Pharmacokinetics and Exposure–Response of Vosoritide in Children with Achondroplasia

Abstract

Background and Objective

Vosoritide, an analog of C-type natriuretic peptide, has been developed for the treatment of children with achondroplasia. The pharmacokinetics of vosoritide and relationships between plasma exposure and efficacy, biomarkers, and safety endpoints were evaluated in a phase II, open-label, dose-escalation study (N = 35 patients aged 5–14 years who received daily subcutaneous injections for 24 months) and a phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (N = 60 patients aged 5–18 years randomized to receive daily subcutaneous injections for 52 weeks).

Methods

Pharmacokinetic parameters for both studies were obtained from non-compartmental analysis. Potential correlations between vosoritide exposure and changes in annualized growth velocity, collagen type X marker (CXM; a biomarker of endochondral ossification), cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP; a biomarker of pharmacological activity), heart rate, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures were then evaluated.

Results

The exposure–response relationships for changes in both annualized growth velocity and the CXM biomarker saturated at 15 μg/kg, while systemic pharmacological activity, as measured by urinary cGMP, was near maximal or saturated at exposures obtained at the highest dose studied (i.e. 30 μg/kg). This suggested that the additional bioactivity was likely in tissues not related to endochondral bone formation. In the phase III study, following subcutaneous administration at the recommended dose of 15 μg/kg to patients with achondroplasia aged 5–18 years, vosoritide was rapidly absorbed with a median time to maximal plasma concentration (C_max) of 15 minutes, and cleared with a mean half-life of 27.9 minutes after 52 weeks of treatment. Vosoritide exposure (C_max and area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]) was consistent across visits. No evidence of accumulation with once-daily dosing was observed. Total anti-vosoritide antibody (TAb) responses were detected in the serum of 25 of 60 (42%) treated patients in the phase III study, with no apparent impact of TAb development noted on annualized growth velocity or vosoritide exposure. Across the exposure range obtained with 15 µg/kg in the phase III study, no meaningful correlations between vosoritide plasma exposure and changes in annualized growth velocity or CXM, or changes from predose heart rate, and systolic or diastolic blood pressures were observed.

Conclusions

The results support the recommended dose of vosoritide 15 µg/kg for once-daily subcutaneous administration in patients with achondroplasia aged ≥ 5 years whose epiphyses are not closed.

Clinical Trials Registration

NCT02055157, NCT03197766, and NCT01603095.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40262-021-01059-1.

Key Points

The pharmacokinetics of vosoritide and relationships between vosoritide plasma exposure and efficacy, biomarkers, and safety endpoints were evaluated in a phase II and a phase III study.

The exposure–response relationships for annualized growth velocity and an endochondral ossification biomarker saturated at exposures obtained at 15 μg/kg, while pharmacological activity was near maximal at exposures obtained at 30 μg/kg. No differences were observed in the safety profile of vosoritide between the two doses.

The results from these analyses support the recommended dose of 15 µg/kg vosoritide for once-daily subcutaneous administration in patients with achondroplasia aged ≥5 years whose growth plates are not closed.

Introduction

Achondroplasia is the most common form of disproportionate short stature and is characterized by rhizomelic shortening of the limbs and macrocephaly [1–3]. Achondroplasia is an inherited autosomal dominant chondrodysplasia caused by a single nucleotide gain-of-function pathogenic variant in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) gene. The resultant protein product constitutively activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) inhibitory signaling pathway in chondrocytes, inhibiting endochondral ossification [4–6]. Achondroplasia is associated with a condition-specific developmental milestone profile, functional limitations impacting quality of life, causing chronic pain and leading to psychosocial challenges [7–10]. Medical complications include foramen magnum stenosis, cervicomedullary compression, hydrocephalus, hypotonia, back and leg pain, and hearing loss and speech delay related to recurrent otitis media and chronic middle ear fluid. There are no approved pharmacological therapies for achondroplasia except for growth hormone, which is available for this indication in Japan [11]; however, while it may help accelerate growth in the first 2 years of treatment, its effect on disproportionality and long-term complications are unknown [12–14]. Limb lengthening procedures are available to patients but they are controversial and are associated with a high risk of complications [15].

Natriuretic peptides comprise a family of three structurally related peptides: atrial natriuretic peptide, brain natriuretic peptide, and C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP). CNP, encoded by the Nppc gene, and its receptor, natriuretic peptide receptor 2 (NPR-B), are potent stimulators of endochondral ossification [16]. Distinct domains of expression of FGFR3 and NPR-B in the growth plate allow these two antagonistic signaling pathways to maintain a finely balanced rate of chondrocyte hypertrophy [17]. Reduced or absent Nppc or Npr2 gene expression in mice results in severe dwarfism due to impaired endochondral ossification [18, 19]. Conversely, overexpression of the Nppc gene in mice and human disease models with NPPC overexpression are characterized by sustained skeletal overgrowth [20–23]. Endogenous CNP overproduction and continuous intravenous infusion of exogenous CNP rescues the impaired bone growth observed in mice with achondroplasia and increases long bone growth in wild-type monkeys through inhibition of the FGFR3-mediated MAPK signaling pathway, supporting the potential for CNP-targeted therapies in achondroplasia [19, 24–26].

Vosoritide (molecular weight 4.1 kD) is an analog of CNP that was designed to mimic CNP receptor binding and pharmacological activity, with structural modification to confer resistance to neutral endopeptidase (NEP) digestion in order to have an extended half-life in comparison with CNP. Like CNP, vosoritide binding to NPR-B stimulates intracellular cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) production and inhibits FGFR3 downstream signaling cascade. This in turn counteracts the effect of constitutive FGFR3 activation on chondrocyte function and promotes endochondral bone growth by stimulating chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation [27–29].

Type X collagen is a homotrimeric protein consisting of the C-terminal NC1 and N-terminal NC2 domains connected by a collagenous triple helix [30]. It is produced by hypertrophic chondrocytes and promotes endochondral ossification by gathering matrix components into the hypertrophic zone of the cartilage and modulating cartilage and bone mineralization [31]. As endochondral ossification occurs, the NC1 domain of type X collagen is released into the blood and this CXM biomarker was found to correlate with skeletal growth velocity in humans and mice [30, 32]. As such, in the vosoritide development program, CXM was measured in serum as an exploratory biomarker to investigate the effect of vosoritide on growth plate activity. Both cGMP and CXM biomarkers were measured to assess pharmacodynamic (PD) responses following vosoritide treatment in patients with achondroplasia.

The safety and efficacy of vosoritide have been investigated in a phase II, open-label, dose-escalation and extension study [33] and a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study [34]. In the phase II study, long-term administration of vosoritide at daily doses of both 15 and 30 µg/kg for up to 52 months was generally well-tolerated with no change in safety profile over time. No differences were observed in the safety profile of vosoritide between the two doses. No meaningful differences were observed in the pattern or timing of heart rate, and systolic or diastolic blood pressure changes between patients receiving 15 and 30 µg/kg in clinical studies. The phase II study demonstrated a sustained mean increase in annualized growth velocity (AGV) of 1.55 cm/year above baseline up to 42 months in children with achondroplasia administered a daily dose of 15 µg/kg. The phase III study showed the adjusted mean difference in AGV between patients in the vosoritide and placebo groups was 1.57 cm/year in favor of vosoritide (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22–1.93; two-sided p < 0.0001).

A more detailed summary of the pharmacokinetic (PK) data from the phase II study presented previously [33] is shown in Table 1. After a single subcutaneous dose of vosoritide at 2.5, 7.5, 15 or 30 µg/kg, the median time to maximal plasma concentration (T_max) ranged from 5 to 16 min, and the mean of the maximum observed plasma concentration (C_max) and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration (AUC_0-t) ranged from 549 to 16,800 pg/mL and 1370 to 689,000 pg-min/mL, respectively. PK data from the phase II and III studies were used to analyze the relationships between plasma exposure and efficacy, biomarkers, and safety endpoints.

Table 1.

Summary of vosoritide PK parameters after a single dose in the phase II study

Cohort	Dose (µg/kg)	Visit	Statistic	Tmax (min)	Cmax (pg/mL)	AUC0-t (pg-min/mL)	AUC0-∞ (pg-min/mL)	CL/F (mL/min/kg)	Vz/F (mL/kg)	t½ (min)
C1	2.5	Day 1	Mean	5.00	549	1370	NA	NA	NA	NA
			SD	–	–	–	NA	NA	NA	NA
			CV%	–	–	–	NA	NA	NA	NA
C2	7.5	Day 1	Mean	13.7	1360	32,200	NA	NA	NA	NA
			SD	6.26	901	28,100	NA	NA	NA	NA
			CV%	45.7	66.3	87.3	NA	NA	NA	NA
C3	15	Day 1	Mean	15.8	4750	175,000	293,000	83.7	2560	24.4
			SD	5.98	1990	113,000	258,000	73.8	1730	7.17
			CV%	37.8	41.8	64.6	88.1	88.1	67.5	29.4
C4	30	Day 1	Mean	14.4	16,800	689,000	779,000	49.2	1830	27.0
			SD	7.26	11,500	383,000	393,000	28.4	1020	7.72
			CV%	50.3	68.7	55.6	50.5	57.7	55.6	28.6

All summary statistics rounded to three significant figures

AUC_0-∞ area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity, AUC_0-t area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration, CL/F apparent clearance, C_max maximum observed plasma concentration, CV coefficient of variation, NA not available due to insufficient data points for the calculation of pharmacokinetic parameters, SD standard deviation, t_½ half-life, T_max time to reach maximum concentration, V_z/F apparent volume of distribution

Methods

Clinical Study Design

In the phase II dose-finding study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02055157; date of registration, 5 February 2014), 35 patients with achondroplasia aged 5–14 years were administered daily subcutaneous injections of 2.5, 7.5, 15 or 30 µg/kg vosoritide for 6 months, followed by an optional open-label extension phase of 18 months where patients who received 2.5 or 7.5 µg/kg were subsequently administered 15 µg/kg vosoritide, while those patients who received 15 or 30 µg/kg continued to receive their initial doses. In the phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03197766; date of registration, 23 June 2017), a total of 121 patients aged 5–18 years were enrolled. 60 patients were randomized to receive daily subcutaneous injections of 15 µg/kg vosoritide for 52 weeks.

Sample Collections and Bioanalytical Methods

Vosoritide concentrations were measured in plasma samples for PK analyses in the phases II and III studies. During the initial 6 months of the phase II study, full PK sampling was performed at days 1, 10, 29, 85 and 183, during which plasma samples were collected predose and at 5 (± 2 min), 15 (± 2 min), 30 (± 5 min), 60 (± 5 min), 90 (± 5 min), 120 (± 5 min) and 180 (± 5 min) min postdose. For patients whose doses were not changed in the extension phase, full PK sampling was performed at months 12 and 24, while sparse PK sampling was performed at months 8, 10, 15, 18 and 21, during which plasma samples were collected predose and at 15 (± 2 min), 30 (± 5 min), and 60 (± 5 min) min postdose. For patients whose doses were adjusted from 2.5 or 7.5 µg/kg to 15 µg/kg in the extension phase, full PK sampling was performed at the dose adjustment visit and sparse PK sampling was performed 4 weeks after the adjustment. Thereafter, PK sampling followed the same schedule as those patients who were not dose-escalated. In the phase III study, full PK sampling was performed at day 1, week 26, and week 52, during which plasma samples were collected predose and at 5 (± 2 min), 15 (± 2 min), 30 (± 5 min), 45 (± 5 min), 60 (± 5 min), 90 (± 5 min) and 120 (± 5 min) min postdose. Sparse PK sampling was performed at week 13 and week 39, during which plasma samples were collected predose and at 15 (± 2 min), 30 (± 5 min), and 60 (± 5 min) min postdose. Whole blood was collected at each time point in 1 mL vacutainer collection tubes containing tri-potassium ethylene di-amine tetra-acetic acid (K₃-EDTA), phosphodiesterase inhibitor (3-Isobutyl-1-methylxanthine; Sigma-Aldrich catalog #I5879) and a cocktail of protease inhibitors (AEBSF, Aprotinin, Bestatin, E-64, EDTA, and Leupeptin; Sigma-Aldrich catalog #P2714).

Quantitative Measurement of Vosoritide in Human Plasma

In the phase II study, plasma samples were analyzed for vosoritide concentrations using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The assay used a murine monoclonal anti-vosoritide immunoglobulin (Ig) G capture antibody and a rabbit polyclonal anti-CNP IgG primary detection antibody. The assay utilized horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG for secondary detection and tetramethyl benzidine (TMB) substrate for colorimetric development. The optical density (OD) at 450 nm was read for each well using a SpectraMax spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA). The concentration of vosoritide in study samples was determined by interpolation of raw OD signals for each sample against a standard calibrator curve prepared in human plasma, using a four-parameter logistic curve fit. The assay lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was 391 pg/mL vosoritide in neat plasma.

The vosoritide PK ELISA was further optimized as an electrochemiluminesence assay (ECLA) before analysis of phase III study samples. In the PK ECLA, the capture re-agent was a biotinylated mouse monoclonal anti-vosoritide IgG, and the detection reagent was a ruthenylated rabbit polyclonal anti-vosoritide IgG. Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) read buffer was used for the generation of ECL signal, which was recorded using an MSD Quickplex instrument. The concentration of vosoritide in study samples was determined by interpolation of raw assay signals against the standard calibrator curve, using a four-parameter logistic curve fit. The assay LLOQ was 137 pg/mL vosoritide in neat plasma.

Relative Quantitative Measurement of Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate (cGMP) in Human Urine

Cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) was measured in urine as an exploratory biomarker of overall vosoritide activity through the target receptor NPR-B. Potential sources of cGMP include the target tissue (growth plate chondrocytes) and other tissues that express NPR-B, such as vascular endothelium. Urine samples were collected for cGMP measurement before dose administration and at 1, 2 and 4 h after dosing. In the phase II study, samples were collected on days 1, 10, 15, 29, 43, 85, 127 and 183 in the initial 6-month period, and at months 12, 18 and 24 of the extension phase. In the phase III study, samples were collected on days 1, 2 and 3, and weeks 6, 26 and 52.

A relative quantitative competitive ELISA based on an assay kit from Cayman Chemical Co. (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) was developed and qualified to measure cGMP in human urine samples from the phase III study. The method was later validated before testing phase III urine samples. In the method, cGMP in diluted urine samples and a cGMP-acetylcholinesterase conjugate reagent (cGMP-AChE) competed for binding to cGMP-specific rabbit antiserum. Complexes consisting of cGMP and/or cGMP-AChE and rabbit IgG were captured to a mouse monoclonal anti-rabbit IgG antibody that had been previously coated on the assay plate. The plate was washed and Ellman’s Reagent (AChE substrate) was added to the wells. The AChE enzymatic reaction produced a yellow color that was read on a SpectraMax Spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) at 420 nm. The assay signal was proportional to the concentration of cGMP-AChE bound to the well, and inversely proportional to the cGMP concentration in each sample. The relative concentration of cGMP in each sample was determined by interpolation of raw signals using a standard calibrator curve and a four-parameter logistic fit with a weighting factor of 1/Y. The LLOQ was 138 pmol/mL cGMP in neat human urine. Raw urine cGMP concentrations were normalized to the corresponding urine creatinine concentration in each sample for further analysis.

Relative Quantitative Measurement of Collagen Type X Marker (CXM) in Human Serum

CXM was measured in serum as an exploratory biomarker of growth plate activity directly related to the effect of vosoritide on endochondral bone growth. In the phase II study, predose serum samples were collected on days 1, 10, 29, 85 and 183 during the initial 6-month period, and at months 8, 10, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 during the extension phase. In the phase III study, samples were collected on day 1 and weeks 13, 26, 39 and 52.

CXM was measured in serum using a validated relative quantitative ECLA (modification of the method described by Coghlan et al. [30]), in the phases II and III studies. 96-well MSD streptavidin plates were blocked with StartingBlock PBS with Tween-20 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). After decanting blocking buffer, biotinylated anti-human collagen type X NC1 domain capture SOMAmer (SomaLogic, Boulder, CO, USA) was incubated on the plate. The standard stock consisting of recombinant human collagen type X NC1 domain (BioMatik, Kitchener, ON, Canada) in assay diluent (AD) was serially diluted in AD, while serum quality control samples (QCs) and serum study samples were diluted 1:100 in AD. After washing the assay plate, diluted calibrators and samples were incubated on the plate. After a second wash, ruthenium-labeled mouse monoclonal anti-collagen type X NC1 domain IgG detection antibody was incubated on the plate. The plate was then washed, MSD Read Buffer T with surfactant was added, and the plate was read on an MSD Quickplex instrument. The raw signal from each well was proportional to the collagen type X concentration in each sample. The concentration of collagen type X in each unknown sample was determined by interpolation of the raw assay signal using the standard calibrator curve. The standard regression performed by Watson LIMS used a four-parameter logistic Marquardt model with a weighting factor of 1/Y². The assay limit of detection was 914 pg/mL CXM in neat human serum.

Semi-Quantitative Measurement of Total Anti-Vosoritide Antibodies in Human Serum

Predose serum samples for immunogenicity assessment were collected at the same visits as CXM samples in the phases II and III studies. Total anti-vosoritide antibody (TAb) titers were measured using a validated semi-quantitative bridging ECLA method. The TAb assay method used bridging of biotin- and ruthenium-conjugated vosoritide reagents to detect anti-vosoritide antibodies of all isotypes in human serum samples. Anti-vosoritide antibodies present in serum samples formed complexes with conjugated vosoritide reagents in solution. The mixture was then incubated on a streptavidin-coated assay plate to capture vosoritide antibody complexes. After a final wash, MSD Read Buffer T with surfactant was added and raw assay signals were read on an MSD Quickplex instrument.

Samples that produced assay signal greater than or equal to the screening cut point (statistically defined at the upper 95th percentile of signals from pretreatment study samples) after a 1:10 dilution were considered reactive in an initial screening assay. Samples that screened positive were confirmed positive in a second-tier assay if the signal inhibition in the presence of free vosoritide exceeded the confirmation cut point established during method validation. A semi-quantitative titer value was determined for confirmed positive samples in a third-tier assay by serially diluting each sample until the signal crossed the titer cut point. The interpolated dilution factor at which the signal of the dilution curve crossed the titer cut point was reported as the sample titer. The assay limit of detection was 37.5 ng/mL anti-vosoritide antibody in neat serum.

Semi-Quantitative Measurement of Vosoritide-Neutralizing Antibodies in Human Serum

Study samples that were confirmed positive for anti-vosoritide TAb were further analyzed for anti-vosoritide neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) capable of interfering with vosoritide signaling through the cell-surface receptor NPR-B using a validated cell-based assay. Frozen ready-to-assay NIH/3T3 cells were seeded in 96-well culture plates with D10 media (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium [high glucose] + 10% fetal bovine serum) and cultured overnight in a 5% CO₂ incubator at 37°C. After overnight culture, the cells were stimulated with 5 ng/mL vosoritide in the presence of diluted human serum samples. Vosoritide NAbs in samples interfered with the activation of cellular NPR-B, reducing the amount of intracellular cGMP generated. After stimulation, cells were lysed and cGMP concentrations in cell lysates were measured using a competitive format ELISA kit from Cayman Chemical Co. (Ann Arbor, MI, USA; described above). The raw assay signal in the cGMP ELISA was inversely proportional to the cGMP concentration in each sample. Therefore, samples containing NAbs generated higher assay signals due to reduced cellular cGMP production.

Samples that produced absorbance at or above the established screening cut point (set at the upper 95th percentile of pretreatment sera) were considered potentially positive and were further tested in the confirmation step, in which anti-vosoritide antibodies were removed by immunodepletion using vosoritide-conjugated magnetic beads. Samples with %inhibition after immunodepletion that was greater than or equal to the confirmation cut point defined in the validation were considered positive. Samples that were screened and confirmed positive were serially diluted and assayed to determine a semi-quantitative titer value. The interpolated dilution factor at which the signal of the dilution curve crossed the titer cut point was reported as the sample titer. The assay limit of detection was 227 ng/mL anti-vosoritide IgG in human serum.

Pharmacokinetic Analysis

Plasma vosoritide PK parameters, including C_max, T_max, AUC_0-t, AUC from time zero to 60 min postdose (AUC_0-60min), AUC from time zero to infinity (${\text{AUC}}_{0-\infty }$) and elimination half-life (t_½), were obtained using standard non-compartmental analysis in the phase II and III studies. AUC values were calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule for increasing concentrations and the logarithmic trapezoidal rule for decreasing concentrations. Where appropriate, individual mean C_max and AUC_0-t or AUC_0-60min values were calculated for each patient, using available PK data from all visit days, and were used as representative measures of a patient’s exposure during the respective durations. Plasma vosoritide concentrations that were below the LLOQ at timepoints prior to T_max were treated as zero, while those that were below the LLOQ at timepoints after T_max were censored (set to ‘missing’).

Analysis of Factors Affecting Vosoritide Pharmacokinetics

The impact of patient demographics, including sex, body weight, age and race, as well as the development of anti-vosoritide antibody (ADA), on plasma vosoritide exposure were evaluated. The potential relationships between vosoritide exposure and body weight and age were investigated using linear regressions to determine if the slopes of the relationships were significantly different from zero at a significance level of 0.05. The distribution of vosoritide exposures between each category of sex, race and ADA were compared to determine the impact of each factor on vosoritide exposure. The significance of the impact of TAb on the PK parameters was tested using a t test.

Analysis of Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy

The primary efficacy endpoint is the change from baseline in AGV. For a given interval (Date 1 to Date 2), AGV is defined as follows (Eq. 1):

$$\text{AGV}\left(\text{cm}/\text{yr}\right)=\frac{\text{Standing}\text{height}\text{at}\text{Date}2-\text{Standing}\text{Height}\text{at}\text{Date}1}{\text{Date}2-\text{Date}1\left(\text{days}\right)}\times 365.25.$$ 1

The baseline AGV was established based on data of the last 6 months in the observational study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01603095; date of registration, 22 May 2012).

For the phase II study, potential correlations between vosoritide exposure and change in AGV from baseline to day 183 were explored, during which patients were administered daily subcutaneous injections of 2.5 (Cohort 1), 7.5 (Cohort 2), 15 (Cohort 3) or 30 µg/kg (Cohort 4), and from baseline to month 24 for Cohorts 3 (15 µg/kg) and 4 (30 µg/kg). Data used in the phase II study from baseline to day 183 were modeled using a sigmoid maximum effect (E_max) model (Eq. 2),

$$\mathrm{\Delta }\text{AGV}=E_0+\frac{{\text{PK}}^h\times E_{max}}{{\text{PK}}^h+{\text{EC}}_{50}^h},$$ 2

where ΔAGV is the change in AGV from baseline to day 183, PK is the individual mean PK parameter (C_max or AUC_0-t), E₀ is the baseline effect, E_max is the maximum possible effect, EC₅₀ is the PK parameter value producing half maximal effect, and h is the Hill coefficient. Exposure data from patients administered 15 or 30 µg/kg from baseline to month 24 were then modeled using linear regression to determine if the slope of the relationship was significantly different from zero at a significance level of 0.05.

Data used in the phase III study were also modeled using linear regression to confirm the lack of correlation between vosoritide exposure obtained at 15 µg/kg and changes in AGV from baseline to week 52. This would indicate that the plateau of the exposure–efficacy curve has been reached.

Analysis of Pharmacokinetics and Biomarkers

For the phase II study, potential correlations between vosoritide exposure across the 2.5–30 µg/kg dose range, and mean CXM from the day 10 (the first on-treatment assessment) to day 183 phase were explored using a sigmoid E_max model (Eq. 3),

$$\overline{\text{CXM}}=E_0+\frac{{\text{PK}}^h\times E_{\mathit{max}}}{{\text{PK}}^h+{\text{EC}}_{50}^h},$$ 3

where $\overline{\text{CXM}}$ is the individual mean CXM from day 10 to day 183, PK is the individual mean PK parameter (C_max or AUC_0-t), E₀ is the baseline level, E_max is the maximum possible pharmacologic effect on CXM, EC₅₀ is the PK parameter value producing half maximal effect, and h is the Hill coefficient. Data from patients administered 15 or 30 µg/kg from day 10 to month 24 were then modeled using linear regression to determine if the slope of the relationship was significantly different from zero at a significance level of 0.05.

Data used in the phase III study were also modeled using linear regression to confirm the lack of correlation between vosoritide exposure obtained at 15 µg/kg and mean CXM from week 13 to week 52. This would indicate that the plateau of the exposure–CXM curve has been reached.

Besides CXM, for the phase II study, potential correlations between vosoritide exposure across the 2.5–30 µg/kg dose range and visit-matched maximum postdose increases in urine cGMP normalized to creatinine (cGMP/Cr) over the predose level at each visit were evaluated for the initial 6-month period. The predose cGMP/Cr assessment at a given visit was used as the baseline value to calculate the maximum postdose increase at that visit. In cases where cGMP/Cr was maximal at predose, the maximum postdose increase was represented as a negative value. Individual C_max and AUC that were not estimable due to samples being below the limit of quantitation were set to zero for these analyses.

Data from the phase II study were modeled using a sigmoid E_max model (Eq. 4):

$$\mathrm{\Delta }\text{cGMP}=E_0+\frac{{\text{PK}}^h\times E_{max}}{{\text{PK}}^h+{\text{EC}}_{50}^h},$$ 4

where ΔcGMP is the maximum increase in cGMP/Cr, PK is the visit-matched PK parameter (C_max, AUC_0-t or AUC_0-60min), E₀ is the baseline level, E_max is the maximum possible pharmacologic effect on cGMP/Cr, EC₅₀ is the PK parameter value producing half maximal effect, and h is the Hill coefficient. Data from the phase III study were modeled using an E_max model, where h is 1.

Analysis of Pharmacokinetics and Heart Rate as Well as Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures

Potential relationships between vosoritide exposure and maximum changes from predose heart rate as well as systolic and diastolic blood pressures were evaluated in the phases II and III studies using linear regressions to determine if the slopes of the relationships were significantly different from zero at a significance level of 0.05.

Software

Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using non-compartmental analysis using a validated version of Phoenix WinNonlin (version 6.4 or later; Pharsight Corporation, Mountain View, CA, USA). Data processing and further analyses were performed using R (version 3.4.1 or later; The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) with R Studio (version 1.1.423 or later; R Studio, Inc., Boston, MA, USA).

Results

Vosoritide Pharmacokinetics in Children with Achondroplasia

The mean single-dose PK profiles obtained from the phase II study and the mean PK profiles across visits obtained from the phase III study are shown in Fig. 1. Key PK parameters from the phase II study are described earlier and are summarized in Table 1. After 52 weeks of treatment in the phase III study, median T_max was 15 min and mean t_½ was 27.9 min; mean C_max and ${\text{AUC}}_{0-\infty }$ were 5800 pg/mL and 276,000 pg-min/mL, respectively. Mean apparent clearance (CL/F) and apparent volume of distribution (V_z/F) were 79.4 mL/min/kg and 2910 mL/kg, respectively (Table 2). Plasma vosoritide exposure in treated patients was consistent over 52 weeks and was comparable with that observed in patients administered the 15 µg/kg dose in the phase II study, as previously reported [33]. Results from the phase III study also suggest that plasma vosoritide AUC_0-60min is positively correlated with body weight and age (p < 0.001) [Fig. S1 in the electronic supplementary material (ESM)], while the sex of a patient had no apparent impact on plasma vosoritide C_max or AUC_0-60min (Fig. S2 in the ESM). The impact of race on vosoritide exposure was also evaluated but the data were insufficient to draw conclusions (Fig. S3 in the ESM).

Fig. 1.

Mean (+SD) concentration-time profiles of vosoritide in plasma observed in the phases II and III studies. a Mean (+SD) concentration-time profiles of vosoritide in plasma observed on day 1 in the phase II study, color-coded by study cohort and dose (C1: Cohort 1, 2.5 µg/kg; C2: Cohort 2, 7.5 µg/kg; C3: Cohort 3, 15 µg/kg; C4: Cohort 4, 30 µg/kg). Each line represents the mean plasma vosoritide concentration across patients receiving 2.5, 7.5, 15.0 or 30.0 µg/kg vosoritide on day 1. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean, and only the upper error bars are shown. b Mean (+SD) concentration-time profiles of vosoritide in plasma observed at 15 µg/kg in the phase III study, color-coded by visits. Each line represents the mean plasma vosoritide concentration across patients for each visit. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean, and only the upper error bars are shown. The LLOQ for the PK assays used in the phases II and III studies were 391 pg/mL and 137 pg/mL in neat plasma, respectively. SD standard error, LLOQ lower limit of quantitation, PK pharmacokinetic

Table 2.

Summary of vosoritide PK parameters in treated patients in the phase III study

Visit	Statistic	Tmax (min)	Cmax (pg/mL)	AUC0-60min (pg-min/mL)	AUC0-t (pg-min/mL)	AUC0-∞ (pg-min/mL)	CL/F (mL/min/kg)	Vz/F (mL/kg)	t½ (min)
Day 1	Mean	13.8	7180	208,000	242,000	244,000	104	2880	21.0
	SD	7.23	9650	198,000	232,000	224,000	98.8	2450	4.67
	CV%	52.4	134	95.2	95.8	91.8	95.2	85.1	22.2
Week 26	Mean	14.5	6520	205,000	256,000	283,000	85.2	3020	26.6
	SD	7.62	7890	151,000	211,000	249,000	53.2	1980	9.08
	CV%	52.6	121	73.5	82.6	87.9	62.5	65.7	34.2
Week 52	Mean	16.8	5800	212,000	290,000	276,000	79.4	2910	27.9
	SD	11.7	3680	133,000	235,000	187,000	53.0	1660	9.91
	CV%	69.6	63.4	62.9	81.2	67.5	66.8	57.1	35.5

All summary statistics rounded to three significant figures

Two patients discontinued from treatment on day 7 and day 15, respectively. Their PK data were available for day 1 but not for later visits

On day 1, one patient was administered a dose higher than the nominal dose and the associated PK were excluded from summary statistics. Another subject had no PK parameters as the actual sampling times were negative for all PK samples

On week 26, two patients had no PK parameters as only predose PK samples were taken. One patient had no PK parameters as two PK samples were associated with the same actual sampling time of 15 min

On week 52, PK samples were not taken for two patients

AUC_0-∞ area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity, AUC_0-t area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration, AUC_0-60min area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 60 min postdose, CL/F apparent clearance, C_max maximum observed plasma concentration, CV coefficient of variation, PK pharmacokinetic, SD standard deviation, t_½ half-life, T_max time to reach maximum concentration, V_z/F apparent volume of distribution

Impact of Immunogenicity on Vosoritide Pharmacokinetics

In the phase III study, TAb responses were detected in the serum of 42% (25/60) of treated patients, and all placebo-treated patients tested negative for TAb at all time points tested. All of the TAb-positive patients tested negative for NAb at all time points tested. Vosoritide plasma exposures (C_max and ${\text{AUC}}_{0-\infty }$) were comparable between visits where there was detectable TAb titer and where there was no detectable TAb titer (p > 0.8 for the difference in estimated mean C_max and ${\text{AUC}}_{0-\infty }$ by TAb status tested with a t-test), suggesting there was no impact of serum TAb on plasma exposure of vosoritide (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Distribution of individual mean vosoritide AUC_0-∞ in plasma by serum TAb status (negative or positive) in the phase III study. The line inside the box represents the median and the box represents the limits of the middle half of the data. The range of the box, from the first quartile (Q1) to the third quartile (Q3), defines the IQR. The standard span of the data is defined within the range from Q1 − 1.5 × IQR to Q3+1.5 × IQR. Whiskers are drawn to the nearest value not beyond the range of the standard span; points beyond are drawn as individual open circles. Distribution of the individual mean vosoritide C_max is similar and is shown in Fig. S4 of the ESM. AUC_0-∞ area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity, TAb total anti-vosoritide antibody, IQR interquartile range, C_max maximum observed plasma concentration, ESM electronic supplementary material

Pharmacokinetics and Annualized Growth Velocity

In the phase II study, sigmoid E_max model parameter estimates with 95% CIs for the PK–AGV relationship are provided in Table 3. Analysis of the phase II data demonstrated a steep exposure–response relationship between the range of exposures obtained with the 2.5 µg/kg through 7.5 µg/kg doses (h = 2.26 for AUC_0-t). This was followed by a relatively similar response at the exposure range obtained with the 15 and 30 µg/kg doses (Fig. 3a). There was no significant correlation between vosoritide plasma exposure and change in AGV through 24 months of daily dosing across the exposure range obtained with daily doses between 15 and 30 µg/kg (p = 0.34 for C_max, and p = 0.50 for AUC_0-60min) [Fig. 3b], suggesting the exposures obtained at these dose levels yielded a maximal and saturated response, with no additional meaningful improvements in AGV at 30 µg/kg compared with 15 µg/kg.

Table 3.

Sigmoid E_max model parameter estimates for annualized growth velocity (initial 6 months of the phase II study)

Pharmacokinetic parameter	E0 (cm/year) MPE (95% CI)	Emax (cm/year) MPE (95% CI)	EC 50 MPE (95% CI)	h MPE (95% CI)
C max	− 0.282 (− 1.84 to 1.28)	2.80 (0.819–4.78)	1500 pg/mL (− 2920 to 5920)	NAa
AUC0-t	− 0.311 (− 1.69 to 1.07)	2.41 (0.729–4.10)	20,500 pg-min/mL (− 16,000 to 57,000)	2.26 (− 5.48 to 10.0)

C_max maximum observed plasma concentration, AUC_0-t area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration, CI confidence interval, E₀ baseline effect, EC₅₀ pharmacokinetic parameter value producing half maximal effect, E_max maximum possible effect, h Hill coefficient, MPE model parameter estimates, NA not available

^aData did not support estimation of h for C_max; data were modeled using the E_max model (i.e. h = 1)

Fig. 3.

Change in annualized growth velocity from baseline by individual mean AUC in the phase II and III studies. a Points represent the individual change in annualized growth velocity from baseline to day 183 of the phase II study and individual mean vosoritide AUC_0-t, color-coded by study cohort (C1: Cohort 1, 2.5 µg/kg; C2: Cohort 2, 7.5 µg/kg; C3: Cohort 3, 15 µg/kg; C4: Cohort 4, 30 µg/kg). One patient had a high individual mean AUC_0-t (4.28 × 10⁶ pg-min/mL) relative to other patients, but a within-range change in annualized growth velocity (3.56 cm/year). This patient was included in the fit through the data, but was not included in this figure. b Points represent the individual change in annualized growth velocity from baseline to month 24 of the phase II study and individual mean vosoritide AUC_0-60min, color-coded by study cohort (C3: Cohort 3, 15 µg/kg; C4: Cohort 4, 30 µg/kg). c Points represent the individual change in annualized growth velocity from baseline from the phase III study and individual mean vosoritide AUC_0-60min. Solid lines represent the fits through the data and the shaded regions represent the 95% confidence intervals. The respective analyses using the individual mean vosoritide C_max are similar and are shown in Fig. S5 in the ESM. AUC area under the plasma concentration-time curve, AUC_0-t AUC from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration, AUC_0-60min area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 60 min postdose, C_max maximum observed plasma concentration, ESM electronic supplementary material

The data from the phase III study further confirmed the change in AGV from baseline had reached the plateau of the exposure–response curve at exposures obtained at 15 µg/kg (Fig. 3c), as evidenced by the lack of relationship between exposure and changes in AGV in patients receiving 15 µg/kg vosoritide (p = 0.52 for C_max, and p = 0.54 for AUC_0-60min).

Pharmacokinetics and Biomarkers

Transient increases in urine cGMP from predose levels, during a dosing interval, were observed following vosoritide administration to patients with achondroplasia. The phase II study showed that the maximum postdose increase in urine cGMP/Cr over the predose level at each visit was dose-dependent, and the magnitude of the maximal increases at each dose remained similar over 24 months of treatment in patients administered 15 or 30 μg/kg [33], suggesting vosoritide treatment induced sustained pharmacological activity through binding to the NPR-B receptor with each dose over 24 months of treatment. The phase II study also showed an increase in the median CXM concentrations above baseline, which remained elevated across 24 months, suggesting vosoritide treatment at 15–30 μg/kg induced a sustained increase in growth plate activity. Moreover, median serum CXM concentrations were also similar in patients administered 15 μg/kg as those administered 30 μg/kg, indicating a maximal CXM response at exposures obtained at 15 μg/kg [33].

In the phase II study, sigmoid E_max model parameter estimates with 95% CIs for the PK–CXM relationship are provided in Table 4. Like AGV, analysis of the phase II data demonstrated a steep exposure–response relationship between the mean CXM and the range of exposures obtained with the 2.5 µg/kg through 7.5 µg/kg doses (h = 3.93 for C_max, and h = 1.10 for AUC_0-t), and an upper plateau of mean CXM at exposure observed at 15 and 30 µg/kg dose levels (Fig. 4a). There was also no significant correlation between vosoritide plasma exposure and mean CXM concentration through 24 months of daily dosing across the exposure range obtained with daily doses between 15 and 30 µg/kg (p = 0.98 for C_max, and p = 0.99 for AUC_0-60min) (Fig. 4b), suggesting the exposures obtained with daily doses ≥ 15 µg/kg yielded a maximal and saturated CXM response.

Table 4.

Sigmoid E_max model parameter estimates for mean CXM (initial 6 months of the phase II study)

Pharmacokinetic parameter	E0 (pg/mL) MPE (95% CI)	Emax (pg/mL) MPE (95% CI)	EC50 MPE (95% CI)	h MPE (95% CI)
Cmax	9270 (7000–11,500)	3690 (647–6740)	1730 pg/mL (− 636 to 4100)	3.93 (− 9.41 to 16.2)
AUC0-t	9040 (6530–11,600)	4460 (− 175 to 9100)	5.17 × 104 pg-min/mL (− 1.01 × 105 to 2.04 × 105)	1.10 (− 1.78 to 3.98)

C_max maximum observed plasma concentration, AUC_0-t area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration, CI confidence interval, CXM collagen type X marker, E₀ baseline level, EC₅₀ pharmacokinetic parameter value producing half maximal effect on CXM, E_max maximum possible effect, h Hill coefficient, MPE model parameter estimates

Fig. 4.

Change in mean CXM by individual mean AUC in the phase II and III studies. (a) Points represent the individual mean CXM from day 10 to day 183 of the phase II study and individual mean vosoritide AUC_0-t, color-coded by study cohort (C1: Cohort 1, 2.5 µg/kg; C2: Cohort 2, 7.5 µg/kg; C3: Cohort 3, 15 µg/kg; C4: Cohort 4, 30 µg/kg). One patient had a high individual mean AUC_0-t (4.28 × 10⁶ pg-min/mL) relative to other patients, but a within-range mean CXM (12,200 pg/mL). This patient was included in the fit through the data but was not included in this figure. b Points represent the individual mean CXM from day 10 to month 24 of the phase II study and individual mean vosoritide AUC_0-60min, color-coded by study cohort (C3: Cohort 3, 15 µg/kg; C4: Cohort 4, 30 µg/kg). c Points represent the individual mean CXM from week 13 to week 52 in the phase III study and individual mean vosoritide AUC_0-60min. Solid lines represent the fits through the data and the shaded regions represent the 95% confidence intervals. The respective analyses using the individual mean vosoritide C_max are similar and are shown in Fig. S6 in the ESM. AUC_0-t area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration, AUC_0-60min area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 60 min postdose, CXM collagen type X marker, C_max maximum observed plasma concentration, ESM electronic supplementary material

In the phase III study, transient increases in urine cGMP/Cr were also observed in the treated group and were similar over 52 weeks, while remaining unchanged in the placebo group (Fig. 5). Increases in the mean and median CXM concentrations above baseline were also observed in patients in the treated group by week 13 (first on-treatment assessment) and were sustained through 52 weeks, while CXM concentrations remained relatively unchanged in patients in the placebo group (Fig. 6). The data from the phase III study further confirmed that CXM concentrations had reached the plateau of the exposure–CXM curve at exposures obtained at 15 µg/kg (Fig. 4c), as evidenced by the lack of relationship between exposure and mean CXM concentrations in patients receiving 15 µg/kg vosoritide (p = 0.74 for C_max, and p = 0.58 for AUC_0-60min).

Fig. 5.

Distribution of the change from predose to maximum postdose urine cGMP/Cr levels observed in the phase III study. The line inside the box represents the median and the box represents the limits of the middle half of the data. The range of the box, from the first quartile (Q1) to the third quartile (Q3), defines the IQR. The standard span of the data is defined within the range from Q1 − 1.5 × IQR to Q3 + 1.5 × IQR. Whiskers are drawn to the nearest value not beyond the range of the standard span; points beyond are drawn as individual open circles. cGMP cyclic guanosine monophosphate, cGMP/Cr cGMP normalized to creatinine, IQR interquartile range

Fig. 6.

Distribution of the change in CXM from baseline from week 13 to week 52 of the phase III study. The line inside the box represents the median and the box represents the limits of the middle half of the data. The range of the box, from the first quartile (Q1) to the third quartile (Q3), defines the IQR. The standard span of the data is defined within the range from Q1 − 1.5 × IQR to Q3 + 1.5 × IQR. Whiskers are drawn to the nearest value not beyond the range of the standard span; points beyond are drawn as individual open circles. CXM collagen type X marker, IQR interquartile range

E_max model parameter estimates with 95% CIs for the PK–cGMP relationships for the initial 6-month period of the phases II and III studies are provided in Tables 5 and 6, respectively. Unlike AGV and the CXM biomarker, exposure–cGMP analyses showed that systemic pharmacological activity is near maximal or saturated at exposures obtained at the highest dose studied (i.e. 30 μg/kg) [Fig. 7]. The mean AUC_0-t observed with 30 µg/kg in the initial 6 months of the phase II study (1.27 × 10⁶ pg-min/mL) was approximately sixfold greater than the estimated EC₅₀ (2.22 × 10⁵ pg-min/mL). Given that exposure–response relationships for changes in both AGV and the CXM biomarker were saturated at 15 μg/kg, the additional systemic pharmacological activity, indicated by the increase in cGMP/Cr at the higher end of the exposure range (i.e. exposure from 30 µg/kg), was likely present in tissues not related to endochondral bone formation.

Table 5.

Sigmoid E_max model parameter estimates for urine cGMP/Cr (initial 6 months of the phase II study)

Pharmacokinetic parameter	E0 (pmol/mg Cr) MPE (95% CI)	Emax (pmol/mg Cr) MPE (95% CI)	EC50 MPE (95% CI)	h MPE (95% CI)
Cmax	579 (− 331 to 1490)	10,100 (7720–12,600)	4790 pg/mL (3270–6320)	2.04 (0.811–3.26)
AUC0-t	393 (− 503 to 1290)	11,800 (8140–15,400)	2.22 × 105 pg-min/mL (7.48 × 104 to 3.69 × 105)	1.12 (0.486–1.76)

C_max maximum observed plasma concentration, AUC_0-t area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration, CI confidence interval, E₀ baseline level, EC₅₀ pharmacokinetic parameter value producing half maximal effect on cGMP/Cr, E_max maximum possible effect, cGMP cyclic guanosine monophosphate, cGMP/Cr cGMP normalized to creatinine, h Hill coefficient, MPE model parameter estimates

Table 6.

E_max model parameter estimates for urine cGMP/Cr in the phase III study

Pharmacokinetic parameter	E0 (pmol/mg Cr) MPE (95% CI)	Emax (pmol/mg Cr) MPE (95% CI)	EC50 MPE (95% CI)
Cmax	− 3014 (− 8800 to 2770)	18,160 (13,800–22,600)	5020 pg/mL (− 714 to 10,800)
AUC0-60min	4.54 (− 2730 to 2740)	21,900 (11,800–32,000)	4.79 × 105 pg-min/mL (− 9.25 × 104, 1.05 × 106)

C_max maximum observed plasma concentration, AUC_0-60min area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 60 min postdose, CI confidence interval, E₀ baseline level, EC₅₀ pharmacokinetic parameter value producing half maximal effect on cGMP/Cr, E_max maximum possible effect, cGMP cyclic guanosine monophosphate, cGMP/Cr cGMP normalized to creatinine, MPE model parameter estimates

Fig. 7.

Visit-matched maximum increase in urine cGMP/Cr by individual AUC in the phase II and III studies. a Points represent the individual patient urine cGMP/Cr data and individual plasma vosoritide AUC_0-t at each visit during the initial 6 months of the phase II study, color-coded by study cohort (C1: Cohort 1, 2.5 µg/kg; C2: Cohort 2, 7.5 µg/kg; C3: Cohort 3, 15 µg/kg; C4: Cohort 4, 30 µg/kg). One patient had a high AUC_0-t (1.63 × 10⁷ pg-min/mL) relative to other patients, but a within-range maximum change from pre-dose cGMP/Cr (8190 pmol/mg Cr). This patient was included in the fit through the data but was not included in this figure. b Points represent the individual patient urine cGMP/Cr data and individual plasma vosoritide AUC_0-60min at each visit during the phase III study. Solid lines represent E_max model fits through the data and the shaded regions represent the 95% confidence intervals. The respective analyses using the individual plasma vosoritide C_max are similar and are shown in Fig. S7 in the ESM. cGMP cyclic guanosine monophosphate, cGMP/Cr cGMP normalized to creatinine, AUC_0-t area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration, AUC_0-60min area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 60 min postdose, E_max maximum possible effect, ESM electronic supplementary material

Pharmacokinetics and Heart Rate as Well as Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures

The relationships between visit-matched vosoritide C_max and the maximum increase from predose heart rate for the initial 6 months of the phase II study and the 52-week duration of the phase III study are shown in Fig. 8. Weak positive correlations between the maximum increase from predose heart rate and exposure were observed and were statistically significant (p < 0.05) but not clinically meaningful. Similarly, the relationships between visit-matched vosoritide C_max and the maximum decreases from predose systolic and diastolic blood pressures for each study are shown in Fig. 9. The results showed no correlation between vosoritide plasma exposure and decrease in systolic or diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.54 for phase II systolic blood pressure vs. C_max correlation; p = 0.72 for phase III systolic blood pressure vs. C_max correlation; p = 0.43 for phase II diastolic blood pressure vs. C_max correlation; and p = 0.79 for phase III diastolic blood pressure vs. C_max correlation). For each vital sign, the results for the 24-month period of the phase II study showed a similar trend to that of the analysis for the initial 6-month period.

Fig. 8.

Visit-matched vosoritide C_max in plasma and maximum increase in heart rate in the phase II and III studies. a Points represent the individual patient maximum increase in HR and individual plasma vosoritide C_max at each visit during the initial 6 months of the phase II study, color-coded by study cohort (C1: Cohort 1, 2.5 µg/kg; C2: Cohort 2, 7.5 µg/kg; C3: Cohort 3, 15 µg/kg; C4: Cohort 4, 30 µg/kg). One patient had a high C_max (8.39 × 10⁵ pg/mL) relative to other patients, but a within-range maximum increase in HR (39 bpm). This patient was included in the fit through the data but was not included in this figure. b Points represent the individual patient maximum increase in HR and individual plasma vosoritide C_max at each visit during the phase III study. Solid lines represent the linear fits through the data and the shaded regions represent the 95% confidence interval. The respective analyses using the individual plasma vosoritide AUC is similar and is shown in Fig. S8 in the ESM. C_max maximum observed plasma concentration, HR heart rate, bpm beats per min, AUC area under the plasma concentration-time curve, ESM electronic supplementary material

Fig. 9.

Visit-matched vosoritide C_max in plasma and maximum decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the phase II and III studies. a Points represent the individual patient maximum decrease in SBP and individual plasma vosoritide C_max at each visit during the initial 6 months of the phase II study, color-coded by study cohort (C1: Cohort 1, 2.5 µg/kg; C2: Cohort 2, 7.5 µg/kg; C3: Cohort 3, 15 µg/kg; C4: Cohort 4, 30 µg/kg). One patient had a high C_max (8.39 × 10⁵ pg/mL) relative to other patients, but a within-range maximum decrease in SBP (−7 mmHg). This patient was included in the fit through the data but was not included in this figure. b Points represent the individual patient maximum decrease in SBP and individual plasma vosoritide C_max at each visit during the phase III study. c Points represent the individual patient maximum decrease in DBP and individual plasma vosoritide C_max at each visit during the initial 6 months of the phase II study, color-coded by study cohort (C1: Cohort 1, 2.5 µg/kg; C2: Cohort 2, 7.5 µg/kg; C3: Cohort 3, 15 µg/kg; C4: Cohort 4, 30 µg/kg). One patient had a high C_max (8.39 × 10⁵ pg/mL) relative to other patients, but a within-range maximum decrease in DBP (−2 mmHg). This patient was included in the fit through the data but was not included in this figure. d Points represent the individual patient maximum decrease in DBP and individual plasma vosoritide C_max at each visit during the phase III study. Solid lines represent the linear fits through the data and the shaded regions represent the 95% confidence interval. The respective analyses using the individual patient AUC are similar and are shown in Fig. S9 in the ESM. C_max maximum observed plasma concentration, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, mmHg millimeter of mercury, ESM electronic supplementary material

Overall, there were no clinically meaningful correlations between vosoritide plasma exposure and changes from predose heart rate, as well as systolic or diastolic blood pressures in patients with achondroplasia treated with vosoritide. Exposure–response analyses were also conducted for incidences of reported treatment-emergent adverse events based on predefined search criteria for hypotension and injection site reactions in the phase II study, and no meaningful correlations were observed between vosoritide plasma exposure and the reporting of either hypotension or injection site reactions (Figs. S10 and S11 in the ESM).

Discussion

Most peptides have very low oral bioavailability and are often delivered subcutaneously, where they enter systemic circulation through the blood capillaries and/or lymphatic vessels depending on their molecular weight [35]. They are also rapidly cleared from systemic circulation through enzymatic proteolysis and/or renal filtration, resulting in very short half-lives of a few minutes [36]. While endogenous CNP binds to the NPR-B receptor for intracellular signaling, it is predominately cleared by intracellular proteases through binding with the NPR-C receptor and the extracellular NEP protease, resulting in a short half-life of 2.6 min in humans [37]. The structural modification of vosoritide confers resistance to proteolysis by NEP, such that its half-life is extended almost tenfold in comparison with CNP. This increases exposure to the target growth plate and allows for once-daily subcutaneous administration to produce its desired pharmacologic effect.

Nonlinear PK have been observed in biologics, including peptides, and have been attributed to target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) [38]. While the PK profiles for vosoritide do not indicate that TMDD is at play, the observed greater than proportional increase in vosoritide exposure with doses from 2.5 to 30 μg/kg may result from the saturation of binding sites. While the NPR-B and NPR-C receptors are both expressed in many organs [29, 39], these binding sites may become saturated when the concentration of vosoritide is higher relative to the number of available binding sites in situ. The lack of accumulation is supported by the consistent vosoritide plasma exposure (C_max and AUC) observed over 52 weeks of the phase III study. This is consistent with the short half-life of vosoritide relative to the once-daily dosing.

The development of ADA may impact the PK and PD of exogenously administered therapeutic proteins, including peptides. A therapeutic protein may bind with clearing ADA to form immune complexes and the elimination of these complexes increases the clearance of the protein, leading to a shorter half-life. Conversely, sustaining ADA may bind with the therapeutic protein to form complexes but these complexes could either act like storage depots for the protein or recycled through the neonatal Fc receptor, both of which reduce the clearance of the protein, resulting in a longer half-life and higher systemic exposure [40]. Immune responses may also affect the pharmacological activity of therapeutic proteins, and, consequently, their safety and efficacy profiles. Immunogenicity analyses were conducted during the phases II and III studies of vosoritide and the results showed that the development of an ADA response to vosoritide was not associated with an increased frequency or severity of hypersensitivity adverse events or injection site reactions, and had no apparent impact on vosoritide PK or efficacy as measured by the change from baseline in AGV [33, 34].

The evaluation of growth in children using growth velocity is superior to single static height measurements [41]. This is routinely assessed by measuring heights at 6- or 12-monthly intervals with stadiometers. Growth velocity is typically highest at birth and decreases to around 6 cm/year in children with average stature until puberty, when it is accompanied by an acceleration in growth. It then decelerates as the epiphyses fuse and final adult height is reached [41]. In contrast, the expected AGV in children with achondroplasia is about 4 cm/year [42–44].

While the efficacy and safety of vosoritide have been reported elsewhere [33, 34], in this study we present the PK, PD, and exposure–response relationships that confirm the dose selection and treatment effect based on the totality of evidence available. In the phase III study, an increase in urine cGMP/Cr was observed in vosoritide-treated patients, but not in patients in the placebo group, which confirmed the pharmacological activity of vosoritide. CXM concentrations above baseline were also observed in patients in the treated group by week 13 (first on-treatment assessment) and were sustained through 52 weeks, while CXM concentrations remained relatively unchanged in patients in the placebo group, suggesting a greater rate of endochondral ossification in vosoritide-treated patients.

The changes in AGV from baseline and CXM were dose-dependent from 2.5 to 30 μg/kg, and exposure–response analyses showed that both have reached the plateau of the exposure–response curve at exposures obtained at 15 μg/kg. There was no additional benefit in effect on AGV or CXM seen with the 30 μg/kg daily dose compared with 15 μg/kg. Exposure–cGMP response analysis showed that systemic pharmacological activity is near maximal or saturated at exposures obtained at 30 μg/kg. Given that exposure–response relationship for changes in both AGV and CXM saturated at 15 μg/kg, the additional systemic pharmacological activity indicated by the increase in urine cGMP at the higher end of the exposure range (i.e., exposure from 30 µg/kg) was likely in tissues not related to endochondral bone formation. Besides chondrocytes in the growth plates, NPR-B is expressed in many organs, including the heart, brain, liver, lungs and adipocytes [29, 39], while CXM is specifically produced by hypertrophic chondrocytes during endochondral bone formation. As such, cGMP levels are not specific to bone but reflect systemic activity in all tissues expressing NPR-B. Hence, CXM could become saturated at the growth plates at lower doses compared with systemic cGMP.

In addition to monitoring heart rate as well as systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the clinic, the analysis showed that there were no clinically meaningful correlations between vosoritide plasma exposure and these safety endpoints at clinically relevant exposures. This supports a wide therapeutic index for vosoritide within which vosoritide can be administered safely and efficaciously to children with achondroplasia.

Conclusion

The PK of vosoritide and exposure–response relationships with efficacy, biomarkers and safety endpoints were characterized in children with achondroplasia. Results support the recommended dose of 15 µg/kg vosoritide for once-daily subcutaneous administration in patients with achondroplasia aged ≥ 5 years whose epiphyses were not closed.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Author Contributions

MLC performed the PK and exposure–response analyses and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. RS, MI, CAB, JH-F, KO, KM and WRW recruited and enrolled patients to the trials and managed them during the trial periods according to the protocols. WAH collaborated with BioMarin to develop its type X collagen assay. All authors participated in critical review of the manuscript and approved the final draft for submission.

Funding

These studies were funded by BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.

Declarations

Conflict of Interest

Ming Liang Chan, Yulan Qi, Kevin Larimore, Anu Cherukuri, Lori Seid, Kala Jayaram, Elena Fisheleva, Jonathan Day, Alice Huntsman Labed and Joshua Henshaw are employees of BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. Ravi Savarirayan and Klaus Mohnike have received consulting fees and grants from BioMarin. Melita Irving has received consulting fees from BioMarin. Carlos A. Bacino has received consulting fees, honoraria and grants from BioMarin. Julie Hoover-Fong has received consulting fees from BioMarin, Therachon and Ascendis, and grants from BioMarin. Keiichi Ozono has received consulting fees and honoraria from BioMarin. William R. Wilcox was a consultant to BioMarin and received an honoraria, and was the principal investigator for the clinical trial contract with Emory University. William A. Horton is an inventor on a patent application “Type X collagen assay and methods of use thereof”, submitted by Shriners Hospitals for Children. He has consulted for and/or received speaker honoraria from BioMarin, TherAchon (Pfizer), Ascendis, QED, Relay Therapeutics, Fortress Biotech, OPKO, and Medicell Technologies.

Ethics Approval

The studies were conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocols were approved by the relevant ethics boards at each site.

Consent to Participate

Written informed consent from a parent or legal guardian of each patient was obtained, and assent was obtained from patients, if appropriate, prior to enrolment.

Availability of Data and Material

The de-identified individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article (including text, tables, figures, and appendices) will be made available together with the research protocol and data dictionaries, for non-commercial, academic purposes. Additional supporting documents may be available on request. Investigators will be able to request access to these data, along with supporting documents, via a website beginning at 6 months and ending 2 years after publication. Data associated with any ongoing development program will be made available within 6 months after approval of the relevant product. Requests must include a research proposal clarifying how the data will be used, including proposed analysis methodology. Research proposals will be evaluated relative to publicly available criteria at the BioMarin website to determine whether access will be given, contingent on execution of a data access agreement with BioMarin Pharmaceutical. For data access requests, see www.BioMarin.com.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.