Skip to main content
International Journal of Reproductive Medicine logoLink to International Journal of Reproductive Medicine
. 2022 Jan 21;2022:8646724. doi: 10.1155/2022/8646724

Unintended Pregnancy and Associated Factors among Women Who Live in Ilu Gelan District, Western Ethiopia, 2021

Ephrem Yohannes 1,, Bikila Balis 2
PMCID: PMC8799332  PMID: 35097105

Abstract

Background

The World Health Organization Report noted that unintended pregnancy is the most common cause of maternal mortality in developing countries. Most unintended pregnancies occur where access to maternal care is limited, and because of this, many mothers lose their life. Therefore, this study was an attempt to assess the proportion of unintended pregnancy and associated factors among women who live in Ilu Gelan District, Western Ethiopia, 2021.

Method

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in the rural and urban kebeles of Ilu Gelan Woreda West Shoa Zone, Ethiopia, from March 1 to 30, 2021. The study population consists of 540 pregnant women who were living in Ilu Gelan Woreda for at least the last six months during the data collection period. Simple random sampling by lottery method was used to recruit the study subject. Data were checked, coded, entered to EpiData version 3, and then exported to SPSS version 25 for analysis. Both descriptive and analytical statistical procedures were utilized. Both bivariable and multivariable logistic regressions was implemented.

Result

In this study, the proportion of unintended pregnancy was found to be 55%, at 95% CI: 50.7-59.3. Multivariable logistic regression results showed that married women (AOR = 0.117, CI: 0.04-0.38), monthly income less than 1000 Ethiopian Birr (AOR = 4.93, CI: 1.72-14.09), gravidity greater than or equal to five (AOR = 6.07, CI: 2.4-15.28), birth interval less than 2 years (AOR = 3.35 (1.44-7.8)), lack of awareness about contraceptive (AOR = 2.06 (1.03-4.15)), and husband decision-making on health care (AOR = 11.1 (2.07-59.51)) were significantly associated with unintended pregnancy. Conclusion and Recommendation. This study indicated that more than half of pregnant women reported that their current pregnancy was found to be unintended pregnancy. Married women, family monthly income less than 1000 Ethiopian Birr, gravidity greater than or equal to five, birth space less than two years, lack of contraceptive awareness, and health care decisions by husband only showed a significant association with unintended pregnancy. To decrease the current level of unintended pregnancy, all concerned stakeholders should emphatically consider those identified factors for intervention; specifically, Ilu Gelan District Health Bureau and health providers should empower women with health education about family planning and decision-making related to their health issues in the study area.

1. Introduction

Pregnancy is a happy event for the woman, husband, family, and community when it is wanted or intended. However, millions of pregnancies in the world ended to be unintended due to many factors [1]. Unintended pregnancy is a pregnancy that occurred when no children were desired or earlier than the desired point of time [2]. Over 100 million acts of sexual intercourse take place each day in the world, resulting in around 1 million conceptions, about 50% of which are endeavour unplanned and about 25% are definitely unwanted pregnancies [3].

The complications and risks of unprotected sex, unintended pregnancy, and sexually transmitted disease are extremely connected to unintended pregnancy [4]. The study indicated that women with a history of intimate partner violence (IPV) had significantly higher likelihoods of unintended pregnancy, and reducing IPV by 50% could possibly decrease unintended pregnancy by 2%-8% [5]. Unsafe abortion, caused by unintended pregnancies, signifies a significant public health task all over the world. Although numerous approaches have been used to report this problem, unsafe abortion from unwanted pregnancy continued to be the reason for a significant figure of maternal morbidity and mortality [6]. The fundamental public goal is to avert unplanned pregnancies and empowering women to plan their period of pregnancy. Not only this but also, unplanned pregnancy has relation with basic demographic patterns to women's educational achievement and to families' financial welfare [7].

Globally, it was estimated that there are 87 million cases of unintended pregnancies, and 46 million cases resulted to be induced abortion. More than 18 million of 46 million pregnant women end up with unsafe abortions [8]. Unintended pregnancy can be prevented through higher coverage of sexual and reproductive health services [9]. Even though the rate of unintended pregnancy has decreased in both developed and undeveloped countries, the problem is not resolved yet [10, 11]. Worldwide, 44% of pregnancies were unintended in 2014 [9]. While the fall in unintended pregnancy rates in developed regions matched with a reduction in abortion rates, the decline in low-income countries concurred with a fall in ectopic pregnancy rates. In 2010-14, 59% of unintended pregnancies ended in abortion in developed regions, whereas 55% of unintended pregnancies happened in developing countries [9, 12].

The problem of unintended pregnancy affects an enormous proportion of society. The growing plea for lesser families, reducing the age at first sex, and raising the age of marriage have meant that many women expend much of their adult lives trying to escape an unintended pregnancy [13]. Unintended pregnancies can have contrary physical, mental, social, and economic consequences. Mainly, unlawful abortions and related difficulties often follow unintended pregnancies and affect the lives of many women in developing countries [14]. Unintended pregnancy is one of the most community health issues in the world, and it is the main sexual and reproductive health difficulty that brings sophisticated jeopardy of morbidity and mortality for women, often due to unsafe abortion [15].

Few investigators in Ethiopia have reported the concern associated with unintended pregnancy, and little has been discussed about its cause particularly in the rural area. Moreover, determinations to decrease the occurrence of unintended pregnancy were very fragile. In Ethiopia, the required fertility rate is 3.6 offspring as compared with the actual total fertility rate, which is 4.6 children. This shows that the women in Ethiopia are at the problem of having, on average, one child more than they want to have. According to the report of the Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey, the prevalence of unintended pregnancy in Ethiopia is 25%, of which 17% are unplanned and 8% are unwanted [16]. Unintended pregnancy was found to be a main reproductive health problem in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia [17].

Even though some studies have been done on the prevalence and associated factors of unintended pregnancy in Ethiopia and study area, but there is no community-based study conducted at the study area yet. Therefore, this study was aimed at determining the proportion and the factors associated with unintended pregnancy among pregnant mothers attending ANC at Ilu Gelan district, West Shoa Zone, Oromia region, Ethiopia.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Setting

This community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in the Ilu Gelan district selected kebeles from March 1 to 30, 2021. Ilu Gelan district is found in West Shewa Zone, Oromia regional state, and 221 km away from Addis Ababa to Western Ethiopia. The district has 28 kebeles (27 rural and 1 urban). The total population of the district is 88,045; the reproductive age group is 19,484; and the number of pregnant women is 3,055. There are three health centres, 17 health posts, and 1 government hospital in the district [18].

2.2. Study Population and Study Design

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from March 1 to 30, 2021, among pregnant women who lived in Ilu Gelan Woreda at least for the last 6 months.

All the pregnant women who were living in the Woreda during the data collection period were included, but the ones who were unable to communicate and seriously ill women were excluded from the study.

2.3. Sample Size Determination and Sampling Technique

The total sample size used for this study was determined using a single population proportion formula. By considering the proportion of unintended pregnancy, which was taken from the study done in Ethiopia, p = 33.5 % [19], 95% confidence level, z and a margin of error 5%, the final sample size after considering 10% nonresponse and 1.5 design effect was 568 study participants. A multistage stratified sampling technique was used to select the participants. The information received from the Woreda Health Office indicated that there are averages of 100 pregnant women in each kebele (the smallest kebele). The total 28 kebeles in the district have been stratified into two (27 rural and 1 urban kebeles). Finally, eight rural kebeles and one urban kebele were selected by a simple random sampling technique using the lottery method. The final sample size was proportionally allocated to each selected kebele according to the number of pregnant women present in each kebele. Health Extension Workers (HEW) provided a list of pregnant women working in the area, and pregnant women were selected through a simple random sampling technique using computer-generated random numbers.

2.4. Operational Definition

Unintended pregnancy is defined as a pregnancy that is either unwanted, such as the pregnancy that occurred when no children or no more children were desired or the pregnancy is mistimed, such as the pregnancy occurred earlier than desired a pregnancy that was either unwanted or mistimed [20].

2.5. Data Collection Tools and Procedure

Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a structured and pretested questionnaire adapted from a different study conducted on the same topic (49, 51). Ten (10) trained BSc midwives collected the data, and the data collection were supervised by 2 masters in public health holders. The questionnaire was first prepared in English and then translated into the local language Afaan Oromoo and then translated back to English by a third party to check its consistency and conceptual equivalence. The data were properly coded, categorized, and checked for completeness, accuracy, clarity, and consistency by the principal investigator and supervisors before being entered into software for final analysis.

2.6. Data Processing and Analysis

The collected data were coded, cleaned, and entered into EpiData version 3.3.1 by two data clerks to minimize logical errors and design skipping patterns. Then, the data were exported to SPSS Window version 25 for analyses. Frequency and crosstabulation were employed to check for any missing values. Descriptive statistics were used to present the proportion of unintended pregnancy, and a binary logistic regression was used to see the association between the outcome variable and each independent variable. The variables that showed p ≤ 0.25 in the bivariable analysis were considered as a candidate for multivariable logistic regression analysis (using enter method); this was to control possible confounders and to detect significantly associated factors with unintended pregnancy. Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness of-fit test (0.95) was used to evaluate whether the required assumptions were fulfilled or not. A multicollinearity test was implemented to check the correlation among the independent variables; the test indicated that there was no multicollinearity (VIF < 2). The direction and strength of statistical association were assessed by an odds ratio with 95% CI. The adjusted odds ratio along with 95% CI was computed to identify the associated factors for unintended pregnancy. Finally, statistical significance was declared at p < 0.05.

2.7. Data Quality Assurance

Data were collected through a pretested structured face-to-face interview questionnaire. Additionally, 1-day training was provided for data collectors and supervisors by the principal investigator to create awareness on the data collection time, the basic technique of data collection, approaches, and the issue of confidentiality and privacy. To get informed consent and reliable data, a clear explanation of the purpose and procedure of the study was given to the study participants. Moreover, supervisors supervised the data collectors daily. The supervisors and principal investigator for completeness and consistency checked the filled questionnaire daily.

3. Result

3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics

In this study, we interviewed 540 women who were living in the Ilu Gelan District, yielding a response rate of 95%. The mean age of the study participants was 29.30 (SD ± 4.577), and 194 (35.9%) participants were within the age group of 30-34 years. Out of the 540 respondents, 328 (60.7%) were urban dwellers, 328 (60.7%) were from the Orthodox religion. More than two-thirds of the respondents were from the Oromo ethnic group. Most of the respondents were only able to read and write 216 (40.0%). Moreover, most women 222 (41.1%) were housewives, and half of them were married, and most of their husbands, 236 (43.7%), were farmers. Nearly half of the respondents 260 (48.1%) were living with greater than six family members (Table 1).

Table 1.

Sociodemographic characteristics of respondents among pregnant women living Ilu Gelan district, West Shewa Zone, Ethiopia 2021 (n = 540).

Variables Category Frequency Percent
Age 20-24 70 13.0
25-29 193 35.7
30-34 194 35.9
>35 83 15.4

Residence Urban 212 39.3
Rural 328 60.7

Religious Protestant 212 39.3
Orthodox 328 60.7
Muslim 77 14.3
Others 61 11.3

Ethnicity Oromo 411 76.1
Amhara 78 14.4
Gurage 29 5.4
Others∗∗ 22 4.1

Educational level Unable to read and write 178 33.0
Only read and write 216 40.0
Primary school [1–8] 42 7.8
Secondary [9–12] 56 10.4
College and above 48 8.9

Marital status Single 92 17.0
Married 270 50.0
Divorced 132 24.4
Widowed 46 8.5

Mother's occupation Government employee 95 17.6
Merchant 125 23.1
Student 38 7.0
Housewife 222 41.1
Farmer 45 8.3
Daily labor 15 2.8

Husband occupation Government 147 27.2
Merchant 123 22.8
Student 34 6.3
Farmer 236 43.7

Family size ≤2 105 19.4
2-5 175 32.4
≥6 260 48.1

Monthly income <1000 51 9.4
1000-10000 399 73.9
≥10,000 90 16.7

Distance <2 hours 180 33.3
≥2 hours 360 66.7

Waqeffata, Catholic, and Atheist; ∗∗Gambella, Afar, and Tigre.

3.2. Pregnancy and Health-Related Characteristics

Most of the respondents had greater than five gravidity 235 (43.5%), and nearly half of participants 243 (45%) were multiparous mothers. Majority, 204 (37.8%), of the respondents gave birth in less than two-years birth intervals. Most of the respondents194 (35.9%) have a son baby. Nearly two-thirds of the respondents 388 (71.9%) have no awareness of ovulation time. Not only this but also, the majority of the respondents 347 (64.3%) have no ANC visits (Table 2).

Table 2.

Pregnancy and health-related characteristics of pregnant women living in Ilu Gelan district, West Shewa Zone, Ethiopia, 2021 (n = 540).

Variables Category Frequency Percent
Gravidity 1-2 241 44.6
3-4 129 23.9
≥5 170 31.5

Parity Nulliparous 201 37.2
Multiparous 243 45.0
Grand multiparous 96 17.8

Birth interval Nulliparous 201 37.2
<2 204 37.8
≥2 135 25.0

Having son Nulliparous 201 37.2
Yes 194 35.9
No 145 26.9

Ovulation time knowledge Do not know 388 71.9
Know 152 28.1

ANC visit Yes 347 64.3
No 193 35.7

History of unintended pregnancy No 238 44.1
Yes 302 55.9

3.3. Prevalence of Unintended Pregnancy

The majority of the respondents, 302 (55.9%), have history of unintended pregnancy. Most of the respondents 97 (32.7%) did not want the current pregnancy because of their financial problems to raise the child (Figure 1). More than half of the respondent's current pregnancy 297 (55%) were unintended pregnancy (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The reason of unintended pregnancy among pregnant women living in Ilu Gelan district, West Shewa Zone, Ethiopia, 2021 (n = 540).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Proportion of unintended pregnancy among pregnant women living in Ilu Gelan district, West Shewa Zone, Ethiopia, 2021 (n = 540).

3.4. Contraceptive Method Awareness

Majority of the respondents, 301 (55.7%), heard about contraceptive methods. The source of information for most participants 106 (35.2%) was media. Most of the respondents 168 (31.1%) have awareness of condoms as a modern contraceptive. More than half of the respondents 304 (56.3%) have communicated about contraceptive methods with their spouse. Majority of the participants 120 (60.3%) ever used pills as a modern contraceptive method. The health care autonomy (all health-related services) was majorly 266 (49.3%) decided jointly with their husbands. In addition to this, the majority, 234 (43.3%), said that their family planning utilization was decided by their husbands. Not only this but also, the majority's 243 (45%) family income was decided by their husbands. The majority of the respondents, 360 (66.7%), traveled more than two hours to arrive at health institutions (Table 3).

Table 3.

Awareness towards contraceptive method of pregnant women living in Ilu Gelan district, West Shewa Zone, Ethiopia, 2021 (n = 540).

Variables Category Frequency Percent
Do you know contraceptive method? No 239 44.3
Yes 301 55.7

Source of information Media 106 35.2
Health professionals 65 21.6
Husband 78 25.9
Peer 52 17.2

Which one of the following modern contraceptives do you know? Pills 125 23.1
Condom 168 31.1
Injectable 120 22.2
Implants 128 23.7
IUCD 136 25.2
Female sterilization 87 16.1
Male sterilization 56 10.4

Spousal communication about contraceptives No 236 43.7
Yes 304 56.3

Ever used contraceptive No 341 63.1
Yes 199 36.9

Type of contraceptive used Pills 120 60.3
Condom 100 50.3
Injectable 104 52.3
Implants 95 47.7
IUCD 86 43.2

Prevention of unintended pregnancy awareness No 285 52.8
Yes 255 47.2

Do you know of emergency contraceptive No 362 67.0
Yes 178 33.0

Health care decision (all health services) Husband or partner 140 25.9
Me and husband jointly 266 49.3
Me 134 24.8

Family planning use decision Husband or partner 234 43.3
Me and husband jointly 184 34.1
Me 122 22.6

Family income decision Husband or partner 243 45.0
Me and husband jointly 181 33.5
Me 116 21.5

Means of communication Radio 71 13.1
Television 228 42.2
Others 22 4.1
None 106 19.6

Internet, telephone, and cell phone.

3.5. Factors Associated with Unintended Pregnancy

Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that married pregnant women who had husbands were 11% less likely to experience unintended pregnancy than widowed women (AOR = 0.117, CI: 0.04-0.38). The pregnant women whose monthly income was less than 1000 Ethiopian Birr were (AOR = 4.93, CI: 1.72-14.09) almost 5 times more likely to report their pregnancy was unintended than pregnant women who have monthly income of greater than 10,000 Ethiopian Birr. The women who had gravidity greater than or equal to 5 were 6 times more likely to report their pregnancy was unintended (AOR = 6.07, CI: 2.4-15.28), than those who had gravidity of less than or equal to two. The pregnant women who have less than two years of birth interval were (AOR = 3.35 (1.44-7.8)) three times more likely to experience unintended pregnancy than those who have a birth interval greater than or equal to 2 years. The pregnant women who have no awareness about contraceptives were (AOR = 2.06 (1.03-4.15)) two times more likely to have an unintended pregnancy than those pregnant women who have awareness about contraceptives. The pregnant women whom their husband or partner decided about their health care were (AOR = 11.1 (2.07-59.51)) eleven times more likely to experience unintended pregnancy than those who decided their health care by themselves (Table 4).

Table 4.

Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression of factors of unintended pregnancy among pregnant women living in Ilu Gelan district, West Shewa Zone, Ethiopia, 2021 (n = 540).

Variables Category Unintended pregnancy COR (95% CI) AOR (95% CI) p value
Yes No
No % No %
Age 20-24 44 62.9 26 37.1 1.00 1.00
25-29 107 55.4 86 44.6 2.697 (1.4-5.19) 0.99 (0.31-3.21)
30-34 114 58.8 80 41.2 1.983 (1.17-3.35) 0.73 (0.19-2.68)
>35 32 38.6 51 61.4 2.271 (1.34-3.84) 0.35 (0.08-1.56)

Educational level Unable to read and write 101 56.7 77 43.3 1.02 (0.54-1.94) 0.34 (0.11-1.13)
Only read and write 126 58.3 90 41.7 1.08 (0.56-2.05) 0.51 (0.15-1.62)
Primary school 20 47.6 22 52.4 0.70 (0.30-1.62) 0.65 (0.15-2.76)
Secondary 23 41.1 33 58.9 0.54 (0.25-1.18) 0.23 (0.06-0.98)
College and above 27 56.3 21 43.8 1.00 1.00

Marital status Single 67 72.8 25 27.2 1.17 (0.54-2.55) 3.22 (0.49-21.05)
Married 113 41.9 157 58.1 0.32 (0.16-0.6) 0.117 (0.04-0.38) 0.01
Divorced 85 64.4 47 35.6 0.79 (0.38-1.6) 0.58 (0.17-1.98)
Widowed 32 69.6 14 30.4 1.00 1.00

Husband occupation Government 86 58.5 61 41.5 1.00 1.00
Merchant 76 61.8 47 38.2 1.147 (0.70-1.87) 1.57 (0.58-4.28)
Student 11 32.4 23 67.6 0.34 (0.15-0.74) 1.76 (0.46-6.72)
Farmer 124 52.5 112 47.5 0.783 (0.52-1.19) 1.35 (0.57-3.19)

Family size ≤2 74 70.5 31 29.5 2.38 (1.47-3.87) 2.13 (0.73-6.16)
2-5 93 53.1 82 46.9 1.134 (0.773-1.65) 0.74 (0.35-1.56)
≥6 130 50 130 50 1.00 1.00

Monthly income <1000 31 60.8 20 39.2 2.39 (1.47-3.87) 4.93 (1.72-14.1) 0.03
1000-10000 225 56.4 174 43.6 1.13 (0.77-1.65) 1.13 (0.77-1.65)
≥10,000 41 45.6 49 54.4 1.00 1.00

Gravidity 1-2 136 56.4 105 43.6 1.00 1.00
3-4 60 46.5 69 53.5 0.67 (0.44-1.032) 2.23 (0.94-5.33)
≥5 101 59.4 69 40.6 1.13 (0.76-1.68) 6.07 (2.4-15.28) 0.01

Birth interval <2 110 53.9 94 46.1 1.93 (1.237-3.04) 3.35 (1.44-7.8) 0.01
≥2 51 37.8 84 62.2 1.00 1.00

Having son Yes 55 37.9 115 59.3 1.00 1.00
No 79 40.7 90 62.1 2.38 (1.532-3.70) 1.94 (0.91-4.14)

ANC visit Yes 154 44.4 193 55.6 1.00 1.00
No 143 74.1 50 25.9 3.58 (2.43-5.27) 0.71 (0.31-1.6)
History of unintended pregnancy Yes 232 76.8 70 23.2 8.82 (5.96-13.04) 1.06 (0.51-2.22)
No 65 27.3 173 72.7 1.00 1.00

Contraceptive awareness Yes 153 50.8 148 49.2 1.00 1.00
No 144 60.3 95 39.7 1.46 (1.040-2.07) 2.06 (1.03-4.15) 0.042

Spousal communication about contraceptive Yes 156 51.3 148 48.7 1.00 1.00
No 141 59.7 95 40.3 1.41 (0.99-1.98) 1.021 (0.48-2.16)

Ever used contraceptive Yes 91 45.7 108 54.3 1.00 1.00
No 206 60.4 135 39.6 1.81 (1.27-2.58) 0.69 (0.16-2.85)

Health care decision Husband or partner 83 59.3 57 40.7 1.96 (1.22-3.18) 11.1 (2.1-59.51) 0.01
Me and husband 157 59 109 41 1.95 (1.28-2.96) 3.78 (0.98-14.62)
Me 57 42.5 77 57.5 1.00 1.00

Variable of p value ≤ 0.05 in multiple logistic regression.

4. Discussion

This study showed that the prevalence of unintended pregnancy among pregnant women who live in the Ilu Gelan district was 55% (95% CI: 50.7-59.3). The factors significantly associated with unintended pregnancy were marital status, monthly income, gravidity, birth space, awareness of contraceptive, and health care decision.

The prevalence of unintended pregnancy found in this study is in line with a study conducted in Nepal [21] which was 54.5%. In addition to this, a study conducted in Tanzania showed a high prevalence (47.5%) of unintended pregnancy [22]. The study conducted in Southern Ethiopia and Botswana revealed that the prevalence of unintended pregnancy was found to be nearly 43 percent among married women of reproductive age [23, 24]. However, a study conducted in South Africa (64%) indicated that the prevalence of unintended pregnancy was higher than that of the current study [25]. Most of the studies from different countries (Sudan Khartoum 30%, India 22%, Addis Ababa 28%, Oromia regional state 39.8%, Northern Ethiopia 20.6%, and Southern Ethiopia 36.8%) showed that the prevalence of unintended pregnancy was found to be lower than the current study [1, 2630]. The reason why most of the studies reported lower than the current study was that most of the studies were conducted at the health institution level. The other reason may be due to differences in sample size, study population, and sociocultural characteristics and, as well as, due to geographical barriers across the countries.

The current study showed that married pregnant women who had husbands were eleven percent less likely to experience unintended pregnancy than widowed women. In line with the current finding, a community-based cross-sectional study conducted in Ethiopia revealed that being formerly married and separated and never married was significantly associated with unintended pregnancy [31]. The same as the current study in Oromia region Gelemso town being divorced/widowed marital statuses was significantly associated with unintended pregnancy than married women [32]. The reason behind this might be that a widowed woman has a higher chance to have sex with different persons. The other possible reason could be due to economic problems. This can increase the chance of having unintended pregnancies than those married women.

This study indicated that unintended pregnancy was five times higher among women who have a monthly income of less than a thousand Ethiopian Birr than those earning more than ten thousand Ethiopian Birr. This finding is similar to a study conducted in Southern Ethiopia [17]. The survey conducted by the WHO showed that the burden of unintended pregnancy disproportionately affects the poor [11]. A systematic and meta-analysis observational study conducted in Ethiopia revealed that unintended pregnancy was common among low-income pregnant women [26]. This implies that it is hard to feed their baby after giving birth so that the women did not want the unplanned pregnancy.

Grand multigravida women (gravid more than equal to five) experienced unintended pregnancy more likely than pregnant women with gravida of less than two. This finding is supported by evidence obtained from the systematic review conducted on twenty-two papers, which indicated that unintended pregnancy was common among multigravid women [33]. The study conducted in Tanzania also showed that there was an association between unintended pregnancy and grand multigravida women [22]. Not only this but also, a study done in Arsi Negele, Ethiopia, showed that grand multigravida women experienced unintended pregnancy than women with gravida of two [34]. In addition to this, a study conducted in Hossana, Ethiopia, showed that multigravida women had experienced unintended pregnancy than others [35]. In Southern Ethiopia, researchers explored that women with lower parity are less risky to have unintended pregnancy than high parity mothers [23]. Moreover, the community-based cross-sectional study conducted in Ethiopia revealed that being gravidity > 5 is significantly associated with unintended pregnancy [31]. This is because high-gravidity women might already have adequate children and practice sex for enjoyment rather than to have children. In addition, the reason why they are grand multigravida may be due to unplanned pregnancy. These findings can be explained by the fact that couples from rural areas prefer to have more sons and they may end up having more children.

Pregnant women with a birth interval of fewer than two years were more likely found to have unintended pregnancy. This finding is similar to a study conducted in Pakistan that indicated birth spacing less than one year was strongly associated with the unintended pregnancy [36]. The cross-sectional study conducted at Yumbe Hospital showed that unplanned pregnancy was significantly associated with a short birth interval [37]. Limited access to reproductive health services in some settings may lead to unwanted or unplanned pregnancies for those women who wish to use contraceptives at present or in the future, leading to the notion of unmet need for family planning and therefore short birth intervals [38]. Similar to parity, short birth intervals of less than 12 months were also found to be significantly associated with unintended pregnancies in our study as has been noted elsewhere [39]. A study conducted at the University of Cincinnati Medical Centre showed that short birth spacing is significantly associated with unintended pregnancy [40]. This could probably be because women/couples who plan their pregnancy may follow the recommendations for child spacing and therefore end up with optimal birth intervals.

The current study indicated that the pregnant women who have no awareness about contraceptives were two times more likely to have an unintended pregnancy than those pregnant women who have awareness about contraceptives. Consistent with the available literature [22, 4143], our study found that unintended pregnancy is strongly associated with a lack of awareness of contraceptive methods. In line with this finding, a study conducted in South-Western Ethiopia showed that unintended pregnancy was common among women who have no awareness about contraceptives [2]. The study conducted in the Oromia region Gelemso town showed that having no awareness of contraception was significantly associated with unintended pregnancy [32]. Knowledge about contraceptives was reported to be negatively associated with unintended pregnancy [33]. The reason why this study found a strong positive association between users of modern contraceptives and unintended pregnancy can be assumed that method failure might have increased the chances of unintended pregnancy among these women.

The other strong evidence this study found out is that pregnant women whose husband or partner decided about their health care were eleven times more likely to experience unintended pregnancy than those who decided their health care by themselves. Similar to this finding, a study conducted in Bale showed that their husband's decision-making style in the household significantly increases the chance of unintended pregnancy [44]. In Southern Ethiopia's study, it showed that unintended pregnancy was less likely to happen among pregnant who have autonomy in their health care [23]. A study done in Bangladesh stated that a unit increase in the autonomy scale of women decreases the odds of unintended pregnancy by sixteen percent [45]. A study conducted among pregnant Nepalese women found a significant relationship between women's autonomy and unintended pregnancy in a bivariate analysis [46]. A study conducted among pregnant women in Northwest Ethiopia and Arsi Negele revealed that making family planning decisions on their own was preventive against unintended pregnancies [14, 31]. The strength of this study was that it was community-based; it might indicate the true rate of unintended pregnancies in the community, as many of the clients with unintended pregnancy are less likely to visit health institutions. However, the responses of the respondents might be liable to social desirability bias specifically underreporting of unintended pregnancy due to domination and fear of their husband and community around them.

5. Conclusion and Recommendation

The prevalence of unintended pregnancy among the pregnant women living in the Ilu Gelan district was found to be high. This study identified widowed marital status, low family monthly income, grand multigravidas, birth interval less than two years, lack of awareness about contraceptive, and health care autonomy decided by their husband as factors significantly associated with unintended pregnancy.

All concerned bodies should pay particular attention to the factors that directly limit the decision-making authority of women in Ethiopia. The West Shewa Zone Health Office should provide contraceptive services especially the modern methods to women during preconception and postpartum. In addition, the health care providers need to give health education on the advantage of autonomic decisions of women and effective utilization of contraceptives, as it minimizes unintended pregnancy. Finally, we would like to recommend researchers to conduct further mixed qualitative and quantitative studies in the study area.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to West Shewa Zonal Health Office, Ambo University, study participants, data collectors, and supervisors for their cooperation.

Abbreviations

ANC:

Antenatal care

APH:

Ante partum hemorrhage

CDC:

Center of Disease Control and Prevention

EDHS:

Ethiopia Demographic Health Survey

ETB:

Ethiopian Birr

GA:

Gestational age

MDG:

Millennium development goal

MNCH:

Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health

SPSS:

Statistical Package for Social Science

SVD:

Spontaneous vaginal delivery

WHO:

World Health Organization.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Ethical Approval

Ethical clearance was obtained from Ambo University, Department of Midwifery. A formal letter for permission and support was written to the Ilu Gelan Woreda Health Office. Permission was secured from the respective zone administrators.

Consent

All the study participants were informed of the purpose of the study and their right to refuse. Informed voluntary written and signed consent was obtained from all study participants prior to distributing the questionnaires. The respondents were told that the information obtained from them was kept with confidentiality and does not cause any harm to them.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' Contributions

EY conceptualized the proposal and participated in data collection and drafted the paper, approved the proposal with some revisions, participated in data collection and analysis, and revised subsequent drafts of the paper. BB critically reviewed the article and participated in journal selection for publication, gave final approval of the version to be published, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  • 1.Abame D. E., Abera M., Tesfay A., et al. Relationship between unintended pregnancy and antenatal care use during pregnancy in Hadiya Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Reproduction & Infertility. . 2019;20(1):42–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beyene G. A. Prevalence of unintended pregnancy and associated factors among pregnant mothers in Jimma town, southwest Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. Contraception and Reproductive Medicine. . 2019;4(1):p. 8. doi: 10.1186/s40834-019-0090-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barker G., Ricardo C., Nascimento M. Engaging men in changing gender based inequality in health: evidence from programme intervention . Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brady M. Preventing sexually transmitted infections and unintended pregnancy, and safeguarding fertility: triple protection needs of young women. Reproductive Health Matters . 2003;11(22):134–141. doi: 10.1016/s0968-8080(03)02289-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pallitto C. C., García-Moreno C., Jansen H. A., Heise L., Ellsberg M., Watts C. Intimate partner violence, abortion, and unintended pregnancy: results from the WHO Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics . 2013;120(1):3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mulatu T., Cherie A., Negesa L. Prevalence of unwanted pregnancy and associated factors among women in reproductive age groups at selected health facilities in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Journal of Women's Health Care . 2017;6(5):p. 2167. doi: 10.4172/2167-0420.1000392. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Finer L. B., Sonfield A. The evidence mounts on the benefits of preventing unintended pregnancy. Contraception . 2013;87(2):126–127. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.World Health Organization W. World Health Report 2005: Make Every Mother and Child Count . Geneva: WHO press; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bearak J., Popinchalk A., Alkema L., Sedgh G. Global, regional, and subregional trends in unintended pregnancy and its outcomes from 1990 to 2014: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. The Lancet Global Health. . 2018;6(4):e380–e389. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30029-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Singh S., Sedgh G., Hussain R. Unintended pregnancy: worldwide levels, trends, and outcomes. Studies in Family Planning . 2010;41(4):241–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2010.00250.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Blas E., Anand S. K. Equity, Social Determinants and Public Health Programmes . Geneva: WHO Press, World Health Organization; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sedgh G., Henshaw S., Singh S., Åhman E., Shah I. H. Induced abortion: estimated rates and trends worldwide. Lancet . 2007;370(9595):1338–1345. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61575-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wellings K., Collumbien M., Slaymaker E., et al. Sexual behaviour in context: a global perspective. Lancet . 2006;368(9548):1706–1728. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69479-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tsegaye A. T., Mengistu M., Shimeka A. Prevalence of unintended pregnancy and associated factors among married women in west Belessa Woreda, Northwest Ethiopia, 2016. Reproductive Health . 2018;15(1):p. 201. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0649-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kassahun E. A., Zeleke L. B., Dessie A. A., et al. Factors associated with unintended pregnancy among women attending antenatal care in Maichew Town, Northern Ethiopia, 2017. BMC Research Notes . 2019;12(1):p. 381. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4419-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Central Statistical Agency (CSA) [Ethiopia] and ICF. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016 . Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Rockville, MD, USA: Key Indicators Report, CSA and ICF; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Getachew F. D. Level of unintended pregnancy and its associated factors among currently pregnant women in Duguna Fango District, Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Malaysian Journal of Medical and Biological Research . 2015;2(2):75–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.WestShoaZoneHealthOffice. West Shoa Zonal Office: health managment information system general report. 2018.
  • 19.Bekele H., Dheressa M., Mengistie B., Sintayehu Y., Fekadu G. Unintended pregnancy and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care at Bako Tibe district public health facility, Oromia region, Ethiopia. Journal of Pregnancy . 2020;2020:7. doi: 10.1155/2020/3179193.3179193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.WHO. Unintended pregnancy; improving maternal and child health . WHO; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bastola K., Neupane S., Hadkhale K., Kinnunen T. Unintended pregnancy among married pregnant women in Nepal. J Womens Health, Issues Care . 2015;4(4) doi: 10.4172/2325-9795.1000197. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Exavery A., Kanté A. M., Njozi M., et al. Predictors of mistimed, and unwanted pregnancies among women of childbearing age in Rufiji, Kilombero, and Ulanga districts of Tanzania. Reproductive Health . 2014;11(1):p. 63. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Geda N. R., Lako T. K. A population based study on unintended pregnancy among married women in a district in Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning. . 2011;4(7):p. 417. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Doherty K., Arena K., Wynn A., et al. Unintended pregnancy in Gaborone, Botswana: a Cross-Sectional study. African Journal of Reproductive Health . 2018;22(2):76–82. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2018/v22i2.8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Haffejee F., O’Connor L., Govender N., et al. Factors associated with unintended pregnancy among women attending a public health facility in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. South African Family Practice . 2018;60(3):79–83. doi: 10.1080/20786190.2017.1396790. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Alene M., Yismaw L., Berelie Y., Kassie B., Yeshambel R., Assemie M. A. Prevalence and determinants of unintended pregnancy in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS One . 2020;15(4, article e0231012) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Raushan R., Raushan M. R. Level and correlates of unintended pregnancy among currently pregnant young women in India. Journal of Population and Social Studies [JPSS]. . 2017;25(3):194–212. doi: 10.25133/JPSSv25n3.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Habte D., Teklu S., Melese T., Magafu M. G. Correlates of unintended pregnancy in Ethiopia: results from a national survey. PLoS One . 2013;8(12, article e82987) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shewamene Z., Legesse B., Wodajo D. Unintended pregnancy, unsafe abortion and emergency contraception. African Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health . 2012;6(3):150–153. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Moges Y., Worku S. A., Niguse A., Kelkay B. Factors associated with the unplanned pregnancy at Suhul General Hospital, Northern Ethiopia, 2018. Journal of Pregnancy . 2020;2020:7. doi: 10.1155/2020/2926097.2926097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Getu Melese K., Gebrie M. H., Berta Badi M., Fekadu M. W. Unintended pregnancy in Ethiopia: community based cross-sectional study. Obstetrics and Gynecology International . 2016;2016:5. doi: 10.1155/2016/4374791.4374791 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mohammed F., Musa A., Amano A. Prevalence and determinants of unintended pregnancy among pregnant woman attending ANC at Gelemso General Hospital, Oromiya Region, East Ethiopia: a facility based cross-sectional study. BMC Women's Health . 2016;16(1):p. 56. doi: 10.1186/s12905-016-0335-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ali S. A., Tikmani S. S., Qidwai W. Prevalence and determinants of unintended pregnancy: systematic review. World Family Medicine Journal: Incorporating the Middle East Journal of Family Medicine. . 2016;99(3671):1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fite R. O., Mohammedamin A., Abebe T. W. Unintended pregnancy and associated factors among pregnant women in Arsi Negele Woreda, West Arsi Zone, Ethiopia. BMC Research Notes . 2018;11(1):p. 671. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3778-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hamdela B., G/mariam A., Tilahun T. Unwanted pregnancy and associated factors among pregnant married women in Hosanna Town, Southern Ethiopia. PLoS One . 2012;7(6, article e39074) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Habib M. A., Raynes-Greenow C., Nausheen S., et al. Prevalence and determinants of unintended pregnancies amongst women attending antenatal clinics in Pakistan. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth . 2017;17(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1339-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Aleni M., Mbalinda S., Muhindo R. Birth intervals and associated factors among women attending young child clinic in Yumbe Hospital, Uganda. International Journal of Reproductive Medicine. . 2020;2020, article 1326596:11. doi: 10.1155/2020/1326596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lutalo T., Gray R., Santelli J., et al. Unfulfilled need for contraception among women with unmet need but with the intention to use contraception in Rakai, Uganda: a longitudinal study. BMC Women's Health . 2018;18(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0551-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Heller R., Cameron S., Briggs R., Forson N., Glasier A. Postpartum contraception: a missed opportunity to prevent unintended pregnancy and short inter-pregnancy intervals. The Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care . 2016;42(2):93–98. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2014-101165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wolf J., DeFranco E. A., Chen A., Bessett D., Kelly E. Unintended Pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology . 2015;125(Supplement 1):p. 27S. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000462741.31130.2b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Katagwa V. N., Opio R. O., Niwasasira D. N., Onyege A., Naisanga M., Bongomin F. A., et al. Acceptability of human papilloma virus vaccination among primary school girls in Minakulu sub-county, northern Uganda. European journal of cancer prevention: the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP). . 2014;23(4):p. 294. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kassa N., Berhane Y., Worku A. Predictors of unintended pregnancy in Kersa, Eastern Ethiopia, 2010. Reproductive Health . 2012;9(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-9-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Eliason S., Baiden F., Yankey B. A., Awusabo–Asare K. Determinants of unintended pregnancies in rural Ghana. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth . 2014;14(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Darega B., Dida N. Unplanned pregnancy: prevalence and associated factors among antenatal care attending women in Bale Zone, Oromiya Region, Southeast Ethiopia: a facility-based cross sectional study. Global Journal of Medical Research . 2015;15(4) [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rahman M. Women’s autonomy and unintended pregnancy among currently pregnant women in Bangladesh. Maternal and Child Health Journal . 2012;16(6):1206–1214. doi: 10.1007/s10995-011-0897-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Adhikari R., Soonthorndhada K., Prasartkul P. Correlates of unintended pregnancy among currently pregnant married women in Nepal. BMC International Health and Human Rights . 2009;9(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-9-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from International Journal of Reproductive Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES