Cellular organization within tissues is purposeful: specific cell-types are arranged at different proximities with intent, thus enabling intercellular crosstalk and driving tissue functions in health, disease, and response to therapy. Elucidating the spatial pattern of cells and molecules within their native tissue microenvironment is therefore critical towards identifying tissue-based biomarkers predictive of clinical outcome.
Multiplexed tissue imaging methods—including imaging mass cytometry (IMC) (1), multiplex ion beam imaging (MIBI) (2, 3), multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) (4), CO-Detection by indEXing (CODEX) (5, 6), cyclic immunofluorescence (CyCIF) (7, 8), and spatial transcriptomics (9–12)—allow for the simultaneous detection of more than 50 proteins and 1000s of transcripts, thereby empowering the interrogation of spatial organization within tissues. Importantly, these technologies retain the native tissue context of each individual cell, while enabling deep phenotypical and functional interrogation. To date, these methods have enhanced our understanding of the diverse tissue microenvironments in oncology (3, 13–19), reactive and auto-immunology (5, 20, 21), and microbiology (22–24).
This Research Topic focuses on the spatial organization of immune responses to cancer and viral infections. It brings together nine manuscripts that 1) contribute methods to improve the accuracy of cell-type annotation, 2) provide new computational tools to profile spatial tissue patterns, and 3) advance our understanding of spatially resolved immune responses to cancer, infections, and immunotherapy.
A well-designed multiplexed antibody panel is critical for accurate cell-type annotation and serves as the foundation for characterizing cellular composition, cell-cell interactions, intracellular functional states and all further downstream spatial analyses (Phillips D. et al.) optimize a 56-marker CODEX panel consisting of major structural, tumor, and immune cell markers, including eight regulatory proteins that are common immunotherapy targets—PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4, ICOS, IDO-1, LAG-3, OX40, TIM-3, and VISTA. As such, this panel provides an important tool for informing clinical cancer care and the design of therapeutic combination strategies across tumor types. Jiang S. et al. present a 21-marker CODEX panel consisting of 18 antibodies for major immune cell-types and 3 Ebola virus-specific antibodies in rhesus macaques. Importantly, this is one of the first highly multiplexed tissue imaging antibody panels targeted towards rhesus macaques, a common non-human primate model used to evaluate the efficacy of medical countermeasures against biothreat pathogens. Development and optimization of both multiplexed antibody panels was costly and time-consuming, but these panels are easy to reproduce, expand upon, and translate towards other multiplexed imaging modalities. For example, the analogous biochemistry of CODEX and MIBI/IMC antibody conjugations have allowed many of our stains to be reproduced across these platforms (unpublished observations from D.P. and S.J.). Thus, these studies provide investigators with a solid starting point for interrogating how cells functionally organize within tissues to mount coordinated immune responses to cancer, infections, biothreats, and therapeutic intervention.
Accurate cell-type identification is also heavily influenced by chosen normalization strategy and data pre-processing algorithms. Hickey et al. evaluate the performance of major normalization techniques (i.e., Z, log(double Z), min-max, and arcsinh) in mitigating the effects of noise on cell-type annotation in a CODEX dataset. This study shows that regardless of the downstream unsupervised clustering algorithm used, Z normalization of marker intensity results in the most reproducible intra- and inter-sample comparisons for the most accurate cell-type annotation. Correct cell-type identification also depends on the ability to minimize and correct for lateral signal spillover from adjacent cells, a particular challenge in packed lymphoid or tumor tissues. Given the large number of antibody tags imaged in multiplexed experiments, cumulative pairwise spillovers in densely packed tissues can have detrimental effects on cell-type assignments and downstream biological conclusions. Bai et al. present a lateral spillover compensation algorithm termed Reinforcement Dynamic Spillover EliminAtion (REDSEA), which allows robust reassignment of lateral spillover signal to the cell of origin based on the proportion of the shared boundary between adjacent cells. Application of REDSEA to MIBI and CyCIF datasets led to significant improvement in cell-type annotation (i.e., 56.0% of cells were correctly identified at baseline compared to 81.5% after a border-based REDSEA compensation). These studies provide platform agnostic image processing tools that increase the certainty of marker intensities extracted from individual segmented cells, thereby improving the speed and accuracy of cell-type identification.
In addition to REDSEA (Bai et al.), this Research Topic provides additional computational tools that resolve cellular tissue heterogeneity and reveal complex tissue architecture. Yuan et al. present Seg-SOM, a computer vision method for dimensionality reduction of nuclear morphology in histological images. Seg-SOM is easily scalable: it is entirely automated, performs dimensionality reduction on hundreds of thousands of cells within seconds, and can operate on H&E-stained or multiplexed images. Application of Seg-SOM to breast cancer imaging datasets enabled the 1) prediction of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density in normal and cancerous breast tissues and 2) classification of ductal carcinoma in situ lesions into those that exist in isolation or were accompanied by invasive breast cancer. Baranwal et al. present Cell-Graph Attention (CGAT) Network, a graph-theory approach that allows for grading of pancreatic disease based on point patterns derived from multiplexed immunofluorescence-stained images. The CGAT framework can differentiate pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from chronic pancreatitis. This is of fundamental clinical impact as the similar pathological appearances of these conditions can often lead to either a missed diagnosis of an aggressive cancer or repeated, unnecessary biopsies of a benign condition. Modular implementation of these computational approaches into existing analytical pipelines will provide new avenues of investigation and facilitate a greater understanding of spatial dynamics in complex tissue microenvironments.
A major effort of multiplexed tissue imaging is to better understand how the composition and spatial interactions of distinct cell-types in tumor tissues contribute to disease prognosis and response predictions during immunotherapy. Stoltzfus et al. leveraged upon multi-parameter confocal imaging, histocytometry, and a previous described computational method for distinguishing tissue organization, CytoMAP (30), to characterize immune cell organization in mouse models of colorectal and pancreatic cancer to identify a perivascular immune niche (i.e., co-localization of myeloid and CD8+ T cell aggregates adjacent to tumor blood vessels), which is positively associated with anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy response. The increased abundance of this perivascular immune niche following immunotherapy suggests a major role of blood vessels in coordinating the active remodeling of innate and adaptive immune cells within tumors, leading to improved antitumor immunity. Ardighieri et al. combine immunohistochemistry with RNAscope to identify a subset of M1-type tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) (i.e., CXCL10+IRF1+STAT1+) in ovarian cancer. Patients with a high density of these tumor-infiltrating macrophages have improved prognoses and superior responses to platinum-based therapies. These findings are also extended to other cancer types—including melanoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer, breast cancer, and lung cancer—suggesting that these specialized M1-polarized TAMs are part of a T-cell infiltrated immune contexture that confers a better clinical outcome. Yoshimura et al. utilized multiplexed immunohistochemistry and image cytometry-based quantification to reveal co-localization of PD-1+ helper T cells and CD163+ TAMs within tumor cells nests as a negative prognostic indicator in HNSCC. This finding suggests that CD163+ TAMs exert their immunosuppressive effects on effector PD-1+ helper T cells, in line with recent orthogonal work showing that co-localization of PD-1+CD4+ T cells and Tregs was associated with poor response to immunotherapy (18). Collectively, these studies provide a framework for utilizing advanced spatial analyses to interrogate the complexity of the tumor microenvironment and decode the therapeutic response in situ.
For multiplexed tissue imaging to reach its full potential as a research paradigm, it is pertinent that these studies are not performed in isolation. Orthogonal interrogation with synergistic tools, such as RNA quantification methods including spatial transcriptomics, single-cell RNA sequencing, and other advanced techniques are needed to precisely define the genetic and protein topographies of human tissues. The development of multi-omic measurements in situ is a key fundamental advancement in this regard, including the quantification of metabolic states (21), nucleic acids and proteins (12, 23, 25), clonality (26), and epigenetic states (27). The continued advancement of computational methods is also vital for multi-scalar inferential analysis across different measurement modalities (28). Future studies must be performed in large, well-annotated clinical cohorts to delineate more subtle features of the tissue’s spatial architecture and to determine if spatial findings translate broadly, with the incorporation of powerful statistical frameworks to aid in experimental designs (29). To this end, numerous challenges must be overcome, including 1) establishing protocols for collecting tissue specimens that minimize fixation artifacts, 2) compilation of published lists of domain expert-verified antibody clones that retain specificity even after conjugation, 3) development of better methods for segmentation, normalization and quantification of single-cell protein expression intensities, 4) novel algorithms to automate cell-type and tissue feature identification in a scalable manner, 5) experimental and computational methods to enable multi-modal measurements of spatial-resolved single cells.
In sum, investigation into the spatial organization of cells and molecules within tissues is advancing at a rapid and exciting pace. The articles in this Research Topic serve as a reference for those interested in using multiplexed tissue imaging technologies and emerging computational tools to enable a comprehensive understanding of tissue-level immune responses to cancer, viral infections, and immunotherapy.
Author Contributions
All authors wrote and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) F32CA233203 (DP) and R01AI149672 (SJ), The Beckman Center for Molecular and Genetic Medicine (DP), Bristol-Myers Squibb (SJR), Merck (SJR), KITE/Gilead (SJR), and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation INV-002704 (SJ). SJR is also a Scientific Advisory Board member for KITE/Gilead and Immunitas Therapeutics.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- 1. Giesen C, Wang HA, Schapiro D, Zivanovic N, Jacobs A, Hattendorf B, et al. Highly Multiplexed Imaging of Tumor Tissues With Subcellular Resolution by Mass Cytometry. Nat Methods (2014) 11(4):417–22. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2869 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Angelo M, Bendall SC, Finck R, Hale MB, Hitzman C, Borowsky AD, et al. Multiplexed Ion Beam Imaging of Human Breast Tumors. Nat Med (2014) 20(4):436–42. doi: 10.1038/nm.3488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Keren L, Bosse M, Marquez D, Angoshtari R, Jain S, Varma S, et al. A Structured Tumor-Immune Microenvironment in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Revealed by Multiplexed Ion Beam Imaging. Cell (2018) 174(6):1373–1387.e1319. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Tsujikawa T, Kumar S, Borkar RN, Azimi V, Thibault G, Chang YH, et al. Quantitative Multiplex Immunohistochemistry Reveals Myeloid-Inflamed Tumor-Immune Complexity Associated With Poor Prognosis. Cell Rep (2017) 19(1):203–17. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Goltsev Y, Samusik N, Kennedy-Darling J, Bhate S, Hale M, Vazquez G, et al. Deep Profiling of Mouse Splenic Architecture With CODEX Multiplexed Imaging. Cell (2018) 174(4):968–981.e915. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Black S, Phillips D, Hickey JW, Kennedy-Darling J, Venkataraaman VG, Samusik N, et al. CODEX Multiplexed Tissue Imaging With DNA-Conjugated Antibodies. Nat Protoc (2021) 16(8):3802–35. doi: 10.1038/s41596-021-00556-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Lin JR, Izar B, Wang S, Yapp C, Mei S, Shah PM, et al. Highly Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Imaging of Human Tissues and Tumors Using T-CyCIF and Conventional Optical Microscopes. Elife (2018) 7:e31657. doi: 10.7554/eLife.31657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Eng J, Thibault G, Luoh SW, Gray JW, Chang YH, Chin K. Cyclic Multiplexed-Immunofluorescence (cmIF), a Highly Multiplexed Method for Single-Cell Analysis. Methods Mol Biol (2020) 2055:521–62. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9773-2_24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Salmen F, Stahl PL, Mollbrink A, Navarro JF, Vickovic S, Frisen J, et al. Barcoded Solid-Phase RNA Capture for Spatial Transcriptomics Profiling in Mammalian Tissue Sections. Nat Protoc (2018) 13(11):2501–34. doi: 10.1038/s41596-018-0045-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Rodriques SG, Stickels RR, Goeva A, Martin CA, Murray E, Vanderburg CR, et al. Slide-Seq: A Scalable Technology for Measuring Genome-Wide Expression at High Spatial Resolution. Science (2019) 363(6434):1463–7. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw1219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Merritt CR, Ong GT, Church SE, Barker K, Danaher P, Geiss G, et al. Multiplex Digital Spatial Profiling of Proteins and RNA in Fixed Tissue. Nat Biotechnol (2020) 38(5):586–99. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0472-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. He S, Bhatt R, Birditt B, Brown C, Brown E, Chantranuvatana K, et al. High-Plex Multiomic Analysis in FFPE Tissue at Single-Cellular and Subcellular Resolution by Spatial Molecular Imaging. bioRxiv (2021). doi: 10.1101/2021.11.03.467020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Jackson HW, Fischer JR, Zanotelli VRT, Ali HR, Mechera R, Soysal SD, et al. The Single-Cell Pathology Landscape of Breast Cancer. Nature (2020) 578(7796):615–20. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1876-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Ji AL, Rubin AJ, Thrane K, Jiang S, Reynolds DL, Meyers RM, et al. Multimodal Analysis of Composition and Spatial Architecture in Human Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cell (2020) 182(6):1661–2. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Schurch CM, Bhate SS, Barlow GL, Phillips DJ, Noti L, Zlobec I, et al. Coordinated Cellular Neighborhoods Orchestrate Antitumoral Immunity at the Colorectal Cancer Invasive Front. Cell (2020) 182(5):1341–1359.e1319. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Berry S, Giraldo NA, Green BF, Cottrell TR, Stein JE, Engle EL, et al. Analysis of Multispectral Imaging With the AstroPath Platform Informs Efficacy of PD-1 Blockade. Science (2021) 372(6547). doi: 10.1126/science.aba2609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Patwa A, Yamashita R, Long J, Risom T, Angelo M, Keren L, et al. Multiplexed Imaging Analysis of the Tumor-Immune Microenvironment Reveals Predictors of Outcome in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Commun Biol (2021) 4(1):852. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02361-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Phillips D, Matusiak M, Gutierrez BR, Bhate SS, Barlow GL, Jiang S, et al. Immune Cell Topography Predicts Response to PD-1 Blockade in Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma. Nat Commun (2021) 12(1):6726. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26974-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Rovira-Clave X, Jiang S, Bai Y, Zhu B, Barlow G, Bhate S, et al. Subcellular Localization of Biomolecules and Drug Distribution by High-Definition Ion Beam Imaging. Nat Commun (2021) 12(1):4628. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24822-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Ramaglia V, Sheikh-Mohamed S, Legg K, Park C, Rojas OL, Zandee S, et al. Multiplexed Imaging of Immune Cells in Staged Multiple Sclerosis Lesions by Mass Cytometry. Elife (2019) 8. doi: 10.7554/eLife.48051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Hartmann FJ, Mrdjen D, McCaffrey E, Glass DR, Greenwald NF, Bharadwaj A, et al. Single-Cell Metabolic Profiling of Human Cytotoxic T Cells. Nat Biotechnol (2021) 39(2):186–97. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0651-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. McCaffrey EF, Donato M, Keren L, Chen Z, Fitzpatrick M, Jojic V, et al. Multiplexed Imaging of Human Tuberculosis Granulomas Uncovers Immunoregulatory Features Conserved Across Tissue and Blood. bioRxiv (2020). doi: 10.1101/2020.06.08.140426 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Jiang S, Chan CN, Rovira-Clave X, Chen H, Bai Y, Zhu B, et al. Virus-Dependent Immune Conditioning of Tissue Microenvironments. bioRxiv (2021). doi: 10.1101/2021.05.21.444548 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Rendeiro AF, Ravichandran H, Bram Y, Chandar V, Kim J, Meydan C, et al. The Spatial Landscape of Lung Pathology During COVID-19 Progression. Nature (2021) 593(7860):564–9. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03475-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Schulz D, Zanotelli VRT, Fischer JR, Schapiro D, Engler S, Lun XK, et al. Simultaneous Multiplexed Imaging of mRNA and Proteins With Subcellular Resolution in Breast Cancer Tissue Samples by Mass Cytometry. Cell Syst (2018) 6(1):25–36.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2017.12.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Rovira-Clavé X, Drainas AP, Jiang S, Bai Y, Baron M, Zhu B, et al. Spatial Epitope Barcoding Reveals Subclonal Tumor Patch Behaviors. bioRxiv (2021). doi: 10.1101/2021.06.29.449991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Deng Y, Bartosovic M, Ma S, Zhang D, Liu Y, Qin X, et al. Spatial-ATAC-Seq: Spatially Resolved Chromatin Accessibility Profiling of Tissues at Genome Scale and Cellular Level. bioRxiv (2021). doi: 10.1101/2021.06.06.447244 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Zhu B, Chen S, Bai Y, Chen H, Mukherjee N, Vazquez G, et al. Robust Single-Cell Matching and Multi-Modal Analysis Using Shared and Distinct Features Reveals Orchestrated Immune Responses. bioRxiv (2021). doi: 10.1101/2021.12.03.471185 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Bost P, Schulz D, Engler S, Wasserfall C, Bodenmiller B. Optimizing Multiplexed Imaging Experimental Design Through Tissue Spatial Segregation Estimation. bioRxiv (2021). doi: 10.1101/2021.11.28.470262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Stoltzfus CR, Filipek J, Gern BH, Olin BE, Leal JM, Wu Y, et al. CytoMAP: A Spatial Analysis Toolbox Reveals Features of Myeloid Cell Organization in Lymphoid Tissues. Cell Rep (2020) 31(3):107523. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107523 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]