Abstract
Human saliva seeded with H. pylori was incubated in urea-HCl and then cultured on nonselective media. Pretreatment with 0.06 N HCl–0.08 M urea for 5 min at 37°C resulted in reproducible isolation of H. pylori, even at low inocula (≤102 CFU/ml of saliva), despite the presence of large numbers of contaminating organisms.
The transmission route and source of Helicobacter pylori infection remain unclear. The presence of H. pylori DNA in the oral cavity, feces, and water has been demonstrated using PCR (7, 10, 17, 21), but the culture of H. pylori from these specimens using established methods is quite difficult (1, 2, 6, 18, 22). These specimens may contain low numbers of H. pylori organisms (20), which are likely to be overgrown by more abundant populations of rapidly growing competing microorganisms even on selective media. Urease is found in the cytoplasm and on the membrane of H. pylori cells (5, 8). Compared to other urease-positive microorganisms, H. pylori produces larger quantities of highly active urease (5, 9, 19). Urease hydrolyzes urea, creating a basic “ammonia cloud” around the bacteria, thereby allowing H. pylori to survive at low pH in the presence of urea under conditions similar to those in the stomach (3, 12, 16). The aim of this study was to develop a new method using short-duration exposures to hydrochloric acid (HCl) plus urea to facilitate the isolation of H. pylori from highly contaminated specimens.
Local institutional review board approval for specimen collection was obtained, and patients gave informed written consent. Saliva was obtained from an H. pylori-negative volunteer. Primary H. pylori cultures were obtained from patients undergoing upper endoscopy. H. pylori type strain ATCC 43504 was grown on heart infusion agar with 5% rabbit blood (BBL, Cockeysville, Md.) for 48 h at 37°C under microaerobic conditions (85% N2, 10% CO2, 5% O2) and then suspended in normal saline for the following assays. First, pure cultures of H. pylori were tested to determine survival in various urea-HCl concentration ranges. Ten microliters of the diluted suspension (∼105 CFU of H. pylori) was incubated with 5 μl of urea and 10 μl of HCl at various concentrations for 5 min at room temperature and then serially diluted in 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). One-hundred-microliter aliquots of each dilution were then plated onto heart infusion agar. After the 5-day microaerobic incubation, colonies were counted. Control cultures were carried out using PBS instead of urea-HCl under the same conditions. Additional experiments were conducted to assess incubation time and temperature (4 to 37°C) effects on the survival of H. pylori exposed to urea-HCl. Second, saliva spiked with different concentrations of H. pylori was tested using the procedures above. Optimal urea and HCl concentrations were determined based on H. pylori survival and minimal growth of other microorganisms. Third, the minimum number of H. pylori CFU that could be inoculated into saliva and successfully recovered was determined using the optimal urea-HCl treatment conditions as determined from experiments described above. One milliliter of saliva spiked with 10 to 104 CFU of H. pylori was evaluated. Centrifugation was used instead of the PBS dilution to remove urea-HCl after the pretreatment. Urease activities of viable intact cells of the type strain and clinical isolates were measured using a coupled enzyme assay (5, 14).
Exposure of pure H. pylori to HCl-urea mixtures resulted in survival rates of 0.01 to 70% in a pH range from 0.36 to 2.7. In the absence of urea, few H. pylori organisms survived. Incubation for 1 and 20 min in 0.06 N HCl–0.08 M urea (pH 1.2) gave similar H. pylori recoveries (range, 6 to 10%), but ≥1 h killed nearly all H. pylori cells. Incubation in 0.06 N HCl–0.08 M urea at 37, 25, and 4°C for 5 min gave 15.7, 10.4, and 0.8% survival rates, respectively (P < 0.001).
Hydrochloric acid concentrations of 0.06 N or higher were necessary to effectively inhibit microflora present in saliva. Table 1 shows survival rates of H. pylori added to saliva after pretreatment using urea-HCl for 5 min at room temperature. Optimal HCl-urea concentrations were 0.06 N HCl–0.02 to 0.16 M urea, 0.12 N HCl–0.2 to 0.5 M urea, and 0.24 N HCl–1 M urea, with all giving nearly equivalent recoveries of H. pylori (Table 1). The 0.06 N HCl–0.08 M urea combination (arbitrarily selected) and 5-min incubations at 37°C were used in the further experiments. H. pylori was consistently and readily isolated at inoculum levels as low as 102 CFU/ml of saliva. In contrast, a minimum concentration of 104 CFU of H. pylori/ml in saliva was necessary for successful isolation on Skirrow's medium without urea-HCl pretreatment.
TABLE 1.
HCl concn (N)b | Survival (%) ata:
|
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Urea concentration (mM)b
|
pH | |||||||||||
1,000 | 500 | 200 | 160 | 80 | 40 | 20 | 10 | 5 | 2.5 | 1.25 | ||
0.24 | 4.75 | 3.2 | 1.6 | 1.15 | 0.8 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.21 | 0.48 | 0.32 | 0.16 | 0.68 |
0.12 | 2.5 | 5.5 | 4.75 | 3.8 | 2.75 | 1.25 | 2.05 | 0.55 | 0.23 | 0.8 | 0.03 | 1.06 |
0.06 | 2.15 | 3.45 | 3.73 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 4.75 | 1.45 | 0.9 | 1.75 | 0.02 | 1.38 |
0.03 | 0.65 | 1 | 1.25 | 1 | 1.95 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 0.34 | 0.38 | 0.01 | 1.82 |
H. pylori survival rates are expressed as the percentage of input colonies recovered after urea-HCl treatment, as determined by parallel controls with PBS replacing urea and HCl. All values are means for triplicate trials.
Final concentration during incubation of H. pylori suspension with urea and HCl solution before dilution with PBS buffer.
Twenty-five gastric biopsy specimens were subjected to H. pylori isolation using the optimal urea-HCl pretreatment method described above. The results were compared with those obtained by direct inoculation onto Skirrow's medium. Similar isolation rates were obtained: 56% (14 of 25) for urea-HCl pretreatment and 52% (13 of 25) for Skirrow's medium (P > 0.05). With one specimen, H. pylori colonies were isolated only after urea-HCl pretreatment; direct plating of this specimen in Skirrow's medium resulted in overgrowth by competitors. After exposure to the optimal conditions, 13 clinical strains had survival rates of 14 to 86% (median, 49%), compared with 8% for the type strain (P < 0.01). Urease activities ranged from 1.4 × 10−8 to 4.6 × 10−8 (median, 2.5 × 10−8) μM ammonia/min/cell for 13 clinical strains and 1.3 × 10−8 μM ammonia/min/cell for the type strain (P < 0.05). While the survival rate of H. pylori appeared to increase with increasing urease activity, this was not a statistically significant association (P > 0.10).
Our data show that in the presence of appropriate concentrations of urea, H. pylori can survive short periods of exposure to acid at much lower pH levels than previously reported (3, 11, 12, 15). The conditions used in our study are similar to those occurring in natural H. pylori infection, where H. pylori and other organisms enter the stomach through the mouth (4, 23). Before reaching the gastric mucosa, H. pylori encounters the acidic (pH 1 to 6) stomach contents. It is postulated that a large proportion of H. pylori cells are killed during the stomach exposure, with a smaller number surviving.
Our finding is similar to those of other reports in that H. pylori could not be isolated from saliva using standard culture conditions, particularly when the number of H. pylori organisms in the sample was lower than 104/ml, because of overgrowth by other oral organisms (13). Other investigations have demonstrated that the H. pylori load in the oral cavity is quite low (20). It is highly likely that the number of H. pylori in the natural environment, water, and other potential infection sources is also very low because of the fastidious nature of the organism. Therefore, applying the method described here may yield better success in culturing H. pylori from extragastric contaminated sites. This approach may be particularly useful for epidemiologic studies to identify the source and route of transmitting H. pylori.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, DK-53708-01.
We thank Alana Sulka for her assistance with statistical analysis of the data described herein and Robert Hoekstra for consultation on statistic analysis.
REFERENCES
- 1.Banatvala N, Lopez C R, Owen R, Abdi Y, Davis G, Hardie J, Feldman R. Helicobacter pylori in dental plaque. Lancet. 1993;341:380. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90191-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bernarder S, Dalen J, Gastrin B, Hedenborg L, Lamke L O, Obrn R. Absence of Helicobacter pylori in dental plaque in Helicobacter pylori positive dyspeptic patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993;12:282–285. doi: 10.1007/BF01967259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Clyne M, Labigne A, Drumm B. Helicobacter pylori requires an acidic environment to survive in the presence of urea. Infect Immun. 1995;63:1669–1673. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.5.1669-1673.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Drasar B S, Shiner M, McLeod G M. Studies on the intestinal flora. Gastroenterology. 1969;56:71–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dunn B E, Campbell G P, Perez-Perez G I, Blaser M J. Purification and characterization of urease from Helicobacter pylori. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:9464–9469. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ferguson D A, Jr, Li C, Patel N R, Mayberry W R, Chi D S, Thomas E. Isolation of Helicobacter pylori from saliva. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:2802–2804. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.10.2802-2804.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gramley W A, Asghar A, Frierson H F, Jr, Parell S M. Detection of Helicobacter pylori DNA in fecal samples from infected individuals. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:2236–2240. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.7.2236-2240.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hawtin P R, Stacey A R, Newell D G. Investigation of the structure and localization of the urease of Helicobacter pylori using monoclonal antibody. J Gen Microbiol. 1990;136:1995–2000. doi: 10.1099/00221287-136-10-1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hu L T, Mobley H L T. Purification and N-terminal analysis of urease from Helicobacter pylori. Infect Immun. 1990;58:992–998. doi: 10.1128/iai.58.4.992-998.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hulten K, Han S W, Enroth H, Klein P D, Opekun A R, Gilman R H, Evans D G, Engstrand L, Graham D Y, El-Zaatari F A K. Helicobacter pylori in the drinking water in Peru. Gastroenterology. 1996;110:1031–1035. doi: 10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8612990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hunt R H. Hp and pH: implication for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1993;28(Suppl. 196):12–16. doi: 10.3109/00365529309098335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jiang X, Doyle M P. Effect of environment and substrate factors on survival and growth of Helicobacter pylori. J Food Prot. 1998;61:929–933. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-61.8.929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jonkers D, Stobberingh E, Stockbrugger R. Influence of oropharyngeal flora and specimen pretreatment on the recovery of Helicobacter pylori. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996;15:378–382. doi: 10.1007/BF01690093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kaltwasser H, Schlegel H G. NADH-dependent coupled enzyme assay for urease and other ammonia-producing systems. Anal Biochem. 1966;16:132–138. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(66)90088-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kangatharalingam N, Amy P S. Helicobacter pylori comb. nov. exhibits facultative acidophilism and obligate microaerophilism. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994;60:2176–2179. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.6.2176-2179.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Krishnamurthy P, Parlow M, Zitzer J B, Vakil N B, Mobley H L T, Levy M, Phadnis S H, Dunn B E. Helicobacter pylori containing only cytoplasmic urease is susceptible to acid. Infect Immun. 1998;66:5060–5066. doi: 10.1128/iai.66.11.5060-5066.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li C, Ha T, Ferguson D A, Jr, Chi D S, Zhao R, Patel N R, Krishnaswamy G, Thomas E. A newly developed PCR assay of H. pylori in gastric biopsy, saliva and feces. Evidence of high prevalence of H. pylori in saliva supports oral transmission. Dig Dis Sci. 1996;41:2142–2149. doi: 10.1007/BF02071393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, Michetti P, Price A. Helicobacter pylori, the year in 1997. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 1997;13(Suppl. 1):1–62. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mobley H L T, Hausinger R P. Microbial ureases: significance, regulation, and molecular characterization. Microbiol Rev. 1989;53:85–108. doi: 10.1128/mr.53.1.85-108.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Song Q, Haller B, Ulrich D, Adler G, Bode G. Quantitation of H. pylori by cPCR. J Clin Pathol. 2000;53:218–222. doi: 10.1136/jcp.53.3.218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Song Q, Lange T, Spahr A, Adler G, Bode G. Characteristic pattern of Helicobacter pylori in dental plaque and saliva detected with nested PCR. J Med Microbiol. 2000;49:349–353. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-49-4-349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Thomas J E, Gibson G R, Darboe M K, Dale A, Weaver L T. Isolation of Helicobacter pylori from human feces. Lancet. 1992;340:1194–1195. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92894-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Verdu E, Viani F, Armstrong D, Fraser R, Siegrist H H, Pignatielli B, Idstrom J P, Cederberg C, Blum A L, Fried M. Effect of omeprazole on intragastric bacterial counts, nitrates, nitrites and N-nitroso compounds. Gut. 1994;35:455–460. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.4.455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]