Abstract
Skin wound healing often contains a series of dynamic and complex physiological healing processes. It is a great clinical challenge to effectively treat the cutaneous wound and regenerate the damaged skin. Hydrogels have shown great promise for skin wound healing through the rational design and preparation to endow with specific functionalities. In the mini review, we firstly introduce the design and construction of various types of hydrogels based on their bonding chemistry during cross-linking. Then, we summarize the recent research progress on the functionalization of bioactive hydrogel dressings for skin wound healing, including anti-bacteria, anti-inflammatory, tissue proliferation and remodeling. In addition, we highlight the design strategies of responsive hydrogels to external physical stimuli. Ultimately, we provide perspectives on future directions and challenges of functional hydrogels for skin wound healing.
Keywords: skin wound healing, hydrogel, wound dressing, bioactive materials, tissue regeneration
Introduction
As the largest organ of the human body, skin is the most important natural barrier to protect human from external injuries (Gao et al., 2019). Due to various types of internal and external factors, such as mechanical injuries, burns, chronic skin trauma caused by diabetes and malignant tumors, human skin is extremely vulnerable to damage. At present, it is still a great clinical challenge to effectively treat the cutaneous wound and regenerate the damaged skin. Cutaneous wound healing is a dynamic and complex physiological process, which generally includes four overlapping but different periods: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling (Chen et al., 2021). These four healing stages involve interactions among various types of cells and their products, bioactive factors, and extracellular matrices (ECMs) (Xiao et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019). However, due to the imbalance of the physiological environment under severe conditions, the wound healing process may stop at one of the above stages, resulting in impaired cell function at the wound site and the failure of normal healing. Therefore, an accurate wound management is of great significance to promote wound healing.
One of the promising treatment strategies for promoting wound healing is to provide an artificial matrix as the wound dressing. Simulating the wound healing microenvironment, many wound dressing or skin substitutes have been developed. Specifically, hydrogels have attracted much attention as wound adjuvants because of their high porosity, interconnected macro-porous network, large specific surface area, and appropriate degradation rate, as well as their capability of maintaining moist microenvironment and absorbing tissue exudates (Wang Z. et al., 2019; Asadi et al., 2021). In addition, functional hydrogels can be obtained through rational design and preparation. Among them, injectable in-situ moldable hydrogels are gaining attention, which can be directly applied to irregular wounds (Xuan et al., 2021). A plain hydrogel is often not effective enough in repairing skin wounds by only serving as a covering material. Therefore, it is essential to integrate the hydrogel matrix with typical types of drugs, bioactive factors, cells, and/or specific genes to promote wound repair and accelerate skin regeneration.
The overview of this review is shown in Figure 1. We firstly introduce the design and construction of various types of hydrogels based on their bonding chemistry during cross-linking. Then, we summarize the recent research progress on the functionalization of bioactive hydrogel dressings for skin wound healing (Table 1). Finally, we provide suggestions and perspectives on future directions and improvement strategies for hydrogel wound dressings. We hope that this literature will provide ideas and references for research in the field of skin wound repair.
TABLE 1.
Hydrogels | Bond chemistry of hydrogels | Structure of hydrogels | Functionalization of hydrogels | Animal models | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gelatin/poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogels | Dynamic phenylboronic acid−diol-ester bonds | Injectable hydrogel | Vancomycin-conjugated silver nanoclusters, pH-sensitive micelles loaded with Nimesulide | Diabetic rat model | Wang et al. (2021b) |
Heparin-poloxamer hydrogels | Amido bond | Patch | Different growth factor (a-FGF and b-FGF) | Rat full-thickness skin defect model | Wu et al. (2016) |
Bacterial cellulose/MXene hydrogels | Hydrogen bond, chemical covalent cross-linking bond, chain self-entanglement | Patch | Ti3C2Tx-MXene | Rat full-thickness skin defect model | Mao et al. (2020) |
Calcium peroxide-GelMA hydrogels | Carbon-carbon covalent bonds | 3D printed patch | Calcium peroxide | — | Erdem et al. (2020) |
Bilayered thiolated alginate/polyethylene glycol diacrylate hydrogels | Disulfide bond, Carbon-carbon covalent bonds | Bilayered patch | The small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) secreted by bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells, and the sEVs secreted by miR-29b-3p-enriched bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells | Full-thickness skin defect model of rats and rabbit ears | Shen et al. (2021) |
VEGF-decorated t-ZnO-laden hydrogels | Carbon-carbon covalent bonds | 3D printed patch | Tetrapodal zinc oxide, VEGF | Full-thickness skin defect model | Siebert et al. (2021) |
Poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) microcapsules hydrogels | Imine crosslinking | Injectable hydrogel | TGF-β inhibitor | Rabbit ear and porcine skin wounding model | Zhang et al. (2021a) |
Bio-multifunctional hydrogels | MgO-catechol, Schiff’s base bond | Injectable hydrogel | MgO | Full-thickness cutaneous defect and burn model | Tang et al. (2021) |
Multifunctional double colorimetry-integrated polyacrylamide-quaternary ammonium chitosan-carbon quantum dots-phenol red hydrogels | Carbon-carbon covalent bonds, physical entanglement | Patch | Carbon quantum dots, phenol red | Rat skin defect model | Zheng et al. (2021) |
The peptide modified nanofibers reinforced hydrogels | Schiff’s base bond | Composite hydrogel | Antimicrobial peptide (RRRFRADA) | Murine diabetic wound healing model | Qiu et al. (2021) |
Sodium alginate-chitosan oligosaccharide-zinc oxide hydrogels | Schiff’s base bond | Patch | Zinc oxide nanoparticles | Second-degree scald wounds model | Zhang et al. (2021b) |
Catechol/ε-polylysine hydrogels | Schiff’s base bond | Patch | Catechol, ε-polylysine | Burn Wound Infection Model | Xu et al. (2019b) |
Polypeptide-based FHE hydrogels | Schiff’s base bond | Injectable and self-healing | stimuli-responsive adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells exosomes | Diabetic rat model | Wang et al. (2019a) |
Metallohydrogels | Coordination self-assembly | Patch | Amino acid, Ag+ | Bacterial infection rat model | Song et al. (2020) |
Hydrogel/polycaprolactone core/shell fiber scaffolds | Ionic bond | 3D printed patch | Polydopamine, doxorubicin | Rat full-thickness skin defect model | Liu et al. (2021) |
Gelatin-Tannic acid hydrogels | Hydrogen Bond | Patch | Tannic acid, allantion | Rat full-thickness skin defect model | Ahmadian et al. (2021) |
Epigallocatechin-3-gallate-3-acrylamido phenylboronic acid complex-based polyacrylamide hydrogels | Boronate ester bond, phenylboronate ester | Patch | Epigallocatechin-3-gallate, 3-acrylamido phenylboronic acid | The diabetic rat model | Zhao et al. (2021b) |
Injectable multifunctional hydrogels | Schiff’s base bond | Injectable hydrogel | ε-polylysine-coated MnO2 nanosheets, insulin | The diabetic rat model | Wang et al. (2020) |
Polydopamine-modified graphene oxide hydrogels | Schiff’s base bond | Patch | Graphene oxide, ε-polylysine | The diabetic rat model | Tu et al. (2021) |
Sprayable hydrogels | Carbon-carbon covalent bonds | sprayable | Cerium oxide nanoparticles, antimicrobial peptide | Infected rat model | Cheng et al. (2021) |
Dual-dynamic-bond cross-linked antibacterial adhesive hydrogels | pH-sensitive coordinate bond, Schiff’s base bond | Patch | Protocatechualdehyde, ferric iron | Rat skin incision model | Liang et al. (2021) |
Polyvinyl alcohol-iodine hydrogels | Hydrogen bond | Patch | Iodine | Rat skin incision model | Miao et al. (2021) |
Cellulose-based adhesive hydrogels | Covalent bond, hydrogen bond, cation-π, π-π stacking, electrostatic interaction | Patch | — | Rat full-thickness skin defect model | Lu et al. (2021) |
Formation Mechanism of Hydrogels
Static Covalent Bonds
Static covalent bonds of hydrogels are formed by chemical reaction or static cross-linking of complementary functional groups. Static covalent bonds are usually stable and robust, but cannot be recovered once broken. Though the self-healing ability of static covalent bonds is relatively weak, on the other hand, it can significantly improve the mechanical properties of hydrogels. For example, a double network hydrogel was prepared by oxidized methacrylic acid sodium alginate and collagen-polypeptide-functionalized carboxymethyl chitosan, which were based on the dynamic covalent Schiff’s base bond and UV irradiation to form a static covalent bond (He et al., 2021).
Dynamic Covalent Bonds
Dynamic covalent bonds are usually reversible covalent bonds formed by dynamic crosslinking, including disulfide, imine, acyl hydrazone, phenylboronate ester, etc. (Yang et al., 2019). Compared with static covalent bonds, dynamic covalent bonds can be reversibly broken and reorganized under a certain external stimulus, such as pH, light, and heat (Chakma and Konkolewicz, 2019; Huang et al., 2020). Therefore, hydrogels with good shape recovery ability and excellent self-healing ability can be prepared by introducing multiple reversible bonds as cross-linking agents. For example, the catechol group in epigallocatechin-3-gallate can form two reversible borate ester bonds with phenylboronic acid, which can be used as a dynamic cross-linking agent to form hydrogel with acrylamide (Zhao X. et al., 2021). This dynamic reversible property endows the hydrogel excellent self-healing properties. Tang et al. (2021) used catechol-modified chitosan and oxidized dextran as the main chain segments of the hydrogels to form dynamic covalent bonds via the Schiff’s base reaction, while MgO and catechol-modified chitosan were chelated as another gel agent to form a double chemical bond hydrogel.
Ionic Bonds
Electrostatic interactions can form ionic bonds, especially between metal ions and nonmetal ions. The formation of ionic bonds can enhance the properties of hydrogels to a certain extent, and different ions can also impart specific characteristics to hydrogels. For instance, magnesium ions bonded cross-linked hydrogels can effectively improve the attachment and enhance the bioactivity of primary osteoblasts in vitro (Yin et al., 2015). Hydrogels based on alginate and chondroitin sulfate are cross-linked by calcium ionic bonds (Fajardo et al., 2012). Under acidic conditions, the functional groups in both alginate and chondroitin sulfate are in neutral form, making the hydrogel network more hydrophobic and thus giving it a pH-dependent water absorption ability. The presence of iron ions can increase the strength of ionic bonds. For example, the carboxyl group in the copolymer of acrylamide and acrylic acid (PAMAAc) strongly interacts with iron through coordination interactions and then generates agar/PAMAAC-Fe3+ double network hydrogel (Chen et al., 2016). This highly coordinated interaction dramatically improves the self-healing ability and good fatigue resistance of the hydrogel.
Hydrogen Bonds
Hydrogen bonding is the intermolecular force between hydrogen atoms and another atom with high electronegativity. Hydrogen bond complexes can be formed by the dense arrangement of hydrogen bonds between polymers. For example, the hydroxyl group of tannic acid acts as the hydrogen donor, and the carboxyl and amino groups of gelatin act as the hydrogen acceptor, forming abundant hydrogen bonds and generating hydrogels rapidly (Ahmadian et al., 2021). Although hydrogen bonds are unstable in an aqueous environment, they are stable under hydrophobic conditions. Hydrogels formed from methacrylic acid and methacrylamide can be cross-linked by hydrogen bonds (Wang Y. J. et al., 2019). Methyl groups are hydrophobic groups that cover hydrogen bonds and stabilize the hydrogel from attack by water molecules. Moreover, the dense and robust hydrogen bonding network gives the hydrogel super stiffness.
Other Non-covalent Interactions
Other non-covalent bonds also contribute to the formation of hydrogels with a 3D network structure, including hydrophobic interaction (Liu X. et al., 2020), dipole-dipole interaction (Jia et al., 2017), π-π interaction (Li et al., 2010), electrostatic interaction (Zhang and Khademhosseini, 2017), and host-guest interaction (Sinawang et al., 2020), etc. The non-covalent bond is relatively weak, so multiple types of non-covalent bonds are often used at the same time to form a hydrogel. In addition, non-covalent bond can be applied as a complement to covalent bonds to form hydrogels. For example, an injectable micellar hydrogel was developed by combining Schiff’s base dynamic covalent bonds, hydrogen bonding, and π-π stacking interactions (Yang et al., 2020).
Structure of Hydrogels for Wound Healing
Hydrogel Microspheres
Compared to the traditional bulk hydrogels, hydrogel microspheres are smaller in size and can reach the nanoscale. Hydrogel microspheres can be used to deliver drugs, bioactive factors, and stem cells for tissue repair (Zhao Z. et al., 2021). The commonly used preparation methods of hydrogel microspheres are batch emulsion, microfluidic, lithography, electro jetting, and mechanical crushing (Daly et al., 2020). For example, Griffin et al. (2015) prepared polyethylene glycol-based hydrogel microspheres using a microfluidic emulsion.
Hydrogel Implants
Hydrogel patches are the most common form of wound dressings. In addition to the use of molds to prepare wound dressing with regular shapes, 3D printing technology offers a new method for patch preparation. According to the shape of the wound, 3D printing can be used to prepare individualized patches conforming to the shape of the wound. Alizadehgiashi et al. (2021) used cellulose nanocrystals and methyl acrylamide-chitosan as printing inks to prepare hydrogel patches with homogeneous composition and mesh structure by 3D printing for active substance delivery, which is not possible with conventional patches for their incompetent in reaching the deeper layers of the skin. The bulged microstructure on the surface of the patch can penetrate well into the deep part of the damaged skin, realizing the profound delivery of bioactive factors to promote skin repair. Sun et al. (2021) prepared MXene-integrated microneedle array patches loaded with adenosine to achieve a controlled release under near-infrared (NIR) stimulation.
Injectable Hydrogels
For irregular wounds, it is difficult for the traditional hydrogel patches to completely and perfectly cover and fit the shape and size of the wound (Gao et al., 2020). Injectable hydrogels offer a solution for the repair of a wound with irregular shapes. The fabrication of injectable hydrogels can be realized by regulating the bond chemistry of hydrogels. Dynamic covalent bonds, ionic bonds, hydrogen bonds, and other non-covalent bonds can provide ideas for the preparation of injectable hydrogels. For example, injectable hydrogels were fabricated through a Schiff’s base reaction between ε-polylysine-coated MnO2 nanosheets and insulin-loaded self-assembled aldehyde Pluronic F127 micelles (Wang et al., 2020).
Self-Healing Hydrogels
Due to the low mechanical strength of hydrogel, it is easily damaged during application (Xuan et al., 2021). The development of self-healing ability is crucial for hydrogel patches. Similar to the preparation of injectable hydrogels, self-healing hydrogels can also be realized by reversible dynamic covalent bonds or non-covalent bonds. For instance, a self-healing hydrogel dressing was obtained through the formation of boronate ester (Zhao X. et al., 2021). When the two surfaces of the separated hydrogel contacted to each other, the rearrangement of the boronate ester bond could promote the self-healing of the separated hydrogel. Takashima et al. (2012) reported a self-healing hydrogel based on supramolecular host-guest interaction, which was prepared by copolymerization of acrylamide with the complex of β-cyclodextrin (host) and adamantane (guest) monomer. After being damaged, the hydrogel was self-healing through the host-guest interaction between β-cyclodextrin and adamantane. At room temperature, the mechanical properties of the self-healing hydrogel could be fully restored after contact at the cutting site for 24 h, showing excellent self-healing properties.
Hydrogel Fibers
Compared with traditional hydrogels, hydrogel fibers have a 3D network structure with a higher specific surface area, which can simulate the structure and characteristics of the ECM and provide more sites for cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation (Li et al., 2021). The standard preparation methods of hydrogel fibers include electrospinning (Liu W. et al., 2020), 3D printing (Kong et al., 2020), microfluidic spinning (Cai et al., 2019), and dynamic polymer spinning (Chen et al., 2020). The most commonly used method is to prepare nanofibers by electrospinning and then cross-link the obtained fibrous membrane to improve its mechanical properties. Chen et al. (2019) successfully prepared gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) fibers by electrospinning. They soaked the fibrous membrane in the solution containing initiator crosslinking to fabricate hydrogel fibers. Hydrogel fibers can be further functionalized by surface modifications to endow them with special functions. For example, Liu et al. (2021) used 3D printing technology to prepare core-shell hydrogel/Polycaprolactone fibers and grafted a layer of dopamine on the outermost layer to endow it with the ability of NIR-triggered drug release.
Composite Hydrogels
Although hydrogels can absorb tissue exudates and maintain water balance at the wound site, most hydrogels have poor mechanical properties, limiting their biomedical applications (Teixeira et al., 2021). Qiu et al. (2021) incorporated the peptide modified fiber composite into the hydrogel, and the stability and mechanical strength of the hydrogel was greatly improved. In addition to poor mechanical stability, a plain hydrogel scaffold cannot mimic the complexity of the natural ECM, making the development of novel composite hydrogels critical. For example, gelatin nanofibers were combined with a photo-crosslinking composite hydrogel-loaded with epidermal growth factor (EGF) to prepare a bionic bilayer composite hydrogel scaffold (Zandi et al., 2021). In the scaffold, the nanofibers and the EGF-loaded composite hydrogel acted as the dermal and the epidermal layer, respectively.
Functionalization of Hydrogels for Wound Healing
Anti-Bacteria and Anti-inflammatory
When skin injuries occur, microorganisms can easily invade and cause severe wound infections, thus preventing wound healing. Some hydrogel materials have inherent antibacterial properties, such as chitosan (Chi et al., 2020) and modified chitosan (Lu et al., 2020). However, these materials alone are less effective as antimicrobial agents, and therefore the addition of antimicrobial active ingredients is required to achieve an excellent antimicrobial efficacy. The most common solution is to load antimicrobial agents, antibiotics, and/or metal nanomaterials into the hydrogel to treat the infection at the wound site. Wang et al. (2021b) reported an antibacterial hydrogel prepared by coupling vancomycin with silver nanoparticles. ZnO nanoparticles were also loaded in a hydrogel to endow it with the antibacterial ability (Zhang M. et al., 2021). However, the abuse of antimicrobial agents, antibiotics, and metal nanomaterials may lead to drug resistance, making the drugs cytotoxic and limiting their potential applications (Song et al., 2020). In addition to finding new antimicrobial drugs as an alternative, many researchers have chosen incorporating antibacterial peptides, such as Epsilon-Poly-L-lysine antimicrobial peptides, in the hydrogel dressings or microneedles to achieve deep bactericidal effects (Wang C. et al., 2019; Xu M. et al., 2019). Brushing cationic polyelectrolyte poly (dially ldimethyl ammonium chloride) onto bacterial cellulose via surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization could impart a sustained antimicrobial activity to the resultant hydrogels (Yang Z. et al., 2021). Additionally, hydrogels loaded with cationic carbon dots also showed an antimicrobial function (Cui et al., 2021). The prepared cationic carbon dots had an ultra-high positive charge and a small particle size, which could rapidly bind to bacteria and disrupt their surface charge, leading to the apoptosis of bacteria. To prevent the drug resistance of bacteria, incorporating stimuli-responsive substances into hydrogels and combining them with exogenous physical stimuli can achieve effective antibacterial properties. For instance, a catechol-Fe cross-linked matrix with good photothermal conversion ability was combined with quaternized chitosan, and the resultant hydrogel showed good antibacterial properties under NIR irradiation (Liang et al., 2021).
The wound healing process is also severely affected by the failure of macrophage response, during which persistently high levels of pro-inflammatory chemokines and large amounts of ROS are presented at the wound site (Kharaziha et al., 2021). The main idea of preparing anti-inflammatory hydrogels is to give them the ability to promote macrophage polarization, eliminate ROS, reduce pro-inflammatory chemokines, and improve inflammatory inhibitory factors. The most common solution is to add anti-inflammatory drugs to the hydrogels. For example, nanomicelles loaded with pH-responsive nimesulide-loaded anti-inflammatory drugs can promote the transformation of macrophages from M1-type to M2-type, realizing anti-inflammatory function (Wangetal., 2021). In addition to the delivery of anti-inflammatory drugs, loading stem cells and/or genes in hydrogels is another feasible strategy to promote the healing of chronic inflammatory wounds (da Silva et al., 2017). For example, an adhesion GelMA hydrogel containing hyaluronic acid nanoparticles-encapsulated with miR-223 5P mimics was used for chronic wound healing to control the polarization of tissue macrophages (Saleh et al., 2019). Some specific types of ions or elements can regulate the inflammation response. In one study, selenium nanoparticles were loaded into bacterial cellulose/gelatin hydrogel, which could significantly reduce the expression of TNF-α and IL-6, reducing the inflammatory effect during wound healing and promoting wound healing (Mao et al., 2021). Tu et al. (2021) grafted dopamine onto graphene oxide and then loaded the composite into a polydopamine-modified graphene oxide hydrogel. As the catechol on dopamine turned into quinone to trap free radicals, graphene oxide promoted the macrophage polarization, thus conferring the hydrogel with capabilities of anti-inflammatory and capturing ROS. Low levels of reactive oxygen species can promote wound healing, while excessive ROS can hinder wound healing (Xu et al., 2020). Especially in chronic wounds, a sustained inflammation can lead to a high level of ROS, thereby preventing the transition to the next regeneration stage. Therefore, it is particularly important to maintain the balance of ROS level at the wound. Delivering drugs that can scavenge ROS is the most common strategy. For example, thioketone-modified chitosan hydrogel loaded with curcumin could remove excessive ROS to promote wound healing (Yang C. et al., 2021).
Tissue Proliferation and Remodeling
The proliferation and remodeling periods are the most critical periods of skin wound healing, which mainly involve the formation of granulation tissue, re-epithelialization, angiogenesis, and other events. In the stage of re-tissue regeneration, loading growth factors into hydrogel is an effective manner to improve the wound healing rate. Wu et al. (2016) loaded a-FGF and b-FGF into the thermosensitive heparin-Poloxamer hydrogel, significantly promoting the granulation tissue formation, re-epithelialization, and cell proliferation. However, due to the short half-life and poor stability of growth factors, it is imperative to explore new wound healing agents as an alternative for promoting wound healing. Wang et al. (2021a) isolated a short peptide (RL-QN15) from Rana limnocharis skin secretions, which was proved to promote wound healing in mice. This short peptide could activate the signaling pathway and selectively regulate the secretion of cytokines by macrophages, thereby accelerating the formation of granulation tissue and the regeneration of skin wound.
Hypoxia caused by vascular damage can inhibit wound healing. Therefore, it is extremely important to endow hydrogel trauma excipients with a particular ability to transport oxygen and promote angiogenesis. For example, MnO2 nanosheets were loaded into nanoenzyme-reinforced injectable hyaluronic acid hydrogel to provide oxygen to the wound site because the reaction between the high concentrations of reactive oxygen with the MnO2 nanosheets could generate oxygen (Wang et al., 2020). In addition to the above endogenous oxygen generation methods, calcium peroxide and catalase were added to GelMA hydrogel to produce oxygen continuously (Erdem et al., 2020). This method could not only improve the cell survival rate loaded in GelMA hydrogel, but also provide oxygen for the wound to promote wound healing.
Angiogenesis at skin wounds plays a key role in the transportation of oxygen and nutrients. Therefore, loading growth factors or peptides that promote angiogenesis in hydrogels has become a feasible strategy. For example, Siebert et al. (2021) developed a 3D printing hydrogel patch coated with VEGF and modified by tetrapod zinc oxide (t-ZnO) particles with photoactivity and antibacterial effect. The controlled release of VEGF could be achieved by chemical modification of t-ZnO and activation with ultraviolet/visible light. Endothelial growth factor modified t-ZnO hydrogel patch showed lower cytotoxicity and improved angiogenesis with an excellent antibacterial capability. In addition to the direct release of angiogenesis-related exogenous growth factors, it is another viable means with the use of growth factors secreted from mesenchymal stem cells or stem cell exosomes by paracrine effect to promote angiogenesis. Eke et al. (2017) loaded adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells into hydrogel made of a mixture of GelMA and methacrylic acid hyaluronan. The in vivo results showed that the hydrogel loaded with stem cells could increase vascularization by three times relative to the case without stem cells, thereby accelerating angiogenesis in the damaged skin. Although the above strategies can accelerate the angiogenesis in the wound defect, sometimes the angiogenesis can be extremely slow or blocked under the influence of uncertain factors. In vitro pre-vascularization can be a feasible method. For example, Lei et al. (2019) prepared a hierarchical microchannel network using 3D printing technology, which could reasonably simulate the natural vascular network and showed good structural characteristics.
Scar formation often occurs late in wound healing due to excessive deposition and dislocation of ECM, increased cell density, and chronic inflammation (Xu T. et al., 2019). Scar formation often leads to several complications that can seriously endanger the health of patients. Current research shows that transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signal transduction disorder is closely associated with pathological scar formation (Song et al., 2019). Therefore, TGF-β related pathways have been considered as a very promising target for the treatment of abnormal skin scar formation. Yet, TGF-β also plays a very important role in the process of wound healing, including regulating the proliferation and differentiation of epidermal cells and dermal cells and regulating tissue regeneration (Mokoena et al., 2018). Therefore, rational delivery of TGF-β inhibitors at the late stage of wound healing by certain methods becomes a feasible strategy to inhibit scar formation. For example, Zhang J. et al. (2021) loaded TGF-β inhibitor-containing biodegradable microcapsules into a light-cured hydrogel. TGF-β inhibitor was released from the microcapsules by pulse during the late wound healing, resulting in the acceleration of skin wound healing and the inhibition of collagen deposition in wounds and thereby reducing scar formation during wound healing. In addition to TGF-β inhibitors, Shen et al. (2021) designed and prepared a double-layer sodium alginate/polyethylene glycol diacrylate hydrogel for the continuous release of extracellular vesicles at different wound healing stages to achieve a rapid wound healing. In the late stage of wound healing, the small extracellular vesicles secreted by miR-29b-3p-enriched bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells were released from the upper layer of the hydrogel, inhibiting the excessive capillary proliferation and collagen deposition.
Furthermore, external physical stimuli such as mechanical force (Saiding et al., 2020), photothermal (Zhang X. et al., 2021), electrical filed (Korupalli et al., 2021), ultrasound (Lyu et al., 2021), and magnetic field (Shang et al., 2019) at the wound can also accelerate wound healing. Different from the introduction of various drugs or cells into hydrogels to passively promote wound healing, these exogenous signals can directly and actively regulate the behaviors of fibroblasts, keratinocytes, and epithelial cells, modulating the cell behavior to promote wound healing. In one study, the main network of poly (N-isopropyl acrylamide) hydrogels were formed by free radical polymerization of N-isopropyl acrylamide, a temperature-sensitive monomer, while the semi-crosslinked network was further formed by introducing poly (methacrylic acid) (Hu et al., 2021). The hydrogel could effectively accelerate wound healing in mouse and pig models by promoting angiogenesis, collagen deposition and reducing inflammation through the strong adhesion to tissue and mechanical contraction of the wound. Photothermal therapy is another interesting strategy for promoting wound skin repair. Gao et al. (2019) reported a photothermal hydrogel film, which could convert light energy into heat energy under sunlight irradiation. Excessive local wound temperature can reduce inflammation and promote epithelialization, angiogenesis, and collagen deposition. Mao et al. (2020) prepared a cellulose/MXene composite hydrogel, which could actively regulate the cell behavior and improve the cell viability under the external electric field stimulation, accelerating the wound healing process. Ultrasonic treatment can also accelerate the speed of chronic wound healing. Lyu et al. (2021) fabricated flexible ultrasonic patches, in which ultrasound could accelerate the wound healing by activating RAC1 in the dermis and epidermis, thus effectively treating chronic wounds. Shi et al. (2020) seeded normal human dermal fibroblasts on an anisotropic magnetic hydrogel, and the cells were oriented to grow under the guidance of the magnetic field, indicating that the anisotropic magnetic hydrogel showed a beneficial effect on the skin tissue regeneration.
Conclusions and Perspectives
Hydrogels have been widely used as a wound dressing for skin wound repair because they are simple to prepare and easy to be modified and functionalized. Hydrogels can be fabricated from many natural and synthetic polymers, meanwhile, they can be loaded with a variety of bioactive substances such as growth factors, proteins, genes, etc., thus making them more biologically active to facilitate wound healing. As a dynamic process, wound healing involves several stages, and each stage involves the synergistic action of multiple factors and cells to promote tissue regeneration. Therefore, modulating the on-demand release of active substances according to the specific needs at the different phases has become a major challenge for current wound dressings. On-demand release must focus on the whole process of wound healing but not only on a particular phase. For example, Ma et al. (2020) reported a multilayer injectable hydrogel, which can sequentially deliver bioactive molecules to meet the requirements for bioactivity and timeline of each wound healing stage. In addition, hydrogel scaffolds with integrated monitoring and therapeutic functions will be a new direction for the development of hydrogel wound dressings in the future. By remotely monitoring wound healing process, a real-time dynamic intervene in vivo during the treatment process can be adopted, guiding the targeted therapy. For instance, a wound healing dressing with a double-layer structure can monitor the temperature of the wound in real-time, detect bacterial infection, and release antibiotics through in situ UV irradiation to provide an on-demand infection treatment (Pang et al., 2020). Overall, the ultimate goal is to transfer hydrogels from laboratory to industry, from bench to bedside, and finally achieve a true industrialization for the clinical treatment.
Author Contributions
RH and ZC wrote the draft of the manuscript. XZ, TM, LZ, FR, and JX revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82002049 and 52073014; to J. X.), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (buctrc202020), and Peking University People’s Hospital Research and Development Fund RDY 2020-07.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- Ahmadian Z., Correia A., Hasany M., Figueiredo P., Dobakhti F., Eskandari M. R., et al. (2021). A Hydrogen‐Bonded Extracellular Matrix‐Mimicking Bactericidal Hydrogel with Radical Scavenging and Hemostatic Function for pH‐Responsive Wound Healing Acceleration. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 10, 2001122. 10.1002/adhm.202001122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alizadehgiashi M., Nemr C. R., Chekini M., Pinto Ramos D., Mittal N., Ahmed S. U., et al. (2021). Multifunctional 3D-Printed Wound Dressings. ACS Nano 15, 12375–12387. 10.1021/acsnano.1c04499 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Asadi N., Pazoki-Toroudi H., Del Bakhshayesh A. R., Akbarzadeh A., Davaran S., Annabi N. (2021). Multifunctional Hydrogels for Wound Healing: Special Focus on Biomacromolecular Based Hydrogels. Int. J. Biol. Macromolecules 170, 728–750. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cai J., Ye D., Wu Y., Fan L., Yu H. (2019). Injectable Alginate Fibrous Hydrogel with a Three-Dimensional Network Structure Fabricated by Microfluidic Spinning. Composites Commun. 15, 1–5. 10.1016/j.coco.2019.06.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chakma P., Konkolewicz D. (2019). Dynamic Covalent Bonds in Polymeric Materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 9682–9695. 10.1002/anie.201813525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen C., Tang J., Gu Y., Liu L., Liu X., Deng L., et al. (2019). Bioinspired Hydrogel Electrospun Fibers for Spinal Cord Regeneration. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1806899. 10.1002/adfm.201806899 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen G., Wang G., Tan X., Hou K., Meng Q., Zhao P., et al. (2020). Integrated Dynamic Wet Spinning of Core-Sheath Hydrogel Fibers for Optical-To-Brain/tissue Communications. Natl. Sci. Rev. 8, nwaa209. 10.1093/nsr/nwaa209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Q., Yan X., Zhu L., Chen H., Jiang B., Wei D., et al. (2016). Improvement of Mechanical Strength and Fatigue Resistance of Double Network Hydrogels by Ionic Coordination Interactions. Chem. Mater. 28, 5710–5720. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01920 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen S., Lu J., You T., Sun D. (2021). Metal-organic Frameworks for Improving Wound Healing. Coord. Chem. Rev. 439, 213929. 10.1016/j.ccr.2021.213929 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng H., Shi Z., Yue K., Huang X., Xu Y., Gao C., et al. (2021). Sprayable Hydrogel Dressing Accelerates Wound Healing with Combined Reactive Oxygen Species-Scavenging and Antibacterial Abilities. Acta Biomater. 124, 219–232. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chi J., Zhang X., Chen C., Shao C., Zhao Y., Wang Y. (2020). Antibacterial and Angiogenic Chitosan Microneedle Array Patch for Promoting Wound Healing. Bioactive Mater. 5, 253–259. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.02.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cui F., Sun J., Ji J., Yang X., Wei K., Xu H., et al. (2021). Carbon Dots-Releasing Hydrogels with Antibacterial Activity, High Biocompatibility, and Fluorescence Performance as Candidate Materials for Wound Healing. J. Hazard. Mater. 406, 124330. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124330 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- da Silva L. P., Santos T. C., Rodrigues D. B., Pirraco R. P., Cerqueira M. T., Reis R. L., et al. (2017). Stem Cell-Containing Hyaluronic Acid-Based Spongy Hydrogels for Integrated Diabetic Wound Healing. J. Invest. Dermatol. 137, 1541–1551. 10.1016/j.jid.2017.02.976 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daly A. C., Riley L., Segura T., Burdick J. A. (2020). Hydrogel Microparticles for Biomedical Applications. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 20–43. 10.1038/s41578-019-0148-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eke G., Mangir N., Hasirci N., MacNeil S., Hasirci V. (2017). Development of a UV Crosslinked Biodegradable Hydrogel Containing Adipose Derived Stem Cells to Promote Vascularization for Skin Wounds and Tissue Engineering. Biomaterials 129, 188–198. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.03.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Erdem A., Darabi M. A., Nasiri R., Sangabathuni S., Ertas Y. N., Alem H., et al. (2020). 3D Bioprinting of Oxygenated Cell‐Laden Gelatin Methacryloyl Constructs. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 9, 1901794. 10.1002/adhm.201901794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fajardo A. R., Silva M. B., Lopes L. C., Piai J. F., Rubira A. F., Muniz E. C. (2012). Hydrogel Based on an Alginate-Ca2+/chondroitin Sulfate Matrix as a Potential colon-specific Drug Delivery System. RSC Adv. 2, 11095–11103. 10.1039/c2ra20785k [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gao Y., Du H., Xie Z., Li M., Zhu J., Xu J., et al. (2019). Self-adhesive Photothermal Hydrogel Films for Solar-Light Assisted Wound Healing. J. Mater. Chem. B 7, 3644–3651. 10.1039/c9tb00481e [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gao Y., Li Z., Huang J., Zhao M., Wu J. (2020). In Situ formation of Injectable Hydrogels for Chronic Wound Healing. J. Mater. Chem. B 8, 8768–8780. 10.1039/d0tb01074j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Griffin D. R., Weaver W. M., Scumpia P. O., Di Carlo D., Segura T. (2015). Accelerated Wound Healing by Injectable Microporous Gel Scaffolds Assembled from Annealed Building Blocks. Nat. Mater 14, 737–744. 10.1038/nmat4294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He Y., Li Y., Sun Y., Zhao S., Feng M., Xu G., et al. (2021). A Double-Network Polysaccharide-Based Composite Hydrogel for Skin Wound Healing. Carbohydr. Polym. 261, 117870. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117870 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu J., Wei T., Zhao H., Chen M., Tan Y., Ji Z., et al. (2021). Mechanically Active Adhesive and Immune Regulative Dressings for Wound Closure. Matter 4, 2985–3000. 10.1016/j.matt.2021.06.044 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Huang S., Kong X., Xiong Y., Zhang X., Chen H., Jiang W., et al. (2020). An Overview of Dynamic Covalent Bonds in Polymer Material and Their Applications. Eur. Polym. J. 141, 110094. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.110094 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jia H., Huang Z., Fei Z., Dyson P. J., Zheng Z., Wang X. (2017). Bilayered Polyurethane/dipole-Dipole and H-Bonding Interaction Reinforced Hydrogels as Thermo-Responsive Soft Manipulators. J. Mater. Chem. B 5, 8193–8199. 10.1039/c7tb02028g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kharaziha M., Baidya A., Annabi N. (2021). Rational Design of Immunomodulatory Hydrogels for Chronic Wound Healing. Adv. Mater. 33, 2100176. 10.1002/adma.202100176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kong B., Chen Y., Liu R., Liu X., Liu C., Shao Z., et al. (2020). Fiber Reinforced GelMA Hydrogel to Induce the Regeneration of Corneal Stroma. Nat. Commun. 11, 1435. 10.1038/s41467-020-14887-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Korupalli C., Li H., Nguyen N., Mi F. L., Chang Y., Lin Y. J., et al. (2021). Conductive Materials for Healing Wounds: Their Incorporation in Electroactive Wound Dressings, Characterization, and Perspectives. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 10, 2001384. 10.1002/adhm.202001384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lei D., Yang Y., Liu Z., Yang B., Gong W., Chen S., et al. (2019). 3D Printing of Biomimetic Vasculature for Tissue Regeneration. Mater. Horiz. 6, 1197–1206. 10.1039/c9mh00174c [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li F., Zhu Y., You B., Zhao D., Ruan Q., Zeng Y., et al. (2010). Smart Hydrogels Co-switched by Hydrogen Bonds and π-π Stacking for Continuously Regulated Controlled-Release System. Adv. Funct. Mater. 20, 669–676. 10.1002/adfm.200901245 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y., Wang J., Wang Y., Cui W. (2021). Advanced Electrospun Hydrogel Fibers for Wound Healing. Composites B: Eng. 223, 109101. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109101 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liang Y., Li Z., Huang Y., Yu R., Guo B. (2021). Dual-dynamic-bond Cross-Linked Antibacterial Adhesive Hydrogel Sealants with On-Demand Removability for post-wound-closure and Infected Wound Healing. ACS Nano 15, 7078–7093. 10.1021/acsnano.1c00204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu C., Wang Z., Wei X., Chen B., Luo Y. (2021). 3D Printed Hydrogel/PCL Core/shell Fiber Scaffolds with NIR-Triggered Drug Release for Cancer Therapy and Wound Healing. Acta Biomater. 131, 314–325. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.07.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu W., Bi W., Sun Y., Wang L., Yu X., Cheng R., et al. (2020a). Biomimetic Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Hydrogel Electrospinning Periosteum for Accelerating Bone Regeneration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 110, 110670. 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu X., He X., Yang B., Lai L., Chen N., Hu J., et al. (2020b). Dual Physically Cross‐Linked Hydrogels Incorporating Hydrophobic Interactions with Promising Repairability and Ultrahigh Elongation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2008187. 10.1002/adfm.202008187 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lu M., Yu S., Wang Z., Xin Q., Sun T., Chen X., et al. (2020). Zwitterionic Choline Phosphate Functionalized Chitosan with Antibacterial Property and superior Water Solubility. Eur. Polym. J. 134, 109821. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109821 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lu S., Zhang X., Tang Z., Xiao H., Zhang M., Liu K., et al. (2021). Mussel-inspired Blue-Light-Activated Cellulose-Based Adhesive Hydrogel with Fast Gelation, Rapid Haemostasis and Antibacterial Property for Wound Healing. Chem. Eng. J. 417, 129329. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129329 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lyu W., Ma Y., Chen S., Li H., Wang P., Chen Y., et al. (2021). Flexible Ultrasonic Patch for Accelerating Chronic Wound Healing. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 10, 2100785. 10.1002/adhm.202100785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma Z., Song W., He Y., Li H. (2020). Multilayer Injectable Hydrogel System Sequentially Delivers Bioactive Substances for Each Wound Healing Stage. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 12, 29787–29806. 10.1021/acsami.0c06360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mao L., Hu S., Gao Y., Wang L., Zhao W., Fu L., et al. (2020). Biodegradable and Electroactive Regenerated Bacterial Cellulose/MXene (Ti 3 C 2 T X ) Composite Hydrogel as Wound Dressing for Accelerating Skin Wound Healing under Electrical Stimulation. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 9, 2000872. 10.1002/adhm.202000872 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mao L., Wang L., Zhang M., Ullah M. W., Liu L., Zhao W., et al. (2021). In Situ Synthesized Selenium Nanoparticles‐Decorated Bacterial Cellulose/Gelatin Hydrogel with Enhanced Antibacterial, Antioxidant, and Anti‐Inflammatory Capabilities for Facilitating Skin Wound Healing. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 10, 2100402. 10.1002/adhm.202100402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miao Z., Sun Y., Tao Z., Chen Y., Ma Y., Zhu D., et al. (2021). Thermochromic Polyvinyl Alcohol‐Iodine Hydrogels with Safe Threshold Temperature for Infectious Wound Healing. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 10, 2100722. 10.1002/adhm.202100722 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mokoena D., Dhilip Kumar S. S., Houreld N. N., Abrahamse H. (2018). Role of Photobiomodulation on the Activation of the Smad Pathway via TGF-β in Wound Healing. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol. 189, 138–144. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.10.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pang Q., Lou D., Li S., Wang G., Qiao B., Dong S., et al. (2020). Smart Flexible Electronics‐Integrated Wound Dressing for Real‐Time Monitoring and On‐Demand Treatment of Infected Wounds. Adv. Sci. 7, 1902673. 10.1002/advs.201902673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qiu W., Han H., Li M., Li N., Wang Q., Qin X., et al. (2021). Nanofibers Reinforced Injectable Hydrogel with Self-Healing, Antibacterial, and Hemostatic Properties for Chronic Wound Healing. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 596, 312–323. 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.02.107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saiding Q., Jin J., Qin M., Cai Z., Lu M., Wang F., et al. (2020). Heat‐Shrinkable Electrospun Fibrous Tape for Restoring Structure and Function of Loose Soft Tissue. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2007440. 10.1002/adfm.202007440 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Saleh B., Dhaliwal H. K., Portillo‐Lara R., Shirzaei Sani E., Abdi R., Amiji M. M., et al. (2019). Local Immunomodulation Using an Adhesive Hydrogel Loaded with miRNA‐Laden Nanoparticles Promotes Wound Healing. Small 15, 1902232. 10.1002/smll.201902232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shang W., Chen G., Li Y., Zhuo Y., Wang Y., Fang Z., et al. (2019). Static Magnetic Field Accelerates Diabetic Wound Healing by Facilitating Resolution of Inflammation. J. Diabetes Res. 2019, 1–11. 10.1155/2019/5641271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shen Y., Xu G., Huang H., Wang K., Wang H., Lang M., et al. (2021). Sequential Release of Small Extracellular Vesicles from Bilayered Thiolated Alginate/polyethylene Glycol Diacrylate Hydrogels for Scarless Wound Healing. ACS Nano 15, 6352–6368. 10.1021/acsnano.0c07714 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi Y., Li Y., Coradin T. (2020). Magnetically-oriented Type I Collagen-SiO2@Fe3O4 Rods Composite Hydrogels Tuning Skin Cell Growth. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 185, 110597. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110597 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siebert L., Luna‐Cerón E., García‐Rivera L. E., Oh J., Jang J., Rosas‐Gómez D. A., et al. (2021). Light‐Controlled Growth Factors Release on Tetrapodal ZnO‐Incorporated 3D‐Printed Hydrogels for Developing Smart Wound Scaffold. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2007555. 10.1002/adfm.202007555 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sinawang G., Osaki M., Takashima Y., Yamaguchi H., Harada A. (2020). Biofunctional Hydrogels Based on Host-Guest Interactions. Polym. J. 52, 839–859. 10.1038/s41428-020-0352-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Song G., Yang R., Zhang Q., Chen L., Huang D., Zeng J., et al. (2019). TGF-β Secretion by M2 Macrophages Induces Glial Scar Formation by Activating Astrocytes In Vitro . J. Mol. Neurosci. 69, 324–332. 10.1007/s12031-019-01361-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song J., Yuan C., Jiao T., Xing R., Yang M., Adams D. J., et al. (2020). Multifunctional Antimicrobial Biometallohydrogels Based on Amino Acid Coordinated Self‐Assembly. Small 16, 1907309. 10.1002/smll.201907309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun L., Fan L., Bian F., Chen G., Wang Y., Zhao Y. (2021). MXene-integrated Microneedle Patches with Innate Molecule Encapsulation for Wound Healing. Research 2021, 1–9. 10.34133/2021/9838490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takashima Y., Hatanaka S., Otsubo M., Nakahata M., Kakuta T., Hashidzume A., et al. (2012). Expansion-contraction of Photoresponsive Artificial Muscle Regulated by Host-Guest Interactions. Nat. Commun. 3, 1270. 10.1038/ncomms2280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang X., Wang X., Sun Y., Zhao L., Li D., Zhang J., et al. (2021). Magnesium Oxide‐Assisted Dual‐Cross‐Linking Bio‐Multifunctional Hydrogels for Wound Repair during Full‐Thickness Skin Injuries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2105718. 10.1002/adfm.202105718 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Teixeira M. O., Antunes J. C., Felgueiras H. P. (2021). Recent Advances in Fiber-Hydrogel Composites for Wound Healing and Drug Delivery Systems. Antibiotics 10, 248. 10.3390/antibiotics10030248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tu Z., Chen M., Wang M., Shao Z., Jiang X., Wang K., et al. (2021). Engineering Bioactive M2 Macrophage‐Polarized Anti‐Inflammatory, Antioxidant, and Antibacterial Scaffolds for Rapid Angiogenesis and Diabetic Wound Repair. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2100924. 10.1002/adfm.202100924 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang C., Wang M., Xu T., Zhang X., Lin C., Gao W., et al. (2019a). Engineering Bioactive Self-Healing Antibacterial Exosomes Hydrogel for Promoting Chronic Diabetic Wound Healing and Complete Skin Regeneration. Theranostics 9, 65–76. 10.7150/thno.29766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang S., Zheng H., Zhou L., Cheng F., Liu Z., Zhang H., et al. (2020). Nanoenzyme-reinforced Injectable Hydrogel for Healing Diabetic Wounds Infected with Multidrug Resistant Bacteria. Nano Lett. 20, 5149–5158. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y., Feng Z., Yang M., Zeng L., Qi B. e., Yin S., et al. (2021a). Discovery of a Novel Short Peptide with Efficacy in Accelerating the Healing of Skin Wounds. Pharmacol. Res. 163, 105296. 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y. J., Zhang X. N., Song Y., Zhao Y., Chen L., Su F., et al. (2019b). Ultrastiff and Tough Supramolecular Hydrogels with a Dense and Robust Hydrogen Bond Network. Chem. Mater. 31, 1430–1440. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b05262 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y., Wu Y., Long L., Yang L., Fu D., Hu C., et al. (2021b). Inflammation-responsive Drug-Loaded Hydrogels with Sequential Hemostasis, Antibacterial, and Anti-inflammatory Behavior for Chronically Infected Diabetic Wound Treatment. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 13, 33584–33599. 10.1021/acsami.1c09889 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Z., Wang Y., Peng X., He Y., Wei L., Su W., et al. (2019c). Photocatalytic Antibacterial Agent Incorporated Double-Network Hydrogel for Wound Healing. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 180, 237–244. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.04.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu J., Zhu J., He C., Xiao Z., Ye J., Li Y., et al. (2016). Comparative Study of Heparin-Poloxamer Hydrogel Modified bFGF and aFGF for In Vivo Wound Healing Efficiency. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 8, 18710–18721. 10.1021/acsami.6b06047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiao M., Gao L., Chandrasekaran A. R., Zhao J., Tang Q., Qu Z., et al. (2019). Bio-functional G-Molecular Hydrogels for Accelerated Wound Healing. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 105, 110067. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu M., Khan A., Wang T., Song Q., Han C., Wang Q., et al. (2019a). Mussel-inspired Hydrogel with Potent In Vivo Contact-Active Antimicrobial and Wound Healing Promoting Activities. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2, 3329–3340. 10.1021/acsabm.9b00353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu T., Yang R., Ma X., Chen W., Liu S., Liu X., et al. (2019b). Bionic Poly(γ‐Glutamic Acid) Electrospun Fibrous Scaffolds for Preventing Hypertrophic Scars. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 8, 1900123. 10.1002/adhm.201900123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu Z., Han S., Gu Z., Wu J. (2020). Advances and Impact of Antioxidant Hydrogel in Chronic Wound Healing. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 9, 1901502. 10.1002/adhm.201901502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xuan H., Wu S., Fei S., Li B., Yang Y., Yuan H. (2021). Injectable Nanofiber-Polysaccharide Self-Healing Hydrogels for Wound Healing. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 128, 112264. 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang B., Song J., Jiang Y., Li M., Wei J., Qin J., et al. (2020). Injectable Adhesive Self-Healing Multicross-Linked Double-Network Hydrogel Facilitates Full-Thickness Skin Wound Healing. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 12, 57782–57797. 10.1021/acsami.0c18948 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang C., Chen Y., Huang H., Fan S., Yang C., Wang L., et al. (2021a). ROS-eliminating Carboxymethyl Chitosan Hydrogel to Enhance Burn Wound-Healing Efficacy. Front. Pharmacol. 12, 679580. 10.3389/fphar.2021.679580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang J., Bai R., Chen B., Suo Z. (2019). Hydrogel Adhesion: A Supramolecular Synergy of Chemistry, Topology, and Mechanics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1901693. 10.1002/adfm.201901693 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Z., Huang R., Zheng B., Guo W., Li C., He W., et al. (2021b). Highly Stretchable, Adhesive, Biocompatible, and Antibacterial Hydrogel Dressings for Wound Healing. Adv. Sci. 8, 2003627. 10.1002/advs.202003627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yin M., Xu F., Ding H., Tan F., Song F., Wang J. (2015). Incorporation of Magnesium Ions into Photo-Crosslinked Alginate Hydrogel Enhanced Cell Adhesion Ability. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 9, 1088–1092. 10.1002/term.2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zandi N., Dolatyar B., Lotfi R., Shallageh Y., Shokrgozar M. A., Tamjid E., et al. (2021). Biomimetic Nanoengineered Scaffold for Enhanced Full-Thickness Cutaneous Wound Healing. Acta Biomater. 124, 191–204. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.01.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J., Zheng Y., Lee J., Hua J., Li S., Panchamukhi A., et al. (2021a). A Pulsatile Release Platform Based on Photo-Induced Imine-Crosslinking Hydrogel Promotes Scarless Wound Healing. Nat. Commun. 12, 1670. 10.1038/s41467-021-21964-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang M., Qiao X., Han W., Jiang T., Liu F., Zhao X. (2021b). Alginate-chitosan Oligosaccharide-ZnO Composite Hydrogel for Accelerating Wound Healing. Carbohydr. Polym. 266, 118100. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang S., Ou Q., Xin P., Yuan Q., Wang Y., Wu J. (2019). Polydopamine/puerarin Nanoparticle-Incorporated Hybrid Hydrogels for Enhanced Wound Healing. Biomater. Sci. 7, 4230–4236. 10.1039/c9bm00991d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang X., Tan B., Wu Y., Zhang M., Liao J. (2021c). A Review on Hydrogels with Photothermal Effect in Wound Healing and Bone Tissue Engineering. Polymers 13, 2100. 10.3390/polym13132100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y. S., Khademhosseini A. (2017). Advances in Engineering Hydrogels. Science 356, 6337. 10.1126/science.aaf3627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao X., Pei D., Yang Y., Xu K., Yu J., Zhang Y., et al. (2021a). Green tea Derivative Driven Smart Hydrogels with Desired Functions for Chronic Diabetic Wound Treatment. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2009442. 10.1002/adfm.202009442 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao Z., Wang Z., Li G., Cai Z., Wu J., Wang L., et al. (2021b). Injectable Microfluidic Hydrogel Microspheres for Cell and Drug Delivery. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2103339. 10.1002/adfm.202103339 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng K., Tong Y., Zhang S., He R., Xiao L., Iqbal Z., et al. (2021). Flexible Bicolorimetric Polyacrylamide/Chitosan Hydrogels for Smart Real‐Time Monitoring and Promotion of Wound Healing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2102599. 10.1002/adfm.202102599 [DOI] [Google Scholar]