Abstract
Cache Valley virus (CVV) is a mosquito-borne virus in the genus Orthobunyavirus, family Peribunyaviridae. It was first isolated from a Culiseta inorata mosquito in Cache Valley, Utah in 1956 and is known to circulate widely in the Americas. While only a handful of human cases have been reported since its discovery, it is the causative agent of fetal death and severe malformations in livestock. CVV has recently emerged as a potential viral pathogen causing severe disease in humans. Currently, the only serological assay available for diagnostic testing is plaque reduction neutralization test which takes several days to perform and requires biocontainment. To expand diagnostic capacity to detect CVV infections by immunoassays, 12 hybridoma clones secreting anti-CVV murine monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) were developed. All MAbs developed were found to be non-neutralizing and specific to the nucleoprotein of CVV. Cross-reactivity experiments with related orthobunyaviruses revealed several of the MAbs reacted with Tensaw, Fort Sherman, Tlacotalpan, Maguari, Playas, and Potosi viruses. Our data shows that MAbs CVV14, CVV15, CVV17, and CVV18 have high specific reactivity as a detector in an IgM antibody capture test with human sera.
Author summary
Cache Valley virus is a mosquito-borne virus found throughout the Americas. It causes fetal death and severe malformations in livestock, and only a few cases of human viral disease have been identified. Currently, we do not fully understand the spectrum of disease in humans including its potential to cause fetal malformations. The only serological diagnostic assay available to detect recent viral infection is plaque reduction neutralization test which requires the use of live virus in biocontainment. In order to develop faster and safer serodiagnostics we generated 12 monoclonal antibodies for incorporation into new assays. These antibodies are specific to the nucleoprotein of the virus and cross-react with other closely related mosquito-borne viruses. Four of these antibodies were incorporated into an immunoassay for the detection of IgM from human sera demonstrating their utility in serodiagnosis. Rapid and higher throughput assays utilizing these antibodies will expand diagnostic capacity and facilitate research to increase our understanding of Cache Valley disease prevalence and the virus’s impact on at-risk populations.
Introduction
Cache Valley virus (CVV) is a member of the Bunyamwera serogroup in the genus Orthobunyavirus, family Peribunyaviridae. Subtypes of CVV include Tlacotalpan and Cholul viruses found in Mexico. Other viruses in the Bunyamwera serogroup of medical importance related to CVV include Maguari and Fort Sherman viruses [1–3]. CVV was first isolated from a Culiseta inorata mosquito in Cache Valley, Utah in 1956 [4]. Since then, it has been isolated from several mosquito species and mammals throughout the Americas and is considered the most widely distributed member of the Bunyamwera serogroup [1,2,5].
Orthobunyaviruses have a tripartite single stranded RNA genome encoding three structural proteins. The nucleocapsid (N) protein is approximately 23–27 kilodalton (kDa) in size and encapsidates the segmented genome together with several copies of the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. The nucleocapsid core is surrounded by a lipid bilayer with viral glycoproteins, Gc (108–125 kDa) and Gn (29–41 kDa), displayed on the surface of the virion. These glycoproteins are involved in receptor-mediated endocytosis and viral-cell membrane fusion [6].
While the virus transmission cycle is not well characterized, serosurveillance studies have shown exposure to CVV occurring in domestic animals including sheep, horses, and cattle across North America [7,8]. Anti-CVV neutralizing antibody (Ab) in sheep was found to be as high as 28% and 64.6% in the U.S. and Saskatchewan, Canada, respectively [7,8]. CVV infection in sheep has been shown to be the causative agent of congenital malformations and fetal death [9]. Several studies demonstrate ovine CVV infection in utero compromises the musculoskeletal and central nervous systems [9–12].
The evidence of CVV infection incidence in humans is documented in serosurveys conducted throughout North and Central America with seroprevalence recorded as low as 3% and as high as 18% among populations sampled [13–15]. Less than 10 human cases of severe Cache Valley disease have been documented. At least five of these cases caused severe neurological symptoms including meningitis and encephalitis. Often in cases of human CVV infection, a positive diagnosis was the result of virus isolation from cerebral spinal fluid or blood [3,16–20]. While the teratogenicity of CVV in humans is unknown, serologic studies conducted retrospectively from specimens collected from women post-partum (n = 500) in the early 1960s showed anti-CVV Abs were significantly higher in those women who had given birth to newborns with macrocephaly [21].
While CVV exposure may be more common than clinical disease, this discrepancy may in fact be due to the lack of diagnostic testing conducted. Currently, no commercial diagnostic test or kit is available for the detection of CVV. Molecular assays such as reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) have been developed, but because of the potential for transient viremia in orthobunyaviral infections, cases of CVV may be missed [22]. Serological techniques for diagnosis are limited to plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) which requires a dedicated biosafety laboratory for work with live virus, and positive titers in one sample cannot indicate the timing of infection. Rapid immunoassays, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or multiplex immunoassay (MIA) for faster serological detection of IgM Abs present early in infection, are needed to overcome the limitations of PRNT. Additionally, immunoassays for the detection of IgG Abs can aid in identification of past CVV infections for increased serosurveillance. The limitation in these assays is that they all require monoclonal Abs (MAbs) in their design. IgM antibody capture ELISA (MAC-ELISA) requires a virus-specific MAb-enzyme conjugate as a detector, while IgG ELISA uses a virus-specific MAb to capture and present antigen for the detection of anti-viral IgG.
To our knowledge, no MAbs reactive to CVV have been described. Therefore, our objective was to develop anti-CVV MAbs for inclusion in diagnostic immunoassays for the detection of both recent and prior infections and for use in future studies to assess the disease burden of CVV in the United States. Here, we report the development and characterization of 12 murine MAbs for future application. All MAbs developed were non-neutralizing and reactive with CVV in ELISA formats. Several of these MAbs were cross-reactive with related orthobunyaviruses including Tensaw, Fort Sherman, Tlacotalpan, Maguari, Playas, and Potosi viruses. In preliminary experiments, four MAbs showed their potential to function as a detector in a MAC-ELISA format for detection of anti-CVV IgM from human sera.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
Ethics approval for use of previously collected human diagnostic specimens was obtained from CDC’s Human Subjects Institutional Review Board (CDC IRB# 6773). All specimens were delinked from any personal identifiers prior to the commencement of this study.
Mice were handled as specified by the Division of Vector-Borne Diseases Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee recommendations (Protocol #19–003).
Viruses, cell lines, and diagnostic specimens
CVV strain W1-03BS7669 (genotype 1), Tensaw virus (TENV) strain A9-171B, Tlacotalpan virus (TLAV) strain 61D240, Fort Sherman virus (FSV) strain 86MSP18, Maguari virus (MAGV) strain BeAr7272, Playas virus (PLAV) strain 75V5938, Potosi virus (POTV) strain IL94-1921, and La Crosse virus (LACV) strain Original were obtained from the Arboviral Diseases Branch (ADB), Reference and Reagent Laboratory (Fort Collins, CO, USA). CVV stock was grown in Vero cells to a titer of 5.0 × 107 plaque forming units per mL (PFU/mL). Vero cells were grown in DMEM (Cat# 11965118, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Cat# 1500-500G, VWR, Radnor, PA, USA), 2 mM L-glutamine (Cat# 25030–081 Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), 0.15% sodium bicarbonate (Cat# 25080–094, Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA), 100 U/mL penicillin G sodium, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Cat # 15140–122, Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA) at 37°C in 5% CO2. CVV was purified on glycerol tartrate gradients and protein concentration was determined by Bradford assay (Cat# 5000006, Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, USA) as previously described [23]. These purified stocks were used in subsequent serologic assays. The mouse myeloma cell line, P3X63Ag8.653, used for hybridoma fusions was grown in ClonaCell-HY Medium A (Cat# 03801, StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) at 37°C in 5% CO2.
One human serum sample positive for CVV (confirmed by PRNT with 90% endpoint cut off (PRNT90) with an endpoint titer of 1:1280) and eight other human serum samples positive for other arboviral diseases with no indication of a recent CVV infection were obtained from the ADB’s Diagnostic lab for evaluation of MAbs’ performance in the MAC-ELISA format. Pooled negative human sera (NHS) (Cat# S1-100ML, EMD Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) was used as a negative control and confirmed to have no reactivity to several arboviruses, including CVV, by PRNT90.
Animal studies
AG129 mice deficient in interferon (IFN) α/β and γ receptors were originally obtained from B&K Universal (Hull, United Kingdom) and bred in-house. Virulence of CVV in 6-week-old AG129 mice was evaluated by inoculating five groups of mice (n = 6) intraperitoneally (IP) with 10-fold dilutions of virus (103 to 10−1 PFU/0.1 mL). After challenge, mice were monitored four times per day for signs of morbidity (hunched posture, ruffled fur, and neurological signs) for four weeks. Mice that showed signs of morbidity were euthanized immediately. Fifty percent IP lethal dose endpoints (IP LD50) were calculated as previously described [24]. The first immunization of surviving mice (n = 4) inoculated in the 10 PFU group were immunized with 25 μg β-propiolactone inactivated CVV and Magic Mouse adjuvant (Cat# CDN-A001, Creative Diagnostics, Shirley, NY, USA). This immunization occurred 38 days after viral challenge and was considered day 0 in the immunization timeline. The final boost before hybridoma fusions was performed 81 days after the first immunization. Sera was collected 31 days post-viral challenge and 35-, 66-, and 85- days post-immunization (PI) from the first inoculation of inactivated virus and adjuvant.
Hybridoma fusions, clone selection, and MAb purification
At day of harvest, mice were anesthetized under 1–4% isoflurane by inhalation, and euthanasia was carried out by cervical dislocation. Splenocytes from vaccinated mice were harvested four days after the last inoculation. Electrofusions with the mouse myeloma cell line P3X63Ag8.653 were performed with the ECM2001 electrofusion system (BTX, Holliston, MA, USA) in glass microslides with a 10 mm gap according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After 48 hours of recovery, fused cells were plated in ClonaCell-HY hybridoma semi-solid selection medium (Cat# 03804, StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) containing anti-mouse IgG (H+L) CloneDetect (Cat# K8220, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and incubated for 10 days at 37°C in 5% CO2. Clones expressing anti-mouse IgG were identified and picked with the ClonePix2 automated colony picker (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Clones were grown in 96-well plates in ClonaCell-HY hybridoma medium containing hypoxanthine and thymidine (Cat# 03805, StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada). Positive clones were selected after screening hybridoma supernatant by ELISA and expanded in CD hybridoma medium (Cat#11279023, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 2% low IgG FBS (Cat# 16250078, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Up to 500 mL of hybridoma supernatant was concentrated using centrifugal concentrators (Cat# UFC710008, Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA) with a 100 kDa cut off and dialyzed overnight in 0.1M phosphate buffer. MAbs were purified using protein-A Sepharose (Cat# 101041, GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. MAb concentrations were determined using a NanoDrop ND1000 spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
Isotyping assay
Ab isotypes were determined using the Antibody Isotyping 7-Plex Mouse ProcartaPlex kit (Cat# EPX070-20815-901, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Enzyme linked-immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
All ELISAs were performed in 96-well plates (Cat# 44-2404-21, Nunc Maxisorp plates, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Plates were coated either with 0.25 μg/well of purified CVV or anti-CVV rabbit polyclonal Ab (Lot# A43977, available upon request from ADB, Reference and Reagent Laboratory, Fort Collins, CO, USA) diluted 1:500 in carbonate/bicarbonate buffer (50 mM sodium carbonate, 50 mM sodium bicarbonate, pH 9.6) and incubated overnight at 4°C. Plates were washed five times with PBS/0.1% Tween wash buffer with an automatic plate washer. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked with Pierce Starting Block (PBS) blocking buffer (Cat# 37538, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) (100 μL/well) and immediately removed. To plates coated with anti-CVV rabbit polyclonal sera, 0.25 μg/well of purified CVV was added (50 μL/well) and incubated on the plates for two hours at 37°C, after which the plates were washed as previously described. Purified MAbs starting at 104 ng/mL or mouse sera starting at a 1:100 dilution in PBS were added in 4-fold dilutions (50 μL/well) and incubated for one hour at 37°C. Plates were washed five times before the addition of goat anti-mouse Ab conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Cat# 115-035-062, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA) (50 μL/well), diluted 1:5000 in 5% skim milk/PBS. After an incubation period of one hour at 37°C, plates were washed again 10 times. Enhanced K-blue TMB substrate (Cat# 308175, Neogen, Lansing, MI, USA) was added to each well of the plate (100 μL/well) and incubated in the dark at room temperature for 10 minutes. The reaction was stopped with the addition of 2N H2SO4 (50 μL/well), and the plates were read at 450 nm. Binding curves were generated by a 4-parameter non-linear regression dose response with the bottom of the curve constrained to 0 and used to calculate the half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) values of each MAb using GraphPad Prism V6.
Immunoblot
CVV proteins from a purified virus preparation were separated by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) on 4–12% Bis-Tris gels (Cat# NP0335PK2, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) under reduced (DTT (Cat# NP0004, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA)) and non-reduced conditions. Proteins were electrophoretically blotted from the gels onto nitrocellulose membranes (Cat# 88014, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and washed for 15 minutes in PBS/0.1% Tween wash buffer. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS overnight at 4°C. Sera taken from vaccinated mice (diluted 1:100 in PBS) and purified MAbs (50 μg/mL) were incubated with the membrane for one hour with gentle rocking. Membranes were washed again in PBS/0.1% Tween wash buffer three times for five minutes each. Goat anti-mouse Ab conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (Cat# 115-055-062, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA) was diluted 1:200 in 3% BSA/PBS and incubated on the membrane for one hour with gentle rocking. Membranes were washed as described previously, and BCIP/NBT phosphatase substrate (Cat# 5420–0038, SeraCare, Milford, MA, USA) was added to the membrane until a color change appeared. The reaction was stopped by the addition of water. CVV strain 6V633 mouse-hyperimmune ascitic fluid (MHIAF) (lot# M3233, available upon request from ADB, Reference and Reagent Laboratory, Fort Collins, CO, USA) was used as a positive control to detect all viral proteins while PBS alone was used as a negative control to detect nonspecific binding of the Ab conjugate to viral protein.
Plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT)
To assess neutralization activity, purified MAbs and mouse sera were tested in duplicate in PRNT with CVV. About 100 PFU of CVV strain W1-03BS7669 were incubated with equal amounts of serial 2-fold dilutions of purified MAb starting at 104 ng/mL for one hour at 37°C. Sera were diluted 1:5 in BA1 (Hanks M-199 salts (Cat# M9163, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 0.05 M Tris pH 7.6 (Cat# 15567027, Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA), 1% bovine serum albumin (Cat# 81-066-4, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), 0.35 g/L sodium bicarbonate (Cat# 25080–094, Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA), 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 mg/L streptomycin (Cat # 15140–122, Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA), 1 mg/L fungizone (Cat# SV30078.01, Hyclone, Marlborough, MA, USA), and heat inactivated at 56°C for 30 minutes before mixing with virus as described above. Six-well plates of Vero cells were then inoculated with the virus–Ab mixtures and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for one hour after which cells were overlaid with 3 mL of medium containing 1% SeaKem LE agarose (Cat# 50004, Lonza, Rockland, ME, USA) in nutrient medium (0.165% lactalbumin hydrolysate (Cat# 259962, VWR, Radnor, PA, USA), 0.033% yeast extract (Cat#212750, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), Earle’s balanced salt solution, and 2% FBS). After incubation at 37°C for two days a second overlay containing an additional 80 μg/mL of neutral red vital stain (Cat# 091691149, MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, USA) was added. Plaques were counted three days after infection and percent neutralization was calculated based on input virus titer. Virus neutralization curves were generated by a 4-parameter non-linear regression dose response used to calculate the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of each MAb using GraphPad Prism V6 with the bottom and top of the curves constrained to 0 and 100, respectively.
Immunofluorescence assay (IFA)
To determine the cross-reactivity of anti-CVV MAbs with other orthobunyaviruses, Vero cells grown on coverslip slides were infected at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1.0 with viruses mentioned previously, and cells were fixed 24 hours later with cold 70% acetone in PBS for 10 minutes. Purified CVV MAbs diluted to 10 μg/mL were added (20 μL/well) and incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. MHIAFs generated against each orthobunyavirus were diluted 1:500 in PBS (CVV MHIAF (Lot# M32331-13), TENV MHIAF (Lot# A4862-1Aby), TLAV MHIAF (Lot# M8158A/Aby), FSV MHIAF (Lot# M27862Aby), MAGV MHIAF (Lot# PR102130-Aby), PLAV MHIAF (Lot# M15472-1Aby), POTV MHIAF (Lot# M25656A/Aby), and LACV MHIAF (Lot# M30177Aby) available upon request from ADB, Reference and Reagent Laboratory, Fort Collins, CO, USA) and used as a positive control on cells infected with the homologous virus (S2 Fig). A purified anti-alphavirus IgG2b MAb was used as a negative Ab control (NAC) to detect nonspecific binding of the Ab conjugate to virus-infected cells (S2 Fig). Slides were washed three times in PBS and allowed to dry before goat anti-mouse conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (Cat# 115-095-062, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA) diluted 1:100 in PBS was added (20 μL/well) and incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. As another control, uninfected cells grown on coverslips were fixed and stained with each MAb and control Ab as previously described (S2 Fig). Slides were washed and mounted with ProLong Gold antifade reagent with DAPI (Cat# P36931, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and examined on a LSM 800 laser scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
IgM-antibody capture pilot ELISA (MAC-ELISA)
The MAbs with the highest reactivities in the indirect and capture ELISAs were tested for their preliminary performance as detector Abs in the MAC-ELISA format using one CVV positive human sera, eight human sera diagnosed with a recent infection of an unrelated arbovirus, and pooled negative human sera (NHS) used as a negative control. Goat anti-human IgM Ab (Cat# 5210–0157, SeraCare, Milford, MA, USA) was diluted 1:2000 in carbonate/bicarbonate buffer and incubated overnight at 4°C. Plates were washed five times with PBS/0.1% Tween wash buffer with an automatic plate washer. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk with 0.5% Tween-20 in PBS (100 μL/well) for 30 minutes at room temperature, after which plates were washed. Human serum diluted 1:400 in PBS was added to the plates (50 μL/well) in triplicate and incubated at 37°C for one hour. Plates were washed before the addition of positive antigen (purified CVV 0.25 μg/well diluted in PBS) or negative antigen (PBS alone) and incubated overnight at 4°C. The next day, plates were washed, purified MAb diluted to 1 μg/mL in PBS was added to the plate (50 μL/well), and the plate was incubated for one hour at 37°C. Plates were washed five times before the addition of goat anti-mouse Ab conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Cat# 115-035-062, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA) (50 μL/well), diluted 1:5000 in 5% skim milk/PBS. After an incubation period of one hour at 37°C, plates were washed again 10 times. Enhanced K-blue TMB substrate (Cat# 308175, Neogen, Lansing, MI, USA) was added to each well of the plate (100 μL/well) and incubated in the dark at room temperature for 10 minutes. The reaction was stopped with the addition of 2N H2SO4 (50 μL/well), and the plates were read at 450 nm. Nonspecific background values (NBVs) were determined by calculating positive/negative (P/N) ratios of the serum sample on viral antigen and negative antigen wells (average optical density (OD) of the serum sample on positive antigen divided by the average OD of the serum sample on negative antigen). Pilot diagnostic P/N ratios were calculated by taking the OD values of the test serum sample on viral antigen and dividing by the OD values of NHS on viral antigen.
Results
Virulence and immunogenicity of CVV in AG129 mice
To determine the virulence of CVV strain W1-03BS7669 in α/β and γ IFN-receptor-deficient AG129, 6-week-old mice were inoculated IP with 10-fold dilutions of virus starting at 103 PFU/0.1 mL. The first signs of illness in mice infected with 103 or 102 PFU began on day 5 post-infection, and their condition rapidly deteriorated thereafter. Only one animal infected with 101 PFU succumbed to infection 13 days post-infection. The IP LD50 of CVV in AG129 mice was calculated as 25 PFU/0.1 mL (Fig 1A). There was no Ab response measured by ELISA in surviving AG129 mice immunized with lower doses of CVV (10, 1.0, and 0.1 PFU/0.1 mL) indicating these animals may not have become infected or the level of Ab was below the limit of detection of the assay. Since no Ab response was detected, four of the surviving mice in the 10 PFU/0.1 mL group were subsequently immunized with purified inactivated CVV and adjuvant for hybridoma development. Two mice developed a detectable Ab response (EC50 reciprocal dilution values: 13 and 383 for mice 2 and 3, respectively) to CVV when tested 35-days PI, and all mice had detectable Ab to CVV 66 days after the first immunization (Fig 1B and 1C). At day of harvest (day 85 PI), mice 3 and 4 had the highest detectable Ab to CVV (EC50 reciprocal dilution values: 2403 and 1528, respectively), while mice 1 and 2 also displayed anti-CVV Ab measured by ELISA (EC50 reciprocal dilution values: 493 and 485, respectively) (Fig 1B and 1C). None of the mice produced neutralizing Ab as measured by PRNT50; however, sera from mouse 3 taken on day 85 PI did display 48.5% virus neutralization at a 1:10 dilution in the assay (Figs 1B and S1A). The Ab response developed in immunized mice was to viral structural proteins, Gc and N, as demonstrated by immunoblot under reduced conditions (Fig 1D).
Fig 1. Virulence of CVV and anti-CVV specific Ab response in AG129 mice.
A) Mice (n = 6/group) were inoculated IP as described with 10-fold dilutions of CVV and monitored for signs of morbidity. 1000 PFU (open circle), 100 PFU (open triangle), 10 PFU (open square), 1 PFU (star), and 0.1 PFU (open diamond). B) and C) Binding of anti-CVV Ab from immunized mice to purified virus was determined by indirect ELISA with 4-fold dilutions of sera. Colors indicate day PI (day 35 (blue), day 66 (black), day 85 (green)). EC50 values, shown as the reciprocal of dilution of sera, were determined by non-linear fit analysis, with the bottom of the curve constrained to 0, using GraphPad Prism software V6. EC50 values were calculated for 35-, 66- and 85-days PI. IC50 values for 85-days PI were determined by non-linear fit analysis, with the bottom and top of the curve constrained to 0 and 100, respectively, using GraphPad Prim software V6. > indicates no detectable binding reactivity or neutralizing activity at a 1:10 dilution of sera. D) CVV protein-specific Ab responses in AG129 mice 85-days PI. Lanes: N (negative control (PBS)), P (positive control (CVV MHIAF)), 1 (mouse 1), 2 (mouse 2), 3 (mouse 3), 4 (mouse 4), M (Bio-Rad Precision Plus Protein Dual Color Standard (Cat# 1610374)), Gc (glycoprotein C), Gn (glycoprotein N), N (nucleoprotein), kDa (Kilodaltons).
Generation and characterization of anti-CVV MAbs
Thirty-five hybridoma clones secreting anti-CVV Ab were isolated, and of these hybridoma clones, 12 were further evaluated based on their ELISA reactivity in the selection process. All MAbs with detectable signal in the assay were determined to be IgG2b isotype (S1 Table). MAbs with EC50 values <100 ng/mL in the indirect ELISA were CVV4, CVV5, CVV10, CVV13, CVV14, CVV15, CVV16, and CVV18 (Fig 2A and 2B). MAbs CVV1, CVV6, and CVV17 had EC50 values between 100–10,000 ng/mL, while the EC50 value of CVV8 was >10,000 ng/mL in the indirect ELISA. The MAbs with EC50 values <100 ng/mL in the capture ELISA were CVV15 and CVV16 (Fig 2A and 2B). MAbs CVV10, CVV13, CVV17, and CVV18 had EC50 values between 100–10,000 ng/mL, while the EC50 values of CVV1, CVV4, CVV5, CVV6, CVV8, and CVV14 were >10,000 ng/mL. None of the MAbs were able to neutralize virus in vitro when tested by PRNT50 (Figs 2B and S1B). Viral protein specificity was determined by SDS-PAGE and Western blot. Most MAbs reacted specifically to the N protein of CVV under reduced conditions (Fig 2C). MAb CVV16, which showed no reactivity to viral proteins under reduced conditions, was reactive with Gc and N protein under non-reduced conditions (Fig 2D). Cross-reactivity with other closely related viruses was tested by immunofluorescence of virus-infected Vero cells. All MAbs exhibited some immunofluorescence signal with serologically related TENV, TLAV, FSV, MAGV, PLAV, and POTV when tested at a concentration of 10 μg/mL in IFA compared to the positive and negative controls (Figs 3 and S2). No or low signal intensities (CVV5 and CVV10) with CVV MAbs were noted on cells infected with LACV, a more distantly related orthobunyavirus.
Fig 2. Binding, neutralization reactivity, and protein specificity of anti-CVV MAbs.
A) Binding of anti-CVV MAbs to purified virus was determined by indirect (blue) and capture (black) ELISA. B) EC50 and IC50 values (shown as MAb concentrations of ng/mL) in ELISA and PRNT were determined by non-linear fit analysis, with the bottom of the curve constrained to 0 for both analyses and the top of the curve constrained to 100 for neutralization analysis, using GraphPad Prism software V6. Dark blue: EC50 values <100 ng/mL. Light blue: EC50 values 100–10,000 ng/mL. > indicates no detectable reactivity at 10,000 ng/mL. C) Western blot of reduced purified CVV with anti-CVV MAbs was prepared as described in Materials and Methods. Lane nomenclature corresponds to MAb nomenclature. D) Western blot of non-reduced purified CVV with MAb CVV16, P (positive control (CVV MHIAF)), M (Bio-Rad Precision Plus Protein Dual Color Standard (Cat# 1610374)), Gc (glycoprotein C), Gn (glycoprotein N) N (nucleoprotein), kDa (Kilodaltons).
Fig 3. Cross-reactivity of anti-CVV MAbs with related orthobunyaviruses.
Vero cells were grown on glass coverslips in 24-well plates, infected with viruses in the Bunyamwera serogroup at an MOI 1.0 and fixed 24 hours post-infection. Cells were stained with anti-CVV MAbs and a goat anti-mouse FITC labeled conjugate (green). Nuclei of cells were stained with DAPI (blue).
Development of pilot MAC-ELISA for CVV
Performances of nine anti-CVV MAbs with the lowest EC50 values in the indirect ELISA, as well as CVV17 that had detectable EC50 values in both the indirect and capture ELISAs, were assessed for their ability to be used as detector Abs in a pilot MAC-ELISA format using purified CVV as positive antigen. NBVs of each MAb were determined using the ratios of the absorbance of the serum samples on positive antigen over absorbance of the serum sample on negative antigen (P/N) tested in triplicate. Anti-CVV MAbs with the highest NBV P/N ratios with the CVV positive human serum sample were CVV14, CVV15, CVV17, and CVV18 with P/Ns of 12.9, 11.5, 14.5, and 12.2, respectively. NBV P/Ns of each MAb tested with the NHS remained <2.0 (Table 1). MAb CVV13 had a low NBV P/N (2.13) due to high nonspecific reactivity with the negative antigen control, while MAbs CVV4, CVV5, CVV10, and CVV16 had lower NBV P/Ns (6.94, 8.12, 6.39, and 9.22, respectively) compared to other MAbs tested (Table 1). MAbs CVV14, CVV15, CVV17, and CVV18 were further evaluated in the MAC-ELISA with diagnostic specimens confirmed positive for a recent infection with other arboviruses (Jamestown Canyon virus (JCV), LACV, Powassan virus (POWV), West Nile virus (WNV), and chikungunya virus (CHIKV)) with no indication of a recent CVV infection. P/N ratios in this assay were calculated as the absorbance of the diagnostic serum samples on positive antigen over absorbance of the NHS on positive antigen. P/N ratios for the CVV positive human serum were high with all MAbs used as detector Abs (Table 2). Some of the human serum samples (POWV, WNV, and CHIKV) had higher P/N ratios than other samples tested, although not as high as the CVV positive human serum. One of the serum samples diagnosed as a recent WNV infection had a P/N ratio >3.0 (a presumptive positive in other CDC MAC-ELISA assays) when MAb CVV14 was used as the detector Ab (Table 2). When MAb CVV18 was used as the detector Ab, two of the serum samples (POWV and WNV) had P/N ratios >3.0, and when MAbs CVV15 and CVV17 were used as the detector Abs, three of the serum samples (POWV, WNV, and CHIKV) had P/N ratios >3.0 (Table 2). These preliminary results demonstrate that MAbs CVV14, CVV15, CVV17, and CVV18 have the potential to be used as detector Abs in an optimized MAC-ELISA format for the detection of anti-CVV IgM Abs from human sera.
Table 1. Nonspecific background evaluation of anti-CVV MAbs as detector Abs in pilot MAC-ELISA.
| MAb clone | NBV (P/N)a | |
|---|---|---|
| CVVb | NHSc | |
| CVV4 | 6.94 | 0.99 |
| CVV5 | 8.12 | 0.93 |
| CVV10 | 6.39 | 1.05 |
| CVV13 | 2.13 | 0.89 |
| CVV14 | 12.9 | 1.12 |
| CVV15 | 11.5 | 1.01 |
| CVV16 | 9.22 | 0.94 |
| CVV17 | 14.5 | 1.18 |
| CVV18 | 12.2 | 1.22 |
aNBV (nonspecific background values) were determined by calculating the ratio of the mean OD450 of the wells containing CVV (P) divided by the mean OD450 of the wells without virus (N) for each serum sample.
bhuman serum sample positive for CVV neutralizing Ab.
cpooled negative human serum (NHS).
Table 2. Specificity of pilot MAC-ELISA with anti-CVV MAbs as detector Abs.
| MAb clone | P/N ratioa | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVVb | JCV | LACV | POWV | POWV | WNV | WNV | DENV | CHIKV | |
| CVV14 | 27.52 | 1.40 | 1.48 | 1.40 | 1.45 | 4.01 | 1.45 | 1.10 | 2.68 |
| CVV15 | 26.85 | 1.69 | 1.91 | 1.98 | 3.25 | 3.88 | 1.22 | 1.15 | 3.26 |
| CVV17 | 59.66 | 1.51 | 2.09 | 2.49 | 4.83 | 5.43 | 1.79 | 1.17 | 3.49 |
| CVV18 | 36.38 | 1.35 | 2.14 | 2.51 | 3.22 | 4.10 | 1.81 | 1.17 | 2.43 |
aResults are expressed as the P/N ratio of mean test patient serum OD450 values on CVV divided by mean negative patient serum OD450 values on CVV.
bArbovirus diagnosis of patient serum confirmed by PRNT90. Jamestown Canyon virus (JCV), La Crosse virus (LACV), Powassan virus (POWV), West Nile virus (WNV), dengue virus (DENV) and chikungunya virus (CHIKV).
Discussion
This study reports the generation of a panel of MAbs directed to CVV. Activated B cells from AG129 mice deficient in α/β and γ IFN receptors were infected and boosted with CVV for the development of these hybridomas since previous studies had shown immunocompetent mice are resistant to CVV infection [25]. While anti-CVV Ab was not detected in mice that survived challenge and whose splenocytes were subsequently used for hybridoma fusions, an undetectable Ab response post-infection may have resulted in increased Ab titers after boost with inactivated CVV.
The use of this mouse model for the development of MAbs to Heartland virus (HRTV), another arbovirus incapable of a productive viral infection in immunocompetent mice, has shown its utility in MAb development for use in a HRTV MIA for the rapid and accurate identification of recent and past human HRTV infections [26,27]. AG129 mice are also a valuable tool in studying the pathogenesis of arboviral disease due to their inability to produce sterilizing immunity in the absence of IFN, thus allowing for an unimpeded viral infection in vivo. Several IFN-induced immune proteins and regulators have been shown to be important in restricting growth in vivo for several viruses in the genuses Orthobunyavirus and Phlebovirus including CVV, LACV, Oropouche virus, and Rift Valley fever virus [11,28–33]. Recently, López et. al (2021) showed that IFN plays an important role in disease of CVV in vivo. Similar to our results, six-week-old IFN-αβR-/- mice inoculated subcutaneously with 104 PFU of CVV became moribund by eight days post-infection [34]. Our previous studies have shown that the lack of α/β and γ IFN receptors in AG129 mice and subsequent downregulated IFN responses results in susceptibility to a host of other arboviruses [27,35–38]. AG129 mice have also been used to investigate sexual transmission and teratogenicity of Zika virus, another arbovirus of public health concern [39]. Likewise, pregnant IFN-αβR-/- mice have been used to study CVV vertical transmission resulting in spontaneous abortions and congenital malformations in vivo [34].
Bunyaviruses encode for three structural proteins: two glycoproteins (Gn and Gc) and nucleoprotein (N). The panel of anti-CVV MAbs were all specific to the viral N protein. The N protein is highly conserved within the Bunyamwera serogroup with many species sharing >90% amino acid sequence identity. The N protein is abundantly expressed in virus-infected cells; however, anti-N protein MAbs do not typically have neutralizing activity [40–42]. In contrast, most neutralizing MAbs are directed against the glycoproteins, particularly Gc [42–45]. The anti-CVV MAbs reactive to the N protein described here, cross-reacted with several viruses in the Bunyamwera serogroup by IFA including TLAV, FSV, MAGV, PLAV, and POTV; however, anti-CVV MAbs had little reactivity with the more distantly related LACV, another orthobunyavirus in the California serogroup. MAb CVV4 displayed the highest signal intensities to TLAV, FSV, PLAV, and POTV. Like CVV, these viruses commonly circulate in the Americas; however, they rarely cause human disease [46–48]. Anti-CVV MAbs developed here with cross-reactivity to closely related viruses may be useful in future studies to determine seroprevalence of these viruses among humans and animals.
Rapid serological assays that do not rely on detection of neutralizing Ab with live virus requiring biocontainment are needed for detection of CVV-specific IgG and IgM. The MAC-ELISA format is extensively used in ADB’s diagnostic laboratory to detect IgM during an acute infection for several medically important arboviruses including DENV, WNV, St. Louis encephalitis virus, LACV, Eastern equine encephalitis virus, and CHIKV [49]. Since the MAC-ELISA specifically detects IgM, which is produced early in infection, acute diagnosis can be made in the absence of RT-PCR. Additionally, capture of IgM minimizes the incidence of false-negatives due to cross-reactive IgG that may be present in the sample if the patient has had prior exposure to a closely related virus.
Our results show the utility of these anti-CVV MAbs in a pilot MAC-ELISA. Four MAbs (CVV14, CVV15, CVV17, and CVV18) showed low nonspecific reactivity on NHS, while maintaining high reactivity with the CVV-positive human serum tested. MAb CVV14 exhibited the highest specificity when further evaluated in the pilot MAC-ELISA with eight human specimens. P/Ns for some of the samples were >3.0, the cutoff for a presumptive positive in the CDC MAC-ELISA format. This is most likely due to very low background from the use of purified virus in the assay resulting in lower OD readings of NHS on positive antigen. These lower OD readings most likely led to the false positive results in the assay. Additionally, the evaluation of the preliminary MAC-ELISA was limited by the small sample size. This was due to the limited number and volume of CVV positive human serum control available for use in the assay.
Currently, studies are underway for the development and optimization of a CVV MAC-ELISA for use in diagnostics utilizing MAb CVV14 as the detector Ab and evaluating different antigen preparations including tissue culture fluid and suckling mouse brain antigen. Likewise, development of human-chimeric IgM Abs utilizing variable regions from these anti-CVV murine hybridomas for use as positive controls in MAC-ELISA is in progress. Validation of this assay will be ongoing as more samples from recent CVV infections are identified for testing including specimens identified retroactively from patients exhibiting encephalitis with no known causal agent. The MAbs described here have shown to be cross-reactive with other members in the Bunyamwera serogroup and may be useful in future assays to detect related viral infections for which no rapid serological diagnostic assay exists.
Even though CVV circulates widely in mosquito and animal species and has a large geographic range, our understanding of the virus’s impact on human health is limited. Currently, we do not fully understand the spectrum of disease in humans caused by CVV including its potential as a teratogenic agent, which may be likely, given the strong correlation between maternal anti-CVV Abs and macrocephaly [21]. Only severe human cases have been identified to date without the utilization of rapid serological assays. Assays that do not rely on live virus will aid in making diagnostics more widely available in public health laboratories for CVV and other viruses in the Bunyamwera serogroup. Rapid and higher throughput serological assays utilizing these MAbs will make larger seroprevalence studies possible facilitating our understanding of the virus ecological life cycle, disease prevalence, and impact on at-risk populations.
Author disclaimer
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of CDC.
Supporting information
Percent neutralization of serum samples taken from immunized mice 85-days PI (A) and purified MAbs (B) was calculated based on virus input titer. Virus neutralization curves were generated by a 4-parameter non-linear regression dose response and used to calculate the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of each sample using GraphPad Prism V6. The dotted line represents 50% neutralization.
(TIF)
Vero cells were grown on glass coverslips in 24-well plates, infected with orthobunyaviruses at an MOI 1.0 and fixed 24 hours post-infection. Cells were stained with Abs and a goat anti-mouse FITC labeled conjugate (green). Nuclei of cells were stained with DAPI (blue). A) MHIAF to several orthobunyaviruses was used as a positive control in IFA and tested on homologous virus-infected cells. A purified anti-alphavirus IgG2b antibody was used as a negative antibody control (NAC) to detect nonspecific binding in the assay. B) Reactivities of anti-CVV MAbs on CVV-infected cells and uninfected (UI) cells were included as controls in IFA experiments.
(TIF)
(DOCX)
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
References
- 1.Armstrong PM, Andreadis TG, Anderson JF. Emergence of a new lineage of Cache Valley virus (Bunyaviridae: Orthobunyavirus) in the Northeastern United States. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93(1):11–7. Epub 2015/05/13. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0132 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4497881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Blitvich BJ, Lorono-Pino MA, Garcia-Rejon JE, Farfan-Ale JA, Dorman KS. Nucleotide sequencing and serologic analysis of Cache Valley virus isolates from the Yucatan Peninsula of Mexico. Virus Genes. 2012;45(1):176–80. Epub 2012/04/03. doi: 10.1007/s11262-012-0741-x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yang Y, Qiu J, Snyder-Keller A, Wu Y, Sun S, Sui H, et al. Fatal Cache Valley virus meningoencephalitis associated with rituximab maintenance therapy. Am J Hematol. 2018;93(4):590–4. Epub 2017/12/29. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25024 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6037180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Holden P, Hess AD. Cache Valley virus, a previously undescribed mosquito-borne agent. Science. 1959;130(3383):1187–8. Epub 1959/10/30. doi: 10.1126/science.130.3383.1187 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Calisher CH, Francy DB, Smith GC, Muth DJ, Lazuick JS, Karabatsos N, et al. Distribution of Bunyamwera serogroup viruses in North America, 1956–1984. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1986;35(2):429–43. Epub 1986/03/01. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1986.35.429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Soldan SS, Gonzalez-Scarano F. The Bunyaviridae. Handb Clin Neurol. 2014;123:449–63. Epub 2014/07/13. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53488-0.00021-3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Meyers MT, Bahnson CS, Hanlon M, Kopral C, Srisinlapaudom S, Cochrane ZN, et al. Management Factors Associated with Operation-Level Prevalence of Antibodies to Cache Valley Virus and Other Bunyamwera Serogroup Viruses in Sheep in the United States. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2015;15(11):683–93. Epub 2015/11/14. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2015.1810 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Uehlinger FD, Wilkins W, Godson DL, Drebot MA. Seroprevalence of Cache Valley virus and related viruses in sheep and other livestock from Saskatchewan, Canada. Can Vet J. 2018;59(4):413–8. Epub 2018/04/03. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5855288. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chung SI, Livingston CW Jr, Jones CW, Collisson EW. Cache Valley virus infection in Texas sheep flocks. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1991;199(3):337–40. Epub 1991/08/11. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Edwards JF, Livingston CW, Chung SI, Collisson EC. Ovine arthrogryposis and central nervous system malformations associated with in utero Cache Valley virus infection: spontaneous disease. Vet Pathol. 1989;26(1):33–9. Epub 1989/01/01. doi: 10.1177/030098588902600106 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rodrigues Hoffmann A, Dorniak P, Filant J, Dunlap KA, Bazer FW, de la Concha-Bermejillo A, et al. Ovine fetal immune response to Cache Valley virus infection. J Virol. 2013;87(10):5586–92. Epub 2013/03/08. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01821-12 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3648191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rodrigues Hoffmann A, Welsh CJ, Wilcox Varner P, de la Concha-Bermejillo A, Marchand Ball J, Ambrus A, et al. Identification of the target cells and sequence of infection during experimental infection of ovine fetuses with Cache Valley virus. J Virol. 2012;86(9):4793–800. Epub 2012/03/02. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06858-11 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3347386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kosoy O, Rabe I, Geissler A, Adjemian J, Panella A, Laven J, et al. Serological Survey for Antibodies to Mosquito-Borne Bunyaviruses Among US National Park Service and US Forest Service Employees. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2016;16(3):191–8. Epub 2016/02/09. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2015.1865 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Blitvich BJ, Saiyasombat R, Talavera-Aguilar LG, Garcia-Rejon JE, Farfan-Ale JA, Machain-Williams C, et al. Orthobunyavirus antibodies in humans, Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18(10):1629–32. Epub 2012/09/29. doi: 10.3201/eid1810.120492 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3471633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Buescher EL, Byrne RJ, Clarke GC, Gould DJ, Russell PK, Scheider FG, et al. Cache Valley virus in the Del Mar Va Peninsula. I. Virologic and serologic evidence of infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1970;19(3):493–502. Epub 1970/05/01. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1970.19.493 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Baker M, Hughes HR, Naqvi SH, Yates K, Velez JO, McGuirk S, et al. Reassortant Cache Valley virus associated with acute febrile, non-neurologic illness, Missouri. Clin Infect Dis. 2021. Epub 2021/02/26. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab175 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Campbell GL, Mataczynski JD, Reisdorf ES, Powell JW, Martin DA, Lambert AJ, et al. Second human case of Cache Valley virus disease. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12(5):854–6. Epub 2006/05/18. doi: 10.3201/eid1205.051625 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3374447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nguyen NL, Zhao G, Hull R, Shelly MA, Wong SJ, Wu G, et al. Cache valley virus in a patient diagnosed with aseptic meningitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(6):1966–9. Epub 2013/03/22. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00252-13 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3716113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sexton DJ, Rollin PE, Breitschwerdt EB, Corey GR, Myers SA, Dumais MR, et al. Life-threatening Cache Valley virus infection. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(8):547–9. Epub 1997/02/20. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199702203360804 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wilson MR, Suan D, Duggins A, Schubert RD, Khan LM, Sample HA, et al. A novel cause of chronic viral meningoencephalitis: Cache Valley virus. Ann Neurol. 2017;82(1):105–14. Epub 2017/06/20. doi: 10.1002/ana.24982 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5546801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Calisher CH, Sever JL. Are North American Bunyamwera serogroup viruses etiologic agents of human congenital defects of the central nervous system? Emerg Infect Dis. 1995;1(4):147–51. Epub 1995/10/01. doi: 10.3201/eid0104.950409 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2626893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang H, Nattanmai S, Kramer LD, Bernard KA, Tavakoli NP. A duplex real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of California serogroup and Cache Valley viruses. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;65(2):150–7. Epub 2009/09/15. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2009.07.001 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2774246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Obijeski JF, Bishop DH, Murphy FA, Palmer EL. Structural proteins of La Crosse virus. J Virol. 1976;19(3):985–97. Epub 1976/09/01. doi: 10.1128/JVI.19.3.985-997.1976 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC354939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Reed LJ, & Muench H. A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints American Journal of Hygiene. 1938;27(3):493–7. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Edwards JF, Higgs S, Beaty BJ. Mosquito feeding-induced enhancement of Cache Valley Virus (Bunyaviridae) infection in mice. J Med Entomol. 1998;35(3):261–5. Epub 1998/06/06. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/35.3.261 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Basile AJ, Horiuchi K, Goodman CH, Kosoy O, Panella AJ, Velez JO, et al. Development of diagnostic microsphere-based immunoassays for Heartland virus. J Clin Virol. 2021;134:104693. Epub 2020/11/29. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104693 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Calvert AE, Brault AC. Development and Characterization of Monoclonal Antibodies Directed Against the Nucleoprotein of Heartland Virus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93(6):1338–40. Epub 2015/10/28. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0473 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4674255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hefti HP, Frese M, Landis H, Di Paolo C, Aguzzi A, Haller O, et al. Human MxA protein protects mice lacking a functional alpha/beta interferon system against La crosse virus and other lethal viral infections. J Virol. 1999;73(8):6984–91. Epub 1999/07/10. doi: 10.1128/JVI.73.8.6984-6991.1999 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC112784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kochs G, Janzen C, Hohenberg H, Haller O. Antivirally active MxA protein sequesters La Crosse virus nucleocapsid protein into perinuclear complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(5):3153–8. Epub 2002/03/07. doi: 10.1073/pnas.052430399 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC122488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Proenca-Modena JL, Sesti-Costa R, Pinto AK, Richner JM, Lazear HM, Lucas T, et al. Oropouche virus infection and pathogenesis are restricted by MAVS, IRF-3, IRF-7, and type I interferon signaling pathways in nonmyeloid cells. J Virol. 2015;89(9):4720–37. Epub 2015/02/27. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00077-15 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4403474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sandrock M, Frese M, Haller O, Kochs G. Interferon-induced rat Mx proteins confer resistance to Rift Valley fever virus and other arthropod-borne viruses. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2001;21(9):663–8. Epub 2001/09/29. doi: 10.1089/107999001753124390 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Skaug B, Chen ZJ. Emerging role of ISG15 in antiviral immunity. Cell. 2010;143(2):187–90. Epub 2010/10/16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.033 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2981609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Stertz S, Dittmann J, Blanco JC, Pletneva LM, Haller O, Kochs G. The antiviral potential of interferon-induced cotton rat Mx proteins against orthomyxovirus (influenza), rhabdovirus, and bunyavirus. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2007;27(10):847–55. Epub 2007/11/01. doi: 10.1089/jir.2006.0176 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lopez K, Wilson SN, Coutermash-Ott S, Tanelus M, Stone WB, Porier DL, et al. Novel murine models for studying Cache Valley virus pathogenesis and in utero transmission. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2021;10(1):1649–59. Epub 2021/08/07. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.1965497 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8381923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Calvert AE, Dixon KL, Delorey MJ, Blair CD, Roehrig JT. Development of a small animal peripheral challenge model of Japanese encephalitis virus using interferon deficient AG129 mice and the SA14-14-2 vaccine virus strain. Vaccine. 2014;32(2):258–64. Epub 2013/11/21. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.11.016 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3910511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Calvert AE, Dixon KL, Piper J, Bennett SL, Thibodeaux BA, Barrett AD, et al. A humanized monoclonal antibody neutralizes yellow fever virus strain 17D-204 in vitro but does not protect a mouse model from disease. Antiviral Res. 2016;131:92–9. Epub 2016/04/30. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2016.04.013 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4899248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Calvert AE, Huang CY, Kinney RM, Roehrig JT. Non-structural proteins of dengue 2 virus offer limited protection to interferon-deficient mice after dengue 2 virus challenge. J Gen Virol. 2006;87(Pt 2):339–46. Epub 2006/01/25. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.81256-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Calvert AE, Kalantarov GF, Chang GJ, Trakht I, Blair CD, Roehrig JT. Human monoclonal antibodies to West Nile virus identify epitopes on the prM protein. Virology. 2011;410(1):30–7. Epub 2010/11/19. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.10.033 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Duggal NK, McDonald EM, Ritter JM, Brault AC. Sexual transmission of Zika virus enhances in utero transmission in a mouse model. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):4510. Epub 2018/03/16. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22840-6 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5852059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bilk S, Schulze C, Fischer M, Beer M, Hlinak A, Hoffmann B. Organ distribution of Schmallenberg virus RNA in malformed newborns. Vet Microbiol. 2012;159(1–2):236–8. Epub 2012/04/21. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.03.035 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Breard E, Lara E, Comtet L, Viarouge C, Doceul V, Desprat A, et al. Validation of a commercially available indirect ELISA using a nucleocapside recombinant protein for detection of Schmallenberg virus antibodies. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53446. Epub 2013/01/22. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053446 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3546048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wernike K, Brocchi E, Cordioli P, Senechal Y, Schelp C, Wegelt A, et al. A novel panel of monoclonal antibodies against Schmallenberg virus nucleoprotein and glycoprotein Gc allows specific orthobunyavirus detection and reveals antigenic differences. Vet Res. 2015;46:27. Epub 2015/04/19. doi: 10.1186/s13567-015-0165-4 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4354985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gonzalez-Scarano F, Shope RE, Calisher CE, Nathanson N. Characterization of monoclonal antibodies against the G1 and N proteins of La Crosse and Tahyna, two California serogroup bunyaviruses. Virology. 1982;120(1):42–53. Epub 1982/07/15. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(82)90005-8 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pekosz A, Griot C, Stillmock K, Nathanson N, Gonzalez-Scarano F. Protection from La Crosse virus encephalitis with recombinant glycoproteins: role of neutralizing anti-G1 antibodies. J Virol. 1995;69(6):3475–81. Epub 1995/06/01. doi: 10.1128/JVI.69.6.3475-3481.1995 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC189060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Boshra H, Lorenzo G, Busquets N, Brun A. Rift valley fever: recent insights into pathogenesis and prevention. J Virol. 2011;85(13):6098–105. Epub 2011/04/01. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02641-10 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3126526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Calisher CH, Sabattini MS, Monath TP, Wolff KL. Cross-neutralization tests among Cache Valley virus isolates revealing the existence of multiple subtypes. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1988;39(2):202–5. Epub 1988/08/01. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1988.39.202 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Groseth A, Vine V, Weisend C, Guevara C, Watts D, Russell B, et al. Maguari Virus Associated with Human Disease. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(8):1325–31. Epub 2017/07/21. doi: 10.3201/eid2308.161254 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5547800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mangiafico JA, Sanchez JL, Figueiredo LT, LeDuc JW, Peters CJ. Isolation of a newly recognized Bunyamwera serogroup virus from a febrile human in Panama. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1988;39(6):593–6. Epub 1988/12/01. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1988.39.593 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Martin DA, Muth DA, Brown T, Johnson AJ, Karabatsos N, Roehrig JT. Standardization of immunoglobulin M capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for routine diagnosis of arboviral infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(5):1823–6. Epub 2000/05/02. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.5.1823-1826.2000 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC86599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Percent neutralization of serum samples taken from immunized mice 85-days PI (A) and purified MAbs (B) was calculated based on virus input titer. Virus neutralization curves were generated by a 4-parameter non-linear regression dose response and used to calculate the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of each sample using GraphPad Prism V6. The dotted line represents 50% neutralization.
(TIF)
Vero cells were grown on glass coverslips in 24-well plates, infected with orthobunyaviruses at an MOI 1.0 and fixed 24 hours post-infection. Cells were stained with Abs and a goat anti-mouse FITC labeled conjugate (green). Nuclei of cells were stained with DAPI (blue). A) MHIAF to several orthobunyaviruses was used as a positive control in IFA and tested on homologous virus-infected cells. A purified anti-alphavirus IgG2b antibody was used as a negative antibody control (NAC) to detect nonspecific binding in the assay. B) Reactivities of anti-CVV MAbs on CVV-infected cells and uninfected (UI) cells were included as controls in IFA experiments.
(TIF)
(DOCX)
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.



