Abstract
The collective movement of African trypanosomes on semi-solid surfaces, known as social motility, is presumed to be due to migration factors and repellents released by the parasites. Here we show that procyclic (insect midgut) forms acidify their environment as a consequence of glucose metabolism, generating pH gradients by diffusion. Early and late procyclic forms exhibit self-organising properties on agarose plates. While early procyclic forms are repelled by acid and migrate outwards, late procyclic forms remain at the inoculation site. Furthermore, trypanosomes respond to exogenously formed pH gradients, with both early and late procyclic forms being attracted to alkali. pH taxis is mediated by multiple cyclic AMP effectors: deletion of one copy of adenylate cyclase ACP5, or both copies of the cyclic AMP response protein CARP3, abrogates the response to acid, while deletion of phosphodiesterase PDEB1 completely abolishes pH taxis. The ability to sense pH is biologically relevant as trypanosomes experience large changes as they migrate through their tsetse host. Supporting this, a CARP3 null mutant is severely compromised in its ability to establish infections in flies. Based on these findings, we propose that the expanded family of adenylate cyclases in trypanosomes might govern other chemotactic responses in their two hosts.
Subject terms: Chemotaxis, Cell signalling, Parasite biology
African trypanosomes collectively move in a process called social motility. Here, the authors show that procyclic forms acidify their environment as a consequence of glucose metabolism, generating pH gradients by diffusion that are sensed via cyclic AMP signalling. Parasite mutants defective in cAMP signaling are inhibited in fly infection.
Introduction
Environmental sensing, chemotaxis, and quorum sensing present possibilities for pathogens to orient themselves within their hosts. All three are widespread in bacteria, and the sensors and response mechanisms have been characterised in detail1,2. Genes involved in bacterial chemotaxis and quorum sensing have long been linked to biofilm formation and swarming behaviour3,4. By contrast, very little is known about chemotaxis in unicellular eukaryotes, with the exception of Dictyostelium discoideum, which generates and reacts to cyclic AMP (cAMP) gradients, promoting aggregation and differentiation5–8.
Intracellular pathogens frequently exploit receptor-ligand interactions to recognise and invade the appropriate cell types9–12. For extracellular parasites such as Trypanosoma brucei spp., causative agents of human and animal trypanosomiasis, it is not known what drives them to move from one host tissue to another. In their mammalian hosts, quorum sensing regulates the titre of T. brucei by triggering the differentiation of proliferative slender forms to quiescent stumpy forms13,14. When these are taken up by tsetse flies during a blood meal15 they differentiate to early procyclic (midgut) forms and then to late procyclic forms16. In addition to the surface marker GPEET procyclin, which is only expressed by early procyclic forms, several metabolic enzymes, nutrient transporters and signal transducers are differentially expressed between the two forms17,18. Colonisation of the midgut by procyclic forms is followed by additional rounds of differentiation as parasites invade the proventriculus, and then move to the salivary glands before being transmitted to a new mammalian host. At present, however, the cues allowing trypanosomes to orient themselves within their hosts are unknown.
Early procyclic forms engage in a form of group migration, known as social motility (SoMo), when cultured on semi-solid surfaces such as agarose plates18,19. The parasites initially remain at the inoculation site, dividing approximately once every 24 h, then the communities start to form regularly spaced projections that extend by ~1 cm (500 body lengths) per day. Communities on the same plate are able to sense each other and reorient to avoid contact (Supplementary Movie 1). Late procyclic forms do not exhibit SoMo, but they do produce a repellent that is sensed by early procyclic forms18. Communities on plates also react to other signals. Trypanosomes depleted of the spliced leader core protein SmD1 shed exosomes that act as repellents20, while bacterial colonies can act as attractants21. Various species of Leishmania, parasites related to trypanosomes, respond chemotactically to a range of compounds including amino acids, carbohydrates and sera, in liquid culture22–25. In none of these cases is it known which genes mediate the responses.
Few genes have been implicated in SoMo. Concomitant depletion of adenylate cyclases ACP1&2, or depletion of ACP6 on its own, resulted in a hyper-social phenotype (hyper-SoMo) where the communities formed more projections and migrated more rapidly, suggesting that these are negative regulators26. Interestingly, ACP1 and ACP6 are upregulated in late procyclic forms17, which are SoMo-negative18. The flagellar phosphodiesterase B1 (PDEB1)19 and the endoplasmic reticulum protein Rft127,28 are positive regulators of SoMo. Importantly, null mutants of PDEB1 and Rft1 were not only impaired in SoMo, but also defective in colonising the tsetse midgut27,29. We postulated that SoMo is largely a chemotactic response to factors produced by the trypanosomes themselves. Here we show that procyclic forms can generate pH gradients through glucose metabolism and that the response of early and late procyclic forms to these gradients can explain the self-organising properties of communities on plates. In addition, we identified two cAMP signalling components involved in the response to acid, ACP5 and the cAMP response protein CARP3. Notably, pH sensing is completely abolished in PDEB1 knockout, where cAMP levels are perturbed. pH taxis could be biologically relevant as there is a pH gradient in the tissues that are colonised by the parasites during their transmission through the insect host30. In support of this, we show that CARP3 null mutant parasites are severely compromised in their ability to establish fly infections.
Results
Parasite-secreted factors change properties of the medium and repel migrating projections
What are the factors causing collective migration in SoMo? The fact that communities sense and avoid each other over considerable distances means that they react to attractants or repellents that are secreted, or otherwise released, by the parasites. We started by investigating if these factors were produced under normal growth conditions in liquid culture. We concentrated the supernatant of a dense culture (2 × 107 cells ml−1) 10-fold and spotted this “conditioned medium” (CM) next to migrating projections on SoMo plates (Fig. 1a, upper panel). Projections migrating towards the site where CM was spotted reoriented away from it, indicating that it was perceived as a repellent. In a second experiment, CM was either sterile filtered or dialysed (with a 12 kDa cut-off) prior to concentration and spotted next to migrating projections. As seen with untreated CM, filtered CM still repelled migrating projections (Fig. 1a, lower left panel), but dialysed CM lost its repellent properties (Fig. 1a, lower right panel). On the contrary, migrating parasites were attracted to dialysed CM in the same way that they were to concentrated fresh medium (DTM) (Fig. 1a). These results suggested that repellents might be metabolites that were lost upon dialysis.
Trypanosomes acidify their environment in liquid culture and on agarose plates
Trypanosomes secrete a variety of molecules that influence the pH of their environment31,32. Indicators for pH, such as phenol red, are commonly used for culture media and it is apparent that dense cultures are more acidic than fresh medium or log phase cultures, as illustrated for early procyclic forms growing in liquid culture (Fig. 1b). We therefore used a small tip micro glass pH electrode to measure the pH in liquid culture and on agarose plates (Fig. 2). Fresh medium has a pH of 7.46 (± 0.02) and the supernatant of a log phase culture has a pH of 7.45 (± 0.01) (Fig. 2a). The pH decreased to 6.95 (± 0.00) when parasites were allowed to overgrow; this corresponds to ~3-fold increase in the concentration of H+ ions (Fig. 2a).
To measure the pH on plates, 2 × 105 parasites were inoculated either in the centre of a plate (Fig. 2b, left row), or in pairs at a defined distance from each other (Fig. 2b, right row), and the pH was measured after 2, 3, 4, and 7 days post-inoculation. We measured the pH in the centre of a community, at the periphery of a plate and between two communities. The pH at the centres of the communities decreased from 7.50 (± 0.01) to 7.31 (± 0.05) during the first 3 days and decreased further to 6.96 (± 0.05) between days 3 and 7 (Fig. 2b, c). The pH at the periphery also started to decrease between day 3 and 7, possibly because of diffusion of H+ ions from the parasite communities. When communities were plated in pairs, the pH at the midpoint between them also decreased over time (Fig. 2b, right row, arrow). Thus, communities acidify their vicinity resulting in pH gradients on the plates.
We showed previously that trypanosomes needed to reach a threshold number before they started migrating18. We now demonstrate that it is not the cell number per se that is critical, but rather the need to establish a discernible pH gradient. When the same number of parasites were inoculated onto plates containing different volumes of semi-solid medium, the time point at which projections started to form was inversely proportional to the volume (Fig. 2d). This would be consistent with larger volumes buffering the pH more effectively and requiring more cells, and thus more time, before a gradient was established. We cannot exclude, however, that other factors are also affected by the volume of the medium.
Reaction of early and late procyclic forms to exposure to acid and alkali
As a next step, we tested if manipulating the pH gradient had an influence on migration by exposing early procyclic forms to external sources of acid or alkali (Fig. 3a, b). Early procyclic forms were inoculated onto plates and incubated until the projections reached a length of about 2 cm. At this point, solutions of HCl or NaOH were pipetted onto the surface at a defined distance (Fig. 3a) and the plates were incubated for 16–20 h. The migrating cells responded very strongly to both solutions (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Movies 2 and 3). Exogenous NaOH acted as an attractant, causing projections to reorient towards it (OH- treatment), while HCl caused the projections to stop moving outwards, or to move away from the acid (H+ treatment). Using the same assay, another 22 chemicals were tested (Supplementary Fig. 1). In most cases, when a solution was acidic, the projections were repelled, and when a solution was basic, the cells were attracted to it. These experiments also showed that the projections reacted to the pH rather than to specific cations or anions in the solutions.
We next tested late procyclic forms since these do not perform SoMo. Late procyclic forms did not respond to HCl (Fig. 3c, Supplementary Movie 4), but they formed a limited number of projections that migrated towards NaOH. Community lifts (Fig. 3c) confirmed that the parasites were still GPEET-negative and had not dedifferentiated to early forms. In summary, these results demonstrate that procyclic forms exhibit pH taxis, with alkali acting as an attractant for both early and late procyclic forms. In contrast, there are stage-specific differences in their reaction to acid.
RNA-seq analyses suggest that SoMo is a response to self-generated gradients
To better understand the mechanisms behind self-organisation of early and late procyclic forms, and their pH responses, we performed RNA-seq under different conditions. A culture of procyclic forms (>60% GPEET-positive) was plated and allowed to form projections (Fig. 4a, far right). A community lift with antibodies against procyclins showed that the tips were strongly positive for GPEET, while the centre of the community stained more strongly for EP. Cells were isolated from the tips and roots of projections (Fig. 4a, far right) and analysed by RNA-seq. Data confirmed that markers of early procyclic forms were more highly expressed in the tips than the roots (Fig. 4a, left; Supplementary Data 1a). Other transcripts that were more highly expressed in the tip were not characteristic of early procyclic forms in liquid culture, such as cysteine-rich acidic integral membrane protein (CRAM)33, a microtubule-associated repetitive protein (MARP2)34 and a hypothetical protein (hypo; Tb927.9.10400). In addition, several adenylate cyclases were differentially expressed on plates; ACP3 and ACP5 were ≥2-fold higher in the tip, while ACP6 and another adenylate cyclase (GRESAG 4; Tb927.11.1480) were ≥2-fold higher in the root. The up-regulation of high-affinity glucose transporters (THT2 and 2A), glycolytic enzymes and components of the glycosome (Fig. 4a, middle and Supplementary Data 1a) is suggestive of higher glucose metabolism by the tip than the root. Increased expression of these transcripts is also characteristic of early procyclic forms in liquid culture17,18.
RNA-seq was also performed on the tips of communities exposed to acid or alkali (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Data 1b). There were no significant differences (≥2-fold, p = 0.05) between non-exposed communities and those exposed to alkali. A single cation transporter (CatT, Tb927.11.9000) was more highly expressed in cells exposed to acid, but the read counts were extremely low in both cases. CatT and a copy of a contig (Tb11.v5.0514) were the only significant differences in a comparison of acid- versus alkali-treated communities. Taken together, these results suggest that self-generated pH gradients might be the normal driver of migration on SoMo plates.
Glucose contributes to the formation of pH gradients
Since the RNA-seq data indicated that cells at the tip might metabolise glucose more actively than cells at the root, we investigated the role of glucose in SoMo. For these experiments SDM80 medium was prepared with 1 mM glucose, 6 mM glucose, or 6mM N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), which inhibits glucose uptake by binding to hexose transporters35. Early procyclic forms of Lister 427 Bern were inoculated onto plates and incubated for 6 days (Fig. 5a). The parasites in SDM80 with 1 mM glucose started migrating later than cells in SDM80 containing 6 mM glucose, and the SoMo defect was even more pronounced when glucose uptake was blocked by GlcNAc. Under these conditions the cells only formed rudimentary “knobs” at the edge of the community and failed to form projections, even at later time points.
The reduced ability to migrate on plates can have a variety of causes, especially in the context of glucose restriction. It might be due to longer population doubling times, motility defects or inefficient energy metabolism. Procyclic cultures of Lister 427 Bern are stably GPEET-positive27,36. Nevertheless, we assessed the proportion of early procyclic forms by flow cytometry (Fig. 5b). Regardless of the medium in which the cells were grown, all cultures were ≥97% GPEET-positive. Furthermore, the glucose concentration had no impact on the population doubling time (Fig. 5c) or intracellular ATP levels (Fig. 5d), both assessed in liquid culture. Previous work showed that directional motility is important for SoMo and migration through the fly29. We therefore assessed cell motility (Fig. 5e); no differences were observed between cells grown in the presence or absence of glucose.
To investigate whether different glucose concentrations influence the culture pH, we compared medium alone with liquid cultures of trypanosomes in log phase or high density (Fig. 5f). While the pH of log-phase cultures did not differ from that of medium alone, dense cultures of parasites in SDM79 or SDM80 with 6 mM glucose strongly acidified the medium. The concentration of H+ in dense cultures, compared to log phase cultures, increased 2.53-fold (±0.03) for SDM79 and 2.51-fold (±0.06) for SDM80 plus glucose. By contrast, cells grown in SDM80 plus GlcNAc showed a smaller change in H+ ion concentration (1.22-fold ±0.03). We next measured pH changes for communities growing on plates (Fig. 5g). The ΔpH between the centre and the periphery reached −0.31(± 0.02) for parasites on SDM79 and −0.37(± 0.02) for SDM80 + 6 mM glucose, corresponding to a ≥ 2-fold difference in H+ ions at the two locations, whereas plates containing SDM80 + GlcNAc did not show a difference in pH. Taken together, these data show that glucose is required for parasites to generate a pH gradient, and that this correlates with their ability to perform SoMo.
Cyclic AMP signalling is involved in the response to pH
RNA-seq identified a number of differentially expressed transcripts, including that of the flagellar pocket protein CRAM, which was more highly expressed in the tips than in the roots (Fig. 4a). CRAM is not essential in procyclic culture forms37. When we generated knockouts, these grew at the same rate as their parental line, but two out of three independent clones produced smaller projections. Nevertheless, all three reacted to acid and alkali in the same way as wild-type cells (Supplementary Fig. 2) so we did not proceed with additional analyses.
Several adenylate cyclases were also differentially expressed between the tip and the root (Fig. 4a). Before we started analysing these and other members of the cAMP signalling pathway, we tested whether PDEB1, which hydrolyses cAMP, had an influence on the pH response. When the PDEB1 null mutant was exposed to alkali or acid, it showed no pH response (Fig. 6a). Notably, the PDEB1 null mutant differs from both early procyclic forms, which react to acid and alkali, and late procyclic forms, which form projections in response to alkali but do not respond to acid (Supplementary Table 1).
Four cAMP response proteins (CARP1-CARP4) were previously identified in an RNAi screen as mediating resistance to an inhibitor of PDEB138, but they have not been studied in the context of SoMo. In our attempts to generate knockout cell lines for CARP 1 and 2, we only obtained clones after single rounds of transfection. We did not pursue these further, however, as the resistance genes were not integrated at the correct loci. We were able to obtain knockouts of CARP3 and 4, however (Supplementary Fig. 3a). CARP4 null mutants did not show any difference to the parental line when they were subjected to a standard SoMo assay (Supplementary Fig. 3b) and were not analysed further. Deletion of CARP3, while not affecting growth in liquid culture (Supplementary Fig. 3c) or on plates (Supplementary Fig. 4c, d), or expression of the early marker GPEET (Supplementary Fig. 3d) resulted in a major SoMo defect (Fig. 6b, upper panel) reminiscent of the PDEB1 null mutant. The CARP3 knockout did not display a motility defect in liquid culture (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b) and still reacted to alkali, but did not react to acid on plates (Fig. 6b, lower panel and Supplementary Table 1). An HA-tagged addback of CARP3, expressed from a procyclin locus, partially rescued the SoMo phenotype (Fig. 6b, upper panel), although the projections were shorter than in the parental line. Importantly, the addback was now able to sense and react to both acid and alkali (Fig. 6b, lower panel).
We next assessed the requirement for CARP3 in vivo. For these experiments we generated a null mutant in wild-type T. b. brucei Lister 427 using a recently described CRISPR/Cas9 transient expression system39. In addition, we engineered an addback ectopically expressing an untagged version of CARP3 (Supplementary Fig. 5). Flies were infected with either the wild type, the knockout or the addback and evaluated for the prevalence and intensity of midgut infections after 14 days. The knockout showed a significantly lower midgut infection rate (p < 0.00001, Fisher’s exact test, two-sided) when compared to the wild type. In addition, infection intensities were reduced (Fig. 6c). Both the prevalence and intensities of infection with the addback were comparable to the wild type. Thus, the defect in establishing a midgut infection can be attributed specifically to the loss of CARP3. In addition, whereas 55–60% of flies heavily infected with the wild type, and 100% heavily infected with the addback, had trypanosomes in the proventriculus, the knockout gave no heavy midgut infections nor did it colonise the proventriculus (Supplementary Table 2).
CARP3 is present in both the cytoplasm and the flagellum (Supplementary Fig. 4e; www.tryptag.org). Since no interaction partners have been reported, a pulldown was performed with HA-tagged CARP3 (Fig. 6d) and analysed by mass spectrometry. This led to the identification of adenylate cyclases ACP3 and ACP5 in two biological replicates (Supplementary Data 2). These interactions were confirmed by in situ tagging and co-immunoprecipitation of myc-tagged versions of ACP3 and ACP5 in the CARP3-HA addback line (Fig. 6d and Supplementary Data 2). The reciprocal co-immunoprecipitations with anti-myc antibody confirmed the interaction for both ACP3 and ACP5 (Fig. 6d and Supplementary Data 2). These results, combined with their differential expression in the tips and roots of projections (Fig. 4a) stimulated us to revisit some of the flagellar ACP previously characterised by Lopez and coworkers26. In their study they showed that knockdown of ACP1/2 or ACP6 by RNAi resulted in a hyper-SoMo phenotype. We obtained null mutants of ACP2 and ACP6, but it was only possible to generate single knockouts of ACP1 and ACP5 (Supplementary Fig. 6a, 7a) implying that they are essential at this stage of the life cycle. Although we attempted to knock out ACP3, and isolated resistant cell lines, the antibiotic resistance genes were not integrated at the correct locus. The full knockout of ACP6 and the semi-knockout of ACP1 both exhibited hyper-SoMo phenotypes, while the full knockout of ACP2 showed no phenotype (Supplementary Fig. 6b). These results are consistent with the findings with the RNAi lines; they also indicate that the hyper-SoMo phenotype in the previously published ACP1/2 RNAi line26 was due to depletion of ACP1. Unexpectedly, however, and in contrast to the results with RNAi26, two out of three single knockouts of ACP5 were unable to form projections on plates and the third produced stunted projections (Fig. 6e, upper panel). In terms of their pH response, ACP5 single knockouts resembled CARP3 double knockouts - they were able to form projections migrating towards an alkaline source, but were refractory to acid (Fig. 6e, lower panel and Supplementary Table 1). Further experiments showed that >80% of these cells were GPEET-positive and that the phenotype of the ACP5 mutants was not due to defects in growth or motility (Supplementary Fig. 7b–g). These experiments also revealed that ACP5-myc was localised exclusively at the flagellar tip (Fig. 6f). In summary, we have extended the catalogue of cAMP signalling components that are involved in regulating SoMo. In addition, the finding that PDEB1, ACP5 and CARP3 play a role in the perception of environmental acidity/alkalinity is consistent with SoMo being a response to self-generated pH gradients.
Discussion
It was proposed more than a decade ago that the collective migration of trypanosomes on plates could be explained by a combination of migration factors and repellents released by the parasites19, but the identity of these molecules was unknown. Here we show for the first time that trypanosomes acidify their environment as a consequence of glucose metabolism, generating pH gradients by diffusion. While it is commonly assumed that free glucose levels in tsetse are low between blood meals, and this is often stated in reviews, there are no primary publications on this topic. The fact that transcripts encoding high-affinity glucose transporters and glycolytic enzymes are not only upregulated in SoMo tips (Fig. 4) and in early procyclic forms17, but also in trypanosomes at the beginning of a fly infection40, is compatible with procyclic forms utilising carbon sources other than proline in tsetse.
Early and late procyclic forms exhibit self-organising properties. It is the perception of these self-generated pH gradients that governs the outward migration of early procyclic forms towards a more alkaline environment, while late procyclic forms remain at the inoculation site. Local acidification of the environment, and the response to it, can also explain the spacing between projections emanating from the same parasite colony, as well as the cessation of migration or the reorientation of projections from two separate communities on the same plate. In addition, it explains why the start of migration is not solely dependent on a threshold cell number, as was previously reported18, but rather on the external pH. Early procyclic forms are also able to perceive exogenous sources of acid and alkali as repellents and attractants, respectively. Late procyclic forms are also attracted to a more basic environment, but unlike early procyclic forms they are not repelled by acid, explaining why they remain at the inoculation site on plates and do not perform SoMo.
Analyses of the transcriptomes of cells spontaneously performing SoMo, or reacting to exogenous alkali or acid, are consistent with them being the same response. Comparison of the transcriptomes of trypanosomes at the tips and roots of projections showed that migrating cells at the tip expressed high levels of markers for early procyclic forms. This mirrors what is seen in liquid culture17,18 as well as at early time points after flies are infected with stumpy forms40. Among the adenylate cyclases differentially expressed between the tip and the root, ACP6 is more highly expressed at the root and is also up-regulated in late procyclic forms. By contrast, ACP3 and ACP5, which are more highly expressed in the tip, are not stage-regulated between early and late procyclic forms in liquid culture17. This is also true of a few other transcripts, such as CRAM, and may reflect a response to culture on plates.
cAMP signalling is required for the perception of pH gradients (summarised in Fig. 6g). A PDEB1 knockout was not only defective in SoMo29, but was also impervious to acid and alkali. In contrast to an RNAi mutant of ACP5 which still performed SoMo normally26, an ACP5 single knockout did not form projections and was insensitive to exogenous acid, but was still attracted to alkali. In this respect, its behaviour resembles that of late procyclic forms. Down-regulation or deletion of ACP6 (26 and Supplementary Fig. 6b) or deletion of one copy of ACP1 cause hyper-SoMo, while ACP2 is not required for SoMo or pH taxis. ACP1, ACP5 and ACP6 are localised at the flagellar tip (41 and Fig. 6f), highlighting its importance as a sensor.
For the first time, we show that there is a physical link between a cyclic AMP response protein, CARP3, and adenylate cyclases ACP3 and ACP5. Moreover, the CARP3 null mutant had the same defects in SoMo and acid sensing as the ACP5 single knockout. Interestingly, there is strong evidence that CARP3 is N-myristoylated42, which could enable it to associate with the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane. N-myristoylation has been shown to regulate signalling in mammals43 and it is conceivable that acylated and non-acylated forms of CARP3 enable signals to be transmitted from the membrane to the interior of the cell. T. brucei, which has the most complex life cycle of all the African trypanosomes, also encodes the largest number of adenylate cyclases. Many of these are stage-regulated, and it is plausible that they have functions in reacting to their local environment. It is also worth noting that CARP3 interacts with other adenylate cyclases, although ACP3 and ACP5 were the top hits (Supplementary Data 2), and that it was recently identified by proximity labelling as interacting with ACP144.
pH taxis by trypanosomes is likely to be biologically relevant during fly transmission as there are large differences between the pH of the midgut (pH ~8) and proventriculus (pH ~10.5)30. This would enable parasites to follow cues provided by the fly as they migrate to different compartments. The hindgut is also more basic than the posterior midgut30, and trypanosomes have been detected there, but these have abnormal morphologies45. At present we do not know if there are additional chemotactic cues attracting trypanosomes towards to the proventriculus or repelling them from the hindgut. Regardless of whether they migrate in one or both directions, only parasites migrating to the proventriculus can survive and complete the life cycle. We have shown that CARP3 is required for efficient colonisation of tsetse. Interestingly, the knockout has a more severe phenotype than the PDEB1 knockout described previously29. The finding that CARP3 interacts with several adenylate cyclases in addition to ACP3 and 5 suggests that it may act as a node for signal perception via cAMP signalling. It is established that procyclic forms respond chemotactically to other effectors20,21, but their identities are unknown. Chemotaxis may also explain how parasites in the mammalian host disperse from the bloodstream into other tissues46–48. Finally, the concept that self-generated gradients help drive directionality and speed expansion into new territories, recently described for bacteria49, may also apply to trypanosomes.
Methods
Trypanosome stocks and culture conditions
Procyclic forms of EATRO1125 were derived from bloodstream forms of T. b. brucei AnTat1.150. Early procyclic forms were cultivated at 27 °C and 2.5% CO2 in DTM supplemented with 15% foetal bovine serum (FBS)51. Late procyclic forms were cultured in SDM7952 containing 10% FBS at 27 °C. Parasites were maintained at a density between 106 and 107 cells ml−1. Procyclic forms of T. b. brucei Lister 427 and derivatives thereof were cultured in SDM79 or SDM80 containing 10% FBS at 27 °C. SDM80 components were as described53, except that BME vitamin solution 100x (Bioconcept 5-20K00-H) was used instead of vitamin mix 100x (Invitrogen 010144) and 1% Pen/Strep stock solution (Bioconcept 4-01F00-H) was used instead of 0.1 mM kanamycin. Glucose-free SDM80 medium was supplemented with 10% FBS, which results in a final concentration of ~1 mM glucose. If indicated, SDM80 + 10% FBS was supplemented with 6 mM d-glucose or 6 mM N-Acetyl-d-glucosamine (GlcNAc) from a 1.2 M stock solution in water. Population doubling times were determined over a period of at least 5 days in which the cell density was determined daily.
SoMo assays and community lifts
The protocol to produce plates was adapted from Imhof and coworkers18. Plates were always used on the same day that they were poured. Culture medium (10 ml) supplemented with 0.4% agarose (Promega V3125) was poured into petri dishes (85 mm diameter). Open plates were then air-dried for 1 h in a laminar flow hood. Cells from an exponentially growing culture were centrifuged briefly and resuspended in the residual medium at a density of 4 × 107 cells ml−1. Two hundred thousand cells were spotted per inoculum; plates were sealed with parafilm and incubated in a humidified environment at 27 °C and 2.5% CO2. Photographs of plates were taken using a Nikon E8400 camera.
Community lifts for the detection of GPEET and EP procyclins were performed as described18, using nitrocellulose filters (Whatman Protran BA85), K1 rabbit anti-GPEET36 at a dilution of 1:1000 and TBRP1/247 mouse anti-EP (Cat. no. CLP001A, Cedarlane Laboratories, Burlington, Canada) at a dilution of 1:2500 as primary antibodies (1 h incubation time at room temperature). The secondary antibodies goat anti-mouse IRDye 800CW (LI-COR Biosciences, Bad Homburg, Germany) and goat anti-rabbit IRDye 680LT (LI-COR Biosciences) were used at dilutions of 1:10000 (1 h incubation time at room temperature). The filters were rinsed 3 times in TBS + 0.05% Tween (Sigma), followed by one final rinse in PBS before being dried overnight at room temperature and scanned on a LI-COR Odyssey Infrared Imager model 9120, using Odyssey Application Software, Version 3.0.21.
pH measurements on SoMo plates and in liquid cultures
To monitor pH changes in liquid culture and on agarose plates, trypanosomes were cultured in a humidified incubator at 27 °C and 2.5% CO2. SoMo plates were kept in the same incubator, without sealing the lids with parafilm. For analysis of growth rate and pH measurements, cells were maintained between 1–10 × 106 cells ml−1 by daily monitoring and dilution. “Log-phase” samples had densities of 3–9 × 106 cells ml−1. If not stated otherwise, “dense” samples were obtained from cultures with a concentration of 1–1.5 × 107 cells ml−1 without further dilution for 2 days. “Medium only” refers to complete medium incubated in a culture flask in a humidified incubator at 27 °C and 2.5% CO2 for at least 12 h. The pH of culture supernatants or SoMo plates was measured using a microelectrode (Thermo Scientific™ Orion™ 9810BN Micro pH Electrode; fisher scientific).
Preparation of concentrated supernatant
Early procyclic forms were grown until they reached a concentration of 3 × 107 cells ml−1. The cells were centrifuged for 5 min at 2500 g and the conditioned medium was transferred to a new tube. Conditioned medium was either concentrated directly or first sterile filtered (Jet Biofil syringe filter, 0.22 μm, REF: FVP203030K) or dialysed. 2 ml of conditioned medium were dialysed with dialysis tubing cellulose membranes (Sigma-Aldrich, cut-off 12 kDa, REF: D9777-100FT) against 50 ml DTM supplemented with 15% FBS at 4 °C in two rounds (16 h, then 12 h). To concentrate the conditioned medium, 1 ml was transferred into a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube and vacuum centrifuged for several hours until 100 μl remained in the tube. As a control, DTM only was concentrated in parallel.
pH taxis assay
Procyclic forms were inoculated onto plates as described for SoMo assays. Following incubation at 27 °C for four days, concentrates of 30 μl conditioned medium or medium only, or different chemical solutions were added to the plates at a distance of 1.5 cm from migrating projections (Fig. 3a, D = distance). The plates were sealed with parafilm and incubated at 27 °C for 16–20 h. Stock solutions were prepared at a concentration of 1 M, if not stated otherwise.
Hot phenol extraction of RNA from migrating tips
Plates containing semi-solid DTM medium were inoculated with 2 × 105 cells from a culture of procyclic form EATRO1125 (60–80% GPEET-positive). Following incubation for 6–7 days, tip and root samples were collected from projections that were ≥2.5 cm long. For collecting tips reacting to acid or alkali, 3 × 105 cells were seeded, incubated for 5 days and then 30 μl 1 M NaOH or 1 M HCl were added on two sides of migrating cells at a distance of 1.5 cm from the tips (Fig. 3a, D = distance). In total, between 70–100 tips of migrating projections, that were exposed to acidic or alkaline solutions for 16 h, were harvested. Only tips that clearly showed a reaction were collected (usually 5–7 tips per community).
Cells were harvested by punching out a piece of agarose using an inverted P2 micro tip (outer and inner diameters 6 and 4.5 mm, respectively). The tip subpopulation refers to the outermost 3 mm of protrusions. The root refers to the region at the base of the projection as shown in Fig. 4a. Between 20–25 tips or 3–5 root samples were transferred into 1 ml DTM in a 24-well plate well. Cells were washed off the agarose pieces by careful rinsing with a P1000 pipette and the cell suspension was transferred to a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube. The agarose pieces were rinsed once more with 0.5 ml DTM, added to the cell suspension and centrifuged for 2 min at 3300 × g. On average, approximately 1 × 105 cells were retrieved from each tip and 6 × 105 cells from each root sample. For tips reacting to acid or alkali, the wells of a 6-well plate contained a larger number of samples (up to 100 tips). In this case, the supernatant was carefully aspirated from the well and collected in a 15 ml Falcon tube and the agarose pieces were washed twice with 4 ml medium. The washes were added to the cells in the 15 ml Falcon tube and centrifuged for 5 min at 2500 × g. Cell pellets were resuspended in 50 µl residual medium and RNA was extracted with hot phenol as described54.
RNA-seq analysis
Total RNA (maximum 10 µg) was processed and used for Illumina sequencing as described previously17. Poly(A)-selected RNAs were used for the preparation of cDNA libraries using an Illumina TruSeq kit. Sequencing of cDNA libraries was performed at Fasteris, Geneva, using Illumina HiSeq sequencing systems with 150 bp read lengths and sequencing depths of approximately 20 million reads per sample. Reads were mapped to the T. b. brucei 927 reference genome version 5.1, using the bowtie2 tool available in the Galaxy Interface (usegalaxy.org) with default parameters that allow a maximum of 2 mismatches per 28 bp seed (Galaxy version 1.1.2). Read counts were extracted using “featureCounts” tool available in Galaxy using TritrypDB-41 GFF annotation file. DESeq2 analysis were performed to identify the differentially regulated genes and RPM values were calculated to estimate the transcripts abundance. Raw read files are deposited at the European Nucleotide Archives (ENA) http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena as study PRJEB41935.
Flow cytometry
Cells were fixed in 2% (w/v) PFA/PBS at 4 °C overnight at a concentration of 1 × 107 cells ml−1 and processed for flow cytometric analysis as previously described55,56. Rabbit antiserum α-GPEET K136 and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used at 1:1000 dilution in 2% BSA/PBS and incubated for 1.5 h at 4 °C with rotation. To remove particles of subcellular size, a cut-off of 7.5 × 105 was applied to the forward scatter. A total of ten thousand events were recorded using a ACEA NovoCyte flow cytometer and analysed without gating using FlowJo software version 7 & 10 (BD Life Sciences).
Determination of steady-state ATP levels
ATP concentrations were measured based on a previously described ATP production assay57. To measure steady-state ATP levels in whole cells, cells were washed twice in ice-cold PBS and resuspended in PBS at 2.5 × 107 cells ml−1. Denaturation with perchloric acid, precipitation and neutralisation with KOH was performed as described57. The cleared lysate was serially diluted 4-fold in H2O. Routinely, cells were harvested in triplicate and the second dilution of the cleared lysate (16-fold dilution) was used for the bioluminescence assay. For each replicate, ATP concentrations were measured in triplicate. ATP concentrations were determined using the ATP Bioluminescence Assay Kit CLS II (Roche 11699695001, from Sigma-Aldrich) according to manufacturer’s instructions. For each dilution, 10 µl was added to 40 µl of 0.5 M Tris-acetate, pH 7.75 and supplemented with luciferase reagent to a final volume of 100 µl. Titrations of the ATP standard supplied were analysed in parallel. Luminescence was measured in 96-well microtitre plates (opaque, non-binding) using a Turner BioSystems Modulus Microplate Luminometer, Model 9300-001. Signals were integrated over 5 sec in steady-glo mode. Three readings per plate were acquired, with a period of 10 min. Values of the second reading were used for analysis, since only the second and third readings yielded stable signals.
Motility assays
Cultures were allowed to grow to a density between 4–7 × 106 cells ml−1 and adjusted to a final concentration of 5 × 106 prior to the experiment. These cells (in medium) were placed into motility chambers58. To prevent cell adherence, the chamber was precoated with 1% poly l-glutamic acid (Fisher Scientific, P4886-25MG) for 1 h and washed twice with 70% EtOH. The chambers were then washed twice with 100 µl medium and once with cell suspension before loading 100 µl of cells at a concentration of 5 × 106 cells ml−1. The edges of the coverslip were sealed to avoid evaporation and capillary flow of liquid. Time lapse movies were recorded at 200 ms, with 250 cycles and ×10 magnification with a Leica DM 5500B microscope. The dataset was analysed with a tracking macro provided by Richard Wheeler, University of Oxford59. Velocity, speed, and individual cell tracks were plotted using Fiji version 1.060 and Prism Version 6.
Immunoprecipitation and proteomic analysis
Isolation of HA-tagged protein complexes was performed as previously described61 using the addback cell line expressing CARP3-HA, or derivatives expressing CARP3-HA and either ACP3-myc or ACP5-myc. Myc-tagged proteins were immunoprecipitated with 5 µg monoclonal antibody 9E10 (Cat No: MA1-980) and Dynabeads™ Pan Mouse IgG (Cat No: 11041), both from ThermoFisher Scientific (Invitrogen). Isolated protein complexes were subjected to Western blot analysis, or protein bands were cut from Coomassie-stained polyacrylamide gels, subjected to trypsin digestion and proteins were identified by LC-tandem mass spectometry62 at the Proteomics and Mass Spectrometry Core Facility of the University of Bern.
Generation of knockouts and addbacks
Single knockouts, double knockouts and tagged addbacks used for all in vitro experiments were generated in the parental 427 Cas9 cell line29. The CARP3 double knockout used for fly experiments was generated in T. b. brucei Lister 42736 using transiently expressed Cas9 and T7 RNA polymerase39. An addback ectopically expressing CARP3 was derived from the null mutant. Targeting cassettes were amplified from pPOTv7-hygromycin and pPOTv7-G41863 plasmids. The primers used for PCR amplification of the targeting fragments and the sgRNA templates were designed using LeishGEdit. These primers and the primers used for genotyping PCRs can be found in Supplementary Data 3. The knockouts and the addback were verified by PCR (Supplementary Data 3). To generate addbacks, HA-tagged and untagged versions of CARP3 were cloned into the pGAPRONE-ΔLII64 derivate pG-mcs-puro65, linearised with Spe I and integrated upstream of a procyclin locus on chromosome 6. Transfection was performed as described previously66 using TbBSF transfection buffer67. Stable transformants were selected using 15 μg ml−1 Geneticin G418 sulphate, 25 μg ml−1 hygromycin and 1 μg ml−1 puromycin.
Immunofluorescence analysis (IFA) of HA- and or Myc-tagged cells
Cells were harvested at a density of 2–5 × 106 cells and then washed once with PBS. They were left to settle on a coverslip for 20 min and then fixed with 4% PFA in PBS for 4 min. After removing the supernatant, the cells were permeabilized with Triton-x 100 diluted to 0.2% in PBS for 5 min and the liquid was aspirated. The samples were blocked in PBS + 4% BSA for 1 h at RT. The primary antibodies (monoclonal α-HA rat 3F10 and monoclonal α-myc mouse 9E10, from Roche, distributed by Sigma Aldrich) were diluted 1:1000 and 1:500 respectively in PBS + 0.4% BSA and the samples incubated for 1 h at RT. The cells were then washed 3 times with PBS and the supernatant aspirated after every washing step. They were then incubated with the secondary antibodies AlexaFluor 488 conjugated donkey α-rat (Life Technologies) and AlexaFluor 488 conjugated goat α-mouse (Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher) both diluted 1:2000 in PBS + 0.4% BSA for 1 h at RT. The samples were then washed 3 times as described for the primary antibodies and incubated with Hoechst 33342 (20 μg/ml) diluted 1:500 in PBS for 2 min. After three washing steps, the cover slips were mounted on microscope slides with Mowiol and imaged with a Leica DM 5500B microscope with a ×100 objective. The acquired images were processed with Fiji60.
Fly infections
Glossina morsitans morsitans pupae were purchased from the Department of Entomology, Slovak Academy of Science, Bratislava, Slovakia or were a kind gift from Jan van den Abbeele, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium. Teneral flies were infected by membrane feeding with 2.5 × 106 parasites ml−1 and maintained on horse blood as described36, except that pupae and flies were kept at 24 °C, 65–70% humidity, rather than 27 °C in the original protocol. Flies were dissected and midgut infections were analysed on days 13 and 14 post-infection. The intensities of infections were graded as described36.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
Berta Pozzi, Stephanie DeMarco and Boris Striepen are thanked for stimulating discussions and constructive comments on the manuscript. We are indebted to Jan van den Abbeele, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp for a gift of tsetse pupae. This research was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation to I.R. (Grant numbers 310030_184669 and 31003A_166427) and the Canton of Bern.
Source data
Author contributions
S.S., S.K., A.N., D.A. and I.R. conceived, designed and conducted experiments. R.E. and M.B. conducted experiments. S.S., S.K., A.N., D.A., M.B., R.E. and I.R. analysed the data. S.S. and I.R. wrote the paper.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Data availability
The RNA-seq data generated in this study have been deposited at the European Nucleotide Archives (ENA) under accession code PRJEB41935. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE68 partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD030766. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Sebastian Knüsel, Daniel Abbühl, Arunasalam Naguleswaran.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-022-28293-w.
References
- 1.Aframian N, Eldar A. A bacterial tower of babel: quorum-sensing signaling diversity and its evolution. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2020;74:587–606. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-012220-063740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yang W, Briegel A. Diversity of bacterial chemosensory arrays. Trends Microbiol. 2020;28:68–80. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2019.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Daniels R, Vanderleyden J, Michiels J. Quorum sensing and swarming migration in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2004;28:261–289. doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2003.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Burkart M, Toguchi A, Harshey RM. The chemotaxis system, but not chemotaxis, is essential for swarming motility in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:2568–2573. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.5.2568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tyson JJ, Murray JD. Cyclic AMP waves during aggregation of Dictyostelium amoebae. Development. 1989;106:421–426. doi: 10.1242/dev.106.3.421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tomchik KJ, Devreotes PN. Adenosine 3’,5’-monophosphate waves in Dictyostelium discoideum: a demonstration by isotope dilution-fluorography. Science. 1981;212:443–446. doi: 10.1126/science.6259734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Maeda M, et al. Periodic signaling controlled by an oscillatory circuit that includes protein kinases ERK2 and PKA. Science. 2004;304:875–878. doi: 10.1126/science.1094647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang M, Aerts RJ, Spek W, Schaap P. Cell cycle phase in Dictyostelium discoideum is correlated with the expression of cyclic AMP production, detection, and degradation. Involvement of cyclic AMP signaling in cell sorting. Dev. Biol. 1988;125:410–416. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(88)90221-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kahn S, et al. Trypanosoma cruzi amastigote adhesion to macrophages is facilitated by the mannose receptor. J. Exp. Med. 1995;182:1243–1258. doi: 10.1084/jem.182.5.1243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kanjee, U. et al. Plasmodium vivax strains use alternative pathways for invasion. J. Infect. Dis. 10.1093/infdis/jiaa592 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 11.Kedzierski L, et al. A leucine-rich repeat motif of Leishmania parasite surface antigen 2 binds to macrophages through the complement receptor 3. J. Immunol. 2004;172:4902–4906. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.8.4902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Xing M, et al. A sialic acid-binding protein SABP1 of Toxoplasma gondii mediates host cell attachment and Invasion. J. Infect. Dis. 2020;222:126–135. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Reuner B, Vassella E, Yutzy B, Boshart M. Cell density triggers slender to stumpy differentiation of Trypanosoma brucei bloodstream forms in culture. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 1997;90:269–280. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(97)00160-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Vassella E, Reuner B, Yutzy B, Boshart M. Differentiation of African trypanosomes is controlled by a density sensing mechanism which signals cell cycle arrest via the cAMP pathway. J. Cell Sci. 1997;110:2661–2671. doi: 10.1242/jcs.110.21.2661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rico E, et al. Bloodstream form pre-adaptation to the tsetse fly in Trypanosoma brucei. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2013;3:78. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vassella E, et al. A major surface glycoprotein of trypanosoma brucei is expressed transiently during development and can be regulated post-transcriptionally by glycerol or hypoxia. Genes Dev. 2000;14:615–626. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Naguleswaran A, Doiron N, Roditi I. RNA-Seq analysis validates the use of culture-derived Trypanosoma brucei and provides new markers for mammalian and insect life-cycle stages. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:227. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4600-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Imhof S, Knüsel S, Gunasekera K, Vu XL, Roditi I. Social motility of African trypanosomes is a property of a distinct life-cycle stage that occurs early in tsetse fly transmission. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004493. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Oberholzer M, Lopez MA, McLelland BT, Hill KL. Social motility in african trypanosomes. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000739. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Eliaz D, et al. Exosome secretion affects social motility in Trypanosoma brucei. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13:e1006245. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.DeMarco, S. F., Saada, E. A., Lopez, M. A. & Hill, K. L. Identification of positive chemotaxis in the protozoan pathogen Trypanosoma brucei. mSphere5, e00685-20 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 22.Diaz E, et al. Effect of aliphatic, monocarboxylic, dicarboxylic, heterocyclic and sulphur-containing amino acids on Leishmania spp. chemotaxis. Parasitology. 2015;142:1621–1630. doi: 10.1017/S003118201500116X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pozzo LY, et al. Studying taxis in real time using optical tweezers: applications for Leishmania amazonensis parasites. Micron. 2009;40:617–620. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2009.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Barros VC, Oliveira JS, Melo MN, Gontijo NF. Leishmania amazonensis: chemotaxic and osmotaxic responses in promastigotes and their probable role in development in the phlebotomine gut. Exp. Parasitol. 2006;112:152–157. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2005.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Findlay, R. C. et al. High-speed, three-dimensional imaging reveals chemotactic behaviour specific to human-infective Leishmania parasites. Elife10, e65051 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 26.Lopez MA, Saada EA, Hill KL. Insect stage-specific adenylate cyclases regulate social motility in African trypanosomes. Eukaryot. Cell. 2015;14:104–112. doi: 10.1128/EC.00217-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Imhof S, Vu XL, Bütikofer P, Roditi I. A glycosylation mutant of Trypanosoma brucei links social motility defects in vitro to impaired colonization of tsetse flies in vivo. Eukaryot. Cell. 2015;14:588–592. doi: 10.1128/EC.00023-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jelk J, et al. Glycoprotein biosynthesis in a eukaryote lacking the membrane protein Rft1. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:20616–20623. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.479642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shaw, S. et al. Flagellar cAMP signaling controls trypanosome progression through host tissues. Nat. Commun. 10, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Liniger M, et al. Cleavage of trypanosome surface glycoproteins by alkaline trypsin-like enzyme(s) in the midgut of Glossina morsitans. Int. J. Parasitol. 2003;33:1319–1328. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(03)00182-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bringaud F, Ebikeme C, Boshart M. Acetate and succinate production in amoebae, helminths, diplomonads, trichomonads and trypanosomatids: common and diverse metabolic strategies used by parasitic lower eukaryotes. Parasitology. 2010;137:1315–1331. doi: 10.1017/S0031182009991843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Besteiro S, et al. Succinate secreted by Trypanosoma brucei is produced by a novel and unique glycosomal enzyme, NADH-dependent fumarate reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:38001–38012. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M201759200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lee MG, Bihain BE, Russell DG, Deckelbaum RJ, Van der Ploeg LH. Characterization of a cDNA encoding a cysteine-rich cell surface protein located in the flagellar pocket of the protozoan Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1990;10:4506–4517. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.9.4506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Affolter M, Hemphill A, Roditi I, Müller N, Seebeck T. The repetitive microtubule-associated proteins MARP-1 and MARP-2 of Trypanosoma brucei. J. Struct. Biol. 1994;112:241–251. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1994.1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ebikeme CE, et al. N-acetyl D-glucosamine stimulates growth in procyclic forms of Trypanosoma brucei by inducing a metabolic shift. Parasitology. 2008;135:585–594. doi: 10.1017/S0031182008004241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ruepp S, et al. Survival of Trypanosoma brucei in the tsetse fly is enhanced by the expression of specific forms of procyclin. J. Cell Biol. 1997;137:1369–1379. doi: 10.1083/jcb.137.6.1369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zheng B, Yao H, Lee GS. Inactivation of the gene encoding the flagellar pocket protein, CRAM, in African trypanosomes. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 1999;100:235–242. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(99)00048-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gould MK, et al. Cyclic AMP effectors in African trypanosomes revealed by genome-scale RNA interference library screening for resistance to the phosphodiesterase inhibitor CpdA. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013;57:4882–4893. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00508-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shaw S, Knüsel S, Hoenner S, Roditi I. A transient CRISPR/Cas9 expression system for genome editing in Trypanosoma brucei. BMC Res. Notes. 2020;13:268. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05089-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Naguleswaran A, et al. Developmental changes and metabolic reprogramming during establishment of infection and progression of Trypanosoma brucei brucei through its insect host. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021;15:e0009504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Saada EA, et al. Insect stage-specific receptor adenylate cyclases are localized to distinct subdomains of the Trypanosoma brucei Flagellar membrane. Eukaryot. Cell. 2014;13:1064–1076. doi: 10.1128/EC.00019-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wright MH, Paape D, Price HP, Smith DF, Tate EW. Global profiling and inhibition of protein lipidation in vector and host stages of the sleeping sickness parasite Trypanosoma brucei. ACS Infect. Dis. 2016;2:427–441. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.6b00034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kwon, H., Choi, M., Ahn, Y. & Pak, Y. N-myristoylation regulates insulin-induced phosphorylation and ubiquitination of Caveolin-2 for insulin signaling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.08.072 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 44.Vélez-Ramírez, D. E. et al. APEX2 proximity proteomics resolves flagellum subdomains and identifies flagellum tip-specific proteins in Trypanosoma brucei. mSphere6, e01090 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 45.Rose C, et al. Trypanosoma brucei colonizes the tsetse gut via an immature peritrophic matrix in the proventriculus. Nat. Microbiol. 2020;5:909–916. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0707-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Caljon G, et al. The dermis as a delivery site of Trypanosoma brucei for Tsetse flies. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12:e1005744. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Capewell, P. et al. The skin is a significant but overlooked anatomical reservoir for vector-borne African trypanosomes. Elife5, e17716 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 48.Trindade S, et al. Trypanosoma brucei parasites occupy and functionally adapt to the adipose tissue in mice. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;19:837–848. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cremer J, et al. Chemotaxis as a navigation strategy to boost range expansion. Nature. 2019;575:658–663. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1733-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Le Ray D, Barry JD, Easton C, Vickerman K. First tsetse fly transmission of the ‘AnTat’ serodeme of Trypanosoma brucei. Ann. Soc. Belg. Med. Trop. (1920). 1977;57:369–381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Overath P, Czichos J, Haas C. The effect of citrate/cis-aconitate on oxidative metabolism during transformation of Trypanosoma brucei. Eur. J. Biochem. 1986;160:175–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb09955.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Brun R, Schönenberger. Cultivation and in vitro cloning or procyclic culture forms of Trypanosoma brucei in a semi-defined medium. Short communication. Acta Trop. 1979;36:289–292. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lamour N, et al. Proline metabolism in procyclic Trypanosoma brucei is down-regulated in the presence of glucose. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:11902–11910. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M414274200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Roditi I, Carrington M, Turner M. Expression of a polypeptide containing a dipeptide repeat is confined to the insect stage of Trypanosoma brucei. Nature. 1987;325:272–274. doi: 10.1038/325272a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Roditi I, et al. Procyclin gene expression and loss of the variant surface glycoprotein during differentiation of Trypanosoma brucei. J. Cell Biol. 1989;108:737–746. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.2.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Knüsel S, Roditi I. Insights into the regulation of GPEET procyclin during differentiation from early to late procyclic forms of Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2013;191:66–74. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2013.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Allemann N, Schneider A. ATP production in isolated mitochondria of procyclic Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2000;111:87–94. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(00)00303-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Gadelha C, Wickstead B, de Souza W, Gull K, Cunha-e-Silva N. Cryptic paraflagellar rod in endosymbiont-containing kinetoplastid protozoa. Eukaryot. Cell. 2005;4:516–525. doi: 10.1128/EC.4.3.516-525.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wheeler RJ. Use of chiral cell shape to ensure highly directional swimming in trypanosomes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017;13:e1005353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Schindelin J, et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Florini F, Naguleswaran A, Gharib WH, Bringaud F, Roditi I. Unexpected diversity in eukaryotic transcription revealed by the retrotransposon hotspot family of Trypanosoma brucei. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:1725–1739. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Al Kaabi A, Traupe T, Stutz M, Buchs N, Heller M. Cause or effect of arteriogenesis: compositional alterations of microparticles from CAD patients undergoing external counterpulsation therapy. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e46822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Beneke T, et al. A CRISPR Cas9 high-throughput genome editing toolkit for kinetoplastids. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2017;4:170095. doi: 10.1098/rsos.170095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Furger A, Schürch N, Kurath U, Roditi I. Elements in the 3’ untranslated region of procyclin mRNA regulate expression in insect forms of Trypanosoma brucei by modulating RNA stability and translation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997;17:4372–4380. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.8.4372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Furger A, Jungi TW, Salomone JY, Weynants V, Roditi I. Stable expression of biologically active recombinant bovine interleukin-4 in Trypanosoma brucei. FEBS Lett. 2001;508:90–94. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(01)03031-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Burkard G, Fragoso CM, Roditi I. Highly efficient stable transformation of bloodstream forms of Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2007;153:220–223. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2007.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Schumann Burkard G, Jutzi P, Roditi I. Genome-wide RNAi screens in bloodstream form trypanosomes identify drug transporters. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2011;175:91–94. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2010.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Perez-Riverol Y, et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D442–D450. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. 1995;57:289–300. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The RNA-seq data generated in this study have been deposited at the European Nucleotide Archives (ENA) under accession code PRJEB41935. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE68 partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD030766. Source data are provided with this paper.