Introduction
In the last two decades, sport-related concussion (SRC) has received growing attention within the sporting world. High SRC incidence rates have been reported for contact team sports such as rugby, American football and ice hockey, whereas men’s football (soccer) is associated with the lowest concussion incidence.1 Furthermore, higher rates of SRC were found in female football and ice hockey players during competition and training.
Since 2017, the Concussion in Sport Group (CISG) consensus statement has set the benchmark for physicians, athletic trainers, sports physical therapists and other healthcare providers involved in athlete care at any level of sport.2 Sport-related concussion is defined as a subset of mild traumatic brain injury without structural anomalies on conventional neuroimaging. Headache and dizziness are the most common acute symptoms of SRC that usually resolve after 7 to 10 days, although 10% to 15% of symptoms may persist for a longer period. The CISG statement describes 11 “Rs” of clinical SRC management: recognize, remove, re-evaluate, rest, rehabilitation, refer, recover, return to sport, reconsider, residual effects and sequelae, and risk reduction.2 After an initial period of 24 to 48 hours of physical and cognitive rest, a gradual return to sport (RTS) strategy is recommended.
Feddermann-Demont et al.3 recently presented a systematic approach for the initial examination, diagnosis, and management after SRC for high-level football (soccer) players, which includes a detailed RTS program. To date, this procedure is the only example of a sport-specific comprehensive strategy available for team physicians and healthcare personnel to treat SRC athletes.
In elite ice hockey, concussion protocols of the National Hockey League (NHL)4 and International Ice Hockey Federation (IIHF)5 exist and are consistent with the CISG consensus and RTS guidelines. While the CISG-RTS guideline entails generic activity descriptions (Table 1), the NHL protocol provides an example of a graded return to play progression for ice hockey players after SRC.
Table 1. Graduated Return to Sport (RTS) Strategy of the Concussion in Sport Group (CISG).
| Stage | Aim | Activity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Symptom-limited activity | Daily activities that do not provoke symptoms |
| 2 | Light aerobic exercise | Walking or stationary cycling at slow or medium pace. No resistance training |
| 3 | Sport-specific exercise | Running or skating drills. No head impact activities |
| 4 | Non-contact training drills | Harder training drills, e.g. passing drills. May start progressive resistance training |
| 5 | Full contact practice | Following medical clearance, participate in normal training activities |
| 6 | Return to sport | Normal game play |
Consensus adapted from McCrory et al.2
This clinical commentary presents a detailed RTS program for high-level ice hockey, which is based on the most recent recommendations as well as clinical and practical experience. The proposed comprehensive protocol specifically aims to optimize performance in elite male and female ice hockey players after SRC.
Return to sport
While the team physician (or designee) supervises the RTS protocol,2,3 sports physical therapists, athletic trainers, and conditioning coaches closely cooperate to monitor the injured player throughout the various RTS stages.
Based on CISG guidelines, SRC players are progressively exposed to training activities (known as graduated RTS progression) that do not provoke or worsen symptoms (Table 1). There should be a period of at least 24 hours (or longer) for each progression step. If any symptoms worsen during exercise, the athlete should return to the previous stage.2 The process from one phase to the next should be individualized based on the current signs and symptoms, and on the unique characteristics (i.e. age, experience and skills) of each player.
The 2016 consensus statement on RTS defines three elements of the “RTS continuum”: return to participation, return to sport and return to performance.6 While the ultimate aim of returning to pre-injury performance level is ideally reached after complying with the consensus RTS process, the goal of the supporting staff is to safely and optimally guide the athlete through the “training to perform” regimen. In a recent editorial, Reinhold7 highlighted that sports physical therapy should aim to optimize performance: the key concept (or the “performance spectrum continuum”) not only involves helping the athlete to restore their baseline function(s), but also requires working with them to improve, enhance and optimize performance.
Optimizing return to performance
From a sports physical therapy and athletic trainer perspective, there is a need to be more actively involved in the RTS process rather than passively guiding the athlete.
While it is paramount to closely monitor SRC symptoms (i.e. before/during/after exercising), the inclusion of additional individual-adapted training activities can help the athlete in their “training to perform” at the different stages of the RTS program (Table 2). Table 2 outlines an example of a suitable RTS program for elite ice hockey players with SRC: the athlete should not only progress through the RTS stages, but also work on any deficits linked directly (i.e. balance abilities) and/or indirectly (i.e. reactive capacities) with the SRC.
Table 2. Graduated Return to Ice Hockey Program for Elite Players.
| STAGE | AIM(S) | ACTIVITY |
| 1 | Symptom-limited activity | Daily activities that do not provoke symptoms (e.g. 10 min of slow walking) |
| 2 | Light aerobic exercises (unspecific) |
|
| 3 | 3.1 Aerobic exercise (progression) |
|
| No heavy resistance training. | ||
| 3.2 Ice hockey-specific exercises |
No contact activities on ice. For goalkeepers: controlled and non-explosive movements (T-glide, butterfly, half-butterfly, other); no shooting on goal |
|
| 4.1 | Non-contact ice hockey training drills |
No contact activities on ice. For goalkeepers: controlled and explosive movements; shooting on goal 1:1 with a coach from different ranges (short to long) and angles (no slapshots) |
| 4.2 | Ice hockey training drills with controlled contact | Participation in team training with controlled contact situations (checks on players, checks on boards) Progressively increase intensity in all training drills For goalkeepers: all movements; drills with players shooting (incl. slapshots) on goal from different angles |
| 5 | Full contact practice (team training) |
Following medical clearance, participate in normal team training
|
| 6 | Return to play | Normal match play |
HR max = maximum heart rate, min = minutes, RM= repetition maximum
In Stages 2 and 3 of the recommended program, the player is often supervised by the sports physical therapist or athletic trainer: while the focus is set on aerobic exercise (initially using a stationary bike or elliptical trainer to avoid neck/head impact) and initiating light resistance training, further elements can be added to facilitate player recovery.8–10 In the gym, the player may use skates and a stick for balance and coordination drills, and the slide board for (controlled) agility drills (Figures 1, 2, 3). While the player is still far away from the ice, the additional neuromuscular training—which should be role-specific depending on whether the affected athlete is a player or goalkeeper—enhances sport-specific reactive stabilization strategies and promotes a positive psychological attitude within the overall training regimen.
Figure 1. Reactive balance/stabilization on skates and against elastic resistance (duration/sets to be adapted).

Figure 2. Balance/stabilization on board with stickhandling and moving the puck between two plates (duration/sets to be adapted).

Figure 3. Moving on the slide board with an oculomotor task (fixing objects at various distances) (duration/sets to be adapted).

If symptoms persist for more than 10 to 14 days, the athlete should be referred to a healthcare professional with concussion management expertise.2,11 In particular, this is the case for players dealing with vestibular and/or oculomotor deficits (the topic of which is beyond the scope of this commentary), who often require comprehensive and targeted management.11–13
Deficient (or insufficient) activation of the deep cervical muscles is a common clinical observation in athletes after SRC,14 and it is therefore recommended to implement a neck stabilization/strengthening scheme in the RTS program usually during Stage 3 when SRC symptoms gradually resolve (Figure 4, 5). Despite the controversy surrounding this aspect of cervical involvement, a stable and stronger neck may contribute to a lower risk of further injury in athletes post-SRC.15–19
Figure 4. Isometric neck stabilization (lateral muscles) against a Swiss ball (duration/sets to be adapted) – Stage 3 (Table 2).

Figure 5. Reactive neck stabilization against elastic resistance, on an instable surface (duration/sets to be adapted) – Stage 4 (Table 2).

Within Stage 3, SRC players can begin with easy skating (while respecting the sub-symptom threshold) and before engaging in non-contact training (Stage 4.1), a basic set of on-ice drills is recommended (Stage 3.2). The assumption that a symptom-free player in the gym will remain symptom-free on the ice should be avoided; for example, if dizziness caused by head and/or body rotations has resolved with specific vestibular exercises,20 turning and pivoting on the ice may invoke renewed symptoms of head pressure or dizziness. Therefore, by allowing the player to proceed through a set of simple drills, where linear and circular/rotational moves (forward and backward) with simple and dual tasks (i.e. adding puck control, focusing on a fixed/moving target) are performed, the player is then able to feel (and the coaches can observe) whether they are experiencing symptoms during these movements on the ice or not (Figure 6). The ability to master these drills on the ice without symptoms improves the player’s confidence and raises the chances that they will be able to resume non-contact team practice efficiently.
Figure 6. Scheme of basic moves on ice: 1) Bully circle, skating one/other directions; 20-30 sec per each direction; 2-3 sets with increased speed (stick only/ stick & puck) 2) Figure 8 skating, ½ forwards & ½ backwards; 20-30 sec per each direction; 2-3 sets with increased speed (stick only/ stick and puck) 3) A: circling 2x => B) accelerate to the boards, stop and back => A) + C) accelerate to boards, stop and back => continue (stick only) (duration/sets to be adapted).

Ice hockey is a fast-paced, contact team sport that requires high levels of reaction time and decision making, and athletes after SRC need to master motor and cognitive skills concurrently. Affected players usually experience difficulties with quickness and reactivity drills, which confirms recent findings on impaired reaction times during sports-related movement tasks.21,22 The inclusion of cognitive reactive agility drills with dual or multitasks (e.g. visuomotor reaction time training with the FITLIGHT® system) is therefore an important element in the “training to perform” part of Stage 4 and beyond (both in the gym and on ice).23,24 (Figure 7, 8) In addition to strength and conditioning training, these cognitive reactive agility drills are also necessary to minimize subsequent injury risk.25,26
Figure 7. Visuomotor reactive training on the “Speed Court” (GlobalSpeed GmbH, Hemsbach, Germany). The player moves quickly form plate to plate reacting to the given signal on the screen placed on the wall in front of him. Drills of about 20-30-40 sec duration (sets to be adapted). Photo courtesy of Steven Lingenhag (Hockey Club Davos).

Figure 8. Several cones on the bully circle line and one in the middle. Player skates quickly and randomly between cones (stick/stick and puck). Progression: Fitlights are placed on the cones, and the player skates quicky to the cones reacting to the given light signal (stick only). Drills of about 20-30 sec duration (sets to be adapted).

At Stage 5 of our proposed RTS strategy, the player needs, on average, 4 to 5 full team training practice sessions (including unrestricted contact) before they can be considered completely mentally and physically ready for participation in competition games. As previously mentioned, this process is highly individual and should be based on both the athlete’s response and staff judgement of the athlete’s performance during training. The psychological readiness for competition is crucial, and the use of the Injury-Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport (I-PRSS) tool is helpful to assess the player’s confidence in performing at the last stages of the RTS scheme.27,28 Neurocognitive testing (not discussed here) should also be used as part of the RTS decision-making process.11 Depending on the position, role and importance of the player within the team, the coaching staff often plan a number of games with increasing ice time (usually with the farm team) to allow the progressive return of the player to competition. With appropriate monitoring of the player’s training progression and close interaction with the player, the medical and technical staff can best support the athlete in the “training to perform” stage of the RTS program, which should ideally be a shared decision-making process among these stakeholders.6 Ultimately, RTS after SRC should only occur with medical clearance from a licensed healthcare provider who is trained in the evaluation and management of concussion.13
Conclusion
Sport-related concussion is a severe and complex type of injury requiring specific rehabilitation management and a RTS protocol following the CISG guidelines. While respecting these principles, the supporting team comprising a sports physical therapist and athletic trainer should work with the athlete to restore function as well as optimize and enhance their performance. The athlete is constantly supervised by the medical team during this process. Elite ice hockey players post-SRC should not only be symptom-free and able to participate in unrestricted practice and games, they should also be optimally ready at both physical and mental levels to perform with minimal re-injury risk. This clinical commentary has described a comprehensive RTS ice hockey program, which can help injured elite players in reaching this goal.
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgements
The author would like to acknowledge Nik Hess (athletic trainer at SCL Tigers, Langnau, Switzerland), Steven Lingenhag (athletic trainer at Hockey Club Davos, Davos, Switzerland) and Gilles Neuenschwander (physical therapist and athletic trainer at Hockey Club Ambrì Piotta, Quinto, Switzerland) for their invaluable cooperation over the years and assistance in the development of this proposed RTS protocol. Melissa Wilhelmi, PhD (medical writer at Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland) participated in the copyediting and final proofreading of this manuscript.
References
- Epidemiology of head injuries focusing on concussions in team contact sports: a systematic review. Prien Annika, Grafe Alexander, Rössler Roland, Junge Astrid, Verhagen Evert. Jan 18;2018 Sports Medicine. 48(4):953–969. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0854-4. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0854-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Consensus statement on concussion in sport-the 5(th) international conference on concussion in sport held in Berlin, October 2016. McCrory P., Meeuwisse W., Dvořák J.., et al. 201751(11):838–847. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feddermann‐Demont Nina, Chiampas Georges, Cowie Charlotte M., Meyer Tim, Nordström Anna, Putukian Margot, Straumann Dominik, Kramer Efraim. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 10. Vol. 30. Wiley; Recommendations for initial examination, differential diagnosis, and management of concussion and other head injuries in high‐level football; pp. 1846–1858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The NHL/NHLPA Concussion Evaluation and Management Protocol 2019-2020 season. Jun 1;2019 https://nhlpa.com/the-pa/pa-programs-and-partnerships/concussion-protocol-and-education
- International Ice Hockey Federation concussion protocol. Sep 5;2019 https://www.iihf.com/en/static/5070/medical Published September 5, 2019.
- Ardern Clare L, Glasgow Philip, Schneiders Anthony, Witvrouw Erik, Clarsen Benjamin, Cools Ann, Gojanovic Boris, Griffin Steffan, Khan Karim M, Moksnes Håvard, Mutch Stephen A, Phillips Nicola, Reurink Gustaaf, Sadler Robin, Grävare Silbernagel Karin, Thorborg Kristian, Wangensteen Arnlaug, Wilk Kevin E, Bizzini Mario. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 14. Vol. 50. BMJ; 2016 Consensus statement on return to sport from the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy, Bern; pp. 853–864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Performance physical therapy is sports physical therapy: why our profession needs to progress. Reinold Michael M. Apr 1;2021 International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 16(2) doi: 10.26603/001c.21556. doi: 10.26603/001c.21556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lateral meniscus repair in a professional ice hockey goaltender: a case report with a 5-year follow-up. Bizzini Mario, Gorelick Mark, Drobny Thomas. Feb;2006 Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 36(2):89–100. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.36.2.89. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.36.2.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rehabilitation and return to sport after bilateral open surgery for femoroacetabular impingement in a professional ice hockey player: A case report. Casartelli Nicola C., Bizzini Mario, Maffiuletti Nicola A., Lepers Romuald, Leunig Michael. May;2015 Physical Therapy in Sport. 16(2):193–201. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.08.002. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Physical therapy management of ice hockey athletes: from the rink to the clinic and back. Wolfinger C.R., Davenport T.E. 2016Int J Sports Phys Ther. 11(3):482–495. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Collins Michael W., Kontos Anthony P., Reynolds Erin, Murawski Christopher D., Fu Freddie H. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2. Vol. 22. Springer Science and Business Media LLC; A comprehensive, targeted approach to the clinical care of athletes following sport-related concussion; pp. 235–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rest and treatment/rehabilitation following sport-related concussion: a systematic review. Schneider Kathryn J, Leddy John J, Guskiewicz Kevin M, Seifert Tad, McCrea Michael, Silverberg Noah D, Feddermann-Demont Nina, Iverson Grant L, Hayden Alix, Makdissi Michael. Mar 24;2017 British Journal of Sports Medicine. 51(12):930–934. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097475. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- American Medical Society for sports medicine position statement on concussion in sport. Harmon Kimberly G., Clugston James R., Dec Katherine, Hainline Brian, Herring Stanley A., Kane Shawn, Kontos Anthony P., Leddy John J., McCrea Michael A., Poddar Sourav K., Putukian Margot, Wilson Julie C., Roberts William O. Mar;2019 Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. 29(2):87–100. doi: 10.1097/jsm.0000000000000720. doi: 10.1097/jsm.0000000000000720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clinical assessment of the deep cervical flexor muscles: the craniocervical flexion test. Jull Gwendolen A., O'Leary Shaun P., Falla Deborah L. Sep;2008 Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 31(7):525–533. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.08.003. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neck muscular strength, training, performance and sport injury risk: a review. Hrysomallis Con. Feb 9;2016 Sports Medicine. 46(8):1111–1124. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0490-4. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0490-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The potential role of the cervical spine in sports-related concussion: clinical perspectives and considerations for risk reduction. Streifer Michael, Brown Allison M., Porfido Tara, Anderson Ellen Zambo, Buckman Jennifer F., Esopenko Carrie. Mar;2019 Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 49(3):202–208. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8582. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Proceedings from the Ice Hockey Summit III: Action on Concussion. Smith Aynsley M., Alford Patrick A., Aubry Mark, Benson Brian, Black Amanda, Brooks Alison, Burke Charles, D’Arcy Ryan, Dodick David, Eaves Michael, Eickhoff Chad, Erredge Kristen, Farrell Kyle, Finnoff Jonathon, Fraser Douglas D., Giza Christopher, Greenwald Richard M., Hoshizaki Blaine, Huston John, Jorgensen Janelle, Joyner Michael, Krause David, LaVoi Nicole, Leaf Matthew, Leddy John, Margarucci Kevin, Margulies Susan, Mihalik Jason, Munce Thayne, Oeur Anna, Prideaux Cara, Roberts William O., Shen Francis, Soma David, Tabrum Mark, Stuart Michael B., Wethe Jennifer, Whitehead James R., Wiese-Bjornstal Diane, Stuart Michael J. Jan;2019 Current Sports Medicine Reports. 18(1):23–34. doi: 10.1249/jsr.0000000000000557. doi: 10.1249/jsr.0000000000000557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- A systematic review of strength and conditioning protocols for improving neck strength and reducing concussion incidence and impact injury risk in collision sports; is there evidence? Daly Ed, Pearce Alan J., Ryan Lisa. Jan 12;2021 Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 6(1):8. doi: 10.3390/jfmk6010008. doi: 10.3390/jfmk6010008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Injury reduction programs for reducing the incidence of sport-related head and neck injuries including concussion: A systematic review. Elliott Jonathan, Heron Neil, Versteegh Theo, Gilchrist Ian A., Webb Michael, Archbold Pooler, Hart Nigel D., Peek Kerry. Jun 18;2021 Sports Medicine. :40279–40021. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01501-1. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01501-1. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Cervicovestibular rehabilitation in sport-related concussion: a randomised controlled trial. Schneider Kathryn J, Meeuwisse Willem H, Nettel-Aguirre Alberto, Barlow Karen, Boyd Lara, Kang Jian, Emery Carolyn A. May 22;2014 British Journal of Sports Medicine. 48(17):1294–1298. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093267. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reaction time and joint kinematics during functional movement in recently concussed individuals. Lynall Robert C., Blackburn J. Troy, Guskiewicz Kevin M., Marshall Stephen W., Plummer Prudence, Mihalik Jason P. May;2018 Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 99(5):880–886. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.12.011. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neuromuscular control deficits and the risk of subsequent injury after a concussion: a scoping review. Howell David R., Lynall Robert C., Buckley Thomas A., Herman Daniel C. Feb 17;2018 Sports Medicine. 48(5):1097–1115. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-0871-y. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-0871-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Influence of cognitive performance on musculoskeletal injury risk: A systematic review. Avedesian Jason M., Forbes Warren, Covassin Tracey, Dufek Janet S. Mar 19;2021 The American Journal of Sports Medicine. :036354652199808. doi: 10.1177/0363546521998081. doi: 10.1177/0363546521998081. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Neuromechanical considerations for postconcussion musculoskeletal injury risk management. Wilkerson Gary B., Grooms Dustin R., Acocello Shellie N. 2017Current Sports Medicine Reports. 16(6):419–427. doi: 10.1249/jsr.0000000000000430. doi: 10.1249/jsr.0000000000000430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Musculoskeletal injury risk after sport-related concussion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. McPherson April L., Nagai Takashi, Webster Kate E., Hewett Timothy E. 2019The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 47(7):1754–1762. doi: 10.1177/0363546518785901. doi: 10.1177/0363546518785901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Impaired motor control after sport-related concussion could increase risk for musculoskeletal injury: Implications for clinical management and rehabilitation. Chmielewski Terese L., Tatman Justin, Suzuki Shuhei, Horodyski MaryBeth, Reisman Darcy S., Bauer Russell M., Clugston James R., Herman Daniel C. Mar;2021 Journal of Sport and Health Science. 10(2):154–161. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.11.005. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Development and preliminary validation of the Injury-Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport (I-PRRS) scale. Glazer Douglas D. Mar 1;2009 Journal of Athletic Training. 44(2):185–189. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-44.2.185. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-44.2.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Are athletes psychologically ready for sport following a concussion? Caron Jeffrey G, Bloom Gordon A, Podlog Leslie W. 2018British Journal of Sports Medicine. 52(1):1–2. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098319. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
