Skip to main content
Sage Choice logoLink to Sage Choice
. 2021 May 29;36(1):12–19. doi: 10.1177/02698811211008554

Psychedelics and health behaviour change

Pedro J Teixeira 1,2,, Matthew W Johnson 3, Christopher Timmermann 4, Rosalind Watts 2, David Erritzoe 4, Hannah Douglass 4, Hannes Kettner 4, Robin L Carhart-Harris 4
PMCID: PMC8801670  PMID: 34053342

Abstract

Healthful behaviours such as maintaining a balanced diet, being physically active and refraining from smoking have major impacts on the risk of developing cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and other serious conditions. The burden of the so-called ‘lifestyle diseases’—in personal suffering, premature mortality and public health costs—is considerable. Consequently, interventions designed to promote healthy behaviours are increasingly being studied, e.g., using psychobiological models of behavioural regulation and change. In this article, we explore the notion that psychedelic substances such as psilocybin could be used to assist in promoting positive lifestyle change conducive to good overall health. Psilocybin has a low toxicity, is non-addictive and has been shown to predict favourable changes in patients with depression, anxiety and other conditions marked by rigid behavioural patterns, including substance (mis)use. While it is still early days for modern psychedelic science, research is advancing fast and results are promising. Here we describe psychedelics’ proposed mechanisms of action and research findings pertinent to health behaviour change science, hoping to generate discussion and new research hypotheses linking the two areas. Therapeutic models including psychedelic experiences and common behaviour change methods (e.g., Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, Motivational Interviewing) are already being tested for addiction and eating disorders. We believe this research may soon be extended to help promote improved diet, exercise, nature exposure and also mindfulness or stress reduction practices, all of which can contribute to physical and psychological health and well-being.

Keywords: Psilocybin, serotonin, therapy, public health, interventions

Introduction

Promoting healthy lifestyles in areas such as diet, physical activity, smoking and drinking has become a key priority area in the public and private sector, with the present wellness market reportedly valued at US$4.5T (McGroarty, 2018). Relevant to this industry is the science of ‘health behaviour change’ devoted to exploring and expanding the understanding of theories, determinants and interventions in this area (e.g., Davidson and Scholz, 2020). Promoting healthier lifestyles is important as unhealthy behaviours increase the probability of manifest disorders such as obesity, diabetes, depression, cancer and cardiovascular disease, as well as untold personal and familial suffering and significant economic burden (World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research, 2018). Healthy lifestyles and mental health are closely related (e.g., Nagasu et al., 2019) and unhealthy lifestyle choices can cross over into pathology, with substance abuse being a major contributor to premature death (Case and Deaton, 2015). Tobacco and alcohol use in particular constitute a substantial health burden, together accounting for approximately 15% of global deaths (World Health Organization, 2017b, 2018). Both obesity (World Health Organization, 2020) and physical inactivity (Ding et al., 2016) remain highly prevalent worldwide, despite several decades of public health campaigns and policies intended to combat them.

Psychedelic 1 compounds such as LSD (lysergic acid diethylamide), psilocybin (present in ‘magic mushrooms’) and DMT (dimethyltryptamine, present in ayahuasca 2 and other preparations) may not seem like obvious tools for promoting healthier living. However, plants and fungi with psychedelic potential have been used by humans for centuries, if not millennia, for holistic ‘healing’ of body and mind (Akers et al., 2011; Lowy, 1971; Schultes, 1969). In the mid-20th century, aided by the laboratory synthesis of mescaline, LSD and psilocybin, scientists began to systematically test the effects of these compounds, with hundreds of studies performed. Several of these focused on the ability of psychedelics to promote traditional psychotherapy—with positive results claimed in the treatment of mood disorders and addictions, in particular. For example, a systematic review of 21 studies published between 1949 and 1973 covering the use of LSD and psilocybin for treating depression reported that 79% of participants had clinician-judged improvement after treatment (Rucker et al., 2016). In this period, over 40,000 patients participated in more than 1000 published studies with psychedelics, with many encouraging outcomes (Grinspoon, 1981; Grinspoon and Bakalar, 1979). Circa 1970, psychedelic research was halted due to prohibitive new legislation with formidable barriers to research, inaccessibility of drug product, a shifted public opinion, professional marginalization and lack of funding (Bonson, 2018; Johnson et al., 2008).

The 21st century has witnessed a so-called ‘renaissance’ of human research with psychedelic compounds. This is reflected in mainstream coverage of the topic, advocacy movements (e.g., Mazzei, 2019) and improved funding for clinical research (e.g., Emerson et al., 2014; Nichols, 2014; Sessa, 2018). Research of psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy has been published or is now being planned or underway for a range of psychiatric conditions including cancer-related distress (Gasser et al., 2014, 2015; Griffiths et al., 2016; Grob et al., 2011; Ross et al., 2016), depression (e.g., Carhart-Harris et al., 2021; National Library of Medicine [NLM], 2017a, 2019b), anxiety (NLM, 2017b), substance use disorders (e.g., Bogenschutz et al., 2015; Johnson et al., 2014; Moreno et al., 2006), obsessive compulsive disorder (Moreno et al., 2006) and eating disorders (Carhart-Harris et al., 2021). Despite mostly small-sample studies, published results are largely promising (Johnson and Griffiths, 2017). In the USA, the FDA has granted ‘Breakthrough Therapy Designation’ to psilocybin therapy for depression for two separate sponsors, effectively fast-tracking the development pathway to licensing if clear criteria are met. The substances ketamine and MDMA (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine), which can induce psychedelic-like effects, are also being studied for treating depression, posttraumatic stress disorder and substance abuse (e.g., Krediet et al., 2020). MDMA has also been granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation by the US FDA for treating PTSD. However, because ketamine and MDMA are not considered ‘classic psychedelics’ (their mechanisms of action only partially overlap with those of psilocybin, LSD or DMT), they will not be covered in this review.

How do psychedelics work? A summary of neurobiological findings

Classic psychedelics are direct agonists at the serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, or 5-HT) 2A receptor (5-HT2AR) subtype, and while all of the most popular psychedelics also have activity at other receptor subtypes, agonism at the 5-HT2AR appears to be key to their main action (Glennon et al., 1984; Preller et al., 2017; Vollenweider, 1998; Winter et al., 2004). Psychedelics have a favourable toxicity profile and therapeutic index (Van Amsterdam et al., 2015), and apparently negligible addiction potential (Rucker et al., 2018). The main hazards relate to the intensity of the altered state of consciousness they produce, particularly at higher doses, and the need for professional supervision under these conditions (Johnson et al., 2008).

The effect of stimulating the 5-HT2AR is to increase the postsynaptic gain of the host neuron, which is commensurate with it becoming more excitable to input. 5-HT2ARs are most densely expressed on cortical layer V pyramidal neurons, important information integration units (Jakab and Goldman-Rakic, 1998). This increase in postsynaptic gain translates into a spike-wave decoherence at the population level (Celada et al., 2008) and increase in the complexity, unpredictability or entropy of field potentials—an effect that correlates closely with the intensity of subjective effects in humans (Schartner et al., 2017). Higher, macroscopic level effects include the dysregulation of large-scale intrinsic networks (Carhart-Harris et al., 2016), increase in the repertoire of high-spatial frequency global brain states (Atasoy et al., 2018), and an increase in the communication between large-scale intrinsic networks (Carhart-Harris et al., 2016; Tagliazucchi et al., 2016). At the anatomical level, psychedelics have been found to promote cortical synaptogenesis, an important marker of neuroplasticity (Ly et al., 2018). The pertinent question, however, is: how do these effects relate to the putative therapeutic action of psychedelic therapy?

Recently a model was introduced to directly address this question (Carhart-Harris and Friston, 2019). It takes inspiration from the hierarchical predictive processing model of global brain function, which states that the brain strives to model its world in order to minimize surprising exchanges with it and thus, promote its mastery. Applied to psychedelics, the so-called ‘REBUS’ model, ‘relaxed beliefs under psychedelics’ states that psychedelics decrease the prediction-weighting of priors at different levels of the brain’s functional hierarchy—but particularly its highest hierarchical levels. In plainer language, this relates to dysregulated activity in relevant dimensions of brain function thought to encode high-level predictive models, such as the strength of oscillatory rhythms (such as the predominant alpha rhythm) and the integrity of intrinsic brain networks (such as the default-mode network). In more intuitive experiential terms, this effect relates to a felt relaxation of beliefs or assumptions e.g., about one’s self, relationships with others, or to the world more generally. In many psychiatric disorders, it is argued that habits of mind and behaviour, as well as beliefs, become ‘too precise’, meaning they are rigidly encoded and too influential. Examples include the negative cognitive bias in depression, specific cravings in addictions, specific fears in anxiety disorders, specific obsessions in obsessive compulsive disorder and specific bodily beliefs in body image disorders. According to the REBUS model, psychedelics afford the individual respite from weighty beliefs and thus a window of opportunity for change that can be exploited if combined with a commitment to therapeutic development (Carhart-Harris, 2019).

The evidence presented above highlights a potentially relevant link between the neuroscientific findings and behavioural change which may be facilitated by psychedelics. Revision of high-order mechanisms not only have an introspective consequence (i.e., in affective and cognitive domains) but may also result in exploratory behaviour which is consistent with new patterns and beliefs acquired during or after the acute experience. For example, a new appreciation for natural environments (Lyons and Carhart-Harris, 2018) could result in an increase in nature immersion behaviours (e.g., choosing parks or riverside trails to be more physically active) or a more sustainable shopping and dietary pattern. Such an increase in exploration of new behaviours would be consistent with an increase in the personality domain called ‘openness to experience,’ which has been shown to be increased by psilocybin (MacLean et al., 2011). From a mechanistic point of view, evidence from psychology and neuroscience experiments show that psychedelics are able to induce flexible patterns of thinking in different cognitive domains, which occur at a basic level of perception (Kometer et al., 2011; Timmermann et al., 2018), as well as on domains related to language and semantics (Family et al., 2016). Psychedelics may also enhance creative thinking (Kuypers et al., 2016) during acute states, depending on the context in which the experience takes place (Hartogsohn, 2016). It is thus reasonable to assume that the effects of psychedelics at multiple levels of the cognitive hierarchy may result in long-term changes in behaviour.

Could psychedelic experiences increase self-determination?

Self-determination, or perceived autonomy, can be defined as the degree of self-endorsement of one’s actions at the highest order of reflection (Ryan and Deci, 2006). Self-determined motivation is consistently associated with improved psychological well-being and with engagement with—and persistence in—a variety of tasks and long-term behaviours (Ntoumanis et al., 2020). Consequently, the concept has been explored in studies in health behaviour change, in areas such as dental hygiene (Halvari et al., 2019), diet, exercise and obesity (Teixeira et al., 2012a), diabetes (Phillips and Guarnaccia, 2020) and tobacco cessation (Williams et al., 2016), with generally encouraging results (Leblanc et al., 2016; Sheeran et al., 2020; Teixeira et al., 2012b). We propose that it could present a fruitful psychological framework from which to understand how psychedelics could assist in lifestyle change, especially from a motivational viewpoint.

According to self-determination theory (SDT; Ryan and Deci, 2017), at the root of self-determined motivation and behaviour is the satisfaction of the three psychological needs of competence, autonomy and relatedness (see Table 1 from Teixeira et al., 2020). Much the same as the five human needs, as defined by Maslow, may be necessary for human survival and development (Maslow, 1943), SDT posits that competence, autonomy and relatedness are innate essential psychological needs for mental health and for psychological growth. It suggests that human beings are naturally inclined to ‘engage in interesting activities, to exercise capacities, to pursue connectedness in social groups, and to integrate intrapsychic and interpersonal experiences into a relative unity’ (Deci and Ryan, 2000) but this will occur only to the extent basic psychological needs are satisfied. SDT also makes reference to the concept of ‘true’ or ‘core’ self, 3 one which researchers and practitioners involved with psychedelic therapy will easily relate to many participants’ personal accounts (e.g., Noorani et al., 2018; Watts et al., 2017).

Table 1.

Conceptual definitions of the three psychological needs from self-determination theory.

Psychological need Conceptual definition
Autonomy The psychological need to experience self-direction and personal endorsement in the initiation and regulation of one’s behaviour. The hallmarks of autonomy need satisfaction are volitional action and wholehearted self-endorsement (i.e., personal ownership) of that action.
Competence The psychological need to be effective in one’s interactions with the environment. It reflects the desire to extend one’s capacities and skills and, in doing so, to seek out optimal challenges, take them on, and exert effort and strategic thinking until personal growth is experienced.
Relatedness The psychological need to establish close emotional bonds and attachments with other people. It reflects the desire to be emotionally connected to and interpersonally involved in warm relationships. The hallmarks of relatedness need satisfaction are feeling socially connected and being actively engaged in both the giving and receiving of care and benevolence to the significant people in one’s life.

Conceptual definitions are based on Ryan and Deci (2017).

We hypothesize that competence (akin to a sense of self-efficacy and confidence in one’s capacities), autonomy (i.e., wholehearted self-endorsement of one’s actions) and interpersonal relatedness are all factors which psychedelics could plausibly influence. Although at present we have no direct evidence for such effects, accounts of participants in research trials for depression (Watts et al., 2017), alcohol cessation (Nielson et al., 2018) and smoking cessation (Noorani et al., 2018) suggest this could be the case. Regarding competence, Nielson et al. (2018) included a category of ‘confidence, motivation and resolve’ and another of ‘commitment to change’ as descriptive of participants’ experiences. In turn, Watts et al. (2017) reported feeling more ‘confident’, ‘resilient’ and ‘effective’. In relation to ‘autonomy,’ Noorani et al. (2018) found insights into self-identity (e.g., unveiling of true self, and honesty with oneself) to result from sessions, and Watts et al. (2017) reported increased connection to self and feeling more attuned with ones’ internal needs and inherent worth as central processes underlying transformative experiences, in previously depressed patients (Watts et al., 2017). For example, ‘One of the things that happened to me (…) was the magnification of how important it was to be true to yourself and have integrity about it’ (Noorani et al., 2018: 11).

Finally, regarding relatedness, Noorani et al. (2018) noted that sessions left participants with lasting impressions of interconnectedness and an increase in prosocial behaviour. ‘Relatedness’, as defined by SDT, is an especially interesting case vis à vis the evidence that significant psychedelic experiences are often associated with increased feelings of connectedness to others (Carhart-Harris et al., 2018; Watts et al., 2017). A sense of unity, which might be conceptualized as an ultimate level of relatedness, is one of the features of the mystical experience construct that is strongly affected by classic psychedelics (Johnson et al., 2019). Future research will be needed to investigate whether psychedelic experiences relate to changes in concepts central to SDT (e.g., need satisfaction and autonomous self-regulation), and to what extent these concepts may predict lasting behaviour change after a positive experience or therapeutic process.

Spontaneous health behaviour changes with psychedelics

As a result of these lessons [from psychedelic treatment for depression], there were some major lifestyle changes; nearly half of the sample reported improvements to diet, exercise, and cutting down on drinking alcohol. One described the improvement to his diet that happened after the dose as ‘life-changing’, although he was not sure how these changes came about as he did not receive direct ‘lessons’ about diet. (Watts et al., 2017: 13)

To our knowledge, no study has been conducted specifically to investigate lifestyle behaviours such as over-eating and physical activity in relation to psychedelic use. However, some studies have asked participants to report spontaneous changes in various areas of their lives, including in health behaviours, perhaps due to the fact that anecdotal accounts of these phenomena are not uncommon. In fact, it appears that the first studies in alcohol abuse were initiated precisely because of ad hoc observations by some users – notably Leo Zeff, a famous psychedelic clinician, regarding his own smoking cessation success after using a classic psychedelic (c.f. Johnson et al., 2017b). It is also interesting to note that, along with environmental concerns, healthy eating and living more healthfully were popular elements of psychedelic culture from the beginning, at least in some communities (Smith and Sternfield, 1970).

In a recent observational study, 380 ayahuasca users were interviewed face to face and asked about their health (including height and weight, allowing for calculation of their body mass index (BMI)) and also their physical activity, diet and yoga/meditation habits (Ona et al., 2019). These measures were then compared to data from the general population. Although limited by the cross-sectional nature of the data (e.g., confounding factors may be present), results showed that ayahuasca users had a mean BMI of 22.6 kg/m2, well below the 30 kg/m2 cut-off for obesity and clearly lower than that of the general Spanish population (around 26 kg/m2 in 2016; World Health Organization, 2017a) and had a high fruit and vegetable consumption (60–75% ingesting 3–6 servings a day of each vs. 22–48% in the general population). As to physical activity, 55% reported being ‘as physically active as they wished’, a value that seems high but which cannot be compared with any standard measure of activity in the population (Ona et al., 2019).

In a US survey of 343 people who claimed to have stopped or reduced alcohol consumption and misuse after a psychedelic experience, 63% of the participants also endorsed ‘improved diet,’ and 55% reported ‘increased exercise’ as a result of their psychedelic experience (Garcia-Romeu et al., 2019b). In a similar study of 444 participants who claimed to have stopped or reduced cannabis, opioid or stimulant misuse after a psychedelic experience, 59% endorsed ‘improved diet’ and 58% endorsed ‘increased exercise’ as a result of their psychedelic experience (Garcia-Romeu et al., 2019a). It is unknown from these studies whether these individuals were intentionally seeking changes in these specific areas as they embarked on psychedelic use. However, one can speculate that many were probably not because only 9.9% reported an intention to reduce/quit drinking alcohol. This suggests that psychedelic-assisted interventions that more specifically target health behaviour changes could result in even higher rates of success in this domain.

The Johns Hopkins’ studies on smoking cessation also provide some evidence that participants were making other positive changes in their lives (besides reducing smoking) as they went through the psilocybin-assisted therapy programme. Both the initial (Johnson et al., 2014) and follow-up (Johnson et al., 2017a) studies report significant (51%) increases in a self-reported scale titled ‘positive behaviour changes’ as people moved from baseline to the end of the treatment. These were described further in a qualitative analysis, which reported increases in time spent in nature, taking time for oneself, prosocial behaviours such as volunteering and joining community groups, and greater engagement with art (Noorani et al., 2018). A similar pattern was observed in the study of psilocybin for depression in cancer patients, from the same research group (Griffiths et al., 2016). Although these are not health-related behaviours per se, results suggest psychedelics may be associated with life changes consistent with improved well-being and meaning. In support of this, a recent 4.5 year follow-up of cancer patients who underwent psilocybin-assisted therapy showed persisting increases in not just well-being/life satisfaction (reported by 86% of participants, n=12) but also in ‘positive behaviour changes’ attributed to the psilocybin experience (100% of participants, n=14) (Agin-Liebes et al., 2020).

A qualitative descriptive study with 16 participants who had been previously diagnosed with an eating disorder (ED, anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa) and were at various phases of illness and/or recovery investigated how having partaken in one or several ayahuasca ceremonies influenced their management of their condition or recovery process (Lafrance et al., 2017). A majority of participants reported reductions in ED-related negative thoughts, improvements in emotional processing and regulation, and an increased ability to identify what they perceived as the root psychological causes of the disorder. No specific behavioural changes were measured, but participants generally either reported more easily managing symptoms or having achieved full and sustained remission, subsequent to their psychedelic experience.

Finally, a recent study looked at benefits and challenges in 278 users of microdosing with LSD and/or psilocybin (Anderson et al., 2019). Microdosing typically involves the regular (i.e., 2–3 times a week) intake of about 5–15% of the normal dose used in most studies. Consequently, both the brain/neurological effects as well as the psychological (and phenomenological) effects with this dosing model are presumed to be partially different than those from taking a high dose (Passie, 2019). These differences notwithstanding, and also considering other limitations (self-selected convenience sample with no comparison group), microdosing was associated with spontaneous improvements in meditative practice (49.1% of participants), exercise (49.1%), eating habits (36.0%) and sleep (28.8%); and with reduced use of caffeine (44.2%), alcohol (42.3%) and tobacco (21.0%).

From addiction to behaviour change interventions using psychedelics

Among the mental health/psychiatric targets of early clinical psychedelic research in the 1950s and 60s were disorders primarily defined by behavioural problems, including substance abuse disorders (e.g., alcohol, opioids). Surveying studies from the 1950s to 1970s, a meta-analysis of six double-blind intervention studies using LSD for alcohol misuse suggested a significant effect in abstinence rates at the short (2–3 months) and the medium-term (6 months), but not at 12 months (Krebs and Johansen, 2013). This line of research was resumed more recently, and results have tended to confirm the earlier observations with psilocybin for alcohol dependence (Bogenschutz et al., 2015), and extended it to tobacco smoking (Johnson et al., 2014, 2017b). In the latter studies, after two or three drug sessions and behaviour therapy before and after, biologically verified smoking abstinence at 12 months and ~30 months by far surpassed success rates in current treatment modalities (Johnson et al., 2017a). A complementary survey describes instances in which classic psychedelic use outside of research settings is followed by cessation or reduction of tobacco smoking (Johnson et al., 2017b).

Mechanisms of action in tobacco cessation with psychedelics reportedly include improved mood and affect, change in life priorities and values, motivational insights and emotional regulation (Johnson et al., 2017b). In addition, qualitative analysis of smoking cessation participants suggested psilocybin sessions helped in smoking abstinence by providing insights into self-identify and personal reasons for smoking, a sense of awe, curiosity and interconnectedness, and a persistent overshadowing of withdrawal symptoms (Noorani et al., 2018). It is noteworthy that for both smoking and alcohol dependence the most recent intervention trials using psychedelics have employed mainstream motivational/behaviour change methods such as Motivational Interviewing (Nielson et al., 2018) and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (Johnson et al., 2014) to complement the substance-induced psychedelic experience(s). Both Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy have been used extensively in the areas of mental health and health behaviour change (e.g., Frost et al., 2018; Health Quality Ontario, 2019).

The models of psychedelic therapy which are now emerging in the field (e.g., Watts and Luoma, 2020; Wolff et al., 2020) typically include one or two sessions where participants ingest the psychedelic compound (e.g., a psilocybin capsule), with variable amounts of preparation and integration therapeutic sessions (Johnson et al., 2008). Trained guides/therapists are usually present for the duration of the psychedelic experience. One reference is the use of psilocybin for smoking cessation at Johns Hopkins (Johnson et al., 2014, 2017a), where participants underwent a 15-week programme with six preparation/integration individual meetings. Psychedelic-assisted behavioural change interventions could also take place in a group format, which is often used in ceremonial settings, and holds much promise as a cost-effective way to deliver psilocybin therapy in research contexts. Although current lifestyle behaviour change interventions (e.g., for weight loss or diabetes) involve a wide variability of formats and length, a programme of several weeks (sometimes months) with regular educational sessions in a group setting is a very common model (e.g., Teixeira et al., 2010).

Looking forward, the therapeutic container for such work could be the ACE model (Accept, Connect, Embody) which was used to support patients undergoing psilocybin treatment for depression (Watts and Luoma, 2020) and is based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy or ACT (A-Tjak et al., 2015). In fact, Walsh and Thiessen (2018) have also proposed that psychedelic therapy should incorporate Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, a framework which has also been used for different mental and physical health problems, including obesity (Lawlor et al., 2020) and depression (Bai et al., 2020). Alternatively, as highlighted above, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (see also Wolff et al., 2020) and Motivational Enhancement Therapy (including Motivational Interviewing) could be used as therapeutic containers, as each of these has been supported by robust research as effective in supporting multiple varieties of health behaviour change (Miller and Rollnick, 2012). Motivational Interviewing in particular is largely consistent with SDT (Patrick and Williams, 2012), and both have a range of intervention techniques (e.g., Teixeira et al., 2020) which could be tested as part of future psychedelic-assisted behaviour change interventions.

Final considerations

We have reviewed the modern resurgence in psychedelic research with a focus on therapeutic applications. Among these are the treatment of addictions (alcohol and tobacco) using psychedelics, which can be viewed as instances of health behaviour change facilitation. We have also briefly reviewed how biological effects of psychedelics may result in acute psychological effects, such as relaxed beliefs, that may have long-lasting effects on perspective and behaviour. In addition, we have proposed that SDT, which emphasizes autonomy, competence and relatedness, may be a useful framework to understand increases in internally driven motivation upon well-integrated psychedelic experiences. Finally, we propose directions for how psychedelic work in behaviour change may be conducted in the future, establishing several parallels between commonly used models, such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy or Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, and emerging psychedelic-assisted therapies for tobacco cessation or depression (e.g., the ACE model). Another area for future enquiry is to examine the role of individual differences in suggestibility as well as drug-induced enhancements of suggestibility in moderating and mediating behavioural change (Carhart-Harris et al., 2015; Carhart-Harris and Friston, 2019).

One concern might be an impression by some in the public that administering psychedelics to patients might cause them to lose motivation for prior pursuits and for engagement in mainstream society, including abandonment of family responsibilities. We suspect such fears are driven not by the pharmacological effects of psychedelic drugs, but by their historical cultural association with the counterculture and their status as illicit drugs. The data that directly addresses these questions in clinical research do not show evidence for it. For example, Griffiths et al. (2006, 2011) examined ratings by community observers (i.e., family members, friends or co-workers with frequent contact with the participant) about the participant’s behaviours, attitudes and functioning. These were assessed before psilocybin administration and up to 2 or 14 months after psilocybin administration. Both studies showed significant long-term improvements as assessed by these community observers, suggesting that the intervention did not cause a general tendency for people to drop out of mainstream society or disengage with their families. The clinical studies reviewed have utilized preparation, monitoring and some form of integration (Johnson et al., 2008). As psychedelics move forward as possible approved therapeutics, to minimize the potential for societally disruptive effects it is important that clinicians observe appropriate clinical practice boundaries and not introduce counter-cultural or supernatural frameworks to patients in the context of psychedelic therapy (Johnson, 2020).

There are numerous future directions suggested by our framework. Studies should expand existing research to look at broader ranges of behavioural targets including diet, exercise and other ‘wellness behaviours’. If such research endeavours are also encouraging, this would further reinforce the already suggestive case that psychedelic therapy can be broadly applicable to behaviour change via transdiagnostic mechanisms. Future work should continue to conduct hypothesis-driven tests of the REBUS and other models that may be useful for bridging our understanding of how acute pharmacological effects translate into long-term behaviour changes. Empirical work should also address the role of therapy, for example, whether results are enhanced when psychedelic sessions are accompanied by explicit frameworks such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, Motivational Interviewing and the ACE model, versus psychedelic sessions with only general preparation, monitoring and follow-up discussion. Additionally, research should eventually compare these, and potentially other therapeutic models, in their ability to support psychedelic therapy for particular indications. From the broadest perspective, if psychedelic-assisted therapy is found to work through general processes, such as relaxed beliefs, psychological flexibility and self-determined motivation, this might be used to enhance behaviour change across a number of disorders and lifestyle challenges, and enhance the effects of multiple psychotherapeutic approaches. This would constitute a shift to a fuller transdiagnostic understanding of psychiatric disorders along a continuum with normative human behaviour and lifestyle challenges.

1.

The word ‘psychedelic’ is derived from the Greek meaning ‘mind manifesting’ or ‘mind revealing’.

2.

A drink traditionally produced and used ceremonially in South America, but also used by churches in North America and Europe. It is commonly made from a combination of the Banisteriopsis caapi vine with one of several DMT-containing plants (such as Psychotria viridis) (Ott, 1996).

3.

See Ryan and Deci (2017) for an in-depth discussion of this concept and its historical use in Psychology and Philosophy. In brief, it is conceived within the ‘self-as-process’ tradition as an innate, integrative, organizing ‘energy’ (motivational force) directed towards the realization of one’s potentials and full functioning, or eudaimonia. It is associated with the expression of integrity, spontaneity and vitality, and with a sense of ‘feeling real’, unmasked, ‘true to heart’, and with access and sensitivity to one’s feelings and needs.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests: PJT is the research director at The Synthesis Institute B.V.. MWJ is an advisor to AWAKN Life Sciences Inc., Beckley Psytech Ltd., Entheogen Biomedical Corp., Field Trip Psychedelics Inc., Mind Medicine Inc., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization Inc., and Silo Pharma, Inc.; CT is an advisor for Entheon Biomedical Corp; RW is a member of the Clinical Advisory Board of the Usona Institute; and clinical director at The Synthesis Institute B.V.. DE is an advisor for Field Trip Psychedelics Inc. and Mydecine Innovations Group Inc. HD was funded by the Imperial College London President’s PhD Scholarships. RCH is a scientific advisor for Entheon Biomedical Corp., Mydecine Innovations Group Inc., The Synthesis Institute B.V., Usona Institute, Beckley Psychtech Ltd., Maya PBC, Osmind PBC, and TRYP Therapeutics Inc. HK declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: PJT was partially funded by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, under Grant UIDB/00447/2020 to CIPER. All other authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. Agin-Liebes GI, Malone T, Yalch MM, et al. (2020) Long-term follow-up of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy for psychiatric and existential distress in patients with life-threatening cancer. J Psychopharmacol 34: 155–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akers BP, Ruiz JF, Piper A, et al. (2011) A prehistoric mural in spain depicting neurotropic psilocybe mushrooms? Econ Bot 65: 121–128. [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson T, Petranker R, Christopher A, et al. (2019) Psychedelic microdosing benefits and challenges: An empirical codebook. Harm Reduct J 16: 43. DOI: 10.1186/s12954-019-0308-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Atasoy S, Deco G, Kringelbach ML, et al. (2018) Harmonic brain modes: A unifying framework for linking space and time in brain dynamics. Neuroscientist 24: 277–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. A-Tjak JGL, Davis ML, Morina N, et al. (2015) A meta-analysis of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for clinically relevant mental and physical health problems. Psychother Psychosom 84: 30–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bai Z, Luo S, Zhang L, et al. (2020) Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) to reduce depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 260: 728–737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bogenschutz MP, Forcehimes AA, Pommy JA, et al. (2015) Psilocybin-assisted treatment for alcohol dependence: A proof-of-concept study. J Psychopharmacol 29: 289–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bonson KR. (2018) Regulation of human research with LSD in the United States (1949–1987). Psychopharmacology (Berl) 235: 591–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Carhart-Harris R, Giribaldi B, Watts R, et al. (2021) Trial of Psilocybin versus Escitalopram for depression. N Engl J Med 384: 1402–1411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Carhart-Harris RL. (2019) How do psychedelics work? Curr Opin Psychiatry 32: 16–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Carhart-Harris RL, Erritzoe D, Haijen E, et al. (2018) Psychedelics and connectedness. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 235: 547–550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Carhart-Harris RL, Friston KJ. (2019) REBUS and the anarchic brain: Toward a unified model of the brain action of psychedelics. Pharmacol Rev 71: 316–344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Carhart-Harris RL, Kaelen M, Whalley MG, et al. (2015) LSD enhances suggestibility in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology 232: 785–794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Carhart-Harris RL, Muthukumaraswamy S, Roseman L, et al. (2016) Neural correlates of the LSD experience revealed by multimodal neuroimaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113: 4853–4858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Case A, Deaton A. (2015) Rising morbidity and mortality in midlife among white non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st century. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112: 15078–15083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Celada P, Puig MV, Díaz-Mataix L, et al. (2008) The hallucinogen DOI reduces low-frequency oscillations in rat prefrontal cortex: Reversal by antipsychotic drugs. Biol Psychiatry 64: 392–400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Davidson KW, Scholz U. (2020) Understanding and predicting health behaviour change: A contemporary view through the lenses of meta-reviews. Health Psychol Rev 14: 1–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Deci EL, Ryan RM. (2000) The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq 11: 227–268. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ding D, Lawson KD, Kolbe-Alexander TL, et al. (2016) The economic burden of physical inactivity: A global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. Lancet 388: 1311–1324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Emerson A, Ponté L, Jerome L, et al. (2014) History and future of the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS). J Psychoactive Drugs 46: 27–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Family N, Vinson D, Vigliocco G, et al. (2016) Semantic activation in LSD: Evidence from picture naming. Lang Cogn Neurosci 31: 1320–1327. [Google Scholar]
  22. Frost H, Campbell P, Maxwell M, et al. (2018) Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing on adult behaviour change in health and social care settings: A systematic review of reviews. PLoS One 13: e0204890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Garcia-Romeu A, Davis AK, Erowid F, et al. (2019. b) Cessation and reduction in alcohol consumption and misuse after psychedelic use. J Psychopharmacol 33: 1088–1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Garcia-Romeu A, Davis AK, Erowid E, et al. (2020). Persisting reductions in cannabis, opioid, and stimulant misuse after naturalistic psychedelic use: An online survey. Front Psychiatry 10: 955. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gasser P, Holstein D, Michel Y, et al. (2014) Safety and efficacy of lysergic acid diethylamide-assisted psychotherapy for anxiety associated with life-threatening diseases. J Nerv Ment Dis 202: 513–520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gasser P, Kirchner K, Passie T. (2015) LSD-assisted psychotherapy for anxiety associated with a life-threatening disease: A qualitative study of acute and sustained subjective effects. J Psychopharmacol 29: 57–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Glennon RA, Titeler M, McKenney JD. (1984) Evidence for 5-HT2 involvement in the mechanism of action of hallucinogenic agents. Life Sci 35: 2505–2511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Griffiths RR, Johnson MW, Carducci MA, et al. (2016) Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized double-blind trial. J Psychopharmacol 30: 1181–1197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Griffiths RR, Johnson MW, Richards WA, et al. (2011) Psilocybin occasioned mystical-type experiences: Immediate and persisting dose-related effects. Psychopharmacology 218: 649–665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Griffiths RR, Richards WA, McCann U, et al. (2006) Psilocybin can occasion mystical-type experiences having substantial and sustained personal meaning and spiritual significance. Psychopharmacology 187: 268–283; discussion 284–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Grinspoon L. (1981) LSD reconsidered: Should clinical research be resumed? Sciences 21: 20–23. [Google Scholar]
  32. Grinspoon L, Bakalar JB. (1979) Psychedelic Drugs Reconsidered. New York: Basic Books. [Google Scholar]
  33. Grob CS, Danforth AL, Chopra GS, et al. (2011) Pilot study of psilocybin treatment for anxiety in patients with advanced-stage cancer. Arch Gen Psychiatry 68: 71–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Halvari AEM, Halvari H, Deci EL, et al. (2019) Autonomy-supportive dental treatment, oral health-related eudaimonic well-being and oral health: A randomized clinical trial. Psychol Health 34: 1421–1436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hartogsohn I. (2016) Set and setting, psychedelics and the placebo response: An extra-pharmacological perspective on psychopharmacology. J Psychopharmacol 30: 1259–1267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Health Quality Ontario (2019) Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for major depression and anxiety disorders: A health technology assessment. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 19: 1–199. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jakab RL, Goldman-Rakic PS. (1998) 5-Hydroxytryptamine2A serotonin receptors in the primate cerebral cortex: Possible site of action of hallucinogenic and antipsychotic drugs in pyramidal cell apical dendrites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 735–740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Johnson M, Richards W, Griffiths R. (2008) Human hallucinogen research: Guidelines for safety. J Psychopharmacol 22: 603–620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Johnson MW. (2020) Consciousness, religion, and gurus: Pitfalls of psychedelic medicine. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. Epub ahead of print 16 December 2020. DOI: 10.1021/acsptsci.0c00198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Johnson MW, Garcia-Romeu A, Cosimano MP, et al. (2014) Pilot study of the 5-HT2AR agonist psilocybin in the treatment of tobacco addiction. J Psychopharmacol 28: 983–992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Johnson MW, Garcia-Romeu A, Griffiths RR. (2017. a) Long-term follow-up of psilocybin-facilitated smoking cessation. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 43: 55–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Johnson MW, Garcia-Romeu A, Johnson PS, et al. (2017. b) An online survey of tobacco smoking cessation associated with naturalistic psychedelic use. J Psychopharmacol 31: 841–850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Johnson MW, Griffiths RR. (2017) Potential therapeutic effects of psilocybin. Neurotherapeutics 14: 734–740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Johnson MW, Hendricks PS, Barrett FS, et al. (2019) Classic psychedelics: An integrative review of epidemiology, therapeutics, mystical experience, and brain network function. Pharmacol Ther 197: 83–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kometer M, Cahn BR, Andel D, et al. (2011) The 5-HT2A/1A agonist psilocybin disrupts modal object completion associated with visual hallucinations. Biol Psychiatry 69: 399–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Krebs TS, Johansen P-Ø. (2013) Psychedelics and mental health: A population study. PLoS One 8: e63972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Krediet E, Bostoen T, Breeksema J, et al. (2020) Reviewing the potential of psychedelics for the treatment of PTSD. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 23: 385–400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kuypers KPC, Riba J, de la Fuente Revenga M, et al. (2016) Ayahuasca enhances creative divergent thinking while decreasing conventional convergent thinking. Psychopharmacology 233: 3395–3403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lafrance A, Loizaga-Velder A, Fletcher J, et al. (2017) Nourishing the spirit: Exploratory research on ayahuasca experiences along the continuum of recovery from eating disorders. J Psychoactive Drugs 49: 427–435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lawlor ER, Islam N, Bates S, et al. (2020) Third-wave cognitive behaviour therapies for weight management: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Obes Rev 21: e13013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Leblanc V, Bégin C, Hudon A-M, et al. (2016) Effects of a nutritional intervention program based on the self-determination theory and promoting the Mediterranean diet. Health Psychol Open 3: 2055102915622094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Lowy B. (1971) New records of mushroom stones from Guatemala. Mycologia 63: 983–993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Ly C, Greb AC, Cameron LP, et al. (2018) Psychedelics promote structural and functional neural plasticity. Cell Rep 23: 3170–3182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Lyons T, Carhart-Harris RL. (2018) Increased nature relatedness and decreased authoritarian political views after psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression. J Psychopharmacol 32: 811–819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. McGroarty B. (2018) Wellness trends for 2019. Available at: https://globalwellnessinstitute.org/global-wellness-institute-blog/2018/12/29/wellness-trends-for-2019/ (accessed 1 January 2021).
  56. MacLean KA, Johnson MW, Griffiths RR. (2011) Mystical experiences occasioned by the hallucinogen psilocybin lead to increases in the personality domain of openness. J Psychopharmacol 25: 1453–1461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Maslow AH. (1943) A theory of human motivation. Psychol Rev 50: 370–396. [Google Scholar]
  58. Mazzei P. (2019) Denver voters support ‘magic’ mushrooms. The New York Times, 8 May. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/08/us/denver-magic-mushrooms-decriminalization.html (accessed 19 January 2021).
  59. Miller WR, Rollnick S. (2012) Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change. New York: Guilford Press. [Google Scholar]
  60. Moreno FA, Wiegand CB, Taitano EK, et al. (2006) Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of psilocybin in 9 patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 67: 1735–1740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Nagasu M, Kogi K, Yamamoto I. (2019) Association of socioeconomic and lifestyle-related risk factors with mental health conditions: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 19: 1759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. National Library of Medicine (U.S.) (2017. a, June) Effects of psilocybin in major depressive disorder. Identifier NCT03181529. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03181529 (accessed 13 May 2021).
  63. National Library of Medicine (U.S.) (2017. b, May) LSD treatment in persons suffering from anxiety symptoms in severe somatic diseases or in psychiatric anxiety disorders (LSD-assist). Identifier NCT03153579. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03153579 (accessed 13 May 2021).
  64. National Library of Medicine (U.S.) (2019. a, August) Effects of psilocybin in anorexia nervosa. Identifier NCT04052568. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04052568 (accessed 13 May 2021).
  65. National Library of Medicine (U.S.) (2019. b, March) LSD therapy for persons suffering from major depression (LAD). Identifier NCT03866252. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03866252
  66. Nichols DE. (2014) The Heffter Research Institute: Past and hopeful future. J Psychoactive Drugs 46: 20–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Nielson EM, May DG, Forcehimes AA, et al. (2018) The psychedelic debriefing in alcohol dependence treatment: Illustrating key change phenomena through qualitative content analysis of clinical sessions. Front Pharmacol 9: 132. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Noorani T, Garcia-Romeu A, Swift TC, et al. (2018) Psychedelic therapy for smoking cessation: Qualitative analysis of participant accounts. J Psychopharmacol 32: 756–769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Ntoumanis N, Ng JYY, Prestwich A, et al. (2020) A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: Effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health. Health Psychol Rev. Epub ahead of print 3 February 2020. DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1718529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Ona G, Kohek M, Massaguer T, et al. (2019) Ayahuasca and public health: Health status, psychosocial well-being, lifestyle, and coping strategies in a large sample of ritual ayahuasca users. J Psychoactive Drugs 51: 135–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Ott J. (1996) Pharmacotheon: Entheogenic Drugs, Their Plant Sources and History, 2nd edn. Occidental, CA: Natural Products Company. [Google Scholar]
  72. Passie T. (2019) The Science of Microdosing Psychedelics. London, UK: Psychedelic Press. [Google Scholar]
  73. Patrick H, Williams GC. (2012) Self-determination theory: Its application to health behavior and complementarity with motivational interviewing. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 9: 18. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Phillips AS, Guarnaccia CA. (2020) Self-determination theory and motivational interviewing interventions for type 2 diabetes prevention and treatment: A systematic review. J Health Psychol 25: 44–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Preller KH, Herdener M, Pokorny T, et al. (2017) The fabric of meaning and subjective effects in LSD-induced states depend on serotonin 2A receptor activation. Curr Biol 27: 451–457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Ross S, Bossis A, Guss J, et al. (2016) Rapid and sustained symptom reduction following psilocybin treatment for anxiety and depression in patients with life-threatening cancer: A randomized controlled trial. J Psychopharmacol 30: 1165–1180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Rucker JJH, Iliff J, Nutt DJ. (2018) Psychiatry & the psychedelic drugs. Past, present & future. Neuropharmacology 142: 200–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Rucker JJH, Jelen LA, Flynn S, et al. (2016) Psychedelics in the treatment of unipolar mood disorders: A systematic review. J Psychopharmacol 30: 1220–1229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Ryan RM, Deci EL. (2006) Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? J Pers 74: 1557–1585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Ryan RM, Deci EL. (2017) Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. New York: Guilford Publications. [Google Scholar]
  81. Schartner MM, Carhart-Harris RL, Barrett AB, et al. (2017) Increased spontaneous MEG signal diversity for psychoactive doses of ketamine, LSD and psilocybin. Sci Rep 7: 46421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Schultes RE. (1969) Hallucinogens of plant origin. Science 163: 245–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Sessa B. (2018) The 21st century psychedelic renaissance: Heroic steps forward on the back of an elephant. Psychopharmacology 235: 551–560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Sheeran P, Wright CE, Avishai A, et al. (2020) Self-determination theory interventions for health behavior change: Meta-analysis and meta-analytic structural equation modeling of randomized controlled trials. J Consult Clin Psychol 88: 726–737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Smith DE, Sternfield JL. (1970) Natural childbirth and cooperative child rearing in psychedelic communes. J Psychedelic Drugs 3: 120–124. [Google Scholar]
  86. Tagliazucchi E, Roseman L, Kaelen M, et al. (2016) Increased global functional connectivity correlates with LSD-induced ego dissolution. Curr Biol 26: 1043–1050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland D, et al. (2012. a) Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 9: 78. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Teixeira PJ, Marques MM, Silva MN, et al. (2020) A classification of motivation and behavior change techniques used in self-determination theory-based interventions in health contexts. Motiv Sci. Epub ahead of print 5 March 2020. DOI: 10.1037/mot0000172. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  89. Teixeira PJ, Silva MN, Coutinho SR, et al. (2010) Mediators of weight loss and weight loss maintenance in middle-aged women. Obesity 18: 725–735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Teixeira PJ, Silva MN, Mata J, et al. (2012. b) Motivation, self-determination, and long-term weight control. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 9: 22. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Timmermann C, Spriggs MJ, Kaelen M, et al. (2018) LSD modulates effective connectivity and neural adaptation mechanisms in an auditory oddball paradigm. Neuropharmacology 142: 251–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Van Amsterdam J, Nutt D, Phillips L, et al. (2015) European rating of drug harms. J Psychopharmacol 29: 655–660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Vollenweider FX. (1998) Advances and pathophysiological models of hallucinogenic drug actions in humans: A preamble to schizophrenia research. Pharmacopsychiatry 31(Suppl 2): 92–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Walsh Z, Thiessen MS. (2018) Psychedelics and the new behaviourism: Considering the integration of third-wave behaviour therapies with psychedelic-assisted therapy. Int Rev Psychiatry 30: 343–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Watts R, Day C, Krzanowski J, et al. (2017) Patients’ accounts of increased “connectedness” and “acceptance” after psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression. J Humanistic Psychol 57: 520–564. [Google Scholar]
  96. Watts R, Luoma JB. (2020) The use of the psychological flexibility model to support psychedelic assisted therapy. J Contextual Behav Sci 15: 92–102. [Google Scholar]
  97. Williams GC, Niemiec CP, Patrick H, et al. (2016) Outcomes of the Smoker’s Health Project: A pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial of tobacco-dependence interventions based on self-determination theory. Health Educ Res 31: 749–759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Winter JC, Eckler JR, Rabin RA. (2004) Serotonergic/glutamatergic interactions: The effects of mGlu2/3 receptor ligands in rats trained with LSD and PCP as discriminative stimuli. Psychopharmacology 172: 233–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Wolff M, Evens R, Mertens LJ, et al. (2020) Learning to let go: A cognitive-behavioral model of how psychedelic therapy promotes acceptance. Front Psychiatry 11: 5. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (2018) Diet, nutrition, physical activity and cancer: A global perspective. Continuous update progress report 2018. Available at: dietandcancerreport.org (accessed 13 May 2021).
  101. World Health Organization (2017. a) The global health observatory. Available at: https://www.who.int/data/gho (accessed 1 January 2021).
  102. World Health Organization (2017. b) WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2017: Monitoring Tobacco Use and Prevention Policies. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at: https://www.who.int/tobacco/global_report/2017/en/ (accessed 1 January 2021). [Google Scholar]
  103. World Health Organization (2018) Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565639 (accessed 1 January 2021). [Google Scholar]
  104. World Health Organization (2020) Factsheet: Obesity and overweight. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight (accessed 1 January 2021).

Articles from Journal of Psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES