5 embryonic samples, daily plug checks were used to estimate the date of conception. Embryos were collected 14 days following the observation of a vaginal plug. For the aging study, C57BL/6J males at 2 (n=3), 6 (n=3), and 12 months (n=3) of age were used. All mice were kept in a 12 hr light/dark cycle with food and water provided ad libitum.

Tissue preparation

For adult tissues, animals were transcardially perfused using a peristaltic pump with cold 0.9% saline solution followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in phosphate buffer. Brains were collected and post-fixed in 4% PFA at 4°C for 8 hr. The brains were then cryo-protected in 30% sucrose for 2 days prior to sectioning. Adult mouse brain tissue was sectioned into 40 μm coronal sections on a cryotome (Leica SM2010R). For E14.5 samples, embryonic heads from C57Bl/6 mice were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed with 4% PFA overnight. Cryoprotection occurred in two steps, first for 2 days in 15% sucrose followed by 2 days in 30% sucrose, before being flash-frozen and embedded in OCT Compound (Tissue-Tek) using liquid nitrogen. Sectioning was done coronally at 40 μm using a cryostat. Sections were collected and washed with PBS to remove the remaining OCT before being transferred to cryoprotectant solution (CPS, 25% Ethyleneglycol, 25% Glycerin, and 0.1 M phosphate buffer). Forebrain-specific organoids derived from hESCs (approved by the Kantonale Ethikkomission Zurich and reported to the federal Bundesamt für Gesundheit of Switzerland) were generated as described before (Bowers et al., 2020), and fixed at day 40 in 4% PFA for 15 min, embedded in OCT, and flash-frozen using liquid nitrogen. Organoids were sectioned at 40 μm using a cryostat, sections were collected in PBS. Serial washes with PBS were performed to remove the remaining OCT, before being transferred to CPS.

Mounting

Prior to mounting, glass-bottomed 24-well plates (Cellvis P24-1.5H-N) were coated with 1 mg/ml PDL (Sigma-Aldrich P6407). 75 μl of the PDL solution was transferred into the center of each well and brushed to the edges with a fine paintbrush to ensure total coverage. The plates were rocked on a shaker for 5 min, after which the PDL was collected for reuse. Wells were rinsed three times with deionized water and let dry for at least 2 hr. Tissue sections were washed three times in PBS, loaded into wells containing 500 µl 1× PBS, which was subsequently aspirated allowing the tissue to lie flat and dry for approximately 20 min until there was no visible liquid remaining around the edges of the sections. The tissue was then rinsed for 30 s with 4% PFA and washed in PBS three times for 5 min each. Organoids sections were gently aspirated using a P1000 pipet with a trimmed tip and transferred into a well of a glass bottomed well plate. The sections were allowed to settle onto the glass before carefully removing the excess liquid and allowing to dry. Mounted organoid sections were additionally fixed with 4% PFA for 15 min followed by three washes with PBS. Prior to staining, the organoid sections were washed with the elution buffer three times for 5 min as a form of mild antigen retrieval.

Staining

Once mounted, sections were blocked for 1 hr at room temperature in a blocking solution containing PBS with 3% donkey serum, 0.5% Triton-X, and 0.025% PFA (PBS++). Sections were incubated in the primary antibodies (Supplementary file 1), diluted in the blocking solution, for between two to four nights, depending on the efficacy of the antibodies, shaking at 4°C. Following the primary antibody incubations, the tissue was washed two times with PBS for 5 min and then blocked with PBS++ for 1 hr at room temperature. Sections were incubated with secondary antibodies, diluted at a ratio of 1:250 along with DAPI at 1:1000 in PBS++, for 3 hr shaking at room temperature, after which the tissue was washed three times with PBS for 5 min. Once the secondary antibody solutions were added all liquid handling was conducted in low light until the antibodies were eluted to reduce the chance of fluorophore crosslinking. The imaging buffer was added at least 5 min prior to imaging to ensure the penetrance of the tissue.

Imaging

Before imaging, fresh imaging buffer was prepared by dissolving 0.7 M N-Acetyl-Cysteine in 0.2 M phosphate buffer, using 10 M NaOH to adjust the pH to 7.40. Approximately 500 µl of the imaging buffer was added to each well. All 4i images were taken on a Zeiss LSM800 confocal laser-scanning microscope. Images from tile scans were exported using Carl Zeiss ZEN Blue software and stitched using Fiji (Schindelin et al., 2012). For the aging study, DG image stacks were taken with a 20× magnification objective with a 0.8 numerical aperture and composed of tile regions with 10 tiles (5×2), with a pixel resolution of 1024×1024 per tile for a scale of 3.2055 pixels/µm with 16-bit pixel depth. Image stacks consisted of 40 frames acquired with a z-step interval of 1 µm and were used for all quantifications. High-resolution close-ups were acquired with a 40× magnification objective with a 1.1 numerical aperture in a water immersion (Zeiss Immersol W 2010) at a pixel resolution of 2048×2048 with a z-step size of 0.5 µm for 80 frames. These 40× images were used as example images in figures. All acquisitions were done with bi-directional scanning with a pixel dwell time of 2.06 µs. Within each cycle, all samples were labeled with the same antibodies, and imaged with identical microscopy settings for laser power, gain, digital offset, pinhole diameter, and z-step.

Elution

A stock solution containing 0.5 M L-Glycine, 3 M Urea, and 3 M Guanidine hydrochloride was prepared and kept at 4°C. Prior to elution, 0.07 M (0.02 g/ml) TCEP-HCl was added to a volume of the stock solution determined by multiplying the number of wells by the working volume of 150 µl by three washes. The pH of the buffer was then lowered to 2.5 using 5 M HCl to facilitated denaturation of the antibodies. The tissue was first rinsed with dH2O, then 150 µl of dH2O followed by 150 µl of the elution buffer was added to each well, shaken for 5 min, and repeated for a total of three washes. After elution, the tissue was washed three times for 5 min in PBS, after which the blocking step for the next round of IF could be started.

Image alignment

To achieve accurate alignment between rounds of staining, images were registered using consistent DAPI intensity patterns. At a high digital zoom, the x and y coordinates, as well as the stack position of pixels in DAPI puncta that were recognizable across cycles and were measured. Images were transformed in the x and y planes to align to the image from the first round, with the canvas size being adjust so no image cropped and data was lost. For alignment in the z-plane, blank frames were added or frames lacking positive fluorescent signal were subtracted from the image stack accordingly using the ‘Add Slice’ and ‘Delete Slice’ functions in ImageJ.

Antigenicity test

Two brain sections from 2-month-old mice were mounted and stained for all 18 antibodies used in the main study. Regions of the DG were imaged with a Zeiss LSM800 confocal laser-scanning microscope at 20× with the same parameters as in the main study. The sections were then subjected to six rounds of elution washes (3×5 min). The brain sections were incubated with the same secondary antibodies used in the first round and re-imaged to confirm successful antibody removal. A subsequent cycle of staining and imaging was performed with the same primary and secondary antibody combinations as in the first round (Supplementary file 2). Images across cycles were acquired using the same microscope settings (laser power, gain, digital offset, pinhole diameter, and z-step). Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn around positive cells in images from the first cycle and fluorescent intensities were measured in the same cells from the two rounds of staining as well as following elution and were correlated. For KI67, phosphorylated histone-3, and parvalbumin, too few cells were present in the sections to correlate values.

Image analysis

All quantifications were performed on non-projected 3D z-stack images with cells being sampled throughout the entire thickness of the image. All measures of density and intensity were performed on 16-bit images, while volumetric analyses were performed using 8-bit binary representations of the original images.

Cell counting: R cells were defined by HOPX+/SOX2+ soma with a clear vertical process that was also GFAP+ and S100β. ROIs were created outlining the cell soma using the polygon selection tool in Fiji, which were saved and later used to measure fluorescent intensities of stem cell markers HOPX, and MT3, the intensity of the nuclear envelope protein LaminB1, as well as checking for the presence of the cell cycle marker KI67. NR glia-like cells in cell cycle were identified by being KI67+ and located within the lower granular cell layer or SGZ extending approximately 20 µm beyond the hilar edge of the GCL. Immature neurons were counted using DCX. Positive cells had a clear ring of non-nuclear staining that encircled a significant majority of the cell (approx. 75%). Glial cell types, astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes, were identified as being S100β+, IBA1+, or NG2+, respectively. All cells were counted throughout the entire images using the Cell Counter plugin in Fiji using localization identifiers for the ML, hilus/CA3, and the supra and infrapyramidal blades of the GCL. The areas of the hippocampal subregions were measured. Cell density was calculated by dividing the number of cells by the regional volume expressed as mm3 (region area [mm2] × tissue thickness [0.04 mm]).

Fluorescent intensity was measured in the z-position in which it was brightest for each cell. Measures were normalized to the background intensity, which was averaged from five ROIs per slice containing no positive cells within the GCL. Cells were normalized to the background of the representative slice in which the cells were measured to account for any gradient in fluorescent intensity caused by unequal antibody penetrance. The fluorescent intensity of LaminB1 was measured in R cells, immature neurons, and PV interneurons using the ROIs generated during cell counting. For glial cell types, 100 cells were selected at random throughout the imaged hippocampal structures and somatic ROIs were drawn. To ensure accurate measurement, if necessary, ROIs were adjusted to better fit the LaminB1 outline. Intensity measures were normalized to the background, which was averaged from five ROIs per slice throughout the tissue containing no positive signal. Like with the RGL markers, normalization was slice specific to account for a gradient in intensity across the z-plane. The ROIs made to measure LaminB1 in S100β+ astrocytes were also used to measure the intensities of HOPX and MT3 in astrocytes.

Vasculature dimensions: All measures of vasculature dimensions were conducted using CollagenIV staining within the visible areas of the hippocampus (areas of the thalamus were excluded). To calculate vasculature density, volumes were generated based on Cavalieri’s principle, summing the area of blood vessels in each slice of an image stack and dividing by the tissue volume. Vasculature areas were measured by applying a 3D Gaussian blur with pixel radii of 2, 2, and 1.5 in the x, y, and z directions, respectively, thresholding at a fluorescence intensity of 1500, followed by two binary erosions to generate an accurate binary representation of the CollagenIV staining.

Cellular interactions: Cellular interactions were estimated by measuring the area of colocalization of cell markers on the vasculature and RGL processes. RGL processes were manually isolated from vasculature in Nestin stains by outlining Nestin+ RGL processes into an ROI and clearing the outside. Binary representations were created the same as was done for CollagenIV for CD13, GFAP, and the isolated Nestin processes with thresholding at lower intensity limits of 1800, 5250, and 2000, respectively. For NG2, and IBA1, a median filter with a radius of 2 pixels was applied and thresholds were applied at 5500 and 2000, respectively. ROIs were generated by creating selections around the binary CollagenIV and Nestin, which were then applied to the other stains, measuring the area of positive pixels within the ROIs. The measured areas were normalized to the total ROI areas to get percent of coverage. S100β was excluded from all contact and volumetric analyses as the level of background prevented the creation of accurate binary representations.

Randomized niche mapping: Binary representations of DCX, HOPX, SOX2, PV, ARC, and KI67 were generated in the same manner as CollagenIV with thresholds set at 2500, 2200, 1600, 4300, 2500, and 2000, respectively. In generating binaries with intensity thresholding, Arc and Ki67 images had small false positive puncta and required additional processing to remove these background elements. Particle analysis was run to select all for positive cells using a lower area limit of 25 µm for ARC, and 15 µm for Ki67. ROIs were saved and used to draw the cells onto a blank canvas. To generate randomized sample regions, ROIs were created around the GCL using maximum z-projections of DAPI stains, which were then overlaid and filled in white on a blank image. A second equivalent blank image was subdivided by drawing vertical white bars extending the height of the canvas with a width of 1 pixel, spaced 160 pixels apart, equivalent to 50 µm in the microscope image scale. The filled representation of the GCL was multiplied with the image containing the bars resulting in an image with white bars spaced 160 pixels apart, fit to the shape and spanning the width of the blades of the GCL. ROIs were created for each bar individually by particle analysis. On a blank canvas, the bars were filled and an intensity gradient distance map was generated around it. The pixels in the bar had an intensity value of 0, with intensities increasing by one with each pixel radiating away from the origin until a value of 255. The binary representations of ARC, CD13, CollagenIV, DCX, GFAP, HOPX, IBA1, Ki67, Nestin, NG2, PV, SOX2, and S100β, which were divided by 255 so the new intensity value was 1. The binary distance maps for each bar were multiplied against the divided binary images created an image with 8-bit intensity profile representative of the distance from the point of origin. Analyzing the histogram of the resulting images provided the areas and spatial distribution of positive signal for each stain within the distance map. Areas of stains were summed within the distance maps to up to a 160 pixel (50 µm) radius, which provided adequate and contiguous sampling of the GCL, bordering areas of the hilus, and inner ML. The areas were also summed across the z-stack creating volumes. These were normalized by dividing by the total volume sampled by the distance map and reported as a percentage.

Targeted niche mapping: Distance maps were generated around the Nestin+ R cell processes, and proliferating cells, and measured against the binary representations of cells the same as was done for the randomized probing. Nestin-labeled R cell processes were measured as a whole per section. Ki67+ cells were isolated using particle analysis on the maximum intensity z-projection. ROIs were created around the cells and individually applied to the 3D binary to clear signal outside of the cell of interest. Stain volumes were binned at 5 µm intervals and divided by the total measured volume and reported as percent coverage.

Statistical analyses

For all analyses, an alpha level was set at 0.05. To assess preservation of antigenicity Pearson correlations were performed on the normalized intensity values of isolated cells or ROIs. Unpaired t-tests were used to compare counted cell densities, as well as quiescent cell marker and LaminB1 intensities of DCX-labeled immature neurons and PV interneurons between the 2- and 12-month groups. The standard deviations between age groups were significantly different for the intensities of LaminB1 in R cells, IBA1-labeled microglia, and S100β+ astrocytes so they were compared using Welch’s t-tests. One-way ANOVAs were performed to assess differences between ages in vascular densities, blood vessel coverage, randomized microniche volumes, and stem cell contact measures. These analyses were followed by post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests. When data failed the Brown-Forsythe test for equal variances, Welch’s ANOVA tests were run with Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons. For the microniche volumetric measures, Games-Howell’s multiple comparisons were used to account for the large group sizes. In comparing spots identified as young and old, Nestin high and low, and KI67 positive and negative, multiple unpaired t-tests were performed with Holms-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons. Microenvironments surrounding radial processes and proliferating cells were analyzed using mixed-effects model analysis and Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank P Eugster for analytical help, G Pilz for conceptual input and advice, and A Denoth-Lippuner and DC Lie for comments on the manuscript.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Sebastian Jessberger, Email: jessberger@hifo.uzh.ch.

D Nora Abrous, Neurocentre Magendie, INSERM, France.

Marianne E Bronner, California Institute of Technology, United States.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • European Research Council STEMBAR to Sebastian Jessberger.

  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung BSCGI0_157859 to Sebastian Jessberger.

  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 310030_196869 to Sebastian Jessberger.

  • European Research Council ERC-2019-AdG-885579 to Lucas Pelkmans.

  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 310030_192622 to Lucas Pelkmans.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

No competing interests declared.

Inventor of a patent related to 4i technology (WO2019207004A1).

Author contributions

Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft.

Methodology.

Methodology.

Methodology.

Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision.

Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft.

Ethics

Animal experiments were approved by the Cantonal Commission for Animal Experimentation of the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland in accordance with national and cantonal regulations (license ZH037/2017; ZH126/2020).

Additional files

Supplementary file 1. Values and statistics for graphs shown in main Figures 1 and 37 and Figure 6—figure supplement 1 of Figure 6.
elife-68000-supp1.xlsx (34KB, xlsx)
Supplementary file 2. Primary and secondary antibody combinations used for antigenicity testing.
elife-68000-supp2.xlsx (9.3KB, xlsx)
Transparent reporting form

Data availability

Data was deposited to the Image Data Resource under accession number idr0131.

The following dataset was generated:

Cole JD, Jessberger S. 2022. Data from:Characterization of the neurogenic niche in the aging dentate gyrus using iterative immunofluorescence imaging. Image Data Resource. idr0131

References

  1. Bedrosian TA, Houtman J, Eguiguren JS, Ghassemzadeh S, Rund N, Novaresi NM, Hu L, Parylak SL, Denli AM, Randolph-Moore L, Namba T, Gage FH, Toda T. Lamin B1 decline underlies age-related loss of adult hippocampal neurogenesis. The EMBO Journal. 2021;40:e105819. doi: 10.15252/embj.2020105819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell RD, Winkler EA, Sagare AP, Singh I, LaRue B, Deane R, Zlokovic BV. Pericytes control key neurovascular functions and neuronal phenotype in the adult brain and during brain aging. Neuron. 2010;68:409–427. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ben Abdallah NM-B, Slomianka L, Vyssotski AL, Lipp H-P. Early age-related changes in adult hippocampal neurogenesis in C57 mice. Neurobiology of Aging. 2010;31:151–161. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berdugo-Vega G, Arias-Gil G, López-Fernández A, Artegiani B, Wasielewska JM, Lee C-C, Lippert MT, Kempermann G, Takagaki K, Calegari F. creasing neurogenesis refines hippocampal activity rejuvenating navigational learning strategies and contextual memory throughout life. Nature Communications. 2020;11:135. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14026-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berg DA, Su Y, Jimenez-Cyrus D, Patel A, Huang N, Morizet D, Lee S, Shah R, Ringeling FR, Jain R, Epstein JA, Wu QF, Canzar S, Ming GL, Song H, Bond AM. A Common Embryonic Origin of Stem Cells Drives Developmental and Adult Neurogenesis. Cell. 2019;177:654–668. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bin Imtiaz MK, Jaeger BN, Bottes S, Machado RAC, Vidmar M, Moore DL, Jessberger S. Declining lamin B1 expression mediates age-dependent decreases of hippocampal stem cell activity. Cell Stem Cell. 2021;28:967–977. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2021.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Boldrini M, Fulmore CA, Tartt AN, Simeon LR, Pavlova I, Poposka V, Rosoklija GB, Stankov A, Arango V, Dwork AJ, Hen R, Mann JJ. Human Hippocampal Neurogenesis Persists throughout Aging. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;22:589–599. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bonaguidi MA, Wheeler MA, Shapiro JS, Stadel RP, Sun GJ, Ming G, Song H. Vivo Clonal Analysis Reveals Self-Renewing and Multipotent Adult Neural Stem Cell Characteristics. Cell. 2011;145:1142–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.05.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bottes S, Jaeger BN, Pilz G-A, Jörg DJ, Cole JD, Kruse M, Harris L, Korobeynyk VI, Mallona I, Helmchen F, Guillemot F, Simons BD, Jessberger S. Long-term self-renewing stem cells in the adult mouse hippocampus identified by intravital imaging. Nature Neuroscience. 2021;24:225–233. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-00759-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bowers M, Liang T, Gonzalez-Bohorquez D, Zocher S, Jaeger BN, Kovacs WJ, Röhrl C, Cramb KML, Winterer J, Kruse M, Dimitrieva S, Overall RW, Wegleiter T, Najmabadi H, Semenkovich CF, Kempermann G, Földy C, Jessberger S. FASN-Dependent Lipid Metabolism Links Neurogenic Stem/Progenitor Cell Activity to Learning and Memory Deficits. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;27:98–109. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Burgess DJ. Spatial transcriptomics coming of age. Nature Reviews. Genetics. 2019;20:317. doi: 10.1038/s41576-019-0129-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Burke B, Stewart CL. The nuclear lamins: flexibility in function. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2013;14:13–24. doi: 10.1038/nrm3488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Decalf J, Albert ML, Ziai J. New tools for pathology: a user’s review of a highly multiplexed method for in situ analysis of protein and RNA expression in tissue. The Journal of Pathology. 2019;247:650–661. doi: 10.1002/path.5223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Denoth-Lippuner A, Jessberger S. Formation and integration of new neurons in the adult hippocampus. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. 2021;22:223–236. doi: 10.1038/s41583-021-00433-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Drapeau E, Mayo W, Aurousseau C, Le Moal M, Piazza PV, Abrous DN. Spatial memory performances of aged rats in the water maze predict levels of hippocampal neurogenesis. PNAS. 2003;100:14385–14390. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2334169100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dulken BW, Buckley MT, Navarro Negredo P, Saligrama N, Cayrol R, Leeman DS, George BM, Boutet SC, Hebestreit K, Pluvinage JV, Wyss-Coray T, Weissman IL, Vogel H, Davis MM, Brunet A. Single-cell analysis reveals T cell infiltration in old neurogenic niches. Nature. 2019;571:205–210. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1362-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ermolaeva M, Neri F, Ori A, Rudolph KL. Cellular and epigenetic drivers of stem cell ageing. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2018;19:594–610. doi: 10.1038/s41580-018-0020-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fan X, Wheatley EG, Villeda SA. Mechanisms of Hippocampal Aging and the Potential for Rejuvenation. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2017;40:251–272. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fuchs E, Segre JA. Stem cells: a new lease on life. Cell. 2000;100:143–155. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81691-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gage FH. Adult neurogenesis in mammals. Science. 2019;364:827–828. doi: 10.1126/science.aav6885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Giesen C, Wang HAO, Schapiro D, Zivanovic N, Jacobs A, Hattendorf B, Schüffler PJ, Grolimund D, Buhmann JM, Brandt S, Varga Z, Wild PJ, Günther D, Bodenmiller B. Highly multiplexed imaging of tumor tissues with subcellular resolution by mass cytometry. Nature Methods. 2014;11:417–422. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gut G, Herrmann MD, Pelkmans L. Multiplexed protein maps link subcellular organization to cellular states. Science. 2018;361:eaar7042. doi: 10.1126/science.aar7042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hafezi-Moghadam A, Thomas KL, Wagner DD. ApoE deficiency leads to a progressive age-dependent blood-brain barrier leakage. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology. 2007;292:C1256–C1262. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00563.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Harris L, Rigo P, Stiehl T, Gaber ZB, Austin SHL, Masdeu MDM, Edwards A, Urbán N, Marciniak-Czochra A, Guillemot F. Coordinated changes in cellular behavior ensure the lifelong maintenance of the hippocampal stem cell population. Cell Stem Cell. 2021;28:863–876. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2021.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Horowitz AM, Fan X, Bieri G, Smith LK, Sanchez-Diaz CI, Schroer AB, Gontier G, Casaletto KB, Kramer JH, Williams KE, Villeda SA. Blood factors transfer beneficial effects of exercise on neurogenesis and cognition to the aged brain. Science. 2020;369:167–173. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw2622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ibrayeva A, Bay M, Pu E, Jörg D, Peng L, Jun H, Zhang N, Aaron D, Lin C, Resler G, Hidalgo A, Jang MH, Simons BD, Bonaguidi MA. Early Stem Cell Aging in the Mature Brain. bioRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/654608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  27. Kalamakis G, Brüne D, Ravichandran S, Bolz J, Fan W, Ziebell F, Stiehl T, Catalá-Martinez F, Kupke J, Zhao S, Llorens-Bobadilla E, Bauer K, Limpert S, Berger B, Christen U, Schmezer P, Mallm JP, Berninger B, Anders S, Del Sol A, Marciniak-Czochra A, Martin-Villalba A. Quiescence Modulates Stem Cell Maintenance and Regenerative Capacity in the Aging Brain. Cell. 2019;176:1407–1419. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Katsimpardi L, Litterman NK, Schein PA, Miller CM, Loffredo FS, Wojtkiewicz GR, Chen JW, Lee RT, Wagers AJ, Rubin LL. Vascular and neurogenic rejuvenation of the aging mouse brain by young systemic factors. Science. 2014;344:630–634. doi: 10.1126/science.1251141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Knoth R, Singec I, Ditter M, Pantazis G, Capetian P, Meyer RP, Horvat V, Volk B, Kempermann G. Murine features of neurogenesis in the human hippocampus across the lifespan from 0 to 100 years. PLOS ONE. 2010;5:e8809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kronenberg G, Reuter K, Steiner B, Brandt MD, Jessberger S, Yamaguchi M, Kempermann G. Subpopulations of proliferating cells of the adult hippocampus respond differently to physiologic neurogenic stimuli. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2003;467:455–463. doi: 10.1002/cne.10945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kuhn HG, Dickinson-Anson H, Gage FH. Neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat: age-related decrease of neuronal progenitor proliferation. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1996;16:2027–2033. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-06-02027.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Leeman DS, Hebestreit K, Ruetz T, Webb AE, McKay A, Pollina EA, Dulken BW, Zhao X, Yeo RW, Ho TT, Mahmoudi S, Devarajan K, Passegué E, Rando TA, Frydman J, Brunet A. Lysosome activation clears aggregates and enhances quiescent neural stem cell activation during aging. Science. 2018;359:1277–1283. doi: 10.1126/science.aag3048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Licht T, Sasson E, Bell B, Grunewald M, Kumar S, Kreisel T, Ben-Zvi A, Keshet E. Hippocampal neural stem cells facilitate access from circulation via apical cytoplasmic processes. eLife. 2020;9:e52134. doi: 10.7554/eLife.52134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lin JR, Izar B, Wang S, Yapp C, Mei S, Shah PM, Santagata S, Sorger PK. Highly multiplexed immunofluorescence imaging of human tissues and tumors using t-CyCIF and conventional optical microscopes. eLife. 2018;7:e31657. doi: 10.7554/eLife.31657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Martín-Suárez S, Valero J, Muro-García T, Encinas JM. Phenotypical and functional heterogeneity of neural stem cells in the aged hippocampus. Aging Cell. 2019;18:e12958. doi: 10.1111/acel.12958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. McAvoy KM, Scobie KN, Berger S, Russo C, Guo N, Decharatanachart P, Vega-Ramirez H, Miake-Lye S, Whalen M, Nelson M, Bergami M, Bartsch D, Hen R, Berninger B, Sahay A. Modulating Neuronal Competition Dynamics in the Dentate Gyrus to Rejuvenate Aging Memory Circuits. Neuron. 2016;91:1356–1373. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.08.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Moncada R, Barkley D, Wagner F, Chiodin M, Devlin JC, Baron M, Hajdu CH, Simeone DM, Yanai I. tegrating microarray-based spatial transcriptomics and single-cell RNA-seq reveals tissue architecture in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Nature Biotechnology. 2020;38:333–342. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0392-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Moore D, Pilz G, Araúzo-Bravo M, Barral Y, Jessberger S. A mechanism for the segregation of age in mammalian neural stem cells. Science. 2015;349:1334–1338. doi: 10.1126/science.aac9868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Moreno-Jiménez EP, Flor-García M, Terreros-Roncal J, Rábano A, Cafini F, Pallas-Bazarra N, Ávila J, Llorens-Martín M. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is abundant in neurologically healthy subjects and drops sharply in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Nature Medicine. 2019;25:554–560. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0375-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Morrison SJ, Spradling AC. Stem cells and niches: mechanisms that promote stem cell maintenance throughout life. Cell. 2008;132:598–611. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Morrow CS, Porter TJ, Xu N, Arndt ZP, Ako-Asare K, Heo HJ, Thompson EAN, Moore DL. Vimentin Coordinates Protein Turnover at the Aggresome during Neural Stem Cell Quiescence Exit. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;26:558–568. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.01.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mosher KI, Schaffer DV. fluence of hippocampal niche signals on neural stem cell functions during aging. Cell and Tissue Research. 2018;371:115–124. doi: 10.1007/s00441-017-2709-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Moss J, Gebara E, Bushong EA, Sánchez-Pascual I, O’Laoi R, El M’Ghari I, Kocher-Braissant J, Ellisman MH, Toni N. Fine processes of Nestin-GFP–positive radial glia-like stem cells in the adult dentate gyrus ensheathe local synapses and vasculature. PNAS. 2016;113:E2536–E2545. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1514652113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Navarro Negredo P, Yeo RW, Brunet A. Aging and Rejuvenation of Neural Stem Cells and Their Niches. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;27:202–223. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ozek C, Krolewski RC, Buchanan SM, Rubin LL. Growth Differentiation Factor 11 treatment leads to neuronal and vascular improvements in the hippocampus of aged mice. Scientific Reports. 2018;8:17293. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35716-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Palmer TD, Willhoite AR, Gage FH. Vascular niche for adult hippocampal neurogenesis. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2000;425:479–494. doi: 10.1002/1096-9861(20001002)425:4&#x0003c;479::AID-CNE2&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Pilz G-A, Bottes S, Betizeau M, Jörg DJ, Carta S, Simons BD, Helmchen F, Jessberger S. Live imaging of neurogenesis in the adult mouse hippocampus. Science. 2018;359:658–662. doi: 10.1126/science.aao5056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Schapiro D, Jackson HW, Raghuraman S, Fischer JR, Zanotelli VRT, Schulz D, Giesen C, Catena R, Varga Z, Bodenmiller B. histoCAT: analysis of cell phenotypes and interactions in multiplex image cytometry data. Nature Methods. 2017;14:873–876. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez J-Y, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Schulz D, Zanotelli VRT, Fischer JR, Schapiro D, Engler S, Lun XK, Jackson HW, Bodenmiller B. Simultaneous Multiplexed Imaging of mRNA and Proteins with Subcellular Resolution in Breast Cancer Tissue Samples by Mass Cytometry. Cell Systems. 2018;6:531. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2018.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Seri B, García-Verdugo JM, McEwen BS, Alvarez-Buylla A. Astrocytes give rise to new neurons in the adult mammalian hippocampus. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2001;21:7153–7160. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-18-07153.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Shavlakadze T, Morris M, Fang J, Wang SX, Zhu J, Zhou W, Tse HW, Mondragon-Gonzalez R, Roma G, Glass DJ. Age-Related Gene Expression Signature in Rats Demonstrate Early, Late, and Linear Transcriptional Changes from Multiple Tissues. Cell Reports. 2019;28:3263–3273. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Shen J, Wang D, Wang X, Gupta S, Ayloo B, Wu S, Prasad P, Xiong Q, Xia J, Ge S. Neurovascular Coupling in the Dentate Gyrus Regulates Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis. Neuron. 2019;103:878–890. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.05.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Shin J, Berg DA, Zhu Y, Shin JY, Song J, Bonaguidi MA, Enikolopov G, Nauen DW, Christian KM, Ming G, Song H. Single-Cell RNA-Seq with Waterfall Reveals Molecular Cascades underlying Adult Neurogenesis. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;17:360–372. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.07.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Song J, Olsen RHJ, Sun J, Ming G-L, Song H. Neuronal Circuitry Mechanisms Regulating Adult Mammalian Neurogenesis. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2016;8:a018937. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ståhl PL, Salmén F, Vickovic S, Lundmark A, Navarro JF, Magnusson J, Giacomello S, Asp M, Westholm JO, Huss M, Mollbrink A, Linnarsson S, Codeluppi S, Borg Å, Pontén F, Costea PI, Sahlén P, Mulder J, Bergmann O, Lundeberg J, Frisén J. Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics. Science. 2016;353:78–82. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tobin MK, Musaraca K, Disouky A, Shetti A, Bheri A, Honer WG, Kim N, Dawe RJ, Bennett DA, Arfanakis K, Lazarov O. Human Hippocampal Neurogenesis Persists in Aged Adults and Alzheimer’s Disease Patients. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;24:974–982. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2019.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. van Praag H, Shubert T, Zhao C, Gage FH. Exercise enhances learning and hippocampal neurogenesis in aged mice. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2005;25:8680–8685. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1731-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Verbitsky M, Yonan AL, Malleret G, Kandel ER, Gilliam TC, Pavlidis P. Altered hippocampal transcript profile accompanies an age-related spatial memory deficit in mice. Learning & Memory. 2004;11:253–260. doi: 10.1101/lm.68204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Villeda SA, Luo J, Mosher KI, Zou B, Britschgi M, Bieri G, Stan TM, Fainberg N, Ding Z, Eggel A, Lucin KM, Czirr E, Park J-S, Couillard-Després S, Aigner L, Li G, Peskind ER, Kaye JA, Quinn JF, Galasko DR, Xie XS, Rando TA, Wyss-Coray T. The ageing systemic milieu negatively regulates neurogenesis and cognitive function. Nature. 2011;477:90–94. doi: 10.1038/nature10357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Vonk WIM, Rainbolt TK, Dolan PT, Webb AE, Brunet A, Frydman J. Differentiation Drives Widespread Rewiring of the Neural Stem Cell Chaperone Network. Molecular Cell. 2020;78:329–345. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Wagner J, Rapsomaniki MA, Chevrier S, Anzeneder T, Langwieder C, Dykgers A, Rees M, Ramaswamy A, Muenst S, Soysal SD, Jacobs A, Windhager J, Silina K, van den Broek M, Dedes KJ, Rodríguez Martínez M, Weber WP, Bodenmiller B. A Single-Cell Atlas of the Tumor and Immune Ecosystem of Human Breast Cancer. Cell. 2019;177:1330–1345. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Ximerakis M, Lipnick SL, Innes BT, Simmons SK, Adiconis X, Dionne D, Mayweather BA, Nguyen L, Niziolek Z, Ozek C, Butty VL, Isserlin R, Buchanan SM, Levine SS, Regev A, Bader GD, Levin JZ, Rubin LL. Single-cell transcriptomic profiling of the aging mouse brain. Nature Neuroscience. 2019;22:1696–1708. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0491-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision letter

Editor: D Nora Abrous1
Reviewed by: Tim James Viney2

Our editorial process produces two outputs: i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Acceptance summary:

This paper describing the development of a new anatomical method in the context of adult hippocampal neurogenesis in the aging brain will have a high impact for the scientific community. It will allow to deepen our understanding of cellular complexity in the normal and disease brain.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Characterization of the neurogenic niche in the aging dentate gyrus using iterative immunofluorescence imaging" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Marianne Bronner as the Senior Editor. The following individual involved in review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: Tim James Viney (Reviewer #2).

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential revisions:

The reviewers are very enthusiastic about your work and the impact of this 4i method for the scientific community. However, more information is needed to improve the manuscript. In particular, we recommend to

i) Strengthen the reporting of the methods,

ii) Add some control for the consistency in antibody staining , the sensitivity of the elution process, individual section variability etc.

iii) To provide high resolution single-channel images.

Concerning the main criticism of Reviewer 1, you may as requested add a group of old mice (>18 months) or alternatively remove all references to aging in the title, abstract and discussion.

In addition, it would be very beneficial for the community to add in the discussion (or methods/results) comments about the boundaries conditions of the 4i method (pitfall, what not to do…).

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

1) This study does not addresses ageing but the transition of the hippocampal niche to an adult or mature stage, the text including the title should be modified to reflect this.

2) There is no evidence that staining for the different antibodies used works as well in the 2-month and 12-month-old sections (except for the similar expression levels of LaminB1 in some cell types), expression of a protein that is not expected to change between the two stages should be analysed alongside the proteins analysed, as a control of consistency in antibody staining.

3) In contrast with the thorough characterisation of neural stem cells, other cell types in the niche are identified with only one marker. This might reduce the ability of the authors to draw conclusions regarding age-related changes in the niche, particularly for cell types such as astrocytes or microglia that can exist in different subtypes or different activation states. This could be discussed.

4) The comparison of the intensity of antibody labelling before and after 6 rounds of elution (Figure 1E) is an important validation of the method. However it should be conducted systematically for each antibody used in 4i as different epitopes recognised by different antibodies may differ in their sensitivity to the elution process.

5) In the same figure, have the authors verified that not only the secondary antibody but also the primary antibody is eluted in each cycle (by re-incubating the eluted sections with the secondary antibody only)?

6) I find it somewhat counterintuitive that microniches from 2-month-old animals segregate into two groups of young-like and old-like spots rather than forming a continuum between these two states (Figure 6C). Please discuss the implications.

7) Proximity of radial processes with CollagenIV and CD13 diminishes between 2- and 6-months and increases between 6- and 12- months. There is therefore no clear trend in the changes that occur across the lifespan. This cast some doubt on the significance of the analysis and the results obtained. Please comment.

8) In Figure 7A-B, the authors conduct an analysis of contact sites of radial stem cells with other cell types in the niche. However the analysis does not seem to have enough spatial resolution to conclude that NSCs contact other niche cells rather than being in proximity but without contact. The conclusion from this analysis should be toned down.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

I recommend strengthening the reporting of the methods, including examples of the specific analysis, and providing high resolution single-channel images demonstrating colocalisation and associations. This would significantly improve the ability to interpret the results and assess the conclusions.

eLife. 2022 Jan 28;11:e68000. doi: 10.7554/eLife.68000.sa2

Author response


Essential revisions:

The reviewers are very enthusiastic about your work and the impact of this 4i method for the scientific community. However, more information is needed to improve the manuscript. In particular, we recommend to

i) Strengthen the reporting of the methods,

ii) Add some control for the consistency in antibody staining , the sensitivity of the elution process, individual section variability etc…

iii) To provide high resolution single-channel images.

Concerning the main criticism of Reviewer 1, you may as requested add a group of old mice (>18 months) or alternatively remove all references to aging in the title, abstract and discussion.

In addition, it would be very beneficial for the community to add in the discussion (or methods/results) comments about the boundaries conditions of the 4i method (pitfall, what not to do…).

We thank the reviewing editor and the reviewers for their supportive and constructive comments on our manuscript. We are confident that our new experiments and analyses fully address the concerns previously raised by the reviewers. We feel that newly added data and analyses substantially strengthened our manuscript.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

1) This study does not addresses ageing but the transition of the hippocampal niche to an adult or mature stage, the text including the title should be modified to reflect this.

We understand the reviewer’s concern and have carefully edited our revised manuscript. We now carefully avoid the term “aged” when describing results for 12-month-old mice. We also more explicitly introduced what we refer to by the term “advancing age”. We had not meant to portray our findings in the context of “aged” mice (where we fully agree that older mice, e.g., 18-24 month-old, should have been used) but rather in the context of “advancing age”, which we define as functional alteration based on chronological age of an individual/tissue. Maturation until mid-life cannot be ruled out but given that in mice and humans function of cells seems to decline rather early on in life (certainly around the first third of the maximum life span if not much earlier), we do not believe that the changes in neurogenesis (dramatic decline of newborn neurons compared to sexually mature, young adult, 2-month-old mice) seen in 12-month-old mice purely reflect “maturation” of that brain area. We understand that the use of “aged” is not just semantics. However, we do feel that the use of the term “advanced age” is certainly justified and together with the introductory remarks now included will not mislead the reader.

2) There is no evidence that staining for the different antibodies used works as well in the 2-month and 12-month-old sections (except for the similar expression levels of LaminB1 in some cell types), expression of a protein that is not expected to change between the two stages should be analysed alongside the proteins analysed, as a control of consistency in antibody staining.

We agree with the reviewer and have now included novel data showing that

HOPX and MT3 – showing altered expression levels in neurogenic progenitors – do not change expression levels in classical astrocytes with age (please refer to revised Figure 4C). Furthermore, we do show that changes of LB1 with age are cell type specific (please refer to revised Figure 4E).

3) In contrast with the thorough characterisation of neural stem cells, other cell types in the niche are identified with only one marker. This might reduce the ability of the authors to draw conclusions regarding age-related changes in the niche, particularly for cell types such as astrocytes or microglia that can exist in different subtypes or different activation states. This could be discussed.

We understand the reviewer’s concern and have now extended the discussion accordingly. Please refer to page 15 of the revised manuscript.

4) The comparison of the intensity of antibody labelling before and after 6 rounds of elution (Figure 1E) is an important validation of the method. However it should be conducted systematically for each antibody used in 4i as different epitopes recognised by different antibodies may differ in their sensitivity to the elution process.

This is an excellent suggestion and we have now performed the suggested experiments. The new data are included in the revised extended data Figure 1. Furthermore, we have now added a more detailed description how “new” antibodies should be tested. Please refer to page 5 of the revised manuscript.

“To assess potential effects of cyclic staining and repeated elutions on sample antigenicity, adult brain sections were stained with the 18 antibodies used in the present study, imaged, and subsequently subjected to six rounds of elution prior to restaining. Measured fluorescence intensities between the stainings before and after rounds of elution were strongly correlated (Figure 1E and Figure 1 Supplemental), indicating that antigenicity is preserved across repeated cycles of iterative immunostainings for most of the antibodies that we used in tissue sections, similar to the high reproducibility that 4i achieves in cultured cells (Gut et al., 2018).”

5) In the same figure, have the authors verified that not only the secondary antibody but also the primary antibody is eluted in each cycle (by re-incubating the eluted sections with the secondary antibody only)?

We have now performed the suggested experiments, again corroborating the results that were obtained using cultured cells (Gut et al., 2018 Science). The new data are included in the revised extended data Figure 1.

6) I find it somewhat counterintuitive that microniches from 2-month-old animals segregate into two groups of young-like and old-like spots rather than forming a continuum between these two states (Figure 6C). Please discuss the implications.

Indeed, the microniches in 2-month-old mice do represent a continuum in a PCA (indicated by the stretch on component 1). However, there are already at the 2 months time point microniches that do resemble microniches in the DG of mice with more advanced age. We have discussed this finding now more explicitly. Please refer to page 10 and 11 of the revised manuscript. The split between young and old was manufactured by K-means clustering expecting two groups.

7) Proximity of radial processes with CollagenIV and CD13 diminishes between 2- and 6-months and increases between 6- and 12- months. There is therefore no clear trend in the changes that occur across the lifespan. This cast some doubt on the significance of the analysis and the results obtained. Please comment.

The reviewer is correct that stem cell contacts with CollagenIV are reduced at 6 months compared to 2-month-old mice and then increased between 6- and 12-month-old mice (CD13 is not different between 2- and 6-month-old mice). These are the data we observed that may indicate that the situation is distinct between 6- and 12-month-old mice. We do not understand how that result may “cast some doubt on the significance of the analysis”: it would be rather unlikely if the changes we observed would all follow a linear trajectory. However, we have extended the presentation of that finding and also followed the reviewer’s advice to tone down conclusions regarding contact sites (please refer to changes on page 11 and 12).

“To analyze possible interactions between R cells and other cell types in the niche, the area of cell marker co-localization (i.e., proximity) was measured. In general, a greater percentage of radial processes in 12-month-old animals were in close proximity with niche cell markers for vasculature, pericytes, and microglia, than in younger mice (Figure 7A-B). R cell processes were preferentially close to the vasculature in areas with low pericyte coverage (negative for CD13) (Licht et al., 2020), but co-localization of radial processes with CD13-labeled pericytes was increased at 12 months compared to at 2 months (Figure 7A-B). Further, the number of close proximity potential contact sites with IBA1-labeled microglia increased with age, while proximity between R cells and OPCs remained unchanged (Figure 7A-B).”

8) In Figure 7A-B, the authors conduct an analysis of contact sites of radial stem cells with other cell types in the niche. However the analysis does not seem to have enough spatial resolution to conclude that NSCs contact other niche cells rather than being in proximity but without contact. The conclusion from this analysis should be toned down.

We agree with the reviewer and have modified the description of our results accordingly. Please refer to page 11 and 12 of the revised manuscript (and to point 7).

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

I recommend strengthening the reporting of the methods, including examples of the specific analysis, and providing high resolution single-channel images demonstrating colocalisation and associations. This would significantly improve the ability to interpret the results and assess the conclusions.

We understand the reviewer’s concerns and have carefully edited our manuscript to provide more methodological details. Further, we have added the single channels for the R Cell quantification (Supplemental Figure 3).

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Cole JD, Jessberger S. 2022. Data from:Characterization of the neurogenic niche in the aging dentate gyrus using iterative immunofluorescence imaging. Image Data Resource. idr0131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

    Supplementary Materials

    Supplementary file 1. Values and statistics for graphs shown in main Figures 1 and 37 and Figure 6—figure supplement 1 of Figure 6.
    elife-68000-supp1.xlsx (34KB, xlsx)
    Supplementary file 2. Primary and secondary antibody combinations used for antigenicity testing.
    elife-68000-supp2.xlsx (9.3KB, xlsx)
    Transparent reporting form

    Data Availability Statement

    Data was deposited to the Image Data Resource under accession number idr0131.

    The following dataset was generated:

    Cole JD, Jessberger S. 2022. Data from:Characterization of the neurogenic niche in the aging dentate gyrus using iterative immunofluorescence imaging. Image Data Resource. idr0131


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES