Skip to main content
Eye logoLink to Eye
. 2021 May 26;36(2):350–351. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01531-z

Infographic: Effect of face-down positioning vs support-the-break positioning after macula-involving retinal detachment repair: the PostRD randomised clinical trial

Salman Naveed Sadiq 1, Alexander Mehta 2, Anna Song 2, Ali Ghareeb 2, Mohaimen Al-Zubaidy 2, Islam Mostafa 2, Declan C Murphy 2, Nikolaos Tzoumas 2, David H Steel 2,
PMCID: PMC8807849  PMID: 34040187

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

This PostRD trial involving patients with macula involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachment showed that face-down positioning led to a reduction in the rate and amplitude of postoperative retinal displacement and binocular diplopia in comparison with support-the-break positioning. However, no differences were found in best-corrected visual acuity, distortion and quality of life scores between the groups. RRD rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, LA local anesthesia, ITT intention-to-treat, ERM epiretinal membrane, BCVA best-corrected visual acuity, FAF fundus autofluorescence imaging, QoL quality of life, IOP intraocular pressure.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Reference

  • 1.Casswell EJ, Yorston D, Lee E, Heeren TF, Harris N, Zvobgo TM, et al. Effect of face-down positioning vs support-the-break positioning after macula-involving retinal detachment repair: the PostRD randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020;138:634–42. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.0997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Eye are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES