Abstract
Oxygen (O2) is a critical metabolite for cellular function as it fuels aerobic cellular metabolism; further, it is a known regulator of gene expression. Monitoring oxygenation within cells and organelles can provide valuable insights into how O2, or lack thereof, both influences and responds to cell processes. In recent years, fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) has been used to track several probe-concentration-independent intracellular phenomena, such as pH, viscosity, and, in conjunction with Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), protein-protein interactions. Here, we describe methods for synthesizing and expressing the novel FLIM-FRET intracellular O2 probe Myoglobin-mCherry (Myo-mCherry) in cultured cell lines, as well as acquiring FLIM images using a laser scanning confocal microscope configured for two-photon excitation and a time correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) module. Finally, we provide step-by-step protocols for FLIM analysis of Myo-mCherry using the commercial software SPCImage and conversion of fluorescence lifetime values in each pixel to apparent intracellular oxygen partial pressures (pO2).
Keywords: Myo-mCherry, Intracellular oxygenation, Hypoxia, Two-photon fluorescence lifetime imaging, Förster resonance energy transfer
1. Introduction
Imaging physically measurable quantities (“quantitative imaging”) within subcellular environments can reveal crucial information about biological processes [1, 2]. Fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM) has emerged as a reliable method for measuring physiological processes in cells and subcellular organelles with high signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and submicron (<< 1 μm) planar resolution when combined with confocal or multiphoton microscopy (yielding Z sectioning). Improvements in data acquisition using time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC), have played a significant role in making FLIM more reliable and of more general use [3, 4, 5, 6]. Cell biologists have used FLIM to measure intracellular viscosity, bio-membrane heterogeneity, molecular species concentrations, redox state of cells, pH, and, in conjunction with Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET), protein-protein interactions, among other parameters [7, 8, 9]. We recently published a novel, genetically encoded sensor, myoglobin-mCherry (Myo-mCherry), to monitor intracellular oxygen partial pressure (pO2) that expands the list of measurables accessible through FLIM [10, 11]. In an effort to expand the accessibility of FLIM measurements by other researchers, we herein present a protocol for utilizing FLIM to image Myo-mCherry in transfected cells. The protocol details the use of a laser scanning microscope (LSM) configured for two-photon microscopy, but one-photon excitation is also suitable and it should yield very similar results in cultured cells, although it is not advisable for tissue slices and thicker samples. We would also like to emphasize that we make the plasmid encoding for the sensor available to the community and requests for material should be addressed to the corresponding author.
The fluorescence ‘lifetime’ for a homogenous population of excited molecules in a singlet state (S1, Fig. 1a) is the time required for this excited state population to be reduced by a factor of as a result of fluorescence (toward S0, Fig. 1a) [12]. Since the lifetime is a ‘state function’, its value depends on the type and conformation of the fluorophores, as well as how they interact with their chemical and physical environment [1, 5]. The fluorescence lifetime is not related to a fluorophore’s concentration across a wide range [12]: this makes it an invaluable tool for probing biological environments, which often have unknown concentrations and/or require low fluorophore concentrations (on the order of 10s −100s of nM) to preserve system integrity. For fluorophore populations with more heterogeneous / complex fluorescence decays, which are often found in biological environments, the molecular mean fluorescence lifetime, , corresponds to the weighted arithmetic mean of the individual lifetimes for each component in the decay (Eq. 1) [4].
Fig. 1.

(a) Jablonski diagram illustrating the physical mechanism of fluorescence. A photon (or multiple lower energy photons) excites the fluorophore to a higher energy singlet state (S0, 0 → S1, 3), where it undergoes non-radiative relaxation beyond the scope of this chapter (S1, 3 → S1, 0). The fluorophore decays to its ground state with emission of a fluorescent photon (S1, 0 → S0, 2). (b) Jablonski diagram illustrating the physical mechanism of FRET. After excitation and relaxation of the donor, a “virtual photon” would excite the acceptor (S1, 0 (D) → S0, 0 (A)), leading to acceptor fluorescence. (c) Factors that cause fluorescence decay spectra to deviate from their model. To account for the nonzero width of the excitation pulse (left) and the nonzero temporal response of the detector (middle), the excitation pulse width and the photodetector response function are convolved, generating the IRF for the imaging system (right). ((c) reproduced from Becker 2017 [4] with permission from Becker & Hickl Gmbh).
| (1) |
If two different fluorophores are in close proximity to one another (~ 2-6 nm [13]) and the emission spectrum of one overlaps with the absorption spectrum of the other, energy from the first molecule, the donor, can transfer to the second molecule, the acceptor, through a nonradiative dipole-dipole interaction called FRET [14, 15] (Fig. 1b). This energy transfer results in a reduction in both donor intensity and lifetime, as well as an increase in acceptor intensity. This reduction in donor lifetime in one way that enables FLIM to discern where donor-acceptor pairs are in close proximity within a sample based on the lifetimes of the interacting fluorophores [1, 4, 12].
In practice, however, fluorescence decay data do not appear as a sum of exponentials model due to the nonzero width of the excitation beam and the detector’s imperfect temporal response to photon detection (Fig. 1c) [4]. To account for these factors, the instrument response function (IRF) for the imaging system is measured, especially in multi-photon microscopy where detected second harmonic generation (SHG) can confound fluorescence data [4]. After determining the appropriate IRF, a sum of exponentials model would be iteratively reconvolved with the IRF and the result would be fit to the acquired fluorescence decay data.
As discussed at length in prior work [10], Myo-mCherry is a biocompatible FLIM-FRET probe that is capable of tracking pO2 within cells. The probe combines myoglobin, an oxygen (O2) binding protein that experiences spectral shifts between its oxygenated (oxyMyo) and deoxygenated (deoxyMyo) states [16], with the fluorescent protein mCherry. In Fig. 2a, an artistic ribbon depiction of the probe is presented. The absorption spectrum of myoglobin in each biochemical state has different overlap with the emission spectrum of mCherry. The latter acts as a donor for the dark (i.e.: virtually nonfluorescent for the excitation wavelength) acceptor myoglobin [16]. The absorption spectrum of deoxyMyo has more overlap with mCherry than when myoglobin is in its oxygenated state. This overlap yields large FRET in deoxyMyo-mCherry and as a result, shorter lifetimes are observed in the deoxygenated state of the probe. Upon oxygenation, oxyMyo-mCherry is formed and the decrease in spectral overlap yields longer lifetimes (see Fig. 2c and full explanation in Ref. 11). Given these two different populations (deoxy and oxyMyo-mCherry), and assuming a single discrete orientation factor in the FRET, a biexponential model can be used to fit this FLIM data:
| (2) |
where and are pre-exponential weights used to represent the fractions of fluorophore populations with lifetimes and , assuming the natural lifetime is constant [17]. Orientation is likely distributed rather than unique and mCherry itself has been reported to have two lifetimes [18] such that the ideal model must be multiexponential; however, a biexponential model appears to capture the main FRET trends in the Myo-mCherry system and changes in the energy transfer are easily monitored using the average lifetime as an indicator [16].
Fig. 2.

(a) The Myo-mCherry construct, where mCherry (PDB: 2H5Q) was coupled to the C-terminus of myoglobin (PDB: 1MBO) by using a 2 amino acid linker. (b) Theoretical energy transfer efficiency for the Myo-mCherry system as a function of distance between the two proteins. The dashed line at 4 nm highlights the average distance between the two proteins as inferred from the available structures of the individual proteins. (c) Absorption spectra of oxyMyo and deoxyMyo overlapped with the emission spectrum of mCherry, highlighting the spectral overlap region (shaded area) between the species. R0 is the Förster radius calculated based on the actual spectral overlap integral (not shown here). (This figure was reproduced from Penjweini 2018 [10] with permission from Journal of Biomedical Optics)
In prior work [10], cells transfected with Myo-mCherry yielded shorter average lifetimes at lower external pO2 than at higher external pO2 across A549 cells and its mitochondrial DNA-depleted (mtDNA) counterparts, A549 cells. Additionally, transfected A549 cells capable of aerobic respiration yielded shorter average lifetimes at all external O2 concentrations (excluding near-anoxia) than A549 cells with inhibited aerobic respiration [10]. To image Myo-mCherry using time-domain FLIM, we used a Becker & Hickl (B&H) time correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) module. A high-repetition near-infrared (NIR) pulsed laser (≈80 MHz, 780 nm) excites a sample with a focused beam swept across the sample using a laser scanning microscope configured for two-photon microscopy [1]. The arrival times of the fluorescent photons are then recorded with respect to the laser pulses and the 2D spatial coordinate of the scanner [1]. As a large number of excitation cycles is repeated over time, photons are accumulated and a spatiotemporal histogram of photon counts is built, creating a spatial map of fluorescence decay curves with the highest time resolution and best lifetime accuracy of any FLIM technique [1, 19, 20, 21]. To analyze the acquired data, we used the proprietary FLIM analysis software, SPCImage, from B&H configured for batch analysis followed by user corrections and refinement to optimize fitting parameters.
Here below we outline details on how to setup and configure FLIM measurements, record data and subsequently analyze them using an appropriate analysis pipeline suitable to extract meaningful information from recordings of the genetically encoded oxygen probe Myo-mCherry expressed in cells.
2. Materials
The plasmid containing the Myo-mCherry (or mito-Myo-mCherry, nucleus-Myo-mCherry) gene is available through our laboratory to anyone interested in using it. The expression of the gene is constitutive and driven by a CMV promoter The plasmid encodes for antibiotic resistance (Kanamycin/Neomycin). This feature can be used for amplification and propagation in E. coli, or for transfected cells selection to produce a stable cell line (topics not covered here) (see Notes 1 and 2).
2.1. Transfection of Living Cells with Myo-mCherry
Living cells to be transfected.
Cell culture media consisting of modified eagle’s medium (DMEM) with 10% non-heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Invitrogen, Grand Island, New York) and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin.
Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
Low or serum-free media such as Opti-MEM.
Lipofectamine® or FuGENE® transfection reagent.
Plasmid containing Myo-mCherry DNA.
1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes as needed.
Welled microscope slides for cell plating and suitable for confocal microscopy (i.e., Ibidi 4-well μ-Slide, with a single-well volume of 700 μL). Make sure that they are compatible with the stage mounted O2/CO2 incubator.
2.2. Cell Treatment with Rotenone and Antimycin A
2.3. Imaging Setup
A laser-scanning confocal microscope configured for two-photon microscopy and equipped with an objective that can transmit IR signal, typically with a numerical aperture (NA) greater than one. For subcellular resolution, an NA above 1.2 (for example, a Leica SP5 or Zeiss LSM 510 with oil objective, NA = 1.4) is best to obtain pixel resolution smaller than subcellular organelles.
A femtosecond, high-repetition (40–80 MHz) laser tunable to 780 nm (for example, a mode-locked Mai Tai®, Spectra-Physics laser operated at40 MHz or 80 MHz with a peak wavelength of 780 nm) (see Notes 3 and 4).
Dual-band dichroic mirror that transmits the excitation beam into the objective and reflects emitted fluorescent photons consistent with the mCherry emission spectrum to the photodetector (380–740 nm, with a maximum at 610 nm [24]). This dual-band dichroic is an essential component for two-photon fluorescence microscopy (for example, an HFT KP 700/488-nm).
Long-pass dichroic mirror that can reflect emitted fluorescent photons downstream into the nondescanned detector (e.g., 735 nm, Thorlabs, DMLP735B).
Two short pass filters that remove residual signals representing scattered light from the laser (e.g. 750 nm, Thorlabs, DMSP750B; 700 nm, Edmund Optics Inc., 12.5 mm diameter, OD 2).
Band pass filter to transmit the mCherry emission to the detector (e.g. 641/75 nm, Semrock, BrightLine® single-band) (See Note 5).
A fast (low transit time spread) photomultiplier module (for example, B&H, HPM-100 or Hamamatsu, H7422P-40).
Photon counting card equipped with a histogramming TCSPC module that is synchronized with the laser pulses and the pixel and line clocks from the microscope (for example, a B&H SPC-150 or SPC-830).
2.4. IRF Measurements (Multiphoton Microscopy)
-
Same imaging setup described in Subheading 2.3 except:
Short-pass filter in front of the detector that transmits SHG signal to the photomultiplier (e.g. below 425 nm (for two-photon excitation at 780 nm), Edmund Optics, 25 mm diameter, OD 2).
A strong SHG generation source (for example, high purity urea crystals or sucrose [25]) (See Note 6).
2.5. Controlled Experimental Environment with a Range of Stable Oxygen Concentrations for Imaging and Calibration
A stage-mounted incubator to provide temperature control and an environment suitable for homeostasis during imaging (i.e. a TC-MI-20×46, Bioscience tools, San Diego, CA).
An incubator temperature controller, such as a TC-1-100-I (Bioscience Tools).
A gas mixing system to deliver mixtures of N2, O2 and 5% CO2 inside the incubator (i.e. CO2-O2-MI, Bioscience Tools) and capable of delivering O2 concentrations from normoxia to hypoxia.
Tanks of high purity CO2 and N2 to supply the gas mixing system.
An oxygen monitoring system, (i.e., an OxyLite Pro 2-channel bare-fiber O2 sensor (NX-BF/O/E, Optronix Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom) for measuring extracellular pO2 and temperature at and above (~100 μm) the cell layer.
3. Methods
Methods are partially adapted from Refs. 10, 11. The plasmid provided by our laboratory is generally delivered in a final volume of 50 μL, with a concentration between 0.5 and 1 μg/μl. No further dilution is necessary. For transfection in cell lines (as described below), we generally advise to use plasmid solutions with a concentration between 0.5 and 1.0 μg/μL, to minimize dilution of the transfection reagents used in the following step (see Note 7).
3.1. Transfection of Living Cells with Myo-mCherry
This transfection protocol is suitable for an Ibidi 4 well μ-Slide, with a single well volume of 700 μL. The protocol can be scaled appropriately for a range of well numbers and volumes so long as the final concentration of DNA per well during the 24-48 h incubation period is 0.57 ng/μL.
Seed cells such at the end of the 24-48 h incubation period confluency will be in the range of 70-80%. High confluency will result in increased O2 consumption, and therefore alter the local O2 environment, and vice versa for low confluency. As such confluency should be kept consistent across samples. 70-80% provides an adequate pool of cells to choose from and image individually or in groups.
Remove old cell culture medium. Add 400 μl of fresh culture media.
Add 150 μL of OptiMEM and 400 ng of the Myo-mCherry plasmid to a 1.5 mL tube.
Add 150 μL of OptiMEM and 2 μL of Lipofectamine® 2000 to a different 1.5 mL tube. Lipofectamine® 3000 can be used in cell lines, such as suspension and primary cells, that are difficult to transfect [26].
Combine the lipofectamine and plasmid solutions. Mix gently.
Incubate the transfection solution for 10-20 min at room temperature.
Add dropwise to a single well on the multi-well slide.
Allow the cells to incubate at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 24-48 h. After 24-48 h, wash the cells twice with warm PBS and then cover with 500 μL (2-3mm) of fresh media.
When imaging, use phenol red free media to reduce background signal. Imaging media can be either DMEM or Opti-MEM formulated without phenol red, or Bright-MEM optimized to give low background for imaging. In alternative, DPBS or HBSS can also be used as low background imaging solutions, care must be taken in this case if longer imaging sessions are planned since these buffer/salt solutions do not contain any nutrients.
3.2. Fluorescence Two-Photon Image Acquisition
Turn on and (if necessary) tune the laser apparatus such that the excitation beam provides consistent mode-locked pulses (typically <200 fs width) at a high repetition rate (40 – 80 MHz) (see Note 8).
Turn on and configure the microscope with mirrors and filters (or their two-photon compatible functional equivalents). It is possible that some mirrors are built into your microscope system and others need to be installed manually depending on the configurations available. Consult your system documentation for further details.
Turn on the photon-counting card module and (if necessary) sync it with the laser pulses, either with a ns photodiode such as Thorlabs det 10A observing a small pickoff (for example, a cover slip at 45° deflecting the excitation beam) or from an attenuated manufacturer’s “sync” electrical output from the laser. Additionally, sync the module with the time and pixel clocks on your microscope. See your TCSPC module documentation for specific instructions (see Note 9).
Mount your sample on the microscope stage and eliminate as much room light as possible prior to acquiring images (see Note 10).
Ensure that the microscope and the TCSPC software have the same image dimensions (for example, 2n x 2n pixels2). The dimensions you can obtain depend on your TCSPC system (see Note 11).
Find your sample of interest and record the spatial TCSPC histogram (often for 30 – 100 seconds, depending on the intensity of your sample). When imaging single cells, zoom in to fill as much of the field as possible (see Notes 12 and 13).
Ascertain that the photon count rate in bright areas is still below 4% of the laser repetition, unless you intend to employ a “pileup correction” algorithm.
3.3. IRF Measurement (Multiphoton Microscopy)
Place the short-pass filter that transmits SHG wavelengths in front of the detector.
Mount the optically thin SHG sample onto the microscope stage.
Collect a spatial (or spectral) TCSPC histogram using the same parameters used during image acquisition in Subheading 3.2 (e.g., laser power, gain, offset, number of time channels, optics configuration. Attenuate emission as needed without changing power). See your TCSPC module documentation for further details (See Note 14).
3.4. Controlled Experimental Environment with a Range of Stable Oxygen Concentrations for Imaging
Mount a small, enclosed incubator onto the stage of the microscope. Use the temperature controller to preheat the incubator to the target temperature of 37 °C for live cell imaging. Connect the incubator to the gas mixing system, and be sure that the gas tanks are open, tubing is unobstructed, and gas is being delivered inside the chamber.
Once the incubator is at temperature, place the slide containing the cells inside. Remove the lid from the sample slide to allow equilibration with the atmosphere inside the chamber. Check the readout on the gas mixing system to verify 5% CO2 and desired O2 concentration. In this environment cells remain stable and can be imaged at the desired oxygen concentration for several hours.
We recommend obtaining FLIM images from at least 30 cells at each imposed oxygen concentration to obtain a sample size large enough for meaningful statistical analysis [27].
3.5. Myo-mCherry Calibration and Cell Treatment with Rotenone and Antimycin A
The lifetime of Myo-mCherry is used to determine the concentration of intracellular O2. However, cells, through oxidative phosphorylation within mitochondria, consume O2. This means that cells act as an O2 sink, and therefore the concentration of O2 within cells as measured by Myo-mCherry is not equivalent to the imposed O2 concentration within the atmosphere, or even the media. Treatment with both rotenone and antimycin A nearly eliminates this sink by inhibiting cellular respiration. This allows for intra- and extra-cellular O2 concentration to be treated as equivalent, and subsequent determination of cellular pO2 as described below.
Prepare 1 mM stock solutions for both rotenone and antimycin A by dissolving them in DMSO.
Dose the desired sample such that concentration of each agent is 100nM.
Re-dose samples every 4 hours during imaging, or as needed to maintain respiratory inhibition.
Use the same controlled atmosphere imaging set up as before. Image the treated cells at various stable O2 concentrations from 20% down to 0.5% in steps of 3-4% with a constant CO2 concentration of 5%. Begin with the highest O2 and end with the lowest to avoid undue stress and shock to the cells.
Allow 30-45 min between step-downs in O2 concentration. This gives time for atmospheric gasses to diffuse into the media and reach a new equilibrium. Larger step-downs require longer equilibration periods.
We again recommend obtaining at least 30 FLIM images at each imposed O2 concentration.
3.6. Measurements of the Oxygen Partial Pressure (pO2) at Each Imposed Oxygen Concentration
This measurement can be performed during the imaging session, or as a separate experiment. Be aware that if performed during imaging, care must be taken not to record O2 concentration through the OxyLite Pro while imaging: the fiber probe uses light to measure O2 concentration, and emits light at 650 nm which could interfere with FLIM measurements by increasing background noise.
Setup the same controlled atmosphere chamber and same dish used for imaging.
Plate cells to the same confluency used for FLIM, and transfect them with the Myo-mCherry probe.
After 24-48 h, proceed to prepare the sample as if it was going to be used for FLIM measurements.
Prepare a fiber optic polymer phosphorescence quenching probe such as OxyLite Pro (NX-BF/O/E, Optronix Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom). This bare-fiber O2 sensor, or similar O2 monitoring probe, can be used to measure pO2 in the media at the bottom of the Petri dish close to the cell layer. Obtain measurements for untreated cells and samples treated with rotenone and antimycin A. Obtain an average pO2 for each condition by collecting six point measurements in different areas of each sample. Repeating using five samples each of treated and untreated cells to record sample to sample variability and statistics is strongly advised.
Observe the temperature and pO2 readings on the OxyLite Pro display. Record pO2 for imposed O2 concentrations of 20% down to 0.5%. Use the same step-downs used during imaging.
Use the partial pressure measured at each imposed O2 concentration to plot the lifetime values of Myo-mCherry versus the measured pO2 and perform a hyperbolic curve fit of the data (see 3.9). pO2 values vary between cell lines due to different O2 consumption rates [28]; as such, this procedure has to be repeated for each different cell line used, and ideally should be done in parallel with imaging to achieve greater accuracy.
3.7. FLIM Analysis
The software SPCImage (B&H) is used to quantify lifetime values and calculate decay coefficients, as shown in Fig. 3. If there is a large enough laser interpulse time so that the entire Myo-mCherry fluorescence decay curve is recorded (e.g. 12.5 ns), then it is possible to use the experimental decay function with the “standard decay” model without incurring “wrap around” issues.
The SHG transient measured from urea crystals as described in Subheading 3.3 was used as the IRF data. To load the IRF data into SPCImage, open the raw FLIM file containing the IRF data and select an appropriate region in the image using the blue crosshairs. Observe the wave form in the curve window and increase binning as needed to obtain a smooth curve (typically >10,000 peak photons). Then use the sliders in the same curve window to select the start and end of the portion of the TCSPC histogram to be used as the IRF. Store the IRF for use in image analysis by clicking the “curve to IRF” button on the left-hand tool bar.
Open a FLIM file containing the desired data to be analyzed. Open the IRF tab from the toolbar and select “Paste from clipboard.” The IRF appears as a green wave form in the curve window, as shown in Fig. 3d.
Select a bright pixel in the region of interest using the blue cursor. If there is any unwanted region of the image, select the ROI tool on the left side menu and click around the perimeter of the region to be included for analysis. Alternatively, use the ROI tool to remove any unwanted areas or use the white cursors on the edge of the image frame to exclude undesired sections.
In the presence of the FRET acceptor Myoglobin, the fluorescence decay of mCherry is better described by a multiexponential function with more than two exponential components [29]. However, the 4-parameter function in Eq. (1) (two exponentials) adequately represents most data and can be used to glean FRET trends in terms of average lifetime. In the menu on the right side, increase the multiexponential decay components from 1 to 2.
For dimmer samples, increase the bin number to values greater than 2 to avoid using decays with a peak count lower than 1,000. For our samples, the typical bin value per image is 5 (which corresponds to an area of 11x11 (pixels)2). If such a loss of spatial lifetime resolution is prohibitive, one must collect more frames or increase photon rates (see Note 15).
Increase the threshold at least by a factor of N2+1, where N is the bin number, to exclude dark pixels. Avoid a high threshold value that results in missing cellular features.
The shift of the IRF is determined by fitting the decay of the pixel with the highest intensity in each image, while leaving the shift parameter free. Once the shift is determined from the brightest pixel, it can be fixed for the subsequent pixel-by-pixel fitting of the lifetime decay across the whole image. A known standard sample with a single lifetime can be fit with shift allowed to vary. Shift is then fixed for subsequent unknown samples according to the known standard (see Note 16).
Only fix the offset at zero if detectors with low background and negligible afterpulsing are used in conjunction with maximum rejection of ambient and stray light. (for example, an HPM-100 hybrid photo detector from B&H, or Leica HyD detectors) [4].
Unfix scatter correction to account for any photon generation as a result of second harmonic components or other zero-delay scattering [4] (see Note 17).
Select Options from the toolbar, and open the Color panel. Adjust the width of the lifetime histogram to an interval of 500 to 1500 ps. This covers the range of Myo-mCherry mean lifetimes. If left unspecified, SPCImage will autogenerate the histogram width.
Press F2, or select “decay matrix” in the calculate tab to start the pixel-by-pixel fitting procedure.
Once the fit is completed, the average lifetime is calculated for each pixel via amplitude weighting, and a lifetime distribution histogram is generated for the image or selected ROI.
If you have more than one image, go to the Calculate tab and select Batch Processing to analyze the rest of the images in the set using the same fit parameters.
Once the set of images has been batch processed, open another image in the set and observe that the same parameters are used. Readjust fit parameters as needed: to achieve a peak photon count close to 1,000 binning might have to be changed; to exclude dark pixels from analysis thresholding might have to be adjusted. Recalculate the fit to improve accuracy of the lifetime values for the current image of the set. Repeat for all images to verify the results.
Fig. 3.

Lifetime analysis in SPCImage for mitochondrial targeted Myo-mCherry in a primary mouse fibroblast. (a) Intensity image of sample. (b) Amplitude-weighted lifetime image of sample. (c) Lifetime histogram with mean lifetime value (μ) and its error range (μ−/μ+sig). (d) Lifetime decay curve fitting options. The time gates (T1 & T2), the lifetime binning parameter (Bin), and the photon threshold are held constant across the image. X and Y give coordinates for the crosshair tool overlaying the images. The top plot shows the data (blue), the model iteratively re-convolved with the IRF (red), and the IRF (green). The bottom plot shows the fit residuals. (e) Lifetime decay curve model results for the selected pixel. The parameters a1, t1, a2, and t2 correspond to and . The shift parameter corrects for the difference in timing between the detector response at the IRF collection wavelength and response in the emission collection band, usually a fraction of a channel. ‘Scatter’ represents the amount of scattered light (with same timing as IRF, and no decay tail) detected during measurement. ‘Offset’ corrects for the upward shift of the decay curve due to background signal.
3.8. Obtaining the Intracellular pO2 from Lifetime Data at Each Imposed Oxygen Concentration
The τ([pO2]) for respiring cells is compared to the data for the same cell type treated with rotenone and antimycin A, which inhibits intracellular O2 consumption [30]. If O2 freely diffuses through cell membranes, and oxidative phosphorylation does not occur in treated cells, the τ([pO2]) cell response in these conditions can determine the relationship between pO2 and lifetime value, thus providing a calibration curve [31]. By using the calibration curve obtained with this method, it is then possible to back calculate the pO2 in untreated cells based on the lifetime of Myo-mCherry measured.
Myoglobin has a hyperbolic oxygen dissociation curve [32, 33]. Use MATLAB’s 4Curve Fitting Toolbox (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts) or any other fitting software to fit a hyperbolic curve to the data:
| (3) |
where are the recorded lifetime values at the highest and lowest imposed partial oxygen partial pressure, [pO2] respectively, and a is a fitting parameter related to oxygen affinity [34] (Fig. 4a).
Fig. 4.

(a) Average Myo-mCherry lifetimes for A549 cells and A549 cells treated with rotenone and antimycin A versus imposed [pO2]. Since rotenone and antimycin A inhibit cellular respiration, there is more oxyMyo-mCherry in the cell, FRET decreases, and the average lifetime values increase relative to the respiring cell line. (b) Intracellular [pO2] for A549 cells was plotted against imposed pO2. Values were calculated using a, and values obtained from the calibration curve.
Fit τ([pO2]) for the non-respiring cell to the model described in Eq. (3) to obtain a, which serves as a conversion factor between lifetime and external [pO2] (See Note 18).
Fit for the respiring cell to the same model to confirm the hyperbolic behavior of Myo-mCherry in the cell line of interest.
Given a lifetime value for a respiring cell, find the external [pO2] that produces the same lifetime value on the non-respiring cell calibration curve. This [pO2] corresponds to the intracellular [pO2] in the respiring cell (Fig. 4b).
3.9. Statistical Analysis
Using statistics software packages (SPSS, R, etc.), Mann-Whitney U tests can be used to determine differences between groups for sets of cells with at least 30 samples across external [pO2]. Mann-Whitney U tests are alternatives to t-tests, where the lifetimes for the two sets of cells is not assumed to follow a normal distribution [35].
Fig. 5.

(a) A C2C12 cell shows homogeneous distribution of the probe. (b) A differentiated C2C12 myo-tube shows heterogeneous distribution within the cytoplasm and organelles.
Fig. 6.

(a) Oversampling of the Airy disk in the intensity image (left) and binning of lifetime data (right). Since the pixel size is smaller than the physical image resolution, lifetime data can be binned with no loss in spatial resolution. (b) Overlapping binning of pixels for lifetime calculation. Since adjacent pixels in the intensity image overlap in the binned lifetime data, sampling artifacts are minimized. (This figure was reproduced from Becker 2017 [4] with permission)
Fig. 7.

The effects of (a) IRF, (b) shift parameter, (c) bin number, and (d) thresholding on average Myo-mCherry lifetimes. Error bars represent ±μ sig values given by SPCImage. Shift, threshold, and bin values taken from a single A549 sample. Bin and threshold should be done together to avoid these biasing trends.
Fig. 8.

Effect of intermolecular FRET on Myo-mCherry lifetime. (a) Lifetime distribution of Myo-mCherry in non-respiring SCO2 KO cell at 20% oxygen concentration. (b) Shorter lifetime of Myo-mCherry due to intermolecular FRET. (c) Lifetime histogram distribution of Myo-mCherry (solid black line with a peak at 1.33 ns) and a shift in the average lifetime (solid white line with a peak at 0.97 ns) due to intermolecular FRET.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of NHLBI, and in part by funds from the Office of Intramural Training and Education (OITE) of the Office of the Director (OD), National Institutes of Health (NIH). We would like to acknowledge the Light Microscopy Core at the NHLBI (particularly Dr. Christian Combs) for the use of their multiphoton microscopes.
4 Notes
The source material and the preparation of the plasmid coding for Myo-mCherry is described in ref. 10. For users with experience in molecular biology, the preparation is straightforward using the plasmid pmCherry N1, obtainable from Clontech (TakaraBio), as a backbone. The gene of myoglobin from Physeter catodon (Sperm Whale) is available on Addgene (plasmid pMB413a, #20058). Although restriction enzyme cloning is a viable option, because of the insertion of the Gly-Ser linker between the two genes we find it simpler to use a seamless cloning method such as Gibson Assembly (kit available from New England Biolabs), or In-Fusion cloning (kit available from Clontech, Takara Bio). The map of the Myo-mCherry plasmid is available for anyone interested, and it will be sent along with the sample to anyone who will request the plasmid for their experiments.
Transfection efficiency depends on factors including the cell line, confluency, antibiotics, and media [36]. For instance, cell lines with inhibited endocytosis will be more difficult to transfect [37]. It is also possible that different reagents display different transfection efficiencies between cell lines, where higher transfection efficiency often occurs in conjunction with higher cytotoxicity [38]. We have observed that some cell lines distribute Myo-mCherry more homogeneously within organelles (see Fig. 5). Research on the transfection efficiency of various reagents and their interactions with the Myo-mCherry probe between cell lines is needed. There is also evidence that over time mCherry becomes abnormally localized within lysosomes [39]. This could lead to artifacts from accidental FRET and index of refraction, so careful attention must be devoted to localization.
Tuning to 780 nm is convenient because many Ti:Sapphire oscillators (even inexpensive kit lasers lacking tuning) can achieve this wavelength with high power output, and mCherry shows an intense 2-photon excitation peak around this wavelength. For in vivo, Myo-mCherry can be excited at ≈ 1050 nm using the same setup: 1100 nm excitation would be more appropriate, however this wavelength is out of range for common Ti:Sapphire lasers, therefore an optical parametric oscillator (OPO) or Nd laser with access to these longer wavelengths would be needed.
For single photon excitation, any laser tunable across the mCherry excitation spectrum can be used, but single photon excitation presents several drawbacks compared to 2-photon excitation. First, photobleaching and photodamage is no longer constrained to the focal plane because fluorescence excitation occurs throughout the illumination volume rather than only at the laser focal point [40]. Second, descanned detectors behind the confocal pinhole must be used to eliminate out of focus emission, which increases the number of optical elements required in the imaging system [4, 40]. Finally, IRF measurements become more complicated (unless your single photon microscope has a wideband beamsplitter) because dichroic beamsplitters do not transmit much scattered light to the detector, meaning that optical components need to be added and/or removed to acquire a strong signal [4]. See [40] for a primer on multiphoton microscopy touching on some of these subjects.
For all filters mentioned, check to see if there is a two-photon compatible version of it from your manufacturer of interest. Oftentimes, bandpass filters do not reject IR light efficiently, which can cause issues with acquisition.
Anecdotally, reagent urea crystals give a cleaner (tail free) signal than sucrose in our lab. It is not unlikely that sucrose may either contain fluorescent contaminants, or act as a substrate for microbial growth.
The amount provided is generally sufficient for several transfection reactions. If amplification and propagation of plasmids to replenish the provided stock is not regularly performed in house, we strongly suggest seeking advice from colleagues in the same department/institution that routinely do so. Some companies also offer plasmid amplification services if large-scale production is needed for experiments.
For users using turn-key auto-tuning lasers (e.g.: Chameleon, MaiTai, Insight), alignment of the beam is often not required.
Performing this syncing procedure is necessary when first setting up a TCSPC system. Typically, the procedure is not required for later measurements on the same system.
In addition to turning off room lights, cover the microscope with a thick dark cloth. Furthermore, try to remove any possible entrance point of stray light into the objective from above, below, and the sides of the microscope stage by using non-reflective black masking tape, cardboard, or aluminum foil.
In the past, photon distributions were built directly into the hardware of the TCSPC counting card, thereby limiting the number of possible spatial and temporal channels one could record [4]. In contrast, new TCSPC systems running 64-bit acquisition software store spatiotemporal photon distributions directly into the memory and onto the disk of the computer, thus expanding the dimensional capacities of TCSPC systems [4]. The microscope pixel resolution defines the spatial channel constraints. On the temporal side, the FWHM of the IRF acts as the dominant constraining factor on the minimum possible lifetime value one can resolve from a sample, since many TCSPC systems have sub-picosecond channel widths constrained by the full-width half-maximum (FWHM) of the system’s electronic jitter [4, 41]. These electronic limits are an order of magnitude better than current detectors.
Filling the field of view with as much of the sample as possible maximizes the spatial resolution of the image, yielding more defined intracellular features.
Measuring overly bright cells can result in systemically low lifetime values due to “accidental” intermolecular FRET (See Note 19).
For spectral IRF measurements, longer acquisition times with a lower rate of incoming photons provide the best results, since high photon rates can oversaturate the photodetector, resulting in a broadened IRF [42]. Anecdotally, ≈ 20,000 counts in the peak time channel provides a reasonable IRF. Ideally, the IRF should be recorded before each experiment to account for potential day-to-day fluctuations in laser output.
During data acquisition in laser-scanning microscopy experiments, the point-spread function (PSF) of the microscope lens is oversampled, meaning that the pixel size in an image is smaller than its Airy disk [4] (Fig. 6a). Accordingly, binning of lifetime data from adjacent pixels in the intensity image yields substantially improved lifetime accuracy without loss of spatial resolution; in addition, sampling artifacts are avoided due to overlapping binning [4] (Fig. 6b).
Effects of IRF, shift, threshold, and bin on FLIM analysis: Obtaining correct scatter values is dependent on the experimental IRF, and as such IRF should be collected before each experiment [5]. As shown in Fig. 7a, four types of IRF data were used in the calculation of mean lifetimes forten sample Myo-mCherry images. The images were analyzed with IRF data(IRF 1) from an experiment a year prior to imaging and was compared toanalysis done with an IRF taken prior to obtaining the sample images (IRF2). Additionally, shown here are the average lifetimes calculated using thenew IRF with a fixed scatter parameter, and those calculated using IRFdata auto-generated by SPCImage.
The parameters bin, shift, and threshold are used in the fitting procedure to obtain more accurate lifetime measurements by resolving the needs of numerical de-convolution [5]. In order to obtain accurate lifetime measurements using these parameters, it is necessary to know how each one affects fitting, and therefore lifetime. Lifetime binning for a number of pixels (2n+1)2 results in less sampling artifact, reducing spatial resolution [5]. Increasing pixel size for lifetime calculation through binning will alter lifetimes as dim regions can surpass the set photon count threshold as binning increases. To account for this, threshold must be simultaneously adjusted accordingly to exclude these regions. Thresholding excludes pixels below the set photon count limit from lifetime calculation and limits the influence of dark pixels on lifetime calculation, which otherwise contribute long lived arrival times to the mixture [5]. Shift accounts for differences in detector timing at the IRF collection wavelength and the sample’s emission [5]. Slight changes in shift (less than a single time channel, and without significantly changing χ2) can be used to fine tune analysis and achieve the best possible lifetime values. The effects of shift, threshold and binning (all in isolation) on the average lifetime of Myo-mCherry are shown in Fig. 7 b–d. Clearly, the collection of a contemporaneous IRF, the calibration of the shift parameter described above, and the exclusion of background with a proper threshold (one that must be changed if binning changes) are all important in recovering stable, accurate mean lifetimes. Doing one without the other may bias results.
Obtaining correct scatter values is dependent on the experimental IRF, especially in multiphoton microscopy [4]. If the ‘automatically generated’ IRF (option available in the SPCImage software) is used for data acquired with a multiphoton setup, faster lifetimes will be biased towards longer values and SHG components will be difficult to separate from FLIM data [4]. Likewise, if the scatter parameter is fixed when copying the IRF from the SHG generator data, SHG components are not correctly extracted.
The accuracy of the fitting parameter, a, is dependent on the number of imposed O2 concentrations measured for the cell line of interest, n. In the example provided for the calibration curve where n =8, a = 7 ± 3 and for τA549 = 1.150 ns, [pO2,int]= 4 ± 2, yielding up to a 50% variation in the calculated [pO2] values depending on the value of a used. As n increases, the variation in a will decrease, yielding more precise calculated [pO2] values.
Effect of Intermolecular FRET on FLIM Analysis: If the distance between chromophores is approximately 3 nm or less, intermolecular FRET can occur [4, 12, 43]. To prevent intermolecular FRET, it would be useful to ensure, when possible, that the concentration of Myo-mCherry does not exceed a few μM. Empirically, while imaging, select cells that do not show oversaturated intensity [44]. Intermolecular FRET can cause self-quenching fluorophore pairs as a result of oversaturation. The unusually high fluorescence results in inaccurate, shortened lifetimes. In Fig. 8, the Myo-mCherry lifetime for a non-respiring SCO2 KO cell at 20% imposed O2 concentration (A) is compared to that measured in the same cell and imposed O2 concentration affected by intermolecular FRET (B). The lifetime histogram distribution is shown for both in Fig. 8c. (B) intentionally has a corrected total cell fluorescence 2.8 times greater than (A) as a result of oversaturation [45].
References
- 1.Becker W (2012) Fluorescence lifetime imaging—techniques and applications. J. Micros 247(2): 119–136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Suhling K, French PM, Phillips D (2005) Time-resolved fluorescence microscopy. Photochem Photobiol Sci 4(1): 13–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Becker W (2005) Advanced Time-Correlated Single Photon Counting Techniques. Springer, Berlin [Google Scholar]
- 4.Becker W (2017) The bh TCSPC Handbook, 7th ed. Becker & Hickl GmbH, Berlin [Google Scholar]
- 5.Berezin MY, Achilefu S (2010) Fluorescence Lifetime Measurements and Biological Imaging. Chem Rev 110:2641–2684 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tinnefeld P et al. (2000) Confocal Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy (FLIM) at the Single Molecule Level. Single Mol 1(2):215–223 [Google Scholar]
- 7.Singh AK, Das J (1998) Liposome encapsulated vitamin A compounds exhibit greater stability and diminished toxicity. Biophys Chem 73(1-2):155–162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Owen DM et al. (2006) Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Provides Enhanced Contrast when Imaging the Phase-Sensitive Dye di-4-ANEPPDHQ in Model Membranes and Live Cells. Biophys J 90(11):L80–L82 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wallrabe H, Periasamy A (2005) Imaging protein molecules using FRET and FLIM microscopy. Curr Op in Biotech 16:19–27 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Penjweini R et al. (2018) Intracellular oxygen mapping using a myoglobin-mCherry probe with fluorescence lifetime imaging. J. Biomed. Optics 23(10):107001. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.23.10.107001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Andreoni A et al. (2019) Genetically encoded FRET probes for direct mapping and quantification of intracellular oxygenation level via fluorescence lifetime imaging. In: Proc. SPIE 10882, Multiphoton Microscopy in the Biomedical Sciences XIX, 108820O, February 2019. doi: 10.1117/12.2510646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lakowicz JR (1984) Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Plenum, New York [Google Scholar]
- 13.Selvin PR (2000) The renaissance of fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Nat. Struct. Bio 7(9):730–734 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Förster T (1946) Energiwanderung und Fluoreszenz. Nat. 6:166–175 [Google Scholar]
- 15.Förster T (1948) Zwischenmolekulare Energiewanderung und Fluoreszenz. Ann. Phys. Ser 6(2):55–75 [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sun Q et al. (2015) Mechanism of two-photon excited hemoglobin fluorescence emission. J. Biomed. Opt 20 (10):105014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jain A, Blum C, Subramaniam V (2009) Fluorescence Lifetime Spectroscopy and Imaging of Visible Fluorescent Proteins. In: Verdonck P (ed) Advances in Biomedical Engineering. Elsevier [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wu B, et al. (2009) Fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy of mCherry in living cells. Biophys. J 96(6):2391–2404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ballew RM, Demas JN (1989) An error analysis of the rapid lifetime determination method for the evaluation of single exponential decays. Anal. Chem 61:30–33 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Köllner M, Wolfrum J (1992) How many photons are necessary for fluorescence lifetime measurements? Phys. Chem. Lett 200:199–204 [Google Scholar]
- 21.Phillip JP, Carlsson K (2003) Theoretical investigation of the signal-to-noise ratio in fluorescence lifetime imaging. J. Opt. Soc. Am A20:368–379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li N et al. (2003) Mitochondrial complex I inhibitor rotenone induces apoptosis through enhancing mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production. J. Biol. Chem 278(10):8516–8525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chen Q et al. (2003) Production of Reactive Oxygen Species by Mitochondria Central Role of Complex III. J. Biol. Chem 278(38):36027–36031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shanser NC, et al. (2004) Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat. Biotech 22:1567–1572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Becker & Hickl GmbH (2008) Recording the Instrument Response Function of a Multiphoton FLIM System. Becker & Hickl GmbH. Available via DIALOG. https://www.becker-hickl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/irf-mp-v04.pdf. Accessed on October 9, 2019 [Google Scholar]
- 26.Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc (2017) Invitrogen™ Lipofectamine™ 3000 Transfection Agent. In: Meet our transfection product family. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. Available via DIALOG. http://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets/BID/Flyers/transfection-product-family-flyer.pdf. Accessed on October 9, 2019 [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hirsch RP (2016) Introduction to Biostatistical Applications in Health Research with Microsoft Office Excel. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wagner BA, Venkataraman S, Buettner GR (2011) The Rate of Oxygen Utilization by Cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 51(3):700–712 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lackowicz JR (2000) On Spectral Relaxation in Proteins. Photochemistry and Photobiology 72(4):421–437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Forkink M et al. (2015) Complex I and complex III inhibition specifically increase cytosolic hydrogen peroxide levels without inducing oxidative stress in HEK293 cells. Redox Biology 6:607–616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lodish H, Berk A, Zipursky SL et al. (2000) Molecular Cell Biology, 4th edition. W.H. Freeman, New York [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ruiz-Larrera M (2006) A simple question to think about when considering the hemoglobin function. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 30(4):235–238 [Google Scholar]
- 33.Schenkman KA et al. (1997) Myoglobin oxygen dissociation by multiwavelength spectroscopy. J. Appl. Physiol 82(1):86–92 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kelly JJ et al. (1991) Myoglobin Oxygen Binding Curves Determined by Phosphorescence Quenching of Palladium Porphyrin. Appl. Spectrosc 45:1177–1182 [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schweitzer D et al. (2015) Fluorescence lifetime imaging ophthalmoscopy intype 2 diabetic patients who have no signs of diabetic retinopathy. J BiomedOpt 20(6):061106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Thermo Fisher Scientific (2019) Factors Influencing Transfection Agency. Thermo Fisher Scientific. Available via DIALOG. https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/references/gibco-cell-culture-basics/transfection-basics/factors-influencing-transfection-efficiency.html. Accessed October 9, 2019 [Google Scholar]
- 37.Conner SD, Schmid SL (2003) Regulated portals of entry into the cell. Nature 22:37–44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wang T et al. (2018) Systematic Screening of Commonly Used Commercial Transfection Reagents towards Efficient Transfection of Single-Stranded Oligonucleotides. Molecules 23(10):2564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shemmiakina II, et al. (2012) A monomeric red fluorescent protein with low cytotoxicity. Nature Communications 3(1):1204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Piston D et al. (2019) Multiphoton Microscopy: Fundamentals and Applications in Multiphoton Excitation Microscopy. In: Microscopy U, The Source for Microscopy Education. Nikon. Available via DIALOG. https://www.microscopyu.com/techniques/multi-photon/multiphoton-microscopy. Accessed on October 9, 2019 [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wahl M (2014) Time-Correlated Single Photon Counting. PicoQuant Gmbh. Available via DIALOG. https://www.picoquant.com/images/uploads/page/files/7253/technote_tcspc.pdf. Accessed on October 9, 2019 [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hamamatsu Photonics KK (2019) MCP (Microchannel Plate) and MCP Assembly. Hamamatsu. Available via DIALOG. https://www.hamamatsu.com/resources/pdf/etd/MCP_TMCP0002E.pdf. Accessed on October 9, 2019 [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bajar BT et al. (2016) A Guide to Fluorescent Protein FRET Pairs. Sensors (Basel) 16(9):1488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wilbur S, Williams M, Williams R et al. (2012) Toxicological Profile for Carbon Monoxide. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, USA. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp.asp?id=1145&tid=253. Accessed October 9, 2019 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Waters JC, (2019) Accuracy and precision in quantitative fluorescence microscopy. J. Cell Bio 185(7):1135–1148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
