Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 30.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2020 Aug 28;239:111314. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2020.111314

Diagnostic urinary cfDNA detected in human cystic echinococcosis

Luz Toribio 1, Saul Santivanez 1,3, Alan L Scott 2, Raul Enriquez 1, Cesar Sedano 1, Percy Soto-Becerra 1, Hector H Garcia 1,3, Clive J Shiff 2,*, Cysticercosis Working Group in Peru
PMCID: PMC8801304  NIHMSID: NIHMS1772042  PMID: 32866606

Abstract

Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is a major neglected tropical zoonotic disease caused by the tissued-welling larval stage of cestode parasite Echinococcus granulosus. For individuals suspected of CE, the diagnostic standard is imaging using ultrasonography, X rays, or computed tomography. These resource-demanding and expensive procedures are rarely available in endemic rural areas where CE is most prevalent. There is a critical need for a new approach to identify CE patients so that they can be managed early in the course of their infection. This study reports on the results of a diagnostic approach that identifies E. granulosus-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the urine of CE patients. Utilizing PCR to amplify a fragment of a major tandem repeat element found in E. granulosus nuclear DNA, urine samples from all seven imaging-confirmed CE patients who harbored active liver cysts were positive. In addition, the urine samples from 2/4 patients who presented with non-viable/calcified liver cysts were also PCR positive for the repeat fragment. To our knowledge, this is the first report of using parasite cfDNA from urine to diagnose CE. This approach provides an easy to implement and cost-effective method to survey for the prevalence of E. granulosus in humans populations.

Keywords: Diagnosis of hydatid cysts, cell-free DNA, hydatidosis, urinary DNA, Echinococcus granulosus, Peru

1). Introduction

Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is a neglected tropical zoonosis caused by the cestode Echinococcus granulosus. Several herbivorous and omnivorous species function as intermediate hosts of E. granulosus when they ingest parasite eggs from contaminated food and water. The parasites develop into transmissible larvae in the viscera. Canidae (dogs, dingoes, wolves and coyotes), the definitive hosts, obtain the parasite when they consume larvae-containing viscera. The adult tapeworm, which resides in the intestine of the definitive host, broadcasts embryonated eggs into the environment in the feces. Humans are accidental intermediate hosts when these eggs are inadvertently consumed. The eggs hatch and the larvae cross the intestinal mucosae and encyst principally in the liver or lungs [1, 2].

CE impacts up to a million people per year, and it is considered a serious public health problem in farming regions around the world due its detrimental impact on human health and on the livestock industry resulting in ~$2 billion dollars in loss annually [3]. In rural regions of South America the prevalence of CE can be as high as 5%-10% [1, 3, 4], with an estimated incidence of 3,000+ cases per year in Peru alone [5]. The principal risk factors for CE are the use of dogs to herd sheep, feeding dogs with raw sheep viscera, and absence of an effective sanitary infrastructure [6, 7].

Diagnosis of CE is challenging, particularly in the early stages when the infection is largely asymptomatic. Definitive diagnosis of CE is based on imaging methods using ultrasonography for liver CE and chest X-Ray for lung CE, followed by validation with computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These imaging techniques are expensive and largely unavailable to the rural populations that are most impacted by this disease. Serological tests have been developed to detect host antibodies or parasite antigens, but these tests have limited sensitivity and lack sufficient specificity. There is a need for diagnostic approaches appropriate for community-based screening to assess the prevalence of CE in children and adults [8-10]. Although there are several reports of using parasite genomic and mitochondrial DNA to differentiate Echinococcus species and haplotypes from humans and animals [3, 8, 11-14], the use of cfDNA for the diagnosis of echinococcosis has been limited.

The analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has found wide used in the clinic setting for non-invasive prenatal testing [15, 16], cancer diagnosis and monitoring [17, 18], and detecting pathogens [19]. Parasite-derived cfDNA in body fluids has been demonstrated to be useful for the diagnosis of malaria, trypanosomiasis, leishmaniasis, schistosomiasis, strongyloidiasis, filariasis [20-22], and echinococcosis [7, 23-26]. Echinococcus-derived nuclear cfDNA was detectible in the circulation of experimentally infected animals [23] and patients [23, 26] with polycystic echinococcosis. Studies have employed deep sequencing approaches to define the complexity and nature of the parasite cfDNA circulating in the blood of patients with various clinical forms of echinococcosis [25, 26]. Ji et al. [25] showed that E. granulosus cfDNA in the circulation of patients ranged from ~100 bp to over 350 bp and mapped uniformly across the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes.

Our group has developed PCR-based analyses to detect helminth-derived cfDNA in the urine of patients with schistosomiasis (Schistosoma mansoni, S. haematobium), stongyloidiasis (Strongyloides stercoralis) and neurocysticercosis (Taenia solium) with high sensitivity and specificity [27-30]. This non-invasive sampling method is well-suited for population-based surveys to assess the prevalence of the infection, something that heretofore has not been feasible. The goal of this study was to provide proof-of-principle evidence that E. granulosus-derived cfDNA can be detected in the urine from imaging-confirmed CE patients and to demonstrate the potential of urine-based diagnostics as a first-line test for detection of hydatid cysts in a rural setting in Peru.

2). Materials and Methods

a). Study population

Urine samples were collected from 12 patients who were confirmed as harboring liver or lung CE cysts by ultrasound or thorax/abdominal CT scans. The patients resided in Corpacancha-Junín, a highly endemic village in the Central Peruvian Highlands, with altitude of 4,141 m above sea level. A brief survey was applied to register their epidemiological information and to obtain written consent to participate in an ultrasound survey for CE and to provide urine samples. Subjects between the ages of 3 and 18 years required parental consent to participate.

Additionally, urine samples were collected from 25 healthy volunteers from Cayetano Heredia research laboratories to serve as controls. These volunteers were selected based on self-reporting that they had no history of exposure to the E. granulosus. The study protocol and consent forms were reviewed and approved by the main IRB of the Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (approval code 102270).

b). Sample collection

A total of 40 ml of fresh urine was collected in a disposable plastic receptacle and filtered into a 50 ml Falcon tube through a filter paper cone fitted with Whatman #3 paper (GE Healthcare, Illinois, USA) [27]. The urine was filter processed within 3 hours of collection. The filter paper specimens were dried overnight at room temperature, labeled, placed individually in a sealed plastic bag with desiccant, stored at room temperature and transported to the facilities of Cayetano Heredia University in Lima for extraction and PCR analysis.

c). DNA extraction

Fifteen 1.0 mm diameter discs were punched from the central area of the filter paper and the discs were placed in 500 μL nuclease-free water in a 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube. The tubes were incubated at 95°C for 10 minutes in dry bath and then were left at room temperature with gentle agitation for at least 12 hours. The next day, the tubes were centrifuged at 8,000 rpm for 5 minutes and the supernatant was transferred to a Qiagen spin column. Cell-free DNA was recovered from the column following the manufacturer’s instructions (QIamp Mini Kit -Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA quantification was carried out with a Nanodrop system (NanoDrop Technologies LLC, Wilmington, DE) and the extracted cfDNA was stored at −20°C.

d). Detection of cfDNA

Primers were synthesized to amplify a 133 bp fragment of the E. granulosus EgG1 Hae III repeat as reported by Abbasi et al. [31]. The repeat is estimated to be found in the E. granulosus genome at ~7,000 copies that are arranged in tandem in groups of 2-6 repeats [31]. The primer sequences were: forward Eg1121a GAATGCAAGCAGCAGATG and Eg1122a reverse GAGATGAGTGAGAAGGAGTG. The PCR amplification mix contained 15 μL of final volume containing 7.5 μL of Taq 2× Master mix (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA), 0.75 μL of each primer (10 μM), 1.5 μL of MgCl2 (25 mM), 2.5 μL of water, and 2 μL of cfDNA. The PCR conditions were: 95°C for 10 minutes, 35 cycles of 95°C for 1 minute, 57°C for 90 seconds and 72°C for 1 minute; and a final extension step of 72°C for 5 minutes. A positive control was obtained by pooling the cfDNA from 10 confirmed, image-positive patients who reside in the same community as the test patients. The PCR product was visualized on a 2% agarose gel. The samples were assayed in duplicate and triplicate for noncongruent results. All of the amplicons produced in this study were sequence-verified as the E. granulosus EgG1Hae III repeat fragment.

3). Results

a). Patients and Imaging findings:

Of the 12 CE cases that tested positive using either ultrasound or CT scans, four were male and eight were female with ages ranging from 7 to 98 years (Table 1). The control group contained seven men and 18 women with ages ranging from 22 to 63 years. Of the 11 CE patients that harbored liver cysts, five had cysts in other organs: three in the lungs (patients 2, 3, and 11), one in the spleen (patient 1), and one in the uterus (patient 6). Two patients had multiple liver cysts (patient 3 had three and patient 9 had two). According to the ultrasound classification developed by the World Health Organization Informal Working Group on Echinococcosis (WHO-IWGE) for CE in the liver, of the 11 patients with liver cysts, five CE patients harbored eight active cysts (CE1 in classification), two CE patients had two transitional cysts (CE3 in classification), and four CE patients had four inactive cysts (one CE4 and three CE5 in classification) (Table 1). For the three patients who harbored cysts in both the liver and the lungs, all of the lung cysts were active. For the single patient that harbored cysts only in the lungs (patient 12), there was a mix of active and inactive cysts.

Table 1.

PCR results for the detection of a 133 bp fragment of the Echinococcus granulosus EgG1Hae III repeat DNA in the urine of imaging-confirmed patients harboring cysts in the liver and lungs.

CE Patient
No.
Sex/Age
(years)
ultrasound Abdominal
CT
Tissue volume
(mm3)
WHO
IGWE
EgG1 Hae III
PCR
1* F/14 positive NE liver 32.7 CE1 positive
2 F/10 positive negative liver 385 CE1 positive
lung 7.6 active
lung 8.5 active
lung 2.25 active
3 F/46 positive NE liver 56.5 CE1 positive
lung 5.23 active
4 F/7 positive negative liver 4.1 CE1 positive
5 M/10 positive NE liver 797 CE1 positive
liver 23.3 CE1
liver 795 CE1
6** F/25 positive NE liver 2240 CE3 positive
7 F/12 positive NE liver 110 CE3 positive
8 F/32 positive NE liver 22.4 CE4 negative
9 M/29 negative positive liver 8.75 CE5 positive
liver 2.15 CE5
10 F/98 negative positive liver 82.32 CE5 negative
11 F/8 negative positive liver 4.06 CE5 positive
lung 97.66 active
12 M/59 positive NE lung 1.4 inactive negative
lung 21.2 inactive
lung 4.6 active
lung 66.6 active
*

harbored a cyst in the spleen

**

harbored a cyst in the uterus

NE = not evaluated

b). PCR results:

The Eg1121a-Eg1122a primer set generated a major PCR product at 133 bp fragment from the 269 pb EgG1 Hae III tandem repeat with as little as ~1 fg of E. granulosus template DNA [31] (data not shown). The PCR product generated when the urine-derived cfDNA was used as a template was 133 bp and when sequenced the PCR products had 92% to 95% identity to the reported EgG1 Hae III sequence (GenBank Accession DQ157697.1; data not shown).

Between 2.96 to 9.42 ng/μl of total cfDNA was extracted from the test and control urine filter samples. The amount of total cfDNA recovered from the urine did not correlate with the number of cysts carried by the image-positive patients (R2=0.185).

Overall, the E. granulosus EgG1Hae III repeat-derived cfDNA was PCR-amplified from the urine samples of 9/12 (75%) of the imaging-confirmed CE cases (Table 1). Of note, all seven of the urine samples from patients with presumptively viable (CE1) or transitional (CE3) liver cysts were EgG1Hae III PCR-positive. Of the urine samples obtained from patients with calcified and degenerating liver cysts (CE4 and CE5) two were EgG1Hae III PCR-positive and two were EgG1Hae III PCR-negative. The third PCR-negative urine sample was derived from the single patient who was ultrasound positive only in the lungs with a mix of active and inactive cysts.

It is important to report that one out of the 25 urine samples collected from control volunteers, one tested positive. Interestingly, upon further questioning, it was revealed that the person who provided the positive sample originated from an area endemic for E. granulosus, thus raising the possibility that the volunteer was cryptically infected with the parasite.

These results demonstrate that the detection of parasite-derived cfDNA from a urine sample has potential utility as a first-line diagnostic approach for the identification of CE patients harboring active and transitional E. granulosus cysts in the liver. Although the numbers were limited, findings also indicated that the use of the EgG1Hae III PCR-based detection in urine samples from patients who have inactive cysts or active cysts outside the liver may be less sensitive.

4). Discussion

The absence of obvious symptoms during the early stages of CE presents a challenge to identify infected individuals. Although attempts have been made over the years to develop antibody-based and antigen-based serological diagnostic approaches to screen populations, CE remains under diagnosed and typically identified only when complications arise or by chance. Currently there is no practical way of defining community-based prevalence of this infection. The tests designed to detect anti-parasite antibodies or parasite-derived antigens have proven to lack the sensitivity and specificity required to diagnose CE in the clinic or in the field [32]. The WHO standard for diagnosis is ultrasonography imaging of parasite cysts associated with the internal organs followed by validation with CT and/or MRI scans. This resource intensive approach likely identifies only a fraction of the infected individuals.

There is a clear need to develop diagnostic approaches with sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be a useful tool to screen asymptomatic children and adults for infection with E. granulosus. Here we report on the potential effectiveness of an approach that detects E. granulosus cfDNA amplified from the urine of image-confirmed CE patients.

In this study, we adapted a simple, low-tech field processing protocol that has been used previously in urine-based diagnostic tests for other helminth parasites [27-30]. A key feature of this processing protocol is a step where ~40 ml of freshly collected urine is passed through a cellulose membrane to capture, concentrate and stabilize cfDNA and then filter is dried for easy transport of the sample to the lab for analysis and/or long-term storage. In our hands, parasite cfDNA can be extracted from properly stored filters for over one year [27]. While such factors as the mechanism of binding of the cfDNA to the filter, the influence of urine pH, protein and lipid content on cfDNA binding, the efficiency of cfDNA capture on and elution from the cellulose membrane are not known, the procedure has proven a reliable, practical, and cost-effective for the collection pathogen-derived transrenal cfDNA in a field setting [27, 29, 30].

The proportion of E. granulosus-derived cfDNA contained in the total cfDNA isolated from the filter-processed urine samples is not known. Ji et al. used a non-biased sequencing approach to identify the cfDNAs isolated from serum samples obtained from CE patients and reported that on average parasite-derived sequences were found at the level of 0.433 sequences per million read-pairs [25]. Wan et al., using a similar sequencing approach, also concluded that Echinococcus cfDNA in plasma is a very low proportion of the total cfDNA [26]. This is in stark contrast to the levels of fetal cfDNA in the mother’s blood which ranges from ~3% during early gestation to ~6% during the later stages of pregnancy [33]. Since the parasite cfDNA in the serum is the presumed proximal source of the cfDNA found in the urine [34, 35], it is likely that only a small proportion of the cfDNA isolated from the urine of patients is parasite-derived.

Based on our extensive experience targeting repetitive genomic DNA to devise urine-based cfDNA diagnostics for other helminth parasites [27-30], the EgG1Hae III repeat was selected for the development of the PCR assay. The rationale for this selection is based on the presumption that, if the cfDNA was generated from the parasite’s nuclear DNA at random, this repeat, which is present at ~7,000 tandem copies arranged in 2-6 clusters [31], would likely be one of the most highly represented nucleic acid species in the parasite cfDNA. These assumptions are supported by findings that demonstrate that the genomic release points for parasite cfDNAs isolated from blood map evenly across the known Echinococcus nuclear genome [25] and that a majority of Echinococcus cfDNA mapped to non-coding and low complexity regions of the parasite’s genome [26]. Further, Wan et al. demonstrated that a number of different repeats present in the Echinococcus genome are readily detected amongst the cfDNAs isolated from patient’s blood [26]. In future work, it will be of interest to know if any of these additional repeat fragments found in the blood are also found in the urine of patients and can be incorporated into a multiplex assay that will increase the sensitivity of urine-based diagnosis of CE.

Our results demonstrated that the E. granulosus-specific DNA repeat fragment was most efficiently detected in the urine of patients with liver cysts classified as active. The urine from patients harboring calcified liver cysts (CE4 and CE5) gave a mixed signal for the E. granulosus EgG1Hae III repeat DNA (Table 1). These variable results from patients with calcified cysts are likely a function of the age of the calcified cyst and the level of inflammation in the cyst-proximal microenvironment. It is of interest to note that patients harboring calcified brain cysts caused by Taiena solium were also shown to be positive for parasite cfDNA in the blood [36] and in the urine [30].

While not a point of care test, the approach outlined here has the potential to be a cost-effective method to identify both asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals harboring active liver cysts and who require confirmatory diagnosis and disease management. The protocol used here outlines a low-tech pipeline where the urine specimen is filtered, dried and packaged in the field in preparation for transport and analysis in the laboratory. In addition to its prospective utility as a scalable diagnostic tool, detection of parasite-derived cfDNA in urine might be used to monitor the efficacy of therapeutic treatments for the elimination of the parasite [27]. Additionally, this approach could prove to be an easy to implement, non-invasive approach for early case detection and to monitor the prevalence of CE in rural communities.

While limited in scope, to our knowledge, this study is the first to report the potential for using a urine-based approach to detect E. granulosus cfDNA as a diagnostic test for CE. While more extensive studies are required to validate the findings, this urine-based approach has the potential to be useful as an adjunct screening tool that is a component in a more efficient and cost-effective pipeline to identify the individuals most in need of imaging-based diagnosis for CE.

Highlights:

  • An in house-PCR was designed to specifically amplify a tandem repeat fragment from Echinococcus granulosus DNA.

  • We established the presence of the E. granulosus DNA repeat fragment as part of the cell-free (cf)DNA from the urine of cystic echinococcosis patients, principally in patients with viable liver cysts (9/11, 81.8%).

  • Urine-based diagnosis of E. granulosus has potential as a non-invasive, cost-effective, practical method to identify individuals with cystic echinococcosis in field conditions.

Acknowledgments:

We wish to thank Milagros Chuquillanqui and Yelina Chavez for their assistance in the collection of urine sample in the field.

Funding

Sample collection and imaging evaluations were supported by the National Institute of Health 8 (NIH)/NIAID grant number R01AI116470 and NIH/FIC grant number: D43TW001140; additional expenses covered by departmental funds

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Conflicts of interest:

None

References

  • [1].Agudelo Higuita NI, Brunetti E, McCloskey C, Cystic Echinococcosis, J Clin Microbiol 54(3) (2016) 518–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Moro PL, Nakao M, Ito A, Schantz PM, Cavero C, Cabrera L, Molecular identification of Echinococcus isolates from Peru, Parasitology international 58(2) (2009) 184–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Cucher MA, Macchiaroli N, Baldi G, Camicia F, Prada L, Maldonado L, Avila HG, Fox A, Gutierrez A, Negro P, Lopez R, Jensen O, Rosenzvit M, Kamenetzky L, Cystic echinococcosis in South America: systematic review of species and genotypes of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato in humans and natural domestic hosts, Trop Med Int Health 21(2) (2016) 166–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Reyes MM, Taramona CP, Saire-Mendoza M, Gavidia CM, Barron E, Boufana B, Craig PS, Tello L, Garcia HH, Santivanez SJ, Human and canine echinococcosis infection in informal, unlicensed abattoirs in Lima, Peru, PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6(4) (2012) e1462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Pavletic CF, Larrieu E, Guarnera EA, Casas N, Irabedra P, Ferreira C, Sayes J, Gavidia CM, Caldas E, Lise MLZ, Maxwell M, Arezo M, Navarro AM, Vigilato MAN, Cosivi O, Espinal M, Vilas V, Cystic echinococcosis in South America: a call for action, Rev Panam Salud Publica 41 (2017) e42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Craig P, Mastin A, van Kesteren F, Boufana B, Echinococcus granulosus: Epidemiology and state-of-the-art of diagnostics in animals, Veterinary parasitology 213(3-4) (2015) 132–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Moradi M, Meamar AR, Akhlaghi L, Roozbehani M, Razmjou E, Detection and genetic characterization of Echinococcus granulosus mitochondrial DNA in serum and formalin-fixed paraffin embedded cyst tissue samples of cystic echinococcosis patients, PLoS One 14(10) (2019) e0224501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Gottstein B, Wang J, Blagosklonov O, Grenouillet F, Millon L, Vuitton DA, Muller N, Echinococcus metacestode: in search of viability markers, Parasite 21 (2014) 63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Jara LM, Rodriguez M, Altamirano F, Herrera A, Verastegui M, Gimenez-Lirola LG, Gilman RH, Gavidia CM, Development and Validation of a Copro-Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Sandwich for Detection of Echinococcus granulosus-Soluble Membrane Antigens in Dogs, Am J Trop Med Hyg 100(2) (2019) 330–335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Santivanez SJ, Arias P, Portocarrero M, Rodriguez S, Gonzalez AE, Gilman RH, Gavidia CM, Garcia HH, Serological diagnosis of lung cystic hydatid disease using the synthetic p176 peptide, Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI 19(6) (2012) 944–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Georges S, Villard O, Filisetti D, Mathis A, Marcellin L, Hansmann Y, Candolfi E, Usefulness of PCR analysis for diagnosis of alveolar echinococcosis with unusual localizations: two case studies, J Clin Microbiol 42(12) (2004) 5954–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Gottstein B, Mowatt MR, Sequencing and characterization of an Echinococcus multilocularis DNA probe and its use in the polymerase chain reaction, Mol Biochem Parasitol 44(2) (1991) 183–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Hu D, Song X, Wang N, Zhong X, Wang J, Liu T, Jiang Z, Dawa T, Gu X, Peng X, Yang G, Molecular identification of Echinococcus granulosus on the Tibetan Plateau using mitochondrial DNA markers, Genet Mol Res 14(4) (2015) 13915–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Shang JY, Zhang GJ, Liao S, Huang Y, Yu WJ, He W, Yang GY, Li TY, Chen XW, Zhong B, Wang Q, Wang Q, Li RR, Wang H, A multiplex PCR for differential detection of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto, Echinococcus multilocularis and Echinococcus canadensis in China, Infect Dis Poverty 8(1) (2019) 68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Bull MJ, Down Syndrome, N Engl J Med 382(24) (2020) 2344–2352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Mesoraca A, Margiotti K, Dello Russo C, Cesta A, Cima A, Longo SA, Barone MA, Viola A, Sparacino D, Giorlandino C, Cell-free DNA screening for aneuploidies in 7113 pregnancies: single Italian centre study, Genet Res (Camb) 102 (2020) e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Bulbul A, Leal A, Husain H, Applications of cell-free circulating tumor DNA detection in EGFR mutant lung cancer, Journal of thoracic disease 12(5) (2020) 2877–2882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Radovich M, Jiang G, Hancock BA, Chitambar C, Nanda R, Falkson C, Lynce FC, Gallagher C, Isaacs C, Blaya M, Paplomata E, Walling R, Daily K, Mahtani R, Thompson MA, Graham R, Cooper ME, Pavlick DC, Albacker LA, Gregg J, Solzak JP, Chen YH, Bales CL, Cantor E, Shen F, Storniolo AMV, Badve S, Ballinger TJ, Chang CL, Zhong Y, Savran C, Miller KD, Schneider BP, Association of Circulating Tumor DNA and Circulating Tumor Cells After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Disease Recurrence in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Preplanned Secondary Analysis of the BRE12–158 Randomized Clinical Trial, JAMA oncology (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Blauwkamp TA, Thair S, Rosen MJ, Blair L, Lindner MS, Vilfan ID, Kawli T, Christians FC, Venkatasubrahmanyam S, Wall GD, Cheung A, Rogers ZN, Meshulam-Simon G, Huijse L, Balakrishnan S, Quinn JV, Hollemon D, Hong DK, Vaughn ML, Kertesz M, Bercovici S, Wilber JC, Yang S, Analytical and clinical validation of a microbial cell-free DNA sequencing test for infectious disease, Nat Microbiol 4(4) (2019) 663–674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Akter S, Nakao R, Imasato Y, Alam MZ, Katakura K, Potential of cell-free DNA as a screening marker for parasite infections in dog, Genomics 111(4) (2019) 906–912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Wagner J, Free DNA--new potential analyte in clinical laboratory diagnostics?, Biochemia medica 22(1) (2012) 24–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Weerakoon KG, McManus DP, Cell-Free DNA as a Diagnostic Tool for Human Parasitic Infections, Trends Parasitol 32(5) (2016) 378–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Baraquin A, Hervouet E, Richou C, Flori P, Peixoto P, Azizi A, Delabrousse E, Blagosklonov O, Umhang G, Bresson-Hadni S, Valot B, Grenouillet F, g. EchinoVista study, Circulating cell-free DNA in patients with alveolar echinococcosis, Mol Biochem Parasitol 222 (2018) 14–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Chaya D, Parija SC, Performance of polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of cystic echinococcosis using serum, urine, and cyst fluid samples, Trop Parasitol 4(1) (2014) 43–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Ji J, Li B, Li J, Danzeng W, Li J, Zhao Y, Qiangba G, Zhang Q, Renzhen N, Basang Z, Jia C, Gongsang Q, Ma J, Wang Y, Chen F, Zhou H, Huasang, Yin J, Xie J, Pei N, Cai H, Jiang H, Yang H, Wang J, Asan, Han X, Li J, Chen W, Yang D, Comprehensive characterization of plasma cell-free Echinococcus spp. DNA in echinococcosis patients using ultra-high-throughput sequencing, PLoS Negl Trop Dis 14(4) (2020) e0008148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Wan Z, Peng X, Ma L, Tian Q, Wu S, Li J, Ling J, Lv W, Ding B, Tan J, Zhang Z, Targeted Sequencing of Genomic Repeat Regions Detects Circulating Cell-free Echinococcus DNA, PLoS Negl Trop Dis 14(3) (2020) e0008147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Ibironke OA, Phillips AE, Garba A, Lamine SM, Shiff C, Diagnosis of Schistosoma haematobium by detection of specific DNA fragments from filtered urine samples, Am J Trop Med Hyg 84(6) (2011) 998–1001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Krolewiecki AJ, Koukounari A, Romano M, Caro RN, Scott AL, Fleitas P, Cimino R, Shiff CJ, Transrenal DNA-based diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis (Grassi, 1879) infection: Bayesian latent class modeling of test accuracy, PLoS Negl Trop Dis 12(6) (2018) e0006550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Lodh N, Caro R, Sofer S, Scott A, Krolewiecki A, Shiff C, Diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis: Detection of parasite-derived DNA in urine, Acta tropica 163 (2016) 9–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Toribio L, Romano M, Scott AL, Gonzales I, Saavedra H, Garcia HH, Shiff C, For P. The Cysticercosis Working Group In, Detection of Taenia solium DNA in the Urine of Neurocysticercosis Patients, Am J Trop Med Hyg 100(2) (2019) 327–329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Abbasi I, Branzburg A, Campos-Ponce M, Abdel Hafez SK, Raoul F, Craig PS, Hamburger J, Copro-diagnosis of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs by amplification of a newly identified repeated DNA sequence, Am J Trop Med Hyg 69(3) (2003) 324–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Siles-Lucas M, Casulli A, Conraths FJ, Muller N, Laboratory Diagnosis of Echinococcus spp. in Human Patients and Infected Animals, Adv Parasitol 96 (2017) 159–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Lo YM, Tein MS, Lau TK, Haines CJ, Leung TN, Poon PM, Wainscoat JS, Johnson PJ, Chang AM, Hjelm NM, Quantitative analysis of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum: implications for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis, American journal of human genetics 62(4) (1998) 768–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Lichtenstein AV, Melkonyan HS, Tomei LD, Umansky SR, Circulating nucleic acids and apoptosis, Ann N Y Acad Sci 945 (2001) 239–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Umansky SR, Tomei LD, Transrenal DNA testing: progress and perspectives, Expert Rev Mol Diagn 6(2) (2006) 153–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].O'Connell EM, Harrison S, Dahlstrom E, Nash T, Nutman TB, A Novel, Highly Sensitive Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Diagnosis of Subarachnoid and Ventricular Neurocysticercosis and for Assessing Responses to Treatment, Clin Infect Dis 70(9) (2020) 1875–1881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES