Skip to main content
Bentham Open Access logoLink to Bentham Open Access
. 2021 Dec 24;18(9):711–720. doi: 10.2174/1567205018666211126113904

Heterogeneity of Tau Deposition and Microvascular Involvement in MCI and AD

Annie G Bryant 1, Mary K Manhard 2, David H Salat 2, Bruce R Rosen 2, Bradley T Hyman 1, Keith A Johnson 1,2,3,4, Susie Huang 2,#, Rachel E Bennett 1,#, Yi-Fen Yen 1,*,#
PMCID: PMC8822690  NIHMSID: NIHMS1768299  PMID: 34825871

Abstract

Background

Reduced cerebrovascular function and accumulation of tau pathology are key components of cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Recent multimodal neuroimaging studies show a correlation between cortical tau accumulation and reduced cerebral perfusion. However, animal models predict that tau exerts capillary-level changes that may not be fully captured by standard imaging protocols.

Objective

Using newly-developed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology to measure capillary-specific perfusion parameters, we examined a series of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD patients with tau positron emission tomography (PET) to observe whole-brain capillary perfusion alterations and their association with tau deposition.

Methods

Seven subjects with MCI or AD received Flortaucipir PET to measure tau deposition and spin-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast (SE-DSC) MRI to measure microvascular perfusion (<10μm radius vessels). Gradient-echo (GE) DSC and pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL) MRI were also acquired to assess macrovascular perfusion. Tau PET, microvascular perfusion, and cortical thickness maps were visually inspected in volumetric slices and on cortical surface projections.

Results

High tau PET signal was generally observed in the lateral temporal and parietal cortices, with uptake in the occipital cortex in one subject. Global blood flow measured by PCASL was reduced with increasing tau burden, which was consistent with previous studies. Tau accumulation was spatially associated with variable patterns of microvascular cerebral blood flow (CBF) and oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) in the cortex and with increased capillary transit heterogeneity (CTH) in adjacent periventricular white matter, independent of amyloid-β status.

Conclusion

Although macrovascular perfusion generally correlated with tau deposition at the whole-cortex level, regional changes in microvascular perfusion were not uniformly associated with either tau pathology or cortical atrophy. This work highlights the heterogeneity of AD-related brain changes and the challenges of implementing therapeutic interventions to improve cerebrovascular function.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease, tau pathology, microvascular perfusion, multimodal neuroimaging, positron emission tomography, dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrovascular function

1. INTRODUCTION

Vascular dysfunction and tau neurofibrillary tangle (NFT) formation are key contributors to the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) neuropathological cascade. Broadly, reduced cerebral perfusion is known to occur early in the disease course, before the onset of frank neurodegeneration or detectable changes in metabolism on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)- positron emission tomography (PET) [1-3]. While in vivo tau pathology correlates well with cognitive decline [4-9], the functional relationship between pathological tau deposition and diminished vascular function in the human cortex remains uncertain. Recent preclinical findings in transgenic mice suggest that tau pathology drives neurovascular uncoupling [10], alterations to microvascular structure [11], and impaired capillary flow via transient leukocyte adhesion [11]. Such leukocyte-perturbed capillary flow patterns are a phenocopy of those reported in the human traumatic brain injury literature [12, 13], and they may reflect cortical capillary transit heterogeneity (CTH) previously described in human AD [14-16].

Human neuroimaging studies have demonstrated localized inverse correlations between increased tau burden and reduced macrovascular cerebral blood flow (CBF) in vivo across the cognitive spectrum [17-20]. However, both tau pathology [21, 22] and vascular function [23] exhibit pronounced spatiotemporal variability in vivo, suggesting the existence of distinct tau and vascular pathology subtypes. Examining whole-brain tau and cerebrovascular function distributions could elucidate important regional associations at the individual level. Moreover, while CBF is an integral component of functional neurovascular coupling, changes in CTH and oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) levels can reflect microvascular dysfunction even with supra-ischemic CBF levels [16]. Indeed, Jespersen and Østergaard [24] propose that the combined effects of CBF, CTH, and OEF better capture cerebral hemodynamics than those of CBF alone. It is thus relevant to examine tau-related CBF in the context of these other microvascular biomarkers, which reflect capillary dysfunction and are associated with cognitive decline and neurodegeneration in AD [14, 15, 25].

Based on mounting preclinical and clinical evidence, we hypothesized that a high regional tau burden would spatially colocalize with low microvascular CBF and high microvascular CTH in the cortex. Here, we sought to characterize microvascular perfusion using spin-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast (SE-DSC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is particularly sensitive to susceptibility contrast signal in small vessels such as capillaries (radius < 10 µm) [26, 27] and from which CBF, CTH, and OEF parametric maps can be derived. Microvascular perfusion maps are visualized along with tau PET imaging in seven cognitively impaired subjects to examine qualitative spatial associations. To compare our data with previously published studies [17-20], we also acquired gradient echo DSC (GE-DSC) MRI and pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL), which measure perfusion signals from vessels of all sizes, from capillaries to large arteries.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Subjects

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mass General Brigham and was HIPAA compliant. Seven subjects previously diagnosed with MCI (n=6) or AD (n=1) and with prior amyloid-β and tau PET scans were recruited to undergo SE-DSC, GE-DSC, and PCASL MRI at the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). In addition, cognitive status was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [28], Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Global score [29], Sum of Boxes (SoB) [30], and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) [31].

2.2. Image Acquisition and Processing

Anatomical MRI was acquired with 1mm isotropic T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MPRAGE) and T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR). Amyloid-β plaque deposition was measured using Pittsburgh Compound-B (PiB) PET and tau NFT burden was measured using Flortaucipir ([18F]-AV-1451) PET, with standardized uptake value (SUV) maps generated as previously described [32]. A novel dual-echo SE-DSC and GE-DSC MRI sequence [33] was acquired with intravenous injection of 0.1 mmol/kg gadolinium-based contrast agent using the following parameters: 2.4mm in-plane resolution, 33 3mm-thick slices, 15% slice gap; repetition time (TR) 1500ms, echo time (TE) 90ms; 244 time series with temporal resolution 1.5s. SE-DSC and GE-DSC time-series data were processed using pgui (PGUI Perfusion Analysis Software; Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University Hospital Norrebrogade, Denmark; https://cfin.au.dk/software/pgui/) to yield parametric maps, including CBF, CTH, and oxygen extraction fraction (OEF).

Multi-band PCASL [34] was acquired using a 3T MRI scanner (Magnetom Prisma, Siemens, Munich, Germany) and a Siemens 32-channel head coil. Labeled and control images were collected at the following post-label delay intervals: 0.2s (n=12 measurements), 0.7s (n=12 measurements), 1.2s (n=12 measurements), 1.7s (n=20 measurements), 2.2s (n=30 measurements). At each post-label delay, 60 2.27mm-thick slices were acquired with TR 8000ms and TE 40ms. Motion correction was performed using 3dvolreg from Analysis of Functional NeuroImages (AFNI) [35], using the median frame in the time-series as the template volume for co-registration. Perfusion was quantified using the oxford_asl script from the Bayesian Inference for Arterial Spin Labeling MRI (BASIL) toolbox [36].

Image registration and segmentation were performed using FreeSurfer 7.1.1 (https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/). The PET SUV and perfusion parametric maps were registered to anatomical MRI and normalized to the mean cerebellum cortex and sensorimotor cortex, respectively, yielding relative maps (denoted with, e.g., “SUVR” or “rCBF”). The sensorimotor cortex was selected as a perfusion reference region given its relative sparing in AD pathology and previous usage for perfusion quantification in the AD brain [37-43]. Additionally, the PiB PET distribution volume ratio (DVR) was calculated for a large cortical ROI encompassing frontal, lateral temporal, and retrosplenial cortices (FLR) following partial volume correction as described previously [32]. Amyloid-β positivity was defined as an FLR PiB DVR of 1.3 or greater [44-46]. All co-registered functional maps were brain-masked and spatially smoothed with a 6mm Gaussian kernel using FreeSurfer. To complement visualization in subject space, each subject’s structural and functional volumes were registered to a group-averaged template using combined volumetric and surface registration [47, 48]. Volumetric data were additionally projected onto the template cortical surface with even sampling between the white and pial surfaces using FreeSurfer.

2.3. Image Visualization and Analysis

Volumetric slice and functional overlay visualizations were generated using the oro.nifti and neurobase packages in R. The inflated template cortical surface was flattened by first introducing relaxation cuts (see https://surfer.nmr. mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FreeSurferOccipitalFlattenedPatch) and using FreeSurfer’s surface flattening tool. Functional data projected onto the surface were visualized on the template cortical flatmap using pycortex [49] in python (v3.8).

2.4. Statistical

Vertex-wise cortical surface summary statistics were calculated for cortical thickness, SE rCBF, GE rCBF, PCASL rCBF, and tau SUVR for each subject using the freesurferformats package in R (v4.0.2). Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficient (r) and p-values were calculated using the cor.test() function from the stats package in R.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Subject Information

Seven subjects (6 MCI/1 AD, mean age 76.7 ± 6.7) underwent PET and MRI, with an average of 2.7 ± 1.2 years in between PET and perfusion MRI scans. Subject demographics, cognitive scores, amyloid-β status, and APOE genotypes are shown in Table 1. All subjects met National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association criteria for cognitive impairment, with n=6 MCI (CDR global score of 0.5) [50] and n=1 AD (CDR global score of 1) [51]. Additionally, based on CDR SoB scores, these subjects exhibited either questionable cognitive impairment (n=5), very mild dementia (n=1), or mild dementia (n=1) [30].

Table 1.

Demographic and cognitive information for the subjects in this case series study. Amyloid-β positivity is defined as a partial volume corrected FLR (frontal, lateral temporal, and retrosplenial cortex) distribution volume ratio (DVR) of 1.3 or greater. Summary statistics in the final row are presented as mean (standard deviation).

Subject Diagnosis Age at Tau Scan Sex MMSE CDR SoB CDR Global Years between Tau/MRI APOE Amyloid-β
Sub01 AD 74 F 21 6 1 2.9 e3/e4 +
Sub02 MCI 82 M 26 2 0.5 2.9 NA +
Sub03 MCI 62 F 22 2 0.5 3.8 e4/e4 +
Sub04 MCI 70 M 24 2.5 0.5 0.5 NA +
Sub05 MCI 78 M 29 2 0.5 1.7 e3/e4 +
Sub06 MCI 79 M 22 3 0.5 3.2 e3/e3 -
Sub07 MCI 75 F 30 1 0.5 4.1 e3/e3 -
n=7 6 MCI, 1 AD 74.3 (6.7) 4M, 3F 24.9 (3.6) 2.6 (1.6) 6 CDR0.5, 1 CDR1 2.7 (1.2) 3 e4+, 2 e4-, 2 NA 5+, 2-

Table 2 shows the whole-cortex tau SUVR mean and standard deviation for each subject, with a mean cortical tau SUVR of 1.22 ± 0.31 across the seven subjects. Five subjects exhibited PiB FLR DVR > 1.3 and were therefore classified as amyloid-β positive (Table 1). The two amyloid-β negative subjects (Sub06 and Sub07) exhibited relatively low cortical tau SUVR compared to other subjects (Fig. 1), with cortical accumulation limited to the medial temporal region. This pattern of medial temporal tau deposition, coupled with mild cognitive impairment, suggests primary age-related tauopathy (PART) [52], though other neuropathologies such as Lewy body disease and major depressive disorder cannot be ruled out. Three subjects had at least one APOE ε4 allele (Sub01, Sub03, Sub05), two subjects had ε3/ε3 (Sub06, Sub07), and two subjects did not have APOE genotype data available (Sub02, Sub04).

Table 2.

Summary statistics from functional data projected onto the cortical surface in individual subject space. Values are presented as the mean (standard deviation) across all cortical surface vertices per subject. In the bottom row, results from Pearson’s correlation test are shown for each column compared with Tau SUVR across the seven subjects. a.u. = arbitrary units.

Subject Cortical Thickness (mm) SE rCBF (a.u.) GE rCBF (a.u.) PCASL rCBF (a.u.) Tau SUVR (a.u.)
Sub01 2.19 (0.59) 0.82 (0.33) 0.67 (0.35) 0.62 (0.35) 1.38 (0.41)
Sub02 2.17 (0.57) 0.79 (0.33) 0.71 (0.43) 0.81 (0.38) 1.13 (0.28)
Sub03 2.26 (0.49) 0.74 (0.43) 0.82 (0.61) 0.67 (0.22) 1.43 (0.40)
Sub04 2.38 (0.48) 0.71 (0.27) 0.80 (0.66) 0.64 (0.20) 1.24 (0.25)
Sub05 2.25 (0.53) 0.61 (0.23) 0.69 (0.57) 0.78 (0.33) 1.14 (0.26)
Sub06 2.29 (0.47) 0.91 (0.34) 0.82 (0.53) 0.78 (0.30) 1.10 (0.20)
Sub07 2.38 (0.56) 0.88 (0.37) 0.77 (0.65) 0.70 (0.22) 1.15 (0.20)
Correlation with Tau SUVR r = -0.188
p = 0.687
r = -0.173
p = 0.709
r = 0.075
p = 0.872
r = -0.790
p = 0.035
-

Fig. (1).

Fig. (1)

Tau SUVR overlaid on the group-average template structural MRI slices at coronal levels that demonstrate tracer distribution in each case. (A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).

3.2. PCASL-Measured Blood Flow Reflects Whole-Cortex Tau Deposition

Previous studies indicate that global cortical CBF is reduced in AD [53-57]. To compare these subjects with previous work, we first obtained values for whole-cortex cerebral blood flow as measured by each of the three rCBF sequences: SE, GE, and PCASL (Table 2). PCASL-derived rCBF exhibited a significant negative correlation with tau SUVR at the whole-cortex level (r = -0.790, p = 0.035), which is in line with previous studies showing negative associations at the regional level [17, 18, 20]. Neither SE-rCBF nor GE-rCBF correlated with tau SUVR at the whole-cortex level. Average cortical thickness was also comparable across subjects and did not correlate with tau, although the one AD subject (Sub01) did have the second-greatest cortical tau SUVR (1.40) and the lowest average cortical thickness (1.99 mm).

3.3. Tau Deposition and Microvascular Perfusion Exhibit Intra-Subject Spatial Variability

To provide an overview of tau NFT distribution throughout the cortex and subcortical structures in these seven subjects, representative coronal slices are shown in group-average template space in Fig. (1). Individual patterns of tau deposition varied by subject and did not clearly adhere to strict Braak staging schemes [58, 59]. Consistent with AD-susceptible brain areas, the highest cortical tau SUVR was generally observed in the middle and inferior temporal regions, though Sub01 showed high occipital cortex uptake and Sub03 showed high frontal, parietal, and cingulate uptake. Of note, most subjects also exhibited clear asymmetries, with one hemisphere showing greater overall tau burden.

Next, we examined the microvascular (SE-DSC) perfusion maps from these subjects to see if local areas of altered capillary rCBF matched areas of high tau deposition. Representative structural FLAIR, tau-PET, and SE-DSC parametric maps are shown in volumetric slices in Fig. (2). We compared areas of asymmetric tau uptake (circled) to the contralateral hemisphere and surrounding parenchyma and examined the relationships with rCBF, rCTH, and rOEF. Among the amyloid-positive subjects (Sub01, Sub02, Sub03, Sub04, Sub05), most had at least one high-tau region that overlapped with reduced rCBF, though there were notable exceptions in which the relationship between tau uptake and rCBF was more heterogeneous. For example, Sub03 (Fig. 2C; 66F, CDR SoB 2) exhibited higher tau burden throughout the right parietal, temporal, and cingulate cortices compared with the left hemisphere, with many areas of elevated tau uptake corresponding to relatively higher rCBF and lower rOEF. By contrast, the amyloid-negative subjects - Sub06 (Fig. 2F; 82M, CDR SoB 3) and Sub07 (Fig. 2G; 79F, CDR SoB 1) - exhibited lower rCBF within areas of elevated tau but higher rCBF in the surrounding brain parenchyma.

Fig. (2).

Fig. (2)

Representative slices showing FLAIR, tau-PET SUVR, rCBF, rCTH, and rOEF parametric maps for each subject. All volumes are presented in individual subject space. White ovals highlight regions with high tau-PET signal and/or noteworthy SE-DSC microvascular patterns. a.u. = arbitrary units. (A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).

High rCTH was also observed in cortical regions and, unexpectedly, in periventricular white matter adjacent to areas of elevated tau uptake. For example, Sub04 (Fig. 2D; 70M, CDR SoB 2.5) had a focus of elevated tau uptake in the right inferior parietal cortex, with high rCTH in the subjacent periventricular white matter. Sub06 (Fig. 2F) showed mild tau deposition in the right entorhinal cortex, which also exhibited high rCTH and low rCBF. Sub05 (Figs. 2E; 79M, CDR SoB 2) showed asymmetrically high tau deposition in the left middle temporal cortex and amygdala, which collectively exhibited diminished rCBF compared with the right hemispheric counterparts and markedly higher rCTH and rOEF in the adjacent periventricular white matter. While all subjects exhibit variably increased rCTH in the periventricular white matter (notably Figs. 2C, D, E, and G), such increased rCTH only coincided with FLAIR signal hyperintensity in Sub02 (Fig. 2B), with no FLAIR signal abnormalities detected in the other subjects.

3.4. Tau Deposition and Microvascular Function Exhibit Heterogeneity on the Cortical Surface

To assess the relationship between tau uptake and microvascular perfusion parameters across subjects, maps of tau uptake, perfusion parameters, and cortical thickness were projected onto a group-averaged cortical surface flatmap (Fig. 3). This enabled the investigation of spatial associations between cortical tau pathology, microvascular function, and atrophy within the same group-averaged space. A flatmap atlas is included in Fig. (S1) for guidance. Despite relatively consistent spatial patterns in cortical thickness, the tau SUVR and rCBF maps differed markedly across subjects. For example, Sub01 and Sub03 had the most cortical tau deposition among all subjects, yet rCBF in Sub01 was uniformly diminished in areas of elevated tau uptake, while rCBF in Sub03 was preserved to elevated in areas of increased tau and adjacent regions. Sub02 and Sub06 showed marked asymmetry between cerebral hemispheres in tau deposition, with areas of lower rCBF corresponding to areas of greater tau uptake. In other subjects, the relationship between tau uptake and rCBF was more complex. For example, Sub03 and Sub07 showed fairly symmetric tau burden between cerebral hemispheres and asymmetric patterns of

Fig. (3).

Fig. (3)

Tau-PET SUVR, rCBF, rCTH, rOEF, and cortical thickness surface data projected onto the flattened group-average template surface. Left and right hemispheres are indicated with L and R, respectively. a.u. = arbitrary units. (A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).

rCBF, including higher rCBF in the right cerebral hemisphere in Sub03 that appeared to correspond to slightly greater tau uptake in the same hemisphere. While greater rCBF in one hemisphere often showed asymmetrically lower rOEF and/or rCTH in the same hemisphere, as exemplified in Sub06, this trend was not universal, with Sub05 showing symmetric rCTH and rOEF maps despite focally elevated rCBF in the right cerebral hemisphere.

4. DISCUSSION

Based on the growing literature documenting associations between high tau burden and reduced blood flow in the cortex, we hypothesized that tau deposition would be spatially associated with low rCBF in these seven cognitively impaired subjects. We additionally hypothesized that tau burden would be associated with high rCTH, given evidence of tau-driven capillary flow heterogeneity in the murine cortex [11]. While we observed a negative association between tau burden and PCASL CBF at the whole-cortex level, the visualizations provided herein indicate that the relationship between tau pathology is more nuanced. Given the relative consistency of cortical thickness distribution across these seven subjects, it is not likely that such microvascular heterogeneity is driven by cortical atrophy alone but rather by complex underlying physiology.

Spatiotemporal variability in tau pathology is increasingly recognized as the norm rather than the exception [21, 22, 60], underscoring the need to examine whole-brain tau and vascular dynamics at the individual patient level. The microvascular heterogeneity observed in our cohort may be driven in part by variability in individual tau pathology trajectory, though future longitudinal analysis is needed to clarify such a mechanism. The observed microvascular asymmetry between hemispheres also warrants further study, as it may relate to “misery perfusion”, a phenomenon in which reduced CBF in one hemisphere induces elevated OEF compared with the contralateral hemisphere. Misery perfusion has been reported in various cerebrovascular pathologies [61, 62] as well as in AD [63].

In addition to a variable pattern of cortical perfusion, we also observed high rCTH in the periventricular white matter in several subjects. Several areas of elevated rCTH appeared in the periventricular white matter subjacent to areas of elevated tau uptake, suggesting the alteration of microvascular dynamics in white matter in association with cortical tau pathology. Such areas of elevated rCTH were primarily observed in the absence of white matter lesions on FLAIR imaging, which are the expected hallmark of cerebrovascular damage in small vessel disease [64, 65]. However, periventricular white matter hyperintense signal did overlap with relatively increased rCTH in one subject (Sub02, see Fig. 2B), potentially indicating an association between these two markers as has been previously reported [66]. Given that cortical tau pathology can contribute to white matter damage independent of frank FLAIR hyperintense lesions [67], further studies are needed to clarify such associations and the potential role of tau NFT clearance via white matter vasculature.

Moreover, vascular dynamics likely fluctuate throughout the disease course as the cerebral vasculature struggles to maintain oxygen for metabolism with increasing capillary dysfunction. To that end, a longitudinal study in asymptomatic APOE ε4 allele carriers showed an inverted U-shape in CBF, with CBF initially increasing to meet the brain’s metabolic needs but subsequently decreasing to maximize oxygen availability [68]. Another study showed positive regional correlations between amyloid-β burden and CBF in cognitively normal adults, suggesting a compensatory vascular mechanism early in the disease process [69]. While we provided the amyloid-β status and APOE genotype of our cohort subjects when available, we did not examine either factor in the scope of this study. Both amyloid-β oligomers [70] and the APOE ε4 allele [71] can disrupt microvascular flow via impaired capillary pericyte function, and further study is needed to disentangle their microvascular effects from those of tau pathology. We also cannot exclude potential vascular contributions of other common AD comorbidities such as Lewy body disease, TDP-43 pathology, and/or small vessel ischemic disease [72].

Strengths of this study include the noninvasive mapping of tau pathology and perfusion arising from the microvasculature in the whole brain using tau-PET and SE-DSC MRI. However, the conclusions of this qualitative study are limited by the small sample size and variable elapsed time between tau-PET and DSC-MRI. Longitudinal studies using Flortaucipir PET suggest that amyloid-negative subjects exhibit minimal cortical tau SUVR change (0-3% increase per year) while amyloid-positive subjects exhibit more pronounced annual tau deposition (3-8% increase per year) [73-76]. Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that tau pathology spread to new regions between the Flortaucipir scans and subsequent perfusion MRI in these subjects, particularly those with amyloid-β pathology. Given the cross-sectional nature of this study, the temporal and/or causal relationship(s) between tau accumulation and microvascular function could not be evaluated. Moving forward, longitudinal imaging in a larger subject cohort with cognitively normal controls could better elucidate the specific relationship between tau deposition and microvascular function.

CONCLUSION

In this small case series, complex relationships were observed between tau lesions and microvascular perfusion, with elevated tau uptake associated with variable degrees of CBF reduction and, in some individuals, paradoxically increased CBF. Collectively, the findings present a previously underappreciated heterogeneous relationship between tau and microvascular function that has larger implications for how to monitor therapeutic efficacy in AD. Further study is warranted to better elucidate their interaction in AD pathogenesis and progression.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Danielle Mayblyum for organizing and providing clinical, demographic, and neuroimaging summary data. We also thank Dr. Leif Østergaard, Dr. Kim Mouridsen, and Dr. Mikkel Bo Hansen of the Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience and MINDLab, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, for their generous support on the PGUI Perfusion Analysis Software.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

The study was approved by the Massachusetts General Hospital Institutional Review Board [IRB], USA, with the committe number 2020P000370.

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

No animals were used in this study. All the human procedures were followed in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

All subjects provided written informed consent to participate.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

Not applicable.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, grant numbers P41EB030006, R21AG067562, K99AG061259, and P30AG062421; the Charleston Conference on Alzheimer’s Disease New Vision Investigator Award; and the Foundation of the American Society of Neuroradiology’s 2020 Boerger Research Fund in Alzheimer’s Disease and Neurocognitive Disorders.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Iturria-Medina Y., Sotero R.C., Toussaint P.J., Mateos-Pérez J.M., Evans A.C., Weiner M.W. Early role of vascular dysregulation on late-onset Alzheimer’s disease based on multifactorial data-driven analysis. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:11934. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sweeney M.D., Kisler K., Montagne A., Toga A.W., Zlokovic B.V. The role of brain vasculature in neurodegenerative disorders. Vol. 21. Nature Neuroscience. Nature Publishing Group; 2018. pp. 1318–1331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Govindpani K, McNamara LG, Smith NR, Vinnakota C, Waldvogel HJ, Faull RL. Vascular dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease: A prelude to the pathological process or a consequence of it? . J Clin Med. 2019;8(5):651. doi: 10.3390/jcm8050651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mattsson-Carlgren N., Andersson E., Janelidze S., Ossenkoppele R., Insel P., Strandberg O., Zetterberg H., Rosen H.J., Rabinovici G., Chai X., Blennow K., Dage J.L., Stomrud E., Smith R., Palmqvist S., Hansson O. Aβ deposition is associated with increases in soluble and phosphorylated tau that precede a positive Tau PET in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Adv. 2020;6(16):eaaz2387. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz2387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schöll M., Lockhart S.N., Schonhaut D.R., O’Neil J.P., Janabi M., Ossenkoppele R., Baker S.L., Vogel J.W., Faria J., Schwimmer H.D., Rabinovici G.D., Jagust W.J. PET imaging of tau deposition in the aging human brain. Neuron. 2016;89(5):971–982. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hanseeuw B.J., Betensky R.A., Jacobs H.I.L., Schultz A.P., Sepulcre J., Becker J.A., Cosio D.M.O., Farrell M., Quiroz Y.T., Mormino E.C., Buckley R.F., Papp K.V., Amariglio R.A., Dewachter I., Ivanoiu A., Huijbers W., Hedden T., Marshall G.A., Chhatwal J.P., Rentz D.M., Sperling R.A., Johnson K. Association of amyloid and tau with cognition in preclinical Alzheimer disease: A longitudinal study. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(8):915–924. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Malpetti M., Kievit R.A., Passamonti L., Jones P.S., Tsvetanov K.A., Rittman T., Mak E., Nicastro N., Bevan-Jones W.R., Su L., Hong Y.T., Fryer T.D., Aigbirhio F.I., O’Brien J.T., Rowe J.B. Microglial activation and tau burden predict cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2020;143(5):1588–1602. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhao Q., Liu M., Ha L., Zhou Y. Quantitative 18F-AV1451 brain tau PET imaging in cognitively normal older adults, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease patients. Front. Neurol. 2019;10(MAY):486. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cho H., Choi J.Y., Hwang M.S., Lee J.H., Kim Y.J., Lee H.M., Lyoo C.H., Ryu Y.H., Lee M.S. Tau PET in Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurology. 2016;87(4):375–383. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Park L., Hochrainer K., Hattori Y., Ahn S.J., Anfray A., Wang G., Uekawa K., Seo J., Palfini V., Blanco I., Acosta D., Eliezer D., Zhou P., Anrather J., Iadecola C. Tau induces PSD95-neuronal NOS uncoupling and neurovascular dysfunction independent of neurodegeneration. Nat. Neurosci. 2020;23(9):1079–1089. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-0686-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bennett R.E., Robbins A.B., Hu M., Cao X., Betensky R.A., Clark T., Das S., Hyman B.T. Tau induces blood vessel abnormalities and angiogenesis-related gene expression in P301L transgenic mice and human Alzheimer’s disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115(6):E1289–E1298. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710329115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mazzoni M.C., Schmid-Schönbein G.W. Mechanisms and consequences of cell activation in the microcirculation. Cardiovasc. Res. 1996;32(4):709–719. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(96)00146-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bullock R., Maxwell W.L., Graham D.I., Teasdale G.M., Adams J.H. Glial swelling following human cerebral contusion: An ultrastructural study. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 1991;54(5):427–434. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.54.5.427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Eskildsen S.F., Gyldensted L., Nagenthiraja K., Nielsen R.B., Hansen M.B., Dalby R.B., Frandsen J., Rodell A., Gyldensted C., Jespersen S.N., Lund T.E., Mouridsen K., Brændgaard H., Østergaard L. Increased cortical capillary transit time heterogeneity in Alzheimer’s disease: A DSC-MRI perfusion study. Neurobiol. Aging. 2017;50:107–118. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nielsen R.B., Egefjord L., Angleys H., Mouridsen K., Gejl M., Møller A., Brock B., Brændgaard H., Gottrup H., Rungby J., Eskildsen S.F., Østergaard L. Capillary dysfunction is associated with symptom severity and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13(10):1143–1153. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nielsen R.B., Parbo P., Ismail R., Dalby R., Tietze A., Brændgaard H. Impaired perfusion and capillary dysfunction in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement Diagnosis, Assess Dis Monit. 2020;12(1) doi: 10.1002/dad2.12032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Albrecht D., Isenberg A.L., Stradford J., Monreal T., Sagare A., Pachicano M., Sweeney M., Toga A., Zlokovic B., Chui H., Joe E., Schneider L., Conti P., Jann K., Pa J. Associations between vascular function and Tau PET are associated with global cognition and amyloid. J. Neurosci. 2020;40(44):8573–8586. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1230-20.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nedelska Z, Senjem ML, Przybelski SA, Lesnick TG, Lowe VJ, Boeve BF. Regional cortical perfusion on arterial spin labeling MRI in dementia with Lewy bodies: Associations with clinical severity, glucose metabolism and tau PET. NeuroImage Clin. 2018;19:939–947. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.06.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Visser D., Wolters E.E., Verfaillie S.C.J., Coomans E.M., Timmers T., Tuncel H. Tau pathology and relative cerebral blood flow are independently associated with cognition in Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(13):3165–75. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04831-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rubinski A., Tosun D., Franzmeier N., Neitzel J., Frontzkowski L., Weiner M., Ewers M. Lower cerebral perfusion is associated with tau-PET in the entorhinal cortex across the Alzheimer’s continuum. Neurobiol. Aging. 2021;102:111–118. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ossenkoppele R., Schonhaut D.R., Schöll M., Lockhart S.N., Ayakta N., Baker S.L., O’Neil J.P., Janabi M., Lazaris A., Cantwell A., Vogel J., Santos M., Miller Z.A., Bettcher B.M., Vossel K.A., Kramer J.H., Gorno-Tempini M.L., Miller B.L., Jagust W.J., Rabinovici G.D. Tau PET patterns mirror clinical and neuroanatomical variability in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2016;139(Pt 5):1551–1567. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Vogel J.W., Young A.L., Oxtoby N.P., Smith R., Ossenkoppele R., Aksman L.M. Spatiotemporal imaging phenotypes of tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2020;16(S4):e045612. doi: 10.1002/alz.045612. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Warkentin S., Ohlsson M., Wollmer P., Edenbrandt L., Minthon L. Regional cerebral blood flow in Alzheimer’s disease: classification and analysis of heterogeneity. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 2004;17(3):207–214. doi: 10.1159/000076358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jespersen S.N., Østergaard L. The roles of cerebral blood flow, capillary transit time heterogeneity, and oxygen tension in brain oxygenation and metabolism. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32(2):264–277. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jiang D., Lin Z., Liu P., Sur S., Xu C., Hazel K., Pottanat G., Darrow J., Pillai J.J., Yasar S., Rosenberg P., Moghekar A., Albert M., Lu H. Brain oxygen extraction is differentially altered by Alzheimer’s and vascular diseases. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2020;52(6):1829–1837. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Weisskoff R.M., Zuo C.S., Boxerman J.L., Rosen B.R. Microscopic susceptibility variation and transverse relaxation: theory and experiment. Magn. Reson. Med. 1994;31(6):601–610. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910310605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Boxerman J.L., Hamberg L.M., Rosen B.R., Weisskoff R.M. MR contrast due to intravascular magnetic susceptibility perturbations. Magn. Reson. Med. 1995;34(4):555–566. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910340412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Folstein M.F., Folstein S.E., McHugh P.R. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatr. Res. 1975;12(3):189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hughes C.P., Berg L., Danziger W.L., Coben L.A., Martin R.L. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br. J. Psychiatry. 1982;140(6):566–572. doi: 10.1192/bjp.140.6.566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.O’Bryant SE, Waring SC, Cullum CM, Hall J, Lacritz L, Massman PJ. Staging dementia using clinical dementia rating scale sum of boxes scores: A Texas Alzheimer’s research consortium study. Arch Neurol. 2008;65(8):1091–1095. doi: 10.1001/archneur.65.8.1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nasreddine Z.S., Phillips N.A., Bédirian V., Charbonneau S., Whitehead V., Collin I., Cummings J.L., Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2005;53(4):695–699. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Johnson KA, Schultz A, Betensky RA, Becker JA, Sepulcre J, Rentz D. Tau positron emission tomographic imaging in aging and early Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2016;79(1):110–119. doi: 10.1002/ana.24546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Manhard M.K., Bilgic B., Liao C., Han S., Witzel T., Yen Y.F., Setsompop K. Accelerated whole-brain perfusion imaging using a simultaneous multislice spin-echo and gradient-echo sequence with joint virtual coil reconstruction. Magn. Reson. Med. 2019;82(3):973–983. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li X, Wang D, Auerbach EJ, Moeller S, Ugurbil K, Metzger GJ. Theoretical and experimental evaluation of multi-band EPI for high-resolution whole brain pCASL Imaging. Neuroimage. 2015;106:170–181. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cox R.W., Jesmanowicz A. Real-time 3D image registration for functional MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 1999;42(6):1014–1018. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199912)42:6&#x0003c;1014::AID-MRM4&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chappell M.A., Groves A.R., Whitcher B., Woolrich M.W. Variational Bayesian inference for a nonlinear forward model. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2009;57(1):223–236. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2008.2005752. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ishii K., Sasaki M., Matsui M., Sakamoto S., Yamaji S., Hayashi N., Mori T., Kitagaki H., Hirono N., Mori E. A diagnostic method for suspected Alzheimer’s disease using H(2)15O positron emission tomography perfusion Z score. Neuroradiology. 2000;42(11):787–794. doi: 10.1007/s002340000404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Johnson N.A., Jahng G.H., Weiner M.W., Miller B.L., Chui H.C., Jagust W.J., Gorno-Tempini M.L., Schuff N. Pattern of cerebral hypoperfusion in Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment measured with arterial spin-labeling MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology. 2005;234(3):851–859. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2343040197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Schuff N.W., Du A-T., Jahng G., Mueller S., Stables L., Cashdollar N. Regional decline of brain perfusion in healthy aging detected with arterial spin labeling at 4T. Alzheimers Dement. 2005;1:S83–S83. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2005.06.293. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Du A.T., Jahng G.H., Hayasaka S., Kramer J.H., Rosen H.J., Gorno-Tempini M.L., Rankin K.P., Miller B.L., Weiner M.W., Schuff N. Hypoperfusion in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease by arterial spin labeling MRI. Neurology. 2006;67(7):1215–1220. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000238163.71349.78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yoshiura T., Hiwatashi A., Noguchi T., Yamashita K., Ohyagi Y., Monji A., Nagao E., Kamano H., Togao O., Honda H. Arterial spin labelling at 3-T MR imaging for detection of individuals with Alzheimer’s disease. Eur. Radiol. 2009;19(12):2819–2825. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1511-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chen Y., Wolk D.A., Reddin J.S., Korczykowski M., Martinez P.M., Musiek E.S., Newberg A.B., Julin P., Arnold S.E., Greenberg J.H., Detre J.A. Voxel-level comparison of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI and FDG-PET in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2011;77(22):1977–1985. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823a0ef7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dashjamts T., Yoshiura T., Hiwatashi A., Yamashita K., Monji A., Ohyagi Y., Kamano H., Kawashima T., Kira J., Honda H. Simultaneous arterial spin labeling cerebral blood flow and morphological assessments for detection of Alzheimer’s disease. Acad. Radiol. 2011;18(12):1492–1499. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kobayashi R., Hayashi H., Kawakatsu S., Okamura N., Yoshioka M., Otani K. Assessment of amyloid deposition in patients with probable REM sleep behavior disorder as a prodromal symptom of dementia with lewy bodies using PiB-PET. Front. Neurol. 2019;10:671. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Daniela P., Orazio S., Alessandro P., Mariano N.F., Leonardo I., Pasquale Anthony D.R. A survey of FDG- and amyloid-PET imaging in dementia and grade analysis. Vol. 2014. BioMed Res Intern Hindawi Lim; 2014. p. 785039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ciarmiello A., Tartaglione A., Giovannini E., Riondato M., Giovacchini G., Ferrando O., De Biasi M., Passera C., Carabelli E., Mannironi A., Foppiano F., Alfano B., Mansi L. Amyloid burden identifies neuropsychological phenotypes at increased risk of progression to Alzheimer’s disease in mild cognitive impairment patients. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2019;46(2):288–296. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4149-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Postelnicu G, Zollei L, Fischl B. Combined volumetric and surface registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009;28(4):508–522. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2008.2004426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zöllei L., Stevens A., Huber K., Kakunoori S., Fischl B. Improved tractography alignment using combined volumetric and surface registration. Neuroimage. 2010;51(1):206–213. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gao J.S., Huth A.G., Lescroart M.D., Gallant J.L. Pycortex: An interactive surface visualizer for fMRI. Front. Neuroinform. 2015;9:23. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2015.00023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Albert M.S., DeKosky S.T., Dickson D., Dubois B., Feldman H.H., Fox N.C., Gamst A., Holtzman D.M., Jagust W.J., Petersen R.C., Snyder P.J., Carrillo M.C., Thies B., Phelps C.H. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):270–279. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.McKhann G.M., Knopman D.S., Chertkow H., Hyman B.T., Jack C.R., Jr, Kawas C.H., Klunk W.E., Koroshetz W.J., Manly J.J., Mayeux R., Mohs R.C., Morris J.C., Rossor M.N., Scheltens P., Carrillo M.C., Thies B., Weintraub S., Phelps C.H. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):263–269. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Crary J.F., Trojanowski J.Q., Schneider J.A., Abisambra J.F., Abner E.L., Alafuzoff I., Arnold S.E., Attems J., Beach T.G., Bigio E.H., Cairns N.J., Dickson D.W., Gearing M., Grinberg L.T., Hof P.R., Hyman B.T., Jellinger K., Jicha G.A., Kovacs G.G., Knopman D.S., Kofler J., Kukull W.A., Mackenzie I.R., Masliah E., McKee A., Montine T.J., Murray M.E., Neltner J.H., Santa-Maria I., Seeley W.W., Serrano-Pozo A., Shelanski M.L., Stein T., Takao M., Thal D.R., Toledo J.B., Troncoso J.C., Vonsattel J.P., White C.L., III, Wisniewski T., Woltjer R.L., Yamada M., Nelson P.T. Primary age-related tauopathy (PART): A common pathology associated with human aging. Acta Neuropathol. 2014;128(6):755–766. doi: 10.1007/s00401-014-1349-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.van de Haar H.J., Jansen J.F.A., van Osch M.J.P., van Buchem M.A., Muller M., Wong S.M., Hofman P.A.M., Burgmans S., Verhey F.R.J., Backes W.H. Neurovascular unit impairment in early Alzheimer’s disease measured with magnetic resonance imaging. Neurobiol. Aging. 2016;45:190–196. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.van Beek A.H.E.A., Lagro J., Olde-Rikkert M.G.M., Zhang R., Claassen J.A.H.R. Oscillations in cerebral blood flow and cortical oxygenation in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging. 2012;33(2):428.e21–428.e31. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Asllani I., Habeck C., Scarmeas N., Borogovac A., Brown T.R., Stern Y. Multivariate and univariate analysis of continuous arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2008;28(4):725–736. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kogure D, Matsuda H, Ohnishi T, Asada T, Uno M, Kunihiro T. Longitudinal Evaluation of Early Alzheimer’s Disease Using Brain Perfusion SPECT. J. Nuc. Med. 2000;14(7):1155–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Leeuwis A.E., Benedictus M.R., Kuijer J.P.A., Binnewijzend M.A.A., Hooghiemstra A.M., Verfaillie S.C.J., Koene T., Scheltens P., Barkhof F., Prins N.D., van der Flier W.M. Lower cerebral blood flow is associated with impairment in multiple cognitive domains in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13(5):531–540. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Braak H., Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. 1991;82(4):239–259. doi: 10.1007/BF00308809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Schwarz A.J., Yu P., Miller B.B., Shcherbinin S., Dickson J., Navitsky M., Joshi A.D., Devous M.D., Sr, Mintun M.S. Regional profiles of the candidate tau PET ligand 18F-AV-1451 recapitulate key features of Braak histopathological stages. Brain. 2016;139(Pt 5):1539–1550. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Franzmeier N., Dewenter A., Frontzkowski L., Dichgans M., Rubinski A., Neitzel J., Smith R., Strandberg O., Ossenkoppele R., Buerger K., Duering M., Hansson O., Ewers M. Patient-centered connectivity-based prediction of tau pathology spread in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Adv. 2020;6(48):eabd1327. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd1327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Yamauchi H, Kagawa S, Takahashi M, Oishi N, Ono M, Higashi T. Misery perfusion and amyloid deposition in atherosclerotic major cerebral artery disease. NeuroImage Clin. 2019;22:101762. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Matsumoto Y., Ogasawara K., Saito H., Terasaki K., Takahashi Y., Ogasawara Y., Kobayashi M., Yoshida K., Beppu T., Kubo Y., Fujiwara S., Tsushima E., Ogawa A. Detection of misery perfusion in the cerebral hemisphere with chronic unilateral major cerebral artery steno-occlusive disease using crossed cerebellar hypoperfusion: comparison of brain SPECT and PET imaging. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2013;40(10):1573–1581. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2463-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Nagata K., Buchan RJ., Yokoyama E., Kondoh Y., Sato M., Terashi H. Misery perfusion with preserved vascular reactivity in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997;826:272–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb48479.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wardlaw J.M., Smith E.E., Biessels G.J., Cordonnier C., Fazekas F., Frayne R. The Lancet Neurology. Elsevier; 2013. Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. pp. 822–832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Pantoni L. Cerebral small vessel disease: from pathogenesis and clinical characteristics to therapeutic challenges. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(7):689–701. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70104-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Dalby R.B., Eskildsen S.F., Videbech P., Frandsen J., Mouridsen K., Sørensen L., Jeppesen P., Bek T., Rosenberg R., Østergaard L. Oxygenation differs among white matter hyperintensities, intersected fiber tracts and unaffected white matter. Brain Commun. 2019;1(1):fcz033. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcz033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Strain JF, Smith RX, Beaumont H, Roe CM, Gordon BA, Mishra S. Loss of white matter integrity reflects tau accumulation in Alzheimer disease defined regions. Neurology. 2018;91(4):E313–E318. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Thambisetty M., Beason-Held L., An Y., Kraut M.A., Resnick S.M. APOE ε4 genotype and longitudinal changes in cerebral blood flow in normal aging. Arch. Neurol. 2010;67(1):93–98. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Fazlollahi A., Calamante F., Liang X., Bourgeat P., Raniga P., Dore V., Fripp J., Ames D., Masters C.L., Rowe C.C., Connelly A., Villemagne V.L., Salvado O. Increased cerebral blood flow with increased amyloid burden in the preclinical phase of alzheimer’s disease. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2020;51(2):505–513. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Nortley R., Korte N., Izquierdo P., Hirunpattarasilp C., Mishra A., Jaunmuktane Z. Amyloid b oligomers constrict human capillaries in Alzheimer’s disease via signaling to pericytes. Science. 2019;365(6450):eaav9518. doi: 10.1126/science.aav9518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Montagne A., Nation D.A., Sagare A.P., Barisano G., Sweeney M.D., Chakhoyan A., Pachicano M., Joe E., Nelson A.R., D’Orazio L.M., Buennagel D.P., Harrington M.G., Benzinger T.L.S., Fagan A.M., Ringman J.M., Schneider L.S., Morris J.C., Reiman E.M., Caselli R.J., Chui H.C., Tcw J., Chen Y., Pa J., Conti P.S., Law M., Toga A.W., Zlokovic B.V. APOE4 leads to blood-brain barrier dysfunction predicting cognitive decline. Nature. 2020;581(7806):71–76. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2247-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Spina S., La Joie R., Petersen C., Nolan A.L., Cuevas D., Cosme C. Comorbid neuropathological diagnoses in early versus late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2021;144(7):2186–98. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Harrison TM, La Joie R, Maass A, Baker SL, Swinnerton K, Fenton L. Longitudinal tau accumulation and atrophy in aging and alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2019;85(2):229–240. doi: 10.1002/ana.25406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Jack C.R., Jr, Wiste H.J., Schwarz C.G., Lowe V.J., Senjem M.L., Vemuri P., Weigand S.D., Therneau T.M., Knopman D.S., Gunter J.L., Jones D.T., Graff-Radford J., Kantarci K., Roberts R.O., Mielke M.M., Machulda M.M., Petersen R.C. Longitudinal tau PET in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2018;141(5):1517–1528. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Pontecorvo M.J., Devous M.D., Kennedy I., Navitsky M., Lu M., Galante N., Salloway S., Doraiswamy P.M., Southekal S., Arora A.K., McGeehan A., Lim N.C., Xiong H., Truocchio S.P., Joshi A.D., Shcherbinin S., Teske B., Fleisher A.S., Mintun M.A. A multicentre longitudinal study of flortaucipir (18F) in normal ageing, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease dementia. Brain. 2019;142(6):1723–1735. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Cho H., Choi J.Y., Lee H.S., Lee J.H., Ryu Y.H., Lee M.S., Jack C.R., Jr, Lyoo C.H. Progressive tau accumulation in Alzheimer disease: 2-year follow-up study. J. Nucl. Med. 2019;60(11):1611–1621. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.221697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Current Alzheimer Research are provided here courtesy of Bentham Science Publishers

RESOURCES