Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 29.
Published in final edited form as: Inorg Chem. 2021 Oct 4;60(20):15223–15232. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01690

A Third Generation Potentially Bifunctional Trithiol Chelate, Its nat,1XXSb(III) Complex, and Selective Chelation of Radioantimony (119Sb) from Its Sn Target

Aeli P Olson 1,#, Li Ma 2,#, Yutian Feng 3, Firouzeh Najafi Khosroshahi 4, Steven P Kelley 5, Eduardo Aluicio-Sarduy 6, Todd E Barnhart 7, Heather M Hennkens 8, Paul A Ellison 9, Silvia S Jurisson 10, Jonathan W Engle 11
PMCID: PMC8800004  NIHMSID: NIHMS1772440  PMID: 34606252

Abstract

The therapeutic potential of the Meitner-Auger- and conversion-electron emitting radionuclide 119Sb remains unexplored because of the difficulty of incorporating it into biologically targeted compounds. To address this challenge, we report the development of 119Sb production from electroplated tin cyclotron targets and its complexation by a novel trithiol chelate. The chelation reaction occurs in harsh solvent conditions even in the presence of large quantities of tin, which are necessary for production on small, low energy (16 MeV) cyclotrons. The 119Sb-trithiol complex has high stability and can be purified by HPLC. The third generation trithiol chelate and the analogous stable natSb-trithiol compound were synthesized and characterized, including by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1772440-f0008.jpg

INTRODUCTION

Targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) has gained momentum as an attractive cancer treatment method, as seen in recent clinical trials.1,2 Among many TRT radionuclide choices, Meitner-Auger Electron (MAE) emitting radionuclides have unique properties to be advantageously leveraged in cancer TRT.37 Antimony-119 (119Sb, t1/2 = 38.19 h, EC = 100% (MAE))8 is considered one of the most promising MAE emitting radionuclides for TRT applications9,10 and has potential application in theranostic nuclear medicine with its imaging radioisotope congener antimony-117 (117Sb, t1/2 = 2.8 h, γ = 85.9%, 158.56 keV, EC = 97.3%, β+ = 1.8%).11

Antimony-119 is a MAE emitting radionuclide that emits 23–24 conversion electrons and MAEs with energies up to 28 keV and no dosimetrically problematic gammas.12 Electrons with these energies have high linear energy transfer (LET) and consequently high relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in a short range (nm-μm), capable of delivering lethal radiation doses in subcellular ranges while having little off-target toxicity.13 The densely ionizing pathlengths up to 15 μm length in tissue12 reach a cell nucleus from the cell surface.9,1417 Its lighter radioisotope 117Sb emits a 158.6 keV gamma ray that is ideal for single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).14 Together, 119Sb and 117Sb form a theranostic (therapy and diagnostic) radionuclide pair, facilitating precise measurement of patient specific biodistribution and calculations of in vivo dosimetry. 119Sb can be produced indirectly via a tellurium generator.1822 However, direct, no-carrier-added (n.c.a.) production routes of irradiating tin with protons or deuterons avoid medically incompatible eluent systems and dosimetrically problematic tellurium radioisotopes, making the generators difficult to shield.2325

Antimony complexes are used for treatment of parasitic infections Schistosomiasis and Leishmaniasis. These complexes deliver pentavalent antimony to the parasites, and it is believed that reduction to Sb(III) interferes with the parasites’ thiol redox metabolism.26 Clinical treatments for antimony and fellow pnictogen arsenic poisoning employ two chelators: meso-2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) and 2,3-dimercaptopropane-1-sulfonic acid (DMPS).27 Antimony is considered a large,28,29 soft atom,30,31 and similar to arsenic, antimony is thiophilic and forms complexes with thiol donor atoms.3235 The greatest barrier to medical application of 119Sb is the lack of stable complexation with a bifunctional chelator that has the ability to chelate Sb and also covalently bind to a targeting moiety. The only reported chelation of radioantimony was a 117Sb Potassium Antimonyl Tartrate (PAT) complex published in 1969.36 No complex stability measurements are reported, and the PAT complex is incapable of functionalization to molecular targeting agents.

This work explores stable, selective chelation of radioantimony by a potentially bifunctional trithiol chelator originally developed for the complexation of arsenic.3740 The trithiol chelator design includes three thiol functional groups to complex radioantimony and two carboxylic acid arms for potential linker incorporation. The selectivity of the novel trithiol for antimony circumvented usual and cumbersome radiochemical isolation of n.c.a. radioantimony from the tin accelerator target material. We describe a novel, economical production route to small quantities of 119Sb, the synthesis and characterization of a novel trithiol chelate, its chemistry with natSb(III), and its radiochemistry with 1XXSb. Tin target recycling, facilitating isotopically enriched 119Sn targetry and production of radioisotopically pure 119Sb, will be reported in a future article.

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Materials and General Methods.

All solutions were prepared with 18 MΩ·cm deionized water and optima grade H2SO4, HCl, ethanol, and acetonitrile (MeCN) from Fisher Chemical (Hampton, NH). Dimethyl 5-hydroxyisophthalate, pentaerythritol tetrabromide, tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride (TCEP), silica gel 60 Å, potassium thiocyanate, antimony trichloride, and potassium carbonate were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA) or Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Silica gel w/UV 254 TLC plates were purchased from Sorbtech Technologies (Norcross, GA). All solvents and reagent grade acids and bases were purchased from Fisher Scientific or Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification. Unless otherwise noted, only 18 MΩ·cm water was used.

Microwave reactions were performed using a CEM Discover SP microwave reactor (CEM Corp., Matthews, NC). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra were obtained in CDCl3 or d6-DMSO on a Bruker ARX-500 or 600 MHz spectrometer and calibrated with the respective residual solvent. Infrared (IR) spectra were obtained on a Thermo Nicolet Nexus 670 Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrophotometer. Elemental analyses were performed by Atlantic Microlabs, Inc. (Norcross, GA). High-resolution mass spectral (HRMS) analyses were performed at the University of Missouri Charles W Gehrke Proteomics Center; briefly, the sample was loaded by an EASY-nLC system with methanol solvent and analyzed by nanoelectrospray ionization in positive-ion/negative-ion mode on a ThermoScientific LTQ Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer. The methanol solvent flow rate was set to 600 nL/min. HRMS data were acquired for 5 min per sample (30,000 resolving power, 120–1000 m/z, 1 microscan, maximum inject time of 500 ms, automatic gain control = 5 × 105).

Caution! Antimony and Sn radioisotopes are produced by deuteron irradiation of Sn targets as listed in Table 1. All are gamma emitters. Proper radiation safety procedures and shielding were used when handling these radionuclides in laboratories approved for radioisotope use.

Table 1.

Physical Decay Characteristics of Radionuclides Produced from Deuteron Bombardment of Natural Tin

radionuclide half-life (h) emission (keV) (Iγ)
117Sb 2.80 158.56 (0.859)
118mSb 5.00 253.66 (0.996)
119Sb 38.19 25.271 (0.389)
120mSb 138.24 1171.7 (1.0)
122Sb 65.37 564.24 (0.707)
124Sb 1444.8 602.72 (0.978)
125Sb 24181.5 427.87 (0.296)
117mSn 336 158.56 (86.5)

Target Production.

Metallic tin was electroplated as previously reported41,42 from a stannous sulfate based electrolytic solution43 onto 2 mm thick silver disks (∅24 mm). Briefly, stannous sulfate (90 mg; Strem Chemicals, Newburyport, MA) was dissolved in 100 μL of concentrated H2SO4. After addition of phenol sulfonic acid (45 μL; Sigma-Aldrich), gelatin (2 mg; Dot scientific, Burton, MI), and 2-naftol (1 mg; Chem Cruz, Dallas, TX), the solution was gently heated (50 °C) and vortexed. Additional DI water was added to a total volume of 1 mL before adding it into the electrodeposition chamber. Voltage control with a constant 3.0 V applied between the platinum wire anode and silver disk cathode resulted in approximately 50 mg of tin deposited onto an 8 mm diameter exposed surface of the Ag disk over a time period of 48 h.

Target Irradiation.

Using a PETtrace (General Electric, Sweden) cyclotron, antimony radioisotopes (Table 1) were produced by irradiating electroplated tin targets with deuterons at an energy of 8 MeV and beam intensities between 20 and 40 μA, inducing natSn-(d,n)1XXSb and few natSn(d,2n)1XXSb nuclear reactions. An ARTMS Quantm Irradiation System (Richmond, BC) automated retrieval of the irradiated target from the cyclotron, reducing operators’ radiation exposure. For yield measurements and radiolabeling experiments, targets received 10 and 30 μA·h of integrated beam fluence over 0.5 and 1 h, respectively. The radionuclides produced and their decay characteristics are listed in Table 1.44

Target Yield Measurements.

Two hours after the end of bombardment (EOB), radionuclide activities were quantified via High Purity Germanium (HPGe) gamma spectrometry using an aluminium-windowed detector (Ortec, Knoxville, Tennessee) coupled to a Canberra (Concord, Ontario) Model 2025 research amplifier and multichannel analyzer calibrated for energy and efficiency using 241Am, 133Ba, 152Eu, 137Cs, and 60Co sources (Amersham PLC, Little Chalfont, U.K.). The system’s full width at half-maximum resolution at 1333 keV is 1.8 keV. A second HPGe spectrum collection after all 117Sb decayed (>30 h) allowed quantification of 117mSn activity and subsequent correction for 117mSn contribution to 158.56 keV signal. Target yields were measured and decay corrected to EOB. Using a saturation factor dependent upon radionuclide decay properties and length of irradiation, EOB yield can be converted to yield at End of Saturated Bombardment (EOSB).

Synthesis.

Synthesis of Dimethyl 5-(3-Bromo-2,2-bis-(bromomethyl)propoxy)isophthalate [C15H17Br3O5], 1.

Synthesis of compound 1 was accomplished following a modified literature procedure.45 Pentaerythritol tetrabromide (13.8 g; 35.7 mmol), potassium carbonate (9.83 g; 71.1 mmol), and dimethyl 5hydroxyisophthalate (4.98 g; 23.7 mmol) were dissolved in 100 mL of anhydrous dimethylformamide (DMF) under a nitrogen atmosphere in a 500 mL round-bottom flask. The reaction mixture was stirred and heated in a 70 °C oil bath for 24 h. After cooling to room temperature, DMF was removed under vacuum. Deionized water (500 mL) was added to the reaction, and the mixture was extracted with dichloromethane (DCM; 3 × 300 mL). The organic layers were collected and combined, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and taken to dryness to afford the crude product. The crude product was purified via silica gel column chromatography using hexanes:DCM (3:1) as the mobile phase (dimethyl 5-hydroxyisophthalate, Rf ≈ 0; pentaerythritol tetrabromide; Rf ≈ 0.5; 1, Rf ≈ 0.15). The product was eluted with DCM, and the fractions were collected, combined, and taken to dryness to afford the pure product as a white solid. Yield: 67%, 8.2 g. 1H NMR (CDCl3; 600 MHz) δ ppm: 3.680 (s, 6H, CH2Br), 3.956 (s, 6H, OCH3), 4.147 (s, 2H, OCH2), 7.779 (d, 2H, CH), 8.333 (t, 1H, CH). 13C NMR (CDCl3; 125 MHz) δ ppm: 34.22 (CH2Br), 43.83 (C(CH2)4), 52.89 (CH3), 67.89 (CH2O), 120.09 (OC=C), 124.05 (O=CC=C), 132.14 (O=CC), 158.24 (OC=C), 166.02 (COO). HRMS (m/z): 514.86899 (514.8704 calc’d for [M + H]+ of [C15H17Br3O5]). Elemental Anal. Calc’d (found) for C15H17Br3O5: C, 34.85 (35.03); H, 3.31 (3.27). (See Supplemental Figures S1S3.)

Synthesis of 5-(3-Bromo-2,2-bis(bromomethyl)propoxy)-isophthalic Acid [C13H13Br3O5], 2.

Synthesis of compound 2 was achieved by hydrolysis of 1. Compound 1 (2.6 g, 5 mmol) and NaOH (2.016 g, 50 mmol) were dissolved in 30 mL of MeCN in a 100 mL round-bottom flask. The reaction mixture was stirred and refluxed at 94 °C for 18 h. Silica gel TLC was used to monitor the reaction progress (ethyl acetate (EtOAc):DCM:glacial acetic acid (20:80:0.5 v/v/v); 1, Rf ≈ 0.95; 2, Rf ≈ 0.4). The reaction was cooled to room temperature, and the MeCN was removed under vacuum. DI water (50 mL) was added to the reaction flask, the mixture was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 50 mL), and the combined organic fractions were back-extracted with DI water (2 × 50 mL). The combined aqueous phase was adjusted to pH 2 with 3 M HCl. A white precipitate formed, and it was collected by vacuum filtration and dried under vacuum. Yield: 1.222 g; 50%. The purity was over 95% by 1H NMR, and no further purification was performed. 1H NMR (DMSO; 600 MHz) δ ppm: 3.701 (s, 6H, CH2Br), 4.113 (s, 2H, OCH2), 7.753 (d, 2H, CH), 8.114 (t, 1H, CH). 13C NMR (CDCl3; 150 MHz) δ ppm: 34.66 (CH2Br), 43.36 (C(CH2)4), 67.38 (CH2O), 119.36 (OC=C), 122.98 (O=CC=C), 132.80 (O=CC), 158.21 (OC=C), 166.30 (COO). HRMS (m/z): 484.82146 (484.822938 calc’d for [M –H] of [C13H13Br3O5]). Elemental Anal. Calc’d (found) for C13H13Br3O5: C, 31.93 (32.80); H, 2.68 (2.76). (See SupplementalFigures S4S6.)

Synthesis of 5-(3-Thiocyanate-2,2-bis(thiocyanatomethyl)-propoxy)isophthalic Acid, [C16H13N3O5S3], 3.

Synthesis of compound 3 was performed by thiocyanation of 2. Compound 2 (350 mg, 0.83 mmol) and KSCN (725.2 mg, 8.3 mmol) were suspended in 4 mL of DMF in a 10 mL microwave reaction vessel outfitted with a stir bar. The reaction vessel was placed into the microwave at a fixed power of 1 kW, temperature of 120 °C, and reaction time of 20 min. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, poured into ice water, and then placed in the freezer overnight. The solid was collected by vacuum filtration, dissolved in EtOAc, and then dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solvent was removed under vacuum to yield the product as a white solid. Yield: 140 mg, 40%. X-ray quality crystals were grown by dissolving 3 in a 70/30 (v/v) MeCN/H2O mix at 70 °C and cooling to room temperature. 1H NMR (DMSO; 600 MHz) δ ppm: 3.626 (s, 6H, CH2SCN), 4.288 (s, 2H, OCH2), 7.733 (d, 2H, CH), 8.117 (t, 1H, CH), 13.326 (s, COOH). 13C NMR (DMSO; 150 MHz) δ ppm: 37.34 (CH2SCN), 44.49 (C(CH2)4), 68.76 (CH2O), 113.20 (CH2SCN), 119.36 (OC=C), 122.97 (O=CC=C), 132.55 (O=CC), 157.40 (OC=C), 166.30 (COO). HRMS (m/z): 445.98983 (445.99095 calc’d for [M + Na]+ of [C16H13N3O5S3]). Elemental Anal. Calc’d (found) for C16H13N3O5S3: C, 45.38 (45.38); H, 3.09 (3.17); N, 9.92 (9.49); S, 22.71 (21.82). (See Supplemental Figures S7S9.)

Synthesis of 5-(3-Mercapto-2,2-bis(mercaptomethyl)propoxy)-isophthalic Acid [C13H16O5S3], 4.

Compound 4 was prepared by reductive deprotection of 3. Compound 3 (80 mg, 0.189 mmol) was dissolved in 7 mL of 90% MeCN in water in a round-bottom flask and placed in a 55 °C water bath. TCEP (538 mg, 1.89 mmol) dissolved in 70% MeCN in water (7 mL) was added. Ethanol can be used instead of acetonitrile in the deprotection of 3. After 2 h, the reaction was cooled to room temperature, and the solvent was removed under vacuum. The crude product was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL), which was collected and back extracted with water (3 × 20 mL). The organic layer was collected and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solvent was removed under vacuum to yield the product as a white powder. Yield: 26.3 mg; 40%. The trithiol product is easily oxidized, and thus the crude reaction was used in situ in the complexation with antimony. 1H NMR (DMSO; 600 MHz) δ ppm: 2.439 (t, 3H, CH2SH), 2.680 (d, 6H, CH2SH), 3.992 (s, 2H, OCH2), 7.705 (d, 2H, CH), 8.084 (t, 1H, CH), 13.294 (s, COOH). (See Supplemental Figure S10.)

Synthesis of 5-((2,6,7-Trithia-1-stibabicyclo[2.2.2]octan-4-yl)-methoxy)isothalic Acid, 5.

Compound 5 was synthesized by two methods. Method a: Compound 3 (15 mg, 0.0354 mmol) and TCEP (101.4 mg, 0.3538 mmol) were dissolved in 5 mL of 70% ethanol in water and stirred on a hot plate at 55 °C for 2 h. After the reductive deprotection reaction was complete, SbCl3 (11.81 mg, 0.0425 mmol) dissolved in 1 mL of ethanol was added, and the reaction mixture was kept at 55 °C for another 45 min. A white precipitate formed during this time. The reaction mixture was cooled, the white precipitate was collected by filtration, washed with water, followed by diethyl ether, and dried in vacuo. Yield: 14.08 mg; 85%. X-ray quality crystals were grown by dissolving 5 (5 mg) in DMSO (2 mL) containing H2O (200 mL) at 70 °C and allowing the mixture to sit at room temperature for 2 weeks. 1H NMR (DMSO; 600 MHz) δ ppm: 3.193 (s, 6H, CH2S), 3.828 (s, 2H, OCH2), 7.649 (d, 2H, CH), 8.093 (t, 1H, CH). 13C NMR (DMSO; 150 MHz) δ ppm: 28.66 (CH2S), 56.02 (C(CH2)3), 76.46 (OCH2), 119.28 (CH), 122.56 (CH), 132.60 (CCO), 158.58 (COCH2), 166.32 (COOH). HRMS (m/z): 464.88606 (464.88795 calc’d for [M –H] of [C13H13O5S3Sb]). Elemental Anal. Calc’d (found) for C13H13O5S3Sb: C, 33.42 (30.49); H, 2.80 (2.74); S, 20.59 (17.32). FT-IR (cm−1): 1711 (C=O), 1197 (C–O). Note, 1H NMR shows excess residual water at 3.30 ppm. Elemental Anal. Calc’d (found) for C13H13O5S3Sb·2.5H2O: C, 30.48(30.49); H, 3.54 (2.74); S, 18.78 (17.32). (See Supplemental Figures S11S14.)

Method b:

Compound 3 (15 mg, 0.0354 mmol) and TCEP (101.4 mg, 0.3538 mmol) were dissolved in 2 mL of 70% ethanol in water in a 10 mL microwave vessel. The vial was capped and placed into the microwave unit and set at a fixed power of 15 kW and a temperature of 70 °C for 5 min to generate 4. Following the reduction reaction, SbCl3 (11.81 mg, 0.0425 mmol) dissolved in 1 mL of ethanol was transferred into the reaction vessel via syringe. The reaction vessel was then microwaved at a fixed power of 15 kW and a control temperature of 70 °C for 5 min. After cooling, the reaction mixture was centrifuged, and the white precipitate was filtered and washed three times with water and three times with ether. Yield: 14.88 mg; 90%.

Direct Radioantimony Labeling and Purification.

The trithiol chelator (3, 10 mM in MeCN) was deprotected in 1:1 MeCN:H2O using TCEP (100 mM in H2O) to yield 4. After irradiation, the tin/radioantimony target (∼50 mg) was dissolved in 3 mL of concentrated HCl (3 h, 90 °C), and without purification, the 1XXSb reacted in situ (30 min, 25 °C) with 0.01–1 mM 4. A C18 Sep-Pak (55–105 μm particle size, 125 Å pore size; Waters Corporation, Milford, MA) was preconditioned with 5 mL of ethanol (Fisher Chemical) and 5 mL of H2O. The labeled target solution was diluted (1/20) with H2O and passed through the preconditioned C18 cartridge. Five milliliters of H2O was passed through the cartridge to remove unchelated tin target material, and [1XXSb]5 was eluted in 3 mL of MeCN and dried under nitrogen. Next, 20 sequential 30 min HPGe activity assays quantified 118mSb, 120mSb, 122Sb, and 124Sb, and, by fitting the decay of 117Sb and 117mSn’s shared 158.56 keV gamma to double exponential decay equations, determined 117Sb and 117mSn activities in the final purified fraction.

Stability and Cysteine Challenges.

The stability of the [1XXSb] 5 complex was determined by challenging with various chelating agents endogenous to biological systems. After drying, the purified [1XXSb]5 was resuspended in either phosphate buffered saline (PBS; Thermo Scientific), 25 mM cysteine (Thermo Scientific) in PBS, or fetal bovine serum (FBS; ATCC, Manassas, VA) and allowed to sit at room temperature. At various time points (0, 24, 72 h), aliquots were analyzed by reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) using a C18 Acclaim column (4.6 mm I.D. × 250 mm, 5 μm particle size, 120 Å pore size; DIONEX, Sunnyvale, CA) and 1 mL/min flow rate with the following H2O:MeCN gradient: 25% MeCN 0–3.5 min; 25–50% MeCN 3.5–23.5 min; 50–90% MeCN 23.5–24 min; 90% MeCN 24–29 min; 90–25% MeCN 29–30 min; 25% MeCN 30–35 min. For the FBS challenge solutions, an equal volume of MeCN was added to the aliquot to precipitate large serum proteins, which were removed by centrifugation (12,000 rpm, 5 min; Beckman Coulter Microfuge 22R Centrifuge, Brea, CA) prior to HPLC analysis.

Single-Crystal X-ray Diffraction Analysis.

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction data were collected on a Bruker X8 Prospector diffractometer (Bruker-AXS, Inc., Madison, WI, USA) using Cu Kα radiation (l = 1.54178 Å) from a microfocus source. The crystals were cooled to 100 K during collection using a Cryostream 700 cryostat (Oxford Cryosystems, Oxford, UK). Hemispheres of data were collected out to resolutions of at least 0.81 Å using strategies of scans about the phi and omega axes. Unit cell determinations, data reduction, absorption corrections, and scaling were performed using the Bruker Apex3 software suite.46 The crystal structure of 3 was solved by an iterative dual space approach as implemented in SHELXT,47 and 5 was solved by direct methods.48 Both structures were refined by full-matrix least-squares refinement using SHELXL49 implemented via Olex2.50 Non-hydrogen atoms were located from the difference maps and refined anisotropically. Hydrogen atoms were placed in calculated positions, and their coordinates and thermal parameters were constrained to ride on the carrier atoms. The crystal structure of 3 was found to contain regions of disordered solvent that could not be accurately modeled; these were treated by applying a solvent mask as implemented in PLATON SQUEEZE.51 Six hundred thirty-seven electrons were removed from a total void volume of 2014 Å3 per unit cell, equivalent to 1.5 acetonitrile molecules per formula unit. Crystal data, structure refinements, and bond distances and angles are reported in the Supporting Information (Tables S1S4).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In targeted radionuclide therapy contexts, 119Sb has potential to effectively eliminate disease when targeting cellular locations outside of the cell nucleus14 while mitigating off target radiation toxicities.9,15 However, exploration of this potential is limited to in silico studies due to a lack of stable complexing agents capable of functionalization to a targeting moiety. No literature reports of stable radioantimony complexation by a bifunctional chelator exist.52 Complexation of radioantimony builds upon previous work complexing fellow pnictogen arsenic. Antimony is the heavier congener of arsenic. Both arsenic and antimony are thiophilic, generally found in nature as their sulfides (M2S3) and dithiolates (e.g., DMSA, DMPS, British anti-Lewisite (BAL)) are used for treating arsenic and antimony poisoning.53 Thiolate compounds of Sb(III) have been reported, including a recent trithiolate complex.5457 Previously, various trithiol ligands and their natAs and 77As complexes were reported.37,39,40 This is the third iteration in our development of a hydrophilic bifunctional trithiol chelate.

Trithiol Ligand Synthesis.

A trithiocyanate protected trithiol ligand 3 was synthesized as shown in Scheme 1 and deprotected to 4 just prior to use as free thiols (−SH) are readily oxidized. Since alkyl bromides are good leaving groups and are readily substituted with the thiocyanate thiol-protecting group, pentaerythritol tetrabromide was used as the starting material. The two ester groups were then hydrolyzed to their carboxylic acids with one carboxylic acid group available for bioconjugation with a targeting moiety (e.g., peptide, antibody) and the other carboxylic acid improving hydrophilicity. Thiocyanate is a very stable thiol-protecting group and is easily reduced to the free thiol with the mild reducing reagent TCEP.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Synthetic Route for Trithiol Ligand 4

Compound 3 was reduced with TCEP in MeCN or ethanol with 20–50% water to form the reduced form of the free thiol −SH (compound 4) just prior to complexation with Sb(III) to form compound 5. Free thiol groups are readily oxidized and must be used in situ. The advantage of this synthetic route is that, following reduction to the free-thiol, no separation was needed for the metal complexation reaction with Sb(III), either at the macroscopic or radiotracer (nM or less) level, similar to observations with As(III).37,39

Compounds 1–3 were characterized by their elemental analyses, 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra and HRMS mass spectra. Trithiol 4 was only characterized by its 1H NMR spectra due to its ease of oxidation. Compound 3 was also characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (Figure 1, Supplemental Figure S15). This trithiol chelator is expected to further improve the hydrophilicity of the resultant radiometal bioconjugate compared to its previous trithiol analogues.37,39,40 The previous two trithiol bioconjugates were quite lipophilic based on the high hepatobiliary clearance of their 77As labeled trithiol-bioconjugates in mice.37,39 The presence of two carboxylic acid groups in 3 (Figure 1) allows one to be conjugated to a targeting moiety while leaving the second one to increase hydrophilicity relative to the previous analogues.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

X-Seed representation of 3 (CCDC #2071806) showing 50% ellipsoids.

Sb-Trithiol Complex.

The antimony trithiol 5 was successfully synthesized according to reaction Scheme 2. Precursor 3 (1 equiv) was reduced to trithiol 4 with TCEP (10 equiv) after which SbCl3 (1.2 equiv) in ethanol solution was added. The product immediately precipitated from solution. The synthesis was evaluated by both conventional and microwave heating methods. Both reaction methods provided high yields over 85% of the product; however, the microwave reaction was more time efficient (10 min vs 45 min). The antimony trithiol (5) was characterized by 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectroscopy, FT-IR spectroscopy, HRMS, and elemental analysis. X-ray quality crystals of 5 were obtained from a DMSO/H2O mix (Figure 2; Supplemental Figures S16S17). The 1H NMR spectrum shows the expected disappearance of the −SH protons and a downfield shift of the −CH2S protons of 4 on coordination to Sb. The FT-IR shows the expected stretches from the −COOH groups at 1711 cm−1 (C=O) and 1197 cm−1 (C–O).

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2.

Reaction Scheme for Synthesis of 5, Sb-Trithiol

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

X-Seed representation of 5 (CCDC #2071807).

X-ray Diffraction Studies.

Compound 3 crystallized from MeCN and water in the rhombohedral R3¯ space group. It packed forming discrete hydrogen bonded rings containing six molecules, all interacting through the carboxylic acid groups. The six-molecule rings stacked above and below each other and interfaced through the thiocyanate groups, which interact with each other through electric dipole interactions and with the phenyl π system. The disordered solvent is modeled as 1.5 acetonitrile molecules per formula unit. Bond lengths and angles are very similar to the previously characterized trithiocyanate protected trithiol ligands.40 Selected bond distances and angles are listed in Table 2.

Table 2.

Selected Bond Distances (Å) and Angles (deg) for 3 and 5

compound 3 (CCDC #2071806) compound 5 (CCDC#2071807)
bond distances (Å)
S1-C9 1.836(5) Sb-S1 2.4416(5)
S1-C14 1.681(6) Sb-S2 2.4314(5)
S2-C10 1.858(5) Sb-S3 2.4465(5)
S2-C15 1.658(5) S1-C9 1.832(2)
S3-C11 1.806(5) S2-C10 1.832(2)
S3-C16 1.672(5) S3-C11 1.832(2)
N1-C14 1.172(7)
N2-C15 1.198(12) O2(acid) ....O1S(DMSO) 2.602(2)
N3-C16 1.171(6) O4(acid) ....O1S(DMSO) 2.562(2)
bond angles (deg)
N1-C14- S1 177.6(6) S1-Sb-S2 92.25(2)
N2-C15- S2 173.9(8) S1-Sb-S3 91.965(16)
N3-C16- S3 176.1(5) S2-Sb-S3 90.62(2)

Compound 5 crystallized from DMSO and water over 2 weeks. The crystal structure of compound 5 (Figure 2) confirms the expected molecular structure, which is consistent with its solution structure based on NMR and HRMS. The molecule crystallized with 2 equiv of DMSO in the monoclinic space group P21/c. Both acid groups are protonated, and the three thiols are coordinated trigonally to the Sb(III), making it a discrete, neutral molecule. The geometry about the Sb atom is trigonal pyramidal, but the S–Sb–S bond angles are all closer to 90° (an octahedron missing 3 vertices) than they are to 109.5° (a tetrahedron missing one vertex). The S–Sb–S bond angles in the structure are in agreement with those previously reported.54,58,59 Previously characterized As-trithiol complexes have bond angles about arsenic close to 97°.40 The average Sb–S bond length is 2.440(8) Å, which is in agreement with the previously reported average Sb–S (2.447(7) Å) bond distance.54,58,59 Selected bond distances and angles are listed in Table 2.

Several different interactions influence the crystal packing in this structure. An important interaction appears to be between the Sb atom and the S atoms of adjacent molecules, which organize the molecules into chains along a (Supplemental Figure S17). Each Sb atom interacts with 2 S atoms from one neighboring molecule (Sb·····S2 = 3.6987(6) Å, Sb·····S3 = 3.5370(6) Å) and a third S atom from a second neighboring molecule (Sb·····S1 = 3.2529(5) Å), although they are not octahedrally arranged about the Sb. This seems to be an interaction of the Lewis acidic Sb and the Lewis basic nonbonding S lone pair and has been observed in previously reported structures.54,58,59 There are also two short S·····S distances between neighboring molecules (S1·····S2 = 3.3212(7) Å, S2·····S3 = 3.3829(7) Å). These interactions polymerize the structure into an infinite chain parallel to the a axis (Supplemental Figure S17). Additionally, the acids groups each donate a hydrogen bond to the oxygen of a DMSO molecule (Table 2) and accept a hydrogen bond from the methyl group of a different DMSO molecule. These hydrogen bonds cross-link the chains into a network.

Target Irradiation and Chelator-Based Separation.

A choice cyclotron target provides strong thermal adherence and electrical conductance, dissipating kW/cm2 beam thermal power, conducting tens of microamperes of electrical current, and withstanding transitions from microtorr pressures to standard atmosphere. Electrodeposition uses electrical reduction to transition metal ions in solution to a solid phase, forming a metallic material that is electrically and thermally well-joined to a durable, rigid backing. Electroplated natSn targets with lineal mass density 88–128 mg/cm2 withstood 8 MeV energy deuterons at a beam current of 40 μA. End of saturated bombardment (EOSB) theoretical, estimated, and measured yields and EOB measured yields are reported in Table 3. The yield at the end of bombardment, AEOB, is described mathematically according to eq 1, where N is the target atom density, x is the thickness of material slice under consideration, I is the accelerated particle current, σ is the nuclear reaction cross section at specified particle energy, λ is the decay factor, and t is the time duration of irradiation.

Table 3.

Relevant Antimony Radioisotopes Produced from Deuteron Bombardment of Natural Enrichment Tin and Theoretical, Estimated 119Sb, and Measured EOSB Yieldsa

antimony radioisotope theoretical EOSB yield (MBq·μA−1) measured EOSB yield (MBq·μA−1) measured EOB yield (kBq·μAh1-)
117Sb d,n 32.2
d,2n 7.9
total 40.1 48.0 ± 6.2 680 ± 100
118mSb d,n 4.0
d,2n 0.3
total 4.3 1.2 ± 0.4 60 ± 2
119Sb d,n 50.9
d,2n 14.8
total 65.7 70–80b 240–250b
120mSb d,n 4.1
d,2n 4.0
total 8.1 1.60 ± 0.07 4.9 ± 0.8
122Sb d,2n 6.5 7.3 ± 1.5 39 ± 8
124Sb d,2n 7.1 12 ± 4 2.9 ± 0.9
125Sb d,n 2.2 <2.6c <0.7c
a

Uncertainty is presented as the standard deviation of replicate measurements (N = 3).

b

Estimated 119Sb EOSB and EOB yields.

c

No detected 125Sb activity (limit of detection = 7 kBq)61.

AEOB=NxσI(1eλt) (1)

A column was added to Table 3 listing EOB values for comparison.

The yield at EOSB, or “end of saturated bombardment”, AEOSB, describes the yield when the rate of production is equal to the rate of radioactive decay. It is convenient for comparing yields of short-lived radionuclides. EOSB yield is described by eq 2.

AEOSB=NxσI (2)

Conversion between EOB and EOSB is described in eq 3 and is dependent only upon the half-life of the radionuclide and the length of time duration of the irradiation.

AEOSB=NxσI=AEOB/(1eλt) (3)

We report a measured EOSB yield as opposed to a theoretical number predicted from a modeled nuclear excitation function.

Proton irradiation of natSn produces larger quantities of long-lived radioantimony impurities: 124Sb (t1/2 = 60.2 d), 122Sb (t1/2 = 2.72 d), and 120mSb (t1/2 = 5.76 d). Deuteron irradiation of natSn produces only small quantities of 120mSb, 122Sb, 124Sb, the relatively short-lived 117Sb (t1/2 = 2.8 h), and 118mSb (t1/2 = 5.0 h) in addition to desired 119Sb, dramatically reducing troublesome longer-lived contaminants. For example, deuteron irradiation of the most abundant tin isotope, 120Sn (32.58%), predominantly forms stable 121Sb via the 120Sn(d,n)121Sb reaction. With a reaction threshold of 4.7 MeV, the 122Sn-(d,2n)122Sb nuclear reaction is initiated when bombarding natSn, producing less long-lived 122Sb than proton bombardment of natSn. Using TALYS theoretical excitation functions,60 a typical 1 h, 40 μA 8 MeV deuteron irradiation of a 100 mg natSn target theoretically produces approximately 47 MBq of 119Sb, 350 MBq of 117Sb, 22 MBq of 118mSb, 1.6 MBq of 120mSb, 2.8 MBq of 122Sb, 0.1 MBq of 124Sb, and 2.6 kBq of 125Sb at EOB. A similar length and intensity 12 MeV proton irradiation would produce a factor of 6 more long-lived 120mSb (10.4 MBq), 14 times more 122Sb (40 mBq), and over 6 times the activity of very-long-lived 124Sb (0.9 MBq). Although less suitable than proton irradiation for producing large quantities of 119Sb, deuteron irradiation produces relatively low 122Sb and 124Sb activities, the longest lived and most problematic antimony radioisotopes in a working laboratory environment, while also producing relatively larger amounts of 119Sb. The deuteron targets also require less natSn material because deuterons have a shorter range than protons, reducing possible contaminant mass in processing. Thus, deuteron irradiation of natSn is an economical route to developmental, preclinical quantities of 119Sb and 120mSb.

Due to the inability to resolve the low characteristic photon emission of 119Sb (23.87 keV), the EOSB yield of 119Sb was not measured directly. Instead, 119Sb EOSB yield was estimated using the ratio of 117Sb to 119Sb TALYS theoretical excitation functions60 and the measured 117Sb EOSB yield. Because 117Sb and 117mSn share a 158.56 keV characteristic emission, 117mSn activities within irradiated targets were quantified after 117Sb decayed away (>30 h), and measured 117Sb EOSB yields were corrected for 117mSn 158.56 keV signal contribution.

Radiolabeling.

Trithiol 4 rapidly complexes n.c.a. pmol quantities of antimony in 30 min at room temperature in the presence of mmol quantities of the tin target (108-fold excess) at ligand concentrations down to 0.01 mM. At low radiolabeling concentrations of 10 μM, 30 nmol of ligand was used to complex 5.8 pmol of various antimony isotopes—calculated from HPGe gamma spectroscopy measured radioantimony activities, theoretical accelerator produced stable antimony isotopes, and trace metal contaminant limits of detection from reagents within the dissolved target solution. After an irradiation of 30 μAh 8 MeV deuterons, the calculated molar activity for 49 MBq of 117Sb is 8.4 MBq/pmol, and the calculated molar activity for an estimated 240 kBq 119Sb is 42 kBq/pmol. HPLC traces of radioantimony unbound and bound by 4 are shown (Figure 3). The nonradioactive [natSb]5 standard coelutes with radioactive [1XXSb]5 with a retention time of 23.7 min (Figure 4). The trithiol chelator 4 has a strong selectivity for antimony over tin as seen by the full chelation of radioantimony (<nM) in the presence of macroscopic quantities of tin and harsh (∼6 M HCl) solvent conditions. The ability to directly radiolabel radioantimony quantitatively from unseparated target material greatly simplifies radiopharmaceutical production. Greater than 99% of [1XXSb]5 activity was trapped onto the C18 cartridge and eluted with a radiochemical yield of 65% ± 20% (N = 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

HPLC radiation detector traces showing chelation of radioantimony using trithiol chelator 4: a) unchelated radioantimony Rt = 1.5 min, b) direct radiolabeling of radioantimony from an unseparated target solution using 4 Rt = 24.0 min post C18 cartridge purification, c) 24 h 25 mM cysteine challenge Rt = 24.0 min, and d) 72 h FBS challenge Rt = 23.6 min.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

HPLC traces of [1XXSb]5 and [natSb]5: a) 280 nm UV–vis spectrum of compound 5 Rt = 24.5 min post C18 cartridge purification, b) 280 nm UV–vis spectrum of [natSb]5 standard Rt = 23.8 min, c) 280 nm UV–vis spectrum of coinjection containing both C18 cartridge purified [1XXSb]5 and [natSb]5 standard Rt = 23.7 min, and d) radiotrace of matching coinjected [nat/1XXSb]5 Rt = 23.7 min.

[1XXSb]5 was stable over 72 h when challenged with biologically relevant complexing agents. HPLC analyses showed [1XXSb]5 to be 91% ± 9% (N = 3) intact in 25 mM cysteine at 72 h and 97.5% ± 1.6% (N = 3) intact in FBS at 72 h. HPLC traces of [1XXSb]5 challenged with 25 mM cysteine at 72 h and FBS at 24 h are reported in the Supporting Information (Supplemental Figure S18). [1XXSb]5 is thus expected to be stable in vivo. Unchelated compound 4 has a retention time of 24.5 min (Figure 4), which is approximately 0.5 min longer than [1XXSb]5, and the two peaks would be distinguishable and separable. The molar activity of the final solution can be increased by removing nonradiolabeled chelator from [1XXSb]5. The reaction of trithiol chelator 4 with antimony is the first reported complexation of radioantimony with a bifunctional chelator capable of both stably retaining the radiometal and providing a linker group that can be conjugated to disease targeting moieties.

Fractions isolated from the HPLC [1XXSb]5 peak, Rt = 24.0 min, were assayed by HPGe, and the spectra are shown in Figure 5 left. To determine the degree to which 4 complexes solely antimony and not tin target material, 117mSn activity within a HPLC purified fraction was measured. Antimony-117 decays to ground state 117Sn.11 The fitted, logged decay of the sample enabled a half-life measurement that distinguishes 117Sb (2.80 h) from 117mSn (14 d). Fitting the 158.56 keV photopeak over a 30-h span constructed the decay curve (Figure 5 right) and measured a half-life of 2.86 ± 0.02 h, 2.3% larger than the true 117Sb half-life, 2.80 h.11 A measured half-life larger than the true half-life indicates the presence of a longer-lived radionuclide, in this case, 117mSn.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

HPGe gamma spectrum and produced activity curves. (left) HPGe gamma spectrum of C18 purified sample labeled with characteristic emissions, displaying radionuclidic purity. 122Sb (692.65 keV) and 117Sb (861.3 keV, 1004.5 keV) peaks are observed but unlabeled for graphic clarity. (right) Double exponential equation fitting of time activity curve.

Double exponential decay equations describe and quantify relative activities of mixed radionuclide samples in time; using this fit, the 117mSn activity coeluting with [1XXSb]5 at HPLC separation was calculated to be 11.29 ± 0.12 Bq, and comparing initial reaction to final purified 117mSn activity provides a tin decontamination factor of 1.41 × 103. This decontamination factor, describing the high level at which tin target material was removed from the radiopharmaceutical, is impressive for a nontraditional radiochemical production and resulted in a final formulation of tin mass that is orders of magnitude below the estimated daily intake of 4.003 mg inorganic tin for an adult in the United States.62 For a target with lineal mass density of 120 mg/cm2, the final sample holds an estimated 45 μg of tin. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) reports no evidence that inorganic tin is a neurotoxin, mutagen, carcinogen, or immunotoxin or affects reproduction or development in humans.62 No radionuclidic impurities were observed besides the various radioantimony isotopes (useful for radioantimony activity quantification) and 117mSn (Figure 5 left).

CONCLUSIONS

Deuteron irradiation of inexpensive natSn targets produces a profile of radioantimony isotopes with far shorter half-lives compared to proton bombardment while still producing preclinical quantities of 119Sb, making it a better production route for research and development purposes. The various radioantimony isotopes allow useful tracking and quantification of radioantimony activity. No unexpected radionuclide impurities were observed in the final product. We report a method for radioantimony chelation using a functionalizable trithiol ligand, circumventing usual radionuclide isolation from dissolved accelerator targets. This is the first report of radioantimony complexation with a chelator capable of bifunctionalization—an essential step toward exploration of 117Sb and 119Sb in theranostic applications of targeted radionuclide therapeutic contexts.

Supplementary Material

supplementary material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

A.P.O. gratefully acknowledges support from NIH T32 NRSA Institutional Predoctoral Training Fellowship 2T32CA009206-41 and NIH F31 Ruth L Kirschstein Predoctoral Individual National Research Service Award F31CA239617. J.W.E. and A.P.O. gratefully acknowledge support from the NIH NCI P01CA250972. S.S.J. and H.M.H. gratefully acknowledge support from the U.S. Department of Energy Isotope Program, managed by the Office of Science under grants DE-SC0010283 and DE-SC0020159.

Footnotes

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01690.

1H NMR, 13C NMR, HRMS, and FT-IR spectra, X-Seed representations, extended crystal structures, HPLC radiation detector traces, crystal data, structure refinement, and bond distances and angles (PDF)

Accession Codes

CCDC 20718062071807 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif, or by emailing data_request@ccdc.cam.ac.uk, or by contacting The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033.

Complete contact information is available at: https://pubs.acs.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01690

Notes

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Contributor Information

Aeli P. Olson, Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, United States.

Li Ma, Department of Chemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, United States.

Yutian Feng, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States.

Firouzeh Najafi Khosroshahi, Department of Chemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, United States.

Steven P. Kelley, Department of Chemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, United States.

Eduardo Aluicio-Sarduy, Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, United States.

Todd E. Barnhart, Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, United States

Heather M. Hennkens, Department of Chemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, United States; University of Missouri Research Reactor (MURR), Columbia, Missouri 65203, United States.

Paul A. Ellison, Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, United States.

Silvia S. Jurisson, Department of Chemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, United States.

Jonathan W. Engle, Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, United States; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, United States.

REFERENCES

  • (1).Hofman MS; Emmett L; Sandhu S; Iravani A; Joshua AM; Goh JC; Pattison DA; Tan TH; Kirkwood ID; Ng S; Francis RJ; Gedye C; Rutherford NK; Weickhardt A; Scott AM; Lee ST; Kwan EM; Azad AA; Ramdave S; Redfern AD; Macdonald W; Guminski A; Hsiao E; Chua W; Lin P; Zhang AY; McJannett MM; Stockler MR; Violet JA; Williams SG; Martin AJ; Davis ID; Dhiantravan N; Ford K; Langford A; Lawrence N; McDonald W; Rana N; Subramaniam S; Yip S [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus Cabazitaxel in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (TheraP): A Randomised, Open-Label, Phase 2 Trial. Lancet 2021, 397 (10276), 797–804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Lin F; Del Rivero J; Carrasquillo JA; Jha A; Gonzales MK; Lindenberg L; Turkbey B; Lin E; Mena E; Millo C; Chen C; Herscovitch P; Choyke PL; Pacak K Phase 2 Trial of Lu-177-DOTATATE in Inoperable Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma. J. Clin. Oncol 2019, 37 (15_suppl), TPS4159–TPS4159. [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Shen CJ; Minn I; Hobbs RF; Chen Y; Josefsson A; Brummet M; Banerjee SR; Brayton CF; Mease RC; Pomper MG; Kiess AP Auger Radiopharmaceutical Therapy Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen in a Micrometastatic Model of Prostate Cancer. Theranostics 2020, 10 (7), 2888–2896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Pirovano G; Jannetti SA; Carter LM; Sadique A; Kossatz S; Guru N; de Souza Franca P; Maeda M; Zeglis BM; Lewis JS; Humm JL; Reiner T Targeted Brain Tumor Radiotherapy Using an Auger Emitter. Clin. Cancer Res 2020, 26 (12), 2871–2881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Kiess AP; Minn I; Chen Y; Hobbs R; Sgouros G; Mease RC; Pullambhatla M; Shen CJ; Foss CA; Pomper MG Auger Radiopharmaceutical Therapy Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen. J. Nucl. Med 2015, 56 (9), 1401–1407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Baum RP; Singh A; Kulkarni HR; Bernhardt P; Rydén T; Schuchardt C; Gracheva N; Grundler PV; Köster U; Müller D; Pröhl M; Zeevaart JR; Schibli R; Van der Meulen NP; Müller C First-in-Human Application of Terbium-161: A Feasibility Study Using 161Tb-DOTATOC. J. Nucl. Med 2021, jnumed.120.258376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Müller C; Umbricht CA; Gracheva N; Tschan VJ; Pellegrini G; Bernhardt P; Zeevaart JR; Köster U; Schibli R; van der Meulen NP Terbium-161 for PSMA-Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Prostate Cancer. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2019, 46 (9), 1919–1930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Symochko DM; Browne E; Tuli JK Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 119. Nucl. Data Sheets 2009, 110 (11), 2945–3105. [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Filosofov D; Kurakina E; Radchenko V Potent Candidates for Targeted Auger Therapy: Production and Radiochemical Considerations. Nucl. Med. Biol 2021, 94–95, 1–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Ku A; Facca VJ; Cai Z; Reilly RM Auger Electrons for Cancer Therapy – a Review. EJNMMI Radiopharm. Chem 2019, 4 (1), 27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Blachot J Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 117. Nucl. Data Sheets 2002, 95 (3), 679–836. [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Protection, I. C. on R. ICRP Publication 107: Nuclear Decay Data for Dosimetric Calculations. Ann. ICRP 2008, 38 (3), 7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Kassis AI Molecular and Cellular Radiobiological Effects of Auger Emitting Radionuclides. Radiat. Prot. Dosim 2011, 143 (2–4), 241–247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Thisgaard H; Jensen M 119Sb - A Potent Auger Emitter for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy. Med. Phys 2008, 35 (9), 3839–3846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Bernhardt P; Forssell-aronsson E; Jacobsson L; Skarnemark G Low-Energy Electron Emitters for Targeted Radiotherapy of Small Tumours. Acta Oncol. 2001, 40, 602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Hsiao YY; Hung TH; Tu SJ; Tung CJ Fast Monte Carlo Simulation of DNA Damage Induction by Auger-Electron Emission. Int. J. Radiat. Biol 2014, 90 (5), 392–400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Falzone N; Fernández-Varea JM; Flux G; Vallis KA Monte Carlo Evaluation of Auger Electron–Emitting Theranostic Radionuclides. J. Nucl. Med 2015, 56 (9), 1441–1446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Gupta RK; Pramila GC; Srinivasa Raghavan R On the Decay of Te-119m and Te-119. Nucl. Phys 1962, 32, 669–683. [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Miller DA; Sun S; Yi JH Preparation of a 118Te/118Sb Radionuclide Generator. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem 1992, 160 (2), 467–476. [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Miller DA; Sun S; Smithbauer S Separation of Radiotellurium from Proton-Irradiated Antimony Targets. Radiochim. Acta 1993, 60 (2–3), 69–74. [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Bennett KT; Bone SE; Akin AC; Birnbaum ER; Blake AV; Brugh M; Daly SR; Engle JW; Fassbender ME; Ferrier MG; Kozimor SA; Lilley LM; Martinez CA; Mocko V; Nortier FM; Stein BW; Thiemann SL; Vermeulen C Large-Scale Production of 119mTe and 119Sb for Radiopharmaceutical Applications. ACS Cent. Sci 2019, 5 (3), 494–505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Downs D; Miller DA Radiochemical Separation of Antimony and Tellurium in Isotope Production and in Radionuclide Generators. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem 2004, 262 (1), 241–247. [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Thisgaard H Accelerator Based Production of Auger-Electron-Emitting Isotopes for Radionuclide Therapy; Technical University of Denmark: Kongen Lyngby, Denmark, 2008, Ph.D. Dissertation. [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Thisgaard H.; Jensen M; Elema DR Medium to Large Scale Radioisotope Production for Targeted Radiotherapy Using a Small PET Cyclotron. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2011, 69, 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Thisgaard H; Jensen M Production of the Auger Emitter 119Sb for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy Using a Small PET-Cyclotron. Appl. Radiat. Isot 2009, 67, 34–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Croft ST; Sndar S; Fairlamb AH Drug Resistance in Leishmaniasis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev 2006, 19 (1), 111–126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Blaurock-Busch E Comparison of Chelating Agents DMPS, DMSA and EDTA for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Metal Exposure. Br. J. Med. Med. Res 2014, 4 (9), 1821–1835. [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Wardell JL Arsenic, Antimony, and Bismuth. In Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry II; Aberdeen, UK, 1995; pp 321–347,. [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Fischer RC Antimony: Inorganic Chemistry. Encycl. Inorg. Bioinorg. Chem 2016, Iii (No), 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Maroulis G, Ed.; Atomic Static Dipole Polarizabilities. In Atoms, Molecules and Clusters in Electric Fields; Imperial College Press: London, England, 2006. DOI: 10.1142/9781860948862_00. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Maroulis G Cluster Size Effect on the Electric Polarizability and Hyperpolarizability in Small Antimony Clusters Sbn, n = 1, 2 and 4. Chem. Phys. Lett 2007, 444 (1–3), 44–47. [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Garje SS; Jain VK Chemistry of Arsenic, Antimony and Bismuth Compounds Derived from Xanthate, Dithiocarbamate and Phosphorus Based Ligands. Coord. Chem. Rev 2003, 236 (1–2), 35–56. [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Ozturk II Novel Antimony(III) Halide Complexes with Some n-Alkyl Thioureas: Synthesis, Characterization and Study of Their Effect upon the Catalytic Oxidation of Linoleic Acid to Hydroperoxylinoleic Acid by Lipoxygenase. JOTCSA 2017, 4 (1), 81–98. [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Besold J; Kumar N; Scheinost AC; Lezama Pacheco J; Fendorf S; Planer-Friedrich B Antimonite Complexation with Thiol and Carboxyl/Phenol Groups of Peat Organic Matter. Environ. Sci. Technol 2019, 53 (9), 5005–5015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Hadjikakou SK; Antoniadis CD; Hadjiliadis N; Kubicki M; Binolis J; Karkabounas S; Charalabopoulos K Synthesis and Characterization of New Water Stable Antimony(III) Complex with Pyrimidine-2-Thione and in Vitro Biological Study. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2005, 358, 2861. [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Thakur ML; Clark JC; Silvester D The Production of 117Sb-Labelled Potassium Antimonyl Tartrate for Medical Use. Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot 1970, 21, 33–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Najafi Khosroshahi F; Feng Y; Ma L; Manring S; Rold TL; Gallazzi FA; Kelley SP; Embree MF; Hennkens HM; Hoffman TJ; Jurisson SS A New, Second Generation Trithiol Bifunctional Chelate for 72,77As: Trithiol(b)-(Ser)2-RM2. Bioconjug. Chem 2021, 32, 1364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Feng Y; Jurisson SS Trithiol Compounds—Tricky but Valuable: The Design and Synthesis of Ligands for Stabilizing Radioarsenic for Radiopharmaceutical Development. Strateg. Tactics. Org. Synth 2019, 14, 207–224. [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Feng Y; DeGraffenreid AJ; Phipps MD; Rold TL; Okoye NC; Gallazzi FA; Barnes CL; Cutler CS; Ketring AR; Hoffman TJ; Jurisson SS A Trithiol Bifunctional Chelate for 72,77As: A Matched Pair Theranostic Complex with High in Vivo Stability. Nucl. Med. Biol 2018, 61, 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (40).DeGraffenreid AJ; Feng Y; Barnes CL; Ketring AR; Cutler CS; Jurrison SS Trithiols and Their Arsenic Comounds for Potential Use in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiopharmaceuticals. Nucl. Med. Biol 2016, 43 (5), 288–295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (41).Olson AP; Ellison PA; Radchenko V; Barnhart TE; Engle JW Electrodeposition and Recovery of Sn Targets for Sb-119 Production. In Workshop in Targetry and Target. Chemistry 2018, 17, 63. [Google Scholar]
  • (42).Olson AP; Ellison PA; Aluicio-sarduy E; Kostelnik T; Mynerich J; Barnhart TE; Nickles J; Radchenko V; Engle JW Target Development and Chemical Separation for Radioantimony Production. In European Association of Nuclear Medicine Annual Congress; OP-090, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • (43).Møller P; Nielsen LP Advanced Surface Technology, 2nd ed.; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • (44).IAEA. Live Chart of Nuclides: nuclear structure and decay data. https://nds.iaea.org/relnsd/vcharthtml/VChartHTML.html (accessed 2021-05-18). [Google Scholar]
  • (45).Hou YL; Yee KK; Wong YL; Zha M; He J; Zeller M; Hunter AD; Yang K; Xu Z Metalation Triggers Single Crystalline Order in a Porous Solid. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138 (45), 14852–14855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (46).Apex3, AXScale, and SAINT; Brunker AXS, Inc.: Madison, WI, 2017.
  • (47).Sheldrick GM SHELXT - Integrated Space-Group and Crystal-Structure Determination. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Found. Adv 2015, 71 (1), 3–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (48).(a) Sheldrick GM SHELXS; Göttingen, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]; (b) Sheldrick GM SHELXS 97, Program for the Solution of Crystal Structure; University of Göttingen: Göttingen, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • (49).Sheldrick GM Crystal Structure Refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C: Struct. Chem 2015, 71 (1), 3–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (50).Dolomanov OV; Bourhis LJ; Gildea RJ; Howard JAK; Puschmann H OLEXA2: A Complete Structure Solution, Refinement and Analysis Program. J. Appl. Crystallogr 2009, 42 (2), 339–341. [Google Scholar]
  • (51).Spek AL PLATON SQUEEZE: A Tool for the Calculation of the Disordered Solvent Contribution to the Calculated Structure Factors. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C: Struct. Chem 2015, 71 (1), 9–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (52).Randhawa P; Olson AP; Chen S; Gower-Fry KL; Hoehr C; Engle JW; Ramogida CF; Radchenko V Meitner-Auger Electron Emitters for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy: Mercury-197m/g and Antimony-119. Curr. Radiopharm 2021, 14, 394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (53).Andersen O Principles and Recent Developments in Chelation Treatment of Metal Intoxication. Chem. Rev 1999, 99 (9), 2683–2710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (54).Moaven S; Watson BT; Thompson SB; Lyons VJ; Unruh DK; Casadonte DJ; Pappas D; Cozzolino AF Self-Assembly of Reversed Bilayer Vesicles through Pnictogen Bonding: Water-Stable Supramolecular Nanocontainers for Organic Solvents. Chem. Sci 2020, 11 (17), 4374–4380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (55).Ioannou PV; Tsivgoulis GM Thiolates of Arsenic(III), Antimony(III), and Bismuth(III) with Dl-α-Dihydrolipoic Acid. Monatsh. Chem 2014, 145 (6), 897–909. [Google Scholar]
  • (56).Adeyemi JO; Onwudiwe DC Chemistry and Some Biological Potential of Bismuth and Antimony Dithiocarbamate Complexes. Molecules 2020, 25 (2), 305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (57).Chauhan HPS; Carpenter N; Bhatiya S; Joshi S Synthesis, Characterization, Structural Elucidation and Biological Screening of Some Bis(Idisobutyldithiophosphato)Antimony(III) Complexes. Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem 2019, 194 (12), 1116–1125. [Google Scholar]
  • (58).Cea-olivares R; Mufioz-hern M; Hern S; Silvestru C On the 5-Thia-(Substituted)-1-Oxa-4,6-Dithia-5-Stibocanes. Synthesis and Characterization of O(CH2CH2S)2Sb-SCH2CH2OCH2CH2S-Sb(SCH2CH2)2O, a Compound with Two Different Eight-Membered Ring Conformations. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1995, 236, 31–36. [Google Scholar]
  • (59).García Y García P; Martínez-Salas P; Hernández-Ortega S; Román-Bravo P; López-Cardoso M; Del Carmen Pérez-Redondo M; Vargas-Pineda G; Cotero-Villegas AM; Cea-Olivares R Synthesis, Structure and Characterization of New Stibocanes Substituted with Dithiophosphate Ligands. Polyhedron 2012, 37 (1), 48–53. [Google Scholar]
  • (60).Koning A; Rochman DA; Sublet JC; Dzysiuk NR; Fleming MJ; van der Mark SC TENDL: Complete Nuclear Data Library for Innovative Nuclear Science and Technology. Nucl. Data Sheets 2019, 155, 1–55. [Google Scholar]
  • (61).Currie LA Limits for Qualitative Detection and Quantitative Determination: Application to Radiochemistry. Anal. Chem 1968, 40 (3), 586–593. [Google Scholar]
  • (62).Harper C; Llados F; Diamond G; Chappell LL Toxicological Profile for Tin and Tin Compounds. Agency Toxic Subst. Dis. Regist 2005, 2, 1–426. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supplementary material

RESOURCES