Abstract
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum is one of the most diverse species of lactic acid bacteria found in various habitats. The aim of this work was to perform preliminary phenotypic and genomic characterization of two novel and potentially probiotic L. plantarum strains isolated from Indian foods, viz., dhokla batter and jaggery. Both the strains were bile and acid tolerant, utilized various sugars, adhered to intestinal epithelial cells, produced exopolysaccharides and folate, were susceptible for tetracycline, erythromycin, and chloramphenicol, did not cause hemolysis, and exhibited antimicrobial and plant phenolics metabolizing activities. The genetic determinants of bile tolerance, cell-adhesion, bacteriocins production, riboflavin and folate biosynthesis, plant polyphenols utilization, and exopolysaccharide production were found in both the strains. One of the strains contained a large number of unique genes while the other had a simultaneous presence of glucansucrase and fructansucrase genes which is a rare trait in L. plantarum. Comparative genome analysis of 149 L. plantarum strains highlighted high variation in the cell-adhesion and sugar metabolism genes while the genomic regions for some other properties were relatively conserved. This work highlights the unique properties of our strains along with the probiotic and technically important genomic features of a large number of L. plantarum strains.
Subject terms: Bacterial genomics, Applied microbiology, Bacteria, Bacteriology, Cellular microbiology, Environmental microbiology, Industrial microbiology
Introduction
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are one of the most important groups of food-related bacteria that are widely used in the food, probiotic, dairy, and beverage industries. These applications are due to generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status of LAB as well as the peculiar properties of these bacteria that make them useful for such applications. In terms of probiotic properties, certain strains of lactobacilli are used for the applications such as treating gastric diseases, immune modulation, and prevention of colonization of harmful bacteria1,2. Certain traits that such potentially probiotic lactobacilli display include the ability to survive in low pH and bile, higher hydrophobicity, adhesion to the colon epithelium, production of conjugated linoleic acid, production of exopolysaccharides, etc3–5. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, one of the members of lactobacilli, is found in various environments and harbors a variety of probiotic properties. This homofermentative species is known for its highly variable strains possessing diverse phenotypes and variable genomes. There are many incidences of its isolation from various foods including plants, meat, and fermented products6. They are normal inhabitants of the gut microsystem and have been isolated from the guts of various mammals, fruit flies, and honeybees. The vaginal microsystem has also shown the presence of L. plantarum and they have been evaluated for their probiotic properties7. A few strains of L. plantarum such as 299v which was isolated from human intestinal mucosa and Lp01 are commercially used as probiotics. The genome size of L. plantarum strains is in the range of 3–3.6 million base pairs which is higher compared to other LAB8. In a comparative genomic study establishing a connection between evolution and habitat, L. plantarum has been identified to be part of the nomadic lifestyle9.
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum has been frequently found in Indian fermented foods such as idli and dosa batter, and sorghum-based fermented products10–12. It has also been reported from fermented vegetable products such as gundruk, sinki, khalpi, inziangsang and xaj-pitha from North-East India13,14. In contrast to these reports and the rich diversity of the fermented foods in India, not many studies have been carried out on the genome sequencing and analysis of L. plantarum from India. This is also reflected in the fact that of the total 593 L. plantarum genomes available on the PATRIC database, only 16 are reported from India. Recently, genomic characterization of L. plantarum isolated from dahi and kinema revealed their putative bacteriocin production and probiotic potential15. Additionally, Indian L. plantarum isolates Lp91from human gut and JDARSH from sheep milk have also been sequenced for their genome16,17. In this paper, we describe the isolation, phenotypic and genotypic characterization, and comparative genomics of two diverse L. plantarum strains isolated from different food sources in India. These isolates were also shown to have high probiotic potential in-silico as well as in-vitro. Additionally, we report variation in L. plantarum strains with respect to the presence of genomic determinants of cell adhesion, carbohydrate metabolism, vitamin biosynthesis, and metabolism of plant phenolics by mining the publicly available whole-genome sequence data of 147 strains.
Materials and methods
Samples, bacterial cultures, and growth conditions
The bacterial cultures were isolated from the batter used for making dhokla (Indian fermented food) and a jaggery sample from the Indian states of Gujarat and Maharashtra, respectively. The food samples were inoculated in mMRS broth (deMan, Rogossa, Sharpe media supplemented with 0.05% L-cysteine) and streaked on mMRS agar after 24 h of incubation at 37 °C. The isolates identified as Lactiplantibacillus plantarum by 16S rRNA gene sequencing were selected for further characterization. The strains were regularly grown in mMRS medium and grown at 37 °C. Escherichia coli MTCC730, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC14506, and Listeria monocytogens ATCC19115 were grown in nutrient broth.
Whole-genome sequencing
Genomic DNA was isolated using Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega Inc, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Whole-genome sequencing using Illumina Nextseq500 platform to generate paired-end 150 bp sequences was outsourced. The raw reads were assembled using Unicycler18 and the analysis and visualization of the genomes were performed using genome analysis tools on PATRIC BRC19 (https://patricbrc.org/). Plasmid contigs were identified using Platon tool20. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum WCFS1 was used as a reference to sequentially order the whole genome contigs using Mauve Contig Mover21. The contigs were subjected to ORF prediction and annotation using PATRIC BRC22.
Phenotypic characterization
The isolates were analyzed for their ability to thrive separately in mMRS having 0.3% oxgall (Merck) and mMRS with pH adjusted to 3.9 using hydrochloric acid by CFU/ml counts after three-hour exposure. The ability of the strains to utilize various sugars was assessed by growing them in minimal mMRS medium containing 2% (w/v) sugars viz., lactose, maltose, arabinose, melezitose, melibiose, raffinose, salicin, sorbitol, trehalose, sucrose, mannose, and fructose and comparing OD600 with those obtained with 2% (w/v) glucose. Nitrate reduction was examined on nitrate broth using sulphanilic acid and α-naphthylamine with zinc dust. H2S production, arginine dihydrolase activity, and urease activity were analyzed on TSI agar, arginine dihydrolase broth, and urea agar, respectively. Catalase activity was assessed using 15% H2O2 on a glass slide. The pH reduction was examined after 3 days of the growth in 10% skim milk media at 37 °C.
Technological characterization
Cell adhesion assay was performed by seeding 107 CFU of the bacteria on 21-days post confluent human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells (HT-29). Bacteria were allowed to adhere to HT-29 cells for 1 h at 37 °C. Non-adhered bacterial cells were removed by washing with PBS, adhered bacteria were released by trypsinization, and the bacterial cell count was estimated by determining CFU23. Antimicrobial activity was assessed using the agar spot diffusion method by spotting the supernatants of the overnight grown cultures on nutrient agar plates and pouring pathogens mixed in soft nutrient agar over it24. Escherichia coli MTCC 728, L. monocytogenes ATCC 19115, E. faecalis ATCC 14506, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used as the test pathogens and the zone of inhibition was considered as the measure of antimicrobial activity.
Exopolysaccharide (EPS) production of both the strains was determined as described earlier with some modifications25. Briefly, the strains were grown in 50 ml skim milk (100 g/l) supplemented with sucrose (50 g/l), casitose (10 g/l) and K2HPO4 (1 g/l) for 72 h. The coagulants were broken and pH was adjusted to 7.5 with 2 M NaOH followed by the addition of pronase (0.1 g/l) and thiomersal (1 g/l) and incubation at 37 °C for 24 h. EPS were precipitated from the supernatant by adding three volumes of cold absolute ethanol and incubating at 4 °C for 24 h. The precipitates were air-dried and dissolved in deionized water. The crude ESP solutions were further treated with 12% trichloroacetic acid stored at 4 °C for 24 h. The proteins were pelleted by centrifugation and the supernatant were subjected to dialysis for 3 days at 4 °C against deionized water. Dialysed EPS fractions were again precipitated with three volumes of cold absolute ethanol. EPS yields were determined by phenol–sulphuric acid method in a 96-well microplate26. The monosaccharide composition was determined using gas chromatography after converting acid hydrolyzed EPS to its alditol acetate derivatives27.
Folic acid production by the strains was analysed using reporter strain Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus DSM 20021 which needs folic acid for growth28. DKL3 and JGR2 were grown in folic acid casei medium (Himedia Laboratories) and cell free supernatants (CFS) were made. Growth of L. rhamnosus DSM 20021 in folic acid casei medium supplemented with 20% CFS was assessed and considered as the indicator of folic acid production. Feruloyl esterase activity was assessed using mMRS agar plates containing ethyl ferulate (1% w/v in dimethyl formamide) and observing the zone of clearance. The mMRS broth was supplemented with 4 mg/ml tannic acid (TA) for detecting tannase activity and 4 mg/ml gallic acid (GA) for detecting gallate decarboxylase activity, separately and the cultures were inoculated for 24 h. The culture supernatants of tannase activity assay were analysed by TLC with chloroform–ethyl acetate-acetic acid (50:50:1) as the mobile phase and 1% ferric chloride in methanol as the developing reagent29. The culture supernatants of gallate decarboxylase activity assay were extracted using ethyl acetate followed by evaporation of solvent and the products were assessed by GC–MS (Agilent, 8890 GC System coupled with 5977B MSD) after TMS-derivatization using BSTFA + 1%TMCS (N,O-Bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide).
The unique GH68 (FTF) gene from DKL3 was amplified from genomic DNA, cloned in EcoRI site of pET30b vector and expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3). The protein purified by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography was assayed by monitoring glucose release from sucrose by DNSA (3,5-Dinitrosalicylic acid) method.
Safety assessment
The hemolytic activity of the isolates was assessed by streaking them on anaerobic blood agar plates (Himedia Laboratories). The antibiotic sensitivity of the isolates was analyzed using Ezy-MIC strips (Himedia Laboratories) carrying tetracycline, gentamycin, vancomycin, clindamycin, and trimethoprim. The MIC values were compared with the cut-off values defined by EFSA30. Antibiotic resistance (AR) genes were annotated using comprehensive antibiotic resistance database (CARD) analysis31. The proteins involved in the biogenic amine production (Table S1) were also annotated using BLASTp with E-value threshold of 1E-10.
Genome characterization
The insertion elements were identified by subjecting the ordered contigs to ISfinder using BLASTn v2.2.31 with an E-value threshold of 1e−5032. The Antibacterial Biocide and Metal Resistance Genes Database (BacMet) v2.033 was used to predict the biocide and metal resistance genes using BLASTx v2.2.26 against the experimentally characterized (n = 753) and predicted (n = 155,512) resistance gene with an E-value threshold of 1e−100. CRISPR-Cas elements were determined by the CRISPERCasFinder34. Identification of prophage loci was carried out using PHASTER35.
The presence of the genes encoding bile salt hydrolase (Bsh) and esterases involved in the hydrolysis of phenolics in DKL3 and JGR2 genomes was assessed using BLASTp tool with the amino acid sequences of the previously characterized genes as the queries and an E-value threshold of 1E-10 (Table S1). Proteins involved in vitamin biosynthesis mentioned in previous reports36 were similarly identified. EPS clusters were identified as described earlier37. BAGEL4 was used to identify the bacteriocin-related gene clusters in the genomes of DKL3 and JGR238.
Comparative genomics
Genome sequences of the L. plantarum strains having whole-genome status as complete on NCBI were downloaded (n = 147) and used for the comparative analysis (Table S2). Seven representative strains of L. plantarum viz. JDM1, ST-III, WCFS1, ZJ316, P8, 16, and DSM20174 along with DKL3 and JGR2 were used for the whole-genome phylogeny. Protein sequences of these nine strains were compared considering WCFS1 as the reference using the proteome comparison tool available on PATRIC39. The genomes of these nine strains were also compared by assessing the presence of PATRIC cross-genus families (PGFam) for the identification of the unique proteins.
All the complete L. plantarum genomes along with DKL3 and JGR2 were subjected to BLAST with 15 cell adhesion-related protein sequences40 (Table S3) using BLASTp with an E-value, % query coverage, and % identity thresholds of 1E-10, 70%, and 50%, respectively. These genomes were also annotated using dbCAN2.0 for the identification of the carbohydrate-active enzymes as described on CAZy41,42. The presence of genes involved in lactose utilization, vitamin biosynthesis and plant phenolics utilization were also assessed across all the 149 strains by BLASTp.
Results and discussion
Research on the probiotic or food-industry potential of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) has been on the rise in the last couple of decades. In this quest, the genus Lactobacillus (basonym) became popular because of the diverse properties and the generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status of the individual species. Recently, lactobacilli have been reclassified in 25 genera to address the diversity among the species and L. plantarum, one of the most studied species has been classified under the new genus Lactiplantibacillus to further emphasize its association with the plants43. This study addresses preliminary characterization of two novel and potentially probiotic L. plantarum strains isolated from Indian foods.
Isolation, identification of bacteria and whole-genome sequencing
In this study, the L. plantarum strains were isolated from dhokla batter and jaggery. Dhokla batter is made up of fermented chickpea flour, rice, and ground urad dal whereas jaggery is a form of brown sugar made from sugarcane concentrate. Seven LAB isolates were found in jaggery whereas three isolates were found in dhokla batter. They were identified to be Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, Enterococcus faecium by 16S rRNA gene sequencing (data not shown). Two of these L. plantarum isolates named DKL3 (from dhokla) and JGR2 (from jaggery) were selected for further characterization. The whole genomes of DLK3 and JGR2 were sequenced with a coverage greater than 200-fold. The genome sizes of DKL3 and JGR2 were 3,283,055 and 3,131,275 bp, respectively, with the GC content of about 44% (Table 1 and Fig. S1). Both the genome sizes and GC content fell in the range of 3–3.6 Mb and 44–45% respectively, that have been reported for this species 9. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of L. plantarum isolation from these food sources. Previously, L. fermentum was isolated from dhokla batter and exopolysaccharide production of those isolates was evaluated44.
Table 1.
Isolate | No. of contigs | Raw read fold coverage | N50 | L50 | Genome Size (bp) | CDS | rRNA operon | tRNA genes | GC% | OrthoANI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L. plantarum DKL3 | 110 | 450 | 236,088 | 6 | 3,283,055 | 3258 | 2 | 58 | 44.33 | 98.88 |
L. plantarum JGR2 | 106 | 238 | 86,465 | 13 | 3,131,275 | 3094 | 2 | 58 | 44.53 |
Genome characterization and plasmid analysis
The IS elements in both the genomes were detected by ISfinder. DKL3 and JGR2 showed the presence of 12 and 10 IS elements, respectively, of which 5 and 7, respectively, were complete (Table S4). Both strains contained IS1165 (family ISL3) and ISLpl1, ISPp1 (family IS30). DKL3 had three extra members belonging to IS30 and IS3 family elements; whereas; JGR2 had one extra member belonging to ISL3. IS elements are known to play a role in creating genetic diversity aiding in the adaptation of the microbes45. One putative P-type ATPase gene involved in copper translocation across the membrane was found in both strains using the BacMet database (data not shown). When mined for CRISPR-Cas elements, only DKL3 showed the presence of three CRISPR elements, and no Cas cluster was found in any of the genomes. Two intact prophage regions were identified in JGR2, whereas one complete and two incomplete regions were found in DKL3 (Table S5).
Upon the analysis through the Platon tool, 33 plasmid contigs harbouring 246 CDS were found in DKL3 whereas 10 contigs having 102 CDS were found in JGR2 (Table S6). More than 70% of these CDS could be annotated via eggNOG database reflecting ‘replication, recombination and repair’ and ‘function unknown’ as the top-most categories contributing to more than 40% of the CDS to the annotated plasmidome. Some of the notable plasmid-encoded proteins were glycine betaine transporter, glucansucrase, fructansucrase, major facilitator transporters, metal ion uptake proteins, and toxin-antitoxin systems. Previously, we reported the presence of some such genes at a higher frequency on the plasmids of L. plantarum than any other species46. Overall, these results indicate the contribution of plasmids to the stress resistance as well as potentially technical properties of DKL3 and JGR2.
Comparative genomics
The genomes of DKL3 and JGR2 along with seven other strains of L. plantarum were subjected to core genome-based phylogeny. DKL3 and JGR2 clustered separately from each other suggesting their diverse nature (Fig. 1a) and showed clustering of DKL3 with strain 16 and that of JGR2 with JDM1. The proteomes of these nine strains were also compared with a reference strain L. plantarum WCFS1 which is well-characterized to have potentially probiotic properties (Fig. 1b). This analysis resulted in the identification of four regions of high variability. Regions V1 (lp_0624 to lp_0683) and V3 (lp_2398 to lp_2480) were found to be phage-related proteins, region V2 (lp_1176 to lp_1233) contained exopolysaccharide synthesis-related proteins; whereas, region V4 (lp_3590 to lp_3650) contained sugar metabolism-related proteins. These variable genomic regions are consistent with those previously reported47.
Using PATRIC BRC, the unique proteins were identified as the members of unique PGFam across the selected strains (Table S7 and S7, supplementary files). Lactiplantibacillus plantarum WCFS1 which is a well-characterized and potentially probiotic strain had the highest number (32) of unique proteins followed by JGR2 (23), and DKL3 (7). Most of the unique proteins found in DKL3 and JGR2 were phage and sugar metabolism-related, which are known to be variable in L. plantarum47. This might result in the sugar metabolism of our strains being different from the seven other well-characterized strains including some of the established probiotic candidates (Tables S7 and S8, supplementary files). Since carbohydrate metabolism is strongly associated with the prebiotic, probiotic, and industrial properties through the exopolysaccharides production and utilization oligosaccharides1,8, the potentially unique features of JGR2 and DKL3 in this aspect are being investigated. Pyruvate dehydrogenase (quinone) and heme-transporter (IsdDEF) were also found to be two of the unique proteins in our isolates amongst the selected strains. Heme-transporter IsdDEF is an ABC transporter for heme transport across the membrane and has been well characterized in S. aureus48. Both these genes are likely to contribute to the respiratory growth with enhanced biomass and higher yields of value-added chemicals including diacetyl and acetoin49. Thus, it will be worth analysing the plausible uniqueness of JGR2 in this regard in comparison to the established probiotic and industrial candidates not having these genes.
Phenotypes, technological properties and their genetic determinants
The isolates did not show nitrate reduction, H2S production, arginine dihydrolase activity, urease activity, and catalase activity. The DKL3 cell biomass was yellowish and sticky and the colonies did not disperse easily in the liquid medium whereas JGR2 pellet was white and dispersed relatively easily (Fig. S2). The color variation displayed by both strains is likely due to variable carotenoid production. A previous study showed the involvement of crtNM operon in the carotenoid synthesis which rendered yellow color to the L. plantarum isolates50. Even though our isolates showed color variation, the crtNM operon was present in both the isolates (data not shown).
Sugar utilization
Both the strains were able to utilize maltose, salicin, sucrose, mannose, and fructose to a similar extent as glucose but neither of them was able to utilize arabinose and rhamnose (Fig. 2a). Melezitose was only utilized by DKL3; whereas, lactose, raffinose, sorbitol, and trehalose were exclusively utilized by L. plantarum JGR2. In general, high variability in the utilization of some sugars is reported in L. plantarum strains. The common and differential pattern observed for DKL3 and JGR2 was in accordance with such differences reported, for example, in the case of L. plantarum 299v and ATCC 1491751,52. For melezitose, raffinose, sorbitol, and trehalose utilization, the gene cassettes were found in both the genomes despite variable utilization. It has been shown that L. plantarum carbohydrate utilization operons are highly variable and are altered depending on the niche53. The correlation of these variable sugar utilization with the genome was only possible in the case of lactose, where a lactose utilization gene cassette was found only in JGR2.
The lac region in WCFS1 is identified to be lp_3468 to lp_3470 and encodes for LacS (lactose and galactose permease), LacA (β-galactosidases), LacR (lactose transport regulator)54. JGR2 genome consisted of four β-galactosidases, of which one belongs to the GH42 family (lacA), and a lacS; but lacked lacR. The absence of lacR might make the lactose utilization in JGR2 constitutive as observed in L. delbrueckii55. In the case of DKL3, all these genes were absent, justifying its inability to utilize lactose. This operon has also been shown to be involved in utilization of galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) but the absence of lacR has been associated with non-GOS utilization phenotype56. Thus, none of our strains might be able to utilize GOS.
Since we found correlation between lactose utilization and the presence of the lac operon in JGR2, both of which were not observed in DKL3, we further expanded the assessment of lac operon to 147 strains of L. plantarum for which the complete genome sequences were available on NCBI database. In total, 122 (~ 82%) strains were found to have the complete lactose utilization cassette harbouring lacS, lacA, and lacR (Fig. 3a). Including DKL3, only 17strains lacked lacS; whereas, 20 strains lacked the lacA, as a result these strains might not be able to utilize lactose. Total 23 strains lacked lacR out of which three strains contained the other two genes (lacS and lacA) hence might be able to utilize lactose but not GOS, similar to JGR2.
Bile and acid tolerance
Both DKL3 and JGR2 showed < 1 log10 CFU reduction after three-hour exposure to 0.3% oxgall and pH of 3.9, separately. This reduction was slightly higher than that observed for L. plantarum DSM 20174 under similar conditions (Fig. 2b) but lower than that reported for a commercial probiotic strain, L. plantarum 299v as assessed for the shorter exposure duration57. These observations suggest that DKL3 and JGR2 might be able to survive in the human gastrointestinal tract during its probiotic usage.
The bile resistance of DKL3 and JGR2 correlates well with the presence of the four genes encoding bile salt hydrolase (Bsh) proteins in their genome that have been characterized from the two highly studied probiotic strains, L. plantarum WCFS158 and L. plantarum ST-III59. None of the genes encoding Bsh from other lactobacilli60 or human gut microbiota61 were found in DKL3 and JGR2. As L. plantarum produces acid in its own environment, one of the contributors to the acid tolerance is F-ATPase which regulates the intracellular pH62. Also, Cfa1 (cyclopropane-fatty-acyl-phospholipid synthase), MleS (malolactic enzyme) and HisD (histidinol dehydrogenase) which are also known to play a role in acid resistance of L. plantarum1,63 were found to be encoded by both the genomes.
Antimicrobial activity
DKL3 and JGR2 showed the zones of inhibition against all the test pathogens and the extent of such antimicrobial activity for the given pathogen was similar for DKL3 and JGR2 (Fig. 2c). The highest inhibition was in the case of P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 while the lowest was seen for E. faecalis ATCC 14506.
When mined for the presence of genomic determinants of bacteriocin production, both the strains were found to have plantaricin E/F genes (Fig. S3). Additionally, JGR2 also showed the presence of two lactococcin (ComC, member of class IIc), plantaricin A (member of class IId) and J (member of class IIB) genes (Fig. S3). Both plantaricin E/F and plantaricin J/K are class IIb two-peptide bacteriocins where both the peptides act synergistically to confer antimicrobial activity64,65. Since the gene for plantaricin K was not found, plantaricin J might not be active. Along with the structural genes, the plantaricin E/F loci in both the genomes contained genes encoding ABC transporters (LanT and HlyD), a two or three-component system (HPK, plnC (only seen in JGR2), plnD), immunity protein (plnI), biosynthesis proteins (plnS and/or plnY), and DNA helicase IV. The sequence of these genes in DKL3 was similar to JDM1; whereas, that in JGR2 was similar to WCFS1. Since the bacteriocin clusters/operons in DKL3 and JGR2 appear to be complete, both the strains are possibly able to synthesize, process and secret the plantaricin E/F and this property could contribute to the antimicrobial activity showed by the isolates.
Both the isolates showed acid production with a pH drop till 4.2 for DKL3 and 4.6 for JGR2 in 10% skim milk having the initial pH of 6.5. Thus, in addition to the bacteriocin production, the antimicrobial activity displayed by the isolates can also be attributed to the production of organic acids. Antimicrobial properties are beneficial in food preservation during fermentation and also as an important probiotic characteristic66.
Adhesion to human intestinal epithelial cells
The extent of adhesion to the HT-29 intestinal epithelial cells, of DKL3 (82.8%), and JGR2 (79.6%), were similar to that of an established probiotic strain Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG as determined by us (81.1%) (Fig. 2d) and as reported earlier (80.8%)67. This extent was also higher than that reported earlier for another probiotic strain, L. plantarum 299v (24%)57. This observation suggests the possibility of equivalent or even better ability of DKL3 and JGR2 to colonize the gut in comparison to the established probiotics.
The adhesion properties of the probiotic bacteria are highly important for the gut colonization and are based on the cell surface characteristics of the bacteria. Over the years, various cell adhesion-related proteins have been characterized from lactobacilli and have been thought to be required for colonization in the host40. The genomes of DKL3 and JGR2 were searched for the presence of genes encoding such proteins40 (Table S3). Both the strains showed the presence of the genes encoding both cell wall-anchored adhesion-associated protein (CwaA) (96% similarity) and mucus-binding protein precursor (Mbp) (99% similarity). DKL2 and JRG2 were also found to encode fibronectin-binding protein A (FbpA) with low identity (< 58%). Furthermore, mannose-specific lectin (Msl) was found to be encoded by the DKL3 genome with 83.8% identity. Based on the earlier studies, all these proteins appear to be associated with the probiotic properties of the lactobacilli. Specifically, recombinantly expressed CwaA in Lactococcus lactis has been shown to be involved in adhesion to the colonic epithelial cells as well as in the exclusion of pathogen47. Similarly, recombinant expression of two of the six mucous binding domains of L. plantarum Mbp in E. coli has been shown to exhibit very high adhesion to rat, pig, and human intestinal tissues and also inhibition of pathogen binding68. Also, purified FbpA from L. casei has been characterized to show adhesion to immobilized fibronectin69. In L. plantarum CMPG5300, Msl was shown to be required for adhesion to the vaginal epithelial cells and other cell adhesion properties such as auto-aggregation, biofilm formation, and binding to mannosylated glycans70. Thus, the in vitro adhesion properties and the presence of the required genes suggests the potential of both the DKL3 and JGR2 to colonize in the human gut. The presence of msl in DKL3 also suggests that it can have the potential of colonizing in the vagina and subsequently exhibiting probiotic effects.
Additionally, we assessed 147 genomes of L. plantarum available in the NCBI database for the presence of these adhesion-related genes (Fig. 3b). Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strains have previously been shown to have either of the two types of CwaA47. In accordance with this observation, the majority of the strains that we analyzed had Group I CwaA (107 strains), a few had Group II CwaA (30 strains); whereas, the remaining few strains did not contain this protein. Similarly, a protein with about 57.6% similarity to FbpA was present in all but two strains. A protein showing about 54% identity with MapA from Limosilactobacillus reuteri but annotated as transporter substrate-binding protein was present in all the L. plantarum strains analyzed. Proteins similar to mucin-binding protein (MucBP) (8 strains with 52–98% identity), and collagen-binding protein (Cbp) (5 strains with 88–89% identity), were scarcely found across L. plantarum strains and were annotated differently. The presence of adhesion-related protein of one or the other type in a large majority of the L. plantarum strains suggests that they might be able to colonize in the animal hosts.
Safety of isolates
Although L. plantarum has a GRAS status, the safety of each stain for usage in human consumption needs to be determined 71. To establish food safety, DKL3 and JGR2 were assessed for their antibiotic resistance at the phenotypic and genomic levels, hemolysis activity at phenotypic levels, and the biogenic amine biosynthesis at the genomic levels. Antibiotic MIC test revealed that both the strains were sensitive to tetracycline, chloramphenicol, clindamycin, and trimethoprim and resistant to gentamicin and vancomycin (Table 2). Campedelli et al. (2019) reported phenotypic resistance to tetracycline and chloramphenicol in a majority of L. plantarum strains in their panel. This fact suggests the superiority of JGR2 and DKL3 on this parameter. Resistance to gentamicin and vancomycin is considered to be intrinsic and is well-studied in lactobacilli72. When mined for AR genes, those conferring resistance to tetracycline, chloramphenicol, and erythromycin were found in both strains in spite of having the phenotypic susceptibility to the former two antibiotics. This observation is also consistent with the earlier report which showed the presence of chlorapmphenicol resistance gene in a majority of the lactobacilli strains which were susceptible to this antibiotic72. Aac(6’)-Ian (aminoglycoside 6'-N-acetyltransferase) which is responsible for aminoglycosides resistance was found in both the genomes with 33% identity (Table S9). This gene might be responsible for the observed gentamicin resistance in DKL3 and JGR273. Vancomycin resistance in both the isolates might be due to the presence in them of ddl gene identical to the F-type sequence (phenylalanine residue in active site) which is generally found in vancomycin-resistant L. plantarum72. Taken together, our results suggest better susceptibility of DKL3 and JGR2 to the commonly used antibiotics with a negative correlation with the presence of antibiotic resistance in some cases as has been shown previously72. This situation demands further investigations to understand if these putative antibiotic resistance genes encode for active proteins or play some other roles.
Table 2.
Antibiotic | Concentration range tested# | MIC cut-off for resistance# | MIC obtained# | Phenotype category | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DKL3 | JGR2 | ||||
Tetracycline | 0.01–240 | 32 | 0.1 | 0.1 | Sensitive |
Gentamicin | 0.064–1024 | 16 | 64 | 64 | Resistant |
Vancomycin | 0.001–240 | nr | > 240 | > 240 | Resistant |
Clindamycin | 0.001–240 | 4 | 0.001 | 0.06 | Sensitive |
Trimethoprim | 0.001–240 | nd | 0.01 | 0.01 | Sensitive |
Chloramphenicol$ | 30 | 4 | nd | nd | Sensitive |
Cut-off values are based on the guidelines given by European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), 2012.
#Values in mg/l.
$Sensitivity was determined by disc-diffusion method and MIC not determined (nr: not required; nd: not defined).
The isolates did not show hemolysis on the blood agar plates. Genes involved in biosynthesis of the biogenic amines, viz., histamine, tyramine, putrescine, cadaverine characterized from Lactobacillus saerimneri 30a74, Enterococcus faecalis75, Levilactobacillus brevis76 and L. saerimneri 30a77 (Table S1) were absent in both DKL3 and JGR2. Hence, the absence of hemolysis, absence biogenic amine synthesis genes, the absence of phenotypic resistance to the commonly used antibiotics, and the intrinsic nature of the resistance to some antibiotics supported the safety of these isolates to be used in food or probiotic preparations.
Plant phenolics utilization and vitamin biosynthesis
The genomes of DKL3 and JGR2 were further analyzed for the presence of the genes involved in metabolizing the plant phenolics (Fig. 3c). Since the presence of some such genes is a strain-specific feature, 147 L. plantarum genomes in the NCBI database were also analysed. An esterase characterized from the potentially probiotic L. plantarum WCFS1 that can hydrolyze the feruloyl esters78 was found in DKL3 and JGR2 along with all other strains analyzed; whereas, another esterase found only in a few strains of L. plantarum and having a broad range of activities on numerous phenolic esters79 was found in JGR2 along with 22 other strains. The presence of this broad-range and uncommon esterase might allow better growth of JGR2 in plant-based media such as fermented vegetables in comparison to the established probiotic strain, WCFS1 which does not contain this gene79. Similarly, a tannase from another probiotic strain, L. plantarum ATCC 1491780 was found in all the strains including DKL3 and JGR2; a gallate decarboxylase from L. plantarum WCFS181 was present in both DKL3 and JGR2 along with 142 other strains; while, another novel Tannase82 was found only in 22 L. plantarum strains was absent in our strains (Table S1). Furthermore, the phenotypic assays confirmed the presence of feruloyl esterase, tannase, and gallate decarboxylase (Fig. 2f–i) enzymatic activities in DKL3 and JGR2. Since such enzymatic activities are associated with lowering of the potentially carcinogenic phytochemicals, improving the colonic health, and adaptation of the probiotic lactobacilli to the gut environment83,84, DKL3 and JGR2 are likely to offer health benefits upon consumption. Additionally, they also have the potential to be employed as the starter cultures for the fermentation of vegetables and fruits for enhancing the levels of bioactive phenolics85.
DKL3 and JGR2 along with 137 other L. plantarum strains showed the presence of complete pathway required for riboflavin biosynthesis (Fig. 3d). Similarly, 118 strains including DKL3 and JGR2 harboured all necessary genes for folate biosynthesis (Fig. 3e). Both the strains were able to produce folic acid since their cell-free supernatants supported the growth of L. rhamnosus DSM 20021 which is deficient in folic acid biosynthesis (Fig. 2e). Thus, the presence of complete pathways for riboflavin and folate biosynthesis36 and the production of folate further suggests the potential application of DKL3 and JGR2 for producing nutritionally enriched fermented foods and as probiotics.
CAZy families
Genomes of DKL3 and JGR2 along with those of the 147 L. plantarum strains were subjected to annotation by the dbCAN2 server for the identification of carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes). Amongst the glycosyl hydrolases, the families involved in the catabolism of oligosaccharides made up of glucose, galactose, fructose, rhamnose, trehalose, and mannose (GH1, GH2, GH31, GH32, GH36, GH38, GH42, GH65, and GH78), polysaccharides (GH13 and GH32), and cell wall (GH23, GH25, and GH73) were found in more than 90% of the strains (Fig. 4). All these enzymes were also present in JGR2 and DKL3 except for the absence of GH42 in DKL3. Overall, these results underline the ability of DKL3 and JGR2 and well a large number of other strains to utilize various carbohydrates. DKL3 was one of the two strains possessing the highest number (six) of GH65. GH65 enzymes have been characterized to be involved in maltose catabolism in L. acidophilus NCFM, L. sanfranciscensis, and L. brevis86–88. Since DKL3 was isolated from the dhokla batter which is likely to be rich in starch, the multiple GH65 hydrolase in this strain might enable it to efficiently use maltose released upon the action of α-amylases which too were abundantly encoded by DKL3 genome. JGR2 was one of about half of the strains having a GH126 member (α-amylase, identified as a unique gene) which was absent in DKL3. Provided that only one GH126 enzyme has so far been characterized and its substrate specificity is still ambiguous89, exploring the properties of this enzyme from JGR2 might provide novel insights. DKL3 contained one member each of GH68 and GH70 which were absent in JGR2. These enzymes are involved in homopolysaccharide biosynthesis and were present only in seven and nine of the 147 strains, respectively, highlighting a unique feature of DKL3. Exopolysaccharides which include homo- and heteropolysaccharides are highly important in the technological applications of lactobacilli as well as in their interaction with the host5, Thus, assessing the properties conferred by these genes, which were absent in numerous vastly studied L. plantarum strains such as WCFS1, JDM1, and ST-III, to DKL3 might reveal novel findings.
Amongst the glycosyltransferases, GT2 and GT4 were the most predominant families and were found in all the L. plantarum strains. These genes are mostly associated with the EPS biosynthesis gene clusters in lactobacilli37. GT5 and GT35 which were involved in glycogen biosynthesis and degradation, respectively, were present in DKL3 and JGR2 as well as in more than 90% of all the analyzed strains. This observation corroborates with the earlier report on the abundance of these genes in L. plantarum90, although the biochemical features of these glycogen metabolism enzymes from L. plantarum remains to be characterized. GT14 and GT32 were present in 13 and 26 strains, respectively; however, no strain had the simultaneous presence of both these genes. This observation is in agreement with our earlier observation of the mutually exclusive presence of GT14 and GT32 in Lactobacillus EPS gene clusters37.
Exopolysaccharide production
Exopolysaccharide (EPS) production is another industrially important trait possessed by LAB. Both DKL3 and JGR2 were able to produce EPS with yields of 397 ± 8.1 mg/l and 461 ± 5.9 mg/l, respectively. The monosaccharide composition was almost identical with glucose (92% and 94%, respectively) as the most abundant monosaccharide followed by galactose (5% and 6%, respectively). Both the strains also had the presence of a very low proportion of mannose. The EPS yields observed for DKL3 and JGR2 fall in the range of 20–600 mg/l reported earlier for lactobacilli and the monosaccharaide composition is also similar to that reported commonly for L. plantarum5. Both the strains contained an EPS biosynthesis gene cluster highly similar (> 99%) to the L. plantarum WCFS1 cluster cps4A-J (data not shown). WCFS1 contains four EPS clusters of which cluster cps4A-J is the most conserved in other L. plantarum strains37,91. This cluster was previously identified to be involved in contributing to the overall EPS yield and its deletion resulted in less than half yield compared to wild-type91. Similar to our earlier observation for other L. plantarum strains, DKL3 and JGR2 also did not have epsA associated with the EPS gene cluster unlike the host-associated lactobacilli37. Both the genomes possessed a gene identical to lp_1000 from WCFS1 which is involved in biofilm formation92 and can act as a putative epsA37.
We further compared GH68 and GH70 from DKL3 with those characterized from other LAB. The putative GH68 enzyme encoded by DKL3 displayed only 41.7% identity to an inulosucrase characterized from Limosilactobacillus reuteri (AAN05575.1)93 and much lower identity to the other characterized fructansucrases. On the other hand, the maximum identity showed by GH70 from DKL3 was 78.5% with a dextransucrase characterized from L. reuteri (ABQ83597.1)94. Phylogenetic analysis of these proteins with those tagged as characterized in the CAZy database revealed clustering of DKL3 fructosyltransferase (FTF) with Streptococcus mutans GS-5 fructosyltranferase and DKL3 glucosyltransferase (GTF) with Leuconostoc citreum alternansucrase (Fig. 5). Further, the sequence analysis of DKL3 FTF revealed the presence of all the conserved residues found in GH68 enzymes but lack of the cell-wall anchoring motif including the LPXTG and the hydrophobic domain (Fig. 6). This suggests a possibility of extracellular release of this enzyme as has been previously reported for an inulosucrase from Lactobacillus gasseri95. To assess the activity of DKL3 FTF, the gene was cloned and expressed in E. coli. The purified protein showed sucrase activity as assessed by analysing the glucose release from sucrose by DNSA method (data not shown). Considering that glucansucrases have mostly been studied from Leuconostoc and no fructansucrase has yet been characterized from L. plantarum, further characterization of these GH68 and GH70 enzymes might reveal interesting findings.
Conclusion
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strains possess larger genomes as compared to the other LAB species. This also translates into the ability of this species to exist in a large number of habitats which is further correlated to the strain-wise variation observed in some of the properties of this bacterium. This scenario demands the detailed analysis of the strains of this species from as many niches as possible to be able to get more insights into the interesting and varying phenotypes that it exhibits. Here we reported isolation and preliminary phenotypic and genomic data of two novel probiotic candidates belonging to L. plantarum. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the isolation and genome sequencing of L. plantarum from dhokla batter and also on the isolation of LAB and genome sequencing of any bacterium from jaggery. Further studies on functionally characterizing the unique and biotechnologically important genes from these isolates are underway and will shed more light on yet unexplored facets of L. plantarum. Our results on comparative genomic analysis of a large number of L. plantarum strain suggests the need of establishing genotype–phenotype correlations for a wider array of properties to be able to biologically understand and biotechnologically utilize this fascinating bacterium.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Symbiosis Centre for Research and Innovation (SCRI), Symbiosis International (Deemed University) for the financial support. The equipment grant received through the Material Resource Program of DAAD (Germany) is highly acknowledged. Equipment support was also obtained as a part of the Early Career Research Award from Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), India. The academic activities related to antimicrobial resistance at the host institute are supported through ERASMUS+ Grant 598515-EPP-1-2018-1-IN-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP. We also acknowledge the assistance provided by Dipti Deo, Sahara Sarang and Shruti Gaikwad in the WGS, cloning and recombinant expression of GH68, and EPS analysis, respectively.
Author contributions
S.S. performed most of the experiments; D.S. carried out some of the phenotypic characterization experiments; S.S. wrote the first draft of the manuscript: S.S. and R.K. revised the manuscript; R.K. wrote some parts of the manuscript and conceptualized the study; all authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Data availability
The raw NGS reads generated in this project were deposited to NCBI under Bioproject accession PRJNA749646.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-05850-3.
References
- 1.Lebeer S, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SCJ. Genes and molecules of lactobacilli supporting probiotic action. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2008;72:728–764. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00017-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Van Baarlen P, et al. Human mucosal in vivo transcriptome responses to three lactobacilli indicate how probiotics may modulate human cellular pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011;108:4562–4569. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000079107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ganguly NK, et al. ICMR-DBT guidelines for evaluation of probiotics in food. Indian J. Med. Res. 2011;134:22–25. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ribeiro SC, Stanton C, Yang B, Ross RP, Silva CCG. Conjugated linoleic acid production and probiotic assessment of Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from Pico cheese. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2018;90:403–411. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zeidan AA, et al. Polysaccharide production by lactic acid bacteria: from genes to industrial applications. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017;41:S168–S200. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fux017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lorenzo, J. M. et al. Main groups of microorganisms of relevance for food safety and stability: general aspects and overall description. in Innovative Technologies for Food Preservation: Inactivation of Spoilage and Pathogenic Microorganisms 53–107 (Elsevier, 2018). 10.1016/B978-0-12-811031-7.00003-0.
- 7.Pino A, Bartolo E, Caggia C, Cianci A, Randazzo CL. Detection of vaginal lactobacilli as probiotic candidates. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40304-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Siezen RJ, et al. Phenotypic and genomic diversity of Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from various environmental niches. Environ. Microbiol. 2010;12:758–773. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02119.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Martino ME, et al. Nomadic lifestyle of Lactobacillus plantarum revealed by comparative genomics of 54 strains isolated from different habitats. Environ. Microbiol. 2016;18:4974–4989. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gupta A, Tiwari SK. Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus plantarum LD1 isolated from batter of dosa, a South Indian fermented food. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins. 2014;6:73–81. doi: 10.1007/s12602-014-9158-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Khemariya P, Singh S, Jaiswal N, Chaurasia SNS. Isolation and Identification of Lactobacillus plantarum from vegetable samples. Food Biotechnol. 2016;30:49–62. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Poornachandra Rao K, et al. Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus strains isolated from sorghum-based traditional fermented food. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins. 2015;7:146–156. doi: 10.1007/s12602-015-9186-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bora SS, Keot J, Das S, Sarma K, Barooah M. Metagenomics analysis of microbial communities associated with a traditional rice wine starter culture (Xaj-pitha) of Assam, India. 3 Biotech. 2016;6:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s13205-016-0471-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tamang JP, et al. Identification of predominant lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditionally fermented vegetable products of the Eastern Himalayas. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005;105:347–356. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.04.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Goel A, Halami PM, Tamang JP. Genome analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from some indian fermented foods for bacteriocin production and probiotic marker genes. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:40. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Grover S, Sharma VK, Mallapa RH, Batish VK. Draft genome sequence of Lactobacillus fermentum Lf1, an Indian isolate of human gut origin. Genome Announc. 2013;1:1. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00883-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Patil A, et al. Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum strain JDARSH, isolated from sheep milk. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2020;9:e01199. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01199-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017;13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wattam AR, et al. Improvements to PATRIC, the all-bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource center. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D535–D542. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schwengers O, et al. Platon: identification and characterization of bacterial plasmid contigs in short-read draft assemblies exploiting protein sequence-based replicon distribution scores. Microb. Genomics. 2020;6:1–12. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rissman AI, et al. Reordering contigs of draft genomes using the Mauve Aligner. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2071–2073. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Overbeek R, et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST) Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D206. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tamang JP, Tamang B, Schillinger U, Guigas C, Holzapfel WH. Functional properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from ethnic fermented vegetables of the Himalayas. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009;135:28–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Koo OK, Eggleton M, O’Bryan CA, Crandall PG, Ricke SC. Antimicrobial activity of lactic acid bacteria against Listeria monocytogenes on frankfurters formulated with and without lactate/diacetate. Meat Sci. 2012;92:533–537. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mozzi, F., Torino, M. I. & de Valdez, G. F. Identification of exopolysaccharide-producing: lactic acid bacteria a method for the isolation of polysaccharides in milk cultures. in Food Microbiology Protocols 183–190 (Humana Press, 2003). 10.1385/1-59259-029-2:183.
- 26.Masuko T, et al. Carbohydrate analysis by a phenol-sulfuric acid method in microplate format. Anal. Biochem. 2005;339:69–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2004.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Englyst, H. N., Quigley, M. E. & Hudson, G. J. Dietary fiber analysis as non-starch polysaccharides. in Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry (American Cancer Society, 2006). 10.1002/9780470027318.a1006.
- 28.Chen L, Eitenmiller RR. Single laboratory method performance evaluation for the analysis of total food folate by trienzyme extraction and microplate assay. J. Food Sci. 2007;72:C243–C247. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00370.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sharma OP, Bhat TK, Singh B. Thin-layer chromatography of gallic acid, methyl gallate, pyrogallol, phloroglucinol, catechol, resorcinol, hydroquinone, catechin, epicatechin, cinnamic acid, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid and tannic acid. J. Chromatogr. A. 1998;822:167–171. [Google Scholar]
- 30.European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). European Food Safety Authority, EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP). Scientific opinion guidance on the assessment of bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobials of human and veterinary importance. EFSA J.10, 2740 (2012).
- 31.Alcock BP, et al. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucl. Acids Res. 2020;48:D517–D525. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Siguier P, Perochon J, Lestrade L, Mahillon J, Chandler M. ISfinder: the reference centre for bacterial insertion sequences. Nucl. Acids Res. 2006;34:D32–D36. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pal C, Bengtsson-Palme J, Rensing C, Kristiansson E, Larsson DGJ. BacMet: antibacterial biocide and metal resistance genes database. Nucl. Acids Res. 2014;42:D737–D743. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Couvin D, et al. CRISPRCasFinder, an update of CRISRFinder, includes a portable version, enhanced performance and integrates search for Cas proteins. Nucl. Acids Res. 2018;46:W246–W251. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Arndt D, et al. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucl. Acids Res. 2016;44:W16–W21. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Capozzi V, Russo P, Dueñas MT, López P, Spano G. Lactic acid bacteria producing B-group vitamins: a great potential for functional cereals products. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012;96:1383–1394. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4440-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Deo D, Davray D, Kulkarni R. A diverse repertoire of exopolysaccharide biosynthesis gene clusters in Lactobacillus revealed by comparative analysis in 106 sequenced genomes. Microorganisms. 2019;7:444. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7100444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Van Heel AJ, et al. BAGEL4: a user-friendly web server to thoroughly mine RiPPs and bacteriocins. Nucl. Acids Res. 2018;46:W278–W281. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wattam, A. R. et al. Assembly, annotation, and comparative genomics in PATRIC, the all bacterial bioinformatics resource center. in Methods in Molecular Biology vol. 1704, 79–101 (Humana Press Inc., 2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 40.Muscariello L, De Siena B, Marasco R. Lactobacillus cell surface proteins involved in interaction with mucus and extracellular matrix components. Curr. Microbiol. 2020;77:3831–3841. doi: 10.1007/s00284-020-02243-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lombard V, Golaconda Ramulu H, Drula E, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucl. Acids Res. 2014;42:D490–D495. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhang H, et al. DbCAN2: A meta server for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucl. Acids Res. 2018;46:W95–W101. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zheng J, et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020;70:2782–2858. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Patel A, Lindström C, Patel A, Prajapati JB, Holst O. Probiotic properties of exopolysaccharide producing lactic acid bacteria isolated from vegetables and traditional Indian fermented foods. Int. J. Fermented Foods. 2012;1:87–101. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Schneider D, Lenski RE. Dynamics of insertion sequence elements during experimental evolution of bacteria. Res. Microbiol. 2004;155:319–327. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2003.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Davray, D., Deo, D. & Kulkarni, R. Plasmids encode niche-specific traits in Lactobacillaceae. Microb. Genomics7 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 47.Zhang B, et al. Comparative genome-based identification of a cell wall-anchored protein from Lactobacillus plantarum increases adhesion of Lactococcus lactis to human epithelial cells. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:1–12. doi: 10.1038/srep14109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Reniere, M. L., Torres, V. J. & Skaar, E. P. Intracellular metalloporphyrin metabolism in Staphylococcus aureus. in BioMetals, vol. 20, 333–345 (Springer, 2007). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 49.Brooijmans RJW, De Vos WM, Hugenholtz J. Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 electron transport chains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009;75:3580–3585. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00147-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Garrido-Fernández J, Maldonado-Barragán A, Caballero-Guerrero B, Hornero-Méndez D, Ruiz-Barba JL. Carotenoid production in Lactobacillus plantarum. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010;140:34–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hedberg M, Hasslöf P, Sjöström I, Twetman S, Stecksén-Blicks C. Sugar fermentation in probiotic bacteria: an in vitro study. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 2008;23:482–485. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2008.00457.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Buron-Moles G, Chailyan A, Dolejs I, Forster J, Mikš MH. Uncovering carbohydrate metabolism through a genotype-phenotype association study of 56 lactic acid bacteria genomes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019;103:3135–3152. doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-09701-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gänzle MG, Follador R. Metabolism of oligosaccharides and starch in lactobacilli: a review. Front. Microbiol. 2012;3:340. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Heiss S, et al. Evaluation of novel inducible promoter/repressor systems for recombinant protein expression in Lactobacillus plantarum. Microb. Cell Fact. 2016;15:1–17. doi: 10.1186/s12934-016-0448-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lapierre L, Mollet B, Germond JE. Regulation and adaptive evolution of lactose operon expression in Lactobacillus delbrueckii. J. Bacteriol. 2002;184:928–935. doi: 10.1128/jb.184.4.928-935.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Fuhren J, et al. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of differential galacto-oligosaccharide utilization in Lactobacillus plantarum. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78721-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mathara JM, et al. Functional properties of Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from Maasai traditional fermented milk products in Kenya. Curr. Microbiol. 2008;56:315–321. doi: 10.1007/s00284-007-9084-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lambert JM, Bongers RS, De Vos WM, Kleerebezem M. Functional analysis of four bile salt hydrolase and penicillin acylase family members in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008;74:4719–4726. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00137-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ren J, Sun K, Wu Z, Yao J, Guo B. All 4 bile salt hydrolase proteins are responsible for the hydrolysis activity in Lactobacillus plantarum ST-III. J. Food Sci. 2011;76:M622–M628. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02431.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Foley MH, et al. Lactobacillus bile salt hydrolase substrate specificity governs bacterial fitness and host colonization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2021;118:e2017709118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2017709118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Song Z, et al. Taxonomic profiling and populational patterns of bacterial bile salt hydrolase (BSH) genes based on worldwide human gut microbiome. Microbiome. 2019;7:1–16. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0628-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kleerebezem M, et al. Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003;100:1990–1995. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0337704100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Šeme H, et al. Acid resistance and response to pH-induced stress in two Lactobacillus plantarum strains with probiotic potential. Benef. Microbes. 2015;6:369–379. doi: 10.3920/BM2014.0069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Collins FWJ, et al. Bacteriocin Gene-Trait matching across the complete Lactobacillus Pan-genome. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03339-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Fernandes J, Kumbhar R, Kulkarni R. Bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria: a natural strategy for inhibiting unwanted bacteria. Resonance. 2021;26:387–398. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Šušković J, et al. Antimicrobial activity: the most important property of probiotic and starter lactic acid bacteria. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2010;48:296–307. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Dhanani AS, Bagchi T. Lactobacillus plantarum CS24.2 prevents Escherichia coli adhesion to HT-29 cells and also down-regulates enteropathogen-induced tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-8 expression. Microbiol. Immunol. 2013;57:309–315. doi: 10.1111/1348-0421.12038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Singh KS, Kumar S, Mohanty AK, Grover S, Kaushik JK. Mechanistic insights into the host-microbe interaction and pathogen exclusion mediated by the Mucus-binding protein of Lactobacillus plantarum. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:14198. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32417-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Muñoz-Provencio D, Pérez-Martínez G, Monedero V. Characterization of a fibronectin-binding protein from Lactobacillus casei BL23. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010;108:1050–1059. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04508.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Malik S, et al. High mannose-specific lectin Msl mediates key interactions of the vaginal Lactobacillus plantarum isolate CMPG5300. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:1–16. doi: 10.1038/srep37339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.FAO/WHO. Probiotics in food: health and nutritional properties and guidelines for evaluation. Food Nutr. Pap.85, 71 (2001).
- 72.Campedelli I, et al. Genus-wide assessment of antibiotic resistance in Lactobacillus spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019;85:e01738. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01738-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Wright GD, Ladak P. Overexpression and characterization of the chromosomal aminoglycoside 6-N-Acetyltransferase from Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997;41:956–960. doi: 10.1128/aac.41.5.956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Lucas PM, Wolken WAM, Claisse O, Lolkema JS, Lonvaud-Funel A. Histamine-producing pathway encoded on an unstable plasmid in Lactobacillus hilgardii 0006. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005;71:1417–1424. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.3.1417-1424.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Connil N, et al. Identification of the Enterococcus faecalis tyrosine decarboxylase operon involved in tyramine production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002;68:3537–3544. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.7.3537-3544.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Romano A, Trip H, Lonvaud-Funel A, Lolkema JS, Lucas PM. Evidence of two functionally distinct ornithine decarboxylation systems in lactic acid bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012;78:1953–1961. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07161-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Romano A, Trip H, Lolkema JS, Lucas PM. Three-component lysine/ornithine decarboxylation system in lactobacillus saerimneri 30a. J. Bacteriol. 2013;195:1249–1254. doi: 10.1128/JB.02070-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Esteban-Torres M, Reverón I, Mancheño JM, De las Rivas B, Muñoz R. Characterization of a feruloyl esterase from Lactobacillus plantarum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013;79:5130–5136. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01523-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Esteban-Torres M, et al. A Lactobacillus plantarum esterase active on a broad range of phenolic esters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;81:3235–3242. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00323-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Iwamoto K, Tsuruta H, Nishitaini Y, Osawa R. Identification and cloning of a gene encoding tannase (tannin acylhydrolase) from Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 14917T. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2008;31:269–277. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2008.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Jiménez N, Curiel JA, Reverón I, de las Rivas B, Muñoz R. Uncovering the Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 gallate decarboxylase involved in tannin degradation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013;79:4253–4263. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00840-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Jiménez N, Esteban-Torres M, Mancheño JM, De Las Rivas B, Muñoz R. Tannin degradation by a novel tannase enzyme present in some Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014 doi: 10.1128/AEM.00324-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.de Felipe FL, de las Rivas B, Muñoz R. Bioactive compounds produced by gut microbial tannase: implications for colorectal cancer development. Front. Microbiol. 2014;5:1–4. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Reverón I, et al. Tannic acid-dependent modulation of selected Lactobacillus plantarum traits linked to gastrointestinal survival. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e66473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Filannino P, Di Cagno R, Gobbetti M. Metabolic and functional paths of lactic acid bacteria in plant foods: get out of the labyrinth. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2018;49:64–72. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2017.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Ehrmann MA, Vogel RF. Maltose metabolism of Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis: cloning and heterologous expression of the key enzymes, maltose phosphorylase and phosphoglucomutase. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1998;169:81–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13302.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Hüwel S, Haalck L, Conrath N, Spener F. Maltose phosphorylase from Lactobacillus brevis: purification, characterization, and application in a biosensor for ortho-phosphate. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1997;21:413–420. doi: 10.1016/s0141-0229(97)00014-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Nakai H, et al. The maltodextrin transport system and metabolism in Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM and production of novel α-glucosides through reverse phosphorolysis by maltose phosphorylase. FEBS J. 2009;276:7353–7365. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07445.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Kerényiová L, Janeček Š. A detailed in silico analysis of the amylolytic family GH126 and its possible relatedness to family GH76. Carbohydr. Res. 2020;494:108082. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2020.108082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Sun Z, et al. Expanding the biotechnology potential of lactobacilli through comparative genomics of 213 strains and associated genera. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:1–13. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Remus DM, et al. Impact of 4 Lactobacillus plantarum capsular polysaccharide clusters on surface glycan composition and host cell signaling. Microb. Cell Fact. 2012;11:1–10. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-11-149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.D’Abrosca G, et al. Structural characterization of the lactobacillus plantarum FLMC protein involved in biofilm formation. Molecules. 2018;23:2252. doi: 10.3390/molecules23092252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Van Hijum SAFT, Van Geel-Schutten GH, Rahaoui H, Van der Maarel MJEC, Dijkhuizen L. Characterization of a novel fructosyltransferase from Lactobacillus reuteri that synthesizes high-molecular-weight inulin and inulin oligosaccharides. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002;68:4390–4398. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.9.4390-4398.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Leemhuis H, et al. 4,6-α-Glucanotransferase activity occurs more widespread in Lactobacillus strains and constitutes a separate GH70 subfamily. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012;97:181–193. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-3943-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Anwar MA, et al. Inulin and levan synthesis by probiotic Lactobacillus gasseri strains: characterization of three novel fructansucrase enzymes and their fructan products. Microbiology. 2010;156:1264–1274. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.036616-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K, Dudley J. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets downloaded from. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016;33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The raw NGS reads generated in this project were deposited to NCBI under Bioproject accession PRJNA749646.