Skip to main content
Cartilage logoLink to Cartilage
. 2020 May 23;13(2 Suppl):1562S–1569S. doi: 10.1177/1947603520923143

Increased Vascularity in the Neonatal versus Adult Meniscus: Evaluation with Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Kenneth M Lin 1,, Naomi E Gadinsky 2, Craig E Klinger 2, Jonathan P Dyke 3, Scott A Rodeo 1, Daniel W Green 4, Peter D Fabricant 4, David L Helfet 2, Kevin G Shea 5, Lionel E Lazaro 6
PMCID: PMC8804749  PMID: 32447965

Abstract

Objective. Quantification of meniscus vascularity has been limited with previous techniques, and minimal data exist describing differential vascular zones in the skeletally immature meniscus. The objective of this study is to use quantitative contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to compare meniscal vascularity in neonatal specimens with adults. We hypothesized that the developing meniscus has greater and more uniform vascularity throughout all zones. Design. Ten fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees (5 neonatal, age 0-6 months; 5 adult, 34-67 years) underwent gadolinium-enhanced MRI using an established vascularity quantification protocol. Regions of interest corresponding to peripheral and central zones of the meniscus were identified on pre-contrast coronal images, and signal enhancement within the same regions (normalized against background tissue) was compared between pre- and post-contrast images. Results. The medial and lateral menisci had similar distribution of perfusion (45.8% ± 8.1% medial vs. 54.2% ± 8.1% lateral in neonatal knees; 50.6% ± 11.3% medial vs. 49.4% ± 11.3% lateral in adult knees, P = 0.47). Increased perfusion was demonstrated in the periphery compared with the central zone (2.3:1 in neonatal knees and 3.25:1 in adult knees, P = 0.31). Neonatal specimens demonstrated 6.0-fold greater overall post-contrast meniscal signal enhancement compared with adults (P < 0.0001), with the 0-month specimen demonstrating the greatest proportional signal enhancement. Conclusions. While blood flow to the periphery is greater than to central zones in all menisci, younger menisci receive proportionally greater overall blood flow compared to adults, including to the central zone, suggesting that the immature meniscus is a more biologically active tissue than its adult counterpart.

Keywords: meniscus, tissue, magnetic resonance imaging, diagnostics, meniscal injury, diagnosis, knee, joint involved, vascularity

Introduction

Meniscal tears are a common orthopedic condition causing significant pain and dysfunction within the general population, in both adults and children.1,2 Historically, meniscal tears were treated with meniscectomy; however, with greater understanding of the biomechanical role of the meniscus for the long-term health of the knee, there has been a shift toward meniscal preservation.3-8 Despite advancements in surgical techniques for meniscal repair as well as novel adjunctive therapies such as platelet-rich plasma, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, and adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells, the fundamental limitation of meniscus healing is its relative hypovascularity, resulting in poor intrinsic healing capacity.4,5,9,10 Numerous studies, such as the landmark study by Arnoczky and Warren, 11 have shown that meniscal vascularity is greatest along the periphery, with 3 generally accepted zones based on degree of vascularity from peripheral to central: red-red, red-white, and white-white, with most blood flow occurring in the red-red and essentially no vascularity in the white-white zone. Prior studies demonstrate that vascularity of the meniscus recedes to the outer 10% to 30% during development.9,12-14 While integral for establishing our current paradigm for meniscal vascularity, techniques used previously in the literature allow for only qualitative analysis. With improved surgical techniques, implants, adjunctive therapies, and diagnostic precision, it is reasonable to further study the microscopic anatomy of the meniscus to further our understanding of the intrinsic healing capacity of this tissue.

As children and adolescents have become increasingly active in sports, there has been a growing incidence of meniscal tears in younger patients, and some authors have reported that these patients have different healing potential than adults. 15 Previous studies of meniscectomy in children have shown poor long-term outcomes, largely related to the premature development of osteoarthritis.1,16 However, studies of meniscal repairs in pediatric patients have shown promising results, with some authors reporting better outcomes than in adult meniscal tears.17,18 Recent studies have demonstrated relatively good healing potential after repairs in young patients with tears in what was traditionally considered the avascular zone of the meniscus.19,20 This suggests that in the pediatric population, there may be a greater intrinsic healing capacity, which may be due at least in part to vascularity that extends beyond the generally accepted vascular boundaries that were established in adult studies.

Previous studies that have attempted to characterize the vascularity of the human meniscus have used cadaveric tissue from older donors. Furthermore, it is difficult to accurately visualize or quantify blood flow in the meniscus using available diagnostic imaging modalities, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 21 In this study, meniscal vascularity in the developing knee was assessed by applying a previously established MRI protocol for quantifying vascularity within musculoskeletal tissues.22-25 This technique differs from others in that it uses normalized changes in signal intensity to quantify and compare relative regional blood flow independent of visualizing individual vessels. Thus, the objective of this study was to compare meniscus vascularity in neonatal versus adult cadaveric specimens. Given that the immature knee has increased vascularity due to high metabolic demand during development, we hypothesized that neonatal meniscus specimens would demonstrate greater overall vascularity in a more even distribution (proportionally greater blood supply to the central portion) compared with mature meniscus specimens.

Methods

Cadaveric Specimens

Approval was granted by the institutional review board of the study institution for obtaining and investigating 10 fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees for this research investigation. Cadaveric specimens (from mid-femur to mid-tibia) utilized for this study included the following: 5 human immature knees, age 0-6 months, including 1 female and 4 males; and 5 adult knees, age 34 to 67 years, including 2 females and 3 males. No specimen had an associated history of vascular disease, prior lower extremity surgery, or a history of lower extremity trauma.

Dissection and Preparation for Imaging

Specimen preparation was performed at the Laboratory for Joint Tissue Repair and Regeneration and the Bioskills Education Laboratory, an American College of Surgeons accredited dissection laboratory at the study institution. Minimal dissection was performed at the level of the knee joint, with care taken to isolate the superficial femoral artery proximal to the joint at the femoral stump. No arthrotomy or intra-articular dissection was performed, and no deep structures were exposed. Using a previously described vessel cannulation protocol,22,23 each cadaveric knee underwent cannulation of the superficial femoral artery, at the level of the adductor canal, to include the genicular arterial system supplying the menisci. DLP model 30000 vessel cannulas (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) were utilized. Normal saline was infused through the implanted cannula, and any large or visible extravasating vessels were tied off to allow adequate infusion and retention of contrast material.

Imaging Acquisition

Imaging was performed using a 3.0 Tesla Excite HD GE MRI scanner (General Electric Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin); an 8-channel wrist coil was used for all neonatal knee specimen and an 8-channel knee coil was used for the adult knee specimens. Images were obtained using a previously described protocol.22,23 High-resolution fat-suppressed 3-dimensional gradient echo sequences were acquired both before and after MRI contrast agent administration. MRI images were acquired at 2-mm slice thickness pre- and post-contrast solution infusion with Gd-DTPA (gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid) diluted with saline at a 3:1 saline to contrast agent ratio. Fat-suppressed MRI images were utilized for quantitative MRI assessment to remove signal generated by bone marrow while enhancing Gd-DTPA imaging detail. Contrast solution infusion consisted of 61 mL for adult specimen and 5 mL for all neonatal knee specimens. Images were reconstructed to a resolution of 0.4 × 0.4 × 1.0 mm. Parameters for acquisition consisted of repetition and echo times of 18.6 and 5.3 ms, respectively, with a 35° flip angle.

Analysis

For quantitative analysis, regions of interest (ROIs) corresponding to peripheral and central zones of the meniscus were identified and manually defined on pre-contrast coronal images ( Fig. 1 ). The defined ROIs were used to compare signal intensity in the same area on the post-contrast images using software developed by a study investigator (J.P.D.) based on IDL 6.4 (Exelis, Boulder, CO) allowing ROI assessment in the coronal imaging plane. Increase in signal enhancement following contrast injection though the arterial system supplying the meniscal tissue was considered to represent arterial perfusion. Signal enhancement was quantified to produce a weighted average, and raw signal intensity per voxel was corrected by normalizing to nonenhancing muscle away from the area of interest as a baseline. Following normalization to muscle, relative signal enhancement was recorded from peripheral and central zones of the medial and lateral meniscus and reported as a percentage of pre-contrast signal.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Analysis of meniscal vascularity using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. (A) Schematic drawing of peripheral and central zones of the medial and lateral menisci used for quantification. (B) Mid-coronal images showing pre- and post-contrast images with regions of interest (ROIs) delineated in adult and pediatric specimens; there is significantly increased perfusion to the epiphysis in the immature knee.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistical analysis was performed comparing signal enhancement between peripheral and central zones of the medial and lateral menisci individually, the peripheral versus central zones of the medial and lateral menisci aggregated, and total overall meniscal signal enhancement across different age groups. Comparative statistics were computed using the 2-tailed t test. A post hoc power analysis was calculated for 2 independent study groups with a continuous primary endpoint.

Results

Five neonatal knees, with an average age of 3 months (range 0-6 months), including 1 female and 4 males, and 5 adult knees, with an average age 50.2 years (range 34-60 years), including 2 females and 3 males, were analyzed, for a total of 10 menisci (5 lateral and 5 medial) from each group. Overall, the medial and lateral menisci had similar perfusion to each other in all specimens (45.9% ± 8.3% medial vs. 54.1% ± 8.3% lateral in neonatal knees; 50.5% ± 11.3% medial vs. 49.5% ± 11.3% lateral in adult knees). When comparing the 10 neonatal menisci to the 10 adult menisci, there was similarly increased perfusion in the peripheral zones compared with the central zones, at a ratio of 2.3:1 (70.0% vs. 30.0%) in immature knees, and 3.25:1 (76.5% vs. 23.5%) in mature knees (P = 0.31; Fig. 2 ). The trend of greater peripheral perfusion was present in all adult and neonatal specimens.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Distribution of meniscal perfusion by region. Comparison of relative vascularity of peripheral versus central zones in neonatal and adult menisci shows significantly greater blood flow to peripheral zones: 70% peripheral versus 30% central (SD 13.1%) in neonatal menisci and 76.5% peripheral versus 23.5% central (SD 14.7%) in adult menisci. The ratio of peripheral to central perfusion is not significantly different between the neonatal and adult groups (P = 0.31).

When comparing the total aggregate (peripheral plus central) meniscal perfusion, younger specimens demonstrated increased overall normalized meniscal signal enhancement ( Fig. 3 ). Average post-contrast signal enhancement in the neonatal menisci was 775% (95% CI 605.8% to 995.0%), compared with 129.8% (95% CI 71.2% to 188.4%) in adult menisci (P < 0.0001). This represents on average 6.0-fold greater perfusion to the total meniscus in neonatal knees compared to adults. All neonatal menisci demonstrated greater than 450% enhancement in signal intensity after contrast administration, with greatest enhancement seen in the 0-month old specimen, at over 1200% for both medial and lateral menisci. Among the adult specimens, the greatest signal enhancement (255% medial and 280% lateral) was seen in the 34-year-old specimen, the youngest of the adult specimens. Data are summarized in Table 1.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Total relative meniscal perfusion. Quantification of total meniscal post-contrast signal enhancement (peripheral plus central perfusion) shows an approximately 6.0-fold greater overall perfusion to neonatal menisci compared to adults. Neonatal menisci demonstrate 775.4% (SD 273.4%) signal enhancement, compared with 129.8% (SD 94.6%) enhancement in adult menisci (P < 0.0001).

Table 1.

Summary Statistics.

Demographics Immature Menisci Adult Menisci
Number of knees 5 5
Number of menisci 10 10
Age (range) 3 months (0-6) 50.2 years (34-60)
% Female 20 40
Distribution of meniscal perfusion (% of whole meniscus)
 Medial (SD) 45.8 (8.1) 50.6 (11.3)
 95% CI 38.7-52.9 40.6-60.5 P = 0.47
 Lateral (SD) 54.2 (8.1) 49.4 (11.3)
 95% CI 47.1-61.3 39.5-59.4
 Peripheral (SD) 70 (13.1) 76.5 (14.7) P = 0.31
 95% CI 62.0-78.1 67.44-85.63
 Central (SD) 30 (13.1) 23.5 (14.7)
 95% CI 21.9-38.1 14.4-32.6
 Peripheral:Central ratio 2.3:1 3.25:1
Total meniscal perfusion (% post-contrast signal enhancement)
 Average 775 129.8 P < 0.0001
 SD 273.6 94.6
 95% CI 605.8 to 995.0 71.2 to 188.4

On post-contrast coronal images in both pediatric and adult specimens, the peripheral vascular plexus described in previous literature was visualized ( Fig. 4 ).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Representative mid-coronal post-contrast magnetic resonance image showing signal enhancement at the periphery of the meniscus, representing the peripheral vascular plexus described by Arnoczky and Warren. 11

Post hoc power analysis was calculated separately for comparison of peripheral-central perfusion ratio between neonatal and adult menisci, and for comparison of total meniscal perfusion between the 2 groups. Post hoc power was 0.18 for detecting a difference in the peripheral:central ratio, and 1.00 for detecting a difference in total meniscal perfusion between neonatal and adult menisci in this study.

Discussion

The intrinsic capacity of meniscal tissue to heal after injury is dependent on the biological milieu of the tissue, specifically cell population(s), matrix-synthesizing activity, cell signaling capacity, and blood flow. The biomechanical loading environment likely also plays a critical role in meniscus biology. To our knowledge, this is the first study that quantifies meniscal vascularity through the use of quantitative MRI in the developing human knee. Quantitative contrast-enhanced MRI demonstrates that while arterial contribution to the periphery is greater than that to central zones in all menisci, developing menisci receive proportionally 6-fold greater arterial contribution compared to adults including to the central zone. Greater overall and central vascularity in the developing meniscus suggests improved healing potential, further encouraging meniscal preservation whenever possible.

From a developmental standpoint, the presence of a perfusion gradient from peripheral to central in the developing meniscus, although less pronounced than in the adult meniscus, suggests that development of the local vascularity of the meniscus is likely complete by birth. Early studies using only qualitative methods showed that the prenatal meniscus is a homogenous structure that is fully vascularized, and this abundant vascularization is known to recede throughout development.26,27 Studies in adult specimens have shown that this vascularized region comprises only the outer 10% to 30%.9,12,13,27,28 Our study provides insight into the early postnatal developmental period. Importantly, our findings suggest that at this point in development, although the vascular distribution may be similar to adult specimens, there is increased overall flow to the meniscus, including the presence of flow to the central region (albeit less than to the peripheral region).

Over time, there has been a trend toward meniscal preservation as opposed to meniscectomy when possible, given numerous studies showing an adverse effect on joint contact mechanics and long-term deterioration of the joint following meniscectomy.28-30 Biomechanical studies have shown that removal of 30% of the meniscus can increase peak compartment contact pressures by up to 350%. 31 Clinical and radiographic outcomes have been shown to be superior following meniscus preservation compared with meniscectomy,6-8,32-34 with a reported relative risk ratio of 14 for the development of osteoarthritis at an average 21 years after meniscectomy. 35 However, while meniscal preservation is the favored treatment for meniscal pathology, tissue healing is limited by the relatively poor intrinsic biological capacity of the meniscus for regeneration.27,36 Biological healing potential is imparted by available progenitor cell populations in the meniscus as well as cells derived from synovium, synovial fluid, bone marrow, or the vasculature, inter- and intracellular signaling pathways, and vascularity. While we are unable to draw conclusions regarding true healing potential in this cadaveric study, our results suggest that in neonatal/pediatric specimens, there exists arterial contribution to the central portion of the meniscus. While the distribution of arterial contribution is similar within the neonatal and adult meniscus, there is increased overall vascularity to the meniscus in the neonatal specimens, including to the central region, which was previously thought to be avascular. These findings suggest greater overall plasticity as greater blood flow means greater perfusion with oxygen, growth factors, and possibly progenitor cells. However, while vascularity clearly plays a critical role in meniscus healing, it should be noted that increased vascularity by itself may not be adequate to improve healing, as evidenced by animal studies of local treatment of meniscal tears using vascular endothelial growth factor, which have shown no effect in meniscal angiogenesis nor improved healing. 37

This increased overall vascularity may in part explain the improved outcomes after meniscal repairs in pediatric patients compared to adults.16,17 A recent study of horizontal meniscus tears extending into the “avascular zone” in a young population showed good midterm outcomes following repair, with a slight additional benefit when augmented with platelet-rich plasma. 38 A recent systematic review reported good to excellent results following meniscal repair in children and adolescents regardless of injury pattern, zone, or repair technique. 39 Some authors suggest that in contrast to adult patients, in pediatric patients, repair should be attempted for meniscal injuries in any zone, due to the hypothesized improved vascularity and intrinsic healing capacity.18,40 Nonetheless, further investigation is required to improve our basic understanding of meniscal biology with respect to cellular activity, signaling pathways, and vascularity. Further study is also necessary to better elucidate the clinical differences in outcomes following meniscus repair in immature versus mature knees, as well as the differences in initial injury patterns. Moreover, a fundamental understanding of the biology of the developing meniscus may provide greater insight that can inform development of therapeutic strategies for biological augmentation to improve healing in the adult meniscus.

There are several limitations to our study. First of all, this study included a small sample size of cadaveric specimens, as immature human cadaveric tissues are exceptionally rare. The post hoc power analysis showed a significantly underpowered comparison of peripheral-central distribution of perfusion between adults and immature specimens; thus, there is a high likelihood of type II error (false negative). Post hoc calculations, however, showed adequate power for determining difference in overall perfusion, due to the large effect size observed. For clinical correlation, analysis of living knees with presence of physiologic circulation would be most relevant. Additionally, analysis of older children or adolescent knees would be more directly applicable, as among the pediatric cohort they are typically the demographic that presents with meniscal injuries. While immature cadaveric tissues are exceedingly rare, a thorough study would require multiple specimens at each age; this is an area of interest for future study. Second, our MRI images are collected using a 3-T MRI. The meniscus, even in the adult specimens, is a small structure. The resolution of the images is enough to fully visualize the meniscus and to divide it into peripheral and central zones on a coronal projection; however, it is very difficult to subdivide further. The traditional breakdown of the meniscal zones includes red-red, red-white, and white-white zones, while our analysis is only able to reliably include peripheral third and central two-thirds. Similarly, due to resolution of the images in relation to the small size of the pediatric specimens, our imaging analysis was limited to the coronal plane. Nonetheless, clear quantitative analysis of signal enhancement changes was obtained using the defined zones in this study, providing valuable information. Another consideration is the contribution of the anterior and posterior horns to the vascularity. Further study using 3-dimensional ROIs in combination with higher resolution imaging capabilities would allow for more precise assessment of blood flow not only in the coronal projection but also within the horns and root attachments. Finally, the amount of contrast solution infused into the adult and pediatric specimens, while constant within each cohort, was different between cohorts: adult specimens received larger volumes of contrast given the greater overall specimen size. In order to control for different overall volumes of contrast administered, all quantifications were performed by normalizing to a standardized peripheral tissue. Furthermore, the overall contrast administered to adult specimens was four times greater than that administered to pediatric specimens; if pure contrast volume could create falsely elevated measurements of contrast enhancement, the adult specimens should theoretically have demonstrated elevated increases in overall signal intensity as compared with pediatric specimens. However, even with the greater contrast volume injected into adult specimens, neonatal menisci still had greater overall relative contrast enhancement, with analysis normalized to surrounding soft tissue. Further study using contrast volumes precisely standardized to specimen size would be beneficial.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates similar perfusion patterns in both immature and mature knees, with the periphery more densely perfused than the central region. Furthermore, younger menisci appear to receive proportionally greater overall arterial contribution even though the distribution of arterial contribution to peripheral and central zones remains similar. This knowledge has direct clinical relevance for meniscal repair in both pediatric and adult patients. Further investigation is warranted in pediatric and adult specimens using a larger sample size and higher resolution imaging to allow for detailed analysis of smaller zones of the meniscus.

Footnotes

Authors’ Note: This investigation was performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.

Acknowledgments and Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This investigation was funded by the Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Service Research Award, specifically for contrast-enhanced MRI imaging and analysis software. The study investigators gratefully acknowledge AlloSource (Centennial, CO, USA) for provision of immature specimen and Anatomy Gifts Registry (Hanover, MD, USA) for provision of adult specimen used for this vascular research study.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Scott A. Rodeo—Flexion Therapeutics (paid consultant), Ortho RTI (Stock or stock options); Daniel W. Green—AO Trauma International (paid presenter or speaker), Arthrex, Inc. (IP royalties, paid consultant, paid presenter or speaker), Pega Medical (IP royalties); David L. Helfet—Fx Devices (stock or stock options), Healthpoint Capital (unpaid consultant), OHK Medical Devices (Stock or stock options, unpaid consultant), TriMedics (unpaid consultant). The remainder of the authors have nothing to disclose.

ORCID iD: Kenneth M. Lin Inline graphic https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8340-8922

References

  • 1. Manzione M, Pizzutillo PD, Peoples AB, Schweizer PA. Meniscectomy in children: a long-term follow-up study. Am J Sports Med. 1983;11:111-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Stanitski CL, Harvell JC, Fu F. Observations on acute knee hemarthrosis in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 1993;13:506-10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Laible C, Stein DA, Kiridly DN. Meniscal repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21:204-13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kowalski C, Gallo RA. Platelet-rich fibrin clot-augmented repair of horizontal cleavage meniscal tear. Arthrosc Tech. 2017;6:e2047-e2051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Roemer FW, Kwoh CK, Hannon MJ, Hunter DJ, Eckstein F, Grago J, et al. Partial meniscectomy is associated with increased risk of incident radiographic osteoarthritis and worsening cartilage damage in the following year. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:404-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Beaufils P, Becker R, Kopf S, Englund M, Verdonk R, Ollivier M, et al. Surgical management of degenerative meniscus lesions: the 2016 ESSKA Meniscus Consensus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:335-46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Beaufils P, Pujol N. Management of traumatic meniscal tear and degenerative meniscal lesions. Save the meniscus. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(8 Suppl.):S237-S244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kopf S, Beaufils P, Hirschmann MT, Rotigliano N, Ollivier M, Pereira H, et al. Management of traumatic meniscus tears: the 2019 ESSKA Meniscus Consensus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28:1177-94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Travascio F, Jackson AR. The nutrition of the human meniscus: a computational analysis investigating the effect of vascular recession on tissue homeostasis. J Biomech. 2017;61:151-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kamimura T, Kimura M. Repair of horizontal meniscal cleavage tears with exogenous fibrin clots. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19:1154-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Arnoczky SP, Warren RF. Microvasculature of the human meniscus. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10:90-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Danzig L, Resnick D, Gonsalves M, Akeson WH. Blood supply to the normal and abnormal menisci of the human knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;(172):271-6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Sweigart MA, Athanasiou KA. Toward tissue engineering of the knee meniscus. Tissue Eng. 2001;7:111-29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. McDermott I, Masouros SD, Bull AM, Amis A. Anatomy. In: Beaufils P, Verdonk R, editors. The meniscus. Berlin: Springer; 2010. p. 11-8. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Bellisari G, Samora W, Klingele K. Meniscus tears in children. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2011;19:50-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Lucas G, Accadbled F, Violas P, Sales de, Gauzy J, Knörr J. Isolated meniscal injuries in paediatric patients: outcomes after arthroscopic repair. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101:173-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Mintzer CM, Richmond JC, Taylor J. Meniscal repair in the young athlete. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:630-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Vanderhave KL, Moravek JE, Sekiya JK, Wojtys EM. Meniscus tears in the young athlete: results of arthroscopic repair. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31:496-500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Noyes FR, Chen RC, Barber-Westin SD, Potter HG. Greater than 10-year results of red-white longitudinal meniscal repairs in patients 20 years of age or younger. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39:1008-17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR. Clinical healing rates of meniscus repairs of tears in the central-third (red-white) zone. Arthroscopy. 2014;30:134-46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Hauger O, Frank LR, Boutin RD, Lektrakul N, Chung CB, Haghighi P, et al. Characterization of the “red zone” of knee meniscus: MR imaging and histologic correlation. Radiology. 2000;217:193-200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Lazaro LE, Wellman DS, Klinger CE, Dyke JP, Pardee NC, Sculco PK, et al. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of bone perfusion and arterial contributions in a patellar fracture model using gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:e1401-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Jones KJ, Lazaro LE, Taylor SA, Pardee NC, Dyke JP, Hannafin JA, et al. Quantitative assessment of patellar vascularity following bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft harvest for ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:2818-24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Lazaro LE, Nawabi DH, Klinger CE, Sculco PK, van der List JP, Dyke JP, et al. Quantitative assessment of femoral head perfusion following arthroscopic femoral osteochondroplasty: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99:2094-102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Sculco PK, Lazaro LE, Su EP, Klinger CE, Dyke JP, Helfet DL, et al. A vessel-preserving surgical hip dislocation through a modified posterior approach: assessment of femoral head vascularity using gadolinium-enhanced MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:475-83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Clark CR, Ogden JA. Development of the menisci of the human knee joint. Morphological changes and their potential role in childhood meniscal injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65:538-47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Hutchinson ID, Rodeo SA, Perrone GS, Murray MM. Can platelet-rich plasma enhance anterior cruciate ligament and meniscal repair? J Knee Surg. 2015;28:19-28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD. Management of meniscus tears that extend into the avascular region. Clin Sports Med. 2012;31:65-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. McCann L, Ingham E, Jin Z, Fisher J. Influence of the meniscus on friction and degradation of cartilage in the natural knee joint. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009;17:995-1000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Paletta GA, Jr, Manning T, Snell E, Parker R, Bergfeld J. The effect of allograft meniscal replacement on intraarticular contact area and pressures in the human knee. A biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:692-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Seedhom BB, Hargreaves DJ. Transmission of the load in the knee joint with special reference to the role of the menisci: Part II: experimental results, discussion and conclusions. Eng Med. 1979;8:220-8. [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Stein T, Mehling AP, Welsch F, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Jager A. Long-term outcome after arthroscopic meniscal repair versus arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for traumatic meniscal tears. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1542-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Andersson-Molina H, Karlsson H, Rockborn P. Arthroscopic partial and total meniscectomy: a long-term follow-up study with matched controls. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:183-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. McNicholas MJ, Rowley DI, McGurty D, Adalberth T, Abdon P, Lindstrand A, et al. Total meniscectomy in adolescence. A thirty-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:217-21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Roos H, Lauren M, Adalberth T, Roos EM, Jonsson K, Lohmander LS. Knee osteoarthritis after meniscectomy: prevalence of radiographic changes after twenty-one years, compared with matched controls. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41:687-93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Hutchinson ID, Moran CJ, Potter HG, Warren RF, Rodeo SA. Restoration of the meniscus: form and function. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:987-98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Kopf S, Birkenfeld F, Becker R, Petersen W, Starke C, Wruck CJ, et al. Local treatment of meniscal lesions with vascular endothelial growth factor. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2682-91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Pujol N, Salle De, Chou E, Boisrenoult P, Beaufils P. Platelet-rich plasma for open meniscal repair in young patients: any benefit? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:51-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Ferrari MB, Murphy CP, Gomes JLE. Meniscus repair in children and adolescents: a systematic review of treatment approaches, meniscal healing, and outcomes. J Knee Surg. 2019;32:492-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Kraus T, Heidari N, Svehlik M, Schneider F, Sperl M, Linhart W. Outcome of repaired unstable meniscal tears in children and adolescents. Acta Orthop. 2012;83:261-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cartilage are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES