Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2022 Jan 8;38(6):697–707. doi: 10.1007/s10719-021-10035-7

The association between serum interleukin-1 beta and heparin sulphate in diabetic nephropathy patients

Liqiong Jiang 1,, Jianying Zhou 2, Li Zhang 3, Yufeng Du 1, Mingming Jiang 1, Liqian Xie 4, Zhenni Ma 4, Fengling Chen 5,
PMCID: PMC8821487  PMID: 34997893

Abstract

Inflammation is considered an important mechanism in the development of diabetes mellitus (DM) and persists for a long time before the occurrence of diabetic nephropathy (DN). Many studies have demonstrated that a decrease in the endothelial glycocalyx (EG) is negatively correlated with proteinuria. To elucidate whether EG damage induced by inflammasomes in DM patients leads to the occurrence of microalbuminuria (MA) and accelerates the progression of DN, this study screened 300 diagnosed DM patients. Finally, 70 type 2 diabetes patients were invited to participate in this study and were divided into two groups: the T2DM group (patients with normal MA and without diabetic retinopathy, n = 35) and the T2DN group (patients with increased MA and diabetic retinopathy, n = 35). Circulating heparin sulphate (HS, EG biomarkers) and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β, inflammasome biomarkers) of the patients were measured by ELISA. Laboratory data were measured using routine laboratory methods. Patients in the T2DN group had increased serum HS, increased IL-1β, increased CRP, decreased haemoglobin, and increased neutrophils compared to patients in the T2DM group (all P < 0.05). Increased HS and decreased haemoglobin were independently associated with T2DN patients. ROC curves showed that the AUC of HS for the prediction of T2DN was 0.67 (P < 0.05). The combination of HS and haemoglobin yielded a significant increasement in the AUC (0.75, P < 0.001) with optimal sensitivity (71.2%) and specificity (79%). Furthermore, serum IL-1β was positively correlated with HS and was an independent associated factor of HS in the T2DN group. The relationship between HS and IL-1β was not significant in the T2DM group. Our findings surgessed the inflammasome may be associated with and promote damage to the EG during the disease course of DN that manifests as increased MA.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10719-021-10035-7.

Keywords: Diabetic nephropathy, heparin sulphate, Interleukin 1β, Inflammasome, Endothelial glycocalyx, Microalbuminuria

Introduction

The global diabetes mellitus (DM) prevalence in 2019 was estimated to be 9.3% (463 million people) and is expected to increase to 10.2% (578 million) by 2030 and 10.9% (700 million) by 2045 [1]. Approximately 30% to 40% of patients with DM develop diabetic nephropathy (DN) [2]. DN is the single most common cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in many parts of the world [3].

Because actual loss of renal function is a late indicator of DN, albuminuria has been proposed as a sensitive surrogate marker for ongoing renal injury in DN [4]. Much evidence indicates that endothelial glycocalyx (EG) damage results in disordered microvascular permeability, which in the kidney manifests as albuminuria [58]. The EG is a negatively charged gel that coats the endothelium and creates a molecular sieve that prevents large molecules from passing through and likely protects endothelial cells [9]. The EG consists of glycoproteins, proteoglycans, glycosaminoglycans and associated plasma proteins, and hyaluronic acid and heparin sulphate (HS) are its major constituents [10]. The EG is very fragile and easily deteriorates [11], therefore, one possibility to investigate the state of the glycocalyx is to measure retention or shedding of its constituent parts, such as HS, syndecan-1 or hyaluronan [1214]. There is a negative association between the EG and proteinuria [15]. Maintaining the structural integrity of EG may prevent proteinuria [16].

There is increasing evidence for the role of the inflammatory response both in developing DM and its associated complications, including DN [17]. Various molecules related to the inflammatory pathways in DN include transcription factors, proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, adhesion molecules, Toll-like receptors, adipokines and nuclear receptors, which are candidates for new molecular targets for the treatment of DN [18]. Activation of the Nod-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome is directly related to an excessive inflammatory response and, therefore, is directly linked to the pathophysiology of chronic inflammatory disorders, such as DM, and its associated complications [19]. The assembly of the NLRP3 inflammasome complex creates a potent inflammatory multiprotein that can upregulate inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β) and interleukin 18 (IL-18). [19] EG damage can be triggered by exposure to pathogens, microbial toxins, or endogenous danger signals [20]. Whether the NLRP3 inflammasome damages the EG in DM and DN patients is not well investigated.

Based on these mechanisms, we hypothesized that the NLRP3 inflammasome in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients would be associated with pathological degradation of the EG and excretion of EG fragments into the circulatory system. Damage to the EG would therefore be associated with the development of microalbuminuria (MA) and DN. We performed a prospective study of T2D patients to test this hypothesis. HS was used as a marker of EG degradation, and IL-1β was used as a marker of the NLRP3 inflammasome in this study.

Materials and methods

Study design and population

This cross-sectional, observational study screened 300 diagnosed diabetic patients (age > 18 years old) from the Departments of Nephrology and Endocrinology of Suzhou Municipal Hospital from May to December 2020. The exclusion criteria are described in the flow chart (Fig. 1). Finally, 70 T2D patients were invited to participate in this study. Additionally, we obtained data from 16 healthy controls from the Physical Examination Center of Suzhou Municipal Hospital. Normal MA was defined as a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UARC) less than 30 mg/g. [21] Seventy T2D patients were divided into a T2DM group (n = 35) and a T2DN group (n = 35). The T2DM group was defined as patients with normal MA (UARC < 30 mg/g) without diabetic retinopathy, and the T2DN group was defined as patients with increased MA (UARC 30 to 300 mg/g) and diabetic retinopathy. Blood samples were collected in dry tubes, centrifuged to obtain the serum and stored at -80 °C for a maximum of 6 months before the final measurement.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Flow chart of the prospective, observational cohort. UACR, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio

Demographic characteristics and laboratory data collection

Demographic information, including age and sex, was recorded for each patient. Serum albumin, fasting blood glucose (FBG), urea nitrogen, creatinine, uric acid, carbon dioxide, triglyceride, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), c-reactive protein (CRP), glycosylated haemoglobin (HbAlc), haemoglobin (HGB), platelet, leukocyte, neutrophil, and neutrophilic granulocyte percentage (N%) were measured using routine laboratory methods.

Measurement of serum IL-1β and HS in diabetic patients

Serum IL-1β levels were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for human IL-1β (Catalogue No: KE00021, Proteintech, China). Serum HS levels were assessed by ELISA kits for human HS (Catalogue No: F01027, Westang Biotech, China). Levels of serum IL-1β and HS were measured according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Details of the measurements are provided in the Supplementary Methods.

Statistical analyses

Continuous variables are shown as the mean ± standard error or as the median with interquartile range. Categorical variables are expressed as percentages. Univariate analyses were performed to compare differences between the T2DM and T2DN groups. Student’s t-test was used to compare normally distributed data, while the Mann–Whitney U-test was used for nonnormally distributed data. Categorical data were compared using the Chi-squared test. Comparisons of the three groups (T2DN, T2DN and healthy control groups) were performed using one-way ANOVA. Bivariate correlation analyses were performed to assess the correlation of variables. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate variables independently associated with T2DN. ROC curves were generated to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) and compare the prognostic value of every independently associated factor or united factor to T2DN. Furthermore, in the T2DN group, 35 patients were divided into two groups according median of serum HS, multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors associated with HS. All analyses were two-tailed, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. SPSS 18.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analyses.

Results

Comparison of demographic and laboratory characteristics of patients between the T2DM and T2DN groups

The average ages of T2DN and T2DM patients were 65 and 62 years, respectively. There were no significant differences in age or sex between the T2DN and T2DM groups (Table 1, all P > 0.05). T2DN patients had increased serum HS, increased urea nitrogen, increased CRP, decreased HGB, increased neutrophils and increased N% compared to T2DM patients (all P < 0.05, Table 1). There were no additional parameters with significant differences between the two groups (all P > 0.05).

Table 1.

Characteristics of subjects and comparison of demographic and laboratory data of diabetic patients between the T2DN group and the T2DM group by univariate analyses

Healthy controls (n = 16) T2DM patients (n = 35) T2DN patients (n = 35)
Age (years old) 61 ± 9 62 ± 12 65 ± 13
Gender (female) 52% 57% 42%
HS (ng/ml) 1.54 ± 0.60 1.41 ± 0.92 2.17 ± 1.44 a,b
IL-1β (pg/ml) 16.06 ± 6.70 21.35 ± 11.26 a 27.85 ± 14.62 a,b
UARC (mg/g) 4.2(0.08,8.7) 8.1(5.1,11.1) a 58.5(35.9,125.6) a,b
Albumin (g/L) 45.40 ± 2.09 42.92 ± 3.16 41.52 ± 5.57
FGB (mmol/L) 5.32 ± 0.35 8.63 ± 3.36 8.48 ± 3.26
Urea nitrogen (mmol/L) 5.48 ± 1.49 5.33 ± 1.22 6.30 ± 2.52 a,b
Creatinine (umol/L) 69.71 ± 14.12 58.69 ± 12.32 69.71 ± 34.32
Uric acid (umol/L) 360.71 ± 90.16 322.57 ± 85.92 324.93 ± 90.18
Carbon dioxide (mmol/L) 26.47 ± 1.14 26.25 ± 3.06 26.19 ± 2.92
Triglyceride (mmol/L) 1.35(0.92,2.54) 1.43(1.10,2.08) 1.30(0.93,1.95)
Total cholesterol (mmol/L) 4.99(4.50,5.71) 4.34(3.58,4.99) 4.32(3.66,5.07)
HDL (mmol/L) 1.27 ± 0.19 1.10 ± 0.28 1.09 ± 0.28
LDL (mmol/L) 3.20 ± 0.77 2.46 ± 1.01 2.66 ± 0.78
CRP (mg/L) 1.07(0.43,2.83) 0.81(0.45,3.15) 2.03(0.90,6.53) a,b
HbAlc (%) 5.6 ± 0.3 9.2 ± 2.5 9.8 ± 2.9
HGB (g/L) 148 ± 7 141 ± 15 128 ± 19 a,b
Platelet (× 109/L) 215 ± 38 204 ± 51 224 ± 70
Leukocyte (× 109/L) 6.1 ± 1.2 5.9 ± 1.3 6.4 ± 2.1
Neutrophil (× 109/L) 3.5 ± 1.0 3.4 ± 1.0 4.1 ± 1.9 a,b
N% 57 ± 9 56 ± 9 63 ± 10 a,b

HS heparin sulphate, UARC urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio, FGB fasting blood glucose, HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein, CRP c-reaction protein, HbAlc glycosylated haemoglobin, HGB haemoglobin, N% neutrophilic granulocyte percentage

a P < 0.05 vs. Healthy controls

b P < 0.05 vs. T2DM

Comparison of serum IL-1β and HS among the T2DM group, T2DN group and controls

In this study, the median IL-1β levels steadily increased across the following groups: healthy controls: 16.06 pg/ml; T2DM group: 21.35 pg/ml; and T2DN group: 27.85 pg/ml (ANOVA P < 0.05) (Fig. 2). Serum HS levels were significantly higher in the T2DN group (median 2.17 ng/ml) than in the T2DM group (median 1.41 ng/ml, P < 0.05) or healthy controls (median 1.54 ng/ml, P < 0.05) (Fig. 3). However, there was no significant difference in HS levels between the T2DM group and controls (P > 0.05).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Comparison of serum IL-1β among the T2DM group, the T2DN group and the controls

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Comparison of serum HS among the T2DM group, the T2DN group and the controls

Logistic regression analyses for identifying factors independently associated with T2DN patients

Variables that were different between the T2DM group and the T2DN group in the univariate analyses, such as HS, urea nitrogen, CRP, HGB, neutrophils and N%, were entered into a logistic regression analysis. The dichotomous dependent variable in the logistic regression analyses was the presence or absence of T2DN. The results showed that HS (B = 0.582) and HGB (B = 1.051) were factors independently associated with T2DN patients (all P < 0.05, Table 2).

Table 2.

Logistic regression analyses for identifying factors independently associated with T2DN patients

Variable Exp (B value) P value EXP (B value) 95% CI
Lower limit Upper limit
HS 0.582 0.047* 0.342 0.992
CRP 0.977 0.561 0.904 1.056
HGB 1.051 0.029* 1.005 1.099
IL-1β 0.973 0.326 0.922 1.027
FGB 0.997 0.981 0.793 1.254
N% 0.942 0.096 0.878 1.011

HS heparin sulphate, FGB fasting blood glucose, CRP c-reaction protein, HGB haemoglobin, N% neutrophilic granulocyte percentage, CI confidence interval

* P < 0.05

Prediction of T2DN by HS and HGB

To evaluate the discriminative performance of independently associated factors for the prediction of T2DN, ROC curves were constructed (Fig. 4). The AUCs of HS and HGB for the prediction of T2DN were 0.672 (P = 0.015) and 0.713 (P = 0.002), respectively. Both factors achieved statistical significance for T2DN. Furthermore, a combined model of HS and HGB yielded a significant increase in the AUC (0.750, P < 0.001).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for T2DN with each potential predictor. Blue line: HS concentration; orange line: HGB concentration; green line: HS concentration + HGB concentration. Abbreviations: HS, heparin sulphate; HGB, haemoglobin; AUC, area under the ROC curve

Correlation of serum HS and IL-1β with other variables in the T2DM group and T2DN group

In T2DM patients, serum HS was significantly positively associated with albumin (P < 0.05, Table 3). There was no significant association between serum IL-1β and HS or other variables in T2DM patients (all P > 0.05). In T2DN patients, serum HS was significantly positively associated with IL-1β, FGB, and HbA1c (P < 0.05, Fig. 5). Serum IL-1β was significantly positively associated with HS, urea nitrogen, and HbA1c (all P < 0.05, Table 3) in T2DN patients.

Table 3.

Bivariate correlation analyses for the correlation of serum HS and serum IL-1β with other variables in T2DM patients and T2DN patients

T2DM T2DN
heparan sulfate IL-1β heparan sulfate IL-1β
r P value r P value r P value r P value
Age -0.14 0.43 -0.31 0.07 0.11 0.53 0.27 0.12
HS / / 0.19 0.29 / / 0.60 0.00*
IL-1β 0.19 0.29 / / 0.60 0.00* / /
eGFR 0.00 0.99 0.11 0.52 0.11 0.52 -0.15 0.40
Albumin 0.37 0.03* 0.26 0.14 -0.11 0.53 -0.19 0.28
FBG 0.06 0.75 0.33 0.06 0.42 0.01* 0.13 0.48
Urea nitrogen -0.05 0.80 -0.20 0.24 0.04 0.81 0.29 0.09
Creatinine -0.07 0.69 -0.05 0.80 -0.05 0.79 0.15 0.39
Uric acid -0.08 0.64 -0.03 0.87 -0.17 0.33 0.03 0.89
Carbon dioxide -0.09 0.62 0.06 0.74 0.04 0.83 -0.12 0.51
Triglyceride 0.22 0.21 -0.06 0.74 0.00 1.00 -0.09 0.61
Total cholesterol 0.17 0.34 -0.02 0.91 -0.01 0.94 -0.19 0.28
HDL 0.09 0.60 -0.03 0.88 0.02 0.94 -0.16 0.38
LDL -0.26 0.13 -0.02 0.93 -0.11 0.54 -0.15 0.41
CRP -0.03 0.85 0.16 0.38 0.05 0.79 0.00 0.99
HbAlc -0.06 0.75 0.23 0.18 0.43 0.02* 0.31 0.09
HGB 0.08 0.63 0.18 0.30 -0.21 0.24 -0.25 0.16
Platelet 0.04 0.83 -0.05 0.78 0.09 0.61 -0.35 0.05
Leukocyte -0.21 0.23 0.09 0.62 -0.05 0.77 -0.02 0.91
Neutrophil -0.19 0.28 -0.01 0.95 -0.06 0.74 -0.05 0.77
N% -0.06 0.74 -0.10 0.58 -0.06 0.76 -0.10 0.57

HS heparin sulphate, FGB fasting blood glucose HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein, CRP c-reaction protein, HbAlc glycosylated haemoglobin, HGB haemoglobin, N% neutrophilic granulocyte percentage

*P < 0.05

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Correlation of serum HS with IL-1β, FBG and HbA1c in T2DN patients. Serum HS was significantly positively correlated with serum IL-1β, FBG and HbA1c in T2DN patients

Multivariate linear regression analyses for identifying independently associated factors for HS in T2DN patients

Variables that were significantly correlated with HS in T2DN patients (IL-1β, FBG and HbA1c) were entered into multivariate linear regression analyses. The results showed that IL-1β (β = 0.053, P < 0.001) and FBG (β = 0.168, P = 0.008) were factors independently associated with HS in T2DN patients (Table 4).

Table 4.

Multivariate linear regression analyses for the establishment of factors independently associated with HS in T2DN patients adjusted by HbA1c

Variable B value P value B value 95% CI
lower limit upper limit
IL-1β 0.053 0.000* 0.029 0.077
FGB 0.168 0.008* 0.047 0.289

FGB fasting blood glucose, HbA1c glycosylated haemoglobin, CI confidence interval

*P < 0.05

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to show two results. (1) Serum HS levels were significantly and independently correlated with T2DN in all T2D patients; HS (serum HS > 2.32 ng/ml) combined with haemoglobin (HGB < 136 g/L) predicted T2DN with optimal sensitivity (71.2%) and specificity (79%). (2) In T2DN patients, increased serum IL-1β may be an independent factor associated with HS.

Obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) represent low-grade chronic inflammatory states. [22, 23] Low-grade inflammation is closely involved in the pathogenesis of T2D and its associated complications. [24] Neutrophils are a major component of the host innate defence against infection and contribute to autoimmune pathogenesis and chronic inflammation. [25] Serum hepcidin levels are increased in chronic inflammation, causing anaemia and inflammation. [26] C-reactive protein (CRP) is a sensitive biomarker of chronic low-grade inflammation. [27] Together, increased neutrophils, reduced haemoglobin and increased CRP are biomarkers of chronic inflammation. In our study, neutrophils and CRP of T2D patients with nephropathy were higher than those without nephropathy, while haemoglobin in T2D patients with nephropathy was lower than that in those without nephropathy. These results suggest that the chronic inflammatory state of DN is more severe than that of diabetes without nephropathy, and this low-grade persistent inflammation may promote DN development and progression.

Generalized EG damage occurs in diabetes [28] and is associated with microalbuminuria (MA). [29] When EG is damaged, its degradation is accompanied by shedding of one or more glycocalyx components into the blood. [30] EG deterioration can be detected using the plasma levels of two well-established biomarkers, syndecan-1 and HS. [31] In our study, serum HS levels were higher in the T2DN group than in the T2DM group and healthy controls, but there were no significant differences between T2DM patients and controls. These results indicate that the EG in T2DN patients is more severely damaged than that of T2DM patients and healthy controls. There was a significant difference between serum HS levels in T2DN and T2DM patients, and HS may be an independently associated factor of T2DN patients in our study. However, Yokoyama et al. measured HS in the urine and serum of diabetic patients by two different HS-specific ELISAs (10E4 and 3G10) and did not find significant differences in the serum. [32] In contrast to Yokoyama, we used a similar to but not the same as 3G10 ELISA kit, which detected a degraded serum heparin sulfate fragment in the circulation. Furthermore, Yokoyama divided patients by different urinary albumin excretion rate (AER), in their study, diabetic patients were divided into normoalbuminuria (AER < 12 mg/g. Cr), incipient nephropathy (AER 12 to 220 mg/g. Cr), and clinical nephropathy (AER > 200 mg/g. Cr). In our study, patients were divided into a T2DM group (UARC < 30 mg/g without diabetic retinopathy) and a T2DN group (UARC 30 to 300 mg/g and diabetic retinopathy). As such, the different methods and grouping criteria may produce different results. Deckert et al. observed that the de novo synthesis of heparan sulfate was reduced in fibroblasts isolated from diabetes patients with albuminuria but not in those from patients without albuminuria, or healthy control subjects, and formulated a hypothesis that the loss of EG is a prerequisite for developing diabetic nephropathy. [33] This may be the potential mechanism of the research of Yokoyama. The pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy is very complicated and not yet clear. Our results were not completely contradictory to those of Yokoyama. In the future, large samples and prospective clinical research or basic experimental research are needed for further clarification.

In our study, haemoglobin was another independently associated factor in T2DN patients. The ROC curves showed that the AUC of HS for the prediction of T2DN was 0.67 with good specificity (88.6%) but poor sensitivity (45.4%). When HS was combined with haemoglobin, the AUC increased to 0.75 with optimal sensitivity (71%) and specificity (79%). A 5-year prospective observational study conducted at a diabetes clinic in Australia showed that declining haemoglobin levels were more common in those with higher levels of albuminuria, [34] and this finding was in agreement with our results.

Albuminuria as an outcome of kidney damage is not a specific biomarker for the prediction of DN prior to the onset of this devastating complication. [35] There is an urgent need to determine an easy and accurate way to detect DN prior to its beginning or during the infancy stage so that its progression can be slowed or arrested. Our study revealed that serum HS and/or haemoglobin could be novel biomarkers of T2DN and could help identify potential DN patients among T2D patients early with both diagnostic and prognostic implications. Defining new predictive biomarkers to use alongside UARC during the initial stages of DN would provide a window of opportunity for therapeutic interventions to prevent or delay the onset of the disease, and to improve outcomes.

It is possible that the NLRP3 inflammasome is homeostatic and maintains metabolic balance under normal physiology. However, NLRP3 may be activated by chronic inflammation in diabetes, becoming pathologic and promoting disease. [36] Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome leads to caspase 1-dependent release of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1β. [37] Elevated circulating IL-1β may impair islet cell function and induce dysregulation of blood glucose levels, resulting in the progression of T2D and even the development of T2DN, [38, 39] and may play an important role in initiating and sustaining inflammation-induced organ dysfunction in T2D. [40]

In this study, serum IL-1β levels in all T2D patients were significantly higher than those of healthy controls, and serum IL-1β was higher in the T2DN group than in the T2DM group. These results indicate that persistently increased inflammatory factor IL-1β may be involved in the development and progression of T2D and even T2DN. Serum IL-1β was significantly different between T2DN patients and healthy controls, but there was no significant difference between T2DM patients and healthy controls. These results suggest that the increased serum IL-1β occurs earlier than the increased serum HS, which indicates that abnormal inflammasomes appear earlier than damage to the EG during the course of diabetes and may potentially induce damage to the EG. Serum IL-1β and fasting blood glucose (FBG) were independently associated with HS in our T2DN group. As HS may represent a promising biomarker of T2DN, increased serum IL-1β and FBG may predict and promote the progression of DN. These results again indicate that inflammasomes may be associated with and promote EG damage in DN patients, which induces MA in T2D and DN disease courses. Preventing the increase in IL-1β and FBG in patients during the early stage of T2D may be potential therapeutic targets to prevent or delay DN. Advances in basic science and clinical investigations of the mechanism of inflammasomes, the EG and MA in T2D are worth pursuing. Ongoing trials will determine whether the reduction in the NLRP3 inflammasome and/or IL-1β will translate into long-term success in forestalling damage to the EG in T2D and the progression of DN. The anti-inflammatory activities of the NLRP3/IL-1β pathway suggest that it is a promising prospect for DN treatment and provides new ideas for DN treatment.

This study has several limitations. First, it was performed at a single centre, and the sample size was relatively small. Second, the cross-sectional study design precluded the determination of cause and effect. Third, the degree of EG degradation was assessed by measuring serum HS, and this method may not accurately represent current EG integrity or the extent of loss. Fourth, we did not recognize HS by antibodies, which are crucially dependent on specific modification/sulfation motifs in HS. Changes in ELISA signals could be either related to a change in the serum concentration of HS or related to structural changes in HS. Fifth, DN patients with macroalbuminuria and renal insufficiency were not included in this study. Finally, the HS and IL-1β ELISA kits used in this study are available for research use only and are not intended for diagnostic or therapeutic use; these measurement methods are not standardized. These limitations highlight the need for adequately powered RCTs and basic studies to further confirm the findings presented here.

Conclusions

HS is isolated from porcine intestinal mucosa as a by-product during heparin production. [41] HS is a type of glycosaminoglycan that is attached to the core proteins of proteoglycans, which is a ubiquitous component of the cell surface and in extracellular matrix. [42] In this study, we found that serum HS may be a novel biomarker in the prediction of ongoing/progressive T2DN. Serum IL-1β was associated with HS in T2DN patients, suggesting that inflammasomes may be associated with damage to the endothelial glycocalyx in the T2DN disease course, which is manifested by microalbuminuria. IL-1β maybe a potential therapeutic target of T2DN.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Author’s contributions

Conceptualization and writing-original draft: Liqiong Jiang and Fengling Chen; Data curation and investigation: Jianying Zhou, Mingming Jiang; Methodology and formal analysis: Liqiong Jiang, Li Zhang and Yufeng Du; Resources: Liqian Xie and Zhenni Ma.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Key Subject Construction Programme for Nephrology of Suzhou (grant number Szxk201807).

Data availability

The data used for the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request and approval by the principal investigator.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Suzhou Municipal Hospital (approval number: K-2020–042-H01, 15/07/2020). This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2100042515). All included patients signed a written informed consent before participation.

Conflicts of interest

Nothing to declare.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Liqiong Jiang, Email: 98qiong2008@163.com.

Fengling Chen, Email: cfl95002@163.com.

References

  • 1.Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, Colagiuri S, Guariguata L, Motala AA, Ogurtsova K, Shaw JE, Bright D, Williams R. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9(th) edition. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2019;157:107843. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Umanath K, Lewis JB. Update on Diabetic Nephropathy: Core Curriculum 2018. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2018;71(6):884–895. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tuttle KR, Bakris GL, Bilous RW, Chiang JL, de Boer IH, Goldstein-Fuchs J, Hirsch IB, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Narva AS, Navaneethan SD, Neumiller JJ, Patel UD, Ratner RE, Whaley-Connell AT, Molitch ME. Diabetic kidney disease: a report from an ADA Consensus Conference. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(10):2864–2883. doi: 10.2337/dc14-1296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Boels MG, Avramut MC, Koudijs A, Dane MJ, Lee DH, van der Vlag J, Koster AJ, van Zonneveld AJ, van Faassen E, Gröne HJ, van den Berg BM, Rabelink TJ. Atrasentan Reduces Albuminuria by Restoring the Glomerular Endothelial Glycocalyx Barrier in Diabetic Nephropathy. Diabetes. 2016;65(8):2429–2439. doi: 10.2337/db15-1413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Haraldsson B, Nyström J, Deen WM. Properties of the glomerular barrier and mechanisms of proteinuria. Physiol. Rev. 2008;88(2):451–487. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00055.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Arkill KP, Knupp C, Michel CC, Neal CR, Qvortrup K, Rostgaard J, Squire JM. Similar endothelial glycocalyx structures in microvessels from a range of mammalian tissues: evidence for a common filtering mechanism? Biophys. J . 2011;101(5):1046–1056. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.07.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fridén V, Oveland E, Tenstad O, Ebefors K, Nyström J, Nilsson UA, Haraldsson B. The glomerular endothelial cell coat is essential for glomerular filtration. Kidney Int. 2011;79(12):1322–1330. doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jeansson M, Björck K, Tenstad O, Haraldsson B. Adriamycin alters glomerular endothelium to induce proteinuria. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(1):114–122. doi: 10.1681/asn.2007111205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rabelink TJ, de Zeeuw D. The glycocalyx–linking albuminuria with renal and cardiovascular disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2015;11(11):667–676. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2015.162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nieuwdorp M, Meuwese MC, Vink H, Hoekstra JB, Kastelein JJ, Stroes ES. The endothelial glycocalyx: a potential barrier between health and vascular disease. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2005;16(5):507–511. doi: 10.1097/01.mol.0000181325.08926.9c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pries AR, Secomb TW, Gaehtgens P. The endothelial surface layer. Pflugers Arch. 2000;440(5):653–666. doi: 10.1007/s004240000307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rehm M, Haller M, Orth V, Kreimeier U, Jacob M, Dressel H, Mayer S, Brechtelsbauer H, Finsterer U. Changes in blood volume and hematocrit during acute preoperative volume loading with 5% albumin or 6% hetastarch solutions in patients before radical hysterectomy. Anesthesiology. 2001;95(4):849–856. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200110000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nieuwdorp M, van Haeften TW, Gouverneur MC, Mooij HL, van Lieshout MH, Levi M, Meijers JC, Holleman F, Hoekstra JB, Vink H, Kastelein JJ, Stroes ES. Loss of endothelial glycocalyx during acute hyperglycemia coincides with endothelial dysfunction and coagulation activation in vivo. Diabetes. 2006;55(2):480–486. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.55.02.06.db05-1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Iba T, Levy JH. Derangement of the endothelial glycocalyx in sepsis. Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH. 2019;17(2):283–294. doi: 10.1111/jth.14371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Garsen M, Rops AL, Rabelink TJ, Berden JH, van der Vlag J. The role of heparanase and the endothelial glycocalyx in the development of proteinuria. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2014;29(1):49–55. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dane MJ, van den Berg BM, Avramut MC, Faas FG, van der Vlag J, Rops AL, Ravelli RB, Koster BJ, van Zonneveld AJ, Vink H, Rabelink TJ. Glomerular endothelial surface layer acts as a barrier against albumin filtration. Am. J. Pathol. 2013;182(5):1532–1540. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.01.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yaribeygi H, Atkin SL, Simental-Mendía LE, Barreto GE, Sahebkar A. Anti-inflammatory effects of resolvins in diabetic nephropathy: Mechanistic pathways. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019 doi: 10.1002/jcp.28315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wada, J., Makino, H.: Inflammation and the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. Clinical science (London, England : 1979) 124(3), 139–152 (2013). 10.1042/cs20120198 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 19.Coll RC, Robertson AA, Chae JJ, Higgins SC, Muñoz-Planillo R, Inserra MC, Vetter I, Dungan LS, Monks BG, Stutz A, Croker DE, Butler MS, Haneklaus M, Sutton CE, Núñez G, Latz E, Kastner DL, Mills KH, Masters SL, Schroder K, Cooper MA, O'Neill LA. A small-molecule inhibitor of the NLRP3 inflammasome for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Nat. Med. 2015;21(3):248–255. doi: 10.1038/nm.3806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wei S, Gonzalez Rodriguez E, Chang R, Holcomb JB, Kao LS, Wade CE. Elevated Syndecan-1 after Trauma and Risk of Sepsis: A Secondary Analysis of Patients from the Pragmatic, Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) Trial. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2018;227(6):587–595. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2017: Summary of Revisions. Diabetes care 40(Suppl 1), S4-s5 (2017). 10.2337/dc17-S003 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 22.Ramos-Zavala MG, González-Ortiz M, Martínez-Abundis E, Robles-Cervantes JA, González-López R, Santiago-Hernández NJ. Effect of diacerein on insulin secretion and metabolic control in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(7):1591–1594. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sun Q, Yue P, Deiuliis JA, Lumeng CN, Kampfrath T, Mikolaj MB, Cai Y, Ostrowski MC, Lu B, Parthasarathy S, Brook RD, Moffatt-Bruce SD, Chen LC, Rajagopalan S. Ambient air pollution exaggerates adipose inflammation and insulin resistance in a mouse model of diet-induced obesity. Circulation. 2009;119(4):538–546. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.108.799015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pickup JC. Inflammation and activated innate immunity in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(3):813–823. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.3.813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhu G, Augustine MM, Azuma T, Luo L, Yao S, Anand S, Rietz AC, Huang J, Xu H, Flies AS, Flies SJ, Tamada K, Colonna M, van Deursen JM, Chen L. B7–H4-deficient mice display augmented neutrophil-mediated innate immunity. Blood. 2009;113(8):1759–1767. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-01-133223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Camaschella C, Nai A, Silvestri L. Iron metabolism and iron disorders revisited in the hepcidin era. Haematologica. 2020;105(2):260–272. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2019.232124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ligthart, S., Vaez, A., Võsa, U., Stathopoulou, M.G., de Vries, P.S., Prins, B.P., Van der Most, P.J., Tanaka, T., Naderi, E., Rose, L.M., Wu, Y., Karlsson, R., Barbalic, M., Lin, H., Pool, R., Zhu, G., Macé, A., Sidore, C., Trompet, S., Mangino, M., Sabater-Lleal, M., Kemp, J.P., Abbasi, A., Kacprowski, T., Verweij, N., Smith, A.V., Huang, T., Marzi, C., Feitosa, M.F., Lohman, K.K., Kleber, M.E., Milaneschi, Y., Mueller, C., Huq, M., Vlachopoulou, E., Lyytikäinen, L.P., Oldmeadow, C., Deelen, J., Perola, M., Zhao, J.H., Feenstra, B., Amini, M., Lahti, J., Schraut, K.E., Fornage, M., Suktitipat, B., Chen, W.M., Li, X., Nutile, T., Malerba, G., Luan, J., Bak, T., Schork, N., Del Greco, M.F., Thiering, E., Mahajan, A., Marioni, R.E., Mihailov, E., Eriksson, J., Ozel, A.B., Zhang, W., Nethander, M., Cheng, Y.C., Aslibekyan, S., Ang, W., Gandin, I., Yengo, L., Portas, L., Kooperberg, C., Hofer, E., Rajan, K.B., Schurmann, C., den Hollander, W., Ahluwalia, T.S., Zhao, J., Draisma, H.H.M., Ford, I., Timpson, N., Teumer, A., Huang, H., Wahl, S., Liu, Y., Huang, J., Uh, H.W., Geller, F., Joshi, P.K., Yanek, L.R., Trabetti, E., Lehne, B., Vozzi, D., Verbanck, M., Biino, G., Saba, Y., Meulenbelt, I., O'Connell, J.R., Laakso, M., Giulianini, F., Magnusson, P.K.E., Ballantyne, C.M., Hottenga, J.J., Montgomery, G.W., Rivadineira, F., Rueedi, R., Steri, M., Herzig, K.H., Stott, D.J., Menni, C., Frånberg, M., St Pourcain, B., Felix, S.B., Pers, T.H., Bakker, S.J.L., Kraft, P., Peters, A., Vaidya, D., Delgado, G., Smit, J.H., Großmann, V., Sinisalo, J., Seppälä, I., Williams, S.R., Holliday, E.G., Moed, M., Langenberg, C., Räikkönen, K., Ding, J., Campbell, H., Sale, M.M., Chen, Y.I., James, A.L., Ruggiero, D., Soranzo, N., Hartman, C.A., Smith, E.N., Berenson, G.S., Fuchsberger, C., Hernandez, D., Tiesler, C.M.T., Giedraitis, V., Liewald, D., Fischer, K., Mellström, D., Larsson, A., Wang, Y., Scott, W.R., Lorentzon, M., Beilby, J., Ryan, K.A., Pennell, C.E., Vuckovic, D., Balkau, B., Concas, M.P., Schmidt, R., Mendes de Leon, C.F., Bottinger, E.P., Kloppenburg, M., Paternoster, L., Boehnke, M., Musk, A.W., Willemsen, G., Evans, D.M., Madden, P.A.F., Kähönen, M., Kutalik, Z., Zoledziewska, M., Karhunen, V., Kritchevsky, S.B., Sattar, N., Lachance, G., Clarke, R., Harris, T.B., Raitakari, O.T., Attia, J.R., van Heemst, D., Kajantie, E., Sorice, R., Gambaro, G., Scott, R.A., Hicks, A.A., Ferrucci, L., Standl, M., Lindgren, C.M., Starr, J.M., Karlsson, M., Lind, L., Li, J.Z., Chambers, J.C., Mori, T.A., de Geus, E., Heath, A.C., Martin, N.G., Auvinen, J., Buckley, B.M., de Craen, A.J.M., Waldenberger, M., Strauch, K., Meitinger, T., Scott, R.J., McEvoy, M., Beekman, M., Bombieri, C., Ridker, P.M., Mohlke, K.L., Pedersen, N.L., Morrison, A.C., Boomsma, D.I., Whitfield, J.B., Strachan, D.P., Hofman, A., Vollenweider, P., Cucca, F., Jarvelin, M.R., Jukema, J.W., Spector, T.D., Hamsten, A., Zeller, T., Uitterlinden, A.G., Nauck, M., Gudnason, V., Qi, L., Grallert, H., Borecki, I.B., Rotter, J.I., März, W., Wild, P.S., Lokki, M.L., Boyle, M., Salomaa, V., Melbye, M., Eriksson, J.G., Wilson, J.F., Penninx, B., Becker, D.M., Worrall, B.B., Gibson, G., Krauss, R.M., Ciullo, M., Zaza, G., Wareham, N.J., Oldehinkel, A.J., Palmer, L.J., Murray, S.S., Pramstaller, P.P., Bandinelli, S., Heinrich, J., Ingelsson, E., Deary, I.J., Mägi, R., Vandenput, L., van der Harst, P., Desch, K.C., Kooner, J.S., Ohlsson, C., Hayward, C., Lehtimäki, T., Shuldiner, A.R., Arnett, D.K., Beilin, L.J., Robino, A., Froguel, P., Pirastu, M., Jess, T., Koenig, W., Loos, R.J.F., Evans, D.A., Schmidt, H., Smith, G.D., Slagboom, P.E., Eiriksdottir, G., Morris, A.P., Psaty, B.M., Tracy, R.P., Nolte, I.M., Boerwinkle, E., Visvikis-Siest, S., Reiner, A.P., Gross, M., Bis, J.C., Franke, L., Franco, O.H., Benjamin, E.J., Chasman, D.I., Dupuis, J., Snieder, H., Dehghan, A., Alizadeh, B.Z.: Genome Analyses of >200,000 Individuals Identify 58 Loci for Chronic Inflammation and Highlight Pathways that Link Inflammation and Complex Disorders. Am j human gen 103(5), 691–706 (2018). 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.09.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 28.Dou, L., Jourde-Chiche, N.: Endothelial Toxicity of High Glucose and its by-Products in Diabetic Kidney Disease. Toxins 11(10) (2019). 10.3390/toxins11100578 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 29.Satchell SC, Tooke JE. What is the mechanism of microalbuminuria in diabetes: a role for the glomerular endothelium? Diabetologia. 2008;51(5):714–725. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-0961-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dogné S, Flamion B. Endothelial Glycocalyx Impairment in Disease: Focus on Hyaluronan Shedding. Am. J. Pathol. 2020;190(4):768–780. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2019.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Uchimido R, Schmidt EP, Shapiro NI. The glycocalyx: a novel diagnostic and therapeutic target in sepsis. Critical care (London, England) 2019;23(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2292-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yokoyama H, Sato K, Okudaira M, Morita C, Takahashi C, Suzuki D, Sakai H, Iwamoto Y. Serum and urinary concentrations of heparan sulfate in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int. 1999;56(2):650–658. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00591.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Deckert T, Horowitz IM, Kofoed-Enevoldsen A, Kjellén L, Deckert M, Lykkelund C, Burcharth F. Possible genetic defects in regulation of glycosaminoglycans in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes. 1991;40(6):764–770. doi: 10.2337/diab.40.6.764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Thomas MC, Cooper ME, Rossing K, Parving HH. Anaemia in diabetes: Is there a rationale to TREAT? Diabetologia. 2006;49(6):1151–1157. doi: 10.1007/s00125-006-0215-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Singh S, Sonkar SK, Sonkar GK, Mahdi AA. Diabetic kidney disease: A systematic review on the role of epigenetics as diagnostic and prognostic marker. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2019;35(5):e3155. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Haneklaus M, O'Neill LA. NLRP3 at the interface of metabolism and inflammation. Immunol. Rev. 2015;265(1):53–62. doi: 10.1111/imr.12285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Swanson KV, Deng M, Ting JP. The NLRP3 inflammasome: molecular activation and regulation to therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019;19(8):477–489. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0165-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dinarello CA, Donath MY, Mandrup-Poulsen T. Role of IL-1beta in type 2 diabetes. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 2010;17(4):314–321. doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e32833bf6dc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tsalamandris S, Antonopoulos AS, Oikonomou E, Papamikroulis GA, Vogiatzi G, Papaioannou S, Deftereos S, Tousoulis D. The Role of Inflammation in Diabetes: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives. European cardiology. 2019;14(1):50–59. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2018.33.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Grant RW, Dixit VD. Mechanisms of disease: inflammasome activation and the development of type 2 diabetes. Front. Immunol. 2013;4:50. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Griffin CC, Linhardt RJ, Van Gorp CL, Toida T, Hileman RE, Schubert RL, 2nd, Brown SE. Isolation and characterization of heparan sulfate from crude porcine intestinal mucosal peptidoglycan heparin. Carbohyd. Res. 1995;276(1):183–197. doi: 10.1016/0008-6215(95)00166-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhang L. Glycosaminoglycan (GAG) biosynthesis and GAG-binding proteins. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2010;93:1–17. doi: 10.1016/s1877-1173(10)93001-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data used for the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request and approval by the principal investigator.


Articles from Glycoconjugate Journal are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES