Skip to main content
Frontiers in Nutrition logoLink to Frontiers in Nutrition
. 2022 Jan 17;8:819835. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.819835

The Amino Acids Sensing and Utilization in Response to Dietary Aromatic Amino Acid Supplementation in LPS-Induced Inflammation Piglet Model

Qing Duanmu 1, Bie Tan 1,2,*, Jing Wang 1, Bo Huang 1,2, Jianjun Li 2, Meng Kang 1, Ke Huang 1, Qiuchun Deng 1, Yulong Yin 1,2
PMCID: PMC8801454  PMID: 35111801

Abstract

Dietary supplementation with aromatic amino acids (AAAs) has been demonstrated to alleviate intestinal inflammation induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the piglets. But the mechanism of AAA sensing and utilization under inflammatory conditions is not well-understood. The study was conducted with 32 weanling piglets using a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement (diet and LPS challenge) in a randomized complete block design. Piglets were fed as basal diet or the basal diet supplemented with 0.16% tryptophan (Trp), 0.41% phenylalanine (Phe), and 0.22% tyrosine (Tyr) for 21 days. The results showed that LPS treatment significantly reduced the concentrations of cholecystokinin (CCK) and total protein but increased leptin concentration, the activities of alanine transaminase, and aspartate aminotransferase in serum. Dietary supplementation with AAAs significantly increased the serum concentrations of CCK, peptide YY (PYY), and total protein but decreased the blood urea nitrogen. LPS challenge reduced the ileal threonine (Thr) digestibility, as well as serum isoleucine (Ile) and Trp concentrations, but increased the serum concentrations of Phe, Thr, histidine (His), alanine (Ala), cysteine (Cys), and serine (Ser) (P < 0.05). The serum-free amino acid concentrations of His, lysine (Lys), arginine (Arg), Trp, Tyr, Cys, and the digestibilities of His, Lys, Arg, and Cys were significantly increased by feeding AAA diets (P < 0.05). Dietary AAA supplementation significantly increased the serum concentrations of Trp in LPS-challenged piglets (P < 0.05). In the jejunal mucosa, LPS increased the contents of Ala and Cys, and the mRNA expressions of solute carrier (SLC) transporters (i.e., SLC7A11, SLC16A10, SLC38A2, and SLC3A2), but decreased Lys and glutamine (Gln) contents, and SLC1A1 mRNA expression (P < 0.05). In the ileal mucosa, LPS challenge induced increasing in SLC7A11 and SLC38A2 and decreasing in SLC38A9 and SLC36A1 mRNA expressions, AAAs supplementation significantly decreased mucosal amino acid (AA) concentrations of methionine (Met), Arg, Ala, and Tyr, etc. (P < 0.05). And the interaction between AAAs supplementation and LPS challenge significantly altered the expressions of SLC36A1 and SLC38A9 mRNA (P < 0.05). Together, these findings indicated that AAAs supplementation promoted the AAs absorption and utilization in the small intestine of piglets and increased the mRNA expressions of SLC transports to meet the high demands for specific AAs in response to inflammation and immune response.

Keywords: aromatic amino acid, amino acids sensing, transporters, sensors, piglets

Introduction

During the immunological stress, amino acids (AAs) are redistributed away from protein production toward tissues involved in inflammation and immune response (13). The metabolism reprogramming in the immune process could affect the animal's ability to sense and demand AAs because AAs are used as a substrate for the synthesis of inflammatory proteins and immunoglobulins (4). Therefore, the transportation and metabolism of AA are important for immune cells. Immunological stress and inflammation will lead to the increase of basal metabolic rate, which directly leads to metabolic changes (5). The increased synthesis of immune system metabolites such as acute phase proteins, immunoglobulin, and glutathione is accompanied by the increased demand for specific AA (6). For example, the dietary tyrosine (Tyr), phenylalanine (Phe), and tryptophan (Trp) requirements are increased to support the immune response under inflammation conditions in pigs (7). Circulating aromatic AAs (AAAs) as the crucial mediators in the communication between gut and brain participates in immune regulation (8).

The absorptions of dietary AAs by the small intestine play critical roles on extraintestinal tissues and the serum AA profiles are correlated with the mRNA expression levels for key AA transporters in the small intestine (9). Some AA transporters are transceptors with both transporting and sensing functions, which trigger the downstream signal transduction pathway such as the Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 (mTORC1) pathway and general control non-derepressible kinase pathway (1013). The previous study has demonstrated that dietary supplementation with AAAs activated the Ca2+-sensing receptor (CaSR) signaling pathway and alleviated intestinal inflammation induced by LPS in piglets (14). CaSR is expressed in the enterocytes cells throughout the intestine and responds to a broad range of AAs, especially aromatic compounds (15). CaSR couples to the phosphatidylinositol pathway and has been linked to AAAs stimulation of CCK release and intracellular Ca2+ mobilization (16). It has been extensively documented that CaSR coordinated food digestion and nutrient absorption, promoted cell proliferation and differentiation, regulated energy metabolism and immune response, stimulated hormone secretion, mitigated secretory diarrhea, and enhanced intestinal barrier function (1719). This would appear to provide a molecular explanation for AA absorption and utilization to support the inflammatory response in the intestine. The signaling pathways downstream of CaSR, phospholipase Cβ2, and NF-κB have been confirmed to be involved in the regulation of AAAs on intestinal inflammation (14). But it is not clear whether the CaSR activation is accompanied by the change of availability of AAs.

Therefore, the present study is conducted to investigate the effects of dietary supplementation with AAAs on the ileal apparent digestibility of AAs, serum and mucosal AAs profiles as well as AA transporters in the small intestine of LPS-challenged piglets.

Materials and Methods

The animal trial was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences (2013020).

Animal Experiment Design

The animal experimental design was based on the same experimental protocol that has been presented by Liu et al. (14). Briefly, a total of 32 cross-bred (Duroc × Landrace) weanling gilts and barrows (6.66 ± 0.31 kg body weight) were randomly assigned into four treatments (eight piglets /treatment) using a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. The main factors were dietary treatment (piglets were fed the basal diet or the 0.16% Trp, 0.41% Phe, and 0.22% Tyr supplemented diet) and LPS challenge (piglets were challenged with LPS or treated with sterile saline). The diets preparation, feeding, and management of piglets were the same as the description in the previous study (14).

On the morning of day 21 after the initiation of the treatment, the piglets were intraperitoneally injected with either 100 μg/kg BW LPS (Escherichia coli strain O5:B55) or the same volume of 0.9% sterilized saline, respectively. Blood samples were collected from the jugular vein at 4 h after injection and serum samples were obtained by centrifugation at 2,000 g for 15 min and then stored at −80°C until further analysis. Jejunal and ileal mucosa were collected and immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for the analysis of free AA profiles and gene expression. In addition, digesta samples were collected from terminal ileum for the AAs digestibility analysis.

Analysis of Serum Metabolites and Hormones

Serum biochemical parameters, including total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), glucose (GLU), and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), were measured using Biochemical Analytical Instrument (Beckman CX4) and commercial kits (Sino-German Beijing Leadman Biotech Ltd, Beijing, China).

Serum samples were treated with sulfosalicylic acid, centrifuged, and filtered through a 0.45 μm filtration membrane. Then the amino acid concentrations were determined using an automatic amino acid analyzer (Model L-8900, Hitachi Ltd. Tokyo, Japan).

The serum concentrations of cholecystokinin (CCK), peptide YY (PYY), ghrelin, glucagon, and leptin were determined using the corresponding pig ELISA Kit (CUSABIO, Wuhan, China) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

Determination of Free Amino Acids in the Intestinal Mucosa

About 0.5 g of jejunal and ileum mucosal tissues were weighed, and 5 ml of 0.1 M HCl homogenate was added, centrifuged for 10 min at 5,000 g. We took 0.5 ml of the supernatant, mixed it with the same volume of 8% sulfosalicylic acid, and left it resting at 4°C overnight. Centrifugation was performed at 12,000 g for 10 min. Then the supernatant was absorbed and centrifuged again at 12,000 g for 10 min, and then through filter membranes. Then the AA content was determined by a high-performance liquid chromatography (Agilent 1200, Agilent Technologies, USA). The test conditions were as following: wavelength: 254 nm; flow rate: 1 ml/min; column temperature: elution at 40°C; Acetonitrile: 0.02 mol/L; Ammonium formate = 30:70 (V:V).

Digestibility of Amino Acid Analysis

Feed samples and terminal ileal digesta samples (0.5 g) were accurately weighed and put into an ampere tube, 10 ml of 6 M hydrochloric acid was added. The tube was sealed with an alcohol torch, hydrolyzed at 110 ± 2°C for 24 h, and then transferred to a 100 ml volumetric flask after cooling. Took a constant volume of 1–25 ml from the above solution. Then filtered into the injection flask with a 0.22 μm membrane. The AAs content was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (Agilent 1200, Agilent Technologies, USA).

The feed samples and ileal digesta after freeze-drying were weighed in parallel samples for analysis and determination. The AA profiles were detected by high-performance liquid chromatography (Agilent 1200, Agilent Technologies, USA). Lysine and threonine were detected after hydrolyzing with 6 mol/L HCl at 105°C for 24 h. Methionine was analyzed as methionine sulfone after cold performic acid oxidation overnight before hydrolysis. Tryptophan was determined after hydrolyzing with 4 mol/L LiOH at 110°C for 20 h. The apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of AAs was calculated using the following formula:

AID of diet component = [(Diet component/Chromium)d-(Diet component/Chromium) i]*1/(Dietcomponent/Chromium) d.

Where (Diet component/Chromium) d = ratio of diet component to Chromium in the diet and (Diet component/ Chromium) i = ratio of diet component to Chromium in the ileal digesta (20, 21).

Real-Time Quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated from the liquid nitrogen-pulverized jejunal, and ileal mucosa samples, and cDNA were synthesized as previously described (9). The mRNA abundance of AA transporters including SLC1A1, SLC7A11, SLC1A5, SLC6A19, SLC6A20, SLC16A10, SLC36A1, SLC38A2, SLC38A9, SLC3A1, SLC6A14, SLC7A1, SLC7A2, SLC7A7, SLC7A9, and SLC3A2 were analyzed using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis. The primer sequences for the tested genes are shown the previous study (9). Data are expressed as the relative values to those for piglets of the basal diet with saline injection treatment.

Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed by ANOVA using the general linear model procedures of SPSS for a 2 × 2 factorial design (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA, 2001). The statistical model included the effects of challenge (saline or LPS), diet (basal or AAAs), and their interactions. When there was significant interaction. The differences among treatments were evaluated using the Duncan test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Serum Concentrations of Gastrointestinal Hormones

Compared to the saline injected piglets, LPS administration remarkably decreased the serum CCK and increased leptin concentration. However, the supplementation of AAAs in the diet markedly increased the concentrations of CCK and PYY (P < 0.05). LPS challenge × diet had an interactive effect on serum leptin concentration (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in serum concentrations of ghrelin and glucagon among all treatments (P > 0.05) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Effects of dietary supplementation with AAA on serum concentrations of gastrointestinal hormones in piglets (pg/ml).

Item Basal diet AAA diet SEM P -value
Saline LPS Saline LPS Diet LPS Diet × LPS
Cholecystokinin 234.23 186.89 286.76 265.35 15.918 <0.001 0.041 0.425
Peptide YY 305.58 278.95 387.45 328.64 27.223 0.024 0.134 0.565
Ghrelin 457.52 476.50 487.82 457.98 33.868 0.866 0.876 0.485
Glucagon 187.85 168.98 205.65 201.36 15.068 0.116 0.461 0.641
Leptin 221.06b 299.64a 275.64a 254.65ab 13.650 0.734 0.049 0.001

AAA diet, basal diet supplemented with 0.16% tryptophan + 0.41% phenylalanine + 0.22% tyrosine.

a, b

Within a row, means sharing different superscript letters differ significantly (p < 0.05).

Serum Biochemical Parameters

As shown in Table 2, LPS treatment markedly increased the activity of alanine transaminase and aspartate aminotransferase but decreased the serum concentration of total protein (P < 0.05). Dietary AAAs supplementation increased the serum concentration of total protein and decreased the concentration of blood urea nitrogen (P < 0.05). There was no significant change of other determined serum biochemical parameters in response to LPS or AAA treatment (P > 0.05).

Table 2.

Effects of dietary supplementation with AAA on serum biochemical parameters (P < 0.05).

Item Basal diet AAA diet SEM P -value
Saline LPS Saline LPS Diet LPS Diet × LPS
Total protein (g/L) 74.12 69.32 83.87 76.56 1.843 <0.001 0.004 0.520
Albumin (g/L) 36.45 39.46 38.58 37.48 1.536 0.963 0.558 0.214
Alkaline phosphatase (U/L) 198.45 189.25 215.69 208.96 16.762 0.290 0.645 0.943
Alanine transaminase (U/L) 48.95 64.52 50.42 58.35 3.381 0.505 0.002 0.282
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L) 53.64 72.54 52.98 60.54 5.004 0.231 0.016 0.282
Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L) 4.23 4.56 3.68 4.05 0.240 0.043 0.168 0.923
Glucose (mmol/L) 4.87 4.77 4.54 4.39 0.319 0.303 0.710 0.942
Lactic dehydrogenase (U/L) 784.56 851.54 778.65 825.45 30.108 0.621 0.086 0.755

AAA diet, basal diet supplemented with 0.16% tryptophan + 0.41% phenylalanine + 0.22% tyrosine.

Serum Amino Acids Profiles

The results of serum AAs profiles were shown in Table 3. LPS treatment induced the increases in serum concentrations such as His, Phe, Thr, Ala, Cys, and Ser, also including total non-essential amino acids (NEAA), but the decreases of serum Ile and Trp concentrations (P < 0.05). Dietary supplementation of the AAAs improved the serum concentrations of His, Lys, Arg, Trp, Tyr, and Cys (P < 0.05). An interaction of LPS challenge × diet was observed for Trp content (P < 0.05).

Table 3.

Effects of dietary supplementation with AAA on serum concentration of amino acids in piglets (μmol/L).

Item Basal diet AAA diet SEM P -value
Saline LPS Saline LPS Diet LPS Diet × LPS
His 41.11 53.53 41.91 65.89 1.464 0.034 <0.001 0.060
Ile 73.42 58.20 71.97 55.51 2.912 0.726 0.012 0.916
Leu 104.81 89.05 89.97 87.72 4.722 0.400 0.350 0.481
Lys 142.67 128.09 155.06 157.64 4.771 0.038 0.536 0.378
Met 17.09 18.64 21.55 19.98 0.950 0.140 0.994 0.419
Phe 56.87 67.77 64.67 73.19 2.238 0.153 0.040 0.793
Arg 45.85 46.40 56.06 48.26 1.431 0.046 0.217 0.158
Thr 24.55 28.66 22.10 35.14 1.705 0.560 0.019 0.203
Trp 15.45b 14.18b 26.41a 15.30b 1.123 0.013 0.011 0.038
Val 79.59 76.49 71.65 81.23 2.468 0.749 0.518 0.212
EAA 601.42 581.01 621.36 639.85 17.224 0.264 0.978 0.578
Ala 545.30 770.11 494.02 930.11 27.690 0.336 <0.001 0.068
Asn 6.33 5.99 6.18 6.41 0.165 0.688 0.868 0.397
Asp 5.14 6.68 4.86 4.40 0.567 0.270 0.639 0.387
Cys 1.21 1.96 1.38 2.66 0.097 0.034 <0.001 0.192
Gln 338.58 362.71 322.47 364.73 9.618 0.717 0.097 0.642
Glu 91.14 105.17 87.97 88.88 7.449 0.520 0.621 0.664
Gly 542.11 538.29 500.34 593.69 21.636 0.876 0.311 0.273
Pro 167.77 180.06 161.81 200.81 8.197 0.656 0.131 0.423
Ser 74.69 83.19 71.81 96.37 2.222 0.258 0.001 0.084
Tyr 37.55 42.77 64.33 58.03 3.457 0.006 0.938 0.413
NEAA 1809.81 2096.94 1715.18 2346.08 54.062 0.482 <0.001 0.125

AAA diet, basal diet supplemented with 0.16% tryptophan + 0.41% phenylalanine + 0.22% tyrosine.

a, b

Within a row, means sharing different superscript letters differ significantly (p < 0.05).

His, histidine; Ile, isoleucine; Leu, leucine; Lys, lysine; Met, methionine; Phe, phenylalanine; Arg, arginine; Thr, threonine; Trp, tryptophan; Val, valine; EAA, essential amino acid; Ala, alanine; Asn, asparagine; Asp, aspartic acid; Cys, cysteine; Gln, glutamine; Glu, glutamic acid; Gly, glycine; Pro, proline; Ser, serine; Tyr, tyrosine; NEAA, non-essential amino acid.

The Jejunal and Ileal Mucosal Amino Acid Profiles and Apparent Ileal Digestibility of Amino Acid

In the jejunal mucosa, LPS significantly increased the contents of Ala and Cys but decreased the Lys and Gln contents (P < 0.05). Dietary supplementation with AAA had interactive effects with LPS (Diet × LPS, P < 0.05) on the Gly and Ser contents (Table 4).

Table 4.

Effects of dietary supplementation with AAA on the concentration of amino acid content in the jejunal mucosa (μg/g).

Item Basal diet AAA diet SEM P -value
Saline LPS Saline LPS Diet LPS Diet × LPS
His 83.02 72.00 77.34 79.21 1.910 0.842 0.242 0.103
Ile 74.95 64.83 73.59 74.09 2.255 0.389 0.296 0.249
Leu 176.99 160.13 170.39 177.97 4.341 0.523 0.597 0.171
Lys 78.67 64.14 71.15 55.19 3.097 0.195 0.021 0.909
Met 88.19 79.37 83.92 84.82 2.212 0.895 0.379 0.282
Phe 111.15 103.26 108.41 114.15 2.975 0.499 0.858 0.262
Arg 66.06 55.30 57.77 52.59 2.577 0.295 0.134 0.593
Thr 134.90 122.83 126.40 136.15 3.542 0.736 0.871 0.135
Trp 30.17 27.52 31.12 31.13 0.764 0.148 0.395 0.392
Val 125.70 116.41 122.23 130.71 3.346 0.426 0.952 0.195
EAA 969.81 865.81 922.32 936.01 22.276 0.801 0.320 0.198
Ala 353.84 374.15 322.71 411.29 9.109 0.870 0.006 0.072
Asn 18.45 16.25 17.45 17.86 0.433 0.730 0.310 0.143
Asp 225.09 220.01 234.56 230.17 6.681 0.469 0.726 0.980
Cys 3.69 5.40 3.75 4.55 0.265 0.457 0.025 0.397
Gln 234.66 199.89 229.17 206.98 6.636 0.952 0.041 0.639
Glu 1030.23 1011.80 1000.10 1061.88 24.635 0.841 0.664 0.423
Gly 510.27a 477.69ab 430.61b 496.87a 10.373 0.156 0.424 0.025
Pro 215.78 197.55 204.71 217.54 5.869 0.707 0.820 0.197
Ser 243.80a 210.56b 218.77ab 229.48ab 4.920 0.758 0.263 0.034
Tyr 120.98 112.38 118.82 125.90 3.088 0.366 0.903 0.215
NEAA 2956.79 2825.69 2780.66 3002.53 55.436 0.997 0.686 0.123

AAA diet, basal diet supplemented with 0.16% tryptophan + 0.41% phenylalanine + 0.22% tyrosine.

a, b

Within a row, means sharing different superscript letters differ significantly (p < 0.05).

His, histidine; Ile, isoleucine; Leu, leucine; Lys, lysine; Met, methionine; Phe, phenylalanine; Arg, arginine; Thr, threonine; Trp, tryptophan; Val, valine; EAA, essential amino acid; Ala, alanine; Asn, asparagine; Asp, aspartic acid; Cys, cysteine; Gln, glutamine; Glu, glutamic acid; Gly, glycine; Pro, proline; Ser, serine; Tyr, tyrosine; NEAA, non-essential amino acid.

In the ileal mucosa, LPS injection had no effects on all determined AAs (P > 0.05). Dietary supplementation with AAA decreased the contents of Ile, Leu, Met, Phe, Thr, Val, Ala, Asn, Gly, Pro, Ser, and Tyr, as well as the total NEAA (P < 0.05). There was no interaction of LPS challenge × diet on all determined AAs contents (P > 0.05) (Table 5).

Table 5.

Effects of dietary supplementation with AAA on the concentration of amino acid content in the ileal mucosa (μg/g).

Item Basal diet AAA diet SEM P -value
Saline LPS Saline LPS Diet LPS Diet × LPS
His 97.12 102.10 84.15 87.81 3.534 0.064 0.545 0.926
Ile 91.30 82.23 73.00 65.79 3.277 0.013 0.225 0.887
Leu 206.45 191.90 171.25 162.09 6.771 0.023 0.389 0.843
Lys 100.14 86.03 79.93 86.77 5.607 0.393 0.748 0.358
Met 99.65 96.74 85.29 81.92 2.897 0.018 0.592 0.969
Phe 116.65 112.93 100.31 96.28 3.762 0.037 0.610 0.984
Arg 81.12 71.18 61.95 62.22 3.526 0.056 0.498 0.475
Thr 162.71 160.30 135.51 137.04 5.654 0.034 0.969 0.863
Trp 31.97 31.34 29.04 28.15 1.190 0.209 0.753 0.955
Val 164.05 146.18 125.69 120.73 5.462 0.007 0.305 0.559
EAA 788.95 1080.92 946.11 928.82 59.833 0.983 0.261 0.207
Ala 440.10 439.94 314.94 357.64 12.670 <0.001 0.408 0.405
Asn 18.55 16.01 14.48 14.43 0.531 0.013 0.234 0.249
Asp 243.43 235.79 227.48 218.17 8.421 0.328 0.619 0.961
Cys 1.71 1.39 1.50 1.48 0.095 0.743 0.369 0.423
Gln 143.77 189.18 177.70 166.22 12.965 0.834 0.518 0.282
Glu 1228.95 1255.79 1211.44 1193.44 32.344 0.542 0.946 0.731
Gly 648.80 591.85 493.94 535.14 14.173 0.001 0.783 0.094
Pro 284.51 256.71 217.11 205.94 9.596 0.005 0.319 0.668
Ser 328.64 270.07 226.76 223.76 8.696 <0.001 0.088 0.121
Tyr 124.46 125.24 110.75 107.91 3.702 0.045 0.891 0.809
NEAA 3462.92 3381.98 2996.09 3024.15 83.059 0.019 0.875 0.745

AAA diet, basal diet supplemented with 0.16% tryptophan + 0.41% phenylalanine + 0.22% tyrosine.

His, histidine; Ile, isoleucine; Leu, leucine; Lys, lysine; Met, methionine; Phe, phenylalanine; Arg, arginine; Thr, threonine; Trp, tryptophan; Val, valine; EAA, essential amino acid; Ala, alanine; Asn, asparagine; Asp, aspartic acid; Cys, cysteine; Gln, glutamine; Glu, glutamic acid; Gly, glycine; Pro, proline; Ser, serine; Tyr, tyrosine; NEAA, non-essential amino acid.

The apparent ileal digestibility of AAs was shown in Table 6, LPS significantly increased the digestibility of His but decreased the digestibility of Thr. Dietary AAA supplementation enhanced the digestibility of His, Lys, Arg, and Cys (P < 0.05). There was no interaction of LPS challenge × diet on the apparent ileal digestibility of AAs (P > 0.05).

Table 6.

Effects of dietary supplementation with AAA on apparent ileal digestibility of amino acid in piglets.

Item Basal diet AAA diet SEM P -value
Saline LPS Saline LPS Diet LPS Diet × LPS
Essential AA (%)
His 83.32 85.45 85.46 88.98 1.298 0.043 0.044 0.608
Ile 69.45 70.59 72.59 71.54 1.168 0.098 0.970 0.366
Leu 67.62 66.78 67.97 70.89 1.321 0.116 0.455 0.182
Lys 83.56 82.50 86.54 85.57 1.276 0.032 0.454 0.973
Met 86.89 85.48 87.64 86.49 1.579 0.594 0.440 0.936
Phe 88.96 87.46 91.54 89.45 1.254 0.099 0.190 0.827
Arg 78.79 79.54 83.74 80.38 1.316 0.047 0.356 0.150
Thr 73.58 68.45 74.87 72.87 1.393 0.060 0.021 0.291
Trp 75.45 73.59 76.89 77.74 1.367 0.061 0.726 0.351
Val 72.55 70.57 74.86 73.46 1.259 0.055 0.203 0.830
Non-essential AA (%)
Ala 65.43 64.78 68.99 66.46 1.910 0.303 0.710 0.942
Asp 79.46 80.58 81.78 82.69 1.502 0.162 0.518 0.945
Cys 76.84 74.86 77.55 79.54 1.275 0.049 0.995 0.140
Gln 80.79 78.49 81.05 81.57 1.176 0.183 0.474 0.260
Gly 71.58 72.41 72.68 73.96 1.338 0.363 0.468 0.876
Pro 76.89 74.15 78.85 77.68 1.667 0.120 0.262 0.649
Ser 77.95 75.87 79.87 78.68 1.468 0.138 0.300 0.774
Tyr 71.58 69.87 73.58 72.69 1.122 0.056 0.289 0.738

AAA diet, basal diet supplemented with 0.16% tryptophan + 0.41% phenylalanine + 0.22% tyrosine.

His, histidine; Ile, isoleucine; Leu, leucine; Lys, lysine; Met, methionine; Phe, phenylalanine; Arg, arginine; Thr, threonine; Trp, tryptophan; Val, valine; Ala, alanine; Asp, aspartic acid; Cys, cysteine; Gln, glutamine; Gly, glycine; Pro, proline; Ser, serine; Tyr, tyrosine.

The MRNA Expression Level of Amino Acids Transporters in the Jejunal and Ileal Mucosa

In the jejunum, the relative mRNA expressions of SLC7A11, SLC16A10, SLC38A2, SLC6A14, SLC3A2, and SLC7A2 were markedly increased but the expression of SLC1A1 was decreased by LPS challenge (P < 0.05). AAAs supplementation only decreased the expression of SLC6A19 mRNA (P < 0.05). The interaction between AAAs supplementation and LPS challenge notably affected the expression of SLC1A1, SLC36A1, SLC3A1, SLC7A2, and SLC7A9 mRNA (P < 0.05) (Table 7).

Table 7.

Effects of dietary supplementation with AAA on the mRNA expression level of amino acids transporters in the jejunum and ileum of piglets (P < 0.05).

Item Basal diet AAA diet SEM P -value
Saline LPS Saline LPS Diet LPS Diet × LPS
Jejunum
SLC1A1 1.00b 0.89b 1.71a 0.76b 0.088 0.113 0.006 0.024
SLC7A11 1.00 6.61 1.03 4.71 0.438 0.296 <0.001 0.281
SLC1A5 1.00 0.76 0.67 1.35 0.113 0.348 0.568 0.054
SLC6A19 1.00 0.79 0.62 0.46 0.076 0.028 0.241 0.871
SLC6A20 1.00 0.92 0.90 0.95 0.074 0.822 0.933 0.659
SLC16A10 1.00 1.19 0.65 1.79 0.121 0.601 0.011 0.060
SLC36A1 1.00ab 0.87ab 0.44b 1.33a 0.105 0.825 0.084 0.022
SLC38A2 1.00 1.91 0.88 1.60 0.162 0.517 0.018 0.774
SLC38A9 1.00 0.79 1.16 1.14 0.090 0.168 0.528 0.596
SLC3A1 1.00ab 0.61b 0.67b 1.53a 0.120 0.234 0.338 0.016
SLC6A14 1.00 1.25 0.73 2.25 0.157 0.254 0.009 0.054
SLC7A1 1.00 1.55 0.81 1.72 0.144 0.973 0.017 0.529
SLC7A2 1.00b 2.27ab 0.58b 5.74a 0.456 0.106 0.002 0.042
SLC7A7 1.00 1.03 0.60 1.08 0.090 0.331 0.168 0.228
SLC7A9 1.00a 0.41c 0.46bc 0.89ab 0.059 0.798 0.530 <0.001
SLC3A2 1.00 1.65 1.24 1.87 0.150 0.445 0.043 0.969
Ileum
SLC1A1 1.00 0.49 1.17 1.30 0.118 0.051 0.427 0.1911
SLC7A11 1.00 2.42 0.49 3.20 0.266 0.798 0.001 0.237
SLC1A5 1.00 1.23 1.02 2.26 0.256 0.317 0.164 0.334
SLC6A19 1.00 0.70 0.76 0.75 0.080 0.566 0.335 0.374
SLC6A20 1.00 0.60 0.94 1.11 0.101 0.273 0.557 0.171
SLC16A10 1.00 1.44 2.10 3.26 0.243 0.007 0.116 0.466
SLC36A1 1.00a 0.34b 0.39a 0.41b 0.067 0.057 0.026 0.018
SLC38A2 1.00 1.83 1.46 3.14 0.224 0.060 0.010 0.350
SLC38A9 1.00b 0.98b 3.19a 1.63b 0.158 <0.001 0.020 0.024
SLC3A1 1.00 0.59 1.10 1.30 0.187 0.293 0.780 0.423
SLC6A14 1.00 0.87 1.01 1.79 0.184 0.219 0.389 0.231
SLC7A1 1.00 0.73 0.40 0.99 0.113 0.457 0.491 0.075
SLC7A2 1.00 0.92 0.66 1.16 0.098 0.814 0.296 0.150
SLC7A7 1.00 1.33 1.22 1.66 0.120 0.266 0.123 0.810
SLC7A9 1.00 0.42 1.11 1.29 0.208 0.251 0.629 0.375
SLC3A2 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.97 0.112 0.783 0.871 0.699

AAA diet, basal diet supplemented with 0.16% tryptophan + 0.41% phenylalanine + 0.22% tyrosine.

The mRNA expression levels normalized basal diet LPS treatment group, AAA diet saline, and LPS treatment group by basal diet saline treatment group.

a, b, c

Within a row, means sharing different superscript letters differ significantly (p < 0.05).

In the ileum, the AAAs supplementation had significantly up-regulated the mRNA expressions of SLC16A10 and SLC38A9 (P < 0.05). The mRNA expression of SLC38A2 and SLC7A11 were increased, but the expression of SLC36A1 was decreased by the LPS challenge (P < 0.05). The interaction between AAAs supplementation and the LPS challenge significantly altered the expression of SLC36A1 and SLC38A9 (P < 0.05) (Table 7).

Discussion

The immune system stimulation alters the animals' physiology and metabolism via a complex system involving innate and adaptive immune response, several cytokines and acute-phase proteins, as well as the central nervous system (22). During the period of immune system stimulation, especially the metabolism and demand of Glu, Arg, Trp, Thr, and sulfur-containing AAs undergo certain changes (23). The present study showed the changes of AAs metabolism in piglets in response to LPS change including the AAs profiles in serum and intestinal mucosa, as well as apparent ileal digestibility of AA, etc. However, dietary supplementation with AAAs showed to improve the AAs sensing and utilization under inflammatory conditions.

Firstly, LPS significantly reduced the amount of CCK and increased the concentrations of leptin. But supplementation with AAAs counteracted the negative effect of LPS and stimulated CCK secretion. It has been well-documented that AAs stimulate cholecystokinin release through the Ca2+-sensing receptor (14). In non-calcified tissues, CaSR affected gastrointestinal nutrient sensing and intestinal endocrine hormone secretion (24). Additionally, it is allosterically sensed and associated with AAAs (15). As a metabolic substrate for Clostridium sporogenes, AAAs could be metabolized into 12 compounds, 9 of which could accumulate in the serum and affect systemic immunity (25). Trp and Phe were the most potent CaSR activators in Cai2+ mobilization assays (26). The supplementation of AAAs alleviated intestinal inflammation mediated by the CaSR signaling pathway (14). CaSR mediated the secretion of CCK induced by AAAs in the native intestinal I cell. And L-Phe stimulated CCK secretion enhancement in the presence of extracellular calcium levels (27). L-Phe increased serum glucagon and PYY levels but reduced the ghrelin levels in plasma (28).

Secondly, the addition of AAAs not only increased the total protein levels but also significantly reduced the blood urea nitrogen content, which partly indicated the decrease of N excretion and increase of AAs utilization in piglets. The increased N excretion, which occurs during the immune response, is a reflection of a relative imbalance in the profile of AAs released from peripheral tissues (29). Numerous compelling investigations have indicated that a metabolic alteration will occur in intestinal inflammation, resulting in the change of serum profile of AAs (3033). LPS challenge reduced the ileal Thr digestibility, as well as serum total protein, Ile, and Trp concentrations, but increased the serum concentrations of Phe, Thr, His, Ala, Cys, and Ser in the present study. Reduced total protein means that AA is redistributes inflammation and immunity, not protein synthesis (5, 34). Therefore, it requires the increased provision of particular AAs from the diet in order to spare body protein stores (29). Some dispensable AAs become limiting because their de novo synthesis could be impaired. Several strands of evidence suggest that sulfur AAs, and AAs that are metabolically related to them, may be required in increased amounts (35). The demand for Cys increases under immune system stimulation and is used for the synthesis of glutathione (36) and acute phase proteins (22). AAAs demands are also increased to support the immune response under inflammation conditions in pigs (12). Therefore, dietary supplementation with AAAs showed the anti-inflammatory effects in LPS-challenged piglets (10), which could be explained by the increase in AID of His, Lys, Arg, and Cys, as well as serum concentrations of His, Arg, Trp, and Cys. The increased levels of AAs in serum may be due to the increase in hepatic catabolism and AA requirements for utilization. Interestingly, the levels of 12 kinds of AA were reduced in the jejunal mucosa, where after only the level of Trp was elevated significantly in serum. This is because the capture, absorption, transformation, and metabolism of intestinal epithelial cells and liver metabolism were jointly responsible for regulating the amount of AAs in peripheral blood (37, 38). It was also found in rat liver that His, Phe, Leu, Tyr, Gln, Pro, Trp, and Met inhibit intracellular proteolysis (39). And AA catabolism by the mucosal cells was quantitatively greater than AA incorporation into mucosal protein (40). The catabolism of AAs in the small intestine plays an important role in regulating the availability of dietary AAs to extraintestinal tissues (41).

It is well-known that AAs are absorbed through AA transporters, which may act as an initiator of nutritional signaling. Signaling pathways are intrinsically linked to amino acid transporter activity as well as to intracellular AAs metabolism (42). The SLC family mediates the transport of AAs on the plasma membrane (43). Both A2 and A9 of the SLC38 family are involved in the mTOR pathway. SLC38A9, which is a lysosomal Arg sensor machinery in the mTORC1 pathway (44). The Arg activates mTORC1 through the SLC38A9 sensor and binds it to other essential AAs in lysosomes as a lysosomal messenger, including Phe, Leu, Ile, Trp, Tyr, Val, Pro, Ser, and Met (45). The expression of SLC38A9 in the ileum and the content of Arg, Trp, and Tyr in serum were significantly increased by the addition of AAAs. This suggests that LPS-induced immunity activated the mTOR pathway and increased the Arg requirements in animals. SLC38A2 participates in the regulation of AA availability (46) and also as an AA sensor upstream of mTOR (47). SLC38A2 knockdown in rat myocytes and leads to a drop in intracellular concentrations of both Gln and Leu (48). Gln has been demonstrated to be a rate-limiting nutrient for mTOR activation (49). The content of Gln in the jejunum mucosa was significantly decreased by the LPS stimulation. Compared to the basal diet group, the relative expression of SLC7A11 was significantly increased in the LPS-challenged group, especially in the jejunal mucosa. It promoted Cys uptake and Glu biosynthesis, resulting in protection from oxidative stress (50). The Cys levels were markedly increased both in jejunal mucosa and serum. SLC7A11 imports extracellular Cys with intracellular Glu release at a ratio of 1:1 (51). According to reports, SLC6A19 as a major transporter for neutral AAs is the main agent of branched-chain AAs and Met absorption in the intestinal tract (52). However, the AAA diet significantly reduced its expression in the jejunum, but had no significant effect on the content of three branched-chain AAs and Met in the jejunal mucosa. AAA diet up-regulated significantly the expression level of SLC16A10. This proves the roles of SLC16A10 in mediating facilitated diffusion of AAAs across membranes and maintaining homeostasis by balancing AAAs concentrations between plasma and liver cells (53). SLC16A10 realizes the regulation of neutral AAs through the recovery of aromatic substrates (54).

In conclusion, the present results showed that the inflammation induced by LPS altered the AAs metabolism including the AAs profiles in serum and intestinal mucosa, as well as apparent ileal digestibility of AAs, etc. However, dietary supplementation with AAAs showed to improve the AAs sensing and utilization, which may meet the high demands for specific AAs in response to inflammation and immune response and then exert the anti-inflammatory effects. These findings may provide guidelines for the use of AAAs in animal and human nutrition.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences (2013020).

Author Contributions

QDu: writing—original draft. BT: supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition. JW: writing—review and editing. BH: data curation and supervision. JL, MK, KH, QDe, and YY: supervision. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32072745), Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-35), and Innovation Province Project (2019RS3021).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Glossary

Abbreviations

AA

amino acid

AAA

aromatic amino acid

AID

apparent ileal digestibility

Ala

alanine

ALB

albumin

ALP

alkaline phosphatase

ALT

alanine transaminase

Arg

arginine

Asn

asparagine

Asp

aspartic acid

AST

aspartate aminotransferase

BUN

blood urea nitrogen

CaSR

calcium-sensing receptor

CCK

cholecystokinin

Cys

cysteine

EAA

essential amino acid

Gln

glutamine

Glu

glutamic acid

GLU

glucose

Gly

glycine

His

histidine

Ile

isoleucine

LDH

lactic dehydrogenase

Leu

leucine

LPS

lipopolysaccharide

Lys

lysine

Met

methionine

mTOR

mammalian target of rapamycin

NEAA

non-essential amino acid

Phe

phenylalanine

Pro

proline

Ser

serine

SLC

solute carrier

Thr

threonine

Tp

total protein

Trp

tryptophan

Tyr

tyrosine

Val

valine.

References

  • 1.Bruins MJ, Soeters PB, Deutz NE. Endotoxemia affects organ protein metabolism differently during prolonged feeding in pigs. J Nutr. (2000) 130:3003–13. 10.1093/jn/130.12.3003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bruins MJ, Soeters PB, Lamers WH, Deutz NE. L-arginine supplementation in pigs decreases liver protein turnover and increases hindquarter protein turnover both during and after endotoxemia. Am J Clin Nutr. (2002) 75:1031–44. 10.1093/ajcn/75.6.1031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Webster JI, Tonelli L, Sternberg EM. Neuroendocrine regulation of immunity. Annu Rev Immunol. (2002) 20:125–63. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.082401.104914 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Melchior D, Sève B, Le Floc'h N. Chronic lung inflammation affects plasma amino acid concentrations in pigs. J Anim Sci. (2004) 82:1091–9. 10.2527/2004.8241091x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Klasing KC, Johnstone BJ. Monokines in growth and development. Poult Sci. (1991) 70:1781–9. 10.3382/ps.0701781 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Daly JM, Reynolds J, Sigal RK, Jian S, Liberman M. Effect of dietary protein and amino acids on immune function. Crit Care Med. (1990) 18:86–93. 10.1097/00003246-199002003-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gao K, Pi Y, Mu CL, Peng Y, Huang Z, Zhu WY. Antibiotics-induced modulation of large intestinal microbiota altered aromatic amino acid profile and expression of neurotransmitters in the hypothalamus of piglets. J Neurochem. (2018) 146:219–34. 10.1111/jnc.14333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Platten M, Nollen EAA, Röhrig UF, Fallarino F, Opitz CA. Tryptophan metabolism as a common therapeutic target in cancer, neurodegeneration and beyond. Nat Rev Drug Discov. (2019) 18:379–401. 10.1038/s41573-019-0016-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Duan Y, Tan B, Li J, Liao P, Huang B, Li F, et al. Optimal branched-chain amino acid ratio improves cell proliferation and protein metabolism of porcine enterocytesin in vivo and in vitro. Nutrition. (2018) 54:173–81. 10.1016/j.nut.2018.03.057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jewell JL, Russell RC, Guan KL. Amino acid signalling upstream of mTOR. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2013) 14:133–9. 10.1038/nrm3522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kim SG, Buel GR, Blenis J. Nutrient regulation of the mTOR complex 1 signaling pathway. Mol Cells. (2013) 35:463–73. 10.1007/s10059-013-0138-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Poncet N, Taylor PM. The role of amino acid transporters in nutrition. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. (2013) 16:57–65. 10.1097/MCO.0b013e32835a885c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kilberg MS, Shan J, Su N. ATF4-dependent transcription mediates signaling of amino acid limitation. Trends Endocrinol Metab. (2009) 20:436–43. 10.1016/j.tem.2009.05.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liu H, Tan B, Huang B, Li J, Wang J, Liao P, et al. Involvement of calcium-sensing receptor activation in the alleviation of intestinal inflammation in a piglet model by dietary aromatic amino acid supplementation. Br J Nutr. (2018) 120:1321–31. 10.1017/S0007114518002891 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Conigrave AD, Franks AH, Brown EM, Quinn SJ. L-amino acid sensing by the calcium-sensing receptor: a general mechanism for coupling protein and calcium metabolism? Eur J Clin Nutr. (2002) 56:1072–80. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ling S, Shi P, Liu S, Meng X, Zhou Y, Sun W, et al. Structural mechanism of cooperative activation of the human calcium-sensing receptor by Ca(2+) ions and L-tryptophan. Cell Res. (2021) 31:383–94. 10.1038/s41422-021-00474-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Reimann F, Ward P, Gribble F. Signaling Mechanisms Underlying the Release of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1. Diabetes. (2006) 55:10. 10.2337/db06-S010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang Y, Chandra R, Samsa LA, Gooch B, Fee BE, Cook JM, et al. Amino acids stimulate cholecystokinin release through the Ca2+-sensing receptor. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. (2011) 300:G528–37. 10.1152/ajpgi.00387.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Knerr I, Gröschl M, Rascher W, Rauh M. Endocrine effects of food intake: insulin, ghrelin, and leptin responses to a single bolus of essential amino acids in humans. Ann Nutr Metab. (2003) 47:312–8. 10.1159/000072405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li H, Yin J, He X, Li Z, Ma X. Enzyme-treated soybean meal replacing extruded full-fat soybean affects nitrogen digestibility, cecal fermentation characteristics and bacterial community of newly weaned piglets. Front Vet Sci. (2021) 8:e639039. 10.3389/fvets.2021.639039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Neto M, Gallardo C, Perna F, Dadalt JC. Apparent total and ileal digestibility of rice bran with or without multicarbohydrase and phytase in weaned piglets. Livest Sci. (2021) 245:104423. 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104423 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Reeds PJ, Jahoor F. The amino acid requirements of disease. Clin Nutr. (2001) 20:15–22. 10.1054/clnu.2001.0402 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rakhshandeh A. Immune system stimulation in the pig: effect on performance and implications for amino acid nutrition. J Anim Sci. (2011) 97:735–44. 10.1093/jas/sky468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hannan FM, Kallay E, Chang W, Brandi ML, Thakker RV. The calcium-sensing receptor in physiology and in calcitropic and noncalcitropic diseases. Nat Rev Endocrinol. (2018) 15:33–51. 10.1038/s41574-018-0115-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dodd D, Spitzer MH, Van Treuren W, Merrill BD, Hryckowian AJ, Higginbottom SK, et al. A gut bacterial pathway metabolizes aromatic amino acids into nine circulating metabolites. Nature. (2017) 551:648–52. 10.1038/nature24661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Conigrave AD, Mun HC, Delbridge L, Quinn SJ, Wilkinson M, Brown EM. L-amino acids regulate parathyroid hormone secretion. J Biol Chem. (2004) 279:38151–9. 10.1074/jbc.M406373200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liou AP, Sei Y, Zhao X, Feng J, Lu X, Thomas C, et al. The extracellular calcium-sensing receptor is required for cholecystokinin secretion in response to L-phenylalanine in acutely isolated intestinal I cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. (2011) 300:G538–46. 10.1152/ajpgi.00342.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Alamshah A, Spreckley E, Norton M, Kinsey-Jones JS, Amin A, Ramgulam A, et al. l-phenylalanine modulates gut hormone release and glucose tolerance, and suppresses food intake through the calcium-sensing receptor in rodents. Int J Obes. (2017) 41:1693–701. 10.1038/ijo.2017.164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Obled C. Amino acid requirements in inflammatory states. Can J Anim Sci. (2003) 83:365–73. 10.4141/A03-021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McGilvray WD, Klein D, Wooten H, Dawson JA, Hewitt D, Rakhshandeh AR, et al. Immune system stimulation induced by Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide alters plasma free amino acid flux and dietary nitrogen utilization in growing pigs. J Anim Sci. (2019) 97:315–26. 10.1093/jas/sky401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rakhshandeh A, Htoo JK, Karrow N, Miller SP, de Lange CF. Impact of immune system stimulation on the ileal nutrient digestibility and utilisation of methionine plus cysteine intake for whole-body protein deposition in growing pigs. Br J Nutr. (2014) 111:101–10. 10.1017/S0007114513001955 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.McGaha TL, Huang L, Lemos H, Metz R, Mautino M, Prendergast GC, et al. Amino acid catabolism: a pivotal regulator of innate and adaptive immunity. Immunol Rev. (2012) 249:135–57. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01149.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kelly B, Pearce EL. Amino assets: how amino acids support immunity. Cell Metab. (2020) 32:154–75. 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.06.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rakhshandeh A, Weber TE, Dekkers J, Tuggle CK, Gabler NK. Impact of systemic immune system stimulation on intestinal integrity and function in pigs. J Exp Bio. (2013) 34:1. 10.1096/fasebj.27.1_supplement.867.2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Grimble RF, Grimble GK. Immunonutrition: role of sulfur amino acids, related amino acids, and polyamines. Nutrition. (1998) 14:605–10. 10.1016/S0899-9007(98)80041-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Malmezat T, Breuillé D, Capitan P, Mirand PP, Obled C. Glutathione turnover is increased during the acute phase of sepsis in rats. J Nutr. (2000) 130:1239–46. 10.1093/jn/130.5.1239 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Trefts E, Gannon M, Wasserman DH. The liver. Curr Biol. (2017) 27:R1147–51. 10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wu G. Amino acids: metabolism, functions, and nutrition. Amino Acids. (2009) 37:1–17. 10.1007/s00726-009-0269-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pösö AR, Wert JJ, Jr., Mortimore GE. Multifunctional control of amino acids of deprivation-induced proteolysis in liver. Role of leucine. J Biol Chem. (1982) 257:12114–20. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)33686-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Stoll B, Henry J, Reeds PJ, Yu H, Jahoor F, Burrin DG. Catabolism dominates the first-pass intestinal metabolism of dietary essential amino acids in milk protein-fed piglets. J Nutr. (1998) 128:606–14. 10.1093/jn/128.3.606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wu G. Intestinal mucosal amino acid catabolism. J Nutr. (1998) 128:1249–52. 10.1093/jn/128.8.1249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hyde R, Taylor PM, Hundal HS. Amino acid transporters: roles in amino acid sensing and signalling in animal cells. Biochemical J. (2003) 373:1–18. 10.1042/bj20030405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kandasamy P, Gyimesi G, Kanai Y, Hediger MA. Amino acid transporters revisited: New views in health and disease. Trends Biochem Sci. (2018) 43:752–89. 10.1016/j.tibs.2018.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rebsamen M, Superti-Furga G. SLC38A9: A lysosomal amino acid transporter at the core of the amino acid-sensing machinery that controls MTORC1. Autophagy. (2016) 12:1061–2. 10.1080/15548627.2015.1091143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wyant GA, Abu-Remaileh M, Wolfson RL, Chen WW, Freinkman E, Danai LV, et al. mTORC1 activator SLC38A9 is required to efflux essential amino acids from lysosomes and use protein as a nutrient. Cell. (2017) 171:642–54.e12. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gazzola GC, Franchi R, Saibene V, Ronchi P, Guidotti GG. Regulation of amino acid transport in chick embryo heart cells. I. Adaptive system of mediation for neutral amino acids. Biochim Biophys Acta. (1972) 266:407–21. 10.1016/0005-2736(72)90097-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hundal HS, Taylor PM. Amino acid transceptors: gate keepers of nutrient exchange and regulators of nutrient signaling. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. (2009) 296:E603–13. 10.1152/ajpendo.91002.2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Evans K, Nasim Z, Brown J, Clapp E, Amin A, Yang B, et al. Inhibition of SNAT2 by metabolic acidosis enhances proteolysis in skeletal muscle. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2008) 19:2119–29. 10.1681/ASN.2007101108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Nicklin P, Bergman P, Zhang B, Triantafellow E, Wang H, Nyfeler B, et al. Bidirectional transport of amino acids regulates mTOR and autophagy. Cell. (2009) 136:521–34. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Koppula P, Zhang Y, Zhuang L, Gan B. Amino acid transporter SLC7A11/xCT at the crossroads of regulating redox homeostasis and nutrient dependency of cancer. Cancer Commun. (2018) 38:12. 10.1186/s40880-018-0288-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lin W, Wang C, Liu G, Bi C, Wang X, Zhou Q, et al. SLC7A11/xCT in cancer: biological functions and therapeutic implications. Am J Cancer Res. (2020) 10:3106–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bröer S. The role of the neutral amino acid transporter B0AT1 (SLC6A19) in Hartnup disorder and protein nutrition. IUBMB Life. (2009) 61:591–9. 10.1002/iub.210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mariotta L, Ramadan T, Singer D, Guetg A, Herzog B, Stoeger C, et al. T-type amino acid transporter TAT1 (Slc16a10) is essential for extracellular aromatic amino acid homeostasis control. J Physiol. (2012) 590:6413–24. 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.239574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ramadan T, Camargo SM, Herzog B, Bordin M, Pos KM, Verrey F. Recycling of aromatic amino acids via TAT1 allows efflux of neutral amino acids via LAT2-4F2hc exchanger. Pflugers Arch. (2007) 454:507–16. 10.1007/s00424-007-0209-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.


Articles from Frontiers in Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES